TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gdengine Archive

View 7 posts and 245 comments by gdengine on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

He found that article difficult to read? Yikes.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 02:22 AM
2

I agree. And not to knock early 20s parents, but the level of maturity say post 26 or 27 increases significantly. Women can't change the economic reality of our times, which is that to get a good paying job you have to get more education and experience. That is true of men and women. I'd much rather have people have babies at 29-35 and have those babies raised in healthy and stable homes, than at 20.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:23 PM
2

I appreciate you proving to me that you're just a bitter miserable fuck.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:34 PM
1

Well, I've got that going for me, and the fact that I'm not working in a lower middle-class career.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:25 PM
0

Wow, that's the best you could come up with. God damn dude, you need to get out of your parent's basement.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 02:03 PM
1

Imagine a straight dude being an expert in vaginas...you saying men should be gynecologists? Oh the horror. There is nothing wrong, biased, or even slightly objectionable in this article. At all. You're just being a bitter fuck for reasons unknown.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 01:55 PM
-8

Anyone who finds this article objectionable is just looking for a reason to bitch.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 03:59 AM
1

What bothers me on stuff like this is the assumption that depression and committing suicide is a defect that leads to purely irrational behavior. Sometimes people rationally conclude that this shit we call "life" isn't worth living. I think the idea that some people come to that conclusion through a real and careful analysis of the world in which they live is hard for the rest of us to accept.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 01:07 PM
1

Hmmm. It might have to do with the fact that only 1 in 1000 men will ever get breast cancer, which is 1% of all breast cancer occurrences. At the same time, 1 in 8 women will develop breast cancer in their lives. In the U.S. over 40,000 women will die of breast cancer this year. Only about 2,500 men will even be diagnosed. That's right, 16x as many women will DIE of breast cancer this year than men will even be diagnosed. It's not a fucking priority. I don't know how to put that any other way. 3…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:42 PM
0

You sure it's the same people saying each of these things? Seems like you may be strawmanning yourself. A rare accomplishment.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 06:03 PM
31

Are you fucking dense? How did this guy do anything that was positive towards his side of the argument. The only thing he accomplished is making himself look like a fool.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:16 PM
23

Now that we know what Harbaugh is working with, it all makes sense...
/r/MensRights05/06/18 05:44 AM
0

Stop being salty then.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:16 PM
4

I generally think Peterson is an intellectual bullshitter, but, in this case he's not wrong (if only because he didn't come up with this idea). In his words, if the system allows polygamy and you end up with that ratio you mentioned, then those young, angry, frustrated men are going to violently tear down the system.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 03:17 PM
13

Did you read Peterson's view on the problem? I think that is literally what this is all about.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:29 PM
1

I read an interesting perspective on the college thing once. It went something along the lines of the disparity in college enrollment may actually be a reflection of male employment advantage. For example, a male might not enroll in college because there are a lot of employment opportunities that are better suited to men (due to physical strength) than women. In other words, men might not be enrolling in college because they don't see the advantage of it economically. Women on the other hand mig…
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:58 PM
1

Don't be a jackass. If you want to play the "extension to the absurd" game, play it by yourself.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:33 PM
1

No, but it does mean that I don't have to have sympathy for him either.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:19 PM
1

Well, it's not a joke, but it's also not the same. My wife at 115 lbs can come at me pretty hard and I'll be able to easily protect myself. If I at 240 lbs went at her with the same intensity I would kill her without much effort. Fundamentally DV is a more risky event for the average woman than it is for the average man.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:46 PM
-2

All I'm saying is that human beings are known to be violent when subjected to emotional harm. Fact. If you don't want to be on the receiving end of that, don't do shit that is well known to bring about those reactions.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:39 PM
1

What's wrong about someone deserving negative consequences when they do something bad? A child molester deserves to be burned. A murder the electric chair. Why not a serial adulterer a lamp thrown at them?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 01:02 PM
-42

Eh, some times you get what's coming to you. If I fuck your wife and you walk in the door and catch us, it's really a stretch for me to be the "victim" in the ensuing ass kicking that I would receive. Likewise, learning that your husband and father of your children has been banging a dozen sluts over the course of a decade is going to produce similar anger, and that is known.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:20 AM
121

Stats say that he has been bringing in an average of about $1M a year since 2001 in winnings (before expenses) and not including any sponsorship deals. Seems alright to me. Gold digging bitch.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:14 AM
1

The arguments are there as well. The insults are just because you are seeming the world's most obtuse person.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:19 PM
1

See, here you are to prove my point exactly. So is burglary a widespread societal problem too? Yes, you fucking moron. That is why people have locks on their doors, have security cameras everywhere, and why we have police. Every stat we have on the subject of rape indicates somewhere in the range of 1 in 5 or 1 in 6 US women have been the victim of rape or attempted rape in their life. That is a fucking problem you bass ackwards retard.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 01:19 PM
1

One is a widespread societal problem, the other...white it occurs in extremely small numbers, is not. So right off the bat the equating of the two is off, and because of that, it makes it seems like men (who post the meme) are downplaying the prevalence and impact of rape.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:28 AM
-2

Ah, practical racism. The best kind of racism.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 11:25 PM
-3

And the problem with applying the "bad apple" concept to populations, is that the result is racism. "It's too bad that a few black people robbed my store last week. So now I have to follow black people around the store to make sure they're not shoplifting."
/r/MensRights08/05/18 11:16 PM
-4

Your comment is illogical. The OP just said "few bad apples". If OP really believed that it was just a few bad apples, they wouldn't go to such length as to intentionally limit their interactions with minorities. OP clearly must thing the problem is more widespread than that to go to such lengths.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 10:52 PM
-2

No really, its just a little banter. Okay, I'll let it go. It didn't seem like it, but I'll take you at your word.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:58 PM
2

The article, from what I have read, was done within the context of a philosophical inquiry. That is the key. Perhaps not quite "devil's advocate", but similar. They were posing the idea such that it was intended to spark a debate that ultimately was expected to result in the idea being shot down. They focused on the idea of personhood because that is the most common justification used for supporting abortion, and perhaps in a rhetorical sense of sorts, they were noting that the personhood argume…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:56 PM
-6

And that isn't racist how? Put it in reverse. If an employer had a bad experience with a man, and decided to never hire or do business with men, how would you feel about that? Would you justify that in the same way?
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:49 PM
-7

Call me crazy, but it seemed like you meant that my degrees were useless. I'm not wealthy, but I live comfortably, so I would disagree with your assessment.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:48 PM
-37

Well, my music degree taught me how to play piano and organ like a boss. My business degree taught me that I can play 4 weddings a week in the city I live in, charge $300 per wedding to do so, and make $5k a month cash in addition to my day job. It also taught me how to own and operate my own instrument repair business. I charge $150 to tune a piano, and I do about 20 of them a week. You do the math. lol.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 02:21 PM
-81

Your poor reading comprehension gives that away . For the record, I got a Bachelor of Music degree and then an MBA. Is that your best insult though, Nolan? That I got a gender studies education? Yikes. Creativity must not run in your family.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:58 PM
-5

It's an estimate about the people on this subreddit. It's an eyeball for sure. But there are enough of them to sink the MRM. Think of it this way...feminism is on the down trend and it has everything to do with the crazies in that movement. There are just as many if not more bitter losers in the MRM than there are radical feminists in theirs. IMO it's the major reason some men's issues don't get more attention.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:56 PM
-8

It's not though, because every year maybe at best a dozen babies are tossed into dumpsters or similar. That compared to the roughly 700,000 rapes that occur in the U.S. each year. It presents something that is a frequent and widespread occurrence in society and tries to equate that with something that happens exponentially less often.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:50 PM
1

Have you researched the article in question?
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:48 PM
-3

You understand that you are the worst. Like, you're talking about yourself...you fucking moron.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:41 PM
-17

Your entire movement is fucked. There are things that the average person could sympathize from, but people like Nexrohecr will do you in. I've said before that the MRM is about 50% men who focus on a limited number of issues that men face, and 50% bitter losers who hate women.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:40 PM
-120

This was 2 years ago and I have limited my interactions with minority students as a result which is a shame because a few bad apples spoiled the rest who are fine students. It's like they say, you just can't trust the minorities, so you best just not interact with them at all, am I right?
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:35 PM
1

God you guys seem as bad and annoying as the feminists. Yeah buddy. This subreddit is almost unbearable these days. Honestly, it's become worse than the feminists.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 05:08 PM
-1

Stop trying to be logical!
/r/MensRights29/04/18 05:00 PM
-19

WTF are you talking about? Common law marriages have been around for hundreds of years in North America as a legal doctrine..and for literally thousands of years more broadly. This isn't some new feminist policy that is going to suddenly tank the birth rate. It didn't destroy the birth rates and marriage rates for the few hundred years its been around...and its not doing so now.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 05:13 AM
1

I do / have. Honestly, this time last year I was on the mensrights train. And in regard to some issues I still am. But I am slowly realizing that a lot of this is just BS moping.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:08 AM
0

I'm just tired of the men's rights pity party. Talk to me about people who legitimately are fucked and have no way to help themselves. I'll listen to that. But all this crap is just nonsense.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 10:00 PM
-1

No money, inability to find a place to stay, no job, no friends, no family. Man...you think this hypothetical man has been making good decisions in his life?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:26 PM
0

There are no abuse shelters specializing in male victims. The ones that just opened ar Walk your ass out the door, grab your phone, and walk to a fucking motel. Once there, spend an hour searching your phone for an apartment. He's fucked only if he is a dumbass with zero thinking ability, which I suppose we have to stipulate that he may be. Women's shelters existed for women in times when literally, THEY were their husband's property and had nothing to their name whatsoever. Or for women who wer…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:18 PM
-2

abusive relationship go? Call a friend. Call family. Call a co-worker. Go anywhere.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 03:27 PM
-1

That's the irrational part of it. A rational person says fuck this, and is gone.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 03:26 PM
-14

In fairness, it's fairly difficult to understand why the average man would fall victim to abuse. You'd figure that any rational person who is being abused would just get up and fucking leave and never come back. Now, for the average woman, the actual physical act of doing so if more difficult than for the average man given differences in stength. Honestly, I sort of just scratch my head and both men and women who stay in abusive relationships...but definitly more so men because I'm just like "wh…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 12:27 PM
-2

What part of "partly", a word which I have used numerous times, confuses you?
/r/MensRights24/04/18 12:26 PM
-1

MGTOW isn't bring attention to anything. MGTOW is sitting in a basement playing video games.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 12:26 PM
7

You get a solid say in who you marry. You don't get nearly as much say in say...the quality of the aircraft at which you choose to fly. In other words, one can get a much better sense of the type of person they are going to marry than they can of the condition of the hydraulic mechanism on an aircraft.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 03:34 AM
1

Partly your fault...yes.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 03:30 AM
-22

My god, your analogy makes zero sense. Like none. A correct analogy would be, you had your pick of persons to be standing next to...you didn't pick the right person, and the person you did pick shot you in the head. In which case...yeah, you picked wrong and you are partly responsible for your circumstance.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 02:54 AM
1

BULLLLLLSHIT. I don't want to hear it. You could argue to me a couple of pennies. But even a 10% difference in the price of a stick of deodorant is bullshit. You're hiding behind a mound of bullshit. Look, I have an MBA. No, I'm not a cost accountant wizard, but I know enough to understand that if you are arguing to me a 33% difference in cost for a stick of flower deodorant over a "Scenic River" deodorant, bull fucking shit.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 01:54 AM
-47

For one's own bad decisions. If you go into a store and buy a shit piece of furniture, really, who's fault is that? I trust you can apply that principle to partner selection. So it's all men's fault then. In part. Going back to the furniture analogy, it's not as though there is no fault on the part of a furniture store for selling / upselling a sofa as more than it is. But it's also your responsibility to know what you are getting into. When you ask someone to marry you, you have to be fucking s…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 01:11 AM
-88

MGTOW is fundamentally a bunch of men who made shit decisions in picking a partner, then try to pick themselves up with "it's not me, man, it's that women are all bloodsuckers". Accountability is a thing. A woman doesn't just wake up one day and all of a sudden become a vindictive witch...she was like that when they married, but for whatever reason, he didn't see it.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 10:52 PM
2

This is a cop-out answer that intentionally tries to evade the actual issue. "That's capitalism...man" is what it amounts to.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 10:48 PM
1

Who do you know that "needlessly demands" special products? When I go to the store to buy shampoo, I don't want a bottle that smells like flowers. Instead, I want something that smells manly. As far as I can tell, women do the exact same thing. They don't want one that smells manly, they want one that smells feminine. How do men and women differ in that regard? So why then, given that there are practically equal numbers of men and women, does a female scented product cost more than a male scente…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 03:57 PM
-3

How old we're the students?
/r/MensRights23/04/18 03:04 PM
6

I get it, men's rights is going to go on a rant about male disposability. But this isn't it. People, yes...that includes women, have emotions, needs. Living with a person with this severity of a disability is hard. She is likely still fairly young and has a lot of her life ahead of her. Not everyone is emotionally able to handle the commitment that this involves, and that includes men as well. And as much as we think we are ready for something like this when we say "in sickness and in health", n…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 02:59 AM
3

Fact of life: anyone who uses the term "cucks" is somewhere betweens 30-40 points lower on the IQ curve than they think they are.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:58 AM
-4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-fault_divorce#United_States Here, you can enlighten yourself.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 07:07 PM
-6

You're the one whos standing there scratching your head, like there is no way you could possibly fathom why no-fault divorces exist... Do you really not understand?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 07:03 PM
0

Agreed. It's the simple minded interpurtation of. Marriage is much more than that.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:55 PM
-2

You don't understand what no-fault divorce is for?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:54 PM
-2

Can't wait for all the excuses coming from the leading researchers in /mensrights and the crushing flaw finding that will ensure. Repeat on a loop boys: der, but the sample size was small.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 04:43 AM
1

I won't round about it. Cricket is a super popular sport. Yet, here in the US there are practically zero people gunning to be professional cricket players when they grow up, despite the fact that in terms of a potential payday, it's every bit as likely that a person could be a famous cricket player as it is basketball, football, etc. So why are there virtually no American raised professional cricket players? My guess is because growing up, nobody sees cricket here. Nobody idolizes their favorite…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 04:56 AM
0

Interesting stuff. Do you think cricket is a challenging sport? Or for that matter, an interesting sport?
/r/MensRights06/04/18 01:49 AM
2

What incentives did you offer?
/r/MensRights05/04/18 06:39 PM
9

The argument being made is against legalism. Not against the rule of law. There is a difference.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 03:45 AM
1

Come on, you can't possibly by that invested in your beliefs to suggest that it has never happened. https://www1.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/11-15-17.cfm http://fortune.com/2017/10/05/fearless-girl-state-street-pay-discrimination/ https://www.wmlaborlaw.com/equal-pay https://www.sdbj.com/news/2017/aug/04/settlement-reached-qualcomm-gender-discrimination-/ https://www.fisherphillips.com/pay-equity-blog/multi-million-dollar-settlement-in-new-york Shit dude. I am an analyst at my job. Just the o…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:23 PM
2

First off, there has never been any research that shows that the wage gap, defined as you are defining it, isn't real. At best, there has been research that narrows it down to 3-4% after having to "control" for about 40 different factors, all of which carry the "but why is there a gap in those factors" asterisk next to them. Second, don't be cute. You know damn well what we're talking about and how the term is used. The rest of it is either just your anecdotal observation which does not reflect …
/r/MensRights27/03/18 04:47 PM
0

It's based on the idea that men and women don't think exactly alike. So the issue then becomes that if the basis for AI is rooted in ways of thinking that are more aligned with male ways of thinking, that it inheratly could leave the female perspective by the wayside. To understand this better, imagine that you found out that 99% of AI development was being done by liberals (or conservative if you are a liberal). Then you read about how AI is going to control everything and guide the world into …
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:09 PM
0

But the wage gap is real. The only way it "vanishes" is when you control for occupations. At which point the discussion naturally has to shift to discussing why women are in particular occupations. If "controlling" for occupation results in men of occupation X being paid roughly the same as women in occupation X, but that women at large earn 78% of what men at large do, then you naturally have to start talking about why there are more men in occupation X than women in occupation X. Even on your …
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:01 PM
1

lol. The OP story was about a woman harming a man because she was rejected. So you post up three links in defense of your comment, two of which are of women being harmed by men. God dammit, mental illness is a real problem in America today.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 05:03 PM
-1

Lol, dumbass. Your first link is about MEN killing WOMEN for saying no. As is the third link.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:51 PM
6

You lack critical thinking skills if you think this as a broad rule.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:02 AM
5

People who use the term "cuck" in conversation are of low intelligence. That includes you.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 04:52 PM
1

I'm pretty sure your just being obtuse.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 01:16 PM
3

Rogaine. Just for Men.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 07:32 PM
0

They talked about that particular assumption he made about dress and makeup? Might you be able to link me to that? Interested to hear it. It just not the first time I've seen him base an entire line of reasoning off of a pure assumption. Once he makes that assumption, he is fantastic at defending it. But it is still all based off of an assumption. Which I am not opposed to entirely...some things either require an assumption to even discuss or the assumption is entirely obvious, if not provable. …
/r/MensRights12/03/18 04:10 PM
6

The more you listen to Jordan, if you give yourself a minute or two to think about what he says, he has a lot of really good point. BUT, he is also fairly susceptible to logical errors...which is surprising because he comes across as quite the opposite. I was struck just lack week by an interview he did about sexual harassment in the workplace. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xagvKQ4z6Uw). The majority of the interview is spent with the two dancing around the idea that women are to blame for th…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 03:36 PM
1

Hey ass wipe, surely victims exist, right? And surely a significant percentage of accusers are actual victims, right?
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:57 AM
1

If the number is zero, then you are in effect saying that the hypothetical number of women who could be raped as a result of a system that is unable to convict actual rapists who will then be released and rape again, is infinite. I have no idea how to approach the cost analysis of the injustice of being falsely imprisoned with the unjust of being raped. But at least I recognize that whatever is decided, injustice will occur, and I am not solely basing anything on a pure assumption, which is what…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 03:08 AM
1

Nobody has a right not to be named. It's a pipe dream. A victim has a right to name their assailant.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 01:45 AM
1

Well, we'd send that person to prison based on the evidence 100% of the time. With rape, there is the added layer of "she wanted it" that makes rape more difficult to prove. We can assume that a person does not want to be murdered, and can further assume that the given evidence suggests guilt on "you". With rape, all that could still be true, but the possibility of consensuality is what makes it more difficult to prove. I would say that rape is one of the harder crimes to convict on, save for co…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 01:43 AM
1

They should be punished for wasting the court's time and for attempting [and successfully] damaging a man's character forever. Sounds reasonable. We should also have anonymity for the accused Not so sure about this. In my mind the rest of society has a right to know what people have been accused of. Hypothetical, say you own a duplex and on one half of it lives you, your wife and your daughter. You are looking to rent the other half, and you get an application. You google the person and find out…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:24 PM
1

Those who regret consensual sex could persuade themselves that the consequences for the accused would probably not be serious. Lodging an accusation wouldn't trouble their conscience as much as it would today. At the same time, they are just as likely to convince themselves that the consequences won't be damaging enough to be worth the effort.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:17 PM
1

I don't think you've addressed my point relating to the inherent tradeoff between justice and injustice here. To be to the point, I will pose a hypothetical question. How many rapes is acceptable per instance of a guilty rapist being set free under the "better to have X offenders go free than one innocent person be imprisoned" philosophy? Put differently, in order to ensure that not a single innocent person is imprisoned, how many rapes would be acceptable in order to ensure that outcome? I'll f…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:03 PM
1

It's a weak argument. With any sort of judicial overview, it would happen next to never. And it further falls apart because you could claim the same thing with other crimes. Couldn't get you on murder? Just pay some witnesses to claim rape. Can't get rape, pay some people to say they saw you building a bomb. Etc. etc. In other words, if one really really wanted to try to keep you in jail for an extended period of time through corruption and conspiracy, they could already do that.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:57 PM
1

For me personally, I think some crimes should be exempt from double jepordy. Actually, I would limit it to murder and rape. They are so heinous that, IMO, that 2nd trials should be allowed assuming some significantly compelling evidence arises. In those two crimes I hink the overwhelming objective of trying someone is to remove them as a danger to society. What is accomplished by saying "double jepordy" in the event that new evidence arises and pretending that it doesn't exist is not something I…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:04 AM
0

I just want to know at what point you would draw the line. Not to deflect, but are you not just making the reverse argument? If I'm saying X innocent people should go to jail to prevent Y rapes, then you are simply saying Y rapes are acceptable to prevent X innocent people from going to jail knowing that Z guilty people will return to the community to commit more rape. There is a hard discussion here, but I'm not convinced that either you or I are ever going to achieve a high ground. At the end …
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:54 AM
1

It is true. Take your murder example: say someone gets stabbed to death. Say lab results show your prints on the knife with the blood. GPS on your phone shows you in the location of the murder at the time of the murder. Say the blood of the victim is on you when the police catch you. You're going to jail. Take the same scenario as above and replace murder and blood with rape. You could be in the location, leave and have DNA evidence at the crime scene and on you. Yet, you could still just claim …
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:51 AM
-1

I think you're trying to use the "where do you draw the line" argument, which is fine, but you could just as quickly say "where do you draw the line on reasonable doubt?" What is "reasonable" is subjective? It is important to point out that I am against lowering the standard unless the penalty is also lowered. Example, someone convicted under the "likely" standard might only have to do community service, be restricted from some locations, but may not be on a registry. Again, I can't define every…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:47 AM
-4

Sorry for jumping several places. I was just implying that overall, there are some crimes that seem to warrant some modification to due process. We allow the airport searches, though clearly an unconstitutional search lacking probable cause, because the consequence of not doing so is deemed to be far enough against the public interest to warrant the violation. I can't speak for society in drawing a line on rape. I just point out that rape is sort of a different crime than most in that the same p…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:41 AM
-4

prove that you didn't do it. Trials for serious crimes all end up doing this anyway. Nobody get accused of a serious crime and does not try to prove their innocence.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:04 AM
0

Relax dev_jerkingwithotherhand, nobody is suggesting that an accusation leads right into prison.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:54 PM
-13

Oh sweetie pie, we both know that is an ideal that breaks down in a heartbeat. The basis of our legal system is that searches can only be done if a crime is suspected...yet I got a strip search at the airport. Due process is an ideal of our legal system...unless you're suspected of terrorism and then you are treated to a all inclusive down at gitmo, or maybe just a dark room someplace where nice men in suites question you. The problem is women do due false accusations. Some women. Important dist…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:48 PM
-19

Rape and sexual assault are much harder to prove than most crimes. Even when there is evidence, it often just devolves into a he said she said situation. Which is kind of a problem from the standpoint of serving justice, as anyone can just say "it was consensual" and the accusation, therefore, becomes 100x harder to prove. Add to that internet trolls who just blanked accuse women of false accusations. Rape is further unique because unlike most crimes, the distinction between the act itself being…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:04 PM
2

Jesus, did you reason all that from this one article? Critical thinking is important bud...
/r/MensRights06/03/18 06:28 PM
-3

No joke dude. I am positive you are the only person who did. The rest seem to have read the title and just ran with it.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 06:11 AM
-8

The only rational comment here so far.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:28 AM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:25 AM
1

How toxic the left has become, or how toxic the right portrays the left? Because right off the bat, I can tell you that the right would call you a supporter of baby murdering, enabler of deliquency, potentially anti-white, a cultural marxist, or any other number of things just based on the issues you mentioned.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:21 AM
-3

I didn't agree with a lot of conservative ideas, at least most conservatIves are willing to have an open and honest conversation about the issues and change their stance on something if the data backs it up. That's right. As long as you aren't a libshit, cuck, libtard, commie, anti-freedom, anti-American, or any variant thereof, the right is super willing to engage in an open and honest debate. /s Obviously, the point I am making here is that you are dramatically underestimating how similarly re…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:18 AM
1

Oh shit, you're not going to get me banned form 70 IQ marriedredpill are you? The fuck will I do?
/r/MarriedRedPill28/02/18 08:59 PM
1

It's clear how you came to this sub. A total fucking moron. Opening up to your wife about anxieties is the same as applying leeches. Seems pretty clear. Applying leeches was BS medicine that accomplished nothing. Therefore, OP is saying that opening up to your wife about your anxieties is also BS that accomplishes nothing. My comments that follow clearly state my disagreement. Why is it always that subs like this are filled with 70 IQ men?
/r/MarriedRedPill27/02/18 03:54 PM
0

If your IQ levels were above 75, you'd understand that IQ and testosterone are measured in different units. You don't so you don't,
/r/MarriedRedPill26/02/18 03:03 PM
1

It's like they say in The Wolf of Wall Street, "they're to the manor born. Their fathers are douchebags, just like their fathers before them. But you... you, you got this way all on your own. Good for you, little man." As I think about how to progress my sexual life with my wife, and I consider how to overide 25 years of deeply conservative brainwashing about sex, her sexual molestation, and the medications she needs that kill her sex drive, I'll remember your retarded advise that I really need …
/r/MarriedRedPill25/02/18 10:34 PM
1

You're a fucking tool. If your wife is fucking you more, it just means she gets wet for fucking tools. I would especially avoid lifting. But do you even lift, brah? Tool. The rest of your comment is about as toolish as it could be.
/r/MarriedRedPill25/02/18 10:20 PM
-1

Honestly dude, I've read all this red pill stuff going back years. I'm a pretty methodical guy, and I've tested this kind of stuff. You know what dramatically increases my wife's sexual attraction in me? Stronger emotional connections. One or two days a month (ovulation) she might go for the "you're a manly manly man" thing and the TRP stuff might work. But the other 28 days the shit is useless. And when I say "emotional connection" please understand that there is a difference between connecting…
/r/MarriedRedPill25/02/18 06:14 PM
1

it’s not to share them w a woman It's not about sharing them with a woman or not. It's moronic to marry someone just so that you can share things with your buds. The strongest marriages are the ones where a man shares these things with his wife, without being a bitch about it. There's a difference between being a mopy, whiny, and insufferable person, and sharing your problems in a way that allows her to support you in ways that help you meet those challenges in your life head on. This sub and it…
/r/MarriedRedPill25/02/18 06:02 PM
-8

Given that your posting history reads like a “how to dry out pussy” instruction manual, I think you may be in the wrong place.... All that being said, not for a moment do I think my wife is about to fucking leave me because I'm not sufficiently bottling up negative emotions. My wife and I have vastly different sex drive largely due to medications she must take, and the fact that she was molested by a close friend of her father's when she was 17, and the extremely conservative upbringing she rece…
/r/MarriedRedPill24/02/18 07:07 PM
-4

This thread is full of retarded men who are choosing to "suffer in silence". If you think this is the case, all we can conclude is that you picked the wrong woman.
/r/MarriedRedPill24/02/18 03:41 PM
2

I read OPs usage of the term as "toxic male expectations" or something along those lines. That these men did what they did out of some expectation placed on men by society to be protectors.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:20 AM
1

I would argue that toxic masculinity does in fact exist, just that it's far more extreme and less prevalent than the typical feminist would describe. I mean there are some real douchebags out there...guys who do in fact feel entirely entitled to women (rapists), men/groups of men who use violence as their default method of achieving an end (think gangs, maybe even world leaders), men who actually think that their stature is beyond that of any given women simply because he is a man (my wife is a …
/r/MensRights17/02/18 01:25 AM
26

This sub is half filled with men who genuinely want some of the issues that affect men to change, and half men who are bitter fucking losers with no life and nothing else to do but bitch day in and day out about nonsense. I'll let you decide which of these two things OP is.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 10:20 PM
24

Arguing that she never had intercourse with these kids is not an option for her. I would normally agree with you, but it is worth keeping in mind that it is incredibly common for someone to plead guilty in response to the unethical (IMO) prosecutorial practice of threatening unfair charges in order to force someone into a deal. "Oh, in addition to sexual contact with a minor, we are going to charge you with 150 counts of unlawful sexual communication with a minor, 10 counts of contributing to th…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 07:06 PM
0

Does it get hard? Spending all your time worrying about how women get more attention? A sad lonely little man. I'm cool. Not sad or lonely. Hanging out watching the Office with my Wife, my 6 month old son and my dog, the latter two of which are not nearly as much of a bitch and a baby as you.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 04:42 AM
1

Have more sex. You'll be less concerned with petty shit like this.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:56 AM
1

Unlike you, I'm not a bitch, and the number of downvotes I get means literally nothing to me.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:52 AM
0

Maybe they'll let us eat the crumbs off the floor next. Apparently, feminists are retards, that are what, outsmarting you to the point that they get to decide if you get crumbs or not? You're already pathetic for bitching about the Office of Women's health.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:52 AM
0

Yeah wanting equality is so terrible. You're just as bad as the feminists. Bitching about the location of a URL and of all the fucking things, a supposed lack of information on the internet.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:50 AM
1

You're a bitter, whiny bitch.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:42 AM
0

Did you know that the Office of Women's health has a Men's Health Page as well?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:41 AM
1

I merely cited a resource women have and asked you to show me where men have that same resource. You linked to a website, run by the federal government, dedicated to giving women information and resources pertaining to health issues that are either unique or more common among women. I linked to the exact same thing for men. The only difference, is the level of the URL. One had a couple more backslashes than the other.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:33 AM
1

Looks more like a video of your wife. And I had to say, you've clearly married up.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:30 AM
0

No, the problem which you seem to be to full of hate to grasp is that there are resources for women which don't exist for men. Let's see how many results return for a google search of "Men's Health". 33,900,000. So long as you're not a dumbass, it's not hard to find what you are looking for. women get twice as much healthcare funding as men. Quit bitching...go to a doctor if you're sick. Why is this sub full if low T bitching men.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:27 AM
0

wahhhh, wahhh wahhh. There is not office for men's health! I'm a whiny bitch with nothing better to do than complain about how the incredibly vast resources pertaining to men's health on the internet are not neatly consolidated into a single office / webpage. Being less of a bitch would go far. Being a whiny bitch is not good for your intelligence.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:23 AM
1

You live under a bridge.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 02:13 AM
0

So what's your lazy ass beef here? That the URL is slightly longer? Get a life. If you find yourself bitching because you have to like 10 seconds into a google search to find a webpage with the same information as the google search that takes 8 seconds, you're a bum. Grow up.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 02:12 AM
1

WomensHealth.gov https://nccih.nih.gov/health/mens-health "Some health issues are unique to men (such as prostate disease and erectile dysfunction), and others are more common in men than women (such as coronary heart disease, lung cancer, HIV infection, and Parkinson’s disease). This page provides resources and information on health conditions of special concern to men. It also includes summaries of research on the effects of complementary health approaches in men with certain conditions." ....…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:43 AM
2

I would add...if you want men to live longer..encourage them to not be hardasses and go to the doctor more...
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:15 PM
1

So in your view, if I reference a geographic location, I am not referencing the people who live there as well?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:56 PM
1

That's all fine. The problem comes when you blanket say "Mexicans are not qualified to be in this country" or similar. Which is what Trump and many of his far-right supporters are saying.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:55 PM
1

You're right. I think Europeans are the scum of the earth. Now, Flavius, I didn't insult white people..because Europe is a continent, not a race.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:32 PM
0

No, leftists have done nothing to it. At some point the racists stopped feeling guilted by it. They said fuck it, I'm going to be a racist if I want. That is how we got here. The far right used to try to hide it. Now they embrace it.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:30 PM
-1

While I'm sure you have a fascinating point with D&D, I think we can both agree that D&D is objectively very different from a video of two actual human being. That kids intuitively cannot understand that their sex life is not going to be like what they see in porn? Why would they? You can reason that watching porn might lead to a warped sense of reality? At younger ages, kids psychology are looking to the world to understand what "normal" is. It's the process by which we all get socialized. And …
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:27 PM
0

So if I say we shouldn't have immigration from mexico at all, because "mexico is a shithole nation" I'm not talking about mexicans, I'm just talking about the culture of Mexico, right?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 05:22 PM
0

"do we need more people from shithole countries" is indirectly racist?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 05:12 PM
3

It is a real problem that it is not clear to young people that porn, much like an action movie or crime-fighting drama, is not real life. Yes, there are people that engage in the things you see in porn, but for any given activity the percentage is going to be much, much, much lower in real life. So that girl you took to prom is going to be far less likely to enjoy you pulling her by the hair and choking her than porkhub would make you believe. Think of it like the movie Taken. Fucking fantastic …
/r/MensRights08/02/18 05:08 PM
1

Oh yeah. Go ahead and toss out the numbers for me.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:33 PM
-3

you don't see calls for all minorities to make themselves scarce for a day so we can celebrate the white race You're right. Instead, you see calls for minorities to make themselves scarce forever so that we can have a white nation...and it's not like they have support. I mean fuck, they only have the President of the United States on their side. You're way off base about the proportions of the extremists on the right and left. I'm just ballparking off observation, but I am willing to be that abo…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:52 PM
-1

Stop trying to be rational.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:30 PM
1

WTF are you even talking about? You yourself seem to think that women will en masse accuse men of raping them. And you complain about the potential loss of trust?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:29 PM
-3

Not only did his professor fail to explore alternative views, but Hughes said his professor also ridiculed students who held dissenting viewpoints and suggested that they were evil, citing an in-class debate the professor facilitated on whether biological sex differences exist. At the same time, insisting that a feminist class explore alternative views is sort of along the same lines as expecting a biology class to explore "alternative creation views". If I show up to a physics class and insist …
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:14 PM
2

I'm just going by the title which states "women are much more violent than men". Which may or may not be true, but what sure as hell is true is that you can't make a statement like that without considering the various ways in which men or women engage in violence. To do so would be intellectually dishonest. Say for argument that women do engage in more domestic violence than men, then to figure out if women are more or less violent than men we'd have to fact in the wars that men predominantly fi…
/r/MensRights08/11/17 08:40 PM
-5

Now, are we counting wars in this?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 05:24 AM
39

Agreed. The SJW feminist is sect is out there, but honestly, general feminism is far from crazy. There is stuff that I disagree with of course, but objectively I can still undersand how a rational person could come to a number of conclusions.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 05:24 AM
16

I mean, we can't really deny that it is more difficult to start a new relationship being a full time parent than not. I get the back lash against the idea that men just want to move on to the next, but this point the book makes isn't false. I've known a few women who's husbands flaked out on them (legit, d-bag dudes) and it was near impossible for them to find another partner. The time alone required to watch after the kid made it difficult to "get out there", and when they did, once prospect pa…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 03:53 PM
1

It seems to me from watching other clips that this show is basically British Jerry Springer..
/r/MensRights10/02/17 02:20 AM
1

This isn't productive. If the men's rights movement is to get anywhere, acting exactly in the same way as those we criticize won't accomplish that. When thinking about equality there is positive equality and negative equality. Negative equality aims to bring about equality through tearing down an advantaged group instead of building up the disadvantaged. Feminism is, in my opinion, a negative equality movement. It would be useful or those in the MRM to keep that in mind and not replicate their t…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 06:14 AM
10

I've noticed in my own life that the women I know who are successful, in whatever way that is defined as by them, basically either don't give two shits about feminism, or, are just oblivious to it. I use my wife as an example...she's got a doctorate in physical therapy, makes good money, and likes what she does. She does not blame men or anything else for her struggles. When she has a problem, she thinking of ways she can change what SHE does to solve the problem, not try to blame and change soc…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 05:16 AM
9

as far as I am aware, men and women are only a couple points off in polling on abortion. I think women are more likely to support it, but it's not like 80% of women support it and 80% of men oppose it...the numbers are within the margin of error.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 05:17 AM
1

Good for you. But 99% of the population pairs off, like it or not, and having 10s of millions of people unable to do so mathematically will lead to social unrest.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 08:54 PM
3

Correct. I guess my point is that fertility rate aside, we don't NEED more babies. If we want more babies, we could simply cut the supply to birth control, for example. People are out there fucking more than they ever have. World population is skyrocketing, and in countries where the fertility rate is lower, it is because of things like BC, which are choices, that the rate has declined. I'm just saying that humans don't really need these scientific advancements in order to reproduce more, and es…
/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:24 PM
1

Yeah, but it has nothing to do with our ability to reproduce. People are just choosing not to have kids. So there is a difference between not being able to reproduce, of which we have zero problem in that regard, and choosing not to reproduce.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 03:17 PM
4

I personally oppose any effort for people to make babies other than the "old fashion way", for a number of reasons. The main pitfalls I see in the field are designer babies, the possibility of losing diversity in the gene pool, and the potential for drastically unequal ratios of men to women. I mean take the U.S. population right now of 300M. Imagine a world where there are 55% men and 45% women (just for fun). That would mean there would be 30 million mathematically unable to find a mate. The 5…
/r/MensRights12/01/17 05:11 AM
9

No, it doesn't. But surely it should raise an eye brow? Music is not a female dominated field by any stretch of the imagination. There are some instruments/disciplines within music that are (female flute players for example and male brass players), but all in all things are 50/50 for the most part. It may have just been the case that there were no male applicants..but, as a male in the field at the time (2008-2014) when the economy was shit and a music degree got one nowhere, I can tell you that…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 02:35 AM
19

I worked a number of places where similar things happened. One was a music studio (music lessons) where of the 22 or so employees, 2 were male. The other was a liberal arts college where of the 16 or so VPs and CEx level people, 13 or 14 were female. Many people are not aware as well that a lot of the non-profit world has this issue. It's not everywhere. The NPO I work for now is very balanced. But yeah, why people don't think this stuff happens is beyond me.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:33 PM
6

Was just thinking this. Or human sexuality in general. Our sexual attraction to each other is something that is deeply rooted in our psychology as a result of not just the history of our species, but those that we evolved from. I mean we're talking perhaps billions of years of evolution. A sex robot will be a glorified dildo or fleshlight. It will get the job done, but everyone would much rather have the real thing.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 03:50 AM
2

You know why there are so many more "deadbeat Dads" ? Because we let all the deadbeat women in society kill their babies in the womb. Honestly, think about that one for a moment. The would be deadbeat moms have the option to either have an abortion or give the child up for adoption. When a woman is emotionally or financially unready for a child she has options to avoid being a parent. Men don't have those options, therefore the system naturally produces deadbeat dads, but far fewer deadbeat moms…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:26 PM
6

To be fair, I personally know about 20-30 people who are better singers. It's not that she is a bad singer, but she is nowhere near "great", which is true of 99% of popular musicians. Their appeal is mostly due to marketing and "appeal", sex appeal most often.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 05:11 AM
4

Women are more naïve, and less willing to rationally think through the long-term consequences of avoiding confrontation or dealing with unpleasant realities now. yeah, I think this is very, very true. I think women are not as skilled as men at evaluating threats, as a class, of course.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 04:23 AM
1

I'll say it this time as I have said it many times. The lack of due process in Title IX investigations is in fact a violation of the United States Constitution. If Title IX is federal law, and if the Federal Government compels university to conduct investigations and make determinations of law violation which result in punishment to an individual, then the university is a de facto law enforcement agency and Title IX investigations are de facto law enforcement investigations. If the universities …
/r/MensRights28/12/16 01:39 AM
1

I buy that..but only to an extent. I mean yeah, there is obviously a medical recovery period after giving birth. But at some point, in most countries women continue to have leave even after medical recovery and men do not.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 01:33 AM
2

If I were to time travel back to soviet Russia and ask them what communism was, they'd tell me "Communism is a system in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs."... Well my goodness, how could anyone oppose that? All people being paid according to their abilities and needs? What's not to love?? Oh, right, the authoritarian and utter inefficiency of the system which leads to mass poverty. The definition means nothing. Words me…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:21 AM
1

I've thought about killing myself before. Never talked to a single person about it, including my wife. I eventually moved on from it and stopped feeling that way. It's harder to tell people that one might think. Take the wife for example, I didn't tell her because I was afraid that she'd think it was because of her, and I didn't want to put that on her. I was protecting her in a sense. I would add that I think there is another layer on the "kill myself" scale which should not be over looked, and…
/r/MensRights17/11/16 05:31 AM
1

Milo is a catholic...
/r/MensRights15/11/16 02:37 PM
2

I've long thought about the sexual economy in terms of "power" running along our traditional economy. You know, that whole "women are valuable because while men can have countless kids, women cannot", and how that principal affects how we act on an individual level and on a social political level. Reading your post, I am left wondering how much of the "capital" you describe, can be attributed to the sexual reproductive value of women. Or in other words, women clearly do the kinds of things you m…
/r/MensRights05/11/16 11:44 PM
2

If I make 100k and I get a woman pregnant who makes 100k, and we split up, a court will make me pay child support under the assumption that the child deserves the resources of a couple that makes 200k. Interestingly, if I make 50k and my wife makes 50k, we have a kid and don't split up, the child will be receiving the resources of a couple with 100k. Yet, there is no court that I know of that will somehow provide our child resources from some other place such that my child is provided the resour…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:07 AM
6

Add anything that has to do with automotive repair and maintaince to that list.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 04:14 AM
1

After all that stuff that happened when he was being confirmed for the court, I would assume that he is pretty much off limits. I would agree in saying that only video would make it possible for him to leave the court.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 04:11 AM
1

Some men don't think it should be a woman's right to kill his child in the womb. In other words, the fact that a man has zero say in reproduction past sexual intercourse is an area in which men have no rights where women do.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 01:42 PM
8

Is anyone else amazed at the timing? It's not like she killed her kids one night. She killed one, then the second months later, then the third months after that...did she manage to keep their deaths secret, and if not, who the fuck dropped the ball in allowing the remaining kids to stay with her..?
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:23 AM
4

I couldn't help but notice that for men the number is defined as "rape", but for women, the number is for "sexual assault". Presumably SA is a broader term that would allow for a higher number of women to fall into it.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 01:44 AM
0

You talking about upvotes? Dude, if that is how you make it through the day...whatever makes you feel good about yourself..
/r/MensRights05/10/16 06:55 PM
-2

You forgot to use an apostrophe in the word "can't". Come on bumble fuck, wipe the jizz off your hand and try again.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 06:45 PM
2

No, it does not, because the men in that case never had a right to not sit next to a woman to begin with.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 06:44 PM
-2

You forgot to add an apostrophe to "you're". You did this twice. It's okay, when you let off your other hand from jerking off you can edit your comment.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 05:33 PM
1

Yes, this goes both ways, that's kinda the point. They infringed on this lady's rights, and it's despicable that the airline supported them in harassing her like that. EDIT: I noted in a further comment that I am not at all discussing this point in relation to anything in this article. I am generally talking about the phrase as being useless. Also, I find it interesting that you would say that sitting in a different seat on the same airplane is an inconvenience. I would never presume a right to …
/r/MensRights05/10/16 05:28 PM
0

Conflicting rights are essentially what the court system is for. This shit is not some far out there idea, conflicts of right happen all the fucking time, and the "you're rights end where mine begin" is utterly useless as a way of navigating instances where two people both have a legal right to something, but where either exercising their right would prevent the other from doing the same. All I am noting is that the phrase itself works for both perspectives in any conflicting rights situation an…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 05:25 PM
0

Which is a bad analogy. It implies that one person is passive and the other not. A more correct analogy of the phrase would be "your right to extend your fist ends when it meets my fist" given that two people are asserting a right. Take abortion: One could argue that the right to life ends when it violates another person's bodily autonomy, and on the flip side, one could argue that the right to bodily autonomy ends when it interferes with another's right to life. I use that because that debate i…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 05:06 PM
-4

I mean, the phrase literally describes a situation of conflicting rights, does it not? And in such a case, who's rights win out? This is unrelated to the video btw, I'm just commenting on the phrase you used.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 04:18 PM
-9

My rights end where the rights of another person begins This line has always stuck me as idiotic. It can only ever be used in cases where two people's rights are in direct conflict (like abortion, for example), and it never makes any sense because you could say that of your rights, but you could also say that of the other person's rights. So basically this phrase is meaningless.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 04:02 PM
2

Yeah, but isn't mating in general eugenics?
/r/MensRights26/09/16 03:37 AM
3

I agree entirely. It's so absurd I sometimes wonder if it is satire or something.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 04:07 PM
1

I think you missed a step here.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 09:46 PM
3

There is a local barbersop here where i live called "Haircuts for Men", I've been meaning to head on in..
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:40 PM
2

however the response is that as these are school disciplinary actions rather than criminal trials, the department of education can do this. The constitution does not permit the government to punish a citizen without due process of law. I agree that a private school doing this stuff on their own is not an issue, though it would be shitty, but the moment that a school is compelled by the government to do these things, then the due process aspects of the constitution would seem to apply. I think yo…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 03:38 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDYcfycWVOk I show this video to people all the time. I've yet to have someone watch this and then tell me that people shouldn't be allowed to carry guns...
/r/MensRights04/09/16 03:02 AM
4

In my non-expect legal opinion, I think there needs to be a constitutional challenge to Title IX. The way I see it, because Title IX is a federal law that mandates schools investigate and most importantly, punish an individual, Title IX effectively makes a university an extension of law enforcement of the federal government. As such, I think the standard of guild (50.01%), lack of ability to confront one's accuser, inability to have a lawyer present during proceedings, etc. are direct violations…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 02:58 AM
1

I'll second this. Make a fucking point, don't ask for a conversation. Want a conversation? Make noise. Asking politely get's you nowhere.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 06:34 PM
2

Right? Why the fuck is this so hard for feminists to understand? If it's too cold you can put on a sweater. If it's too hot, I can't randomly slice off the extra 80lbs of weight that is insulating my body making me warm...
/r/MensRights01/09/16 02:47 AM
4

idk, in both the cases of male and female victims of this stuff, I honestly think a big part of the trauma that victims feel is socially induced. I think there is a lot to be said of people feeling victimized because that is the "right" response. I liken it to children crying. There are a number of psychological studies that show that if a child randomly falls and scrapes their knee, few actually cry about it...until an adult runs over saying "of baby are you okay?!!"...now I'm not saying that t…
/r/MensRights24/08/16 06:14 PM
9

First of all, Jesus talk about betters remorse...5 months turned to 8 years... That being said, while I know a lot of people here will feel a sense of justice given sentencing disparities, at the risk of getting flamed, I think 8 years is WAY too long of a sentence, just like I think some of the sentences given to men are far too long. I think it is important in some of these discussions to remember that where an inequality exists, that inequality can be made equal two different ways. It is impo…
/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:20 PM
1

Are you reading the same article...the word sexism is used in the first sentence, and many times thereafter.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 04:58 AM
0

Any program that uses tax dollars to just give people some benefit using government is by definition socialist. Again, there is no reason I can think of why a socialistic program cannot be to the benefit of plutocrats. The wealthy are not necessarily plutocrats. But, the plutocrats are wealthy. I think that is the thing your logic is missing. The plutocrats could very well implement social programs that tax other wealthy people ultimately benefiting the plutocrats..
/r/MensRights24/07/16 03:40 AM
1

Your theory fails in that it assumes that there is a singular objective with feminists as well as plutocrats both working towards that same end. However, there is nothing precluding each from pursuing individual objective and for that matter, one being "used" by the other. You seem to totally forget that in many cases plutocrats activity support social systems. Walmart for example, is know to take full advantage of social benefits (i.e., if social benefits exist, walmart can pay workers less bec…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 03:10 AM
1

The idea is that one goal of feminists was to remove the power individual men had over individual women given that men earned the money. They do this, the theory states, by destabilizing the family unit through women entering the work place, through constant bashing of men, and through characterizing women as constant victims and men as constant aggressors. Circling back, once the family unit is destabilized you'd end up with high rates of divorce and high rates of single motherhood. And of cour…
/r/MensRights23/07/16 02:28 PM
3

There are a lot of theories out there about feminism being a sort of front for marxism/socialism.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 04:59 AM
1

The whole "marxist feminist" theory was one of those things that upon first glance to young eyes seemed like a loony theory to me. But the more I think about it and factor in data related to divorce, single motherhood, public welfare expenditures, and talk with various people I know who are big time feminists who all seem to be really behind things like free child care, etc, it really starts to click that destabilization of the family unit was/is central to feminism. Whether that is an end or a …
/r/MensRights21/07/16 03:44 AM
2

Yeah, had a similar situation. I think the topic was on abortion and my comment was "Opposition to abortion is more or less split evenly by both men and women". Banned, asked why, no response, etc.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 03:24 AM
3

This will sound bad, but the sterotype of the hardcore feminists being unattractive generally holds true from my observational experience. Normally the hardcore ones I know first get onto feminist in the first place due to some experience they had with a man, them being rejected or something of the like.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 02:34 AM
4

Honestly, using "vagina" in reference to a woman the same way a person would use dick would be rather impactful in terms of point out double standards. It's short, to the point, will catch just about everyone off guard, and any anger anyone has over it is easily dismissed by saying "I mean, we call people dicks, what's the difference?"
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:09 AM
9

Because if we showed students a video how to avoid rape, SJWs would blow their shit and call it victim blaming.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 06:20 PM
5

Exactly. It took me a 2nd read to realize that this was the response from 44 different men. So when 20 of them say "We can't express out emotions" it hits home really much harder.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 07:55 PM
2

I don't like feminized work places for the reasons you and other mention on a regular basis. I also don't like more masculine work places (super high competition, everyone riding your ass constantly, etc). I've been out of college for 8 years, so while that is not a super ton of time I have had 5 job in that time. I've come to be rather happy working for a non-profit in my area that operates a number of second hand stores and uses that money to employ disabled people, among many other things. I'…
/r/MensRights04/07/16 04:45 AM
7

This is essentially the feminist game plan is it not? When there is a traditional standard that provides a benefit for women, mum's the word. When there is one that hurts women, shot from atop the roofs.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 05:07 AM
6

I have been thinking this myself. I know A LOT of men who are really starting to get fed up. Mind you, these are people who are generally liberal leaning folks, fair minded, etc, but are tired of carrying the weight of all things gender/race related past and present on their backs. While not a 1:1 attribution, Donald Trump's support is in many ways a reflection of this. He rejects a low of the "feminine" values of society, does not give two fucks about stepping on egg shells, and is totally unap…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 03:03 PM
6

It's becoming more common. I personally stick up for myself more and more, and have been encouraging (with positive results) my male friends to do so themselves. I personally find the best defense to be relentless. In the NFL if you stuff a player's forward progress the refs will blow the whistle. In life, there are no refs so if you work someone into a corner don't let up with the punches. (Jackpot, I worked in two sports analogies into one sentences).
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:56 PM
5

Honestly, I clicked on this not expecting much. Normally when I start watching these sorts of things I click through to get the gist of it and then call it a day. I watched the entire thing just now, and I'm struggling to think of a better documentary that I've ever seen. Just fucking fantastic in every way.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 03:51 PM
2

So in this way, you're saying that women do have a "control over institutional power based on gender." In a way yes. The distinction between gender and victim in this case is nuanced I suppose. They have power over institutions because they are victims, and they are claiming to be victims based on gender. I guess I write it as victim over gender because I think that once you take the victim out of the equation and leave just gender, their power disappears. At least that is how i see it. Why do y…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:25 AM
3

Just wondering -- why do you think that the movements are different in this way? I think that feminists have discovered the power of victimization, as have women in general. I don't think that either men or women have firm control over institutional power based on gender (even though most politicians are men, that does not mean they use their power to help men..), and given that, women are able to use victim power to influence institutional power. I also power of being victims is especially stro…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 11:01 PM
9

I've always said that the MRM is essentially applied feminism. Both seem to agree on one principal idea, which is that gender roles / stereotypes have existed and hurt men and women respectively. In fact, I also think that the MRM does not exist as a counter to feminism, but because of a failure on the part of feminism to address men's issues. In other words, there are agreements on fundamental aspects of both, but the feminist movement has focused on how women are affected, while paying only li…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:22 PM
1

Indeed that might change the situation. For example, if they had a son that she raised for 18 years and during that time he was paying some form of child support that was based off of his pre-success income, or not paying any at all, there would at least be some rationale along the lines of him perhaps owing her more.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:08 PM
6

/u/heimdahl81 pointed out in another sub that her bruise in the photo towards the bottom appears to be in a different place than the bruise in the video. It seems to be shifted down more..
/r/MensRights07/06/16 07:21 PM
4

I agree. I generally think that mental illness should not be a legitimate reason to avoid trial. The problem is that logically, any person who does any sort of crime could use it quite easily. For example: John murders Cindy. We must conclude that John is mentally insane, because no sane person would murder another human being. In other words, my guess is that 99% of people who commit horrible crimes could be classified as being mentally unstable, solely on the basis that they committed the crim…
/r/MensRights03/06/16 02:41 PM
2

The brotherhood line had me scratching my head a bit..
/r/MensRights27/05/16 05:26 PM
11

You wouldn't. But if you were one that generalized blacks, this type of behavior would be seen as further "proof" for whatever hatred you harbored. It's kind of like all that stuff in Baltimore. The black community was outraged by the police, accusing them of this that and the other. Maybe they have a point. But whatever point they had, people looting stores en mass and burning down strip malls does not help them make a case. If anything, it works against them. Demonstrating a total lack of civi…
/r/MensRights25/05/16 06:12 PM
25

In a country that already has a problem with how black people are viewed, you know what does not help change that? Black people acting like idiots.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 01:28 PM
2

He might not count Asians as "people of color". I don't personally, because in this country anyway, there is no indication whatsoever than Asians face any type of discrimination, social or systemic.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 01:49 PM
1

Do we need proof to understand something? I know that sounds pejorative but some things we do know to be true without having any sort of "provable" evidence for it. In which case, reason itself serves as all the proof we need. We live in a time of science, so much so that people seem to forget the truths that reason can lead us to. Anyway, more to the point, if little Jimmy is walking fine, and one month he grows 3 inches and all of a sudden he starts tripping on stuff, it reasons well enough th…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 07:30 PM
1

I didn't read the full thing, but is this news? Honestly, "the brain not being used to height" seems like a general observation that anyone who has been, or seen teenage boys could readily make. I'm pretty sure I drew this conclusion in middle school.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 07:09 PM
75

I hope this just blows up even more than it already has. Justin has been puffing that feminist bullshit for too long, and hopefully this opens his eyes up a bit. There are a lot of men out there that will tell you that a single event opened their eyes to all the BS of feminism, and hopefully this is his.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:42 PM
1

Haha, no. I think my implied point was that feminism tells women that they need to be a particular way, and that without feminism women cannot succeed. My wife, who is successful (doctorate) managed to do so without being involved with the feminist cause at all, and thinks that a lot of the stuff in modern feminism is stupid. In other words, a accomplished women telling other women to shut up about how "hard" it is.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:56 PM
-1

Honestly, I find it interesting how some women break. For ever "tumbler" feminist out there there is someone like my wife who has her doctorate and thinks 3rd wave feminism is stupid.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:46 PM
4

In case anyone wants to check it out, it seems to be accessible from some person's google drive... https://ef2490216286c222791a99f912bba7d38569f254.googledrive.com/host/0B6CJCm8vUSj0NHZDZUg5bFgxVW8/Mating%20in%20Captivity%20-%20Perel,%20Esther.pdf
/r/MarriedRedPill21/04/16 02:22 PM
1

Is booking something earlier better? I've been waiting to book my vacation to California because my research of google flights shows that prices seem to rest on a parabola. If you book too close to the flight you pay a high price, if you book too far in advance you pay a lot. If you book 1.5-3 months in advance you can save a lot. Sometimes waiting saves money.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 01:32 PM
8

I'm not saying it would be okay, but I could see this happening. At some point the reality is that we are biological beings and that anger is something of a subconscious/conscious mix. At some point something becomes so infuriating that rationality literally becomes neurologically impossible. I wish people would realize that. To some extent I think our laws allow people to get away with more BS, because literally you could almost do anything to a person, and so long as they physically strike you…
/r/MensRights14/04/16 06:31 PM
2

NRP is really bad about this. I like listening to radio during my lunch breaks, and Terry Gross has at least one feminist guest per week (or so it seems).
/r/MensRights06/04/16 08:33 PM
1

The one reporter in the documentary wrote a column apologizing to them.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:30 PM
4

I've never seen a man hit a woman. It happens of course, just not in public.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:38 PM
0

Do you understand why per capita is used? Yes those countries have smaller populations which means that a single or to incidents are going to skew the numbers, but a larger population provides more "opportunity" for these things to happen. If it is the case, and sadly it likely is, that a particular very small percentage of the population is just biologically and psychologically bat shit crazy and is going to do these things, the only way to determine if a country is producing more or less of th…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:35 PM
2

How about Finland and Norway? Or Slovakia, Switzerland? (I excluded Isreal because it is like a war zone there..) http://www.ijreview.com/2015/12/348197-paris-attack-claim-mass-shootings/
/r/MensRights17/12/15 06:49 PM
3

Yes, I was speaking more casually and perhaps I should change the words "never" to rarely or something. It is not that I've never heard it happen, but it happens so infrequently that the average listener is could easily go long stretches of time without hearing it. For example, excluding stuff that is just entertainment related such as interviews with musicians, actors, etc about their work, Terry's recent political themed shows include: "The U.S. Has A Mass Shooting Epidemic, But No Government …
/r/MensRights17/12/15 06:13 PM
10

I listen to NRP a lot because I think it is still better than conservative talk radio...but yeah, NRP is very liberal. It is not even so much about getting on the mic and telling listeners what to think..but more so they are very liberal in which topics they choose to cover and when they do, the format they select. It seems that multiple times a week for example you are likely to hear about transgender rights, gay marriage when it was big, black lives matter, etc. Very rarely will you have a sho…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 04:37 PM
1

Right, but I think the laws are intended to prevent someone from willy nilly bringing up past encounters in broad sweeping strokes. So "jane has had sex with 40 men this year, she is clearly a slut therefore she wanted it" is what the laws are meant to protect. But that much different than say an accuser saying she was bound against her well and that she does not like bondage, and perhaps there are 4 ex-boyfriends out there that are willing to testify that indeed, Jane asked to be bound on multi…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:30 AM
1

tell this will fall on deaf ears by your claim that someone is a rapist before a trial is even through, but I'll say it anyway. A person's history is good evidence, humans are creatures of habit. If someone has done something multiple times before they're likely to do it again. If someone goes to a bar multiple times and always picks up someone else and has consensual sex, then the likelihood that they will do it again is very high. I'm not a lawyer, think the last part of your comment is incorr…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:33 PM
5

Best comment I have read all day. Thanks.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:24 PM
3

I posted a link in /r/feminism/ 2 weeks ago. It was a link to someone giving a speech on the need for fathers to play an active role in the raising of children. I didn't add a comment, just a link. Within 6 minutes of posted it was removed and I was banned from posting. I asked the mods of /r/feminism/ why I had been banned, and I did not receive a reply. 10 days after no replay, I sent another message asking again, and within 10 minutes I received a message telling me to stop spamming the mods,…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:07 AM
1

Do feminists/women realize that the gender roles they EXPECT men to fulfill naturally create their own gender roles? If you expect your man to have a high status, high paying job in a respected field, etc, then the natural consequence is that he is not going to be able to do a 50/50 split of house chores. If you expect men to be highly competitive in the workplace to provide for the family, as most women do, then you have to be prepared to either compete just as much or compete less heavily and …
/r/MensRights05/10/15 02:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter