TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

existentialdude Archive

View 0 posts and 158 comments by existentialdude on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Are red pillers and alt right racist? Sure white supremists normally indentify with alt right, but by your own logic we can't identify all alt right by their most radical members. And red pill, how are they racist at all?
/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:38 PM
-2

Just look at all the stories of teachers raping boys. And those are fair to criticize because we can point to example of men in similar circumstances getting longer sentences. My point is not every case of a woman getting a short sentence has to do with her gender.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 09:20 AM
1

It's just that I have never heard a man call his wife wifey, but I hear women call their husband hubby all the time. The only time I hear the term "wifey" women saying stuff like "he wants me to be a good little wifey". That is why I think they may be different.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:47 AM
1

Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:40 AM
1

Is "hubby" the the opposite of "wifey"? Or are they just two words that originated from gender opposites but have different connotations?
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:39 AM
14

Pain is funny. I laugh at women getting cunt punched too. Though it isn't always funny when done out of malice. When guys see another guy take a nut shot, it is more of a glad that happened to you not me laugh. Also context is key. I don't think many people would laugh at a guy getting maliciously kicked in the nuts in real life (as opposed to in a movie) but something like a baseball hitting a player i nthe nuts after he failed to make a catch is hilarious. Also watch woman's MMA, there are ple…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:24 AM
2

Jack Black does it on Mr. Show, I think their is a whole song on it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O--uGzo34N4 This clip is from the Mr. Show Movie Run Ronnie Run, but I swear a similar scene was in Mr. SHow as well.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:11 AM
-1

Come on, men get short sentences for stuff all the time too. Remember that brock rapist guy and the affluenza teen. Unless there is a similar case with a guy getting a longer sentence, this isn't a gender issue. People of both sexes get what many people see as too short sentences all the time.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:06 AM
1

I don't have a wife, so I don't use or called either term. Are they both used in the same context? Just because the word hubby originated from husband and wifey from wife, doesn't mean they are equal. For example "sissy" and "bro" both originate from opposite gendered words, but they are definitely not equal.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:02 AM
1

Yes, so why is insurance a special case?
/r/MensRights26/07/17 02:07 AM
1

So beings men are more likely to be sex offenders, you are okay with airlines taking that risk assessment and not sitting them next to children or parks banning unaccompanied men? African Americans are more likely to steal, statistically, so stores should be able to discriminate and not let them shop there? Or maybe Cost Co should charge black people more for membership?
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:10 AM
1

While it makes sense, it should still be considered discrimination as long as the government polices such things. African Americans are statistically more likely to be evicted for failure of payment. So why can't apartments charge them more? Women are more likely to take leaves of absences at work, they should be paid less, right? If its illegal to discriminate in one area, no matter what statistics say, it should be illegal in all areas.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:58 AM
21

Fake. Viral stunt.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 10:48 AM
6

You can kill them after they impregnate you.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 10:17 AM
1

We likely won't ever know all the details of the mother daughter relationship, but from the video it made it clear the mother was over bearing and the daughter was legitimately scared of her. Call the daughter a coward if you like but growing up with strict over bearing parents will have that effect. If you agree that the "police, prosecutor, judge, and most of all the jury" are also to blame, why do you believe the girl should face the brunt of the punishment?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 05:00 AM
1

You also have to factor in her fear of her mother, whom was her legal guardian. I know she knew better, but she also didn't have legal control of her life at that time. So I don't think she should have full responsibility. It is a weird case with no easy solution, imo. Furthermore, the ineptness of the courts and judge is also to blame for the guys incarceration.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 04:34 AM
1

Do you think the fact she was a minor when she made the false accusations should weigh into this? Even males get shorter sentences as minors.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 03:13 AM
3

So you would have rather her not come forward?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 03:10 AM
3

Honestly, I don't think jokes about rape shrug off empathy for rape victims. In many cases getting beat up, shot, or abused in many other nonsexual ways can be as traumatic or more so than a rape. Yet, no one gets up in arms about joking about those forms of violence. I personally have a dark sense of humor and joke about vile things which has got me banned from subreddits. But, I am also very empathetic when it comes to actual victims. I get the want for feminists to be consistent with there tr…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:26 AM
7

Unpopular opinion, but rather than attack movies for the lighthearted treatment of male rape, advocate that all types of rape can be joked about again. Some of my favorite movies joke about male on female rape.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 02:03 AM
5

What about the boys own agency? Are we saying men aren't responsible for their own actions?
/r/MensRights27/12/16 08:53 AM
1

Not many people would. I might feel general empathy that I get from seeing any one suffer, but he wouldn't get much sympathy out of me.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:41 PM
0

I know what you are getting at, and it is a double standard. But I don't think she should be forever crucufied because she lots control of her emotions and hit a guy. I also don't think most men should be forever painted as evil if they lose control of their emotions and strike a girl. Imagine if a short scrawny guy was goading a bigger dude and the dude decked him, no one would feel bad for the scrawny dude. Yet if the scrawny dude was a woman, which happens in many domestic abuse cases. The wo…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:30 PM
1

Depends on what and how severe the mental handicap is. It can be fucked. People claim throw around words like special needs, mentally challanged, etc. to cover a range of things, just to garner symphony. I hate that angle.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/16 12:15 AM
2

I just looked at the video of the dude, and he definitely isn't mentally retarded, just off a little and awkward. Couldn't find anywhere were people were making fun of him. Though, why should he be treated different than any other contestant? Should he be treated like a special snowflake because he is awkward?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 04:47 AM
1

What's wrong with making fun of retards? I thought this was an sjw free zone.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/16 01:19 PM
4

Even if it tool 15 minutes to code, the time is better used elsewhere.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 06:13 AM
2

For the last hundred plus years women have dominated teaching jobs though, and most people probably think they always have.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 09:29 AM
2

So you think people would be okay with "teaching is mens work" magnets as a tounge in cheek reminder of mens equal position in an historically female dominated discipline?
/r/MensRights02/03/16 09:08 AM
2

How would it have a different meaning? What meaning do you think it has now?
/r/MensRights02/03/16 09:00 AM
1

I was thinking the same thing, but they keep coming: http://www.theonion.com/article/perfect-gentleman-does-not-assault-drunk-woman-52437 http://www.theonion.com/article/female-presidential-candidate-who-was-united-state-52367
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:44 AM
-1

Okay. So there is one time in a thousand that the media gets outraged at naked celeb pics and it happens to be female so it is a double standard. In order for it to be a double standard it has to be consistently applied. If one time a woman gets a lighter sentence for a crime, that really isnt a double standard. If a woman almost always gets a lighter sentence it is a double standard. With just hulk and j law the double standard is there, but it don't even have to be sexist. In fact there is mor…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 12:06 AM
-1

J laws nude and sexually explicit photos are not paparazzi pics...
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:16 PM
-1

Fuck you are dense. The fappening and the hulk hogan videos are miles different than paparazzi shots and you cant compare the two. But if you do say they are the same then there isn't a double standard. Because there are tons of female nude paparazzi pics that the media is fine publishing.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:01 PM
-1

Link me to a story where media are saying not to spread the picture or that people looking at it are pervs or are invading her privacy, etc. And i think the hulk hogan vs frappening does show a double standard.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 09:16 PM
1

Link me to a story where media are saying not to spread the picture or that people looking at it are pervs or are invading her privacy, etc.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 09:14 PM
1

In my edit i said taken from the cloud. My point is the difference between publishing private pictures and publishing pictures taken candidly in public. Give me one example of the media being outraged over a female candid nude photo or wardrobe malfunction.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 06:54 PM
1

Way to miss the point.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 06:28 PM
1

I am not saying there isn't a double standard, just that candid pitcures like that aren't a good example of it, because their are tons of female celeb nude candids that haven't caused outrage in the media. In fact i have never seen it.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 06:27 PM
2

No one gets outraged by candid photos male or female. There is no double standard. The double standard is there when it comes to private photos / videos being leaked. I am not denying that.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 09:59 AM
2

I was talking about when a wave knocked her bikini top down. It was kristen dunce, not bell.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 04:38 AM
1

There are plenty of cases with female celebs having nude pics snapped public with no outrage. Look at britinay spears crotch shot, that singers super bowl wardrobe malfunction, kristin bell beach bikini mishap. http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-body/pictures/celebrity-bikini-malfunctions-from-nip-slips-to-crotch-shots-2014241/35416
/r/MensRights31/12/15 11:08 PM
-4

The responses from the celebs might be the same but its not the same "offense". You really don't see a difference in these two actions: I am walking down the street and my pants fall down and some snaps a picture of my junk. And someone hacking into my phone and stealing private pictures? Edit: i am not saying there isn't a double standard. Just that candid paparazzi photos and public wardrobe malfunctions are different. Tell me one time when the media has got out outraged over a female candid p…
/r/MensRights31/12/15 10:30 PM
2

Krazitz and beiber are different. They were taken by another photographer in perfectly legal ways. The photographer then published them legally. There are plenty of examples of this happening to female celebs with no outrage: topless beach pics, superbowl wardrobe malfunctions, pantiless crotch shots. With the fappening the pictures were stolen illegally and distributed illegally.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 09:14 PM
5

I'm actually with you here. He can't technically consent to eat, watch tv, etc... But that stuff is still provided because it brings him comfort and joy. If the guy shows no sign of discomfort or distress and especially if he shows signs of enjoyment sexual stuff should be okay imo.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/15 04:34 AM
4

Many do, but you got to have a little smarts behind the looks. We all say, he (my roommate) could have any girl he wants, if he could just shut his mouth. The stupid and bizzare stuff he says creeps girls out.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/15 07:37 AM
18

Its not. He trys to talk to women by saying some pretty bizarre niche stuff, like his weird comic book ideas (that make little sense), or some hairbrained science theory. He literally comes off as a creep. Genetics isn't just about looks. A woman also wants a competent intellegent man and children. Looks will get him in the door, but he can never finish the deal without creeping them out. Everyone says he could get any girl he wanted if he just shut his mouth.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/15 07:21 AM
14

My roommate is physically fit and attractive guy. He is also socially awkward and insecure. He can't get laid for anything.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/15 06:17 AM
2

http://www.wibw.com/home/headlines/2-women-wanted-for-twerking-man-they-didnt-know-344277412.html
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/15 02:58 PM
-1

I don't know what SF is, and honestly don't know much about rangers besides what I read on the internet. But reading the wiki page on them they do lots of stuff where a woman might be handy, from intelligence to disaster relief. I just can't imigine not carry as much is going to factor into to many missions. And there may be a chance where having a woman may help. Unless not carrying as much somehow puts a particular mission at riskc I am of the mind, having a woman on the team and not needed he…
/r/MensRights02/10/15 01:29 AM
-1

Yeah, yeah, I sense your sarcasm, but in reality women do bring something that men cannot provide. And the only thing they don't bring is they can't carry things as heavy as what men can. It seems like a fair trade off for what they do bring to the table.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 01:55 PM
-6

Honestly though, isn't there things women rangers can offer that men can't? I am sure there are situations where they will blend in easier, or tight places they can squeeze, or even use there feminine wiles (or just the take advantage of how informants may be more trusting of a woman). Though they should label it as such, instead of saying it is about equality.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 08:41 AM
-9

no, no, no. he did it himself. I don't think a sort of male hypoagency should be used as an excuse. Lets not snoop to that level.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:24 AM
0

Well I agree with you, I have to question why girls do care. I really think many girls wouldn't mind it but when other girls see the pic, they will get up in arms and say she is being molested. In some cases they may even convince the girl to feel violated or even persue legal actions, even though she may not have minded it at first. Feminism has a way of convincing girls to be outraged about things that originally didn't bother them. Men and women both seek affirmation of their feelings. If all…
/r/MensRights20/08/15 06:59 AM
1

I asked a question in askfeminists and I got banned in both. Not for my question but because one of my responses to a reply that happened to be an unmarked mods reply. She said "I think you disappointed the poor guy. All this build-up, and, bam, damned feminists are consistent and moral." I took it as presumptuous and condescending and responded with a sarcastic comment. The comment was callous, but I don't think it was ban worthy. I even marked it sarcasm.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:25 AM
0

Ughh, I hate all these MRA's dissecting Mad Max. It reminds of feminists who find male agenda in the most innocent of narratives. Also, if you are a lifelong mad max fan you should no that men have always been disposable in that universe.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:39 AM
4

NO tyrannical or oppressive traits What would you call controlling the water supply? You also forget there are more people he has power over than just his male soldiers. He also contols them through disinformation, namely the promise of Valhalla.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:35 AM
1

I agree, I think the skit is fine and funny, but I understand some MRA's reactions. To a typical feminist (and lots of other people) male-female statutory rape is viewed as "rape rape", but female-male statutory rape isn't.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:26 AM
0

Unfortunately, those sites don't make it past my company filter.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:09 AM
11

The patriarchy.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:35 PM
8

I think he tried too hard to be a moral shepherd, instead of focusing on making good works. The fact that he was praised early on for being somewhat of a social justice warrior didn't help, and I think he felt he had to meet that role. Hopefully he sees now, that most SJW will find something to complain about no matter what. The only way to appease them would be to make unrealistic films where women are never shown in compromising positions, are romantically involved with a guy, or used to merel…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 09:42 AM
1

No, but the people in this article have more knowledge. And it says that with any stimuli the brain responds to the same way. I imagine it isn't terribly awful. They were poking the baby with needles while it was asleep and it didn't wake up. I know if I was poked with a needle I would wake up. Source: my cat's needle-like claws.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 09:36 AM
1

I am against circumcision, but this article just isn't compelling evidence to support that view.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:40 PM
-11

"Even light pokes “feel” the same as harder ones, reflecting their still inexperienced system in distinguishing levels of activation" So circumcision is no more painful than a shot or a pinch to the baby.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 11:24 AM
3

It is pretty funny that if a girl wore a small bikini showing pubes, it would probably be taken down. Though not if she was shaven. On her big thing about period blood, would instagram allow picture of men in urine, semen, or feces stained underwear?
/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:51 PM
2

How can you even talk about Jorah without mentioning friend-zone? Anyway, I don't think its sexist at all. I think it can be about wanting sex, or even expecting sex and not getting it. Most the time it does boiling down to the man wanting a romantic relation and the woman not. This happens enough that it has its own word, "friendzone." It can happen to women too.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:32 PM
9

That's what I thought too, but like someone else said, reading the rest says "whosoever" instead of a specific gender. What is curious though is it says in that same section: "(4) Subsection (3) above shall also apply if a man or a woman is convicted because of an exhibitionist act" So if it just applies to men, how come it says "or woman".
/r/MensRights06/04/15 11:55 AM
4

Who is he responding to in that video? it is some pink haired girl. I want to see the actual video without him interrupting.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 11:50 AM
1

why identify with right or left? Just identify with logic.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:28 AM
0

Is it cheap? I am sure there are lots of men who would want to have weight reduction surgery, for example, but cannot afford it.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:21 AM
1

I think if you are goign to post something as "reverse genders" I think you out to show a case similar with a man. This is a pretty unique case. I have never heard of something like this, man or woman. Unless there was something explicitly sexual in the texts, I don't think they would get a man with anything worse. Is there even a similar case that involves a man for comparison?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:12 AM
7

I thought you were saying "Imagine this scenario if it was Bonkers, the early 90s Disney cartoon cat cop."
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/15 12:22 PM
151

If a man purposefully gets his bodily fluid on a girl it is sexual assault, at least that is the precedent in the US.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/03/15 12:21 PM
2

It sounded like she was the initiator, and the one who had contact with the children. From the article it doesn't make it clear that he ever even touched a child. It does make clear that she did touch a child and took pictures of it. Sounds like they have way more evidence against her, yet she gets bonded.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:54 AM
2

Reading that pissed me off. It is like we are trying to raise a nation of thin-skinned babies. The more institutions cave in to this type of pressure the more it will happen. I don't think being overprotective of peoples feelings is he way to go. I am against literal hate speech (not the over reaching legal definition), but at the same time I think there is a point where people need to learn to toughen up.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:35 PM
3

I don't like it. It just feels like a gimmick that feminist would use. Also where is the data on this? Is it as easily falsifiable as the 1-5 rape myth?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:24 PM
6

scantily clad characters My hero growing up was He-man and he was scantily clad. I turned out all right.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:15 AM
2

girl who doesn't like all the prissy/princessy Try being a boy who does likes this stuff and then show me lots of male comic characters that appeal to him. That being said, your argument is outdated. There are tons of strong female characters. I used to manage a comic shop and I know this for a fact. If your comic shop does not carry lots of comics with strong female characters, ask them to see a previews magazine then you can pick out one of the dozens of strong female character comics for your…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:10 AM
0

I see where you are coming from. But I am of the opinion that if someone wants to put on programs only for girls, I don't have a problem with it. Even if there isn't a respective one for boys. As long as no one is preventing someone from starting a similar program for boys, I don't have a problem. If the government is intervening on the creation of a boys group on the grounds of discrimination, I will fight that. I am totally okay with an all boys science or math day, or whatever. Unless this "n…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:54 AM
6

I think you guys might be interested in my comments to a feminist on the /r/dccomics thread about this: It's not that no female can ever by on the receiving end of violence, but that if that is supposed to occur in a comic book it has to have some meaning to that character rather than simply be window dressing or motivation for a different character. "I think this sets a unreal expectation for writers. I assume you extend the same view point to men. With monthly 18-32 page stories that have to h…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:32 AM
2

read my other responses. Though I am getting tired of arguing about something that is tangent to my main point. Here is another teaching strategy that teachers use: Some students actually respond to getting grades they don't deserve or praise they didn't earn. It actually makes them feel "bad" so they then work harder to justify to themselves that the praise and future praise was/will be deserved. whether you think it is an effective strategy or not, or even if it can be proven not an effective …
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:12 AM
0

Can you think of any academic event that excludes girls? http://www.midtown-metro.org/midtown/ http://www.pdsmemphis.org/learning/character-education http://www.townschool.com/Page/Student-Life/After-School-Programs I found even more, but the filter on my work wouldn't let go to the links. So I didn't want to post them. No, the MRM doesn't support this kinda thing because it isn't helping. What do they support in regards to gender only programs? In some instances, they (some MRAs) are like we ne…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:11 AM
-1

This is an event created by college women for girls. It isn't part of any school. And show me anytime a similar boys only thing has come under scrutiny? For example there are plenty of boys only ballet classes (just google it), just as there are girls only ballet classes. It is more socially acceptable to have something girls only, than boys only. And, unfortunately, you are right, many MRMs, instead of wanting to change to more boys only programs would rather just attack girls only programs.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:20 PM
0

I am not saying giving them grades they didn't earn. Read my other posts. I am saying that if she was getting bad grades and she really shown improvement on this test, to the point where the teacher could tell she was studying and grasping the subject matter and her only mistake was using abbreviations instead of writing something out, the teacher may be inclined to over look that. She can then use this test as leverage to get her to study for future tests. Even another possibility, is that from…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:29 PM
-2

Teachers can and do do stuff like that. If the student was struggling and was showing signs of improvement, the teacher may be lenient with the students answers. She technically got the answers correct, she just didn't hold her answers to t he same technical standard as his. Which is totally different than giving a person an "A" when they are way off on the answers. Whether this is ethical behavior or not, is for another discussion. I am just throwing out alternative possibilities. That being sa…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:00 AM
-1

I know it does wonders for a kids self esteem (myself included) when they get good grades. You are truly an abnormality if success doesn't bolster your esteem. edit: besides, you are missing the point, which is: there are numerous factors, besides gender politics, that could have affected the teachers grading discrepancy.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 10:45 AM
-1

poor as in poor performance, poor grades, etc..
/r/MensRights17/03/15 10:30 AM
-4

And men could organize such events, instead of complaining on reddit, just saying.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:29 AM
2

Yes and so could you. It is women organizing this for girls. Men could step up and organize similar events for boys.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:28 AM
0

This program is run by volunteers and the costs are paid by student attendees. There is nothing illegal here. If anything it shows me that more men should step up and start programs like this for boys. https://www.seattleu.edu/scieng/outreach/seyh/
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:27 AM
1

Cost: $15 per student covers the registration fee, lunch and all materials. looking at their website it looks like the costs are paid by students/parents and it is ran by volunteers. https://www.seattleu.edu/scieng/outreach/seyh/
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:25 AM
1

Did you see the same questions marked (not marked) on her paper? Is it possible she had extra-credit, or something? Also had you been warned about abbreviations (or something similar) in the past, and maybe this was her first mistake? Also, is she a poor student? Perhaps the teacher was giving her a little boost in her confidence, or support to encourage her. This may not be the equitable thing, but I would definitely be understanding if this was the case. On the same side of the coin, it is pos…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:19 AM
1

Don't you know women aren't represented equally as Art Museum directors! Lets focus on that instead. It is much more pressing. /s edit: I am directly referencing a point she made in the video.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:09 AM
3

The bullshit and facts she left out of the story aren't even what piss me off the most. Honestly, if men kept screwing her over, she could be conditioned to hate men. What pisses me off is the hypocrisy. If a man keeps getting screwed over my women to the point where he finally decides he hates all women, he is a monster. Yet, a women who hates men is showered with support.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:32 PM
4

god! I made so many mistakes in that...argh!
/r/MensRights12/03/15 11:09 AM
2

LGBTQIA+ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning, Intersex, Asexual, and other minorities got this off some college's website
/r/MensRights12/03/15 06:50 AM
20

Just the fact that they label stuff like that as misogyny, amazes me. "When people realize this isn't acceptable, our space will be safer and more welcoming." More welcoming to those lesbians that enjoying using terms like "we banged and nice tits." as opposed to stuff like, 'We made love" or "you have a beautiful body"? Some people are more "vulgar" than others I don't think it really has anything to do with misogyny. I am sure some of the "vulgar" lesbians, don't like hearing other lesbians wa…
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:57 AM
1

Except, for presenting Miley Cyrus as a good role model at the end, it was pretty tame. It is obvious that the little girls mom is little crazy, pushing feminism on her daughter, but there really wasn't anything controversial in this video. I am all for parents telling there little girls they can do whatever they want, even if that thing is predominately boys. But feminism as a whole philosophy is something little girls cannot understand and is probably unhealthy. I did like how the little girl …
/r/MensRights09/03/15 08:46 AM
-1

Yes, because you can speak for every librarian.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:09 PM
1

You seem to be ignoring that fact. Not really. There are too many blurry lines involved and that makes me uncomfortable viewing any expression of thought a crime. First off, it is impossible to judge the mental state of a person or whether an action is out of depression or some other mental illness. Especially after the fact, when it is too late to even talk to a therapist to get good indicators of what his mental state was. Imagine most other scenarios where she could have encouraged him to tak…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:39 AM
1

'People should be allowed to kill themselves' is protected. Saying, 'You should go kill yourself, and this is how'...That is a crime" I disagree that it should be a crime.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:44 PM
1

At most that action could be harassment, not manslaughter. I am not talking about thinking people should be allowed to commit suicide. I am talking about the specific case of here thinking he should commit suicide. If one of my friends comes up to me and says they are thinking about committing suicide. I shouldn't be punished if I say. "Yeah that is a great idea. You should kill yourself." I don't understand why it should be criminal for me to speak my opinion in such matters.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:40 PM
1

allowing another to die by not acting to prevent it when you could have without putting yourself in danger That shouldn't be against the law, IMO. At least in cases of suicide.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:36 PM
1

What if I promote heroin, and they overdose?
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:05 PM
1

Also going by the link I posted she knew what she was doing was ilegal That is irrelevant. There are many laws that I don't think should exist. I don't agree with people getting charged for marijuana possession, even if they knew having marijuana on them was illegal, for example. Anyway, at most it is harassment, if they can prove he felt harassed by her. But it is definitely not manslaughter.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 01:38 PM
0

She is a vile sociopath bitch, that much is obvious. But, it boils down to a thought crime. I am against thought crimes, and I refuse to make an exception in this case. She thought he should commit suicide, and expressed that thought. No one should be arrested for expressing thoughts, no matter how disturbing others find the thoughts.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 01:22 PM
-2

but should it be? I am of the belief that expressing ones thoughts shouldn't be a crime.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 12:21 PM
0

I have often promoted LSD, should I be charged with a crime if I tell someone they should try LSD then get caught with it? Or what if I say to someone, "if my kid did that I would beat them silly," then they beat their kid next time they do something, is that my fault? To be charged with promoting something is to be charged with a thought crime. It opens up the door for other thought crimes to be instituted.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 12:16 PM
16

my younger niece knocks over my other niece's lego/block structures. It is just for attention. Nothing to do with gender. My sister's response; kids will be kids...
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:27 PM
3

Nope it's only possible for one group to have it bad. Every other group there is living merrily.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 04:37 AM
1

my bad, I thought you were saying you were a teenager in Saudi Arabia, lol.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 01:09 PM
2

you were a teenager there? was it really horrible? I guess if you were poor. How long a go was it when you were a teenager? edit: I have teenage in-laws who live over there and they don't seem to have a problem with it. The males mostly just play video games, screw around on the computer (thats what they do in the us too, though). The girl, goes shopping with her friends at the mall and listens to her ipod. You have to be more specific about what they can not do there that makes it so boring. I …
/r/MensRights19/02/15 12:46 PM
3

Not that there's anything fun to do outside the home in a heavily prohibitionist country like SA Teenagers can do most the same stuff there that teenagers do here. Go to the mall, go to starbucks, skate in the park. It's not the middle ages over there.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 12:33 PM
7

Have you ever visited there? I have, and have family living there. Don't always rely on facts from some internet document. There is much advancement that is still to be done in Saudi, but it isn't as bad as it largely seems. Sure, some cities are extremely conservative and if a woman is caught without a hijab, or even without a male escort, she could get reprimanded or harassed by religious police. In most cities they are fairly liberal and the religious police do not care about much. In malls, …
/r/MensRights19/02/15 12:28 PM
3

I agree it can be used for positive change, though I doubt it will be. I think the point OP is getting at is, that there have been studies in the past saying men were better at something, and women got their panties in a bunch to the point that the the studies had to be condemned as flawed or they blame it on the patriarchy keeping women down. Remember when that professor revealed that men were better at math than women?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:44 AM
1

I know it can be aggravated assault, if the person feels like they are being threatened with it (granted it is probably 99.9% of the cases) but it isn't inherently illegal, AFAIK. If I was stupid enough to point a gun at you jokingly, and you knew I was joking and it didn't bother you, we would only be guilty of stupidity. I imagine judges and lawyers challenge it on a technical level at times, for many reasons, on a case by case basis. I mean, maybe the judge decided not to try and get that cha…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:44 PM
2

I am not sure pointing a gun at someone is a felony. Maybe pointing a gun at someone with criminal intent. I would like to see the cops arrest me for pointing a gun at a burglar. Also, these are juveniles, I am sure the judge is showing them mercy for there lapse in judgement.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 11:04 AM
2

http://www.nbc-2.com/story/17081013/2012/03/05/teen-convicted-of-killing-girlfriend-to-be-sentenced
/r/MensRights28/01/15 10:09 AM
2

You are incorrect. Here is a boy, 15 who got sentenced 10 for manslaughter with a gun: http://www.nbc-2.com/story/17081013/2012/03/05/teen-convicted-of-killing-girlfriend-to-be-sentenced but it does show that they are not being sexist. He did basically the same thing. Pointed a gun he thought was unloaded at his girlfriend and pulled the trigger.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 10:04 AM
2

Here is my reply from r/news: This study doesn't seem accurate to me. I can't imagine many men, even actual rapists identifying themselves as a rapist even in an anonymous survey, let alone 1 out of 7 men. Also the questions were answered on a 1 to 6 scale. Basically: I have intentions to rape a women: 1-strongly disagree - 6 strongly agree It is really weird question and way to answer it. Someone might think , "So I have masturbated to rape porn, so maybe I should put slightly agree." Also, whi…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:30 PM
1

I definitely agree with you on most, that is why I must be discriminatory. I do have female friends I am comfortable with being vulgar with. The difference is, even with most men that I just met, I am comfortable making vulgar comments around. I would definitely make comments to a stranger who was male that I wouldn't make to a stranger that was a woman. As with gay men, the one gay guy I do hang out with somewhat often, I do make sexual comments to him. Say, even if he was disappointed that I d…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 09:33 AM
4

Here is a published source that comes to similar conclusions: Divided Labor. I don't have the book with me, but there is a chapter, I think titled something like: "sexual harassment is sexual discrimination". Talking about how if men talk to women how they talk to each other, it is often considered harassment at work.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:20 AM
-1

I don't know, I could see how some men who are not generally white knights, might see telling a woman, "Man I want to do some things to that new girl Rebecca, if you know what I mean." or something more vulgar, as sexist. I even make jokes to my male friends where I offer them sexual favors in exchange for something insignificant. Like, "tell you what, if you give me the last piece of pizza, I will give you a rusty trombone." I don't think it is sexist to say vulgar things to a woman, but I am d…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:08 AM
2

It is harassment (not sexual) and is an invasion of privacy. I agree with you there. If a guy randomly slaps a girls ass or a woman randomly barges into a mens bathroom knowing a man is in there, in most cases I would agree it was sexual harassment. In this case we have more information to go on. We know with almost 100% certainty that she was not sexually motivated. We have verifiable evidence from both parties and several witnesses that there was ongoing bad-blood between these two and the bat…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:41 PM
1

If you could prove that you and the girl had an escalating series of jokes and pranks, that culminated in you grabbing her boob, you probably have a case that it wasn't sexual harassment. You and this lady have a history of confrontation. Her bursting into the stall is a culmination of this history. Therefore, it is easily shown that the intent wasn't sexual.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 07:34 AM
3

How is making the definition of sexual harassment extend to situations where it is not sexual harassment improving men's rights? I think trying to do so is at the same level of feminists calling unwanted glares sexual harassment, or sex while drunk rape.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 07:26 AM
0

If a guy entered a woman's stall while she was peeing, this would be sexual harassment, You think this, but I don't think you have anything to back this up. Unless it is sexually motivated, it is not sexual harassment. Show me one case where a man, for a non-sexually related reason burst into a females restroom and got reprimanded or charged for sexual harassment. And like I said to another person, most women are not looking for any excuse to cry foul, and we would never even hear of cases where…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 06:42 AM
1

Got the runs, sprint into the wrong restroom and throw open the door. \ But in honesty, but how are you going to hear about it? They don't make news stories about women NOT reporting sexual harassment. Not all women look for every excuse to cry sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 06:28 AM
0

genitals ≠ sexual Harassment, invasion of privacy, but not sexual.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 06:23 AM
1

Of course men dominate "fishermen" jobs, expand it top include all "fisher-people" and see what the numbers are. /s
/r/MensRights01/01/15 02:28 PM
1

I don't think they are doing anything wrong. I would really have to see the hole thing to know for sure. They can't base their decision on whether you are male or female, but that info is needed in order to insure the correct tenant is staying in the residence. also it may just be optional like on job apps, without reading the above paragraph I can't really make much of a judgement.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 02:26 PM
3

can you post the sentence please? I can't go to that website at work.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 03:45 PM
2

Most informal fallacies can be correct in the right context, especially when given the right empirical evidence. Just be aware that they exist, and then apply them logically to the argument at hand. If I am arguing whether or not Popie McPederass's theory on creationism is correct, using the argument, "It's wrong because Popie is a child molester," would be an ad hominem fallacy. If I am arguing whether Popie's proposed plan to move the choir boy quarters next to his room is a good idea, it woul…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:43 PM
3

easy for someone to say whose work doesn't block imgur. I actually assumed it was a self post just form the context. I am used to clicking comments instead of the link because so many sites are blocked by my work.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:04 PM
1

“Don’t worry guys – when the male dog groomer did his AMA (where he specifically identified as male), there were also dozens of comments asking why his sex mattered. Oh no, wait, there weren’t.” http://np.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/2ogvlt/iama_male_dog_groomer_and_its_a_slow_day_ama/?sort=controversial Actually there were plenty of gay jokes, and at least one person asked why it mattered that he was male and at least one other hit on him (I didn't take the time to read all the comments). Honestl…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 10:40 AM
2

It is an excuse to pay them less. Just like statistics about wrecks are used to charge men more for insurance. Same logic, correct?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 10:05 AM
3

Going through his comment history to discredit him, I see.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 10:00 AM
1

ohh, that's not how they present themselves so I was not aware. "This is for ranting, blowing off steam, and general complaints about misandry."
/r/MensRights16/12/14 09:36 AM
1

I agree, they shouldn't pass her off as real. But how would "look at this funny feminist parody" or "this satirist really has modern feminism down." be a men's rant?
/r/MensRights16/12/14 09:13 AM
1

https://plus.google.com/112221225063660781289/posts I wouldn't say troll, more of a satirist of feminism. I think satire has a place here.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 06:30 AM
2

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=wage+gap+myth https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=1+in+5+rape+myth
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:23 AM
2

Every single site on the internet!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:14 AM
2

source?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:06 AM
1

first, why was it the same article 3 times? lol. Second, I was just commenting in another thread about the irony of using girls as objects to promote girls are not objects. Third, yeah they should have criticized the message, but there are plenty of articles out there already doing that.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:05 AM
2

Where do you get rape from this?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:57 PM
7

It's definitely not offensive. I mean, seeking sex without attachment is normally a trait associated with men, but I imagine many women like the idea to. I don't see it necessarily bashing men, as the joke could be told by either gender. Not saying some feminist wouldn't be pissed if a man said something similar, but I don't care what they think.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:17 PM
1

whats it say? I am at work and can't see it.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 11:29 AM
1

Seriously stop giving those people attention. I disagree. People need to know how ludicrous these people are. Also it is a good laugh for people who already know.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 02:55 PM
1

Its like when my mom wouldn't read me a story unless I gave her a bedtime kiss. Also affection isn't the same as sexual abuse. I don't know the extent of it, but it is at worst slightly inappropriate, and by no means abuse. Heck my sister made me clean her room for some candy before, I much rather would have kissed her on the lips for five seconds. Edit: also you call that stuff "illicit sex acts"?, Also you didn't have siblings did you? Edit: where is a quote saying she did that stuff until she…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 08:44 AM
3

Can someone explain the logic behind the claim freshman promotes rape? how does it suggest that women might make good rape victims?
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:32 AM
0

How is she a child predator? What illicit sex acts has preformed on a child, in which she wasn't a child herself? I have heard that she looked at her sisters vagina when she was 7. That is innocent child exploration. Don't even tell me that masturbating next to a sleeping child is sexual abuse. Her sister was asleep, how could that possible harm her. When I was young I went camping with my uncle and his girlfriend, when they thought I was asleep, they had sex. Very uncomfortable for me, but that…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:10 AM
1

Masturbating next to a sleeping person isn't molestation, sorry.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:24 AM
1

You need to reread the facts, or provide a link to your version of the events.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:12 AM
1

I'm in the same boat. The most I can get from it is that some feminists are defending her against people attacking her actions involving her little sister. Which from what I have heard, I will defend her from those attacks to. It seems that some MRA think that a boy doing the same things as her would be attacked by feminists and they are being hypocritical. As I don't know of any circumstances similar involving a boy, I find this silly. Even if it was the case that feminist were genuinely being …
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:10 AM
0

She masturbated in her own bed, while her sister was asleep. As a young teen I have masturbated next to my sleeping friends (not my proudest moment). Her sister wasn't even involved. Heck, I had friends in junior high who would masturbate under the desk will looking at the girl across from them. Is that sexual abuse?
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:01 AM
3

OMG, I getting tired of hearing about her. Is she even a feminist? What has she done against men's rights? The strongest inclination I have that MRA don't like her is that feminist support some her actions as a youth and we (MRAs) believe that feminist would have demonized her if she was a man. That's not even on her.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 07:44 AM
-2

That isn't mentioned in the article and we are talking about the article.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:23 AM
0

It wasn't molestation in my opinion. Neither would it be if Lena was a boy. Kids are curious. I have no problem with Feminists defending her. But they damn well better extend the same courtesy if a man ever admits to exploring his little sister when he was a kid. Is there a case of this (admiting to exploring with his siblign and getting in blacklash from feminists)? If not, I am not sure why MRA would get up in arms about this.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 04:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter