TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fokm Archive

View 19 posts and 254 comments by fokm on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
311

Discriminationfokm/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:56 PM
298

fokm/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:44 AM
224

fokm/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:16 AM
196

Blue Pill Examplefokm/r/TheRedPill08/02/18 10:01 PM
126

Men's Rightsfokm/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 04:08 PM
52

Men's Rightsfokm/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 06:34 PM
32

Discriminationfokm/r/MensRights25/05/16 05:19 PM
25

fokm/r/MensRights04/04/16 05:44 PM
23

Men's Rightsfokm/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 04:44 PM
11

fokm/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 03:05 PM
8

Red Pill Theoryfokm/r/TheRedPill16/12/13 07:00 AM
5

fokm/r/MensRights29/04/13 05:44 PM
5

fokm/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 07:46 PM
5

Fathers/Custodyfokm/r/MensRights21/03/16 05:37 PM
3

fokm/r/TheRedPill08/02/13 12:29 AM
2

Blue Pill Examplefokm/r/TheRedPill15/12/16 05:17 AM
1

fokm/r/TheRedPill24/01/13 08:33 PM
1

fokm/r/seduction26/04/13 11:15 PM
0

fokm/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:00 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Our daughter was the exact same way at that age. Comically so. I took a couple of business trips and me being away for a bit, while hard on our daughter at first, made mother and daughter closer. Today, our daughter prefers us both equally. If it’s this important to your wife, try being away from home for a few nights if you can.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 12:46 PM
-3

Join a church, even if you aren’t religious or a believer.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 01:42 PM
5

Great post echoing the same thoughts I’ve been having recently. Looking back, i really think the first shot fired in this modern day censorship war was google shutting down google reader. Reader was where you could visit a ton of sites using just one site. I think RSS-enabled sites using a client like Inoreader is the way to go in the future. It solves having to bookmark things and remember to check them.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 11:14 PM
7

I read I’m the first few chapters and literally had an out of body experience when I went to sleep that night. Never happened before or since. It’s a powerful book and those who dismiss it as psychobabble are missing out.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/19 07:36 PM
4

Of course they were Swedes.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 06:56 PM
1

Careful. Yes he ran. Why? Maybe two strangers are like, "What the fuck are you doing," and he sees that his consensual encounter now looks bad. He didn't know if they were going to beat him up or what. Very easy to pass judgement when you weren't there. I can spin it in a way that he was trying to protect himself, and you can spin it to say he was obviously guilty. The main lesson: don't do stupid shit in public. Keep your guard up. Had he just gotten her back to his place, my belief is consensu…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 03:53 PM
7

I actually haven't been black out drunk before and likely never will. And yes, never sexually assaulted a woman. If roles were reversed and he passed out and she kept going, nothing would have happened here. This is the core TRP tenet -- not that it's unfair (though it is), but that women keep saying they are equals. They are not. If she got behind the wheel of a car and killed someone, claiming she was too drunk to legally consent to drive would be laughable. But if she passes out while he's fi…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 03:42 PM
13

I think those things do matter. They were both drunk yet he got punished. For all we know he was passed out too and awoken by the cyclists. I am not defending Brock. He could be the biggest piece of shit ever. What I am defending, though, is the right not to have your life ruined over what was very likely a woman changing her mind. If she consented before she passed out, it changes the entire story. And in all likelihood she did. And if they were both drunk, regardless of what the law says, ther…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 03:30 PM
29

Was she awake when he started? Was he drunk too? Why would he assault someone in public and risk getting caught and having his life ruined? And she was spotted leaving the party with him. Scratch all of the above. I’ll make it simple for you. In all of these awful rape posts about Brock Turner that went viral a few years ago, did any of them make it clear that there was no intercourse? The answer to that is no. Why? Because a story about a drunk guy fingering a passed out girl behind a dumpster …
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 03:05 PM
78

Brock Turner didn’t even have intercourse with the girl. They were both drunk and some foreign guys riding bikes decided to get involved. The girl had a boyfriend and so this was her way of getting out of getting caught. When that Brock Turner stuff was going around, did you just assume he had intercourse? They wanted you to believe he did. Did you hear anything about his side of the story? No. What you heard about was a sympathetic judge who had to book him under the law. Did you know a promine…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 12:37 PM
2

No kidding. All those white knights magically appearing as we live in the year 1357 where women would never treat a man like that. I was amazed that they apparently didn’t hurt him.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 07:54 PM
3

I saw that video. That video and almost every other like it, the man involved waits a long time to unleash, usually after several attempts to walk away or otherwise deescalate. And usually after being physically attacked. I think he should sue. He did nothing wrong (unless something before that video changes the context completely).
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:07 PM
30

Nia Burr made Bill get rid of his dog.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/19 01:21 PM
5

The perfect is the enemy of the good.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/19 07:21 PM
6

I understand where you're coming from and I think this is different. In my life, a woman has never, ever purchased razors for me. So while they may see sales from lots of women for their more feminine products, I do think males, who actually purchase the majority of Gillette products, will move on, especially in this era of wet shave info (safety razors, dual edge, competitors that deliver straight to home). You may ultimately be right, but the variables of the equation are different than they w…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/19 09:58 PM
6

Have you seen the ad? They hate you.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/19 09:55 PM
14

Boys will be boys.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/19 01:46 PM
2

Harry’s is a virtue signaling company too.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:46 AM
3

P&G approved the ad. That’s at best an implicit endorsement of its content and message, at worst an explicit endorsement.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:45 AM
6

MS, as in Mississippi? I’ve never heard of this. Are you sure? I’ve paid thousands and the court always just had me mail the mom a check.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:58 PM
–

Yes. By prostitutes.
/r/seduction27/10/18 02:45 PM
18

Upvoted for the Emo Philips reference. Saw him last year and he’s still hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/18 01:26 PM
2

Fair enough. I highly appreciate the civil discourse and you hearing me out and sharing your view.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 09:22 AM
1

but the worse case scenario is FAR worse than is being publicized Can you please elaborate on this? Why wouldn't the direness of this situation be reported? And did you disagree with anything I said? I am all for funding of more research on climate change.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:26 AM
1

Correlation does not equal causation. My only point so far has been that more science and research are needed. Are humans causing global climate change? It's a great question. Has it been proven we are? No, no it hasn't. If it were proven, there'd be no argument. We put more Carbon Dioxide in the air. Plants breathe CO2. Thus, there should be more plants. And it turns out that's true: https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2436/co2-is-making-earth-greenerfor-now/ ... and while this article sounds ominus …
/r/MensRights05/10/18 02:56 AM
1

They could be fighting harder on all of those fronts, but yes I do believe the reason groups like the alt-right exist is as a direct response to the feminization of our culture and the traditional right’s lack of fighting back. I would also say that even if they weren’t fighting for those things at all, the enemy of my enemy...
/r/MensRights04/10/18 03:02 PM
1

And I think they do now.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:36 PM
1

Will you answer my questions?
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:36 PM
1

I’m willing to have a discussion. Saying more science is needed. I answered your questions. You did not answer mine. You, sir, are the one wasting my time. Good day.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:01 PM
1

I didn’t say that. You just ignored my questions. I was answering yours.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:58 PM
1

The left has abandoned men.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:57 PM
1

How is economics science? The only argument I can see is that it’s based on psychology. There are patterns in economics but that doesn’t make it science. It’s like saying the law is science or government is science. They aren’t.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:54 PM
1

And so are former liberals who realize lunacy when they see it. Just because there are some tradcons who have softened up doesn’t also mean there aren’t many former liberals disgusted with the current direction of their former party.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:48 PM
1

Can you touch it?
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:46 PM
1

Economics isn’t science.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:27 PM
1

I said modern conservatism. I wasn’t talking about tradcons.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:26 PM
1

You don’t understand science. You need a hypothesis. Then a test. Then results. Then repetition by others. In the 1800s, the arrival of Haley’s comet was predicted. That had never happened before. No such specific predictions exist for global warming, which is now called climate change, which used to be called global cooling. The science is not settled and demanding more proof is pro-science.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:26 PM
2

It is actually pro-science of people like me to demand more proof. I didn’t say it isn’t happening. I said it may be happening. But more proof is needed. That is not anti-science, but pro-science.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:22 PM
-15

Global warming cannot be modeled and this there is reason to doubt it. It may be happening but there is no true scientific proof that can predict the future accurately yet. Conservatives these days do not talk about gay rights and the like. You have a rather simplistic view of modern conservatism and may want to further research it rather than LOLing. In any case, the modern left has abandoned men, rationale, and logic. #believeallwomen
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:17 AM
-8

Give up your liberalism. The left has abandoned you.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 03:51 AM
-2

There are subreddits devoted to the subject. Try the one called seduction
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:56 PM
0

Just view those posts as how Game applies to politics.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/18 11:26 PM
2

I think you're missing the point -- and it can be hard to get if you're not familiar with the games. Part of the reasons the fans love the games has been devotion to some level of historical accuracy, especially with regards to the soldiers, guns, and vehicles. The entire environment. The theater of war. This year, all of that gets eschewed because mah womyn soldiers. We live in an age where they removed the "N-word" from Huckleberry Finn. Here, we have a series of realistic games and then bam, …
/r/MensRights14/07/18 04:33 AM
4

Are you intentionally missing my point? I’ll assume so.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 02:54 AM
8

I understand your exaggeration but ok, what about in 100 years? 1000 years? If this trend of appending history continues, truth is lost.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 10:23 PM
95

I think the point is that when you can name 4 women who were the exception to the rule, but you can’t name the millions of men, then maybe the game centering on women with bionic arms being historically accurate is a distorting the truth. The war was fought by 99.9999999999999999% men. Thus historically accurate game is exposing kids to history that didn’t happen.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 06:34 PM
1

If you’re young do everything you can to get a foreign bank account in a country whose currency is backed by real gold. This would today be Hong Kong/Singapore. Don’t put all your eggs into one basket. That includes your currency.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/18 04:36 AM
3

Women have reproductive rights. Men don’t. There is not a single feminist who has ever called for equality in the area of reproductive rights.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/18 11:52 PM
37

Another user in he original thread went through dudes comment history and yes, this is a troll post it seems. What really sucks is that it’s completely plausible barring those details.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/18 03:25 AM
2

Yeah I exaggerated for effect. Even if you moved next door, not going to happen. Judges don’t like changing the status quo. I got temp emergency custody of my daughter last year and am still working to make it permanent. Before I had custody though, the most important thing was that my daughter knew I was wanted to be there for her no matter what, and she is loved and can always reach out to me. Final advice to you is barring physical custody, what do you want out of this for you and your daught…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:13 PM
8

There are two types of custody—physical and legal. You are probably talking about physical. Physical is really the important one. You are not getting joint physical unless you move within one mile of your child’s current home. Joint legal basically means you are obligated to pay child support. There is very little power in joint legal. I don’t mean to be a downer. You are clearly awesome and have a huge tolerance for bullshit. More than I do. I just want to help you set realistic expectations.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:02 PM
38

Do NOT file for custody. You will not get it. Big waste of time and money. You’re disabled and you’ve never even seen your child in person. There’s not a judge alive who would grant you custody. When time comes, file for visitation. If you can agree to it with just lawyers do that (very possible without a court hearing) If she pulls the “not letting her see your child” bit, then file contempt against her. After you have an agreement or court order. If you can see your child without a court battl…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 06:14 PM
2

Cohabitation in certain states leads to common law marriage or palimony. Be really careful. Not getting married is not a 100% solution.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/18 05:43 PM
4

The word "rape" wasn't used, but the exact quote from the article: If you let boys be boys, they will murder their fathers and sleep with their mothers. Based apparently upon Freud.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 09:41 PM
2

You know well that lots of porn on the internet does not exactly portray intercourse as consensual. The Internet is huge. If I were to argue with exactly what you are saying I would likely be wrong. Obviously I'm talking about mainstream porn and porn sites when I made my comments wrt consent. So yeah, go to pornhub or youporn and show me all those videos that don't show consent. I'm not saying these videos don't exist, but they are the minority. Most amateur and professional porn always show co…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 09:26 PM
3

Obviously anyone who disagrees with the press is literally Hitler. I do think Literally Hitler would be a great name for a band.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 09:22 PM
1

But only if she consents. /s
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 09:21 PM
10

If I'm reading an article about air travel and the author has to remind me that Trump is terrible, then I stop reading. This article was the exception. And given all that Trump has going against him, I think he's nothing short of amazing. The reason Obama is revered is due to media control. And that's why i posted this article here: it really clearly demonstrates how the media literally brainwashes its audience.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 04:58 PM
3

What do you think is doing it?
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 01:15 PM
30

If you have the link about the boys and their moms I'd like to see it.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 12:41 AM
5

You won't find this story on bestof. Instead you'll find how TRP has led us to white nationalism. Congrats op! Keep improving your life.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 11:46 PM
3

https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&hl=en-us&biw=414&bih=628&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=8-cMWoHhHIramAGLp7uQDw&q=female+celebs+without+makeup&oq=female+celebs+&gs_l=mobile-gws-img.1.2.0l5.164184.173764.0.175479.36.25.11.0.0.0.290.4615.0j18j6.24.0....0...1.1.64.mobile-gws-img..1.35.4927.3..35i39k1j0i10k1.387.6HDnwQ02xBU
/r/TheRedPill16/11/17 01:24 AM
12

Wish I could upvotr you times 1000. Great comment.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 04:09 PM
2

Be as independent as possible. The OP was wondering what was better, independence or authority. Between the two, the answer is always independence unless you happen to be in authority. Going to authority is easy: you are putting hard decisions to other people. Being independent is hard.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 01:34 AM
41

I'll help you: it's bad. When you appeal to authorities, you are giving up control. You are giving up power. You are putting your fate in others' hands.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:47 PM
5

two x chromosomes implies that gender is a biological construct. Hypocrites.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 12:34 PM
6

I read the first free chapters of that book before going to bed one night and as I was falling asleep I had my first and only ever out of body experience. It was very surreal. Great book.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/17 02:57 PM
20

Do you know that in the Brock turner case there was never any sexual intercourse? He never stuck his penis in her. Did you know they were both drunk? Did you know a female friend of his defended him on Facebook telling people he was a great guy and to wait for the facts to come out and she received death threats for doing so? What do you really know about Brock Turner? If you read the court filings and do research you may find out that the outrage against him is misguided. Brock Turner may be a …
/r/MensRights02/06/17 03:03 AM
3

By "being there for him" you are enabling him. Stop it. Tell him you're happy to give him advice but if he never uses it you aren't going to listen to his problems.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 03:19 PM
8

But biology is a social construct!
/r/MensRights26/05/17 03:07 PM
1

Yeah I guess the mods aren't sensitive to baldness
/r/TheRedPill15/12/16 04:00 PM
1

It's because I put a link in via archive.org, which I didn't know was not allowed. I messaged moderators and have heard nothing back.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/16 02:55 PM
2

I don't disagree with you at all. It's that due to their censorship, points like yours could not have been made. Had they left that answer up then others like yourself could have made a nuanced point, but instead they deleted the replies and the thread itself, which shows their intolerance.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/16 05:44 AM
1

The irony is that Sarah Silverman likely made much more on her book advance years ago than male comedian authors like Adam Carolla, Marc Maron, and Drew Carey.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 07:06 PM
-13

Don't ask for the number. Be direct. Say, "Give me your number."
/r/seduction08/07/16 03:59 AM
14

Because I'm sure if a man had been caught with 600 grams of cocaine, but decided to enroll in college, that this same judge would have let him off with only probation. I want to clarify that I agree that it's way too easy to get convicted of a felony in the US and that I think our drug laws need to be rethought, still, the vast majority of our drug convictions are to men, and they do not get this kind of lenient treatment.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 05:21 PM
4

Agreed. Though I read the book years ago and appreciate a summary just to be able to review it and ensure it keeps sticking.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 07:27 PM
2

And this is why I keep saying family court is a scam. Once you have the one unreasonable person, the system can string everyone along and wring the money right out of them, destroying lives in the process.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 07:58 PM
1

Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 12:59 AM
1

Because the system is a scam. We have a winner take all system where women win the majority of the cases. You make the system fair and fast, the system then stops making money for the lawyers.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 05:10 PM
1

Link to story?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 05:08 PM
2

I DMd /u/Benny757 after he left this comment. Between Round 2 and Round 3 I had read the laws of power. But even before Round 2, I learned that perception is all that matters in court. Truth be damned. Benny's advice is spot on, but if you take it you still must know that it only improves your odds--the system is still a scam and the laws of power can't always beat a pre-determined outcome. In Round 3 the GaL told the court he would have done exactly as I did if he were in my shoes. Yet of cours…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/16 05:06 PM
1

What state and what year?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 02:17 AM
1

It did, and the lawyers and the judge were not happy about it. The saving grace for me is I didn't find out about those examinations until well after it happened. How old are your kids?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:36 AM
1

I went to 25 schools between Kindergarten and 12th grade. Never left the country though, and family was NOT military. We had HUGE ups and downs, and I know what real poverty is (at least in the USA). Yet once a court gets involved the child's standard cannot decrease just a little bit. It's not realistic yet that doesn't matter. Court-ordered insanity.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:35 AM
1

Apology accepted. I felt as if you were attacking me. I put it all out there and it's fine, you can attack me. I got divorced and women were throwing themselves at me for the first time in my life. I did not knowingly have sex with a drug addict thief, and if I could take it back you better believe I would. In fact, once she told me she was a shoplifter, I said to myself I was never seeing this woman again. You can't run a background check on all one night stands (though I concede this chick was…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 10:32 PM
2

How about you put your life out there and let me poke holes in it? Dude is free to take or leave my advice as he sees fit. I will say that if his kids are treating him like a stranger and refuse all contact with him for no good reason, then I believe he owes them nothing. That's my opinion, and apparently you got your panties in a wad over it. Go change that tampon of yours.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 08:20 PM
2

This is such a chilling comment. The scam only tightens its grip.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 02:43 PM
2

Holy shit, this article just came out this morning! Again, more common than you think. Perez claims he spent nearly a month in jail in 2014 after false allegations of child molestation made by his ex-wife. Even after bonding out, he had to surrender his passport, leaving him essentially homeless until the charges against him were dropped months later.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 01:49 PM
2

Children can still be used as weapons even without child support. Many people have an ingrained biological imperative to protect their children. But let's say you're completely right. Isn't this just survival of the fittest? Wouldn't our species be better off? And if you are completely right, well, still, why the fuck should I pay child support so beta males can get laid? Not my problem.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 11:56 AM
2

Thanks man. The tough part is making it palatable. It's hard making posts like this because it comes across as a wall of shit. Just complaining. I think digestible youtube videos are likely the way to go. People see little animations along with links to court paperwork showing the truth of the stories and that could go a long way. Make this stuff entertaining/informative.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 11:50 AM
3

I want to ask you, "How does that work? How can the judge just ignore evidence?" But I know. It's family court. There's no oversight. It's a scam. Stories like yours are what need to be put out there.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 11:47 AM
1

I've been alienated too. I know what it's like, though in my case it was with my one-year-old daughter. You have to figure out what works for you. But do keep in mind that you also need to put yourself first. Your kids have been poisoned and they don't want to talk to you, so from their perspective you are annoying them. You want a relationship with your kids, and for whatever reason they don't want one. There are ways to open dialogs, but you have to put yourself in a position where they want t…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:44 AM
1

Sociopaths can use the family court system to ruin other people. If the system were truly about the best interests of the child, the majority of cases would be done in 3 months. But there's no money in that. So one person uses the system in all out war against the other, and the other has to defend, and everyone loses. The scam must stop.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:41 AM
1

I'm not perfect. I've made mistakes. The problem with allegations like this is you can't prove a negative. You can prove that someone molested a child by examining that child, but you cannot prove that the child was not molested. You can only say that no evidence appears that physical damage or evidence has been done to the child. I kept the moral high ground for a long time but now that I reflect it's gotten me nowhere and really hasn't done any good for my daughter. The only good to come out o…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 11:40 AM
2

Thanks for reading my other posts. Short version: I had just gotten separated and had women throwing themselves at me for the first time in my life. Fucked her the first time we met and a few weeks later fucked her again. That's when the condom broke. Then she opens up to me. Tells me she has a boyfriend. Tells me she shoplifted from Wal-mart. I was about to have a short-term job in NYC and thought to myself, "This is easy. I'll never see this woman again." Get a phone call while I'm in NYC and …
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 11:33 AM
3

Vaselgel. Sex robots. MGTOW. It's not a simple equation like USA - Child Support = More Virgins. There are LOTS of factors to consider.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 11:15 AM
1

You gotta do what works for you, but here are some of my recommendations, some of which may sound harsh: If you're contacting them weekly and getting no response, take the hint. Don't torture yourself. Also, no one likes a beggar or pleader. If you want to do something like travel the world or what not, do so, and post those details on your social media. Be attractive to them. If you do want to message them once more, make it a final type of message. Tell them you wish to respect them, however t…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 04:31 AM
1

Since your kids are old enough, how is facebook for contacting them? Also, the best revenge is living a great life. Work towards getting back on your feet and travel the world, write a novel or reconnect with old friends. Live for you. Don't let the system crush your spirit.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 04:01 AM
3

I recommend Divorce Corps as well. The movie doesn't talk about the scamminess of this enough. They talk about how family law trumps The Constitution and how lawyers and judges are co-workers, but Bumblefuck, MS doesn't have a revolving door of law firms and judges. A big part of the problem is that different states' laws are not at all the same. I'd love to see an amendment to The Constitution that addressed parents' rights, so at least some sort of uniformity could occur. But that's not going …
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 03:59 AM
3

I'm not sure that anyone knows how common it is to be accused of molestation during a custody case. I can offer some anecdotal evidence though. I had a new client once. First meeting was good working meeting. I work in engineering and generally my points of contact are all male. This customer was female. Over email, I mention that I'm involved in a custody case and that limits my ability to travel. I typically keep work life and personal life as separate as possible, but over the years have lear…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 03:56 AM
1

You cannot claim a child as a dependent unless they live with you for over 6 months of the year. No tax breaks whatsoever for child support.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/16 01:50 AM
1

http://family-in-law.com/making-sense-of-minnesotas-new-shared-parenting-presumptions/
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 11:24 PM
3

I don't believe the court would actually give 50/50. The mother has moved 3 times since my case started. She can live anywhere she wants. Me? I can't realistically live in Bumblefuck, MS, due to needing to be close to an airport. The situation sucks. I either give up my freedom to be closer to my daughter (with no guarantee the court will change anything) or live an hour away in a city with far more amenities (like an airport and high speed internet) that help me run my business. There really is…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:23 PM
2

While your situation sucks and everything about it makes sense except for this one part above. I'm with you. Seems petty, right? The issue is that she was telling my two-year-old daughter things like, "He's not you father," referring to me. Having a two-year-old be confused about "real daddy" versus "other daddy," when she only sees "real daddy" once every couple of months is horrible. She had no problem cashing the child support checks. But telling her daughter I was her father was apparently t…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 11:20 PM
3

I agree with you, completely. I'm talking about action. I don't see a real, actionable path to getting child support repealed. No politician is going to float a bill to remove child support obligations. No legislature would approve that bill if it did happen, and no lobbying group proposing such a thing would get anywhere. The only thing that I think would work is if all fathers banded together, as a group protest, and for one or more months, just didn't pay their child support. Protest and floo…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 09:01 PM
2

I don't think you're being harsh. You're being real. I did not know 7 years ago what I know now. I also don't come from a big family and the family I have isn't that close, so having a daughter also meant a lot to me. That all being said, this past weekend my daughter repeated a joke to me that we've said on and off to each other since she was 2 years old. I also told her that shoplifting was illegal and she could go to jail for it. She had no idea and told her mom to stop shoplifting. To my kno…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 08:52 PM
3

I think Minnesota is trying to move toward this however most states are still fighting it due to best interests of the child. The real battle is and always will be about child support. The second problem for the system is that shared custody makes things easy. If I hate my ex but I also know that there is no abuse or crime around, then I'll get shared custody, and that means I won't hire a lawyer for a lengthy trial, but rather to bang out an agreed order. Shared custody undermines child support…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 06:52 PM
12

Women view children as a meal ticket because the system encourages slavery of men via child support. Child support is at best, taxation without representation, and at worst, slavery. Child support is: tax-free to the mother comes from the after tax money of the father is not calculated by the amount of time the non-custodial parent gets (ie, I have to pay child support even when I have my kid over the summer, even though I have more expenses over the summer with my kid like camp, babysitters, fo…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 06:37 PM
6

This has come up every time I've posted one of my articles here. I agree that child support laws should be abolished. I just don't think it's a realistic goal. No politician is going to vote to repeal child support laws. No legislature is going to enact the repealing of child support laws. And no political group that would like CS removal is large and influential enough to make it happen. This is the red pill. The reality is that you can be fucking Jesus Christ but because Eve has a fucking vagi…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 06:15 PM
4

That's a great point. A convicted drug offender mother against an out of state father -- the mother wins every time. I was not in a position to move to Bumblefuck, MS. And even moving there is a gamble -- it would strengthen my case, but there is NO GUARANTEE it would help. The mother doesn't take my kid to school and fattens her to 130lbs, all while teaching her to shoplift. But dad refuses to move to Bumblefuck, so fuck him. Best interests of the child my ass.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 05:47 PM
6

Dude, I didn't even want to have a kid. Slept with the mom, basically a one night stand, and the condom broke and she got pregnant. I explained I did not want to have a kid. That did not matter. So I went all in and the above is where it got me. I figured if I had to pay child support, I might as well get every second of time I can. As far as to how to circumvent court: If you are split and you physical possession of your kid, file for custody and do not allow the other parent any contact. Posse…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 05:39 PM
15

When the story was reported one of my girfriend's neighbors had put a letter out for the mailman. It was from UVA alumni association and addressed to the neighbor. The neighbor had female handwriting and wrote "return to sender and remove me from your list!" The hoax had an impact that is nearly impossible to calculate.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 12:45 AM
1

But if the father would have missed one child support payment they would have been on him like white on rice. That's really the most important thing you said. She can withhold the child from him, even though he has a court order, and nothing can be done then and there to enforce said court order. Instead, he must go back to court and file contempt charges. However, if he doesn't pay child support, his wages get garnished. If that's not possible, men with guns come and arrest him. If you ask a la…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 01:37 PM
2

The mom lived in Oxford, MS, small town america. The cops were issued the warrant by the court with the expectation that they deliver said warrant. In MS, the statute that they were charging her with falls under the "Child Abuse/Neglect" laws (at least as it regards sentencing). That's pretty serious, even if it isn't murder. Schools also get funding based on attendance. Truant kids = less money for the school. There's incentive to deliver these warrants.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 04:46 AM
3

I'll repeat what I said in another comment: My neighbor cop told me this. Whether the cop was telling the truth or not is up for debate. I have absolutely no proof that his story was true. He lived with his son and dated -- and never lied to me about anything else that I'm aware of. Even if the cop lied to me, it doesn't invalidate the entire post. It weakens some points, sure, but doesn't mean the points aren't accurate.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 04:43 AM
2

Which state were your cases?
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 11:14 PM
1

I think men know they face an uphill battle. What they don't realize is the depth of the problem, hence men still file for custody and the like. Getting the truth out there with verifiable examples is one thing we can do to make sure that men have a real idea of the scam. If they know it's a scam they won't participate. So step one is to educate as many folks as possible.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 10:58 PM
1

I married young too. Biggest mistake of my life. If it's meant to be at 23, it's meant to be at 40.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 10:55 PM
1

All I can tell you is that the cop told me this. He did live with his son. He was law enforcement. Whether he was lying to me or not is up for debate, but he did tell me this story. EDIT: Fixed typo.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 10:53 PM
3

Even so it's a huge cost to you. You have to give up control of the life you made because a woman can use the system to literally ruin that life. Insane.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 10:31 PM
5

Even adoption. Lesbians want to adopt a kid? Sure. Two gay men? MAYBE. Non-married male? No. Any single male who wants to adopt a kid must be an abuser/molester.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 10:29 PM
3

It all depends on your state. In Mississippi, it would work hard against you. I suspect that unless you are Cait Jenner that it'll work against you. Plus it could fuck up your kid even more.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 09:05 PM
5

I can't speak for any one else, but for me this is all hypothetical. I don't advocate the killing of anyone in the family court system, however if a person is going to self-immolate, then that person is mistaken that their act is going to get the word out as Mr Ball has proven. If he had killed a lawyer or a judge and survived, he could have testified and maybe, MAYBE gotten publicity and sympathy. To be clear, I only advocate nonviolent means, that is, bankruptcy. Bankrupt the system (as the sy…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 08:24 PM
16

Continuing with my casino analogy from last week, you got lucky. My daughter had 60+ absences from first grade. Mom had a warrant for her arrest that was NEVER DELIVERED by the fucking cops. My daughter is smart. The school failed her for excessive absences, the mother appealed and because my daughter is smart they passed her. Then the warrant gets delivered and in court, mom says, "They passed my daughter," so that case gets dropped. Then I go to court and they say, "They passed your daughter, …
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 06:00 PM
38

Never forget Thomas James Ball: http://freekeene.com/2011/06/16/thomas-james-ball-self-immolated-in-protest-of-the-justice-system/ I wonder if he had murdered the lawyers and judges involved instead of killing himself if the story would have gotten any more coverage.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 05:14 PM
2

Nobody said anything about abandoning children except for you. You are not making counterpoints in good faith. Assuming you are, though, try not to project your abandonment issues onto others.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 02:19 AM
2

And men don't use them because they don't believe they have a fair shot. Not apples and oranges.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:31 AM
1

Coming soon. Sneak preview: my daughter failed first grade. More to come.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:53 PM
2

I would like to say your friend was in that 17% statistical anomaly, but in cases where the child has a say with whom they live with, you should absolutely go to court to make it official. Still, though, it took 2 months. Think about that. In many cases "temporary orders" are completely valid. If the judge knew that was the ruling he was going to make, he could have made a temporary order for the benefit of the child, and then made his final ruling upholding the temporary order. Again, IANAL, bu…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 05:27 PM
2

Feel free to PM or twitter me with how this all goes for you.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 05:22 PM
8

I'm going to lay down some super red pill shit here. Swallow at your own risk. If there is no court order in your case yet (usually a temporary order Witt visitation and child support is created really early), if you want to win custody, take the kids and don't give them back until an order forces you. Possession is 9/10 of the law and that applies here too. In most states, the parent who has possession of the kids before court and during the trial wins by default because that parent is the one …
/r/TheRedPill19/03/16 02:07 AM
2

Yes. Judges can rule all sorts of stuff, doesn't mean it can be enforced and opens up a whole web of nasty litigation (appeals and such). You could also hire one of those ambulance chasers, or enroll in a mail correspondence course. Besides, if all stopped hiring lawyers, you can't (initially) force everyone to get a lawyer. If a state were to create a law forcing legal representation for civil matters, I would believe that an informed populace would be outraged. I'll have to research divorce co…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 11:39 PM
6

Anyone who believes in justice has never been through a court case other than for traffic tickets. If traffic court is a joke, family court is a tragedy, and criminal court an outright farce. Really makes it hard to respect the law. And society needs respect and trust to operate.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 11:34 PM
5

This is very similar to where I'm going with this series. The issue becomes how you defend yourself legally. Because once you're in the legal system you are (in some states) forever at risk of being dragged back into it. If no one pays lawyers, the system will change. If more men had your attitude, many (but not all) women would really think hard before giving birth out of wedlock/divorce.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 11:31 PM
6

Don't give the family court or the lawyers anything to work with. Even this isn't always possible. In my case, the condom broke. Life was created, child was confirmed mine through DNA testing. Never married to the mother. I'm on my sixth year of about $900/month of child support. And those court fees I mentioned above did not include a dollar of child support. Main point: just like everything else TRP, you must rely on yourself. You cannot trust any system. And if you're still fighting BP tenden…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 08:50 PM
2

I knew some of these statistics yet I believed my case was different. And I'll share some undisputed facts within my case to drive the point home. The vast majority of those custodial fathers did not have to go through a lengthy custody battle. Handle as much outside the courts as possible.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 08:47 PM
9

Good for you man! I think family courts are so miserable that most lawyers just learn to block emotions for their clients. I hope your life is more fulfilling now!
/r/TheRedPill18/03/16 08:05 PM
21

I took the red pill rectally.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 01:53 PM
4

/r/wicked_edge
/r/MensRights16/08/15 05:00 PM
1

You can't use food stamps to buy alcohol and cigarettes, so it would be a start.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 09:40 PM
16

I like that idea. I also like the idea of it being on a debit card where the father has access to the transactions, and transactions like alcohol and cigarettes were not allowed, like food stamps. Having access to the transactions makes it much harder for the mother to sell the debit card for cash, especially if it's a revolving account. The next step would then be to get judges to give a shit. It's sad, but this is not just a technology issue.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:20 PM
89

This is a fantastic article about a mother who puts her kids first. She went to court to have the back child support removed, and makes points about how the current system, being as combative as it is, delegates non-custodial parents (i.e., fathers) to merely being viewed as a wallet, and how even the term "child support" has more meaning than "money."
/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:46 AM
4

Check out her Twitter feed. She retweeted a graphic explaining to men how not to rape women (ie, we should teach men not to rape). No jokes attached. She's Hollywood old and jaded. She also received $2.5 million for her book in 2008. I don't think Dmitri Martin or Adam Carolla got that. But you know. Wage gap. See also: http://www.fokmcast.com/2013/09/20/saving-sarah-silverman/ to view her hypocrisy re ageism in jokes. She's a walking, talking, lying hypocrite.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:58 AM
0

Tweeted this earlier: https://twitter.com/fokm/status/562060016853983232
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 02:36 AM
33

Have you seen Chris Rock's "Top Five"? Spoiler alert: in it, a woman shoves a tampon with hot sauce on it up her boyfriend's ass and he writhes around in pain with a string hanging out of his ass. In the movie, what he did to deserve that was make fun of the woman's credit score. If that's what passes for comedy these days at the movies, I see how people could think the real life stuff like this post is funny. But they'll get offended at rape jokes aimed at women. Hypocrites. EDIT: Fixed a typo.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 06:24 AM
9

They forgot #yesallwomen. Even though Elliot Rodgers killed more men, let's focus on the women. That did give us #yesallcats, though.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 10:29 PM
2

The woman had her young children in the car, ages 1 and 3, The current version of the story does NOT have this line, but it does have the other lines. Given that I'd much rather believe a random poster on TRP than anyone in the MSM, this is not surprising. Can't have pesky things like facts derailing The Narrative.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 04:42 AM
2

I thought it was much more misogynistic when Neal Armstrong hung the "NO FAT CHICKS" banner next to the American flag on the moon.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 04:41 AM
2

I submitted a commit on the article calling the author a pussy. That comment was deleted. I didn't taunt the author, just said he's a pussy, and without 'mansplaining' there wouldn't be journalism or even civilization. Anyhow, this article really hit me, that there could be men who think like this, who want to live in a world where they are second-class citizens full of doubt and self-hatred. Since TRP deals with truth, over the long run on being on it, doubts may linger, but they don't hold you…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 08:38 PM
7

The author of this piece was born with a Y chromosome, but you would never, ever know it by reading. Want to feel guilty for every thought you have? For wanting to explain to others, male or female, what you believe? For wanting to teach others and pass on knowledge? Then read this article and be like the author. From the article: But mansplaining has popped up in other contexts as well, particularly with a political edge. Slate accused Congress of mansplaining to Federal Reserve chair Janet Yel…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 03:12 PM
1

How can a five year old'a signature on anything be legally binding? Being a school administrator is being in a position of trust, right? Not nowadays. We need more and more stories like this to keep happening. I will teach my kid to say nothing to any school admin when she is in trouble and to have her parents called immediately. Everyone reading this should do the same.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 06:47 PM
2

I wrote an article about this just two weeks ago: How Movies Made For Girls Devalue Boys Maleficient is particularly offensive in this regard.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 03:12 PM
1

Even if women were convicted at the same rate as men, women's prisons are a cakewalk compared to men's. In a all female prison, people actually would be horrified if you were raped. In a male prison, it's hilarious!
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 09:19 PM
4

Down with the poochtriarchy!
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 12:55 PM
2

McNulty isn't the best example (though the redhead lawyer upgrading to the black guy is an example), however the lesbian couple is dead on. I never considered it a Red Pill show though, just ultra realistic, which TRP deals with: reality. Makes me wonder why Blue Pillers love the show so much.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 05:58 AM
2

How is The Wire red pill? I watched the entire series before learning about TRP. I'm having a hard time seeing how it's red pill.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 08:16 PM
5

In court there's rarely a such thing as a 100% loss. Even in family court. Most lawyers won't let a case like that go to trial. I went through an almost four-year long court battle for my daughter in a southern state. Long story short: I'm atheist, didn't deny it, even volunteered that if it was important to the court that I would bring my daughter to church twice a month if I were to be awarded custody. Guardian ad litem recommended custody be kept with the mother, and emphasized that he BARELY…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 06:44 PM
1

I've known disbelievers. Thing is when I tell them what to do from TRP perspective, they get results. I, for one, do get listened to.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 05:28 AM
0

As far as we know, her husband works and she doesn't, unless I read the OPs post wrong. She does support her kids. Again, though, you're judging someone else's money. I think $420 is reasonable. But that $420 may be much more useful to the OP's boyfriend than the mother. That seems to be the part you're missing.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:18 AM
3

And please don't tell me that the ex-wife has no responsibilities. Not financially, she doesn't, it sounds.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:55 AM
1

Your post assumes two things: 50/50 custody is possible. Many judges and states won't give 50/50 custody though. Too traumatic for the child, they argue. People going through divorces are reasonable AND the system is there to help them stay reasonable. Why settle for 50/50 when I can take this sucker for $500-800 month AND keep the kid 90% of the time?
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:19 AM
0

Who are you to determine what's reasonable? If the OP's story is true and the church is receiving the child support, then how is that at all irrelevant? It's easy to be generous with other people's money, isn't it? For some people, $420 is a lot of money.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:16 AM
3

EBT cards. They do it for welfare recipients. They can do it for child support. But doing so will be seen as "misogynistic" so no politician will dare touch it. But the solution is right fucking there.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:14 AM
1

HAHAHAHA. As if lawyers could fix this. Child support rarely gets lowered, ever. OP's boyfriend is fucked.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:13 AM
4

He needs to pay for them because its HIS FUCKING KIDS. I think most involved parents want to be involved in, and pay for their kids. However, when the government tells you that you have to pay a certain amount, the other side isn't accountable to actually spend any of it on the kids, you don't have any say in how it's spent, well, we're already at slavery. In this instance, the other side literally gives the money away. He's not paying for his kids. I would think with your username you'd be more…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:11 AM
0

885/month for one. Since my kid was one year old.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:08 AM
11

My custody case went for almost full four years. Believe me, brother, you haven't even begun to fight. Biggest waste of $300? I laugh at you. Still, I feel for your situation and know exactly what you are going through. I went months without seeing or contacting my (at the time) 1-year-old daughter. Her mom and her mom's family literally tried to erase me from her memory and it didn't work. I went in front of a judge and was allowed overnight visitation (how's that for wording--I'm allowed to se…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 05:16 AM
19

Have you seen most female prisoners? We aren't taking runway models here.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 10:14 PM
46

Also you never see feminists wanting things like gender-neutral prisons. If we are striving for men and women being treated equally then there should be no women's prisons or men's prisons. Just prisons. My guess is prison rape wouldn't be viewed as being nearly as funny as it is viewed today if it happened to female inmates the way it happens to male inmates. EDIT: fixed a typo
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 06:16 PM
2

Hey Panda, I don't just throw out phrases like "anti-male" with no justification. You posted to this sub, and I believe that at least indicates you have an open mind about what guys here think. From the sidebar: Facts and statistics detailing male oppression / disadvantage. I wish you all the best of luck in future endeavors and hope you can find work that makes you happier.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 09:46 PM
2

Thank you for all of your replies to my messages. The point that women file first is directly related to the fact that women are granted the most valuable marital assets (the children) 80-90% of the time, gives them a built-in incentive to dissolve marriages. That's why it's important. This implies that if custody was seen as 50/50 by default (some states are moving to this) that women won't have an incentive to dissolve their marriages. Thus, it matters, big time. No system is perfect but our s…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 08:44 PM
7

Agreed with you that it does veer into other issues, but vehemently disagree with you not spinning things. The "best interests of the child" means whatever the court wants it to mean, and when you have one person's interests above all others, that is not justice. But I do want to enlighten you instead of arguing with you. From Wikipedia: The National Center for Health Statistics reports that from 1975 to 1988 in the U.S., in families with children present, wives file for divorce in approximately…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 07:50 PM
5

If the court believes everyone lies then why even bother swearing people in? Why not enforce the perjury laws on the books instead? This would cut down on lying and allow people who aren't lying an advantage that you claim they currently do not get. (IOW our lawyer here is basically saying that lying wont necessarily hurt you because everyone does it). As far as custody not being a sex-biased issue, I find your argument flawed. Our society has raised men with the expectation of being a breadwinn…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 07:12 PM
14

In other words, spend even more money while your kids get withheld from you and hope that something is done swiftly. You may have to bring contempt charges multiple times in order for action to take place. Does the OP disagree?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 06:51 PM
1

And that's exactly what I said. Right after suggesting not to pay.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 01:15 PM
1

....and of course I replied without reading the comments first. But I haven't seen anyone suggest the child support deduction in lieu of court yet.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 12:11 AM
2

I did some research on this issue during my custody case and unfortunately, I think the IRS is right in their actions here. I am NOT saying I agree. I am just saying they are acting as they always do. The tax code states that you must have physical custody of your child for over half of the year (there is an actual number stated) in order to be able to legally claim the child as a dependent. So, under the tax code, if she did have this child for 207 days, she has the legal right to do what she d…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 12:09 AM
1

If they are so certain you are not the father then they should have no objections to a paternity test. If they object to the paternity test, then logic dictates that it must be that they believe you are the father. Either way though, the child has a father somewhere and the child, theoretically has a right to know its dad.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 04:15 PM
19

Interesting question: who was listed on the birth certificate as the father? My guess is that Megan's parents left that portion blank and signed the birth certificate. If what you say is true, this will completely work against them in court. You need to find a lawyer and act fast. The courts already don't give a shit about fathers' rights and every day that baby is with her grandparents is a day that the baby has bonded with them and they'll make the argument that pulling the baby from the only …
/r/MensRights18/05/13 12:26 AM
8

Bring him other women to enjoy. Regularly.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/13 05:23 AM
1

I was one of these guys, and may still be working through it actually. I think the reason is that at work there are known rules. You know what your organization thinks of you, and if you're good at what you do, you know how valued you are, whether or not it is ever formally recognized. You can build one what you learn and learn more and build deep bonds with people as you see them daily. Non-work life is different. What goals do you have? You've worked all day and likely worked very hard, do you…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/13 10:13 PM
2

I get what you're saying so let's focus it. Forget his standup. Talk about the episodes of Louie. He claims that a few of them are based on his life, a few years before he really got famous. Likely just after his divorce. If you watch how he deals with Pamela and most of his romantic interactions (including being forced to perform oral sex on a woman he didn't want to do it to), his show just oozes beta.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/13 05:08 AM
1

I don't believe CK tailors his work that much to his audience. He's written jokes involving child molesting, which I think feminists frown on, if I'm not mistaken.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/13 02:29 AM
3

I'm not sure what you mean by this comment. I didn't say CK was clueless, just that I thought he was a beta. Louis worked very hard to get as famous as he is. He had to learn to work with suits and eventually get them out of the way. I have major respect for him, and that's why I believe at work he is an alpha dog. He writes his show though, and that one with his crazy date with the crazy chick--that's exactly how not to date. An alpha would never have gone along with that crazy chick. It really…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/13 02:28 AM
19

Louis is a beta boy. I love him and his comedy, but make no mistake from watching his show he is all in on the beta. He's very alpha about his production and how he gets stuff done, but I feel he does pedastalize women. I also feel that is changing as he's gotten more famous. But he'll still always be a beta. In his last special he was saying how women should always be afraid of men...men are the biggest threat to women. I get what he means and that it is a joke, but truthfully, women are the bi…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/13 11:12 PM
5

I really feel for him. He hasn't seen his son since his son was 10 months old. His son will be turning 10 years old this year. It's not right.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:10 PM
1

Feedback appreciated.
/r/seduction26/04/13 11:15 PM
1

You're putting too much pressure on yourself, and you're communicating it as well. It's all in your head. You were all having fun with the techniques until the movie--instead of just watching the movie and enjoying it, you kept thinking "what do I do"? Try to get those words, "What do I do" out of your inner vocabulary. Do what you want to do. I think you wanted to keep touching her during the movie, so the best way to escalate would be hand on her knee or thigh. Another move you could have done…
/r/seduction22/04/13 01:23 AM
11

Who writes most movies? Male nerds. That's why the hero is always flawed and always gets the girl in the end.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/13 05:42 PM
14

I love myself several times a day.
/r/seduction16/04/13 02:08 AM
2

I believe that if men and women shared prison cells, that instead of being a punchline, the topic of prison rape would actually be taken seriously. Also, if men and women were in the same prisons, I think you'd see the conditions of those prisons dramatically rise. That's my point. It's not to further punish the women, but to improve things for the male prison population. TLDR: There are male gazelles too. EDIT: Fixed a typo.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 02:27 AM
1

I have a podcast. A few months ago I argued that if feminists care about equality, then they must demand that women and men's prisons be shared and not segregated as they currently are. Listen to the podcast and tell me how I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:50 PM
4

This is one of the best posts I've read here in a while. Awesome knowledge. Doesn't part of you think it sucks that you just can't be "nice" and have it work out? By "nice" I guess I mean "genuine".
/r/TheRedPill12/04/13 08:02 PM
7

The key phrase is "I opt out." That will give you the pat down, but you won't have to go through the scanner. I always opt out. If only everyone did.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 01:20 AM
1

Saw this while browsing job postings today. Heterosexual white males are the bottom of the list. I posted this to /r/MensRights and made this comment there: But by mentioning those people, they are implying those people are preferred over the people they aren't mentioning. Bring your daughter to work day = sons aren't as important. You can't promote certain groups without demoting others at the same time. It's a discreet form of sexism and racism that, while discreet, is prevelent and accepted i…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 08:32 PM
1

Sorry about that. New to reddit and I guess I cross posted incorrectly. I'll see if I can fix this. EDIT: Not sure how to put explanation beneath the link text as this is a link post and not a text post.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 08:26 PM
0

What did I say that was racist or insane? I gave two facts. What do you disagree with?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:45 PM
0

But by mentioning those people, they are implying those people are preferred over the people they aren't mentioning. Bring your daughter to work day = sons aren't as important. You can't promote certain groups without demoting others at the same time. It's a discreet form of sexism and racism that, while discreet, is prevelent and accepted in society. Just as the letter of the law usually states that men and women have an equal chance in custody cases, the application of that law does not reflec…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:44 PM
0

Yeah, putting "Equal Opportunity Employer" completely prevents them from getting sued. (That's sarcasm) We have a black president and young women are out-earning their male counterparts. When is enough enough?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:39 PM
0

What this is saying is that preference is given to those with the above characteristics. A gay white man is preferred to a straight white man, even though the job has nothing to do with orientation. Maybe I should have posted this in /r/redpill instead.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:37 PM
2

Saw this while browsing job postings today. Heterosexual white males are the bottom of the list.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:01 PM
2

The best advice so far on this thread is that, if you are already on the birth certificate, get the child and don't turn her over again until there is a court document. You can let the mother call or webcam, but don't give the child back. It's complete bullshit that the system works this way, but when there is no order you are not obligated to do anything, and then you go to court and argue that the kid is closer to you (because she's spent more time with you). Also, if you are not smoking weed …
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:42 PM
6

Thank you for actually citing a source. I have been unable to read all of the first link, but the thing that jumped out most at me was that they consider "joint custody" as being "awarded custody." This is where actually going through this stuff you realize that is not the complete story. When non-lawyers talk custody, they talk about "sole physical custody". I said it myself: I filed for custody twice, and lost twice. I was speaking about sole physical. I did file for custody and was originally…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:16 PM
4

IMO, your arguments are more emotional than logical. I honestly thought you were a woman based on your writing. I'm not trying to insult you, just telling you what I believed.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:02 PM
9

1. You don't sound like a man in your writing. 2. You didn't site your source. I filed for custody, twice, and was not awarded it, twice.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:58 PM
8

The condition is you have a penis, you pay. True about 90% of the time.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:59 PM
8

the majority of fathers that are non-custodial are so because they didn't even bother fighting for custody. in fact, when a father bothers to fight for custody, they tend to win. Thanks, I needed a laugh. Oh, this is just rich. Source this, please, because I think you just pulled this straight from your ass. being a custodial parent does require career sacrifice, you need to be less flexible with your work schedule, take greater amount of time off, and are disproportionately passed over for prom…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:57 PM
8

Way to argue my specific points, pal. I don't believe I ever claimed you were wrong. Anyhow, this is another example of why a man should never get married. If the legal system keeps going this way, one day all men in this country will wisen up.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:54 AM
9

Based on what I know about this case, I'm still in disagreement that the entire prenup should be thrown out. If this guy only gave the prenup one or two days before the wedding, then she should not have married him. If the wedding reception that her dad spent a lot of money on was so important, she had two options at that point: She says, "No, I'm not signing the prenup until after our honeymoon" or She refuses to marry him, and asks for him to repay her father. I think what was truly going thro…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:51 PM
1

Hey Bohica--wondering if this changes things? Ignore that it's a British link--this is American law. Millionaire's wife rips up her pre-nup after court rules she was FORCED to sign it four days before luxury wedding
/r/MensRights11/03/13 10:13 PM
1

How is the system different in your country? One thing I've been wondering is how custody disputes are handled in other countries.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:56 PM
1

I can be a prick, but have not been a prick in my case since before August 2010. Once I settled the case, I have constantly taken the high road. Maybe I did not communicate clearly. I am not against discussing the religion, or lack of, in court. I even told the GAL and testified in court that if I was awarded custody I would take my daughter to church twice a month. What bothers me is that my lack of religion was not "discussed" much by me and it was a given that because I am an atheist, that's …
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:24 PM
6

Glad you fought and I look forward to details of what you've done. I know how hard it is to package this stuff so that it's understood.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:19 PM
2

Is it "maladministration" if it's just standard operating procedure?
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:18 PM
1

What's the point? Because I've missed it. Why should differences in religion be brought up at all? To put it bluntly, the mother knew I was atheist when we first had sex, and even if she didn't, it's my constitutional right to be whatever religion I want. What if the mom was a Jehovah's Witness who did not want my daughter to have a blood transfusion? I'd think that was crazy, but the mom wouldn't. I could come up with all sorts of slippery slope arguments here. Please elaborate on why religion …
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:14 PM
1

And practically, in deep south Tupelo, MS, what do you really think matters? Further, isn't it unconstitutional to even consider religion? The constitution says I can be whatever religion I want, so why does it even come into play?
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:58 PM
2

I echo your sentiments completely. My daughter had two forensic pelvic examinations when she was 3, initiated by her mother and DHS, for something I didn't do and with no proof that I may have done anything other than the mother's word. And apparently they examined her before they interviewed her due to I guess wanting to move quickly. Had they interviewed her first, no exam would have taken place. If I sit and steam about it I can get myself to be very angry, just like you, but I also decided t…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:24 PM
1

I don't know about you, but I have lost a great deal of respect for the law due to my experience. I thought people were punished for perjury and that a court order was meant to be followed to the letter.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:11 PM
1

I might have redress in civil court, but this statute is aimed at the family court. A civil court could judge could easily say, "This is a chancery court matter" and decide to throw out the case.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:10 PM
1

You are correct. I have no proof yet that this is about my atheism. And the judge likely won't expose that in her written ruling if it is indeed about my atheism. The problem is that according to my lawyers, this particular judge usually does not give such lopsided rulings, and does not make it a habit of ignoring the GAL's recommendations. I am not hopeful that the judge will follow the law and award me my legal fees, because she would have already. See several comments below regarding the stat…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:08 PM
1

You can also lose your passport. Lose your job, get behind on child support, and get an interview in another country? Can't renew your passport until you pay child support. Can't pay child support until you get a job. It's happened.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:03 PM
1

Was there justification for no penalty whatsoever? Other than, "that's how it is"?
/r/MensRights07/03/13 05:50 PM
2

Apparently the judge does. The defense also hammered away about this. The Guardian ad Litem, did NOT care that I'm atheist. In MS, custody of unmarried parents is determined by something called The Albright Factors. One of these factors is how active in the church one of the parents is. So the state may actually care.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 05:46 PM
1

I have heard hearsay about prenups getting overturned. It's nice to know they work. One additional tip I heard (and I don't ever plan on getting married again, but for the suckers out there who do): as each partner signs the prenup, they should be recorded on video and then say something like, "I am of sound mind and I just read, understood, and signed this document." Glad it worked out for you!
/r/MensRights07/03/13 05:32 PM
1

Her proof was, "My daughter said." The daughter never corroborated the mother in any case that I am aware of. My daughter told me of something sexual that her stepsister did to her at her mother's house. The mother never told me about this and I provided video evidence of my daughter telling me this. The mother admitted that it happened and never even told the counselor who was working with my daughter. The main point--I had proof, and in court the mother admitted that what my daughter told me w…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 05:24 PM
1

On my part or on the judge's? There's really two possibilities--the judge is corrupt or knows someone involved and didn't recuse herself, or two, my atheism was used against me. On the podcast I mentioned that this judge has a good reputation for being fair. My lawyers assured me that nothing about her ruling is normal. My take is that she appointed the GAL because she thought I was neglecting my daughter. She didn't expect the GAL to be on my side for so many things, and thus, has just ignored …
/r/MensRights07/03/13 05:19 PM
2

Even prenups aren't a guarantee. I count you lucky. What women and the law fail to realize is that if the system doesn't change, then men just won't get married or commit, and thus fewer children are born and those that are have a higher chance of being born to a single mother. This can't be good for society as a whole. It's already happening. What's amazing to me is that we have a drone near a plane in JFK which is going to cause laws that were made in 1981 to be updated -- a case where technol…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 05:16 PM
6

That's a great question. Long ago my lawyer told me that this judge is my judge forever. If we have to appeal, perhaps we can make sure that the higher court doesn't bounce me back down to the same judge. Anyhow, I'm sure we can't right now, and we'll have to actually see her verdict and finding of facts before we can show bias. Great idea though and I will follow up on it when the time is right. Thanks so much!
/r/MensRights07/03/13 04:16 PM
8

The weird thing is that I don't get the impression that the state or the system hates me, but I do get the impression that this judge does. My lawyers are the type that won't bring contempt or a motion for custody (after custody has been determined) unless they are fairly certain they will prevail. In my case, one of my lawyers bluntly told me they'd never seen a case where the mother so willingly puts the child right in the middle. I get the impression that they, along with the appointed GAL, a…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 03:49 PM
5

From the statute: If after investigation by the Department of Human Services or final disposition by the youth court or family court allegations of child abuse are found to be without foundation, the chancery court shall order the alleging party to pay all court costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the defending party in responding to such allegation. IANAL, but the three keywords there are "without foundation" and "shall". In my specific case, the mother withdrew her allegations at …
/r/MensRights07/03/13 03:45 PM
2

How old were your kids? In my case, DHS interviewed my three-year-old daughter. My daughter happens to be able to communicate well above her level, but it's easy to manipulate adults with questioning. Still, my daughter was very clear. I didn't know about the interview until well after it happened, so I never had the opportunity to be as calm or anxious as you.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 03:38 PM
5

This is precisely why I believe in the abolition of child support. Child support makes the government an interested party in the case. If Child support is not paid, the government 'loses' revenue. Non custodial parent's ability to pay is irrelevant. Second, since women win custody at least 80% of the time (if not higher), women have a financial incentive to break up their own family at the man's expense. If custody were truly about who the better parent is and not the parent's gender, then this …
/r/MensRights07/03/13 03:36 PM
34

The above link is to an episode of my podcast that details some of the awful experiences I've had over the past few years. It's hard to be very concise as this case has essentially dragged on for four years. I live in Los Angeles and my daughter lives with her mother in Mississippi. In 2010 the mother was awarded custody while I was awarded visitation of one week a month. For almost 3 years I flew back and forth at least once a month to spend time with my daughter. When my daughter was both 3 an…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:27 AM
2

I can't say I disagree with you. My point was more along the lines of "everyone gets a trophy" being a more female idea. If men ran the school system, you would never see an idea like that gain any sort of traction. And to bolster my point with yours -- you're stating that the system is anti-intellectual, and I state that as a result, women flocked to said system while men have flocked from it, by and large. Maybe a coincidence, maybe not.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:52 AM
4

When schools are run by women, this is what happens. Anyone who hates "Everyone gets a trophy" and "zero tolerance" policies can blame women driving men out of the education field. In other words, if you hate the modern US educational system, you are anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 08:08 AM
3

You're probably right, since this is your profession and you have more firsthand accounts than probably most people here. The problem I have with what you say is since the US family court system is basically a 'winner take all' system regarding custody, women know that if they leave their husband that there's a greater than 90% chance that they will retain custody and thus get child support at his expense. Thus the system encourages divorce, and that's why we have so many men not getting married…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 08:22 PM
1

I specifically said "inability to be a party to arguing..." They are a party to the abortion. They are not a party to arguing against said abortion. How could I have been more clear than that?
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:50 PM
1

The child has an inability to be party to arguing against their own abortion. I don't think that was the point of the poster above.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:28 PM
2

I agree with you totally, however this is not the way the courts would see it. Many courts are still of the opinion that having both parents involved is actually worse for the kid. My custody case ended last week and I spoke to my lawyer at length afterwards and the above is what she told me. The system in this state (Mississippi) basically discourages anything resembling 50/50. She told me when parents come in with their own 50/50 plan and just want a judge to ratify it, the judges try to talk …
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:27 PM
8

Won't help. Court's standard is "best interest of the child." If the child is born it is the most important thing. "Best interest of the child" frequently means whatever the court wants it to mean, usually that it's more important to jail a dad for non-payment of support than it is to force a mom to allow a dad to see his kid.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:56 PM
2

FYI: if you ever owe more than $2500 in child support, you cannot get a passport until it's paid off...even if you're just going for a renewal.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:54 PM
3

This posts links to an inspirational speech made by Jamie Clark on how he made it to the summit of the tallest mountain in the world. If you watch this with the red pill swallowed, you should see parallels on being successful with women, especially on his points about learning from rejection. It's also about how a punk kid grew into a man and started seeing the world differently. It's one of the best speeches I've ever seen, particularly towards the end. I hope you all enjoy.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/13 12:31 AM
1

That last paragraph may just be the best advice you've ever given. Major respect.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/13 12:37 AM
7

You've traveled around and forged your own path in life. Why do you feel so many people don't do the same? What is it about you that makes ou different? Why do so many fear change when you embrace it, and even force yourself out of your comfort zone?
/r/TheRedPill05/02/13 12:27 AM
2

Do you ever see yourself becoming a citizen of another country (and thus losing your US citizenship status)? Are your taxes complicated or rather, is it hard for you to manage your business while you're abroad? Do you vote in any US elections? Thanks so much Roosh.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/13 11:53 PM
8

Tits, Ass, or Face -- pick two.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/13 11:45 PM
4

Do you ever regret quitting your corporate job all those years ago? Re: Your last post, The Beginning Of The End...do you have any clue what you'll be doing next? Has your over the past decade life made you happy? Do you think you're happier than the average American male your age? Are there any cultures/countries that I could visit that value men in a way that the Anglosphere doesn't, just so I could find out what that's like?
/r/TheRedPill04/02/13 11:41 PM
1

Thanks a ton man!
/r/TheRedPill26/01/13 09:35 PM
1

I put a link in the title and of course am now away from my computer. Hit www.fokmcast.com for iTunes and stitcher links.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/13 09:13 PM
2

Episode 24: Red Pill Movie has been posted at fokmcast, or search iTunes and Stitcher for fokmcast. I reference this thread in the podcast and rip American Beauty and Juno new assholes. I forgot to mention explicitly though that Steven Spielberg was directly involved with American Beauty. I bring him up, but don't mention his involvement outright.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/13 05:09 AM
2

Shameless plug: I have a podcast: fokmcast.com. I was actually thinking about doing a podcast or an article about a movie that showed how to be alpha almost perfectly. (Don't want to spoil it here though)...I plan on updating the podcast this week.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/13 12:41 AM
3

I hated the movie. I love the idea of the character quitting his job, working fast food, and wanting to feel young again, but what man fantasizes about having sex with one of his daughter's friends on petals of roses? Even in "becoming alpha" he is pedastalizing women. A better movie to watch to understand how Hollywood hates real portrayals of beta males turning into alpha males is Juno. I hated Juno, because it tells the story from the wrong perspective. Jason Bateman's character is the hero, …
/r/TheRedPill20/01/13 11:15 PM
1

I'm down too. One of the more frustrating things with the more well known PUAs is that they don't really talk about their growth. They have already transformed. There's the past, and there's now. The journey isn't well documented. Even Roosh's 30 Bangs book, while a decent read, wasn't totally clear on how he grew. He seemed to go from not confident to completely confident. Looking forward to reading your experiences!
/r/seduction17/01/13 05:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter