TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fonduman Archive

View 9 posts and 1,671 comments by fonduman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,671 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-11

Yeah so you rub the head with lube. Uncirced, you rub the head with the skin (or maybe directly, depending on sensitivity etc). Not complicated
/r/MensRights11/01/19 07:31 PM
-11

Yeah but it hardly makes it difficult enough that you need to ask for guidance
/r/MensRights11/01/19 04:12 PM
-6

I'd imagine it's pretty much exactly the same but you use lube lol
/r/MensRights11/01/19 03:56 PM
6

If women were literally not allowed to work by society then it might make sense, but if you can freely choose to work, then you're freely choosing to not work, and the consequences are your own to deal with
/r/MensRights11/01/19 03:44 PM
1

Ah, I see you've given up and dropped down to ad homs and straw-men. Fair enough, I accept your admission of defeat.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 06:03 PM
2

Who's being resentful? Also, it's nothing to do with "deserving". We don't dispense sexual partners like treats for good behaviour. It's biology, not morality. And reducing obesity down to effort or willpower is a vast oversimplification of the causes, too.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:31 PM
2

Hypergamy. Women are designed to find the top 20% adequately attractive, not the average guy who is doing ok but not impressively so.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 03:08 PM
2

Responsibility for what? We don't have an obligation to look nice for other people
/r/MensRights02/01/19 03:06 PM
5

and no one has the right to make fun of how you feel Actually, they do. You just have the right to do the same in turn, or judge them how you want, or stop being around them, etc
/r/MensRights02/01/19 02:56 PM
3

Is there any groups for men's rights of a liberal persuasion? Depends on what you mean by "liberal". I'm centre-left, but very anti social justice in general, so I guess it's a matter of how far on the socjus spectrum "liberal" is.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 12:36 PM
3

Make sure you take out the extra comma or it kinda falls flat
/r/MensRights31/12/18 12:34 PM
11

Wasn't there a sob story in the news a few times about a woman who lost custody of her children and how bad it is for a mother to be in such a situation? Then some about a woman who was shocked when she was made to pay alimony
/r/MensRights31/12/18 12:33 PM
1

Actually, it was pointing out a logical inconsistency
/r/MensRights24/12/18 10:39 AM
6

why does athletics get an exemption? Because men would end up dominating about 95% of all sports and it would be hilarious
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:32 AM
1

A laundry cycle alone can take me a good half hour. Take laundry out of washing machine (usually dragging out about 5 handfuls) and put in basket, load washing machine with next load, put in detergent and softener. That's a few minutes. Take laundry upstairs and switch with current laundry in dryer, a few minutes. Hang laundry up on coat hangers and fold rest into drawers, can be at least 15 minutes. Dunno, maybe I'm just slow. Then I have to meticulously rinse every piece of cutlery when washin…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:20 AM
7

for the layman Not even for the layman. If you use this kind of language, what it allows you to do is be so vague that the reader fills in the gaps and makes assumptions about what you're talking about, and basically make your argument for you. There's a lack of precision that makes the position unfalsifiable: you can't criticise wishy-washy vague stuff like this, because there's nothing concrete to tie down to disassemble. It can mean practically whatever you want it to mean.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:02 AM
6

Not exactly gibberish, but it makes no point of any consequence. Basically, newtonian physics models things as discrete objects, because it works pretty well. For example, if you have a baseball flying through the air, you only need to consider gravity acting on a single center of mass, which is essentially an average of all the individual center of masses of all the atoms comprising the baseball. This is what is meant by "individualized separatism". So, basically, they're saying this is similar…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:59 AM
3

This basically summarises it: http://i.imgur.com/2MstAzl.gif Women are "designed", if you will, to only find a minority of men acceptably attractive (in this case, 80% of men are rated below average). Hence, women tend to all fight over the same few high status guys. If you could quantify attractiveness and line up men and women by their respective percentiles, most women would demand a guy significantly above their own percentile of attractiveness. It's more of an incel related issue than anyth…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:51 AM
1

Until they ban you for pointing out a flaw in the logic of one of their gods lol. Not a great place for open discussion unless you agree with everyone else.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:46 AM
2

I wouldn't call my house spartan, but the only chores that really need done on a daily basis are dishes (don't have a dishwasher yet), laundry, cooking, and general tidying up. I'm pretty slow/lazy when it comes to chores, but I could get it all done in about an hour a day max.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:34 AM
2

To be fair, the prince didn't know the kiss would work, he was just like "hey, chick in a coma, I'm getting some of that!"
/r/MensRights22/12/18 04:17 AM
5

I actually find her cuter in the movie than in that picture, but I tend to find the overly sleek/stylish Hollywood look to be a bit sterile
/r/MensRights22/12/18 04:16 AM
8

Because it's obviously one or the other. Can't both look for jobs actively whilst also clicking on an advert for one too. Everyone knows that.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 01:02 AM
3

You can't counter an accusation that offers no reason for the accusation.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 01:02 PM
5

what I wanted from this admittedly was arguments against her She made the assertion, it's on her to make arguments against us. Pretty stupid to just ask us to prove we're not misogynists or something. If you could come back with some actual statements from her as to why she believes what she does, then I'm sure we'd be happy to respond, but this is kinda moronic.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 01:01 PM
2

Or should have at least put up some sort of defense. Who just stands there and lets them hit them repeatedly?
/r/MensRights26/11/18 12:59 PM
1

Interpretation != opinion
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:46 PM
2

so how about those MGM studies that show it's beneficial? The evidence is pretty weak and inconsistent either way. Some studies find beneficial effects, some negative, some neither. But even if there was a demonstrable beneficial effect, most anti-circumcision arguments are on the basis of moral principles involving bodily integrity and personal choice, not material benefit. Or maybe the studies that show we're all dead from global warming? U wot?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:07 PM
13

Thing is, the implication in the article is that he would normally watch male children change without complaint. So, what's the significant difference here in including a female child, to him? I mean, it's not like pedophiles are all heterosexual: he could just as easily be a pedophile enjoying watching the boys as one enjoying watching the girl. Can someone explain why the distinction is so important?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 01:42 PM
5

Well, I'd imagine it addresses the original question of which subs are anti-equality to bring up the subs that preemptively banned him
/r/MensRights15/11/18 01:37 PM
1

When someone on this sub tells a story about how they lost custody of their kids, to their abusive ex-wife, no one asks for evidence. Because no one's going to prison if we believe them. Pro-tip: belief isn't a binary yes or no. There's degrees of confidence. Pretty sure no one here would believe a story to the extent that we think it should be sufficient to put someone away for. These brigadier trolls are getting stupider every time...
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:03 PM
4

Thing is, 9/10 subs are de facto feminist subs anyway
/r/MensRights06/11/18 12:38 PM
1

I mean what reason did they give as to why he doesn't believe in equality of opportunity?
/r/MensRights29/10/18 06:23 PM
3

I agree. Think they get to decide what we should want to talk about.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 05:20 PM
1

Well, most incels don't see the term "incel" as some sort of political statement, more just a description of a state. Not able to get sex? Incel, generally. I'd say you're actually not technically incel because your dry spell is a matter of choice. I'm not even sure if I technically met the definition, since it was my own fear keeping me back and therefore my own agency in a sense, depending on how you view it.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 03:54 PM
1

then is "challenged" for not "believing in" equality of opportunity On what basis?
/r/MensRights29/10/18 03:02 PM
2

The Haunting of Hill House seemed to be going down that path the first few episodes too, with all the female characters flawless and everyone blaming the men for everything, and each guy portrayed as flawed, but then it kinda subverted it towards the end. However, show itself wasn't particularly scary, contrary to hype, unless you count cheap jump-scares. Still, atmosphere wasn't bad, and you got into the story after a while. Their main flaw was showing the ghosts too openly. Plus, they got pret…
/r/MensRights29/10/18 03:01 PM
2

I was incel till 23 because I was too scared to ask a girl out or otherwise show romantic interest in her in case it offended her or she thought I was creepy. Kinda annoying seeing people form incel stereotypes that are the complete opposite of how I was.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 02:49 PM
5

I got stickied before, without much in the way of comments and mediocre upvotes. I think the mods just sticky stuff they like/find significant
/r/MensRights28/10/18 11:52 AM
2

You realise they're jokes, right? They're not seriously saying men are superior. Feminism demands we kowtow to their sensibilities and persecutes people who don't, so yeah, "offensive" jokes are anti-feminist. It's a statement that you won't be obedient.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 04:43 PM
3

It's anti-feminism, which is an important objective of men's rights. it’s about men’s roles Debatable. "Roles" are the purview of the social sphere. Not all of us believe in social justice either way - stop the state and large companies from discriminating against us, but let people do as they want.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 04:22 PM
10

It's immature teenagers being edgy, hardly an organised MRA movement, yes. Still, somewhat amusing to see how overblown the reaction is, and it's nice to see the seeds of rebellion against feminism amongst the younger crowd, even if it's not quite matured yet. The sentiment is there. I also note that they don't show us what happened during women's week in the previous years. I have a feeling this trash talk is two-way, and as usual it's a case of double standards.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 04:17 PM
6

“I also want to provide people’s first vibrator because a lot of people are going to be getting their first ever vibrator here today, and it becomes a life long relationship with their sexuality and me being a person who can be there for them through that journey, so it just makes sense to work with college students,” My god, it's like trying to communicate with someone with logorrhea. You can really tell where the crazy theories come from from the incoherence of their speech.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 04:13 PM
7

Illiterates are given jobs at your place?
/r/MensRights25/10/18 11:59 AM
3

I appreciate your intellectual honesty, but it's not about winning. If I were to "lose", then I'd realise I was wrong, which would still be a win. But it is easy to lose track of the whole point when a discussion goes down the rabbit hole. To clarify, I don't really care if male suicide is worse than the female version, I only want the two to be given equal credence despite feminism trying to use tenuous excuses to dismiss it.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 04:54 PM
11

Lol you're probably a good example of someone who'd fail at it, then. For example, with hanging, you have to calculate the drop height based on your weight, the right knot type, etc. If you want to die from blood restriction instead of neck injury (and I'm assuming you wouldn't want to go by asphyxiation) then you need to make the knot the right shape and in the right area to compress the right vessels in your neck, etc. Plus, you've made a fallacy already by saying that planning is the difficul…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 03:08 PM
12

If you picked a suicide method based on the probability that you may want to change your mind halfway through, then you weren't as serious about the attempt as those who pick more lethal methods, ergo confirming my original point
/r/MensRights23/10/18 03:00 PM
12

no we are less impulsive Pick one. More impulsive would mean more suicide attempts and with poorer planning (and thus less success), which would match the data for women exactly. and change opinion frequently Wouldn't that make them more impulsive? It's been a good while since I've seen this much nonsense crammed into such a small post
/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:49 PM
16

Alternatively, you could also consider this study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4984734/ Basically, gun ownership is associated with both increased rate of suicide, and suicide by gun in men, but only the latter in women. In other words, women who have guns are more likely to commit suicide with a gun, but not more likely to actually commit suicide overall. Ergo, it's unlikely that if women had more guns as a group that they'd commit suicide much more.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:41 PM
15

So? The hypothesis is that the presence of guns etc skews the gender ratio of suicides. We test the hypothesis by looking at countries that are similar in all respects except for said presence of guns, and find a similar ratio, suggesting guns are not the salient variable at play. Basic science - change one variable, see what happens. Of course, we can't do this with absolute perfection, but that's just the social sciences for you. It's not an absolute proof of any stance, but it remains as fair…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:22 PM
1

Well, that's nice of her, to hand over clear evidence supporting his custody case. Just a matter of if it was enough to overcome the judge's massive bias, I guess.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 12:38 PM
44

Which is fine until you consider countries like the UK where hardly anyone has guns, and the main methods of suicide are the same between men and women (hanging and poisoning), despite suicide rates being at a similar ratio. Interesting that your psychology class was willing to feed you a poorly reasoned scapegoat, though.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 12:27 PM
52

Well, there's two main possible interpretations of the data: women aren't as serious when attempting suicide, or they're incompetent.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:31 AM
1

It's (purported) equality of outcome. If you want e.g. 50% of people on boards to be women, you need to be sexist against men. Ergo, sexism is equality when equality is outcome. If you're then brainwashed to believe that the only reason that most of the board members were men to begin with is due to sexism against women, then you can begin to comprehend their mindset.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 10:27 AM
5

That's interesting because all of the Left actually advocates for no state at all You're going to have to back up a bizarre, zany claim like that with some kind of evidence. So it's actually the right that demands wealth redistribution to the rich which is how they are rich. Or do you think people come out of the womb waving dollar bills? Wealth distribution isn't a description of what happens, it's a description of what we purposefully do. Wealth accumulates with the rich with a free market and…
/r/MensRights22/10/18 03:31 PM
12

He knows it's conservative the behavior he's seeing. The authoritarianism, the policed thought and speech. The censorship. The rage against anyone daring to dissent. He knows that's not liberal or left. "Left" means advocating for state control of the economy and wealth re-distribution/equalization, to varying degrees of extremity. You're confusing the left-right axis with the authoritarian/libertarian one. Left-right is best described economically, with another axis to describe social policy.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 11:41 AM
7

"Should" has nothing to do with it. We're a sexually dimorphic species whether we like it or not.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 10:30 PM
1

No, women were considered more delicate and therefore needed stronger men to save them. Easily disproved by looking at situations in which death is certain regardless of capability.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 10:54 AM
3

"level playing field" Yeah, like quotas and affirmative action In any case, who's set up this dichotomy that the genders are somehow competing against each other? Even if you view the world competitively, you're competing against individuals regardless of their gender. We haven't been put into teams or something. This is why we call them collectivists.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 12:50 PM
6

I wouldn't believe someone who claimed their car was stolen to the extent that I would have the accused punished without evidence first. That goes for all crime, although as of the last few years I've actually come to trust those who claim to be rape victims a bit less than claims of other crimes because it's become so politically charged.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 12:47 PM
3

Not from a sequel memer
/r/MensRights18/10/18 03:05 PM
5

Feminists are willing to believe that men are so immoral that they rape en masse, but that women are not immoral enough to falsely accuse of rape in similar numbers. Then they claim we're equal. Pick one.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 12:06 PM
1

But do you think it's that common? I think this is a pretty common strawman/misconception that pops up a lot. It's largely irrelevant how common it is (or, at least, it's besides the central point). If you legalised rape, but it remained relatively rare, would that be ok? Of course not. Men would collectively have the power to rape women regardless of whether or not they exercised that power. Similarly, every woman wields power over every man, exercised or not, with the capacity to ruin his life…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 12:03 PM
1

There will always be a small number that are radical relative to the average of the group, but that doesn't mean that that center point can't itself move towards radicalisation. It's a false equivalency to say that every social or political movement is equally radical/non-radical.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 09:10 AM
7

I am honestly surprised by this, but for once it's a good kind of surprised. I hear over on r/prequelmemes that they have a way to summarise such a stance
/r/MensRights18/10/18 09:09 AM
4

link?
/r/MensRights18/10/18 07:15 AM
2

So many people on this sub struggle with this kind of stuff lol
/r/MensRights17/10/18 02:23 PM
5

Bit of a one-dimensional view. America lacks some freedoms the UK has, and vice-versa. For instance, civil forfeiture is still a thing in many places in the US, which is a shocking violation of freedom.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 02:17 PM
5

Isn't it the other way around? Addiction would be going out of your way to post. In work, sometimes you have nothing better to do (or at least those things are boring)
/r/MensRights16/10/18 06:08 PM
14

Saw this earlier. Basically, they'll consider men, but no guarantees. Nice how equality is optional for those who screech incessantly about equality.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 10:01 AM
4

used to victimize woman more than empower her. In feminist culture, it's the same thing. Victimhood is status. Victims are heroes to be revered, and somehow implicitly more virtuous than the standard person.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 07:02 PM
1

How can you tell he has abs if he's wearing a suit?
/r/MensRights15/10/18 08:50 AM
1

I kind of expect that at some point in my life the odds will be against me and I'll end up in a car accident Already happened to me, now I look like I'm stuck in the 90s
/r/MensRights11/10/18 11:08 AM
1

Not necessary != no value. Think of it this way: degree: Learn Official recognition of learning via exams pay fees self-taught: Learn no official recognition of learning no fees. Therefore, you'd only choose university over self-learning for the official recognition (usually necessary for employment), but that doesn't mean it has no value for learning itself, just that it's not the primary reason to choose it over the cheaper options of learning at home.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:15 AM
1

The point wasn't that university would lead to not learning, just that learning isn't the primary objective, and if you only want to learn, then it isn't necessary. Employers value the paper because it implies you've had your knowledge tested, which is the most important part. I'm a Physics graduate, and you wouldn't believe the number of people on the internet who claim to be self-taught in Physics and talk complete nonsense about it. No way they'd pass an exam.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:54 AM
1

university was the place to go if you wanted a job etc. that pays well "Oh it's for your CV" Uh, what's the difference here? You get the job because it's on your CV
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:45 AM
2

You don't really go to learn, though. It's because "I learnt this subject on the internet" and "I have a degree in the subject" are considered vastly different things to employers
/r/MensRights10/10/18 07:46 AM
5

trying to get women into careers where most women are not interested may appear to be noble Only if you're into equality of outcome. Equality of opportunity does not implicitly depend on the outcome at all.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 10:50 AM
0

We need a UEBS mod for a feminist unit. It would point its finger at an enemy and spawn a group of white knights to fight for it. Maybe the cooldown on this would only be about 10 seconds, but the white knights are very weak, so you end up with piles of the corpses of males strewn at the feet of the feminist who expended them as mere tools. Fitting.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 10:38 AM
10

It really does seem like a virtuous mob. Maybe I'm just being a geek, but it's funny how much this reminds me of a quote from Tolkien which suggests even he was familiar with this concept: Gandalf as Ring-Lord would have been far worse than Sauron. He would have remained 'righteous', but self-righteous. Thus while Sauron multiplied evil, he left "good" clearly distinguishable from it. Gandalf would have made good detestable and seem evil
/r/MensRights02/10/18 10:01 PM
1

Which is pretty insulting to women since logic is essentially a decoding of reality, thus implying that women don't have a solid grip on reality lol. Then again, you know what they say about each woman having their own "truth", i.e. their own reality, so I guess it's starting to make sense now.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:08 PM
3

b. Can’t be dismissed with arguments based on “feelings” alone Doesn't usually stop them from trying
/r/MensRights02/10/18 10:01 AM
9

Woman claims his cited studies have been discredited; proceeds to talk about feelings instead of demonstrating how. Thing is, if the title of the article was actually a good representation of his stance (with the reader presumably expected to interpret it as saying that women aren't welcome in Physics), then I would agree that what he said was sexist, but then when you read the context, he seems to have been purely approaching it in a meritocratic angle, suggesting women shouldn't expect special…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:49 PM
1

But then we don't get the justice boner of seeing him clock her back
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:22 AM
0

We can't see from the video if they were white-knighting or just breaking the fight up
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:20 AM
5

Centre-left seems sanest. Got the common-sense economic stance of moderate leftism (workers rights, corporate regulation, decent welfare, universal healthcare, etc), and socially there's a push for equality, but in an individualist sense (i.e. make all people subject to the same rules instead of trying to face off groups against each other)
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:16 AM
1

If "what not" confuses you, ironically it's because it is an English term lol
/r/MensRights30/09/18 08:06 AM
6

Centre-left, here
/r/MensRights29/09/18 11:05 PM
2

Again, not the point. We're not saying the people who make the message believe in the message, we're saying that such a message is viewed by the public as acceptable and normal, whilst the inverse would invoke instant outrage.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 11:44 AM
5

I believe you
/r/MensRights28/09/18 11:08 AM
2

K, but not really relevant. It's the acceptability and willingness to portray the message that's the source of contention.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 11:04 AM
2

stating they find it sexist because it objectifies women Wouldn't it be implying that the guy in the picture is objectifying them? Unless the joke is endorsing it, then the joke itself wouldn't be. Of course, this presuming that being physically attracted to someone is objectifying them, in which case objectification is a non-issue.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 03:41 PM
3

Because it's obviously staged
/r/MensRights26/09/18 11:58 AM
1

Don’t jerk off for two weeks Uh... what? My personal record is three days
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:15 PM
11

No way the guy can be on the hook for child support. Maybe. A guy can be on the hook if his wife cheats on him, after all. I'd be interested to know how much weight the word "intention" carries. Easy to claim that they don't intend to chase him for money, but then have it turn out that they can still change their minds later.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:08 PM
1

Could be tricky to catch it before he puts it back in, but so long as she notices at some point, she can take a morning after pill.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 08:53 PM
5

because, in their mind, they think it helps more people than it hurts. This is one major difference in values I've noticed between SJWs and most people. To us, it's not just about how many people are hurt - state-mandated injustice is far worse than an individual criminal act. Also, if one person can be stripped of their rights at the whim of government, anyone can, and thus those rights do not exist at all. An act towards the individual is really a violation of the freedom of everyone, when don…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 08:07 PM
6

Not too sure China will be completely fair about determining false accusations, but I agree with the general idea lol
/r/MensRights24/09/18 04:47 PM
1

Grammar*
/r/MensRights24/09/18 11:43 AM
1

Should we defend him against possible false allegations or should we celebrate the irony and karma? Yes
/r/MensRights24/09/18 11:42 AM
2

This isn't an actual quote, right? That would be cringey
/r/MensRights24/09/18 11:37 AM
99

Says she's for human rights, then says she's ok with innocent men going to jail... the only conclusion one can draw is that she doesn't view men as humans.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 11:29 AM
26

She's probably conflating them with asteroids due to feminist scientific illiteracy
/r/MensRights24/09/18 07:44 AM
2

I just kinda prop them on top of my thighs and it's not an issue. Although I wouldn't want to manually hold my legs together for too long, starts aching after a while
/r/MensRights22/09/18 09:45 AM
3

Ways to decrease single motherhood and ways to compensate for existing instances of single motherhood are complimentary rather than mutually exclusive avenues of action. Not that said advice is really a valid way to compensate for single motherhood (since it's a joke) of course, but the idea is that, following their own logic to its ultimate conclusion, it would be.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:05 PM
53

It's because men are assumed to be bad, and women assumed to be good. So a man not changing is stubbornly clinging to his bad ways, while a woman not changing is staying uncorrupted and good.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:18 PM
6

Good job reverting to sensitive snowflake mode instantly in the face of disagreement, so much irony here it's delicious
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:10 PM
8

It's not about offense, it's about the irony of essentially implying that half the active members on an MRA sub are opposed to Men's Rights, and thus pointing out how ridiculous a dichotomy you've formed.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 02:59 PM
12

Good job alienating about half the people on this sub there
/r/MensRights20/09/18 02:41 PM
94

The problem is that there's too much humanity (i.e. emotion) put into them, and not enough thought. I'm sure this law was initially dreamt up as part of the dead-beat-dad-hysteria train under the presumption of stopping the evil menz from getting away with not paying money to poor womenz. Any objections would have been dismissed out of hand as offensive or some other piece of blind emotive reasoning. Basically, the problem is people being led by their feelings, not that there's a lack of feeling…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 02:45 PM
1

http://lunamarshall.com/blog/2013/2/15/clothes-oppression-or-empowerment-of-women
/r/MensRights14/09/18 05:35 PM
1

I'm centre left, and according to this I'm "far right" lol. It really has just become a term to smear everyone SJWs disagree with.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 10:57 AM
14

Well for one thing, rape in female prisons was actually considered news-worthy lol. Happens constantly in male ones.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 10:55 AM
2

That's what google says
/r/MensRights10/09/18 11:00 PM
28

Not 100lbs obviously, otherwise she would have weighed about 50lbs before that, but it is borderline impossible for a woman to look like that without roids.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 06:53 PM
2

Satire is supposed to be a comment on reality, which this unfortunately fails at since the question didn't make sense in the first place. The article says: “One second, she was arguing that women are entirely capable of surviving without men,” Johnson explained. “The next, she was insisting that women are oppressed victims of an ‘inescapable patriarchy.’ So, I asked how both could be true.” Saying that x can survive without y, and that x are being oppressed by y are not mutually exclusive statem…
/r/MensRights07/09/18 10:00 AM
5

Is she implying there's laws that give the government the power to make decisions about the female body? Because the male equivalent will depend on what she counts as a female example of that. The obvious thing that springs to mind would be if the government could force someone to undergo a change to their body. I can't think of any direct examples. The next two potentially qualifying forms would be a) where the government forbids you to do something to your own body, and b) where the government…
/r/MensRights07/09/18 09:27 AM
3

My wife comes from Singapore, and believe me, she's extremely relieved to be out of that place. There's no minimum wage, so the only gig she could get was $5 an hour, 12 hours a day, 6 days a week, in a cutthroat corporate culture that doesn't care about their workers, and in a country where rents are sky-high. Not that her employer was paying her for more than 7 hours worth of work a day, if lucky. Not a great combination. And there's next to no safety net, so the poor are basically screwed. Ni…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:23 AM
5

I used to go there quite a lot Me too, until I was banned for attempting to apply some critical thinking lol
/r/MensRights30/08/18 01:17 PM
1

She really didn't bring anything to the relationship other than her looks At least she was working. Assuming she pays for herself, you could just view it as free sex lol
/r/MensRights30/08/18 09:18 AM
20

It is true for example that people tend to regard males as more competent/authoritative I wonder if this is really two sides of the same coin - give women life on easy mode, where they're patted on the back for merely existing, and perhaps people are more inclined to believe a man in a similar position is more likely to have got there on his own merit, and will therefore be more competent.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 09:08 AM
21

If other people think they're men, then they're going to treat them like men, and thus they will experience that component of society as we do
/r/MensRights30/08/18 09:06 AM
30

The implication seems to be that he talked about the kids as a group and thus didn't give any different information for the boy vs the girl, but that isn't specifically said.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:41 PM
1

What's it got to do with the alt-right?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 10:43 AM
2

He should just try to get some real evidence on tape first, otherwise the whole thing could backfire.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 10:08 AM
7

Name checks out
/r/MensRights28/08/18 09:56 AM
2

Thing is, it's not really a big enough deal here to really warrant a "thanks" most of the time, unless you've been holding it more for more than a couple of seconds. It's just taken for granted that if there's someone right behind you, you don't swing the door shut on them.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:24 PM
31

IQ and career success are known to be correlated, which could explain how men tend to mirror their IQ distributions by being more common in both the least and most successful of jobs. The picture is saying we only talk about the latter, whilst suggesting an explanation for the phenomenon.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:04 PM
3

Debt, tattoos and virginity have no real correlation on a person's character You can argue that it has no correlation with how good a person someone is, but it would be pretty stupid to claim that traits that are largely influenced (debt can at least be bad luck, though that wouldn't prevent a valid correlation unless every case was bad luck) by personal choices would not be correlated with personality at all.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:51 PM
1

And if she's just laying there I doubt she's having a really great time! Well missionary is the only position in which either of us get significant sensation (in my case, a medical thing), and while I've seen one or two pornstars take a fairly active role from that position, it hardly seems normal lol
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:44 PM
3

their ultimate goal is the 'freedom' of women through the abolition of marriage I'm certainly down for that at least. Then again, I'm only so strongly opposed to marriage because feminists made it so toxic, although even if it was safe instead of suicide I still wouldn't marry, since all it does is restrict freedom.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:41 PM
5

Good excuse to use the disabled toilet, though Edit: written before I read the sign lol
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:34 PM
1

Figuratively, yes. Literally, no.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:06 PM
2

Well, to be fair, Trump supporters already got this one: https://image.slidesharecdn.com/flyerthefutureisorange-120604083813-phpapp02/95/the-future-is-orange-1-728.jpg?cb=1338799398
/r/MensRights10/08/18 08:09 AM
2

Once again, I never said they lied. Lying is deliberate. Believing something is true when it isn't is not generally deemed to be lying. If we can't move past this as a starting point, then you're probably just too slow for me to bother attempting communication with.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:39 PM
2

You're saying that because women frequently lie about this, that my friends have lied. Never said they lied. Lying implies intention. The statistics imply that most women who believe they were spiked, weren't. Unless you're suggesting your friends are all magical unicorns, it's likely that most of their claims about having been spiked are not true. To you that seems like a winning point because I'm some dude on Reddit with no way to validate my claims. Win what? Why is everything a competition t…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:04 PM
8

You're wrong, but the error is understandable due to how they randomly switch to a new woman halfway through with little signposting
/r/MensRights09/08/18 11:37 AM
18

When it suddenly said "both women", I had to go back to check if I was reading about a lesbian relstionship the whole time lol
/r/MensRights09/08/18 11:35 AM
10

It is in the standard equities stock market, where things are generally very stable/slow. People invest expecting something like 6% per year returns, so even 0% growth would be viewed as a year's setback to savings, while 5% loss is definitely not going to go down well with investors.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 09:18 AM
5

we're not talking about whether it exists or not, we're talking about frequency, which your statement is irrelevant to.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:12 AM
5

They probably werent spiked. I remember reading a study where they analysed urine samples from hundreds of women who claimed to have been, and didn't find a single positive case. This article covers the topic: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1225854/Are-date-rape-spiked-drinks-urban-myth.html
/r/MensRights08/08/18 11:42 PM
1

Except you're purposefully removing the critical, central part of the whole point, which is the difference between someone violating rules, and the rules being set up to enable someone to do something. It's the difference between the act of an individual, and the act of the state at large. Further, you're trying to conflate the two scenarios as if they're equivalent in terms of the steps I can take in response to the respective threats. Just because I don't completely avoid every dangerous situa…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 09:42 AM
3

It's not even necessarily about risk, it's about retaining personal agency and power. Imagine you had someone walking beside you all day, aiming a loaded gun at your head, and they were legally entitled to pull the trigger. Would someone telling you that it's rare that someone ever does pull the trigger make you comfortable with the situation? No, because whether or not they exercise their power, they have it, and that is wrong on principle, because it means you don't control your own life. If w…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:24 PM
2

I thought it was supposed to be a jab at men who take issue with the rad fems by portraying them as overly sensitive cry-babies.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:04 PM
2

In other news, 100% of college rape victims went to college
/r/MensRights07/08/18 09:20 AM
1

I don't think they're suggesting otherwise, it's just that abuse directed at women is considered a uniquely bad/problematic issue because vagina.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:48 PM
1

Outside of that, look at how retarded they are that you said women want 75% of the traits, and they failed at reading comprehension so badly they thought you meant 75% of women want the traits.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:09 PM
2

basically summarises social justice, too, which is basically complaining about things no one can make you do, but that there may be a social expectation or norm that you do them, which no one with genuine issues could care less about
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:05 PM
3

But I usually stop after the first comment because I remembered that I have a life and don't want to argue with stupid people. Basically summarises reddit. You start something, and you know the person on the other end will be so obsessive about it that they will never admit you're right, they will reply literally for years if they need to. That's why I usually give up after their replies reach a certain threshold of stupidity in their attempts to keep the argument going.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 08:54 AM
8

would they not have done it via bank transfers or something?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:24 AM
2

could you report them to the police or something? sounds like something a bit shady on the legal front, maybe fraud/deception.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 01:35 PM
1

Would you not take turns or something?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:32 PM
1

I feel more lucky that I found a wife who doesn't want kids at all
/r/MensRights02/08/18 08:45 AM
11

And here I thought inclusion meant only women
/r/MensRights01/08/18 10:47 PM
8

not quite as intutive, makes it sound like they're tense/uptight
/r/MensRights31/07/18 06:16 PM
2

But if you were actually against it, you would only claim full support when pressed. You wouldn't go out of your way to make it known that you support it. Though maybe in the aftermath of this it isn't clear where he truly stands, since people are demanding lip-service.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 10:35 AM
0

To be fair, it all tastes like vinegar to me, white or red
/r/MensRights31/07/18 10:33 AM
1

You mean LeftThinking
/r/MensRights31/07/18 10:32 AM
34

The higher female obesity rates and resultant higher average mass means they have a greater warp in the space-time continuum around them, stretching time and resulting in longer hours worked.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 08:34 AM
2

none of which makes any sense, which may be why you've neglected to provide examples lol
/r/MensRights30/07/18 07:11 PM
2

Except we're not campaigning for social change, we're campaigning for legal change and campaigning against social change, because social change usually is authoritarian.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 06:50 PM
4

Also, if you have reasonable cause to believe violence is imminent (not just possible or approaching, but if they're literally cocking their arm back to hit you or something to that effect), then you're allowed to strike first in self-defense.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 03:44 PM
3

Considering their age, they've presumably been together for potentially decades... who literally kills someone they've been married to for decades just because of porn? It's mind-boggling. Was she some sort of religious nut?
/r/MensRights30/07/18 08:55 AM
1

Isn't this obvious? Yet I see many men around me sacrificing their happiness for a shot at more money and status... but what's the point? People ask me why I'm not more ambitious, but I'm just as ambitious as them, it's just that what I want is something different.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 08:52 AM
1

Well yeah, isn't that the natural assumption of the quote? It's not about weighing up the value of suffering so much as the morality of individuals doing wrong vs the state doing wrong, the implication being that if the state can justify jailing innocent people just to catch a few more guilty ones then they've essentially stripped the right to freedom of all citizens, which is worse than anything the criminals can do.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 08:44 AM
-1

You can never have enough asian girls, duh
/r/MensRights29/07/18 07:54 AM
2

I was wondering why the thread said 12 comments but I could only see one, so I unblocked some people and now I see this thread lol. I wouldn't bother trying to reason with them, there's a reason they were on the list.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 07:22 AM
2

Also, it tends to be the big, successful companies that end up experimenting with SJW stuff in the first place, so there's a potential reversal of cause and effect going on
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:24 PM
16

First minister of Northern Ireland. Basically, 3 out of the 4 states comprising the UK.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:13 PM
1

You don't vote for the leaders, you vote for the parties. Contrast that with American primaries etc.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:31 AM
1

You're the one telling her what her standards should be. I'm telling her that many other people won't hold her to the same strict standards, because she sounds like her standards are based on a misconception that people are extremely hung up on things that they typically aren't. Obviously I can't change someone's standards, because they decide them.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:29 AM
0

Do you really think she'll struggle attracting a mate just for being merely chubby? She's a woman. She could be a whale and still have plenty of options. As to "best self", moderate weight gain is largely irrelevant and won't impact your life in any significant way.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:19 AM
4

There are such things as personal preferences, you know
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:12 AM
2

My sister did it. My impression is that it's quite a vocational course focused on practicalities, so there shouldn't be too much of the academic feminism BS compared to social studies etc.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:59 AM
4

It's a blast the 5% of the time I'm actually developing and not testing, writing documentation, fixing servers, plugging things into environments, grappling with network issues, addressing support tickets, or being heckled to go to company parties/networking events.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:57 AM
3

The contradictory evidence is due to a difference in results compared to when you poll them, and actually test it (e.g. sensors on genitals to detect arousal when viewing pictures)
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:51 AM
2

Only childbirth typically stretches it, though. Stretching from sex is a myth. And for some reason, people seem to attribute said stretching purely to girls sleeping around rather than a girl sleeping with the same guy the same total number of times, which seems inconsistent.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:48 AM
2

Yes, but that also comes with a host of behavioural trends that are also important e.g. dominance, aggression, impulsivity, experience-seeking etc.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:43 AM
0

Well yeah, the religion side of it is a bit stupid, but it's still amusing pointing out the double standards present
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:39 AM
7

I'm a woman that a little chubby and I know if I want to start dating, I need to work on myself I don't think we should be so harsh on everyone in general. I personally prefer girls who are a little chubby.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:38 AM
3

I have had no issues at all with female leaders in Germany, UK, Denmark etc They all got elected not because of their gender but because of them being the best at the time. Well, in the UK at least, we didn't vote for her directly. And to be honest, she's leader now because the more likely candidates knew that it was going to be a meat-grinder and she was the only one stupid enough to take it on lol.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:31 AM
2

Well I wouldn't be instantly out because she stayed up to 5am watching horror movies one night lol. Maybe if it became persistent, and it affected her daily life, since most people clearly won't be functioning in a day job like that. Same for drugs - not much issue if she gives something a try, more an issue if it becomes addiction.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 05:11 PM
6

6 years? I'd be out the door the first time half of that happened
/r/MensRights26/07/18 03:44 PM
5

Well, you should hold the door if you go through first, I mean it's rude to slam anyone in the face with a door lol
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:39 AM
2

Yeah, I think the guy might be a MGTOW in disguise lol
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:38 AM
2

If anything, the surprising part of this article is that they experienced otherwise before becoming a man. I mean, this just sounds like normal life to me.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:36 AM
29

She should be able to do what she wants, she just shouldn't be able to take his money in the process
/r/MensRights25/07/18 01:44 PM
8

we would like to have equal representation for men I don't care about representation - that's just the mirror image of current SJW identity politics that we're supposed to be rising above. What does interest me is when skewed representation, as in this case, appears to be a deliberate move on behalf of the identitarians. Active discrimination and bias I care about, not so much ensuring a particular outcome.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 01:42 PM
4

Hmm, I guess my mistake was trying to reform a feminist's ideas into something approaching basic logic. You seem to have confirmed that there is indeed none.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 11:34 AM
3

By the way, it occurred to me that this line: There are only institutions and people with influence in government who happen to be feminists. Might have been an attempt to separate the concept of institutions that are neutral, and people who happen to be feminists. If so, you want an extra comma, otherwise you're saying that the institutions and people are both feminists. This changes the meaning significantly: There are only institutions, and people with influence in government who happen to be…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:47 AM
2

There are no such things as "feminist institutions" There are only institutions... who happen to be feminists. The stupidity and doublespeak is real
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:36 AM
6

Wouldn't exactly be surprised at this point, with all the victorian-esque sexual hysteria going on at the moment. There was a news article about some guy on a plane who was found jerking it under a blanket, and you'd think he'd murdered babies. The woman next to him "didn't feel safe", and afterwards considered herself to have been literally assaulted just by the action of him fapping near her. The airline moved her to a new seat, but that apparently wasn't enough.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:34 AM
1

Women belong to their spouse for eternity, even after divorce What if she doesn't get married? Checkmate!
/r/MensRights23/07/18 02:17 AM
1

TRP was purely PUA stuff until Cassie Jaye's film, that's why I think it was a bad title.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 01:26 AM
2

The date went well. Some smiles, some flirty touches –- your standard, mildly nervous, I-think-I-might-be-attracted-to-you kind of first date. He repeatedly made mention of his dislike of "females who played games." To which I repeatedly, albeit naively, responded that it was a real date and not a game. At one point, he described himself as a "red pill." At the time, I was unfamiliar with the vernacular. After he said it, I went to the bathroom and Googled it. I came up with hits for The Red Pil…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 01:25 AM
8

or giving out your home address to an angry mob) Surely you can give out your own, you just can't give out others'?
/r/MensRights20/07/18 03:50 PM
8

Neither. Pretty sure it's a troll. Interestingly, there's a theory that sometimes the most ridiculous members of a group are actually planted there by the opposition to discredit them, so maybe it's an MRA trying to discredit feminists lol. Then again, could just be poe's law and they're really this crazy.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 12:27 PM
22

Well, we're supposed to control ourselves despite biological drives, not just slavishly serve them. If I'm stuck in a meeting and need the toilet, I can wait 10 minutes for it. If I see an attractive woman, I don't immediately grope her. Men are expected to control their urges, why does she get to dump them on others completely unfiltered and uncontrolled?
/r/MensRights20/07/18 10:19 AM
3

Am I the only one who initially interpreted "missing from the table" as being dead, then thought they were recommending some sort of seance?
/r/MensRights19/07/18 11:37 PM
6

She kills a child Attempted to
/r/MensRights19/07/18 03:36 PM
1

But it's impossible to give them a safe space, because they'd be trying to eat each other, and that's not very safe
/r/MensRights19/07/18 02:25 PM
1

Let's not support open cannibals
/r/MensRights19/07/18 02:18 PM
14

Why are sentences so wildly inconsistent, then? One woman gets 40 years for a murder, others get a slap on the wrist Edit: oh, looks to be the US. She wouldn't get anywhere near this in the UK. Assistant U.S. Attorney Sarah Collins told the court during sentencing Shangreaux's brutal beating had left the two-year-old boy with bleeding on his brain, cigarette burns on his head and horrifically mutilated genitals. When she finally called 911, she told the dispatcher her son had choked on apple jui…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 11:43 AM
12

Is it weird if I'm married and I'm just like "sex?" "ok" sexes
/r/MensRights18/07/18 03:54 PM
10

lol would be funny if the "he said/she said" just ended up the same as now, except with assertions of who said what.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 03:53 PM
13

But does a ban on reporting such things extend to other, related things that have happened? For example, a police raid by itself vs a police raid that results in someone getting killed, could they not report the death? My take on the ruling is that it's supposed to prevent people from jumping to conclusions about things that haven't been proven to have happened yet, but a death has definitely happened in the latter case, even if it hasn't been proven to be murder. Or, phrased another way, the in…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 12:49 PM
3

You must be new here. While it doesn't get less ridiculous each time, stuff like this is pretty much routine by now.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 11:41 AM
1

nice ad-hom, what a great argument
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:26 AM
3

Happened to me at least twice in the last month, although they usually say "you're subbed to MR, therefore you are misogynist/far-right". I don't even know where they get the right-wing thing from: I'm centre-left.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:12 AM
1

Usually the concern trolls
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:11 AM
2

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSaVnHAnD4zyO4_oxShUn2aFu-pVMMPfkFjyXMx_fWy8pczYQ6nPg
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:09 AM
7

I can't even view archive pages in work, either, so original source is more convenient for me, personally
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:04 AM
0

Accidents happen, rape happens, birth control fails, people get pregnant who never had any chance of working full time due to disability or age All of which can be prevented by frequent pregnancy tests to catch any "accidents" early, before the embryo is much more than a small clump of cells.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:00 AM
4

So, if you decided that, rape being a difficult crime to prove, you had a 5% chance of being convicted of rape or you could introduce the evidence and be guaranteed to not be convicted of rape but a 100% chance of the lesser charge of recording stuff illegally, which would you choose? The alternative would be to hold off on the extra evidence until absolutely necessary (it began to look like conviction was becoming certain), but then it raises questions about hiding your crime earlier, which mig…
/r/MensRights17/07/18 01:33 PM
2

I'd rather get probation for a misdemeanor 'wiretapping' charge than a decade in prison for a rape I didn't commit Isn't there a thing about illegal evidence not being permissible?
/r/MensRights17/07/18 10:59 AM
6

Yes, and the idea of defining symmetrical situations differently based on gender runs contrary to the idea of gender equality, hence our opposition to it
/r/MensRights16/07/18 04:13 PM
1

You can by setting the temp to suit the highest BMI in the office, and then other people apply clothing as needed. This is the best solution because adding warmth is much easier than cooling down. Personally, my office is a bit too warm for me, but is fine so long as I have a fan running. Then there's some skinny girls who sit with jumpers on without a fan going, which I don't understand lol, but yeah, this seems to be the best compromise.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:26 PM
4

Even if that were true, there's a difference between a charity and a movement for legal rights. We tend to focus on how society and the legal system treats men in general, not so much on individual cases of crimes, because crimes are already crimes. The problem with rape is that male rape often isn't considered a crime, not necessarily that it happens at all.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:22 PM
11

Ancient and modern human men have gone off to work to hunt food/money for at least 2,000,000 years Yeah but hunter-gatherers typically spend a much smaller portion of their time hunting than we do working. It's somewhat ironic that agriculture brought so many benefits, yet also made us work much harder.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 02:35 PM
8

Which is pretty generous already, considering Terry Crews is basically trying to simultaneously ally himself with feminists and paint it as a feminist issue.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 11:36 AM
2

Well I'm not really all that terrified by nudity lol. If we're trying to find an equivalent retaliatory action that would match the level of "wrongness", I would say a slap is about right. I can't say severe physical assault is anyway equivalent to nudity.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 10:59 AM
3

And it's already easier to start with in terms of absolute strength, since they weigh much less.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 10:10 AM
2

The fact is if you protect yourself as is your right in America if you feel threatened you have that right No, you have the right if a reasonable person would have considered violence to be imminent. So, the two differences here are reasonable person vs personal feelings (which could vary greatly based on individual), and threatened vs imminent violence. In this case, I doubt someone showing you their dick is enough reason to believe they're about to be assaulted.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:24 AM
1

but Hollywood will put him out of a job and ensure he's never paid or spoken to again To be fair, if you're in that position, all you have to do is save your money and not spend as if you'll be getting paid like that forever, and you're set for life lol.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 03:41 PM
3

'Tis a disappointing day indeed when we fall into the same patterns as our enemies. Of course, I don't disagree that there's a double standard involved in how it's acceptable for women to joke about this kind of stuff whilst for men it probably wouldn't be, but that's not what's being criticised here.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 02:29 PM
-17

You're being an easily offended snowflake here unless she meant it seriously. People make jokes like "you could be a murderer!" all the time, it's just that murder isn't as politically charged.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 01:06 PM
2

Should I feel bad for slapping my sister? No, but you may want to work on your grammar
/r/MensRights13/07/18 10:42 AM
7

Well, none alive qualified. Whether or not one could do it is impossible to determine.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 10:33 AM
2

Quite
/r/MensRights11/07/18 04:10 PM
2

Why does that matter so long as the accuser believes it's true? This is about the double standard in their attitudes
/r/MensRights11/07/18 04:09 PM
1

I'd be surprised if a one year old could understand what the taser implies unless it had previously been used on them
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:57 AM
3

Don't really care about those things in isolation, but it is a bit of a double standard when we're so ultra-sensitive about anything that could possibly be negatively portraying a woman.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:55 AM
1

I'd watch women's topless football. That should be a thing.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:49 AM
1

I find the NBA way more interesting than the NBA Not sure if some sort of joke, or a typo...
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:46 AM
2

She was the one trying to fallaciously conflate his claims about economic revenue with personal worth. If she wanted to make some sort of separate point linking the two, she should have explicitly made that point. Instead, she was trying to imply that that was his implication the whole time, whilst keeping the wording ambiguous enough to bait him. I don't see why people defend such obviously intellectually dishonest and lazy tactics.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:44 AM
1

No, clearly if you just put more money into it, money just springs back out from nowhere. /s
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:41 AM
4

They always try to conflate the two as a form of emotional manipulation, as if we hand out money to people based entirely on how much we value them as people as opposed to capitalism being a non-sentient system to be gamed.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:39 AM
1

There's a kind of communist mentality where they think all money for anything should come from some sort of mega-government that controls everything, and dispensed according to their ideas of fairness as opposed to merit or productivity.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:35 AM
2

Wouldn't that mean the ratios are different in the opposite direction? The men get 3 times less prize money as a ratio of the prize money to the total revenue. If more of the revenue was eaten by mandatory costs, you'd expect less prize money relative to the revenue to be available.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:30 AM
7

"Exponential" doesn't mean "a lot", it refers to how something changes with time. If something is rising exponentially, it's following an exponential curve. It's only used to refer to a rate of change, not an absolute quantity.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:27 AM
3

But can you really say you're an oppressed snowflake if you're a weapon of the government that oppresses people in other countries?
/r/MensRights10/07/18 11:01 AM
15

If they actively select for those who put down the "superior person" traits, then declining to state would likely just be treated the same and discarded.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 10:48 AM
4

So we teabag them instead?
/r/MensRights10/07/18 09:56 AM
1

Maybe that's the point. They want men out of politics, so they just persecute them until they're too scared to enter it at all.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 09:53 AM
1

What is the sentence like? How about your employment prospects? Nothing I can directly do, but I am buying a house soon and planning to get a lodger in if you want to escape the country lol (EU freedom of movement would make that fairly easy, theoretically). I'd give free rent for a few months until you're back on your feet. But might be pointless if a criminal record makes it impossible to find work.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 09:51 AM
3

Could he not just get her case thrown out before he has to spend anything? It's clearly got no tangible basis.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 09:38 AM
1

Plus, anyone who isn't mentally a toddler tends to form their worldview out of consistent principles as opposed to just deciding what they do and don't like at that particular moment and banning accordingly. In my case, I want to maximise personal freedom. Obviously that means other people's freedom must also be maximised, which puts a natural limit on the behaviours that can be allowed - overt use of force like violence etc violates others' freedom. When it comes to cat calling, we can either h…
/r/MensRights10/07/18 09:28 AM
1

You realise the order doesn't matter? In one you say it shouldn't be illegal, in the other you say it should be considered crime. It doesn't make it different if it's backwards. Since you just seem to be a retarded, condescending troll, you can just go on the block list
/r/MensRights09/07/18 03:47 PM
3

But the whistling is a manifestation of the attitude, and many women explicitly look for that attitude, hence it works.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 03:46 PM
1

Not illegal just perhaps don't wolf whistle at people? I really think the wolf whistling should be considered a crime if the female in question is under 18 Maybe it's your inconsistency that's hard to grasp?
/r/MensRights09/07/18 03:45 PM
2

Yeah, that number is pretty exaggerated, although note that the report concluded that "high risk" scenarios occur at a rate of about 36 per 100,000 population, and we can probably include all the serious cases of repeated violence within that set, so it works out at a pretty low number. Also, there were nearly 1.2 million reports by women, but only 46% of those were taken seriously enough by police to constitute a crime, and only 72% of those lead to charges, and 76% of those lead to a convictio…
/r/MensRights09/07/18 03:41 PM
1

I think the confusion is these two statements: For men, the lifetime prevalence of being made to penetrate a perpetrator was an estimated 6.7% (>7.6 million men), while an estimated 1.7% of men were made to penetrate a perpetrator in the 12 months preceding the survey. an estimated 19.3% of women (or >23 million women) have been raped during their lifetimes (Table 1). Completed forced penetration was experienced by an estimated 11.5% of women. Nationally, an estimated 1.6% of women (or approxima…
/r/MensRights09/07/18 03:30 PM
1

The problem isn't even whether or not it happens, it's society's collective attitude towards things that's the issue.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 03:24 PM
1

You mean make the whole thing illegal just in case some of the people it's directed at are underage?
/r/MensRights09/07/18 02:13 PM
1

Then what's your point?
/r/MensRights09/07/18 01:51 PM
7

Not everything that's uncomfortable should be a crime
/r/MensRights09/07/18 01:36 PM
5

Acts like you need definite and precise legal agendas to be an MRA, meanwhile feminists claim that feminism has no real common goals because they all want different things.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 12:49 PM
2

Sex itself is a sensitive point in the modern era to the point of hysteria. It's much more controversial to put sex in a film than murder. It doesn't make much sense to me, but you generally have to toe the line with the mob mentality we have.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 12:47 PM
0

You should have pointed out that this is satire. Seemed pretty obvious from the article, but for some reason most people on the internet are pretty bad at detecting satire, so I guess so.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 12:45 PM
3

Can confirm, got to age 23 as a virgin as a sensitive withdrawn nerd, whilst loud, obnoxious guys like these are getting laid constantly.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 12:41 PM
1

Is that sub the PUA-type redpill, or the Cassie Jaye-type redpill?
/r/MensRights09/07/18 12:22 PM
14

Seems like a bit of a long-winded way to go about admitting she has a rape-fetish, but whatever.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 12:17 PM
1

Looks like a trad con meme, most here are smarter than that
/r/MensRights07/07/18 11:00 PM
3

Plus, gamers tend to be more anti-SJW than most, these days, so firing her was probably a pretty smart move in terms of PR - maybe not for media, who will side with her, but with the gamers, where it counts.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 10:46 PM
5

He wasn't even challenging her. He was suggesting a possible solution to an issue she had raised. And it wasn't even a technical question, so it's not like she either knew the "answer" or didn't - it was a more subjective topic, and he gave his opinion. I can't quite understand how she got so butthurt.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 10:41 PM
6

I'm not a massive fan of MGTOWs after they literally banned me lol, but even I can see that's a massive stretch. Feminists seek control over others, MGTOWs only seek control over themselves.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:16 PM
7

It's right on average for most western nations. Some have an average of 5'10 or so, but it's a small difference, and the measurements aren't always consistent.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 02:55 PM
6

Edit: Actually, both forms work equally well. You can refer to "the lack of" something as a property, or say there's "a lack of" something e.g. "the issue is that there's a lack of punctuation" and "the issue is the lack of punctuation".
/r/MensRights06/07/18 02:00 PM
5

What did I do? Other than the criminally bad lack of punctuation?
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:43 PM
1

I should be allowed to carry my legal property anywhere I want. I shouldn't need to justify my actions to anyone, as long as I'm not hurting anyone. Well, you can get in trouble in any country for being threatening or leading people to believe that violence could be imminent, so I think one should be allowed to carry a knife wherever they want to go (barring a few sensible exceptions), but walking around with the blade out and held in front of you for no reason is taking things a bit far.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:37 PM
2

Then why use the term "gender identity" at all? If gender is an identity, then surely "gender identity" would be redundant?
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:34 PM
1

Is there a provision where the government just can't make these kinds of blatantly discriminatory laws in the first place that we could make use of? Like there are some immigration laws the government made that got them in trouble because they violated European law or internal human rights.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:32 PM
5

And he's saying people should be jailed based on assumptions about their character as opposed for things they actually did
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:30 PM
2

t;dr equity is a sly way for them to talk about equality of outcome instead of equality of opportunity now that people have realised they're not actually for equality.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:28 PM
14

Very relevant, if you're capable of a little big-picture thinking. Much of the current discourse is essentially about equality of outcome vs equality of opportunity. One of the main arguments for those in favour of equal outcomes, which is often used as a weapon to discriminate against men, is that equal treatment should lead to equal outcomes, so enforcing equal outcomes is ensuring equal treatment. As more and more of the evidence comes out that equality of outcome is a farce and that it requi…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:00 PM
20

Yeah, but clearly de-facto policies aren't enough, we need the sexism to be official /s
/r/MensRights05/07/18 09:41 AM
2

I agree that he reacted stupidly, but I can't see how he said anything sexist
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:27 PM
1

Do they apply so much scrutiny to her claims that what he said was sexist? Rhetorical question, of course
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:24 PM
9

"Well then you should stop shagging men" Can anyone explain how this was supposed to be sexist in the first place? In what way does it discriminate between men and women or otherwise distinguish between the genders, other than in its identification of her sexual orientation?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:23 PM
1

Act as if you did nothing wrong and never admit anything. It sounds awful, and goes against good sentiment, but it can save your ass. What? Not being a pushover who apologises for things that never happened is awful now? That's what most people call self-respect.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:11 PM
13

If we're acknowledging that these sorts of issues can lead to frivolous accusations then maybe the court system should actually keep the accused anonymous instead of letting their names be dragged through the mud
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:08 PM
215

dafuq is "gender violence", anyway? Does violence suddenly become significantly worse depending on the genders involved?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:06 PM
19

Cottage Delight Naga Chilli Sauce
/r/MensRights03/07/18 06:02 PM
24

I just have the essential condiments etc - soy sauce, olive oil, curry powder, some emergency canned rations. Actually, I need to restock my supply of peach-based hot sauce, that stuff's good. It's like fruity instead of pure salt like most hot sauces.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 04:30 PM
1

Almost like rationality is a better policy to follow than endless bleeding-heart impulsivity.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:42 PM
2

It was a little weird when my wife's parents came to stay for a couple of weeks at our house. They're from a more traditional culture, and I got these kind of "respect the breadwinner" type vibes from them. Hard to point to specific examples, but it was like her mom (who has always been a housewife) had no resentment whatsoever doing most of the housework, took pride in it even, saw it as her job, practically insisted even though I felt guilty lol. Then seemed to appreciate me when I went out to…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 12:22 PM
3

They banned me for what I presume was pointing out a flaw in Ben Shapiro's argument. There's a decent number of cool guys there, but there's also an unusually large number of easily triggerable snowflakes who resort to rage when they're too stupid to comprehend nuance lol.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 12:15 PM
2

And they're less likely to be a gold digger if they were happy to marry someone without money
/r/MensRights03/07/18 12:06 PM
1

Imagine an article blaming women for not putting out as the reason prostitution exists. That wouldn't be entitlement, though, it's just a way to solve an issue. It would be entitlement if you said it's the reason sex slavery exists, or should exist.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 12:05 PM
7

I've spoken to many women who "can't find a man", turns out they can't find one who's in the small minority of men who live up to their standards whilst also simultaneously reciprocating their feelings.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 12:04 PM
2

If you're incel long enough you can be duracel
/r/MensRights03/07/18 12:03 PM
1

I've hung around an incel place before, and they periodically get some girls coming in, butthurt at the idea of an issue that only men can have, claiming they're incel and it still counts even though they're just picky lol. They can't stand not being the victim of something.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 12:02 PM
1

Not that this is permissable, but social media (especially Instagram) is kind of dominated by women Is there any male-dominated forum where people make hashtags/threads about how divinely amazing men are lol? There are many behaviours that are ridiculous when it isn't a woman doing them.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 11:19 AM
1

Any kind of equivalent - even gender-appropriate - phrasing would just sound cringy, because with men we realise that making a hashtag just to worship your gender is ridiculous. There are many such things women can get away with and we take it seriously when it would be ridiculous outside that context.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 11:18 AM
1

How long till an SJW gets triggered over the tag?
/r/MensRights02/07/18 11:15 AM
1

I guess the definition of "patriarchy" is getting more and more diluted to the point that it now means "When most of those in powerful positions are men, but they and society at large are only interested in serving women at the expense of men", which doesn't exactly sound like something feminists would even want to fight against lol
/r/MensRights02/07/18 11:13 AM
1

Well, the first point was a bit irrelevant because it was an interpersonal issue and not a legal one. The state has nothing to do with your wife cheating on you and getting pregnant. The issue is where it forces you to pay for the kid or denies you a paternity test.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 10:51 AM
1

It's a fairly decent sentence, actually. Women have gotten 2 years suspended sentences for attempted murder before. 7 years in jail for sustained physical abuse but that wasn't fatal isn't too bad. I'd personally have thought more like 9-10 years was more appropriate, but otherwise reasonable.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 09:47 AM
20

You realise the article is talking about cases in which it turned out the women were lying, not just where there was insufficient evidence to convict the guy, right?
/r/MensRights30/06/18 08:40 AM
2

I guess his interpretation was a little colorful, but everything is about factions with these crazies. Men vs women. As if men as an entire class are at war with them. You know what makes it sound so misandrist? She could have said they aren't going to protect women from rapists, or muggers, or criminals. But she chose to identify them as men.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 12:09 AM
1

you've been living under a rock in Australia Well, the world is a big rock, and Australia is on the bottom of the big rock, so I guess you could say that Australia is under a rock
/r/MensRights29/06/18 12:05 AM
3

I doubt I'll even be alive by then. My heart already spends half its time dancing around, and I'm only 27.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 06:20 PM
2

Probably closest to insult her based on breast size, except that's usually outwardly apparent.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 12:42 AM
1

Start recording audio around her, secretly. Chances are, if she does try to cause trouble, she'll try to threaten or taunt you first. Best to pre-empt her at her game.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 12:35 AM
2

And the shows where they try out different foods. Basically, food - SJW politics = win
/r/MensRights25/06/18 12:31 AM
1

Providing he intends to make that point, otherwise no one else would realise
/r/MensRights23/06/18 03:25 PM
29

Incels tend to do both, as far as I know More of a hybrid attitude: "I can't get a girl at all, but every asshole I know is swimming in them, so the problem is that girls prefer assholes, and I'm not one"
/r/MensRights23/06/18 12:56 PM
-3

So you're saying you're a lobster?
/r/MensRights23/06/18 11:02 AM
-2

It was a private meeting, that's why they, you know, say it was in private. If there is a separate claim of them doing it publicly, then that would be a separate claim, unless it's already part of this lawsuit.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 10:44 AM
2

Less standards than foods causing a shift in gut flora populations, resulting in inflammatory chemicals being released into the body, causing inflammation of the hypothalamus and reducing its ability to bind to leptin, thus disrupting the feedback loop that normally maintains body weight. But yeah, emotion-based rants and assumptions are good too.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 10:21 AM
-5

There's no way he's going to win this, though. Personal opinions in private. If that was defamation, we'd all be getting sued for saying feminists are basically Nazis lol
/r/MensRights23/06/18 10:13 AM
9

There was an interview where he was asked about his religious beliefs and he basically said he views them as moral codes, so he's basically an atheist as far as most people define it. He doesn't believe in God in a literal sense.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 10:07 AM
2

A blob wouldn't be mildly obese, it would be at least BMI 40+. You realise the threshold for obesity is only a BMI of 30? This girl could be about 4 BMI points lower, and still be obese, and she's not even a "blob" to start with: http://vagendamagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/1-XCcaBZ70b33RXnN9_75IMg.jpeg
/r/MensRights22/06/18 06:31 PM
3

Obesity is not curvy Mild obesity is
/r/MensRights22/06/18 01:15 PM
6

I think you're wife is wrong He's right, you know. "You are wife" is indeed incorrect.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 09:26 AM
2

Although, interestingly, they seem to have reached that conclusion by redefining corruption to suit their own ideology. Women focusing exclusively on benefits for women isn't corruption, supposedly, but men focusing exclusively on men would be.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 09:16 AM
2

I don't think she can be claimed to have done it by accident after she supposedly then walked into a cubicle after the guy points out she's in the wrong bathroom. It doesn't say, but the implication seems to be that she used a cubicle in the male bathroom.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 05:55 PM
1

pretend your man pumping I think that would secrete a different type of white fluid
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:55 PM
18

They said there were women breastfeeding in the room and that he wasn't welcome, that he was a male and that there were male toilets that he could access Funny how you have women arguing that they should be able to breastfeed in public, then flip out at the prospect of a man potentially seeing them do it. Make your mind up lol.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:42 PM
5

Which, I don’t get vegans/ vegetarians, do you really think that pre agri we were just walking around gathering thousands of calories of food off the ground? Very far back, we were probably some kind of herbivorous or omnivorous ape, so we could eat loads of stuff we can't now, probably could climb trees and stuff. Then we discovered fire, and evolved alongside it. The funny thing is that many vegans use arguments that don't even take this into account, for example they claim we couldn't have be…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:38 PM
6

Does diet coke count as a drug?
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:08 PM
4

The person going round drugging and raping people is under no impression that it's a good thing to do Or, they personally think it's a good thing to do, but are aware that others don't consider it a good thing to do already, so reiterating your opinion to them won't change anything
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:07 PM
1

Ok, you're just deliberately being dense now
/r/MensRights15/06/18 02:03 PM
1

lolwut, I wasn't even disagreeing with you initially. You talked about avoiding getting falsely accused, I pointed out that being falsely accused wouldn't even be an inherently damaging thing if it wasn't for society deliberately making it so.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 02:00 PM
1

Obviously
/r/MensRights15/06/18 01:50 PM
1

Well, the false accusation isn't even the real problem, the problem is how society chooses to act on false accusations i.e. punishing before guilt has even been established
/r/MensRights15/06/18 01:11 PM
1

Just set up cameras everywhere if possible. I mean, even if it's illegal, providing you can hide them until they're actually needed, you'd probably get off considerably lighter than the alternative.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 01:10 PM
3

Seems to be the equivalent of telling women to not place themselves in situations in which rape could occur, the main difference being that rape is done by an individual and is not condoned by society, whilst society itself is leveraged against you in a frivolous accusation of sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 01:08 PM
1

You know what's interesting? I once participated in a psychological survey thing by Cambridge to measure critical thinking skills in the population. The results were sorted into different categories. I scored in the top percentile for logical thinking, but scored quite badly in the "interpretation" part. I can't help think that maybe interpretation is just the most subjective and therefore most prone to bias aspect, and perhaps the researchers' bias was influencing the results i.e. they assigned…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 11:37 AM
2

Except you're talking about individual interpersonal interactions, and I'm talking about systemic treatment like laws, hiring policies, etc.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:25 PM
7

Yeah, posts like these just threaten to derail us with traditionalist nonsense. Who cares if there are differences on average so long as everyone is individually treated the same?
/r/MensRights14/06/18 12:15 PM
3

When your ideology is based on identity, you can't see individuals, only groups
/r/MensRights13/06/18 08:57 PM
9

That's the point... So many people without a grasp of sarcasm on the internet
/r/MensRights13/06/18 08:55 PM
1

That study shows that children being told that only a certain group are good at a task can become self-fulfilling. It doesn't show that girls receive this kind of message to any extent, which would be the important component.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 08:39 PM
9

one study really doesn't prove anything Are there actual studies that have found evidence in contradiction to this study? If not, then a single study is enough to effectively discredit what was an unsubstantiated theory in the first place. It doesn't prove it's wrong, but it gives a strong reason to dismiss it until there is significant evidence to suggest otherwise.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 01:02 PM
5

Feminists love the word "scholar", they inject it everywhere. It's basically a form of compensation where they think the authority of the term legitimises academically void subject areas.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:32 AM
3

She's about 70% of the way to real understanding, but she's still got some big gaps going on.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:21 AM
3

I avoid google if I'm looking to stream a movie or something. It's ironic that being a moral crusader is actually just giving business to your competitors. If it wasn't for google censoring stuff, I'd have never used Yahoo search in my life. If it wasn't for full movies occasionally appearing on Vimeo, I'd probably have never used that either.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:09 AM
2

I think he means no issue the article mentions is relevant to gender, not that the article doesn't mention gender
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:41 PM
24

And then use that money to sue the BBC again
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:40 PM
3

Who are the retards that are upvoting you? Any highly upvoted thread has basically been brigaded by feminists
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:16 AM
8

You find me an attractive man who couldn't theoretically overpower three women in a fight and I'll sell you a ticket to the moon. Justin Bieber couldn't overpower a Yorkshire Terrier
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:15 AM
9

Plus, failing to talk about men's problems or denying they exist is a pretty mild accusation compared to the reality, which is that they actively seek to discriminate against men and make things worse.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:40 PM
2

His mistake was not also being pansexual and disabled. Maximum intersectionality points.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 12:07 PM
0

More like you're browsing the categories and she's everywhere then. But I think she's in GOT, and I don't watch that, so whatever.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 11:36 AM
1

And they define advantage vs disadvantage even in the best case in terms of equality of outcome, so best case scenario they're still outright sexists to those who view rights in terms of individuals
/r/MensRights08/06/18 10:46 AM
0

"You're a KKK member, or you're a racist" - makes as much sense as what she's saying
/r/MensRights08/06/18 10:45 AM
1

All I know is that she keeps popping up in deepfake pron lol
/r/MensRights08/06/18 10:44 AM
11

Yeah but this a way to legitimize the extremists who call themselves feminists. If everyone's a feminist unless they're a sexist, then how can you criticise the top feminists who are sexists? It's basically an underhanded way to invalidate opposition to sexism itself, ironically.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 10:43 AM
3

Tempted, although I'd need a flight over and stuff, quite expensive when I'm supposed to be saving a house deposit lol
/r/MensRights08/06/18 09:06 AM
11

It's probably more that they need a minimum number of people in work, so they all get the same number of vacation days but the women all take theirs at a certain time of the year... at least I'm assuming that, it would be a bit ridiculous if there was literally a split in the vacation time given
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:54 PM
6

Plus the Fetts were supposed to have trained their entire lives to be killers. I don't think she understands what "Mary Sue" means.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 08:57 AM
3

And writing the laws, and receiving all the funding, and reporting the news, etc...
/r/MensRights06/06/18 12:54 PM
1

"When you're too intellectually inept to form an argument, just criticise tone!" - feminist handbook
/r/MensRights06/06/18 12:53 PM
3

Well, they've got to group the reasonable ones with the unreasonable ones in order to achieve guilt by association
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:44 AM
-3

What if they're like 8 years old?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:41 AM
2

I guess trades aren't even bad. It seems like there's a kind of trap these days - you spend so much time in school without learning specific, applicable skills. Which is fine if you just go onto university and get an employable degree, but everyone else suddenly realises they've invested their life into a course that hasn't returned anything of particular use - they're qualified to wash dishes, and that's about it.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:59 PM
2

Neither do women, anymore
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:30 AM
5

Because pointing out that there is merely a trivial physical difference between the two is a more effective way to emphasise the similarity, and he's not actively trying to avoid triggering snowflakes, hence the result.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:15 AM
3

My current GF has a degree & is currently doing a masters part time. I earn almost double what she does. She just doesn't want to use the degrees to get a higher paying job as she doesn't like the type of work. Why get the degrees then.....? Because low paying degree jobs are much more pleasant than low paying menial jobs. Plus, "low paying" is relative. Most jobs round here that don't require a degree are minimum wage, whereas a modest skilled job can still easily hit twice that before tax, wit…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:54 AM
1

I don't care who is more naturally nurturing or whatever so long as everyone is free to make their own choices. This attempt to regulate people's personal lives i.e. social justice is a trap we shouldn't fall into and start doing ourselves.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:47 AM
1

lol "reserved", you can tell they have a hard-on for communism
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:45 AM
3

Even assuming this is true, if one can make up double standards based on perceptions of gender-based differences, then: They're not in favour of equality or egalitarian, and should stop asserting that they are (presuming that they are, which is usually the case) What exactly is their issue with traditionalism, then? If double standards are ok, then do they just take issue with exactly how those double standards were implemented traditionally? And if these double standards are ok then doesn't tha…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:32 PM
2

Yeah, seems pretty stupid to give someone a written statement that you're going to falsely accuse them lol
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:53 AM
3

Could also be the sexual harassment hysteria making men afraid of sleeping with women.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:35 AM
1

Well, presumably they're either trying to say women feel unsafe due to danger, or that there's some kind of inherent sexism to the situation of women being assaulted by men. If men are more likely to be assaulted then women have no more reason to feel unsafe than men, and if men are more likely to assault men than women then there's no sexism other than towards men, so their argument seems to fail on every level. But maybe instead of always trying to unravel the incomprehensible mess of argument…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:10 AM
7

Why is it an argument in the first place? It makes no sense. I think, like I mentioned before, feminists tend to be collectivists - we see individuals, they see warring factions.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:07 AM
28

Plus she seems to have gotten 10 years, which is a pretty decent sentence, maybe even excessive for sleeping with a 13 year old. Based on the headlines, he only got 7 years.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 09:34 AM
1

Ah, a subtle distinction lol
/r/MensRights30/05/18 03:52 PM
8

Don't get married, would be my advice
/r/MensRights30/05/18 02:32 PM
2

I like how the site assumes the first name of the user, so that when "Men's rights" posts it tells me how "Men's needs me" lol
/r/MensRights30/05/18 12:48 PM
3

I will address it though. False rape accusations are not as big of a problem for men as actually being raped and not finding justice. An issue isn't just an issue when it becomes actualized, the same way power isn't only power when it's exercised. A policy gives women power over all men, all the time, whether or not they abuse it. A crime is only crime when it's committed.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 11:24 AM
12

I believe the truly just course of action is the one that frees the innocent from unwarranted imprisonment. You could just as easily argue that this is achieved better by having punishments for false accusations in the first place, as a deterrent. The best balance might be a harsh penalty if found out, and a softer penalty when admitted i.e. like most crimes.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 11:20 AM
1

ok, you're just retarded then
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:44 PM
5

No, I was just pointing out that they mentioned things they didn't explain, it's like saying "email us for details!" and not giving the email address.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:42 PM
1

Actually, I was talking in terms of overall magnitude, I hadn't gone on to address distribution by that point, hence why it's usually a bad idea to treat half a point as though it's the entire point. If you read what I said, it's regulation and redistribution which then ensures a relatively good spread of money.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:41 PM
1

nor can you use a past history or relationship as evidence that no sexual assault occurred. That's also reasonable, given that past relationships don't necessarily mean that the person consented at the time. I disagree with this. Relationships (not sure if this extends to being in a current relationship or not) tend to come with assumptions of consent. They don't stop someone from withdrawing consent, but obviously consent needs less explicit confirmation as time goes on. The first kiss is a big…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 04:23 PM
2

held most property in common This is economic leftism, I'm talking about social collectivism
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:54 AM
1

Well, you need to expound more on your stance for me to understand what your argument is. Are you blaming capitalism itself, or something else? Were previous eras less capitalist, to your thinking? Assuming this is your stance, I'd point out that inequality is only one part of the equation - total economic output is also relevant. Imagine we have a rich person and a poor person. If, under a communistic system, the rich person has $10 and the poor person $5, and under a capitalistic system the ri…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:50 AM
3

At least in that analogy, all bees are grouped together, whereas feminists thrive on dividing people along arbitrary categories and framing things as a competition between them. And I guess it depends on how you define "good". That can be a materialistic objective, or something more abstract. If your end goal is individual equality, then collectivism is directly opposed to that, and vice versa. So it's not so much that we see different paths to similar goals, as much as our fundamental values an…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:45 AM
3

I was surprised to see some here claiming to be left/liberal, as I figured this sub was largely more right-leaning. Well, I can't really think of anyone IRL in the UK here who really views some of the aspects of the American system as anything less than a nightmare. I was brought up thinking that moderate leftism was just the default, popular opinion and the right wing some kind of lunatic fringe like flat earthism that would never gain significant traction. But I guess not.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:39 AM
2

These people are anti-capitalist (or anti corporate capitalism) I'm more pro-capitalism, but also pro-regulation. Capitalism generates the money most effectively, whilst regulation keeps power from being too tightly concentrated in small pockets and ensures the greater population benefits more from the wealth.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:36 AM
8

It's because of collectivism. Instead of seeing people as individual units, imagine we're factions in a war. If one faction had all the top posts, then that faction as a collective is more powerful than the other. Feminists only see things this way - it's about combating the collective enemy faction, and it's about outcome, not opportunity, because the power of the faction is an outcome.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:21 AM
11

Mentioned donations and membership, didn't mention how either of those are attained in practice
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:02 AM
2

You can be anti-feminist and egalitarian
/r/MensRights28/05/18 03:16 PM
1

You don't win arguments with feminists, because they don't believe in logic
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:03 PM
2

Or just slapped her back
/r/MensRights27/05/18 11:21 AM
1

Can confirm, watch a lot of Japanese horror, didn't occur to me once to be offended on the basis of the complete lack of white actors
/r/MensRights27/05/18 11:21 AM
20

My sister's friend got an english degree and is working some dead-end barista job now, and made some facebook post about being a low paid woman in the patriarchy, and I said "Yeah, remember that time you tried to get into a higher paying sector like STEM and the patriarchy stopped you? Terrible". Shut her complaining down pretty fast lol. It's useful to remind people like this that their own choices lead them to where they are.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 10:38 PM
3

Notice how much power they give to anecdotes. Anecdotes are the only evidence they need.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 10:34 PM
3

And then some other feminist will complain that it isn't macho enough and is thus perpetuating stereotypes about women being feminine
/r/MensRights26/05/18 10:22 PM
4

Maybe they mean breaking the taboo of domestic abuse more in the sense that (a female) domestically abusing someone is the taboo that needs broken lol.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:15 PM
18

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1651234.stm Then I remember them inviting another woman to speak at women's marches who was previously convicted for kidnapping and torturing a guy over several days.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:39 PM
25

You're talking about a group who gave a medal of courage to a woman who fatally set her husband on fire while he slept.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 01:50 PM
1

Get a voice recorder, meet up with her, then steer the conversation towards the false rape accusation as if you're supportive of it, so that she admits to doing it on tape -> done.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 09:24 AM
1

Yeah, you said 3 times as likely would imply women are 33% of victims. If that was the case, men would be 2 times as likely.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 08:58 AM
3

I know an incel who's in his late 40s now, still a virgin. Ultra-nice, decent job, dedicates himself to church and scouts, goes out every weekend to give blankets to homeless people etc. This need to conflate morality and sex is some bizarre hamstering. Attractiveness isn't a moral declaration. I was incel until I was 23 because I was too afraid to ask a girl out in case it made her uncomfortable/came across as harassment, due to early feminist brainwashing. Does that sound like someone who does…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 08:54 AM
1

Then it'd be about twice as likely. 66% is twice as much as 33%. Three times would be 25%.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 07:47 AM
1

She doesn't even have that much melanin to start with
/r/MensRights22/05/18 03:49 PM
1

What about the Diana in Wake Up Dead?
/r/MensRights22/05/18 03:47 PM
1

Sounds like a tongue twister
/r/MensRights22/05/18 03:46 PM
2

Now you're admitting you have no arguments. You're not worth my time, you seem to just be a standard run of the mill sexist without a coherent stance, and a lack of self-awareness.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 10:48 AM
3

Ok, so: 1. You're trying to justify sexual discrimination, so I presume you don't refer to yourself as an egalitarian. 2. You're trying to justify punishing people for things they could have done but didn't do. This makes about as much sense as punishing me every time I walk past a house because I could have broken in. We don't have imaginary crimes (yet).
/r/MensRights22/05/18 10:45 AM
3

You think one scenario is more serious because the perpetrator is a male, because the victim will feel more intimidated. Everything else I said follows logically from this conclusion.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 10:36 AM
4

Actually, I'm disagreeing with you. You're stating that whether or not we consider a crime to be a crime should depend on how the victim feels about it, and not based on the action performed, with the assumption of certain mental states based on the genders involved, and therefore attempting to justify institutional sexual discrimination where a crime is effectively defined by the gender of the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 10:08 AM
5

Good thing we define crimes based on the action and intent, and not on some spurious subjective feelings
/r/MensRights22/05/18 10:01 AM
7

I'm not primarily interested in social justice type subjects to start with. Sentencing disparity is an area I'd be concerned about, because it's a demonstrable difference in treatment by an institution that wields power over people, but "some people earn less money on average" is not a compelling enough argument alone.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 09:52 AM
2

Well, 1. that doesn't mean that her response was accurate. You could agree with her responding in a mean tone in response to a mean statement, but that doesn't make her correct. 2. She didn't really just respond to one person, did she? If she says that disliking period blood is misogynistic, then she's really branding everyone in existence who shares the same views as misogynists, so what did they do to deserve that kind of slander?
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:57 PM
4

I'm not sure which way you were suggesting the courtesy should be given but to me the basic point here is that the OP was being shamed for her period fetish which is kink shaming. They're saying that if people shouldn't be shamed for having a kink, then they shouldn't be shamed for not having it. The lengths I go to for people without basic reading comprehension skills...
/r/MensRights21/05/18 02:03 PM
7

It's circular logic. Women don't sexually harass men because, when they do, they twist definitions so that it doesn't count
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:59 AM
5

Plus, it's weasel tactics to try to group together three drastically different types of crimes. For all we know, it could break down as 1% of women having been raped, and 80% having been made slightly uncomfortable by a guy looking at them, and suddenly we have "the vast majority of women have been raped or harassed!" hysteria-mongering material.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:06 AM
2

I'm saying that they freely make claims about being discriminated against based on their gut feelings, e.g. the claim that women only own 1% of land worldwide was quoted as being based on the claimants "perception of the scope of the problem", and became a widely quoted factual statistic despite being obviously untrue
/r/MensRights20/05/18 08:08 PM
6

When we make a claim: citation needed. When they make a claim: feelings are enough
/r/MensRights20/05/18 07:48 PM
4

Only one gender deserves to be protected from violence, of course
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:17 PM
2

A religion of chads. That's new to me. I thought they usually called them "fraternities".
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:17 PM
8

Is there even a correct answer? I'd imagine if it happened to me I'd probably just quickly nope out of there and pretend it never happened lol. I'd probably be justified in reporting it to HR, but would I even have evidence, and would it be worth the drama?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:14 PM
1

I didn't say we needed to, I suggested that it may be a good idea; an improvement
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:10 PM
1

Why don't we put in a place one of those rules where you can only vote and comment if you're subscribed? It wouldn't stop someone from just subscribing temporarily in order to grief us, but I think it would act as a deterrent to non-serious posters who are low-effort brigaders.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:57 PM
2

To me, the Netherlands is the country that is far ahead of others. And not just in terms of gender equality...
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:38 PM
1

Sounds worse in some ways
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:36 PM
2

Then they wouldn't choose to do it instead of being homeless
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:38 PM
2

If they prefer sex work to being homeless then it's obviously not as "oppressive" as being homeless lol. This logic that someone is a victim for a choice they freely made... hilarious
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:29 PM
3

Yeah, this thread is definitely pretty heavy on the brigading
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:25 PM
4

There's free speech as a legal construct, and free speech as a value or ideal. You can disagree with a company's policy and actions even if they aren't illegal.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:22 PM
3

It's quite insulting that they assume we are biased, and then try to appeal to it. If a female relative of mine started a fight then it's up to them to deal with the consequences. I'd help out if the other guy used unreasonable force that actually endangered their lives e.g. he kicks them once they're down, but reasonable use of force in self defense? Knock yourself out.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:18 PM
3

Plot twist - sharp edge of a broken bone is jutting out from her hand, you go to hit yourself with her fist again and kill yourself from being impaled by a sharp object
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:16 PM
6

The premise of the questions seems to be that we're somehow part of a leftist "gang", as if we hang around with SJWs or something just because we have economically leftist tendencies. It's like asking the more right wing members of the sub what people think of us at their NAZI rallies.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:19 PM
8

she's so brave and inspirational
/r/MensRights17/05/18 03:38 PM
6

Being gay won't save you if a girl decides to accuse you of rape
/r/MensRights17/05/18 10:26 AM
-5

If every woman was unbiased in their complimenting then they'd probably work out like that without having particular women being biased in their favour. But you seem to be talking in terms of equality of outcome, which I don't condone.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:11 PM
-25

I appreciate her sentiment, but in the spirit of staying true to equality as a principle and remaining objective, I'd point out that it's technically a bit sexist to explicitly favour one gender in this fashion. I'd be a little irritated if a woman made a post about how she especially likes to complement other women.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:13 PM
6

He and Krista live in Jupiter Welp, that escalated quickly
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:47 PM
4

I started the article thinking he'd maybe won something like 500k a couple of times over the last 20 years and they were beginning to struggle, but 20M? How can she not be happy with that? lol
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:44 PM
2

What if you're punching someone and you're enough of a sucker to walk off without checking for retaliation?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/18 03:37 PM
61

Yeah lol, she was like "eh, I'll just walk off like a bad-ass and be fine..." twatted in the side of the head and goes down like a sack of potatoes
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/18 03:36 PM
3

The constitution states that married couples are entitled to equal rights and the group argued that the law unfairly impacted women, who were more likely to suffer financially from a marriage break-up. I guess it didn't occur to them that "rights" and "money" aren't synonyms.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:30 PM
2

Whether or not he was guilty is irrelevant to him trying to bias the court in his favour in underhanded and dishonest ways, so no.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:22 PM
27

feminism is authoritarian Well, yeah, the main concept of social justice is that people are acting in ways they don't like, so they need to force people to act in other ways that they approve of. It's not just authoritarian in practice, it's based on authoritarianism in principle.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 11:30 AM
3

My work still has single occupancy bathrooms that are gender specific. Most people just ignore it lol. Especially in a place that has about 70 men and 5 women, with the gender of the bathrooms equally divided among us.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 11:19 AM
1

Women think men will try to rape them or something. Women are generally paranoid and fear nonsensical things.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 11:17 AM
0

This sub shouldn't be about negativity, and trying to remove things, or deny certain experiences. It should be about gaining things for men. Why do you feel you should be able to define the motivations of the sub? Personally, my main motivating value is fairness. I'd rather remove something from single mothers than tolerate double standards and sexism to exist on the actions of people who preach about how they're all about gender equality.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 04:12 PM
18

"wait a minute, if I'm oppressed by the system, why are all of the system's most powerful institutions supporting me?" The cognitive dissonance is breathtaking. Fixed
/r/MensRights14/05/18 11:40 AM
4

Classic example of why we claim the ideologues in power want equality of outcome. To them, equal pay doesn't mean unbiased pay, it means literally men and women taking home the same wage on average, exactly the same outcome.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:01 PM
3

Yeah, but turns out they're largely as much petulant snowflakes as most feminists. Literally got banned for pointing out an instance in which Ben Shapiro's response to a question didn't address the question properly lol.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 05:37 PM
5

"Parliament's definition of consent does not extend to advance consent to sexual acts committed while the complainant is unconscious," Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote for the majority." I guess by that logic, you can't consent to surgery done under general anesthesia in advance
/r/MensRights12/05/18 05:36 PM
2

Typical. Gets her tits out, doesn't even have tits.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 08:29 AM
4

you all look like extreme antifeminists Thank you, I am flattered
/r/MensRights12/05/18 08:12 AM
1

We're talking about boy scouts. She asked where "boy" is stated to mean biologically, he said it's in the title. The title just says "boy".
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 08:21 PM
2

Well, because the repayments are income based, so always affordable, and you can't get into issues with missing payments due to being unemployed. That's a pretty forgiving system.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 06:10 PM
-3

I'm talking about what it's like to live there, mainly the quality of life attainable, the rules that apply to you, etc. Identity is an abstraction that doesn't physically exist. They can all call themselves unicorns for all I care, so long as they don't make me attach a horn to my head.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 06:08 PM
0

Yeah, but the name "boy scouts" doesn't explicitly specify biological males. For all we know, they were going by the "gender" definition. That is what Shapiro should have addressed. He demonstrated that they only admit boys, but he didn't demonstrate what definition of "boy" they were operating under.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 06:06 PM
1

Well, no one really goes to learn, you go to get the paper lol But I can't complain, the UK student loans system is generally pretty sweet. Although they have some stupid anal rules. Like they would have funded me for a four year MSci course, but after I'd done a three year BSc, they refused to fund me for a 1 year MSc. Had to get a proper personal loan, wasn't nice.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 05:27 PM
3

To be fair, the secondary school system consistently gets higher grades than the rest of the UK, so it doesn't seem bad. The violence I've experienced. I've been punched in the face every year for the past 8-9 years in various circumstances (eg nights out, girlfriend brothers/fathers) Really? I've been physically attacked once, and that was in school. Most of the issues you list seem to be largely a working class/rough areas of Belfast thing. When I was 19, my friends and I spent Friday nights p…
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 05:20 PM
0

You can have that if you want, but it still doesn't show how the countries are different lol. Canadians are the real canadians, but I'd still say Canada is fairly similar to America in some respects.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 05:03 PM
1

Not when the self-evidence itself is what is itself being questioned, and they were looking for explicit confirmation on a technical level, like something in the fine-print of the rules.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 05:02 PM
3

Well, in some senses: You can't camp anywhere without permission. You can't fish without a license. You can't live on your own land without planning permission, which is difficult to get to the point that most people consider it fruitless. You're not allowed to live in a boat or camper van either, unless it's in a very particular year-long designated site, which are practically non-existent. You can't choose what to put into your body, for the most part. The UK has recently been setting preceden…
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 04:57 PM
3

And he didn't demonstrate that the term is being defined biologically simply by referring to the name
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 04:48 PM
-14

K, but your opinion of their argument is irrelevant to my pointing out that he failed to address it at all.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 04:05 PM
-5

lolwut. You have similar wages, similar laws, similar restrictions, a similar economic model, similar crime rates, similar climate and natural habitats... the only significant difference is the accents. Can you point out something measurable that's significantly different between the two?
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 04:05 PM
-14

To be fair, he didn't address the actual argument that she was getting at. If he says "biological boys", that suggests they were talking about transgenderism obviously. The feminist argument is that girls who think they're boys are actually boys, so according to their logic, the title "boy scouts" wouldn't explicitly exclude girls who think they're boys.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 03:48 PM
-2

If it's anything like Northern Ireland, then you're talking shit weather, no real freedom, boring nature, and hardly anything to do, so I'm not sure why you'd want to lol
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 03:38 PM
2

ok
/r/MensRights11/05/18 01:12 PM
2

No, I asked why you didn't record it. I didn't mention anything to do with it being illegal in my question.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:46 PM
3

It also includes all sexual contact whilst "intoxicated". That probably accounts for about 90% of the stats lol
/r/MensRights11/05/18 11:42 AM
2

It's both. They self-report stuff, then the interviewer tries to classify it as rape
/r/MensRights11/05/18 11:40 AM
2

Why didn't you get audio recordings of all the corruption and use it against them?
/r/MensRights11/05/18 10:38 AM
14

SJW movements are obsessed with controlling people
/r/MensRights11/05/18 10:28 AM
15

The article says fewer men are having children because more men are being shared among multiple women for their DNA. The conclusion basically supports the idea that feminism leads to an increased expression of hypergamy, which taken to its extreme, is the idea that all women would only mate with a small subset of men among them. Imagine you have 10 women and 10 men and, instead of pairing off 1:1, all the women fuck the same guy.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 10:24 AM
2

I'm not even sure if this is red-pilled or blue-pilled lol. On the one hand, it's acknowledging the general pattern of leeching off men, on the other it's kinda encouraging it.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 09:20 AM
3

Heh, getting angry at plants. That's a new one.
/r/MGTOW10/05/18 04:39 PM
34

"leave me alone" "stop forcing me to leave you alone!"
/r/MGTOW10/05/18 02:19 PM
63

Well, I'd say if you're attached to someone, you have a responsibility to not blow it all and get into debt etc, because it affects both of you, but leisure money is a whole different ball game. If she would rather you be spending that on her, she should get her own job for it.
/r/MGTOW10/05/18 01:00 PM
13

lol that'd be even more reason to complain than usual. He's a niceguy after-all.
/r/MGTOW10/05/18 12:42 PM
5

I go to the beach then get bored, because I'm basically just sitting at the beach. Then again, a "warm day" here is about 15C, so maybe it's better when the water isn't frigid.
/r/MGTOW10/05/18 11:49 AM
9

I hope the grammar is part of the joke
/r/MGTOW10/05/18 10:53 AM
3

whoever they feel wronged them What, the legal system for convicting them on a baseless accusation? They're the real villains in this.
/r/MGTOW10/05/18 10:37 AM
1

No True Scotsfem
/r/MGTOW10/05/18 10:16 AM
3

sounds like you're doing the right things Mostly. The pleading and attempts to reason with his wife are obviously stupid and just put him in a more vulnerable position by indicating that he is open to be manipulated. He'd be far better off stone-walling her. She's clearly a complete psychopath and sees him as a tool for her purposes - he won't find even a shred of sympathy there.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:16 PM
4

I think this one is a troll pretending to be a feminist. It's too self-aware and honest.
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 04:00 PM
1

Well, if it was to be an actual serious piece of writing, it would have to drop the expositions/explanations of everything. Show, don't tell, that stuff.
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 02:33 PM
1

It's not the minorities that are the problem, it's the system put in place that gives them disproportionate power. Power corrupts.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:18 PM
1

Is it possible when women get sexually assaulted, there is a sense of fear. As the man could overpower them and actually do something harmful. In public, with tons of people around that would jump in instantly, and a severe retaliation from the legal system for trying? I don't buy it
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:11 PM
1

It’ll pass? What’s your evidence for that staggering claim? Sheesh!! How incredibly arrogant. Well, I can prove it'll definitely pass
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:09 PM
0

sweaty! Eww
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:09 PM
3

I stayed in a fancy hotel once where the water stream was like 3 feet wide, did two people easily
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:07 PM
4

Anything can be twisted to suit their agenda. I wouldn't be surprised if there was an article published tomorrow that the majority of the homeless being men is actually a burden on women because it means women have a house they need to clean.
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 01:01 PM
4

What about stuff on cam?
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 12:50 PM
1

It's not the size that's unrealistic, it's the fact that they can only make large breasts in that kind of watermelon shape at the moment, whereas realistically, at that size, they'd hang more.
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 10:54 AM
2

IN order of aging I think it's; Sun I'm good for that, just get a little here and there for the D Stress Generally avoid it by avoiding high pay/high stress jobs etc Genes Not much to be done there Smoking/drinking/drugs Don't do any of those (I'd probably do some weed if I could get it lol) Make Up Nope Bad diet Well, I'd rate mine as about 7/10 at the moment. Some room for improvement, but I avoid the obvious traps like soda and cooking with omega-6 oils. Also, don't underestimate facial expre…
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 10:51 AM
2

Known a few guys who have had to get rid of their dogs and the woman openly admits she hates the dog. Why would anyone do that? To me, that's like "getting rid" of your kids because a woman doesn't like them. You don't just discard a family member. Not that they literally are, but you have that kind of bond with them.
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 09:54 AM
1

Have they invented a dog yet that's fairly big and fluffy, doesn't shed loads of hair, doesn't need tons of exercise, doesn't bark a lot, and doesn't drool everywhere? I kinda want a Samoyed, but every breed seems to have some of these disadvantages.
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 09:52 AM
2

I like Skoda. Tops the chart or close to it for reliability every year.
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 09:48 AM
5

My work has BBC news on constantly in the kitchen. I swear, I can't endure just being in there for more than 5 minutes at a time due to the cringe. I don't remember it being that bad before. All they seem to have is women complaining to each other about how someone hurt their feelings and blaming men for it 24/7.
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 09:47 AM
1

I was starting to get lower back pain and tightness from the desk job, I find a daily walk really helps sort it out.
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 09:43 AM
1

Of course. It's not like feminists actually complain about legitimate issues
/r/MGTOW08/05/18 01:09 PM
1

It's explained later in the article. Department stores used to have human operators for their elevators, so you'd tell them which department you wanted to go to.
/r/MGTOW08/05/18 10:00 AM
3

If it's a "request" for an apology, it's not a sanction. They clearly demanded that he apologize. She acts like being demanded to prostrate himself to her ideology is no big deal whilst simultaneously saying that an elevator joke is a big deal. So much hipocrisy and stupidity.
/r/MGTOW08/05/18 09:59 AM
5

Too late, she's already doing that
/r/MGTOW08/05/18 09:55 AM
5

Recently, They Are Billions, The Long Dark, Crossout, Subnautica, and 7 Days to Die
/r/MGTOW07/05/18 02:33 PM
5

1200p, technically
/r/MGTOW07/05/18 02:25 PM
43

I think she's ineptly trying to argue that weight alone is meaningless because its impact on your appearance depends on your height etc. It just comes out like nonsensical diarrhea for obvious reasons.
/r/MGTOW07/05/18 02:23 PM
3

They mass-censored a thread the other day that was getting too red-pilled/anti-SJW: https://i.imgur.com/k0jl9u6.png
/r/MGTOW07/05/18 02:20 PM
8

1200p here, 4790k and 980gtx is plenty
/r/MGTOW07/05/18 02:12 PM
6

I've got a 980 and it hasn't struggled to reach 60fps since I can remember
/r/MGTOW07/05/18 02:11 PM
3

slow food That's when you eat snails and turtles
/r/MensRights04/05/18 04:46 PM
2

Yeah but they can't stand the thought of men being victims in some way that they aren't, and they want a slice, so there's always girls popping up trying to claim the term when they don't even understand what it means.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 01:00 PM
9

Sounds like an app that no women would join
/r/MensRights04/05/18 11:40 AM
24

Plot twist: she's really just concerned about men struggling in their personal lives and is asking companies to set up dates for them
/r/MensRights04/05/18 11:02 AM
3

Well, men and women incels wouldn't be able to simultaneously co-exist, so women ones don't really exist. If they were to meet up and not have sex, at least one of them chose to not have sex, thus at least one of them is no longer incel.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 11:01 AM
84

"What are you going to do about it?" ... Set them up on dates or something? I don't quite get what she's going for here, but it's nice of her to show such concern for men who are struggling in their personal lives at least
/r/MGTOW04/05/18 10:59 AM
5

And I'd say even 1kg of muscle a month is steroid-level gains
/r/MGTOW04/05/18 09:55 AM
11

" Given the popular wisdom that Hollywood, the Internet, and Photoshop have created unrealistic expectations of how a woman should look, I found the fairness and, well, realism, of this gray arc kind of heartening. " Translation: "We tested our feminist indoctrination against the real world for the first time in our lives, and were shocked to find it's actually all bullshit!"
/r/MGTOW04/05/18 09:34 AM
5

Yeah, studies find individual results vary greatly based on genetics, but most guys can expect to grow about 5-10 pounds of muscle a year, maybe a bit faster for newbie gains. It usually takes 1-2 years for it to really become noticeable.
/r/MGTOW04/05/18 09:31 AM
4

Especially when she's basically a rich famous actor, now. It's one thing not paying your father back when you'd struggle to, and quite another when he's just not even worth the effort to write a cheque.
/r/MGTOW03/05/18 12:55 PM
6

From what I've heard, she basically uses men as a platform to move up in the world, dumping them when they've outlived their usefulness. He has to be crazy to go ahead with her now, knowing that.
/r/MGTOW03/05/18 12:54 PM
1

Actually, you got my statement backwards. Look up "illiteracy", then "correlated", then "inverse".
/r/MensRights03/05/18 07:23 AM
5

I heard that, in studies, in order of attractiveness, men are rated black, white, then asian. Women are rated asian, white, then black. Could be that blacks are considered more masculine and asians more feminine, with whites as an intermediate point, would explain things if it applied to both genders.
/r/MGTOW02/05/18 02:12 PM
1

even though perhaps it shouldn’t I'm pretty sure, if we looked for evidence, we'd find illiteracy is inversely correlated with intelligence.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:38 PM
2

As for ghosting for that long I stop trying before 4 days maybe 3. Makes sense when you're young, and friends are all messaging each other several times a day. I find now that it's pretty normal to exchange a message with someone like twice a week lol. Could just be my crappy friends, though.
/r/MGTOW02/05/18 12:55 PM
2

You'd think it would be common sense to try to establish why someone hadn't been online before assuming it's deliberate and targeted at you. Although sometimes when someone is giving one word answers every 4 days, you have to just assume they've started ghosting for no reason, and leave it at that.
/r/MGTOW02/05/18 12:46 PM
4

Yeah, my whole issue with PUA is that, if it's true, then it's not even worth it. If a woman's continued interest is dependent on me acting like a douche 24/7, then what's the point?
/r/MGTOW02/05/18 12:43 PM
1

I haven't even played a console since that was the case, so I'm not sure just how bad they are now lol Although, to be fair, it might be more a performance thing. Can't viably grab data off a disc fast enough to load stuff quickly these days
/r/MGTOW02/05/18 12:40 PM
5

But soy sauce doesn't really count as soy because it's fermented and in small quantities
/r/MGTOW02/05/18 11:59 AM
1

Well, there's this article, to start with
/r/MGTOW02/05/18 09:37 AM
1

https://www.fft.ie/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/donertrumpbangor.jpg
/r/MGTOW02/05/18 09:34 AM
4

Property taxes sound terrible. I'm counting on basically living rent-free once I pay my house off. That's the whole point. And rent on my current place is only $9000 a year to start with. 3-6k rent on a place you already fully own is ridiculous.
/r/MGTOW01/05/18 03:30 PM
6

Well, it doesn't make sense to make people sell their houses to get welfare, because then they'll just need extra welfare for rent. But they should have to have a reasonably priced house, at least i.e. downsize first.
/r/MGTOW01/05/18 03:25 PM
1

Well, we mostly used the handle of this glowstick thing we got at the aquarium lol. It's quite thin, but at the start even that wouldn't go in. I flew home, and we had to get paperwork done before she could move over here, so she had a few months in the meantime to get things stretched out, and it seemed to have resolved itself by the time she got here. I'm still kinda shocked that she hadn't even internally fapped before, since she couldn't get anything in there.
/r/MGTOW01/05/18 01:11 PM
1

We literally couldn't even have sex for the first few weeks until she started a kind of stretching regimen lol. Still not sure if it was actual tightness or just some kind of hymen thing, but it wouldn't go in. That's how I know she was a virgin, though, unless there was some kind of complex conspiracy going on
/r/MGTOW01/05/18 01:04 PM
2

Yeah, there's a lot of myths when it comes to it, like somehow sex loosens the vagina etc. In my case, I wasn't specifically looking for one, although it is kinda nice to know I've never "shared" her with anyone else lol
/r/MGTOW01/05/18 11:29 AM
1

I married a virgin
/r/MGTOW01/05/18 11:04 AM
2

When I was being interviewed for my current job, I was discussing my thesis project, and the female interviewer was trying to imply that I hadn't really created anything myself, because it used libraries. I mean, everyone understands that code is all about building upon previous constructs and utilising them in certain ways. You don't write a new game engine everytime you make a new video game, for example. Even std::string is a library lol.
/r/MGTOW01/05/18 11:02 AM
2

I tried it, got bored in about two days. It's just wandering around shooting stuff.
/r/MGTOW01/05/18 10:07 AM
10

That's the joke
/r/MGTOW01/05/18 09:48 AM
2

Although, ironically, the song is about getting sex lol
/r/MGTOW01/05/18 09:46 AM
3

So they managed to come to a point where they punished him on the basis of a felony but tried him on a lower standard of proof. Brilliant. Not that there was even enough evidence to constitute "clear and convincing". There isn't enough for "on the balance of probabilities".
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:08 AM
4

there isn't evidence beyond a reasonable doubt K, so you agree he shouldn't have been punished then, all settled
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:04 AM
-1

No, I expect everyone to get training so that they can defend themselves when they get attacked
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:29 PM
2

Aqua sheep dodged!
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 04:13 PM
4

Probably safest in this legal climate, although I'd have no personal moral qualms with hitting back if she initiated
/r/MensRights30/04/18 03:08 PM
-12

That's the good thing about training. The response becomes automatic, so you don't have to think about it.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 02:42 PM
-9

Plus, if you get hit with a slap that's that slow and obvious, your reaction times are pretty bad.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:30 PM
1

Only problem with this is that we're not exactly a massive movement to start with. I don't think we can afford to dilute our numbers over various different sub-groups. You'll end up with no activity on most of them. Concentrating in one place is what keeps this place active and going.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:29 PM
1

Don't get me wrong, back in the day you will have had to learn equations and so on as complicated as that. However intelligent programmers realised that not only would it be a complete pain in the arse to write that much code for one function it would also be incredibly inefficient. Well, the underlying engine has to be doing that, whether or not you are. Unless you're talking efficiency less in terms of performance and more in terms of everyone re-inventing the wheel. But yeah, maybe I underest…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:14 AM
1

I'm assuming you basically just have to know the basic equations around Newton's laws of motion and how to transform objects in a coordinate system? I've heard in practice it's tricky because in between frames two objects may have traveled far enough to be inside each other when it comes to calculate their position next frame, so you need to backtrack them back out again and apply a collision
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:52 AM
1

Well, I have a degree in Physics and I wouldn't know offhand how to do that kind of stuff. I'm sure I could learn, but I think usually people just learn what they need to know as it comes up, as opposed to a generic education covering everything you could possibly ever need.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:40 AM
3

He actually could derive advantages from many places, now. Homeless? Technically, he should have access to extra shelters. And companies could technically hire him on the basis of fulfilling diversity quotas etc.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:18 AM
2

There were like only 10% of women in my computer science engineering school. We had 3 specialities: 3d and multimedia stuff marketing, management and business stuff very technical and critical stuff 80% of the women went to marketing management and business stuff, the rest to multimedia. Because none were actually interested by getting their hands dirty, as the woman say in the video. I find it amusing how people avoid technical stuff to go to the more artsy stuff, because I've always been the o…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:13 AM
1

Aren't cartesian coordinates just standard coordinates i.e. the shortest distance between two points is a straight line?
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:09 AM
7

I was working for $5 an hour from 15 in a ridiculously busy restaurant with no breaks lol. You don't buy $5 starbucks lattes when you're thinking "I had to work an hour for this?"
/r/MGTOW29/04/18 12:39 PM
1

I'm not making massive money like many others here, but I've gone from about $3000 saved to about $20,000 in the last year or so, and I'm pretty happy with that. I can get a house for about $120k or so, and a standard deposit here is about 10%, so I'm almost good to go. Might even stretch to a 150k place if I can get more room.
/r/MGTOW29/04/18 12:35 PM
2

True, but the number is more significant if you're viewing it in terms of passive income.
/r/MGTOW29/04/18 12:27 PM
5

Durkadurka al shafar. Lol
/r/MGTOW28/04/18 12:15 PM
3

But if it did, then it sounds quite helpful for someone who keeps having to have abortions lol
/r/MGTOW28/04/18 11:59 AM
1

No, it's not automatically a criminal offence at that point. It just enables police to tell you to leave, and ignoring that can then be deemed an offence: http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN05116/SN05116.pdf But it looks like even if you've told them to leave, they need to have caused damage, acted abusive, or have 6 or more vehicles with them before the police have the power to potentially turn their non-compliance into a criminal case, and you can't personally remove them…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 02:13 AM
2

Is the second one a joke?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 02:30 PM
1

WTF is a "meta-study"? I believe it's when they extract the data-sets from multiple studies and then analyse it like it was one big study
/r/MensRights27/04/18 01:17 PM
3

Depends on the country. In the UK, they're paid about average, generally.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 01:03 PM
12

Saw Ghost Stories a few weeks ago, was pretty good. Then again, people complained about the lack of female characters, not sure if a coincidence or not lol
/r/MGTOW27/04/18 12:37 PM
3

You can stay in a hotel for a month for $50? I didn't think living costs were that low. There's a fairly fancy place I go to occasionally that has a spa and everything, that starts at about $300 a night for a room. Last time I was there I stayed in their $550 suite and had gold-diggers after me lol
/r/MGTOW27/04/18 10:14 AM
3

I don't even know what most of those items are. One sounds like wine or something.
/r/MGTOW27/04/18 10:10 AM
1

I just wish there was other night time stuff to replace them. Coffee shops all close by about 8-9pm here. Just somewhere to hang out up until about 11 would be good.
/r/MGTOW27/04/18 09:33 AM
1

Maybe compensation for insecurity
/r/MGTOW27/04/18 09:29 AM
1

My buddy was a bartender and told me the cheap vodka and the select stuff were the same, they kept refilling the select bottle with Grey Goose. I thought Grey Goose is supposed to be expensive anyway. Not that it actually does too well in blind taste tests, but nice marketing.
/r/MGTOW27/04/18 09:28 AM
3

The idea is that you put a sealant in the deflated tire, then use the car battery to inflate it, which also spreads the sealant around. Gives the tire a bit more life to get it home. Haven't tested it out yet though. Can't go wrong with a spare.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 04:40 PM
7

My new car has come with this "puncture repair kit" thing instead of a spare tire. Doesn't seem like a great idea.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 04:29 PM
1

If a DNS server can get around it, would it not be easier to just use the site's IP?
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 04:16 PM
2

Really? You told me to do something? I guess I better do it then! Retard
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 12:27 PM
2

with a bunch of hamstering added. If you can't address arguments, you're just a retard I guess lol I've owned 12 dogs, 5 different breeds, plus 3 of them mutts. Wow, does it take practice to be so irrelevant? Unless one of them was a chihuahua or something, I don't care. For all that tells me, they were all medium to large sized, which were historically bred for obedience because they were used as working dogs.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 12:20 PM
2

And you're oversimplifying. Some dog breeds are much less trainable than others, because we never bred them in the first place for trainability. It wouldn't necessarily be impossible for my dogs to be trained well enough, but it's much more difficult than for most breeds, hence I would need to hire an expert, and it's not worth it.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 12:10 PM
1

Here, private security can't technically apply physical force unless they're essentially employing a form of citizen's arrest. In order to be justified in doing that though, you need to be found guilty of e.g. stealing something afterwards. So if they have no real reason to believe you've stolen something, then they're not allowed to touch you (and even if they have a reason, they still need to have been demonstrated correct, subsequently).
/r/MensRights26/04/18 11:06 AM
1

If he's equally as reliable as you, then what's the benefit in giving him your stuff?
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 10:47 AM
6

The UK is getting pretty ridiculous, they just banned a whole list of weapons from even being stored in your home. If you're attacked, they recommend using a rolled up newspaper.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 10:13 AM
2

Buy gold, bury it in the garden. Pirates knew what they were doing.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 10:05 AM
1

So what's to stop him just walking off with your stuff, if it's legally his?
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 10:04 AM
2

Skinny chicks are literally the only niche in porn that I don't find attractive lol. It doesn't mean they can't be, but it's not a desirable trait. There's a point where she's too fat to be attractive, but I'm fairly generous in my preferences.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 10:02 AM
1

I think you must be mistaking me for someone else. I didn't mention a knife.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 09:59 AM
3

I'm not afraid of them attacking lol. If someone broke into the house, their main defensive strategy would probably be tripping him up in their efforts to make friends. It's against the law here to have your dog off its lead in most public areas, so I just keep them on the lead unless I'm at the beach or something. But this is the UK, so police don't have guns or overreact to stupid stuff. In fact, they often go too far the other way, people can be swearing in their face and they still do nothin…
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 09:39 AM
3

Near the end, after the girls try to shame the men into helping, one of them says something to the effect of "I'm not helping. Welcome to 2018!" lol
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 09:36 AM
2

I've technically been sexually assaulted like 4 times in my life, they just weren't that big of a deal to me that I bring them up.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 09:31 AM
4

Not all dogs can really be trained to do that. Try it with a lhasa apso lol. I mean, they go to bed when I give them a treat, but outside, with impending threats? No chance.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 09:21 AM
1

In the UK, trespassing isn't taken all that seriously. If you're trespassing inside their house and they live there, the police will come and deal with it. If they're trespassing on land that isn't inside your living area, then you have to pursue damages through the civil courts, even if they're literally parked across your driveway or on the driveway.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:56 AM
23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3acZKYrZAO8
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/18 09:41 PM
2

They're not allowed to push or throw someone out of an establishment just because they don't want them there, but doing so in self-defense is a different story
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:29 PM
7

Well, some places serve a particular gender because their hair cuts are typically different, therefore giving a reason to specialise in one or another. He could get away with running a male-only place without any harm.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:06 PM
10

The sad thing about videos like this is that, often, the woman who instigated the violence and then got her ass handed to her asks the guy with the camera if he captured it, intending for it to incriminate the guy who defended himself. Do they not yet realise that the law grants people the right to use reasonable force to defend themselves from anyone, female or not? Whether or not that law is enforced fairly is another thing, but they should at least be aware that they're not literally above th…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:52 PM
4

He was explaining the potential motivations of the judges. He wasn't saying there was an issue with them being girls.
/r/MGTOW25/04/18 01:58 PM
2

There are plenty of things that work if you assume you catch the other person completely off guard. It's finding things that work in a real fight that are trickier. In a real fight, an eye poke does fairly little actual damage (is more to temporarily disrupt them due to pain), and you need to get an open hand with fingers extended past their guard. Not the best idea. If they punch at you at the same time, your fingers are likely broken. If they grab your hand, could be very unpleasant. A fist is…
/r/MGTOW25/04/18 09:08 AM
1

??? Why would you act clueless I already explained that Nobody wants to fight the 6’3 guy with cauliflower ears Same height as me, seems fair enough Just walk away from confrontation the legal repercussions are never worth it tbh fam Not always possible, so why wouldn't you be prepared?
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 03:48 PM
2

I'm about 330, but bulk doesn't increase your skull strength, unfortunately lol. You can get knocked out just as easily as a smaller guy if they respond to you trying to close to grappling distance by clocking you in the face. However, we do have another advantage in enclosed environments in terms of momentum and punching power, e.g.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFsozl4Ai1g
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 11:49 AM
0

You're viewing it one-dimensionally. Social and economic stances are on a different axis. You can be left economically and authoritarian socially, and many modern leftist movements have gone that way, but you can also be leftist and libertarian socially. Similarly, there are the equivalent right-wing movements that try to regulate people's behaviours e.g. religious fundies. A society that prioritises individual freedom above all else would be somewhat leftist economically and libertarian sociall…
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 11:39 AM
0

You realise left refers to a political position, not a political movement, right? Movements have names. Feminism is a movement. If you subscribe to a movement, then you're supporting the specific people and organisations involved in that movement. But if you just want to describe a set of inert ideas and principles that define your political outlook, then "left" is fine. Otherwise, what other term would we use?
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 11:35 AM
5

I believe in abortion, but you need a legit reason beyond "I don't want it" I value individual freedom where possible. That's good enough for me.
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 11:33 AM
2

Climate deniers are basically on the level of flat earthers and creationists. Sad that this sub is infested with so much BS.
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 11:32 AM
1

Apart from the guy who said "yeah, he's not dead". Sounds like a real claim to me.
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 10:49 AM
5

My plan, if someone starts a fight, is to stand in a normal (i.e non-combat) stance with my hands down, like I'm clueless. If they throw a punch, I very quickly block and counter. Because they'll underestimate me greatly, they'll be lazy and probably overly forecast their punch, punch slower than usual, not guard etc. Since it's happening in a closed environment, the idea would be to take them off guard and finish them quickly before they can recover. The only major flaw in this plan is that, if…
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 10:30 AM
4

and it's the big corporations that actually give two shits about diversity Corporation gets big -> suddenly cares about diversity due to PR -> diversity hires -> "studies find that diversity is correlated with success!"
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 09:43 AM
2

Few cucks on that legal advice thread trying to justify it, as usual, but could be worse so far
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 09:41 AM
5

and some white knight pretending to be an enforcer One reason to invest a fair bit of time into combat training of one sort or another. You don't have to be good enough to beat someone who knows what they're doing, just good enough to beat some clueless idiot who isn't expecting you to retaliate.
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 09:30 AM
3

But that's all any human feature is. Not fat, specifically, but we project attraction on to them. It's not like there's such a thing as something being inherently attractive. We create it.
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 08:45 AM
1

I probably need to invest more time into learning computer science topics before I feel comfortable moving up to a higher paid job, then. I came from a physics background so sometimes I've been at a bit of a disadvantage in terms of formal education.
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 07:44 PM
1

I'm a moderately competent C++ developer, with four years experience, but I don't know if I'd be up to American standards lol, seems like they think any decent programmer can write a file system in assembly or something. But, I can make clean, modular code that's reasonably efficient and organised logically in an object-oriented fashion. The standard programmers in my place are all on about $35-40k though. We have an architect probably closer to the max, and maybe team leads are on more like $45…
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 07:32 PM
5

There's also no people allergic to peanuts when there's no peanuts around, by this logic.
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 07:29 PM
3

The genetic part is how badly your body reacts to a western diet. Some people experience inflammation and leptin resistance, some don't. It's like how some people are allergic to peanuts and some aren't.
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 07:28 PM
3

If you actually read the article, all they found was that a high fat diet reduces your sensitivity to the taste of fat. It says nothing about actually being fat. The TL;DR portion: The study saw one in each pair of twins being randomly allocated to a low-fat or hig-fat diet (getting less than 20% or more than 35% of their energy from fat, respectively). Those on the high-fat diet were encouraged to eat more dairy, meat and oil, but each person actually consumed the same number of overall kilojou…
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 07:27 PM
1

Sounds like a magic land of rich people lol. In the UK, even MPs only make $90k. I'm a software developer, and I heard from a supervisor that they literally have a maximum salary cap in the office of $75k, including the manager.
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 07:20 PM
6

I have issues with deciding what to eat, so I made a weekly schedule. I don't always follow it, but it's like a backup if I can't decide on the day.
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 03:32 PM
1

You don't know how Reddit works? It's a site where you read stuff then respond. Kinda like a standard forum but more of a meta-forum.
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 02:33 PM
2

That there's an alternative to a given scenario is not inherently an argument against said scenario. If I ate pasta last night, it doesn't make sense to say "there's no point eating pasta, because you can eat something else", because the same argument works in reverse. Why go to university when you can do a trade? Why do a trade when you can go to university? It doesn't mean anything.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 02:10 PM
1

It's a stupid thing that forces me to go out of my way to do it, and it's not acceptable. That's why it's a crime, duh. It's not the fault of the people who advise you to take those measures. Do you think you're being blamed if someone tells you to park far away from there, or do you think they're helping you compensate for an inconvenient facet of life where some people are criminals?
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:34 AM
3

They give these magical bits of paper that can sometimes convince people to give you money
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:32 AM
2

Needs more video evidence to be really safe, but it's a start
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:31 AM
1

Yeah, I figured it was satire at about number 6, and it was a reflection of general anti-rape advice. Thing is, though, it's actually not terrible advice to avoid being falsely accused. The joke is that it's supposed to make us see how unfair our advice to women is to avoid getting raped, and yet it's actually just common-sense safeguards. Of course, it's insufficient on its own. Walking in a well-lit area doesn't stop someone from accusing you. Walking in a well lit area and somehow having vide…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:31 AM
8

I mean their response is to beat the bullies in the game. Wow, such a savage response. If I'm losing badly, I usually just laugh and either keep plugging at it, or go take a break.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:21 AM
5

He just did... not sure if troll or retarded
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:18 AM
6

Or fisting her anal cavity
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:14 AM
20

And seems to be thinking that most people actually care that much that they're getting killed in a game. Presuming they could actually find "talented female players" among a gang of feminists lol
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:12 AM
1

Most business majors barely make 100k after 20 years if they're lucky Lol I don't even know anyone who makes 100k. Well, I know a doctor, but I think he's got a few years yet before he's approaching that kind of salary, if he ever gets there.
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 10:51 AM
2

So's mine, but we have a corner sofa and even if she's sitting on the other side, if we're both doing our own thing then it's pretty much me-time.
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 10:36 AM
22

Probably worded that way because the article is preparing to try to portray her as being virtuous and justified, and it's setting up the tone
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 10:34 AM
5

Steal his money on him then give it back later
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 10:33 AM
4

MUUUUUUURRRPH
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 10:32 AM
3

Although I wonder if animals which obviously have much faster reactions experience time slower. I mean, look how fast flies react to things. They probably don't have any real sentience, but then a more moderate example would be a mouse. They can sniff something, make a decision, then go do something else before I can barely even register it. They must experience time being slower than for us.
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 10:31 AM
3

men like softness. women like hardness. Are we still talking emotionally?
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 10:29 AM
1

Also told her i need her to go out with her friends like once a week just so i could recharge and get alone time. To be fair, you can do that in the same house if she gives you some peace and quiet.
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 10:29 AM
4

My wife is from Singapore and she literally hasn't turned down sex once in the 5 years I've known her lol, dunno if she was the exception to the rule or not though
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 10:27 AM
12

C++
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 10:26 AM
1

I would go less for "no longer needed" and more on how they're actively toxic and damaging. That's a stronger argument. Your appendix is something that is surplus. Feminism is more like cancer.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:29 PM
2

Not necessarily. It's impossible to even quantify things like that. But even if they didn't actively pursue men's rights too much, if they were really egalitarian, they would at least have egalitarian attitudes towards things, as opposed to being blatantly sexist and anti-male.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:21 PM
3

It's pretty circular logic when they claim to do it for themselves. They do it because it makes them feel good. Ok, but why do they feel good? Because they feel attractive. In other words, the ego boost is obviously for yourself, but you attain it via displaying yourself favourably to others. If the rest of the human race died off, would they keep putting on makeup? I doubt it.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:14 PM
6

I like how all of the sudden, morals go out the window and it becomes all about the bottom line. I wonder if they'd find discrimination ok if studies found places that only hire men are actually more productive. I think they'd suddenly care more about individual rights and less about profitability then. But of course, they have no consistent principles, they grab at whatever straw is available to support their crusade.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:06 PM
4

You've probably never owned a cat. I have one that's more affectionate than most dogs.
/r/MGTOW22/04/18 07:52 PM
3

"Its her life. People fall out of love. She Accidentally fell on another guy's dick". That's true, but I don't see how it changes anything. She made choices, we judged her based on them. Reiterating that they were her choices is pretty irrelevant, like it's supposed to justify them or something.
/r/MGTOW22/04/18 07:50 PM
1

My supplements are to treat my PVCs, generally (premature ventricular contractions, a form of heart palpitation). Without treatment, I get bombarded by thousands of them every day, often several minutes of solid Bigeminy or every 2-3 beats. It's something the doctors are still quite behind the times on and haven't acknowledged officially (although I've been seeing official recognition increasing over the last year), but for many people it's basically a vagus nerve dysfunction. The vagus nerve ru…
/r/MGTOW22/04/18 02:27 PM
5

One minor correction, a psuedo account would be an account that isn't a proper account. Generally if the guy made a full account but was dishonest with his identity, you'd call it a fake account.
/r/MGTOW21/04/18 09:05 AM
3

Sounds hilarious
/r/MGTOW21/04/18 09:00 AM
5

I hear boobs have a large carbon footprint
/r/MGTOW21/04/18 08:56 AM
1

She could save others from sexism, but not herself
/r/MGTOW21/04/18 08:55 AM
3

There are average looking people on TV? Apart from gag jokes, must be pretty rare lol
/r/MGTOW20/04/18 04:48 PM
1

You can shoot someone and they can’t easily get off enough shots to mortally wound you. Either you're agreeing with me, or you meant "can" instead of "can't". In any case, see how long you can last with three guys pumping bullets into you. Your heart will stop almost instantly upon being directly hit multiple times, which gives you about 5 seconds of consciousness. Alternatively, a bullet hits you in the head and you're dead instantly.
/r/MGTOW19/04/18 03:58 PM
51

In order to simultaneously make sense of women being more promiscuous and yet men having to compete for sex, I'd want to see a frequency distribution of promiscuity among men. I'd imagine that hypergamy solves the issue, with a small minority of men being ridiculously promiscuous and most men being less promiscuous than the average woman (i.e. the sluts are all only fucking the same small pool of guys)
/r/MGTOW19/04/18 02:55 PM
3

Can we all just agree that it's no longer the 1920s and both sexes are fully capable of holding doors for everyone? Can't say I've ever came across that kind of issue. You usually just hold a door open so it doesn't swing into their face, nothing to do with gender.
/r/MGTOW19/04/18 01:12 PM
1

If they had guns, they would have just waited for him with their guns out, and then either shoot him dead before he had any chance to react at all, or hold him up, in which case he won't be able to go for his own gun without being shot. If it was 1v1 then maybe the other person would miss enough to give the guy a chance, but several people shooting at you at relatively close range, no chance.
/r/MGTOW19/04/18 09:43 AM
20

He needs to czech his privilege
/r/MGTOW19/04/18 09:20 AM
3

Don't underestimate the moral outrage machine. It's practically a crime to sleep with a woman at the moment. Maybe not criminally, but socially.
/r/MGTOW19/04/18 09:20 AM
9

Given all the moral outrage at the moment, it's possible that he would actually be fired just for sleeping with a girl. That's why I think all guys on these kinds of salaries should be saving 90% of it. If you can go a few years without getting fired, that's when you can basically tell people to go fuck themselves, because the worst case scenario is that you retire in comfort for the rest of your life.
/r/MGTOW19/04/18 09:19 AM
1

And she barely even has tits anymore
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 04:05 PM
1

I think most people have misconceptions about what the friend zone is, though, which often leads to a strawman regards it. Basically, the friendzone isn't rejecting someone but offering friendship, it's rejecting someone because of the friendship. E.g. "I would have a relationship with you, but I wouldn't want it to potentially damage our friendship". In other words, it's this thing women have where "friend" and "romantic partner" are mutually exclusive categories with drastically different trai…
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 03:48 PM
13

organism inducing Assuming this is a typo, but that's actually quite a good play on words to refer to getting pregnant lol
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 03:27 PM
7

Kinda reads like the "wall" in the story is supposed to be symbolic of the actual wall, but hard to even tell lol. It would definitely be symbolic if it was made today, but if it was made before the term "the wall" was ever used, then not sure.
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 02:16 PM
4

There's not always a contradiction between freedom and safety. For example, in the UK you're recommended to hit someone with a rolled-up newspaper if they're trying to assault you, because you're not allowed to carry any weapons at all. Seriously, not even making this up. http://scotcps.org.uk/personal-safety/personal-safety-advice/improvised-weapons/ In that case, freedom helps ensure safety.
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 01:31 PM
8

This accounts for intellectual freedom, but how about countries with physical freedom? E.g. freedom to modify your property freely, camp where you want, fish where you want, etc.
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 01:27 PM
2

A guy walking his dog sees this, walks over, offers to help push. I was in complete shock by the niceness of his gesture. He ties his dog to a tree and pushes. Poor choice - should have tied the dog to the car and had it help. Summon a large enough gang of huskies and they'll take you to work, too.
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 11:58 AM
12

If anything, I see blue collar workers as being more important than me, or at the very least more deserving of respect in most senses. I mean, they work harder than me, get tangible, physical results, form the backbone of society, driving its most fundamental functions, and yet get paid less than I do for hitting a keyboard all day. I won't say our capabilities or skills are the same (which goes both ways - I'm not a practical person), but I certainly respect them.
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 11:27 AM
5

Actually, the moon is bigger than Pluto.
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 11:20 AM
2

What does she mean by "square one"? If she's saying that she never made any kind of progress in life during their marriage, that's her fault.
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 11:19 AM
7

Family courts aren't that rigid, usually the judge has a huge degree of flexibility with regards how they interpret the situation, what evidence they can take heed of or dismiss etc. For example, if the mother hit the father and then he pushed her away, a reasonable judge could say mother is violent, father did nothing wrong - custody to father. An unreasonable judge could say that the mother didn't pose a credible threat and therefore the father basically assaulted her, so custody to the mother…
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 11:12 AM
5

It's fine when they target men and their families, though
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 11:06 AM
2

You don't even need to have had bad experiences to realise the legal structures are currently designed to hurt you and give women power over your life. Even if every woman was an angel who never exercised that power, it'd still be justified to opt out of the system on principle.
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 11:03 AM
1

Depends on how expensive the good is. $5 on a $10 product is a pretty big deal lol. I'd probably drive and bulk buy the cheaper one if it's reasonably close, but not an hour.
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 11:00 AM
5

I was kinda screwed by going to an all-boys school. The others still managed to mingle with other girls at external parties, but you really had to be in the top 20% socially to have that kind of access.
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 04:45 PM
1

What country are you talking about? The US seems to have much larger houses than the UK, so here a thousand square foot is basically a full sized family home lol. Anything with a decent garden or a garage is a bit pricey, though. I'm able to find viable houses that aren't e.g. in a violent council estate from about £80k or so, but nice garden and decent neighborhood ones start about £115k or so.
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 04:33 PM
1

I'm coming up to a similar scenario where my rental contract expires in August, and I want to buy a house around that time, but it seems pretty challenging to time it right unless they'll put me onto a monthly rolling contract. But if I request that, then they know I want to leave soon, so they may prefer to just cancel it all together and bring in someone else.
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 04:12 PM
6

If you yourself were awkward, not great looking and only started on your path to social and economic position - you received zero to minuscule attention - with accordance to your qualities. Well, I wouldn't rule out a woman for being shy or awkward. It has nothing to with how good a person they are, how loyal they are, how interesting they are etc. Confidence is the most superficial and irrelevant of personality traits, so of course women demand it lol
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 04:00 PM
1

First result if you search for "man arrested push woman car road rage": http://boston.cbslocal.com/2018/02/20/ricardo-montanez-road-rage-nashua-new-hampshire-video-arrested/
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 03:04 PM
26

It's worth searching for "when men hit back", much lols to be had
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 12:05 PM
8

Hopefully it's liked because it's amusing/ridiculous as opposed to people thinking there's some sort of valid statement within it
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 10:27 AM
1

r/iamverysmart
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 10:11 AM
1

I made a typo actually, I meant might not just be the lack of being horny lol
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 10:11 AM
4

Might just be the lack of being horny, though. You also effectively release mild sedatives straight afterwards, which alters the conscious experience further.
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 09:39 AM
0

If you're incapable of forming an argument, then stop wasting people's time lol
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 09:24 AM
1

K, so why is that confusing? All means all i.e. no exceptions. Given sometimes it's used with artistic license, which is usually clear by the context.
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 09:21 AM
1

Why would it?
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 09:20 AM
1

"All" is commonly understood to mean 100%, though. If you just say "women" then I understand it to mean speaking about the group in general, but "all" is more specific.
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 09:15 AM
2

British immigration system makes it impossible for her to move here otherwise
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 11:03 PM
2

That's the thing, sometimes it just is a convenient form of payment. Is that something to do with the US not widely using chip and pin or contactless debit cards very widely? Here, you just scan your card and the money's out of your account instantly. Although credit card does seem to have slightly more rigorous protections.
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 09:55 PM
13

I would have thought this was ridiculous, but I have a girl on my fb friends list that I met on a dating site when she was about 22 or 23, and now she's like 28 and the wall has already smacked her full-on, I was stunned.
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 09:07 PM
0

I married because she was from Singapore, so it was the only way to be together
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 09:05 PM
9

What if you don't use a credit card because it's just another form of unnecessary debt? (unless you're doing it purposefully to enhance credit score) Other than that, I'd answer yes to all those things.
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 09:00 PM
1

Everyone that disagrees with you is an irrelevant rambling apparently. And yet I've only said that you are. Funny how that works, eh? And what's an "irrelevant rambling"? You know the difference between a verb and a noun, right? Is English a second language, or are you just illiterate?
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 02:34 PM
3

Well your ad hominem is impressively convincing...
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 02:14 PM
4

You right away took her side Can you explain in what way I took her side? This isn't the fairness or equality sub So you admit to not being fair? Bold, but I appreciate your honesty lol If he was always spending time on his games, you can believe any and every female would bring that up first, she didn't. Speculative. The point of my post was that I don't want to draw conclusions based on speculation; I'd rather act on what I actually know to be true. She told him he was wasting his life with hi…
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 02:11 PM
4

Again, these are irrelevant ramblings. What has any of this to do with what I said? Are you implying that I said he should be forced to stick with her or something? At least formulate an argument that can be responded to instead of making random assertions.
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 02:05 PM
2

May need to be careful about the storage garage. In the UK, you'd probably need planning permission (which means effectively impossible to get) if you want to live in it. It's like every facet of your life is closely controlled by the state, here.
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 01:51 PM
7

If white knighting is being fair, then you've just validated it luls. You obviously don't even understand what it is. White knighting is when the woman does something wrong, but you defend her anyway, due to a double standard. Here, due to a lack of information, I am merely not choosing to take a side. So it fails to be white knighting for two simultaneous reasons: I'm not defending her, I'm being neutral And there isn't enough information to establish that she was unreasonable
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 01:36 PM
5

If he wanted to spend 90% of his life on video games, he should have the right to And where did I say he doesn't? I said she's reasonable to ask for more time, not that she's reasonable to demand it. And you seem to agree with me when you say that she should find another guy if this guy doesn't spend enough time with her, so what are you even saying? If the guy spends 90% of his spare time not engaging with his relationship, and the girl wants more, then she's reasonable to ask for it, and then …
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 12:30 PM
2

I thought MGTOW is about avoiding problems. Doing something to try to counter them sounds more like Men's Rights.
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 10:36 AM
1

Makes more sense when you read it like "nor give thy ways to that which destroyeth kings", which is what it means in context of the run-on sentence. It's a bit like saying "spend your time", your "ways" is how you conduct yourself, how you act etc. So, essentially, don't spend your time on that which destroys kings (the implication here being women). Not very well worded, since it mentions women and then refers to them again as "that which destroyeth kings" after effectively an "or", which would…
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 10:33 AM
4

And destroy his joints by going straight into high-impact exercise whilst unconditioned and overweight? Brilliant. Swimming and walking with some weight lifting would be far better to start off with.
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 10:24 AM
16

When both partners work toward each other's happiness Welp, I'm screwed. My wife has an irrational disgust of "dirty" things, so I occasionally throw my sock at her for lols
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 10:22 AM
61

Interesting how it demonstrates how drastically mate valuations have changed. She seemed to be implying that OPs values would have been in demand in her day, to the point of the girl potentially being in a lower league than him, and yet typically such traits are seen as low-status now, with the girl preferring thugs instead.
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 10:20 AM
2

Why is this being made into a left vs right thing, again? Gamers seem to be fairly equally distributed along the political spectrum: http://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Essential-Facts-About-Gamer-Politics.pdf And we know some of the biggest names in gamergate were left wing.
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 10:16 AM
4

To be fair, we don't know from this picture just how much time he was spending on games versus time with her. If she wanted undivided attention, then his response is perfectly reasonable. If he was spending 90% of his spare time on the game, then it's reasonable for her to ask for more time, because that's basically the point of a relationship.
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 10:11 AM
1

How strong is it?
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 10:08 AM
5

Yeah, but for good, or for bad? I've known some people who actually did better after using it because they were more content to sit down and study stuff lol
/r/MGTOW15/04/18 09:14 PM
3

I guess by that logic, if I start a business and hire a secretary, she should get 50% of the business' profit from then on lol
/r/MGTOW15/04/18 09:11 PM
3

Not entirely. Wage to house ratios aren't constant.
/r/MGTOW15/04/18 09:08 PM
5

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=av52YEACkFg
/r/MGTOW15/04/18 12:45 PM
1

Some major strawmen and moving the goalposts there. Address what I actually said if you want me to take you seriously.
/r/MGTOW14/04/18 01:52 PM
1

That's like saying heroin addicts have fewer rights than other people because only they want to shoot the prohibited drug, so only they are affected by its prohibition. Nope, that's not what rights are. The extent to which a right or lack thereof impacts you does not determine whether or not the right is present.
/r/MGTOW13/04/18 09:00 PM
1

Yep, you just seemed to be implying that they had fewer rights before, and now have equal rights, by saying that their marriages weren't previously recognised, as though whether or not a marriage would be recognised depended on the sexuality of the person themselves: But at least in this country, all that's happened is they can now have their marriages recognised by the state
/r/MGTOW13/04/18 02:48 PM
1

Men have penis and muscle so we can protect or destroy You mean you can destroy things with your penis like Godzilla swinging his tail?
/r/MGTOW13/04/18 10:12 AM
1

I've never really gotten the appeal, even though I like fluffy animals.
/r/MGTOW13/04/18 10:12 AM
2

"Premature teens" If you're going to act conceited, at least learn your native language to the extent that you can distinguish between "premature" and "immature".
/r/MGTOW13/04/18 10:07 AM
3

They're more like categories. Is it impressive that I'm simultaneously a human, an ape, a mammal, and a vertebrate?
/r/MGTOW13/04/18 09:41 AM
8

Nothing against gays, but technically you contradicted yourself here. Gays always had the same rights as others. A gay man was allowed to marry a woman, a straight man was allowed to marry a woman. Neither could have married another man. The issue was that the existing rights didn't suit them, so they needed new rights that would take into account their particular needs. Of course, it was kinda moronic putting that much effort into obtaining gay marriage when marriage is so messed up lol. Then a…
/r/MGTOW13/04/18 09:33 AM
2

At least it looks like she's starting to develop some tits now that she's gained a little weight
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 03:54 PM
0

and is hamstering and that post is written to show her at the best of light and her husband as the worst. Could be, but I wouldn't expect anyone to take me seriously if I stated such a strong opinion that's based purely on speculation and assumptions, so I'd keep it to myself. No point presenting such a weak position for others to tear down.
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 01:52 PM
3

You probably weren't 25-29 if it was only 2 years
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 01:45 PM
2

In that case, it would be grounds to disregard the claim of being a doctor, not to ignore the entire comment.
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 01:25 PM
7

Didn't give her a ring, since it would be a waste of money
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 01:20 PM
-2

She said she only works one hour less than him a day, which I guess wouldn't make up for what sounds like doing all the other stuff. If you take her words at face value, it does sound like the guy is a bit of a dick. I don't really see how it's generating this level of controversy here. Guy is a dick, woman is complaining about it. I mean, she was stupid to have kids in the first place if anything lol, but I don't see her as being unreasonable here.
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 01:18 PM
3

Yeah, only mentioned it because I doubt I'll be able to actually publish it in the end with so many legal/bureaucratic barriers
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 12:03 PM
4

Just an amusing anecdote, but one time I went to a chess club. I play chess maybe once a year, and know practically zero strategies, but figured I'd give it a go. First time there, I play a girl. I have a slight advantage for most of the game, but make a slip-up and lose eventually. Afterwards, the girl tells me I was doing better than her early game, and that she used to play as part of the national team. I wouldn't even say I'm good at chess, so I don't know exactly what to take away.
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 11:51 AM
13

Speaking of cooking, I'm working on an app where you basically tell it what ingredients you have lying around (I think it'll have to have an option to save the sorts of ingredients that don't change too often, so you can quickly reload them - flour, seasonings etc), and it tells you all the different recipes you can make, with a percentage rating of compatibility if you don't have all the ingredients. Then you can filter by food requirements, prioritise cheap foods, different cuisine types etc. …
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 11:34 AM
3

He could probably even reasonably get away with saying that women are better on average as a matter of opinion, but 10x? That's obvious trolling
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 11:29 AM
5

I think that's fairly normal, the perfectly round ones usually use the little round mold thing. You can get them fairly round by making the batter thicker though, means after you put the blob in that it starts to congeal before it runs too far.
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 11:28 AM
1

Even a health question, where someone prefaces their comment with how they're a doctor?
/r/MGTOW12/04/18 11:25 AM
1

I live in N.Ireland, and we're the only UK region that really had a massive house price spike right before the recession (practically doubled in 5 years before it), and the house prices are still way down relative to the peak (49%), so if I can buy this year, it'll be the perfect time, but it's getting quite urgent because I think they're going to spike again quite badly soon. Need to save my deposit fast lol. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTqFNUoy_3Zg9jtEgF2ZwVGJLqyGsCKEh…
/r/MGTOW11/04/18 04:20 PM
3

Plus, if you're not progressing in life in some way or another, it feels like you're wasting your time. Saving money is one way to measure progress. In my case, saving for a house. Then it'll be paying it off. Then I have the security and reduced bills to really enjoy it (after developing a safety buffer, of course, and depending on the job market etc)
/r/MGTOW11/04/18 04:13 PM
2

or those cut out letters spelling out "love" or "home" or some shit. I have one that says "this house runs on love and hot coffee", but I scored out the love part to make it more mgtow
/r/MGTOW11/04/18 07:13 AM
1

She tells me that she talked to a "friend" who said that she can list me as the custodial parent, but enroll our son in this other district without telling the courts. If all this depends on the courts not finding out, that's a bit of a flaw in the plan after she's just told you, isn't it?
/r/MGTOW10/04/18 08:54 PM
1

I have an app idea, and I've made apps before, so I can probably manage the technical side, but I suck at any kind of artistic design lol
/r/MGTOW10/04/18 08:44 PM
1

I've never been into Skyrim or FF either, but I like games with a novel premise or surreal atmosphere. My favourite games recently have been The Long Dark, Subnautica, They Are Billions, and 7 Days to Die. 7D2D I have a kind of love-hate relationship with. It could very well be the most flexible game ever, and has massive potential, but the execution isn't always great. The Long Dark is the opposite - it could do with more content/things to do, but the stuff it has is very well implemented.
/r/MGTOW10/04/18 07:35 PM
4

The general pattern is ignore video games -> try to use them to get attention -> criticise them -> demand they change to suit you -> try to abolish them
/r/MGTOW10/04/18 04:46 PM
3

Am I the only one you can't face playing mainstream shooters anymore? I even thought that I would like one again if I just tried it, so I got fallout 4, but then got bored in a couple of days. It's just that, no matter how you dress it up, they boil down to walking around and shooting stuff. There's nothing fundamentally interesting or different about them. I do like the mechanics of some recent indie games, but then I wish I could have played the same thing that had a decent budget attached to …
/r/MGTOW10/04/18 04:44 PM
2

I'd pay a bit extra for something that actually warranted it. For example, a bed frame made of thick oak, so it's sturdy. Or a chair that's extra comfortable. But there's a lot of stuff vastly overpriced for no reason other than it's supposed to be trendy or something, which makes no sense. By the way, if you're using memory foam in your bed setup, you may want to try alternatives unless you explicitly like it. But most people find they don't. It basically works via a bunch of air bubbles, so pr…
/r/MGTOW10/04/18 01:35 PM
2

I kinda wish my house was well decorated, but I'm absolutely terrible at those sorts of things.
/r/MGTOW10/04/18 01:30 PM
1

UK. Except for Scotland. It's wild camping that's illegal, i.e. anything that isn't a proper campsite. And most of the proper campsites don't even let you build a fire.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 07:03 PM
17

I personally work full time, but in a fairly low-stress job (most of the time), so it's not so bad, and reasonable wage. Don't have to talk to customers, generally just left alone all day to work on the projects.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 04:08 PM
4

If this sub gets brigaded by feminists, it's not nearly as bad as on the mensrights sub. Any topic that has more than a few hundred upvotes there inevitably has any anti-feminist stuff downvoted to hell by the feminist brigade, whereas it usually gets upvoted.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 03:33 PM
5

IT crowd reference? https://youtu.be/NuPolrd9yuo?t=84
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 03:26 PM
3

That's a nice theory, but you haven't demonstrated any actual measurable effects on human health or performance, only made assumptions. Also: The increased energy you experience is again your bodies fight or flight response. The energising effect of coffee isn't due to adrenaline release (which largely doesn't happen when you've built a tolerance anyway). It's due to blocking adenosine. When it comes to real evidence, we've found coffee drinkers: have up to a 65% reduced chance of developing Alz…
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 10:09 AM
1

One time one was imitating a feminist about how they're just trying to allow men to share their feelings easier, then drank from a "male tears" mug. That was good.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 09:48 AM
3

A surprisingly witty and insightful last statement, I'm gonna save that for later lol.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 09:45 AM
2

1.) I do have access to Sat. TV at home. What do I watch? Leave it on some New Age/Ambient music channel for background. Then you may as well stream it from the internet instead, and save money 3.) Take public transportation if you have the time and/or it's at least safe. Get yourself off the road because it's rush-hour all the time now. Stop and go and everyone packed in the rat race boxes will drive anyone batty. Luckily my work lets me work from 10am, and the roads are mostly clear after 9, s…
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 09:23 AM
2

On the internet, yes. In real life, not really.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 09:09 AM
18

You were both wrong, then. You didn't give proof, you gave an anecdote.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 04:54 PM
2

At one point I wanted to do psychology, because I was ignorant of the whole environment surrounding the subject etc. At the time, I figured it would just be about learning about human cognition, and that it would all be quite scientifically rigorous, almost like a less involved neuroscience type thing. Then I realised, in reality, it's only a couple of steps away from gender studies.
/r/MGTOW08/04/18 04:29 PM
2

Main issue is that current governments don't respect scientific research a great deal, so research funding is limited and constantly needs justified, which is stressful, and competition is fierce, along with mediocre pay for what are some of the most challenging jobs around in terms of educational requirements etc. It's just not worth it for most people when they could just walk into an industry job or something.
/r/MGTOW08/04/18 04:27 PM
10

There are some relevant fields math majors can go directly into, but it's not great, relative to the difficulty of the course. Generally, a more practical course is more employable. I know, because I did Physics, which is similar in that it's a little removed from most practical applications, but e.g. I know a guy who got a programming job just with a Physics PhD, the logic being if you can do physics, you can pick up programming easily enough. My scenario is similar but slightly different - did…
/r/MGTOW08/04/18 04:24 PM
0

Their*
/r/MGTOW08/04/18 04:19 PM
16

Oh and they were all single mothers complain that men were cowards for not wanting to date them. Why would I want to enter a relationship that requires bravery to endure? That doesn't sound like a pleasant scenario.
/r/MGTOW08/04/18 04:17 PM
4

Slightly unrelated, but it drove it home to me how cucked the UK is today, when I read this: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/what-you-can-someone-parks-10224302 Basically, if someone is literally parked in your driveway or blocking your entrance, it's not a police matter, and you have no real power to do anything about it without going to civil courts (which will take a while, and cost you money). Imagine if you came home one day and someone was sitting on your sofa, and the police said it…
/r/MGTOW08/04/18 04:14 PM
6

Also the betas won't keep serving her if they don't think they have a chance
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 08:14 PM
12

But apparently what she does with what is exclusively her property is something he is liable for. Funny how that works, eh?
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 08:09 PM
-1

I got a virgin. Only downside is that it took a few weeks to get it in. Dunno if it was a hymen thing or she just needed to stretch it out a bit first, but I'm pretty sure no one could have been there before me lol
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 07:41 AM
1

No... the whole point of what I said is that the ratio of brain size to body size is much more important than absolute size, and now you're still talking about absolute size. You're also not measuring amygdala size, you're measuring height. You'd have to have a very tight and well-evidenced correlation between height and amygdala size established before you can do that. And if you were going to try to point out absolute amygdala size as the defining factor in their emotional states (as opposed t…
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 08:09 PM
1

Woosh
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 07:48 PM
1

Is SLI stable these days? Last I heard it had microstuttering and some compatibility issues I got my system in 2015 then upgraded the GPU about a year ago. 4790k at 4.5 ghz, 16gigs RAM, 980gtx. I find air cooling is fine for it.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 06:31 PM
1

I saw it a few years ago and it stuck with me, but I haven't been able to find it since, unfortunately.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 05:29 PM
1

Absolute brain size isn't a very good indicator of much. Otherwise, whales would be far smarter than us. Encephalization quotient is a better indicator. In part, it's about accounting for physical size differences (larger body requires larger brain to innervate muscles, for example, without contributing to cognition), but not quite that simple.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 03:34 PM
1

Uh, not really. Primarily because women can't tell just by looking at me, and because strangers don't randomly talk to each other that often, and I don't meet new people in a meaningful context that often, male or female, in the sense of having a real conversation.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 03:29 PM
1

So long as you have avoided harm, it's done its job
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 03:25 PM
1

Why are you assuming they're not doing it? Do you think living a lifestyle and discussing the lifestyle are mutually exclusive things? Maybe if it's a very active one or something, but if anything, going your own way just gives you even more free time than before, so why would it make it difficult to browse reddit? This whole thread makes zero sense lol
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 03:24 PM
1

Is he saying they're both in the military? I mean, if he's trying to argue that they're both military because they share the emotional burden or something, that would be some extreme cuckoldry.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 02:12 PM
1

I was going to read the article, but if it's full of quotes like those, I don't think I'll be able to make it through the cringe
/r/MensRights06/04/18 01:17 PM
2

I guess reality catches up to them when they realise the logistics of trying to equalise pay across demographics that choose different working conditions is nonsensical.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 12:34 PM
3

The frustrating thing is that even incredibly minor inconveniences are blown up to such extents. It's baffling.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 12:30 PM
1

We were responding to the recommendation to take steroids. I'm planning to get back into weight lifting once I buy my new house (not enough room in the current one for a bench and stuff), and I treat my lower back issue, which is a mixture of an old injury and having an office job. I think an hour of walking per day should do wonders, once the weather turns slightly better. There is a very wide response to exercise. Some people literally gain no muscle at all - researchers find that exercise ind…
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 12:00 PM
1

If a man wrote this article, it would just end up on r/iamverysmart and no one would take it seriously
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 11:57 AM
4

And then have widespread media coverage talk about it like his sexuality is revered and sacred lol. You'd think society literally worships female sexuality, sometimes.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 11:26 AM
28

It's both. There have been studies, e.g. one study had a guy play a nice guy and his badboy twin (the women thought it was twins), and each in turn talked to women. With the nice guy, the women used different, non-sexual language, such as slipping the "boyfriend bomb" into things, with the badboy they signalled much greater sexual availability. They then rated the badboy as more attractive, afterwards.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 11:24 AM
1

there are tons of SMV girls 1-6 range that would love to fuck a Chad but never will. they'd pay for it if it was there. but there just really are NOT many man whores. Well, it's much harder to be a viable man whore. A girl just needs to have decent natural looks and not be too fat (although there are fat escorts here, for that niche.) There's an escort site here (escorts post their pics, bios, rates, and people review them etc), and the only male ones I've seen are all good looking, muscular, an…
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 11:18 AM
1

Yeah, that's why I say that it might not be worth trying a LTR, because it can be hard to tell if the girl is really trustworthy. These are theoreticals, providing that requirement has been fulfilled.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 11:09 AM
0

With regards the pregnant thing, if you can sure the girl is on the same page as you, it's not a big deal. My wife wants kids even less than me, if possible. She doesn't even want a pet, because it's responsibility and threatens her freedom, never-mind a kid. So, so long as this is the case, she makes sure she takes a pregnancy test every month or so. In the unlikely event pregnancy happens (pull-out method is actually almost as effective as a condom, you'd be surprised), we caught it in the ver…
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 11:05 AM
0

Yeah, UK here too, and I basically failed at online dating for years before getting anything. Well, I did get one crazy land-whale from online dating lol, and I don't mind bigger girls, but the crazy came out in the end and destroyed the relationship. I met my wife on an MBTI forum. She lived in Singapore. All told, I was extremely lucky to meet a decent girl in a place like that, that was interested in me in return, and willing to move. So, probably not too useful in terms of getting a girl, bu…
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 10:57 AM
1

Well, here's my experience/opinion. I'm married, and I find that having someone around, even as a kind of background noise, does kinda make life feel "filled in", so to say. I can feel a bit listless on my own, like I'm just trying to waste time on nothing. Note that you don't need to be married for this. A LTR is the same thing, but less risky. I needed to get married for immigration reasons, but most guys have no need at all. On the other hand, the stuff here about the potential for LTR/marria…
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 10:38 AM
2

And steroids aren't legal, it's the derivatives that are, like Epistane. Problem is that they stress the liver and stuff. I took it for about a month, got really bad back pumps towards the end. Taurine helped, but we don't even know what actually causes the back pumps. For all we know, it's your kidneys dying lol. Doesn't feel healthy. I did find basically no changes to strength in the first three weeks, then suddenly the bar got about 10kg lighter in the 4th week.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 10:32 AM
1

I don't know how people really move to these places, the visa requirements never really seem easy to fulfill. There's a youtube channel of an expat living in Thailand, and he has to cross over into this really sketchy part of Cambodia periodically, for visa purposes, and basically bribe the officials or else they'll screw him over. Sounds stressful.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 10:28 AM
1

I guess it's a matter of self-awareness, in the sense of knowing ahead of time at which point you have enough to be content. To know that the next step is really the end-goal, and that you won't get there and just want more. Personally, my end goal is to have a relatively decent house paid off, and just be living a relaxed lifestyle. But I have a feeling the step up from that would be to move to somewhere nearer nature, which would be expensive.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 10:26 AM
2

Same here. Married, but if she ever tries to control me, I'll make it clear where I stand. Provided my actions don't negatively impact us (you need to take some responsibility for the "team" you're part of), my attitude is that I do what I wish.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 10:14 AM
1

It's not worth spending that much on a tower, though. Diminishing returns are pretty severe at that stage. Some people pay twice the price for the GPU for a 10% FPS increase, for example. The fancy G-SYNC monitors are tempting, though.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 10:11 AM
2

I wonder if you can use these in the UK. Would probably need a decent garden, though. I have a small patch of concrete lol. The joys of renting.
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 10:09 AM
1

If I didn't have much leg room and had to keep my legs together, I might be tempted to do this just so I don't have to constantly exert effort to keep them together.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 04:36 PM
5

I think the Audis look far more refined. Not that I would buy one unless I was actually rich, since they're not even more reliable than most cars, so it would be purely to flush money away for some enjoyment.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 04:05 PM
1

Well, not what would generally be considered a desirable location. Northern Ireland, specifically North Down, which is our nicest area. Even cheaper elsewhere. But it's nice enough. Live in a large-sized town - small enough that there's space to easily drive around and park, large enough to have all the important amenities.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 03:35 PM
6

Yeah, I don't even have a TV to avoid the license, and I cancelled landline wifi and just tether from my phone (unlimited data on Three for £20 a month, nice deal). I'm generally all about streamlining bills, rather than getting into a load of messy financial obligations. Still applied to lease a new car (Skoda Octavia, so not BMW-fancy), because my used cars are just too much trouble for what they're worth. Have to accelerate really gently just with the current one because the clutch is startin…
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 03:32 PM
1

Maybe that's not much in London or something, but I can get a mortgage on a 3 bed house for about £320 a month, here. £38k is loads, I'd be saving £1500 a month. I'd have the first house paid off within 5 years, get another one, and start a rental empire.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 03:28 PM
6

I would imagine a sane court would interpret this as basically withholding it to the point of physical neglect, but surely free reign to spend everything in your account isn't necessary?
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 03:21 PM
2

If I ever earn enough to hit the 40% tax bracket, I'll be happy enough lol
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 03:20 PM
9

Are BMWs still considered some sign of prestige, anyway? I see them constantly, one of the most popular brands round here. The other day I pulled into the car park, 6 cars parked in a row in front of me, 4 were BMWs. It's like everyone's got one now.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 03:06 PM
0

You don't think 20 minutes drive from your neighbours is secluded? Obviously there's secluded areas that are still close enough to be safe. Only problem in the UK is that only rich people can afford to live in them.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 03:05 PM
0

This is the UK lol. There's no wilderness areas more than 20 minutes away from civilisation.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 02:54 PM
4

What's a big of dicks? You're saying you like big dicks?
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 02:41 PM
2

Yeah, I'm waiting for my LISA to pay dividends in July (it's a savings account where the government gives you a 25% bonus on what you've saved that year, up to £1000 per year, to be used towards a house deposit), then I'm looking at buying. My initial instinct would be to buy a very cheap place and pay it off in 5 years, then live a mortgage-free lifetstyle. But on the other hand, people argue that buying a more expensive place will pay dividends down the road in terms of built up equity. I gues…
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 02:32 PM
1

I don't think that kind of thing is really possible here, there just isn't that kind of money in the country for standard jobs. I mean, senior doctors can make up to $150k, but the median wage is about $30k, and all the software dev jobs are around $35-$40k for even mid-level experience. On reddit, American software devs talk about making $70k+ straight out of college, which is just unthinkable here. The most senior manager in my office is barely making that.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 02:29 PM
3

But yeah after your survival costs you only have around 700 pounds left over, so you're forced to be a lifelong slave What kind of money do you think is necessary to not be a slave, then? My friends and family basically think I'm rich because I save 700 a month. Constantly loaning them money because they usually can barely even make ends meet lol. 700 savings a month is enough to buy a new fancy appliance like a high-end fridge every month, if I wanted to. Or save for a couple of months and get …
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 02:19 PM
11

Also, universal healthcare works out much cheaper for the average person in terms of taxes compared to private health insurance.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 02:09 PM
3

Well, here the tax free allowance is about $16.6k, which is round about what someone on minimum wage, full time earns, so they effectively don't get taxed, which is nice enough. I make about £2200 a month gross, and get about £1770 home (more like £1650 after student loan repayments and pension lol), which I think is fairly reasonable. I spend about £900 a month on essentials, and save the rest.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 02:07 PM
4

Well, I wasn't referring to taxes. I meant who can afford to live in the more rural areas. But yeah, if you're rich, you can have some lawyer find tax loopholes and havens.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 01:58 PM
6

Would it not make sense to remove all of her access to your bank account if she was that destructive with it?
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 01:55 PM
10

I earn slightly less than $40k and I can afford to lease a brand new car and still save about $800 a month. Dunno why Americans have such inflated ideas of what wages are necessary lol. You only need to spend about $15k a year to live, and the rest is extra.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 01:54 PM
4

And jobs aren't exactly easy to come by, depending on what sector you're going for. I failed to get a crappy minimum wage job for 2 years, then finished my software dev degree and was offered a job for almost every place I applied to.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 01:52 PM
4

It's like the guy has never heard of cellphones to be able to call for help lol
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 01:49 PM
10

Sounds simple, but the reality is basically impossible where I live. In the UK, the country isn't for poor people - it's for rich people. Somewhere secluded is expensive, fishing and kayaking is all regulated and you probably need a lawyer just to do it lol. Not that it's usually warm enough to even be worth going outside. I'd like somewhere with proper seasons - snowy winters, warm summers. Can't even have a fire in your house here because of rules.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 01:48 PM
11

In the UK, on a wage of £35k/$50k, the mortgage lenders would only give you around £110-130k for a house, so good luck to her trying to get the guy nearly triple that lol
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 01:41 PM
1

You can't kill someone just in case they might be up to something, no.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 09:39 PM
5

"Mother-of-one said she used the website to meet men who aren't 'nobodies'" What, like her? Talk about hypergamy
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 04:37 PM
5

The sub name is also confusing. It's not clear if it's a pro-female sub that trolls elsewhere, or a sub dedicated to trolling twoxchromosomes.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 04:34 PM
40

Ever see that clip of a bunch of black students arguing that western science is colonialist or something and that they should be learning African black magic instead, because the two are just equivalent cultural perspectives on science or something?
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 04:20 PM
1

I had a full sized one for a while. It's fine if you can just keep it in your bed or something, but if you need to take it out each day, you better be an amateur power lifter lol. Takes quite a bit of energy out of you, more than the weight implies. I could deadlift more than three times its weight, but still struggled a bit due to bad ergonomics.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 03:54 PM
5

its unhealthy and you're going to die I think you're overestimating how unhealthy obesity actually is lol. Generally, in the BMI range of 40-45 (which is probably more obese than most of the girls in this article), the life expectancy is reduced by 6.5 years. It's a noticeable reduction, but they can still expect to live to their mid 70s or so. There's a kind of emotive rhetoric going round where people think fat people all keel over dead by 40 or so lol.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 03:50 PM
15

There's anti-feminist comics on twitter? That might be a good enough reason for me to finally join up. Well, until they banned them.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 03:40 PM
4

It is a disorder, but there's a lot of ignorance going around with regard the causes, where popular opinion is that it's a willpower or character flaw. Current research suggests that western diets cause inflammation at the base of the hypothalamus, which reduces its ability to bind with leptin, which is the core issue. Leptin resistance leads the body to think it's starving inappropriately.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 03:29 PM
5

I gave a few hundred to a girl who was on the brink of homelessness, but at least she seemed appreciative and was trying to get back on her feet lol. And she was the daughter of a proper friend.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 03:10 PM
1

I think the fact that the article implies he died of a single stab wound will exonerate him. Also, he was cornered in the kitchen. He basically used whatever was around him at the time as a defensive weapon - not premeditated, and he only struck once - not excessive.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 02:49 PM
2

Fair enough, history isn't really my thing
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 02:31 PM
22

I think people are overreacting. In any deadly force case, it makes sense to arrest so that investigations can be carried out. If he's actually charged with something, despite finding he acted in self-defense, that's when it becomes ridiculous. But, on principle, after something like this happens, you need to at least investigate the incident, because without any additional information, a homeowner could shoot a burglar in the back as they're running off, which is revenge, and is punishable.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 01:11 PM
6

It's lazy thinking. Assess a scenario by the traits of the actual scenario, not by an assumption that the majority are correct.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 12:07 PM
1

Even then, it means it's not clear which gender they are - it doesn't constitute a new gender. That would require their phenotype to constitute a new reproductive role.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 12:05 PM
29

when the accusations are found to be false, the accused are punished anyway FTFY
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 11:58 AM
25

A couple of teeth? I might not have the same emotional attachment to a fish compared to a cat or dog, but someone who kills a pet of mine will be lucky to be breathing after I'm done.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 09:46 AM
1

To be fair, if you had a car in 1927, you were rich enough to be picky lol
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 09:44 AM
3

I was raised by a single mother. Actually, most of my family have spent most of their lives going from one retarded decision to the next. They've mostly balanced out and fixed the worst of the damage over the last 5 years, but I think I'm supposed to be the golden child or something just because I used my brain where appropriate lol. Although my mum has always been very hardworking and sensible (other than picking my father, apparently), so she wasn't a bad role model. I'm still practically usel…
/r/MGTOW03/04/18 11:07 PM
3

I've noticed that even some MGTOW guys make a point to say they had a lot of women or never had trouble getting women, as if they still hold on to that as a badge of honor or self-worth. Fuck that. I always thought it was to pre-empt the usual "virgin" accusations
/r/MGTOW03/04/18 08:04 PM
4

He can always pump n dump if he plays his cards right. Avoid giving his name, for one thing. Hard for them to weaponise the law against you then.
/r/MGTOW03/04/18 08:00 PM
25

I watched TBBT when it first came out. It went from being about smart but slightly socially awkward guys interacting with an airhead (or at least normal socially but below average academically) Penny, to a show of idiot men being constantly shown up by vastly superior, street-smart women.
/r/MGTOW03/04/18 04:52 PM
1

There's two of us, which doesn't help. But consider a standard curry. Chopping board and knife to prepare all the ingredients. Cooking pot to make the main curry. Wooden spoon/spatula to stir it. Separate pot to make rice in. I used to use a colander to drain rice, but now I have a rice cooker I don't need it. Cup to measure out rice and water. Usually gets rice stuck to it - kinda stubborn. Two bowls. Two sets of cutlery, two cups for drinks. Ladle for serving things. If you make tea/coffee, th…
/r/MGTOW03/04/18 04:34 PM
10

Men were more loyal friends, but my boyfriends would always say: That’s because they want to get laid. So I’d think: Women dump on me. Men just want to have sex with me. Who am I? My closest friend was a gay man, he wasn’t jealous and he didn’t want to get laid. That might have been my only pure friendship. I don't think she understands the male psyche. Oftentimes, when you're attracted to a woman, you want to be her friend not as a calculated ploy to have sex, but because we're designed to feel…
/r/MGTOW03/04/18 04:30 PM
1

If there's two of you, then a standard dinner often produces: Main cooking pot (or saute pan or whatever) Rice cooker pot Two bowls 2 cups (if not at dinner, then at least 2-4 over the course of the day) Eating cutlery Cooking cutlery (spatula, wooden spoon, knives etc) Chopping board And even when you clean these straight after use, they're not always easy to clean. A slow-cook stew will have stuff stuck on even if it doesn't burn. Anyway, whichever way you do it, it's pretty tedious and can ta…
/r/MGTOW03/04/18 03:30 PM
2

Looking forward to when I buy my own house and can get a dishwasher. Dishes can easily be 30 minutes to an hour each day when you're home-cooking.
/r/MGTOW03/04/18 10:31 AM
2

Rich people need something to spend their money on lol
/r/MGTOW03/04/18 10:29 AM
1

I hope your English is just slightly off, and a medical student doesn't actually think a patient can be awake for several minutes after their heart stops lol
/r/MGTOW03/04/18 10:18 AM
1

I was actually getting fairly good at the crypto trading. It's fairly predictable after a while - there's a spike, a big fall, then a partial rebound (and when Jamie Dimon caused the BTC price to crash, it was obvious he was setting it up to get in on things himself). And the usual analysis worked most of the time - ascending triangles etc. It's just that the volatility is so great that I had to keep in the game overnight to avoid missing sudden spikes, so I had alarms which would wake me if the…
/r/MGTOW30/03/18 07:02 PM
2

Reenactment of you trying to get through to him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0t0uCWjQ6Og
/r/MGTOW30/03/18 06:50 PM
1

Reminds me of why I stopped trading crypto. So much stress and uncertainty. It's fine to say that you can use current events to predict things, but everyone has a different prediction based on the same set of events. I just do a bit of basic programming and I'm assured of a decent wage, takes the stress out of things, but I know the rewards are correspondingly lower. I can live with that.
/r/MGTOW30/03/18 06:42 PM
1

Resistance is Feudal! You mean futile?
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 06:42 PM
1

Let me check a mortgage calculator. So, borrowing £80k at 3.92% (automatically suggested), 15 years is £589 a month. 30 years is £378. 35 is £350. So the 30 year term has repayments that are 64% of the 15 year term.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 04:12 PM
5

Most non-autists would realise it's a joke.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 04:04 PM
4

Live in a van and maybe suck cocks in a parking lot for gas and weed money? Hey, whatever turns you on. Not for me personally, but you sound keen, so go for it.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 03:55 PM
6

I'll be getting the longest term mortgage available in order to minimise mandatory bills, but then be making overpayments where possible in order to pay it off within 5-10 years, which reduces the total interest paid. And if something happens that gives me money issues so that I have to fall back on those small mandatory payments, that's still a lot better than paying even more on rent.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 03:54 PM
5

I want a mortgage because eventually when you pay it off, you have more freedom and security than ever before. Lose your job, but have a house? At least you won't literally be homeless. Equity is power.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 03:51 PM
2

We don't want kids. Actually, a few years ago, I was slightly undecided, like it would be interesting to see what kind of offspring I produce and how I could mold them lol. She was more resolutely against them than I was, and now I definitely agree. Expensive, noisy, extra responsibility, less freedom, more work... no way. Also, we want to get one of the cheapest houses possible (that isn't in a dangerous neighborhood), since it's largely to reduce outgoings (cheap mortgage is less than cheap re…
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 03:03 PM
1

Well, she doesn't do anything that makes me feel trapped. I'm aware that she holds legal power over me, but I don't resent her for that since it isn't her fault. Would you do it again? It's still early days, really. About 3 and a half years in. But yeah, it's going pretty well so far. It's a bit like having a dog you can have sex with. Which sounds ridiculous obviously lol, but in a way that's my ideal relationship - you just kinda hang around each other, let each other do what they want without…
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 02:51 PM
2

what is a married man doing reading a sub like this one? Well, I think I agree with the general message of the place, and I 'enjoy' (if that's the appropriate word for being addicted to rage-bait) the general theme of the threads pointing out how messed up things are for men, and how we should generally try to distance ourselves from the system/reduce its influence on us/avoid traps. In terms of marriage, I'm actually anti-marriage, and there's usually no reason for it, whilst it hands away a lo…
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 02:33 PM
2

They say that the more fancy and expensive the wedding, the more likelihood of it failing. Perhaps it's the mentality of the people who would want such a materialistic display. I got married in a hotel corridor. Cost less than $100 all told, and we're doing pretty well a few years down the line.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 12:56 PM
0

I drove $500 cars my whole life up until now, and a couple of months ago I finally signed up to lease a new car. I know it's not the most financially savvy decision, but sometimes it's just worth it to spend a little money on peace of mind. It means I don't have to spend every commute worrying about whether or not I'm going to be stranded on the side of the road that day. And my job is fairly lenient about car troubles, but my wife could easily lose hers in the same scenario.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 12:51 PM
1

Depends how the course is structured and taught. I did Physics, and in my class of 30, only one person got a 1st (top grade band in UK, usually 15-20% of students). It was a bit of a mess, especially first year. They gave us a couple of maths modules to get us up to university level quickly - it was basically 200 pages of unexplained handwritten mess and equations about topics that we knew nothing about to start with, and a teacher that barely spoke English. The whole class failed the exams and …
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 12:44 PM
3

Kinda wish I could do that, but this is the UK, so no adventures allowed.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 11:52 AM
2

So many children of right-wing white men and self-hating Asian women on there with issues I have an Asian wife, but I'm a moderate-leftist, does that mean I'm in the clear?
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 11:36 AM
1

I have an Asian girl, and she's personally not bad. Brings home about 40% of our total income, I cook, she does the dishes... actually works out better than flying solo. But she did snore last night.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 11:34 AM
5

How do you even create that much mess in the space of a day? Not that I'm particularly tidy, but I still have standards.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 11:13 AM
10

It's because he came home and died inside
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 11:12 AM
1

the hormones can make you infertile in as little as 6 months. Heh, guess HRT has some perks after all
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 08:32 AM
1

Well yeah, if two groups aren't collectively equal, then the only way to artificially engineer equality is by discriminating against individuals. Men make more than women on average? Better reduce men's pay.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 04:01 PM
1

I guess we'd have to say then that only physically demanding jobs are difficult, since you could do practically any other job in pajamas. Bill Burr could stand on a stage and talk with pajamas on. I could be a software developer with pajamas on. Einstein would have been fine if he wore pajamas to work.
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 03:32 PM
2

when life becomes difficult, they will abandon you as though you meant nothing This reminds me of the other day browsing reddit when we were talking about why a girl left a guy, and a couple of girls suggested she "fell out of love" because the relationship was put under "strain" by difficult circumstances, all as if it's completely normal human behaviour to profess love for someone that's completely conditional on the surrounding environment not exhibiting any sources of stress. It's bizarre, l…
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 03:17 PM
2

What gets me is that she expects a 1950s arrangement in 2018 where men have their earrings power diluted by the presence of women in the workforce and wages have simply not grown much in the last two decades Hypergamy takes care of that. Doesn't matter that average wages are down when you only want the top 10%
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 03:02 PM
2

You mean if it's permitted to do it in pajamas, or theoretically possible?
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 03:00 PM
4

Am I misunderstanding the statistics? It says almost half of all children are fatherless, but then says things like how 63% of suicides coming from fatherless homes constitutes 5 times the average. Surely, in order to achieve a rate in a group that is 5 times higher than another group, you can e.g. have the same numbers per group but one group 5 times smaller, or same sized groups but 5 times larger numbers in one group, or a mixture... I don't see how 63% coming from a group that comprises 43% …
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 12:30 PM
2

Even if there were enough works by women of sufficient quality, they would be choosing the work of a woman's over the work of around 19 men of equal quality on the basis of gender. Assuming the decision was to combat gender bias and a perceived over representation of men in philosophy, over representing women as a solution seems counter productive. This is a misconception on your part. You see, they don't want individual equality, they want group equality. You see equality as each individual bei…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 11:00 AM
1

I personally went for choice C. It's like choice A but a bit less tradcuck. A long term relationship, but we both work, and don't have kids.
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 09:59 AM
2

There was an article where one SJW detailed their experiences to see what would happen if they stopped being an insufferable SJW for a day, because they thought it was damaging their relationships with other people. The examples they gave of things they'd normally make a big deal about were hilarious. Like someone referring to "the HR girl" in an email. She was all ready to blow up about it, and then it turns out it's a self-styled title - the girl wanted to be known as the HR girl. Even then sh…
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 09:55 AM
2

We had a feminist over at the men's rights sub come in claiming that women have more serious issues than men because there's a lack of awareness of periods and menopause. I was practically speechless. Do feminists really think we go to all this trouble over stuff that is as utterly banal and inconsequential as people not paying enough attention to our bodily excretions? We've got some actually serious shit to be worrying about.
/r/MGTOW28/03/18 09:49 AM
86

Sure it doesn't mean she's gonna use her sperm on a biological female? I don't think anyone's so stupid they think they can literally reproduce asexually by mutilating their penis and calling it a vagina.
/r/MGTOW27/03/18 04:19 PM
3

It isn't a single sliding scale, though. We have it better in some ways, but I'm pretty sure a King in 1565 could still get unlimited sex on demand lol.
/r/MGTOW27/03/18 04:16 PM
2

"When the penis goes hard, the brain goes soft." And I thought I was bad having spent $2k on an impulse sex doll purchase
/r/MGTOW27/03/18 03:49 PM
1

Upon further research, it seems like they were more company claims than verifiable facts.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:44 PM
9

It's usually because they're following a collectivist ideology that advocates for equality of outcome, then we get confused because we naturally see people as individuals instead of groups, hence view equality in terms of equality of opportunity. Treating individuals differently in order to raise disparate groups to parity basically summarises it.
/r/MGTOW27/03/18 03:37 PM
1

I thought the idea is that they have a personal store of currency that they enable you to exchange with tether on a 1:1 basis, and regular audits ensure the continued presence of said money.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:25 PM
1

worked 80+ hours a week to support his wife and kids so she didn't have to work and could be a stay at home mom Sounds like he should have realised he was being taken for a ride long before she cheated on him
/r/MensRights27/03/18 10:00 AM
2

I thought that police brutality towards blacks actually balances out when you scale it by the black crime rates? I.e. per arrest/crime, black people aren't any more likely to experience brutality than anyone else. In America, police brutality is just a thing because people have guns, so the cops step up their excessive force to counter it, and you give too much power to them and let them get away with everything, plus the indoctrination of blind patriotism makes people unquestionably respect aut…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 09:38 AM
1

I'm agreeing with you...
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:35 PM
1

I'm pro-choice, and it hasn't damaged my brain to the point that I can't see the absurd false equivalency in this article.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 04:53 PM
3

I don't see how a wait for a colonoscopy is relevant, though
/r/MensRights26/03/18 04:50 PM
10

Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realise sexist society was making your family experience biology. Retard.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 04:20 PM
7

Do you really care about things that minor? The only thing that isn't laughably insignificant there would be if far more women are raped or sexually harassed than men, but we already know that feminists artificially engineered those statistics by twisting definitions. Change the law so that men can't be raped by women in ordinary circumstances -> men are suddenly raped much less. Brilliant. Read this guy's story, and then tell me that having your freedom forcibly revoked and your entire life tra…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:47 PM
5

And then the whole "In other words, the average college male had no more hand strength than a 30-year-old mom." is absurd. Not to mention, separate studies have found that untrained males on average have significantly more grip strength than trained females. The natural gap is so large that a claim that it can be eliminated merely by selecting for males in college is absurd, and would need a great deal of justification.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 02:02 PM
1

What's wrong with Tether?
/r/MensRights26/03/18 01:21 PM
3

Also, it may be important to find a country that doesn't have an extradition treaty with your country, if you're openly being persecuted. It's difficult all round, though. Most of the countries you could escape to aren't exactly the nicest or safest places, and it's difficult to just move anywhere and settle. My wife is Singaporean but will be applying for Irish citizenship soon. Technically, Singapore doesn't allow people to hold dual citizenship, but we may just let her quietly keep her origin…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 01:21 PM
7

And usually when you say you don't understand the product, what you really mean is that you don't understand its market, its demographics, the legal environment. Basically all the contextual information surrounding the product. She seems to have deliberately misconstrued them to imply that they literally don't know how bras work.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 12:59 PM
2

Do you have some kind of mental condition that affects reading comprehension? He has an attorney
/r/MensRights22/03/18 09:31 PM
5

plan ahead Already done. No kids. Had to choose between marriage and no relationship at all, though, due to immigration reasons, but she wasn't particularly keen on marriage either, so I think I chose well, but yeah, it's a risk. We will be appealing to the next higher court as soon as possible Hopefully you can get this thrown out. After all, just how likely is it to get two judges that twisted in a row? You should set up a gofundme or something. Can't speak for anyone else, but while I can't s…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 09:28 PM
6

Well, it's not a violation of their rights. The injustice here is that men have different rights, not that their existing rights aren't being honoured.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 09:20 PM
6

I understand the principle of turning around their own style of arguments against them, but if we're taking the question literally/seriously, I'm not in favour of trying to make a big deal about differences in circumstances that arise across genders as a group. I'm an individualist - each individual should just be given the same opportunities and have the same rules applied to them as anyone else by the state.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 09:19 PM
3

Thing is, power is the potential to do something, not the exercising of that potential. Most people take issue with others having power over them, whether they exercise it or not. If someone followed you everywhere with a gun held to your head, you might be bothered even if you knew they'd never choose to pull the trigger. Because your fate becomes contingent on their choice - not yours. So, while I'd certainly say that choosing your partner more carefully is a good idea, it doesn't fix the unde…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 04:57 PM
5

I'm not sure if booty calls will even be legal, at some point. Look at how SJWs are trying to get sex doll brothels banned in France. Acts that literally don't even involve other people are viable targets, because they feel entitled to forcibly prescribe their own conception of morality onto other people. If they find booty calls distasteful some day, they'll feel fully justified in trying to criminalise them for others. They're basically modern day puritans with moral outrages.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 04:21 PM
1

So many manginas in that thread
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:51 PM
14

Yes, we can see the one on the right provides less information in order to imply something that isn't true. Ergo, the left one is more reliable objectively, not just as a matter of opinion. The woman was qualified, but less qualified than him.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:43 PM
14

Not do away with it - more like force it on people whether they want it or not. He's trying to take away one of the last options men have to avoid becoming a slave to someone else whilst still having a relationship with a woman. If men can't even live with a woman without becoming legally beholden to her, they'll just ignore them completely.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:36 PM
3

How do you end up with that large a premium in the first place? Before I bumped someone a few weeks back, my renewal quote was coming in about $450. Now it's more like $550.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 02:23 PM
4

I can live with that lol
/r/MensRights17/03/18 12:24 AM
6

I haven't actually, because I don't really care if people want to have sex. I've been jealous when it hasn't been with me lol, but doesn't mean I was annoyed about the sex itself.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 09:30 PM
6

Doesn't detract from the irony of what they're saying. It's not like I'm seriously making that argument.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 05:27 PM
3

If anything, it's the other way round - it pedestalizes them by ascribing them a kind of divine mystery.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:28 PM
51

Apparently Einstein, too. They're actually making a pretty strong case in favour of misogyny by pointing out how all the smartest people were misogynists lol
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:26 PM
3

Well, after she's hit you, you've only got a limited window during which your retaliation will likely be counted as self-defense (assuming at least a partially sane court of law, which admittedly may be unlikely), so gotta make full use of it.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:20 PM
3

You're comparing healthcare with the cost of every single other benefit, which is nonsensical. Furthermore, you think the average woman costing 150k means that a significant proportion of males will pay 150k extra, which is nonsensical - the portion paid depends on salary, which means most people will pay far less than that. You also haven't considered that when you take into account that women are registered as the official beneficiary of many benefits that help couples as a whole, then you fin…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:35 PM
1

You would not need "free healthcare" if you did not pay taxes to subsidize women. Actually, someone on an average wage pays about £80 a month in tax towards healthcare in the UK. The average American pays almost three times that much for health insurance. So, yeah, the maths doesn't work out. Despite pesky poor people existing, you're still better off nationalising it. Partly because rich people's contributions make up for it, and partly because increased government regulation of the health indu…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:17 PM
1

OK, I think I see the source of your confusion. Take feminism as an analogy. Feminism is a name; a brand. It's a movement. So when someone says they support feminism, that means they support the movement, the people within, and what it collectively does. However, by your logic, no one can now claim to be egalitarian without siding with feminism as an entity because they claim to be egalitarian. In other words, you're confusing a brand with a concept. "left wing" isn't a brand, it's a description…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 01:11 PM
3

The answer isn't always the moderate position, but it seems to be in this case.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 01:01 PM
2

People like you who come onto this sub in order to defend left wing ideology seem to have very little knowledge of the people who actually identify as left in the modern world. I'm not talking about people, I'm talking about a position. I'm saying that moderate leftism as a political position tends to be (IMO) the best one, and that it would be unfortunate if, in order to reject leftist parties which are crazy, we would feel a need to move to the right, as opposed to simply removing SJW contamin…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 01:00 PM
2

What was my denial, exactly? I talked about moderate leftism, then you pointed to examples of more hard-line leftists and claimed I was denying they were hard-line? Wut? Can you not separate ideas from people?
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:42 PM
5

Moderate leftism isn't anti-capitalism, it's for regulated capitalism. It's the difference between, say, letting employers fire workers on a whim, and requiring them to give a good reason etc. But yeah, extreme leftism/communism hasn't worked out too well previously.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:32 PM
2

I hope in Europe there will be a mass rejection soon of these pro-EU, left wing parties that want to censor all of us and enforce their PC culture. Well, I would have mixed feelings about that. It's sad that people feel that in order to reject PC/SJW ideology that we also have to reject left-wing economics. Bundling social policy in with economic policy seems a little silly, but that's the reality of how we have come to see politics in an only black and white dichotomy.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:12 PM
24

This is how feminists lose support. You'd think so, but in practice it seems like there's no limit to the number of stupid things feminists can do that'll be brushed under the rug or excused. If being crazy was going to end their movement, we're about 30 years overdue.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:29 AM
1

Get $588 subscription Publish data to others for a $50 subscription fee Profit
/r/MensRights13/03/18 05:53 PM
9

Fair point, but until we can magically make society start making sense, it makes sense to protect people from the ramifications of it
/r/MensRights13/03/18 05:50 PM
2

MBTI models cognition based around 8 cognitive functions. You have thinking, feeling, sensing, and intuition, and each of those can either be oriented externally or internally i.e. Ti is Introverted Thinking. Te tends to apply logic/ordering on to the external environment - planning, organizing, strategizing, judging by measurable criteria etc. Ti creates internal models of the world - asking what something is/what defines the essence of something, understanding through creation of hierarchical …
/r/MensRights12/03/18 08:44 PM
-1

If I may be permitted to speculate a little, I ultimately see this in terms of MBTI strengths and weaknesses. Jordan Peterson seems clearly INTJ to me. They tend to be good with "algorithmic thinking" i.e. finding a particular chain of cause and effect to produce a desired outcome, but you can't expect them to be as attuned to subtle logical nuance as a Ti user such as e.g. an INTP.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 04:18 PM
3

Could you bold the subsections so that the individual points don't run into each other so much?
/r/MensRights12/03/18 01:06 PM
26

So you're saying she's a lobster?
/r/MensRights12/03/18 12:52 PM
7

What if the rapists have an extra-long penis and can rape them from across the aisle?
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:52 PM
2

Jaclyn Friedman, a consent educator and author, said that in the end, “Consent is not a legalistic construction. It gets translated into law, and should be reflected in our laws, but it is actually a moral value.” Uh, no it isn't. Caring about consent is a moral value. Consent itself isn't. What is it with every time they get a statement from a SJW in these articles that they just come out with an irrelevant word salad that doesn't even address the question?
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:20 PM
17

Also bear in mind that there's currently a pretty bad rape hysteria/anti-male attitude in India at the moment. There's been cases where mobs of women killed men accused of rape before they'd even gone to trial. Stuff like this is just likely to confirm their biases and inflame tensions further.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:38 PM
29

Rape is a serious issue in India About 25,000 rapes are reported in India per year. Assuming these are only for women, that's 0.005% of the female population in India making a rape accusation per year. Yep, certainly justifies completely segregating genders and re-organising society for.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:37 PM
3

If the SJWs were high, they'd probably calm down a bit
/r/MensRights09/03/18 02:16 PM
5

I don't even really understand how saying no one cares about either could be sexist. You could be saying it as a complaint.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 11:45 AM
3

You mean they actually say SJW stuff IRL? Don't think I've ever personally experienced that much.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 10:35 AM
2

How do you rack up over 800k in legal fees? That's enough money to, like, spend almost a week in a US hospital.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:44 PM
3

Death is a path to many abilities some may consider... unnatural
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:16 PM
2

No, but the vast gulf in publicity the two get would appear to be a form of discrimination. I generally try to take my "feelings" out of the equation. Focus on what is real, not what is feel. However, this is certainly an example that makes me feel discriminated against with regards women's/men's day: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/mp-delivers-spectacular-putdown-over-international-mens-day_uk_5811cad9e4b0ccfc9561c298
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:42 AM
-7

going down into a sewer and taking care of a fatberg How else are feminists supposed to get laid?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:10 AM
5

Can't get sick if you're dead
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:19 AM
13

Is it women's day? Cos it's my mum's birthday lol. Weird.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:02 AM
1

There's this thing called context you know...
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:58 PM
2

Ugh, so much bad spelling... bigotry going on in this movement since several years bigotry that has been going on in this movement for several years "Several years" is a duration, not a time. "Since" refers to a specific time - I haven't eaten since this morning, for example. "I haven't eaten since 5 hours" makes no sense. meant as an aide/resource meant as an aid/resource An "aide" is a person who helps. An object which helps is an "aid". Pointing out the cognitive dissonace Pointing out the co…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:45 PM
1

Knowing that you're putting in effort to respond to their one line nonsense each time probably gives them a sense of satisfaction, though. Better to not respond at all past one or two replies to establish they're definitely just trolling.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 03:31 PM
1

I don't think it's a formatting thing, it's just bad grammar. The date of the letter is an adjective. It doesn't make sense to put another comma after it. It would be like writing "I have a black, cat".
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:20 PM
3

Yes, if you're spending ridiculous amounts of money, you need to keep working for it (within reason - even those expenses you give would amount to only a small fraction of someone's salary when they're making several million a year), but most of those are a matter of choice. If I had, say, $30 million, and I guess I'll probably live for about another 50 years, then, ignoring passive income streams I can generate with that, I can allocate myself $600k a year to live on like a salary. That in itse…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:17 PM
3

Is English your native tongue?
/r/MensRights05/03/18 12:59 PM
1

I think it's just a troll
/r/MensRights05/03/18 12:40 PM
2

Google is your find for local bonobo. They have bonobos now?
/r/MensRights05/03/18 11:53 AM
1

I thought he was referring to the excessive commas.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 11:50 AM
1

Yeah, although if I were in their shoes I'd work hard for maybe 2-3 movies then retire in my huge wealth lol I guess once you have a few dozen million you're just continuing to work for the status or because you like acting.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 11:43 AM
1

Well it depends on a distinction between "left" as an expression of position, and "left" as the brand of a movement. I think it's better to take it as the former, otherwise there would be no word to describe such positions, which is silly. But yeah, the left as a movement is retarded at the moment. I'm still a leftist in terms of values. The right as a movement is retarded in other ways.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 11:32 AM
2

Voted for them in the last election because they weren't too vocal about SJW stuff, and seemed the most reasonable in other areas. Now, nope.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 11:30 AM
1

I'm a 56 year old man who thinks she rocks. Oh, and that I want to bear her child. Dunno if it works that way...
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:26 PM
1

There are studies showing men with dark triad traits (psychopthy, narcissism, machiavellianism) on average have had a larger number of short term partners than the baseline. In other words, being an asshole is sexually advantageous.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:59 AM
1

Problem here would be that you have to retain the original title, which doesn't sound oniony
/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:55 AM
3

Wake up, French men https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/wake_up_sheeple.png
/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:53 AM
2

Anecdotes trump objective research
/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:48 AM
2

Equality of outcome is itself supremacy on an individual level. If you have to bias things in favour of a group in order to achieve an outcome, then you're preferencing individuals of particular groups above others i.e. supremacy. It's just not the only form of supremacy.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 10:48 AM
1

It would support an iguana for men’s rights Lol what? Is that an actual term?
/r/MensRights02/03/18 10:47 AM
2

Yeah but there are no large true egalitarian movements, hence why I'm here instead
/r/MensRights02/03/18 10:46 AM
2

Pssh, "engaged"
/r/MensRights01/03/18 02:26 PM
1

Will she marry me? I make very good chicken soup and spaghetti. (Ask for recipes)
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:42 AM
0

Why can't we have equal representation? We can. If you're asking why we don't necessarily want that, that's a different question. In that case, it's fine if it just coincidentally ends up that way, but not if it's manufactured to be that way.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:28 AM
11

It's a feminist campaigning against reality, not a feminist campaign against reality lol
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:21 AM
2

Leaving out the "as" just makes it more casual. It's often done deliberately. Whereas, there definitely should have been a comma after the "has" (or "have", in this case).
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:18 AM
5

My wife only immigrated here from Singapore about three years ago, and I'm currently pretty pleased with how things are going just because she finally got a full time job a few months back - I'd basically been supporting her until then, and now we have a ton of extra money each month. The idea of moping about a career not going where you want it seems a little alien from my perspective, unless it's actively terrible. I'd remind her that, if you've both got full time jobs, you've got plenty to be…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 08:44 PM
9

Yeah it was an unfortunate title choice. When I first heard of the film I thought it was going to be more PUA focused than on the MRM.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 08:38 PM
17

You don't need any rights when you have all the rights
/r/MensRights28/02/18 08:31 PM
9

You would need a solid STEM basis for this scenario, not a population of gender studies "academics" lol
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:56 AM
6

I'm assuming you haven't had much experience with trying to get onto welfare
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:53 AM
4

They more or less blamed the former 2 on men not being as prone to asking for help Then you should have pointed out that it's more than that, since there's a massive backlash every time men actually do ask for help
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:44 AM
4

It's like one moronic statement after another. Claiming women are oppressed and yet feeling like they need to be treated extra special, to the extent that we need to learn in what way we're permitted to behave around them. It reads like we're servants undeserving of a noble class above us, whilst the noble class sighs about how hard they have it whilst collecting their free money.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:31 AM
6

Well, they never shave
/r/MensRights23/02/18 08:21 PM
1

Yeah, I visit my parents a couple of times a week (although in other places it's more normal to see them less than that), but that's still in line with what I'm saying. People picture a close-knit family unit as if you're all just living together, as if it's a core pillar of your life, a defining feature. That might be somewhat true for a few years, but after they've moved out, you're telling me investing a couple of decades of hard work into raising someone so that you can have someone visit yo…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 03:17 PM
1

In the UK, only 5% of the population earn the equivalent of $100k or more. And that's 5% of taxpayers, which means you have to be earning a full time wage to even be included in the percentile charts lol.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:46 PM
1

Might be possible if you're pretty well off. We both make round about average money (which still isn't bad for being in our mid-20s), so it's when we pool together we can plausibly get a house, pay off the mortgage in 5-10 years, then enjoy living mortgage free.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 12:57 PM
1

Well, my wife is a lot like me in the sense that we're both not keen on drama or placing expectations on each other, and we like personal space, so it's not hard to get on. Much of the time, there's just a kind of comfortable silence where they blend into the background, doing their own thing. The ideal for an introvert like me who still likes to have people close-by.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 12:52 PM
2

By the time you're 50 your kids have moved out and barely talk to you anymore, anyway. Kids aren't the route to lifelong company, by any means. And you don't need marriage to have a partner.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 12:49 PM
1

If I wasn't sitting in front of a computer in work, shitposting on reddit whilst getting paid, I'd probably be at home doing the same thing anyway but without pay.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 12:47 PM
1

Welp, I'm not having kids, but marriage is actually turning out quite profitable now that we're pooling our savings towards a house.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 12:46 PM
5

I hate it when my new appliance kicks the bucket early and didn't even come with a warranty
/r/MensRights23/02/18 12:44 PM
3

I did a CS course after my physics degree, and it was easy in comparison. Large workload, but the material itself wasn't overly challenging.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 12:18 PM
7

Toxic motherhood
/r/MensRights23/02/18 11:03 AM
1

Yeah if they'd found it went from 0.95 to 1.05 they might be able to argue it's flipped, but it doesn't just do cartwheels in a few years lol
/r/MensRights23/02/18 10:27 AM
2

Why was the failure rate so high?
/r/MensRights23/02/18 10:16 AM
14

Although if they know for sure the guy won't ask, then this could actually be good lol. Means they have to do the initiating for once. Of course, what would really happen is that the guys who are respectful of the rules will just not date, and the guys who ignore the rules will, causing more sexual selection for assholes and moving the human species into further douche-baggery, as usual.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:24 PM
3

Ironic to see rational wiki actually admit that the argument is used fallaciously with regards Feminism, often. Given their reputation, I would have expected them to list examples of the fallacy for all conservative talking points (e.g. gay marriage, as listed) and then just act like the Feminist equivalent doesn't exist. They're usually so keen on their bias.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 03:59 PM
1

He seemed relatively ok in the documentary
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:57 AM
1

I think you mean, "Farrell" instead of "feral"? I loled Warren Feral would be a great parody platform
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:55 AM
2

That seems like a decent argument, but I also agree that the previous post was a meaningless world-salad.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:54 AM
1

We don't need "ideologically diverse science", we need ideologically void science.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:48 AM
1

they better nitpick the woman for taking the trouble to look good They were never criticising her, though. They attributed her dress to the all-powerful patriarchy entity that controls everything she does.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:40 AM
1

it should be equivalent to the projected false imprisonment time for each person That's a completely different point. I shared my opinion that a false rape accusation should get about 10 years, you tried to say that this implies three should get 30 years, now you're arguing that each one should come with the same prison time as what the accusation would have brought to the accused. I mean, you're entitled to that opinion, but it's not directly relevant to what we were talking about previously.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:24 PM
0

Multiple offences don't generally scale the sentence linearly with time, herp derp https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/criminal/criminal-law-basics/how-do-multiple-convictions-affect-my-sentence.html
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:11 PM
5

10 years is far smaller than 30 years, I don't think we can lump them together that easily. 10 years for a false rape accusation seems reasonable, 30 doesn't.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 03:44 PM
11

That could be interesting, actually. Imagine every team has to have a set number of girls. It would be like a new imposed obstacle in the game, and they'd have to develop strategies to get around it. It would be like if they took rugby and greased the ground for lols.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 03:42 PM
1

Well, I doubt you're genuinely obese at 170. My wife is about 200 and she's just pleasantly soft lol
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:19 PM
1

Yeah, the only argument here in favour of that would be that girls feel more compelled to drop their standards in response to competition. That's hardly rape-level compulsion lol.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 09:35 PM
1

I'm conflicted about the whole thing. I've spent a few years now spending about an hour a day reading about nutritional science and stuff. So, I was really psyched up to apply it and lose weight, but then I read even further and there was a study where about a dozen obese people all lost like 100 pounds +, and at the end they discovered their basal metabolic rate (of all but one of them) was around 300-400 calories or more less than a typical person of the equivalent size... it's like they had t…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 09:33 PM
1

Yeah, I just wasn't sure if you were being serious or not, I thought it might be a typo
/r/MensRights20/02/18 05:39 PM
2

Guess it depends on how you define rape. I'd imagine pretending to be a secret agent to get sex would be for sexual release lol (there was a case of this where the woman tried to claim it was rape; wouldn't surprise me if it actually was counted as it, these days)
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:52 PM
5

I dunno, if an attack helicopter is violent in any way, is it a war crime?
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:21 PM
5

Even if most cases of pedophilia are incest, that doesn't mean most cases of a father taking his daughter on vacation are pedophilia. If the hotel doesn't have a strong reason to suspect foul play, and deem the father being with his daughter as reason enough alone, then we end up with a scenario where men can't go anywhere with their kids without being constantly harassed and challenged.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:19 PM
21

Identify as a woman for the day and DIY it up.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:06 PM
82

It's basically just a formal acknowledgement of current enforcement attitudes anyway
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:05 PM
1

Michael Phelps weighs 600 pounds? Lol
/r/MensRights20/02/18 02:21 PM
1

I like chubby girls, so it's funny when some of them have lamented the lack of all male interest in them, in the sense that I would myself have been interested if their personality hadn't scared me off.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 02:20 PM
3

He certainly sounds like shit
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:27 PM
7

Which shows when he told how he walks around at night without any consideration for his safety. Ah, emotive reasoning. Feelings demonstrate reality. Of course, he's actually more at risk of being physically assaulted than a woman, but since he's too stupid to realise that, he feels safe.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:18 PM
2

"Let's decrease the poverty amongst our own citizens before trying to fix poverty in other countries." Fixing poverty isn't a right wing view lol. I'd call that left wing nationalist.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:13 PM
2

I was domestically abused by your lack of paragraphs
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:08 PM
2

It's ok though, because her hormones were acting up
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:57 AM
1

Got a link?
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:56 AM
1

You also need to figure out why you keep letting people take advantage of you I don't think that's fair. He took very little shit before he'd decided he'd had enough.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:33 AM
4

But if the females put out then they're choosing to do so... if anything, female competition for males should reduce incentive for rape
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:13 AM
2

What reason was there to even suspect that he was going to do such a thing? He was a man, after all
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:08 AM
3

Thought it was a re-post at first
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:05 AM
-1

Sounds like an ad hominem
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:41 PM
1

I think depression was the motivation. When we, say, solve a murder crime, we always look for motivation. Obviously, the motivation doesn't justify the crime, even if the motivation was understandable. It might affect sentencing slightly, but a crime's a crime. With mental health, the reason people might get off is because it might be sufficient to demonstrate lack of intent. If you killed someone whilst hallucinating that they're an evil demon trying to catch you, then you didn't intend to kill…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:09 PM
1

Why shouldn't attempted murder justify a jail sentence? We jail people for smoking weed, literally a victimless crime lol.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 01:54 PM
1

She's probably thinking "why did I do that" She did it because she felt like it at the time. It's not like something physically possessed her. She made a choice, and should be held accountable for it.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 01:44 PM
3

They already do that with a lot of stuff where they put it inside those impenetrable plastic casings.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 12:58 PM
1

Schizophrenia is much more justifiable as a get out of jail free card, due to it literally warping your perspective of reality. Depression might make you interpret things more negatively than otherwise, but it doesn't outright warp your perception of reality. Saying she killed her baby because of depression is like saying I killed someone because I was very angry at the time. Sure, there was an emotive motivation, doesn't mean we suddenly don't hold people accountable for it. You're supposed to …
/r/MensRights19/02/18 12:56 PM
1

I turned their logic back on them and said I felt sorry that the husband felt the need to be abusive. Time to wait for the rage and cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 12:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter