| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Newcomer here | freebreix | /r/ExRedPill | 07/07/20 04:43 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blue Pill Men: What would it take...If you are only going to have sex with the woman, it is a valid point, otherwise, yes I would rather have an LTR with a cute 8/10 well educated girl, with more ethics than a hedoistic party 10/10 girl. Depends what you are looking for. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/08/20 06:31 PM |
| 0 | Blue Pill Men: What would it take...Firstly, what do you define under "high quality"? You might say high status and/or looks. Now just think about it how many people you could find with these qualities and still be trash people. You could find such men in business - lieing, abusing people, everything for money. Not to talk about the famous cliché about gold diggers - highly attractive women leeching off of men. Would you call these people "high quality"? For me, a high quality woman is who knows how to act like a chick, be humble,… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/08/20 02:45 PM |
| 1 | Blue Pill Men: What would it take...Sure it is common sense that girls will dump you and start looking around in a non-particular order when they aren't attracted to you anymore, because you changed, started acting all needy, etc. My problem with the concept of Hypergamy is that it doesn't take into consideration if a high quality woman is having a respectful relationship with a man, she will likely control herself to remain faithful when meeting a high status male. The concept could only hold if we humans had no ethics and only l… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/08/20 02:02 PM |
| 3 | Blue Pill Men: What would it take...Very well put opinion. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/08/20 10:32 AM |
| 1 | Blue Pill Men: What would it take...Agreed. I used to believe in Hpergamy based on the pseudoscience TRP advocates, but I came to the realization real life isn't like that. There might be some party girls who are just monkey breaching to the highest status male until they get bored of it. But there are a lot of girls who had a good father figure in their childhood and learned to control their impulses and to be faithful to a man they respect. You can call it bullshit based on "science" but that's just how it is. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/08/20 10:10 AM |
| 1 | Newcomer hereHow did it feel like to you to have such a distrust towards women? What were you thinking/feeling? I personally don't think I ever went that far, but I'm curious maybe I did. | /r/ExRedPill | 08/07/20 08:31 AM |
| 3 | Most seduction books are pure s**t, what you need to be doing is working on fundamental social skills and dealing with your inner demons.I agree, trust is important, but solving problems like a man in a stoic way without crying about it, is as important. That doesn't mean you can't ask her opinion on a situation or say how you feel if you can hold your masculine frame. | /r/seduction | 02/07/20 03:51 PM |
| 1 | Most seduction books are pure s**t, what you need to be doing is working on fundamental social skills and dealing with your inner demons.There is nothing wrong about talking about your feelings for a woman if you are just platonic friends but if you are looking for a romantic relationship it is a stupid idea to whine all the time about your little problems like a beta, handle them like a man. That's all I am saying. | /r/seduction | 02/07/20 01:06 PM |
| 4 | Most seduction books are pure s**t, what you need to be doing is working on fundamental social skills and dealing with your inner demons.I follow a simple principle, not to run out of stuff to say and still be interesting. "I think, I feel, I see" Examples: "Oh I see you are dressed up, where are you going?" "I think you the type of girl who loves partying, right? These get conversations going. Also you can just say your opinion about her thoughts on a subject, not agreeing on something always sparks attraction and helps her get to know you more. | /r/seduction | 02/07/20 10:44 AM |
| 8 | Most seduction books are pure s**t, what you need to be doing is working on fundamental social skills and dealing with your inner demons.Men are usually more open about their emotions with women so it is good for your mental health. You never should be open to a girl about your emotions like for a therapist. It comes off needy and weak, turning them off (even if they don't want to show it). You can talk about problems you are dealing with, but still holding a masculine frame and not "crying about your little boy problems" kind of thing. | /r/seduction | 02/07/20 10:23 AM |
| 17 | Most seduction books are pure s**t, what you need to be doing is working on fundamental social skills and dealing with your inner demons.I think many would missunderstand your thoughts. I can sort of understand where you are coming from. Till you spark attraction and not having a full on platonic conversation with a girl like an interview, yeah it actually makes her trust and invest in you even more. The problem is if you are acting platonic, 1. She likely won't be attracted, 2. She won't know your intentions. It's kind of playing safe which more likely will put you in the friend zone talking to a girl above 7 in looks. But I mea… | /r/seduction | 02/07/20 10:16 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter