~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Vanguard Report - Episode 75: Vetoing the dictionary and more.. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/15 06:26 AM |
| 1 | What MRA's could (and Should) learn from Gamergate.Q: What is "the MRA movement"? A: There is no such thing as "the MRA movement". The "MRAs" that you describe are not an actual group of people, but an impressionistic average you have constructed in your head. Stop using false categories and outdated narratives. Ditch the middle-school tribalism. Don't be a checker player; this is chess. I know that reality is complex and messy sometimes, but don't you think it's time to grow up a little, and deal with it? | /r/TheRedPill | 07/07/15 10:52 PM |
| 13 | Karen Straughan saying the Manosphere has to hang together, otherwise we all hang separately.The "manosphere"? There is no such thing as this. . . "manosphere". I do not acknowledge any such concept - it's a word that the feminists like to throw around a lot, and I refuse to validate their linguistic constructions. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/15 12:12 AM |
| 1 | Is this for real? Anonymous poster claims feminists planning to fabricate physical attack as part of smear campaign.You're right. My bad. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/14 08:12 AM |
| 1 | Is this for real? Anonymous poster claims feminists planning to fabricate physical attack as part of smear campaign.No, DO spread it to the masses. It will not make "us" look bad provided that "we" issue a proper "FYI" disclaimer along with the item itself. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/14 02:04 AM |
| 2 | Is this for real? Anonymous poster claims feminists planning to fabricate physical attack as part of smear campaign.Bingo! Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/14 02:00 AM |
| 1 | Is this for real? Anonymous poster claims feminists planning to fabricate physical attack as part of smear campaign.You should keep an eye on the twisted political narrative which this is embedded in. Context is important -- well, sometimes at least. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/14 01:59 AM |
| 1 | Is this for real? Anonymous poster claims feminists planning to fabricate physical attack as part of smear campaign.No "moving along" until value is extracted from this episode -- whichever way it falls out. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/14 01:58 AM |
| 0 | Is this for real? Anonymous poster claims feminists planning to fabricate physical attack as part of smear campaign.But it's not the "MRM" (whatever that is) which is theoretically at issue here. It's the computer gaming community. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/14 01:56 AM |
| 1 | Is this for real? Anonymous poster claims feminists planning to fabricate physical attack as part of smear campaign.Please share this widely, via twitter, Facebook, e-mail, blog posts, forum posts, etc...etc....etc.... We know nothing for sure, but we want to put this on the table anyway. You never know. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/14 07:39 AM |
| 1 | A little compilation of real-world feminism.Well, no. Feminism is nothing more than female supremacism. Plain and simple. Everything which feminism does is for the purpose of "empowering" women, and this will continue with no upper limit. Just watch. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/14 03:11 AM |
| 1 | Feminism Wants Power and Controlhttp://youtu.be/8QPPtRNmjfM | /r/MensRights | 15/01/14 01:30 PM |
| 3 | Forty Two talks about Human RightsYou'd be amazed how many people cannot wrap their minds around the idea that "men's rights are human rights." It sounds completely basic, but plenty of people struggle to comprehend it, and sometimes it even makes them violently angry! | /r/MensRights | 27/12/13 05:01 AM |
| 0 | You've completely mischaracterized Occidental College's rape form and by doing so, you're hurting your own movement.I am surprised that nobody here has mentioned the "Dear Colleague" letter. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 01:00 PM |
| 0 | You've completely mischaracterized Occidental College's rape form and by doing so, you're hurting your own movement.Technically, it is not criminal prosecution. But if there were any justice in the universe, it would be criminally prosecuted. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 12:58 PM |
| 1 | You've completely mischaracterized Occidental College's rape form and by doing so, you're hurting your own movement.Feminists have long argued that rape must be treated like any other crime. I don't know where Naomi Wolf gets THAT idea. Feminists have only ever argued that rape is "uniquely horrible" in a class by itself, and that extraordinary measures are needed to combat it. It looks to me like Naomi Wolf is LYING - but that is what feminists do, after all, so this oughtn't surprise us. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 12:57 PM |
| 1 | You've completely mischaracterized Occidental College's rape form and by doing so, you're hurting your own movement.Nobody actually believes that feminists envision this as a tool for false accusations. Well, no. Some feminists actually DO look at it that way. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 12:53 PM |
| 1 | You've completely mischaracterized Occidental College's rape form and by doing so, you're hurting your own movement.Burning things down is often the best solution. Sometimes, it is the ONLY solution. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 12:49 PM |
| 1 | You've completely mischaracterized Occidental College's rape form and by doing so, you're hurting your own movement.So you feel that it is okay to tell anonymous lies about other people? Thank you for making that clear. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 12:43 PM |
| -7 | A Feminist who is an "MRA", is like a Square Which is a CircleIt is unfortunate that Cristina Hoff Sommers chooses to stick the word "feminist" to herself. She ought to know better. It is perverse - like me calling myself a fish, or whatnot. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/13 03:58 AM |
| 3 | I am a women's and men's rights activist.You make it sound like there is a fundamental polarity with "radical MRAs" on one side, and "radical feminists" on the other. That is a false duality, a false narrative, and a false framing of the actual state of affairs. It sets us up for the logical fallacy that "the truth must be somewhere in the middle." A more correct framing of the situation would be, that there is a cancer called "feminism" spreading through the social body, and that this cancer must be removed before it brings about the … | /r/MensRights | 01/09/13 03:43 AM |
| 3 | I am a women's and men's rights activist.All the men I have talked to, from such countries as India, have assured me that the horror stories which get into the Western press (concerning rape, male violence etc, in such countries) are grossly exaggerated and distorted. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/13 03:38 AM |
| 2 | I am a women's and men's rights activist.If they are wise, those wonderful, normal feminists whom you speak of will renounce the word "feminist" as a self-appellative label. They can keep their belief system, but they must stop calling themselves feminists. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/13 03:34 AM |
| 3 | I am a women's and men's rights activist.My answer is, no. Feminism cannot exist side by side with any social movement that promotes the human rights of males. It is a contradiction in terms, a logical impossibility. The two things necessarily exclude each other. Feminism is the project to increase the power of women with no proposed endpoint, and there is simply no way that such a project would comport with a movement that promotes the human rights of males. The conflict of interest would be radical, and a clash would be inevitable so… | /r/MensRights | 01/09/13 03:25 AM |
| 1 | I am a women's and men's rights activist.I notice that you are avoiding the "F word". Feminist. Are you, or are you not, a feminist? | /r/MensRights | 01/09/13 03:19 AM |
| 3 | Enough of this "I'm a feminist and an MRA!" nonsense. It's a hijack attempt and a pretty transparent one at that.How many "feminists" would publicly renounce the idea of "patriarchy", and the idea of "male privilege"? Not many, would be my guess. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/13 02:37 AM |
| 10 | Enough of this "I'm a feminist and an MRA!" nonsense. It's a hijack attempt and a pretty transparent one at that.Stardusk, in one of his videos, aptly opines that for the pro-male community to be "inclusive of feminism" is somewhat like a flock of sheep becoming "inclusive of" a wolf pack. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/13 07:46 PM |
| 10 | Enough of this "I'm a feminist and an MRA!" nonsense. It's a hijack attempt and a pretty transparent one at that."there's no defined end point at which "equality" is ever achieved." Bingo! This . | /r/MensRights | 31/08/13 07:37 PM |
| 8 | Enough of this "I'm a feminist and an MRA!" nonsense. It's a hijack attempt and a pretty transparent one at that.The trouble with feminism is that it singles out the hard knocks experienced by women specifically, and puts these on their own special pedestal, and shines a special floodlight on them. Feminism is all about making women "special" in that way. Men, not so much. Feminism also flat-out invents stuff whenever it gets a chance. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/13 07:35 PM |
| 3 | Enough of this "I'm a feminist and an MRA!" nonsense. It's a hijack attempt and a pretty transparent one at that.I've a hunch that Manboobz's cryptic statement shows the influence of a recent blog post of mine. I'll send you a link to the post in question, if you haven't guessed it. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/13 07:22 PM |
| 26 | From r/feminism - Fuck you battered men, we don't want your problems hereFeminism is about one thing only: Increasing the power of women. Remember that if you remember nothing else. It will save you hours of pointless, boring conversation. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/13 10:26 PM |
| 1 | The Colonization of Male Space by FidelbogenHello. Fidelbogen here. Most of the commenters on here have absolutely no freaking clue what I'm actually talking about in this video, (platonic essentialism -- wtf?? Warren Farrell -- wtf?? Carol Gilligan -- wtf??) Yup, most of the talk on here is irrelevant blather. And to be honest, I haven't got the patience to shovel such a muddled mudslide. So, jabber on dudes. There are plenty others out there who know exactly what I'm talkin' bout. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/13 06:13 AM |
| 1 | Are you an MRA who supports egalitarianism?"Doesn't that make YOU the advocate for female superiority here?" Demonspawn said "female supremacy". NOT "female superiority". That's a big difference. Is your reading comprehension really so bad, or are you merely pretending? | /r/MensRights | 28/09/12 06:57 AM |
| 1 | "Has Feminism Gone Too Far?" MRA-hosted debate, September 23 in Vancouver, BC.Thank you for this. I have screen capped it, and will be blogging it. ~Fidelbogen~ | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 10:20 PM |
| 3 | "Has Feminism Gone Too Far?" MRA-hosted debate, September 23 in Vancouver, BC.It is hard for me to piece together exactly what happened on this trainwreck of a thread. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 07:50 PM |
| 2 | "Has Feminism Gone Too Far?" MRA-hosted debate, September 23 in Vancouver, BC.Celda, since you seem to be the one who dumped my article into the 'misogynist' category, maybe you can explain why the hell it ought to be considered "misogynistic". Cogent analysis please. No emotional reasoning -- I haven't got time to listen to that. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 07:44 PM |
| 2 | "Has Feminism Gone Too Far?" MRA-hosted debate, September 23 in Vancouver, BC.Fidelbogen here again. For the record, I am not a so-called "MRA". My correct appellative is "non-feminist". Just so we are clear about that. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 07:31 PM |
| 1 | "Has Feminism Gone Too Far?" MRA-hosted debate, September 23 in Vancouver, BC.Fidelbogen here. I am the author of the first-linked item on the list above. And I demand to know why the material in question ought to be considered 'misogynistic'. Emotional reasoning will not be accepted. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 07:27 PM |
| 5 | What brought you to the MRM?What brought me? Well, I was not "burned". But the smoke -- I couldn't help smelling it! Honestly, how could anybody miss it? | /r/MensRights | 03/08/12 08:01 AM |
| 0 | r/MensRights Demographics Poll: This time, Organized!Do you believe that there is no "good" feminism? | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 08:56 PM |
| -1 | r/MensRights Demographics Poll: This time, Organized!I would recommend using the word "sex" rather than "gender". The feminists programmed us to say "gender" and it's time to de-program. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 08:55 PM |
| -1 | The Necessary Metamorphosis of the MRM: to get identified as an "MRA" or an "MRM person", all you must do is to talk against feminismNo. I am not re-defining it. I am defining it. It doesn't make a spit of difference what any feminist "believes" feminism is. The authority to define feminism is not limited to a particular set of people who might happen to say "I am a feminist". If you declare yourself a NON-feminist, then you are, by implication, defining feminism. And you have full authority to do this. | /r/MensRights | 15/06/12 12:52 AM |
| 1 | The Necessary Metamorphosis of the MRM: to get identified as an "MRA" or an "MRM person", all you must do is to talk against feminismBasically, anything that would tend to make men strong and independent, is opposed by feminism. Anything which is explicitly pro-male, is opposed by feminism. That's a good way to figure out what feminism really is. Just look at any issue in question, and discern precisely how it would alter the male-female power differential. The constant endeavor of feminism, is to alter that differential in favor of women in every way possible. That's the bottom line of the matter, which tells the real story. | /r/MensRights | 15/06/12 12:44 AM |
| 1 | The Necessary Metamorphosis of the MRM: to get identified as an "MRA" or an "MRM person", all you must do is to talk against feminismYou have at least implied that you are a non-feminist. That said, how do you feel about the colonizing aggression of feminism toward the non-feminist sector? Surely, as a non-feminist, you'd have something to say about that. . . yes? | /r/MensRights | 15/06/12 12:37 AM |
| 1 | The Necessary Metamorphosis of the MRM: to get identified as an "MRA" or an "MRM person", all you must do is to talk against feminismWhat needs to be established here, is the objective "hatefulness" of the laws and mores in question. Remember that mores per se were different in times past, and so we must guard against the lensing effect that would arise when we view past mores from the standpoint of our own, historically present mores. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/12 10:09 PM |
| 0 | The Necessary Metamorphosis of the MRM: to get identified as an "MRA" or an "MRM person", all you must do is to talk against feminism"Defining" feminism is like "defining" a landscape, or a complex, holistic system. You cannot "define" these things, you can only describe them. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/12 10:03 PM |
| -3 | The Necessary Metamorphosis of the MRM: to get identified as an "MRA" or an "MRM person", all you must do is to talk against feminismHere's a clue for you. Feminism as a whole depends upon the hateful part in order to remain vital. If you throw out the 'hateful' part of feminism, all you'll have left will be a mass of wishy-washy liberal humanist pabulum that most people would agree with anyway. To put it more simply: whatever is good about feminism is not original, and whatever is original about feminism is not good. The word feminism itself (the WORD, mind you) ought to be repudiated by any person who wishes to be generally… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/12 09:58 PM |
| -3 | The Necessary Metamorphosis of the MRM: to get identified as an "MRA" or an "MRM person", all you must do is to talk against feminismNo. You can most certainly (effectively) criticize feminism "as a whole". Entire schools of thought within the pro-male project have been dedicated to precisely that task. The only "diversity" within feminism is the many, many shades and styles of BAD. Your remarks are pure bromide. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/12 09:51 PM |
| -2 | The Necessary Metamorphosis of the MRM: to get identified as an "MRA" or an "MRM person", all you must do is to talk against feminism"Egalitarianism" is a wishy-washy intellectual cop-out. If you can explain precisely what you mean by "equality" -- in non-mathematical terms, I mean -- then we might get somewhere. "Ranting" about feminism (define 'ranting' please) is a vitally important activity. I prefer to call it agitation. It blasts loose and re-suspends the calcified muck of settled ideas within the culture, and lays the necessary groundwork for any paradigm-shift that is needed. Feminism categorically IS THE PROBLEM. So … | /r/MensRights | 14/06/12 09:43 PM |
| 2 | The Necessary Metamorphosis of the MRM: to get identified as an "MRA" or an "MRM person", all you must do is to talk against feminismIf you support "the Rights of Men", then you will automatically come into conflict with feminism. The idea that an "MRA" would support feminism is utterly outlandish and bizarre. Like a fish with feathers, or a snake with antlers. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/12 09:32 PM |
| 1 | The Necessary Metamorphosis of the MRM: to get identified as an "MRA" or an "MRM person", all you must do is to talk against feminismThe value of the term 'feminism' may be set equal to 'female supremacism'. As for a definition, we may define 'feminism' as "the project to increase the power of women." Under the sector system, feminism categorically IS what we (non-feminists) say it is. By linguistic fiat. The burden is upon the self-declared feminist to demonstrate that he/she does not fit the profile. I think that a lot of the confusion here can be cleared up if we realize that feminism is a social organism, whose parts (eit… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/12 09:25 PM |
| -13 | Men's Rights compared to r/beatingwomen, r/jailbait and r/spacedicks.Why do you feel it necessary to inform people (via your screen name), that you are "successful"? | /r/MensRights | 28/12/11 05:20 AM |
| 11 | Men's Rights compared to r/beatingwomen, r/jailbait and r/spacedicks."it seems that the majority of people lump mens rights with misogny and extreme conservatism. " And the truly ironic thing is that most people have no frickin' idea what they are talking about when they throw those words around. Very few people have any clear idea what those words actually mean. "Misogyny" is the worst. I have been called a "misogynist" a time or ten, and in every case, the person who flung the accusation was a complete emotional twit who could not intellectually justify what th… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/11 05:16 AM |
| -13 | Men's Rights compared to r/beatingwomen, r/jailbait and r/spacedicks.Another danger here is that "the movement" will gradually get infiltrated by "soft MRAs", and little by little watered down into something that you could almost call. . .ahem!. . . feminism. So we need to Keep It Radical . . . but we need to do this with class. The question is, how? I've been thinking about that problem for a long time. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/11 05:09 AM |
| -22 | Men's Rights compared to r/beatingwomen, r/jailbait and r/spacedicks."Mangina" is a good, red-blooded insult directed at male political traitors in particular, and in principle I see no objection to it. However, I do not use this term for stylistic reasons; it is too much of a cliche. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/11 05:04 AM |
| 1 | Agent Orange Files ReleasedI have been called a "misogynist" a fair number of times, but never did that accusation have a shred of intellectual truth about it -- the person was always an emotional ninny refusing to address the argument which I had carefully laid out. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 09:29 AM |
| 3 | Agent Orange Files ReleasedOh believe me, the rabbit hole goes way deeper than those "fifty" people. But the primary purpose behind all of this is to out the true character of feminism, and finally ram it into the heads of all the mental slowpokes, simpletons, fence-sitters, etc. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 09:19 AM |
| 0 | Agent Orange Files ReleasedTake it from us insiders, okay? We know what happens to "our people." | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 09:13 AM |
| 0 | Agent Orange Files ReleasedThey don't represent all feminists. They represent all feminISM. Do you get the distinction? The worst people within feminism define feminism as a whole. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 09:05 AM |
| 8 | Agent Orange Files Released"Falsely" accusing them? Then, you do not believe they are trying to start genocide? For the record, nobody has "accused" these people of anything. Their words have been exposed. That is all. And people are free to form their conclusions. It is imperative that the true nature of feminism be outed. And the present scandal could have that effect. At the very least, feminism will never be quite so smug and sassy again, after this little experience. If this episode puts feminism permanently ON THE D… | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 01:19 AM |
| -2 | Agent Orange Files ReleasedThe idea of this was to reveal the true nature of feminism to the world in a dramatic way. Hopefully, it will have that effect. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 01:13 AM |
| -11 | Agent Orange Files ReleasedBosh! Feminism IS WHAT IT IS. And if you want to know what feminism IS, then all you must do is look at the real world and SEE what it is. Where do feminists get this weird idea that they are the only ones authorized to say what feminism "IS"? The rest of the world can see what feminism is, very plainly, and their word carries weight. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 12:59 AM |
| -16 | Agent Orange Files ReleasedFeminism in its "true form". What kinda steaming horseplop is THAT? Reminds me of the "No True Scotsman" fallacy. FYI, feminism in its "true form" is what we can plainly SEE when we look at what is happening in the world. And if you have been paying attention, then you will SEE that it ain't pretty. "By their fruits ye shall know them." | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 12:54 AM |
| 5 | Agent Orange Files ReleasedThere is no "men's rights movement". It is WAY bigger than that, and it will just morph into a hundred new shapes anyway. The underlying energy cannot be contained. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 12:46 AM |
| -2 | Agent Orange Files ReleasedThen, your higher level truth would not include the idea of men having rights, I take it? | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 12:44 AM |
| 0 | Agent Orange Files ReleasedAll right, just to clear the record, what DO you think about innocent males going to prison? Do you figure that's okay? Do you figure it's "acceptable damage" in the service of some higher priority? What DO you think about this...eh? | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 12:24 AM |
| 2 | Agent Orange Files ReleasedReally, what the hell ARE you talking about. Show me where Snark said anything about molesting children, or STFU, fool! You're playing with hot water, you know that?? | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 12:22 AM |
| 8 | Agent Orange Files Released"Ohh boo fucking hoo. You really think this sub is the extent of the movement?" Thank you, thank you, thank you a thousand times, for stating what ought to be obvious, but for plenty of dimwits, evidently, is not. Yes, the "movement" is EVERYWHERE . . . . and thickening fast. There is no stopping it. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/11 12:15 AM |
| 1 | Women were not "oppressed" by non-voting status. Feminists need to STFU about that particular talking point.Nowadays, when households are fragmenting every which-ways, the idea of one vote per household is meaningless. 1 vote per household at least underpinned and underwrote the sanctitude and stability of such social units in the days when such things still existed. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/11 07:03 AM |
| 0 | Women were not "oppressed" by non-voting status. Feminists need to STFU about that particular talking point.Well sorry..."dude", but you are in no position to judge that. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/11 03:03 AM |
| 0 | Women were not "oppressed" by non-voting status. Feminists need to STFU about that particular talking point.Point taken. But branding it as "sexism" still has the ring of feminism. So this gets feminism off the hook. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/11 11:00 PM |
| -1 | Women were not "oppressed" by non-voting status. Feminists need to STFU about that particular talking point.It is currently considered oppression. People in other times and places could have viewed this differently. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/11 10:44 PM |
| 0 | Women were not "oppressed" by non-voting status. Feminists need to STFU about that particular talking point.And. . .? | /r/MensRights | 18/10/11 10:43 PM |
| -5 | Women were not "oppressed" by non-voting status. Feminists need to STFU about that particular talking point.Did you mean to say "because of your sex"? "Gender" is feminist lingo. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/11 10:39 PM |
| 3 | long time lurker , here is my storyHow would you know what non-feminists believe? That's a huge demographic, you know. | /r/MensRights | 16/10/11 07:13 AM |
| -4 | long time lurker , here is my story"Do we have to blame feminism for every bad thing that happens to men?" No, not every bad thing. I would say more like four-fifths of them. | /r/MensRights | 16/10/11 07:10 AM |
| 2 | Reflecting on the proposed Mommy salary...It is very basic. Feminism means the same thing as female supremacism. No more, no less. Whether the feminists like that or not. The rest is details. Makes life simple, doesn't it? | /r/MensRights | 16/10/11 06:20 AM |
| 1 | The phrase 'Men can stop rape' is a feminist mind game. Don't fall for it.Stop with all that ducking the issue about sending innocent people to prison against their will, etc... MRA's hate that, can't you see?! | /r/MensRights | 15/10/11 07:16 AM |
| 1 | The phrase 'Men can stop rape' is a feminist mind game. Don't fall for it.2 defective assertions. The first non-significant and unsupported. The second just unsupported. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/11 07:02 AM |
| 1 | Surprisingly intelligent cartoon from 4chan about the fallacy of extreme feminismAnything that will take the emphasis off of the word "men", and off the word "movement". It should be understood that feminism has transgressed against the rest of the world -- and not just against "men" (although that's a big part of it). | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 01:08 PM |
| 0 | Surprisingly intelligent cartoon from 4chan about the fallacy of extreme feminismYes, we all know that the human race has tons of problems. But the problem here is feminism. Feminism (as an ideology and as a movement) needs to be shut down and put out of business. That will solve a lot of problems all by itself. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 01:00 PM |
| 1 | Given that men die 5-7 years earlier than women, why are there no less than four Federal offices dedicated to women's health, but none dedicated to men?If we were living in normal times, that is how it would be. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 12:56 PM |
| 1 | Surprisingly intelligent cartoon from 4chan about the fallacy of extreme feminismWhat "movement" do you mean? Since when does objective description = fanatical or cult-like? And in a war, isn't the goal to defeat the enemy or something? Sincerely, a baffled non-feminist. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 12:55 PM |
| -3 | The phrase 'Men can stop rape' is a feminist mind game. Don't fall for it."I'm only just getting into feminism. " Then take my advice and get the hell out, NOW. And no, I will not cut you any slack, feminist. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/11 12:26 PM |
| 1 | The phrase 'Men can stop rape' is a feminist mind game. Don't fall for it.Everything you have said here is worthless twaddle which ducks the issue. Oh. . and don't feed us that fucking garbage about "rape culture"! We have heard it all before and it is getting very, very old. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/11 12:18 PM |
| 1 | All right, so men can stop rape. Your point please?How nice of Paul Elam to post this again after I did. The more the merrier! ;) | /r/MensRights | 07/10/11 08:01 PM |
| 1 | The phrase 'Men can stop rape' is a feminist mind game. Don't fall for it."Now, it's true I've never seen this phrase before . . " NEVER heard that one before? Do you live under a rock inside a cave by any chance? | /r/MensRights | 07/10/11 04:12 AM |
| 2 | It's shit like this Feminists (First post, not sure if a repost. I can't find it.)Women initiate divorce at the highest rate, and yet. . . men are still "afraid of commitment". Somebody get me out of this fucking rabbit hole, I can't take it any more. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/11 03:43 AM |
| 5 | Given that men die 5-7 years earlier than women, why are there no less than four Federal offices dedicated to women's health, but none dedicated to men?The takeaway point from all of this, is that women have it pretty damned good compared to men. So pay no attention to all the feminist claptrap about the oppression of women. As men collectively, we have no obligation toward women collectively. "Men collectively" is a mental spook. "Women collectively" is a mental spook. And you needn't worry your head about the relationship between one mental spook and another. And FEMINISM. . . is nothing but a political conjuring trick based upon mental spook… | /r/MensRights | 07/10/11 03:37 AM |
| 1 | Truly offensive article from JezebelLike saying that "men are a privileged group." Now THAT. . is an offensive generalization! | /r/MensRights | 06/10/11 11:03 PM |
| 2 | It's shit like this Feminists (First post, not sure if a repost. I can't find it.)"Well marriage isn't equivalent to actual commitment it's just vows of commitment." Twaddle! Tell me which shows more "commitment": getting married, or not getting married. Yes. Deciding to hitch yourself to a person for life, and then executing said decision, is "commitment". Don't tell me it ain't. We are fucking fed up with the feminist trope that "men are afraid of commitment", so knock that shit off. And I mean NOW! | /r/MensRights | 06/10/11 10:56 PM |
| 1 | The phrase 'Men can stop rape' is a feminist mind game. Don't fall for it.Howdy, ES Berkimer! :) | /r/MensRights | 06/10/11 09:18 PM |
| 4 | The phrase 'Men can stop rape' is a feminist mind game. Don't fall for it.Thank you for making the point that the phrase is pointless. But your endeavor was pointless. Heard of irony? | /r/MensRights | 06/10/11 09:11 PM |
| -2 | The phrase 'Men can stop rape' is a feminist mind game. Don't fall for it.Is it a NON-feminist mind game, then? Quit talking rubbish. And explain your analogy about "stopping dictatorship", because that too sounds like rubbish. In fact, you almost sound like a feminist. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/11 09:04 PM |
| -1 | Surprisingly intelligent cartoon from 4chan about the fallacy of extreme feminismPlease phase out the words "MRM" and "MRA", and seek alternative terminologies. These words encourage the feminists to fall into the crosshairs fallacy, which makes them feel smug about themselves. We want them, instead, to wander in a mental wilderness -- dazed and confused about the nature of the forces which are lining up against them. So please. . . vary your rhetoric. It will assist the cause more than you are presently aware. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/11 08:45 PM |
| 0 | 1 in 3 women in their lifetime are raped is a lie. Actually 1 in 8.Us vs. Them? You mean 'us' vs. feminism? Why, that is the whole point -- to perpetrate an "us vs. them" polarization. It's the only way to throw gravel under the spinning wheels. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/11 04:36 PM |
| -5 | NOW Applauds Diallo for Courage, Condemns Prosecutors, Defense and Media in DSK Case (Statement of NOW President Terry O'Neill)If you're so damned cool, best stop calling yourself a "feminist". Keep your belief system if you wish. . . but think of a different name for yourself. The word feminist is permanently tainted. Not unlike "national socialist". | /r/MensRights | 01/09/11 05:59 AM |
| 1 | This is the twisted mind of feminism: W+G=M, G > 0, but W = M??Pardon me for being a nit-picker, but ...um.... your ought to say "sex" instead of "gender". "Gender" is feminist lingo. We need to purge our vocabulary of their lingo (or else keep it but subvert it). | /r/MensRights | 01/09/11 05:53 AM |
| 3 | To the US guys in here: Did she really say that? and what was the reaction in your society?Hillary Clinton was not the first to make this statement. Feminists in earlier years have said similar; Hillary was echoing from the archive of stock sentiments. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/11 12:25 AM |
| 2 | Counter Feminist should be a Policy WonkFactory, I am glad to see that somebody (other than me) finds this relevant! | /r/MensRights | 27/07/11 12:18 AM |
| 17 | dissent within againstmensrights: "We should probably add that there are legitimate concerns about paternity law and hetero- and cis-normativism.""hetero" means heterosexual. "cis" means "not trans". You know, the vast majority of people. "normativism" means acting like you are the norm. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/11 01:00 PM |
| 3 | Ignore "againstmensrights"?"Feminism" is simply a word. And words, all by themselves, have no meaning. You must GIVE them a meaning. So, give the word 'feminism' a meaning. All 'feminists' who don't fit that meaning are free to find another word for themselves. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/11 03:38 AM |
| 1 | President of Men's Party in Switzerland Recieves Death Threats From FeministsFor that to happen, they would need to get apprehended. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/11 09:43 PM |
| 1 | President of Men's Party in Switzerland Recieves Death Threats From FeministsNah. It was "links-faschos" feminists and their pals. The same ones who "took it to the streets" in Zurich last year at the first IGAF meeting. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/11 09:42 PM |
| 2 | Do you believe that patriarchy exists?"Patriarchy" is a feminist codeword for "any form of male power." When they talk about getting rid of "patriarchy", they mean "empowering" women by removing power from men. Get the full details here: http://counterfem.blogspot.com/2006/11/what-they-dont-want-you-to-know.html | /r/MensRights | 05/07/11 09:36 PM |
| 1 | I would like to become more informed. Can anyone give me the names of some prominent Men's Rights Activists?check the following blogs: gynotheory.blogspot.com avoiceformen.com counterfem.blogspot.com mens-rights.blogspot.com | /r/MensRights | 03/07/11 02:20 AM |
| 2 | A Letter to Jessica ValentiOh my GAAAWWD! Not the friggin' dictionary fallacy!!! Listen...we don't look at dictionaries, we look at the REAL WORLD! Screw the g--damn dictionary! | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 08:09 AM |
| 2 | A Letter to Jessica ValentiCooperation with feminism is impossible because feminism IS female supremacism. And I for one cannot "cooperate" with female supremacism. I mean.. me being male and all... | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 07:45 AM |
| 2 | A Letter to Jessica ValentiIf you don't "buy" the us v. them model.... Then be prepared to live in the feminist category by DEFAULT. Either get off the fence...or you will be pushed off. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 07:42 AM |
| 1 | A Letter to Jessica ValentiWRONG. There are only two sides. Feminism. . . and non-feminism. Either you are a feminist. . . or you are not a feminist. There is NO middle ground. And remember -- non-feminism DEFINES feminism. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 07:39 AM |
| 11 | Two Feminist Fallacies: How feminists misunderestimate the Men's Rights movement"The feminists would argue that MRAs only care about raped men because they disprove feminist theory." The feminists only say THAT because it distracts from the fact that raped men really do disprove feminist theory. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/11 08:28 AM |
| 1 | If this subreddit is about equality...Oh...but feminism DOES mean something. It means <i>female supremacism</i>, very cleanly and precisely. I should know; I've written about this plenty. And so have others. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/11 12:23 AM |
| 2 | If this subreddit is about equality..."What about those of us who think that the use of hateful language, no matter the gender of the people involved, is not right?" Sigh...! This world is a rough-and-tumble place sometimes, and personally, I wouldn't have it any other way. If this disturbs you, then I'd advise you to stay in the parlour sipping tea with your sensitive, cultivated acquaintances. It takes all sorts, and the world is plenty big enough to accomodate. Would you care for some crumpets with that tea? | /r/MensRights | 06/06/11 12:13 AM |
| 0 | If this subreddit is about equality...Yes, an homogenous view of feminism IS the answer. We in the activated non-feminist sector are NOT impressed by that stale old tripe about "feminism is not monolithic". Feminism is very much indeed monolithic. It is a social organism (or mechanism) which operates according to a program. Your car is not "monolithic" -- the various devices under the hood differ greatly from each other: the radiator, the fuel pump, the water pump, etc etc. . . And yet, all of these parts are "monolithically" dedica… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/11 11:54 PM |
| 2 | Anti-Feminist Organization Inaugurated in Germany. Things are looking up!It makes just as much sense to say that the "MR movement" is "full of" some other category of people -- if you find such people in numbers. Besides that. . . there IS no "MR movement". There is a lot of confused motion. . . but hardly a "movement" in any way that I would recognize. Although I admit that I call it a "movement" sometimes for the sake of linguistic convenience. As for the IGAFD: I am going to agree that it is "men's rights plus", and that I would take issue with some of the 'plus' … | /r/MensRights | 10/04/11 12:55 AM |
| 1 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?Considering the number of feminists who drip man-hatred as venom from a cobra's fangs, I find it hard to support the idea that feminism has "very little to do with screwing over men on purpose." It has EVERYTHING to do with that. You need only look at the world with your own eyes, and SEE FOR YOURSELF what is happening. Feminism as a sociopolitical organism could not logically or structurally continue to exist without misandry as a motivating core. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/11 06:52 AM |
| 1 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?These do not DIRECTLY harm men, but then, you are looking at the world through a narrow cardboard tube. Feminism may be minimally defined as "the project to increase the power of women". Feminism ALSO seeks to damage men, but increasing the power of women is a constant -- since the more power women have, the less power men will have in proportion, and therefore, the more power (proportionally) women (read: feminists) will have to subjugate men. Go to gynotheory.blogspot.com and read everything y… | /r/MensRights | 21/02/11 06:34 AM |
| 1 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?The terminology is all in a tangle, so don't tangle your head too much trying to understand it. Basically, there are two positions to take: either feminist, or non-feminist. A wealth of detail unfolds from this -- most of it unnecessary. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/11 06:21 AM |
| -1 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?Nay. The healing process begins only AFTER the enemy quits lacerating your flesh. So, first the war. Then we'll talk about "healing". | /r/MensRights | 21/02/11 05:34 AM |
| 1 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?Would you care to suggest that appeasement and "acting nice" is the appropriate way to deal with a bully? How would playing nice with feminism enhance political viability and "advance the cause of men harmed" in the current (feminist) environment? Might it not be said that such a policy is what harmed those men in the first place? And so, will the leopard change its spots? | /r/MensRights | 21/02/11 05:22 AM |
| 1 | Mothers are the perpetrators in the vast majority of child murders.The injustice to men in this case is misandry. Any form of information that would clarify the actual percentage-wise distribution of bad behavior, rather than blaming everything on men as much as possible (in the feminist way) is both constructive and relevant. Anti-male propaganda must be countered by every means available. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/11 07:49 AM |
| 1 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?I will venture just a little bit for starters. Women are legally able to "opt out" of parenthood, but men are not. In what way does THAT fact operationalize the concept of "equality" in the context of reproductive rights? Parse the semantics if you are so inclined. . . | /r/MensRights | 20/02/11 03:01 AM |
| -2 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?I like your spirit. BTW. . I have been toying with the idea of starting a web forum with the expressed "mission" of establishing and propagating a particular doctrine and message discipline -- very much along the lines that you sketch here. The first plank in the platform would be, that "FEMINISM IS THE ENEMY -- and if you don't accept that for starters, why are you even here....?" It would not be a place for "open debate" -- but only debate within established parameters. Come to think of it, ex… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/11 02:49 AM |
| 0 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?Also, bear in mind that feminism is a sociopolitical organism greater than the sum of its parts. The best way I can put this is to modify a famous snippet by the feminist Susan Brownmiller, to read as follows: "The fact that some feminists are evil manhaters makes it unnecessary for all of them to be so." To get Brownmiller's original version, supply "rapists" for "evil manhaters." Capisch? | /r/MensRights | 20/02/11 02:23 AM |
| -1 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?If you mean to say that the original version (with "feminists") is equally absurd, then. . wrong. There are essential, structural qualitative differences between feminism and "MRAism", which invalidate the analysis you have attempted here. I would summarize it succinctly as follows: Both "movements" contain people who hate the opposite sex. Difference is, that if you removed all of the haters from feminism, then feminism would collapse and cease to exist. But if you removed the haters from the M… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/11 02:13 AM |
| 3 | Gynocentrism Theory - Lecture No. 7 -- Building the intellectual foundation for the liquidation of feminism.These uncompromising lectures will provide plenty of material to rectify the thinking of those who cannot or will not "get" that feminism is THE ENEMY. There is nothing quite like this in the entire body of MRA literature to date. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/11 06:11 AM |
| 1 | Gynocentrism Theory - Lecture No. 7 -- Building the intellectual foundation for the liquidation of feminism.If you are at all serious about "doing a number" on feminism, as an ideology and as a movement, then Adam Kostakis's weekly GC Theory Lectures are a must-read. Lecture No. 7 is presently at the top of the stack, but you can read the entire lot of them if you click the links in the sidebar. http://gynotheory.blogspot.com/2011/02/personal-as-contrasted-to-political.html | /r/MensRights | 19/02/11 06:00 AM |
| 0 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?I'm sure there is one to be found. Let's put it on our wish list, and stick it in our thinking caps.... | /r/MensRights | 19/02/11 03:07 AM |
| -1 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?The problem is, that the "pendulum" analogy is misleading in this case. If there is any so-called pendulum to be found, it exists only because somebody is proactively PULLING it back. It is not "swinging" back by any law inherent to itself. The innate tendency of feminism is to keep going and going and going like a runaway train. NOT a "pendulum" in any sense whatsoever. I would consider the following a "must read" -- but pay special attention to where he talks about the tri-partite division of … | /r/MensRights | 19/02/11 02:27 AM |
| -9 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?Rather than say feminist "policies", it is more fruitful to say feminist "tendencies". Consider the following items: VAWA, paternity fraud, false accusation of rape, false accusation of domestic violence, false accusation of child abuse, false accusation of sexual harassment, false domestic violence statistics, dishonest research methodologies, destruction of equal protection under law for men. . . and the list could go on. All of these items were either initiated, practiced or sanctioned by fem… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/11 02:15 AM |
| -1 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?Good point. See my previous remark, above. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/11 01:46 AM |
| 0 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?As far as I'm concerned, if ownership of the term 'equality' is to be assigned in any way at all, then it ought to go to the mathematicians. Only in the realm of math does the concept make any consistent, coherent sense. So my problem with "equality" is on semantic grounds. The whole idea is bullshit right from the root. In purely philosophical terms, "equality" is an essentially contested concept. Whenever you want to talk about "equality" in a non-mathematical context, you should stop and thin… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/11 01:36 AM |
| 1 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?Thank you for the clarification -- it conveys the world at least somewhat more toward a convergence of understanding. If you were to reframe your original question in light of the reply that you have just given me (so that my previous comment would be rendered unnecessary from the get-go), how might you compose this? I am curious. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/11 11:09 PM |
| -7 | Completely honest question... isn't thinking all feminists are misandrists just as bad as thinking all MRAs are misogynists?The question is, who is actually thinking that? The question you have framed here is rather close to being a strawman. Did somebody say that "ALL" feminists are misandrists? Well I, for one, never said that. The actual truth is more complex and subtle. The actual truth is that feminism is a sociopolitical organism, and like all organisms it is composed of separate parts with separate functions that are nonetheless united by an underlying organic purpose. So I think it is more illuminating to say… | /r/MensRights | 18/02/11 10:16 PM |
| 2 | groundbreaking AAUW report: "How Schools Shortchange girls"-biased, half-true, and suppressive of undesired evidence.This is evidence against feminism. Proof that feminists lie, and hugely. That is what counts here. Some of you people need to lay off the red herrings. Seriously. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/11 03:39 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter