Is there any cheat sheet or flow chart to easily debunk and re-address arguments feminists and sheep-like supports bring up?

i.e. I found this under Sam Harris sub,

"Toxic Masculinity is a term to describe a collection of male behaviors that are harmful to men and to society at large. It includes, but is not limited to:

  • Excessive social dominance (trying to be an “alpha male”)
  • Misogyny and sexual conquest (Pickup artistry, “playboy behavior” and reducing women to sexual objects)
  • Homophobia
  • Use of violence to gain status and solve social problems (starting fights, bullying, etc.)"

(Like where do you even begin? There's no toxic femininity? Women haven't had any part in the social propagation of these traits? etc.)

Re-address

They say: 'It's the fault of toxic masculinity'. I have to deconstruct each point of ‘toxic’, as in

  1. social dominance is used by women to subdue other women, therefore it is not an exclusive male trait and would be considered "sexist" if a derogatory catchall term were used to describe the behavior of women.
  2. Next point, defining ‘masculinity’…

That is time consuming, and too easy to 'tl;dr' it. Karen is great, but she can derail easily.

Imagine realsexism.com as a flow chart, like this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5y33rg/flowchart_for_libtards_i_just_made_maybe_itll/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x