TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

esulcer Archive

View 8 posts and 129 comments by esulcer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes, let them be equal. Make the units all female so no males are compromised my their incompetence. They are equal so they should be better off w/o the males holding them back/ U go girrrllllllll
/r/MensRights14/01/11 01:11 PM
3

First she is against ex-parte restraints,then back pedals and is for them.Then she claims the law is "gender neutral." My Arse! This is why women have NO place in mens rights.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 12:19 PM
1

The urinals at the local civic center have signs at eye level say " only men can prevent rape." What about my right ti piss in a public institution without being referred to as a rapist? Fuck these rabid bitches their rabid need for political control over mens sexuality. Now I do want to piss in a bitches mouth, and perhaps do some freakin counter violence to the asshole who assaulted my sensibilities/
/r/MensRights13/01/11 09:46 AM
1

Exactly. finally someone with sense posting on here. I've never heard a more castrated bunch of wankers who refuse to hold a woman accountable for her wanton spending. If she had ANY respect for her husband she would not be raping his wallett, and every second he waits to dump this walking misandrist is going to cost massive $$. Love=honesty, and she doesn't have it! Get them papers signed today. Hide what little money you have,you're going to need it for the 3 year court battle, then the unknow…
/r/MensRights09/01/11 04:51 AM
3

Listen, believe, and be accountable to women and their stories. When confronted on your own sexism (racism, homohobia, etc.) listen instead of getting defensive. Yes yes, I do need to believe the lies and also work on my homohobia. The homohob's are definetly out to get me! The wankers didn't even take time to do a spell check on their 'entitlement list.' I'm sure the homohob's are going to call me out on this one.ROFL http://www.nomas.org/node/178
/r/MensRights09/01/11 04:31 AM
5

I'm guessing the NOMAS Task Group on Pornography and Prostitution is NOT out there looking for better porn? What a bunch a wankers/killjoys. "12 Steps Men Can Take to End Sexism Don't interrupt women when they speak! The radfems here would love that for this area. Shush boys,no talking when the wymyns are speaking!
/r/MensRights09/01/11 04:28 AM
1

Thats why doggie style is best after spanking her ass beet red.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 10:31 AM
1

Whatever will pay her the most, and still allow for unlimited sexual escapades. This is why men must GTOW.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 10:27 AM
1

Better yet prosecute him for assualting her foot with his groin. /s. But seriously, frame her up on a charge that will stick. Females beating on men is legal, even cops. It's also workplace sexual harrassment, but try getting that to stick in our matriarchal dominant society. Better to plant some coke in her desk.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 10:22 AM
0

Only a rabid feminist goes to the 'monkey defense" This is MENSRIGHTS. Not wymyns rights. FOB
/r/MensRights08/01/11 10:04 AM
1

{quote} "btw, from the medical profession's prespective it is UNETHICAL to tell the man that the mother is pointing to as the father, that he is not the father. It is unethical, because it deprives the child the best financial support possible." So very true.You have to consider if the policy is to cover up genuine paternity,it's a very small step to altering a test report. 'all for the good of the child'
/r/MensRights08/01/11 10:01 AM
1

An even better question:can you trust the female hospital workers not to alter the test results to cater to the mother? (no) A man would have to get a seperate DNA test done by a lab that HE pays. Hospitals are hotbeds of misandry.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 09:55 AM
1

That goes pretty good with the new policy of most women getting more legal help when they (falsely) accuse males of DV. See how that works? Pay the female,hurt the male. female supremacisism is public policy.(and well funded)
/r/MensRights08/01/11 09:52 AM
0

The only reason the media admitted he was male was because everyone knows nurses are female, right? Stereotypical matriarchal biased media/organ of the state. Misandry is public policy.(shhhhh) cue the fem outrage.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 09:48 AM
-2

You really are not aware of the depth of your insanity are you,pinkmask? Your castrating mentality is revolting. I hope to God you are not in child care in anyway,shape or form. If there was a father in the home this boy would have a chance at a normal life instead being molded into a matriarchal slave unit. I hope someone like you is on the receiving end of his inevitable resentment.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 09:41 AM
1

Michigan is real big on fathers rights. (/s) If you're a male w/ children,you must be a felon. Soon it will go w/o saying. 'lock em up.'
/r/MensRights08/01/11 09:18 AM
-2

Perhaps he does mean all wymyn who have sex with men are raayyped and yet consented. After all "all hetrosexual sex is rape, and if the wymyn orgasms, she is "participating in her own oppression." Damn that does sound crazy, doesn't it? Yet these are the wimmins idol/mentor figures. Just lock up them mens after the sex.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 09:14 AM
1

I will take "heroin cartel in Europe" for $500 Alex. Then "oil shipping routes" for $500. That is one big bundle to hide under a skirt.(yet they try so hard)
/r/MensRights06/01/11 06:18 AM
1

http://www.nlada.org/Links/Links_Home
/r/MensRights06/01/11 05:33 AM
1

list of legal resources: http://www.nlada.org/Links/Links_Home Good luck,get sleep do not commit suicide.
/r/MensRights06/01/11 05:26 AM
1

FOB
/r/MensRights02/01/11 03:01 AM
1

The response, as always is FOB.
/r/MensRights01/01/11 08:18 AM
1

Yes, flee this land of the Black Robed Agents of Satan. Perhaps get word to the boy via the underground about the time he is 13 and wanting to flee his gynogical oppressors on his own,regardless of is he has to live in a box under a bridge.
/r/MensRights01/01/11 08:14 AM
2

MSC affirms continuing child support obligation if parental rights terminated December 20, 2010 Justice Robert P. Young Jr. In March, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that a father whose parental rights were terminated still had an obligation to continue paying child support for his two children. (See In re Beck Minors) On Monday, in its first opinion of the 2010-2011 term, the Michigan Supreme Court affirmed that decision, but with a different analysis. The court found the father had no cons…
/r/MensRights01/01/11 07:40 AM
1

His obligation to pay child support is totally separate from his His parental rights. (recent Michigan supreme court ruling) The next logical step is to have him pay both the mother, the child and the state while the child is adopted out/removed from his care forever. Deny them your precious bodily fluids!(Dr Strangelove) The nukes are an allegory for the misandrist court system. FOB
/r/MensRights01/01/11 07:35 AM
1

The slob bitch teacher obviously is sexually frustrated and needed a whipping boy. She would not have done this to a female student. WTF do you mean this is not related to mens rights? Should female be allowed to jail boys for no valid reason? It would have been easier on the boy if the bitch had beat the shit out of him,instead she called the mangina blue gun thugs to do her dirty work for her. And you say this has nothing to do with mens rights. FOB
/r/MensRights01/01/11 07:29 AM
1

John Galt left the building-Horizontal. I recommend leaving vertical. That is exactly what my post says. You have 2 choices-do the right thing.
/r/MensRights18/12/10 07:44 PM
1

You expressed my thoughts so very well aetheralloy. Your words of wisdom are a balm to my wounded reddit soul. As to the others who claim the tide is turning and to continue discourse, This I say to you: The only reason mensrights even has an audience is due to the huge number of casualitys of the misandrist court system. These men no longer support women,and women are noticing it ONLY when they cannot find a provider. I do not expect this to change.More divorces create more small households tha…
/r/MensRights18/12/10 07:35 PM
0

I'm tired of the constant derailing by feminists. The original topics don't get discussed,it always degenerates into he said she said (No you are). I'm considering not bothering with this place anymore,the feminists have destroyed it. The constant REASONING IS DUE TO TROLLING. THEY WILL NOT LET MEN DISCUSS MENS RIGHTS IN PEACE> I"VE HAD ENOUGH OF THIS BS
/r/MensRights30/11/10 04:51 AM
0

I second the motion. They are locusts liers and destroyers. "feminisms complements mens rights. GO TO HELL/ This is a response against feminisms.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 04:23 AM
7

Privilege denying female. How very sexist.(of her)
/r/MensRights28/11/10 01:22 AM
-1

The loss of income to the wives is the real tragedy here. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights24/11/10 09:38 AM
2

It's just part of the whole societal industry. Money could be made if she answers in the affirmative. Also being in pain makes her suspect as a drug abuser. This is mostly projection as medical personel have the access and their misuse of painkillers is higher. So the patients get labeled crazy or as liers because medical people either do not care or get off on treating people like animals. I've found it's best not to answer any questions except if you are allergic to a medication. TLDR Medical …
/r/MensRights22/11/10 05:02 AM
0

The next step is to be searched going into school. They already have cameras and sniffing dogs. Let boys learn they have no right to privacy and come to accept the police state. The feminists embrace totalitarianism,big daddy govt will protect their dominant passive aggression. TLDR Boys must learn to be submissive to any puppet authority figure.
/r/MensRights22/11/10 04:35 AM
1

3rd. 1 best way to be a good father: Do not listen to feminist tripe.
/r/MensRights22/11/10 04:26 AM
0

I've been rejected by wymyn in general for being too nice. That denied me the ability to marry and have children of my own. Also the incentives given to wymyn to divorce are substantial. Doing a realistic risk/benefit calculation produces a negative response. Then I have to consider whom I would be helping and dealing with above and beyond the child. Invasive agencys whom I must prove my innocence to clear their screening,a mother who is in her situation because she has acted out in a manner tha…
/r/MensRights22/11/10 04:23 AM
2

Mine sure is. You sounded EXACTLY like a rad-fem justifying and trolling. It was impossible for me to tell the difference between your sarcasm and the insane justifications of the genderly challenged. Please use /s in doubtful cases.
/r/MensRights22/11/10 03:52 AM
0

Run don't walk away from this nut job bitch from hell. All the money in the world is not good when your in hell or jail. She's the typical american skank the guys on this site rightuflly dislike so much. Never speak to any of them again,nor any female like her. In fact avoid any aggressive manipulative bitch altogether. I know this describes most of them. Soon an aggressive manipulative bitch troll will come on here and tell me NAWALT. Use your hand and avoid the drama/jail time.
/r/MensRights17/11/10 04:55 AM
2

Statistics get manipulated every day. Those mean nothing considering the source. DOJ stats show women are more likely to use a weapon to murder their husbands, and initiate violence %70 of the time. What the overall trend shows is that women abuse on a lower level much more frequently and men just hold it in until they snap. Having the ability to have a confidential advisor who cannot be subpeoned in court is handy for false accusors. Also LE is shut out while specially trained nurses do the rap…
/r/MensRights17/11/10 04:38 AM
0

I suppose the Do Not Resuscitate forms at the hospitals would then all be in valid.Prior consent was given then the person is unconscious. Make no mistake this is dangerous precedent setting for law. To dismiss the concept outright is disingenuous. The fembots in all their irrational hatred of mankind would turn law and reason upon it's head if it hurt men.(just for spite)
/r/MensRights17/11/10 04:18 AM
1

Are we really willing to let pixels on a screen create a mandate as what people can and cannot say? I will not let a MACHINE affect my opinion nor what I say. The person with the agenda who wrote that "test" is too cowardly to tell you what you can or cannot say to your FACE. That would get her (or him) punched in the nose! If it really IS this bad out there avoid women altogether.No sex, no comforting friend talk.NOTHING
/r/MensRights06/11/10 12:58 PM
1

Ah yes, Thank you I see it now.Will edit the thing. I appreciate the time and work you put into this sub-reddit kloo2you. I up vote you %99 of the time.This inverted privilege thing is quite the example of the differences in the way the genders consider themselves. I wasn't going for snarky nor attention seeking,but looking to call attention to the polarity. The concept of abelism is just an excuse,IMHO.It falls in the same category as realism or being realistic. The opposite gender made a comme…
/r/MensRights02/11/10 10:17 PM
1

As far as I know I have quoted myself verbatim once here on this post detailing my response on another sub-reddit. There does not appear to be a double entry in my text above.If there is please correct it,or let me know, I will delete it.
/r/MensRights02/11/10 01:13 PM
-2

There: You all can plainly see onmyface was banned and is back as thepinkmask.Trolling continues. The banhammer should be used to stop continual disruptions. <USE IT>
/r/MensRights01/11/10 11:57 PM
0

Another sign of a troll is someone who just cannot let an argument go.They have to have the last word.A good example was on another recent post on MR.The author continued to assert that the mods here said misandry would be enforced at a higher level than misogyny,When in fact that is not what was said.It came down to the individual perception of said abuse.The author could not or would not substantiate their definition of misogyny. Post after post presenting hypothetical strawman arguments. In t…
/r/MensRights01/11/10 11:17 PM
-2

This is the current re-incarnation of onmyfaceplease. A known troll already banned.Do not feed the troll. It's only purpose in life is to disrupt mens rights subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/11/10 02:18 AM
1

I agree.Violence was initiated.His hesitation to 'put her down' could have got his throat slashed.
/r/MensRights01/11/10 02:13 AM
1

niiice
/r/MensRights01/11/10 01:31 AM
-3

Krase said: "in short, some of the people on r/feminism believe that any voice men have at equality advances wrongs they perceive against their group. If we had an "I like potatoes" thread, they would come in and start with the view that "Potatoes have long held the female in subjugation" and whatnot." You are so right.The wymyn come to disrupt.Do you know why? They are secretly so VERY VERY AFRAID that men will actually learn to treat them as equal human beings;rather than an entitled princess …
/r/MensRights01/11/10 01:20 AM
2

No tactic is needed.The misandrist court system,police,and judges will continue to convert many hardcore MRA's to the cause.As long as the 'law' is inequitable,look for more and more outraged men.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 11:53 PM
1

Do your best to set up a second identity.You have nothing to lose. The state will take care of the child, they sure took care of you! Your finger prints can be burned off w/ a hot plate.That would less painful than what you would go through.Or sanded off for a short term solution.Dissapear into a large city near the southern border.It might be easier to cross south than you could imagine.
/r/MensRights27/10/10 02:20 AM
0

Please leave the earning scorn from feminists line upon there .:) Yeah, I know, Prioritized.rofl
/r/MensRights27/10/10 01:43 AM
1

I see how it w/you prodigal_daughter. If a males uses facts to oppose his societal demonization it is not "civil discourse" in your not so humble opinion? I suppose you really do believe that men defending themselves against misandry is "everything that is wrong with this country."
/r/MensRights27/10/10 01:04 AM
0

2 days later I say: Oh you will be.(the bad guy) The gender feminists are already swarming you,claiming that you've (gasp) banned people who wrote and ASKED to be banned.(facepalm) The gender war is much too hot for you to survive as a man in an arena that allows women free reign. You are welcome to join us here on MR after the fems destroy your reddit dream task.
/r/MensRights27/10/10 12:41 AM
1

And what of the false accuser? NADA,zipola,zip,nothing.
/r/MensRights25/10/10 01:50 AM
1

Men build infrastructure.Women troll reddit topics like this one and destroy the discussion of how men built everything,including the computer they are using to bitch about men.
/r/MensRights24/10/10 07:28 AM
1

IE:your trolling/derailing statement about men killing their babies:over %80 of in family child murders are done by the mother,not to mention the millions of abortions/killings done by women every year.Women have no problem killing infants,but men DO.Your complicit approval of this killing makes you a conspriator and accomplise and I find you guilty guilty guilty.
/r/MensRights24/10/10 07:21 AM
1

wikipedia,while a good resource in other areas,is extremely feminist biased in the gender area.Just look at the descriptions for the words "feminazi","Misandry,Feminism,male studies, ect. The feminist editors of wikipedia wrote that Hitler was anti-feminism, not anticommunist.An outright lie.I just saw a female conducting a Nazi symphony on the History channel. Any changes in feminazi controlled wikipedia subjects like "domestic violence revert back to the feminazi version instantly.. Read just …
/r/MensRights24/10/10 07:01 AM
1

“The Act is a tool misused by the cosmopolitan and misguided wives who want to avenge themselves on their husbands and in-laws if their demands are not fulfilled,,," In India and Aymerika the feminazi's have turned the courts into instruments of gendercide.
/r/MensRights24/10/10 06:41 AM
1

I expected better from you cryptogirl.Half the time you talk good sense and then this. Sheesh.Why buy into the insanity just because you share the gender?
/r/MensRights24/10/10 06:34 AM
1

Well whatever it consists of I wish The founder of the subreddit (vegas?) Good luck and best wishes.Anyone that takes some initiative should be given a chance at it.Here is my thoughts from the vague ideas presented as what it would consists of,IE: Men working to improve themselves,and having open discussions not related to activism. 1:Working to improve oneself means discussing an admitted weakness,downfall or problem. Showing weakness invites attack. Men are good problem solvers,having "other …
/r/MensRights24/10/10 06:27 AM
1

In my experience women initiate Domestic almost exclusively. They know they have the full backing of the misandrist law behind them.So do the men,that's why the men are not reporting female on male violence,they rightfully fear being incarcerated just for reporting. The international standard for determining who the aggressor is in any given situation has been defined as "the party who has the largest body frame and more physical strength." They may as well have defined aggressors as males,ergo …
/r/MensRights23/10/10 04:16 AM
2

The femanazi's get butthurt just knowing that men are discussing the DV inequities.They best they can do is troll and change the topic. It gets old,but we fight on.Consistent trolling/derailing will not stop the false rape and DV discussion from happening.
/r/MensRights23/10/10 04:06 AM
0

I've seen the plastic covered signs over the urinals"only you can stop rape","Prevent domestic violence" It was infuriating to be cock shamed like that in a male place. WHo let the rad-fems into mens urnials?They have no shame,They should, and we do not need their shaming language while we're hanging on to our penis's. This shit needs to stop now. How about a sign in the ladies stalls that reads"Keep your legs closed,it prevents pregnancy". "Only you can prevent STD's,do not be promiscuous" "you…
/r/MensRights23/10/10 03:55 AM
1

Really;does that fall under billable hours or not? My point being lawyers commonly reframe and harp on a single subject in court just to get more billable hours. Why deny legitimate discourse (if) you draw out time on subjects for pay? Perhaps that kind malingering is reserved for paying clients only? So, You've represented people in family court and you want to limit men talking about the false rape industry.Is there a lobbying group paying you to disrupt the forum? It is common knowledge the m…
/r/MensRights22/10/10 02:24 PM
1

Well there you have it. Sounds like store bought shaming language to me. Pointing out your desire to censor free speech does not make herbalessence a "douchebag" I never would have believed the courts had turned into insane star chamber proceedings lead by radical feminist theology if I had not been on the receiving end of it. I was literally bug eyed,stunned,and astonished at the illegality of the so called legal system. I take a hard line because those are the facts on the ground for so many m…
/r/MensRights22/10/10 03:36 AM
0

If you don't believe men should have rights or a voice, I do not understand why you are here.You ignorance of reality is not convincing anyone grounded in said reality.I earnestly suggest you sit in at your local family court just one day.Then perhaps you could see that male gender alone is a convicting offense.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 03:20 AM
1

Thank you so very much.The troll openly posted on another reddit board that men's rights was a "hostile" subject.The history speaks for itself.You ruled justly,fairly,and wisely.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 02:24 AM
1

No.That's why you are here looking at this.To steal a PC police slogan "be an agent of change"
/r/MensRights22/10/10 01:30 AM
10

Bullshit.The downvotes are a knee jerk response from the female supremacists.(feminists,feminazi's,fem-bots,rad-fems,ect. None of them actually need to bother reading anything pro-male. Paul is just too darn good to debate.;)
/r/MensRights22/10/10 01:14 AM
1

Assclown is a perfect adjective for boobz.Perhaps someday his pic will be under misandrist in the dictionary.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 11:07 PM
1

I hope you banned the troll.It's just disruptive consistently.Claims to be a male,but how could a male post hate against males %99.9 of the time on a men's rights forum?Ban it already,that's what the darn banhammer is for!
/r/MensRights20/10/10 10:29 PM
1

My God well said Pam,other than the not caring about trolling part,but the rest of your post more than makes up for the slip. Be prepared to act for your husbands defense at work, because only females have a say in whether a male has committed an offense or not.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 10:26 PM
0

Women harp on male aggression because anytime there is a disagreement or a debate on a topic she is vesting in winning,They can fain fear "oh your scaring me". The logical outcome being she wins the argument because he then rightfully fears being jailed or ostrasized.This is also a tactic used when women desire attention,sexual or otherwise,and it is not provided by the male. "he's creepy" "too much testosterone in this room!" Debate won by default.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 10:11 PM
-4

Who gives a shit? Take ms mag to the feminazi forum.This is man territory.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 03:49 AM
-1

Not all forms of diminished sexual health are due to hormones or nitric acid.The brain is the center of sexual excitement.After being falsely accused of DV and ran through the misandrist court system my brain now recognizes women as an active threat,not as anything else,hence no erections with women.However my hand is looking better every day.I have no fear of it.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 03:46 AM
3

Not everyone watches South Park.So the niice comment would baffle them.... Altho it is 1 hell of a meme!
/r/MensRights20/10/10 03:36 AM
1

http://counterfem.blogspot.com/search?q=loosely+bolted+valve+cover
/r/MensRights20/10/10 03:21 AM
-1

The article makes clear that it is not an infant until the woman chooses it is not garbage,it is not "his" until she decides not to send it out for adoption.All the choices are the females,none are the males,only responsibility AFTER the woman decides it is a "babie"not trash.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 03:16 AM
3

This is what happens when women are given the exclusive right to disciple a child.Having prevented men from acting like fathers,women then turn their passive aggression upon young boys.So they drug them like animals.It would be hard to a boy who has no proper emotional validation as a human being to sit still in a matriarchal misandrist classroom and be constantly indoctrinated with the idea he is subhuman.His righteous indignation gets bottled up with no relief,the fem-destroyers lable him as d…
/r/MensRights19/10/10 11:21 PM
3

I've been in the witness box and treated like a subhuman under the law.I've heard it said that when faced with social inequity a person can use 3 boxes:The ballot box(not working) The soap box (you would like to limit my use of that?) The cartridge box. Be careful what you wish for,you just may get it.
/r/MensRights19/10/10 11:11 PM
-6

Best article ever that illustrates that women have rights while men have responsibilities
/r/MensRights19/10/10 08:48 PM
-2

That would make sense as the welfare queens prefer the bad boys thugs as sex toys.Most women also.Look at the rate of single moms.Note I did not say single dads,because that is so rare as not to be mentioned.It is cheaper for the state to pay for prevention rather than a freebie reward for hatching out babies.The system is realizing men a with money are learning to avoid women altogether due to the financial trappings.
/r/MensRights19/10/10 08:38 PM
-1

Hard to say what happened as it has been deleted. They have the same subject under several different heading over there.Those grrlls just love being the professional victims. Here was my response to the same incidence on another thread. http://www.reddit.com/r/feminisms/comments/drpl3/yale_fraternity_pledges_chant_about_rape_violence/ "Perhaps the boys had just been falsely accused of being rapists purely by gender VIA "sensitivity training. You don't consider that denegrating and scapegoating a…
/r/MensRights19/10/10 08:32 PM
24

Just another flashing arrow sign that indicates men have no rights whatsoever in western society. The western governments have decided men are nothing more than beasts of burden for any vagina from anywhere. Yet feminists come here to men's rights and demand to know why we need to represent and inform other men. They just want the status quo to continue,and more,to incrementalize legislation for even less rights for men. We are less than nothing,less than human to women and 'our'governments and …
/r/MensRights19/10/10 08:08 PM
2

And the grrlss scream nooooo!
/r/MensRights19/10/10 03:50 AM
2

Hilarious AND thought provoking!
/r/MensRights19/10/10 03:47 AM
0

http://www.askmen.com/feeder/askmenRSS_article_print_2006.php?ID=http://askmen.com/top_10/dating/top-10-cruel-things-women-do-to-men.html
/r/MensRights18/10/10 08:18 PM
1

Thanks Hamakua I think I will repost it using your link. Not sure why it went right to number 20 when it was posted,then into page two.Did not give it much of a chance for comment.
/r/MensRights18/10/10 08:17 PM
1

"In several US States, at the time of her report, the crime of rape was defined in such a way that a woman could not be charged with the crime, unless she acted to facilitate a rape in conjunction with a male rapist." The FBI,for statistical purposes STILL holds that only men can rape.Also The Lation race is not catagorized,therefore Latino rapes fall under white male rapes,statistically. Source:Internal association of Police Chiefs
/r/MensRights18/10/10 02:58 AM
2

Interesting how you label the plain unvarnished truth as "batshit insane" U=you rad-fems cannot even come up with your own adjectives! You sure don't sound appreciative of all the sacrifices men have made for women,Guess what?We are noticing and quitting a non-rewarding task.
/r/MensRights18/10/10 01:55 AM
1

http://www.askmen.com/top_10/dating/top-10-cruel-things-women-do-to-men_10.ht
/r/MensRights18/10/10 01:31 AM
1

Deny them your precious bodily fluids! You DNA can and will be traced back to you, then your are a "father" not just a sperm donor.EEK-Wallett-Eeee
/r/MensRights16/10/10 10:57 PM
0

The super was justifiably outraged that you: a man, would dare to question her nazi like control policys regarding the front door. If the genders had been reversed the female questioning the male super would cry raype or violence and the pigs would still come a -hunting the male. Open season on males,protected female supremacists. To question their authority or methods makes you a thought criminal.. Only females have rights when children are present,males only pick up the support tab and should …
/r/MensRights16/10/10 10:23 AM
2

Misandrist court system rewards female rapists while falsely accused males get shafted. Thats still not equal enough.They want men to be jailed on a say so. Like Nazi's. No difference.none.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 10:17 AM
1

The 3 instances of male/female interaction the males say's "I" didn't. In the 1 instance of male/male interaction it is "we didn't" In all instances only males are held accountable for sexual interaction. Never once are females shown as being held accountable for their sexual interaction. Females are never held responsible for what they do sexualy,only males... Only males have sex,females only get raped.All sex is rape to a female,because they are not responsible for opening their legs and sayin…
/r/MensRights15/10/10 10:03 AM
2

If I recall correctly this case was brought about because the misandrist court system usually farms out the children to a foster home rather than to the biological father if/when the mother is unfit/incapable. Talk about an extreme situation to correct for men.Show how very very little rights men have to their own offspring,and how very very tainted the court system is.
/r/MensRights15/10/10 09:29 AM
-5

What it would take to stop "rape" as defined currently would be to have sorority sisters stop getting drunk and spreading their legs for aggressive "alpha" males. Yes:the woman should be responsible when she spreads her legs apart willingly for sex, drunk or not. The 'tell' here is that no one holds men accountable for having sex under the influence.(double standard)
/r/MensRights15/10/10 09:21 AM
0

You're not paying for the doll,you're paying to not hear the bitching afterwards
/r/MensRights14/10/10 10:35 PM
1

20 years of which at any time of any day should could have walked out the door and into a womans shelter and gotten a restraining order pending abuse allegations. 20 years in which she did not simply walk out the door=no excuse. She intended to burn him and if death occured that was not her concern.altho death could be REASONABLY expected. This was murder,make no mistake.lesser punishment =pussy pass. "A DEVOTED husband who fatally set his wife alight while trying to burn her vagina has been acq…
/r/MensRights14/10/10 09:42 PM
1

I'm saying it is a female core sexual value.Therefore any rape claim that actually involved sex would be relevant to the female's core sexual excitement triggers.(rape fantasy)
/r/MensRights14/10/10 02:13 AM
1

Just as cops are being trained to take a taser hit to see how it feels,as to regards to excessive force and violation of human rights and cruel and unusual punishment,perhaps those cops so proud of punishing prisoners with rape should be trial raped so they can see how it feels?
/r/MensRights13/10/10 03:21 AM
1

You are exactly correct John Uskglass. Also is Troll king. At the time there where more asians working on the railroad than any other race.Their fatality numbers where far higher on that project,and also on the Panama Canal. Obviously the minority welfare sucking female has a persecution complex.Asians did a lot more slave work than any other race in early American history. It is also ignorant of the racial composition of late American history.Just because it is for anything that is against whit…
/r/MensRights13/10/10 03:07 AM
1

I respectfully disagree that the popular rape fantasy is irrelevant. It is the most common meme in women's 'romantic' literature. Lines like "he brutally mashed her lips with is and held her down until she was overwhelmed with desire,she responded by ripping his shirt off..... The fact is women are sexually excited by aggressive men. This is one of the major tenets of "game'. That the man will dominate and the woman will submit,that the male is the initiator and the woman the acceptor is common …
/r/MensRights13/10/10 02:01 AM
1

Feminism is defined by Sarah Palin as a bunch of mommy grizzly bears holding an uprising. Sounds like she is talking about herself.I don't know of any grizzly insurrectionists.lulz Are the grizzlys haters? You may have to ask one of them high faluting Washington she-bears to know...
/r/MensRights11/10/10 04:51 AM
0

You could promise to stay by and with him for the 18 years it is going to take the raise the child,And that he will be the only man in your life.
/r/MensRights11/10/10 04:27 AM
0

First in response to the OP: Women can justify any act after the fact by arguing incessantly.Therefore the morality of what they do is not to be questioned. (if a tree falls in the forest and there are no women to witness it fall,did it ever exist to begin with?) In response to charlie 6969 I would say I stand by my post and your shaming language has no effect upon me. I'm not condemning women for being amoral,I am just stating a fact. I would not condemn a rattlesnake for being amoral,but I wou…
/r/MensRights11/10/10 03:50 AM
1

They refuse the "she should fight her attacker" theory. That used to be a legal requirement,that a women would first verbally refuse,then within reason physically fight to defend herself:no longer. Now women can claim rape from the most ambiguous of behaviors. And they mean to KEEP it that way. The real rate of rape is less than %2. The feminists keep insisting on the one on four.%25 They WANT more false rape reporting,it funds their cause and gives them political power.(raw power) Also women cr…
/r/MensRights11/10/10 03:05 AM
2

I would say the term 'amoral' would be more accurate than immoral in this debate.At least for the women's end of it. Only a person capable of understanding/and/or acting morally could be qualified with that word. (women only act in their own best interest=amoral) Wheras men can and do differentiate,so are capable of morality and immorality.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 08:45 PM
-1

"She had never considered that sexism against men needed to be considered, but that she was sorry, and would try to keep it in mind in the future." Then she asked you to buy something for her....
/r/MensRights10/10/10 08:32 PM
0

The misandrist hit piece is commented upon in 2xhere http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/dovy5/how_not_to_rape_people_repost_from_rmelbourne/ The rad-fems just love beating that old wornout raype drum The under reporting fiction is their best weapon an unprovable negative imaginary 'fact' Women are short on logic and long on emotion/entitlement
/r/MensRights10/10/10 07:49 PM
12

OP= The reason for that is because almost ALL women identify as "feminists" whereas almost no male identifies as "patriarchal" In other words,the females support their word,while the males do not.Mostly because the Patriarchy as defined by feminists does not and has never existed. I vote for "gynosauras'
/r/MensRights10/10/10 07:39 PM
1

Actually these few cases where women rape under age boys and then get the courts to order those boys to pay child support is setting nationwide precedent. So this is going to be the norm rather than the exception. Obviously if the genders where reversed the offender would get prison time instead of financial reward. Yet the rad-fems scream it's all fair. Thats is some sick 1 sided "equality" Only a very mentally sick person would defend such a practice,that or a judge.......
/r/MensRights10/10/10 03:51 AM
5

If you think you may be angry now,wait until the divorce when she takes %70 of everything and you become her wage slave for many years or a lifetime while watching her boink her new bad boy in the house you are paying for. DO NOT MARRY It is an invalid contract,a fraud.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 03:06 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/doeya/legally_obscene_ii/
/r/MensRights08/10/10 05:13 AM
1

Bitches be crazy
/r/MensRights07/10/10 02:59 AM
-2

Bitches be crazy!
/r/MensRights07/10/10 02:48 AM
3

Guilty of carrying a concealed penis. The victim should be charged with rape:yeah right.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 01:28 AM
1

Sounds like true love.You two should just get married already!
/r/MensRights04/10/10 05:26 AM
-2

Many people operating in the blackout zone appear to be relatively sober.There is no reliable way to indicate/detect whom is going to remember what the next day. Some people have lapses of memory with no alcohol intake. Some women might actually (gasp) Lie about not recalling. In our misandrist courts reasonable doubt is disregarded. Guilty until proven innocent. Welcome to feminazi Amerika
/r/MensRights04/10/10 04:58 AM
6

Men should just 'man up' and accept the loss of their progeny without admitting it effects them emotionally. After all,only women can truly care for a child. Men are sperm donors and walking wallets and nothing more. (pardon my sarcasm and devils advocate stance.) I'm only saying what the feminists really believe. Men are less than human to them. To have a DSM DX would be tantamount to admitting their humanity. Finally;why are psychiatrists afraid of feminists? Because they are hateful and have …
/r/MensRights04/10/10 04:47 AM
-2

How many women are drawing the same pay without taking the same risks? How many more benefits do they receive? What percentage of women become pregnant during duty when fraternization is against military law? Just how demoralizing and subversive are women to mens moral in combat situations,considering all of the above? Are men distracted competing for sex with these women instead of pulling together as a team? And if so,how many deaths has that caused?
/r/MensRights04/10/10 04:36 AM
1

My post on namwolf's success PROVEs there are quotas in the USA. My post on the Clinton Global Initiative PROVES there are to be quotas worldwide. Feminist NGO"S (care) ect are working hand in hand with the State Dept and other govt organizations to make this the rule rather than the exception. For feminists to come on here and say their against quotas when in fact the entire world is catering to feminism is just obscene. Do your homework people. Try doing a search on the PM divison of the State…
/r/MensRights04/10/10 01:08 AM
3

The rad fems claim since your are a "nice guy" you oppressed those poor wimmin with your unwanted reasonable expectation that they would behave like reasonable human beings instead of wanton animals. The thugs liberated their sexuality you see,with no expectations. The only reminder of morality is the herpes virus the thugs left behind. They can talk and argue all day, but their hurting crotch ruins the glory of it all for them. So of course they go out and abuse men at every opportunity for "do…
/r/MensRights03/10/10 05:54 AM
1

She liked it when she thought she had exclusive access to his wallet. Now remorse=rape. Gold digger found yet another jerk with game. Nothing changes except the legal charges. She was looking for an ass when she found him, and she will be looking for an ass when he is gone.(her intent) His intent was get laid(no intent to hurt her aww feewwings)
/r/MensRights03/10/10 04:46 AM
0

" feminists are seeking to reshape the MDGs to advance their agendas for transformative gender justice and economic justice." "Goals related to women’s health, control over their bodies, freedom from violence, and ability to have access to sexual and reproductive rights are inextricably linked to Goals related to macro-economic policy, poverty and resource distribution. " "In general, women’s unpaid labour is discounted and women are relegated to a secondary status, with less access to property,…
/r/MensRights03/10/10 04:23 AM
1

The National Association of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms (NAMWOLF) Wants to be sure that the federal government is going to adhere to mandates that specify that nearly all government contracts of more than $3,000 and less than $100,000 be reserved for certified small businesses, as well as to the recently passed House Financial Reform Bill, H.R. 4173, which includes a section regarding the inclusion of minorities and women. SEC Commissioner to Keynote NAMWOLF Annual Meeting Another keynote…
/r/MensRights03/10/10 04:10 AM
0

When was the last time a fire-woman carried a person out of a burning building? (never) People DIE from blurring the gender lines. Yet to say so is to "hate women" Women will argue society right into the ground even if other women die from it. How can your rationalize with something that corrupt?
/r/MensRights02/10/10 01:35 PM
1

I ran into some technical problems signing up and posting. It took 3 tries to get this far. I do not see a dollar sign from my end? I agree the study quoted may have been biased(they all are) Yah. I'm a noobie and out on my trial run. It was worth it for this comment that blew my mind; "This is about the fundamental flaw of monogamy being an viable "social norm" in a society that is about equality. If everyone is equal there is no advantage or need for strong pair bonds that last a life time."
/r/MensRights02/10/10 12:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter