TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fumeck60 Archive

View 8 posts and 51 comments by fumeck60 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Schrödinger's Feminist: When a woman takes the form of 'independent of men' or 'dependent on men', based on which state serves her interest best.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 10:34 PM
0

WHAT!? You want to give men the opportunity to chain up women and kill them? WE WON'T LET YOU! You have been reported for hate speech and intent to insurrection.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:45 AM
1

Imagine if child support amount is flat (in Texas it's flat due to cap for rich guys btw). Then guys like Danny and Al Pacino will just get many many women and have many children. Well do rich Texan men have many many women and many many children? More so than the national average? - No. Thought-experiment busted.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 06:40 AM
2

Neither does your comment mate
/r/MensRights09/08/23 04:39 PM
16

The people on the Feminist sub aren’t the same as the ones here; one of thse groups uses logic over feels, as such, getting down voted there would be indicator you are using your brain. Have a good day miss.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 08:17 PM
23

You’re the one with all the negative downvotes on here, so yeah…fyi zombies aren’t real, much like the patriarchy and white racism in the 21st century
/r/MensRights08/08/23 07:15 PM
37

I think u missed the point of parentheses; besides, you were committing the grave sin of excluding non-whites.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 06:05 PM
38

(Do current slave owners (who aren’t white) feel like oppressors? Did western people who only called out western atrocities really feel superior when they ignored Eastern, South American, and African atrocities? )
/r/MensRights08/08/23 05:52 PM
0

2nd and 3rd degree murder is not pre-meditated. A serial killer is a type of murderer, yet it's definition also varies by location. Either way the average person is not a murderer, which is what the slide is saying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/23 03:54 AM
2

Imagine every criminals surprise when they find out we live in a Patriarchy that benefits Men over Women. HAHA. The look on their faces when those Men find out they'll be given the death penalty just because they now identify as Women. ROFL - A Feminist.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 06:46 AM
0

Yes, yes they are.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 03:51 AM
5

If you were to just count actual Suicides as Attempts, adding them, Men would have a 5 v 4 over Women. Either way its a subject that needs "equality" and "equity".
/r/MensRights14/12/22 03:48 AM
1

Correction: The pendulum was never in the opposite direction. Women were believed in the past just as they are today. “Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:49 AM
1

If you have an interest in learning more, I'd suggest: "Fallacy" flashcards. And reading 1984 by Orwell (its a quick read, but the ideas are very deep).
/r/MensRights04/05/22 01:38 AM
1

Say: My body my choice. Put a ring on it, then we'll "talk" about it.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 01:22 AM
8

circular logic** (in Doublethink, they would have to hold the contradictory belief that bad things do happen to men AND the patriarchy prevents those bad things from happening to men)
/r/MensRights04/05/22 12:45 AM
2

Men listened and Men changed, Feminist ideology hasn’t. Those facts were included to demonstrate how the Feminist narrative, Feminist lies, haven’t changed despite even yourself saying “it wasn't always like this”. So if Feminism is lying now, how certain are you that Feminism is telling the truth about then? “just because [Feminism] brought us [selective womens voices then] doesn't mean it's a good thing [now].”
/r/MensRights13/02/22 10:43 PM
2

Even if you could get a Feminist to agree, they'd just cognitive dissonance you and claim 'toxic emotions were caused by patriarchal society conditioning (or even air conditioning)'. Sexism of the Gaps argument.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 06:35 AM
0

Something sticks out, "corset", perhaps he viewed the situation as sexual, but they were playing tran-sexual. "They had him dressed in a corset that evening and said Max wanted to touch a boob. But they were all sexualising each other." "He said 'I have clearly upset them. Yes the context is all wrong but I do not want to hurt them any more' - and I did not think the girls got that." -Ms Stevens. Its sad.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 06:23 AM
24

According to Feminism: The Wage gap hasn’t changed in over 70 years; but I still can’t only hire women to save 30% on wages. Rape rate has only gotten worse, (despite crime falling 80% in the West) Women out-earn college degrees 2:1 while getting more scholarships for being underrepresented. Men are the abusive sex, despite Female/Female relationships having 200%-300 the domestic violence rate in their relationships. The poorest 1% isn’t a group or a phrase we need to concern ourselves with (bec…
/r/MensRights13/02/22 05:59 AM
1

As a certified mulatto, I congratulate you on your effort, as futile it was. You seemed very emotive, not sure if you had invested emotion in the conversation, but if so, you might want to have that looked at.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 05:48 AM
1

DOCUMENT EVERYTHING!!!! You need to prepare for the worst, seems like you hope for the best. You wrote, she said, you're emotionally abusive for being concerned with her weight. Well that can easily be twisted into, "I eat as a coping mechanism because of his abuse". Now you're the bad guy. Can you proof you don't verbally abuse her? Because that is what you'll have to do IF this goes sideways, prove a negative. Phone records, texts, journal where you go, who pays what bill and why, etc. Get a n…
/r/MGTOW22/01/20 04:13 AM
1

"drastic times call for drastic measures", Quick, you now identify as a woman and your wife started abusing you when you came out to her in need of emotional support at the bar. The texts were because of fluctuating hormones; the hormone pills she forced you to take upon threat of taking your kids away from you. It doesn't need to make sense, it just needs to make you a victim - you're a woman now.
/r/MGTOW21/01/20 01:50 AM
1

Telling a beautiful woman stranger U sexist-ly presume that the compliment was regarding her "beauty". U can mind-read other people's intent. U presume the woman in the photoshoots didn't work hard or choose them. "People like genuine compliments about things they have chosen or worked for." So all we need to do is listen to Women huh? Well, let me know when you need a parachute.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 11:00 PM
1

Are you calling 23+ women poor judges of character? Seems sexist to presume that much of so many women; not to mention me. Anyhow, so long as it "charmed" you, what else could I possibly need
/r/MensRights20/01/20 02:45 AM
1

Yes, most "things" these days, are over-market value. Might want to wait for a crash; consider renting until then.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:48 AM
18

I met a semi-model star with my ex-gf one time. There were other models around. I complimented the one model since I liked her photoshoots the best. I was unaware, but my ex informed me afterward, that by complimenting the one and not the others, I earned angry glares from the other women. Lesson: Complimenting women can come at a cost. Actually, anything you do or don't do with a woman will come at a cost.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 06:54 PM
3

Repost+edit: Yes, this is a first step. Thanks for your post. The argument is based on feminism's 'sexism of the gaps'; and using it against them, that was the purpose. (1 variable isn't enough to show 'cause/effect', but most people don't seem to mind anyway.) This low resolution statistic, shows that women aren't earning science degrees from a lack of 'women graduating college'. But also that women are privileged in earning college degrees, so by their argument, it must be sexism. (Also, whats…
/r/MensRights08/01/20 05:50 AM
1

Sorry, this had to be reposted. Ur welcome to comment again. reposted: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/elo3gd/institutional_inequality_now_privilege_women_of/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x
/r/MensRights08/01/20 05:09 AM
2

Sorry, this had to be reposted. Ur welcome to comment again. reposted: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/elo3gd/institutional_inequality_now_privilege_women_of/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x
/r/MensRights08/01/20 05:09 AM
1

Yes, this is a first step. Thanks for your post. It uses the feminist metric of sexism, 'degrees earned', against them, that was the purpose. This low resolution statistic, shows that women aren't earning science degrees from a lack of women graduating college. But also that women are privileged in earning college degrees. (Which begs the question of gender-based scholarships.) I know there are other metrics; I have a brain injury, so it's hard to do this sort of work. But I noticed this discrep…
/r/MensRights08/01/20 04:11 AM
1

thanks, will do
/r/MensRights08/01/20 03:58 AM
1

seriously!? can you share anything else about your exp?
/r/MGTOW04/01/20 05:27 AM
2

https://malepsychology.org.uk/2019/06/15/its-easier-to-blame-men-than-to-see-men-as-victims/ 2.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334855932_Man_Up_and_Take_It_Gender_Bias_in_Moral_Typecasting Moral typecasting is the tendency to categorize intentional perpetrators and suffering victims within moral interactions. We predicted a bias in typecasting, such that women are more easily typecast as victims and men as perpetrators. In Study 1, participants more readily assumed a harmed target was f…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 04:06 AM
1

I think your view needs more thought. Some Resources are limited. Your income is limited. The city budget is limited. There are a finite # of college spots. ex. women get over 60% of scholarships, men get less than 40%. So should we continue to give women more scholarships than men? Should we factor in: Men utilize their college degrees more than women, (women leave the job market for a variety of reasons; men stay in job market for reasons), so if there are only 1million college spots, should i…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 03:35 AM
1

I've edited it. On your point, I agree, though there should be proportionality as a consideration, because resources ARE limited. ex. if 70% of scholarships go toward women, then men lose those opportunities. Instead of balancing it or basing it on 'need under x income'.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 03:17 AM
2

I don't know if trying to convince people that 'feminism isn't about equality' is a hill worth dying on. I think instead of convincing them they've been fooled, show them the labels have been switched might be better; as their values will be retained.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 08:58 PM
2

Great post! Really like the 2nd paragraph, "to distinguish". Just some ideas while reading, take/leave what you want... "I do not believe in any of the feminist concepts of equality.", if you establish that most people's concept of 'equality' is egalitarianism, and feminism has co-opted it; you won't marginalize those groups. Instead you include them by showing the label has simply changed, not their values. Might want to rephrase, "free to do whatever they like", as the current "like" is the mo…
/r/MensRights02/01/20 09:17 AM
1

A women’s only car?! Who knew there were so many white male nationalists in Mexico. Or: Racists chant, “Separate but equal!” “Separate but equal!” “Hey, when did Mexican women join the cause?”
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:29 AM
1

"but in factory jobs women [represented] a big portions", okay, so how did society go from: 'women work in factories' to 'women get to stay at home' to 'women are oppressed because they stay at home' to present time: 'now everyone works' and 'women still oppressed'. At no point does the narrative change, though circumstances have.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 08:27 PM
1

How? What happened? (I’m not big on history, though it seems there’s a corrupted narrative.) Industrial revolution>women put to work. Blank. Women stay at home>Women’s movement> now women are allowed to work.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 06:37 PM
2

I understand your ‘anger into purpose and improvement’, and seeing the potential for things to always be better. I used that early on in life, it worked well, though when dealing with others I often found they were either limited in their ‘potential’, too content bitching, or other. And good for you, turning life’s negatives into positives. I just believe you are wrong that feelings are uncontrollable, or always valid. You aren’t your thoughts. You aren’t your feelings. You're more.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 02:37 AM
7

“Pretty uncontrollable”, have to disagree. Maybe it’s on a spectrum, because Not all feelings are valid. Thoughts/beliefs > action/event > feelings. Change your beliefs, change your feelings. If you lose a match, maybe you think you did your best, so your feelings will not be anger, but acceptance with how the match played out. Perspective? Framing? You are not your emotions.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 06:40 PM
3

"with parental rights come parental responsibilities", that always comes with a disclaimer: need not apply to women. Are you new, because you seem like you haven't fully processed the cheat that is, 'responsibility is abuse when applied to a woman'. The 1st wave said, we want rights. The Men said, rights come with responsibility. The Women said, sure. But then the next wave comes along and says, we want more rights, oh and responsibility is oppressive. So the next wave of men say sure. Rinse, Ri…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 05:17 AM
3

You must not live anywhere near a city then
/r/MensRights02/11/19 11:52 PM
6

Not if they’re attractive. They have an opportunity, though some must earn it; yet men are fashion policed. Is it men stopping other men from letting in some air down there? Is it men who shame other men over their sweat? Or an ill fitting shirt? What about the shame for having a turtleneck, or those who had their turtlenecks cleaved off at birth? Those nerves never grows back...we could just treat men as equal as we treat women.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 11:47 PM
2

Healthy baby boy? Cut his penis off. Unhappy adolescent boy? Cut his penis off. “Unsanitary” adult male? Cut his penis off. Oh, we see what you’re about.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 06:38 PM
1

You have the right train of thought, but you forget the feminist trump card, 'It's the fault of the Patriarchy'. The shadowy force that acts for and against men. If it's to men's benefit, it's the Patriarchy. If it's to men's disadvantage, it's the Patriarchy. Little known fact: Schrodinger's cat, was named Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:32 AM
2

“It does depend on the reasons why?” Torture for non-combatants approved by women. “Why does the dog have to suffer?” More empathy for a dog than a man. “She wasn’t satisfied by just cutting it off” Laughter::Laughter::Laughter instead of denouncing this inhuman act. The coup de grace: ‘It’s not that right to sit around laughing about it’ “oh, but it’s different, one’s floppy”
/r/MensRights10/06/19 09:59 PM
1

**UNBELIEVABLE** Biological mothers account for 86% of female-child abuse, while biological fathers account for less than 26% of male-child abuse. Source: NCANDS, 2002, "MALE PERPETRATORS OF CHILD MALTREATMENT" (Yes, the title of the report is even biased.) "Of all reported cases in the18-State data set, slightly less than one-half of all perpetrators were male. Of these, about one-half (51%) were biological fathers...In comparison, among female perpetrators, 86 percent were biological mothers."
/r/MensRights24/05/19 11:16 PM
17

No, we allow mutilation of infant boys, not "infants". Baby girls get a pass in western countries.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter