TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fluviant Archive

View 5 posts and 971 comments by fluviant on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
459

Red Pill Theoryfluviant/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 12:14 PM
133

Red Pill Examplefluviant/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 08:58 AM
79

Red Pill Theoryfluviant/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 03:50 AM
17

Metafluviant/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 12:59 AM
13

fluviant/r/MarriedRedPill28/02/15 01:59 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Having to pay to fulfill your needs as opposed to fulfilling them on your own terms.
/r/askTRP23/07/17 08:09 AM
3

Stop caring. You text her because you're going to fuck her. That's all that matters.
/r/askTRP23/07/17 07:40 AM
1

No.
/r/askTRP23/07/17 07:39 AM
2

It would be "yes," you faggot. Respect the innocence of children. None of that weird shit about open relationships -- that's degenerate as fuck. Why do you care what a stupid plate thinks? You control the cards, not her. Whatever your explanation, she'll have to live with it.
/r/askTRP23/07/17 07:39 AM
5

Break up with her. She cares more about parties than your "relationship." She's not LTR material. She's plate material at best. Go spit some game and make some sluts swoon. You're enforcing your own prison with this chick.
/r/askTRP23/07/17 07:36 AM
-1

She's suckering you into being her beta bitch. The rule-of-thumb is that you should have an n-count of around 20 (to accumulate enough experience) for an LTR.
/r/askTRP23/07/17 07:35 AM
1

Why are you trying to plate up a bartender? This is literally the worst target. Basically every guy who orders a drink from her tries to flirt with her. You're fighting a losing battle. Stop.
/r/askTRP23/07/17 07:34 AM
12

I understand where you're confused. You think she's genuinely attracted to your beta attributes. The truth, as harsh as it is, is that she's pretending to like your beta attributes. And she's doing so in order to keep the benefits of you and your commitment around. Let me unfuck your mind. Women don't like betas. They use them.
/r/askTRP23/07/17 07:30 AM
-3

Steroids = cheating = crutch. Doing steroids is like paying prostitutes in order to get laid.
/r/askTRP23/07/17 07:27 AM
3

This isn't a matter of "thinking about it."
/r/askTRP28/01/17 04:31 AM
6

First off, drop all emoticons. They're for women. You want to give your texts the plausible deniability of command. Thanks but I tried that, when you're in early 20s girls often make of it that you're butthurt so I mostly use 1 per message. Moderation. You say this like I'm not also in my early 20s. Drop the emoticons already, faggot. You'll thank me later. The Tinder -> WhatsApp conundrum is you being neurotic. Use the OODA loop instead of sperging out because she didn't follow every letter of …
/r/askTRP28/01/17 04:11 AM
1

Lift, faggot.
/r/askTRP28/01/17 04:05 AM
1

Women aren't beta. They're just women. Expect them to act like women.
/r/askTRP28/01/17 04:04 AM
2

Nature would dictate that this is the point when you begin having kids that you can enjoy raising. That you would be able to take joy in more than just the pussy she has to offer. So no, I don't think this is abnormal. But you have to realize what it is you're internally, deep-down desiring.
/r/askTRP28/01/17 04:00 AM
-7

You're not doing yourself any favors here. You have to brush women's actions off as those of a petulant child. There's no other way of "winning" or saving face. Moreover, the way to overcome this is with a shitlord grin. Not a haughty post about how "I'm giving up like a pussy and going MGTOW."
/r/TheRedPill28/01/17 03:47 AM
3

No, it really doesn't seem like an IOI. That being said, you should treat any and all interactions you have with women as full-on IOIs. That'll net you more pussy than "correctly identifying proper IOIs." Always assume the sale. Women are attracted to men who do that.
/r/askTRP28/01/17 03:43 AM
3

One thing you learn by going through the redpilling process is that you can't be both redpilled and liberal. Cops are not pigs. They preserve law and order. Move to America. Trump is causing a large demand for law enforcement officers.
/r/askTRP28/01/17 03:41 AM
1

No, it's not too late. Take control over yourself and your emotions; you come across as neurotic as a woman fawning over a Chad alpha.
/r/askTRP28/01/17 03:39 AM
6

First off, drop all emoticons. They're for women. You want to give your texts the plausible deniability of command. Second, don't let her have rule over your emotions. Being "glad" because of something she does shows that she has control over you. Try this template of text responses: "Stop [doing xyz]." This makes her assume a defensive crouch, and women want to be defensive. They want to be overpowered. They don't want to be predators; they want to be preyed upon, by strong males. So, in this c…
/r/askTRP28/01/17 03:35 AM
-11

This hissy fit makes you sound like a fucking faggot. Giving up on women over a misunderstanding? Can't get more estrogenic than that.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/17 03:27 AM
4

"She wants to take it slow no biggies'' I said to myself. Erase this justification from your mind. Would she want to take it slow if it were Brad Pitt trying to penetrate her? tl;dr You were her rebound. You did good by denying. If she doesn't crack after two weeks of NC, then she was just toying with you in the pre-NC phase anyways.
/r/askTRP27/10/16 01:25 AM
1

Appreciate the shoutout, bud. /u/redpillschool's comment here is very pertinent to that post. A bit reactive in that I was reflecting on what did and did not work, but I am glad to see someone drawing value from it.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/16 01:16 AM
19

You do not stop a woman from falling in love with you. Rather, you learn how to navigate the choppy waters of a woman fighting for reciprocity of her love for you.
/r/askTRP23/10/16 12:27 AM
8

You're literally a cuckold. You are anathema to everything TRP. Fuck out of here.
/r/askTRP25/09/16 02:54 AM
2

This. Fraternity is key.
/r/askTRP25/09/16 02:50 AM
5

Terrible troll attempt you fucking loser.
/r/askTRP25/09/16 02:48 AM
1

It probably transcends this. My money's on him being a faggot.
/r/askTRP25/09/16 02:44 AM
1

My bad. I thought you had an actual problem.
/r/askTRP30/07/16 03:10 AM
0

Do not shit where you eat.
/r/askTRP30/07/16 02:49 AM
5

Tinder "The Talk" Yeah, she's FWB material. Keep on keepin' on. Though it would be helpful to know what your end-goals are. In any case, you handled this like a textbook plate-spinner.
/r/askTRP30/07/16 02:29 AM
3

I like this response.
/r/askTRP30/07/16 02:02 AM
3

No idea what it even is, but can you use it and then reply "oops, disregard that superlike, meant to use it on another chick"?
/r/askTRP30/07/16 02:01 AM
1

"before I got a chance to ask her number" Learn from your mistakes. You hesitated. And now you're paying for it. She's not interested. Especially since you Facebook creeped her. EDIT: In terms of being active, your only shot is a Hail Mary. "Give me your number already. I'm going to take you to <x> on <y-date> so we can <z> <and then fuck in a hotel room like rabbits>."
/r/askTRP30/07/16 01:56 AM
3

Flirt with more girls. Flirt with multiple girls at once. Flirt as often as you can.
/r/askTRP30/07/16 01:49 AM
2

There is a truism you will come to value when seeking out LTR material: "You are the average of your five closest friends."
/r/askTRP30/07/16 01:44 AM
1

Dude what the fuck. /r/altTRP
/r/askTRP30/07/16 01:42 AM
2

Depends on your style of game. I tend to deflect it with something along the lines of, "that's funny, I can read you like an open book." This gets the hamster goin'. Very fun to toy with.
/r/askTRP30/07/16 01:40 AM
2

You've got it all wrong. Men separate love from sex. Women use sex to get love.
/r/askTRP30/07/16 01:38 AM
1

Instantly. CH maxim. Do your reading.
/r/askTRP22/06/16 02:06 AM
3

With that out of the way, I told this girl I work with that it was her turn to talk, since she always makes me talk to her. Cuck alert. Suck fewer miles of cock per day, and then try again.
/r/askTRP05/06/16 03:33 AM
1

"It's complicated."
/r/askTRP05/06/16 12:56 AM
5

Professional engineering is diametric to academic engineering. The people you'll be working under will be expecting to teach you a bunch, and they know that. As much as you don't want to hear this, my best suggestions is that you take mental notes of what your mentors tell you during the day, write them down the minute after work is out (they'll probably still be there, but you're officially "off the hook") and then study them at home. One of your mentors telling you about supply chain? Agree, b…
/r/askTRP05/06/16 12:54 AM
2

He's engineering. He's making at least $15/hr at his internship.
/r/askTRP05/06/16 12:47 AM
1

This is a good answer. I'd rather just call him a buttmad faggot.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/16 12:44 AM
0

Tell her why you don't want kids you fucking autist.
/r/askTRP30/05/16 12:05 AM
1

"Watch out, she gave me herpes."
/r/askTRP29/05/16 11:44 PM
2

Terdmuffin nails it.
/r/askTRP29/05/16 11:20 PM
9

I texted her asking if everything was okay? This is where you fucked up. Should have gone and hit on some other biddies in the joint. I sent her a text back telling her to let me know if she needs anything. Don't. Waste of time. As you've learned... More time passes by, and im getting upset now What for? You've got hot women all around you. Then texted her that i was leaving Third strike, bud. This is classic beta. hope everything gets better with her friend My bad, fourth strike. As regards you…
/r/askTRP17/04/16 03:44 AM
2

Finally.
/r/askTRP17/04/16 02:46 AM
1

School of hard knocks. Practice and learn from your embarrassing failures and mistakes. There is no magic wand you can wave in order to become good at texting.
/r/askTRP12/04/16 10:04 PM
10

Get better at text game then. Two weeks of radio silence and she will forget about you. She'll flake. Women operate on emotions, and the only way to get them to go out and meet up with you is by making them feel like they want to. Not with logistics.
/r/askTRP12/04/16 02:02 AM
9

That's an outmoded truth from the beginnings of PUA in the early- to mid-2000s. No longer true when the vast majority of women are glued to their phones all day every day.
/r/askTRP12/04/16 01:53 AM
7

I disagree and always have with that notion. Hop on the main TRP sub's IRC and you'll catch some good text game advice.
/r/askTRP12/04/16 01:50 AM
3

Women get fucked from behind. All they see is pillow.
/r/askTRP12/04/16 01:43 AM
1

Neither of the two caricatures you ask about would have to ask this question. No less to an anonymous internet forum.
/r/askTRP12/04/16 01:43 AM
9

Text game can be a powerful tool to keep the flames stoked. Don't let the fire burn out.
/r/askTRP12/04/16 01:41 AM
2

Having female friends is cuck behavior. Someday you'll be preaching what I am. Experience is the best tutor.
/r/askTRP10/04/16 04:22 AM
2

You're missing the forest for the trees.
/r/askTRP10/04/16 02:19 AM
2

If he likes wearing dresses then he should enjoy it. Period
/r/askTRP10/04/16 02:15 AM
3

Bingo. Dude got bitched up by his plate.
/r/askTRP10/04/16 02:09 AM
2

CH Commandments, brother. Punish swiftly, reward slowly. Set boundaries when wrong behavior has been committed for the first time. You should not back down and "maintain frame and act like her behavior is not bothering you" if she knows that she's crossing one of the boundaries you've set up. That's her way of stamping all over your rules and you taking it like a grade A cuck. For the small things, like her throwing a temper tantrum over you leaving the toilet seat up, then act unfazed.
/r/askTRP10/04/16 02:07 AM
2

This sort of relativism is toxic. "Who cares if my wife's son wears dresses? If he enjoys it then I'm ok with it."
/r/askTRP10/04/16 02:01 AM
1

Female friends don't exist. Get this idea out of your head. Unless you enjoy shopping for shoes and gossiping about boys, women are not your friends. Read The Way of Men by Jack Donovan.
/r/askTRP10/04/16 02:00 AM
3

Didn't read your wall of text, but I want to tell you that practicing TRP and your personal flavor of game does not necessitate that you approach. Yes, you should approach, but you can dip your toes in the water while off-duty by flirting with chicks in your inner circle. Monitor how they respond to you and use that to calibrate.
/r/askTRP10/04/16 01:58 AM
1

This series by Occam is pivotal. It's LTR 101.
/r/askTRP10/04/16 01:54 AM
1

Your post and question suck shit. Put in more effort in conveying what you want to know, why you're asking, etc., and you'll get genuine answers. "Should I LTR a hot babe?" without any context whatsoever is not helpful to anyone.
/r/askTRP10/04/16 01:53 AM
1

If this is what you think qualifies as a valid question on this sub, then not only are you vastly underqualified to manage an LTR, but you also have a lot of work to do in general.
/r/askTRP09/04/16 01:30 AM
2

I'd go with YouTube videos instead of books. See what's natural and what works as opposed to reading it. I don't have any links, but there are likely plenty of PUA videos on this exact subject.
/r/askTRP07/04/16 03:30 AM
2

Social dominance. Which includes mastering body language and the commanding presence of an alpha male.
/r/askTRP07/04/16 03:20 AM
2

I'd rather not give this guy the option of rationalizing. It's better that he initially be bullish and make his girlfriend beg him than for him to "understand" that he got it from the pre-LTR chick and is fine and dandy with his current LTR. Even if it appeared months later, he's not guilty of anything. This all being said, he's still a fucking doofus for fucking a slut raw.
/r/askTRP07/04/16 03:18 AM
2

Monk mode is a way for newbies to rationalize inaction. Best to not understand it -- it's detrimental to improving social skills and skills with women.
/r/askTRP07/04/16 03:12 AM
2

After the "yikes" shit test, you should have A&A'd. "Don't pretend like you don't like it. Send me some pics so we can make this fast." Instead, you asked her for permission for you to be dominant the way you had been. That's where you failed. Also, /u/Colossus_of_Clout is a colossus of faggotry. I disagree with every egg-shell-stepping word he said. Tell women they're obedient to you. Except don't back down next time -- double down instead.
/r/askTRP07/04/16 03:10 AM
1

Have you ever had it?
/r/askTRP07/04/16 03:05 AM
2

To what end? End it now. You know where you got it from. Enjoy as many women as you can instead of enduring this unnecessary duress.
/r/askTRP07/04/16 03:02 AM
2

Very unlikely to take months to show up, even if theoretically possible.
/r/askTRP07/04/16 03:00 AM
2

TRUMP.
/r/askTRP02/04/16 03:06 AM
2

Drop her now before she cucks you. You're a fucking idiot for knowingly going into this with all the red flags. You cannot undo red flags. The term "damaged goods" has been around for generations for a reason.
/r/askTRP02/04/16 02:32 AM
2

How will you explain to your kids that their mother fucked random guys and smoked weed to cope with her ex breaking up with her, but was fine with settling for their father?
/r/askTRP30/03/16 04:16 AM
1

Moving into the actual city, or into a 'burb of the tri-state area?
/r/askTRP28/03/16 01:31 AM
1

Comfort test. You did fine, but you could do better. /u/surfq summarized this all very well. Only thing I would add is that you should entertain it like a shit test until she expresses sincere insecurity, and then go into comfort mode. She wants to know that you, as her boyfriend, have more tact than to whimsically fuck any chick who shows interest in you. Let her know you can get ass, but show that you have restraint above all. And comfort her with that. In the end, women want to feel desired b…
/r/askTRP26/03/16 05:40 AM
1

Let me start this off properly: You faggot. What in your "text game" there would incite her to want to fuck you? You sound like a god damn retard. She gave you a fake number because you gave definitively zero tingles. Work on your text game. N-close on a high note, not on a lame lull in a text convo.
/r/askTRP26/03/16 05:27 AM
1

You persisted when she was trying to have a laugh. Entertain and A&A. From there, you can close.
/r/askTRP26/03/16 05:24 AM
5

We all get whisky dick. Try drinking less next time you're out. And/or try nofap.
/r/askTRP26/03/16 05:13 AM
2

Pay for the dues by being a barista.
/r/askTRP26/03/16 05:12 AM
4

Would you put a bumper sticker on a Ferrari? That's my personal take. Whatever your choice, make sure to play Mr. Juxtaposition with your tat(s).
/r/askTRP26/03/16 05:00 AM
1

Be a barista. It's worth it.
/r/askTRP26/03/16 04:58 AM
2

Yes.
/r/askTRP26/03/16 04:58 AM
1

Sounds like she's proud of your masculinity and wants you to always have a space that's, more or less, "anti"-domestic. A rugged place for a beast to reside in, too dangerous for the likes of women and children.
/r/MarriedRedPill24/03/16 10:16 PM
2

https://fluviant.wordpress.com/2015/02/15/the-way-of-the-hirsute/
/r/askTRP21/03/16 01:56 AM
2

Say to him, "It really turns me on when you <do blank x/y/z>," like "take control," or "fuck me really hard," or "treat me like a fuckragdoll." Whichever suits your fancy.
/r/askTRP19/03/16 04:55 AM
1

You have faggy oneitis. Didn't even read your post. "HB10" = oneitis. Get over it. There are millions of hot women out there. Get over yourself.
/r/askTRP19/03/16 04:48 AM
4

Then promptly disqualify yourself from this conversation. The context is an LTR, which you admit you don't care to preserve. You'd rather be cheated on than preserve an LTR, after all.
/r/askTRP19/03/16 04:42 AM
9

I saw multiple paragraphs. And I decided not to read. This is a oneitis case. Next her. Find new poon.
/r/askTRP19/03/16 04:37 AM
3

You're not very idgaf if you give a fuck about who she fucks.
/r/askTRP19/03/16 04:35 AM
2

You're so totally right, like if she fucks another dude, she's just expanding her horizons, and any dude who contests that is just so totally insecure about his sexuality.
/r/askTRP19/03/16 04:29 AM
0

This only shows how inexperienced you are.
/r/askTRP19/03/16 04:28 AM
3

"Bro, she just fucked another dude, like literally you need help if you are this worried over it." We call this "reductio ad absurdum" typically.
/r/askTRP19/03/16 04:23 AM
4

Both /u/Apexk9 and /u/Gawernator gave bad answers. Don't listen to these fools. Let me condense what happened here: 1.) You made a command 2.) Your LTR heard your command 3.) Your LTR chose to disobey your command 4.) Your LTR chose to parade her disobedience It seems like your "leverage" over your LTR is nonexistent. Perhaps some Dread Game? We aren't working with much here.
/r/askTRP19/03/16 04:17 AM
4

Turn to the others, "Ooooh, I think this one's hitting on me, hahaha."
/r/askTRP19/03/16 04:12 AM
1

Literally why do you give a fuck.
/r/askTRP15/03/16 03:45 AM
1

I operate in an almost Pavlovian way -- laid-back Lothario until a line is crossed. Should that happen, the foot is put down. I show her that it's in her best interest to not test me.
/r/askTRP05/03/16 09:10 PM
2

I don't invest in women. The context here is an LTR. Are you going to argue that you don't or wouldn't invest in an LTR?
/r/askTRP05/03/16 03:10 AM
1

You need to read up on LTR Game. With LTRs, you need to be the authoritarian, not the laid-back Lothario. You overreacted, but it's better to be too bold than not enough. Your issue here is that you are operating on covert contracts. You need to establish hard and fast rules -- delete/block all male contacts in her phone who aren't regular work/professional acquaintances.
/r/askTRP05/03/16 03:02 AM
3

There's a line to be drawn between being aloof and being cucked.
/r/askTRP05/03/16 02:59 AM
2

Even if you're not being cucked in this exact scenario, she already has you pegged (heh) as a cuck in her mind. Two guys and a girl is a train, not a threesome.
/r/askTRP05/03/16 02:57 AM
1

The Fate of Empires by Sir John Glubb. You'll enjoy it.
/r/askTRP05/03/16 02:54 AM
0

One could argue that we're locking TRP into classical liberalism, actually. Whether or not this harsh reality we call TRP lines up with a certain political ideology is inconsequential to TRP in and of itself. It merely paints a more favorable picture of that ideology for those of us who adhere to TRP. We are witnessing that bridge being connected, which is what I alluded to in my prior comment. I've held for a while now that TRPers will tend towards the right, and they will do so of their own vo…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/16 02:53 PM
31

I knew TRP would head into this territory someday. Great post. This sort of attitude and mentality is spreading like wildfire. The emperor has no clothes.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 08:54 PM
7

Thanks. Unfortunately, it's the rampant faggotry exhibited here that whittles away at my desire to help these guys out.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 08:39 PM
6

Yet you continually prove my point. Think about how you're responding and read into what I'm saying. The pill is hard to swallow and you're showcasing a psychological block here.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 06:03 PM
4

I might? Or I am? What is your opinion? Talk to me straight. I'm not going to try to read your mind like you're a woman hinting at something. Tell me what you fucking think. You're making excuses for your sarcasm while using sarcasm. Complete estrogenic behavior.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 05:22 PM
6

Everything about it is feminine. Women operate heavily on the use of sarcasm. Imagine a boss who gives you straight talk versus uses sarcasm often -- which would you respect more? At least in the context of attempting to make a logical point, it's one of the least masculine ways you could do so. Think about it at its core. Instead of outlining explicitly what you believe, you instead jab at the premise with enough plausible deniability to back out if someone calls you out. "I was just joking, br…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 03:00 PM
1

Treat your life like a never-ending college education. Be a read man. Be a learned man. Always strive to improve yourself. On the job, your smarts coupled with skills will launch you up the ladder. Think of it like branch-swinging. Get to the top in your current workplace, then after gaining experience, apply elsewhere and network. Be highly sociable. Present yourself in a highbrow manner around those of high status. They'll ring you in as one of their own if you're personable enough. That's wha…
/r/askTRP27/02/16 02:02 AM
2

Ben Shapiro is an absolute genius, but I really wish he wasn't so gung-ho against Trump. It's ironic in that it shows a glimpse into his "Jewish privilege" that he doesn't see the appeal of him.
/r/askTRP27/02/16 01:55 AM
-9

Sarcasm is feminine. You'd do well in life to severely limit it. Talk to us like you're a man, not a child.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 01:49 AM
3

To me, it reads like she is nostalgic over the long-lost, forlorn "gender roles" that women actually desire. But all these anger phase fellas just want to get their rocks off to this anti-egalitarian/-feminism circlejerk.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/16 11:13 PM
3

There's not a universal rhetoric that makes a man, but there is rhetoric that assertive men tend towards.
/r/askTRP28/01/16 01:51 AM
4

I was sizing your bitch-ass up, that's all. In the end, I'm here to help. My life experience has taught me that I grew much greater from getting my ass kicked than coddled. I mentor and advise accordingly.
/r/askTRP28/01/16 01:39 AM
3

Analyze how you responded to me in your two posts. Perhaps, I am disgusted by the lack of dominance and control that I show Knee-jerk reactions about how an EC is "uneducated and insecure" -- you know this isn't true. It's a defense mechanism of yours. This is not who you want to be. Fix it. You need to read up on masculinity as a concept. You have very feminine tendencies. One book I typically recommend is The Way of Men by Jack Donovan. I have also heard very good reviews from other respected …
/r/askTRP28/01/16 01:25 AM
4

You might be a faggot.
/r/askTRP28/01/16 12:51 AM
6

Hardly. The first time you drink alcohol, how much do you have before you get drunk? If you drink every night, how much do you need to drink to get drunk? If you relapse after years of sobriety, how much do you need? If you live life as a beta, you are desensitized to being one. Expunging beta from your life will give you a much greater sensitivity to being beta. Even the slightest whiff of beta will send a jolt to your brain and make you straighten the fuck up.
/r/askTRP28/01/16 12:47 AM
5

You're going into it with a loser mindset if your question is, "how do I survive it," as opposed to, "how much money should I expect them to offer me?"
/r/askTRP28/01/16 12:43 AM
2

Hmm, Jenny, good question. I can't possible imagine what that could ever possibly maybe have a slight chance of insinuating.
/r/askTRP28/01/16 12:23 AM
8

This, hahaha. Females are for fucking, not friendship. Uncuck yourself and get some real male friends.
/r/askTRP28/01/16 12:21 AM
29

Sex God Method. Read it. She'll be begging to suck you off.
/r/askTRP28/01/16 12:19 AM
22

It means you're being a little bitch by engaging her in an argument and being so beta that you think logic can change a woman's opinion. Man up and put this chick in her fucking place hard. She's begging you to dominate her.
/r/askTRP28/01/16 12:13 AM
0

I'm under the impression that the basics for LTRs (SMV ratio, N count, etc.) are well established within the sidebar here and on the main sub, and that they're implicit knowledge. I appreciate you clarifying if that's not the case. I don't want to mislead the average FNG into thinking he can master an LTR. The OP seemed to have most of the prerequisites going for him, however.
/r/askTRP24/01/16 03:51 PM
12

Master LTR Game. I sense that you want either "more of a challenge" (which is something that will fulfill you, as you are expanding your experience and knowledge), or you want at last a woman who adds value to your life. I was in your shoes not too long ago. Getting sex is too fucking easy. It's meaningless. There's no reward. Learning woman management is a far greater reward. It brings you one step closer to building your empire.
/r/askTRP24/01/16 01:19 AM
3

It's not a personal attack. It's a description of the reaction.
/r/askTRP23/01/16 02:17 AM
10

Your attachment to your ex is because you feel deep down that she has some sort of meaning and purpose in your life. And the crux of that feeling is that she has influence over your life. Emphasis on feeling. I'm sure you're used to TRP ragging on "feefees," but emotions are essential to human nature. I won't deny that you may feel this way about her. However, that doesn't negate the fact that you, as a man, are responsible for detaching your happiness from your emotions. You should gauge your h…
/r/askTRP23/01/16 02:15 AM
1

Didn't read your post, only the title. I had the same "issue" as you when I first started my TRP journey. The way I flipped it in my favor was by being unrelenting. I didn't hide my memory. I remember way-too-fucking-much, especially about people. One slogan I learned very quickly that turned this into something rather sexual was, "I forgive, but I never forget." That piques women interest as to how you remember seemingly mundane things. It frames your memory as a tool for achieving your goals i…
/r/askTRP23/01/16 02:08 AM
5

No, it just makes you creepy and socially maladjusted as fuck.
/r/askTRP23/01/16 02:03 AM
4

There's only one real answer here. Stop being such a fucking faggot. You're not over your ex because you don't feel, deep down, that women are inferior to you. You still think you're inferior to them. That's the crux of the issue.
/r/askTRP23/01/16 02:01 AM
2

You're correct. Looks like this subreddit has become awash with guys new to the game who pack on like the rest of reddit.
/r/askTRP10/01/16 03:02 PM
1

I'm simply trying to light a fire under your ass. You've got to be apathetic and realize sexual strategy is amoral. Cut ties permanently and leave it in the past. She cheated on you, and that's a reflection of you and your ability, unfortunately. Don't welcome such negativity back into your life. There will be an endless supply of women so long as you're a top dog. Remember that.
/r/askTRP10/01/16 03:00 PM
-1

You sound like a guy who hasn't read the sidebar yet. Get reading, Bambi.
/r/askTRP10/01/16 02:41 AM
1

So prove me wrong.
/r/askTRP10/01/16 02:37 AM
1

You're a cuck. You'll get over it. Step 1: stop being such a flaming fucking faggot. Men have zero remorse for failures like you.
/r/askTRP10/01/16 02:26 AM
-3

You seem to not have a good understanding of Ramsay. He may not be archetypical DT, but he's got at least 2 of the 3 boxes ticked off. The man is one to idolize.
/r/askTRP10/01/16 02:23 AM
9

Perhaps you need to read about stoicism. Perhaps you need to stop being a pussy. Man the fuck up. You're your only obstacle.
/r/askTRP10/01/16 02:21 AM
2

Internalize this concept: every woman you ever come across is internally begging to throat your cock, and they can't help but show IOIs at every corner. This is the attitude you should exude.
/r/askTRP02/01/16 02:02 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M37HHf099oM
/r/askTRP02/01/16 02:00 AM
13

She probably had another boytoy there whom she introduced as her "boyfriend."
/r/askTRP14/12/15 01:33 AM
1

You're a loser and need to get out of this LTR.
/r/askTRP14/12/15 01:30 AM
5

This is like asking someone who gives you a full toolbox, "Why are hammers better than screwdrivers?"
/r/askTRP14/12/15 01:28 AM
3

Yeah, this kid sounds like an absolute faggot.
/r/askTRP14/12/15 01:26 AM
1

Even if 100% she was raped against her will. As in she hated every second of it. I would absolutely motherfucking leave her.
/r/askTRP05/12/15 04:48 AM
3

You need to go to /r/marriedredpill.
/r/askTRP29/11/15 02:52 AM
6

You've got a lot of work to do if you can't even reframe this situation. FYI, she told you to your face that you're her betabux. Time to instill some dread, bud.
/r/askTRP29/11/15 12:25 AM
18

The IQ "standard" is based on American/Westerners' IQ levels. If that doesn't suffice, I'll put it this way: We're comparing 1993 Honda Civics to Shelby GT500's.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 05:17 AM
-2

The guy was running from a cop. If he had cooperated form the get-go and accepted his fate, which was borne from his failure to renew his inspection sticker, this would not have happened. Her actions are not justified, but this stupid fucking moron thought it was a good idea to resist arrest and flee from law enforcement. Most of the commentariat in this thread screaming "police state"/"police brutality" are idiots. I suppose cops should just play paddycake with criminals until they finally subm…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/15 06:55 PM
2

Square up, bruh.
/r/askTRP06/11/15 03:01 AM
1

You've gotta set up your LTR (the relationship, not the woman) in order to accommodate cheating. You might have dun goof'd by now. For example, if you said to her, "gonna hang with the boys tonight and watch the game," would she be able to find out you're blatantly lying, by checking Facebook/social media/texting/etc? She should not be involved with your inner circle of male friends. She has no business there. It's fine for her to meet them and such, but you are the only vehicle through which sh…
/r/askTRP06/11/15 02:59 AM
1

So change it.
/r/askTRP27/10/15 04:58 AM
2

Is she actively trying to impress you? If no, soft next. Does she act unruly/disrespectful? Hard next.
/r/askTRP27/10/15 04:53 AM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTZ6hBi9lws
/r/askTRP27/10/15 03:27 AM
1

Stop trying to dupe yourself into wanting this. You know you don't want it. Six months down the line and you'd resent the everloving FUCK out of her for being with 11 dudes before you.
/r/askTRP27/10/15 03:26 AM
3

...You've got oneitis for a flake. Next.
/r/askTRP27/10/15 02:56 AM
1

Is this even a question? This is validation-seeking unless you're day 1 TRP-retarded. Welcome to reality.
/r/askTRP27/10/15 02:56 AM
2

Single-arm dumbbell preacher curls. 4x10 each arm. Source: 19" arms.
/r/askTRP27/10/15 02:54 AM
1

I'm in the same age bracket as you. I'm not going to White Knight you, but it's not that hard. Here's what's happening: you're clinging onto a glimmer of hope. Don't get duped by it. Read the RPW sub for examples -- there are women out there who don't want to entertain the pump-n-dump lifestyle of so many co-eds. Be diligent, have fun, don't stifle yourself. You gotta take advantage of your situation. But be on the lookout for a chick who espouses the traits you desire. You are the only one who …
/r/askTRP27/10/15 02:52 AM
3

11 fucks at 18 = insta-nope. I'm not trying to grandstand here, either. This is an absolute deal-breaker. You need to read up more on LTRs. Check /u/OccamsUsername for exemplar posts on LTRs.
/r/askTRP27/10/15 02:21 AM
3

He's right, but he's pumping estrogen through his pores. The RPW sub uses this analogy quite often -- that's where I personally first heard about it. MRP also uses it often. It's a good analogy. Whether or not you're trying to claim IP on it is moot. In any case, it's good to see a quality post like this. LTR Game is underrated, despite being the apex of a man's ability to manage a woman ("this isn't even my final form" comes to mind).
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 12:08 AM
1

I don't care what the fuck you feel. Are you majoring in STEM? If you're in your first year or two, switch to engineering NOW. Study math. Study physics. Train your mind to think like an engineer's. Succeed. This is what will determine your fate.
/r/askTRP25/10/15 02:30 AM
2

You do what you want. Fuck her like you hate her (S/O Borgore) and then cuddle the shit outta her. No ragrets.
/r/askTRP25/10/15 02:14 AM
7

I like to juxtapose general aloofness when not post-sex with close affection post-sex. Reward her with cuddling after sex. You will risk her asking for the upgrade eventually, but you'll also seduce the hell out of her. Rough sex with cuddling afterwords is three shots of dopamine to the female brain.
/r/askTRP24/10/15 09:29 PM
2

Did not read your post, only the title. If you're worrying about "blowing it with this girl," you've already lost. Sorry, champ.
/r/askTRP24/10/15 09:25 PM
4

I don't think any women are hot bros.
/r/askTRP24/10/15 01:56 PM
4

Here's what I'm picking up on: this is less about the overarching moral dilemma of cheating, and more about the fact that you were not ready to cheat. In a sense, you got dragged out of your own frame by this chick you wanted to bang. Now, you're regretting it. The roles are absolutely 100% reversed. You need to use this experience to forge your character into one with stronger willpower. If you're going to cheat, do it right. With everything, do not half-ass it, and do not go into uncharted ter…
/r/askTRP24/10/15 01:03 PM
4

This belongs in /r/altTRP To address your question to the best of my ability, men recognize and establish a social hierarchy within their immediate gang of men. You should pick up The Way of Men by Jack Donovan. Excellent book. The man who wrote it is gay, in fact.
/r/askTRP24/10/15 12:59 PM
1

Butthurt. As. Fuck. /u/Archwinger has a good analysis of where you went wrong. I am inclined to add my three cents, though.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/15 02:14 AM
2

Man, I can only imagine this working for someone who's very good on their feet, but my instant reaction to reading this was to (theoretically) announce to the table, "she's been having a craving for sweet and spicy/sweet and sour lately" in an unapologetic/joking manner.
/r/MarriedRedPill24/10/15 12:51 AM
1

I've been there. It's a wonderful position to be in.
/r/askTRP24/10/15 12:46 AM
1

Don't do it. Even if you're spinning other plates, an ex who likely once bitched you up will do the same even if you intend on her being a plate.
/r/askTRP23/10/15 01:15 AM
1

"Auditioning for a soap opera?"
/r/askTRP23/10/15 01:12 AM
2

This is a valid point, but it questions the premise as opposed to correcting and honing the conclusion.
/r/askTRP22/10/15 02:01 AM
9

4 hours later and no reply to my invite to go eat. I text her just to make sure she's okay and still alive. She replies letting me know she's okay. If your LTR is in the state you're describing, you should not do this. You can't be captain while also being distant/aloof. They're antagonistic and will only weaken her trust she has in you. I thought it was ridiculous to continue to wait on her and let the place close. Thoughts? I would not have waited 4 hours to eat. I wouldn't have texted her bac…
/r/askTRP22/10/15 01:51 AM
3

I tried to get her to come over a couple weekends ago but she was busy. No, she rejected your advance. Because... we've started talking a lot and sitting together in class. You should only be "talking a lot" post-sex. I tried again last weekend and she was busy again. I need not repeat myself. She seems like she's into me (just little clues she gives) Enough to keep a beta in orbit. but she's always legitimately busy when I try to get her to come over. No, she's not. She'd make excuses to others…
/r/askTRP22/10/15 01:45 AM
1

No, it's not a secret. TRP is essentially the philosophy a father should impart upon a son by his 20s. You're right about that much. Too many men lack that father figure, though, and in their anger/frustration/angst, they stumble upon TRP, which enlightens them much like a father is supposed to.
/r/askTRP22/10/15 01:40 AM
2

You act like a chick. It's no wonder she friendzoned you.
/r/askTRP22/10/15 01:37 AM
1

Amused Mastery. Always. "That's hilarious. Sounds like she's hoping I put a ring on it."
/r/askTRP22/10/15 12:56 AM
2

You're hard-friendzoned.
/r/askTRP22/10/15 12:54 AM
2

You can't "next" a chick that friendzoned you, faggot. Nut up and learn to make moves more quickly.
/r/askTRP22/10/15 12:53 AM
2

Check the RPW sub. Sort by top all time -- there's a post along the lines of "Be A Slut FOR HIM". That'll give you your answer.
/r/askTRP22/10/15 12:51 AM
2

What a waste of an endorsement.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/15 03:07 AM
3

Don't tell them you're not gay. Tell them "only one way to find out..."
/r/askTRP29/08/15 01:36 AM
1

This isn't a rebuttal. It's a regurgitation of what you've heard in order to rationalize your own opinion. Set the frame and tone of the convo; that is how you establish power in the dynamic.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 10:55 PM
1

Think of it more like setting a type of boundary, and she must comply if she wishes to receive your providence. This chick needs a jolt like that to her system; look at her opener.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 10:54 PM
5

It's not "alpha" to be butthurt. Be socially savvy and reframe the convo. Show some skill. "That'll cost you head or ass. I don't accept handies for my handiwork."
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 11:56 PM
1

Complaining about one EC's opinion is a waste of time. Now do a write-up about me. I want some publicity here.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/15 04:18 PM
1

And once they get this equation changed, they'll complain that men in the workplace are too sweaty. Due to being disgusting pigs who can't sit quietly and enjoy the nice air-conditioned office space.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 10:45 PM
1

Cenk grew up a Republican. I'm seeing a shimmering light of it in this accidental portrayal of Grandpa Cenk.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/15 11:41 PM
1

You've lost any respect I could have given you. Go on the TRP IRC for such personalized advice.
/r/askTRP06/07/15 12:37 AM
1

Yeah, not sure what the fuck this dude is talking about with explaining as little as possible.
/r/askTRP06/07/15 12:29 AM
1

PM me.
/r/askTRP06/07/15 12:26 AM
-1

This is bullshit. He can increase his testosterone naturally. The modern world is far too coddling to justify hormone therapy for low T. Try lifting and becoming a dominant, assertive man. This should raise your T significantly.
/r/askTRP06/07/15 12:25 AM
-9

Let's not play paddycake with others, now.
/r/askTRP06/07/15 12:23 AM
-3

I recommend you stop being such a fucking faggot and start taking control of your life, your mission, and your future. No excuses.
/r/askTRP06/07/15 12:22 AM
2

Best answer right here. The fetishes are likely rooted in a lack (or visceral detestation) of self-respect.
/r/askTRP06/07/15 12:15 AM
3

You're a fucking faggot. Rid yourself of these delusions of "the perfect girl" before you castrate yourself into chronic oneitis.
/r/askTRP06/07/15 12:14 AM
8

You are the biggest sucker on this subreddit. Get yourself checked. Then check yourself on out of this putrid "LTR" you've duped yourself into accepting.
/r/askTRP06/07/15 12:05 AM
1

This chart, as well as a multitude of others, does not correlate fidelity with the value of the man. Garbage.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/15 11:42 PM
1

/u/nyrp -- I recognized your name and that's why I clicked this thread. Kudos to you for being open about this. As a fellow endorsed member, let me try to speak to you man-to-man. I'll put a great deal of effort in this comment to match yours. First off: We were doing LDR. Speaking from first-hand experience, this is only possible if the chick openly detests "sluts" and "how easy women are these days." She must prefer to spend a weekend night inside knitting/quilting. I denied. Claimed I spent a…
/r/askTRP30/06/15 01:33 AM
2

She is not your plate if she rejects sex.
/r/askTRP30/06/15 01:15 AM
1

...Don't. You don't fucking respond. Step back and realize how little fucking effort she put into her text. Five clicks on her phone's keyboard. Screen every text a plate send you with "is she trying to impress me?" If yes, respond. If no, do not respond.
/r/askTRP30/06/15 01:14 AM
11

This is pretty fucking pathetic. Untuck your nutsack, or get left in the dust.
/r/askTRP30/06/15 01:12 AM
10

I've even had instances where they start buying us shots.. What the fuck... Dude, play these BBs. Show your woman what herbs they are. They're so desperate that they'll even buy a chick's boyfriend shots. Take the free lunch. Remember what TRP teaches you: betabux sexual strategy fails in this day and age. These losers buying your girl drinks have zero chance. Mooch off them, because you know it's a fool's errand. You will also strengthen the "partners in crime" dynamic between you and your chic…
/r/askTRP30/06/15 01:10 AM
4

Short answer: stop being such a fucking faggot. Better answer: what I realized from very early on (my TRP journey was wholly detached from any manosphere literature) is that the rejection itself isn't the problem, your reaction to rejection is the problem. What does that mean? If you're talking to a chick and she rejects you, that itself isn't the keystone to the interaction. If you get butthurt as a result of rejection, you'll feel like and seem like a betafag loser. If you get rejected and lau…
/r/askTRP28/06/15 12:34 AM
2

My go-to is The Way of Men by Jack Donovan. It explains the origins of masculinity in a very fluid manner. Helps understand why TRP is the way it is, as opposed to accepting a stand-alone philosophy based on its success.
/r/askTRP28/06/15 12:27 AM
5

Alpha widow the chick, you fool. You'll gain much more by doing this than taking some moral high-ground. She's already broken if she has other tats. She's on her way out -- get some bragging rights along the way.
/r/askTRP28/06/15 12:25 AM
1

Didn't read the body of your text. Read the title only. Your response to any woman saying mentioning this to you is, "I've got quite the reputation."
/r/askTRP28/06/15 12:22 AM
4

Why are we apologizing and making excuses in the first place? No matter how qualified a woman scientist is, there will always be a competing male who out-qualifies her.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 09:42 PM
8

Try this on for size.
/r/askTRP24/06/15 03:18 AM
1

Search /u/OccamsNickname submission history.
/r/askTRP24/06/15 03:15 AM
1

I'm aware -- and, in his own words, he associates with "betas and feminists". Not a high-value group of friends.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 04:27 PM
0

Reference my post history. I'm not like most of these doomsday faggots who let fear of women control their lives (relevant to approach anxiety as well as aversion to marriage).
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 04:05 PM
-1

♂ Very informative comment, well done. The faggots espousing this naysaying in regards to marriage have their heads shoved up their asses. /u/Aerobus is no different -- his forté is in pessimism and negativity regarding women. It has its place in "unplugging," but making that your main message is not conducive to personal growth. Some of the most alpha/TRP guys I've met have wives. But only because they are the man's man are they able to have such successful marriages. Refusing to engage in Woma…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 03:57 PM
2

I didn't even make it through the whole tl;dr. Garbage.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 03:15 PM
6

There is a wealth of literature on masculinity in the manosphere. You do not come across as someone who is well-read on the subject. The Way of Men by Jack Donovan is a great read, and I'd advise you check it out. Your use of sarcasm to prove a point is also indicative of inherent feminine traits. I'd also point out that your reaction through using sarcasm is a defense mechanism you've put up to protect your liberal ideology. Neither is an insult; merely a descriptor. TRP is about self-improveme…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 02:27 PM
2

You can't "sacrifice sexual strategy." LTR Game is a fine art in and of itself. I advise you read up on it and apply it to real life in order to gain some experience before knocking it.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 09:40 PM
15

Tell me how fucking blue pilled I am if I tell you I am actually not willing to sacrifice a healthy relationship over a drunken mistake she made on a girls night out? Yes, I am conflating "cheating" with "getting a piercing/tattoo." No healthy woman would want to get a piercing or tattoo other than to try to catch a guy's attention, or to "rebel" or something similarly destructive to a "healthy relationship" in nature.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 07:52 PM
4

There is no "letting her" or "not letting her" get a piercing or tattoo. Trying to stop that would probably drive her away even more since she has the whole independent woman trip from the nagging in her ear by her friend. That's indicative of how weak a frame he has, and the poor foundation upon which he has built his relationship. There are many factors here, but each and every one goes back to him and his shortcomings. Women respect a man who puts his foot down. Feminism cannot change this.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 07:16 PM
13

"No." If you need to fluff it up a bit: "I will not date a woman who has or gets piercings."
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:19 PM
18

Holding women accountable for their bad behavior is like holding a man accountable for his inability to birth a child. Reread my post. Women's nature is destructive. They need men to keep them on the straight and narrow. Use this to your advantage. "Holding them accountable" for their bad behavior means nothing more than "she has no proper male guidance in her life."
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:17 PM
68

Failure after failure after failure. 1) Why would you let her get a piercing? Those are tramp-stamps. 2) Going with her to get it done. 3) Being a little bitchboy waiting out front for her to get the piercing. 4) Following up your bitchboy behavior with jealousy and uncertainty. Where the fuck is your confidence? 5) Admitting you're jealous you "think." Be fucking decisive -- you don't "think" anything; you either know it or you have not learned it yet. 6) Getting butthurt and going silent after…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 04:33 PM
10

Sorry if I just crushed your dreams of feeling like a badass thinking you were spinning 20 plates This is on point. If you're trying to loosen the definition of "plate," you're likely trying to move the goalposts to feel better about not being a poonslayer.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 10:17 PM
11

Tell him that you find it sexy when he's in control.
/r/RedPillWomen26/05/15 02:34 AM
-1

I cannot fathom how a "Redpill Vanguard" would have a response like this. Are you kidding me? You expect me to sing kumbahyah and play paddycake over the tragic ending to the story of an aged beta? This is not exceptional, this is not skillful, this is not any type of commendable. This is whining about how a woman jilted a man she perceived as lower value than her. Same shit, different day. Grab your fucking nutsack and become a better man. I'm directing this at you, /u/Whisper, for promoting su…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 03:51 AM
4

Not sure why you got downvoted. This is a pretty fucking stupid post by OP, and it belongs in /r/asktrp if anything.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/15 08:50 AM
0

You're still preaching this "abundance" concept as if it's a completely new idea that invalidates what the OP is saying. Abundance mentality is not up for debate here; it's assumed. We're talking about how to manage plates once that's achieved. Your counter-argument is seated in extreme scenarios. We aren't talking getting slapped. We're talking pushing through basic shit tests that plates who want an upgrade would throw at you.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 03:54 AM
4

Carelessness and convenience are enemies of improvement. I back your message, but not your tone.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 01:57 AM
2

Go silent on her. Stop responding 2/3's, make it 1/3 at best. Then, randomly throughout the day (and completely uncalled for) text her something very dirty. Tell her what you are going to do to her when she gets back. Think Sex God Method here in what you tell her.
/r/MarriedRedPill02/05/15 04:50 AM
38

This is an absolutely phenomenal analysis (and guidance for the newer members) on how to maintain plates once you've begun to spin them. Too often is a simple "next!" advised, when really you will build a much stronger character by learning how to manage the plates as opposed to taking the easy way out.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 04:27 AM
1

Quit making excuses for OP's ignorance. You sound like a woman. He needs to fucking read, learn, and invest in TRP, and having faggots like you give him a get-out-of-jail-free card does not coax him in the right direction. Read that three-line interaction again. It's pitiful that he doesn't know what to say next.
/r/askTRP10/04/15 06:23 AM
2

There's a difference between being inexperienced and having zero experience. There's almost nothing to work with here. He's basically asking how to interact with another human being. He's not asking for an analysis on how or where he fucked up, he's asking us to feed him lines. Fuck that. Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, you feed him for life. At least have a bearing on what's going on and show us your attempts before asking us to hold your hand and lead you in the…
/r/askTRP09/04/15 09:49 PM
0

Girlfriend? Fuck your timid approach. Be assertive and forward, like a man. "I want you to get a boob job." Don't be a pansy walking on eggshells around her.
/r/askTRP09/04/15 04:45 PM
0

If you need help at this point, you are dreadfully inexperienced and need to do a lot more reading. This is the most vanilla conversation ever and you're already all out of tricks. C'mon son. Read some more game blogs.
/r/askTRP09/04/15 04:42 PM
-2

I was really hoping that'd open your eyes and make you stop acting like such a faggot. I've lost my faith in you.
/r/askTRP05/04/15 03:15 PM
-2

I'm endorsed on the main sub. Keep whining, kid.
/r/askTRP05/04/15 03:03 PM
2

Your text options read like a faggot wrote them. Way too many sentences/trains of thought, way too much punctuation. Almost never use an exclamation point. Stop overthinking it and just reinitiate with anything. The more polished your re initiation text looks, the more repulsed she's going to be. "Hey I'm in town til x-day. Hit me up if you're around"
/r/askTRP05/04/15 07:02 AM
2

Stop being a faggot.
/r/askTRP05/04/15 06:56 AM
6

It's like taking BP guys and applying RP to them instills that "gut instinct" deep within them that helps them guide and dictate their lives. It's not about canned lines, openers, comebacks, etc. It's about letting that carnal essence of a man ooze through your pores.
/r/MarriedRedPill02/04/15 12:14 AM
2

And FYI, after those 4 days or so, the eggs basically become rotten. And the eggs stick to the uteran wall. That's why they have periods -- they get rid of that lining which the eggs are attached to.
/r/askTRP01/04/15 02:22 AM
2

They ovulate halfway between periods. Ovulate = have eggs at the ready for fertilization. Period = expel uteral lining with eggs, and it's a bloody mess. Ovulation lasts usually 4 days. If you came inside her at around 3/15 then maybe she's not lying.
/r/askTRP01/04/15 02:04 AM
2

You want to go to this party... So go, enjoy the fuck out of it, and have a blast. Nothing more to it.
/r/askTRP30/03/15 11:38 PM
1

You're welcome.
/r/askTRP30/03/15 11:35 PM
2

Well no. There's a way. But you did everything the exact opposite of that way. Not only is this not salvageable, but why the hell are you worried about getting an actual whore out on a date? Get over your pathetic oneitis.
/r/askTRP28/03/15 06:15 AM
2

"You can't fool me. I can read you like an open book."
/r/askTRP28/03/15 05:21 AM
2

You should look into a mechanical engineering undergrad program with concentrations/minors in biomechanical/biomedical engineering if you want to develop prosthetics and the like.
/r/askTRP28/03/15 05:20 AM
2

"It" never "was" with her.
/r/askTRP28/03/15 05:17 AM
1

The reason MRAs get shut-the-fuck-down is because Feminism is not about equality. Feminists are women who are lacking a strong, dominant male in their lives lashing out irrationally. So to play devil's advocate and turn the tables that men don't have "equal rights" is a fool's errand. They'll be disgusted that you think their shit test is actually about equality. It's not, and you need to recognize that. Don't do it, faggot.
/r/askTRP28/03/15 05:17 AM
1

"So cute thinking I'm the jealous type"
/r/askTRP28/03/15 05:14 AM
1

This is the epitome of putrid beta horseshit. You continually pounded your value into the ground with her. Not one thing you have done or said has indicated any value or any whiffs of alpha. Fucking christ, read the sidebar in the main sub.
/r/askTRP28/03/15 05:09 AM
1

The exception does not invalidate the rule. Of course if you can have fun doing something that gives you a nice paycheck, go for it. But expecting work to suck and then loving it is much better than going in expecting to love work and have it only meet you halfway.
/r/askTRP28/03/15 04:56 AM
1

Then you need to refine what your actual question is. Seems like you want advice on what career paths in engineering lead to the most fulfillment. Is this correct?
/r/askTRP28/03/15 01:46 AM
2

From my experience, it's a "fake it 'til you make it" paradigm. If you get really fucking good at what you do, you're going to love it and find it fulfilling because you've mastered the art and are making money from it. EDIT: The important aspect here is if you go into this with the expectation that work should be fun/fulfilling/worthwhile, you're setting yourself up for failure at worst and complacency at best. If you go into it expecting work to suck shit, you're setting yourself up for compla…
/r/askTRP28/03/15 01:27 AM
0

enjoy
/r/askTRP28/03/15 12:35 AM
1

It's called "work" and not "fun" for a reason. It's a means to an end (financial security).
/r/askTRP27/03/15 11:21 PM
2

Why would you prefer to be romantic? It's betabait. A&A with AM, something like "I'm the most romantic caveman around" and pick her up and drag her to the bedroom. You don't want to be a romantic BB, you want to be her (live-in) AF lover.
/r/MarriedRedPill22/03/15 09:05 PM
56

The gym owner and wife colluded in fabricating a story. There were zero charges pressed and they kept sleeping together afterward. Don't be so easily duped.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 08:53 PM
3

NO. Let him find his path to rock-bottom. If he says something like, "dude I found this interesting blog called Chateau Heartiste and I really like what it says," then jump aboard. Otherwise, it'll go in one ear and out the other at best and result in a tarnished reputation at worst.
/r/askTRP22/03/15 06:15 PM
7

And believe it or not, thousands if not millions of laymen were much better mechanics than she ever could be.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 05:55 PM
1

Precisely. It's trusting that AWALT applies to her and that subsequent RP tenets do as well.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 06:08 PM
2

Instead of saying "Oh well she's a woman", demand better behavior. Don't settle. Never did I say anything to this effect. And demanding better behavior from a woman without any proper frame set will not work. When I say she feels and thinks like a woman, I'm saying there's a certain language you have to speak (verbal and body as well as actions) in order for her to understand what you're saying. An example of how not to speak to her is to beg her for sex. An example of how to speak to her is thr…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 05:16 PM
-2

Nah, she's testing your strength. PURELY your strength. "Is that so?" "You're playing with fire"/"I know you want nothing more than to be dominated by a strong, dominant male like me" Last line is very ballsy and may not work if you're new to the game.
/r/askTRP20/03/15 06:39 AM
11

Most guys (especially newcomers) think AWALT means "the woman will cheat on any man better than you." But that's patently false. AWALT (or in this context hypergamy) means a woman will want to marry up, and that's about it. That's why for LTRs the prime SMV ratio (or difference) is 1 or 2 -- you're an 8, she's a 6/7; you're a 9, she's a 7/8. The fact that you're with her means she's fulfilled her hypergamous goal, and there's an immense risk from her branch-swinging from her 8 to a 9, or 9 to a …
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 06:19 AM
2

Ideally, both of you can just communicate with one another like human beings, instead of playing games with rings. And ideally, she wouldn't think and feel like a woman does. This act of hers is a response to him. Harp less on the objective action and more on what she's trying to communicate to him by doing it.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 06:14 AM
10

You completely missed his message: given the right circumstances contingent upon and so we ensure that we control the circumstances
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 06:02 AM
2

This is a stupidly paranoid response.
/r/askTRP19/03/15 11:42 PM
17

"I have better things to do than waste my time on shit like this."
/r/askTRP19/03/15 04:10 AM
6

Sounds like she's subtly inviting herself over for a repeat performance. Play off that angle.
/r/askTRP19/03/15 12:22 AM
7

We call those short-term flings "plates."
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 12:12 AM
3

"I don't feel loved" = "I'm being treated like a side chick" This is an LTR, not a plate. You failed her comfort tests by reacting to her complaints with more distance. She wanted to feel like she meant more to you than just a wet meatsleeve. Look up comfort tests.
/r/askTRP17/03/15 04:07 PM
2

When it comes to determining sluttery, it's less about actions and more about the chick's impulsion to cheat. Past actions are a compass needle for determining just how prone she is to cheating (in the future).
/r/askTRP17/03/15 03:01 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/RedPillWomen/comments/1j0n7t/the_slut_and_how_not_to_be_one/ There's something wrong if she can't "capture" a guy. Sure, sex may not be involved, but sexual activities are.
/r/askTRP17/03/15 04:31 AM
1

Perhaps my comment history here on asktrp. Otherwise, CH is a universal gold mine. Link to search query page might not be sufficient; I'm sure you know how to navigate a website.
/r/askTRP17/03/15 02:11 AM
2

The only time approaching a situation all hammer fist actually works is when you have established authority (boss in the workplace/LTR) and your subordinates have reason and expectation to submit to you and your authority. You have to prove that your authority merits submission to this pack of girls as the new guy.
/r/askTRP17/03/15 01:59 AM
2

First, you incited a quarrel by approaching her with that initial question. Instead of trying to "get" her with a "gotcha" moment, you should have instructed her. "This stretch is done like this, not like that." she looks at me and rolls her eyes She was testing your authority. This is where you had to respond with AM, not explaining yourself with something like this: and I say "You want to be addressed by your name when someone calls you out, right? Well, you're doing this drill wrong, you need…
/r/askTRP17/03/15 01:45 AM
1

You need to tell us exactly what went down for more specific advice. This will be a journey in AM at a bare minimum, though. Think of its application like your presence/attitude commands respect, not your words demand respect.
/r/askTRP17/03/15 01:15 AM
1

Is that a question? Let her bring it up. Let her initiate contact. She must chase you. Moreover, she most certainly knows that it was an accidental double-text. Stop sweating it.
/r/askTRP17/03/15 01:13 AM
3

Did you sit there like a Scrooge demanding respect? Or did you exemplify why you merit respect by pulling off some amused mastery?
/r/askTRP16/03/15 11:55 PM
2

Don't bother explaining yourself (especially over text). If she brings it up, question her ("huh?") then explain ("oh, must've double-sent cuz of shitty cell reception").
/r/askTRP16/03/15 11:53 PM
3

Stop being such a fucking faggot in your own thread. Christ.
/r/askTRP15/03/15 03:41 AM
3

If this is AMOGing, it's Day 1-kindergarten AMOG. Very basic stuff at best. As I've said to others, it's like trying to learn calculus from an algebra textbook.
/r/askTRP15/03/15 01:46 AM
2

And why the fuck are you worrying about this then?
/r/askTRP15/03/15 01:39 AM
1

Stop talking to her until she gets within fuck-distance.
/r/askTRP15/03/15 01:25 AM
2

I liked the pic So you're a beta orbiter. Myth busted.
/r/askTRP15/03/15 01:07 AM
3

Examples: (She's whining/nagging/complaining) "Someone didn't take their nap today" (She asks how are you) "There are much better ways of subtly flirting with me than using that line" (She ask's if you ever want to get married) "You're a good lay and all, but I just don't see you like that" (Yapping about something you dont care about) "No idea what you just said, I was too busy staring at your tits" (and obviously make it obvious you're staring at them) (You're walking side by side) This was on…
/r/askTRP14/03/15 07:56 PM
2

The overweight rate in America is almost 70%. By living in America, you're raising your risk of becoming overweight. You'd be a fool to try to get sub-10% bodyfat when living in America because of the foolishly high overweight rate. Does this sound absurd? It's because it is. Yes, the divorce rate is high at around half. No, the rate in and of itself does not determine your fate. There are certain things you can do to avoid the chance of becoming overweight. The divorce rate doesn't take into ac…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 03:33 PM
13

One thing i’ve noticed is when a girl goes cold This is a shit test. DO NOT INDULGE IT. and I ask her to explain why Shit test failed. They don’t seem to want to put the effort in because they assume i’m getting lots of pussy. Stop going after post-wall women, or near-wall women. The issue is consistent because you remind the women you're going after of their forlorn alpha lovers who widowed them.
/r/askTRP13/03/15 04:04 AM
16

Tonight she finally stopped me on my way out of the gym and we had a 15 minute conversation about why. WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG. This says to her that you were playing a game of "come chase me, I'm butthurt." If that 1 in front of the 5 was a typo, then I'll be a bit more lenient, but even then, you have nothing to say. I told her her actions showed me that she had no interest so I moved on. Nah, no bueno. "...huh?" "<she hamsters>" "...oh, right. yeah i've just been busy, nothing personal"…
/r/askTRP13/03/15 04:00 AM
1

First response should have been: "what's in it for me" Second: "there will be more where that came from so long as you wine-and-dine me first" Third: Same as (2)
/r/askTRP13/03/15 03:53 AM
9

I always go with the "virgin/zero/saving myself for marriage" angle.
/r/askTRP12/03/15 11:09 PM
12

23,088 Dads (141 have shitty reflexes) Doesn't seem like it's what you were expecting/implying.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 02:06 AM
2

Glad someone else sees through the bullshit here.
/r/askTRP08/03/15 12:41 AM
12

You're seeking validation here. You're not interested in your ideas being contested. You are not interested in finding the truth through deep discussion. You can't even handle opposing ideas without closing off. These are the exact antitheses of masculine/dominant qualities. Your responses are emotional, not logical. I'm already breaking down this farce you've propped up. Where is this "logic" you purport to have? This is how men test each other; even a feminine man would prod you like I'm doing…
/r/askTRP07/03/15 11:33 PM
9

Here is an excellent exercise in testing my theory. Instead of focusing on the bigger picture and discussing this idea philosophically, you chose to handle confrontation by taking offense and responding with a petty insult. This is how women typically react. And this is why I concluded that you're a typical woman. It's not hard to read between the lines here.
/r/askTRP07/03/15 11:15 PM
12

You're a virgin and have no experience or idea as to what it's like to be a submissive woman to a dominant man. Everything you're writing is horseshit. Absolute garbage. It's nothing more than a cocktail of projection and mental masturbation. It's seated in your lack of experience coupled with special snowflake syndrome. Explore your submissive side with a dominant man. To address the question/theory: the biggest issue with trying to be a dominant female in the relationship is that you do not ha…
/r/askTRP07/03/15 11:05 PM
1

Bettering your game will increase your SMV, actually. You'll become a more (socially) attractive man.
/r/askTRP07/03/15 05:29 AM
0

And the demographic interested in this topic, as dictated by this flair, is not interested in your pessimism. Move along.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 07:01 AM
2

Let me clarify something: I see a wife/marriage as an LTR with whom I have children. Why don't I just go jump into a pit of poisonous snakes? The point of TRP is to harden men so as to be invulnerable to these snakes so that they can sift through them and find one that doesn't bite. I've made a few other comments in this thread; you should read them to get my perspective so that I don't repeat myself.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 06:51 AM
3

If you're denying yourself of what you ultimately want out of life due to possible consequences of law/courts, then you are a pussy. Respect the flair attached to this topic.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 06:10 AM
4

I completely agree that this is an advanced topic to discuss. You are in the right, and the commenter you're responding to is in the wrong. Don't get me wrong, contractually, marriage is a fool's errand. But there's zero evidence that unicorn-ready women who want nothing more than to fulfill their role as wife to a strong husband don't exist. Check /r/RedPillWomen for examples. Sure, they may be rare, but we preach what we do so that LTR-inclined men can find that one woman who happens to be on …
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 06:04 AM
1

Absolutely correct. Also, OP, bear in mind that throughout the day, women are most horniest in the afternoon. It is subjective woman-to-woman, but usually 2-4pm is a good window to bank on.
/r/askTRP06/03/15 05:37 AM
2

Text game is your friend. Don't text about bullshit -- leave it for the phone calls at night. Text her randomly something heavily sexual about you riding your hand up her skirt at work, pressing her up against the wall and pulling on her hair, etc. Things you're going to do her this weekend. A pleasant surprise for her lunch break. But don't become predictable.
/r/askTRP06/03/15 04:51 AM
2

Then you will likely have to deal with a slight case of abandonment issues. If she's used to your comfort day-in and day-out, I would suggest setting aside some time to skype her at night to talk, or at least a phone call some nights while she's away. The key here is to avoid letting her feel any sort of abandonment. Lay out clear expectations so she knows how to stay in line so that you won't have to dread her via distance. EDIT: Also make sure you treat this distance issue as if it were no big…
/r/askTRP06/03/15 03:38 AM
4

Don't do it. This is an exclusive relationship. This is a slippery slope that's going to end up in swinger parties at best and more affairs of hers at worst. The fact that you're coming here with concern tells one thing: you don't want her to do this. This concern isn't unjustified. You don't want it, end of discussion. EDIT: Sex for women is an emotional journey, not a physical one. The intimacy she experiences in this is going to do nothing but erode at the intimacy you provide her. She'll alw…
/r/askTRP06/03/15 03:29 AM
4

You failed if you came out of that interaction and she either still has blue hair or you still have a girlfriend.
/r/askTRP05/03/15 11:30 PM
1

Agree with you completely. OP, stop being such a fucking faggot, basically. Start acting better, not asking to be better. This is petty bullshit that you need to get the hell over.
/r/askTRP05/03/15 10:09 PM
1

I get the angle you're trying to play. First, cut out "haha" from your texting vocabulary. Second, be a bit less wordy. A simple "TMI" would get the job done. The text you send should focus primarily on the date. "TMI. I'm picking you up at 5," or something of the like.
/r/askTRP05/03/15 09:15 PM
3

There's not much to be gained here, to be honest. This chick is rotten to the core. Anything that you could gain is negated by the fact that she's not worthy of gaining from. Does that make sense? EDIT: To put it in a different light, it's like trying to learn calculus from an algebra textbook.
/r/askTRP05/03/15 02:41 AM
1

Respectfully disagree. TRP is a tool, and if you wish you use it to hammer out an LTR, you are wholly able to do so. EDIT: For clarification, I disagree with the second paragraph of yours. The first is common sense, but it ties into "mate selection" more than it does "mate maintenance."
/r/askTRP05/03/15 02:27 AM
7

"No."
/r/askTRP05/03/15 02:01 AM
0

You should never control a woman or set her boundaries because you're asking for a shit test You are absolutely 100% wrong. I like your original post in this thread, but you've veered a bit off-course. With plates or casual hookups, you are completely right. Boundaries/controlling is pants-on-head retarded. But within the confines of exclusivity, you must stop her hypergamy from becoming unbridled.
/r/askTRP05/03/15 01:43 AM
2

Let's settle for "guiding" as opposed to "controlling."
/r/askTRP05/03/15 12:19 AM
1

The term did not derive from TRP/the Manosphere. "Alpha male of the pack" has been a moniker for many years; imagine a NatGeo documentary on lions or silverbacks. There will be an alpha male in each pack described and identified. His lessers are the betas.
/r/askTRP04/03/15 06:54 PM
1

Why are you asking how to follow a woman's lead? Wrong question. You should be asking how to deflect this kind of question from a woman. "Straight from the depths of Hell, and Satan himself sent me to come get you."
/r/askTRP04/03/15 06:49 PM
0

Have more fun with it, man. "I go by Mr. StealYoGurl."
/r/askTRP04/03/15 06:44 PM
30

Here's where you fucked up: You set a soft boundary ("I don't think girls in LTRs should go out getting smashed in town."). Soft because all you said was this; you didn't drill this into her skull, and you didn't state it absolutely. "Under no circumstances will I be in a relationship with a woman who goes out and gets fucking wasted in town." This is a boundary; what you stated was a meager request. You told her to cross this (internal) boundary of yours by not reinforcing it when she went out …
/r/askTRP04/03/15 05:37 PM
5

Them saying this is mostly empty banter. Don't look into it. That being said, if you're leading the convo (as you should be) and talking about how you love to party, then them saying this is an IOI. They're trying to enter your frame and please you/qualify themselves to your standards. If you don't want a partygirl, then don't bring up clubs. Or, at least, paint them in a pessimistic light. I assume you're speaking in the context of holding tryouts for LTRs. If they bring this up on their own, t…
/r/askTRP04/03/15 02:53 AM
3

First mistake was drawing the convo back to you wanting to see her in your office. For small things like this: forgive, but never forget. "Okay hang up." "Hahaha, little mrs. grumpypants needs to take her nap." Like another poster commented, don't follow her lead or fall into her frame. Never take orders from a woman. If you want to talk to her on the phone, you do it. And you keep the convo going until you're done. That being said, don't draw it out. But the convo operates on your terms, not he…
/r/askTRP04/03/15 02:45 AM
1

I was speaking strictly in terms of learning how to talk to women, deal with shit tests, etc. Self-improvement as a process never stops, but there is a benchmark you surpass and know "I got it."
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 05:42 PM
3

So met another on OKCupid, exchanged over 10 messages back and forth, her's usually longer, getting into 2-3 paragraph territory. Talked about past terrible dates... she claims some guy wanted her to donate blood on a first date (bullshit), I told her when I was invited to a family dinner on a second date, etc. Mostly banter and rapport building, but not anything sexual in nature... I need work on escalation. This sounds absolutely fucking terrible. Beta to a T. You should never be sending a bit…
/r/askTRP03/03/15 09:01 AM
14

It took me two whole YEARS, at least, to go from uninformed schlub to master of the art. Swallowing the pill and perfecting your game isn't an overnight process. This is good to hear, OP. A man has to hit rock-bottom in order to truly understand the foundation upon which he's building himself.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 08:48 AM
4

What you don't want to do is reward beta behaviors of his. Even if he's your captain, right now you need to coax him into a proper mindset.
/r/askTRP03/03/15 07:47 AM
26

"I find nothing sexier than when you take charge and brazenly make a decision on your own." Frame everything in that light.
/r/askTRP03/03/15 06:24 AM
1

One thing I want you to consider: if your dad were a commenter on here, how would he respond? Is the advice you hear here on /r/asktrp the same stuff you'd expect to hear from your father's mouth? To me, it sounds like he worked his ass off for his children while simultaneously trying to provide a hard-ass fatherly discipline. Nothing inherently wrong with that. But your angst towards him (and honestly, validating your angst with "I'm an atheist" is some grade-A bullshit) seems to be a phase. I …
/r/askTRP03/03/15 04:15 AM
1

Play the charming angle. Foster "inside jokes" between the two of you. Maker her feel like you're "different" while simultaneously pulling the same moves on her.
/r/askTRP03/03/15 03:34 AM
-1

This is very wrong. Text in this day and age is a sure-fire way to skip all the formalities with a chick.
/r/askTRP03/03/15 01:59 AM
1

Right, it's very tricky. With the proper mindset, you can massage your LTR into accepting the idea of regular threesomes, at a bare minimum. Usually a woman would need the commitment of "wife" to be comfortable with the idea of side bitches.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 12:16 AM
1

This is a very good response. OP, you may not want to be exclusive with her now, but if you want an exclusive LTR with side bitches, then you will have to endure a period of exclusivity with an LTR in order to establish a strong foundational trust between you two. Trying to get this set up now is not going to work because all you're doing is telling her that she's your main bitch whom you call your girlfriend. It's just labels at that point, and it's insufficient.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 10:19 PM
1

Atta boy! Grab those nuts and give that bitch a middle-finger goodbye.
/r/askTRP02/03/15 09:48 PM
1

There's a glossary link in the sidebar of the main sub.
/r/askTRP02/03/15 09:43 PM
1

Have you considered the reason you're getting rejected might be due to the colossal cock wedged down your throat? You're average height for a male. That means, in a genetic sense, roughly half of all fathers were shorter or as tall as you. Half of men with your "handicap" have reproduced. It's not a fucking issue. It's all in your head. What's an issue is your lack of confidence/self-esteem. There is no reason to be insecure about that which you cannot change. Embrace it.
/r/askTRP02/03/15 09:37 PM
1

"I can't commit to a woman who does XYZ." This is the approach I take. She's asking for an upgrade and is getting ready to leave if she doesn't get it. Tell her you're not interested in a relationship with her because she's not relationship material. Be dead serious, blank facial expression when you tell her this. You WILL be called an asshole, and she WILL get short-tempered with you. She's already on her way out, though, since she doesn't foresee herself getting that upgrade.
/r/askTRP02/03/15 09:29 PM
1

"You know I think you look great, and your interpretation of what I said is off." Massive fail. "No, not at all! I was thinking more along the lines of 'morbidly obese'."
/r/askTRP02/03/15 09:22 PM
1

I'd suggest ignoring, but seeing as you kept talking about the dog, it'd be a bit weird to dodge the elephant in the room. Spin it around and use it to your advantage. "Alright, I see what you're trying to do. Give me a few mins to get into character and I'll pretend to be super jealous of him for ya."
/r/askTRP02/03/15 09:10 PM
3

Have a spine? Don't be a loser who panders to pussy? Hold frame. And don't cave until she's at your full behest.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 06:11 PM
1

This isn't a TRP matter. I didn't read the entirety of your post; hell, I barely read the title. What you must know is that you, as the mentor, harbor all the power in the relationship. As soon as you give in and bend to his meek whim, you lose part of that power. You must be steadfast and stoic in the face of whatever he throws at you. You must position yourself in a place where he has to come crawling back to you with forgiveness for help.
/r/askTRP02/03/15 10:15 AM
2

Grow a beard.
/r/askTRP02/03/15 09:27 AM
1

You must coax your LTR-worthy woman into being a unicorn.
/r/askTRP02/03/15 08:15 AM
2

There are many ways to go about cultivating discipline in your life. Here is one.
/r/askTRP02/03/15 08:10 AM
-6

Power is not a function of action. That's what the sentiment aims towards revealing.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 06:54 AM
8

Yup. But it works on the same principle -- being dismissive of her womanly bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 03:42 AM
2

It's a little hard when we have a joint investment property Sweet jesus. Have you learned your lesson?
/r/askTRP02/03/15 12:55 AM
1

No, because you have solid frame and don't want to LTR her. There is no room for compromise on your end. I'd have much higher standards/expectations for LTRing a chick I met off Tinder. That's almost an insta-DQ for me. EDIT: This is essential reading for LTRs. It is an eight-part series, but this part is relevant here.
/r/askTRP02/03/15 12:31 AM
2

First thing fucking first: my ex recently hopped on the wagon, but managed to take my phone and find out about these other girls. Absolutely not fucking happening in my books. Hard next. This is a blatant invasion of privacy and shows zero respect for my property or my privacy. This merits nuclear hard next for me. and being an honest guy i have trouble lying or telling them the bare minimum they need to know. Be a closed book. Cut this "honesty" shit out; these are plates, not wives. I still di…
/r/askTRP02/03/15 12:22 AM
2

Well, I doubt you're considering LTRing her, so you have to soft next. She's asking for an upgrade. Do not cave.
/r/askTRP02/03/15 12:17 AM
16

However, waiting for an apology may be unnecessary. It seems a "come over" invitation text would be immediately accepted. I'm sure it would. But that's not the point. Control your thirst and use this as an exercise in exploring your power/authority and how it relates to cultivating the types of behavior you prefer out of women. If you're already willing to drop her, why not do so with the intention of learning/gaining experience?
/r/TheRedPill01/03/15 11:14 PM
1

Your response: "What are you whining about now?"
/r/askTRP01/03/15 11:00 PM
27

If you responded to that text of hers, you lost. She needs to come crawling back to you begging for forgiveness; apologizing profusely for the way she acted. Not crawling back reprimanding you for not reading through the lines and listening to her instructions.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/15 10:53 PM
1

First off, you need to read up a LOT on LTR Game. This is catastrophic. This isn't some shit test you need to "pass." This is a fundamental hiccup in the machinery behind your relationship. If you're trying to turn around your relationship after finding TRP, this is going to be an uphill battle. You might want to check out /r/marriedredpill to get an idea of how men turned their once-beta relationshits around. If this chick is recently your LTR (though you should have set this non-equal guidelin…
/r/askTRP01/03/15 09:35 PM
1

You should read my comment history on this sub. I have given a lot of insight about how punishment/discipline relates to women. In short, disciplining a woman only becomes effective once she has your commitment and has to work to keep it. You use commitment as a bargaining chip. Sex/attention is almost meaningless in the bartering game here. Disciplining plates/non-exclusive women is best visualized as her rolling her eyes at displeasing you, a man she is merely hooking up with. It comes from a …
/r/askTRP01/03/15 09:20 PM
1

I would treat this as a legitimate scheduling conflict. As for dread, be a closed book. I would much rather use the hamster to my advantage by letting it run wild in all directions than point it in one where it'll meet its destination faster. Am I being too vague? Covert dread. Lips sealed. Don't admit what your plans are/were. "What are you going to do today?" "Would you like my full agenda for the week too?" Deflect and leave her with no information. Much better results than being tryhard.
/r/askTRP01/03/15 09:17 PM
1

Are you fucking this chick or not?
/r/askTRP01/03/15 08:29 PM
1

I would have calibrated my game better because a mixed response the first time is one too many. You probably tried the same approach to set up a date each and every time. More awkwardness; that shows no social wherewithal. "I'm free now wuu2?" Are you a teenage chick? Text like an educated man. This was still weird no matter how you try to spin it, to randomly invite yourself over.
/r/askTRP28/02/15 07:34 PM
7

After suggesting dates 3 times and getting a mixed response I said "I can get hotter than you I'm not asking again" This is a very weird thing to say to a chick. The next day I spontaneously appeared at her place. Awkward. Do not do this.
/r/askTRP28/02/15 01:46 PM
7

No, you're actually a huge fucking faggot for trying to "save face" with that "nuclear" message you sent on facebook. You could not have pulled a more beta move. Put your ego to the side. You're lame in the sack and awkward as fuck.
/r/askTRP28/02/15 01:34 PM
6

I hope you at least reported it.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 11:35 AM
2

Exactly. This alludes to an A&A approach to her shit test. Tell her to stay put on a bench or whatever nearby, go hit up a random chick, flirt, and walk away with the chick. Your girl will be running towards you in no time. Shit test fucking decimated.
/r/askTRP28/02/15 01:12 AM
1

Objectively i'm a 6/10, maybe a 7/10 if everything breaks right. First, cut this unnecessary bullshit out. Either you can get pussy or you can't. i decide to pull out my phone and watch Robin Williams do a bit about porn(which is a great clip but i could watch that anytime) 4chan's /fit/ board couldn't contrive a more spaghetti-spilling story. Christ, kid. Read the rest of your post. You're basically a gargantuan pussy. Not sure what more you want. Untuck your nutsack and fucking live life. One …
/r/askTRP28/02/15 01:01 AM
5

As did Elliott Hulse.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 09:42 PM
1

She was probably bored while pooping ...you tellin' me girls poop?!
/r/askTRP27/02/15 08:18 AM
1

This exactly. There is no other answer. Your lack of "caring" and being "nonchalant" is a direct result of you being scared of asserting yourself. But on top of that, you need to realize that women DO NOT WANT to make decisions. When you pick what movie to watch, you're doing her a favor. This obviously transcends to all decision-making, so brand it into your mind.
/r/askTRP27/02/15 02:38 AM
3

Read their actions and body language, not their words. That's all you can do to ensure that you're hearing the truth.
/r/askTRP27/02/15 02:36 AM
3

Very true, it's hard to maintain your position of power when you completely give away your commitment to a woman through marriage. I'd prefer to think that these wives have husbands who are inherently beta.
/r/askTRP27/02/15 02:23 AM
1

Why bother responding after she said "depends on when i get back"? Let her come crawling back to you (and your place). She needs to put in the effort, bro. You're begging her to come back over here.
/r/askTRP27/02/15 01:28 AM
0

Passive aggressive response. All passersby should take note of this type of response and how inherently beta it is.
/r/askTRP27/02/15 12:30 AM
1

Very true. First, a thought experiment. You don't see women hitting the wall and wishing they could be set free. The exact opposite; the single ladies go on the hunt for commitment from a man. They ache for commitment. Second, it's absurd how a slut will all of a sudden try to girl-game you into commitment once they perceive how high-value you are.
/r/askTRP27/02/15 12:18 AM
1

still Don't gerbil. She's mad interested in you. Gargantuan greenlight; she is openly saying she will do anything for you. Take all the favors out of her that you so please.
/r/askTRP27/02/15 12:15 AM
1

Fuck off with this bullshit about "insecurity." Women lack agency and it's far too common to hear about "one thing just led to another."
/r/askTRP27/02/15 12:13 AM
4

I did something like this with a plate, but we were at the 2-month mark. Didn't work out well; the lines were too blurred (we were just hooking up) for me to have any tactile authority, if that makes sense. Ended up having to recover. It was a blow to my frame. You're putting the cart ahead of the horse when you're not committed and trying to set boundaries. What has she said about him? If anything, I'd play it casual, and if/when he does come up, play the angle that he just doesn't get it if yo…
/r/askTRP27/02/15 12:05 AM
1

Now, it's gotten to the point where she gives "soft no's" here and there and is generally not as eager to please as she used to be. I have dealt with this. The very first time she even tried to give me a soft no, I fucking stamped that out hard. She was begging to repent via my cock the morning after. You may not realize it, but not doing this right from the get-go is where you majorly fucked up. She got a taste of power. Never let anything gradually grow. When you deem she is overstepping a bou…
/r/askTRP26/02/15 11:10 PM
1

I'm teling him he is making wrong conclusions. Everything about responding with "slight anger and rudeness" is butthurt you fucking faggot. Dislodge cock from throat and accept the truth.
/r/askTRP26/02/15 10:52 PM
1

Especially if you're drinking, something like "fucking S-S-SUE me, bitch hahaha" while laughing at yourself is one way you could play it off in order to continue telling your story.
/r/askTRP26/02/15 10:50 PM
1

Here, ya sperg.
/r/askTRP26/02/15 10:35 PM
3

This is the only acceptable course of action. Scrap any and all ideas about "equality" or "it's only fair" in your sexual escapades. Women bend over backwards for alphas.
/r/askTRP26/02/15 10:18 PM
2

Stop listening to this txnative guy. He doesn't have a clue. "You know you're very fucking annoying right?" = "I am frustrated at how difficult it is for me to be socially more dominant/savvy than you in this conversation, and it's kind of turning me on, actually..." Your response to that was perfect. As per her "you make me nervous" texts, respond like you have been. Don't stoop to butthurt levels. She wants the D. "You make me worried for our future."
/r/askTRP26/02/15 10:15 PM
1

What I AM interested in is being intellectually outclassed by someone. I'm sure you're familiar with IQ bell curve distributions and that at an IQ of 145, males outnumber females 9-to-1, and the ratio only grows exponentially after that.
/r/askTRP26/02/15 09:08 PM
1

I'm going to give a different answer here. I don't think you truly "know yourself." It's a brazen claim. But to me, what I see is a man beaten down to a pulp who yearns for a backbone; who seeks to vicariously fulfill that void through a relationship with a strong, dominant, aggressive woman because he's so beaten down. He can't even assert himself to the point of becoming that identity. You're projecting, basically. Subconsciously yearning to find that one strong, dominant figure in your life. …
/r/askTRP26/02/15 08:12 AM
2

Did she explicitly say, "you can fuck me whenever you want to"? If so, just tell her to come over. She gave you a massive greenlight; it'd be a beta move to try to "wine 'n' dine" her with any extraneous activity. If you need alcohol present, tell her to bring over a bottle of wine.
/r/askTRP26/02/15 07:47 AM
2

This chick probably rolled her eyes at your "reprimanding." You have not even fucked her yet; there is no motivation for her to abide by your discipline. This is way more basic than TRP. In order for your discipline to have any effect, there has to be a conditioned or recognized reward. You are not a source of pleasure to her yet. You are still a bit of a stranger. Applying punishment works against you because she's already taking a bit of a risk in meeting up with you. All you did was give her …
/r/askTRP26/02/15 07:36 AM
2

Would you also argue that monogamous alpha men are dysfunctional?
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 12:31 AM
1

However, I started cheating on the monk mode and hitting on women. GOOD. Monk Mode is a crock of shit meant to validate newcomers' resistance to improving their social skills. hit her up to hang out after she gets back. She wants to (or wanted) to fuck. Should have said "let's go back to my place" instead of settling for a month's wait. I had a lot going on with some other prospects and other than inviting her to my housewarming (which she replied yes to and didn't make), I didn't pursue. We cha…
/r/askTRP26/02/15 12:05 AM
4

I have an over-inflated ego. Let's take a look... lol lookit this sweetie pie trying to demoralize me and misrepresent my arguments like he's the real sooper stronk alpha menz yes I'm feeling so subordinate to u, gimme ur dik hotstuff ur SUV is throgh the fucking roof. Quite an emotional response. The kind that serves to protect one's ego. Everything in your post is cherry-picked and absurdly misrepresented or misunderstood. Further, you look like a fool trying to put on a loud display for the a…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 11:51 PM
3

she is jealous of the fact that a man will spend any resources and time on a child that is not biologically related to her. She is so jealous, in fact, that she would much rather the sister live in foster care or with a meth-head mother than to have to share any attention from the man. Correct. This is one way females "mate-guard". Absolutely fucking disgusting. The truth isn't pretty. TL;DR: woman frames her boyfriend's 11-year-old sister for not doing chores because ... ? This phenomenon is ou…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 08:33 PM
2

What a steaming pile of shit you've posted. I upvoted your comment after that 1984 reference, but quickly turned it upside-down. Also... Most of the things in this plan aren't bad. Teaching kids about consent is... Really good. Smart. Consent should not be assumed. Ongoing consent is rather silly but.... Unless you hear a proper "Yes" don't. Rape is fucked up you sick cunts. No human being needs to be "taught" that a transaction must be agreed upon before it's finalized. Like sex. Both parties m…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 08:12 PM
0

It's not our job to make you feel good, it's our job to get you on the right path to success. Godspeed.
/r/askTRP24/02/15 10:47 PM
1

We've been having dirty convo and exchanging pictures and stuff since we met Alright, alright... not bad... and she's also been a huge support for me through hard times Gonna go grab a barfbag. As such, I do care about her Make that two barfbags. Since then I've kinda been an idiot thinking she'd change her mind about that Textbook oneitis. that feels like a somewhat childish reaction to not being sent dirty pictures anymore I've been using this line a lot in this sub, but you new guys need to g…
/r/askTRP24/02/15 09:06 PM
2

A couple no-brainers to consider here: If you're only entertaining the idea of screwing her in order to break a dry spell of yours, don't do it. The way she's being so pushy indicates she wants a young stallion to tear her apart. If you're lame or inexperienced in the sack, don't do it. The "affair" will likely get aired instead of kept in secrecy, because you will be "regret sex" she had. Everything else is contingent upon your personal moral code. There isn't a TRP answer to fucking taken chic…
/r/askTRP24/02/15 08:58 PM
7

The point these guys are making (which I agree with), is that you're not married yet. You're not bound by contract to this woman. You could cut off the engagement at any moment and find a better candidate, and in a couple years be back in this "engaged" state of affairs. Except that time around, you'll have a much better foundation with the new fiancée, and there will be zero resentment about a beta past, because there will have been none to begin with. You're about to make a lifelong commitment…
/r/MarriedRedPill24/02/15 08:43 PM
3

Have you read Sex God Method? You might be a bit lame in the sack, and that's why she's not going gaga for a romp. Worth a read if you haven't despite how good you might think you are.
/r/MarriedRedPill24/02/15 07:10 PM
4

This PDF should give you a good head-start into altering your behavior and mindset.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 09:22 AM
1

Not sure what that guy posted, but in any case -- canned solid white albacore tuna? If not, what's the cheapest "white fish" to go for?
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 09:15 AM
2

I think the only thing to do is to ask her if she is disturbed by what is going on. I'm thinking more if she says it was bothering her on her own. Which one is it? Your job is to protect your woman. The buck stops with me. It's her job to keep herself out of trouble, and if she's unable, then I'll enter the picture. Unless she acts like she doesn't need it. And if you deem the situation dangerous to your relationship, and she's inviting that danger... well, put two and two together.
/r/askTRP24/02/15 01:16 AM
3

Bingo!
/r/askTRP24/02/15 12:06 AM
0

NO! Christ, NO! Do not ask her if it bothered her. She's a woman and she will lie. She clearly enjoyed the attention as she did not put a stop to it.
/r/askTRP24/02/15 12:05 AM
2

Stupid, stupid, stupid. "Please, I need a higher-up to manage my woman." The chick should be stopping the flirting on her own.
/r/askTRP24/02/15 12:04 AM
1

Agreed. If he was going to "ask her out" via text (big no-no, though I presume logistics weren't in your favor... anyways.), he should have warmed her up first. She got spooked by the creeper, not seduced by the charmer.
/r/askTRP24/02/15 12:02 AM
2

I don't think it's a shit test... she fucking misses you, dude. Not saying to entertain her texts/calls but realize that this isn't some deliberate test of your strength/character. Put your foot down and devise a plan for her to follow. "Save it all for later -- we'll catch up on the phone at night instead of constant texting/calling throughout the day."
/r/askTRP23/02/15 10:11 PM
1

Read EVERYTHING in the sidebar on the main sub.
/r/askTRP23/02/15 06:38 AM
3

she asked me hypothetically That's where you put your foot down. That's a shit test through-and-through. Stamp that kind of bullshit OUT of your LTR.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 05:04 AM
2

Best response. Show her that you want to see her with her shirt off. And show that you like seeing her with her shirt off afterwards.
/r/askTRP23/02/15 03:07 AM
1

Internalize this: A woman's job is to please you. Does her texting days later to your offer please you? You should not have offered her another avenue to come see you.
/r/askTRP23/02/15 03:05 AM
0

Not going to entertain that train of thought. I'm here to help OP and get him out of his friendzone rut.
/r/askTRP23/02/15 03:00 AM
0

That's a culmination of your conditioning and expectation of rejection. I'll cave in that my line requires solid frame. But that's not to say that it's ridiculous in and of itself -- though it may be in context to this particular sub, given the demographic.
/r/askTRP23/02/15 02:45 AM
1

It's not so much a "pick-up line" as it is a generic way of turning something innocuous sexual. The problem with "reading" pick-up lines is that you internalize them and imagine how you would come across if you said these things. We're on different levels here -- I've said much more "harassing" lines to women and have gotten giggly responses. With that in mind, tailor to your own style. You can't be a week-two reader of TRP and expect to pull of the more advanced/expert stuff.
/r/askTRP23/02/15 02:14 AM
1

Submissive, eager to please, etc. Shit tests are relatively infrequent She's just going with the flow for now. You're not inciting any excitement out of her; that's why there are no shit tests. Did she sleep at the guy friend's house or not?
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 01:56 AM
1

I just hate acting like i cant enjoy myself around her though. Your buddies exist for a reason. She is not there so you can shoot the shit. When you're with her, you're dealing with a completely different type of social interaction.
/r/askTRP23/02/15 01:12 AM
-2

"Harassment" -- you're right, we better be nice little betas and not push the limits ever. That might result in getting laid.
/r/askTRP22/02/15 11:49 PM
1

A dose of stoicism will establish you as a solid rock in her life. My immature outburst was following what i perceived as jest. So treat it like silly, womanly bullshit. "sigh you worry me sometimes..." As for the "how" of your insecurity problem, there's no advice you can read that will change you in that regard. An iron resolve in the face of competition is forged through hardship and, unfortunately, failure. The unfortunate part there is because your LTR will only withstand so much failure be…
/r/askTRP22/02/15 11:46 PM
5

Because I'm better than her.
/r/askTRP22/02/15 09:45 PM
2

So, she's been shit testing me by throwing out "You're so predictable". That's not a shit test, son. That's blatant disrespect. Christ. First time I took it serious Never take anything a woman says seriously until she's begging for you to take her seriously. I spin around into the water and fake yell "DONT LOOK AT ME", start washing my face. This is a weirdly immature thing to do. Wreaks of insecurity. She immediately replies "are you insecure?" Funny how things work like that. Kinda threw me of…
/r/askTRP22/02/15 09:36 PM
-3

Be sexual with her. Jokes and innuendo. "That dress looks nice on you. Can't wait to see how much nicer it looks on my bedroom floor."
/r/askTRP22/02/15 09:18 PM
3

It's not your job to hold her door, make her food or be her servant. I like this premise. "What do I look like, your boyfriend?! Hahaha."
/r/askTRP22/02/15 08:51 AM
1

Don't get involved with a taken chick, especially in college where dudes have a massive chip on their shoulder.
/r/askTRP22/02/15 03:58 AM
2

You were trying way too hard to prove yourself to her. Notice how the only time the "/" comes up in this text exchange is in your lines.
/r/askTRP22/02/15 02:27 AM
6

You lack the confidence and self-esteem to be a dominant male. You got to get over it. Additionally, I don't know how the cuck fetish works, but would you jack-off on the sideline if she were getting pounded by some other man? I don't understand what's so great about getting turned on by your cuck fetish if you can't get off, since you wouldn't be fucking her.
/r/askTRP22/02/15 02:25 AM
17

On the fourth date, she brought up the “what is this/what are we” questions and we decided to be boyfriend and girlfriend. Your (sexual) commitment as a man is a prize. You give it away as a reward for the woman satisfying all your needs. This is rule #1 for LTRs and you fucked it up completely. She now has all the power in the relationship and is stringing you along. she gave me a “Nuh-uh,” and moved my hand away. [...] I tried a couple more times, but she stopped me each time. See what I mean?…
/r/askTRP22/02/15 02:18 AM
1

This is how I see it. First issue is she has a boyfriend -- that's a mess waiting to happen. Move on and don't get involved in that shit. Regardless, he cheated on her and she needed some emotional support/validation to help her cope with those feelings. She was hurt by it, sought male attention to validate her SMV, but her hindbrain was thinking, "I need to work harder to win him back because he has options and I want him all for myself." No bueno. You provided your orbiter services, and once s…
/r/askTRP22/02/15 01:17 AM
1

You lost her. Next.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 10:57 PM
1

Eye contact.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 09:46 PM
4

it's now dawning on me that I never really respected her in the first place (and hypocrisy is probably why) Why would you place the expectation of a masculine virtue on her? You don't judge a fish by how well it can ride a bicycle. Don't give this bitch commitment. She's a plate at best. Demote.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 09:22 PM
3

Don't push. You've invited her, she's waffled, you have nothing else you can say at this point. Your intentions are clear, she has responded, and now it's her turn to make this happen.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 09:16 PM
11

Why the fuck is she your girlfriend without having even seen her titties yet? End this mess before you invest any more in such a rotten deal.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 09:14 PM
3

Validating /u/mykonos_rm's point. By definition, the premise (of communism) fails because there will always be bad actors.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 09:05 PM
2

"How do I handle this Ex-girlfriend--" You don't. You don't handle her. She's no longer your liability.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 07:40 PM
14

Is there a difference between not talking to them cause your shy vs. not talking to them cause you dont give a shit? Yeah, and women can smell it like B.O. on you. Because the man who doesn't give a shit, when he does interact with her, he shows immense strength and dominance in his body language and words. And then he ignores her. Then there's the shy-guy who asks her what her opinion is on pocket protectors when he musters up the courage to interact with the chick.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 06:57 PM
1

Sorry for the long-ish read, I feel like this requires a bit of explanation. Nope, it probably doesn't. This problem is about one of them. Oneitis. Knew it. Never did anything about it cause hey, I'm a busy guy faggot frightened of rejection. Thinly veiled attempt at best, bro. she continously told me she couldn't because her friend likes me. LMR. As we made out she also talked about how much she wanted to have sex with me but she couldn't becasue we're in the same class (poor girl, she's really…
/r/askTRP21/02/15 06:50 PM
3

Exactly. "The longer you take to come over, the less I care about fucking you. Chop chop."
/r/askTRP21/02/15 06:27 PM
1

Here's a complete 180 she's done already: she invited him out for lunch. How do you not see that she's interested now? This is basic TRP 101 shit. This IOI of hers is strong. It's easily workable. I'm not saying this is in the bag, but he's caught her attention in a way that she's chasing him now.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 06:21 PM
1

Equality isn't a core tenet of mine. I'm the more valuable one in the relationship. She gave him a reason to be suspicious, and he acted on it. It's not so much a matter of what his actions were, but the truth that surfaced.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 06:08 PM
2

Didn't even read your post. YOU FUCKING DON'T. The old adage, "you can drag a horse to a water trough, but you can't make it drink" comes to mind. TRP is not a political movement. It's a resource for men who have hit rock-bottom. Who want to turn their shitty lives around. Your friend must journey to that desolate place on his own. Let him fall on his own. If he reaches out to you, then provide. But the red pill is fucking bitter, and he will not take it unless he's at a complete loss in life.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 03:47 AM
2

You're gerbiling. I don't mean to pull a power-play here, but I'm endorsed on the main sub. I know what I'm talking about. Be cool and enjoy the company of other women, past failures be damned.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 03:43 AM
-2

What you're really saying is, "but at the same time I was also never alpha." Exactly. She's seeing and treating you in a new light, and this offer for lunch is a direct reflection of that. You've got a clean slate with her.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 03:35 AM
2

During those 1.5yrs, did she ever ask to "catch up over lunch"?
/r/askTRP21/02/15 03:29 AM
7

Her lending out a hand was an implicit/potential fuck. A "real" alpha (and I use that loosely to avoid a No True Scotsman fallacy) would have recognized this and played off that. I would have gamed her. You distanced yourself from her in order to build attraction. She responded positively by opening you. You should have flirted and gauged her responses. Calibrate yourself based on how open she is to fucking. You came across butthurt. Like you were trying to save face for orbiting for so long. Yo…
/r/askTRP21/02/15 03:21 AM
1

Act like nothing happened.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 02:07 AM
4

She's starting to use her pussy to get commitment out of a man instead of purely enjoying a romp.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 02:03 AM
1

"Studies" this, "studies" that. I go by my own field research. Not what some fucking progressive/liberal academic has to say.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 01:57 AM
1

First mistake is going with such a formal approach... going out for drinks to discuss "the relationship". Fuck that. Second, it looks like I didn't post my hypothetical response. If you go stoic, you're not pandering to the comfort she needs. She'll break off, as she is already willing to do so. The best approach to a comfort test like this in your scenario, is "listen, we both know what's coming... let's keep things fun and playful and enjoy what we have going while we have each other."
/r/askTRP21/02/15 01:51 AM
1

I have experience dealing with engineering chicks. They may be able to have a better control of logic, but they're still women. About as masculine as a third-world aircraft is flyable. EDIT: Let me make my stance clear -- NO, do not trust her because of some "masculine brain" hypothesis you have.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 01:15 AM
2

Re: lack of exclusivity... she sees you as the real deal. You've done very well with her. But she is starting to sense that she's just a plate and will never be anything more than a plate. She enjoys your dominance as well as your physical/emotional providence. You're a complete catch, and she recognizes that, but she feels she's getting the short-end of the stick by not having your commitment. Re: comfort test... read up on the premise. I'm sure CH has written about it. It's basically an LTR sh…
/r/askTRP21/02/15 01:06 AM
2

I took her out on V day, what the hell else does she want? Oooh, she wants an upgrade, man. And she wants it baaad. And you're alluding to wanting to give her it. When she shit tests you with how you're being distant, you tell her, "I'm busy." Fini. No más. She must learn to respect your time and agenda.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 01:04 AM
3

Bravo. This is a good comment.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 01:00 AM
3

Jesus. Where do I start? Let me give you my panacea administered in condescension: "You are a faggot. Stop being a faggot, you flaming fucking faggot." Me: Oh yeah, it was no problem. But now, you owe me. Beating around the bush. Nut up, pussy. Me: Yeah, possibly. I didn't think about that. A brownie? With a thumbs up? I'm hurt. You're hurt? Like PMS cramps? Me :👍 Lol. How about a date instead? Let's get a coffee tomorrow. "How are you, fluviant? :) I just wanted to know, if you were maybe free,…
/r/askTRP21/02/15 12:58 AM
8

This is a great approach to getting yourself cucked.
/r/askTRP21/02/15 12:47 AM
2

You are gerbiling very hard, my friend. Engineering chicks are still women, and thus they have Special Snowflake Syndrome. Reread your post with that postulation in mind. She's still a woman. She can pretend to be a wolf in sheep's clothing in the classroom, but she still goes home and has "cry sessions" to deal with the mounting stress of her courseload. She's also dated many betas which seems strange for how attractive she is. Attention whore. She's a phony and it's painfully fucking obvious. …
/r/askTRP21/02/15 12:43 AM
1

We're not exclusive so she doesn't need this excuse to fuck other guys Your head's not in the right place. This lack of exclusivity is driving her actions here... but not because she wants to wander. This is a comfort test. I'd actually wager that she brought this up because you left the last time you fucked her. This could also be her hamster spewing an "asking for an upgrade" shit test. Does she come from a more conservative/traditional culture?
/r/askTRP21/02/15 12:40 AM
13

Red pill has absolutely nothing to do with this political bullshit. Are we reading the same post? This is what I gleaned: What's the moral, here? Trust cannot be gained by demanding it at the point of a gun. Trust cannot be gained by demanding it at the point of a idealistic moral argument. Trust cannot even be earned, because what can be earned can be owed. Trust must inspired. Communal relationships are the most desirable. They are a society's greatest asset, and the real measure of a person's…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 12:27 AM
1

I am not reading all that. Quit being a faggot. This is beginning to seem more like oneitis with all the writing you're doing about this one woman. You've gotten your answer by now. That's all that matters. Proceed from there.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 11:11 PM
1

Interesting. My girls are always pinging me for attention when I'm not with them. Even if they're "busy," they'll throw something my way about this thing or that thing they did that reminded them of me. My gut instinct is that it's bad if you only talk to her to schedule dates when she's away (how often are these dates?). She doesn't need you, and that's a bad sign in the context of an LTR. That seems more like plate status; a casual fling.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 08:44 PM
1

Untuck your fucking nutsack and tell this bitch she will not use you for free beta-orbiter services.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 07:05 PM
1

All of these responses are wrong. Too superficial and whinybaby-like. Women have an intrinsic need to be owned by a greater power. To be a follower of some thing or cause; to be submissive to that cause and support it. That greater power has typically been a strong, alpha male with a vision and mission. In the current day and age, many fathers are frumpy betabux pussywhipped faggots. Daughters grow up without a strong, alpha male father figure. The mom walks all over him. The daughters have no r…
/r/askTRP20/02/15 06:55 PM
1

The more important aspect of this is to go radio silent when she's with her friends for those 10 days. Make her miss you, and show zero need for her attention. This sets the stage. As for your response? A&A mein freund. "Not a second went by that I wasn't compulsively groveling at the thought of you. I was literally frothing at the mouth nonstop." This kinda "flips the script" in that it juxtaposes your radio silence with goofy obsession. Emotional roller coaster, push/pull, etc. Your girl will …
/r/askTRP20/02/15 06:34 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/2wgk21/ive_been_seeing_a_lot_of_posts_on_trp_and_asktrp/cor31j3 http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2wcqk5/give_her_the_gift_of_missing_you_the_trp_way/copwdx4
/r/askTRP20/02/15 03:59 AM
1

Godspeed, brother.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 03:21 AM
2

How do you approach the "Where are we going," or "What are we?" shit-test if you're ready and or not ready to give up your commitment? For instance, if she was to ask, "What are we," If I weren't ready to commit, I would reply, "We're two people enjoying each other's company," or whatever deflection to make her drop the subject for a while. Here is where you need to diverge a bit from the beaten-TRP path. First off, you need to be able to identify if she's LTR-worthy. Imagine how a successful LT…
/r/askTRP20/02/15 02:55 AM
8

Mistake #1: Trying to logic a woman's words.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 02:01 AM
10

1) Your response seems off... like you were jumping the gun with proving to her that you wanted to be more than just friends by using that absolutely canned line. 1a) I would have responded with something like, "I'm glad my outward appearance is that convincing." 2) Her response seems to indicate that she thought you were rejecting meeting her, not rejecting the friendzone. 2a) Your response should be "I'm the biggest meanie around". Easy A&A. Easy tingles will follow. She sees you as a potentia…
/r/askTRP20/02/15 02:00 AM
5

Women have an intrinsic need (not even desire), to be "claimed" by a high-value alpha male. Claim her entire soul... if she's your GF (implies exclusivity). "What about when I'm not with you?" She was shit-testing to see how serious you were about her being completely yours. Your responses: "I'm going to mark your ass with my handprint to remind you who you belong to." "I will bruise you up and down with my signature mark so everyone knows who claimed you." "Your body is going to be imprinted by…
/r/askTRP20/02/15 01:24 AM
5

We will separate this into two different entities: 1) a man finding TRP after already being knee-deep in a girlfriend/LTR, and 2) the generic ideology surrounding TRP's approach to LTR Game. 1) If, as seems to be the case with the OP, a man is having a hard time not devoting his entire self to his woman, then yes, I agree wholeheartedly with you. He should distance himself form her initially (for a good amount of time) to get her used to the "feeling" of dating an alpha. Use this distance to sha…
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 01:55 AM
5

This is a one-way ticket to clipping off a girlfriend you chose due to emotional abandonment, my friend. There's a stark contrast between making plates earn your time, and devoting time to your woman as if she were a hobby/project you were working on. The Law of Entropy. Everything requires upkeep.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 12:31 AM
3

"The gift of missing you" is really an abstraction of "absent-minded male who's too busy with his life (mission) to worry about women." Women find it sexy when the man's off doing his own thing and is so focused and concentrated that he forgets about her.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 12:26 AM
2

What she's saying is, "you're too beta for me to be comfortable with you moving this fast." Like /u/rebuildingMyself said, keep going. She's trying to place you in her comfy "nice guy"/orbiter role. Don't let her see you as one of those chumps.
/r/askTRP18/02/15 10:08 AM
2

I'd suggest against dread here. You have to be proactive in your life. Tell her straight up: "no sex, no relationship."
/r/askTRP18/02/15 10:06 AM
1

You've got to be kidding me. Allow me to teach you how to use the sidebar. Step 1: click link to a TRP endorsed blog, like Chateau Heartiste or The Rational Male. Step 2: search "brain wired male female" or something equally relevant to what you want to verify in the search bar. Step 3: find pertinent-sounding article or one riddled left and right with promising links and other goodies. Step 4: read post while looking for source of claims. Step 5: come to primary source. Every. Thing. Is. In. Th…
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 09:47 AM
0

The sidebar goes much deeper than you think. Make yourself intimately familiar with these concepts.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 07:43 AM
2

You poor sucker. Gotta pay for your pussy in homework assignments.
/r/askTRP18/02/15 07:28 AM
4

No response is the consensus? We got a bunch of spineless babies in here. Here are the conditions: 1) She's engaged 2) You've probably not made any sexual intentions clear to her 3) Corollary to (2), she's not interested in you 4) She has the audacity to ask you to do a homework assignment of hers for which you will not receive credit 5) She gave you no solid reason other than "something came up." What came up? Probably something utterly fucking moronic like "girl's night out." 6) There's a pres…
/r/askTRP18/02/15 07:25 AM
3

I'm no missionary. The information is available to them; they can choose to keep living a life of delusion, or they can take the red pill. I'm indifferent either way.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 06:59 AM
1

We are seeking truth here And we have tallied up a vast repository of truths in the sidebar. and your words are scarily dogmatic. I preach the sidebar and the wealth of knowledge contained within it. TRP should be treated scientifically. It is, and it's all summarized in the sidebar. Our skepticism is justified if there are no sources. Correct. But there are tons of sources. They're in the sidebar. As of now this should be considered hearsay, no matter how plausible. No, it should not. It is doc…
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 06:52 AM
1

What we would prefer to see is something that enhances our perception, not convolutes it. That is, if you came at us with "well actually there's this study that says otherwise -- let's discuss its importance in the grand scheme of OP's premise," not, "but maybe there aren't actually studies that validate what you said (let alone disprove it)?" I appreciate your level-headedness and know your head's in the right place. That being said, sidebar.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 04:09 AM
6

The only misinformation being spread is the skepticism. This isn't r/purplepilldebate.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 03:43 AM
4

♂ I'm giving you this in a very contextual manner: for condescending a request for "sources". 1) The constant stress from newcomers for "sources" and "studies" backing up assertions within this sub. Yes, /u/ComeOnTown isn't endorsed and thus doesn't have the automatic merit to back up what he's saying, but long-timers of this sub will read this post and nod in agreement from top to bottom. If you ask for sources, you're inherently denying facts that should make sense. You just don't get it. 2) /…
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 12:25 AM
2

I don't follow. Your response does not seem to address what I said. Yes, she's still a woman, and yes, I also like women. Marry her if you want. Like another poster pointed out, TRP provides a skillset and repository of information to help you make your best-informed decision. It's not a checklist of things you may or may not do. That being said, you seem to have no concept of what I'm advising. If you don't understand what I'm trying to say here (that you are the one who sets the boundaries, li…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 09:36 PM
2

Plant the seed in her head that you want more, and if you ever need it, you can subtly dread her with that (assuming you want more than two). She may be all these great things you've listed, but she's still a woman. She will form to the container you put her in.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 09:18 PM
2

she only wants two children. No, she wants what you want. Tell her what she wants.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 09:07 PM
3

The jealousy aspect is considered derogatory, but it should not be considered that whatsoever. Women get turned on by being jealous. It excites them. So dreading her when she acts out of line (read: isn't gushing with arousal/attraction for you and thus complete submission) puts her back in line (arousal/attraction and submission). Do her a favor and make her jealous for once.
/r/MarriedRedPill15/02/15 10:53 PM
7

The enraged, spiteful reviews are from bluepill-conditioned people writhing in the pain they experience when someone tries to draw back the wool from over their eyes.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 07:06 PM
4

I commend your knowledge of exact historic dates, but you seem to be missing the forest for the trees. I'd like to hear your take on the summary (XXXIX) that I referenced in my previous comment, and how and which civilizations either did or did not follow a similar pattern to that outlined in part (d).
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 06:35 PM
4

Let's look at the fall of other civilizations then. It's the modern progressive movement whose aim is to blur the lines and tell us that we can't infer anything about anything and thus must resort to unbridled egalitarianism. The rise and fall of empires follows a general psychosocial paradigm as outlined in XXXIX (p. 24) of the above essay.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 04:43 PM
1

Right, I was using hyperbole to make a point. In regards to your other comment, perhaps this is part of the "easing-in" process, but I would suggest getting what you want to see her in and telling her to put it on for you. Minor discrepancies, all in all. Do not use this V-Day gift like an apology or subtle social contract to get sex out of her, like the other poster mentioned.
/r/MarriedRedPill12/02/15 03:34 PM
2

Couldn't agree more. Even if a marriage is going swimmingly, this kind of approach (logistics standing) seems incredibly bluepill. Giving her a shopping spree? Come on, son. You do NOT give her a blank check to waste. She's a woman. What you give her is the sexiest thing YOU can find for her to wear that night. There is no open-ended aspect to this -- YOU are deciding what she WILL wear. And I'm not talking a dress to wear at a restaurant. Do you really, REALLY, want her to look good out at a re…
/r/MarriedRedPill12/02/15 04:04 AM
10

One in 5/4/3 women are raped. The actual statistic just released today is that 3.14 out of every 1+2i women get brutally gangraped every negative 7 seconds. Maybe learn to do some fact-checking, shitlord.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 07:29 PM
3

Not a fan of these other responses. Too tryhard. They scream of validation-seeking. Keep it simple, keep it dominant. "Anything else you'd like to get off your chest?" with a cocky half-smirk.
/r/askTRP10/02/15 11:54 PM
9

Wow, bully, stop AMOGing him!
/r/TheRedPill03/02/15 01:04 AM
5

The 5 Stages of The Red Pill that you link to is actually a psychological theorem of sorts, called the Kübler-Ross model.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/15 12:24 AM
1

From a male's perspective, seeing women post pictures or anything with hints/undertones of a sexual nature on social media makes me think she is subtly polling the crowd of potential male suitors to see whom she could hook. A great way to let hypergamy thrive as there's an enormous amount of plausible deniability in this.
/r/RedPillWomen02/02/15 05:56 PM
2

The funny thing is it's evident that /u/duckspeed doesn't either.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 11:46 PM
7

I'm with you on this one. I can't help but question his endorsed status making such brazen comments ("either agree with me or leave"). That is nonsense, and starting the post with that "disclaimer" in the first place makes me raise an eyebrow. TRP does not hold ideological positions. Rather, it's a repository of information on the sexual market from an evo-psych perspective. What you do with that information is up to you. If a man wants a successful marriage, TRP will be able to provide a wealth…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 08:50 PM
9

Given that women are biologically less spatial-minded, it is perfectly sound to infer that they are more prone to making errors in flight.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 05:05 PM
2

This failure of hers would be far more understandable if it weren't a training mission. I'm a civilian pilot myself, but even I know enough to say that she handled the stall and engine failure in the exact wrong way. I'm glad you know what you're talking about and not blowing smoke up our collective ass. I read the report on the Wiki article and have an understanding of what happened. It says that the F-14 was known for its excessive yaw flaw. From the article: Finding herself overshooting the l…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 04:04 PM
10

Men are forged by hardship. You can't coddle a boy and expect him to come out the other end a man.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 01:29 AM
8

Don't bat an eyelash at videos that question or demean "masculinity." They're likely riddled with Feminist talking points. Moden Western men are pussified enough as it is. We don't need to laud the idea that the words "be a man" are able to cripple a man, like they would be able to cripple a woman. Men are not herd creatures. Social consensus does not sway us.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 01:16 AM
1

You honestly won't find much material that differs from typical PUA stuff. PUA is in essence mimicry of how a man who has high self-esteem/confidence and a high sense of self-worth flirts with women.
/r/seduction27/01/15 02:15 AM
6

Finally, someone with an ounce of sense. This sentiment from the woman is very contextual. If she says it lightheartedly, following a joke, in company of others, or some other nonchalant way, then treat it as a shit test. But if the two of you are sitting together on the couch, and she tries to express concern in private by saying something like this, then what she's really saying is I like you a lot and find you attractive, but the emotional connection is not there in order for me to feel like …
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 05:01 PM
-1

You're missing the forest for the trees.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 11:00 PM
0

No matter how "alpha" a chick thinks she is, I (rather, any alpha male, for that matter) could pick her up at any second and throw her through a fucking wall. You'll be looking mighty dominant covered in all that drywall dust and those tears streaming down your pretty little face.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 11:26 PM
2

As well as a pupil-dilating head rush.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/15 11:33 PM
1

HAHA. I approve. BPP is an esteemed member of this sub (he's not endorsed? He salvaged a 20yr BP marriage for Christ's sake); he should not be on the receiving end of such petty rhetoric.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 07:58 PM
6

All these retards in the comments section don't realize that everything below "BPP" is a copy-paste. I recall reading this post back in November-ish, but I don't recall the user who posted it. If memory serves correct, it wasn't an endorsed member, so good luck.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/15 03:09 AM
1

Of course. The premise of the sentiment remains unchanged. You can love a son or daughter in an alpha way, and you can love them also in a beta way.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/15 02:55 AM
8

Give her alpha fux and alpha bux.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/14 03:44 AM
2

You mean instead of being worth billions? Terribly depressing.
/r/askTRP26/12/14 12:17 AM
1

I see it as more of a doubling-down and enforcing the idea. Hints to her, "I don't find anything wrong with taking that course of action."
/r/MarriedRedPill16/12/14 04:35 AM
3

After a few months of this drop hints about a friend from work who ditched his wife for emotional cheating. Make it scary for her This is gold.
/r/MarriedRedPill15/12/14 07:36 AM
-1

She'd lose her fucking mind if you were texting some fine honey who was telling you all kinds of sweet things. That's not comparable. Women seek emotional fulfillment from men. Men seek physical fulfillment from women. The parallel to be made here is if he, the husband, was receiving nudes from a fine honey.
/r/MarriedRedPill15/12/14 07:25 AM
2

Perfect advice. OP, here is a little "cheat code" for you next time your woman has a bizarre outburst like this: tell her "Get a good night's sleep. You're out of it tonight." Also make sure to let her feel weird; i.e., give her a puzzling look (raised eyebrow, confused demeanor, taken aback by such an "odd" thing to say). Make the hamster work FOR you. In the morning after, make sure to bring it up by saying something like "feeling better today?" and let that hamster spew excuses as to why she …
/r/askTRP13/12/14 09:48 PM
3

The crux of shit-tests is that they are a device through which women gauge a man's strength of character. She's trying to nudge him into a strong stance through pestering him or otherwise insulting him. The supplicating beta will disgust the woman as he does not stand up for himself and is clueless as to why she's "being so irrational."
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 05:51 PM
2

As an engineer, realize that religion is itself a tool of social engineering. It keeps society within limits (or at least yearns to). You're not an atheist missionary -- you have no reason to convert her. Let her be stupidly uncynical (credit goes to another TRPer for that terminology, /u/drrrrrr I believe).
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 05:23 PM
14

This is the best answer. In short, women seek better partners, whereas men seek more partners.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 05:15 AM
7

High-value men will only consider wifing up a woman who has a highly feminine demeanor, respect for masculinity and male authority, and other unicorn-esque traits. Assuming you want your daughter to land a high-value man...
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 08:37 PM
3

Ties into Warrior Bride theory. Women's nature is that of passivity; they enjoy experiencing, whereas men enjoy creating experience. In other words, women prefer to be objects of the world (passive), and men prefer to be the subjects of the world (active). This translates into sexuality as well. Women's sexuality is passive. They yearn to be the OBJECT of men's sexual desire. They want to experience a man's immense sexual desire, rather than create the experience of immense sexual desire. Such i…
/r/askTRP03/12/14 04:41 AM
1

Spot on, pretty much. Only alteration I'd make is... ken-jah-tie-moo
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 01:18 AM
1

A cursory glance at this leads me to believe that dread will be even more important in securing the woman's sexual availability.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/14 12:52 AM
2

Success by calling them rude? That's fine too. But you should be practicing amused mastery, not spiteful indignation that she's ruining the vibe when you're out with your friends.
/r/askTRP19/11/14 03:55 PM
2

The blushing was, "No! Stop leading him on! I'm trying to get rid of him!"
/r/askTRP19/11/14 03:53 PM
6

"sorry, I didn't hear the phone." "Sorry"? Is this a joke? Don't make excuses for her bad behavior. When you see her, it's not "sorry," it's "your fault for taking too long."
/r/askTRP19/11/14 03:37 PM
7

Re: calling her out in group settings, I take an approach like this: Hey, <name>, how's facebook, ya hermit?
/r/askTRP19/11/14 03:36 PM
8

Unfortunately, I end up having to drive her since shes in the same social circle. You do not have to do ANYTHING. You're your own fucking man. Start acting like it.
/r/askTRP19/11/14 03:33 PM
0

Surprised at all the negative feedback here. I personally like what /u/Dorrog is saying.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 01:21 PM
2

That as well is a shit test. You MUST make her feel like she's the crazy one ... in order to stop her from being crazy. It's a dose of reality administered in the form of "this is how weird you're being compared to me." It's also weak on your part to attempt to pull off amused mastery and then drop it once the wife puts up a little hissy-fit.
/r/MarriedRedPill17/11/14 02:44 PM
1

"You're cute when you're melodramatic."
/r/askTRP15/11/14 12:45 AM
6

And after I ask her to explain why it's so "sexist" Dude. Brutal. When you're called a sexist, laugh in their fucking face. With SJWs and feminists and the otherkin like, you must apply a heavy dose of amused mastery. After lunch was over, I told my GF that I was not a fan of Jen and that I don't want to see her anymore.' Wrong. Proper way to start that conversation is, "Jen... what a character. It's too bad that she just doesn't get it." Re: everything else she's been doing -- you're mate guard…
/r/askTRP15/11/14 12:41 AM
2

Me: [Try to keep my cool, but still I interrupted her] Did you hear what I just said? I would have gone a different route. Asking her if she heard you is rhetorical to start. Shows a glimmer of uncertainty manifesting in the form of "this person is trying to vie for my position as leader." It's a really weird situation, looking at the example conversation you posted. I'd only suggest to be aloof to her attempts at engaging in an argument. So instead of what you said, try something like "You misu…
/r/MarriedRedPill13/11/14 02:03 PM
2

You engaged in the argument that she laid, that's the only problem here. Even your calm, cool, collected approach was indulgent of her argument.
/r/MarriedRedPill13/11/14 05:47 AM
1

President of college states facts about frivolous false rape claims. CNN panel harps about how rape claims can't be frivolous. Get logic'd, shitlords. P.S. Notice how the President's apology was taken by the panel with their chortles. Such is why you should only apologize when absolutely necessary. (h/t Heartiste)
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 09:40 PM
1

This is late, but I agree, those are great responses. Since you didn't respond, however, in the future a good way to follow up with not responding (if you choose to respond at all) is when she brings it up later on, have a puzzled look on your face as if you do not recall the incident (snapchat in this case) whatsoever. This puts her in a very uncomfortable position to have to justify her attempt to make you jealous. Stay mostly silent and unaffected as she runs through the paces. She will event…
/r/MarriedRedPill10/11/14 04:29 PM
1

A verbatim translation is what /u/n0c0ntr0l was talking about, not a summary.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/14 06:38 PM
2

Yes, "all women are like that." However, there's a caveat -- all women are like that only if you let them be like that.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 04:26 PM
4

He's a showboater.. anyone can cut an apple fast. Easy as fuck. Playing a guitar solo would be harder. Sounds like you and Gordon have quite a bit in common. No one's impressed. Your comment doesn't add to the discussion. It's not so much the "factual" expertise as it is the "appearance" of displaying expertise. Consider how impressed women are by "palm-reading" or "magic tricks." Those acts are a crock of shit, but giving women the experience of knowing what you're doing and going through the p…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 02:36 PM
1

If the context is, "OP completely mischaracterized his LTR's actions and reactions," then yes, I agree.
/r/askTRP29/10/14 02:27 PM
-5

Withdraw attention. Pull back. Let her know that if she doesn't comply with you, you won't make her feel the feels she likes to feel from you.
/r/askTRP29/10/14 02:37 AM
6

A good rule of thumb to keep in mind with interactions is the following: If you feel butterflies in your stomach, you're doing it right.
/r/askTRP26/10/14 11:26 PM
1

You sound like you need a mentor, or mentors. If I were you, I'd hang out in the TRP IRC chat. This problem far exceeds a post-and-comments format.
/r/askTRP26/10/14 12:42 AM
1

You think "fuck relationships man, I'm gonna plate spin forever like I belong in a travelling circus!" Wrong. I would argue that, at a certain point, people start internally judging you negatively for not being monogamous. It's expected societally, and furthermore, a natural alpha (for lack of a better term) would see great benefit in not having to expend effort working on spinning plates in order to facilitate his growth as a man. Plates serve to give you sex on command. But there necessitates …
/r/TheRedPill26/10/14 12:38 AM
2

People judge height based on the amount of confidence you exude. A parable to offer you: one of the best compliments I've ever received was from a friend who noted You know, you're not the tallest guy around. But the way you hold yourself, the way you walk... I'd be damned if you weren't the tallest guy I know We lived in a dorm with a few guys who were both taller and more muscular than I was at the time.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/14 12:29 AM
1

Why must it be platonic? This scenario is screaming "threesome."
/r/askTRP25/10/14 10:41 PM
6

Do not bring it up.
/r/askTRP25/10/14 03:39 PM
1

It absolutely does. With experience comes a greater sense of self-respect. You become less forgiving.
/r/askTRP25/10/14 03:39 PM
1

Alright. So it sounds like she's still interested (or intrigued by you, at least). If/when you text/call her again, your goal should be to build comfort. Be cool, laid-back, and funny. Tease her at some point in the convo. Keep it short and simple. After some flirting and rapport-building, shoot her an invite. Wait a few days to hit her up again.
/r/askTRP25/10/14 03:29 PM
2

The undertone of her text "sorry things didn't go the way you wanted tonight" is "you tried but you just couldn't get in my pants, sucker!" She's not only acknowledging that she has supreme control of the sexual dynamic of the relationship, but also that she's able to condescend/console his attempt to get laid, as if he's some whimpering dog cowering back to his doghouse. It's the beginnings of her making him an orbiter. I prefer to nuke this shit.
/r/askTRP25/10/14 03:25 PM
4

So, let me get this straight. Your last text exchange ended with trying to set up a date and her "flaking"?
/r/askTRP25/10/14 03:17 PM
2

This sort of pitiful follow-up text deserves a nuke to the hamster. As soon as you show you're fine getting led-on by the prospect of pussy, you lose. [Other girl's name]? Change of plans, we can still hangout tonight. I'll head over shortly.
/r/askTRP25/10/14 03:12 PM
1

Find Sex God Method and read it. There should be a PDF somewhere on the internet. That will revolutionize your sex life.
/r/askTRP25/10/14 03:02 PM
-2

It's a way of deducing her insult's effect/validity by correcting her (agree) with the more extreme (amplify) version of her insult. Simple example: Her: You're mean/awkward/weird You: I'm the meanest/most awkward/weirdest You agree with her premise (that you're mean/awkward/weird), but amplify it (meanest/most awkward/weirdest). It's a social dominance maneuver in that you've positioned yourself above her. It's hard to save face for the woman without being a total cunt/bitch after you A&A.
/r/askTRP25/10/14 02:56 PM
4

Dread was the exact wrong approach to take. Use dread to punish her when she knowingly does something wrong. A miscarriage is a serious issue to a woman, and something that needs consoling, not punishment. I'm not recommending "chick-flick romance," but recognize that your instillment of dread is what caused her to say "God didn't want me to have a child with you." You didn't console her and remind her that you chose her to mother your children regardless of what happens. She thinks she failed a…
/r/askTRP24/10/14 07:41 PM
2

Not enough context in how you handle your relationship. It sounds like she isn't getting enough emotional investment from you. The general rule is something like 95% alpha/5% beta, but adjust accordingly to your woman. I don't think she feels worthy enough for you (and your children). The miscarriage made her feel like she wasn't a good enough woman for you. It put her in hysterics. Your response to her miscarriage seemed to be more along the lines of "you better give me my children, woman!" and…
/r/askTRP24/10/14 07:19 PM
10

You definitely did not build enough rapport or create enough attraction. It was a bland conversation, and you raced to get her out of her house and into your bed. Too soon. M: Depends, if I'm in a good mood, maybe. Depends? On fucking what? You just gave a strong invite out for drinks. Now you're waffling "depending on your mood"? You're not a woman; your "mood" is completely controllable and does not affect your day or your actions. Downhill from there. For the sake of helping you, I'll give a …
/r/askTRP22/10/14 05:17 PM
1

No. She selects nothing. She is joining you on your journey. It sounds like she wants the excitement of go-karts. Say something like "Let's unwind over a movie and wine at my place on x-night"
/r/askTRP21/10/14 11:33 PM
1

Great turn-around. "Not planning on going go-karting for a while, but this weekend I am [doing x-thing at y-place]. Swing by around z-time and we'll do a shot." The goal is to let her know that your plans for go-karting were NOT contingent upon her being there, and lead her to believe that you went go-karting regardless (which I hope you did -- go-karting is tons of fun). Instead, you'll be doing something else soon, and you're inviting her.
/r/askTRP21/10/14 11:10 PM
1

Not enough context -- was her response positive or negative? Set a date already if positive.
/r/askTRP21/10/14 10:34 PM
1

Great points. Even better username, too.
/r/askTRP21/10/14 07:15 PM
3

Depends on the frame you've set. If you establish a weak frame, then this seems like a cop-out to ease the pain of feeling awkwardness. Conversely, if you establish a strong frame, then this is almost like a "next" in that you have to get to the next chick in line. From the sounds of it, OP set a frame more along the lines of weak rather than strong.
/r/askTRP21/10/14 07:12 PM
4

Fully on-board with /u/tombreck2 here. In addition, We meet, she wanted to shake hands and I go for a hug. Awkward, but I didn't let it mind me. Here's a core tenet of inner game: situations are only awkward if you choose to interpret them as awkward. Another way of saying this is, exude confidence in every single thing you do and you'll never be or make anyone else feel awkward. The date was only about 30 minutes long, I said I had to get going early which was kind of the truth Subtly signaling…
/r/askTRP21/10/14 06:29 PM
2

She doesn't think you got the hint. She's trying to end the convo. Tease her for being so standoffish. "Christ, you're awkward. I heard you the first time. Now stop pestering me, you broken record."
/r/askTRP21/10/14 06:00 PM
1

You found it amusing.
/r/askTRP21/10/14 04:23 PM
1

If she brings up the text exchange in a negative light when you see her, act puzzled that she thought it was awkward and say you were getting an kick out of it.
/r/askTRP21/10/14 03:02 PM
1

I agree with /u/sparta126. When I'm in this situation, I tell the girl I'm Prince Charming. If she asks again, I say "people I'm close to call me <name>, though". You sounded like you were begging for a date and too insecure to let her know who you were. You weirded her out.
/r/askTRP21/10/14 02:58 PM
2

I'd be far less forgiving if trying to establish frame. You think you got what it takes, sweetcheeks? Let her ooze for you.
/r/askTRP21/10/14 12:56 PM
1

She's approaching the wall. Her options are dwindling. She's trying to tie down a man.
/r/askTRP21/10/14 12:54 PM
3

Train wreck. Her:I don t wanna be a teacher =p = "it's your job the be in the dominant role" And you dropped the ball with your response. I'd say this is not salvageable. You were a betabitch through-and-through. She's not interested.
/r/askTRP21/10/14 02:59 AM
1

I go to college in a college town. If it's not the college chicks, it's the trashy hillbillies from the boonies around here. It's all circumstantial -- I'll give you that if you can avoid college chicks, do so. But do not handicap yourself from expanding and improving simply out of fear.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 10:04 PM
8

Perhaps it is a strong word, but the safety of women relies solely upon their men protecting them from other men, who have no interest in their well-being.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 09:57 PM
1

It will come to an (unfortunate) end. Read.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 09:53 PM
2

Yes, listen to /u/rpscrote. Ignore and let her wonder if you're busy having dinner and dessert with some other sub.
/r/askTRP20/10/14 08:34 PM
2

Text her whenever the hell you want with unabashed confidence. You don't need to be coaxed out of your cage to get what you want.
/r/askTRP20/10/14 08:31 PM
1

Read the examples I gave in my post, and then let her do the rest.
/r/askTRP20/10/14 01:55 PM
3

I'll break this down. Me (9:08am): And that was with a crude outline off the cuff while distracted by drinking with friends. Imagine what I could make you feel when I really try while sober (<--Too much?) Yes, too much. You're subcommunicating "I promise I'll please you if you allow me!" Also admitting to having been buzzed/drunk -- let her wonder about what you're doing. Read my recent submission (Be A Closed Book). Make her pry for details about you. I would've pushed right here for a meetup. …
/r/askTRP20/10/14 04:12 AM
3

The unfortunate victim learns on Day 1 of Feminism 101 that "history is subjective and we can interpret it however we wish."
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 10:31 PM
3

They're jealous that the woman is beautiful and feminine enough to bring such a handsome man to a point where he's unable to control himself and take her in for a Kodak-moment kiss. It's a mixture of cognitive dissonance and projection.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 10:29 PM
4

I disagree. Is she contemplating divorce? Perhaps, in the moment. Is this a huge red flag? Not at all. AWALT if you're a weak man who allows her to be "like that." She resents her husband for being a weak beta. No woman who's in a relationship with a respectable alpha would call him "abusive," nor would she withhold sex from him.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 02:49 PM
5

She has an admirer on the team that she goes to for all of her problems. Even if this guy's friendzoned as fuck, you do NOT LTR-up a woman who is close with other men -- gay or straight. That's a red flag.
/r/askTRP13/10/14 03:16 AM
6

This is perhaps an even more important concept for TRPers than how to attract women. You'll encounter plenty of bitter losers who want to bring you down. Don't entertain their attempts. Be stoic. Amused Mastery. You're unaffected by their petty insults.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 09:30 PM
5

You know that opinions need to be based on facts as well, right? Where's your source?
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 02:43 PM
34

If you know your history, feminism reared it's head in roman civilization just before it fell. There appears to be a cycle where a civilization becomes so prosperous that it can afford to entertain notions such as feminism, only for those same notions to contribute significantly to the eventual downfall of the civilization, usually by lowering the birth rate and not incentivising beta men to work hard for the tax base Love the Glubb reference. That essay should go in the sidebar. It's quite the …
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 02:14 PM
2

Intimidation is a result of extreme respect.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 10:51 PM
2

You have a point, but consider the premise that we advocate treating women like children. They love games. No matter how self-/male-centric TRP is, biologically, women have the upper-hand in terms of reproduction. Think of the Laws of Power and how you should play others in order to succeed rather than stick to a stringent code of morals and ethics.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 10:33 PM
6

without making the situation uncomfortable Change your thought process on this. Revel in the awkwardness. One way to display social dominance is by being able to persevere in situations of perceived awkwardness or uncomfortability. If she asks, you could literally just stare at her, hold strong eye contact, and build up the awkward tension until she breaks and changes the subject. Once she folds, you have shown her that she is submissive to you/your frame.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 04:38 PM
4

As a general guideline: I recommend reading red pill content such as [...] endorsed contributor comments and posts This one in particular irks me. I'm not going to say every single EC post is perfect, but by and large, the overall message that the endorsed contributor is making is spot-on re: sexual strategy. Instead of nitpicking at what is being said, you should stop posting and soak in the message that the contributor is making. We are not bullshitting you, we are not being absolutist or extr…
/r/TheRedPill07/10/14 12:58 PM
8

I truly believe they were all a lot happier before feminism happened. That's because they objectively were.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 03:06 PM
19

Three hours later and I'm literally Gandalf incarnate.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 12:20 AM
5

Don Draper. Frank Underwood. Much can be learned from these characters, even if fictional.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 03:06 PM
1

This half of married women are likely married to the bottom-of-the-barrel betas. This should come as no surprise. Often, during the anger phase of incessant AWALT proclamations, budding TRPers forget that the knowledge vested in them through this sub puts them well above average (easily in the top 20% of men). If we ask the question with this in mind, then we start looking at the top 20% of married women. We're above the average here. Internalize that.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 01:20 AM
1

When I mentioned contributions, I by no means meant strictly FRs only. Valid TRP opinions need to be promulgated in the comments sections of threads to guide lurkers and new members.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 06:11 PM
1

I don't think that view is feminist, to want to go into public and not hear "hey slut ive got something for you to sit on whore" The world isn't utopian. Sorry, son. Further, if someone does go out of their way to insult you like this, either insult them back or go on with your day. It's immature to want to exact revenge on them for insulting you. It's completely frivolous. All I'm saying is it would be nice to not hear those things, do you get where I'm coming from at all? Yeah, it'd be really …
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 06:08 PM
1

Enforce existing laws, don't craft new laws that will likely be exploited for purposes not intended by the authors. This seems to be the main guise of progressivism (and feminism subsequently), actually. "Yeah, you could technically get persecuted under this new anti-terrorism law, but trust us, it won't be exploited to convict you." Good argument and argumentative style. Solid clarity of thought and rationale. I'd like to see more from you in regards to sexual strategy; I think you could contri…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 01:37 PM
1

Isn't that just everyone saying "murder makes me feel uncomfortable so we should make it illegal." "I feelz bad when someone takes my possessions so we should make it illegal and call it theft." Aren't all laws based around people feeling bad? No. Murder is a quantifiable loss of life. Theft is a quantifiable loss of material goods and property. Hearing words is not a quantifiable loss of anything. or do you think that if enough people find having a nice lunch at a restaurant/bar interrupted by …
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 01:25 PM
10

That, or they'll be single because all the men will be jailed up.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 12:50 PM
4

A great quote by a female commenter: "If a guy is drunk, and he's with a girl who is also drunk, any sort of sexual activity between them is considered rape, under the new definition of rape. [ [...] Seems very sexist to me, [...] but that's the new definition.]" Just absurd. If women are the helpless little children that you are making us out to be, and are as utterly incapable of responsibility for our own actions (eg: drinking) as you claim -- then we logically shouldn't be allowed to drive c…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 05:03 PM
19

She doesn't want actual advice; she wants to feel good. She's a woman.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 04:32 PM
1

Instead of watching superhero movies and wanting the girl, I'm going to get the girl. Good, and that's what we preach here. But instant gratification has planted itself firmly in Western culture, and boy do we love our dopamine rushes.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/14 07:40 PM
5

You are wrong, but that comes as no surprise seeing as you admit to being willfully ignorant and exhibit a hefty anger-phase attitude. Recognize that this is not an insult; it's merely a descriptor. A natural part of the stages of swallowing the pill. Let me offer you a more rational explanation of what's at work here. Women don't want to be dominant. Women want to experience what it's like to be dominant. They do that through interactions with a strong, alpha-type male. In the same sense, all h…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/14 03:47 PM
3

Will it bring me problems on my relationship if I just become more "aggressive"? Only if your frame is weak/shaky, or you are not confident and appear uneasy putting on your new-found aggressive front. She will see right through it if there are any holes.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/14 10:57 PM
2

How do you separate "innate" qualities from those that are programmed into us by society or distorted by the systems of society? Through observation of human behavior. There was a study done wherein one-day-old babies were shown two pictures at once. On one side, there was a face. On the other, there was a block/cube. The baby boys, by a large margin, primarily focused on the block. The baby girls, on the other hand, almost unanimously focused on the face. These babies were completely uninfluenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/14 03:52 PM
1

That's only one application of TRP to the sexual market. There's a strong LTR contingent here, it's just not as vocal.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/14 12:00 PM
1

They'll break themselves soon enough. That's when we swoop in a rebuild a proper TRP civilization/society from the ground up. History is cyclical.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/14 01:37 AM
-1

The primal force behind sex is the man dominating the woman. Of course, there are exceptions, but chances are the guy is too lame rather than too aggressive in bed. This woman does not sound like she has any mental hang-ups. If she's going around here and there for sex, it's highly unlikely that she's finding all these people to have sex with who share or know how to handle the mental hang-up. Frankly, the guy is most likely a sloppy beta in bed who lasts all of two minutes each time. I'm inclin…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 05:43 PM
-6

And also that he sucks in bed, at least relatively. A man who can't ravage a woman properly is indeed a joke of a man.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 12:58 PM
19

History repeats itself; it's purely cyclical. Read more here.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 06:11 PM
25

The fucking audacity for them to flag down a taxi when they know they don't have the money for it. Christ.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 04:51 PM
1

It's the general Lib attitude and ideology that I'm vilifying with that sentiment.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 03:24 PM
5

Current LTR is gaga for the environment/renewable energy. Was into feminism until she slowly lost that streak due to my influence in her life. Openly calls me a "racist" and "sexist towards women." Yet she's still obsessed with me. Women want a man who's judgmental and opinionated. That is what shows true strength of character -- not being affected by the opinions of others, especially in the face of popular opinion.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 03:41 AM
4

I didn't say the phases line up, I said the cycles are roughly the same length. You'd have to line up your own woman's cycle with each phase of the moon personally. But the length is what's important; it makes PMS and the lunar cycle synchronously periodic.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 08:00 PM
3

Golden. I'm using this in the future.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 12:38 PM
22

they are just as lunatic Great choice of words. "Lunatic" comes from the fact that the menstrual cycle (and thus bitchiness from PMS) is about as long as the lunar cycle. They're lunatic in that you can predict how cunty they'll be on a given day like you can predict the phase the Moon will be on any given day.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 12:22 PM
2

Assume the sale; never ask permission. "K but my bed only fits two" or "I need to test drive you 1-on-1 before giving you the threesome stamp of approval"
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 05:35 PM
8

More so too long-winded than too ballsy. When you invest that much in saying a single thing, you lose your leverage in the interaction. There's no perceived outcome independence. Doesn't help that the way that's worded sounds autistic as fuck.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 02:22 PM
12

It means she's extremely receptive and impressionable. She's purely submissive putty in your dominant hands. Use it to your advantage to permanently stamp your alphaness into her mind.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 02:20 PM
8

Fully agree with you here. I want it, therefore I'm going to get it. The OP is definitely a sound, logical argument for men blinded by egalitarianism. Women wouldn't be able to stand reading that whole thing.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 01:30 PM
2

This is without showing (or trying very hard) to show emotion. I get up and do something else or I'll just give her the silent treatment. Either way it always ends with me breaking frame somehow. I'm sure you do this with the thought in mind that a man's best weapon in a relationship is to simply walk away. What I doubt you realize is that walking away or giving the silent treatment only works if executed from a superior position/position of power. Otherwise you come across as butthurt, and it e…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 12:51 PM
1

What OP did is akin to putting a child up for adoption after it writes in crayon on the fridge. Sure, he can do whatever he wants. Does the decision seem rational or spiteful? In OP's case, definitely the latter. Have standards. But you must also let those who follow you want to follow you. When the punishment far exceeds the crime, you are a tyrant. When the two match, you are a beneficent leader. Being draconian in application of punishment tarnishes your reputation and drives people away from…
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 06:07 PM
1

Am I the only one who fits this bill? :\
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 04:15 AM
10

A bit of a recurrent theme I've seen lately is the idea that it's entirely possible to "fry the hamster" with too much alpha/dread. That frying is what leads to mutiny. They can only do so much before feeling completely used and unappreciated.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 05:44 PM
4

Give yourself enough plausible deniability, and you're set.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 01:50 AM
24

Ding ding ding, we have a winner. She may be thinking, "he's just trying to make me jealous ... but he's still with that other girl, and not me."
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 10:24 PM
16

This guy wins the award for the most beta human being to have existed. He dedicated his epitaph to his wife who never loved him.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 03:58 PM
3

I'm in complete agreement with you. Manipulating a man any way she can to commit to her is a girl's entire game And manipulation has more success when used on emotions rather than logic. it's never been the goal to get her to act more reasonable and civilized, just less bitchy, more feminine. Discipline in an interpersonal relationship is reciprocative with submission, not reasonability and civility. Spot on. We all know you're never going to get a woman to be completely reasonable about these t…
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 03:40 PM
9

"We'll construe it as her 'celebrating her curves.' They'll be none the wiser!"
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 01:47 PM
2

It is totally feasible that this other alpha can do everything I can do and more. I can bench, cook, fuck, make her laugh, play an instrument, build things, have great hair and fashion sense. Another alpha can do all these things, and paint and is a football star. You have to weigh it all in context. Sure, the next guy might have a few more tricks up his sleeve, but how can your woman be so certain that he'd stick around for her? As another commenter pointed out, women are risk-averse. Make your…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 04:34 PM
2

Reminds me of this skit by Key & Peele.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 04:05 PM
1

I meant from her perspective, yes. Similar to no matter how you spin it, losing your job and becoming unemployed will result in your woman losing respect for you.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 04:02 PM
5

This is a stupidly basic and empty answer. You might as well tell the OP to "just be himself." There are certain (dangerous) instances where you should have a plan of action in order to save face. See the other responses in this thread.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 04:24 AM
8

If shit gets annoying, always err on the side of caution and just say "babe, let's get out of here, I know a good place on Y street", then walk away. Never fight for the sake of "justice" of any kind, not worth it. Suck it up and move on to live another day. How do you pull this off so that you don't look like a pussy in front of your woman? Honest inquiry.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 04:22 AM
3

This top RPW thread comes to mind here: http://www.reddit.com/r/RedPillWomen/comments/1j0n7t/the_slut_and_how_not_to_be_one/ The gist of it is, don't worry so much about withholding sex. Give it a read and see if you're still of the same mind.
/r/RedPillWomen23/08/14 06:20 PM
1

It's a personal choice. I'm not here to tell you that you have to try an LTR.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 04:16 PM
1

I see mastering LTR Game as the last hurdle to mastering the sexual marketplace/intimate relationships. Spinning and dropping plates is easy and inconsequential; with an exclusive relationship, you have to be far more skilled. Funnily enough, if you don't learn how to handle an LTR (i.e., act beta in an exclusive relationship), then you'll be enduring a minefield of shit-tests every single minute of every day. Game her right so that she respects you, and she will fall in line very easily.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 04:00 PM
1

Your emotional needs aren't being completely met so you've invested yourself in the unicorn fantasy as a glimmer of hope. Satisfy your emotional needs outside of the women you fuck and you won't care about unicorns. This is a great line and a good thing to remind yourself if/when you feel like you're falling into oneitis for a chick.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 03:56 PM
1

We have this ridiculous notion in western culture that our SO should also become our best friend. Its nonsensical. Exactly -- its premise is that the two of you are equals. That's faulty and very toxic to an intimate relationship. The man should undoubtedly be the leader, as having the woman's respect is the only way she'll not wander.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 07:18 PM
2

Fuck, now this should be the motto of TRP. So concisely put; I love it.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 02:34 AM
20

I like where this line of thinking is going.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 04:59 PM
3

The key is alpha bux. But it's more than the paycheck. It's the providence you let her seek comfort in -- whether it be emotional or material. Make her work for the comfort you're able to provide -- which should be penultimate -- instead of showering it upon her at every opportunity.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 01:17 AM
4

You did not vet this woman well enough. /u/OccamsUsername's Unicorn Hunter Checklist will give you a good foundation for what to look for in a woman with whom you become exclusive.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 05:11 PM
1

Helping her pay for things isn't "being beta" if she understands that she's not entitled to it simply by virtue of being your girlfriend. Well put. The fundamental flaw to "beta bux" is that it's a surrender of providence without appreciation for that providence. An alpha provider, like in this context, would make sure the woman knows that she's the insubordinate and is not at all entitled to his resources. Come from a position of power and you avoid being the beta bux.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 03:09 PM
1

Only reason I don't like this is two-fold: He's abiding by her rules and what she wants (to not help with gas), and He comes across as very angsty and stubborn -- childish, even -- by refusing to negotiate (his resources for her submission/obedience).
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 03:05 PM
5

Don't listen to the naysayers here -- what you did is a perfect way of making her realize that 1) your resources are conditional (upon her vying for your approval) and 2) you don't tolerate a sense of entitlement from her. I would say this is TRP LiteTM in that it's very basic frame control and discipline. But this wasn't a monstrous shit-test, and as such, did not require anything complex. Keep it simple. Well done.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 03:00 PM
3

My first instinct here is that the guy accidentally dreaded her (with near-radio silence) during his vacation, and then bathed her in attention/validation after that crazy night of sex, causing her to become repulsed by his betatude.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 02:52 PM
5

A&A is an emotionally settled response intended to point out an instance of foolishness. A&A comes from a state of calm and amusement. This is very accurate. If you ever use sarcasm to make a point, you will come across as butthurt and spiteful. A&A's purpose is to make a point at how ludicrous a woman is being. But it's done, like /u/gg_s said, from a state of calm and amusement. AKA a state of authority/higher value.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 12:59 PM
11

Why are you putting that person down? Is he AMOGing? Giving you lip/attitude? In any case, as an effective leader, utilize your skill of amused mastery to make that person want to befriend and respect you. Build them up. There's a certain charm to "taming" the irrational beast of wildly aggressive men. [EDIT: Women respect men who show social status among other men far more than they do men who show social status among other women. Be the man who knows how to handle other men's "shit-tests".] If…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 02:08 AM
34

A good rule here is simply to cut out any and all sarcasm. Unless you're trying to get a laugh out of the crowd. Never use sarcasm to make a point. That's a womanly trait.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 01:04 AM
6

Remember- any time she misbehaves and you don’t speak up is a missed leadership opportunity. This is probably one of the key takeaways from this post. The reason is that not only is this a missed opportunity to show leadership, but if you fail to do so, she will see herself as the leader and you as a doormat. This is basically a self-destruct "beta" button. Even if you think you go overboard with too much boldness when this opportunity presents yourself, it's far better to do that than to be the…
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 11:22 PM
29

certified rape analysts Finally, those Ph.D.'s in Women's Studies can be put to good use!
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 03:09 PM
8

I would wager that many TRPers (myself included) came from single-mother households. Men don't seek out the advice and help offered by TRP unless they are lacking a father figure or feel inadequate in their masculinity. Unfortunately, far too many young men (the vast majority) give up completely instead of seeking help however possible.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 12:36 PM
2

♂ This is not only a phenomenal analysis of the current state of society/culture we live in and are navigating through (as TRPers), but also of the nature of men at a fundamental level. Yes, spinning plates is fun when we think about all the atrocities of the judicial system and current generation of women (club sluts and such), but most men desire a female companion to support them in their endeavors, whatever they may be. A man's goal in life is to conquer the world, and a reliable woman will …
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 06:24 PM
8

Valid username. And yes, it's sad that they lump the two. Math majors are geniuses, whereas math education majors? ...Not so much.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 12:03 AM
37

If it helps you sleep at night, dear.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 08:16 PM
14

Yup. Same thing happened once when I had a fuckfest one weekend with a plate. Tried flipping her over and hitting it from the back, but I just couldn't get it in. Dick could not stay up. Gave up, lied down on my back and just stared at the ceiling for about a minute or so. She was lying next to me, both in complete silence. She kept looking over at me and I was letting the dread settle in. I got up, cleaned up, grabbed some water and went back to the bedroom. I forget how things unfolded, but af…
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 08:39 PM
19

If you're playing your cards right with this girl, she most likely thought she made a wrong move somewhere along the line to make you go limp. Or that she wasn't sexy enough to keep you at full mast. Keep that in mind. Well played, though. You were realistic and unforgiving -- too much sex will make it hard to stay ... hard. Without some rest, that is. And then you got back to railing the shit out of her after your recovery.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 07:58 PM
1

The key selling point to TRP is that it strikes a cord with humans' primal sociosexual dynamic. Be the man that makes her want to be that man's woman. Make her want to submit and supplicate to you. Actions speak louder than words, so don't bother telling her TRP theory, rather show her how a man embodies it. She will either respond well to it or she won't. You can extrapolate from her responses whether she's TRP-worthy, as you put it. Clarify as necessary, of course. But keep it as terse as poss…
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 07:11 PM
44

This needs to be said. Too much bullshit on here about women acting like women with the Men's Rights flair, as if there's anything revelatory about linking to a news article wherein a woman gets a pussypass. Yes, it helps to be reminded of the harsh realities. But to think you're championing a cause because you're highlighting reality is faulty. We are all redpilled; we know the nature of women. We accept it. And we strategize around it.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 01:51 AM
13

Christ you've got a knack for motivating.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 05:22 PM
1

When you realize you fucked up, go dark. Go radio silent. Do not initiate any contact. Ignore her attempts to get a conversation with you going*. The two of you will probably feel like you're playing the waiting game on who's going to break silence first. The catch here is this: you're simply too busy with work/life/etc. to be worrying about her. That's what you want her to think. And instill some dread. Chances are part of your lost frame made her think you were a whiny beta bitchboy who has on…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 03:22 PM
1

I'm talking about going from a comfortable watershed frame something immovable, undeterred, unfaltering to something that is heated somewhat louder more aggressive a sort of authoritarian or punishment frame. This could come across as insecure or butthurt if it clashes too harshly with your established frame. The answer to me seems to be to treat this like you would treat a young child or a dog scold them verbally which may clash with a relaxed frame and obviously agree and amplify wont work if …
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 02:34 PM
2

Should I act like Johnny Bravo? No. Be Mr. Juxtaposition.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 02:24 PM
3

Two common ones are cocky/funny and amused mastery.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 02:23 PM
5

It's not simply maintaining frame. That's the point of this post. Gradually, you might tend to ease your frame into something different. That's not good. You need to maintain the frame you held when you attracted the woman you see more than a pump-n-dump in. And the way to recover from any change in frame is to revert back to your original frame.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 12:29 AM
0

Let it stew in your mind. The other articles on Radish are very high quality as well. If you can't swallow the pill, know that at least you tried. You gave it an honest attempt.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 12:03 AM
3

How would one question these ideas or principles in a Redpill way and what does this have to do with, "Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men." TRP, this sub, is more or less the retroactive application of questioning and critiquing these pretty lies that you are fed from birth to the sexual market. Otherwise, this is known as the /r/DarkEnlightenment. Aside from the historic revisionism of modern feminism which claims all of white male histor…
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 03:46 PM
9

Soon enough, they'll be asking for a ban on gravity from killing them if they jump off a cliff.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 12:41 AM
3

It's always been my opinion that strong, independent, feminist women simply haven't had the experience (or pleasure) of being dominated by a man. This is my take exactly. Dominate a woman and let her relish in what it feels like to truly be a woman.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/14 05:32 PM
0

I presumed he has the basics down -- that is a good suggestion as well.
/r/askTRP19/07/14 10:15 PM
2

Listen to this, OP. Perfect course of action.
/r/askTRP19/07/14 09:41 PM
1

Time for the tried-and-trusted Dread Game.
/r/askTRP19/07/14 09:39 PM
2

Tell him something along these lines to coax him back into a positive sharing of his feelings: You're so much sexier when you shut off emotionally and then once in a blue moon tell me things that show how manly you are. Something like that. The sharing of feelings that you're denouncing are most likely strictly venting of negativity, which is a turnoff. He has probably fallen into a pit of venting often. If you want to be direct, you could try to tell him he should seek advice from his male frie…
/r/askTRP18/07/14 02:27 AM
7

I approve this message (that which underlies the sarcasm, that is).
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 02:28 AM
4

I simply cannot empathize with a sense of entitlement like this. I'd rather grow and achieve success through hard work than believe I deserve either handed to me on a silver platter.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 07:45 PM
6

No, it absolutely does not. The cynicism you and /u/AgentSmith27 are displaying is ludicrous. You have an accomplished actor telling you to be a good little worker no matter how shitty your job is while he makes bank This sounds like self-victimizing, whiny, woe-is-me bullshit. I just made a post commenting on this same scenario the other day. Evaluate the message itself, not the person preaching it. In any case, we fall into a pit of semantics arguing over whether he's condescending the people …
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 06:26 PM
1

Check out this graph: http://www.randalolson.com/wp-content/uploads/iq-by-college-major-gender.png (Source: http://www.randalolson.com/2014/06/25/average-iq-of-students-by-college-major-and-gender-ratio/) When I see this, I immediately think of the IQ bell curve difference between men and women. Here's an article (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1274952/Men-ARE-brainy-women-says-scientist-Professor-Richard-Lynn.html) and an accompanying graph (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_4ify7vDXrDs/S-WD…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 02:44 PM
3

All women are vulnerable to men because they are both physically and emotionally weaker.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 02:17 PM
11

Read the sidebar link titled "Sexual strategy is amoral." Throwing around the moral high-ground rubbish is not constructive to the analysis of the FR and methods (DT Game, in this case) used to achieve the ends.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 10:49 PM
1

Treat 'em like children.
/r/askTRP13/07/14 06:19 PM
6

Let's not minimize the potential of any analysis like the one OP has offered. There are gems to be found therein. I've been toying with the same idea recently, OP. It's wholly possible to be the lover and provider. A good way of thinking about it would be to be an alpha lover and an alpha provider. Sprinkle in some beta moves with your LTR as necessary. In the long run, you want her to know that she's with a man. I keep saying it, and I'll say it again. The Way of Men by Jack Donovan is a perfec…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 05:40 PM
8

Objective qualities. Dress well, don't speak with that thuggish accent/weird gangsta drawl, sound educated, etc. As another commenter pointed out, the judgment defies the color of your skin. If a Latino kid had fit this bill, I'd judge him the same way. But so long as you differentiate yourself from the stereotype, you're set. EDIT: Doing the above is good general TRP advice, not just "how do I make myself not seem like a rapist" guidelines. These all, funnily enough, fall under the umbrella of …
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 05:07 PM
33

Evaluate the message itself. Age does not guarantee anything; the same wisdom from a 50-year-old and 20-something-year-old bear the same weight. A BP-condition 50-year-old could also spout Disney-esque fantastical nonsense -- does his age make the message any more worthy?
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 05:02 PM
3

Aren't we just creating more value in ourselves, thereby making it so people want to live within our borders? Are we really evil tyrants who abuse people? I quickly had this same idea pop in my head as I read your post. Glad we came to a similar conclusion. I think of the dichotomous nature of leading that you present as boiling down to "making people want to follow you" and "making people unconditionally follow you." The former is obviously the most desirable path you should take as the king of…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 04:22 PM
21

It's always refreshing to hear men on here say they've turned their marriage around with the help of TRP/game essentials. Gives hope for the future.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 09:35 PM
10

The Way of Men should be required reading for anyone starting their journey here. It's a phenomenal book that helps unplug from the "men are evil, women are angels" BP nonsense, and it does so in an evolutionarily sound manner.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 12:27 PM
2

The reason I used to get hugs ALL the time from EVERY girl I knew would therefore be because I was an ultra beta and women had no interest in me. Hit the nail on the head, bub. Differentiate between a hug and her clinging onto you like arm-candy -- the latter is her attempting to piggyback off your SMV, a sign of attraction. The former? "Thanks for being such a good friend to me."
/r/askTRP09/07/14 03:04 AM
1

Why not? He's becoming a better man. A little faggot whining about feminism is essentially becoming a better woman. As a men-based subreddit, we should promote success and learn from failure/mistakes. Simply stating and pointlessly complaining about the current state of feminist affairs does not fit this bill.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 02:42 AM
3

Really, this falls under the umbrella of perfecting masculinity. "Being real" is a side-effect of being "a man on a mission in life." Women know in their heart of hearts that men are the builders of the world. Their purpose is to build and conquer the world. Remind yourself constantly that women are attracted to masculinity. A man who prioritizes his mission over his woman is a man whom women respect because he is building the world first and foremost. He is not only embracing but also prioritiz…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 02:34 AM
59

Men are just actors in the play, the actor doesn't matter, only the role he plays. And what does this mean for TRP? Fulfill that role. Strip yourself of the ego you attach to the barcode of your own being. Be relentlessly unforgiving in rejecting the individuality you ascribe to your name. You are not special as a person; the set of traits and skills you bring to the table are what make you special. You are disposable. Accept that reality. Provide traits and skills that aren't disposable. Women …
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 04:28 PM
2

My take on beards from a previous post: This is actually quite an interesting phenomenon, and I wonder if it's more a product of the cultural zeitgeist or biology. A couple years ago (after having started to lift like the bloodthirsty, virile bull that I am), I decided to take up arms in the quest for hirsuteness. Working out instilled a new sense of masculine pride in me, and I wanted to wear that pride. At the time I had a relatively doughy face from bulking. I had a decent physique, one which…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 11:03 PM
2

Amused Mastery is the manifestation of Dark Triad applied to seduction/sexual strategy.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 08:36 PM
1

This is the exact scenario I envision faggots like this guy in when they are staunchly pro-feminist. Wouldn't last a second without whining about a boo-boo.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 08:06 PM
1

Agreed -- pure conjecture. It needs more relevance and ties to human behavior and society to give it some weight. More thought-provoking analysis here is needed.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 02:13 AM
4

Don't overanalyze it. All you're doing is creating a block that's stopping you from going over and introducing yourself to her. Assume the sale. If this "look of terror" in her face is in fact just that, then go and change it into a "look of lust." EDIT: To directly answer your question, there's absolutely no way of knowing beyond a reasonable doubt. One way to find out is to approach her, and the next step is to change it. EDIT 2: This was in response to a question that went along the following…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 12:33 AM
3

Not really. Shit tests are more ... direct. They're supposed to be a prod to the man to see just how manly he is. This is more of an emotional lash and not at all meant to test the man's character. It may attempt to start some drama, which women love, but like another poster pointed out, it's not the core of the message.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 12:29 AM
36

This sort of tactic is amazing in deflecting any accusations/labels/name-calling. This diverts the negativity back onto the accuser for the audience -- it'll make them look like the weirdo for even knowing about whatever the accusation is. Suited best for a neutral audience that is not knee-deep in the subject matter and as such has never heard of the label.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 11:29 PM
5

Sick! All I have to do to beat out any female competition in my life is to tell her she works "like a girl." That's all it takes to completely defeat her. Or maybe I'll tell her she uses a power-drill like a girl.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 07:50 PM
7

I definitely think being a "good man" has been reinterpreted to being a "good man for a woman" (chivalry) which is very disheartening. This is a very good train of thought. You should pick up The Way of Men by Jack Donovan. He uses almost this same exact wording to describe modern society's ideals in the first pages of the book. In any case, it'll give you a very solid grounding on which to base your applications of TRP. Women are attracted to men, so learn the way of men. Not the way of BP-cond…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 07:39 PM
2

https://plot.ly/~randal_olson/10 "Arts-History ..." Bizarre, to say the least.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 10:41 PM
2

It takes a while, but you have to persevere. Once you start getting success (I assume your goal is to get laid/have women chasing after you), you become tons more confident in yourself. As of right now, everything feels like a farce to you. You're doing all the right self-improvement things. You've been doing this for a while. But one thing still lacks, and it's your sex life. You can feel that your whole persona will crumble at any instant because of this. You have to really internalize your en…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 01:09 AM
3

It's crazy how much is rape these days. It's actually insane. I'm waiting for the day when it all boils over and we're back at 0.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/14 11:23 PM
2

...I am going to use this in the future. Laughed hysterically at this.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/14 07:54 PM
8

Those two responses have a connotation of butthurtedness. This is an instant where you want to treat her like your silly younger sister. Amused Mastery is the tool of choice here. Laugh at her wildly uncontrollable hamster.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/14 07:51 PM
1

Amused Mastery, my friend. Give her a simple "lol" to show that you're unaffected by her womanly wrath.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/14 07:48 PM
2

one of those truths is that alpha isn't necessarily what most people would consider a shining example of a human being. (Emphasis my own) This is only true in part because we have to maintain law, order, and rule in society/civilization. Many of these behaviors that trigger carnal lust in women aren't compatible in such a setting, and that's why the guys who get with women are typically labeled as douchebags/assholes.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 02:41 PM
13

Could not agree more here. In the context of cultivating a fruitful LTR, you will have to put in effort to keep everything in line (see also: Law of Entropy). Part of this effort will be keeping your partner within certain confines of a monogamous relationship. It's like saying you should buy a motorcycle and never have to upkeep it. If it breaks down, then walk away and buy another one. The problem arises, however, that you've already invested in the first bike, and it would be far cheaper to r…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 02:32 PM
2

Results? Ok, she's opening her legs for him. That's about it. She has almost no enthusiasm for him and is talking about other guys she's fucking. I'm glad /u/Tsilent_Tsunami understands. I second his implication that this sub has gotten flooded by teenagers.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 05:10 PM
-4

If your goal is to get TRP material to post here, then go ahead and egg the girl on. But this sort of text exchange is how not to game a chick.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 05:45 AM
4

How did she respond to your last text in the exchange?
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 05:22 AM
-5

Stop being this girl's emotional tampon.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 04:41 AM
5

Such a factoid is more a testament to nature and its hardwiring of the male and female brains, however. Let's not get stuck in a downward spiral complaining about the way of the woman.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 04:13 AM
2

The only life-controlling hobbies an alpha should have are those that are productive and conducive to building the best possible version of himself (as Elliot Hulse would put it). It should be noted, however, that as you reach a better and better version of yourself, you avail yourself more time for leisurely entertainment.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 04:10 AM
6

There are a lot of apologetic posts here being tolerant towards and accepting of gaming. I could not disagree more with the mindset of "alphas don't give a fuck, so they can do what they want." That's an absolutist/extremist mindset that completely misses the mark. Yes, it's true that alphas don't let the opinions/emotions of others influence their decisions. No, this does not mean that any and all behavior is acceptable as long as a man is alpha. /u/eatwheylift hit the nail on the head. I'll ex…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 03:19 AM
3

Train yourself so that even in "spur of the moment" situations, you are able to properly articulate your thoughts and ideas through text. This is a completely uninviting wall of text. It looks incomprehensible, so not many people are going to bother. Tidy it up.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 09:49 PM
9

Frugality is a unicornesque trait among modern women.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 08:29 PM
2

DE stands for Dark Enlightenment, most likely. /r/DarkEnlightenment
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 12:11 AM
1

I was going to describe the study of body language as more "advanced," but precluded it entirely. I presumed that he was starting from a blank slate. Instead of advising him to sit and read (the "advanced" material) extensively, I posit it would be much more beneficial to learn the basics through immersion. Once you begin to have marginal success, then read for the smaller nuances of body language.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 06:06 PM
1

Actually, you are presenting a double standard. But you're still 100% in the right. The only issue raised by such a double standard is that assuming a double standard is wrong. Women want men who have many options as that proves that his genes are highly valuable. The more women he's with, the more dominant he has proven himself to be. He's a good suitor. Men want women who don't sleep around to ensure that the offspring he invests his resources in are his. He wants to use his resources to facil…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 11:30 AM
7

I relay this message to my (newbie) friends as, "it's only awkward if you make it awkward," or, "it's only awkward if you choose for it to be awkward." Nothing removes the awkward tension like stoic (body) language.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 08:23 PM
4

It's not something you can really "study." At least, not from the perspective of being a complete newbie. What you should instead do is immerse yourself in social situations. I've found that's it's more of a "vibe" you get from the chick. Comes with experience. One "rule of thumb" I personally used to test this when I was getting started was "would I act this way to a chick who I had zero sexual interest in?" Try to imagine yourself in her shoes, and imagine she's trying to act in a way that sig…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 06:33 PM
3

TIL 100% of working dads would rather win the lottery than not win the lottery.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 04:48 PM
5

Having read your post, OP, and the comments, I've happened upon less of an absolutist mindset. Let's say you're spinning plates and highly dismissive of any woman as potential LTR material. As such, your MO is to go around gaming women for short-term flings. There are plenty of women who qualify for literally nothing more than fuck-buddy status. You spin these plates happily but in the back of your mind you're open for an exclusive LTR situation. In my mind, LTRs last in the ballpark of four yea…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 04:44 PM
8

It's the job of women to shame to-be sluts. When women stop making uninhibited casual sex taboo, there's no shame. The only thing stopping sluts from slutting around is the fear of gaining a negative reputation and being outcast by the sisterhood.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 06:45 PM
-1

Don't go with PTs. They are a waste of money and all they do is sell fads. exrx.net is your haven for information on how to perform various lifts.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 09:49 PM
2

There is but one recipe to become a large man: eat big + lift big = get big Live by this equation. I believe it was Newton himself who postulated this Law of Nature in his renowned Principia. As far as "eat big" is concerned, eat your meats on top of pasta or rice as often as possible. Lift big is self-explanatory, and the end-result is as well.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 09:40 PM
3

In the same boat as you, here. File this under "amused mastery." I find it entertaining to listen to the shit women say.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 11:25 AM
2

In no way did I intend my "therapy" to salvage his marriage. But higher T-levels are one antidote this fucker needs.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 12:29 PM
19

Redpillers just got BLOWN THE FUCK OUT!!
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 10:27 AM
3

I'm a huge fan of having it up in such a way that the back and/or side of the neck is revealed.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 10:26 AM
-1

Only therapy he needs is the iron and keto.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 09:58 AM
7

But it's just so ~cool~ how he helps people.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 09:22 AM
2

"I'm busy, I'm flying out to the Mayo clinic tomorrow for a 3-month training session on galactic fantabulators. Let's hang out--flarglarglblargl blub blub blub*" as you try to talk over the deluge of pussy juice hydro pumping your face.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 09:17 AM
37

New daygame peacocking concept: go out in a whitecoat/scrubs. Easy pickup.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 04:46 PM
1

You're either post-wall or a gay man.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 06:26 PM
12

Mix-a-lot's rockin' that Black Phillip swag, fedora and all.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 12:14 PM
45

His internal monologue was, "holy fuck these orchestra hoes is ratchet."
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 12:10 PM
3

Briffault's Law, my friend. There's a link explaining it in the sidebar.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 07:53 AM
1

It's no coincidence that the empowerment of women in societies portends total collapse.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 07:01 PM
38

The whole idea of "teaching men not to rape" is preposterous. I'm still a bit uneducated, so I don't know any better. I mean, I got an A- in Intro to Morality of Murder, so I think I have a basic understanding. My radical left-wing progressivist indoctrination center university doesn't offer Rape Morality 101 yet, though, so I'm kind of unsure as to whether the rape of women is morally justified or not. Is there an online course or a series of YouTube videos that could teach me? Please, I'm desp…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 04:10 PM
1

(it was like playing the triangle) Never heard this before, but the mental imagery cracked me up. Fucking hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 02:37 PM
12

The hell are you talking about...
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 09:18 AM
19

the difference is women are now doing it in the one place men don't want to, the one place they expect to find a partner and comrade rather than a competitor, their love life. Spitballin' ideas on the fly here, but I think this is more to do with the fact that women's social interactions are based on drama, lies, deceit, etc. I mean, two women can go from being best friends to mortal nemeses at any moment. Pure machiavellianism. With men, the basis is honor, respect, loyalty, and the like. There…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 07:40 AM
19

Unnecessarily catty response. The blue is strong in this one. We prefer to keep the comments sections of posts productive and conducive to insight/further discussion. Asking for a definition of a term does not meet these criteria. That's why you got downvoted. It's not a matter of butthurtedness from your brethren in arms. Really, though. Read all the sidebar material. You'll glean all the important terminology from simply reading. If you're already identifying with what we're saying, then it's …
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 05:08 AM
13

Shoulda let her use that drill...
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 10:08 AM
12

You could BMOG and he'd still back down.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 02:31 AM
8

This is extremely easy to do, and it doesn't even require you to actually have options. I want to vouch for this. I lost my virginity to a girl who thought I'd slept with "over 10 girls." She even described me as a "man-whore." I'd internalized many TRP values at this point, so I knew what was going on. Funny part is, even though I was a virgin, when she pressed and kept asking how many girls I'd slept with, I kept saying "What? I'm a virgin!" with an air that hinted I was blatantly lying. The j…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 01:52 AM
5

Very well said. I, too, would label myself as a romantic. One thing I've noticed from my personal experience is that women want to be desired ... by the strong, alpha men. If you establish yourself as a high-SMV, strong man, you afford yourself far more leeway in the art of romance. Keep that in mind, as it shouldn't be hard to imagine a romantic beta being labelled as "creepy."
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 09:49 PM
4

Right? How on earth do you uphold a law whose basis is "verbal consent?" That quickly dilutes into a he-said, she-said quarrel. It's redundant.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 02:25 AM
47

During the decline of the Roman Empire: "The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome." -Sir John Glubb Taken from p. 15 here: http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf Much more afterwards. I urge everyone read it.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 12:57 AM
3

You can't give a mars to a submission, anyways. Only comments.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 01:22 AM
7

You're lending far too many excuses to incels. When they choose to label themselves as incels, they are simultaneously choosing to abort their search for hope or an answer to their problem. They are settling for complacency in their failures. This is not good, it proves to only breed negativity.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 11:11 AM
1

Better off asking /r/altTRP. They'd be able to give a better answer/analysis.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 10:42 AM
1

♂ Preaching the truth. I'm glad to see someone calling out this mountainous pile of bullshit. Your hand is better than a woman? This guy is blatantly lying through his teeth. Humans are social creatures, and as men, we enjoy the (sexual) company of a woman. You turned down sex once during a dry spell? I'd never use that as some form of bragging rights. That's only something a man who's deprived of sex and still trying to prove his worth would say. We are neither MGTOW nor MRA. In his comment, /u…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 09:58 AM
1

I'm saying acting stoic and aloof leads to the end-result of "treating women like people." I'm giving a more meta definition; one that falls more in line with TRP's self-improvement philosophy than PUA's/the seduction community's philosophy of only chasing tail/game.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 06:33 AM
5

I'm 21, and I wish I had this sub when I was starting to like girls. It's all about perspective, I guess.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 12:46 AM
5

I fully attest to this. I had the nastiest hangovers til I experimented with chugging and chugging before falling asleep. Also, for extra measure, I'd eat a slice of toast with butter.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 11:32 PM
4

Treating women as people is top level TRP advice It's quite interesting how this piece of advice breaks down upon analysis. Initially, this sentiment hints at telling the guy to break the BP-conditioned pussy pedestalization tactics he's used. It tells him "women are not special creatures." He may be dubious at first, but upon trying it in the real world, he sees her eyes light up as he passes shit tests and doesn't bite her beta-bux lure. Success breeds itself in him displaying this "take it or…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 07:49 PM
2

It really doesn't warrant a response. I wouldn't treat it as a shit test, I'd treat it as an IOI. If she presses, A&A of course, but you can usually just smirk and say "thanks" and move on.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 10:53 PM
26

This is actually quite an interesting phenomenon, and I wonder if it's more a product of the cultural zeitgeist or biology. A couple years ago (after having started to lift like the bloodthirsty, virile bull that I am), I decided to take up arms in the quest for hirsuteness. Working out instilled a new sense of masculine pride in me, and I wanted to wear that pride. At the time I had a relatively doughy face from bulking. I had a decent physique, one which I was receiving compliments often about…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 11:36 AM
3

The point I was making here is that there is biological diversity, not that joe schmoes should run NASA's missions. Again, while there may be biological diversity, the exceptions do not invalidate the rule. Biological diversity exists, but when we analyze for statistical purposes, we find vastly differing means. For example, 99.9% of adult women have weaker bicep strength than the 50th percentile adult man. Yes, this is a physical trait, but it's the most easily analytical objective measurement.…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 03:53 AM
1

You're beginning to argue for the sake of arguing itself; I'd rather let you ruminate over the idea that homosexuals and other gender-oddities belong in nature's discard pile than outright explicate for you. It's not a terribly hard concept to grasp; it simply defies modern PC thought.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 03:45 AM
1

These "fluctuations" belong in nature's discard pile.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 03:37 AM
1

You're viewing this from a standpoint of "evolution facilitates social conservatism," whereas it should be "social conservatism facilitates a healthy society by way of promoting evolutionary human dispositions."
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 03:29 AM
7

saying men should be "men" and women should be "women" is not sufficient to encapsulate the diversity there is [...] You admitted there were exceptions and that is sufficient proof in this case for diversity on a biological basis alone. Yes, there are exceptions. This, however, does not mean we should let NASA's missions be run by the average Joe Schmoes. Some people are far more qualified for jobs than others, and this distinction does not exclude differences in biological sex. I don't see how …
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 03:18 AM
2

I would ask why we ought to care what is best for our society over our own rational self-interest. This is a very deep inquiry that defies the confines of 10,000 characters. Humans (at least men, as easily seen in wartime sacrificial behavior) have evolved to accept death for the greater good of their tribe/society. Howard Bloom articulates on this well in his book "The Lucifer Principle," and words it in a very attractive manner. I'd suggest you read it (I'm sure there's a pdf of it somewhere o…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 03:04 AM
8

Point being? Diversity ("variance" is my preferred word choice) will always exist within a statistical subset; however, the exceptions do not invalidate the rule. Psychology is complex and subjective, too. It's easy to have self-fulfilling prophecies when you're evaluating a person's psyche. Psychics and hand-readers capitalize on this human defect of the mind's affinity towards pattern recognition.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 02:55 AM
4

On what authority is this claim made? Authority? I see where you're trying to take this. The basis of this claim boils down to behavior and actions of a people conducive to a successful society. Behavior highly associated with higher testosterone levels defines the gold standard. It's not an all-encapsulating definition -- it's the goal all men should yearn to achieve. Likewise for femininity and everything else in your post.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 02:32 AM
9

And even those naturally high testosterone levels come nowhere near those of the lowest of men's.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 02:29 AM
15

I think females can be women and males can be men and we can still all get along just fine. Replace "can" with "should" and we're in full agreement. Female/male referring to the sex and woman/man referring to the traits and characteristics of femininity and masculinity.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 12:48 AM
4

And even then, grooming and cleaning up nice will work wonders to this end.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 08:50 PM
23

This is where we start to tread into /r/DarkEnlightenment territory. The problem is not feminism; it is instead modern Western society. Notably, it's a side-effect of extreme progressivist ideals. For anyone interested, Radish wrote a great article on the decay of Western Civiliation.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 02:33 AM
30

I would go further and say its not even feminism but the modern western society as a whole that is destroying marriage and family. What modern Western societies lack the influence of feminism? EDIT: This is not rhetorical, it is completely sincere, /u/RU_Crazy
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 12:58 AM
2

but he has a great advantage. That's the entire point of faking it 'til you make it. Even if it is a farce, the ends justify the means. You want to portray yourself in a light that makes others think you've got brass balls. In his particular case, the advantage of having so much power avails him of this highly alpha demeanor. Whether it's authentic or in fact a farce, others on the receiving end are none the wiser.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 03:33 AM
6

If they appointed me King those types of guys would go the gallows even before the feminists. I would hope so; a man driven to martyrdom poses a far greater threat than a woman administering her daily dosage of oxytocin.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 09:02 PM
5

He had the same looks before and after his shooting spree.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 05:32 PM
13

As a complete omega and an incel, I deal with it by smoking and drinking regularly, playing video games and otherwise taking my mind of everything. It seems to help a bit. Not to get cause and effect mixed up, but it is saddening how likely it is that these common behaviors in boys and men nowadays stem from sexual deprivation. Boys no longer have their mentors, and it is showing with greater magnitude each and every day. This is the main function of TRP: to be the proper masculine guiding force…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 12:49 PM
6

Decent read, but it's far too dismissive of actual "game" techniques that work. The typical guy who reads PUA shit will benefit from hearing that he has to touch a girl or escalate the interaction sexually. These things don't click for the BP beta faggots. This seems more like a cop-out or scapegoat than a true debunking of the seduction community. For what it's worth, I am not a believer in any "system" that contains "routines." I advocate the TRP method: improve yourself and become a better ma…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 12:05 PM
9

There's tons of it. Google "wage gap myth" and do some reading. First link, courtesy of PuffHo
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 01:24 AM
11

This doesn't take into account whether the women are: Single Never married No children Under 30 If you control for these variables, you find women actually make more than men of the same stature. Swallow that (red) pill.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 01:06 AM
1

Edit it.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 06:48 PM
1

Yes, it is. As well as a genetic legacy and companionship, marrying a woman, in theory, secures a male with sex and female attention for life. It's a way to tame any potential outburst of violence and aggression fueled by the virile need for poon. The kid in this scenario went on his rampage because he wasn't getting any. The frustration compounds on itself as he goes day after day without a shred of hope presented to him. This phenomenon was undoubtedly well understood even before the rise of c…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 03:56 PM
8

This kind of lashing out due to sexual frustration (lacking and seeking validation and attention from women falls under this category) is the exact reason why the institution of marriage exists in societies.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 01:59 PM
3

True, but the tips here are too distilled to be useful or meaningful to the average BP guy reading them. They will all go in one ear and out the other without being fleshed out with concrete examples. As always, if you want to learn about TRP, refer to the sidebar.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 06:53 PM
3

fuck the bad boy, marry the good guy. This is essentially an internal push/pull that women indulge in.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 01:55 PM
3

Jealousy is the weakness of the woman. Use this to your advantage, OP.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 10:39 AM
1

Read this classic post by Heartiste.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 11:29 PM
1

Name any serious revolt where women were on the front lines. Beautifully put.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 10:44 PM
4

what if I have a penis and the person behind the vagina is exactly identical biologically to me, in terms of hormonal and chromosomal expression, aside from that vagina? Complete garbage. Do you know what happens when female bodybuilders take steroids (testosterone)? From the article: The side effects have been severe. Along with excess body hair and acne, her clitoris has swelled so much, it has become a mini penis. 'That has gone significantly bigger, yes,' she reveals. 'About an inch [long] a…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 07:27 PM
5

Let's reserve that honorary title for Jezebel.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 01:35 AM
1

If this sounds like you or you identify with this shit, leave a comment here, it will be interesting to see how many people need TRP because they were brought up in this kind of shitty situation or similar. I grew up in a low-income, single-mother household with no father figure ever in my life.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 03:50 AM
0

Men will respect you, and, if you're big enough, fear you. It's eye-opening how drastically different you get treated. After a solid year of lifting, I was seeing people move out of the way when I was walking, holding doors open for me, frantically apologizing whenever I expressed displeasure, eager to do me favors (and subsequently far more compliance). You essentially get treated like a king if you couple the muscular physique with a strong frame.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 12:59 AM
0

You're getting downvoted for being solipsistic. Your post does not add to the discussion whatsoever; it's a mere attention grab.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 03:26 PM
14

♂ Phenomenal post from beginning to end. That's why in the past, slut shaming was serious and seriously done by other women. This was back when women accepted the fact that closer the woman's number was to zero, the more respect men had for her. A hot woman who knows how to cook is many times more attractive than a hot woman whose main culinary expertise is making Hot Pockets. This notion is getting beaten into the ground by the feminists, unfortunately. Many women these days actually take pride…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 05:26 PM
15

Can I give you a ♂ for this analogy? Never heard it before, but it explains the entire premise of TRP all too well -- chiefly, that men and women have different sexual mating strategies, and we are trying to teach men how to attract women, not people how to attract people.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 04:48 PM
7

Part of what makes stoicism such an attractive quality to women is that it is one of the pinnacles of masculinity. Nothing says "strongest of men" like appearing wholly unaffected by tragedy as the women of the group weep with the lesser men. You have to be that immovable statue in her life. This ties into the Dark Triad, as well. Having those qualities will sever your emotions in a manner that will allow you to be stoic.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 04:47 PM
1

Do not text back unless it warrants a response. Playful banter can take a back-burner unless she has earned it from you. From what I've gathered, you've positioned yourself as a beta in her eyes. From now on, ask yourself constantly, "has this earned a response from me?" before texting her back. It'll be hard, but be unforgiving. You have to see yourself as an alpha before she can. She will slowly ramp up the texts over the course of time, and subsequently place herself at your behest inch by in…
/r/askTRP05/05/14 05:00 AM
1

Do this iff the body language you're holding is one of dominance.
/r/askTRP05/05/14 01:19 AM
1

Assuming they're wearing flattering sundresses, you could go up to them and break the ice with, "this is crazy... [pause, wait for a response to make sure you have their attention] ...I almost wore the same dress today." Work from there by introducing yourself. Play the assumption game, e.g. "you give off 'artsy' vibes... art major?" or simply "you look like a sociology major." Quickly derail off the topic of school if you go this route, however.
/r/askTRP05/05/14 01:14 AM
1

If you're ignoring her texts, the air you're giving off is one of "amused mastery." http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/girls-love-it-when-i-dont-take-them-seriously/ http://therationalmale.com/2012/09/14/amused-mastery/
/r/askTRP05/05/14 12:53 AM
2

Maybe you feel scrutinized for showing strength, maybe you don't expect people to react well to you handling arguments aggressively. I would guess it's seated in this postulation. A mix of being insecure in his masculinity and fearful of someone taking so much offense to what he says that they'll beat him up. OP, do you lift? I'd recommend you start if not. You have to learn to embrace the potential for shit to hit the fan.
/r/askTRP05/05/14 12:42 AM
3

By REBECCA DAVISON
/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 10:11 PM
3

Glad to see some quality control working its way in this sub.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 05:35 PM
5

Hard work is more important than raw ability To an extent, perhaps. More importantly, what kind of homework assignments did you have that required hard work? I'm talking high school and prior. Almost all of the homework assignments I had were completely useless and a time-sink. They did not help my understanding whatsoever, so I had zero motivation to do any of it. In fact, the high school class I did the best in was one in which homework was optional, but could help your grade if your test scor…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 10:57 PM
13

I think the OP is more focused on the postulation that women scan a group for the socially dominant males in the same way that men scan a group for chicks with titanic titties or a delectable derrière.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 11:18 PM
2

Your friend was saying that giving an inherently evil person liberty is the single worst thing you could do, as it would lead to a spree of heinous crimes, or something to that effect. This is why prisons exist -- to restrict someone's liberty.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 08:45 PM
0

Try it out. Go to one of your close male friends and ask them enthusiastically if they want to just casually fool around once. Make it seem sincere. I guarantee the results will be illuminating/disappointing. WARNING: Reality ahead. This'll put her delusion to rest.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 04:45 PM
9

I haven't dealt with the "I'm bored, entertain me" shit test much, but whenever I heard anyone say they're bored, I tell them that in French, they say "I am boring myself," as opposed to describing themselves as bored (by the supernatural hand of God).
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 03:01 AM
2

Watch the deleted scenes. She asks him "off the cuff" what his sign is. There was at least one unscripted part.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 08:34 PM
2

Remove the fact that she's a pornstar. This man is seducing this woman hook, line, and sinker. Executed phenomenally.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 08:20 PM
7

Great way to reframe this is to say, "Actually, it adds a nice bit of character to your dress. This is a chic, avant-garde must-have for your spring-summer 2014 collection." Flamboyant accent and mannerisms necessary. Tailor to your own situation.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 07:58 PM
2

Good response. Too many people here are giving compliments a blanket "no" because it lowers perceived SMV. What's all too easily forgotten is that if she already perceives you as a high-SMV man, giving her a compliment will work in your favor. It's like feeding an animal that's hungry... ...for your attention.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 11:07 PM
24

This is how I approach it as well. Keep read receipts on. Use them tactically should you so desire. In the least, they can be used as an affirmative text so you don't have to bother sending an "ok" or "sure" or what have you. Having read receipts on gives you power to fuck with the hamster.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 04:26 PM
1

A guy's job is in no way indicative of his dominance and social proof. The aim is to describe those two traits so poorly as to repulse the woman. We could combine the two and describe the guy as a creepy, needy/clingy loser with no friends who has worked at a cash register at Burger King for 10 years.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 04:10 PM
2

I'd draw the parallel between obese women and "clingy, needy" guys. Try to best describe "beta" to the most putrid degree. The main characteristic of attraction men find in women is youth and beauty. For women in men, it's dominance and social proof.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 03:44 PM
1

She's too exhausted from her long 8-hour day in the HR office to not sit on her ass and shovel excessive amounts of junk food down her whorish, cock carousel cum-stained gullet.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 03:37 PM
3

HB10.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 03:35 PM
3

What /u/nicethingyoucanthave is trying to exemplify is that the issue of indecisiveness of a woman should not bother you if you're swallowed TRP because you know (how) to take action and be decisive.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 03:33 PM
1

Whether that's the case is irrelevant. The only thing to care about is the direction in which these women's self-esteems are being pushed. What you and /u/MartialWay aren't connecting here is that the desperate betas of dating sites are needy, clingy, and lack game to the point of constant pedestalization. The women on these sites have an inflated sense of self from these men, and that's why they rate in such a skewed manner -- their hypergamous instinct is being tapped hard.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 02:50 PM
0

I would argue that "natural" in this context should have an annotation saying "Dark Triad."
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 01:52 AM
-2

The men who join dating sites are largely desperate betas (or, at least, lack game -- which could be one in the same) who get a chub over any pussy that's attached to a heartbeat.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 01:45 AM
11

Fully agree. OP was way too invested in the girl/break-up. Admitting that he stupidly thought she was a unicorn was great foreshadowing, and you can see how truly he believed that by the way he was handling that conversation. His attitude comes across as very sour and spiteful. Be the immovable statuesque figure who is never fazed.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 05:43 PM
9

PPTW: Trigger warnings follow, the slightest glimpse of which may cause you to seize and go into cardiac arrest. Proceed with caution. PTW: Mention of non-wymyn. TW: Patriarchy, emotional/mental rape, sexual assault, domestic abuse, racism, cultural appropriation, white supremacy FEMINIST WHO CHALLENGED MAN TO ARM WRESTLE MATCH FORFEITS, SAYS OPPONENT'S INTIMIDATION TACTICS TRIGGERED PTSD April 6, 2034 CAMBRIDGE, MA (Jezebel/AP) -- After a dispute between a strong, independent Latina womyn, yout…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 04:35 AM
1

Perhaps so, but the biggest trigger in all things feminism-related was letting women enter the workforce.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 04:01 AM
1

These chicks seem very young. High schoolers?
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 02:03 AM
1

I'm going deep with that comment. There's no need to even bring up whether you're confident in yourself or not. For those who are, it's implicit. For those who are unsure, they need to state it. In either case, think about what I wrote in those last four sentences (the last two in particular). It's a great sentiment in general that everyone would benefit from hearing.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 10:20 PM
1

So now feminism is a money-making scheme. GDP may go up, but GDP doesn't tell you anything. The quality of life would likely plummet as mothers are no longer able to spend time with their children and are stuck in their jobs all day only to come home stressed out of their minds.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 09:45 PM
3

not that i lack self confidence ( Got that shit on lock , son) From what I read in your post, this couldn't be further from the truth. This statement is nigh contradictory in and of itself, too. It's evident that you are very insecure about what you have to say. The only reason you fumble over your words is because you're distracted by something else while you talk (i.e. a general lack of confidence). You need to train yourself to focus on what you want to say. Assert your words. Speak with purp…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 06:51 PM
17

You wouldn't put a bumper sticker on a Ferrari.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 05:57 AM
23

He epitomizes his very own (and also TRP's) message of "become the strongest version of yourself."
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 11:14 PM
-5

Asking "hey, can you pass me the salt?" is manipulative. You have a very negative (mis)conception about what manipulation is, and I am certain it's rooted in a BP mindset.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 07:12 AM
3

Drop the petty sarcasm at the door here. It's not conducive to good discussion (and more importantly, a strong DLV).
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 06:53 PM
21

Alternatively, never be that "nice, sweet hubby of your own who'll help with the bills."
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 08:33 PM
1

Tailor to your style and personality -- of course. There is no singular correct answer here. I do prefer the extremes, and it's something I've arrived at over the course of developing my personality these past many years. My goal when meeting people is to immediately separate myself from the boring pack of frumps who stand with their drink at solar plexus-level and the other hand in their pocket or clicking away at their phone. However, it's very hard to convey intonation through text. The line …
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:55 PM
4

Should a woman's occasional avalanche of shitty emotions dislodge you from your position as a solid rock? "Maintain frame" has more meaning beyond in-the-moment episodes of unruly behavior, and a woman who changes a man for the better will be even more prone to adultery, as she now has the status of "maker of alpha." She needs to find that rock that withstands her shitstorms, not place it there herself (should she somehow be able to do so).
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:06 PM
5

Think of it in terms of push-pull -- if you haven't created attraction through playful banter and the like (pull), then being aloof (push) will not have any sexually beneficial effect.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 03:59 PM
3

Or at least go for the motion nonchalantly, yes.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 11:58 PM
6

As for what to say I have no clue. If someone said I was a nice guy for pouring water, I'd probably just say "I like you. You're easy to impress" or something. "So you get all hot 'n' bothered when guys pour water for you, huh?" with a shit-eating smirk on your face.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 11:56 PM
5

Or maybe "who's been telling you these lies about me" Great all-around shit-test-passing line right here. When I pull this angle, I usually go with something like "someone's been feeding you lies..."
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 11:54 PM
3

How specific.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/14 07:52 AM
1

I do as well, but it's always close. Never a landslide, unfortunately. I treat DE as a natural end to this path, though. When I first found out about TRP/Game theory, I was staunch in my Left-leaning views. Oh, how far I've come...
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 06:52 AM
1

I'm surprised how hostile the bulk of this subreddit is to neoreaction. It's as if they've unplugged in regards to sexual strategy, but stopped there and kept plugged into the political matrix.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 06:40 AM
19

And to rape at least one woman per week, am I right, fellow TRPers?!
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 01:47 AM
6

Great post as always. I'll freely admit that I've never considered how these 18-year-old women (girls?) are being indoctrinated from day one in our (abhorrently) left-leaning, progressive universities and colleges. It's sickening.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 01:45 AM
0

So treat this as one source (though the articles are incredibly well sourced in and of themselves) from which to influence a drawn conclusion.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 03:45 AM
0

Ah, your tonality is beginning to resemble that of a typical feminist. I hope you don't "Wow. Just wow." me with this response of mine. Responding in a snarky manner is in no way conducive to constructive discussion. I take it you're rather new here, and I do not say that as a jab to your credibility. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt here. 8 hour work day Moot point, there are benefits to either side of the coin. Forty hours per week is an arbitrary number. slavery being abolished We can d…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 03:04 AM
-5

I don't think you watched the video I linked. That, or you're blatantly ignoring the argument made and pushing an environmentalist position. This has nothing to do with feminism. This has solely to do with progressivism, which is a parasitic decay on our society and culture.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 02:31 AM
1

Which way are you arguing in this post?
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 02:13 AM
-7

According to whom? I'm not invested in the argument either way, but when the progressive viewpoint fails yet again to stand up to the scrutiny of reality, I'm inclined to disbelieve this when (even some) evidence goes against it.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 02:09 AM
-3

She is in the same pool as climate deniers Care to take a dose of climate-change red pill?
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 11:11 PM
21

Feminism is powertalk. Example: Not only does no not always mean no, "No means no" doesn't mean "no means no". It doesn't mean "All men must ask permission before mating". "No mean no" means "If you can't both discern the difference between no that means no, and no that means yes, AND you can't discern that 'no means no' doesn't apply to everyone, then we want YOU to be in the group of men that asks permission before mating. Because your lack of powertalk skills is unattractive, and we want to m…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 05:49 PM
6

Usually the bias sneaks itself into the premises of the studies, like "in what ways are women discriminated against to explain the wage gap?" They take the conclusion (a wage gap exists) and attempt to use feminism (discrimination against women) as a means to reach that end.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 05:11 AM
13

You're not asking any questions or contributing to the discussion whatsoever. You're asking for attention by making your presence known. We don't care that you read our public board; we care that you enhance our view, understanding, and perspective of an issue.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 04:57 AM
7

I enjoy studying sociology, psychology, kinesics, and the like. What you must realize is that a large majority of these fields in our current day-and-age have a tremendous feminism-induced bias. The reason TRP is largely (claimed to be) unscientific is that very few of the studies confirming TRP tenets get past the wastebasket and "redo for better results" pile. A corollary to this is that the reason TRP is supported largely by anecdotes and lightbulb moments is that you don't find out how it wo…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 04:38 AM
1

If you are too aloof, you scare women off. Care to expand on this one? I've experienced this before, but haven't read up on it. It's important to distinguish between "aloof indifference" and "using 'aloof indifference' as a push/pull tactic once attraction has been created".
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 07:07 PM
15

They get disgusted by your view that not "respecting" women is what will get a guy laid. It's like you're trying to unplug their bluepill life-support, and that's why they lash at you in anger when you present the idea. Their entire illusion begins to dissolve.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 05:10 PM
22

You didn't have Misogyny classes in grade school? Man, I miss those. I was always acing the tests.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 04:37 PM
2

Here's my take on it all. "The Conclusion" alludes to this idea that feminism is essentially a shit test.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 02:49 PM
1

Lifting (and nutrition) is a much more regimented lifestyle. Lifting has many benefits beyond the physical nature of it.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 05:34 AM
1

You'd be absolutely surprised how many of my fellow redpillers were raised by single mothers. If anything led me to the red pill, it was my mom's consistently irresponsible behavior. I was raised to believe that family was always right and altruistic, but boy was I wrong. My mom was a great mother, and that was the limit of her ability. She was a terrible father.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/14 04:58 AM
3

Do you really expect a wholly genuine response and analysis from a bluepiller? They have the wool pulled over their eyes and don't care to argue about the truths of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/14 04:47 AM
1

You should read up on logical fallacies. In particular, the appeal to authority fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/14 04:44 AM
5

Don't bother. /u/tetrahydrous is purposefully sidestepping (a common tactic among feminists) to try to corner you into admitting you're a misogynist, thus permitting a self-proclaimed victory in her eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/14 04:35 AM
0

The pretense with this one is cringeworthy. Tone it down a notch, sweetheart.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 04:14 AM
2

This is by far the most likely to be true.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 04:10 AM
3

Feminism is the shit test society failed. This is the exact sentiment I'm rehashing and expanding upon.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 03:39 AM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-son3EJTrU I would recommend all TRPers to watch this a few times over and to really soak in the concepts. Relate what's being said to what you know from TRP. And to sift through some of the bullshit (the source, the RSA, is about as progressive as they come -- Karl Marx was a member), this video pertains to only those who have the depth of knowledge to be able to read and speak between the lines. Not everyone understands or is even able to interpret mutual vs. i…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 09:14 PM
2

I'm most perturbed by the comment by Susannah-Mio, who thinks that men act impulsively on jealousy. Or perhaps I bear to learn something here: have any of you fellow TRPers let jealousy get to the better of you?
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 05:40 PM
1

Contrast her wearing yoga pants with how he was dressed.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 04:24 AM
3

I'm with you on this one. Yoga pants are so fucking tacky.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 04:23 AM
4

Very, very, very interested in the 2013 numbers.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 02:06 AM
1

I find it hard to believe any man is completely and wholly monogamous in his natural (non-bluepilled) state. Even if that is the case, make the smart move by spinning some plates. A smart man knows that women live in the moment. Their actions hinge upon their emotional state. Even if you were to fine "the one," you are bound to experience the cruelty, the harshness, the complete lack of respect for who you are. It will manifest itself in one way or another eventually. Why would you ever want to …
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 10:04 PM
4

It's a false dichotomy; don't get too caught up in the farce of our democracy. Read some Dark Enlightenment blogs to get a bearing on where you stand. I'm partial to Radish Mag. As for the religion and unscientific bullshit, the right uses religion (church) as a form of community cohesion and care-free living. There's no need for science if you're secluded in your own bubble, enjoying easy livin' in rural bumblefuck. It's like societal blinders, very much akin to being bluepilled.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 03:36 PM
6

Phenomenal advice.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 03:20 PM
9

Be playfully ambiguous. "Listen, I don't wanna cause a rift here, but you have some pretty hot friends..." And leave it at that.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 12:21 AM
3

I was hoping someone would point this out for /u/closetothesilence
/r/TheRedPill27/02/14 12:07 PM
2

I get what he's saying, but I don't know how it's relevant or significant in any context on its own.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 10:59 AM
1

Yes, that's absolutely correct. But think about why she "favors 'jerks'" -- don't stop thinking once you arrive at "chicks dig assholes." "Alpha fucks, beta bucks" gets thrown around here a lot, and I'm trying to shed further light on the phenomenon. She wants to get her pussy railed by a strong man, and strong men don't care about having conversations with women, because they know that women have different ways of thinking that all too often don't vibe with those of men. Why waste time talking …
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 01:06 PM
8

Dude, If i am out looking for a man, I'm looking to have sex, not have a conversation This is one of the most telling lines entirely. Read between the lines here. She does not want her night to end with good conversation. She is looking to have to use sex to tie down a strong, alpha male she meets. She does not want the man to be given to her on a silver platter. She wants to chase. She wants to have to use her trump card (sex) to sate her biological imperative. Only the best men get sex from wo…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 09:20 AM
2

Furthermore, giving yourself plausible deniability by using these modifiers makes you sound 1) young, 2) feminine, 3) weak, 4) inexperienced, and 5) unsure of how to properly assert yourself. Scrap the beta vernacular.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 05:51 PM
13

Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit. As one of the other commenters noted, you're #2, #3, or #4 on her list. Women go out of their way to secure an alpha; you clearly have not cemented yourself in her mind as a man of high value. You have to next this girl (though that's being a bit generous -- you're more letting yourself off her hook than anything else). There is very little to salvage.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 05:33 PM
1

That's why you let your RPW wife do that work.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 03:44 PM
17

Number 10 is a great piece of advice that slipped from my mind until recently whilst experiencing some harsh LMR. Nothing will kill your (the average TRPer, that is) ego more than going home and realizing you didn't make a move. You realize this chick you tried to get with sees you as a pussy. One of the best ways to get over rejection for newcomers here is being able to say to yourself, "I tried. I didn't orbit. I went for what I wanted." Women will respect a man who goes for what he wants over…
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 03:39 PM
10

One aspect this article glossed over is how these rich women are imagining conservative men in their minds when taking the survey. Take, for example, millionaire men -- surely a majority of them are conservative, seeing as they are likely successful businessmen. These rich (high-status) women are imagining men they've met who are even higher status than themselves. These conservative men are the apex alphas, and they are the ones the rich women are mingling with. Liberal or otherwise, it would b…
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 08:56 AM
9

I was reading your comment in great anticipation, and then... "Well that doesn't count because I don't want them to hit on me." ...I started nodding. Spot on.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 04:08 AM
23

There's a certain satisfaction knowing that those games no longer work on you anymore. And that is translated into self confidence which makes her want you more. This was one of the first TRP principles I saw validated in real life. I quickly learned that I derived pleasure from toying with the emotions of others in such a way. Love the Machiavellianism reference, OP.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 10:46 AM
0

The evil gay overlords are out to get us huh? We call it The Cathedral. Luckily we have all that patriarchy to protect us from it! This is where you really start with the idiocy. Who gives two shits if it's sustainable? You don't know what we're talking about, apparently. The context of this discussion is that of maintaining and building a society. The seedless fruit you buy from supermarkets isn't sustainable for the exact same reason, but you aren't preaching about that. Seedless fruits vs. se…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 07:10 AM
9

Mad lib time! Replace "mad lib" with "strawman" and then give it another read. And to imply that he should be banned for speaking the truth... do you realize where you are, son? The proliferation of gay culture has a definitive parasitic influence on our society. There are fellow gay TRPers who would agree. We're not talking about homosexuality itself, but rather making its subsequent culture the centerpiece of our vastly heterosexual culture. Homosexuality is not sustainable in nature; why shou…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 06:39 AM
2

Solid perspective. This is what needs to be pounded into every new TRPer's head.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/14 06:49 AM
5

You need to be more confident in yourself. All of these guys are correct. A woman is not going to give you what she wants on a silver platter; she's going to want to feel like you're extracting her desires out of her. One way she does that is by lightly or sarcastically suggesting a desire in a way that gives her plausible deniability. Remember, women fear rejection like the plague, therefore they're not going to put themselves on the line like men do. This chick wanted you to latch onto her BDS…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 09:00 PM
0

The problem I'm talking about is being unable to live with women. Half of the human population. You can definitely be a MGTOW who uses TRP knowledge to make do with women, but then you aren't much of a MGTOW by definition. That's where the road ends for the glorification of MGTOW in my eyes. I cannot respect a man who cannot control a woman under his protection and providence, nor can I respect one who refuses to engage in that sort of leader/dominant (if done properly) relationship. I will not …
/r/TheRedPill28/01/14 02:03 AM
5

That's generally how guys find out about the Manosphere. It's really a stepping stone to going from living a completely directionless life to wholly controlling one's life -- i.e., start with learning how to deal women, work from there for a bit, and soon you will become the supreme commander of your own universe. That being said, MGTOW is weak and not a good route to take because it's seated in ignoring the problem, letting it fester, and pulling off a charade of superiority for acknowledging i…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 05:51 PM
2

Look up posts on various blogs about Dark Triad Traits and the associated attraction it causes in women. I'm partial to Chateau Heartiste.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/14 04:22 PM
1

Never say never.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 09:56 PM
1

Very well put re: penciling in a husband.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 12:07 AM
10

This is a great business idea. Think of all the post-wall feminist women who would buy these "man medals" as tokens to fill their childless, husbandless voids.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 09:11 AM
7

This is one of the best insights in these comments.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 01:15 AM
1

Anecdotal evidence isn't scientific as it can't be reproduced By this you mean "the exact scenario" cannot be reproduced, correct?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 10:24 PM
-24

Haha. I'm an idiot because I want women to have voting rights, and you do not. Awesome! You sound more like a daughter of liberty than a son of it. This is why you're an idiot: your assertion is that everyone should be able to vote. Your reasoning for it is because "the law's the law," and done so in a childish, snarky manner. It's essentially an appeal to authority. You are making yourself sound like an idiot, and I am properly describing it. Why don't we let children vote? Because they're unab…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 05:01 AM
-28

You are an idiot. Just because the law exists does not mean it's right. Take a look at divorce courts. This article is reason in and of itself to rescind women's suffrage. They clearly cannot be trusted with making sound political decisions.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 12:42 AM
2

Yeah because it's sooo hard to trick people into thinking you're not corrupt and power-hungry when you in fact are.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 12:32 AM
2

"Oh no, you made me realize I was looking at an attractive woman, I can't believe I would do such a thing! I am such an oppressor of women! Now I understand why we need feminism!"
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 05:20 PM
-1

War is the natural state of man. Many millions of people were killed in the name of Communism as well. People lacking a proper figure of authority (thus leading to a lack of direction) is what causes them to be impulsive and ultimately degenerate. There's a lot to be said once we go down this rabbithole. If you haven't ventured far into the Dark Enlightenment (the link goes to one of my favorite articles on the topic), I would advise you to do so. It offers a completely different take on these q…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 05:32 AM
1

What you should instead argue is that if the lack of integration/assimilation/tolerance is present, then you might see a clash of culture and perhaps religion, if a different religion is present in large numbers of people. Full integration/assimilation/tolerance is impossible, which is why you see the disparity between blacks and whites in America to this day. They've had 150 years to catch up. That's more than enough time to close the gap. That being said, they got close before they were allowe…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 04:41 AM
-1

Your question is a non-sequitur. Reread what I said because you misinterpreted it (or are strawmanning it). In the least, TRP =/= politics. I'm expressing a political opinion. I am not vouching for a theocracy; anything but, as a matter of fact. Science and/or Law are too fluid as subjects to be viable standards/codes of morality. Allowing them to be altered in any way, shape, or form, allows them to be susceptible to corruption. When a political ideology/movement frowns upon religion and glorif…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 04:03 AM
-2

No, the point I'm making here is that the people can coax others into having scruples if enough of them are adherents to a certain religion. The state does not need to legally enforce a religion for its people to tend towards a certain religion and thus standard of morality. Multiculturalism dissolves this tendency, however. With those links, I was highlighting how there is no correlation between religiosity and happiness. It's possible for a people to be happy with a strong (sometimes extreme) …
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 11:18 PM
-1

Two mistakes. Your first is you took what I said and gave it an extreme spin. I never said to have a state-enforced religion as you're implying. Second is you have that typical prejudice of thinking Islamic countries are evil. Again, your problem is you think religion is evil. Look at people's satisfactions with life or the "happiness index" of peoples and you will see that your preconceived notion is wrong.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 08:14 PM
-5

You sound like a typical uninformed South Park viewer who calls himself "moderate." Your opinion will change in time as you become more and more acquainted with TRP. Even the Right is progressive in this day and age. The problem I see here is you think religion is evil, when in fact it keeps a society within borders of morality. It's very important to impose these moral regulations on people, else you end up with the degeneracy we're witnessing today.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 07:36 PM
7

We got ourselves a bunch of pussy whiteknights on our hands here. /u/thro_way way is absolutely right. Women love watching men physically dominate others or even being on the receiving end. Violence undoubtedly turns women on. If you're going on pure speculation that violence is some sort of putrid, immoral behavior, then try introducing violent ideas into your conversations with women. They eat it up.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 07:18 PM
5

It's important to have its presence in TRP, but when you go balls-deep into MRA territory, it becomes a whiny bitchfest. That's why TRPers, who are go-getters by definition, tend to have a general distaste for it. Moderation is key.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 07:05 PM
0

I disagree wholeheartedly. The Republicans may not have the answers to all of our problems, but at least their platform intends to slow the current Progressivist decay of society whereas the Left has the pedal to the metal.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 07:02 PM
22

Instead of apologizing, acknowledge that you were wrong and own up to it. Do not apologize, just flat-out say that, yeah, you were wrong. Be unapologetic.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 11:27 PM
1

Talk about projection: these guys wait around and hope that women will make a move and use them as sex objects.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 12:26 AM
39

All these idiots in the comments are bewildered as to how or why his wife could have a sudden change of heart. This is literally textbook, day-one Red Pill 101.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/14 11:21 PM
2

Where did you come from, the depths of tumblr? That's just a simple rule in life. And it could easily be applied to other situations: if you're a guy and you walk a girl home, don't go off telling your mates you slept with her if you didn't. If you're a girl and you walk home with a guy, don't tell people you slept with him when you didn't. This is completely irrelevant. Are you trying to refute my point by calling it a "simple rule in life"? When someone accuses another of rape, they don't "tel…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/14 04:55 PM
33

Mens rights is over there >>> My thoughts exactly... Extensive post, but it can easily be summed up with "don't make false accusations." It's equally as simple as the feminist argument you're railing against. Teach girls to respect men's strength, determination, advances, etc. Teach them how to escape dangerous situations. Teach them to adapt to their environment, not adapt the environment to them.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 06:27 PM
0

Howard Bloom makes a case for the phenomenon of destructive masculinity in The Lucifer Principle, which is the only place I've heard about it. Fairly certain he also talks about the negative sides of femininity as well (it's been a while since I've read the book). I'm all for detaching any negativity from the term "masculinity," now that I've heard some arguments here.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 12:48 AM
1

I can agree with that.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 12:43 AM
35

Well now any guy who she accuses of raping has evidence that it's a false rape accusation. Also now any guy can actually rape her and point to this as evidence that she's falsely accusing him of rape.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 11:35 PM
9

MANipulation
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 07:26 PM
0

Do you disagree with the entire concept of "toxic masculinity"?
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 07:26 PM
-3

Toxic masculinity is aggression seated in malevolence -- school shootings, violent rapes, assaults, homicides, etc. We have to work to popularize positive masculinity, and what you have outlined in your post is an excellent start.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 06:50 PM
0

I'll take it this is a nice tl;dr of that article. I am not reading an article which I already know is retarded hamstering if it exceeds 250 words.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 04:27 PM
94

Do you think the reality of what happened factored into their dating advice in the future? Hell no. I think this is the crux here. Women don't want to get pump-'n'-dumped, whereas men do want to pump-'n'-dump. Therefore, since women don't want this, they will give advice on how to be the man they settle down with. They give advice that turns you into a beta schmuck. Remember, they're trying to use you to set up a nice, lofty pension. That's their biological imperative and end-goal. If you bring …
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 12:56 AM
1

Woah, take it easy there, Mr. Misogyny!
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 11:57 PM
4

This guy in the comments section says it all: My Xwife wanted all the "equality", all the protection, a support pipeline, and another boyfriend too. I fail at being a good martyr every time.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 11:50 PM
2

BTW, I would NEVER allow my girl to spend the night at some other dude's house, but it doesn't sound like she's going to stop. It's time for you to move on, because she already is. Honestly, this is when I'd put my foot down. Under NO circumstances should this be allowed in an explicitly exclusive relationship. I don't give a fuck if you've been friends since you were 4, the only reason the guy wants to hangout with you is to get a chance to smash, and if you're spending the night... ...walk awa…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 11:43 PM
41

Can you believe they're trying to make the word "submissive" into something derogatory? I don't speak for all men, of course, but I can tell you that I personally love when a woman is submissive to me and lets me take charge. I can't imagine I'm in the minority of all men, either. Men like submissive women the same way that women like dominant men. Though, maybe with the recent surge of emasculation of men, this might be different according to "studies" where men give their "opinion." But there'…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 11:21 PM
2

They're trying to change the definition to fit that of "femininity," which is essentially the same as saying that manliness is wrong because it's not womanliness.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 03:42 PM
0

You don't think all modern democracy has its roots in the early Jacobins? I mean, the American Revolution and French Revolution have many parallels. Have you read Radish?
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 02:10 PM
-1

Is that the new PC term for pussyjuice?
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 04:18 AM
2

This subreddit isn't your diary. Give your post a purpose instead of merely complaining. This is otherwise junk.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 04:16 AM
58

No excuses, GayLubeOil
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 04:08 AM
3

This seems apologetic in a sense. Or defensive. Does that make sense? We get it that feminism is the problem, and your post came across as though it were beating a dead horse. What's your end-goal? What final message about TRP do you want to send? The next possible set of arguments or questions you would be presented with here is, "You're just reinforcing outdated gender roles and societal expectations. Times have changed, shitlord." We have a few of these going around right now, but I would sug…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 12:52 AM
5

First -- it would be very helpful if you had referenced the post you're addressing. I know the exact post you're talking about, but you can't presume that everyone does. Anyways, her entire rebuttal is a farce through-and-through. It hinges on the girl the OP grabbed to refuse to help herself. How hard is it to say, "I gotta grab a drink," or some other simple excuse? Humans are not that socially retarded. You put it well by saying OP didn't "accept an imaginary 'no.'" The problem is that this d…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 11:59 PM
75

On that note: Whoever says bedding women is not part of The Red Pill: You are too stupid to read the sidebar that clearly says "discussion of sexual strategy". I don't think the argument is that TRP isn't about bedding women. I think it's more along the lines of "the sole purpose of TRP is not about bedding women." I find it hard to restrict this subreddit to just sexual strategy. When you get going and see the world for what it is, it's hard to stop and not go down the path to dark englightenme…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 07:22 PM
2

I never precluded Republicans from doing this. I never mentioned them at all. That was your own mind's doing. I wouldn't disagree that they do it too, especially if we're talking Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck. But the difference is that the Republican/Conservative crowd are not as politically effective as the Liberals/Progressives. Republicans merely drag their heels and slowly cave to the Liberals; they in fact aren't conserving anything. They're just reluctant to agree with the Left, but eventua…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 07:03 PM
6

I would argue it's being done accidentally. I don't think the leftists realize that their toxic ideas are going to eradicate Western culture; they think they're merely going to "strengthen" it with things like multiculturalism and other equality bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 12:43 PM
3

This is a great analogy. Love it.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 12:41 PM
3

Science has explained a lot of objective truths, but it can't explain absolute truths. Instead of tapping away at my keyboard for half an hour, I'll redirect you here. Religious moral principles were formed from human experience over many years in a way that defies scientific explanation. Moral principles have an element of empathy to them. Science can't adequately account for this variable in and of itself. This formation of morals is an informal form of science where the proof is in the puddin…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 12:09 AM
5

I believe treating women as a whole in a sweeping manner is unfair and generalizations always hurt. How is it unfair? Why do they always hurt? You're not looking at the other side of the coin here -- if my generalization is wrong about you, then you have free reign to prove it wrong. But I know what you really mean: "generalizations that are true and go against my philosophy always hurt." There's nothing hurtful about saying "women are more in touch with their emotions than are men," but the lef…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 11:49 PM
2

"Progressivism" is the political ideology/movement of basing policy on science. But only science that supports Cultural Marxism (or "equality" if you want me to sound more PC). The problem is that science is NOT perfect, and is actually quite easily fallible. It's no better than a religion in terms of setting absolute truths, but is wholly incapable of establishing a decree of morality like religion. Science is the religion, liberalism is the fundamentalist indoctrination.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 11:04 PM
1

It's truly dark. It to the red pill is like percocet to tylenol.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 10:55 PM
7

You inspire me. Bullshit. This doesn't belong on the list. Listen to Patrice to understand why this is bullshit. As a man, I am FAR more talented and interesting than you are. I am YOUR inspiration. Link? I want to hear his argument for this touchy subject. I like Arash Dibazar's analogy: if we are two animals, and I evolve and get wings, don't try to hold me back by saying "why do you have wings, you should be down here with me." Get your own set of wings and come fly with me. This guy has some…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 09:05 PM
1

Damn it, I was just going to make that joke...
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 08:45 PM
17

We need to implement government policies to stop this horrible crime of abuse against women.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 12:48 PM
19

What's most upsetting is this is their definition of what it means to "respect a woman." I need to find a good article exposing the idiocy of this notion.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 11:18 PM
59

"The problem is you think you aren't completely helpless when you in fact are completely helpless! Just give up like I have, that's all you can do!"
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 11:02 PM
3

The reason I suggested it is because you dun goof'd twice in regards to apologizing unnecessarily to her. Those were some tell-tale beta signs, and I suggest waiting until she initiates contact again in order to assuage the distaste caused and to get her back into chase-mode. It would do good to show some strength and know-how. If you feel confident enough in your ability to pull it off, go for it. I don't know how long ago this happened, and if it was only yesterday or the day before, then it m…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 10:09 PM
4

Ah, I remember that first FR. Looks like u/valvestate and I gave similar advice the exact same advice. I man up, give great advice, and Mary is completely agreeing with me too (she seems like a real RP woman). RP tip: women tend to follow and agree with men who they interpret as strong and authoritative (in other words, attractive). The kicker? I was a virgin. But she didn’t know that. Hell, I don’t think my brain knew. It just went into autopilot and was as dominant as could be. I knew what I w…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 04:12 PM
13

But if you're tasked with carrying a fallen soldier to safety, the only way to test that is with objective weight standards, not bodyweight standards.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 03:19 PM
6

There are laws already established that help women escape abusive relationships. This is putrid. Western civilization has the pedal to the metal, cruising head-first into the brick wall of anarchy and chaos, thanks to this moronic Cultural Marxism ideology that we've adopted. Congratulations, you get equality! And feminism! And multiculturalism! ...at the expense of everyone's overall happiness. And your cultural identity. And society. Didn't Albert Einstein say something interesting about World…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 08:48 PM
1

I understand what you meant. I'm just elucidating the cause for her being scared off -- it's not a matter of a word being said, it's a matter of the consequences of your actions.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 11:32 AM
1

Those wouldn't scare her off, those would make you seem like an utter prick (different than an asshole). "Negging" is not the same as "insulting." Don't be crass -- treat her like she's just a confused little child who needs to be reminded what to do.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 11:18 AM
4

I like to tease them by calling them a name when this happens. You forgot to give me your number the other night, ya goober/goofball/doofus Makes the interaction less formal and shows you aren't some "James Bond suave try-hard"
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 08:57 AM
0

What gives? Women don't have the capacity to be strong, independent and self-sufficient. It's like telling a man to give birth, except we've been duped into believing such a monstrosity of a lie.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 07:51 AM
11

This is the typical mistake of the beta/white knight. "Oh, she's so helpless! She's in despair! She has no other way of dealing with her emotions! She has to be an insufferable cunt to everyone, or else she might kill herself!" Not buying it. She should know that if she wishes to be truly happy, she has to drop the feminist pretenses and lose herself in the protection provided by a man. There is no excuse to be this way, unless you're indoctrinated or fully delusional.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 10:53 PM
35

Women are capable of earning money. Then why the fuck are they still whining about the "wage gap"? Could it possibly be that they don't have the (testosterone-determined) drive to highly succeed when it comes to anything? Let alone making money, which is a highly competitive field among men.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 10:14 PM
0

You're like a child who takes a mouthful of vegetables at dinner and then spits it out to let the dog eat it. Your failure here is not your looks. Your failure is your unwillingness to believe what TRP tells you. You've gone in with a mindset of "if I don't get immediate results from this, I must be doomed to failure forever, most likely because of my looks." BECAUSE of this uncertainty in yourself and your game, you most likely come across as either a try-hard or a complete oaf. Some random gir…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 05:36 PM
1

I understand what you meant. There was a point when I would have agreed with what you're saying, though. Now, I would not agree that it's a great setup. It all feels fake and superficial once you have everything figured out. The novelty of this "sweet gig" will wear off once the effect of the pill starts to really take its toll on you, and you will see the world for a much darker place. But that's for another topic thread. What I'm saying is that using vague terminology such as what I harped on …
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 04:46 PM
2

You see, when these young men get mixed messages about feminine and masculine virtues, they end up just confused and wholly misguided. They get the worst of both worlds: emotion + aggression = mass (school) shootings.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 04:32 PM
5

I can't even begin to describe the toll that the concept of masculinity has taken on my life. Does this guy not sound like a faggot? "Wear pajamas. Drink hot chocolate. Talk about getting health insurance." Christ. Not surprising that upworthy.com yet again completely misses the mark in favor of cringing left-wing political ideology. And the complete lack of regard for these boys who are truly in despair. It is deplorable for them to propagandize such misfortune. These boys are not suffering fro…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 04:14 PM
3

Just so you know, you're getting downvoted for posting garbage like "just be themselves." You're still plugged in, bud.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 10:34 AM
6

I hate this fucking argument they use. No, I am not "intimidated," I am turned off by how unwomanly you act.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 10:30 AM
4

This just shows female hypergamy in action, really. I would say it's less about feminism and more about unbridled hypergamy.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 09:00 AM
0

Holy shit, I am definitely going to use the CoD/D&D line. Thank you sir.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 08:20 AM
0

Yes -- that last bit was an excellent case of frame-control. Very well done. Remember, though: in regards to frame-control, it doesn't matter who gives the compliments; rather, it matters who instigates them.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 12:31 PM
3

The initial quote on that article sums that up pretty well.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 11:11 AM
4

Solid post. I agree with this. I would highly suggest you read Heartiste's "Sixteen Commandments of Poon" (http://heartiste.wordpress.com/the-sixteen-commandments-of-poon/) to adjust yourself with reality.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 11:04 AM
3

Only reason I don't like this kind of response is because it communicates that your self-frame is weak. Whatever way the wind blows, right? Makes it seem like you're a little conniving shitstain. But it's refreshing to see an entitled whore like this get put in her place. I sometimes think women purposefully USE hamstering to try to guilt-trip men back into wanting them.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 07:37 AM
1

That's because hot cocoa is strictly reserved for those who leech off support ObamaCareTM
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 02:57 PM
6

I was thinking that the entire time I was reading his saga.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 02:48 PM
8

In all honesty, I'm surprised you got this one to work. Definitely cut the emoticons, the tildes, and the exclamation marks. You look too giddy (need I say "like a schoolgirl?"). As for the fishing -- don't feed into it. You are clumsily falling into her frame. I prefer to go a different route with this scenario. Pull a fast one on her: weird, I can think of a ton of things I like about me. and divert the conversation accordingly into fairer grounds. Assuming she has an appreciative opinion of y…
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 02:45 PM
27

Well... he's posting in /r/Feminism, it's not like he has much hope, if any.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 02:08 PM
3

Girl at the end of that video: "actually, hold on, [why did I just give you my number when] you just insulted me! Dang it!" The hamster is strong with this one.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 06:19 AM
41

sigh It's amusing to an extent, yeah, but when you really sit back and realize that so many men actually think like this, don't some of you get depressed? It's nice to be shooting fish in a barrel like we are, but can anyone provide an explanation (or even a positive spin) on why/how having so many hardbetas is a good thing in society? The fear is that having so many provides a large platform upon which feminism can thrive (as we are currently seeing). Is it preposterous to say that we need more…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 06:28 AM
0

You get called out for using an ad populum argument, and then respond with an ad hominem? You are utterly fucking moronic and should not be defending liberal ideology on any medium of social interaction.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/13 09:52 AM
0

What social conditioning? That of traditional values? The very same values that glued together civilization and society as a whole for thousands of years? Need we not remind you that feminism portended the collapse of the Roman Empire?
/r/TheRedPill25/12/13 09:36 AM
0

Whether or not you accept these impulses defines your masculinity. This is the key of your post. Too many men are rejecting and suppressing these masculine, primal tendencies of theirs because they are shameful of exhibiting them in a feminism-indoctrinated society.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/13 05:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter