TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

geniice Archive

View 0 posts and 2,970 comments by geniice on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,970 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I doubt anyone will go see it. Its at the Museum of Old and New Art which overal has a pretty solid collection. The main limiting factor is that is in Tasmania but for people there its a solid place to visit.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 02:14 PM
2

There is some noise about nukes being back on the table for Taiwan strait. But even if we take those off the table AWACS systems don't really care about the gender of the people in them.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 01:57 PM
4

Still better than a woman. Simple example: If you have the bravest women in your squad, you got shot and need to be carried out of the battlefield to get help, she is physically not able to carry you. Its 2024 mate. No one is solo carrying you from the battlefield. Too much risk of eating drone drop (if you were shot the enemy knows where you are). If you are very popular they might try and run you out with 4 to a strecher but otherwise you had better hope there is armoured medivac around.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 01:46 PM
3

But women can't come even close to be as effective soldier as men, I assure you they can enter nuclear launch codes.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 01:44 PM
5

while women would work in safe and cushy jobs like "nursing", "logistics", "communication", administrative roles, or, at worst, as snipers. No. See the IDF. Might see a lot of tank crews mind. There are a lot of advantages to being able to limit your tank crew to 5'5''.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 01:43 PM
1

Why men get fired for wearing their hair long? Because aparently they decided to work for a company owned by Mormons. Why they get fired for wearing bandanas or head scarf? We clearly know a completely different set of welders. Why they get fired for wearing earrings? Again Mormons stuck in the 50s. What you going to do? Men should have various fashion choices also. We do. Kilts of various forms exist. Earrings kinda dropped off after the 90s metrosexul thing but are still around. The west is no…
/r/MensRights15/05/24 03:26 PM
2

wear no jewelry other than wedding ring Cufflinks, tie pin and of course the watch.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 03:13 PM
1

If I had to guess, Why are you guessing? The run up to world war 1 is exceptionaly well docummented. the elite tried to create world peace as the rich got richer but failed and out came WW1 Pretty much everyone in the west at least was getting richer in the run up to WW1. And world peace was very much not a thing. Pax Britannica had kept things in check on a global scale in the aftermath of the napoleonic wars but the european empires were forever dealing with local uprising and even within euro…
/r/MensRights15/05/24 04:08 AM
1

But the purpose of WWI was to destroy America, and replace it with world government. WW1 was driven by european defence pacts. America wasn't really a factor. If men loved America, they should have fought on the German side. Nah. The entente side was reasonably supportive of democracy (at least in the imperial cores) and its always helpful to have a few of those around the place even if they can be rather annoying at the time.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 03:55 AM
1

Even if I had those, I would literally shoot to kill anyone who violates my home borders, The person who fires the shell won't even know or care that you exist. Even your house will barely registier. In a real war small arms have a very limited effect.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 03:52 AM
4

The Order of the White Feather were just a bunch of feminists too scared to go to war themselves but shaming men into going and dying for nothing. Nah. In 1914 women going to war in combat roles was illegal. But women were still expected to be properly patriotic. The whole white feather thing (which was started by a man called Charles Fitzgerald) allowed them to do that. Later in the war more nursing positions in France and factory jobs in the home front because an availible way of showing patri…
/r/MensRights15/05/24 03:49 AM
1

I didn't claim "trad gay is gender conforming" sexuality and gender are 2 different things🤣 You claimed "And yeah dudes used to look like dudes and women used to look like women, it was much simpler." I'm pointing out that if we look back to the traditional gay community this was very much not the case. What point are yoy trying to make with the pics? Yeah 2 men can look like traditional men and be married? That's not what I meant. Picture number 5.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 10:43 AM
0

Anyone can tell Bowie, Prince and such were dudes, just because they wore high heels and blouses didn't mean anything, they weren't getting pissed when people say the wrong things. Prince was the one who went by an unpronounceable symbol that isn't even in unicode. Pronouns tend to be a lot easier But if you want people even further from mainline gender norms then for those into industrial music you've got Genesis P-Orridge and then within the LGBT community you've got people we would describe a…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 10:01 AM
-2

Bruh how old are you? I have only written letters to santa😂 Not quite as old as /u/8nt2L8 who was the one I raised the issue of letters with. I know who the eurythmics are and Bowie, but believe it or not, I wasn't born anywhere near 1983😅 Good. Then you will know your "dudes used to look like dudes and women used to look like women" claim isn't really true. I mean, I'm Bi. In society, women are allowed to be bi, men not as much, so I agree, you know Freddie Mercury was bi? He wasn't portrayed a…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:56 AM
-14

In letter? Who writes nowadays? Who cares about nowadays. There are 60 years between now and 64. At some point I assume you wrote a letter. And yeah dudes used to look like dudes and women used to look like women, it was much simpler. People aren't generaly sitting in front of you when writing letters. Also you and I remember David Bowie very differently. You're perhaps a bit old for the Eurythmics but if had been paying attention as late as 1983 you would have noted Sweet Dreams (Are Made of Th…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:39 AM
-66

It is ridiculous. I've been gay since 1964. My life has been fine with one or 2 simple labels for the straights to identify us. Now, we're asking them to remember our pronouns? Pretty sure you've been expected to remember people's pronouns your entire life. Otherwise how did you talk about people in letters? and all those anacronyms? Nah. Once LGBT is in there somewhere you know the kind of thing they are talking about.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 07:40 AM
8

Eh if you are over the age of 30 go ask the women in your life about "that teacher" at their school. Realisticaly the only change is male teachers becoming a lot less common in general.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 05:01 PM
-5

I feel like every week, there's an article in this sub about a female teacher raping a male child- is it really so commonplace for teachers doing this? There are 4 million teachers in the US. 52 cases a year would be shockingly low. And why exactly are there so many getting in trouble for it? Again 52 cases a year across the whole of the US (and in practice you see cases from the UK reported here as well) would be far less than you would expect from the general population.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 04:59 PM
1

What kind of weird masculinity are you subscribing to? Masculinity is all about how big your steam engine is. The most masculine man on earth is Mr Eddy Foster Head of Historic Engineering at Sheffield Museums Trust home to the 12,000 horsepower river don engine designed for rolling battleship armour (although last used to roll parts for nuclear reactors). In 2020 he shaved his beard and head to raise money for prostate cancer research. While most of us can’t ever hope to reach these heights you…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 02:51 PM
2

I'm a bit more surprised that someone of royalty would be needing to hire call girls, escorts or sex workers. Not royal. I would have thought because of their default riches, royalty and fame that would allow them to have a free selection of women whatever they want. Just officially request for a line of 10 suitable and eligible women and then make your choice for a suitable woman or wife. His first two wives were reasonably "suitable" (daughters of a banker and Ambassador respectively) although…
/r/MensRights25/04/24 12:57 PM
2

So a woman can go on a sexist rant "But a judge found that the 'rant' had not happened as described and had in fact been limited to a muttered remark by the female coworker stating 'you are a pain in the a***'."
/r/MensRights25/04/24 12:34 PM
5

It was never incel music it was always real. Are you saying incel music would not be real? The craziest part about the whole deal? The women who scream incel, they freaking went to their concerts in high school. Or its not the same people. Buddy Holly was released in 1994. People who went to their concerts in high school probably aren't hanging out in youtube music. Its gen Z taking a pop at dad rock. It all changed from a guy craving a woman loving her “thank god for girls” “el scorcho” all of …
/r/MensRights12/04/24 02:12 AM
4

Young people don't like old people music. Tale as old as at least Jazz in the early 20th century. You don't it so much on more recent artists like Ed Sheeran.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 01:47 AM
2

Hmm UK goverment thinks about 2.2% of men are victims of domestic violence per year. Essex has a population of 1.8 million. That works out at about 700,000 adult men. Which means the UK goverment would expect there to be nearly 16,000 cases.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 08:49 PM
-7

Well yes nursing pays better. Which incidentaly relates to why corporate level would be pushing to hire more women. Its not that they actualy care about employee gender ratios. They just figure if they can double the size of their recruiting pool (lets face it the qualifications for night security guard are pretty limited) they can keep costs down.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:39 PM
3

Unfortunately the "old model" of recruit the best you can find (meritocracy) Outside a few oddities like the old chinese civil service the primary driver is recruit people you know.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:26 PM
-20

Try finding females that want to work 50 percent night shifts Nurses.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:20 PM
-16

You volunteering to live opposite a homeless shelter?
/r/MensRights19/03/24 09:11 AM
42

Well yes. NIMBYS are one of the most powerful forces in US politics. Lot of people who don't want to live next to a homeless shelter. The framing is pure politics though. Its a fairly progressive area so you have to frame the argument in terms of "Together, we are calling for more affordable housing, senior housing, mental health services, and improving our programs that will help keep hardworking New Yorkers off the streets." rather than suggesting it will bring the wrong sort of people into th…
/r/MensRights19/03/24 12:31 AM
46

It doesn’t matter if we get all the stuff she’s talking about, a shelter is still needed for men who need to escape abuse especially men with kids. This is a general homeless shelter so is unlikely to be suitable for men with children. What you are asking for would probably need to be a seperate facility.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 12:26 AM
44

Why would she be against building shelter for men? NIMBYS gonna NIMBY And with such confidence too.. Well it appears to be what her constituents want.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 12:25 AM
0

You are only one man. For a gym to be viable it needs at least 100s of members within a fairly limited area (since people don't travel long distance to go to a gym). So you get a couple in megacities (thats your london clubs) where 0.01% is still a few hundred people. But beyond that the market is just too small to be viable.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 06:50 PM
5

Women now control nearly 60% of the wealth in the United States, Their source says 32%.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 06:34 PM
0

Because there are a bunch of companies active in setting up gyms and a reasonable number with experience of running them as private memebers clubs. If the people with actual experience in running gyms don't think its worth it its unlikely to be. And if the people who run the handful of men's only gyms around don't think it is worth expanding it is again unlikely to be. Also I know a range of men who go to gyms and "men only" isn't on their list of demands. Free weights yes. Not being overly crow…
/r/MensRights12/03/24 06:31 PM
1

In some cases a gym is a significant percentage of their offerings. For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bath_%26_Racquets_Club Ultimately its capitalism. The demand for explicty male only gyms is fairly limited so for the most part they are unlikely to exist.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 10:29 AM
2

But women only gyms is exactly that Depends on the local system. For example some countries have an exemption for private members clubs which can descriminate.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 06:49 AM
2

There are a few men only members clubs with gyms so they do exist. More widely men who want men only gyms go to the gyms that while they allow women in theory no women go there in practice.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 06:47 AM
-3

She is talking about recognition and attention. And in the functional greek system a citizen gets that. Because if the poorest farmer didn't the other poorer farmers would start worrying about their status. And a bunch of the governing roles were chosen at random so its best not to disrespect the person who could have a lot of power next year.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 09:57 AM
-4

That's not the kind of respect she is talking about. Yes it is. A big part of the greek system was that even the poorest farmer was still a citizen and should be due as much respect as any other citizen. She is saying she wants the same level of respect in terms of recognition and attention that the men who she is attracted to get when they enter the room. And now you're claiming to be able to see inside people's heads.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 09:15 AM
2

when the country was formed. "ancient period" We're talking classical antiquity. Greeks and romans tended towards around 20% slaves with the greeks probably being a bit higher than the romans.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 09:10 AM
-28

Absolutely false. From the ancient period, men always have to earn respect by being an example. Varied by civilisation. Firstly a lot of states were slave heavy. There was simply no way for a slave to really earn respect. Meanwhile free citizens would get a certian level of respect automaticaly although they might have to wait for their father to die first. Women on the other hand tended not to although roman women were entitled to a lesser level of respect. A lot of respect was also driven by b…
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:41 AM
1

Geniice, you’re thinking of Athens. The Athenian system is not generalised for the rest of Greece. From what we can tell other poleis generaly had much the same structure at least in theory if on a smaller scale with fewer magistrates Athens was also a very male society which encouraged its male population to be strong and involved. Ehh involved yes. Strong? Opinions were actualy a bit mixed on athletes. I think you’re confusing the concept of “strong men” with “the strongman” where one individu…
/r/MensRights31/01/24 04:35 AM
1

If you think England had "exactly" 2 female nobles at that time, you are actually too ignorant to even have this discussion There were two female members off the house of lords. Nobility was a social class. And there were thousands of them all over the country. Not 500 years ago. The nobility were rather small. What you are are thinking of are the gentry. But while they could be rich and powerful they were not nobility and could both vote and sit in the house of commons. The female nobles even h…
/r/MensRights31/01/24 01:29 AM
1

It’s a critical aspect that is necessary No it isn't. Look at all the greek poleis were sucessful despite vast efforts in their social structures to limit strong men (to the point where important roles would be assigned at random). It’s difficult to pinpoint the roots of failure or weakness within a society when you judge based on a Birds Eye view. Its not. See the series ancient near east societies that follow a predictable trend of collapsing when salification wipes out their agricultural base…
/r/MensRights30/01/24 11:54 PM
1

Most feminist will lecture you about how men are historically oppressive and are even today because of history, but are never nearly critical of the discriminatory ills of how women treated black men like me throughout history, 500 years ago contact with sub saharan africa was limited and moors were more concerning due to their religion than skin colour. etc, never comment towards how racist and discrimatory their own movement started off as, Its in the standard histories. Although depending on …
/r/MensRights30/01/24 11:03 PM
1

While feminists love to point out obscure laws that technically allowed men to abuse women in marriage, laws that are on the books don't dictate human behavior. I have friends in the middle East, Asia and Africa right now who are completely dominated by their wives, even though the laws and society imply that they are "supposed" to have the "power". And plently of domestic abuse goes on in the west. You're right laws don't fully dictate human behavior but they do give a reasonable indication of …
/r/MensRights30/01/24 11:00 PM
1

In the strong men make good times to the weak men make bad times quote, Can be dismissed by one look at the track record of arab countries run by strong man leaders. Or since people are usualy talking about the roman empire its decline began as you see a shift from toga wearing civic leaders to sword wielding barracks emperors.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 10:40 PM
0

Metal wouldn't be called pop if it was the most popular genre. Yeah it would although with bands more like say Queensrÿche than Gorgoroth I'm just saying that people judge male preferences more. I gave pop and metal as an example because they were the first to come to mind. And when the "example" was throughly debunked did you reconsider your position.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 03:17 PM
1

For example, women prefer pop much more than men do, while men prefer metal much more than women do. Pop is loved by the media, What media are you consuming? Looking down on pop is a pretty standard position. The word "basic" may or may not be used Meanwhile, metal is constantly hated by the media, Not the 90s any more. Depending on the media metal tends to be ignored, viewed as mildly positive or used a cheap way to show that a character belongs to a subculture while not being too out there. us…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 03:01 PM
-17

I linked to someone who appears to be a parent at the school who posted the letter on Twitter. No Savanah Hernandez is a reporter for places like infowars. What would you need to see to believe it was real? Well I'd start with something we can trace back to a parent at the actual school. Also I'd like to see some evidence of the claimed judge actualy being involved with the case. The last link you provided, about domestic abuse, is pretty worrying. Now I would like to hear her side of the story.…
/r/MensRights20/12/23 07:47 PM
-24

He could be. But the mother's letter to parents at her son's school appears to be real On what basis do you think its real? No source. Do you believe he's lying? Never belive a one sided account of a child custody dispute (indeed there's a reason the original source uses "according to" so much). Also there the issue that these look suspiciously like him: https://unicourt.com/case/ca-lac1-vena-adam-christopher-959607 https://unicourt.com/case/ca-la23-carbone-alexia-vs-vena-adam-christopher-549677…
/r/MensRights20/12/23 06:39 PM
-50

You misssed option 3. The father is lying.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 04:46 PM
1

Semantics. Its not. And failing to understand the difference can get people killed. Fire departments, cops, Marines. Competent fire departments understand managing hazards. US police have their own issues (and the statisics say their job simply isn't that dangerious compared to say taxi driving and for Marines it all about avoiding anything resembling a fair fight. Hazards, dangers, six of one, half dozen of the other according to Merrian Webster and crew. And when they are written by people who…
/r/MensRights20/12/23 01:23 PM
3

Some jobs have inherent dangers. No they have inherent hazards. Triethylaluminium ignites on contact with air. Thats a hazard. But it can be managed to the point where there is no danger. Men understand this. No suckers think that. And the shareholders get rich as a result.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 09:17 PM
1

We do try. Some things are just inherently dangerous. Comparing US and UK statistics shows that US construction is more dangerous than it needs to be. And no. Things are inherently hazardous. Not dangerous.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 09:15 PM
8

I would love to hear your thoughts on this Under Lisa Su AMD went from "the other company that produces x86 CPUs" to "worth more than intel". Meanwhile under Brian Krzanich, Bob Swan and Pat Gelsinger intel went from so dominant that they could sell 14nm 4 core chips for years and people would buy them to "having to run their chips hotter than the sun to try and compete with AMD".
/r/MensRights18/12/23 09:12 PM
1

I wonder how much dying from covid was associated with dangerous jobs. Probably not much. Most of them are pretty physical and covid deaths tend to tend with age and other medical issues which would disqualify people from those jobs.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 10:12 PM
1

Doesn't seem to have been a significant factor. The US has around 5000 fatal work injuries a year total and thats not enough to drive the difference (and its twice UK rates suggesting the US needs more OSHA). Greater chance of straight dying from covid and drug overdoses appear to be the main drivers. Blame the Sackler family and the goverment responce to the problem for the second one.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 04:11 PM
2

Why does it need the gender quantifying! Hamas doesn't generaly wear uniforms. The upshot is that if you present the world with a dead adult man Israel can always say he was a millitant of some time. Hamas is less keen on recruiting women (some of the old sorta marxist groups did) so if you present the world with a dead woman or child its harder to make that argument.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 06:59 PM
1

If you’re going to say that, you may as well call punch cards as modern IT. Modern IT starts with the jump from low level assembly written by mathematicians to high-level languages written by whoever happened to be hanging around the computer lab. Even by 1960 people like Melvin Kaye were considered outliers. Modern IT very much started with punch cards. Spacewar! was 62. The future was already here. Just not very evenly distributed.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 10:13 AM
1

And when did the non-fringe hobbyist computer come in? 80s. When dad started to bring a computer home from work. The Apple was one of the first, and that was in the ‘70’s. Apple 1 was fringe hobbyist. Your Apple II and Commodore PET are where you start to see the impact of home computing And which are these universities (certainly back then) that expected prior computing experience to enrol in their courses? Started in the 80s and solified around 1990. Which is also the point where the percentag…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 10:05 AM
1

Modern IT only really started coming in from the ‘70’s Nah. FORTRAN is 50s COBOL 1960. and particularly the end of the ‘80’s which is when you had the beginnings of the net. Beginnings of the net are NPL network and ARPANET both around 1970.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 09:04 AM
1

I love the claims of early PCs being “aimed at boys” and the implication that this was BEFORE the ‘70’s! In other words before the Apple, before the Vic-20. At most in the ‘60’s you might have been able to build a kit form if you were an electronics enthusiast. Cart before horse???? In this case by PC they mean non fringe-hobbyist home computer. Famlies decided that they were boys toys which created issues when universities started expecting some previous computing experience.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 08:57 AM
1

You know you're argument is ridiculous No its scientific. Where definitions have to hold up under extreme conditions.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 02:35 AM
1

Nah the dates don't fit. The problem is prior to the 19th century you had to be a member of the church of England to get in on the persecution game (within Europe anyway).
/r/MensRights17/10/23 02:33 AM
5

Do you want me to edit my definition? Will that make you feel better? You're still bouncing around the fact that most people who identify as "transgender" Mate we haven't even got that far. We still at the stage where you are actively excluding cis men and defining most of the global male population as "not sure if man or not". I mean where I come from we don't walk about with our dicks out (that's for the Scots) and most people wont let you randomly check their chromosomes.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 02:26 AM
-5

The fact that a small percentage of men have an extra x chromosom Not allowed under your definition of men.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 02:02 AM
0

Yup. Smug. I'm talking about strong family values. Sounds suspiciously islamic. God fearing families. Yup islamic. Europe kinda rowed back on the god fearing thing after the whole 30 year war mess. Decided to have a secular enlightenment instead. French may have taken it a bit far with their Cult of Reason but they are in the end french. Families staying together. The fact it required an act of parliament to get a divorce does not mean families actually stayed together. Work ethic Bit protestant…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 02:01 AM
0

I have no idea what you're talking about dude but it's okay. I Because you don't know anything about European heritage. Morris dancing is a traditional english (well and sort of welsh) dance style. Traditional football is best thought of a particularly violent form of rugby played over the distance between two villages. Beating the bounds is literaly going round the boundries of the parish and hitting things with sticks. The issue is not that you can't celebrate european heritage its that you do…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 01:21 AM
-9

This is that annoying typical smug redditor energy I don't like. A "man" is a human with a penis and xy chromosomes. The XXY crowd have enough issues without that kind of bigotry. Also given the fairly smaller percentage of the population that have been karyotyped we would be in the difficult position where are very few people out there we can actualy definitivy call "men".
/r/MensRights17/10/23 01:13 AM
-4

There is no such thing has "transgender". Just male, female, and intersex. There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy. Shakespeare said that and I think he knew a bit more about men that you do.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 01:13 AM
-1

White men are told to be ashamed of our heritage and never to celebrate it, Who told you you couldn't morris dance? But look you have to accept that some traditions are going to change. In a world where cars exist traditional football just isn't going to be viable. However if you aren't beating the bounds thats on you. If you want more green men you need to take it up with the local church.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 01:08 AM
1

"European heritage" includes the french. Why would anyone want to be a bastion of french culture?
/r/MensRights17/10/23 01:01 AM
-5

Yup. Here we go. Nowadays most "liberal" people can't even define what a "man" is. Adult who identifies as male seems to work well enough for most purposes. The difference is that men who identify as "gay" get special treatment over "straight" men in society. Dude you should try being a stright white middle class male sometime. Its really fun. I'd say that almost any man who identifies as a "liberal" in today's world is supporting causes that go directly against men's right's. Well yes capitalis…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 12:57 AM
1

It affects nobody but that man. It sucks when your friends are hurt.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 06:01 PM
1

Do you guys feel the same way when you see a young man dating a woman who is 10, 20, or 30 years older than him? 21? Certianly file that under questionable life choices. A lot of it depends on what is actualy going on. Two horny people fucking is one thing but long term romantic relationships along those lines have a very high cance of ending poorly. Do you think he needs you to 'save' him from that woman? Irrelivant since I'm in no position to do so. Personally, I couldn't care less about it; i…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 06:00 PM
1

There certainly is a luck element. These is all sport. but the rest she was playing against weren’t. And even at that level they should be clearing out the also rans. Raducanu also won without dropping a set. She won the way a genuinely good player on decent form would win not a player getting though on luck. If she could do it multiple times - I may concede it is more skill than luck. You're not allowing for bad luck.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 12:19 PM
1

I said alot of money. Like ferarris, big houses, etc... You've still got a bunch of men who aparently want that money to buy a steam engine. While its currently fashionable to assume that every unmarried rich man was LGBT (some may be admitted as asexual) that doesn't actualy appear to have been the case. That said such men would have been under a fair bit of pressure to get married so even those that didn't particularly want to generaly did. However there were enough nominaly het singles out th…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 12:06 PM
0

The foundation of all those fairytales is true love conquers all. Nah. Snow White seems essentialy to be a mix of fairy tail greatest hits, Sleeping Beauty perhaps although it derives from the ideas of chivalric romance where as Cinderella would be better thought of as "girl wins the lottery". Snow-White and Rose-Red meanwhile has a message closer to "be generaly nice to people and good things will happen to you". These were stories you told to kids. You needed happy endings. Marrying into the l…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:59 AM
0

When you ask yourself why this message is coming from one of the most powerful financial organizations in the world, and why it has literally nothing to do with banking, It has plently to do with banking. Banks have been trying to get woman to bank more like men for decades.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:30 AM
1

Time to boycott HSBC I think. So money laundering for mexican cartels is fine but this is too far?
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:27 AM
1

I don’t see why everyone fusses over her. She has won one grand slam. Thats more than Tim Henman ever won. One win could just be luck. You don't win a grand slam by luck alone. The nature of tennis means the top players are all really good at efficiently dispatching also rans. At the time she won Raducanu was absolutely a top tier tennis player. Of course tennis is also the kind of sport where the wrong injuries can pretty much be game over.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:26 AM
1

This. This right here. A book about how prince charmings value isn't determined by how much he provides for a woman. So all of the originals. Its deterimed by him being a prince (and charming). He's a Boss Boy who don't need no woman. I'm not entirely sure how the teller of a traditonal folk tale would react to the concept of a "Boss Boy" but again he's a prince. Part of the story can be how single moms tell him to "man up" to a smom. He can say "talk to the hand. I'm not a welfare cheque". Then…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:20 AM
1

I think we should reverse the genders. Write the females out. Pretty sure there are a bunch of gay princes books already. Prince Charming doesn’t need to charm anyone! Well thats pretty much a given in the Prince Charming archetype he doesn't need to work at being Charming he just is. He doesn’t need to do anything to prove himself to a woman! Again thats already pretty much in the original. He's a prince. The most eligible bachelor in the kingdom. He doesn't need to pove himself he just is.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 10:52 AM
1

Born rich and willing to sacrifice his life for the benefit of a common girl. No. The knight in shining armour is prepared to take risks. The Prince Charming archetype is a full on Deus ex machina who can be expected to so overmatch any problem that they don't take any risks. Alturnatively you have the Cinderella approach where the Prince Charming is something to be competed for.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 10:41 AM
9

Wasn't MGTOW villainized and treated like they were Nazis trying to put women in concentration camps for trying to teach men and boys that? The issue is that MGTOW seemed to spend 90% of their compaining about women rather than actualy going their own way. Men who genuinly go their own way aren't generaly considered a problem at least until whatever they built in their shed starts to cause traffic issues/upsets the planning authorities.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 10:38 AM
2

Accidents happen. Seen a significant number of guys being able to take the risk of starting their own business because their wife has some not so great paying goverment job that provides medical insurence.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 08:31 PM
1

So I don't really have an understanding of how weddings work, how they're arranged etc., and I'm just wondering, is there a way I can marry symbolically, exchange rings, share surnames, but without being legally bound to a paper that practically says if this marriage ends, I lose two thirds of my life and everything I own? Yes in basicaly any state/country that doesn't have common law marriage. Gay people did it for decades (there are photos of a gay wedding from the 50s: https://www.bbc.co.uk/n…
/r/MensRights24/08/23 08:28 PM
1

GCSEs are great at class divide as well as sexism. As they are split into higher and lower tiers. The lowers are treated like undesirables Bit more complicated than that. Schools are ranked on how many get 9-4 grades (you would know this as A-C). Therefor those on the 3/4 boarder will be focused on. Yes those are never going to get a 4 tend to be forgotton about.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 01:34 PM
3

Schools and colleges are mostly theoretical which were intentionally designed that way to benefit women. The last hold out of boys doing better was maths. Men learn more from practical subjects. Some do but we tried that approach (the old tripartite system) and and it worked so poorly that trying to re-introduce it is political suicide at this point. There are a fare amount of practical options in the 16-18 education sector. There used to be more in the 14-16 section but that got rather badly ab…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 01:31 PM
2

Can’t wait for lot’s of things said - but no action to follow. It’s all talk. The sad thing is, I can’t see Labour doing any better for boys in education. Problem is that no one really knows what to do about. The issue is mostly due to a subset of boys bringing the average down. Specificaly working class white boys. Working class indian boys and middle class white boys do find by comparision. Some might question working class white male culture but that loses you elections. Meanwhile, women made…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 01:29 PM
2

He's 85. If he's managed to hang on that long no one is firing him now.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 01:24 PM
13

Something is wrong with that. I would think that as part of justice she would have to face the people she harmed. No. You have the right to attend your trial and setencing but you are free to opt out. Generaly you don't want to because it looks bad and may increase your sentencing (although not an issue in this case because 7*full life tarrif can't get any longer) but for people with significant impulse control issues there are advantages to not attending. Equaly there is no requirement that the…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 01:15 PM
1

The leader of the Capper murderers and the Bulger murderers were released, despite the horrific nature of these crimes and the publicity they received. Only killed one person so no whole life tarrif (not that judges had the power to hand them out in those days).
/r/MensRights22/08/23 12:41 PM
1

Its not easy to get a whole life tarrif in England. You generaly have to kill at least two people and only about 100 have been handed out since the early 80s.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 11:40 AM
2

Broadly there are three aproaches. She could in theory get a royal pardon but would basicaly have to stop a nuclear terrorist attack on london to get one. Even then only maybe. She could be found not guiltly on appeal. Overturning 7 murder convictions would be tricky but the Birmingham Six did manage to overturn 21. Compassionate release is possible but given that there are no political reasons to release her (so no Abdelbaset al-Megrahi issues) she would basicaly have to be down to a week to li…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 11:37 AM
1

Would be difficult to do. About the only mechanism for that would be a royal pardon and those are very rare. Last time a murderer got one it was for helping take down a terrorist who had just killed two people and he was getting towards the end of his sentence in any case (was on day release when the attack happened).
/r/MensRights22/08/23 11:31 AM
2

We all know why this went on as long as it did, if that was a male nurse and a complaint went in it would have ended there and then, No. There's a general issue with hospital managers trying to sweep things under the carpet. Not just an issue in the UK either. See Christopher Duntsch in the US.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 11:24 AM
0

I'l deal with the arguments people make.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 12:50 AM
1

Nope. Nazis never broke 34% in a free election or 44% in a somewhat free election. Stop repeating Nazi propaganda.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 12:49 AM
1

It's not even worth it to do a "noble sacrifice" cuz chivalry is dead dude and women killed it, Maxim was a man. Turns out that cavalry doesn't work in the face of machine guns.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 11:29 PM
0

the tragically funny part is the media has utterly ignored the forced conscription of men, and the border freezes preventing them from leaving the country, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/03/09/ukraine-men-leave/ reuters: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/we-pray-ukraine-people-flee-war-into-central-europe-2022-02-25/ the guardian https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/mar/09/ukraine-urged-to-take-humane-approach-as-men-try-to-flee-war So much for "utterly ignored". Got…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 11:28 PM
-4

Zelenskyy was legitimately elected.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 11:25 PM
2

I wonder what the agenda of portraying women as violent would pursue, Ratings. edit: also, as I usually say, this is the stuff on TV, which means privately the issue is much much worse. To be clear you think Becky Lynch spends all her spare time beating people up?
/r/MensRights11/08/23 02:54 PM
1

Thats nothing. If you checked out some WWE you would see that its not just american women but also Irish women and Japanese women have taken to dishing out staggering amounts of violence. Its reality TV. The only trend you've noticed is that the showrunners think that portraying the women as violent will get higher ratings.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 11:36 AM
-2

Smoking rates have going down. Men are living longer as a result. Not sure that counts as making things worse for men. As for it narrowing see: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6015620/
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:41 PM
-6

I can only recall a single anti-smoking campaign that was directed at men, So? The fact is that that anti-smoking campains have resulted in falling rates of smoking and men living longer as a result (its also probably the main driver for the shrinking gender gap in life expectancy).
/r/MensRights10/08/23 05:58 PM
6

The truly frustrating part is summed up in the seventh image you present, where we see so many causes of death that are completely preventable. Yet nothing is done to save men's lives. Anti smoking campains have done a fair bit.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 05:33 PM
4

Factor in misdemeanors (UK doesn't have the split). Or DUI's after 1996
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:43 PM
3

Its 24% if you go down to the age of 10: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/217474/criminal-histories-bulletin.pdf Thats Standard list offences which doesn't include speeding.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 10:08 PM
1

33% of UK men have a criminal conviction although I'm not aware of any breakdown for violent crimes In terms of rape the data isn't great. Lisak et al came up with 6.4% but that is based on survey data so may well be an undercount. https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrvv/17/1/73 However you still have the issue that there is a gap between those who commit 1 violent crime and those that commit a lot of them.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 08:29 PM
2

The only reason Russia is losing to Ukraine is because the US is supplying Ukraine. Allies are a useful thing yes. but that’s not really what this post is about Your senario is the Ukraine conflict exapanding. The reality is the Russian army is pretty much fully deployed. It doesn't have the combat power left to launch much in the way of attacks outside ukraine. The upshot is that US airpower alone would be enough to allow other NATO forces to drive straight down the M9 to moscow.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 07:05 PM
2

It’s not a matter of whether the US army can handle it. I "see how they would feel about a draft " yet another world war if this Ukraine conflict turns into something bigger than it actually is. If the US got involved it would get a lot smaller very quickly. We've already seen how poorly russian forces fare in the face of effective SEAD. Wouldn't be long before all any NATO ground forces were doing was mopping up.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 06:48 PM
3

Irrelivant. If something is attacking Europe that the regular US army can't handle its aliens and its safe to assume they are attacking the US as well.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 06:40 PM
1

Just "dropping HE" on your enemy won't always work, Well no you have to find them first. But if they are pinning you down with dirrect fire that tends to be fairly doable. Also statisticaly it works more often than anything else. some vehicles will break down or get stuck, And recovery these days mostly involves other vehicles. trenches and fox holes must be dug. Sand bags must be filled, Seen women do both. And also excavators. and doors rammed in. Again thats COIN thinking. Assuming the struct…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 03:31 PM
1

True, but even in a defensive situation you need to be able to do those things. Marching to recapture ground or aid a pinned down unit must be able to go fast and smoothly. Does your country not have acess to internal combustion engines? Yes fuckups like the falklands exist but that involves some major strategic mistakes in the first place to allow the situation to develop. Also you aren't going to be trying to do that kind of thing with conscripts. Even tough forklifts exist, a soldier must be …
/r/MensRights01/08/23 03:02 PM
3

Altough it is true that hand-to-hand combat is rare, that is not the only part of the military that requires physical strength. You need to be able to break down doors We're talking situations where there is a draft. Not colonial adventurism. If for some reason artillery hasn't already made plenty of entry holes the grenades you fill the building with probably will. load heavy ammunition, Its 2023. NATO has forklifts.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 01:51 PM
1

If a woman tries to do this to you, dump the biatch and run for your life. Ehhhh russia mostly recruits from the poorest regions of the country where those combat bonuses look rather tempting. Thats why they have adverts like this: https://www.reddit.com/r/NonCredibleDefense/comments/zqo81m/i_have_signed_a_contract_now_well_be_fine_russian/ Personally I will not fight for any country that treats men as second class citizens. Its cool its russia. Everyone outside Moscow or Saint Petersburg is a s…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 12:53 AM
2

No there hasn't been. There was one video of a russian shooting his friend's recruiter.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 12:47 AM
4

He's over 30 so unlikely in theory.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 07:09 PM
1

And more importantly how do we change this? More OSHA/ other countries equivalent. Jobs may be hazardous. They should not be dangerous.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 08:42 PM
-1

Look at the numbers for nursing some time.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 08:34 PM
4

Most footballers/athletes who don't like their coach get on with it, Google "lost the dressing room". Whilst working with women I've seen this all too many times, but normally it's not about performance it's about personality. Thing is that for managers those are much the same thing. You need a personality (or the appearence of one) that keeps the players motivated while getting the best out of them. This is particularly the case for an international manager where to a large extent you are stuck…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 11:05 AM
1

Putin is a selfish rich person who started an unnecessary war. If you have an issue with those kind of people then he's someone you should be doing something about. Your level of trust in the person is irrelivant.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 10:52 AM
0

Not really relivant to the question of putting up this bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 09:15 AM
1

Normally CPS and police would investigate No but they will give you a crime number so you can file an insurance claim.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 09:08 PM
-3

If you truly cared about putting an end to putins imperial ambitions than you would be calling for Ukrainians to start mobilizing women, Fuck no. I'd be calling for F-22s to start seal clubbing the russian airforce before joing the F-35s and B-21s in a SEAD operation. After that its just a matter of bombing into the ground whatever bits of the russian army are too stupid to run away. Do you even NATO?
/r/MensRights18/07/23 07:16 PM
-8

Politics aren’t an excuse to treat men like subhumans. Not sure what that has to do with putting up with Putin's imperial ambitions.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 07:01 PM
0

See but it does work like that for 50% of the adult population, Kid my city has large sections that date from after 1945 despite being in the urban core. So no it doesn't.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 06:59 PM
-1

While being left to my own devices at home safe and sound Your country is under attack and you want to be safe and sound? Thats not how things work.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:53 PM
4

There is no forced conscription there yet. The entire male population of russia is subject to consription in theory. The limits are that its not that expensive to bribe your way out and they aren't meant to be allowed to serve outside russia (a small number were involved in the invasion but since then russia has stuck to intimidating them into signing contracts first).
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:51 PM
7

Where is the conscription of women? Ukraine is a pretty conservative society making that difficult. Even the steps they have taken in that direction (registering women with certian skillsets) have created issues.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:49 PM
-9

Why do men put up with this bullshit? Well why haven't you done something about Putin?
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:48 PM
6

Not much ukraine either. It was a pretty conservative society (the war is changing things).
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:47 PM
0

Will she face any consequences for fake accusations? Can you prove beyond reasonable doubt that they were fake? No? Not much point in making an arrest then. Can you prove on balance of probability? Because if no that's defamation and she could wind up owning your house.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:46 PM
0

Man I've seen reports on Ukrainian veterans being treated better in Russian POW camps than in their own units. The weightloss among returning POWs indicates said reports are bollocks. Find yourself some sources with less russian propaganda.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 06:36 PM
10

I don't know what they're doing. Why not? You have the internet. I'm just amazed that any nation that treats it's citizens like that has soldiers outnumbering defectors. Soldiers tend to work on the basis "if me why not him". And defecting to russia has some fairly obvious downsides. Any nation treating me like that would effectively serving as recruiters for whatever enemy they happened to be fighting at the time, is all I'm saying. In the real world any nation not prepared to hit the conscriti…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 06:54 PM
9

... Really wondering how it is the Russian Army doesn't get a surge of local recruits. DPR and LDR forces exist. Of course a lot of those are conscripts and the DPR at least appears to have largely exausted its availible manpower. I know that if France did that to me, the Russian Army would get a new recruit trained and equipped by the French government. And given that they wouldn't trust you a millimetre you would be expended in the first meatwave attack.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 06:49 PM
1

It wasn't about conscription in UK. "Vote was not supposed to be a right either. It was an agreement in exchange of the obligation to join draft." It was about number of war casualities. No. It was more to do with the war forcing far more mixing within the social classes than had previously been normal. Suddenly the unskilled working classes counted as people.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 11:19 PM
1

In UK men got it first because of decrease in male population of the age group in early and late 20s who died in WW1 so they had to adjust the eligibility age of women to balance the voter population of that age group. Doesn't change conscripted woman not getting it. Also you've got the fun issue of men picking up extra votes due to the university constituencies. Go to university and get a vote. Get drafted not so much.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 10:19 PM
1

It would not surprise me if suffrage and some form of military service went hand in hand in most places but it did not everywhere in the western world. In general it did not. Remember by the 19th century your average soldier was pretty poorly thought of by society. It was a job with poor pay and high risks. So it tended up be occupied by people with few other options. Meanwhile those looking to get some kind of representative democracy of widen the franchise were making arguments about people ha…
/r/MensRights06/06/23 06:00 PM
1

Vote was not supposed to be a right either. It was an agreement in exchange of the obligation to join draft. No. UK introducted consription in 1916. Universal UK male suffrage wouldn't appear until 1918 and the UK abolished conscription in 1920 with no change to voting rights. On top of that during that period the UK had conscription for women between 20 and 30 but the Representation of the People Act 1918 only gave the vote to certian women over the age of 30. On top of that the vote age was on…
/r/MensRights06/06/23 05:52 PM
-1

At the beginning of the 20th century most men didn't have a vote either and were required to go to war for it - No. At the begining of the 20th century voting was based around property and income. Going to war was a good way to lose the vote since soldiers wouldn't meet the income requirments. Some officers might but britian didn't introduce overseas voting until 1918 so no one fighting in the Second Boer War would have got a vote no matter how right. Meanwhile of those men not at war around 60%…
/r/MensRights06/06/23 05:43 PM
2

Salinification was the big one. Empires can't survive their farmland ceasing to be usable.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 11:58 PM
2

Collapse requires the state to be well collapsed which in ancient times mainly happened when vigorous nomadic warriors overran the decadent empire. Nah. It mainly happened when another empire took over.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 11:57 PM
1

Decadent empires fell to invading nomadic hordes who were not decadent. False but its an old myth: https://acoup.blog/2020/01/17/collections-the-fremen-mirage-part-i-war-at-the-dawn-of-civilization/ All you can really say that all empires fall eventualy. Usualy to other empires but sometimes to non empires. On the other hand imperial armies required acess to reasonably nearby farmland to operate for any length of time making it difficult for them to wipe out normadic groups. Nothing to do with b…
/r/MensRights01/06/23 11:55 PM
0

Lying? Do you even live in America? Are you under the impression that statistics can't cross boarders? What do you think is going on over here? We have many Russian immigrants who are here just chilling and living their lives. We aren't going to treat them poorly because their home nation is at war with ukraine. You don't pay much attention to events in america do you? https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/russian-businesses-us-face-backlash-war-ukraine-rcna19155
/r/MensRights26/05/23 05:27 PM
-2

I don't even know what to say, that's just sad He lying of course. The reality is that there simply aren't enough ukrianian refugees in any one area of the US for a doctor not to be able to count them. Of course there are russians in the west pretending to be ukrianian because being russian in the west is not a good look right now.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 11:59 AM
1

Its wrong. It oversimplifies the situation of catholics in northern ireland (propety requirements limited their right to vote in local elections), misses that homless people couldn't vote until the late 90s and misses that prisoners still can't vote (so no the UK does not have 100% suffrage). Its also wrong about working class men not having the vote being a barrier to women voting. Not only did women who met the property requirements in theory have the vote pre 1832 but women who met the proper…
/r/MensRights11/05/23 06:32 PM
1

You volunteering?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 07:22 PM
1

And not accusing the guy just released from prison.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 06:27 PM
3

Then feminists have the audacity to say that justice system don't take rape cases seriously. And this case supports that argument. The police didn't do the initial investigation properly. Instead they managed to railroad a jury into convicting someone on questionable evidence. If they had done the initial investigation properly they might not have got the guilty party but they were more likely to do so. They only say this because they don't see 100% conviction rate. Its more that conviction rate…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 06:14 PM
2

The conviction was for raping a 6 year old. They were saying he raped a child. Try reading the article. And the reality if you spend much time following these cases a lot of them involve cases where the victim didn't identify anyone or the victim was killed in the attack (the later in particular are the kind of cases where the police feel the need to get some kind of conviction reglardless of who actualy did it).
/r/MensRights09/05/23 06:09 PM
1

That would be the DA who has pretty solid immunity from prosecution. They are after all allowed to try and convict innocent people as long as they do so legaly. Its the job of the jury to find them not guilty.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 06:04 PM
6

Eh you'd be looking at a pretty steep sentence for raping a 6 year old.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:57 PM
6

What makes you think the former DA was female?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:56 PM
8

Can someone from the United States explain to me why there are so many cases like this? Race and long prison sentences. Historicaly the US police have tended to solve cases they couldn't otherwise solve by prosecuting a convient black guy. The longer prison sentences mean more pre DNA convictions are still in prison. In most countries he would have been out over a decade ago (although this case wasn't DNA driven).
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:56 PM
9

Now, time to arrest whoever is responsible for stealing this man's life, and throw their ass in prison for the next 29 years. Police and prosecuters have pretty solid immunity from prosecution.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:55 PM
-5

Throughout history many more women have reproduced than men - https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/through-history-more-women-have-reproduced-men-180952840/ Thats mostly due to something that happened between 7000 and 5000 years ago in Africa, Europe and Asia. We don't see it in the americas. Even there it does strictly track reproduction merely surviving sons. The natural biological order By 7000 years ago we are already well into the neolithic. Natural had nothing to do with it. Long term…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 09:27 AM
13

Something I've noticed is that with the rise of feminism, less and less men are in relationships. In the past, it seemed like every guy had a wife. Try looking at the 19th century or before. The "seemed like every guy had a wife" thing is very much the aftermath of WW1 and 2 where a mix of a large number of male deaths and limited economic opportunities for women meant there was massive pressure on both sides to get married. You never heard of 30 year old permavirgins. Of course you did. Even in…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 09:13 AM
1

... there was no headline news. Thats rather the point. OP was asking us to "Imagine the outcry if this was announced as the other way round." Where the reality is there was no outcry. It was not announced by fifa. Yes it was. Who else do you think announced the officials? Face it. OP decided to get upset over an event that only happened in their head. And if they were remotely familiar with the history of woman's football they would know that men refereeing the woman's' game is historically ext…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 04:13 PM
1

Referees and linesmen (this was 1991) are always announced. That how we know their names.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 03:43 PM
1

However (serious question), has an all male referee team ever taking charge of a a women's World Cup match? I tried searching but couldn't find an answer. Yup. 17 Nov 1991 . Denmark Vs New Zealand. Second ever woman's world cup match. The officials were Omer Yengo, Vassilios Nikakis and Li Haiseng. Imagine the outcry if this was announced as the other way round. Well its happened so we don't have to imagine.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 03:17 PM
0

Ask the women who cry patriarchy? Not that I’m aware. Then why would you expect to hear from them? From the POV the media this is a man bites dog story that is already attracting plently of clicks. Quotes from third parties are not required. Well yes, I’m not speaking about this case in one of them being rich. I’m more speaking in general because they still went against him despite his allegation probably being serious. Who went against him? If you mean the jury the standard in england and wales…
/r/MensRights29/09/22 10:30 PM
10

You’re right and this has been something women have often said, the thing is, is people have heard and recognized how the courts don’t address female rape, and how this is apart of “patriarchy” and how privileged men are to not face such issues. Yet when this issue arises 1 those same women who cry “patriarchy” at every little thing are dead silent. Has anyone asked them? In any case most the arguments tend to look at the overal statistics rather than individual cases. 2 it shows how courts have…
/r/MensRights29/09/22 10:08 PM
8

How men haven't gotten the idea to use excuses line I couldn't have done that, she wanted me to choke her, I am too fat, I can't last more than 10 seconds, I am too lazy to do it, etc.. Because in most cases that would just overcomplicate "you can't prove beyond reasonable doubt that it wasn't consensual".
/r/MensRights29/09/22 09:54 PM
60

In the UK a bit below 1% of rape cases reported to the police ended in a conviction. So being cleared is the expected result. From the POV of the jury its mostly a he said/she case which means beyond reasonable doubt was always going to be a significant hurdle. Brusing to the neck means very little ("rough sex" claims have got people off murder charges). Staying the night afterwards while in reality meaning very little is always going to cause issues for juries who have fairly fixed ideas about …
/r/MensRights29/09/22 09:48 PM
1

And after the war Found the optimist Pakistan or US gonna profit more rebuilding Ukraine Ukraine had negative population growth pre war and you can bet a lot of the refugees aren't going home. A lot of it is never going to be rebuilt. Everyone would have profited more if russia had never invaded. No particular evidence? Really? Check out how many are being spent on lobbying and how many politicians and military commanders end up on very lucrative positions in said companies once their terms are …
/r/MensRights24/09/22 03:54 PM
1

How is Pakistan gaining from selling weapons and the West is losing in doing the same? Pakistan make 152mm shell. Sell shell to western goverment. Use money to buy goods and services. US makes a Javlin. Buys it using its own money and sends it to ukraine where it makes a $100k explosion. Yes there is some economic stimulus but during a supply side shock that just results in further inflation and in any case the economic benifits are far less than if the goverment had spent the money on say bike …
/r/MensRights24/09/22 12:01 PM
2

You should not be. He is a psychologist and a decent one at that. He's skilled in the area of Jungian archetypes. The problem is there is no evidence that we live in a universe where they actualy exist.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:27 AM
1

Seems to me that western countries, the military–industrial complex in particular, are the only ones to benefit from this war. Costing western nations a bunch of money so no. India is gaining from cheap oil. Pakistan is gaining from selling weapons. Russia and Ukraine will both lose, no matter the outcome. Ukraine will do whatever the west wants, as it is already completely reliant on backing for weapons and subsequent rebuilding. If ukraine wins it get to continue to exist.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:23 AM
5

The reason men had the right to vote in 1900 was because the were all elegible for the draft Lot of black men drafted in WW1 and 2.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:05 AM
3

10/100k for a JOB is horrible, Yes but if the US reached UK level of H&S standards (edge protection guys look into it) it would be down to below 2 per 100K. It is apples to oranges, but I think it emphasizes a point that men are dying for no reason other than creating a living UK figure makes it clear that most of them are dying due to poor health and safety standards. but most people would rather address the issues others cause or general life cause, before self imposed ones. OSHA exists.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 09:04 PM
0

and inclusion of men in women clothing Thats how it was done in Shakespeare's time. You got a problem with that?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 07:34 AM
1

Well there was the whole issue with pancc. At that level during a game probably not. Teams are somewhat concerned about their public image and try and prevent their players from doing anything that would be too damaging. Problem is that in order to get there you are going to be playing thousands of hours on public servers. And that's a hell of a lot easier if using the mike doesn't have a tendency to make you a target.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 02:59 AM
1

Nice try on using "homosexual male gaze" to deflect away from what the content you mentioned really is for: the female gaze. Lil Nas X is gay in case you somehow missed that. The video is very much about being a gay man. Women aren't really relivant to it.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 08:35 PM
1

So it is the female gaze. Again no. Look at how the first twilight film is shot. Or Lil Nas X's Call Me By Your Name for the homosexual male gaze. Chris Evans's isn't shot in either of those styles.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 08:02 PM
0

It's not called "reverse male gaze". It's female gaze. There's no particular evidence that this is the case. Indeed women lead and controlled projects don't seem to shoot like that. So reverse male gaze is probably the accurate term for "we took the standard hetrosexual male gaze towards a woman and pointed it at a man".
/r/MensRights30/11/21 08:29 PM
1

Really? Who? Christian Cooper. These days probably best known for a completely different reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_birdwatching_incident Was that the one with Northstar wearing a Speedo? Around his neck? Don't think so. Cooper actualy managed to find another gay character (Hector) to pair him up with. Note Cooper did edit #3 so that may be the one with the neck spedo. #4 was the "sod it we're going 100% gay on this one".
/r/MensRights30/11/21 02:24 AM
1

However to say things like muscular men are being casted only for the male audience is completely false. I'm saying they were cast because they already have well established looks that require muscles. But again male gaze is not "conventionaly attrive woman was cast". Its how they are depicted, framed, lit ect. Cap and Thor weren't being shot like Jamie Dornan in 50 shades of grey. And certianly weren't being shot like black widow. Consider the punching bag scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v…
/r/MensRights30/11/21 02:22 AM
0

So to all my Marvel fans reading this, isn’t the whole point of superheroes to look big and muscular. Depends on the superhero and the artist. Some do some don't. Like you wouldn’t read the comics or watch the movies if every man like looked like Steve Rogers before the super soldier serum lol. Asterix has sold well enough over the years and Tintin isn't exactly stacked. And neither would women. Historicaly superhero comic book caracters haven't been designed with a women audience in mind. And s…
/r/MensRights30/11/21 01:37 AM
2

Post vietnam a US draft has ceased to be politicaly viable for smaller wars. The potential is still there for larger conflicts against near peers but they all have nuclear weapons.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 08:00 PM
2

In the end you need to kill your enemy Thats what nukes are for.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 06:17 PM
3

This is beyond NOW. This is reality and women will be drafted with men in the future Nah. By the time the US is up against the kind of peer oponent where a draft might be politicaly viable it will turn into a strategic nuclear exchange before a draft can get going.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 06:14 PM
0

Silver Ferns beat New Zealand men in best of 3 at netball.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 11:14 AM
7

The hell were they thinking? Trying to increase the number of men playing netball. Remember this is New Zealand. The national sport and religion for men is rugby. Not many men play netball and some people in netball would like that to change.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 11:13 AM
3

That's part of the issue with voting rights. Initially they came about only for men as compensation for the draft. Not really. For example in britian pressed men wouldn't have had the vote. Voting rights had more to do with the the middle class's ability to cause political instability (the days of may). The post WW1 expansion had less to do with the draft (although the fact many drafted men would have lost the vote may have been a factor) and more to do with the war messing up britian's class sy…
/r/MensRights13/11/21 03:38 PM
-6

No blame is being assigned. Its simply an explanation as to why the statisitics are what they are.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 01:52 AM
-19

How is the headline lying? Do you feel at risk of public transport? Men in the UK are 4 times more likely to be murdered or assaulted than women. Thats the general figure. Probably a bit lower on public transport. However even there its going to be driven by men taking greater risks. Riding late night buses drunk and alone. Catching a train full for the more questionable type of football supporters. And the main complate given is sexual harassment. Despite makeing some very questionable public t…
/r/MensRights04/11/21 10:50 PM
1

2 years maxium but the sentencing guildines run between 1 year 6 months and a straight discharge depending on the details of the offence. https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/disclosing-private-sexual-images/
/r/MensRights08/10/21 01:57 PM
2

Up to two years in theory. If you dig out the sentencing guidlines the limited scope and planning knocks it down to Culpability C: https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/disclosing-private-sexual-images/ If we assume harm at the highest level then that's 12 weeks’ custody which could easily be converted to a suspended sentence for someone with no previous convictions.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 01:51 PM
-1

Man jailed for 20 Weeks in Prison for Revenge Porn "Boyton used the van to hit the front door of the house. He then got out of the van and picked up a wooden table leg from the front garden, which he used to hit the front window of the house." So there's a criminal damage charge in there as well Man jailed for 24 Weeks in Prison for Revenge Porn Level of planning means culpability level B which yes carries a heavier sentence: https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/d…
/r/MensRights08/10/21 01:46 PM
-6

Assuming the mother isn't dead the courts will award it. Collecting it faces the same issues as collecting it from fathers.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:26 PM
-4

Already exists. If the man gets sole custody of the child they get child support. In the case of joint custody they may get child support depending on where the child actualy lives and relative incomes.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 03:55 PM
1

Eh varies by country but even the US has things like Medicaid and food stamps. Obviously in countries where the goverment provides a higher level of support it tends to be prepared to step in more.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 10:14 PM
1

Well hopefuly the other parent can provide more support but yes there is a point where the state may have to step in. Under the UK system the lowest payment is £7 a week (it can be lower but you would need zero income or be in prison) and yes I've know cases where parents with full custody got that (I think they used it for the kid's pocket money).
/r/MensRights15/09/21 06:03 PM
0

Well you're first problem is that you assume everyone has $500 a month. At the other end you hit the problem that from the POV of wider society there is no benefit in limiting spending on a child. If a multi-millionaire can afford private schooling society would rather they did. Thus your proposal hurts poor men while protecting the rich. All purchases are documented for the other parent to see This results in a paperwork issue and doesn't help anyone. Either the parents get on well enough to di…
/r/MensRights15/09/21 04:26 AM
1

https://twitter.com/AmbarMra/status/1418924706422530049/photo/4 Its standard fascist stuff but the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war demonstrated that the drone pilot is pretty much the master of the modern battlefield. Even /r/CombatFootage/ was finding it depressing. You can do everything right (dug in dispersed) and they can still drop a kamikaze drone on your head at will. The slightly older case is the Battle of Khasham. Russian special forces VS US forces with fire support. 100:1 casulty ratio in …
/r/MensRights25/07/21 04:57 PM
-4

Someone didn't pay attention to the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war. Kamikaze dones don't care about how manly you are on the battlefield.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 04:48 PM
1

I don't believe Goodhart's law applies here as there is no designated target. As soon as people start saying "I want 90% on programs" there's a target. 4 stars on charity navigator is absolutely a target that people in the third sector world talk about. How? What's your basis? "General business practices" doesn't support this What percentage of the average company is operations or R&D? 10% on management & administration? That would be pretty unusal outside some areas with very high materials cos…
/r/MensRights22/07/21 06:01 PM
1

How is that? What in the world are you basing that off of? Mostly looking at general business practices, looking at conversations within the third sector about this matter and watching the various ways the scores are gamed. Also looking into cases where charities have gone wrong. Ultimately though its just Goodhart's law. You somehow think that an org with a lower program expense ratio ISN'T gaming the system and one with a high ratio IS? I think an organisation that isn't gaming the system is g…
/r/MensRights22/07/21 04:12 PM
1

90% is into the level where you are looking at very poorly managed, underpaying their staff to the extent it will cause problems or gaming the system. Sure it might be staffed by true belivers who will put up with being underpaid but realisticaly that situation results in a lack of oversight and sooner or latter a lot of hands in the till. Of course if they are gaming the system (and a lot of charities do these days) then 90% can be fine but its not a meaninful figure at that point.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 03:05 PM
1

Yeah those figures are system gaming. The Cure Alzheimer's Fund is the most obvious. They use the old trick of hiding their running costs behind a separate donation stream. Worse still they seem to regarding grants as 100% money spent of programs. In reality organisations that receive grants (universities hospitals) tend to have pretty heavy overheads of their own (you can easily find academic researchers complaining about the percentage the university takes).
/r/MensRights22/07/21 09:26 AM
1

Non profit organizations should be close to 90% IMO Eh the reality is anyone manging that percentage is either very poorly managed, underpaying their staff to the extent it will cause problems or gaming the system.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 09:21 AM
2

it's "men must do the dangerous work for the women, The differing death rates per hours worked between the US and the UK shows thats not really true. For various reasons the US choses to make its work more dangerious than it needs to be. There's plently of hazardous work but hazards can be controlled. There are only a very limited number of jobs that have to be done in a dangerous manner (mostly emergency services like fire and coastguard).
/r/MensRights08/07/21 07:45 PM
17

It's only gunman which hasn't changed. The modern term is "active shooter". After the event they may be referred to as a spree killer, mass murderer or terrorist depending on a number of factors.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 10:11 AM
0

I do not accept that the right wing media have a thing for Megan because she is half white. It would very non standard for the UK's right wing media they didn't. Sure if she had be prepared to play the perfect princess they would probably have let is slide but her room to manouver was always going to be very limited. They in fact loved her for 2 years until she started complaining about not being given enough money to renovate her palatial home. What palatial home? Nottingham Cottage is an unexc…
/r/MensRights10/06/21 11:34 AM
0

The fuck do they have to complain about? Harry may still be somewhat upset over the death of his mother at rather a young age.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 10:50 AM
1

I don’t really follow the royalty in the UK, is someone willing to give me a 25-words-or-less summary of why so much media attention is on them? 25 words would be tricky. Attention from the UK media is because the royals bring in clicks/views Large chunks of the more right wing UK media hates them because they tried not to play the game. Also Harry chosing to marry a women who was less than 100% white probably didn't help. For the rest of the media they've all got their contacts within the royal…
/r/MensRights10/06/21 10:45 AM
-1

That doesn't mean that the law is correct. So? Rape has a legal definition. Thus strictly no its not rape. If you want to say it should be thats a seperate matter.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 12:02 PM
2

Yes you did when you used age of consent as to why it's not being prosecuted more severely No I explained why the judges were ruling the way they were. I made no statement as to if it was ok or not. You might want to work on your reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 12:01 PM
2

Did I say it was ok? No. I did not. Why do you keep lying?
/r/MensRights26/03/21 11:44 AM
1

Nope. Law calls it abuse of trust.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 11:43 AM
2

Stuart Kerner wasn't jailed and the maxium possible sentence is 5 years (with the guidelines maxing out at 2 years).
/r/MensRights26/03/21 09:43 AM
1

Age of consent in the UK is 16. So the offence is abuse of trust. The sentencing guidlines for that range between 6 months and 2 years depending on various factors. 6 months is within the range where judges will start considering non custodial sentences.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 09:42 AM
4

Its the sun. Their readers don't know what abuse of trust is.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 09:38 AM
5

Strictly no. Age of consent is 16 in the UK. The offence is abuse of trust.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 09:37 AM
3

New London, Connecticut is not in the UK.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 07:47 PM
2

Eh depends on the judge. Stuart Kerner wasn't jailed.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 07:40 PM
1

Yes, and they work part time You don't get through the junior doctor phase working part time.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 07:36 AM
1

Speaking as a chemist no they don't. Meanwhile some sculptors get pretty heavily into chemistry and sociologists have the concept of testing a hypothesis (although actual experiements often run into issues with ethics aproval).
/r/MensRights12/03/21 07:28 AM
0

It lumps in very different subjects with very different activities, career paths and job prospects. Chemists have little in common with programers. Maths is only there because STE is hard to pronounce.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 05:18 PM
-4

I wouldn’t throw it out that fast. Falsicationism says you should. But yeah I guess post modernism is in now. Medical degrees have a very big variety within, with very different intensities among them. Doesn't matter since they are so female majoritiy these days (every UK medical degree is majority women). And post degree Junior doctors tend to hit insane hours under what are not exactly the best conditions. So the hypothesis has been falsified. Most of the evidence suggests it has more to do wi…
/r/MensRights11/03/21 12:58 PM
-1

When free to choose, women prefer less intense fields and better work-life balance. Over 50% of medical degrees go to women. So we can throw out that hypothesis.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:44 AM
1

STEM is a marketing term that has no place in rational theory.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:41 AM
1

Jesus christ, the mental gymnastics. Straight men are not attracted to "trans women" without deception involved. Deception requires intent. I'd suggest going to talk to some long haired lightly built cis men but that would involve you going outside. If a straight man is attracted to a "trans woman" it's because he thinks it's a real woman, This is an MRA subreddit. Trans men are real men, trans women are real women.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 12:49 PM
3

because I'm not gonna "lean" something. Ah spelling flames. You're out of arguments aren't you.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 11:32 PM
2

Yea and I am not going to go fish through a some korean news sites for you, You mean you didn't actualy check your claim was true before you made and you can't support it now?
/r/MensRights07/03/21 11:24 PM
3

Hate to tell you this but straight men can be sexualy attracted to people without being close enough for those to have any effect. Learn some Biology, Medicine, in this time of Pandemic, will you? Go lean something about mean free path.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 11:20 PM
2

Fine "altering appearance outside of the naturally biologically possible standard. And that leaves you objecting to clothing and haircuts. So just like most other media sites So you still don't have any citations for this thing you claim happens in korea every few years.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 11:09 PM
2

If the guy was wearing a muscle suit or using synthol then yea same shit as a woman wearing a padded bra, pants, or slimming girdle. Your standard was "altering your appearance". Building muscle is altering your appearance. It comes up in Korean media every few years, So no citiations.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 10:56 PM
3

No, that would be saying that people expect others to look like they biologically are, altering your appearance to attract someone who wouldn't normally be after you is just physically lying. Thats not why transfolk transitition so they are in the clear. Of course it does then present the problem that according to you working out to make people attracted to you is lying. This doesn't just mean sex, in several Asian countries especially South Korea there have been lawsuits over "ugly children" be…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 10:33 PM
1

No it's quite simple, like I said, Straight men are attracted to women. "Trans women" are not women, and are only attractive to straight men when they trick them into thinking they are women. If straight men are attracted to trans women (and yeah they are). You've got two options. Either trans women are women or straight men are attracted to people that are not women (or you can have both being true). If someone walks into a room and you find them attractive where's the trickery involved?
/r/MensRights07/03/21 10:30 PM
-3

No, that's moronic. You are a straight man = you are attracted to women, and vice versa. Or at least, what you think is a woman. Of course you can't know with 100% certainty every detail about someone else because you don't have a crystal ball, but we are attracted to features that we perceive in other people. We perceive them to be tall, or short, or smart, or kind, or liking sports, or games, or having money, etc, or being a man or being a woman. Your definition is all over the place but I thi…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 10:05 PM
-4

Straight people want to have sex with the opposite biological sex. Since most people don't ask for a doctor's exam before deciding if they are attracted to someone that pretty much leaves you arguing that no one is straight. Not a new argument mind.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 09:22 PM
-3

Please first Honk Honk for me in the future, thank you. Please fuck off back to your nazi Frens.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 09:17 PM
-5

It is, because there a people out there trying to force you to accept trans women as "partners"/"dating women" No there aren't. Apart from anything else trans women tend not to be exactly short of male attention. when you really only want to date biological women. Do you often ask for a doctor's certificate before dating someone?
/r/MensRights07/03/21 07:22 PM
1

My man you do realize that the draft can be started at any time? The draft is politicaly dead at this point. Its one of the few things that might make young people vote and there are too many middle class people who don't want their kids going to war. Hell if a war broke out in a Iraq type situation , a president could easily kickstart the draft. Iraq was an invasion of choice. War didn't just break out. In practice given america's political position its regular army is strong enough to protect …
/r/MensRights03/03/21 03:56 PM
1

Ever heard of Iraq? Volunteer army. I'm talking about a proxy war , my man. So don't join up.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 10:59 AM
1

This memorial actually commemorates the selfishness and toxic masculinity of war It certainly attempts to romanticise it. Austria-Hungary was initially the aggressor and a very illiberal constitutional monarchy at the time (~6% of the population had the vote). This isn't somewhat democratic britian deciding to side with its allies or 160K plus frenchmen dying to try and avoid losing further ground at verdun. This is a monarch sending young men to die in war and the men going along with it in a t…
/r/MensRights03/03/21 10:57 AM
0

The sad part is eventually when the next war breaks out we will be like this father in this memorial , just because we are men , we are expected to fight and maybe die in a imperialistic war. Not a chance. Any serious war consists of a brief nuclear exchange followed by long periods of being dead.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 10:50 AM
-1

Austria-Hungary was the one that helped kick the whole thing off by trying to invade serbia. Maybe if said men had told the unelected guy in the funny hat where to stuff it their sacrifice might be worth highlighting. But they didn't.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 10:49 AM
3

No its Eton. If you wanted education britian has a number of high quality public schools. But even Winchester and Rugby don't quite have the same impact as Eton on a CV.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 01:44 PM
1

Should be obvious though Its not. The reality is that that James Lindsay missrepresented what he did. While he may have intended to base it off mein kampf the reality is what was actualy published had been messed with so much that it had no meaningful resemblance to the original.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 11:37 PM
2

No no he didn't. The paper "Our Struggle Is My Struggle: Solidarity Feminism as an Intersectional Reply to Neoliberal and Choice Feminism" doesn't match up with mein kampf. Now I'm not saying it a good paper (its meandering junk) but if it is any way based one mein kamf it goes far beyond word subsitutions. For example consieer this quote: The focus of neoliberal feminism, as Rottenberg (2014) notes, is on achieving happiness by balancingwork and family life in a highly individualized, responsib…
/r/MensRights24/10/20 10:00 PM
2

A male governor would have been assassinated without the pretense of a trial. Aldo Moro went through the pretense of a trial so it does happen.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 03:02 PM
7

When assigning credit for any scientific document, article, whatever, the list you see of the people worked on it or the "authors," is actually the order of how much work was done by that person. Nope. Varies by field and a bunch of internal politics. The most extreme example would probably be the G. Aad et al. papers. Various papers from the ATLAS group led with that name because they listed the names alphabetically. Others go with the most senior researcher regardless of who did most of the ac…
/r/MensRights06/10/20 10:32 PM
-5

Well the short answer is they changed it so much that it ceased to have anything in common with mien kampf and ended up being a boring meandering paper perfect for write only publication in a low impact journal. But that makes for a less good headline. Seriously look at it yourself: http://norskk.is/bytta/menn/our_struggle_is_my_struggle.pdf
/r/MensRights21/09/20 08:59 AM
4

So basically they kneecapped young men in an effort to advance females in education, or is it just scoring bias? Probably neither. Assuming the (now abandoned algorithm) worked roughly the same as the others the issue was most likely due to a mix of teachers in male dominated subjects estimating grades high and rank order resulting in males closer to grade boarders geting hit.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 09:13 PM
3

Born in the UK with british citizenship. Why should the syrian taxpayer have to pay?
/r/MensRights18/07/20 08:41 AM
2

I know of no man who joined ISIS being allowed to return to the country Mohammed Uddin In theory the government accepts that those who hold UK citizenship can return (or deported to) the UK.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 08:40 AM
1

You’re telling me that you’d rather read than watch a video Well yeah. I can read a lot faster than humans can talk.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 03:44 PM
1

Here’s someone going to stores, yeah I don't watch half hour videos unless they feature buildzoid. Let me know if you have a source in text.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 03:38 PM
3

Men also pay more for car insurance, which can easily add up to additional hundreds per year. That would be illegal in the EU.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 04:51 AM
1

Wouldn’t it be a fucking crime to falsely label ingredients? Varies depending on the product. There may also be multiple ways to describe the same ingredient. Aditional ingredients don't always make a product better. For example powdered diamonds don't have that many real use cases but you will find them in a bunch of premium products.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 03:19 AM
2

Women’s products are more expensive because they’re usually higher quality or have more powerful ingredients Nah thats just marketing. The higher price being part of the marketing.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 03:09 AM
3

Most such cases don't have worthwhile forensic data anyway. Thats why you see so much focus on text messages and the like.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:07 PM
4

Unless they are doing something very odd they would. This seems to be more to do with rolling out an ultra-sensitive test for Y chromosomal DNA which doesn't really have an equiverlent on other chromosomes.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:04 PM
3

It has been like this forever. Eh not really. Childbirth was so leathal that historicaly older populations leaned male.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 08:22 PM
3

That's called the food chain. You learn the food chain in kindergarten. Yeah that's the lies to children version. The reality of food webs is rather more complicated.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 03:07 PM
5

I thought it was too much to be true Then why, deecool1000, did you post it without doing the most minimal research?
/r/MensRights17/02/20 09:37 PM
2

they were in the locker room changing and she walked in. The issue would be what they did after she walked in.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 05:28 PM
1

Depends entirely on what they did after the girl walked in.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 05:27 PM
-14

The boys couldn’t have done anything Sexual assault or deliberate exposure are both possible. Without further details its impossible to say and given that everyone involved is a minor you really shouldn't be discussing this on the internet.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 10:02 AM
4

So whats the men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights15/02/20 04:49 PM
1

They are only witness to their own crimes. They couldn't corroborate each others. It establishes a patturn supported by GPS and computer records. Each one claiming to be a victim. That isn't multiple witness to the same crime. The US isn't subject to islamic law. At least 5 of the women knew each other and from my understanding all were prostitute with drug problems. With one exception they had police records yes. Thats why Holtzclaw was targeting them. He knew that individualy they would make p…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 05:47 PM
1

150 is high but in any case how many other people who might have matched had Holtzclaw met?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 04:02 PM
0

based on? Evidence presented to the court and the arguments by the defence and prosecution lawyers. Due process and all that. this does not verify what took place, really. It puts Holtzclaw at the relivant times and places. It shows Holtzclaw showing a particular interest in the victims (other than the last one). Where victims were moved before an attack the GPS records are consistent with the routes the victims gave. are they feminists? I notice you avoided the question. Why do you want to avoi…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:54 PM
-1

13 Witnesses or do you mean Accusers. They aren't the same thing. The two are not exclusive. If someone beats the shit out of you you probably witnessed the attack on yourself (unless you were unconscious or something). Also the DNA seem to have been messed up. You can read it here: https://www.change.org/p/free-daniel-holtzclaw-an-innocent-man-wrongfully-convicted At no point does that say the DNA was messed up. It mentions the limits of the DNA testing but that was acknowledged in court. One i…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:00 PM
-4

apparently or verified? Found guilty beyond reasonable doubt by a jury of his peers. are their words 100% verified with evidence? GPS records and police compter database searches. Are they feminists or normal people? Do you consider african americans to be normal people?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 02:31 PM
0

13 witnesses apparently. Also GPS logs and suspicious use of the police computer system. Forensics threw up a DNA link.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 01:44 PM
7

That's rather the argument being made here.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 01:35 PM
-1

Making a point over reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 01:35 PM
0

This is exactly how you deal with those shitheads Lie a lot? You aren't going to find that many people who worked in coal mines all their lives in mansfield since most of them closed in the early 90s. (you might get a few from Thoresby but even that was down to 350 people total by the time it closed in 2015). Then there that wouldeful "taboo subject" line. Not true of course (everyone from Theresa May to the New Statesman has talked about it) but Bradley knows that people like yourself won't che…
/r/MensRights13/02/20 06:24 PM
-4

That's not true, it's more labour to blame than conservatives. Labour haven't been in power since 11 May 2010. At some point you have to accept that the party that has actualy been running the country for quite a while now has something to do with the current situation. Feminist and progressive groups would protest any real attempt A)Unlikely but so what(goverments ignore protests all the time)? and B)what do you think a real attempt would look like? and they wield significant influence in the u…
/r/MensRights13/02/20 01:01 AM
-4

It's ignored by everyone, Literaly mentioned in Theresa May's first statement as Prime Minister. Or you could run a search for guardian White working-class boys. You are clearly using a very non standard definition of everyone. No scholarships for white boys, Just females and "those of Carribbean descent" . Scholarships aren't that common in the UK and there is a range of financial support available for those from under privileged backgrounds (so poor white boys). The problem is the gap starts s…
/r/MensRights13/02/20 12:50 AM
-7

And why is it "taboo"? Its not. To quote the Statement from the new Prime Minister Theresa May "If you’re a white, working-class boy, you’re less likely than anybody else in Britain to go to university." Thats from 2016. I seem to recall she had something to do with Westminster. Why is it ignored? It isn't. You get a fair number of lefty think pieces about it. And from time to time the right does a round of pretending that no one is talking about it. If you are asking why nothing gets done about…
/r/MensRights13/02/20 12:41 AM
5

Nah there are bunch of leftist think pieces about white working-class boys in the UK. Of course they tend to be written by people who aren't in a position to do anything. Perhaps Mr Bradley might like to raise the issue with the party that has been running the country for most of the last decade.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 10:59 PM
0

A little known problem that has been effecting landowners is that they get married to a gold digger, who eventually divorces them and steals half of their land. Have you got any evidence that this is "gold digging" rather than just the typtical divorce rate? Agriculture is a tight market, and it requires constant expansion. I'm sure you can see why this isn't exactly sustainable (particularly once you throw in the tax advantages of owning land). I want to have a wife, start a family, and eventua…
/r/MensRights12/02/20 10:48 PM
1

Why does the doctor’s credentials in her field give her credibility in judging this supposed age gap? Its fairly straightforward statistics of the type doctors would generaly be expected to understand.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 05:44 PM
7

Its the people writing and casting the roles that are the issue. There are only a limited number of roles that can realisticaly be nominated for oscars. Men can get cast in these roles across quite a range of ages (but obviously the younger ones are up against men with a lot more experience) where as women find it much harder to get cast as they age.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 05:43 PM
3

They want your blood for free. Fuck that... you want my blood? PAY ME FOR IT. NHS is taxpayer funded. So higher taxes or unpaid blood donation.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:30 PM
-1

So your men's rights issue is that adult men have responsibilities when it comes to not raping children?
/r/MensRights01/01/20 10:16 PM
1

What is the men's rights issue when it comes to children making poor choices?
/r/MensRights01/01/20 09:16 PM
1

Children don't chose what school they go to. If personal choices were the deciding factor (which is your position) Eton would not be over represented.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 07:58 PM
1

If personal choices got you to the top we would expect a reasonable spread of schools amoung UK Prime Ministers. Instead two of the last 3 have been from Eton and Etonians are heavily over represented in the cabinet.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 06:54 PM
2

If personal choices were the deciding factor the UK wouldn't keep getting Prime Ministers from Eton. The reality is that getting to the top requires a lot of choices by other people go your way.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 06:48 PM
1

say that the world is run by men It is. While there are the odd women in positions of power (Merkel, Lisa Su) almost all positions of significant power are held by men. and that there is a patriarchy? Since almost no one knows what patriarchy means it isn't a particularly helpful description.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 06:40 PM
1

imagine a man turns 65, but faced a few years of unemployment. Maybe he was injured or disabled, and is now too old to work, but doesn't have the 44 years Neither of those cases would be an issue. Registered unemployed (which you would have needed to be to qualify for the dole) get national insurance credits. This situation has lead to numerous elderly men on the streets of the UK. Unlikely. The basic State Pension is £129.20 per week. That isn't on its own enough to keep you off the streets.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 02:44 PM
16

Nude Greek woman statues are not the same any more because feminists are complaining about them so now either A. The Greek statues are modified to remove the nipples and gentiles or B. The nude female statues are removed from museums and B is way more common than A. Please show a case of someone modifying an original greek statue in the 21st century. More broadly the hall of casts in the V&A hasn't changed and the only change I'm aware of at the ashmolian is the adition of a painted statue. The …
/r/MensRights28/12/19 08:22 AM
1

Being able to see the political consequences of one's actions and words is a part of being competent as well. Oh well in that case Bailey still isn't particularly competent because he accepted that job at the FCA. Which depending on your POV either explosed his incompetence or where he was set up to fail (in which case a politicaly competent person wouldn't have accepted it). It would also not have been unreasonable for economists to conclude that after the previous appointment (Mark Carney) tha…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 06:25 PM
3

I'd go so far as to wager 99.99% of the General Population haven't the foggiest idea about the Central Bank of England Its called the Bank of England and they do. Both for historical reasons (interest rate decisions impacting variable rate mortgages which were very common) and more recent involvement with the aftermath of the credit crunch.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 04:08 PM
1

Not so. The reason the ability to set interest rates was moved from the chancellor to the bank of england was to make rate setting nominaly non political.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 04:04 PM
3

Quite sure, in the case of a bank, if there was a female candidate they thought would be better at making them money You don't know what the bank of england is do you?
/r/MensRights24/12/19 01:50 PM
10

They appoint someone because they are more competent than 99,99999% of other people. Eh questionable. The problem is pretty much anyone qualified and competent has said something negative about brexit. Andrew Bailey has been rather more careful. The result is that after most qualified and competent candidates have been ruled out for political reasons Andrew Bailey isn't a terrible choice.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 01:49 PM
1

No, YOU want to work there. Then why do they have to pay people to work there?
/r/MensRights24/12/19 11:15 AM
1

It's not about that. Uniforms are there to minimize sexual tensions and distractions because everybody looks the same. If the company wants a uniform it can pay for it. In reality most uniforms and dress codes outside of industry are driven by the image the company wants to project.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 10:24 AM
1

Fusion in the UK is mostly JET. If you look at her papers its mostly organic materials of versions types interacting with light. Think LCDs and OLEDs. Fusion would be a rather different area of physics.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 05:22 PM
1

You appear to be making the mistake of believing daily mail rage bait: https://twitter.com/jesswade/status/1203583885369630721
/r/MensRights09/12/19 05:11 PM
4

Chimerism is going to throw one heck of a spanner in the works.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 07:34 PM
1

Okay, please tell me who beside your health insurance company would want your DNA and what would they do with it? The police to see if it had ever been found at the scene of a crime. Employers who would rather not waste training on people likely to get cancer. Landlords who don't want tenents with increased tendencies towards cancer or mental illness.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 07:32 PM
5

The data will exist and will fit on a thumb drive. The only question is does the goverment officialy have it.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 07:30 PM
22

I think the state would be quite happy with a pretty universal DNA database.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 07:28 PM
8

Err its a while since I watched the film but I'm pretty sure Hades is meant to be the bad guy.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 03:49 PM
1

On their main page "Design your own custom t-shirts & apparel". Looks very much like they are only making to order.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 02:03 AM
2

It doesn't make sense to me how these are able to be produced. Can you prove they have been? There are a bunch of companies that offer clothing for sale and get it printed to order.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 01:49 AM
-1

So you believe that is not something to be concerned with? I belive it is something people disagree on. I care about all people, mentally ill or not, i just do not believe it is ethical to use threats of violence to steal money from people and give that money to other people, that is called theft in any other context The problem is that your position requires that property can rightful belong to anyone other than me. There is no particular reason to think this is the case and yet you are prepare…
/r/MensRights29/09/19 12:15 PM
-2

So you believe conservatives that are trying to reign spending, Austerity is a stated aim and sending has fallen. So yes that seems a reasonable thing believe instead of looking into the actual story. We were asked to image something happening to a single mom. So I found an actual case. That right there is a huge problem, drugs like that are not something you start and stop at random intervals, and will cause your brain chemistry to get massively fucked up. but sure the government just did not g…
/r/MensRights28/09/19 10:00 PM
1

My condolences for the mother, but isn't this basically blackmailing the government? "Give me money or I'll commit suicide". Are you under the impression that the goverment is concerned about poor people committing suicide? Why? But even someone did try that the person in question never contacted the goverment which would kinda be a requirement for blackmail. Anxiety and depression are treatable conditions Varies I don't think that's reason enough for someone to not work their entire life. She h…
/r/MensRights28/09/19 04:17 PM
42

Yeah I can. There have been a bunch of universal credit suicides including at least one involving a single mother: https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/universal-credit-benefit-mum-suicide-14544736 But its reducing welfare spending so its a little unreasonable to expect a conservative goverment to be concerned about such things.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 01:18 PM
1

Also Banksy?? I wonder if the so-called author even aware what the term anonymous even means? Banksy can be a man, a woman, an AI or even a cat. He's a man who lives near bristol.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 08:21 PM
1

That is not "closing loopholes" for women voters. That was your claim, and it is untrue. Why do you think the act was phrased that way? Read my later posts on this issue. Women were never "denied" the right to vote. People were. In short, men won such because they were the first to have reason, the death rate among male workers The reform act of 1832 extended the right to vote to the upper middle classes. Thats not a group with a high death at work rate. They got the vote for a fair number of re…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 03:21 AM
1

Please cite your source for that, because I've not seen it, and I've studied this. Reform act 1832. It grants the right to vote to male persons who meet certain requirements along with the begining of the clearing out of the rotten boroughs. Before that point the requirements to have the right to vote varied a lot by area and in some cases a women could in theory have met them. To what extent women who met the criteria were actualy allowed to vote is unclear The feds What exactly do you think th…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 02:42 AM
2

some women had voting power. Being able to vote was tied to land ownership in many areas of the world, and some women owned land. That loophole was closed in 1832 when women were banned from voting regardless of other factors.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 06:26 PM
1

The one glaring certainty here is that it will not appear in the mainstream media Err OP links to the sunday times.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 06:13 PM
-1

Thing is you could well have been drugged with alcohol which is a bit of a problem in terms of testing.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 01:34 AM
2

Nah, it's widely accepted that life begins at conception, Citation needed. a human life, so they are in fact murdering a human. Murder is unlawful killing so can't be murder if its legal.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 11:14 PM
2

No because the child didn't sign the contract (and even if they did it wouldn't be binding).
/r/MensRights14/09/19 11:12 PM
1

Why isn't 50/50 custody used more often? Men not asking for it is the main factor. It seems weird to be that child support is always a thing but if custody was split no child support for anyone In a 50:50 split the higher earner will generaly still pay child support to the lower earner. The amount will be less (details vary by legal system) but it will still exist. The difference is that in 100% custody the lower earner can end up paying money to the higher earner.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 11:11 PM
3

Yes like you said at the end of the day the women would have to physically go through the abortion/pregnancy but the extent people say "no uterus no say" is fucking mind boggling to me. Its a reasonable argument if you reframe the argument to be less about abortion and more about do you have the right to force someone to remain pregnant.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 11:09 PM
2

Huh, that's pretty bad then. You need to remember that in 1948 canada having a child out of wedlock was a really really bad thing putting such women in an extremely difficult position.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 11:08 PM
4

Did not take me seriously, because I am a male. Eh law enforcement tends not to take female complaints very seriously either. While drink spiking does happen its less common than you might think since it carries a higher risk of being caught than simply trying to get a person drunk. As a result even if you do start testing most will come back with nothing but alcohol. The reality is your reaction is pretty consistent with someone who doesn't drink much drinking quite a bit (.2 BAC? plently of re…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 11:03 PM
1

Eh the biggest driver for the gap is nursing which tends to be a pretty employable skillset.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 12:04 AM
1

Given that the UK has over 3000 women prisoners and less than 1000 murders per year this seems a little unlikely.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 04:19 PM
1

Tradition? Do you know where the wedding ring tradition even came from? It came from a diamond company running a marketing campaign saying that if you loved your spouse you'd buy a diamond ring for them, before that rings weren't even common. Err no. Wedding rings were pretty standard in europe from Middle Ages onwards. Even those groups who didn't wear them on a day to day basis (jews for example) would still have them made for their actual ceremony. You may be thinking of engagement rings. It'…
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:40 AM
0

You've never actualy looked into the area in any depth have you? Oh there's plently of junk in the area but their are some worthwhile core ideas and a reasonable number of those involved are in fact acting in good faith (even if I personaly think academic feminism suffers much the same problems as Literary criticism).
/r/MensRights23/07/19 09:12 PM
-1

Not what I’m saying at all. The point is they’re kicked out for being ‘politically incorrect’. Not for their academic ideas. Neither of the two you are refering two are employed in politics. So not only are their academic ideas wrong but they are wasting time in areas outside their nominal expertise. And even if their ideas are outdated, you should attack their ideas instead of the persons themselves. Hmm found the post-modernist. An in any case your position assumes the person is presenting tho…
/r/MensRights23/07/19 09:03 PM
-1

Alessandro Strumia didn’t get kicked out of CERN for supersymmetry, though. They kicked him out. Thats what you want to happen to people who's ideas die on their merits right? And Cambridge didn’t disinvite Jordan Peterson for his outdated theories. They did so because he disagrees with identity politics (and feminism). So to be clear you want universities to keep dead ideas on life support? Somehow I don't think the chemists will be too impressed with the idea that they should keep a few people…
/r/MensRights23/07/19 08:32 PM
-1

Academics are supposed to be open to ideas and debate them regardless of the controversy. Academics have finite amounts of time and a lot of other things they should be doing. Thus debate tends to be limited to things that have been shown to have some level of credibility and and who's promoters are acting in good faith.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 07:51 PM
-2

Ideas should live and die by their merit. Well of the examples listed one is an expert in Jungian psychology (outdated) one is a catholic theologian (as in they argue that the abrahamic good actualy exists) one appears to be a TERF, one appears to have spent much of their career working on supersymmetry (CERN says no), one appears to be pushing a wierd combination of marxism and racisism and one appears to have decided to become a white nationalist. So when exactly are their ideas going to die?
/r/MensRights23/07/19 07:49 PM
1

Ur logic is, bail out the ppl who screwed u over so they don't screw u even more. Welcome to the real world. And yes thats exactly the situation the goverment faced. Bail out the banks or get a situation that makes the Great Recession look like a minor inconvience. They could have nationalised the banks They did. See RBS and taxed the rich and use from from that £500 billion isn't an amount that can reasonably be raised from taxes in under a month.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 05:08 PM
1

So workers lost jobs and mortgages after Labour bailed out the banks, but somehow it was for their own benefit. Given the numbers would would have lost their jobs in a general bank failure yes.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:38 PM
2

Labour bailed out the banks leaving many workers broke and jobless. That not how it worked. Labour bailed out the banks reducing the number of workers who ended up broke and jobless. They then paid out JSA to workers in rather less than 4 weeks.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:32 PM
4

and labour don't? Care about the 1%? Under Jeremy Corbyn I'm going for no no they don't.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:19 PM
7

You're right. OP this isn't a Tory Vs Labour issue. Universal-credit was introduced by the conservatives and has only existed under conservative and conservative lead goverments. This is totaly a conservative vs labour issue.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:17 PM
1

No. Treating everyone alike is not racist. You do not need a special "agenda" if you do not discriminate. In the 60s? Genuinely not discriminating was an agenda. Newsflash - not everyone and everything in the 60s was racist or sexist. I didn't say everything Saying that it was "the default" is a blatant lie. Your attempt to rewrite histoy is noted. Go talk to some black men that were around in the 60s.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 09:01 AM
-1

Are you unfamilar with 1960s america?
/r/MensRights20/07/19 08:09 AM
0

Being selective against everyone equally does not make anything racist or sexst. No but being an organisation in 1960s without a radical equality agender does.NASA was a product of its time and while things were improving in the 60s racist and sexist was still the default.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 08:04 AM
-16

No this is the stardard that the apollo program was sexist (and racist for that matter) and people shouldn't really be pretending it wasn't. Do you have a problem with this?
/r/MensRights19/07/19 04:41 PM
1

you dont get points for being a black lesbian nor a gay white man, you get points for being a mathematician. If that was the case they would likely have gone with Srinivasa Ramanujan (best pure mathematician on the shortlist)
/r/MensRights16/07/19 09:07 PM
4

Lmk when a black lesbian cracks the enigma code Not many black people in 1930s poland.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 08:57 PM
5

Find a black lesbian Briton who saved over 10 million soldiers' lives. There aren't really any Brits who can claim to have done that other than maybe Alexander Fleming (who has never been on a BOE banknote so obviously not the standard here).
/r/MensRights16/07/19 08:56 PM
1

American Flag sneakers I was unaware that the US flag looked like this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/Flag_of_the_United_States_%281777-1795%29.svg
/r/MensRights10/07/19 03:18 PM
6

The thought of millennials voting frightens me. They've been voting for over a decade at this point.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:50 PM
-1

Way to ignore the rest of what I said Because it was irrelivant to OPs claim. You're clearly being pedantically obtuse Pointing out that a claim is flat our false is hardly pedantic. Unless of couse you have no interest in reality.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 10:37 AM
0

Caveat though, these are tabloids, and what was the traffic? Its mainstream media and coverage. Anything else is goalpost moving to justify a total lack of research.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 10:26 AM
2

Happened a month ago and haven't seen it covered in any mainstream media yet. Just in the UK's biggest selling paper: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9300395/mum-son-lesbian-lover-murder-killed-brazil/ The metro: https://metro.co.uk/2019/06/17/mum-ripped-off-sons-penis-beheaded-reminded-dad-9974568/ the mail: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7150199/Mother-lesbian-lover-confess-murdering-9-year-old-son-cops-claim-genitals-cut-off.html and the mirror: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-new…
/r/MensRights26/06/19 09:43 AM
-1

it says MILITARY DEATHS. "*The vast majority of war deaths before 2016"
/r/MensRights12/06/19 04:16 PM
0

Ah another person who thinks that civilians don't count as war deaths.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:54 PM
-3

Aren’t most books written by white men? No. Most books are written by computers (autogenerated books from various PD datasets. Its a problem). My favorite books are. So? Penty of good books written by women or non white men.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 10:32 AM
2

No, in fact that is completely irrelevant to what I said. You are arguing for the removal of mens rea. Its totaly relivant.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 10:31 AM
0

So, almost all scientific texts having to do with the "hard" sciences? Papers aren't books. Do you even arXiv?
/r/MensRights07/06/19 10:27 AM
1

I don’t know how anyone could justify allowing false rape allegations to not be a crime. It is a crime basicaly anywhere. The problem is that proving something was a false accusation beyond reasonable doubt is very very difficult.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 10:24 AM
1

Why "but it’s only if there is real proof that they knowingly made it up?" If a particular individual is accused, and the accusation turns out to be wrong, why would we not punish the perpetrator? Because generaly the law requires intent. And before the stupid "but what if it was the wrong person" argument: just don't accuse an individual. When filing a police report, you can say "I was raped here at this time in this way by a person of this height, race, they had this birthmark, etc." There is …
/r/MensRights07/06/19 10:23 AM
1

And you chose to read and belive it.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 12:08 PM
6

Why does anyone marry someone like this Because they too are a christian (what sect I'm not sure beyond definitely not catholic).
/r/MensRights05/06/19 08:27 AM
1

Funny that because I was just reading a Washington Times article Any particular reason you are choosing to read moonie's media?
/r/MensRights05/06/19 08:07 AM
-6

The paranoid side of me wonders scanning through this article whether or not this 'sudden rise' in women's wages is due to feminism trying to enforce quotas at the expense of men preventing them from earning more money or advancing their careers. Nah its just the standard impact of starting from a low base (although healthcare may be having an impact). Given how utterly paralysed industries are becoming because of these deranged activists purely from a business perspective They aren't. You've be…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 04:50 PM
-4

Women have 2.3% of the deaths in battle? I find this hard to believe, that’s is way too much. I figured it’d be closer to zero percent, I’m sure there are a few outliers but not that many. Not the total lack of citations. The reality is its far higher. In part because a battle in the DRC civil war consisted of one side's armed forces trying to kill the other sides civilians (which is understandable,attacking even poorly organised millitary units is dangerous).
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:24 AM
1

I think an easy step in the right direction would be to evaluate promotions, hiring, scholarships, college admissions, etc on merit. How would this impact any of the statistics listed?
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:20 AM
2

How about start with "stop pretending that gender is a one-sided story of male privilege and female oppression"? How does this result in more OSHA inspectors?
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:19 AM
1

Society is going to be dealing with the kid for the next 70 years. Dealing with kids raised in absolute grinding poverty tends to be expensive down the line.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:11 AM
1

Because that is the goverment's main source of income.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:10 AM
1

The state then faces the same problem as the UK student loan system. They wont be getting most of the money back and they still have to find the money upfront. Thus the need to raise taxes.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:08 AM
-3

And as has been answered many times its because its not politicaly viable in most countries to raise taxes to support the children of single parents with non contributing partners (there are other reasons but they mostly relate to system gaming).
/r/MensRights30/05/19 04:52 AM
3

Pretty much all of the ones that have laws regarding rape. Too "dunk to consent" comes from long standing laws regarding having the capacity to consent. The other case it kicks in is when people have significant learning difficulties they may lack the capacity to consent (note the laws around capacity to consent are complicated to put it mildly and vary by jurisdiction. Consult a relevant legal expert if you want to know how they work in your area). I think many here will be familiar with the fa…
/r/MensRights29/05/19 07:37 PM
2

Dominic Raab is the second favourite in the contest to replace Theresa May as Prime Minister. He is a former cabinet minister who resigned from May's government for her mishandling of the Brexit issue. Is that how its being spun? He resigned because he realised that he hadn't been involved with the negotiations. The fact it took him months to realise this was kinda sad. He has quite a strong chance of beating the favourite (Boris Johnson) because although Johnson has many supporters, he also has…
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:43 AM
3

Can you name one pro abortion religion? "pro abortion" tends to be limited to pro-eugenics groups and few other politicaly non-mainstream groups. If you mean abortion permitting then mainline Islam is fairly permisive.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:11 PM
-4

Depends what you mean by "something must be done".
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:08 PM
0

We should allow abortions nationwide but revamp child support only for children with established relationships and agreed upon circumstances. I can see a lot of lawyers getting very rich arguing over "established relationships" and "agreed upon circumstances". Forcing men into indentured wage garnishment based on the decision of another person to birth a child is only to take the burden off of the state. Well not entirely. Politicaly its a mix of that (and do you really want to go into an electi…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:07 PM
-3

If your 300 dollar phone (which the police would be forced to replace not to mention your uncited claim of them breaking things, what is it a 2% chance or like 0.2%?) Is more important than putting your alleged rapist in jail then you were not raped and deserve no sympathy. Ah the old "victims must behave exactly the way I want or they are not victims" argument. In the real world rather a large percentage of the population needs their phone on a day to day basis and it can represent the second o…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 02:56 PM
-3

Are you sure that everything on your phone is legal (including anything related to taxes?) . If yes where did you get the money to pay that many specalist lawyers to go through it with a toothpick? Going through your computer means taking it away to be looked at elsewhere. Go ask /r/pcmasterrace/ how they would feel about losing their multi-thousand $ machines for months if not longer. And then you have the issue that the police don't have the best record of not breaking things.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 01:12 PM
1

Go talk to the gay men who tried to create marriage equiverlents for the problems with this. Marriage is useful.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 01:33 PM
5

People are leaving before getting married. Which is overal probably a pluss.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 01:31 PM
1

The elite of ancient Egypt spent their fortunes building pyramids and having their corpses mummified, but none of them thought of going shopping in Babylon or taking a skiing holiday in Phoenicia. Having a kingdom stable enough that you can leave it for a significant length of time is a challange for any ruler. You need to look a level lower down. Certianly rich greeks traveled a fair bit within the mediterranean.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 11:20 AM
5

he had an affair
/r/MensRights05/04/19 12:21 PM
0

What evidence would change your mind on the subject of objective testing outcomes? A non trivial number of non human lifeforms coming to the same "objective" standard. If nothing, congrats, you're an ideologue. When it comes to universal adult suffrage then yes. I am an ideologue. One of the biggest men's rights issues in the US is the denial of suffrage to felons and prisoners (in the UK only prisoners are denied suffrage).
/r/MensRights03/04/19 08:17 PM
1

But the government doesn't expand massively until after women's suffrage. Saudi arabia has significantly increased goverment spending (in attempt to bribe the population into not overthrow the house of saud) so we can reject your hypothesis. The british goverment started serious expansion in the 19th century well before giving women the vote.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 05:02 AM
0

So, you just like to argue, huh? They make non verbal iq tests that only rely on pictures for everything. Like the Porteus Maze test? Fell in popularity after a case when a bunch of nonwhites scored rather higher than was socialy acceptable at the time. Any test can and will be gamed to the benift of those setting the test.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 04:53 AM
1

Non Sequitur. what gender do you think pays the most taxes there? "Women's suffrage has been shown to turn governments against men in a very repeatable and predictable way." Circular argument. Now in which country are you claiming that 80% of government welfare goes to women.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 09:39 PM
0

So, don't do that. Why not? If someone can win elections by excluding anyone who doesn't have basic knowlege about living in a city why would you expect them not to do that. As long as you don't make the wording of such a law race based or gendered, that shouldn't happen. The wording of the law isn't the problem (beyond grandfather clauses). The problem is the selection of questions and methods f measuring IQs. Wanna vote? Get your shit together. Doesn't matter how much you have your shit togeth…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 09:36 PM
1

Hey, if 75% of taxes are paid by men When did saudi arabia get Women's suffrage? and 80% of government welfare goes to women Where exactly are you claiming this is happening? not "turning against men" then I'd hate to see what you think governments turning against men really is... You've not looked at irish history I take it.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 09:03 PM
-2

Women's suffrage has been shown to turn governments against men in a very repeatable and predictable way. I guess I'll just add that to the pile of evidence that men like to lie.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:36 PM
2

I still think that people need a minimum requirements to be able to vote. Like a mini test to see if person is knowing wtf is going on in the world before voting, and some IQ requirement should be a must. Every time this has been done it has been used to exclude certain groups from voting.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:34 PM
5

Nah. women institute welfare state Franklin D. Roosevelt was male and the new deal very much focused on the inability of men to get jobs. Welfare state supports single mothers men die in WW2 State support for single mothers doesn't really appear until the 60s in the US (for the obvious reason that prior to that point they tended to be black). WW2 is pre 60s. The men pay most taxes claim is a highly innacurate description of what is going on. Rich people pay most taxes. Rich people just happen to…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:30 PM
-2

I don’t have Have a job so I don’t pay taxes and I live with my parents and I’m going to college. However if you didn't go to college you would be using so few state services that there is a fair chance you would be a net tax payer.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:04 PM
1

Not getting involved in this argument, I just want to point out that there are different ways to measure efficiency and it's important to be consistent and choose an appropriate measure. Doesn't make much difference in this case. UK spending is so much lower that outcomes would have to be monumentaly worse (rather than much the same) for the NHS to be less efficient. I understand that Britain has somewhat of a doctor shortage. It seems that they have trained a lot of female doctors, but they pre…
/r/MensRights01/04/19 08:11 PM
1

This is all I have to say in regards to the NHS, That current spending levels limit what it can do? Yes. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make. which is utterly ridiculous we have easy access to clean drinking water today because technology has massively improved not because of social justice activists. This an area where technology is far less of a driver than infrastructure. So it was the social justice activists that decided that the cholera levels were unacceptable and thus pushed f…
/r/MensRights01/04/19 05:17 PM
1

I think you meant to write social justice activists have a long history of making everything more expensive. I think your mistake is in factoring the costs of requiring houses to have clean running water but not including the savings from not having to deal with cholera outbreaks. Also, It's ridiculous to even claim that the NHS is more efficient than U.S medical care when on a personal note I had to wait 3 - 4 hours in A&E just to have my eye checked when all I needed was just a quick looking a…
/r/MensRights01/04/19 03:30 PM
1

Honestly this is my only beef with one payer systems. Ultimately, it's an uninformed, Modern bureaucracies tend to be well informed (blame computers for that one). They just have differing and less personalised priorities. that's defining how the system should work. If the NHS bureaucracy got to define how the system should work it wouldn't have spent most of the last decade trying to fix the damage Lansley caused. Meritocracy doesn't play into the equation because it doesn't have to. Well it do…
/r/MensRights01/04/19 02:30 PM
2

This is something that many NHS fanatics refuse to address and it pisses me off. They do. Its just that the NHS is already pretty efficent compared to say the US healthcare system. One of the reasons the NHS is doing so badly is because of a bloated administration, Really it isn't. The problem you hit is that doctors and the facilities they need are so expensive that its almost worth having one admin person per doctor to optimize their time. So goverments always pressure the NHS to cut admin but…
/r/MensRights01/04/19 02:23 PM
7

Why does NHS have a Racial equality manager? Shouldn’t that money be going to, I don’t know, Heath care? The NHS is a massive employer. A certian amount needs to be spent on HR.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 06:32 PM
3

The comparison should be between men and women with all other variables the same, such as men vs women when both live in poor areas. The the gap is falling but thats mostly due to declining rates of smoking.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 05:58 PM
1

I think the best response to that is to point to the UK where the police have started arresting people, holding them for several hours and interrogating them before releasing them with a caution - all for the "crime" of misgendering someone on Twitter. That has kinda proved Peterson right on this point. The last remaining powers of the UK over canada went out in 1982.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 05:55 PM
2

DNA testing at birth should be mandatory. Most law enforcement agencies would agree. Which is the problem. Creates significant privacy issues for the kid.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 04:55 PM
2

And they are damn right. She's still in office and that have neither the numbers nor the guts to force her from power. They don't have the numbers to give anyone else the confidence of the house and they are too terrified of Jeremy Corbyn to go the election route.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:31 PM
1

Given the coverage of May's shoes I beg to differ.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:26 PM
0

Given that both are completely impractical given current technology does it matter?
/r/MensRights23/03/19 09:43 PM
1

No. "positive discrimination" is illegal under UK law outside some rather narrow conditions (for example churches can insist that priests be a memeber the relivant faith).
/r/MensRights18/03/19 12:52 AM
2

it's because of a mixture of fucking affirmative action UK doesn't have affirmative action and the way schools treat boys right from the beginning of their lives. That doesn't explain why black and ethnic minority students do better (and romani do even worse). It also doesn't explain why middle class white males do well enough. Blaming the schools is the easy and tempting option. In particular it has the advantage of being much more political correct than asking if something is going on in the h…
/r/MensRights17/03/19 11:44 PM
1

Isreal will claim any male victims are hamas fighters. Since thats difficult to disprove any one wanting to talk about civilian deaths pretty much has to focus on women and children.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 11:41 PM
-1

Um no both men and women have less male ancestors than female ancestors. The method they were using couldn't test for that. Women don't generaly have Y chromosomes and men don't pass on mitochondrial DNA. Also how these men died is irrelevant. In this case it does because computer modeling by Zeng et al suggests that warfare between patrilineal clans provides the best explantion for the Y chromosome bottleneck
/r/MensRights14/03/19 01:17 AM
-4

No the results show that most men died before having any children. No it didn't. The problem is its using Y chromosome tracking for tracking male decent and any daughters of men won't show up. So its quite possible that men had children but their sons died in patriarcal warfare leaving only daughters.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 12:53 AM
-4

Rape Culture Well yes: But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the LORD thy God hath given thee.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 12:41 AM
-4

The results don't support that. A more accurate description would be that 17 times more women had surviving female offspring than men had surviving male offspring. Which is what you would expect from patriarchal warfare (admittedly rather a lot of it).
/r/MensRights14/03/19 12:40 AM
-2

I’ve owned three homes, lost all three to ex wives who had no financial input. I’m now homeless. You somehow had enough income to buy a house three times and now you can't earn enough to keep a roof over your head?
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:52 PM
1

Its possible. As investments go houses have the advantage that at the end of the day you can live in them even if the return goes negative. Not sure that would ammount to a full 6 percent driver.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:49 PM
2

Someone should adjust the study for income gained from husband when the woman is a housewife Already covered by joint home ownership. The difference is driven by young women (and aparently old men) owning houses on their own. and income from alimony Aproximately none. Australia doesn't have alimony and spouse maintenance payments only cover short periods.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:43 PM
1

This should be obvious, if you are a woman and you get divorced the house is yours by default. Nope 50:50 split of assets. In any case divorce is unlikely to be having much of an effect on the under 34 group.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:41 PM
-2

The girl should be put in jail and given the same punishment a rapist would get You lack of support for due process is noted.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:25 PM
2

Serena should know, her and her sister challenged male tennis players to a match boasting she could beat anyone outside the top 200. In fairness she was 17 at the time.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 07:04 PM
1

Except when there's anything physical to be done As far as I'm aware forklifts don't have sexes. in which case only the "gender is a social construct" people ignore it, because almost no one is feminist when it's time to move a fridge upstairs.Or when someone tries to justify being afraid of men because of male aggression, in that case we recognize the physical as well. I think the mistake you are making is that you think that acknowledging that male humans are generally a fair bit stronger than…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 10:29 PM
1

Is this a mens rea crime or strict liability? And again the standard is "A does not reasonably believe that B consents". Its not strict liability because its a defence that A reasonably belives that B consents but its not mens rea Is there some part of this that isn't obvious to you? it's something only a man can do, Look if you are going to start getting technical you should probably remember the 2001 Claire Marsh case. but what constitutes 'attempted rape'? Currently an attempt to commit the o…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 10:04 PM
1

You don't deny that there's been a tendency recently to ignore the biological side of sex Oh that's not recent. The biological size of sex is complex, messy and frankly the only people not ignoring it are a specialised subset of biologists. in favor of making gender as fluid as possible, though, right? No. With the LG part of LGBT being at least somewhat accepted and the B remaining invisible transexuals and the various groups lumped under queer are becoming the target of choice.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 09:42 PM
1

XX or XY. Thats all the criteria we need to apply to situations like this. Arbitrarily excluding single X women would be odd and of course to add to the fun some people are both. On top of that you hit the problem that most people haven't been karyotyped so don't actualy know.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 07:24 PM
1

Because "gender is a social construct" to this extent ignores the physical realities men face. Not really. Gender is a social construct comes from the seperation between sex as gender. Gender is the social contex of being male. Sex is the biological side.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 07:22 PM
1

So you are saying that, legally, in the UK, there's no difference between rape and attempted rape? Is this a mens rea crime or strict liability? The standard is "A does not reasonably believe that B consents". I'm not asking what the word means, what specific attempts at rehabilitation would be thwarted by not admitting guilt? Attempts that involve working out why the person behaved as they did and how to avoid such behavior patturns in future. From what I can see, both the US and UK treat the w…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 07:20 PM
10

What does that have to do with men's rights? Why do you think trans rights are a purely feminist issue?
/r/MensRights03/02/19 11:32 PM
22

So what's the men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights03/02/19 09:46 PM
1

Southern europe is mostly italy in this case. Uomo d'onore is a pretty big hint. In reality honour killings as opposed to broader honour based violence are pretty rare since they tend to attract the attention of the authorities. Overal things have improved significantly in the last decade. Eastern europe includes the balkans so yes.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 03:32 AM
4

You think we can skip due process if there is a confession? Corrupt police really like that approach.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 12:03 AM
1

So I imagine that if you get life for attempted rape, then you'd get death for a completed rape, right? Its hardly arson in a royal dockyard. In reality english law treats "attempted X" in much the same way as "X" and at the time of the case only had the death penalty for treason and piracy with violence (these have since been abolished). What rehabilitation? There is a general attempt to include a process that reduces the chance of people convicted of crimes from doing it again. You know, they'…
/r/MensRights01/02/19 04:08 PM
1

I'm sorry I wasn't politicaly correct enough for you.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 01:46 AM
1

Your ignorance of voting systems theory noted. 3 candidates. A,B and C. A is popular with 40% B with 35% and C with 25%. Simple version is that A wins despite only being popular with 40%. The slightly less simple version is that people who like C hate A and thus vote B. B wins by being the least unpopular candidate. The even less simple version is that those who like candidate A don't want candidate B to win but know that people who like candidate C will never vote for candidate A but might vote…
/r/MensRights01/02/19 01:30 AM
2

Not really. "Merit" in the context of a popularity contest would simply mean more popular. While the semi PR system they use reduces the cloning problem it doesn't eliminate it (and it introduces the issues with the party list). Its not a case of the more popular candidate winning.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 12:50 AM
-2

That was sarcasm btw. I'm aware. Are you aware of the difference between goverment and parliment?
/r/MensRights31/01/19 08:54 PM
2

Your position would require you to be able to show that memebers of the brandenburg parliment are selected on merit.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:48 PM
1

Then what happens when no truly qualified women run for office? If the parties can't find 44 women who are german citizens who are over the age of 18 and whose habitual residence has been in the Land of Brandenburg for at least three months there is something worrying going on. Those are the qualifiations for running for the Brandenburg State Parliament. Nice government ya got there. Do you not understand the difference between goverment and parliment?
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:45 PM
2

When you hear about Uganda, all you hear is the 231 girls who were kidnapped. What? When were 231 girls kidnapped in Uganda? The main story you hear there are the child soldiers and the LRA being generaly horrible. What you don't hear from there is the goverment using the LRA as an excuse to move the Acoli people into concentration camps under the guise of protecting them.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:21 PM
1

Wait, life in prison for attempted rape? A life sentence doesn't normally mean life in prison. Yeah, you can't release someone if they claim to be innocent. WTF? Makes rehabilitation tricky. And apparently DNA evidence does not raise to that level of proof, somehow. Because while it strongly suggests someone else was involved it doesn't prove beyond reasonable doubt that he wasn't
/r/MensRights31/01/19 02:25 AM
1

its called talking to your representatives and voting Those are also forms of political expression but there is a reason "the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances" is covered in the US first amendment. not crying like a bunch of babies because your park is dirty. Yes well your dislike of protest is noted. Worried they might achieve something?
/r/MensRights28/01/19 08:58 PM
0

Wtf are you talking about? White middle class boys are falling faster in education than anyone. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/10/white-working-class-boys-perform-worst-at-gcses-research-shows/ Err your article doesn't meantion middle class boys. It doesn't even say that anyone is falling just that almost everyone is doing better than white working class boys (technicaly roma and irish travelers do worse but getting stats for those groups is tricky). Women outnumber men, no idea where …
/r/MensRights28/01/19 07:46 PM
-2

"If men are employed theyre happy" This is how we measure hard times in a capitalist system.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 07:01 PM
0

Yeah, I'm lucky to have found my niche in sales. The school I went to was a joke. Gym involved putting on shorts, waiting in line for the gym teacher, stretch for 15 minutes, and then do whatever physical activity was planned for a good 10 minutes. We rarely could even finish a game of anything. I blame STEM mania for that one. Then, lunch was 20 minutes long, in a school of about 2,000 kids. Many times, if you were at the end of the line, the bell rang as you sat down, had to jam whatever you c…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 06:51 PM
2

I agree but being politically engaged doesn't mean to protest, especially when there's no reason for us to. No reason at all? No local park not being maintained? No lack of proper cycle infrastructure? No air quality issues? Local goverment not playing silly buggers with nightclub licences? No local companies doing anything unethical?
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:49 PM
7

I was thinking more of angry teenage boys with no direction and no one to guide them. Thats a different problem. Most of the "falling behind" is working class boys producing typical results for working class boys where as working class girls are getting results more typical of middle class boys. Groups with what the PC crowd call complex lives are more a matter of solical services provision (which has been hammered due to cuts in local goverment spending) than anything to do with university admi…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:39 PM
4

I’m not sure about Europe Europe has rather a lot of different education systems. Even the UK has 4 (the NI one probably being the most worrying).
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:22 PM
2

Guess how many protests we've had? Zero. Why do you view that as a good thing? Idealy you want young people to be politicaly engaged.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:19 PM
5

One of the many reason I believe the schools should be separated by gender at a certain point. The two sexes learn in compleately different ways and require different things to succeed. UK history suggests its not that straight forward. Look at what happened with grammer schools and secondary moderns. Gender wasn't the dividing factor there. But no, let’s just make boys learn in the girls style and drug them the moment they show any “toxic masculinity” or act male in any way. UK isn't really int…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:08 PM
4

. What do you do think happens with a bunch of boys when they are failing and fall behind? Depends. The smarter and more motivated ones can do well enough for themselves in the trades. Electricians, mechanics, scaffolders what have you. Of course they are very dependent on the state of the economy but some manage to do very well for themselves indeed. Others end up as general labourers, warehouse workers and the like.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:04 PM
-9

I try point out how terms like toxic masculinity must be harmful for young boys and men Well I suppose you could look for terms like misaimed masculinity but then people start to yell about political correctness gone mad. and the suicides rates if men, Demands that men tough it out are part of the misaimed masculinity thing. and educational performance At least in part tied to a working class idea of masculinity that actively discourages academic performance. So misaimed masculinity again. and d…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:00 PM
3

I'm sorry but this whole gender critical subreddit is a fucking joke I'm not sure the promotion of attitudes that marginalise trans people can be considered funny.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 11:34 PM
7

Well yes. The core idea of that subreddit is that trans people don't exist.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 11:32 PM
0

I'm not exactly surprised he was convicted when he didn't bother to defend himself He was able to instruct his lawyers.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 07:46 AM
1

Too bad. So you have no actual problem inequality To say we are compensating for some other inequality is a poor excuse indeed. If you belive in equal opportunity its the only rational course of action. It is a bad idea and morally wrong. Too bad.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:16 AM
1

Of course it does. A kid with acess to decent schools is going to have a much better chance of getting a steady job like one with the BTP than a kid who ended up in a bottom tier school in a sink estate (they aslo have a better chance of not ending up with a criminal record even if they both use drugs). If your goal is equal opportunity (which btw is a very extreme goal in anything resembling our current system) they should at least adjust for the quality of school people went to.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:04 AM
89

This is not a good thing. Be realistic. Someone who goes this far in their mid 20s isn't a one off. Its just in the past he's been smart enough to target people who weren't in a position to do much about it. When he finaly screws up and targets someone in a position to do something about it (with witnesses no less) they let him off. Yeah this is how you get Kevin Spacey. This is how workplace bullies survive. This is how adults behave. They don't run to HR Well the police would also be an option…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:56 AM
1

But if providing equal opportunity within their domain mearly reenforces the lack of equal opportunity in wider society how does that provide equal opportunity?
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:35 AM
0

you are failing to provide equal opportunity The British transport police don't control inheritance tax rates nor are they in a position to ban private schools. Equal opportunity is a bit outside their remit.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 08:22 AM
2

Aparently this man thinks sat franco wasn't a strong man. This man is an idiot.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 07:42 PM
1

Yeah. That's entirely bullshit. Capturing the island halved the distance bombers had to fly to their targets Wasn't used for that on any scale. Some fighter bomber work yes but the B-29s continued to operate out of the Mariana Islands while simultaneously denying its use as a staging ground for Japanese naval and air forces Neither of which were capable of produucing effective opposition at that point. Thousands of bombers took off and landed there, Well yes there was a need to make the losses s…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 12:11 AM
0

uh. What? It was utterly essential for the war against Japan. Thats 70 year old propaganda (they couldn't really admit they had got a bunch of marines killed for nothing of significance). The Island was pretty useless as a base for attacking japan and by the time of the battle the garrisons ability to interfere with American operations was pretty limited. Really it should have been left to rot. But try /r/AskHistorians/ if you want details.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 10:11 PM
1

Oh a statistical outlier represents the majority now? Well the only other woman to lead a nuclear state was Benazir Bhutto and going by her history there is little to suggest she wouldn't be prepared to use them. I don't know what? What do you think nuclear deterrent is? You are claiming to know the contents of the letters of last resort and you don't. While some like Thatcher's and Blair's are fairly preditable others like Wilson are much more uncertian.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:24 PM
1

Right, they do, but currently men are in control and prepared to use them. You don't know that. Would they be prepared to nuke the world? I can only assume Margaret Thatcher didn't happen to your country.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:01 PM
1

If China wanted the West, what good would it do them for the countries to be irradiated? The west has nuclear weapons and a first use policy. Nuclear war doesn't have winners. Thats rather my point.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:46 PM
-4

...what happens next time the West gets into a war? Some buttons are pressed and billions die. The aftermath is largely irrelivant.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:13 PM
1

Yeah men sacrificed themselves to save women and children. Err this was Iwo Jima. They were being killed as the result of a strategic error (Iwo Jima wasn't worth taking).
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:11 PM
2

The difference is we know we need to work hard to get it. Abolition of inheritance is a pretty extreme position
/r/MensRights11/01/19 10:09 AM
3

We needed to make an example of Damore. Looking for some excuse to fire him, we spied on his phone and computer. We didn't find anything, although our spying probably made his devices unusably slow, preventing him from organizing support within the company. And that's how you know its bollocks. Not only is modern spyware pretty lightweight but for a computer you would just wait for him to go home then clone the drives.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 09:54 AM
0

I'm saying that you don't just punch someone. It doesn't come from nowhere, you know when you're going to get hit and you know that if you keep doing what you're already doing it's coming and you know exactly why. So you are saying that men do not have the right not to be assaulted at work. The law says otherwise. Argueing for few rights for men in a men's rights subreddit is an interesting approach.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 02:47 AM
1

I was a massive fan, also and because of soft, PC culture, it's dead. Yay, the fun police are here to stay and ruin everyone's day. Are you saying that men do not have the right not to be assaulted at work?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 01:23 AM
0

Spend much time reading HSE accident reports and you see its a mix of employers not providing proper training and equipment and employees not using the equipment or following their training. You can work with stuff like chloride trifluoride (which burst into flame on contact with sand and pretty much everything else) all day everyday and with the propper training and equipment everyone will go home at the end of the day. Without the proper training and equipment even a bunch of rotting leaves ca…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 07:47 PM
0

Driving Occupations are one of the most dangerous jobs in any nation It is hazardous. If the hazards are not properly controlled then yes it would be in breach of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (and various EU regulations which mean that driver hours control everything).
/r/MensRights07/01/19 07:40 PM
2

That's a UK act.... Yes and where do you think I live? And as someone who works in an extemely hazardous industry I resent the whole MRA attutude that deaths at work are some kind of unavoidable force of nature since its the atitude that gets people killed. And I would rather not die at work.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 06:01 AM
-7

Well the alturnative is that the employer has failed to provide the workers with propper training and equipment. But surely you are not suggesting that would happen in any halfway civilised country?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 05:57 AM
-14

If we women were in charge, there would be no workplace deaths at all because there would be no dirty dangerous jobs to work! Job may be dirty. Jobs may be hazardous. If they are dangerous they are likely in breach of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:20 AM
-9

Stop making shit up. The words "death at work" appear nowhere in the tweet. The link goes to an article entitled "Men die on the job more often than women, but no one cares". (j.mp/2GcvtNZ) The sign might also have been a bit of a hint as to what he was talking about.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:23 PM
10

She ran in 1916. Women had had the vote in Montana since 1914.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 09:21 PM
-20

The number of people impacted by deaths are work is far lower than the number impacted by issues relating to pay (wage theft for example). There also doesn't appear to be much that can be done about deaths at work that can be derived from looking at gender ratios. Sure you can point out the issues relating to macho risk taking (hey toxic masculinity) but that is unlikely to to have much impact on high risk groups. More usefully you can look at things like the US/UK gap in deaths per hours worked…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 09:16 PM
-37

Legitimately, even if the pay gap did exist and was a real thing, it would be justified because 93% of workplace deaths are men. The reverse. You want employees that aren't going keep getting themselves killed. Dead employees cost money in lost time and training their replacements.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 09:07 PM
-3

And it IS a pejorative, it's never used in a positive context. Found the person who didn't pay attention during chemistry class.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 04:43 PM
-3

I will stand with you against injustice. Can you show where you've done this?
/r/MensRights30/12/18 06:22 AM
1

14 upvoters think you can be charged with slander.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 10:06 PM
1

The right needs its hatedom targets and is quite happy to go after otherwise irrelivant people to get them (understandable after the volcano monitoring fiasco).
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:15 PM
-2

I... uhm. Do feminists believe that living in certain situations (like, in a building built by men).. will opress them? Not really relivant to the paper in question but oppressive urban planing is certianly a thing. Both in terms of what services you do and don't provide to certian areas but also in terms of defensive architecture and the interaction of public and private space.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:11 PM
12

Even the people who study quantum physics don’t know what it is. Yeah they do. There are certian areas where there are a lack of solid models (quantum gravity is the classic) but in general terms people who study the area know what it is.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:06 PM
-1

Private institutes like the Central European University which they also banned.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:02 PM
-4

Nah they went after one degree for political reasons. Meh for ~30 students in the entire country taking the thing the universities could just have renamed it sociology of gender or something and carried on as before. The whole thing was virtue signalling for the hard right. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:00 PM
-3

Spaniards aren’t white? Has varied over the years. Are italians white? Or do you expect me to believe that the descendants of Spanish conquistadors didn’t actually exterminate the native locals Depends where you are. Don't ask about argentina's demographics.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 05:04 PM
-38

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 04:44 PM
-37

That requires you to be using a broader definition of white (including Hispanic and Latinos) than most Americans appear to be using at the moment.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 04:27 PM
-84

A nation that’s overwhelmingly one race Which the US isn't.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 04:19 PM
4

but if she is ever ended up on the throne Impossible. She isn't decended from Sophia of Hanover.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 05:03 PM
-22

Intent: Hmmm, I was fucking two guys at around 9 months before my child was born, I told one of them they were the father, never mentioned anything about the other guys, sounds pretty straightforward INTENT to defraud to me. Nope. Intent in this case means that you would have to honestly belive that the other guy was the father. another example: I sell a car and don't tell the buyer that if you use the left turn signal it will short out and cause a fire, pretty simple intent to defraud. It would…
/r/MensRights19/12/18 11:38 PM
-28

The mother certainly knew she was banging two dudes and that there was a chance the child didn't belong to the guy she pinned it on. That meets my definition of fraud. That would make fraud convictions a lot more straightforward however current due process for fraud doesn't work like that. You need to be able to prove intent. See? You've also got IVF cases like Annie Branum but in those cases it would probably be viable to prove fraud.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 11:07 PM
2

Well, Theresa May is demonstrably stupid. She's got a dregree from oxford and not in classics. She has a functional brain. The problem appears more to be that she wants to be prime minister but isn't quite sure why.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 09:42 PM
-26

"company’s months-long training program" Things don't need to be common to appear in that. In any case Misattributed paternity (which is all that 23andMe can test for) is not the same as paternity fraud (since that requires that somebody knows that the designated father isn't).
/r/MensRights19/12/18 09:35 PM
1

STEM is a marketing term that collects together a bunch of fields with often little to nothing in common. How do you feel women are treated in your industries? Varies depending on the company The feminist argument is that women don't go into STEM because they don't feel welcome, that they are mistreated like they don't know anything. Its a bit more complicated than that. In any case the term STEM has only been around since 2000 or so. I think the reason is because the "winning male image" is to …
/r/MensRights15/12/18 07:49 PM
0

Political correctness kills. Nah going by your example men kill. Savage appears to have been male as was Able Seaman Ryan Donovan who opened fire on HMS Astute. The comander who had earlier run HMS Astute aground was also male as was the one who ran into HMS Nottingham into Wolf Rock.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 04:39 PM
-7

It was 1914. The goverment was male as the millitary leadership. While there were a limited number of women in positions of power the social leadership was also overwhelming male. Do not attempt to hold me to account for your denial of history.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 09:21 AM
-11

So one man was not only responsible for any and all actions of the 30 women in Folkestone, but for the hundreds or thousands of women across the country involved in shaming? Being at the top comes with responsibilty? You have a very optimistic view of the world. Look I get it. You need a way to somehow blame women for a war started, planned and run by men. And if that requires you to ignore all the fun issues about being properly patriotic in 1914 and men's role in defining what that meant I'm s…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 08:26 AM
-7

Um yeah. Charles Cooper Penrose-Fitzgerald was male.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 04:26 AM
1

Source? If you use puberty blockers They aren't using puberty blockers or anything else. If you read the court documents the judge has ordered therapy and thats about it.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 07:39 PM
-1

It isn't. But the father claims it is and there are a bunch of conservative groups that want to promote the idea that this is happening.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 05:04 AM
1

The last accuser was the only accusation to make that argument against him and she’s been deemed a serial false accuser by the investigators. Did you just accuse someone of an offence without going through due process? His adulthood of life restrictions are due to what the police have determined to be a teenaged girl’s lies. The police are not a jury lets have some consistent standards here. There appears to have been three incerdents. The first may have been appears to have been strait mutal sw…
/r/MensRights09/12/18 05:02 AM
1

"an enhanced check, which shows the same as a standard check plus any information held by local police that’s considered relevant to the role" https://www.gov.uk/criminal-record-checks-apply-role
/r/MensRights08/12/18 08:25 PM
1

Yes but this stuff won't show up on every enhanced background check only ones where it is considered relivant.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 07:58 PM
1

Most employers can't get enhanced criminal record checks. Given the limited relevance to anything the only ones who would be likely to get it would be the likes of MI5/6 and GCHQ who can be assumed get everything (GCHQ may already have it of course).
/r/MensRights08/12/18 07:50 PM
1

Can you explain how underaged kids trading sex pics is related to a sex attacks? The accusations are that not all the trading was consensual. In the absense of other leads there are worse places to start. 30 years ago some neighbourhood policeman would keep a list of the local Jack The Lad's in their head. Today its a database.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 07:49 PM
2

It won't show up when employers run background checks. It will show up if he gets arrested or if there is a series of sex attacks close to where he lives but that's about it unless he applies to MI5 or something.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 03:48 AM
0

being used to slander their legacy and reputation. You can prove on the balance of probability that the incident didn't happen? Otherwise why are you making a false accusation?
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:20 PM
1

The evidence is that she took a job she cant meet requirements for. repeating a false statement doesn't make it true
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:38 AM
13

Whatever, I don't think it'll hurt anyone tbh. If scientists really believe women are better at not bickering among themselves over who is the leader (male-dominated military hasn't existed for thousands of years, I guess) and work better as a team then I'll just leave it up the eggheads. The scientists are unlikely to worry about such things (since they can pick a team of people with really good interpersonal skills). The factor that does matter is that women generaly weigh less and require few…
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:32 AM
1

If you cant do what the job requires then you shouldn't have the job. There's no evidence that she can't. The job provides a salary that is more than generous. If she cant make it work that's on her You don't get paid for being a member-elect which is what Ocasio-Cortez is until January 3rd. And if you go back to her intial comment that was the point she was raising. In your hating on poor people you are forgetting how your own goverment works.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:24 AM
0

I believe of your going after a job you should meet the requirements Ocasio-Cortez is over 25, has been a US citizen for more than 7 years and lived in new york state at the time of the election. She meets the requirements. and if you cant afford to relocate for the job you shouldn't go for it Not entirely sure this is the right subreddit for trying to argue for the removal of the constitutional rights of poor men.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 05:08 PM
1

There's no evidence she didn't know that. She didn't have the money but thats only an issue if you think only rich people should be allowed in congress.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 08:26 AM
-2

Academic record suggests otherwise. The reality is that you don’t get as far as she has in politics while being an idiot unless you have some serious money or connections and she doesn’t. She has a functional brain. You may disagree with her politics but that doesn’t make her an idiot.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 05:17 AM
-2

She doesn’t take office until January 2019 and the request was back in August or somewhere around then. So when she was running for office. Debates are a well known platform for politicians running for office to show why they deserve office. Debates with other politicians running for the same office. Otherwise not really. I don't belive Shapiro live in New York's 14th congressional district so he really isn't very relivant beyond being someone who can spot a publicity opertunity. She got elected…
/r/MensRights01/12/18 05:11 AM
-4

False Accusation? Unless you are counting his false confession (so falsely accusing himself) I'm not seeing the relivance here.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 04:53 AM
1

Explain to me how signing up for selective services when you turn 18 isn’t the definition of conscription The only thing I have to sign up for at 18 is the electoral register. If you made that statement out of honest ignorance, I now know why it is an issue rarely brought up. Its brought up constantly in this subreddit. Often by people who confuse the US with the rest of the world (the 1963 date should really have tipped you off).
/r/MensRights28/11/18 03:31 PM
-2

Reading the court documents and applying brain.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 05:57 AM
-22

If this father's got the money, he should take the son and flee to somewhere sensible. To be clear you think MRAs should be supporting the kidnapping or minors?
/r/MensRights28/11/18 05:20 AM
0

The court doesn't want to deal with the issues related to the child other than ordering therapy. The court is dealing with the issue as a typical "two divorced parents not getting on" and the father has breached more court orders than the mother at present. The article is biased due to its source (the The Federalist is hard right) and that the source has chosen to present only the father's side of the story.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 05:19 AM
-2

Conscription hasn't existed since 1963. Pushing the defintion of "contemporary" a bit there.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 05:06 AM
1

Just a reminder that facts still don’t care about your feelings. This may be Alessandro Strumia's problem. His Phd is in supersymmetry a theory which the LHC has pretty much killed off. That's why he's reduced to peak chasing and meta stuff.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 05:01 AM
26

Well the first pannel is questionable at best. Birth control is off patent at this point. A new patented male birth control pill would be a lot more profitable. As for the second big pharma isn't too concerned about cultural perceptions. That is what their marketing department is for.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 04:16 PM
3

What's a "cis" male? I'm straight and I don't identify as "cis" so stop calling us something that we're not. Found the person who didn't pay attention during chemistry.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 04:13 PM
1

This isn't stricktly a case against due process. There are already cases in England and wales where there is no right to a jury trial (mostly minor offences and xases where there is a significant risk of jury tampering or jury tampering has already taken case).
/r/MensRights22/11/18 11:40 PM
3

What do you expect them to do? Trying to kidnapp any other memebers of the polish community is likely to end poorly for them.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 09:20 PM
2

Mural showing the sacrifice of white men, who today may end up as slaves... talk about white male privilege lol Wrong war. Poland didn't actualy exist at the time the event depicted took place.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 09:18 PM
2

It's neither misinformation nor misleading. It's a plain statement of fact. Its not. Pritpal Binning wasn't a lecture at southampton university at the time of the arrest (and hasn't become one since).
/r/MensRights16/11/18 09:15 PM
5

1)the lecturer has't worked for southampton university since novemeber 2017 (so before the current union president took up their post). 2)The President of the Student's Union was doing a degree in physics not Health Sciences Southampton uni has over 25K students which in turn means a lot of lectures.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 09:14 PM
4

Aside from the fact that they both frequent Southhampton Uni Not even that. Pritpal Binning hasn't worked for southampton uni since novemeber 2017.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 09:11 PM
7

Da fuck? You didnt even hold them? Actually find potential human traffickers and just let them out while you prove it harder? Uuuuuugggggghhhhhh They are unlikely to be in a position to kidnap anyone else and the judge doesn't think they are a flight risk. In england and wales bail is pretty automatic unless you present a significant risk to the public (repeat offenders centain extemely violent offences) or present a signficant flight risk.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 09:10 PM
1

But they are able to focus it better towards an actual result, Thats part of the problem. Results focus results in very incremental steps.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 12:18 PM
1

Is it possible to hook up with a company or research firm that actually profits off research, and get them to fund it? The way I see it, the more useful/important science is being done by private entities looking to profit from it. Outside some very narrow fields not really. From a private sector POV science is expensive, time consuming and frequently doesn't work.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 08:39 AM
9

Only and issue if you lie under oath. Otherwise the US would be suffering from rather significant consitutional crisis.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 09:21 PM
2

Who made a false statement under oath?
/r/MensRights07/11/18 07:25 PM
12

Did she at any point testify under oath?
/r/MensRights07/11/18 07:24 PM
19

Which woman submitted false testimony to congress under punishment of perjury?
/r/MensRights07/11/18 07:22 PM
1

Aren't they more efficient though, if they get more funding and thus a higher number of staff? Efficientcy is generaly considered in terms of costs vs patient outcomes.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 09:47 PM
1

Compared to other healthcare services in Europe, the NHS is pretty mediocre. I can't see what other reason there could be for this other than inefficiency. Other healthcare services in europe get more funding. I guess some more funding couldn't hurt then, even though it might not solve all the problems. What makes you think it will solve any problem? Nurses and doctors don't grown on trees. Due to the goverment's changes to ther student loan system we are now training nurses at below replacement…
/r/MensRights19/10/18 06:54 PM
1

Maybe they're just inefficient? Compared to other health services the NHS is pretty efficient and a bit understaffed. Staff are the NHS's single biggest cost. You can't realistically increase staffing without increasing spending.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 07:40 AM
1

If you are going to claim to be a centrist you need to act like one.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 07:18 PM
3

No mention of the fact Men are more depressed and more Men die by suicide. Not just assemblies, all TVs that have posters about abuse and suicide, all have female models and thus targeted toward females. Would you feel comfortable talking about your mental health to a program who doesn't even have their advertisements focussed on you? Bare in mind the posters have about 6 people on them (all women). I don't understand this objection coming from a centrist. Current metal health services are alrea…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 05:50 PM
-8

What case? There was literally no legal case to be heard. It was past the statute of limitations and she presented literally no evidence that could be used to start a trial. The purjury was during the hearings and thus within any satute of limition. In the meantime he was given multiple FBI investigations (this is his 7th) and they still found no evidence whatsoever. An investigation so limited in its scope as to be meaningless. The reason nobody bought into your nonsense "we need more and more …
/r/MensRights07/10/18 01:21 AM
-1

Strange you never detail where he lied. He claimed not to be involved with the Pryor nomination but emails from the time show otherwise. There is a fair chunk of evidence that he lied to about his university drinkling habits (to be clear I'm not saying his actual drinking habits make him a bad person but he shouldn't be lieing to the senate about them).
/r/MensRights07/10/18 01:15 AM
-5

You want to prove perjury, then go through due process. Well you could. You could very well do that but for some reason the republicans wanted to hold a vote before any such case could be heard. I thought you were claiming this was a victory for justice and due process?
/r/MensRights07/10/18 12:45 AM
-6

This is a victory for justice, a victory for due process, Top be clear you think perjury is part of justice and due process?
/r/MensRights07/10/18 12:02 AM
2

WRONG. Men have not received the right to vote even today. If they have, please quote the law that says they have the right to vote. Protocol 1 article 3. This was established in Hirst v United Kingdom What men have is the privilege to vote if they sign up for the draft and use their body as human shields. Nope UK doesn't link voting to that and hasn't had any form of draft since 1963.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:49 PM
1

How exactly did they get women the vote? did they shed blood in a civil war over it? Men didn't gain the right to vote through civil war. Reform Act 1832 was gained by economic pressure and 1867 was due to weird political maneuvering. They didnt even fight half as hard for rights as blacks had to during the 60's. Race was never an issue with regards to voting in the UK (religion was in Ireland). I didn't see any evidence of women en masse protesting and being attacked with dogs, bullets, police …
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:03 PM
-5

Until 1918, most MEN in the UK could not vote A majority of men had the vote after 1884 Yes, I believe ALL citizens of a democracy should have a vote, Arguing that prisoners should have the vote is politically unpopular https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterloo_Massacre Covered in any reasonable textbook. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartism#Newport_Rising Covered in Newport. Since it didn't have much wider impact it tends to get overlooked.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:53 PM
2

£300K settlement. Dale Vince claimed victory. I'm not sure what the opinion of the ex-wife was.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:55 AM
3

Plently of poor working class men who aren't lazy.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:52 AM
3

Alimony shouldn't exist. This isn't alimony (given the couple's respective income and assets at the time of the divorce neither would qualify for alimony). When people get divorced the assets and money that are accumulated during (and ONLY during) the period of marriage should be split. This is the problem is this case stems from. There wasn't a financial settlement as part of the original divorce (that is to say no formal division of assets) which meant that it was possible to demand a financia…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:52 AM
-1

Well setting asside your revolution fantasies Men are being robbed of presumption of innocence and due process rights. There is absolutely zero controversy about that. Only in regards to Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures and complicated fraud cases neither of which have anything to do with the subject in question.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 12:05 AM
1

Wait awhile. We're only just getting started here. People have been claiming things that women are doing will cause major problems since at least 1558. So far the outcome hasn't been too bad. It's not a "claim" it's a fact. No its claim. Otherwise you've claimed that you can prove with absolute certianty the motivations of this entire "we" group.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 09:25 PM
0

You didn't address a single one of my arguments. Yeah I did. Maybe you didn't notice because I failed to call them retarded. and with each new assault against due process rights, While I'm aware that most people subject to Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures are male I'm not sure what they have to do with the matter at hand. and each new redefinition of rape The defintion of rape in england and wales hasn't changed since 2003. I mean when the actor who plays fucking Superman is expre…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 09:14 PM
-1

The "one in four" figure includes things like an "unwanted kiss". That's retarded. I've seen better lines of argument than calling something retarded. When people hear the words "sexual assault" they think of a guy dragging some woman into an alley and raping her. Assault has always had a far broader defintion than that. It is difficult therefore to escape the conclusion that feminists are indeed attempting to demonize men with their "one in four" claims. Or you know trying to study the issue. Y…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 08:33 PM
0

Conflating jerk behavior in a club Jerk behaviour in a club is spilling someone's drink. What we are talking about is a bit more serious. and a felony is just dumb and designed to make it seem worse than it is. Why make it seem worse? What is a felony? This is the UK we don't play the Misdemeanor/felony game. The closest we have are stuff dealt with at magistrates level vs stuff dealt with crown court level but sexual assault is one of those that can be dealt with at both levels. The reason they…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 03:32 PM
1

Its very possible. Focus on sexuality assaulted (because rape is much less common). There are around 30 million woman in the UK. 85K means the average woman would be sexually assaulted once every 353 years which works out at about 1 in 4 women at some point in their life (actually rather less since some women get assaulted multiple times). So pretty typical figures. Now remember what sexual assault is; any non consensual sexual touching that doesn't rise to the level of rape. So that's things li…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 02:29 PM
1

Go look up Mens Rea in england and wales (where the ROI gets its legal system from).
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:22 PM
-4

If the man continued to believe she was consenting that would be the kind of thing covered under "an honest but unreasonable belief that a woman had consented to sexual intercourse". So yes that is what the article states.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:52 PM
1

Mens Rea reasonable person
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:47 PM
2

The number of cases this impacts in tiny since in most cases defence lawyers stick with the tried and tested option of in most cases it being really hard to prove a lack of consent beyond reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:45 PM
-1

It's going to be a nightmare. Been law in england wales for decades and hasn't caused problems. Really all it means is that if the defendent is going to claim that they belived the victim consented they need to provide a somewhat reasonable reason for doing so.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:43 PM
-8

insanity marches on... they start with a wrong law, they assume that women are too stupid and weak to say NO, and now they try to "fix" the mess by creating new stupid laws without changing the first law Nope. This law covers the situation where the woman says no but the man claims he honestly belived that she consented. Its mostly cleanup to bring the law more in line with England and wales. when politics, feminism, male hating and the law shake hands... ultra stupidity assured A complaint that…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:42 PM
1

Nope 50:50 is the basis judges start from. Any movement away from that is really only going to apply where the marriage was short and one party brought singificantly more wealth into the marriage. In the case the marriage lasted 14 years and took place when the husband was 21 and the wife 22 so neither of those factors are likely to apply.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:36 AM
-2

In this case the original maintenance payments were part of an agreement resulting from the huspand trying to avoid a 50:50 split of assets. If they has been limited to 3 years the split would have had to have been much closer to 50:50 which would not have greatly pleased the huspand.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 06:53 PM
2

In the real world all those have gender neutral options. Police officer, postie and quota trader.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 08:41 PM
3

Shooter or active shooter depending on the point in time is the prefered term.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 08:35 PM
2

Eh. It's not egalitarian to spread the consequences of one groups actions (women...) to everyone. I'm pretty sure Anthony Rapp and Terry Crews are male.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 09:31 AM
1

Well the first thing is you need to learn that the UK has more than one legal system so you should be specifying which one you are talking about. You also need to understand what is happening. The goverment has decided not to build five woman's "community prisons" in england and wales. This is because as a conservative goverment they don't want to spend the money. In order to control the overcrowding this will cause they want to get rid of sentances of less than one year for both genders since t…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:15 AM
-3

What do you think women hating fiction has to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights05/07/18 09:22 PM
-6

Which part of "The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact." do you need explaining to you?
/r/MensRights05/07/18 09:18 PM
-4

The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 09:16 PM
-4

He isn't a senior party member "former Special Adviser and former Deputy Head of Press for the Conservative Party" thats quite a long way up the party hierarchy. This isn't some random memeber or even a space filling councilor. The closest you could get to criticising him on those grounds is that he supports the party that made those cuts and if he did so for other reasons it isn't a criticism at all. He didn't just support the party he worked for it. If he didn't support the cuts he was free to…
/r/MensRights04/07/18 07:42 PM
2

This is so far removed from justice Well yes but he is a senior memeber of a party that has overseen massive spending cuts in that area so I'm unclear as to the basis for his complaint. In particular "Tens of thousands of pounds that I don’t have, and won’t get back" is a direct conservative party policy.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 04:47 PM
1

There is little evidence that single payer increases health outcomes or costs. Apart from say US costs vs NHS costs. Or the people that didn't die wanted it, and use the deaths of those who did as rationale for it. Firstly you are proposing that post war voting intentions had a significant impact on survival chances. That theory appears to lack a certian credibility. Secondly voting is secret in the UK. People are free to use whatever rational they like to decide what they want. What matters is …
/r/MensRights26/06/18 11:48 PM
-16

Source on female conscription in the UK please? Any general history of Britian in WW2 Afaik the only major modern country to send women into combat Oh another so called MRA who spits on the memory of the Bevin Boys. Men who had done nothing wrong conscripted straight to the coal mines. Kept Britain's factories, power stations and ships fueled through the war. Weren't released until 1948. They got no medels (until 2008) little recognition and were at the back of the queue for jobs.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:26 PM
2

Oh basic technological advances taken for granted The NHS was not a basic technological advance while real wealth creators are bilked in the name of equality. Err again they elected Clement Attlee. Your flawed randian concepts have no meaning here. Those who fought and died during World War 2 aparently wanted Socialism and well while the country isn't socalist most of the stuff Bevan built is still intact.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:02 PM
1

Honestly I'm undecided as to whether there is no downside to legally transitioning. Legally transitioning in the UK requires a formal diagnosis with gender dysphoria and depending on the doctors involved that can be tricky to get even if you actualy are transexual. The main downside would be in terms of work. Frankly all but the most progressive of employers are going to quietly drop the CVs of people who don't even vaugley pass for the gender they identify as. I suppose a workers cooperative pu…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 08:09 PM
0

Hmm massively longer life expectancies, much better standards of living and wider acess to healthcare and education. Given that those who fought and survived turned round and elected Clement Attlee I think they would be pretty damn pleased.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 08:02 PM
-8

It's to the point now where large swathes of men should simply change their gender identity, then continue living. "Simply" thats not how UK law works. Cheaper insurance Not under EU law early pension. Only if you were born in the 50s. Lack of draft. UK doesn't have the draft and when it has has conscripted women.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 08:00 PM
10

Guys "mentored" by Kevin Spacey might beg to differ.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:55 PM
-2

It's not just the Navy, it's the world. Like the collapsed bridge that killed people in Florida being engineered by a - previously celebrated - 'diverse' team of all women. The bridge was designed by FIGG Bridge Engineers which has been around for decades and was founded by a man named Eugene Figg.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 12:46 PM
22

If that's not outright illegal, that's pretty f'ed up. It is illegal but the blockchain mob have always had issues with the concept that the law applies to them.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:29 PM
2

They also wish to remove "man" from "chairman," but not out of "garbageman". Because the job title has already shifted to Recycling Refuse Operative or Waste Removal Operative or even Waste Operative.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:03 PM
2

Name one.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 03:13 PM
-4

Actual lawyers disagree with him.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 07:10 AM
2

Given the issues that transgender students already face why would you expect them to do that?
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:19 PM
4

Peterson had a somewhat unique interpritation of a law in Canada. Indiana is not part of Canada.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:17 PM
1

Please show how that would have any issues with the law in question.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:11 PM
8

No the term for memebers of the goverment. Roughly the equiverlent to the various Secretaries in the Cabinet of the United States except there are a lot more of them and traditionaly most roles are held by MPs although some are held by memebers of the house of lords such as the current Minister of State for Trade Policy, Baron Price.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:40 AM
0

Maybe they should have scheduled some time for debate then? Parliamentary time is limited. There simply isn't time to debate all the bills brought before it. That's why on 12 December 2017 Sir Chope voted to allow laws which were required by the UK's membership of the European single market to be weakened, removed or replaced by Ministers (so bypassing parliament all together). The man has no particular problem with passing laws without debate or any involvement by parliament at all. The last bi…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:32 AM
3

He opposed it because they tried to force it through on a Friday evening without any time for debate. Not consistent with his previous actions and votes. Its more likely that as a perma back bencher he enjoys wielding some actual power. He wanted to postpone it till Monday There is no spare time in the parliamentary time table on Monday. The Voyeurism (Offences) Bill would have to go to the back of the private members bill queue which under normal conditions would kill it.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:52 AM
2

What if I'm taking a photo of a landmark and a woman happens to bend over at the same time? Not an offence. No intent to take the image and image wasn't taken for purpose of obtaining sexual gratification (whether for the photographer or third party), or humiliating, distressing or alarming the woman. I can only assume you haven't read the law in question.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:44 AM
19

It's extremely slippery and dangerous territory when you start to implement new laws and legislation with 0 debate Err he voted for that on 12 December 2017 when he voted to allow laws which were required by the UK's membership of the European single market to be weakened, removed or replaced by Ministers. Ministers so not even a brief appearance before parliament.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:31 AM
-34

Has explanation isn't very credible btw. One of his own bills was introduced on the same Friday. He just wanted to wait until Monday to be able to process it properly. That's not how this works. If a private member's bill it blocked it goes to the back of the queue and is unlikely to see the light of day ever again. So yeah for all kilt wearing men in England and wales this man effectively tried to veto a bill giving you a bit more protection.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:19 AM
2

How did she land such a safe seat? Previous MP was having a falling out with the labour party during a turbulent period although since he was 75 it may have been a retirement as much as anything else. Abbott has previously been involved in london local politics and with the abolition of the Greater London Council (it was rather left wing see so didn't go down to well with the conservative goverment of the day) was one of a number of labour people moved in the dirrection of westminister. Is she f…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:57 AM
2

She represents Hackney North and Stoke Newington which has voted labour since its formation in 1950. I suppose racists and sexist might not take this into account.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:13 AM
-14

Roast in the heat or force them to dress like a girl instead of allowing the sane option of shorts. Yes this is a British school. While it may no longer be considered acceptable to make them wear shorts in winter I don't see anything particularly surprising about some standards being maintained. In practice this is a spin off of the current fad for more formal school uniforms (there is some very limited evidence that it results in better educational outcomes but the studies are far from convinci…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:06 AM
-2

Post Modern Neo Marxism You realise that phrase makes absolutely no sense whatsoever? Post modernists fundamentally disagree with Marxists (and its various derivatives) as to how the world works (although they would also question if it meaningful to ask how the world works. This is to be expected. Marxism is intensely modernist in its world view. In fact that's where a lot of its problems come from. Americans are powerful Post modernism wouldn't accept this. therefore third worlders Post moderni…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:25 AM
1

A product of a time where women were socially required to be patriotic and supportive of military action but banned from more direct involvement.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:08 AM
-10

There is no must. They are free to wear trousers.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:05 AM
1

I’ve actually talked to people in the STEM fields. And at no point did you pick up it was a marketing term? Game developers, app developers, tech developers, scientists So you seperate the low level code moneys into different types then lump the Molecular Biologists in with the astronomers? and none of them have had any bias against women. You think you can work that out from the average conversation? Believe it or not sexism is very rare in today’s society Are we using the same internet? Look I…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 05:04 AM
0

However they went on to say "It was by reason of the powerful mitigation that the judge was able to take an exceptional course and suspend the custodial term. It was a constructive and compassionate sentence." The court of the appeal can lengthen sentences on appeal. If they thought that the sentence should have been heavier they would have taken action.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 06:43 PM
1

They didn't say that. If they thought that they would just have unsuspended her sentence. Men in simular situations have recived suspended sentences: https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/supermarket-worker-given-suspended-sentence-9834153
/r/MensRights08/06/18 06:12 PM
4

Funny that argument don't carry water when a man shoots someone Well it didn't work in this case either. However shooting someone would allow for a rather different set of charges.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 04:55 PM
7

You need to be smart enough to plead guilty in a prompt manner. That gets your sentence down to two years which is short enough to be suspended. You then need to be smart enough to have a reasonable prospect of employment (most smart criminals will try and get a job, any job before the case starts) and idealy have no previous offences. Get all those ducks lined up and you two can get a suspended sentence for unlawful wounding: https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/supermarket-worker-give…
/r/MensRights08/06/18 04:54 PM
0

With a worrying amount of ease. Keeping drugs out of prisions is really hard and the goverment isn't prepared to spend the money to do so.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 02:16 PM
2

I have still yet to see why that justifies a 13 month prison sentence Contempt of court combined with previous suspended sentence for the same offence along with a history of convictions. If you keep breaking the law your sentences get longer.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 02:40 AM
3

Apparently he was instructed by a police officer it was okay to film on the public sidewalk so that's not actually true, You realise any such statement would be quite quite irrelivant? Lets see what the judge at his previous trial had to say: "[Y]ou should be under no illusions that if you commit any further offence of any kind, and that would include, I would have thought, a further contempt of court by similar actions, then that sentence of three months would be activated, and that would be on…
/r/MensRights30/05/18 02:25 AM
0

No its about Stephen Yaxley-Lennon's inability to obey the law even when given very clear instructions as to what the law is.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 02:18 AM
0

The guy who placed BACON in front of a mosque had over a YEAR served in his PRISON sentence and was murdered. Kevin Crehan died of a drug overdose.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 02:16 AM
2

Which bit are you suggesting is far left? I mean its wales I doubt they are going to be talking about kibutzes very much.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 07:15 PM
9

If you want to claim that something is a scientific term with a specific meaning you need to be able to show it being consistently used with that meaning and only that meaning. You have failed to do this.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 05:00 PM
6

https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=anthropology+enforced+monogamy Second result is about goverment forced monogamy which is a bit of a problem since we are dealing with the claim ""enforced monogamy” does not mean government-enforced monogamy. “Enforced monogamy” means socially-promoted, culturally-inculcated monogamy" And Google Scholar returns 22k results on "enforced monogamy". It produces far fewer than that (I think the problem is you dropped the quote marks) and what is does produce i…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:42 PM
2

What the hell are you on about? Enforced monogamy is not "experimental" I suggest you read the comment in brackets which explains experimentally enforced monogamy. Its where the experimenters enforce it on whatever species they are testing, mostly insects.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:58 PM
14

Well this one seems straightforward enough to test. There are a number of scientific databases than can be searched without institutional access. I'm going with DOAJ, PLoS One and pubmed. Searching for "enforced monogamy" doesn't produce many results at all (so it is not a commonly used term) and those that do are talking about experimentally enforced monogamy (where the experimenters enforce it on whatever species they are testing, mostly insects). So yeah I'm going to say the headline is false…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 12:22 PM
2

But don't lower the standard, esp not selectively. That would be counter-productive. Not really. The problem with your position is that you rate a BBB student from a private school over a BBC student from a sink estate comprehensive despite the latter being in practice far more impressive.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:08 AM
2

university is a social science hell hole. I think we went to very different universities. go in to trade schools and get degrees in useful shit. UK doesn't really have trade schools in that sense. There are further education colleges but they don't really offer degrees, start a business work hard and get ahead. Have your knees go at age 45 and then get kicked off benifits because you were 2 minutes late to a meeting. One of the problems we face is that unless you are very lucky with your local e…
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:05 AM
2

And she's fired. Nah the idea has been pretty mainstream for years and is in theory the position of the current UK goverment. Of course the current UK goverment is a conservative one so in practice they are making life worse for working class families but at least in theory they claim to want otherwise.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:00 AM
2

You're using an exception to try and argue against the rule. USSR deployed plently of other women in combat. The average woman has no business being on a battlefield, especially if the opposing army is only/mostly men. The Wehrmacht was men only. It lost. Those women will quickly become a liability when they cant run as fast as the men in their squad Soviet combat records indicate otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 04:09 PM
0

It is common knowledge women are not cut out for combat roles in the military. I feel the nazis shot by say Roza Shanina would beg to differ. Or would do if it wasn't for the whole being shot dead thing.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 08:09 AM
0

Seen some pretty unexpected reactions to limited amounts of alcohol over the years. But in any case it doesn't matter. In order to build a rape case you would either need to be able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the woman in question drugged him (which you can't) or that he was too intoxicated to consent (which since he has no memory of events you have no chance of doing). If you happen to know the gentleman in question you can listen and believe but there isn't much that can be done bey…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 07:42 PM
2

The EU dissagrees and pricing insurance on that basis is now illegal in the EU.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 07:22 PM
1

A man would have been fired if he did this The woman in question has been suspended. There are procedures which mean that firing civil servants takes time. and then later jailed after the inquiry? For what offence?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 02:36 PM
1

You're not giving any answer most probably because you can't present a statistic that supports your narrative. You aren't making a coherent point to answer. They managed to pass abortion and ban female circumcision so why not male? House of commons was majority male at the time and abortion law remains extreamly narrow in Northern Ireland. Wtf does males having equal rights have to do with monarchy? One of the very few cases of unequal rights in the UK is that if you are not decended from Electr…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 02:03 PM
1

I'm seeing mixed info here... You are looking over a single year. Look at funding levels since 2010.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 01:58 PM
1

You want to show me the numbers on that? How many men in comparison to women were sent and were any actually forced? Also that doesn't change the fact that in 1918 they received the voting rights and ww1 occurred after / during that time. You aren't making a coherent point. It also doesn't change the fact that women never voted against male circumcision. The UK doesn't do referendums very much so they would never have been in a position to do so. It doesn't change the fact that men never receive…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 01:33 PM
0

Everyone wants status and they exist in a context where there is no other way of gaining it.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 12:59 PM
1

Men didn't get equal rights ever. After 1928 we still had war that was forced on males only. Nope. UK conscripted women during WW2. But we are talking suffrage not rights the UK didn't start moving towards equal rights until the 50s. If I had a choice between having to wait until I was 21 to vote, or being forced to go and get shot at in a foreign country when I'm 18, sorry but I'd rather be female during that period of time. They were clearly the more privileged class. You've just tried to argu…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 12:58 PM
1

I agree with this. People always go on about in UK when women got the right to vote in the 1900s, they miss out the fact that lower class males also gained the right to vote Not exactly. Depending on how you define lower class a fair number would have already had the vote and at the same time women got hit with higher age and property requirements. Women didn't get equal suffrage until 1928.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 07:45 AM
1

They don't consider that men could only vote if they registered for the draft Err no. The US linked it to being white or paying taxes. The UK used various systems mostly linked to wealth, income or again paying certain taxes (it depended where you lived).
/r/MensRights21/04/18 07:31 AM
1

No such policy exists and there's no evidence that it's deliberate. The problem is that the police tend to view it as an annoying paperwork exercise resulting it being done in a rather half-hearted manner at the last minute. Cuts have meant even more pressure on police so more work gets skipped and there just aren't enough people left in the criminal justice system to pick up the issue before its to late. Worse still cuts to legal aid create issues with the quality of the defence available.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:56 AM
1

They can. Guns last and bullets are cheap. These hunts are about status (which is why they are targeting lions rather than some other carnivore) and shooting things doesn't (in this context) give you status.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:48 AM
1

This is a non-sequitur. How can you possibly compare people who have to hunt to survive to ones in Sweden who have their food killed, butchered and often cooked for them? They aren't hunting for survival. If they were they would be using guns. These are men who come from a society where traditionaly women and children did all the day to day work and men went to war. This made sense since it means you can support a larger and more skilled army than any group that didn't do this. The problem is th…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:10 PM
1

The question is, why is she not being prosecuted for perverting the course of justice or some worse crime? Because you would have to prove intent and there is a pretty solid "the goverment didn't give us enough money to do our job properly" defence.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:56 PM
4

On the other hand, this supports the biological differences of the genders, and why men are more capable for active military duty in combat. Depends what you are doing. From the point of view of people designing tanks the ideal tanker (with the possible exception of the loader) is about 5 feet tall. Something ment tend to be rather bad at.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 07:16 AM
1

There's not enough media coverage of this. "Paddy Jackson" "Stuart Olding" "not guilty" Produces 75 thousand results on google news. How much coverage do you want? and the two might as well be imprisoned and put on death row I think you are severely underestimating how bad death row is.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 07:16 PM
1

No I didn't. The cosmonauts who died were due to issues with their manned craft (non closing valve on Soyuz 11 and parachute issues on Soyuz 1) which don't really apply to anything space X has done. The astronauts who died (Challenger, Columbia Apollo 1) died due to issues pretty unique to the shuttle or again issues related purely to their crew module. So no astronauts or cosmonauts died laying the groundwork for the falcon heavy.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:37 PM
0

Let's look at all the astronauts and cosmonauts who died laying the groundwork for this. None. Space X hasn't done any crewed work.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:54 AM
2

Or too smart. Space X doesn't pay that well and has appalling work/life balance issues.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:52 AM
3

I take it that there is concern because of homeless women. No its because the numbers have gone up in recent years which makes it an easy left wing point to score against the conservatives.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:08 AM
3

Is Jeremy Corbin not a rabid communist/feminist No. He's a lefty socialist but not a communist more really a rabid anything (although he has a history of hanging out with those who are).
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:07 AM
1

No thats Asil Nadir not mates. Mates however was involved with a gift of jewellery. In general though jewellery tends not to be the method by which MPs seek extraparlimentry income.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:51 AM
1

Michael Mates retired in 2010.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:34 AM
1

Much the same. The catch is labour has more women MPs and labour tends to draw from a poorer background for its MPs.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:34 AM
1

So yet again, it's another sleight of hand in order to favour their bullshit pay gap shaming tactic. Their complaint is not taking into account the seniority and experience of the highest earners. Err if that was the case the highest earner would be Kenneth Clarke and he isn't. These people are fucking retards! Also, the fact that they're actually bitching yet again about only earning a measly ( In their view ) £78,000 - £79,000 Neither of the authors of the article are MPs. I know I go on about…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:32 AM
1

They may also be counting income from passive investments in these figures. They aren't otherwise the income figures would be a lot higher (Rees-Mogg for example should have a few million in dividends). This a mix of people continuing with their previous work and the traditional approach of paying a government MP to sit on the board of your company (which are also the reasons labour income is lower).
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:29 AM
3

but not about transmen and how they fit in to the real world with actual men. Well there were all those articles about Mack Beggs.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:22 AM
0

Party with 1 MP are the modern left? You could make a better case for Plaid Cymru.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:18 AM
3

For example 'The Last Jedi' has 30K female voters and 200K male voters. That's 1:6 ratio. In other words, female viewers are less than 10% from the overall viewers. You appear to be confusing IMBD voters with viewers. Netflix might know gender ratios but IMBD doesn't.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:44 PM
7

I want to be judged fairly = shady as hell. If you think it requires a full legal due process to judge someone then you are probably going to have to avoid apply for jobs because no employer on earth has time or money for that.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:40 PM
2

Thats like accusing Shakers of genocide. If women freely chose to reproduce via ovular merging its hard to see how that qualifies as gendercide.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 11:02 PM
-4

And what happens when another country that has men decides to invade? Given the technology level implied in this senario (ovular merging is a bit beyond our current tech) any country using men its army will find that they have all be killed in automated defence systems in very short order. Human reaction times max out on the order of 100 milliseconds. Computers have no such limitation.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:03 PM
6

Nah. It came up in the context of ovular merging a reproduction method. Nobody dies its just a switch to a reproduction method that can only produce women.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:59 PM
-1

Any anyone with a real education in science will know that the scientific defintion of sex is going to have to encompase all those less common cases which is why we end up with a defintion based on gametes that also happens to work with humans.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 08:17 PM
0

Nope. That breaks down when you consider temperature-dependent sex determination and species that change sex over the course of their lives (clownfish for example). Actual science which has to account for all this instead uses gamete properties (size, mobility).
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:00 PM
0

Fortunately, real science can tell the difference between birds, platypuses, and humans. Yup. Still doesn't mean that science is going to define sex based on chromosomes. You see in science your definitions have to include all the rare corner cases. For example any definition of “metal” that “included room temperature solid” would have to be rejected even though there aren't very many exceptions. Real science also recognizes that a chromosomal disorder that affects less than .005% of the populat…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 08:23 PM
9

The reverse. He identifies as male and wants to wrestle as a boy. However under the rules of the state he's in (texas) he's require to wrestle under as the gender he was assigned at birth. People's fear of SJWs is the core of the problem here.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:46 PM
1

I recall that from a scientific standpoint that the XX and XY chromosomes determine traditional male/female phenotypes. Nope. Birds are ZW and the platypus seems to regard having only two sex chromosomes as something than happens to other species. Even limiting it to humans you still hit the issue of complete androgen insensitivity syndrome where you have people with XY chromosomes who look and generaly indentify as female. So from a scientific point we must reject your hypothesis.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:38 PM
-7

When did any of those fall outside of the well established HR and PR fields? Existentially its a sub speciality of HR yes. But that's a bit like asking when auditing fell outside the well established accountancy field. PR should yes in theory be able to handle this itself but in practice that varies.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:02 PM
-13

heh Im the one phenotype that wont fill a diversity quota You don't have an age, gender, sex or ethnic background? But anyway your talk of diversity quotas shows why companies have to employ diversity officers who know the actual law. Its all about the boring stuff of showing that your hiring practices are non discriminatory along with your internal disciplinary procedures. Depending on your local legal system you may also have to make sure you are making reasonable accommodation for disabled em…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 06:56 PM
-25

Is there any more bullshit job than Chief Diversity Officer? Yes. Yours. mean can you imagine where your whole career is to basically sell the bullshit that in order for your company to be as "diverse" as possible you have to have the proper mix of vaginas and skin tones in the 21st century. Thats not the job of a normal Chief Diversity Officer. Mostly a mix of making sure your hiring practices are legal and perhaps trying to make sure your marketing materials don't offend anyone you don't want …
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:40 PM
1

I have proof that Intel was intentionally not hiring the best in the field. No you don't. In particular you would need to be able to prove they were in a position to hire Cyrix employees somewhere around 93/94.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:34 PM
0

Why not since they can pay them less than man. /s Thats exactly why telephone exchanges employed women back in the day.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 10:08 PM
0

What do you think throwing incentives at companies does? What do you think incentives are? A woman going into STEM is practically handed a high paying position in the field. That's what "incentivizing diversity" is. As a chemist who works as a chemist I have to say no, no they aren't.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 10:07 PM
-23

It's funny the gender gaps that are ignored, such as: -gender inequality in homelessness Google has chucked money in the dirrection of homeless charities but other than making sure their cars don't run them over homeless people fall rather outside google's business model. -gender inequality in high school dropouts Formal education really isn't google's turf. -gender inequality in unemployment Google employs more men than women so you can't really blame them for that one.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 10:04 PM
3

No. By the time you are down to mayors affairs are at most local news (okey slight exception perhaps for new york). Too many politicans have had then for voters to really care any more.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 10:00 PM
2

Oh loads. The trick to remember is that groups actualy interested in helping men (rather than attacking women feminists) aren't going to identify as MRA. In terms of the biggest issues facing men in the UK you have things like the Howard League for Penal Reform and Shelter. Neither are men only but the nature of say the UK prison population means the Howard League for Penal Reform is mostly going to be focusing on men's issues. For stuff more narrowly focused you have families need fathers, UK M…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 08:54 PM
9

There are currently over 1000 Emoji and new ones are being regularly added to unicode. It would very foolish to specify which emojis.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 08:33 PM
0

So black men aren't men?
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:03 PM
22

Wonder how much #metoo coverage Given her previous fairly low profile and the fact that this happened in korea and everyone involved is korean not much. whether her movies will be redone She's only made one full length film and it made less than $200K so no.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:02 PM
4

In the September 2014 Census Bureau report on income and poverty in the U.S., the median household income in America across all jobs was $51,939. Go look up the difference between household and personal income I love how you cut the average income of Americans in half and tried to pretend that it was average to get your moot point across btw. That was very Buzzfeed of you. Understanding the difference between household and personal income is very Buzzfeed? What?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:17 AM
3

Your grossly overestimating how much a million dollars is No I'm not. Maybe for the lowest poverty bracket. No that's median US personal income. That's 20 years for someone making 50k a year 1.6*US median personal income. But hey for most lower middle class people (which is about where 50K puts you) 20 years of income wouldn't be something they would describe as "isn't much" 20 years is a fair stretch of time. They paid income tax on it you dip shit. They paid income tax on the capital gains on …
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:11 AM
5

Trump has a terrible character, but he is deregulating (As promised) Promising to kill net neutrality and doing so isn't really the sign of a good president. lowered taxes (as promised) Unfunded tax cuts are not an achievement. and has gotten our allies to pay more for their own defense. Looking at the noises from the current UK defense review and the increasingly creative accounting to meet the NATO target no he hasn't.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:50 AM
6

And 5 million among 4-5 kids each with several kids of their own isn't much That's a million per kid or about 32 years of median personal income. They have already paid taxes on that income. They paid capital gains tax on their home? Unusual. In any case the tax isn't on dying but on receiving income from dead people.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:46 AM
1

Ahh, clearly you’ve never set foot on a job site. Of course not. No hat, no boots, no High vis, no job. Basic PPE man. There is a reason the US has a higher death rate per hours worked than the UK for equiverlent industries.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:58 AM
2

Has anyone tried? Scottish NHS did try sending people out to go and look for sick scotsmen.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:51 AM
12

No its when men won't go to the doctor and end up dying of things we have a reasonable prospect of treating if caught early. Problem is no one is really sure how to solve the issue.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:35 PM
-22

Interesting point. As a gender, where are the women toiling away in the steel mills Much the same place as the men. Replaced by robots. exhausted from constructing the high rises We clearly know a different set of crane operators. or dying on the battlefield so that we (both men and women) can have freedom and a good life? Providing the logistical support to people doing actualy useful things on the battlefield.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:32 PM
-2

Because you use the term for pretty much anyone left of center. For example, SJWs consistently get to shut down Conservative or "controversial" speakers at Colleges No conventional conservative speakers do just fine although they tend not to bother since they prefer groups that lean center right. They have been able to pressure YouTube into demonetizing pretty much anybody who is an anti-SJW YouTube has been demonetizing a lot of people of late and it turns out that some people doing advitiser u…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 10:13 AM
5

So, who's next on the list? Cheerleaders? American sports don't like change so no. Fashion Models? Currently cheaper than CGI but when that changes numbers will be significantly reduced.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 10:02 AM
2

I wasnt talking about her shit she had, but if she didnt work and it was an 1 income family, how in the world can the claim she didnt financially contribute be false and earn you a purgery charge???? Because she at the very least brought the clothes she stood up in (which have a non zero value) into the marriage. So zero is not a credible claim and we can wrap up the the case rather quickly. Gifts from friends and relatives just further add to the case. It shows your over the table yearly earnin…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:20 PM
0

Arrest him for fraud? Seriously. Perjury might be another legal option but thats just details. How would it be difficult? Tax returns ect. Tax returns only cover a subset of income. Why would the other partner be entitled to half of anything the other partner bought? You miss the point. The issue is here is that the person has negative income due to depreciation. So if one person buys a car and it falls in value by 8K do they owe the other person 4K? I am looking to make women (or men) who didnt…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:56 PM
1

So? He claims she financially provided nothing, No thats the easy case. You imediately arrest him for fraud if she can show so much as one cent of income at any point. Owning clothing for example prior to the marriage would be enough. She claims X amount. They look at work history and go from there. 10 years of work history is going to be difficult enough to start with. But that's before we get onto the fun areas of investments, capital gains, gambling, ebay sales, pensions and the like. Depreci…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:38 PM
1

I think divorce needs to change to be you walk out with what you financially put into it. The cost of working that out (since if anyone taking more than they put in that would be illegal) would be greater than the cost of most couple's combiened assets. No, how about instead you are free to provide for your offspring how you see fit. There is a reason why child protection laws exist. Wellfare and adoption can try to fill in the gaps from the "bad men". So you want to increase taxes to cover for …
/r/MensRights31/01/18 03:52 PM
0

The difference being that the bar viewed it as a bad thing and took action to stop it.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 08:38 PM
-22

Seems to pretty clearly benefit the woman/recipient at the expense of the man/payer. That due to the way you are looking at it. If you were rich enough to afford a proper accountant other tax changes would likely leave you ahead. If you are not, well, it may not work out so well for you.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:58 AM
1

/U/Crusader_1096 below explains the idiocy of your argument perfectly. If either "white" or "male" privilege were actually meaningful we wouldn't have scenes like in OP. Of course you would. US has a population of 300 million and Intersectionality deals with general trends rather than single cases. And yes male priverage may not help you very much if you are black, poor and given general trends amoung the homeless population not neurotypical.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:36 PM
0

If "White privilege" is real and provides so many advantages then why is he homeless? Well to start with he isn't white. Black and poor is not a good combination. Does this mean a lack in wealth privilege completely overrides "White privilege"? No but it greatly reduces it. Throw in the levels of metal illness amoung the homeless and you see the importance of neurotypical privilege.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:31 PM
0

holy shit you're a pretentious one Or you know a chemist.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:29 PM
1

Molecular orbital theory on the same level as postmodern upside down basket weaving? Dream on. Intersectionality isn't post modern.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:29 PM
-29

Way to be intentionally obtuse. No that's just how intersectionality (which is where the privilege concept comes from) works. The whole point is that it is a set of tools that allows you to examine how if you you lack say wealth and neurotypical privilege then life would still tend to suck for you even if you were a straight white male. Clearly we all need to be socialists so the money gets to him and isn't given to the women who it will be given to because the collective values women over men (…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 05:35 PM
-46

He appears to be lacking in wealth privilege yes. Lack of white privilege may not help his case.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 04:56 PM
1

This tragedy is doomed to repeat unless media laws surrounding showing charged defendants The victim wasn't changed with anything.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 09:38 PM
1

Possibly. They have to find it first. Anonymous coins like, say, Monero would make it exceedingly difficult to trace. This actually isn't simply "hiding one's assets internationally". If I shunted 5K monthly into Monero over the years along with other assets into other more trad forms wealth storage, it's entirely possible that that isn't remotely traceable at the moment. Again the court doesn't have to trace it. They will have acess to your banking records which means they pick up the 5K a mont…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 03:40 PM
1

Oh don't get me wrong, yes, you're still capable of being fucked by the courts, but in the end the ex-wife gets nothing which in the end will remove the whole point of what they're doing. The number of people prepared to sit in jail for years when they can do something that lets them walk out the next day is fairly limited. The difference is, it's not just rich people that can do this now, If you think only rich people have tried hiding assets in divorces you are rather naive. There is a reason …
/r/MensRights14/01/18 05:27 PM
1

You missed part 2. They put you in jail for contempt of court. Pay the money or sit in jail for for year after year after year. And yes this does happen. The day you tried to hide your assets overseas may have seemed the most important day of your life. But for the divorce courts it was tuesday.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 05:11 PM
4

Even if they get a court order out on the income and try to seize everything, how are they going to stop it? Because it would be incredibly easy with Bitcoin to simply get a VPS ( Virtual Private Server ) in another country where they have no jurisdiction, take the money, put it all into Bitcoin and that VPS then hop on over where they can't do anything. Confiscate your passport and if you still don't pay up hold you in jail for contempt of court. People trying to hide assets overseas isn't exac…
/r/MensRights14/01/18 05:00 PM
1

imagine the uproar Not much? A facebook post with classist humour isn't going to attract much attention either way.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 08:29 AM
-2

Be thankful to everyone, male or female, who is doing these dangerous and important jobs to contribute to the infrastructure of society. Why would I be thankful to people who fail to follow procedures thus resulting in lost time accidents and slowing production? Alternatively why would I be thankful to people who sell their skills to unsafe employers rather than ones that practice proper hazard management? The attitude that deaths at work are one of those things that just happens gets people kil…
/r/MensRights23/12/17 06:45 AM
2

So you want to hire Adam Venit and Kevin Spacey?
/r/MensRights20/12/17 04:31 AM
-17

Meh. If you didn't know any before you don't know many men. In any case the Adam Venit and Kevin Spacey cases suggest these men aren't thinking things through.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:06 PM
1

No no you are including books here. Luke Skywalker has featured pretty consistently in the various books published from 1991 onwards.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 07:11 AM
1

So you don't understand what Male Privilege means. The whole point of the theory it comes from is to look at how it interacts with other forms of privilege. In particular it may not help you very much if you lack neurotypical privilege and are towards the bottom of the wealth privilege scale.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 07:06 AM
2

I didn't ask who you trusted. I asked which media you think are centrist. Political alignment has nothing to do with trust. The Weekly World News's political stance isn't the reason you don't trust it.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 07:03 AM
1

I believe I am centrist but I haven’t been able to find very many centrist news outlets. Could you possibly name me a few? Thanks :) If you name the ones you think are centrist I could probably name simular ones.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:57 AM
2

When did media sources become so left leaning When your personal political world view became right wing enough to classify most media as left wing. Thats pretty much all there is to it. why aren’t there any super popular republican news outlets? Because directly competing with fox news is tricky. We're talking about conservatives here. They tend to be rather conservative in their media choices (although Newsmax and One America News Network exist). More broadly most media isn't as prepared to be …
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:46 AM
3

Kevin Spacey got kicked out of house of cards and it was just an accusation. Quite a collection of them. Specificaly he appears to have sexualy assulted a number of people working on house of cards. What I find wierd is how everyone assumed that he actually did sexually assaulted the guy when there is no proof that he did. Well Anthony Rapp had nothing to gain from coming forward and isn't exactly known for making stuff up. Spacey really rather weak defence combined with the "I choose now to liv…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:27 AM
4

The US has a population of 325 million so its not exactly huge. "Innocent until proven guilty" is the standard the legal system works to. Actual human beings not so much.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 05:58 PM
0

That's a weird choice, considering the US DID consider irish republicans terrorists, literally putting them on a terror watch list In 2001. There is a reason I phrased it "used to view irish republicans" I still don't understand. I noticed. I still don't understand. You also have the English Julie Bindel saying the most horrific of things, and she writes for the Guardian. Shouldn't she then be the reason that "people associating with feminism would get a response"? No because it doesn't seem to …
/r/MensRights14/12/17 05:21 AM
1

So you're asserting that an ideology that commits potential assassinations in another country might be considered fine and "not a threat" simply because its UK members don't do it? Yup. Same way the US used to view irish republicans. Frankly we have football teams that have caused more serious problems far more recently. You're arguing that these groups aren't on any type of terrorist watch list merely because they're from the UK? I'd find that again, hard to believe. TRAC literally calls the fi…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 04:27 AM
1

Wait, the ideology itself is solely relevant insofar as they're UK citizens? Groups are assessed on the basis of the issues they cause Britain. Naxalites for example are not going to be a significant concern. Just to be clear, does the counter-terrorism unit do the same thing with, say, Nazism or ISIS? Like, the does the UK version need to be shown to be demonstrably the same as the global ideology, otherwise the UK Nazis and ISIS members get a pass? Combat 18/David Copeland and various Islamic …
/r/MensRights14/12/17 03:48 AM
1

What do you mean? I can point to feminist groups in history actually trying to assassinate people. Those would be americans. Compared with what? Why would they need to be compared with anything?
/r/MensRights14/12/17 03:18 AM
1

Using that standard, one could point to a gamut of self-described feminists and even groups that have advocated far far worse. However they haven't actualy done it. I fail to see why this is the case if tenuous claims of "Fathers For Justice History" is enough to land the entirety of MRAs as an ideological unit on a terrorist list. You're not familiar with the history of Fathers for Justice?
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:46 AM
5

No they don't that has sort of pushed out of history, no mention that a load of one religious group in Northern Ireland did not get the vote until 1970. Even after that point there have been issues with voting while homeless and (mostly male) prisoners still don't have the vote. I have seen it mentioned that there were women on the UK register in the 1700's. Unlikely. Most of the UK didn't have an electoral register at that point. What is true is that woman were only formally banned from voting …
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:25 AM
0

Prior to 1918, there was no universal suffrage in the UK. All those soldiers who died in WW1, drowning in the mud at Somme, none of those men has the right to vote. A fair number of the officers and older men would have qualifed to vote. A rather larger number would have had the right to vote prior to entering the armed forces. In order to vote before then you had to own property. Sufficient income was also acceptable. It makes me legitimately angry. Think about it, if they replaced "women" with…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:17 AM
1

Eh, if it weren't for lunatic feminists droning on and on about how any disagreeable-towards-them ideology is "extremist", MRA's wouldn't have been included in such a sweep. Eh Father's for justice's history is enough to land them on the list. Considering that "lunatic feminist" isn't in the same boat despite being characteristically more extremist than most categories of people. Unless people are also reporting feminists under the aegis of this program and I missed it. While groups that purely …
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:06 AM
-4

But the thing is they don't pay attention to crimes committed against men at all. Oh they do. Its not perhaps a primary focus (after all feminism not unreasonable focuses on issues that directly impact women) but you do see stuff both in terms of a taking a feminist viewpoint when studying male victims (which results in odd sounding titles like "Performing masculinity in a victim context") and suggestions for applying approaches that have worked with female victims to males (how viable this is v…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 12:56 AM
1

Nah. Its just that the criteria for extremists is pretty broad.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 11:54 PM
-1

Not really realistic to expect them to pay attention to every crime in every country.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:50 PM
3

Roy Moore lost by a pretty narrow margin. Its quite possible that if he had been more conciliatory towards black people he would have won. Alabama has never elected a woman as senator making it difficult to predict how the various demographics would respond. If the hyperthetical woman as able to hold onto the same level of white male support while pulling in more women white women voters she would win. Equaly if she lost much in the way of white male voters (even if it was because they prefered …
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:47 PM
1

Not an American but his name is big right now so I'm wondering; what did he actually do? Made a number of racist and sexist comments and carry out a number of religiously discriminatory actions. He's also shown an unfortunate sexual interest in girls below the age of consent. Since he was running in Alabama the former mostly weren't a problem. The latter were a slight problem (he didn't lose by very much). Anything at all, or is he just being accused? Reports from multiple independent sources in…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:38 PM
1

It doesn't matter how the person feels about it or not. The victim's right's movements disagree. Either it's a felony to walk up and randomly grab people by their genitals or it isn't. That's only the start of the problem. You next have to consider sentencing at which point you probably do need to consider victim impact compared to other forms of assult.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 10:15 PM
1

Probably but you miss many of the problems with custody. The biggest is simply men not asking for it in the first place. Idealy there should probably be some kind of awareness program as to people's options. The second is enforcement which to a large part due to a lack of funding for the agencies that are meant to enforce it. Mind you funding enough drop off, pick-up and contact centres to make them widely accessible and the law enforcement to back up contact orders would be kinda expensive. You…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:21 PM
0

The problem with the question is its not clear what you mean by "feel sexually assaulted". If a woman randomly groped me I'd feel pissed off. Does that count as "feel sexually assaulted"?
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:11 PM
-6

Thats not really a coherent response to my comments. Oh look you edited. You cite Buzzfeed. Buzzfeed is not more reliable than Breitbart or the NYT. In fact, likely less. Better than Breitbart and in any case that story has proven pretty solid. I've seen the yearbook signature. It's obviously forged, identical to Moore's signature ten years later on the accuser's divorce papers. Nobody signs their name identically twice. The expert disagrees. Sorry, I've never seen a public statement by any of t…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:09 PM
-7

Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to be linking to alt right sources" is a foolish statement. If a source has reliable information, Breitbart isn't a source of reliable information I'll use it. In this instance, the information is indeed reliable; a Google of "Allred forgery" leads to other sources, including the New York Times. Which doesn't call it a forgery. The handwriting expert says the cursive is by Moore. we need temporary allies wherever we find them. Not entirely unreasonable to judge …
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:00 PM
5

Can't read the article on that online ad cancer website, but from the headline it appears the victim was also male? Nope "A supermarket employee stabbed his partner in the arm “in a fit of jealousy” because she talked to another man, a court has heard."
/r/MensRights08/12/17 02:16 AM
1

That may be how it works in the law generally but if it was a man involved trying to knife a woman in a similar sort of situation or even beat her then the reaction from both the courts and public is blatantly different. The courts not to much: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/supermarket-worker-given-suspended-sentence-9834153 The newspapers would probably refrain from publishing their nude pics so yes there is that difference.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 11:47 PM
-2

I guarantee you that argument wouldn't be used if she was a man, What? No previous conditions is the absolute standard argument people make if they can. If you want to "guarantee" something about the legal system you should be at least vaguely familiar with it.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 11:28 PM
3

Thats not how criminal cases work.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 10:32 PM
-2

If you look at the arguments actually given at the sentencing they are the fairly standard stuff that it was at the lighter end of unlawful wounding and there were a fairly complete set of mitigating factors (big one being lack of any previous).
/r/MensRights07/12/17 10:31 PM
4

Needless to say, reverse the genders and they'd be in jail as we speak. Not so: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/supermarket-worker-given-suspended-sentence-9834153
/r/MensRights07/12/17 10:28 PM
-5

I'm sure gay men enjoy being reminded that they don't count as men.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:40 PM
1

There's a very interesting history of prudish women trying to ban such publications. Feminists are old hat in that respect. Unless you are going to blame capitalism on feminism thats irrelivant. They were killed by market forces. Is that a men's right's issue? Stop the world men want to get off?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:49 PM
2

Still. Nice tits But not ones you are prepared to pay for in sufficient numbers to support a magazine. But still its nice to see the continuing existence of the Sunday Sport is a men's rights issue. Where would we be without headlines like "World War II Bomber Found On The Moon"?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:31 PM
2

Nuts and Zoo tried that and went out of business in 2014.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:18 PM
1

So why would one person be doing soul destroying work and the other not? Because one of them is a less good chemist than the other.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 04:26 PM
2

I think what you're pointing out is the very loose definition of "scientist". Both the people I described would have degrees in a scientific field (probably chemistry).
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:25 PM
3

You can't really be a second rate anything. The people doing say QC at the local cement factory really aren't on the same level as the ones doing high end pharmaceutical research. And this is where you hit the problem. The ones doing high end pharmaceutical research are well paid and tend to be the sort of people who could earn serious money in any field. They are there because they want to be there. The people doing QC at the local plastics factory tend to be rather poorly paid (and while I've …
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:06 PM
5

Maybe more women should get STEM degrees Ah you fell for the marketing. Really only a subset of the stuff lumped under STEM (and lets face it maths is only there because STE is hard to pronounce) actually pays well. or a Law 2000s called. While they don't actually want their poor degree choice advice back they would like you to stop trying to make it worse. Law stopped being lucrative after far too many people to a degree in the subject in the early to mid 2000s. instead of getting their degree …
/r/MensRights06/12/17 01:26 PM
-4

Why is it that we require quotas for jobs in STEM fields We don't. Despite spending my working life bouncing around various STEM jobs the closest I've ever seen to a quota for jobs in a STEM field was a university trying to show that it wasn't discriminating against people with disabilities. but not in hard labour jobs like garbage collection or oil field work? Well it helps that both involve the kind of large employers that have HR departments that can show that their hiring practices are non d…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 01:24 PM
33

Seriously though, these people are abhorrent, yet we're supposed to believe they are paragons of virtue because they label themselves feminists. Nah Burchill has made enemies all over the political spectrum. At this point she's mostly a nostalgia act trading on being edgy in the 80s.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:42 AM
6

I want Men's Rights. Is the left going to listen to me? Yes although they will tend to use rather different phrasing. Social safety nets, actualy spending on mental health rather than just talking about it, improved conditions in prisons, better regulation of workplace health and safety. They won't phrase any of this as men's rights or in many cases even as rights but the left is more likely to take steps to address the issues MRAs claim to care about.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:37 AM
-14

Because no one ever lies on the internet. YHBT HAND
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:32 AM
-1

Well we know from there statement that not everything is in the public domain. They didn't for example publish the review they did.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:46 PM
-6

Claim made without evidence.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:52 PM
23

Then why wouldn't they say that, as opposed to saying that he was simply accused? Because anything they say can be used against them. Stick to the minimium and leave anything beyond that for dealing with future lawsuits.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:51 AM
0

How the fuck can anyone claim this is justice, or a good thing? Because realisticaly we assume we don't have the whole story. Given how fast they acted (didn't even mess about with a suspension) its likely that they know more than is in the public domain.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:50 AM
7

Title says it all I assure you it does not. Doesn't even state the legal juristiction. In general though this shows up when someone is trying to hang onto a specific asset (so she gets 70% of the cash and he gets 100% of a business) or buy their way out of alimony. It can also pop up when someone has been playing silly buggers with declaring assets in which case you should be worried over how much your old trading cheated you out of.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:48 AM
1

equal opportunity The problem is if he really supported equal opportunity then he would support kids being removed from their parents at bith and raised in a kibbutz like collective. That tended not to work out too well.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:42 AM
1

The building should've been condemned, though. The build was fine if a bit expensive to heat until someone stuck a load of flamable stuff on the outside.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:39 AM
1

Training flights have their own goals and according to the navy the drawing of a smaller penis didn't acomplish any of them.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 04:19 PM
12

think the key difference is that the pilots are military, and those women were civilians. More that one was at work and spending a fortune fuel and maintenance time to draw a penis smaller than one previously drawn by the RAF.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 12:16 AM
2

They initially reported it, but how long will it continue to be reported? Well the BBC news has stuff going back to at least 1998 so given the german tank problem at least 20 years. This story will be reported once, then buried. Given your initial prediction was completely false why do you think we should pay any attention to your further predictions? If it was the other way around, it would be on morning, afternoon, evening, TV actor who hasn't had a significant role in 2 years? It would get co…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 03:05 PM
2

People is not the media? How about the BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/42128435/glee-star-naya-rivera-charged-with-domestic-violence-against-her-husband Or CNN:http://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/26/entertainment/naya-rivera-arrested/index.html Your biases are showing.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 01:57 PM
1

then another on complete thought control, That would be Bob Jones University although Brigham Young University does its best.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 12:56 PM
8

It baffles me that people don't care about this. It angers me that people wont care until it starts happening to women. Oh they stilll won't care. Plently of female slavery around. The problem is that its a really difficult problem to solve. Stabilising Libya to the extent that this stops happening would be expensive and even if you did that there is no obvious ethical way of stopping the flow of migrants from sub Saharan Africa.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 12:52 PM
3

Vasalgel is going to have side effects but otherwise may work well enough. Your chemical approach like papaya seed hit the problem that you need to reliably shut down 100% of sperm week after week I'm sceptical that anything out there at the moment can do that.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 09:04 PM
4

To get a drug past the FDA it has to be better that what is currently on the market. The pill is the gold standard. Good luck with that. It only has to be better in a subset of cases. And given that the pill doesn't work at all for 50% of the population and has various side effects in the other 50% that wouldn't be a very high standard to meet. The problem is it would have to be effective.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:35 PM
12

Never going to happen. They will never allow men to control their bodies. If people are prepared to pay for it people will try and invent it. The problem is that its a really hard thing to do. With female contraception you need to stop just over one egg a month. That's a fairly straightforward target and there are existing mechanisms you can hijack to do it. By comparision men produce millions of sperm and there are no existing mechanisms to stop them from doing so.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 05:24 PM
8

The cases its meant to deal with were the classic poor servent girl has a kid. At best the father won't admit any involvement (might well be their employer) at worst the sex wasn't exactly consensual. The social consequences of having a child out of wedlock are significant so the girl hides the pregnacy and kills the baby. In such cases juries often weren't prepared to pass a guilty verdict that would result in a death sentence. Thus the introduction of a less crime that juries would convict for…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 08:49 AM
4

Wasn't there an article posted here recently stating that fathers can also suffer the equivalent of postpartum depression? These laws don't have anything to do with that. They are leftovers from a period where contraception options where limited and having a kid out of wedlock would have resulted in significant social consequences. This resulted in a fair amount of jury nullification thus the introuction of a lesser offence that juries would actualy convict for.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 08:44 AM
2

It's rather sad that this bit of common sense is perceived as extremely radical. Its not treated as a radical idea its just that removing bias between men of different races in sentencing has been tried before and the results have not been entirely sucessful. Whatever happened to "equality before the law"? Northern ireland mostly.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 09:22 AM
1

He's in a pretty safe conservative seat. In the absence of a 1997 style labour win as long as he doesn't actually murder anyone or join UKIP he can pretty much do what he likes without consequence. His history of corruption with regards to the gambling industry aren't an issue for a back bench MP.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 09:15 AM
1

So no one's questioning if the Institute for Family Studies might have an agenda here?
/r/MensRights12/11/17 11:47 PM
1

The outcry? As in none whatsoever since messy relationship breakups are as common as dirt and to most people about as interesting.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 11:50 PM
4

significantly worse... we have the best employment rate in 17+ years, the stock market is higher than any time ever in history, Yes Obama left things in pretty good shape. and aside the countries that elected loser far-left leaders (macron, trudeau, merkel, etc) And there's the complete insanity. Those three are center left, centerist and center right respectively. Only someone mind-wrenchingly ignorant of world affairs would describe the Christian Democratic Union as far left.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 08:36 AM
-8

Wrong country again. Major is really a US term.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 02:36 PM
1

Maybe because the courses aren't meant for them. In fact, the charter of the National Women's Studies Association, which is the body that accredits such programs No it isn't. You've got the wrong country there. The author of the article is in the UK (and writing in 2012).
/r/MensRights06/11/17 02:35 PM
3

Err nothing would happen. Trashy TV is trashy TV.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 03:03 AM
1

Damien Green / some reporter he once met Mr Green's defence is that she is not just some "reporter he met once". That would make the text message hard to explain see.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 01:33 PM
1

Mods and rockers would be a pretty solid counter example.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 04:49 PM
1

In fairness male supermarket workers can also not go to jail after stabbing their partner: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/supermarket-worker-given-suspended-sentence-9834153
/r/MensRights24/10/17 08:55 PM
0

And no, i am not driving 1500 miles to winnipeg to look at something i can view online Well evidently you can't view it online. I have no more reason to assume they included the questionnaire in their online publication then in their physical publication. Its 2017. What makes you think there was a physical publication? And if you do not want people to call your research a push poll, then yes, you really DO need to publish the survey in the online format. Are you offering to pay for this? At the …
/r/MensRights22/10/17 05:37 PM
0

No a thought exercise wouldn't include a survey.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 12:57 PM
1

Eh the original study is a reasonable pilot study. Its enough to stuggest that it might be worth funding a larger study.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:25 AM
1

You are responding to a thread that is text in an image file. Not a great place to argue for traceability. In any case they told you which surveys they used and if you go to the University of Manitoba library you to can view the Phd thesis one of them can be found in (unless you have a dust allergy in which case forget it). Thing is you aren't really meant to publish non original surveys. Leftover from paper publication when people didn't want inch thick journals.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:24 AM
1

That could easily be interpreted as no consequences at all including consequences for the victim. I'm sure plenty of people would rob banks if it meant no consequences for them or for the victim. That doesn't mean they are at all likely to actually rob a bank. Not really relivant to what the study was looking for (it was basicaly trying to find out how answers varied with how you phrased the question).
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:11 AM
0

What were the equivalent female figures? We don't know. Are you offering to fund such a study?
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:08 AM
2

Can you link the studies? I'd imagine they are typical, BS gender studies papers with no peer review, Lisak and Miller 2002 and Swartout, Koss, White Et al 2015 were both published in peer reviewed journals. repeatable results, nor any citations since. Pretty much everyone cited Lisak and Miller since before 2015 it was the only half decent study in the area.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:06 AM
0

It doesn't. Thats a number thats not really been looked into before. There are a bunch of different numbers that tend run together if you aren't paying attention. Percentage of men who've actualy commited rape appears was 6% in a 2002 study and 10.6% in a 2015 study (both have sampling issues mind). Percentage of men who would commit rape if they could get away with it is a new one and there aren't any solid numbers (the study being cited was trying to study something else). The other numbers yo…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 05:02 PM
-7

None of them are rapists. How do you know? FWIW the two largest studdies came up with around 6% and 11% respectively.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 04:58 PM
-1

They asked them. The numbers come from "Denying Rape but Endorsing Forceful Intercourse: Exploring Differences Among Responders" The study suffers from a small sample size and decidedly non representative sample but that's less of an issue for what its actually trying to study (the difference you get between asking about actions that are legally considered rape and using the word "rape") than for the 1 in 3 figure.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 04:54 PM
1

Marketing.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 07:43 AM
1

That would be illegal under laws passed by the goverment Mr Johnson is part of.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 07:42 AM
1

It didn't impact the state pension one way or the other. The issue was with private pensions. They paid out more per year to men due to the lower life expectancy. On the other hand men paid more for car insurance and the like.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:39 PM
2

The reality is that with the increasing pension age it has pretty much reached the point where most people can't work beyond it and trying to mess with that isn't going to save you any further money.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:05 PM
0

Current data suggests the most straightforward way to rectify it would be to ban smoking. This isn't politicaly viable.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:04 PM
1

It sucks for men though since they get a worse annuities since they can no longer account for men's shorter life expectancy.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:02 PM
-1

Seriously? You can't appreciate the fact they, I don't know, launched a fucking rocket into space and even came anywhere near the commet, The main navigational manouvers were done before he became project scientist. much less hit the son of a bitch?! Hitting it wasn't the problem. NASA managed an impactor in 2005 and japan mananaged a landing on a simular body in the same year (although being the Japanese space program a bunch of things went wrong. JAXA are masters of Improvise, Adapt and Overco…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 04:31 AM
-15

he did not mess anything up, it was a successful landing on a comet. No success would have been staying in place rather than bouncing twice before ending stuck in a crevice in deep shadow.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 03:43 AM
-11

Where did you get that they messed up? The bit where instead of staying in place it bounced twice and ended up stuck in a crevice. It is generally considered a massive success in space engineering. ESA have a fairly good PR team yes.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 03:41 AM
-33

There is a slight difference between attending a movie premier and messing up the landing of a taxpayer funded spaceship on a comet.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 08:50 PM
1

Ahh men's rights where mentioning sentencing guidelines is apologising for rapists.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 10:12 PM
1

Hmm? Starting point for setencing is 18 months (Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline page 69). 16 months is hardly very lenient let alone very very lenient.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:59 PM
5

If people are killing themselves, remove their need for killing themselves, not their means for doing so. The data suggests removing or making harder to acess popular ways of killing yourself reduces the suicide rate.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 03:16 AM
2

Suicide is rather more likely.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 12:11 AM
6

A man with a gun most likely buys it to protect his family. Statistics on actual gun use say he is being irrational. And only a percentage of women travel distances to a clinic. What about the women in cities? Depending on state thats still most of them.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 12:10 AM
0

Finance mostly. You know how many students you can have so you try and adjust the A-level points requirement to get the right number. Throw in some slight adjustment for desirable A-levels (maths, anything subject relivant) and school/college quality and job done.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 05:08 PM
1

So who's in charge of deciding who gets into colleges there? 15/16 year olds. If you apply to college you will generaly get into to do something (A-levels, BTEC City and Guilds etc). If you are asking about university then witha few exceptions computers (Take A-level results and adjust slightly for quality of school).
/r/MensRights01/10/17 05:02 PM
1

That specific belief wasn't the one being tested in court to the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard, so you have no grounds for saying that. Yes I do. If the statements had been believed beyond reasonable doubt then the jury would have found the defendant guilty (outside some really uncommon defences regarding intent).
/r/MensRights30/09/17 07:20 AM
1

They weren't believed beyond reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 07:02 AM
1

And at this point we are only left with the options that you have extremely poor reading comprehension or are lieing. Which is it?
/r/MensRights30/09/17 07:01 AM
-2

How is it 'due process' to keep a lying cunt's name out of the paper? Ah so much anger. For how its due process you would need to understand the current constitutional settlement of the United Kingdom and thats rather a large topic.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:08 PM
1

The allegations she made were proven to be false. You keep making this claim and yet seem strangely unuable to support it with any evidence.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:06 PM
0

She confessed. No she didn't. Again you need to work on that reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:04 PM
0

The false accusations were proven in court You seem very confused as to how courts work. It's literally the crux of this case. No it wasn't. The crux was could the prosecution prove rape beyond reasonable doubt. No more no less.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:16 PM
2

Try clicking the link I posted.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:13 PM
0

lol that's ten times worse. Are you really this stupid? Are you really this unfamiliar with sarcasm? Zeus help us if you ever run across understatement.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:00 AM
0

"complaining to the police would be 'so fun'" Nope that's not what was texted. As I said your reading comprehension needs work. The actual text is towards the bottom of the left hand column. "It's going to be so fun." As I said you don't speak British English. Phrasing entirely consistent with sarcasm.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:56 AM
0

I see. So even when an obvious sociopath admits to falsely accusing an innocent young lad of rape No such admission exists. Given your evidently poor reading comprehension I'm also going to doubt your ability to make accurate psychiatric diagnosis based on a single tabloid article. you want to pretend as though he's still a rapist? It would be entirely consistent with your standards of evidence.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:21 AM
-4

You can't be found guilty if you are never charged- women are never prosecuted for this kind of perjury or other liars "wont come forward" - they are above the law. Not so. Convictions do pop up from time to time. Its just really really hard to prove beyond reasonable doubt. If there was sex you got to prove consent beyond reasonable doubt. Which is basicaly imposible. If there wasn't sex on that date then well human memory isn't perfect. Can't prove intent beyond reasonable doubt. If the man ca…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:15 AM
-2

I read the article and I don't see anything but another dumb bitch trying to ruin a man's life. What is your take? Well by the standard of evidence that you are using I could claim to see a rich rapist thats got away with it (the texts are entirely consistent with someone who has been raped and doesn't want to think about it). Howver I have rather higher standards so it looks like a classic case of no third party witnesses and no forensics so you can't show anything beyond reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:02 AM
-8

Wait, feminists now support due process? Nice attempt at avoiding the issue there. But that's fine. Just remember if you ever start complaining about people viewing a man as being guilty before full due process you are being something of a hypocrite. In this case the stupid bitch decided to stop before she completely ruined a man's life for a lark. You don't speak british english do you? Read the text (not the headline, the actual text) and add a heavy ironic inflection to the end.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 12:50 AM
-14

lol, you're hilarious. Interesting you find the concept of due process so funny.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 12:39 AM
-5

false felony charges which is a serious crime. DAs Probably suggests you shouldn't be expressing an opinion on the phrasing chosen by people speaking british english.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 11:29 PM
-2

For what?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 11:28 PM
-22

female criminals No woman have been found guilty of anything connected to this case.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 11:28 PM
1

Where?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:42 PM
-2

But not in the text message being mangled. The reddit headline is about stage 3 in the chinese wispers (text, express headline (ha) reddit).
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:41 PM
-1

I didn't use the word, "found". Stop trying to split hairs. You aren't going to convince anyone that George Owen is a rapist I'm not trying to. or that a false accuser is a victim. Again you have no proof of any false accusations. I mean I get it. You find reasonable doubt an annoying standard and want to remove it. Should certianly shortern some rape trials. Myself I find this an unwise approach.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:41 PM
-2

No one is found innocent. They are found not guilty.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:09 PM
-3

The found him not guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Not that there was a false accusation beyond the reasonable doubt standard.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 07:31 PM
-7

People who falsely accuse someone of rape should be charged double the sentence the originally accused was facing. Sentencing is a matter for judges. Charging is a mater for prosecutors. Combining the roles seems unwise. You disrespect every woman and man who has ever been raped and you attempt to ruin a life "just for fun". Why have you put quote marks around a statement that no one made?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 06:45 PM
-12

the falsely accused You can prove beyond reasonable doubt there was a false accusation?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 06:41 PM
71

Thats not the gender gap. Thats england's approach to crimes against property vs crimes against people. Plently of cases of crimes against people resulting in no custodial sentences. For example: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/supermarket-worker-given-suspended-sentence-9834153
/r/MensRights28/09/17 06:37 PM
5

Nope. Suspended sentence: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/supermarket-worker-given-suspended-sentence-9834153
/r/MensRights25/09/17 10:08 PM
-5

For whatever odd reason, those on the Left think that women are so emotionally fragile that they can't even cope with attending a political conference Because they've been to such conferences in the past. Physical violence at British political party conferences isn't exactly unknown. People have significant disagreements which they really care about. Throw in a large number of the people there being tired and emotional and you get the odd fisticuffs and the like. Externaly clashes with protestor…
/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:48 PM
1

It's a relevant example Completely different crime in a completely different country with a completely different set of conditions and a completely different plea. No it isn't relevant.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:35 PM
0

lol Ah spelling flames. And if this was a high profile case that had national attention in the way this one had, think just as an example the Brock Turner case then yes, yes they would have. Goalpost moving noted. Given that you were completely wrong in your previous claim I fail to see why you think we should take your next hypothetical seriously.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:25 PM
7

but realistically, not a single one of the things he listed would mean shit if a man had stabbed his girlfriend, especially not the "genuine remorse", "immaturity" bullshit The evidence of other cases: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/supermarket-worker-given-suspended-sentence-9834153 and the sentencing guidelines (unlawful wounding cat 3 starting point is "High level community order") say otherwise.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:09 PM
-1

If this was a man the feminists would be holding protests with signs and the guys name/face displayed Well lets see: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/supermarket-worker-given-suspended-sentence-9834153 Hmm no no they didn't.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:07 PM
2

Do you think her class and education are more a factor Han her gender? Biggest factor was probably pleading guilty. Derek Rogers plead not guilty and his defence probably didn't help with his sentencing. By comparision a man who made a guilty plea got a suspended sentence: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/supermarket-worker-given-suspended-sentence-9834153
/r/MensRights25/09/17 06:27 PM
5

Man stabs girlfriend in arm rather than than leg but does plead guilty. Suspended sentence: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/supermarket-worker-given-suspended-sentence-9834153
/r/MensRights25/09/17 06:25 PM
3

I can't see a male being giving a suspended sentence for stabbing a female in the leg. Depends on the stab wound. For a minor injury and a lack of premeditation high level community order is the starting point for sentencing. And yes it happens: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/supermarket-worker-given-suspended-sentence-9834153 My brother was locked up for 3 months for smoking a joint. And, from what I think, marijuana is a Class B drug. How is that fair? Not really a comparible sit…
/r/MensRights25/09/17 06:23 PM
1

She was convicted of GBH because his injuries were serious and a catagory 3 (lowest level GBH offence) the starting point for sentencing is 4 years with 3 years where there were serious mitigations and 5 with serious aggravating factors. She was convicted of Unlawfully wounding where the starting point for category 3 is High level community order.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 06:19 PM
0

Second case the guy plead not guilty
/r/MensRights25/09/17 06:15 PM
1

Given there were previously two hung juries the odds of you proving a false report beyond reasonable doubt are nill.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:08 PM
1

Papers aren't stupid and court reporting is protected by absolute privilege.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:08 PM
1

can we see the picture of the dumb bitch? I mean perpetrator. So you are abandoning the standard of beyond reasonable doubt? i thought we kept victim identities a secret. Being found not guilty does not make you a victim in the eyes of the law.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:07 PM
1

The standard is a reasonable prospect of a conviction. Given the previously hung juries there obviously was one.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:06 PM
1

Who knows. As far as I'm concerned she effectively doxxed him and committed several felonies in the process of filing false reports. So you are abandoning the standard of beyond reasonable doubt?
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:02 PM
1

Did you just abandon the standard of beyond reasonable doubt?
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:01 PM
1

Once you're done fixing that pile of shit, the next step is to make it so that the accuser, once it is found to be a false accusation, should instantly go to jail for perjury, for falsely accusing someone, for wasting the courts time, etc. Already the law. however proving perjury beyond reasonable doubt is really really difficult so largely irrelivant.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:00 PM
1

Sure, but that's not really the point. THe point is there are SO MANY photos of this poor guy. Yeah its the daily mail its what they do. Look on the bright side. At least he's over 18 (or in one extreme case born) and in a public place.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 04:57 PM
1

If you abuse someone of false charges I think the social cost should be redeemable in a defamation lawsuit. Eh unless he has a lot of money risking a balance of probability lawsuit would be pretty foolish. Also is it okay for him to release the name of the false accuser? Can you prove there was one?
/r/MensRights23/09/17 04:52 PM
2

And there's a half-dozen pictures of him. WTF? Its the daily mail. Its what they do.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 04:51 PM
2

Not alleged, but they stated it as a fact that she was raped even before a ruling in court. did you miss the bit where is said "a court heard"?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:38 PM
1

Nope. Protected by absolute privilege.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:38 PM
8

So why do we only hear about women's suffrage and how men oppressed women's rights? Texas text book purchasing patterns. England on the other hand covers the civil war (how much power parliment should have), the Peterloo Massacre (who should be allowed to vote) and rotten boroughs (should a bit of land no one lived on get 2 MPs).
/r/MensRights20/09/17 01:07 AM
1

This situation is caused by the irrational way we police sex. We should be taking a harm-based approach. If there is no harm, butt out. Problem is outside of things like STDs we don't have very good ways of objectively measuring harm in this case.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:55 PM
2

Gender swapping tends to answers these kinds of questions, and I'm pretty sure if an able-bodied man of sound mind did this to a brain-damaged woman, people would certainly consider him to be a predator and would not be accepting of the situation and he would probably be facing charges "Pretty sure" doesn't help you in this case. Assuming a person isn't actually institutionalised they have to be pretty far gone before the law will decide they can't consent to sex. Even if the law decides they ca…
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:51 PM
8

79? South Pasadena Junior High School murders were in 1940.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 09:24 PM
0

men aged under 45 in the UK. How old do you think most men are when they die?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 10:05 AM
1

She should have been sentenced the same way as someone who abducts another person, then stows them away in a locked basement for two years. There aren't exactly many cases of that in the UK to work out how long such a sentence would be. England and wales doesn't really go in for US style really long sentences so I wouldn't be supprised if such a sentence was in the range of 10 years. Last high profile kidnapping was by Michael Donovan and Karen Matthews but that was of a child they drugged and f…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 07:28 PM
3

Excluding suicide, that is. No it isn't. As well as heart disease suicide is behind the likes of Lung cancer, Dementia, Flu/pneumonia and Liver disease.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 06:34 PM
2

They aren't. One is awaiting sentencing and "nick" is under investigation.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 06:27 PM
2

How are the "fantasists?" Why not just call them liars? Lying generaly requires intent and its not clear if all of these people are sane enough for there to be intent. Ultimately its a matter for the courts.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 06:26 PM
1

These things take time. One of them is awaiting sentencing and "Nick" is under investigation.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 06:25 PM
-1

Wait, you think the producers actually wanted the men to win? That's completely at odds with our ubiquitous "you go girl" culture. I think they wanted the women to be pretty. But if you're being honest with yourself a random sampling will invariably produce the result of the Dutch survivor episode. A random sampling would face significant language issues.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 08:56 PM
1

It would be way worse. Complex societal structure based on undocumented taboos, ostracism, and obscure rituals. Zero productivity. Zero basic infrastructure. No specialization of tasks. So Jack's group in Lord of the flies. What little real planning would be attempted through committee consensus but never achieved and instead be driven by popularity of the instigator rather than soundness of concept. Constant bullying and low-level violence. Malingering. Discord. Well the original book had high …
/r/MensRights31/08/17 06:27 PM
3

I should have just laughed at the future box office bomb and not read anything. Instead I now have the knowledge that Sir Golding said that idiotic statement. I only hope he was paying lip service. Golding was a teacher in a boy's school. I suspect that may have had an impact on his view of the male half of the species.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 06:22 PM
-1

Actually, they did a men vs woman Survivor.. but it didn't take, because the women always lost. Nah they have been quite capable of setting it up so the women win and have done so. Its just doesn't seem to make for very interesting TV.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 06:18 PM
0

Came in to say this. Add to the fact that there was a "survivor" type of show where it was Men vs women. The men had a prosperous society (a home built, hunters, etc) within a day. Everyone had a role and no one complained. The women went through ALL of their rations in few days, had no shelter and were on the brink of giving up. They "had to" drop some men into the group and vice versa and the women did JACK SHIT the entire time while the men And there was another show that produced the reverse…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 06:16 PM
1

Society doesn't encourage anything that isn't already there. Men/boys need to be violent to protect the tribe and society at large. Not if you look at how tribes actualy fight. Its all about ambushes and advantages is numbers. You don't need to be that violent to win in a 5:1 fight from an ambush nor is being violent likely to save you in such a situation.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 06:15 PM
1

You are really caught up in all this baloney. It is all so much bullshit. The evidence suggests otherwise. Children can not make the decision you want them to make. Every kid that goes under the knife is another checkmark in your book. We're talking puberty blockers not surgery. Its about buying time until the kid is 18 and longer term options can be looked at.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 03:08 PM
1

You want to block puberty? That is terrible thing to do to a kid. The data suggests not as long as it is well managed. The problem - and it doesn't fit with your values - is that a child is not capable of making these decisions - but is enormously open to influence by parents, teachers, peers who have a political/sexist axe to grind. No. The problem is we don't have particularly good gender dysphoria treatments meaning there are no particularly good options. It just can't be done. It just can't.…
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:48 PM
0

But do the "UK Roma and irish travellers" represent the most disadvantaged group by a number of obstacles Groups plural but yes (its probably the irish travellers in absolute terms but thats a really hard group to get data on). or the LARGEST disadvantaged group by number of members? No. Again that would be everyone not upper middle class and above.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:33 PM
-1

I'm only quoting your source and usage. My source doesn't use the term and my only use of it was to mention the problems with it. The term lumps at least 4 groups together. Roma (who in turn cover about three different groups), Irish Travellers, New Age travellers (what's left of them) and Travelling Showmen (who in turn split into fairground and circus). Of these the Roma and the Irish Travellers tend to be the severely disadvantaged ones. The other groups have their issues but generally on a f…
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:31 PM
-9

May I ask, are you looking at the mean, median or mode of disadvantage? Mean. Median and mode would put pretty much every non middle class group as level which isn't very useful in this case. Whilst "Gypsy and Traveller" You are lumping some very different groups together there. may face more obstacles, do they represent the largest disadvantaged group? The largest disadvantaged group would be "everyone who isn't upper middle class or above" which isn't very helpful. None of this is particularly…
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:13 PM
4

What about the suicide rates from people that got forced into this bullshit and didn't really need it? Not aware of any links between puberty blockers and suicide. What is needed is more support for male suicide prevention anyways. And this is part of that This special-snowflake-fabricated shit just hides real problems. Your opinion of transgender issues is noted.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:58 PM
-10

Among all disadvantaged groups, Roma minorities are by far the least represented in the UK higher education system. Existing estimates suggest that only 3-4% of Roma population have higher education https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=report---researching-marginalized-minorities-in-uk-higher-education-and-the-case-of-roma.pdf&site=41 The catch is that UCAS doesn't collect that data and even the closest related data (which uses the category "Gypsy and Traveller" which lumps say…
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:51 PM
2

I don't care about 'easy'. Like I said, your life sucks - you will get over it. Suicide rates say otherwise.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:30 PM
0

Our gynocentric education system is stacked against boys from the moment they enter it. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/eliminating-feminist-teacher-bias-erases-boys-falling-grades-study-finds Its not 2013 any more. In 2017 boys slightly edged out girls at A Level with 26.6 per cent of boys getting A* or A grades against 26.1 per cent of girls. Seems like there's been a lot of reporting on this "education gap" but nobody's doing anything about it, Not so. The current goverment has made nursing…
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:26 PM
-22

Not true of course. Most Disadvantaged groups would be romani and irish travellers.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:16 PM
7

Pay wise its not too bad, has a pretty reasonable pension and depending on subject solid job security. If you've got your degree and aren't sure what to do next its a reasonable option.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:14 PM
2

Because the answer to getting Japan more populated is having less Japanese. Pretty soon women will realize that chivalry is dying and they are killing it. Err this is Japan. Bushido died beneath atomic fire in 1945.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 12:29 AM
1

Yup. Pensions were the classic case. Mind you all this would be illegal in the EU.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 12:20 AM
2

Postmoderism is explicitly counter marxist - it rejected socialism, communism and marxism in favour of free market economics and neoliberalism. Not really. Post modernism doesn't like those either. Post-modernism is ultimately a critique of modernism which includes most forms of economics.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:23 PM
1

Says someone who dosen't undersrand the philosophical history of the views in question. Postmodernism and feminist theory explicit incorporate, and we're largely based on, Marxist ideas. No. Really just no. While marxism is a bit early to be truely modernist is does take a rather modernist approach to things which in practice makes it just another target for post-modernism.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:21 PM
2

The suffragettes were likely counter productive to the women's rights movement. What government wants to give in to terrorists? The National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies was founded in 1897 and derived from other earlier non violent groups. If the government had wanted to extend the vote to women without violence they have plenty of opportunity to do so.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:14 PM
1

You know full well that this isn't what it's about, they are determined to push a political agenda Lots of people in comics push political agendas. There's a reason Alan "Actual Anarchist" Moore wrote V for Vendetta. How about X-men as a metaphor for homophobia or Charley's War's general take on war. Once you look at comics aimed at people over the age of 12 politics tends to be pretty common. If artists want to draw characters a certain way and cater to a certain audience fine, but what they're…
/r/MensRights01/08/17 05:31 PM
3

That's like wearing a button that proudly states you are racist. Google suggests that people selling 14 words badges exist.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 02:59 PM
2

Could the title be any more fucking blatant? I'm not editorialising anything, this is genuinely what they wrote. Listen here BBC, nobody gives a fuck if someone entering a hobby like comic books, games or movies has a vagina. And yet you post about it and phrase it like that. They care about whether they have a political agenda and don't give a shit the medium they're working in. I'm sure you would assert that that is the reason. Argh! Just fuck off! Comic books aren't real! They're not supposed…
/r/MensRights01/08/17 02:53 PM
0

1940s?
/r/MensRights01/08/17 02:19 PM
3

Women and children first. See any recent cruise ship incident for how this doesn't apply. Or in one word: war. You missed the DRC civil war I take it?
/r/MensRights01/08/17 08:59 AM
3

Where the girl was when she was attacked twice.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 07:37 PM
8

Woman walking alone through an abandoned area It was Witton railway station. I know that London Midland may not be the best train operating company in the world but a station used by 0.25 million people a year is hardly abandoned.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 06:57 PM
-1

But if just saying "no" cuts the number of assaults this much, then a lot of what we are counting as assaults are almost certainly misunderstandings. While we don't have great studies of rapist motivations what we do have suggests otherwise. A significant driving factor in the approach taken by most rapists don't want to go to prison (and a fair number don't want to think of themselves as rapists). They want ambiguity. “No” not only removes ambiguity but also suggests you are dealing with the ki…
/r/MensRights30/07/17 06:52 PM
3

They aren't exactly known for being consistent.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 09:10 PM
10

Whether or not this is true, the same is never said for females. All of a sudden girls who are unhealthily skinny, who undergo surgery and get breast implants are victims of unrealistic body standards Nah this is the daily mail. They hate those women as well.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:00 PM
1

You would have to rind someone prepared to sell you the billboard space.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 02:09 PM
2

Yes but the pay figures don't include what he gets for The Graham Norton Show. Taking a pay cut for Eurovision or dropping it entirely isn't going to be worth complicating that for and with the decline of comercial radio pay he's not got anywhere else to go for the radio show. Of the people at the top really only Lineker and Shearer (to sky) have anywhere obvious to jump to. In general the decline of comercial radio pay means a lot of these people were going to be taking a pay cut anyway which b…
/r/MensRights28/07/17 02:04 PM
3

Channel 4 Doesn't have any football rights so no interest in Lineker. Might be interested Graham Norton but he's got other BBC ties I doubt he wants to complicate.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 09:14 AM
-1

Well no because it happened in california.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 09:15 PM
-1

Prisoners have a lot of free time on their hands and little to lose. One of the results of this tends to be a lot of lawsuits with limited chances of success.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 09:14 PM
1

We took responsibility by fighting to defeat the British and then by handling our own finances and protection once we were no longer British. The immediate defaut? You argued for taking responsibility before which of course the rebels never did. And even afterwards there were an interesting number of american ships with british passes in the mediterranean.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 11:19 PM
0

the fact that there weren't enough lifeboats is the reason that they had to decide which lives were more valuable. No they didn't. This is Victorian Britain. They already knew which lives were the most valuable. Specifically the officers. They decided that the women were more valuable specifically because of their reproductive role. No it was because there were only a handful of women on board meaning that they could be put into the few working boats without swamping them. and I don't even under…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:34 PM
2

Have you any idea how enviromentaly damaging the average cruise ship is?
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:08 PM
-6

It's certainly true that the 'reason' for the notion of "women and children first" (at least the 'women' part of that concept) is related to women's role in reproduction - Nope. Its because there were only a handful of lifeboats and most of the people on board were male soldiers. If soldiers has been allowed to use the boats they would have sunk. True equality demands that you accept equal responsibility before you go seeking equal results. So you will be petitioning the US to return to British …
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:07 PM
0

Fell free to read the many many many scientfic papers on the subject. One they are are pretty clear on is that it is not knowledge.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 06:57 PM
0

As it is defined by the relivant legal system.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 06:54 PM
2

This is such an ass-backward policy. I don't know who benefits except the people who already had the exact same benefit. Tax payers. Pill is cheaper than other abortion options.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 06:38 PM
0

Does the knowledge you have include the difference between knowledge and intelligence?
/r/MensRights21/07/17 06:34 PM
0

No. We have reasonable date from robust crime surveys other similar countries and the rates are much higher. We also know that pretty much all crime is under reported. Significant under reporting is thus a reasonable conclusion based on the figures.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 06:31 PM
2

So if the woman has 90% custody in your case and the dad has 10% custody, does the mom still give money to the dad so that the are equal in parenting? Given the rather high income difference between the two yes. Assuming they were ordered to pay child support at the same rate then the woman would be paying the man about 4K a year under that senario.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:07 AM
0

Pretty clear from the sexual assult numbers that there is a significant under reporting issue. Given the demographics (young people who drink and go to nightclubs) and numbers involved 355 sexual assults a year simply isn't a credible figure. Now part of that is that men tend not to report at all but even taking men off the table that number simply isn't credible. Even if we credit australia with an exceptionaly low level of sexual assults the number should be in the 10s of thousand. There is a …
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:00 AM
4

And do you have any evidence to support your claims.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:07 PM
-1

Men have founded religions and dynasties Are you implying this is a good thing. have built libraries And then burnt them to the ground. In fairness this did lead to some clay tablets being preserved rather better than they otherwise would have been. founded nations states, trained armies Yes and we are still dealing with the problems that that causes. and traveled to corners of the earth. Is that meant to be impressive? Its the planet you evolved on. You should be to be able to move around on it…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 12:41 PM
3

Nothing is being banned. The Advertising Standards Authority is a non governmental self-regulatory organisation. You can still advertise what you like on non ASA platforms.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 02:37 PM
3

This is stupid. We should not ban any adverts aside from literal porn because well children are a thing. Nothing is being banned. The Advertising Standards Authority is a non governmental self-regulatory organisation. You can still advertise what you like on non ASA platforms.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 02:37 PM
0

So, presumably, even though the overwhelming majority of people who do ballet as a hobby are women Billy Elliot was released in 2000. It has had a long term demographic impact.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 02:35 PM
20

This isn't the goverment. This is the Advertising Standards Authority. A non governmental self-regulatory organisation.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 02:34 PM
26

governments banning them This isn't the goverment. This is the Advertising Standards Authority. A non governmental self-regulatory organisation (that all the major advertising platforms have signed up to).
/r/MensRights18/07/17 02:34 PM
16

150.00% more would require that for every man there be 2.5 women. We haven's seen those kind of gender ratios in decades.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 11:43 PM
5

The sun likes to publish pics of scantily clad women and the story is an excuse.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 04:35 PM
3

What doesn't pass it: Alien (1979) Yes it does. Ripley and Lambert have a brief conversation about navigation. They also directly address each other in a group conversation where Lambert suggests running away.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 01:53 PM
1

I'm fine with other people wanting one, I won't stop watching the show or anything. I just don't like being labeled a misogynist for thinking they shouldn't change the formula of a show that's been running for 55 years. The Pre and post cancellation shows already show a significant change of formula. In particular outside the existence of Susan Foreman the Doctor was essentially asexual.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 11:31 AM
1

So their argument is that things like impact factor have a bunch of problems. I'm sorry but if you think their claims are in any way unreasonable you can't have paid much attention to academic publishing for at least a decade.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 02:36 AM
4

Video fails to cite its sources. Perhaps DOIs are anti male or something.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 01:27 AM
1

Uhm, blackmail and threats of doxxing are not legit, Except it wasn't blackmail and what reddit refers to as "doxxing" is entirely legal. His apology was coerced by media bullies who couldn't take a joke. No it was produced when he realise that his actions could have consequences. There is no evidence of coercion and the timing makes it extremely unlikely. rashy cnn loves to proclaim that it isn't inciting violence when nyc's caesar play where the "trump/caesar" character is viciously attacked, …
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:42 PM
1

Err the guy apologised and shut up (as well as deleting a bunch of stuff) before CNN said anything. CNN then decided not to publish the full story on the basis that the apology had made it less newsworthy. If the poster in question does anything else newsworthy they may change their position. You may not like it but this is an entirely legitimate position for a news organisation to take.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:13 PM
1

I've never had a boss who was firing people cavalierly. That sucks if u had to go thru that. I haven't. I don't live in the US. We don't have at will employment over here. Yet gay nyc club rebar refused patronage of african american gay guys. It's truly disgusting how white gay guys are treated like a special class, yet they are racist to us nonwhite gay guys. If it had been a black couple buying the cake the case wouldn't have made it to the supreme court. The people on the cake shop's side wou…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:04 PM
1

You're saying that even some companies can fire him if their contract states that he can be fired for his political beliefs being made public? This is really crazy! Of course people need reddit then to share how they really feel about politics. I don't think you understand how "at will" employment works. You can be fired for drinking coffee. You can be fired for not drinking coffee. You can be fired because the boss doesn't like the colour of your shirt. You can be fired because the boss didn't …
/r/MensRights10/07/17 10:39 AM
3

You're saying political beliefs, or voting republican, isn't protected? Voting is protected by the secret ballot. Expressing political views would depend on the state and the terms of your contract. ? People can be fired for that but can't be fired for their religious beliefs? How can that be when political beliefs and religious beliefs are different beliefs, but they're beliefs nonetheless? Because Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 says "race, color, religion, sex and national origin" n…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:22 AM
2

I was curious as to what you guys think of this. As the people in my life I talk about say it's a misogynistic idea, and act. I'd love to hear other's opinions, as I support the idea. Expensive. Children cost money. If there isn't a father providing financial and other support the reality is that the cost to the state in going to be higher either in the short term with money to support the kid or long term with higher law enforcement costs. Still I'm sure you are ready to pay higher taxes. It st…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 03:40 AM
-1

So what are the reasons men are committing suicide? Media depictions of highly lethal options for male suicide attempts covers a fair bit of it. Beyond that we don't really know in much the same we don't really know why the female suicide rate is higher in china.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 01:04 AM
1

a shame she's already in jail...would love to have a crowd of people around the bus taking her to prison so the whole group can point at her, laugh, and sing ''na na na, hey hey hey, goodbye'' The UK prefers to avoid mob justice.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:24 PM
5

While there are a few exceptions the UK normaly requries that you kill at least two people for a whole life tarrif.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:23 PM
0

The BBC has so many different outlets and dominates broadcasting. It's entirely possible for one of its many radio stations to cover it properly while the others bury the story. It was either covered up or not. Coverage by the UK's biggest talk radio station isn't consistent with covered up. In terms of what's online it's very clear that's it's not on any significant BBC news feeds and it's undeniable that they've categorised it as local news rather than national. For complicated reasons the BBC…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 09:38 PM
0

Err this was covered on the 6 o'clock news on BBC Radio 4. Clearly some defintion of covering up that I wasn't previously aware of.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 08:31 PM
1

Yes, we will still be paying for it through taxes, but funny thing about taxes is the IRS can't impute an income on you. It can only take a portion of money you actually earned (or money you spent, via consumption taxes, or "money" you actually own through property taxes). In practice property taxes can function imputing an income (you have X amount of land, we expect it to generate Y income so we will tax it at 40% of Y) With child support, a judge can force you to pay money based on how much m…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:26 AM
1

Pay even more through taxes.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:20 AM
2

The very clear interpretation of their post isn't that every STEM feminist is saying that specific thing but rather that STEM feminists are saying things along those lines I suggest you look up the meaning of "most". of very explicit examples The two explicit ones cover a philospher (not a STEM subject) and psychologist (generaly not considered STEM). That leaves you with a non explict example which seems to feature a philosopher (H.Longino) , a theologian(C. Keller), possibly literature publica…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 06:15 PM
0

Dude. Fucking relax. You don't have to take the statement so literally. How would you even conduct such a study? The usual method would be a survey of well controlled sample or the interview approach could be taken. He's given sufficient evidence in my books. He has so far failed to provide evidence that any feminists in STEM "call Newtons Principia a rape manual". In my world there is something of a gap between 0 and <50%.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:57 PM
0

Sigh. I already explained but here we go again. "And most of them call Newtons Principia a rape manual," The "them" being refered to is feminists in STEM. The lowest possible value of "most" is slighly above 50%. A citation showing that a single philosopher (and philosophy isn't usualy considered a STEM subject) has at one point called Newtons Principia a rape manual doesn't support the claim that most of feminists in STEM most call Newtons Principia a rape manual. Its that staightforward enough…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:33 PM
-1

No. Basic logic and even a limited understanding of the english language shows it it is correct.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:16 PM
-1

You greatly under estimate the number of women their are in scientific fields.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:13 PM
-4

except none of them support KDulius's claims.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 01:02 PM
8

Sandra Harding called Newtowns Principa a rape manual although she has since walked those comments back slightly Are you already forgetting what your claim was? "And most of them call Newtons Principia a rape manual" one philosopher claiming something doesn't mean that >50% of feminists in STEM claim something.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 01:01 PM
-35

Your ignorance of scientific fields is noted.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 12:15 PM
-2

The previous Prime Minister was again right wing. If australia was incredibly left winged it would be impossible for them to keep winning.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 08:39 AM
2

This is news to me! This is not a problem brought up in Hong Kong at all! Well no. Hong Kong's government finds certain lines of thought concerning.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:19 AM
-2

Am I wrong? If so, I'm all ears; educate me. Describing a country lead by Malcolm Turnbull (even if his party did only win by one seat) as " incredibly left winged liberal country" suggests a lack of knowledge of the liberal left wing.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:17 AM
-35

You think there are no feminists working in STEM fields who raise the issue? You also appear to think that STEM is something more than a political and marketing term which is also worrying.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:55 AM
1

Proving the case beyond reasonable doubt would be tricky to put it mildly.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:33 AM
0

So if you were in power you would get rid of the court system and sentence people directly?
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:32 AM
1

School district got there first. There isn't any money left. His no contest plea in the original case would go against him as well.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:32 AM
-45

So goddamn true You greatly over estimate the number of people taking gender studies.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:24 AM
4

Second, the lack of generic material means recessive alleles on the X counterpart are much more likely to be expressed in the male individual, unlike in the female individual, where through the second X chromosome, only dominant alleles are expressed unless both alleles carry the same recessive trait which is very rare. One example of this is red green color blindness, which is recessive and on the X chromosome, and therefore extremely unlikely to be expressed in females, but affecting almost 10…
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:26 PM
1

'm not because I'm not interested in excuses. People who kill their own children deserve life in prison, period. Mental health issues are NO excuse and people agree with me when talking about men. However in practice there are only two cases of people in the UK being given whole life tarrifs for murdering their kids and in the case of Arthur Simpson-Kent its probably more that he killed 3 people. A father who hurts or even kills his own child(ren) obviously has some kind of mental health issue t…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:07 PM
2

"lazy" and "getting enough sleep" aren't really related.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 03:55 AM
4

She doesn't understand suicide, at all. Well her husband's brother was killed by a suicide bomber.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:47 PM
-9

From the progressive perspective, this woman is not at fault ! No from the progressive perspective that is a matter for the court.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:42 PM
1

Meh the DUP just got £3420 per vote.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:19 PM
0

Its art.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:03 AM
-1

No particular evidence that it makes things fair. Thing is even if you strip out names there is a good chance you can work out if someone is an austrialian aboriginal by looking at locations of qualifications and previous work patturns.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:43 AM
6

UK got rid of the death penalty for a range of reasons but among other things we pretty unambiguously executed an innocent man: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Evans
/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:03 PM
0

No but for some reason the one's turning up at their GP's asking for help in not abusing their partners lean male. Thus the focus for the pilot study.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 03:56 AM
1

I know what their book says, but just like Christians pick and choose in the bible, could Muslims be doing the same thing? Well yes. In both dirrections. The quran does give women rights. Fewer than men but they are there. Of course in traditional pashtun society that isn't really acceptable so they ignore the bit about women having rights. In other areas indonesia say women have more rights than the quran says they should.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:53 PM
1

Probably trying to remind you that muslim men don't count as men.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:45 PM
1

Are you asking me how the law in your country works?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:21 PM
1

There is a difference between "terrible human being" and 1st degree murderer (or whatever they call it where you are).
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:35 PM
1

The heart condition was previously unknown.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:30 PM
-5

Is bristol university not allowed to research trying prevent domestic abusers from abusing?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:27 PM
2

The article explains. The victim had a gentic condition which meant that they essentialy died from the stress of the attack. The physical damage wasn't life threatening.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:17 PM
1

I'm aware that there are those who want to mock mental illness.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 06:05 PM
-8

"Triggered" refers to events that trigger people's PTSD. Fireworks can be an issue for former soldiers for example.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:40 PM
-12

Are you suggesting people get PTSD from the london underground? Because outside events like the King's Cross fire I don't think thats common.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:25 PM
-1

someone other than the government does in fact have the ability to do in some circumstances Record lables aren't that someone any more. Soundcloud, Youtube, bandcamp. If you want to put your music out there record lables can't stop you.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:49 PM
-9

Sigh. Are people still doing this? Look its simple. On crowded public transport try and take up as little space as possible. If that makes your balls uncomfortable just be glad you aren't in Japan where the rest of you would be uncomfortable due to being laminated against the side of the carriage. On non crowded transport do whatever you want. If the meantime if people could stop taking pics of random people's crotches that would be appreciated.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:10 PM
1

Fixing mental health issues is a traditional liberal point. The difference being that they are prepared to admit it would cost money.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:03 PM
-1

Wow. When you start silencing dumb-ass musicians, you know you've lost the thread. Its 2017 non state actors can't silence musicians. They can however chose not to promote them. I am becoming frightened of myself because I am finding that right wing nuts are now less scary than left wing nuts. A music label deciding to drop a fairly minor band is scary? It happens all the time. Deciding, after seeing an impressively dog whistle packed interview, that you don't want to compete with Resistance Rec…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:26 AM
12

Now here's my idea as a gun owner: fix the mental health issue in this country. How much are you prepared to accept your taxes going up in order to do this?
/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:36 PM
1

That's the point. If you're going to lie, it doesn't help to be clear about what you're saying. Every field has its jargon. For example " Using the Proximity Ligation Assay with transporter specific antibodies, we demonstrate close association of OATP1B3 with NTCP in frozen human liver tissue. These findings demonstrate that OATP1B3 can form homo- and hetero-oligomers and suggest a potential co-regulation of the involved transporters." is a perfectly valid bit of molecular biology even if it may…
/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:40 AM
1

Sigh. You don't know what "gender is a social construct" means do you? The statement comes from seperating sex (defined by the type of gametes an individual produces) from gender (defined in terms of social actions. This is a fairly useful thing to do if you want to study such thing. So male and female (as defined by the type of gametes they produce) certianly exist. In the context of modern (and less modern) western society men and women exist. Just because something is a social construct doesn…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 11:22 PM
2

However the general opinion was that the male captian should have prioritized the passengers
/r/MensRights23/06/17 07:58 PM
3

It comes down to the fact that usually the products while they look similar are different. An example is the number of ingredients in male vs. female shampoo. It would be very likely that the ingredients in a vitamin tablet marketed to women vs. men would also be different. Unless you are buying at budget level any such issues are largely unrelated to the price. Other factors often include the additional marketing costs, potentially stocking costs, packaging (although in this case they do look v…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 12:22 AM
-13

If he finds the need to do that i would suggest he seeks professional medical help.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:59 PM
0

As long as a everyone is a bookmaker who's donations you forget to declare.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 07:45 AM
1

My conclusion (that if any election may cause it to flip, it would be this one) was premature and unrefined, but the premise of my argument remains true, namely that no "stronghold" was certain to be safe under this general election, due to many new factors such as record numbers of young people voting. Your argument as to how say North East Hampshire could flip might be entertaining. In fact when looking at voter preferences, considering labour went up by 10% and conservatives went up by 1% the…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 08:17 PM
2

Err non whatsoever (although the subject would probably be Prince Harry rather than a pop star). Gossip mags gonna Gossip mag.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:49 PM
1

Found the slumlord.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:43 PM
1

I ought point out I had absolutely no idea what area he was in, I was merely noting how a few of the so called "strongholds" that the conservatives were holding suddenly became labour this time, which suggests that none of them were "truly" safe, and in fact had a fair chance of flipping. Then you probably don't want to start making statements about how it could change. Your argument as to how say North East Hampshire could flip might be entertaining though.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:42 PM
1

Nah. His interesting links with the gambling industry while perfectly reasonable for a back bencher are from the POV of the conservatives less than ideal. Depending on the fallout from Greenfell his position on tenet vs landlord rights may be an issue but again not much of a problem for a back bencher in a fairly safe seat. In essence it presents a lesser version of the old Michael Mates problem. An acceptable back bencher occupying a seat that the conservative party would rather have held by so…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:48 PM
1

Shipley isn't exactly full of students. No in the absence of a 1997 style national swing Shipley remains the kind of place where the conservatives can run a pigs bladder on a stick and still win.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 04:52 PM
1

Err he's in the kind of conservative seat that would take a 1997 style landslide for him to lose. "paid off" seems to lack evidence.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 04:10 PM
-5

It's appropriate for his industry. No one else in the room was dressed like that. But then everyone else in the room appears to have been doing the actual work. Unless you want to claim its appropriate for a PR guy.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:39 PM
-15

Supreme professional triumph? The landing went wrong.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:38 PM
-10

Imagine how big a douche bag you'd have to be to try to ruin a man's life over a T-shirt after he lands a spacecraft on a comet. Eh he got lucky. Historicaly his life would have been ruined over how he landed the spaceship (poorly) and the coverup. Sometimes I wish we could perform a society-wide experiment like that Dutch survivor episode where the sexes were segregated and left on separate islands. The women were helpless. Only when a man was dropped off to save their sorry asses did they (or …
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:36 PM
9

Ah the "there are no invisible handcaps" position.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:32 PM
-12

Protetect speech can still be probable cause.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:32 PM
1

You're dodging the issue of the resulting adults.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:30 PM
2

What do you think about it? Any suggestions? Given your position on limited taxpayer support for children it seems odd you've failed to budget for massive increase in adult welfare places and law enforcement budgets. If you think providing support for children is expensive wait until you see the cost of dealing with poorly raised adults. And this is the fundamental problem. Raising children well is massively expensive in terms of both time and money. With the father out of the picture someone is…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 04:08 PM
1

Harmless. If it encourages the partent to talk to the baby its probably a net plus.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 03:59 PM
1

Well argued.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:36 PM
2

Can't I just be a god damn isolationist? No because there are far too many things outside your country that you need.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:20 PM
3

Fits the description but the dates don't work. The last Die Deutsche Wochenschau was shot in late march. The last battle before the battle of berlin (Battle of the Seelow Heights) didn't take place until slightly over 2 weeks later.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 10:31 PM
-1

In my experience And this experience is? tend You see the problem yet?
/r/MensRights15/06/17 09:17 PM
4

One in which there are no invisible disabilities?
/r/MensRights15/06/17 08:29 PM
3

There is video of Hitler reviewing his adolescent "troops" before they are ordered to fight in the streets until the bitter end. The video shows Hitler as he pats their cheeks and tosses their hair. No there isn't. While roughly those events happened you are refering to a scene from the film downfall
/r/MensRights15/06/17 08:26 PM
-12

And our allies the Russians? Somehow managed to be better than the wehrmacht. The "literally more evil than Stalin" category isn't a large one and yet here we are. Britains bombing of Dresden? "The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everybody else, and nobody was going to bomb them. At Rotterdam, London, Warsaw, and half a hundred other places, they put that rather naive theory into operation. They sowed the wind, and now, they are going to rea…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 11:26 AM
-17

And in war there are standards. The wehrmacht chose to waste effort it could have used fighting to breach those standards.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 11:15 AM
-10

Conscripts who did terrible things. Clean wehrmacht is a myth.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 11:02 AM
-10

r/ShitWehraboosSay
/r/MensRights15/06/17 07:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter