TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

galtthedestroyer Archive

View 14 posts and 778 comments by galtthedestroyer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
197

Progressgaltthedestroyer/r/MensRights20/02/21 02:09 PM
51

Feminismgaltthedestroyer/r/MensRights03/10/19 08:07 PM
46

Edu./Occu.galtthedestroyer/r/MensRights11/04/18 02:44 AM
22

Edu./Occu.galtthedestroyer/r/MensRights13/12/15 04:09 PM
17

Social Issuesgaltthedestroyer/r/MensRights19/11/18 11:43 PM
16

Edu./Occu.galtthedestroyer/r/MensRights21/02/19 01:04 AM
14

Progressgaltthedestroyer/r/MensRights14/11/18 03:35 AM
13

Edu./Occu.galtthedestroyer/r/MensRights30/10/18 10:58 AM
13

Generalgaltthedestroyer/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:37 AM
4

Generalgaltthedestroyer/r/MensRights25/05/15 01:34 PM
2

galtthedestroyer/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:28 PM
2

Edu./Occu.galtthedestroyer/r/MensRights26/11/15 04:27 PM
1

Edu./Occu.galtthedestroyer/r/MensRights19/08/16 11:31 AM
1

galtthedestroyer/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:33 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Indeed the rules of this subreddit say that it is about rights and rights alone. We don't want to turn into a whiny cringy group. We don't want to provide any fuel to the fire of childish back and forth tit for tat.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:37 AM
3

If you write about either of those you might just reinforce her belief that our culture is a rape culture. If rape is far less prevalent in gay culture then that might work, but usually these dogmatic types of people play mental gymnastics with everything that they encounter. If gay men rape more then, "of course because men are all rapists at heart." If gay men rape less then, "of course because rape culture is about raping women." The underreported statistics for men could be a lot easier now …
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:12 AM
1

Ok you got me there. What I should have said is that the person you originally replied to never implied that the circumcision exception in Alabama had anything to do with the Christian religion. They just pointed out the irony of Christians not caring about human rights.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 10:29 PM
2

Tons of Christians do it in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_circumcision
/r/MensRights09/05/22 09:21 PM
1

Oh I agree with 99% of what you said. I was bringing the subject back to Ukraine. Strength doesn't matter as much when the war is brought to your doorstep. I'm glad that you found that women are on par with men at shooting with rifles.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 11:16 AM
1

I was sightly mistaken. In Europe Queens waged more war. Considering that a minority of rulers throughout history have been women, clearly more wars have been started by men. But that's not the correct way to look at it. The correct way is, for each make or female leader how many / much war did they wage? Yes, universities, especially humanities departments, in the west have been taken over by leftists including feminists. Considering that history is written by the victors, the people in charge …
/r/MensRights03/03/22 11:08 AM
2

When the fight is brought to your doorstep pulling a trigger becomes the biggest part for you. Such is Kyiv.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 01:39 PM
0

Canada focuses on women and children Muslim immigrants. They sent many men.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 01:35 PM
3

Women can pull a trigger just fine. In the case of Kyiv there isn't as much carrying of heavy things because the fight was brought to them.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 01:33 PM
2

Nice cherry picking. You seem to be aware that most wars happened when female leaders were in power so you limited the period to the 21st century. Your statement is irrelevant to this discussion anyway. There's a lot more involved with going to war than a single person making the decision, especially in the 21st century.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 01:21 PM
6

Lol. Good punchline.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 03:32 AM
2

It's true that this isn't a rights issue, but I'll respond anyway. First dates should be lunch or coffee so if they expect you to pay you're not losing too much. The side benefit is that if either of you isn't interested then you don't have to stay too long.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 03:28 AM
2

I also have seen evidence of this, and that his show's producers have him act mean for ratings.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 03:53 AM
1

To be fair he legitimately voluntarily let his own license expire. I swore I've seen him also put women in their place too. Maybe not. I thought he was just an old school chauvinistic type of guy. Either way he does seem to be a POS now. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/rqgtq1/dr_phil_tells_abuse_victim_that_he_isnt_allowed/hqg5hrd
/r/MensRights30/12/21 03:51 AM
1

That's not a rights issue. That's probably why your post got removed.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 07:44 PM
-1

McGraw fulfilled all terms of the board's requirements, and the board closed its complaint file in June 1990. http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3516/3743291121_f47f5434f6_b.jpg McGraw stopped renewing his Texas license to practice psychology in 2006. https://southfloridareporter.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-dr-phil/
/r/MensRights29/12/21 07:39 PM
-7

Not true. He let it expire because he doesn't need it for his show. Edit: down view me all you want. I'm still correct: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/rqgtq1/dr_phil_tells_abuse_victim_that_he_isnt_allowed/hqg5hrd
/r/MensRights28/12/21 06:30 PM
1

Thanks. I won't watch this in theaters now.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:15 PM
4

Well said!
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:20 PM
6

Hero https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:13 AM
3

Cut off contact with both of them. They are lost. It's not fair for you to have to shut up and take it in order to keep the peace. You could also keep sending them facts especially from ex feminists like the factual feminist, the red pill documentary, and that lesbian who pretended to be a man but found out that men are great and life is hard for men. Thomas Sowell and Carol Swain would be the best examples to fight her racism.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 01:18 AM
2

I predict that with the increasing number of cameras including cell phones we'll finally see who the real perpetrators of violence, false accusations, and reputation destruction are. Hopefully there will also be blowback against what will then be "old people" for being such assholes to men.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 01:24 AM
7

I couldn't find any source to back your claim. Please provide one.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 09:26 PM
0

I never said lives are comparable to objects. You're beating a dead fish. I can't fathom why. For the second time, all groups of people are given the same advise, not just women. Sure a man walking down the street at 2am is a lesser target for rape or abduction. They're a greater target for violent crime in general though. Beatings and death are more likely for men vs rape and abduction for women. What matters is that men are more likely to be victims of violent crime. Your claim that women must…
/r/MensRights12/04/21 05:24 PM
1

No. You missed the point. In answer to your first question, I agree with you. The effort involved for protection varies with the value of what is protected. Notice that I said, "etc." The etc includes men, old people, children, in fact all people. Advice to avoid dangerous situations goes for all people. This should be obvious to you because this advice had been given to everyone since the dawn of time. Or do you think they would tell men they don't have to be careful after dark? Considering tha…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 05:26 PM
1

You completely missed the point. The examples I gave were not direct comparisons of the value of objects versus the value of lives. They where comparisons of situations where you want to protect something that has value to you. To reiterate, they were comparisons of situations where you want to be protective. Either get some reading comprehension or stop being disingenuous.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 06:49 PM
1

I agree. I should have made it clearer that those were her ideas.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 06:43 PM
0

It was only hyperbole to illustrate her point that women staying in after dark is effectively a curfew for them. She does not actually advocate for a male curfew.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 02:27 AM
9

Nothing was compared to Jim Crow laws. Maybe actually read past the first few sentences. Also it's exactly the same thing: curfews based on immutable characteristics like skin color or sex rather than any evidence of guilt.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 02:23 AM
7

I haven't seen this sub crying about it. This post certainly isn't. It's pointing out that punishing everyone based on immutable characteristics that have nothing to do with their guilt or innocence is an immoral thing to do. Regarding the advice for women to be more careful, it's the exact same advice that they give homeowners about protecting their homes, car owners about protecting their cars, tourists about protecting their valuables, etc.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 02:18 AM
1

US women's tennis especially.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 05:06 PM
2

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/details-in-bls-report-suggest-that-earnings-differentials-by-gender-can-be-explained-by-age-marital-status-children-hours-worked-3/ That's one of many references that show that men work more hours. I didn't bother checking to see if it still matches the 14% that I previously found. Honestly, search on your own. The other references are in other comments here.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 05:04 PM
2

That was clearly exactly my point. Thank you for grasping it.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 06:06 PM
3

416/365=1.14 so 14%
/r/MensRights21/02/21 05:58 PM
28

r/menkampf
/r/MensRights20/02/21 05:20 PM
42

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/technology/google-gender-pay-gap.html https://inews.co.uk/news/media/bbc-men-pay-rise-gender-514047 2nd reference for same event https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5332355/BBC-hands-pay-rises-men-women.html https://www.forbes.com/sites/maggiemcgrath/2019/07/31/lyfts-2019-pay-equity-audit-has-a-surprising-result-its-male-and-female-employees-earn-the-same-thing/
/r/MensRights20/02/21 04:24 PM
19

Technically yes, but of course not in reality.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 03:04 PM
0

what the actual fuck! downvoted for calling them out for claiming the article is opposite of what it actually is. Neither the title of this post nor the article says that it's a trend or a conspiracy. In fact the article mentions teachers and journalists who openly disagree with the practice. It also includes an excerpt from the article that the 'one' teacher wrote and screenshots of tweets from one of the others. ​ Since when is presenting both sides of an issue propaganda? Ironically, I was bl…
/r/MensRights16/02/21 05:23 PM
-5

There were 8 from all over the US including some from organizations that oppose teaching Shakespeare. Apparently you didn't read the article.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 03:01 PM
6

They probably don't have anything against liberalism. Decades ago progressives stole the word liberal in order to present a better image. Then actual liberals had to make a new word: libertarian. This is in the US. I don't know about other places.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 02:34 PM
3

Where did op do this? I didn't see the term used anywhere. They did say progressive leftists, but that was in a good light.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 02:27 PM
1

They already are being excluded sometimes. There have been posts on here about it.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 02:44 PM
1

What's your point?
/r/MensRights05/01/21 04:20 PM
257

Great post but computer science is most definitely within STEM by definition.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 05:36 PM
1

If that's what the definition is at the end of the day then that would be great. Unfortunately the term has truly been coopted and expunged upon by feminists and their "critical theory" to be a catch all term for blaming things on men. There have been plenty of examples posted to this sub so I don't feel that I need to provide them.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 04:11 AM
1

Wow. Well then it's clearly been appropriated and extended by feminism. Hence the tag "feminism".
/r/MensRights22/12/20 04:43 PM
5

Good question. The right wing criterion is one that is flipped. They match the rest though. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_fascism
/r/MensRights22/12/20 02:02 AM
13

No. The group called "antifa" claims to be anti-fascist, hence the name. Yet what they're actually promoting matches both the textbook definition and the historical examples of fascism. OP was referring to a larger set of people who agree with Antifa about what defines a fascist.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 01:28 AM
10

Feminists created the idea of toxic masculinity. It is well known.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 01:24 AM
1

Thanks for the link!
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:23 PM
1

Sorry for the brigading. It's not normally like this. In fact most of the top comments agree with you.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:13 PM
1

If you check now, most of the top comments mention that all that matters is if they're doing a good job.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:11 PM
1

Please don't be put off by all of the down votes today. Occasionally this sub gets new members that are a little hot headed. Usually we're quite reasonable.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:09 PM
1

On a side note, the 3 jobs you mentioned are nowhere near the best examples. Cross reference the list of the most male dominated jobs with the deadliest jobs. Use those. Electricians and plumbers have great safe jobs that pay quite well. I also like to throw in a dirty job example, but cleaners can mean office cleaner which isn't bad. Sewer worker and trash collector are ones that I use.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:06 PM
1

I'm glad that you want to be a teacher. In the US it's become too generous for men to be teachers because of sexual harassment claims. So now our children are being indoctrinated by misandrists in many cases.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:01 PM
0

Not according to their comment. Why are you claiming that they say the opposite of what they said? We need to be rational in this sub. We need to be better than feminists if we're to have any hope of improving our situation. Otherwise it'll be equivalent to two children fighting.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:58 PM
0

Immediately jumping to vitriolic name calling doesn't help anything. It doesn't change their mind. It makes you and this sub look bad. Ultimately we need people like this to change their minds. We should research how to do so then employ those tactics.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:52 PM
1

Regarding your last statement, most comments here agree that the law is stupid.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:49 PM
1

What makes you say that?
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:45 PM
1

Even worse. The bureaucrat who levied the fine said she had to because of a law that has since been repealed. She then asked the mayor to help her use the money to get even more women into positions of power!
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:38 PM
1

It shouldn't matter, but according to the statements of those involved it does matter. Whether or not they appear to be doing their jobs properly, they might be skipping over men who might be more qualified.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:35 PM
1

The mayor didn't say that it's gone too far with feminists. She said it's not far enough.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:31 PM
1

Not anymore. Try reading the article. It's worse than you can imagine.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:29 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kaaosf/amazon_has_a_very_strict_policy_on_offensive/gf9t0u1
/r/MensRights10/12/20 02:03 PM
4

I was also going mention giving them the benefit of the doubt for the same reasons, but not after this explanation. My parents said the same thing when I asked!
/r/MensRights07/12/20 07:21 AM
6

Please go work in the logging industry.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 06:19 PM
26

State enforced transsexuality. Much worse!
/r/MensRights07/10/20 02:41 PM
2

Record anyway for your own protection. Confront him to get him to say it on record. The recording can always be leaked anonymously. Don't wait for him to say it again on his own. He already said it. Once is too much.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 08:39 PM
14

You're all kinds of wrong. Where are you getting your numbers for rape and false accusations? Also I assume that by "male victims" you mean male accusers considering the context of the poster and your comment about excluding them. If so, what gives you the idea that men who regret sex have more than a snowball's chance in hell of making a false rape accusation?
/r/MensRights15/09/20 02:59 AM
2

I'm in the US. My policy probably has major overlap with yours: I don't date American women for the same reasons as you. Luckily I've always lived in cities with a good number of foreigners.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 01:32 PM
2

Yikes that's a lot of links! Keep up the good work!
/r/MensRights16/08/20 06:57 AM
1

Well written!
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:08 PM
6

Then verify for yourself.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:33 AM
14

Click bait. It's not from Hawaii proper. It's a report from Hawaiʻi State Commission on the Status of Women Department of Human Services There's no indication that anyone is taking it seriously. It's still alarming that an official group within a government body would be brazen and arrogant enough to publish such a document.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 07:38 PM
2

Oh wow. There behavior of my app has changed then! When I click on the photo it shows the photo. When I click on the text it goes to the sub. They both used to go to the link. Thanks so much for bearing with me!
/r/MensRights23/07/20 01:48 PM
1

You didn't mention it anywhere and your screen shot doesn't either! I see now that someone else mentioned it's name in their comment.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 01:20 PM
1

What sub?
/r/MensRights23/07/20 12:28 PM
1

Facebook post? Oh I see. Your title said "sub" so I thought you were taking about reddit.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 12:03 PM
1

Am I missing something? Can you elaborate about your post title? How is this sub ignorant of actual sexism? Posting the article that you screen shot is something that definitely makes sense here.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 11:59 AM
1

You should have recorded it.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 02:01 PM
1

Not rights related. Do we want this to be men's bitching about fashion sense, or men's rights?
/r/MensRights20/07/20 09:33 AM
1

Ffs, keep reading after that sentence.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 02:35 AM
2

It didn't say he grew beasts. It said lumps started developing on his chest that the other boys noticed. Also the first three doses were intravenous.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 03:41 PM
3

I checked it the comments now and found that the most rational ones at the top. One pointed out that native Americans are actually the most at risk. Another pointed out the study that debunks the statistics about blacks being singled out by police. Etc. So my faith is partially restored.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 05:01 PM
3

And the whole thing is about racism, yes cops can be racist towards white people but it doesn't happen to the extent it happens to black people. No one said anything about racism toward white people. You're so stuck on the points of racism and black that you aren't even participating in this conversation. There are two topics: is it about racism? is raising awareness for black women specifically nearsighted and selfish? I guess I'm just bad at getting my words across but when I say black women m…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:25 PM
7

I already answered your question completely. There really isn't anything to add, but I'll try. You claim the message of the poster is fine because it's ok to raise awareness of an extreme minority of police violence in addition to an extreme majority (black men). Native Americans are 3 times more likely to experience police violence than black people per capita. Black people are 2.5 times more likely than white people per capita. Men are over 32 times more likely per capita. So in order from lea…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 01:56 PM
8

By your same logic a white lives matter protester would be perfectly fine. Sure. Anyone can raise awareness of whatever they want. Try carrying a white lives matter sign without getting beaten up though. It's generally accepted that raising awareness about a specific subset of people is because they're being unfairly singled out. Black women are not unfairly singled out for police violence. Raising awareness for black female victims of police violence is myopic and selfish.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 01:12 PM
6

That's not why this post is here. It's here to make us aware that feminists are doing this now. That awareness enables is to counter act against it.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 03:47 PM
0

If it doesn't hurt men then a men's protest to directly oppose it wouldn't help men. You can't have it both ways. If protesting is effective and two protests contradict each other then they hurt each other. In the linked case the women's protest creates alive action policies at work and procedure policies for police that each directly hurt men. We've seen too much evidence of both in this sub for you to deny it. Also just because you don't see calls to protest in this sub doesn't mean that we're…
/r/MensRights15/06/20 03:45 PM
0

Sure it isn't rights related, but there's no need to berate OP.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 08:04 PM
3

Sarcasm or troll?
/r/MensRights27/05/20 07:59 PM
0

The original Aquaman was tired, obvious, and boring.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 02:07 PM
19

I just point out to people equal work day which is the day that women makeup for the additional 14% that men worked in the previous year. Then I also mention equal death day which actually has about a 13-year span. It takes about 13 years worth of female workplace deaths to equal one year of male workplace deaths.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 01:29 PM
1

Oops. Thanks.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:17 PM
0

She didn't say that he was the rapist.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 04:31 AM
1

She didn't say that he was the rapist. Maybe next time I should read the whole thing.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 04:29 AM
2

Stating facts that are relevant and also support the overall argument of this sub gets you down votes? Wtf?
/r/MensRights05/03/20 04:25 AM
7

Then do it anyway to at least protect yourself from false accusations.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 10:14 AM
-4

Even I disagreed with your original comment at first. It seems like you're trying to say that he did have plenty of privilege despite all of the bad things that happened to him. This other comment of yours clarified your argument though. You're absolutely right. He probably has an least a little socially based privilege. I think the article should have said: It's safe to assume that rich and well connected people have privilege, but not safe to assume specific privileges based upon skin color or…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:05 PM
6

Ah, but you're not accounting for the patriarchy which favors hiring men anyway! /s
/r/MensRights16/12/19 12:55 PM
3

Agreed. Also, age of consent in Texas is 17.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 12:40 PM
0

No. There are many ways to deal with sexists. But that's beside the point. Repeating yourself does nothing to further or support your argument. Repeating yourself just shows that you don't have anything better to say.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 03:15 PM
0

Repeating yourself isn't an argument.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 03:25 AM
0

That's an obvious false dichotomy. Otherwise we'll need to police kindergarten lunch tables for when the girls don't want the boys to sit at their table or vice versa. These publications are just childishly ranting. Only when people are forced to wear different clothes to prevent oggling does it become a rights issue.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 03:14 AM
0

Of course not. Don't be simple. This issue is petty. It's blatantly petty.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 02:23 AM
0

I didn't imply anything close to that. I don't want us to devolve to the same level of pettiness as feminism. Whether it's some 2 bit rag or women as a whole, if they bitch about being objectified while also objectifying then let them. We can just calmly call them out for it to their face. If we gather together into a catty little clique to bitch about it then we're not much more mature than they are.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 12:04 AM
5

By your argument you'd be fine if it gets reposted 10 times a day. More importantly, It's called men's rights not men's grievances. This is not a rights issue. Feel free to explain how posting Petty issues like this benefits us.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 03:37 PM
-5

Heck yes!
/r/MensRights07/11/19 01:07 PM
3

Actually there's a whole sub filled with leftists who hate all of this identity politics BS. Sure they obviously have some level of cognitive dissonance because they don't understand that socialism must always lead to identity politics. At least it's refreshing to see them call out identity politics for what it is. They actually do a better job of it than most right wingers. I expect it's because they're focusing on the concepts whereas right wingers often fall into logically fallacious traps be…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 06:50 AM
-1

I'm with you. The freedom of individuals must be respected even in this case.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:37 AM
1

Why compare the two opposite cases? Obviously to see how much difference there is between them. I personally don't care to make any comparisons. This is almost a shit post because it isn't a rights issue. But it is quite a huge culturally based disparity. Also, yes I forgot the 3.52%. You're right also about how these numbers are meaningless. The unknowns must be included to develop a range of possibilities for each outcome. I just didn't bother before because I actually thought the whole exerci…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 02:46 AM
2

You're right about the title. "expected" should be "offered". You're way off about the statistics though. 59 x .45 = 26.55% that's the chance of a paying man matching up with a woman who won't pay or doesn't care. 15 x .55 = 8.25% splitting man with woman who splits or doesn't care. -1% of men expect the woman to pay plus 16% of men who don't care is 15% of men. 15% x 0% of women who would pay equals 0% chance of the woman paying! Ok so you can't actually have a negative percent. Let's say 0% of…
/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:32 AM
1

The blue part expects the other person to pay.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 05:43 AM
13

Her power, wealth, and influence are inconceivable. Donating $1 billion is probably as easy as snapping her fingers.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 08:11 PM
2

I first noticed girls doing this in grammar school. They learn it that early. It's an unwritten social contact between them. Somehow around the teenage and early 20s years they thought they could judge males by the same standards. That's a long time to take before realizing that we won't play silly games. The most egregious example is 'like'. They have to include it because firmly stating something will get them ostricized by their community. Accordingly, purposely conveying only a partial idea,…
/r/MensRights20/09/19 03:14 PM
7

That Marina is a real trooper. She stands her ground. https://www.reddit.com/r/Showerthoughts/comments/d4g4u6/many_women_get_frustrated_when_the_men_they_flirt/f0bry1h
/r/MensRights16/09/19 11:23 AM
40

If women really dressed for comfort they would all wear loose jogging outfits and sneakers with many pockets to stash crap in. Well said! It's right up there with Dave Chappelle. Paraphrasing: ... I may look like a police officer, but I am not a police officer!
/r/MensRights16/09/19 11:04 AM
8

Sorry for the harsh treatment. Some of us are maybe dealing with some stuff. I hope you noticed some of the more mellow comments in here. Personally, I think this sub is very useful.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 10:57 AM
1

I also.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 03:22 AM
7

Do you mean ostracized?
/r/MensRights12/09/19 12:52 PM
1

So is it 229 or 119? Time to read the story.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:23 PM
18

This is actually more of the same from WP. They want boys to be feminized. They're masking.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 03:00 PM
2

When they start raising their voices stay calm and persistent. Also point out that yelling is not an argument. When you start feeling excited remind yourself that showing frustration only strengthens their resolve. When I say persistent, I mean it in the most extreme way. Do not ever drop the subject all day every day. Eventually they'll want it to stop and / or they'll want their child back. The only exception is when you need to go research for supporting evidence. Choose a battle that has the…
/r/MensRights03/09/19 02:01 PM
1

Do not do this: If a woman were to falsely accuse your dad of something your dad's armor might start to crack. Your mom might shun him though. So the false accusation would have to be of a time and place where she is the alibi. Honestly she could still try to blame the patriarchy, but at least she'd personally experience something to counter her cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 01:27 PM
1

It's ironic that you sent me to Wikipedia disambiguation page. Although I'll assume it's the "confer" option.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 01:01 PM
1

What does "cf" stand for?
/r/MensRights12/08/19 02:18 PM
9

You're delusional.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 02:20 PM
1

Including the 12 chosen to be calendar girls.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:01 PM
-2

Yes. This is about indecent exposure and the double standards that it carries. Pull your head out of your ass to realize that boobs are not indecent! Do we really want a world where women can't go topless?
/r/MensRights09/06/19 02:58 PM
1

Literally playing the minority card. That's excellent.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:42 AM
1

Thanks for the motte and bailey reference. TIL
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:38 AM
3

It's not just anti male bias. It's also due to incomplete / insufficient physical changes. It can be easier for a trans man to pass. They might just seen like a smaller weaker man. Also it's expected that they don't have a penis "weapon". The opposite is true for trans women. Speaking of anti-male bias, trans men move into it while trans women can typically move away from it. So there's that.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:24 AM
1

I don't know what the workplace death statistics were for 1960, but in recent years it's improved from a 16x ratio to a 13x ratio. It takes 13 years of female workplace deaths to equal 1 year of male workplace deaths.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:32 AM
7

Before reading I thought sarcastically, "that's ok. I'm sure she got a stern warning." Nope. Charges were dropped. At least the author of the article is a decent human being: [The professor] who will not be named here because he has not been charged with any crime
/r/MensRights15/05/19 02:56 AM
1

What do I think? I think it doesn't have anything to do with rights.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:59 AM
2

Because it's petty, nagging, annoying. Choose your battles.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 02:22 PM
1

He doesn't claim that men are better. He demonstrates the facts that men produce more and people like their work better. Then he claims that men are now being discriminated against. His presentation is linked in the comments.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 01:15 PM
1

I used to have a problem with posts of specific examples rather than overall statistics regarding discrepancies in arrests and sentencing, but the problem is so egregious that we know the specific examples aren't meant to make the argument by themselves. I prefer to get to the truth rather than stir up emotions. So do women commit filicide more often than men? Wikipedia is unclear, but the first 2 references are "women offenders" and "child murder by mothers". I'll start reading those. If anyone…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 12:29 PM
1

But murdering a baby after it's born is true.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 02:48 AM
3

To anyone who reads the article, sees that everyone compared was a board member, and gets the idea that the comparison is apples to apples. It's not. The article is a bag of lies. It fails to take into account the number of hours worked even though it mentions that most non-executives are part time workers. It doesn't mention that in most companies board members are actually relatively low paid compared to a regular normal employee. It's kind of a position of respect and honor for an industry ve…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:53 PM
1

God wasn't created by men.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 04:18 PM
1

oscar_s_r • 1d You sound like a Gillete ad with that “holier than thou” attitude. This is a personal attack. You praised your buddy for being polite after speaking like this. Nice circle jerk. It's not a personal attack when you're being the very definition of "holier than thou". Also they pointed out that calling feminists terrorists without citing any reference is both straw man and ad hominem. The vast amount of resources here alone has proven beyond a doubt that feminism is and always has be…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 04:51 PM
1

There were no personal attacks, only polite questions. Also they pointed out that calling feminists terrorists without citing any reference is both straw man and ad hominem. Also, I feel like people do take me seriously here.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 03:43 PM
1

89th?? Whenever. Its the woman's decision. You know that's typically the last day of gestation. That's terrible. It's inhumane.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:42 AM
2

Get rid of the gestational limit. So an abortion on the 89th day?
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:03 AM
1

Thanks for participating and being polite. Sorry for the jerk. You'll find all kinds of people here. I hope you keep coming back.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:50 AM
1

There are far more important things for spending time and effort.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:05 AM
2

Irish Catholic
/r/MensRights01/01/19 06:29 PM
7

That's a good one!
/r/MensRights28/12/18 04:10 AM
1

Your title should have focused on how they said something to the effect of, "women are the gender most affected by homicides." Sorry, is bean a while and I don't want to read it again.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 04:06 AM
6

https://www.google.com/search?q=million+dollars+or+penny+doubled&oq=million+dollars+penny&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l2.7713j0j4&client=ms-android-google&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8 The metaphor doesn't match exactly because inflation isn't 200%, but the point is that humans are bad at math. Inflation compounds on top of the last year.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 02:48 PM
6

For all who downvoted, it's actually true. https://youtu.be/07Dc4tXl2Lc
/r/MensRights26/11/18 10:17 PM
15

For reference: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/shadow-boxing/201611/boys-dressed-girls-who-became-serial-killers
/r/MensRights26/11/18 10:10 PM
3

That would make a great front page headline.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 05:18 AM
1

It's right on the front page of their crime statistics publications page http://www.unodc.org/gsh/
/r/MensRights19/11/18 11:45 PM
6

I poked around in /r/masstagger and found that the developer is adding code that allows you to set a karma limit to weed out false positives. As it stands there some people that keep pointing out that masstagger merely makes it easier to check through someone's comments on "hate" subs. Meanwhile, the majority of commenters are behaving exactly as they claim that we will behave: they're treating the tags as scarlet letters and making wild claims about us. ​ When the karma filter gets added massta…
/r/MensRights16/11/18 04:39 PM
7

There have been a few men in academia lately who had to apologize it even step down for stating facts. Hopefully this journal will help to provide an outlet for unbiased science.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 03:38 AM
1

Whatever strange website that is exceeded their bandwidth. Does anyone have a different link?
/r/MensRights09/11/18 03:02 AM
1

Well I hope you look into the US. It's pretty good over here.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:47 PM
1

Oh wow. I guessed you worked in silicon valley.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:24 PM
1

May I ask which country you are in?
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:17 PM
1

Hopefully you don't have to leave your country. There has to be a city somewhere with employers who can appreciate you.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:03 PM
1

He sounds insufferable and arrogant which is typical for a smart roughly 20 year old computer science student. Maybe torpedoing his career before it starts will teach him a few lessons like posting anonymously, getting better data, and getting better reference material to back up the claim. At least Damore did the last two. Considering that this account is purely anecdotal I almost didn't post it, but I figured it might become useful.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 11:15 AM
1

I wonder what Maya Angelou would say about Kipling's poem painted over with hers.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 09:24 AM
3

Which is exactly why OP said they need to change the law.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:20 AM
103

Sue the company. By moving her instead of firing her they're creating an unsafe workplace. You are constantly in fear that she'll try it again. She could do it to someone else in fact. Sue for double standards. If you still had to take the week of unpaid leave then get your money back without reducing your vacation allotment. If she didn't have to take a week of unpaid leave then that's worse. Sue her for whatever you can: sexual harassment, harm to character, blackmail, harm to career, the mone…
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:14 AM
2

Run! The biggest mistake I ever made in any relationship was staying too long. Get out now.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 12:05 PM
1

Lol!
/r/MensRights09/10/18 04:34 AM
2

Well that's not fair! They also need to specify a certain number of black people, Hispanics, disabled people, glbt, etc. /s We're living in Atlas Shrugged.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 10:01 PM
14

In that regard it's always bad to marry a woman 22 years older. In most cases it's impossible to say this, but in her case I can say that a woman twice as old as you will not age well.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:07 AM
2

This is so much more relevant when I see it right next to the post where Britts get larger fines for Tweets that offend people.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:54 PM
1

I'm not pretending to speak for every single person on this sub. I was obviously referring to the majority opinion. I was especially not counting trolls who just come here to poke us, as a part of us. I ignored the rest of what you said because it needs elaboration, and because I wasn't interested in addressing it. You seem to be more civil and rational in other subs, but here you throw both out the window.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 02:04 AM
1

We the people of this sub.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 12:51 AM
5

That's a false premise. We say women aren't as interested in some jobs that pay well like crab fishing and engineering. A second separate claim is that they're not as good at the physically demanding jobs like fire fighter and combat soldier. The third claim about gender bias in school is shown in grade records over time. Get over yourself skeptical Bob.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 09:44 PM
1

Feminist logic: when only men are allowed to attend then all scholarships are male scholarships. When only men are allowed to make / do things then all studies are men's studies. Of course if you look at attendance data women have been performing advanced studies for a long time. Regardless of who wrote books and studied things in the past if you ignore things because of who wrote / did them then you are the one missing out on education.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 09:39 PM
1

You pasted the list twice. Can you remove the second one please?
/r/MensRights14/09/18 02:03 PM
10

There should be a bot that says exactly this every time someone says that!
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:32 PM
1

There was another comment about only feeling kids cookies because that's what they want. That clarified things for me. Regarding your example, switching the sexes doesn't change things. Taking beer as payment doesn't seem relevant unless it was agreed upon beforehand like in OP's example.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:38 AM
1

Aha! Like selling alcohol or cigarettes to minors. Kids are too young to make such decisions.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:31 AM
4

He contacted her and paid her. Regardless of gender, I don't believe this counts as abuse.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 01:00 PM
2

The recent win for Asian students at Harvard is a great precedent.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:59 AM
2

Can someone fill us in on the backstory please?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:51 AM
1

This place can be a bit of an echo chamber at times. When one of us tries to call it out we get labeled "concern trolls". But reasonable statements are not trolling. They keep this sub from devolving into an echo chamber of whining, hate mongering, and pettiness. Say what you want about this sub, but it's better than all of the others that I've found at least. I'm happy to call it home.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 11:53 AM
2

IIRC, we're not supposed to post about being banned from other subs. For the feminist subreddits I get it. We don't want our sub filling up with a bunch of people telling the same story over and over again of the obvious: of course people like us would get banned from feminist subs. But for menslib I personally would like to see specific examples just like this one so that it can be made clear that men's lib is not a rational place. Newcomers to menslib might be influenced by some of their frequ…
/r/MensRights12/08/18 11:45 AM
2

Indeed!
/r/MensRights08/08/18 02:47 AM
1

Should've = should have
/r/MensRights23/07/18 01:44 PM
11

There link does not work for me. It says I don't have permission. Maybe use the internet archive next time? Awesome article though. Thanks. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2018/07/20/feature/crossing-the-divide-do-men-really-have-it-easier-these-transgender-guys-found-the-truth-was-more-complex/
/r/MensRights22/07/18 12:47 PM
9

Now I'm curious. Doesn't it take consent of both parents to circumcise?
/r/MensRights22/07/18 08:06 AM
4

Civil disobedience is right in the face of unjust laws.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 08:17 AM
49

There are tons of examples that have been posted here for years. Schools. Airplane seating. Etc. Yes, Australia is way down the rabbit hole.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 10:56 AM
1

Wow that's a handy sub! Excellent work. I agree with you. When I'm having an argument I try not to just paste hyperlinks. In our case we both seemed on the same side and just conversing about details. So I provided reading material.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 11:43 PM
1

Considering that this sub is focused on rights and therefore involves the legal system I'm usually happy to use statistics that are usable in a legal context. Peer review is a nice bonus on top of that though. Here are some examples that I saved: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/42mx2s/in_terms_of_us_domestic_abuse_84_of_relationships http://familieslink.co.uk/download/sept07/Reciprocal%20violence%20AJPH.pdf http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00918369.2017.1374066?journalCode…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 11:08 AM
2

They don't. Gay men experience less and lesbians experience more. It's our favorite report. It's probably in the sidebar by now.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 04:59 PM
2

Thank you for being a voice of reason. Occasionally we get asshats in here that are over-biased. They make us look bad.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 01:28 PM
2

You're missing an important point: it could have been multiple boys or men groping them.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 01:24 PM
-4

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8tmqyx/actress_amber_tamblyn_wrote_a_book_titled_any_man/e18ynyq
/r/MensRights25/06/18 10:32 AM
1

There is one easy way to get around these laws. A community can raise money internally to give to one of its members. E.g. a church to a church member.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 10:01 AM
14

There's about to be a lot more 'non-males' on their staff.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 11:25 AM
1

Incorrect.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:08 AM
1

It doesn't contradict, but it is way off. It should include white cisgendered feminists and capitalism.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:03 AM
4

All of these sentiments of yours would be excellent if you would just acknowledge that forcing the choice is wrong.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 11:53 AM
1

Wtf!
/r/MensRights01/06/18 12:54 AM
7

Nah. I dislike her, but I have to admit that she's just trying to make a point. Read the notes at the end of the Wikipedia page. She defends old men looking at young girls. I think the book is meant to counter the feminists who bitch about the objectification of women and the unrealistic standards of beauty for women.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 01:32 PM
2

It seems everything is going digital these days! /s
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:20 AM
5

That makes sense. Drug users get longer sentences than drug dealers. /s
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:43 PM
3

What! References / citations please. That's horrible.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:41 PM
1

Relax. I was just being flippant regarding the other comment. Ever since the James Damore incident there's been a lot of attention about Google making life tough for 'white males'. It seems to be true, and joking about it helps lighten the mood sometimes. I'm actually one of the ones who tries to curtail all of the shitposts that aren't 'rights' related or that show single examples of women behaving badly rather than overall trends.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 02:53 AM
62

I found a white male! Thomas Edison
/r/MensRights07/05/18 01:19 PM
2

Disgusting
/r/MensRights29/04/18 03:50 PM
2

Do you have some examples of him supporting feminism?
/r/MensRights28/04/18 01:50 PM
2

Men only bars where men can go to get away from all of the bullshit that comes with mixed bars. This will totally be allowed by feminists and governments. /s
/r/MensRights18/04/18 02:47 PM
6

Exactly this. If they can't turn away ethnicities or religions then they can't turn away genders either. Either grant businesses the ability to turn literally anyone away or not!
/r/MensRights18/04/18 02:44 PM
1

Yes. It's their own damn business that they can run (into the ground) the way they want. We can't argue pro men's only clubs if we also argue against the categorically similar policy at bars.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 02:39 PM
2

It's already the age of consent for most of the US. Iirc, also Mexico. Mexico used to be 14.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 09:25 AM
5

Oops. I should have added my references at least. https://www.bls.gov/iif/
/r/MensRights11/04/18 02:52 AM
1

I think you meant to send that archive tip to OP.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 02:21 PM
9

This clickbait isn't a men's rights issue. He was seen breaking, entering, and robbing homes and cars. He had something shiny in his hand at night. The situation has escalated to the level where a helicopter was involved.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 10:20 AM
2

This is men's rights, not men's petty grievances.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 12:34 PM
2

Oh that reminds me. I didn't actually question is validity. The OP said something ambiguous. I asked them if THEY thought the pay gap is real, and I got banned. So good luck!
/r/MensRights09/03/18 10:05 AM
3

That's nothing. In menslib you get banned for questioning the validity of the pay gap.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:31 PM
1

"Excuse me... Gender pay gap" is an irrelevant response to the fact that you keep missing up the two contexts. Perhaps. But in movies where the villains do most of the dialog, they are usually top-billed as well. (Like the Joker in 'Dark Knight'.) Yes that's fine. It appears that you were making a counter argument there. There was no need to do so because it's well established. My example was just an illustration of my point.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:18 PM
1

I'm saying that you frequently contradict yourself. You're also getting tripped up by conflating two different contexts. "Lines of a single male vs. lines of a single female" and " lines of all males vs. lines of all females." Someone brought up Mulan. She's the lead role. The villains and the jester are men. Jesters typically talk a lot, and the villains outnumber the lead. She has less dialog, her singing wasn't counted, and she probably got paid more than any individual male. Now that I menti…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 02:54 PM
1

That's why my OP clearly states... Then stop talking out of both sides of your mouth. Sure, but you can't have it both ways... You either have: • Women are getting paid less than men for the same amount of work. OR • Women are getting cast in 'lesser' roles. Those are mutually exclusive propositions. Either women are getting paid less than men for the same amount of work, which means they are getting cast for the same amount of dialog. OR Women are getting cast in 'lesser' roles and thus not doi…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 02:14 PM
1

So paid less peanuts? Paid less hugs? You were definitely talking about money. The study, the post, even you mention that there is more to acting than lines. Singing, silent roles, non-speaking moments of speaking roles, etc. are all examples. My point is that having less lines and getting paid less are not mutually exclusive at all.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:29 PM
1

Indeed! My point is that you missed the point of the original study and the post. Nowhere did they talk about money. They're complaining about line count.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 01:44 AM
3

But that's exactly part of the complaint. Women just get cast as "the girl".
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:12 PM
2

I agree with you. If OP had just acknowledged Polanski he could have said that his original point still stands, and left it at that. He just needed to chill a little.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 03:16 AM
3

Secret plot by the patriarchy to make all women hot? That's how feminists will spin it.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:46 AM
8

Who gives a shit about this petty bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 02:29 PM
7

Thank you for this. It seems so obvious now. Why didn't we think of this before!
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:37 PM
17

That's actually what OP said. It just wasn't clear.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:11 PM
5

It's the perfect time for an accusation against him.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:41 PM
3

The are laws against it pretty much everywhere.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:53 PM
1

It looks like a republican section is adjacent to hers.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:52 PM
4

Doesn't Canada have shelters now for abused men?
/r/MensRights13/01/18 01:56 PM
2

Well said.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 11:24 PM
3

This was insightful and useful thanks.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 10:06 PM
15

At first I assumed that this doesn't belong in this sub because it's not a rights issue. After reading it I can confirm that it doesn't belong here, but damnit it still pisses me off to know that a PC police is at the helm of the overall Star wars universe and that they're using teams of scientists to screw around with movies.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 09:54 PM
2

Indeed. Link to an internet archive.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 11:23 PM
1

And the cop!
/r/MensRights17/12/17 01:10 PM
2

Thanks for pointing this out. I missed his original post.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 05:24 PM
2

Replace circumcision with leg amputation and then realize your mistake.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 05:17 PM
4

No. I'm not a magic player. No you shouldn't have been banned. They are asshats for banning you. I was correcting your English. You said, "I seen.". You should have said, "I saw."
/r/MensRights28/09/17 12:58 PM
4

I saw.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:43 AM
1

I couldn't have said it better myself!
/r/MensRights15/09/17 11:24 AM
2

Not that I can recall.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:19 AM
4

I would like to take this opportunity to mention that I was banned from MensLib for asking an OP to clarify whether or not they believed in the wage gap. I didn't make a post about it because it's against our rules. A mod asked me to write an essay about the wage gap in order to get reinstated. I obliged and included all of the facts, figures, and even some infographics that I've accumulated over the years from this sub. I was not reinstated. I'd like to point out that MensLib specifically state…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 03:23 PM
13

The headline is click bait. She doesn't mention feminism or feminist principles. I don't like her as a person or a comedian. She spouts feminist rhetoric like it's her job. Her comment is gross and boring. But to be fair, this is not an example of her behaving badly.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 04:04 PM
3

She bends his words. He said generally higher levels of anxiety may be a factor of more women reporting higher levels of anxiety at Google. He doesn't need to mention that a hostile workplace can also be a factor because it's already been established... It's the point his entire essay argues against! ... When these coos are accompanied by misogyny against most women. She acknowledges the science, but then proceeds to call it misogyny anyway. She thinks Google's attempts to be a fair working envi…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 07:20 PM
1

If you replace Christianity with feminism in their conversation it's much easier to see which of the two is right. Feminism has a much shorter history and is much better documented than religion. The black comment is wrong because the evidence shows that feminism is not about peace or equality. Your headline is confusing by the way.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 05:43 PM
1

At first I agreed more with the red person also, even though they both made good points. But Christianity and Islam have both already done exactly what the red person asks for. That's one of the huge problems with religion. Each religion can say the others are wrong and different sects within each religion can say the others are wrong. It's a never-ending battle because it's all based on mythology, hearsay, and magic.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 05:40 PM
2

I totally agree. Personally I consider Cameron Diaz and Julia Roberts to be extremely thin. Any thinner looks unhealthy like Callista Flockheart. Then Natalie Portman, Angelina Jolie, and Gwenyth Paltrow are quite thin Ashley Judd, Charlize Theron, Scarlett Johansen, Uma Thurman, Sigourney Weaver, and Jennifer Lawrence are larger and excellently proportioned. They seem to be the feminist definition of extremely thin. Finally Katherine Zeta Jones, Jeri Ryan, Salma Hayek, and Jessica Biel are quit…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 02:04 PM
1

Moose? Meese? Mooses? None of it sounds right. Yay English!
/r/MensRights13/08/17 01:34 PM
2

These rules seem good for men. We don't want young immature guys and / or douchebags, but we do want young attractive ladies. Although it does seem odd to allow anyone under the drinking age. Chatting with someone who has giant black Xs on her hands isn't very classy.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 12:52 PM
2

Slow. Clap.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:41 AM
4

Flawless!
/r/MensRights01/08/17 01:33 PM
1

To call it invisible magic is grossly dishonest.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 11:23 AM
2

Your own link doesn't support your claim unless you stop reading at the headline. Do you even read? Also I couldn't find anything to support your 60% number for Singapore. But I did find this great article that talks about how Singapore is a shining example of an alternative to a welfare state. http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngoodman/2015/03/31/singapore-a-fascinating-alternative-to-the-welfare-state/ Of course I know about free market economics. I ask for sources from you because you have a str…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 11:15 AM
1

First, there is no such consensus. Second, consensus is the enemy of science.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 10:47 AM
1

Which period is that? Also, citation needed.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:31 AM
2

Crackpot economists.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:22 AM
1

Thanks for the links.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:19 AM
2

And which country has the world's freeest economy according to you?
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:17 AM
1

HE SAID TWICE THAT HE THINKS IT'S FUCKED UP! Can you understand if someone yells it at you?
/r/MensRights14/07/17 09:52 AM
1

The evolutionary explanation has to do with gestation. To reproduce it takes a woman 9 months to recharge. Actually, throughout most history there was no recharge. Women died giving birth often enough. Men take 5 minutes to recharge. That's where male disposability comes from. So if men die in war or at work then the survivors can repopulate. A woman marrying multiple men leaves men reproductively idle. A man marrying multiple women means the women can have pregnancies simultaneously.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 09:42 AM
1

Link. Also mentions feminist snow plowing failure. https://www.google.com/amp/www.breitbart.com/london/2017/03/10/sweden-car-feminism-driven-mostly-men/amp/
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:18 AM
2

I didn't miss the point at all. Soundsaboutwright is proven to be a huge troll that tries to do such things. Again, you took the comment at face value and made an assumption. How about you take that fancy fourth grade reading comprehension and actually look at her comment history.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 08:02 PM
1

Nice analogy.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:12 AM
2

Nope. That's not how fallacies work. There is no choosing to interpret it in a literal and improbable fashion. Fallacies must be immediately dismissed in order to keep the argument on track. The rates for conviction of a crime and committing a crime are two very different things. So this example was clearly meant not only to dismiss the arguments but turn it back around in an emotional way. Straw man is meant to change the subject into one that's easier to argue against and or one that makes the…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:06 AM
2

Me too. Support our side. Don't waste time vilifying the other side.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:32 PM
2

First, it wasn't me. Read the usernames. Second, it is definitely a straw man fallacy. Mode talked about getting caught for the crime not committing the crime. Mode was accused of believing that women and men commit the crime and equal numbers. That is not a claim or argument that mode made.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:29 PM
3

Right wing?
/r/MensRights06/07/17 10:53 AM
0

I agreed with you. I specifically said so. Please improve your reading comprehension. You are so completely off the charts that I'm not even going to address anything else. You win the internets!
/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:38 AM
3

Mode talked about rates of getting caught, not rates of perpetration. Share of perpetration could be 60/40, but apprehension rates are more like 999/1.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:29 AM
1

She did share it. Also, I'm attempting to speak for an entire subreddit here, the point is that if she were male then they'd lock him up and throw away the key. We want parity in the Justice system.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:11 AM
135

Normally I frown upon posting specific examples like this. Take them to /r/pussypass. But this one example is enough to exemplify the entire problem. WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK!
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:53 PM
0

No goal post is moved by me. You specified young and elderly because they are weaker. You reduced the scope. I disagreed about your point. Also, it's not moving the goal post. You were clearly trying to interpret statistics to argue against someone else's point. I merely presented and alternative interpretation. I actually agree with you that rape is also about sex. When you say that rape is a deviant reproductive strategy do you mean somewhere deep in the psychology of the attacker? Because the…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:07 PM
1

Oh, same for genital hair. It acts as lubrication between the two bodies when they rub against each other. Now you know!
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:51 PM
1

It actually reduces friction which helps with chafing and reduces sweating. Smaller people might not ever notice the difference. I was always very skinny and never noticed until I got more muscular. For very heavy people it makes a big difference. This will really drive the point home. Enjoy: http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/lax/35274458.html
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:49 PM
1

The appendix and armpit hair are useful. So is the foreskin for both men and women actually. Read a book, or at least try a better search engine than DuckDuckGo.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 08:36 PM
1

Actually the Wikipedia article is great. It says that there's generally no benefit except in rare cases, among other useful information. If anything the Wikipedia article actually argues against this horrible troll.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 08:34 PM
1

If you didn't care about my opinion then you wouldn't have made the argument in the first place or kept arguing. Nice try.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 08:21 PM
1

There's no point in dominating something that can't fight back.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 08:15 PM
1

First, no, Wikipedia talks about babies and adults. Second, you should have specified. Keep digging yourself deeper though.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:21 PM
1

It's not opinion. The article specifically states: The positions of the world's major medical organizations range from considering elective circumcision of babies and children as having no benefit and significant risks to having a modest health benefit that outweighs small risks. The only thing keeping Denmark and the Netherlands from banning it is a fear that people will start doing it underground without proper medical personnel or procedure. The one exception is HIV prevention in sub Saharan …
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:41 AM
1

Yeah most of us including myself have read that. It's not good evidence for you.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 02:38 PM
1

Ohio, USA. it was a city recreation center.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 02:37 PM
7

Thanks. For anyone interested, the page is gone now but here's the archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20150818191407/http://dalje.com/en-world/sweden-to-abolish-affirmative-action/289636
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:53 PM
5

Wow. Source? I tried Googling to no avail.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:13 PM
9

A woman came in with her little boy instead of taking him to the women's locker. I told her it wasn't cool. The rest of the men didn't say anything. I also told management.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:01 PM
7

You keep saying that but you don't back it up. This has already been debunked on this sub by the way.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 11:53 AM
2

I've never heard of that! I'd like to read more. I tried Googling it but unfortunately there are so many sjw programs for Swedish universities that I couldn't find the one you're talking about. Can you help me out?
/r/MensRights30/06/17 11:33 AM
1

It's perfectly fair when the landlord also lives there. In that situation you'd want to be able to turn anyone away for any reason. Edit: for example, I don't know if I could trust a female tenant.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:54 AM
1

Indeed!
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:04 AM
1

Well one has a gorgeous scantily clad Amazon and the other features wise cracking middle aged fatties, shitlords! No. That horrible spin off from Daredevil with Jennifer Garner (?) and the Golden Girls are nice counter examples. In fact the Golden Girls are probably the best counter example.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 01:37 PM
2

This has nothing to do with mens' rights.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 02:48 PM
2

Wow! Insightful!
/r/MensRights04/06/17 01:57 AM
-1

Instead of the others section call it the colored drinking fountain.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:00 AM
4

How did he misrepresent feminist arguments?
/r/MensRights28/05/17 11:45 PM
1

I'm not a libertarian. I'm a capitalist. Also, you're the ideological pot calling the kettle black. You keep repeating "begging the question" despite my textbook answer. Repeating something doesn't make it true. I believe your problem is that you're either confused or deliberately conflating "most efficient" with "efficient". Just because your price manipulation example shows that it can be difficult to make an actually free trade doesn't discredit capitalism as the best system. In fact, price m…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 03:31 AM
1

A two party market with no outside influence is the base case which is necessary for the definition. I even specifically mentioned what happens when a third party becomes an option Moving the goal posts is a cheap fallacy. Your references are "obviously" just regurgitated socialist dogma. They couldn't be more biased. Of course prices can be manipulated and people wouldn't know. Diamonds are my favorite example. Price manipulation is no excuse to abandon property rights and free trade. You reall…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 09:40 AM
1

I've made no assumptions. I described the base case for a market which is two parties making a trade. When there is no outside coercion and no coercion between the two parties then the price that they agree upon is the least amount that each is willing to pay. When each party pays the lowest price for what they want to buy that is the most efficient price by the definition of efficiency. When there are alternative parties to deal with and or alternative substitute products to buy then that cause…
/r/MensRights21/05/17 09:09 PM
2

Now that the left has finally succeeded in curtailing the patriarchy I feel safe to come out of the closet as a woman, I feel secure that I won't get paid less for doing the same work, and best of all, I have a chance at an executive position thanks to gender quotas.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 01:46 PM
0

Stop complaining. They charge differently for Asian women too /s.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 12:34 PM
1

Refusal feminist theory was introduced by Ford and Rockefeller in order to sabotage feminism. It has the desired effect. Feminism has gone off the deep end in exactly the way Ford had hoped.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:37 PM
1

Nazis weren't socialist. It was just hip to call yourselves socialist at the time.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:34 PM
2

Not over educated. Under educated idiot who has read just enough to blurt out "smart" words.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:27 PM
1

Just because you think you have a counter example does not mean that the argument was "being the question". Russia might have a market economy right now but that does not make it capitalist. The same goes for China where the government has ultimate control over people's lives and still owns most businesses. "Ditto Saudi Arabia". You have absolutely no idea what capitalism is. No wonder you are making such weird arguments. About efficient prices. The definition of something is not a tautology. Le…
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:08 PM
1

If it depends on them staying third world countries then it wouldn't help to improve their situation. Their lives are much less terrible than before.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 02:39 PM
1

No tautologies here. There's plenty of evidence. The more socialist a country is the worse of it is. The more capitalist the better If prices aren't set efficiently then waste happens. If the problem is big enough then businesses die. On a big enough scale countries collapse. An efficient price is equal to the price that two parties agree to for a trade. Also not a tautology. Each party pays the least that they can get away with. Your janitor to doctor comparison is the stupidest thing I've ever…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:44 PM
1

False. Capitalism and trade with the West has improved the lives of third world countries.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 04:54 PM
1

Socialism guarantees that everyone gets a share, but doesn't guarantee that they get an appropriate share. More importantly, it has no means of determining the appropriate compensation for different types of work, or products. Capitalism is the only system that ensures everyone gets an appropriate share. No one works for free. No one works unless they agree to the compensation.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 04:47 PM
1

I'd love to!
/r/MensRights06/05/17 03:32 PM
-1

Seconded
/r/MensRights05/05/17 02:55 PM
26

Don't call it intimate terrorism. It reduces credibility.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 02:34 PM
1

You like the ideas​ of cost as a limit on price, the labor theory of value, and democratically controlled companies?
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:33 PM
1

So what moral and or economic system do you prefer?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 11:50 PM
2

You're historic facts are excellent! Maybe you're getting downvoted because you sound like a whiny hippie when you keep blaming it on capitalists. It was the government and two rich guys. There isn't necessarily any connection to capitalist beliefs.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 11:16 PM
2

I agree with the general sentiment of this sub about calling them survivors. It's a loaded word. They're victims, not survivors.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 10:01 AM
1

Wow. Somehow I missed the genesis of that weird back in 2011. I've never seen it before. Cool word thanks.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:54 PM
2

Stop it. I've plainly stated that some countries give men more rights and others give women more rights, and that both situations need to change. It doesn't get more egalitarian than that. You on the other hand seem to try to ignore the facts​ about the US that I brought. You don't seem to have any facts that support your claim that men have more rights in the US. Trying to back out by claiming that I'm too set in my ways for facts to affect me is a cowardly attempt to weasel out of this argumen…
/r/MensRights18/03/17 04:25 AM
2

Correct. The object of my preposition was violence not acid attacks. My comment was tangencial. The relevance was that people who push multiculturalism over the top are typically the same ones that push for gun control, and both examples cause more problems than they solve. (People clearly find substitutes for guns. )
/r/MensRights17/03/17 10:59 AM
2

I agree. It really sucks that many MRAs focus on social issues in this sub. There are other subs for that. Rape does happen to women more. I never said otherwise. Conscription is not a moot point. Plenty of countries have equality in that regard. Women can and do pass basic training in all branches except the Marines. Talk about ignoring facts! Your accusation that I ignore facts is a blatant case of moving the goal posts. I could have ignored your social issues, but I even addressed them. I ack…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 10:51 AM
1

I have no idea how you possibly drew that conclusion from what I said.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 10:28 AM
1

Don't forget gun control! London is a fantastic example of how gun control reduces violence.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:08 AM
2

It can be outside the USA. The Muslim countries are obvious low hanging fruit. That's all. I should have mentioned that much earlier. Also, the context of this entire post is within the US... Second, I never said women have it better. The double burden is a social issue, not a rights issue. The crimes that you mention are all against rights that women have. Men don't have one of those in many jurisdictions including within that of the US as a whole: rape. The qualification of rape does not inclu…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 12:28 AM
1

Edit: while it's true in some cases that supporting evidence isn't effective, within a rational discussion it's the one and only way. To make a claim without it is worth less than a fart in the wind.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 11:20 PM
2

To make me change my mind show me your biggest example of a right that men have that women don't in the USA.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 11:18 PM
1

I haven't seen the list over and over. I've seen certain things repeated. The best thing that anyone can do when trying to change someone's mind is to back up their claims with evidence. So please go right ahead.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 11:03 PM
2

You're the one who claimed that you want women to have every right that men have. That implies that women currently do not. If you were not making that implication then I'll let you off the hook. In the US at least, I can't think of a single thing that men have that women don't have. That goes for rights, privileges, etc. So there, I'll broaden the scope to make it even easier for you.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 10:59 AM
2

But abortions are cheaper than paying to raise a child. Your argument doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:08 AM
5

Please tell us what rights men have that women don't.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:52 AM
2

You missed the point. It is that the problems women march about are petty compared to men's problems. Marching just emphasizes the pettiness. There was no complaint about women not caring about men's issues.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:39 AM
2

Slow. Clap.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:15 AM
36

No. It's worth reading to the end. This is the most egregious example of pussy pass I've ever seen on this sub. I've been her for a long time too!
/r/MensRights15/03/17 12:08 AM
2

I normally frown upon specific pussy pass examples (as opposed to examples covering a larger scale) but this is ultimately exemplifies gender bias in the legal system. Fuck her and the judge.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 12:06 AM
48

Proof or STFU.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:05 PM
141

I think that's the best photo I've ever seen on this sub. Thanks!
/r/MensRights14/03/17 03:17 AM
22

Feminist double standards. Ftfy Edit: Awesome info graphic btw.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 12:18 PM
3

Or about women getting into dirty dangerous jobs.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 11:19 AM
2

That would be poetic!
/r/MensRights12/02/17 02:11 PM
2

Stop shitposting.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 02:08 PM
0

The question was not directed toward me.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 01:56 PM
1

Judicial bias in the united States is not usable in this context. Swiss is. Edit: autocorrect
/r/MensRights11/02/17 01:19 PM
0

Seconded!
/r/MensRights08/02/17 12:30 PM
2

It's because society has and always will accept fat men shitlord! /s
/r/MensRights03/02/17 06:57 PM
1

Of course you got banned. The sub specifically says it's not for debating socialism or defending capitalism and therefore it's probably not a sub that cares about any kind of truth.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 11:34 PM
1

I don't disagree with you at all. But this sub is specifically about men's rights, not body issues. In another sub those are perfectly acceptable but in this one they are whiny and petty.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 11:03 PM
-2

Whiny petty post. Maybe focus on rights.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 02:24 PM
1

Guns don't cause havoc. People cause havoc. If you shoot someone who's trying to rape you then you're reducing havoc. Either way, segregating people for public services is reprehensible.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 07:50 PM
1

It would be stupid if the legal system and police could be trusted to protect them. But they're not trusted. Self defense is perfectly justifiable. Guns, tasers, and self defense don't increase violence. They end it. Segregation is not an effective solution overall, nor is it a moral one.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 07:31 PM
1

Then women need to get guns, tasers, and self defense classes.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 05:29 PM
0

Maybe we could start yet another men's rights sub with actual moderation.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 10:41 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights16/01/17 10:38 PM
5

the dictionary definition of feminism won't help you here. We know better. I can start a movement called the happy fuzzy bunnies advocates, but if I spend 100 years running around like a James Bond villain then everyone will know it's a misnomer. My examples weren't about naming random feminists. They were to point out that 2014 was a great example of third wave feminism, which you initially mentioned. You started out with just plain "feminism", but dug yourself a lot deeper when you switched to…
/r/MensRights13/01/17 11:15 PM
3

If they are just names then it wouldn't be called feminism. Egalitarianism is great in part because it's not specific to gender issues. For women's rights to simultaneously fix men's issues then women's rights would have to include scaling back certain enormous privileges that women have. It seems highly unlikely that a movement called "women's rights" would or could ever do that.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 11:00 PM
6

Following the principles of third wave feminism, true gender equality can be achieved. Third wave feminism is the worst wave feminism! We thought 2014 would have made that abundantly clear. http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-ol-top-10-feminist-fiascoes-of-2014-20141219-story.html I have no idea why they left out Gamergate especially with Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn. Mattress girl too!! Nowhere in that post did you clearly explain that men and women face gender inequality in different forms. You…
/r/MensRights13/01/17 10:54 PM
1

Focusing on women's rights is a better option considering the west is still (socially) very patriarchal. Why does it matter whether or not society is patriarchal? Is it that by "patriarchal" you mean "against women"? Why focus on women's rights instead of focusing on everyone's rights? The basic principles of feminism, as you seem to represent them are nothing more than egalitarianism. So why stick with the feminism moniker?
/r/MensRights13/01/17 10:42 PM
14

Feminism has always been about more privilege for rich white women since day one. Sure there have been good things that came out of the movement for women's rights, but the straight dope on feminism is very easy to look up.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 10:37 PM
13

No. It's theft and maybe fraud. Also, you sound like you're saying it's OK for him to do this because some women have done that. Do you mean he should get away with it because they got away with it? That would make much more sense.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 10:25 PM
1

Watch out for the downvote brigades for comments like this. This sub has been moving from legitimate issues to petty things for quite a while now.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:30 PM
0

Good point. That's why all the bearded guys drink their beer with a straw!
/r/MensRights02/01/17 04:26 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 04:36 AM
-1

SHIT POST! How often do you see men use a straw? That's a lot of wasted straws. Also, this has nothing to do with men's rights. It's a good damn straw you whiny little twit.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 04:33 AM
2

Thank you for this.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 04:27 PM
0

It's "should have". Learn to read. If you bothered to read through my posts and comments you'd see that I'm a major MRA. I regularly piss off women by pointing out their misinformation and fallacious logic. I've even been banned by some of their subs. So, oh god you're one of those internet jerks that overreacts and jumps to conclusions.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 07:24 PM
0

It may be getting that way, but it wasn't always. I know very well that the mods used to police shit posts like this. It's well documented.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 03:33 AM
0

It is starting to become that way. The mods here used to be diligent about policing.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 01:54 AM
0

What is ffs? And no. I will not stop being the MRA police. I don't want this sub to degenerate into a bunch of pussy whiny petty bitching. I want us to be better than the feminists. Better by example.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 01:51 AM
-1

Yeah let's throw our fists in the air about something that doesn't have to do with the legal system in a sub specifically dedicated to affects of the legal system on men! We can be petty like feminists too! google for "mens issues reddit" and you'll get so many other subs where this post is relevant that maybe you can settle down about it not being relevant to this one. I remember you.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 10:58 PM
-7

There are plenty of subs for men's issues. This one is about men's rights.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 09:51 PM
1

Say out loud in the class that it's not true. Bring printed proof. Be devil's advocate before doing this though. i.e. do your best to prove the pay gap. Bring the list of resources for that effort to list the flaws in each one.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 06:04 PM
7

No way! Otherwise wouldn't there be a HUGE supply of it everywhere? (I can't even tell if I'm being sarcastic anymore. With this and that other recent post about the wife who confessed that the guys IVF son wasn't his, I'm just beside myself with contempt right now.)
/r/MensRights16/11/16 07:06 PM
1

Well I can only assume by your title that it's because she was charged with distribution of child pornography. Excellent. Justice is served.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 06:49 PM
1

I hope you feel welcome here. Occasionally there are posts and comments that are against the entire concept of being trans. Hopefully they will not deter you from coming here.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:34 PM
1

Ugh. Paying for dates is IMO the worst part about our side of things. A woman could literally line up free meals for most of her days just by flirting with strangers. Meanwhile for us dating is like bleeding money.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:44 PM
1

The headline was way overblown.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:41 PM
1

Well that's almost the comparison from the article, and definitely not the one I made. Women and men are in the same boat, well equivalent boats. Men's demands aren't written down because they are simple and well known: be sexy. Also they apply before any interaction. We rule out women by disregarding the ones that we don't want. Women have to rule out men after having been contacted. That can be just as tiresome as the mens' situation, but has a huge difference. The attention can overinflate he…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:22 PM
1

But they weren't being discriminated against or bullied. It was nothing more than typical "dating game". That's like claiming that ruling out fat or ugly women is bullying. It's all just bitching about dating.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:59 PM
1

seconded for both reasons.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:54 PM
2

It's not necessarily powerful just because you think it is, although I didn't downvote you for it.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:54 PM
1

It has been established for quite some time that we should be doing this. When I point it out to people I get downvoted.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:51 PM
1

She's no more spoiled or entitled than any other woman in history. She's dealing with the same overabundance that women have always dealt with. Also, even if she is spoiled or entitled, this post has nothing to do with mens rights.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:40 PM
1

this. 1000 times this. Women have to be thin and pretty. Men have to be the all singing all dancing date paying monkeys. I'm not claiming either one is worse.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:38 PM
4

You really have a way with words! (sincerely)
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:33 PM
1

Oops, that was my mistake. The article didn't say 'hired' at all. It just talked about collaboration.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 02:47 PM
10

Hillary's team hired collaborated with feminists to write articles that literally lied to imply that Bernie Sanders is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 09:25 PM
1

Wow. This topic deserves its own post! I had no idea. I wonder what other countries are like.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 12:10 PM
3

To be clear I'm not characterizing all MRAs. I'm only characterizing the ones that participate in this petty bullshit. Nowhere did I imply or state that any MRAs think all women are monsters. That was the other guy, and I don't agree with it. The only point that I ever made is that posts like this are unhelpful. After reading the rest of your comment, I think you meant to reply to someone else so I'm just going to let it go.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 12:05 PM
0

There's no way to consider my comments an attack on MRAs. You're personally exemplifying the "man baby". The cherry picking and bitchy comments aren't constructive. In fact they only help to provide support for SJWs and the media at large to find examples of us being petty. These are all concepts taught in primary school.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 01:37 PM
0

Very true! Doing it one at a time is childish, pedestrian, and petty. In other words, it proves nothing. National crime statistics are exactly what is needed. The study that we all love to cite that shows that women are the aggressors 70% of the time, and that lesbian relationships are the most violent is the kind of thing that we need to post here. Imagine having a debate with a feminist and each of you just point out one individual case after another.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:13 PM
-1

This shitpost doesn't belong here. The mods have made this abundantly clear. Posting individual incidents is the exact type of petty thing done in the SJW subs. It's petty. In fact, it's posted so early that it doesn't even yet belong in /r/pussypass because there's been no sentence.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 09:40 PM
1

Yeah I saw that too. IIRC, the greater distance was brought up in the court precedings. Oh well.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 11:23 PM
1

I thought I saw a post or a comment on a post in this sub that said they weren't behind a dumpster, but actually a good distance away. I can't find any info on this. Anyone else? EDIT: I think it was a nice bulleted list of the facts after the case was said and done.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 10:06 PM
2

App called alibi. It's awesome. I thought it would be always on but it is not. Maybe you have to start it each time you turn your phone on?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:38 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/56grjz/if_both_procedures_remove_about_the_same_amount/d8jadoc The more you know!
/r/MensRights08/10/16 08:34 PM
3

Thank you for the info and links! I had no idea that most of a man's nerve endings are there. Just to clear some things up though, there are more nerve endings in the whole rest of the body than the clitoris but that doesn't mean a woman can orgasm without one. Women are all over the place. Some can only orgasm from clitoral stimulation. Some only from penetration. So just comparing the number of nerve endings is like comparing hot dogs to tacos. Again, thanks for the prepuce fact. That actually…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 08:30 PM
5

They're usually not the same. I looked hard for statistics that support similarity, but it seems that female circumcision often removes the clitoris. That's a huge difference. Of course all circumcision is wrong.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 01:49 PM
3

what the actual fuck. They might as well make up a super hero name for the position because it "tackles" the big 3 "victims" of the white man. "I'm sorry sir your whiteness and masculinity are clearly a conflict of interest for each one of the aspects of this position."
/r/MensRights06/10/16 09:54 PM
2

First, why are you equating .12 to .171? Wikipedia agrees with your ratio anyway though. I'm using .23 because that's the closest I could get on the chart. 7 drinks for this man to be around .17. 10 drinks to be around .23. for a woman 100 lbs. to 200 lbs. it would take 5 - 10 drinks respectively to be at .23. 6-11 drinks for her to be at .26. He would have had to drink 150% more in order to be as drunk as her. It's funny that people use this comparison to say that she was the victim. I see that…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 04:16 PM
0

Can you translate this to English please? red-pill is a verb? hamster means what?
/r/MensRights03/10/16 03:55 PM
1

Reddit is also about news. Anyway, my point still stands. We've already discussed this topic to death. OP is beating a dead horse.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 07:24 PM
-3

This has already been discussed to death on this sub. It's incredibly old. Reddit is about news.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 03:43 PM
2

OH YOU MEAN TITLE 9! I was so confused about this new title for a while. Either way, you have excellent arguments.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 08:24 PM
1

Here are many examples. http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.html https://blogsforvictory.com/2010/12/18/wikileaks-michael-moores-sicko-banned-in-cuba-for-blatant-lies/
/r/MensRights13/09/16 07:59 PM
1

Or become a small business owner. Also good is anything where you're responsible for your income rather than just getting paid for a job.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 09:23 PM
1

The trend / generalization that I made about leftists. You gave yourself as a counterexample. I couldn't tell if you were being serious or not so I replied as if you were serious.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 09:13 PM
0

Now who's being a tool, bending my words to make my statement seem worse than it was. I didn't say all. It's like saying religious fanatics are righties rather than 'all' religious fanatics are righties. It happens to be true. (Although not the other way around.) The 'girth of the spectrum' gets removed when platforms are campaigned upon and policies are put into practice, not when observations are made about those things.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 09:09 PM
-1

It's not ignorant at all. Both are centered around the idea of equal outcomes as opposed to equal opportunities. There's nothing made up about that. This sub is littered with examples of feminists demonstrating behaviors that define the leftist school of thought.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 05:22 PM
1

Then you're an oxymoron. Mathematically, one counterexample doesn't undo a trend, yet you decided to post your personal anecdote rather than something that might actually refute my claim.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 05:13 PM
10

This is what it took for you to lose respect for the guy! Completely spreading lies in all of his movies wasn't enough?
/r/MensRights12/09/16 01:27 AM
-14

Yet another example of a pet theory of mine: lefties can't conceptualize math.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 01:25 AM
0

Shit post.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 10:30 AM
8

Woah there buddy! I'd like this sub to be pro deodorant please. Hygiene and courtesy are not lying! OK even if they are, please lie to me.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 04:08 AM
2

but are they pissy and passive aggressive to women too?
/r/MensRights29/08/16 09:21 PM
1

I'm not cherry picking anything! I don't disagree with any of your facts. I agree with all of them in fact! The entire point of our dialogue has been that you are completely ignoring the context of the original comment: Even if you're less likely to be victimized the stakes are higher if you are victimized as a women. I never said women have it bad. The examples supported my point that women are typically weaker and more fragile. Never have and never would I say that women must be fearful of eve…
/r/MensRights29/08/16 03:13 PM
0

Are you a troll sent to make MRA look like total idiots? A typical woman would have to lift weights and / or get serious about martial arts in order to be on par with a typical man. Didn't you see the posts about females' injury rates in the US military training camps. What about all of the posts about world champion women's football teams getting owned by teams of 15 year old boys. I'm talking about everyday scenarios.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 05:27 AM
9

Slow clap, my friend.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 04:41 AM
1

Reread the context of the comment. It wasn't about higher chance of victimization. For someone who is in the middle of being victimized, the stakes are higher for women because they're smaller, weaker, and are always carrying around something desirable that men do not have: a vagina. I'm a staunch supporter of men's rights. That doesn't mean I can deny the facts.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 04:32 AM
20

Ha! Labial vote! I'm using that! You are a comedian!
/r/MensRights28/08/16 09:49 PM
7

Wow she's illiterate.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 09:46 PM
1

Does anyone have a nice set of stats like this for other countries? US maybe?
/r/MensRights24/08/16 09:01 PM
1

You're an idiot. Men's social issue does not equal men's rights issue. It's just that simple. Even though it's important to me, this is not the forum to discuss it. There are other similar subs that are all just fine for that. Your other assumptions about me are also completely wrong. They say a lot more about you than me.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 11:26 AM
1

It is definitely my issue. Socially accepted differences in clothing is in fact a big issue for me. Again, this sub is not men's issues. It's men's rights. The moderators specifically state that it's about rights to avoid deteriorating into a catty bitchfest like the feminist subs. If you think complaining about opinion pieces that are complaining about fashion differences is a rights issue then you need to step outside of your cushy little box and go out into the real world. First, those boys a…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 09:42 PM
1

If this was about employees in a company having to wear pants in hot weather it would be a men's rights issue. This is strictly fashion which makes it a men's issue, not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 09:34 PM
0

It has nothing to do with rights. This sub is men's rights not /r/omgbillythosewomenzbitchaboutclothesandwecantevenwearcargoshortsnow_puhlease In all seriousness, social standards of clothing are unfortunate for both sexes, but in different ways. Women can't be topless in most places and situations. Women can seriously abuse workplace dress code in hot weather. Men's personal expression and creativity are stifled, and some women have to cover up or be murdered. It's unfortunate but linking to on…
/r/MensRights21/08/16 10:47 PM
-2

/u/Benito_Mussolini is right. This is trivial catty bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 10:14 PM
1

Honestly, with respect to the sexes, this seems amoral. It's a theme. There are cougar bars. There are other bars that are themed. I'm trying to be serious here, so please politely tell me how I'm wrong. This seems more like ageism rather than sexism, if anything. Edit: nevermind. I don't know what I was thinking. This is clearly illegal discrimination against men. Sure it would be wonderful for people to be able to do business as they see fit ,but it is illegal.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 05:36 PM
0

Maybe because it's just a giant piece of flamebait.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 03:56 PM
1

this has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 03:21 PM
1

That's my point exactly.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 06:58 PM
2

That's a great description.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 06:45 PM
3

modern liberal is actually a progressive. This leaves actual liberals high and dry for a term, which is why they've started using libertarian to describe themselves.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 05:34 PM
2

Extremely petty. This sub has been going downhill.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 05:32 PM
1

Indeed. In fact this entire post is just bitch, moan, whine. This is men's rights, not men's social irritations.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 05:31 PM
-2

Woman is singular. Women is plural. I'm taking the time to say this because I notice it far too often these days.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 05:33 PM
6

Someone should create a bot to reverse the genders and retweet. Edit: autocorrect fix
/r/MensRights21/07/16 11:30 PM
1

I fear that this sub is turning away from men's rights and toward bitching about women.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:39 PM
1

Not callous. Just calling it like it is, all without resorting to childish name calling. This sub is about rights, not social justice. In fact we specifically mock SJW's all the time. It strives to be better than the feminist subs where irrational bitching runs rampant. Remember the test we often use where male and female (or male and black person) pronouns are switched in some text to see if it's sexist? Switch the pronouns for this article and then see what I mean. The majority of these are so…
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:32 PM
-9

That list is mainly a bitch whine and moan fest.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 07:59 PM
1

I heartily agree. I too wear skirts sometimes. They're definitely more comfortable than anything else.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 01:45 PM
1

The closest thing that had anything to do with men's rights in this article was the mention that some women are secretly discontinuing birth control. It didn't mention anything about the man getting screwed over in the divorces.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 01:02 PM
1

People do think twice about female soldiers, female firefighters, etc. /u/kaio-kenX20 isn't trying to pigeonhole men and women into stereotypical roles. He's only pointing out that modern society is pushing men and women to do the same and be the same whether they want to or not, but the reality is that men and women are built differently for a reason. He is claiming that they can't be social equals. You're focusing too hard on the statement: “Men and women are equal,” along with “Men and women …
/r/MensRights28/06/16 10:08 PM
1

This is not relevant to this sub at all.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 05:15 PM
1

8.2-7.8=.4 .4*60 minutes / 1 hour = 24 minutes.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 07:53 PM
1

Thank you for this. I was just about to say the same thing. If she got a slap on the wrist and the article was about that, then it would be slightly better but still one single case. It doesn't matter how many single cases are listed on this sub. Trends can not be gleaned from them. Only the whole sum matters.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 06:15 PM
2

The UK has a leftist problem. Boob jobs and taxis on the NHS!
/r/MensRights23/06/16 06:39 PM
1

Thank you. That's disgusting.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:30 PM
1

How does the bill outlaw criticisms against feminism? I assume it's in relation to the extension of outlawing hate propaganda. Can you elaborate for us non-Canadians please?
/r/MensRights21/06/16 06:04 PM
2

slow. clap. That's the point I've tried to make as well. There's a strong possibility that they're both in the same situation: due to inebriation they're either both innocent or both culpable. When you're that drunk you have little control over your decisions, and he didn't drag or carry her there.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 07:21 PM
3

It was just a pandering fluff piece with the writing capability of a twelve year old.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:07 AM
3

The title is not reflected in the video. That dude was dominating all of the guys he fought. It seemed as if the fighters were told to keep going until the refs pulled then apart. So it would make sense to pull him away so quickly from a smaller more fragile opponent. Noticed that he wasn't admonished or reprimanded in any way. Also there was no fist fight between males. It was broken up before anything happened. It's bad enough to post inflammatory content, but false inflammatory content makes …
/r/MensRights30/05/16 08:01 PM
12

Some shitlord in the comments tried to use logic! One thing that I would like clarified: if women's soccer and men's soccer are different sports - why should there be equal pay?
/r/MensRights29/05/16 02:43 PM
1

The standard deviations [between males and females] for IQ and spatial acuity are different. Of course IQ and spatial acuity are measured differently so think about it before speaking and realize that the statement was in the context of your statement about men having larger standard deviations for any measurable trait. I didn't phrase anything slightly incorrectLY. as a whole == men on average == average man I didn't confuse anything. It's important to have reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:43 PM
1

The standard deviations for IQ and spatial acuity are different. Unlike IQ, men as a whole are better at spatial acuity than women.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:04 PM
1

It said genetic physical superiority. Genetics gives men the necessary organs to flood the body with testosterone rather than estrogen. That's how it works.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:01 PM
2

That's fantastic.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 03:59 PM
1

That's what happens when you don't pay your team enough!
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:42 PM
3

I don't believe everything that I see at first glance, especially sensationalist headlines, especially from tabloid media. Even in the blurry pic on the right you can see the quote came from her agent instead of her.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 07:42 PM
74

It's this kind of petty post that we're trying to avoid.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 01:01 PM
2

None of that has anything to do with capitalism.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:48 PM
5

Safer work place is in there 3 times. Wtf is "having it all"
/r/MensRights18/05/16 11:22 PM
1

It's not his definition of equality. It's his definition of what we have now.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:51 AM
1

Fascinating. I'm surprised that most people make the wrong assumption about the correlation between the levels of hostile and benevolent sexism from a person. There are just too many examples of chauvinists and egalitarians rather than lovers and haters.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 07:55 PM
1

At least in the US more women are starting to dissociate with feminism. https://www.google.com/search?q=less+women+united+states+feminism&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
/r/MensRights12/05/16 07:39 PM
2

Now if you could just convince everyone else that men in the women's restroom is ok I could agree with your actions. I'm all for mixed gender restrooms though.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 04:27 PM
1

Wow someone actually agreed with you despite the glaring difference in men's vs. women's dress code. Men are not forced to wear high heels. Women are. By definition the "dress code...everyone is" is sexist.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 04:23 PM
1

Well she's trying to remove the law that allows employers to create dress codes that "they feel are smart" when such codes are sexist. So there's a chance that men wearing shorts / skirts in the summer can come of this too.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 04:18 PM
1

No you have the wrong question. Women are "forced" not "allowed."
/r/MensRights11/05/16 04:14 PM
1

It is discrimination. The dress code forces women to wear them and not men. This story was already posted on 3 other subs. Here is a copy of my comment from one of those: High heels have no other function than to make women more sexually attractive. They restrain the posture to help create a 43 degree angle at the small of the back which indicates optimal ability to carry a fetus. They make feet look smaller. They make legs look longer. They make each glute bob up and down with each step. Consid…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 04:12 PM
1

That's not what I said. You obviously added on all the rest of that. My point is that there are marriages that don't end because one or both parties refuse to let it go. Now can we let this conversation go?
/r/MensRights10/05/16 09:22 PM
1

Which can be worse than the alternative!
/r/MensRights10/05/16 07:58 PM
1

It's sad. They have awesome videos on mens rights. Then I went to their channel to find out that their main agenda is christianity.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 08:54 PM
2

The title of this post is misleading. The article more specifically says to stop forced feminization of boys. Let them be masculine if they want to. Iirc, it specifically states that the crossdressing potter can dress the way he wants also.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 06:07 PM
14

Any institution stupid enough to not only believe the wage gap myth but act on it is also too stupid to be profitable.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 01:34 PM
3

Unfortunately this sub has become very anti-trans in the past few years. It used to be very accepting with sentiments like, "It's a man's right to be what he wants, including being a woman," and, "Join the club." EDIT It's good to see all of the supportive comments here.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 08:04 PM
2

Suffrage. Men in the US don't have that right yet. Can anyone from other countries add your situation here.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 12:27 AM
1

and 82,000. That's the important part. Putting her in jail isn't nearly as useful as the fine.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:43 PM
1

Can you recall some of the other account names?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 02:52 AM
5

This reply was awesome. Your definitions in the original comment really had me wondering about you though. Intersex doesn't have to have anything to do with transgender or transsexual. Plenty of intersex people just say they're intersex. My experience matches yours about people who self identify as tranny. It is extremely rare for anyone but a transvestite to do that.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:32 PM
12

Replace it with a copy of the rules.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 08:14 AM
1

You are fantastic.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 12:35 PM
1

It doesn't always come down to hours. Tell that to a crab fisherman, a fireman, an EMT, a Marine, a professional athlete, a porn star, or a supermodel.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 05:02 AM
1

Wow that was a long response. I should have been clearer. I jumped working more vigorously and working more hours together into working harder.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 04:41 AM
1

Oh no doubt. I bet almost every perpetrator is judeo Christian and that many acts of violence happen. That doesn't change my assertion (assumption) that they're a niche group. About the 89% of counties without addition clinics, I wonder how many of them are due to low population vs. religious beliefs. I can only hope it's the former. Anyway that was some pretty interesting info you found.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 04:37 AM
2

Seconded. The analogy to the evangelicals is not accurate. Tons of people and Presidents alike perpetuate the pay gap myth, for example. There are not tons of people who want to bomb abortion clinics while shouting "JEESUS!"
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:32 PM
3

At least we have Simpsons, Family Guy, and Southpark. Also reruns of King of the Hill and Futurama. I'm interested to know of some of the shows that you referenced. Also some shows that are still watchable.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:26 PM
7

They also get paid differently for the same job when they do any of these three things: don't work as hard don't work as well don't push as hard for raises
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:22 PM
4

and Jimmy aired those responses.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:21 PM
1

These are the future leaders of our country. They will be running things when we're too old to do anything about it.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 08:02 PM
5

we should all submit feedback using the button on the bottom of the page. We should link them to results from their own search engine about men working 14% more, and the direct correlation between living in affluent countries and the fewer women in STEM. Also, point out Christina Hoff Summers on their very own youtube!
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:16 PM
0

you are correct
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:11 PM
1

unions don't require regulation. unions are fine until they are regulated.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:02 PM
1

No. Regular people should and do create their own support networks. Gangs, unions, fraternal orders, families, neighborhoods, etc.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 03:56 PM
1

Sure there's more to society than the market. Social services are important. Just don't force participation. Let people create their own social support networks.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 03:35 PM
1

I do contribute to society, it's called my job.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 03:26 PM
1

Very good. Different means different. That still doesn't change the fact that I needed to work hard to get where I am. If I didn't I'd still be poor. I did and now I'm not poor. I'm not denying that there are other factors involved. Don't deny that my hard work payed off.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:49 PM
1

True because it happened idiot. It's a recorded event. I'm in these current circumstances.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:20 PM
1

Wow! I'm in the top 10%! I was in the bottom 30% for a while but my hard work ethic payed off.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 11:06 PM
1

So you repeated exactly why you do in fact oppose cheaper populations. I've been surrounded by US college kids my whole life. As a whole they are definitely very left. I never suggested that they hold any political power, that our politicians are lefty enough, or that my dad can beat up your dad.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 11:02 PM
1

Fair distribution happens when people freely choose to do business with each other. Any other distribution is therefore not fair.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 10:57 PM
1

Even if you measure success by the % of people below your poverty line think that they deserve cable TV, smartphones, and free healthcare, it's still a huge success.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 10:28 PM
1

I just called the unethical actions of both sides evil. So who's ideaology am I parroting? hypocrite offshore! offshore! offshore! offshore! offshore! offshore! offshore! offshore! offshore! offshore! offshore! offshore! offshore! offshore! offshore!
/r/MensRights31/03/16 10:26 PM
1

What do you have against cheaper populations? Are you ethnocentric? Racist? I thought you want "the poor working man" to be able to make a buck. If you're against letting someone offer to work for less then do you make sure to find the highest price for everything that you buy? After all, the cheaper price came from cheaper labor. And no, college students are probably the leftiest group of all. That's saying a lot considering how bad US unions are.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 10:24 PM
1

It was a complete success. The numbers don't lie. Chile's GDP has soared over the rest of Latin America once they got the Chicago Plan right. Most of the people were not in poverty. The pollution was a problem, but that's yet another failure to protect individual's from harm. There I go again, protecting individual rights.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 10:21 PM
1

That's what happens with freedom. Some people gain faster than others. The only way to keep that from happening is to stifle them by either stealing their earned wealth and giving it to the poor, or keeping them from earning in the first place with restrictions. Many of the people who don't earn much get jealous of the wealthy and start to go for their torches and pitchforks, so one or both of the aforementioned methods of leftist income redistribution happens to keep the peace. Keep in mind tha…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 10:16 PM
1

Fascinating. It's numbers fit with other sources. Clearly Pinochet's people did a bad job. Specific examples are fixing the exchange rate, then taking control of the banks after the fixed exchange rate tanked the economy. Both critics and praisers seem to agree that 60% of the improvements that happened in the late 80's came from proper implementation of the Chicago Boy's plan. So when it's all said and done, I don't see any propaganda here. Even the CIA's involvement seems well known.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:51 PM
1

Wow, I was unaware. After reading about it, Chile sounds great! Still, I think I would definitely prefer Switzerland.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:09 PM
1

THE CORPERAYSHONS! punches air with fist
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:59 PM
1

So far I have only expressed the importance of protecting individual rights, and that identity politics does not respect them. It specifically disrespects them in a lefty style that is well defined by a simple google and / or wikipedia search. So far you've said, "Th' corperayshuns!" Please continue!
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:50 PM
1

Most leftists are useful idiots for other leftists that are taking advantage of them. That's how equal outcome works. They are leftists. They are leftists. They are leftists. They are leftists. Woah, that was tiring! At least I think it's enough to counter your silly back and forth repetitive game playing.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:32 PM
1

You claim that you know more about it than I do, but you have no real idea. Your inability to compare apples to apples is so typical of a leftist. I'm glad that leftist infighting has increased so much in the last few years.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:14 PM
1

You're a crackpot. Go look up "True Scottsman."
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:01 PM
11

The men should also sue for equal pay then! The women are comparatively getting paid much more.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:00 PM
1

you have no idea what I think, especially because you can't read. I never said the movements are the True Scottsman. In fact I agree with you that they are: controlled rebellion, that achieve nothing but disrupt any sort of political dissent, and scape goat average guys. Identity politics is inherently left by definition because their goal is equal outcome. There's no other way around it. You can repeat your silly logical fallacy until you're blue in the face, but it won't make it true.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:49 PM
1

don't date a feminist.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:41 PM
1

your definition of left is not the definition of left. unfortunately many people who say they are left / right have wildly different beliefs from others who say they're in the same camp. But it all boils down to equality of outcome vs equality of opportunity.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:39 PM
1

You're lumping too many groups together. People pushing identity politics can be Marxist or otherwise. Either way, no one said anything about corporations or said that Marxist and "identity politics people" are one in the same. You said they aren't left. I pointed out how they are absolutely left.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:29 PM
1

They go for equal outcome rather than equal opportunity. That's exactly what the left and Marxists have been going for all along.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:11 PM
2

Not relevant
/r/MensRights27/03/16 10:14 PM
4

I liked his "end women's suffrage" stunt on "The Man Show". This seemed similar. Most of the answers that they chose were actually true. (Not working as hard) Maybe he has to tone it down a little for network TV. Honestly, I can't recall if he's done a bunch of pro-feminist things or not.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 03:07 PM
1

I'm glad that this is the top comment.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 01:21 PM
8

Ah men's rights. The place where the downtrodden's plea for help is best answered by deez_nuts. May I be the first to say deez_nuts is a hero!
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:16 PM
0

Nungesser's suit listed tons of examples where the university allowed mattress girl to do and say certain things that were clearly harassing while not letting him do anything about it and, most importantly, that the university could not provide a single fact to disprove his claim that the decisions were all based upon gender. The judge is an asshat. He tries to claim that Nungesser believes it all stems from being accused of a sexual act, yet none of Nungesser's statements support that claim. In…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 10:36 PM
3

after reading the judge's dismissal, it's clear that the judge did say that. He clarifies early on that Title 9 means 'sex' as 'gender'. He goes on to specifically state that "As an initial matter, the Court rejects the assumption that calling someone a rapist, falsely or not, is inherently gendered."
/r/MensRights15/03/16 10:16 PM
2

Should have
/r/MensRights12/03/16 02:56 PM
1

You beat me to it, cheers.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 04:42 AM
1

Duhhhh, because only white women have enough power to be heard, so they have to speak out on behalf of all women!
/r/MensRights09/03/16 04:38 AM
1

I can't stop. I'm having too much fun watching you attempting to deflect away from your deceitful argument by attacking me. The words are there. There is no changing what has been said or moving of any goal posts. My goal is and has always been the same: to point out that estradiol is not as dangerous as you portrayed it to be. Notice how you haven't moved past your one and only technical point. You've made no attempt to defend your argument, let alone admit that you used facts to make a dishone…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:50 AM
0

When I originally said that it does increase chance of blindness I immediately followed with a statement about their being a huge list of other things that are more likely to cause blindness. "more likely" means that I admit it's technically possible, otherwise I would have included a list of things that "actually" cause blindness. What I've been pointing out in all of these comments is you're focusing on my omission of a qualifier like "effectively" or "significantly" in the first sentence of m…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 09:32 PM
0

Your ad hominem attack on my wording as an attempt to deflect from your argument is sad. I repeat: the bottom line is that blindness is not a serious risk of taking estradiol. You pretended that it is in order to emotionally build up your argument that estradiol is dangerous.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 03:55 PM
0

No. You're actually using "feels" emotional language in place of rational arguments. Specifically you're exaggerating and pretending that you're not. You included blindness in your short list of reasons why estradiol is dangerous. Sure, I should have said that the likelihood is around 0.13%, rather than saying that it doesn't cause blindness. My error pales in comparison to your firm stance that blindness is a serious danger of taking estradiol. Second, you clearly misunderstand that the differe…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:23 AM
0

Actually you're entire argument hangs on a technicality. After I linked to the huge list of things that are more likely to cause blindness you're only digging yourself deeper by continuing. So by all means keep going. And yes. You specifically stated that someone with CAIS is a man.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 09:48 AM
1

Laws are unfortunately absolutely a popularity contest. US history has tons of great examples of that. Even present day.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 03:47 PM
1

Yes very easily enforced as long as everyone who enters a bathroom submits to a genitalia inspection. The hermaphrodites can go fuck themselves. (Pun intended)
/r/MensRights05/03/16 03:38 PM
1

It does not increase chance of blindness. http://www.ehealthme.com/ds/estradiol/blindness Here is a huge list of things that are all more likely to increase chance of blindness including vitamin C and aspirin. Click the tab with the concentric circles in the red box. http://factmed.com/study-SANDRENA%202.5%20MG%20(ESTRADIOL)-causing-BLINDNESS%20UNILATERAL.php You're comments are full of lies that are hiding behind the pretense of facts. Also treating someone with CAIS as male is incorrect and cr…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 03:35 PM
1

Look up androgen insensitivity syndrome, and genetic disorders where someone is XXY and then try saying all of that again. Those are just genetic examples. Biology is messy. There are plenty of other things that can go wrong besides genes. Shit, men have nipples!
/r/MensRights05/03/16 03:06 PM
2

Very true. You forgot though that because man = bad, that all transgendered are bad because they're either traitors or they're not real women. Infiltrators!
/r/MensRights05/03/16 02:28 PM
4

I was surprised at the quality of the article. The focus wasn't on the incident. Instead it was on the problems that we get when we act on the premise that "your rights end where my feelings begin." So are we supposed to accept discussion restraints because someone might talk about rape in the presence of a victim but brush away any concern for past victims actually confronted with a male in spaces where women get naked? The same thing goes for "secret homosexual voyeurs / voyeuses" in the "corr…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:59 PM
1

Now you're just being silly. Free trade existed for thousands of years before protectionism could ever happen. There weren't enough people to protect or enforce any protection! Look at cause and effect. You say trade policies caused job outsourcing. It's sure a lot easier to just pay employees less than to outsource. Your infrastructure and logistics are already in place. So there was a cause that came before: expensive workers. They were expensive because of wage protection. Also your conclusio…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 03:07 PM
1

slippery slope fallacy premise: corporations not inhibited in any way slippery slope conclusion: slave labour becomes the norm The west doesn't have slave labour because we have and uphold laws against slavery. If by "slave labour" you actually mean something like "sweat shops" then the reason the west doesn't have those anymore is because we moved past that part of industrial revolution. We're already seeing improvement in some of the countries that were notorious for sweat shops. Yes, wages an…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 02:59 PM
1

There is no international governing body to impose those restrictions. Also the evidence, both intranational and international, shows that protectionism hurts both parties involved. If a nation succeeds in restricting something then it goes unused. It doesn't get fertilized by international income or harvested for international sale. The fruit that does get used can't compete with the new better fruit from international markets that all the locals now desire. Finally, the local producers shut do…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 12:11 PM
1

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman Also "slippery slope" and "loaded question".
/r/MensRights02/03/16 12:01 PM
1

You didn't do any research. You're just spouting more of your ignorant mythos. I'd cite specific research but Google is better because it produces tons of examples. Also Google removes the possibility of any cherry-picking. Here's one example of an easy search that you should have done: "immigrants increase jobs". Wage protection causes workers to lose their jobs (auto industry) and / or temporarily drives prices up until everyone else's pay is adjusted accordingly (service industry). Protection…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 11:54 AM
4

There's no way around it because, thankfully, there is no single international governing body to interfere with free trade. Jobs have been moving around internationally for hundreds of years. Go ahead and try to find a trade restriction that helped anyone. Instead of getting paid less people lose their jobs entirely.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 09:21 PM
3

Please don't post things that you don't directly tie in to men's rights. Unfortunately, your post is actually against everyone's right to freedom, and therefore against men's rights. Feminists want equal outcome rather than equal opportunity. The same goes for socialism. Notice the old logo of a Fist in the air being reused in the civil rights movement of the 60's and also in feminism. Immigration restrictions, unions ( as they have operated in the US for decades), and especially wage protection…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 09:14 PM
2

They're a cult. Their level of crazy is so far out there that they shouldn't be associated with any group they claim to be.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 03:08 PM
2

This is not productive.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 11:59 PM
2

Tldr. You're a flaming jackass. It says national executive committee is investigating him. The word 'police is never used. Here's the final paragraph where it specifically says that it's not illegal: The party clearly had to investigate the allegations, he said, adding: "The simple fact is that it might not be illegal but a lot of people are going to disapprove of that sort of age gap and that sort of texting, particularly given this is an MP who made the exposure of child abuse a key part of hi…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 02:18 PM
5

This is clickbait. It should say politician rather than adult male. Also the police are not investigating. His party is investigating. The article clearly points out that she is off consenting age. Tldr: politicians being politicians. Nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 08:19 PM
1

9 people who didn't read the article.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 05:16 PM
1

Privacy can be maintained by hiding all identifiers except sex. You have a point about companies trying to maintain a good image. I hope that maintaining their financial bottom line leads them otherwise.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 06:19 PM
1

Like Milo I was enthusiastic until I saw your comment. I think you're right. However, it will be in businesses' best interests to also publish the other data to avoid their own shit storm. I imagine it'll be hard to prohibit them from doing so too.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 04:57 PM
0

Ah good point. I am not. To clarify, I'm only pointing out that people are not equal in the way that feminists mean. I'm also pointing out that pretending that we're equal in certain realms can be deadly.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 11:46 PM
0

I know the correlation is loose. The US marines' study where all male combat units faired better has implications for men on the front lines. EDIT: I'm all for letting women into more positions within the military. I especially approve of a female draft and putting women on the front lines. I'm not supportive of getting troops killed by shoehorning unfit troops into situations where they shouldn't be fit the sake of "equality".
/r/MensRights22/12/15 11:38 PM
-2

On the subject of female toughness in general, and relevant to the recent changes in US military policy. Also can anyone recall an example of a woman doing something like this? Cutting off her own arm to escape from a rock climbing accident? Anything?
/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:33 PM
3

The US military has different hair standards for the sexes too.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:18 PM
1

Correct. That post had nothing to do with rights. Rights extend beyond legal and governmental realms. Rights involve ethics. Examples of businesses charging different amounts for men and women based on the wage gap myth is ill conceived. Teaching methods, policies, curriculum, etc. that give boys a harder time is unethical. "Women and children first" policies are unethical and are often enforced outside the legal realm. All of those topics belong in this sub.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 09:10 AM
0

I don't have an SJW agenda or narrative. I specifically said that we shouldn't resort to things like that. I should have mentioned the wage gap, the treatment of boys in elementary school, and women in STEM. Neither of these involve legal or governmental issues but they are central themes for MRM. Before you start, yes, politicians bring these issues up. Of course they do. Politicians pander to voters. But all of these issues primarily involve public opinion. EDIT: Rights extend beyond legal and…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 08:47 AM
0

men have concrete examples too, but people at large don't care about them. Feminists' focus on specific examples like this is a huge reason that feminism took a huge hit in 2014. Their examples were all bullshit that backfired on them. When trying to win an argument, the counting of specific examples wastes time and frustrates everyone. What you have done with your post is to provide a specific example to add to a count. Nothing about it has any merit to stand on its own. This is your conflation…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 11:00 PM
2

2 is opinion. it even specifically says right in the image. it's meant to change opinion on what is socially acceptable. Nice lying in the form of cherrypicking by the way. The 13th one was about Ellen Page's hiring practices. One such practice, the removal of salary negotiations can't be legally challenged because of the freedom to work somewhere else or employ someone else. 2 of 12 is 17% 3 of 13 is about 25%. You claim that this sub is about only rights. Frankly a single post about something …
/r/MensRights18/12/15 10:47 PM
3

Sort men's rights posts by "top" and then make that claim again. Sure most of the posts deal with legal and governmental issues. That's not the point. There are other posts too. Considering that the opinions of everyone here outweigh yours alone, and the top posts are one sufficient indicator of the nature of this sub, I can confidently say that you are wrong about this sub at least. Go ahead and try to support your argument about the mrm in general. May your evidence be compelling.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:55 PM
9

You misunderstand both of them. They aren't ridiculing men who don't fit into the manly stereotype. They ridicule men who join with feminists for any reason including the lack of fitting into the manly stereotype. To be honest I don't really like most of these vloggers. They tend to just rant and bitch rather than say anything useful.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:23 PM
5

No. The mrm is also about not having to live up to someone else's standards of what it means to be manly. This doesn't have to have anything to do with progressiveness or SJW. A person whose goal is to change hearts and minds, but who refuses to resort to feminist tactics such as bullying, lying, and lobbying for laws based on equality of outcomes, is in line with the mrm. One example that doesn't necessarily have to do with government or legal rights is the portrayal of men in the sex safety vi…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:18 PM
6

Replace men with "blacks". Yet another example!
/r/MensRights18/12/15 08:29 PM
1

And you are an idiot. I never said your post dealt with leniency. Therefore your statement is irrelevant. You have no idea how the average person's mind works. For us, posts of mundane specific examples just clutter up the sub. To outsiders our sub just looks like a circle jerk. Unlike you I have supporting evidence for my claim. The feminist subs sometimes like to take (cherry picked) screenshots of our sub with posts like these, and then claim that we're a bunch of whiny crybabies. They've nev…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:45 AM
1

Then post about a study of systematic leniency for female murder suspects. Specific examples like this are not useful. The problem with a specific example is that it is only one. Therefore it doesn't mean anything. A significant amount of specific examples would have to be collected in order for them to have real value. Littering this sub with many specific examples clutters this sub with links that we don't even need to click. The title says it all. Posting occasional links to studies or collec…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:05 AM
1

She's half right. Unfortunately, iirc, studies have shown that humans are at the top of the list of species that will get their jollies from just about anything. That's greater in both preponderance and number of different animals and things that we'll use. I can't recall the reference. Hopefully we're not #1 anymore. Notice: humans includes women. Have a nice day!
/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:55 PM
3

Studies show that women in cultures that treat the sexes equally don't choose STEM majors. Otherwise women do choose STEM fields. https://youtu.be/tiJVJ5QRRUE
/r/MensRights13/12/15 04:11 PM
1

Eye rape is what that woman is doing to that poor bastard and it's just as bad as reverse rape.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 10:48 PM
6

The boy was right. What an asshole. Although I think this must have been a drama school because every action of every person, and also the language used is super melodramatic. "Now that my education and reputation are severely damaged I must present you with sufficient evidence to clear my name that I could have easily given to you this whole time. May you be cursed with guilt for all eternity!" EDIT: action not evasion
/r/MensRights12/12/15 08:22 PM
1

Oh interesting! I wondered if you meant funneled from college to prison. Thanks for clearing that up.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:29 PM
1

Sure no correlation is mentioned on the article... Even for the rest of the article. Wow you are amazing.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:27 PM
0

They're also unabashedly socialist.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:40 PM
0

Just like we say to women: you survive a murder attempt, not rape.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:48 PM
1

Of course it can. You're an adult and so is your father. He assaulted you. Get the police to take photos of your face and his knuckles before the wounds heal.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:24 PM
1

School to prison pipeline? Can you elaborate please?
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:09 PM
1

The first two sentences. I don't understand why I even have to say that. Go back and read the first two sentences of your link.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:06 PM
1

No. Your original statement said nothing about admissions. Your second statement was dishonesty because the link clearly stated that admissions favor women by far. Then it went on to discuss 128 of the most selective schools where about half slightly favored men for that particular year while simultaneously having more existing female students!
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:40 AM
1

Name some cases where affirmative action helps men in schools. Men in general, not divided by race.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:40 PM
1

Down voted because it's incorrect. The statistics are often posted in this sub.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:39 PM
1

No. You said being male benefits you at more schools than it hurts you. This is not true. There is more free money for women. More females than males are in BS, MS, and PHD programs in the U.S. for a few years female graduates have been out-earning male graduates. There are programs to exclusively help women in STEM fields including female job fairs.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:37 PM
2

No. She's assuming THE PATRIARCHY!
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:12 PM
1

Her cognitive dissonance is off the charts! Her article is solely focused on the cognitive dissonance of a white woman that exactly mirrors her own! Affirmative action unfairly helps colored people! Affirmative action unfairly helps white women! They each want help from the nanny state to help their own self or at least their tour of people. I do admit that the crazy white girl also has the additional dissonance of suing in order to undo the very policies that would enable specifically her to ge…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:11 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3vv3pk/industry_dear_gamergate_please_stop_stealing_our/ It's pointed out often in this sub that we shouldn't support organizations like The Guardian by visiting their pages.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:27 AM
1

Not relevant!
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:42 PM
-1

He says he's a communist. He acts like a communist. Communism's goal is equality of outcomes. Sounds familiar? (Feminism ). Therefore he can not stand for men's rights, or anyone's rights for that matter. Only a moral system founded on each individual's rights ( equal opportunity ) can truly protect anyone's rights. Unfortunately most politicians pander to popular opinion which is understandable considering how voting works.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:17 PM
2

For the millionth time, use archive.org rather than support the guardian!
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:29 PM
1

Thanks that's very useful!
/r/MensRights07/12/15 11:23 AM
1

Sincere question: how have they benefited more with Obama?
/r/MensRights06/12/15 08:49 PM
1

At 10:10 Elliott Rodger did not fatally shoot 6 women and 0 men. He stabbed 3 men to death, fatally shot 2 women and 1 man. Also wounded other people.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:57 PM
1

No. The entire reason that affirmative consent came into being is from situations where the guy thought everything was fine because she said yes, then the next day she claims that she changed her mind during the encounter. Some feminists claim that a woman can change her mind during the act and that it's the man's responsibility to continuously ask, "can I thrust again?" to make sure he's not raping her. Meanwhile, plenty of experts are pointing out that the woman regrets the sex and tries to de…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:58 PM
1

The yes means yes laws of new York, California, etc. Came out of it. EDIT https://web.archive.org/web/20151129153453/http://www.bustle.com/articles/120588-7-things-you-might-think-are-consent-that-arent Honestly your accusation was cheap. A quick Google search and or our sidebar has the references that you're looking for
/r/MensRights29/11/15 03:23 PM
0

Next up, blurred faces and auto tuned voices for job interviews because patriarchy!
/r/MensRights26/11/15 04:48 PM
2

Correction: straight males are excluded. http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/11/24/canada-will-take-in-gay-refugees-from-syria/
/r/MensRights26/11/15 04:33 PM
-1

She's right about some of the examples. Switch the genders and see for yourself. Others are complete BS. If I search for celebrity gossip and cooking all day then Google should show me great deals on tampons!
/r/MensRights24/11/15 09:10 PM
3

That was amazing!
/r/MensRights24/11/15 08:25 PM
2

I tried to search for the Swedish experiment. Can you elaborate or link me please?
/r/MensRights24/11/15 07:02 PM
2

What about this https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/jgrcj/as_requested_iama_28_year_old_female_with/?sort=confidence
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:58 PM
0

What about this https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/jgrcj/as_requested_iama_28_year_old_female_with/?sort=confidence
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:57 PM
8

Meanwhile: thanks for the free advertising!
/r/MensRights14/11/15 02:31 PM
3

That was unexpected. Robin Williams, John Belushi? Edit: these were meant as alternatives to Devito. They were not meant to be a contrast between beauty + boring vs regular + fun.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:47 PM
0

This is not a good example of fat acceptance being fraud. She recognizes that she's not beautiful, admits it, accepts it, and hold her head high as a person. Being a famous actress with a boyfriend probably helps though.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:28 PM
2

Photo confirmation: Taylor Swift is a smoking hot robo babe.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:25 PM
3

She has a great attitude there. Looks aren't everything. Would you rather hang out with Danny Devito or Zoolander?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:23 PM
12

They were the ones who kept encroaching upon him.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:36 AM
1

Was that posted on this sub?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:32 PM
18

Because someone who uses such a flawed study as the CDC 2010 nisvs (especially going further by disregarding the data that disagrees with her views) to push gender stereotypes while pretending to help everyone should not get to be called a doctor.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 09:17 AM
3

No. It's not a good reason. In fact it's not why I call you a shitty liar. The actual reasons that I listed as specific examples of your shitty behavior and potential dishonesty are the reasons why I call you a shitty liar.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 01:18 AM
7

I do know what a username page is. I was just going to yours to PM you because the mods locked the post where we were arguing. Sure, I start out assuming people with views and arguments such as yours are women. I find it hard to believe that your reading comprehension is so low that you misunderstand most of my comments. Instead, I believe you are flailing about trying to make arguments. Examples, putting words in my mouth, then arguing against them, making assumptions about my statements, then …
/r/MensRights06/11/15 12:54 AM
34

except for this particularly shitty person, /u/Kavis whose reading comprehension is poor, who lies, and who seems to generally espouse the qualities of a typical feminist. She and I are having a 'discussion' presently. It pains me, but in situations like this I keep going, keep trying to write with civility and rationality so that anyone who reads it sees the other side for what it is.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 11:58 PM
1

No. They were both polite. Her politeness didn't conjure up politeness in him.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 07:40 PM
121

No, even at 11:00 EST there were plenty of rational people asking proper questions and giving rational replies. I'm actually happy to see them. It's clear that the "doctor" ignores all of those though. She's disgusting.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 07:27 PM
2

And therefore, if I was IBM, I would do everything in my power to keep Linus in charge.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 11:08 PM
7

Should have linked through archive.org to keep them from getting page views.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 08:46 PM
1

Any MRA'S in the Pittsburgh a area? Maybe you can do something l about this.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 08:38 PM
0

Quite the opposite. I'm for equal rights. I want everyone to be treated with respect and dignity. I have to look at facts. Women wear makeup and get surgery to look more feminine. They even take hormones to change their body. So can men. Not all people are fertile. People are attracted to others based upon physical appearance, capabilities, and personality. Other than those qualities humans are all the same. There is nothing more. Sure maybe the 'vast majority' of women and men are all born with…
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:01 PM
0

She says very few things that are truthful. Gender has been effectively shown to be grayscale rather than black and white, fluid, and a social construct. Biological sex, for better or for worse, is also apparently grayscale. Because biological sex has been empirically evidenced as having many different forms between 100% male or female, it becomes impossible to draw a line between the genders of male and female. Some men have breasts. Some women do not. Some men are born with penises the same si…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 06:38 PM
1

She says very few things that are truthful. Gender has been effectively shown to be grayscale rather than black and white, fluid, and a social construct. Biological sex, for better or for worse, is also apparently grayscale. Because biological sex has been empirically evidenced as having many different forms between 100% male or female, it becomes impossible to draw a line between the genders of male and female. Some men have breasts. Some women do not. Some men are born with penises the same si…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 06:37 PM
1

There are two more films that are about jobs and Wozniak. Can't remember titles.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 07:40 PM
1

The article very clearly states that sex offenders don't behave like addicts.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 09:31 PM
2

The article portrayed it as inclusion in a community more than supervision. It mentioned helping to find a job and a home.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 09:29 PM
0

He could arrange an accidental death for less than $75k.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 03:49 PM
5

Yay! You can say things! None of which refute the fact that medical research is science. I didn't say average doctors. I said medical researchers. They use the scientific method to learn about diseases of humans. They run experiments on humans and animals.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 11:55 AM
5

Medical research is science. It's biology.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 11:21 AM
4

I noticed that there are no negative comments. I want to ask why all of the zombies are male. They're clearly overzealous idiots. Hey let's make our goal one of the most expensive on kickstarter even though our team was only formed a few months ago and we're entering a genre with juggernaut incumbents who've been releasing top tier games since before we finished college. Oh did I forget to mention that our focus will be on boring and alienating the majority of gamers? Side note: can anyone point…
/r/MensRights02/10/15 09:24 PM
1

I agree with all of that. I feel like we're under a microscope because women have the upper hand.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:43 PM
1

The video merely makes fun of the statistics. It falls short of either demonstrating how absurd they are or pointing out their flaws. A silly song and dance about 210% only serves to portray MRA's as immature and not worth listening to. Pointing out that the survey counts an unwanted kiss as rape ends the argument. It's fine, in fact awesome, to lampoon the survey by portraying such a flaw. Feeling like the right way isn't working is no excuse to adopt the wrong way. If anything look for a new o…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 04:10 PM
1

True! It's more like a bundle of sticks. ( how do I do that troll face grin glyph thing?) All joking aside, many of the sticks are weak on their own. Together they are strong. Incidentally I learned this from an episode of Smurfs when I was little and I'll never forget. Papa Smurf was a wize old wizard.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 08:21 PM
1

No, you're missing the distinction between the two. Being flippant is not showing a serious or respectful attitude. It's only a part of satire. Satire is the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues. My argument is that the video portrays a message of "boo hoo too bad" rather than "your statistics are wrong and your policies are impossible and therefore foolish…
/r/MensRights28/09/15 06:30 PM
1

And flippancy distracts from it.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 01:40 PM
3

Not normal male sexuality. Normal sexuality in general. Women also rape.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 07:55 AM
1

First, recall the many examples of feminists making similar videos and how they make you feel. I completely understand that this one is meant to be satire. My point is that we can't afford to be this satirical yet because we're still the underdog. At a time when new York and California are passing "yes means yes" laws, I fear that the level of this guy's satire is too much. It's counter productive. I'm not just quickly dismissing a different style of approach. I'm criticizing this one particular…
/r/MensRights28/09/15 07:02 AM
0

It is textbook argument/ debate technique. Pick a textbook, any textbook. In a nutshell and to exaggerate, compare an episode of jerry springer to warren Farrell. The atrocious behavior of feminists at his presentations are noticed. They bring attention to his message.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 11:42 PM
-2

The example you chose isn't. We can't afford to be cocky or snarky. Such attitudes cause people to immediately feel like dismissing us.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 10:47 PM
1

It was all over the news in the 1980s. Then it was in some stand up comedy, TV, and movies. I searched for it a bit but naturally there's so much out there on the subject that I didn't find anything that mentioned "female" specifically. The military part is obviously true. They still do it.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 09:52 PM
3

Referring to women as females came about in the 1980's because women started complaining about many words that were used to refer to them. The lawyers and political-correctness committees all specifically chose male and female because you can't argue that the scientifically correct term is anything but neutral. At that time it has already been in use in the military for a long time. Add that to corporate America, give it a decade or so, and it moves into the vernacular. Yet calling men males nev…
/r/MensRights27/09/15 12:39 PM
1

No. In the U.S. Schools work to prepare students for the tests. Since 1980, girls have been getting better grades than boys while boys always score higher on standardized tests. In fact the gap between girls' and boys' grades has been widening since then as well. What's happening? Women have supplanted men in our schools and coddle girls / mistreat boys. The standardized tests are made by an exclusive old boys club. For the past 35 years no one has noticed the problem that you see with our white…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 06:39 PM
1

No. No. Ban qualifiers. Comprehensive prisons will allow prisoners to go to the prison of their choice.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 06:02 PM
1

SOCIALISM! Everyone let's do socialism. Yeah! Take their money because they also get private funds. More taxes because these schools are dying. Everyone gets to attend their preferred school because DUH! She needs to take remedial math. Ethics too because it's not nice to take things from people just because you want them.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 06:00 PM
2

Luckily someone just reposted it! https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/3jog70/male_cleavage/
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:39 PM
2

I can't find the comic that was probably posted on this very sub, but it's relevant to this post. It had a woman that was irritated at a man looking at her cleavage. Then he comes in with his own cleavage. I don't want to ruin the punchline. Anyone have a link?
/r/MensRights02/09/15 09:55 PM
1

On the glbt subs it's usually said that there are more FTM. They just aren't noticed as often because it's easier for them to fit in.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:35 PM
7

Been there. It only gets worse. Also she will grow to feel entitled to half of your stuff. She might even make up lies and threaten to call the cops. Even if none of that happens she's still a no good gold digger. Dump her. Throw her out. Change the locks. There are way too many fish in the sea. Edit. I'm using a new app. I didn't see the imgur link. I'm glad/ not glad that I was right.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:19 PM
6

There's an android app called alibi. Get it. Also get a dash cam for $60 or so. Too many times I call the cops before opening the video recording app. These two purchases should help.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:14 PM
2

Australia is a bad place for men also
/r/MensRights10/08/15 04:48 PM
1

Yes that's it!
/r/MensRights09/08/15 08:54 PM
2

I saw some other information about women's suffrage from around this era that pointed out that women were protected and privileged. I wish I could remember the details or find the link. One of the things that it pointed out was that men owned things but were beholden to their wives something something. Basically, women had huge advantages that were directly tied with men owning most property. I wish I could remember. I can't remember if I saw it here or on a YouTube channel. Can anyone help me o…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:22 PM
3

She was arrested for murder. If she wasn't, or of she just gets a slap on the wrist then this would be almost worthy of posting here. Specific examples like this are petty and irrelevant to this sub. A woman killed her son in a fit of rage. This does not mean women are like this. If you posted a study or some statistics showing that women are violent then that would be relevant, useful, and constructive. Basically, try to be more mature than feminists.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:19 PM
2

Correction: the article says that women young and old are indeed competitive, but instead of building themselves up they tear others down through sneaky underhanded backstabbing and so forth.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:06 PM
2

Woah there! Don't hold back or sugar coat it just because she's a girl. If she's being an asshole it's your duty as a parent to call her an asshole!
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:02 PM
4

Bingo. Don't start a fight you can't win. Unless you're willing to eat chili cheese dogs with mustard and hot sauce, don't even show up because you don't even know the pain... The horror.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:44 AM
9

have any of the husbands retaliated? Have any wives had legal consequences? What a shitty piece of journalism.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:07 AM
3

Or crab fishing
/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:46 PM
1

The original study that started it all actually explained the reasons for the wage difference. Feminists chose to leave that part out. Iirc, the reasons according to the study were different preferences in career choice especially raising children. After men exposed this, feminists tried to come back claiming that men are encouraged to get great jobs and women are discouraged. Men rebutted that they are pressured into getting high paying jobs, not encouraged to get enviable jobs. Evidence: male …
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:02 PM
1

FML. Words can't describe the cesspool of emotions bubbling up right now
/r/MensRights27/07/15 11:09 PM
1

No functional difference here. Go ahead and let a third party record your bedroom.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:09 PM
2

No. I never argued in support of recording. I argued that if I truly want a recording to be for my benefit then I'll be in control of it. It doesn't matter if I'm a man or a woman or a wombat. I'm not making any statement regarding the moral issue of secretly recording someone else. My only statement is: if recording then my ownership.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:08 PM
7

It doesn't matter where you're from. Allowing someone else to record you and only they can access the recording is absolutely ludicrous. And you're suggesting it in the bedroom!
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:49 PM
2

Think about what you just said. Hint: U.S. office of personnel management.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:42 PM
8

This is ludicrous. The abuse of those recordings would be inevitable. If it really want a recording to protect myself then I am the only one who can access it.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:32 PM
1

I'm sorry. All I could think of was: FAPs!? No they're the FAPs. We're the PFA. Spli'ers!
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:29 PM
8

Iirc her mom is in the psychology field......................
/r/MensRights30/06/15 07:18 PM
12

The most important people to be fair to are those who need rescuing. Anyone who says otherwise needs to be fired.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:21 AM
-8

Doesn't sound like it at all or they wouldn't have failed her twice.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:19 AM
2

I'm aware of that fact. In many European countries you would be about an inch taller than average. In the American Midwest you would be average.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 03:18 AM
0

Well, genius, a woman's hips naturally spread out way past her shoulders when she sits but they can be squeezed in closer as well. You made a petty argument.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 02:35 PM
2

In what strange land can you feel tall at 5'7"?
/r/MensRights21/06/15 02:28 PM
1

When this term first came out there was a post detailing a lengthy explanation on the many reasons why men spread and women do not. some of them included that female pelvises are wider and their thighs and butt are bigger so they support the sitting for form better. Then obviously male genitalia. It would be nice to have an info graphic with the other reasons included.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:57 AM
32

False. The journalist only stated the facts. One fact is that the defendant claimed to be the victim.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 09:58 PM
2

I think she should get as much attention as possible. She is an excellent example to espouse the insanity and evil that is feminism.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:21 PM
-1

I didn't watch the whole video. He made his point early and just kept repeating himself. So, how is this men's rights? Are you just implying that if a man took kids to a sex shop he'd be thrown in jail? Either way, this story belongs somewhere bigger than this sub. The video's message is spot on. Do not introduce kids to porn and kinky sex stuff.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:09 PM
2

This article says the opposite of what you proclaim. That is, unless you believe that the job market should be artificially frozen so that people can keep their existing jobs whether or not they are needed.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 02:31 PM
4

I think false rape accusers should get put on the sex offender list.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:53 PM
2

Then, not than.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 01:44 PM
1

Relevance might not be immediately apparent. If they're defining a level of testosterone for banning "people" from competing in women's sports then certain other "people" should be moved into women's leagues. I thought the science and the implications were interesting.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 01:42 PM
27

Not cherry picking at all. This is a prefect example especially because it's not about the actions of one person, but the reactions of society at large.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:51 PM
1

I always want to know how these things turn out. I want her to suffer the consequences.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:46 PM
1

You forgot percent of people in prison, average life span, on the job deaths, and percent of people drafted into war.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 10:51 PM
1

All of that is obvious. I wasn't arguing against any of it. What I'm against is your opinion that percent difference is relevant here. By your own arguments and more, 2.7 people per one hundred is a fart in the wind. I'm sorry to give you such a hard time, especially because I was just recently wondering this very thing and you've done an excellent job of answering it. I just hate when people misuse statistics and such. Either way, thank you for your post.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:50 AM
1

Not 21.7% difference! If one in abagillion people die from A and two in a bagillion people die from B. It's bogus to say that B is twice as deadly because neither A nor B is a significant cause of death. Again, imagine .001% male poverty and .002% female poverty. In these cases the difference is the proper comparison rather than percent difference.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:18 PM
2

Triple check to make sure you have all of your belongings. Source: experience.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 11:54 AM
0

Normally I would agree with you. But this story had so many little details that are markers for changing tides. None of the boys were charged. The irrelevant fact was pointed out about her ex husband being an Iraq war veteran. No sex charges were filed due to the age of consent. All good things. I especially needed this kind of good news after the example of the British woman raping the 8 year old boy, getting of because she was sorry, and someone arguing that the boy was the aggressor because o…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:27 PM
1

I thought we were supposed to avoid single specific examples like this because it's petty. I've been happy to see so many examples of groups / studies / overall statistics here lately.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:53 AM
11

You are correct. Ep 16 is an example of a man punching them.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 11:47 AM
1

No. She and objection clearly disagree with universal basic income. It is one of the dead fish that she beats into the ground in atlas shrugged, for example.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 09:41 PM
4

That was a fantastically written description of the negative side of any radical system. It was also helpful with advice on how to avoid falling into the same behavior.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 09:37 PM
1

Indeed. I would go further and say that internet anonymity does far more good than bad.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 11:27 AM
1

And computer science!
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:57 PM
1

It exactly answers that question. Accountability is what keeps people from committing crimes, or bullying, etc. School yard bullies would have run wild without their comeuppance. Notice I'm only addressing your comment directly. I'm not advocating for will Wheaton's viewpoint. He is an asshat.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:52 PM
1

Obviously so perpetrators can be held accountable. It's why banks ask you to remove hat and sunglasses before entering.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:35 PM
1

Yeah. Some of it is made by / for idiots who think it should be silly and funny. Others are made for gay men and are quite unflattering. The good stuff is geared for male strippers or just takes itself seriously.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 01:54 PM
1

Black people
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:13 PM
22

I've dealt with this issue for years. Most women complain to me if I wear form fitting jeans. I have a fantastic body. They say they love it but they don't want to see the jeans pressed against it. Then comes swimsuits. Im in the USA where we're lucky enough to be the only country where men are not allowed to wear bikinis. Instead I have to attempt to swim in gigantic shorts. Meanwhile if I attempt to get into a hot tub in gigantic shorts it feels like one thousand miniature people are using my …
/r/MensRights24/10/14 01:45 PM
3

Thank you for this. I heard it broadcast but couldn't remember her name. It was listening to that exact broadcast that finally made me break up with my girlfriend.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 03:50 AM
0

No. Her boyfriend lionizes her. The article makes no judgments. It only reports the facts of the incident.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:42 AM
2

Weren't we trying to avoid these specific examples and trying to focus on issues in general?
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:18 PM
2

It's societal pressure behind the buying habits though. There are two sides to every coin though. With greater status and or power comes greater pressure to conform. The lower down the ladder of power and status you look, the more you'll see wider haircuts, tattoos, clothes, etc.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 10:46 AM
2

They also forgot lung cancer. Iirc, more women die of lung cancer than breast cancer yet much more money is raised for breast cancer. Yup: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=MZj9U_OPLe7jsASnqIKQCg&url=http://www.lung.org/lung-disease/lung-cancer/resources/facts-figures/lung-cancer-fact-sheet.html&cd=1&ved=0CB0QFjAA&usg=AFQjCNFHyH-DPoqTg2hEIlm-hBy--2kFiQ&sig2=Xz37m3FqVI2e7hBpu6N0Bw
/r/MensRights27/08/14 08:36 AM
2

So falsely filing that someone is violent is harassment? I see how it's a crime, but harassment seems like an odd classification. Can you clarify?
/r/MensRights22/08/14 09:53 AM
2

I'm also confused. You say autism and retard job, but you seem totally normal. Are they making fun of you because you're a special needs person?
/r/MensRights10/08/14 08:23 AM
13

Luckily with Wikipedia, we have the power to change that.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:33 AM
3

Of -> have
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:45 AM
1

But the other 4 out of 5 might have been? PHRASING!
/r/MensRights23/01/14 06:23 PM
5

Men in California started talking like women a decade ago. Boys of college age and younger are now overusing / misusing the word "like" as much as women. In the 80's we had a term for girls that spoke "California" : "valley girl." They sounded like idiots. On the surface it may not seem like this issue is relevant to men's rights but it's important to study all aspects of how or culture is becoming feminized. Language is a big indicator of deeper stronger issues such as elementary school policie…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:54 PM
4

Swim attire is not solved, especially in the U.S. men wearing anything that covers less ( or more ) than a pair of shorts is considered weird and gross.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 09:56 AM
13

How did his lawyer get him out of THAT!
/r/MensRights23/12/13 02:55 PM
1

This reminds me of the movie starring the female mortician from men in black #1. Very similar plot.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 03:36 AM
5

First clue that it was her the whole time: " I think its hot and it makes me angry."... Said no man ever because those two things are mutually exclusive. Also, men say "pisses me off." "Makes me angry" is pansy language. Second clue: "... be a good republican bitch." ... Said no Republican ever because raping someone would not incentivize someone to join your group. The writer of the sentence is clearly exposing herself as a hater of Republicans. Part of me wants to delete all of this because it…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:04 PM
5

The article is awesome except for the part about women being " more accomplished and empathetic communicators." Women are changing communication in a big way. More and more people in professional intelligent corporate environments are speaking like a bunch of women getting together for Girl Talk. The worst is the frequency at which the word "like" is used. also, direct pointed discussion and debate is becoming prohibited because the new corporate culture considers it scary, intimidating, and agg…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:48 PM
0

How in the hell did the men's calendar outsell the women's!!! Why has no one addressed this issue yet? It may not have anything to do with rights, but the day a male pinup calendar outsells a female one is a good day for men.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 09:33 AM
63

Time to sue the university.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 09:27 AM
3

Wow! Fantastic link. Well written. Great data! I always thought the " end rape culture" rallies we're actually promoting rape culture, but now I see that they're even more ridiculous!
/r/MensRights24/09/13 01:14 PM
1

Silver lining 2 lines down: absence of father.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 01:13 PM
25

Your arguments are completely missing the point. Its a male locker room. By definition it's a place where men can walk around nude. The reason for intentionally showing your penis to a woman while inside the locker room is irrelevant. Either way, maybe it was to make her uncomfortable , and maybe it was his response to her making him feel uncomfortable by her presence. Tit for tat so to speak.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:22 PM
6

Parody, satire. these things are allowed under US law right? What about canada?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:52 PM
1

Because of the old boys network. A hiring manager might prefer to hire men but doesn't have adequate funding to hire enough men, so HE hires some women. Of course HE can't hire only women because he has to have at least some people that do a great job. Anyway HE has to have at least someone to talk sports and make sexist misogynistic jokes with at the water cooler. I guarantee some feminists believe this.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:47 PM
0

Oh indeed.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:28 PM
10

I'm a huge equal rights advocate. The part in parenthesis doesn't seem to have anything to do with the argument that she poses. If their truly are fully exposed women on reddit, for purposes of sexual gratification then they are pornographic. Her diagram was clearly factual and informational. It should have been left up.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:00 PM
1

I thought about it with role reversal, and it felt the same: nonsensical. That makes it easy to disregard.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:40 PM
7

I'm as die hard as the next guy, but seriously lighten up. It's obviously just a silly sign.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:44 AM
0

We are all well aware of what the feminist subs are like. Focusing on it, and bickering back and forth is petty. We should be better than that to set an example. For example, children are childish. Imagine a sub where people constantly talk about it instead of focusing on being adults.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:45 PM
1

I totally agree. I have had similar experiences. I was throwing it out there in case you were unaware. Good luck to you. I hope you come out OK.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:23 PM
9

Some state universities come with free legal counsel.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:42 AM
1

I read the article. It does not say the majority are women. Only in that one sub group, they are. Also that quote merely speaks about their lack of agenda. It's an awesome study though. I reference it all the time for MR.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:29 AM
3

Not true.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:42 PM
0

not back-pedaling at all. I've spent time there, as well as tons of other cities. what does it mean? well, a city can have the most of something, but can be quiet or understated about it. another city can have some of something, but flaunt it all over the place. and to be clear, it's not the individuals that are in your face doing things like walking down the street or getting married or whatever. all that is regular day to day stuff. it's the constant barrage of the message and so forth. with t…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:04 PM
-2

Not by number, by in-your-face-ness
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:26 PM
-3

Ok let's phrase it differently. San Francisco has the most hipsters and or homosexuals of any city. Either way it's still true.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 08:09 AM
2

Should have. Great post though.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 05:40 AM
0

In fact that's the definition of the fallacy. Look it up! Appeal to authority
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:57 AM
0

Yes, yes it is. Especially when multiple people here have mentioned condoms and the motivation behind circumcising is mistrust that you will raise a son smart enough to use one. On top of that, if anyone overlooks the many essential uses of the foreskin they are misleading at best and a liar at worst.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:55 AM
0

it's irritating that you accuse us of being emotional, yet you have absolutely no grasp of logic or rationality whatsoever. appeal to authority is an official logical fallacy, so yes, you are an idiot. it's laughable that you responded in this manner after my condom argument. finally, a lesson in statistics: if a control group gets cancer 4% of the time and the drug group gets cancer 3% of the time these things are all true: the drug group has a 25% less relative chance of cancer. the control gr…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:05 AM
1

generalization: we've all seen those statistics. we all think the same thing when people spout them off: considering the area in question is at the tip of the penis, and the fact that catching those diseases is possible regardless of circumcision, wear a condom. you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:32 AM
1

what I would say to a woman who has just finished grilling me on my status: i'd like to point out that my wealth and status will increase over time. can you assure me that your beauty and physique will also?
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:26 PM
1

women are more like that in big competitive cities. not that women in other cities are better. their criteria are just different. they're still uptight and neurotic. I've found that foreign women are almost always better dispositioned.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:23 PM
0

indeed I greatly prefer non-US women. they are regular people instead of crazy strung out uptight basket cases.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 12:28 PM
3

WAG?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 12:25 PM
3

He must have deserved it. I don't usually play the grammar nazi, but I can't stand this one. It's not the usual homonym situation. "Of" and "have" are supposed to sound different. Unlike there, their, and they're, they are wildly differently spelled. Unlike lie and lay, the spelling and meaning differences have nothing to do with tense. It's a new level of illiteracy. Do you fill me dog? Also, cheers for the awesome MR post!
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:14 PM
8

this blows my mind. I feel surrounded by women from ages 20 - 45 who claim that it's men men men. how could this shift in attitudes happen? I do feel like females are treated more equally by younger generations. and decades of propaganda have affected males. have we finally reached a generation where the bickering can end?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:22 PM
-1

aha. I thought your poster was a little too cheesy and petty... until I saw the original. well done!
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:51 PM
0

um, you disagree with his point based on your interpretation of sons dying in wars. I agree with him and explained why what you said is incorrect based on your interpretation of sons dying in wars. so it does change what you said. clearly and very much in fact.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 10:11 AM
2

by "die in wars" what was meant is "drafted to fight on the front lines, and women are neither drafted nor on the front lines."
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:53 PM
2

you put it exactly as I should have. thanks.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 04:51 AM
4

you really have no understanding of anything you read and further discussion with you is a waste of my time.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 08:43 PM
2

yes it is a choice. you're still not explaining your original point. if you meant that it is a poor life choice to be publicly sexually objectified by a 6 year old, then yes, you are correct. if you mean that it's silly for them to dance for him before selling their bodies to him, then you are an idiot. if you mean that it only makes sense for his slaves to dance for him, and that it doesn't make sense for these free women to dance for him, then either you are from some kind of backwoods country…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 08:15 PM
2

Try explaining yourself for once. you remind me of certain people repeating, "oh no you di'int," as if that'll change the reality that a bell has already been rung. For example, you mention owning someone else's body. I understand that if you come from a culture where slavery is the norm, and dancing for someone who doesn't own you would be like dividing by zero. Although keep in mind what Smight said. While you're renting something you have all rights and privilege of ownership!
/r/MensRights07/07/12 07:23 PM
6

bingo! upvote for you.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 07:18 PM
5

uh, what? people dance for other people all the time for many reasons.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 07:12 PM
1

ah! obscure reference challenge accepted! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordy at 4.5 years old, still holds the guiness record for youngest person to have a #1 single. also, beat this kid by a huge margin of age and time to market, 1992. I saw footage of him that I believe was at the Playboy Mansion where he was all over the bunnies.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 07:03 PM
6

which is why I said, "while simultaneously being an example of society's double standard about adult women and young boys."
/r/MensRights07/07/12 06:42 PM
5

as for objectification. in the video, he doesn't value their math skills...
/r/MensRights07/07/12 06:41 PM
10

easy concept: at only 6 years old he has women in bikinis shaking their asses just for him, thus making him a bigger player than all other rappers combined.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 06:39 PM
36

you're all missing an important point. the 6 year old male in the video is depicted as having power or ownership over adult women. so this video is a huge example of objectification of women while simultaneously being an example of society's double standard about adult women and young boys. [edit] for all those lacking reading comprehension, let me elaborate. in no way am I disagreeing with the OP, or the rest of you. I'm just pointing out that this video is wrong in so many ways. You all seem a…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:08 PM
1

thank you for this. I was recently having an argument and really needed it. I went to the sidebar of /r/MR but couldn't find it.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:02 PM
2

oooooh! I love the cosmetics analogy! I'm using that! upvote for you!
/r/MensRights22/04/12 03:34 PM
1

"like I need ANOTHER knife to my dick" ftfy. and I'm totally using this expression from now on. cheers!
/r/MensRights14/01/12 04:08 PM
1

I think if you made a clear distinction between feminazis and feminists you might not have been downvoted as much. in either case, I see where you're coming from.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 04:06 PM
1

her statements, her claims about her actions are proof that she is already a hindrance to society.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 04:04 PM
2

your viewpoint is ignorant and deluded. This is far from child abuse. if you were to read up on the subject of gender identification and sexuality in general you'd find that it's not a choice and that the majority of people who identify as LBGTQ do so at a young age. you're also oversimplifying the issue. a kid doesn't just walk up to the parents and say, "I want to be the opposite gender." First, the parents can usually tell anyway. Then the kid eventually discloses it somehow. Then they all ta…
/r/MensRights14/01/12 03:55 PM
2

aha, so it's MRA's like you who give the rest of us a bad name.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 11:56 AM
1

aha. and that's the difference. I didn't assert that MRA and either libertarian or objectivist viewpoints were linked. I claimed that to be an advocate for both feminism and mens rights means to be an advocate of both equality and basic rights, which says more than just "equal rights." and that those traits can also be commonly found in both libertarians and objectivists.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 03:20 AM
1

can you elaborate on that. it sounds like you call my assumption that to identify with both sides probably means someone leans libertarian or objectivist a fallacy, but then you make the same assumption... only confine it to a smaller geographic area. then you tie in religious conservatives?
/r/MensRights09/09/11 02:23 AM
-1

sure. me too. I thought humanitarian was a nice label but hippies already stole it. but to be on both sides of the gender gap probably means you're libertarian or objectivist. either is a great badge to wear.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 09:43 AM
1

...and earn more. you forgot earn more.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 09:29 AM
1

yeah, what's going on? I felt the same way getting downvoted here for a relevant monty python reference. people need to lighten up.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 05:59 PM
1

the right to be a woman is not a mens' right? ...From now on, I want you all to call me 'Loretta'. EDIT: I can't believe I got downvoted for a relevant monty python reference. WTF is wrong with you!
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:46 PM
1

now instead of tearing them down you can paste the (both halves) of the OP's poster over them!
/r/MensRights12/06/11 02:36 PM
9

that is absolutely poignant! did you make it or find it? in fact, where is the original part from?
/r/MensRights11/06/11 02:09 PM
4

You sir are a gentleman and a scholar.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 04:14 PM
1

... Additional research shows... FTFY One example of a previous study showed that not even a father, but just having the stable presence of a man in the house was the #1 factor that lowered a childs risk of abuse. Not having a man in the house or having a revolving door meant a greater chance of abuse but STILL not necessarily with a man as the abuser! I got the link from /r/mens rights a long time ago but can't recall the link.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 11:53 AM
1

you didn't watch the video then. They specifically address children / sex slave trafficking, etc. It's also pointed out by advocates that injustice happens to prostitutes BECAUSE prostitution is illegal. If it is legal then prostitutes can openly report crimes against them, be taxed for their income, have benefits, etc. Not everyone becomes a prostitute because they want to. Performing sex acts for money can be considered degrading in some cases. So can waiting tables or cleaning toilets. Some p…
/r/MensRights19/05/10 03:55 PM
1

no they are all feelings. emotions are higher class. also, none of those are much of an investment. to clarify, maybe I should've italicized, boldfaced, or quotations for "investment."
/r/MensRights19/05/10 03:45 PM
1

They're not ignoring it. It is irrelevant to their argument. They're talking about freedom, nothing more.
/r/MensRights17/05/10 09:12 AM
4

Sex doesn't necessarily take an emotional investment
/r/MensRights17/05/10 09:11 AM
3

how can there be no comments on this? Their logic, their arguments, are so beautiful, simple, and elegant. They back them up with empirical evidence. This video should be shown to as many people as possible.
/r/MensRights16/05/10 01:49 PM
2

hyper-masculinity is definitely a problem. (and so is hypo-masculinity, in a different way.) people assume it's perpetuated by men within our own social interactions to be alpha male. On the contrary, when you see a man in designer clothes sipping a pink cocktail with an umbrella you know he's not competing for booty and you'd just look like an idiot putting him down to make yourself look manlier. It would be similar to challenging an 11 year old to an arm wrestling contest to impress the ladies…
/r/MensRights14/05/10 01:37 PM
0

then there's the reddit post today about female CEO's earning 40% more than male CEO's
/r/MensRights14/05/10 12:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter