TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

giegerwasright Archive

View 19 posts and 5,632 comments by giegerwasright on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
87

giegerwasright/r/MensRights18/01/14 07:10 AM
50

giegerwasright/r/MensRights14/05/13 12:47 AM
36

giegerwasright/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:26 AM
32

giegerwasright/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:11 AM
24

giegerwasright/r/MensRights15/11/13 03:11 PM
16

giegerwasright/r/MensRights20/07/13 03:41 AM
14

giegerwasright/r/MensRights24/08/13 05:35 AM
13

giegerwasright/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:18 AM
4

giegerwasright/r/MensRights28/03/13 11:31 PM
3

giegerwasright/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:08 PM
3

giegerwasright/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:27 AM
3

giegerwasright/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:36 AM
3

giegerwasright/r/MensRights20/07/13 03:22 PM
1

giegerwasright/r/MensRights04/05/13 10:43 AM
0

giegerwasright/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:18 PM
0

giegerwasright/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:59 AM
0

giegerwasright/r/MensRights06/08/13 10:59 PM
0

giegerwasright/r/MensRights13/04/13 11:38 AM
0

giegerwasright/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:17 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 5,632 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Men achieve because they have no choice. Achieve or die is the name of the game. There is NOBODY waiting in the wings to save us or put a free meal on our table. For women, being saved and provided for is still the norm.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 12:27 AM
2

You might want to do a little research on donglegate.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 06:30 PM
1

I don't know why you got downvoted. Were you being sarcastic? I agree with your statement.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 03:12 AM
1

black latex panties Who told you? people actually enjoy the ending more when they know what happens What percentage? That entirely defeats the purpose of the narrative experience. It's like putting the punchline before the pitch.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 02:47 AM
3

So... is there going to be a campaign to cover the hours unworked, skillsets unlearned, and bodies uninjured too? Oh. Wait. No. This is about more free shit.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 02:37 AM
-2

Great. That covers the article. Not the thread.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 09:42 PM
-5

SPOILER TAGS, YOU ASSHOLES!!!!! I fucking wanted to see this movie.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 09:09 PM
1

The problem that most women who have problems in gaming and other geek cultures is that so many of them are casuals. They want the prize, but they don't want to run the race and they are enabled to constantly blame others for their own shortcomings rather than work to improve themselves.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:24 AM
1

If your subordinate has to teach you how to do your job, then you are not qualified for that job.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:21 AM
1

That defeats the purpose, snowflake.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:04 AM
6

Overly guilty, yet ironically overly entitled, middle class and upper class white women don't have the balls to criticize black people.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:23 PM
10

The problem isn't patriarchy. It is oligarchy. There are plenty of women in the oligarchy, they would rather not work though, and prefer their husbands to do that. That does not mean that they don't control the finances to a very large degree. Behind every great man is an even greater woman, right? That's a description of the power relationship in fucking oligarchy.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 09:14 PM
15

Sounds a lot like Elliot Rodger.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 10:24 PM
12

know your place oh. Look. How quickly my wallet closes. If you want my support, the cost is my participation. Equally. Or I will take my business elsewhere.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:30 PM
1

They get it. It's all mental gymnastics because they don't want to get it because it opposes their self interest. Define: obtuse.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:45 PM
4

This whole event is a cross section. It cuts very close to and exposes a rotten rotten core or deceit, manipulation, propaganda, opportunism, and hypocrisy. It is a potential revelation, unequivocally and provably, of what hypocrites, liars, sadists, manipulators, and villains SJWs and feminists are. It is a mens rights issue, btw, because it shows how deep the corruption of our media goes, and how our opponants are the wood boring beetles that have gnawed that media.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:07 PM
3

You got a hotline number for that dept's customer service?
/r/MensRights19/08/14 09:49 PM
1

Not cool I've noticed that people who use this phrase tend to be idiots and assholes. Looks like I can put you in the "proves this theory true" category. True story.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:43 AM
1

Watch the movie DiG about Anton Newcombe and the Brian Jonestown Massacre.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 05:36 PM
4

Hey Michelle; Whites are smarter than blacks. Oh. You don't like that one, huh?
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:06 AM
2

When you marry a woman, your money is "ours" and her money is hers. Usually, though, "ours" means "hers unless she's feeling generous." I have watched men on the telephone meekly ask their wives for permission to buy beer with their own money earned at their job. Fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:05 AM
0

How about you participate in the topic at hand, you twat?
/r/MensRights10/08/14 12:53 PM
-1

Our economy is not a zero-sum game Oh. Really? I wasn't aware that there was some sort of matter tree that pushed out every componant necessary for the replicators that everyone has in their homes to produce everything that they needed. Fact; there is a limited amount of mass and energy on this planet at any given time. Fact; currency represents this mass and energy. Fact; the economy is the tracking of this representative currency. Fact; the economy is a zero sum fucking game, you fucking ostri…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 07:37 PM
2

She's pretty fucking hilarious. edit: Feminists are going to hate her. She's pretty. She's young. She's unapologetically feminine and she has a sense of humor. She probably actually knows some dudes that she honestly likes, but that don't agree with her about everything. I can't wait to see them seethe.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:08 PM
8

The supposition that men cannot afford girlfriends and wives any longer is true. As far as #2 is concerned, there seems to be some cognitive dissonance. If the economy is valued at a total of $1billion (for the sake of argument), and men used to command $900mil of that, but now command $500mil of that (rough numbers for simplicity's sake), yet women still expect men to provide them with the $400mil that they used to have but do not any longer, then there's a problem with basic math here. An econ…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:59 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:52 PM
1

Jews sure do love them some segregation.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:47 PM
1

A wealthy woman, who has probably never worked a real job for a single day of her life, is crowing about conditions that she has no experience of herself. Gee. Where have I seen that before. Where... where...
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:45 PM
1

So. Who's going to be proposing men's only concerts to Arlene's Grocery? If they refuse, lawsuit.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:44 PM
2

I'd leave it down every single fucking time I used it. If you can't be arsed to deal with a fucking toilet seat, you really shouldn't be leaving the house without supervision.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:41 PM
2

Porn, at it's root, is the voyeristic consumption of something that one wants but does not necessarily have. Sexual activity takes a lot of fucking work for men to achieve. Unless they're in the economic bracket that afford them hooker money, although as much as I support people's right to engage in prostitution at their own behest, I can't honestly say that I think it often works out the way either party hopes. Good sex takes more than financial transactions. Because sex is disproportionately o…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:39 PM
2

Fucking spoiler tags, assholes.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:32 PM
3

SPOILERS YOU FUCK.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:32 PM
5

Someone, who is not in a formal setting, resting their body on a freakin' COMMUTE is not "putting on a masculine display" Usually, when I'm on my commute, I'm trying to catch 10-20 minutes of shuteye because I've only gotten 6 or so hours of sleep the night before. I'm coming from and going to a 10-20 hour "shift" that involves hours of heavy labor on my feet at a time and doesn't always involve eating a proper meal or two. Usually, when I'm on my commute, I sit so that I can lean my head back a…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:29 PM
7

OP delivars. I'm just incredulous about how supportive and committed to him you've been.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:23 PM
2

Ask them if they've ever heard or read her making similar statements without wearing a top whose collar terminates right between her titties.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 11:00 AM
0

I love JB's irrascible wit, but dayum. Bitch cray. Fo sho.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:36 AM
1

This demonstrates my assertion that there is a cultural aspect and skew to the prevalence of it because of it. Maybe it's time to have that honest conversation about this... Oh. Wait. Discussing ethnicities seperately and critically makes you uncomfortable, huh? Oh well.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:56 PM
2

We will always be at that risk. Which is why we should be certain to shine the same light of criticism on ourselves as we do on others.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:52 PM
1

I think that by the time that artificial wombs are viable, there will already be pretty high quality AI fuck dolls. I think the sex robots will come first. That one will cause some serious outrage.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:50 PM
1

When a guy wears a short with no sleeves and he's not on the beach or at the gym, he instantly is demonstrating a similar narcissism that makes me want to puke. Aye, dog, aye. I like dem no sleeve shirts. It's alright. You can check out my guns. I won't have a parade about it.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:48 PM
6

Now, say my name, bitch.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:59 PM
3

All the posts you've put into this thread represent time you've spent on the topic. You're one of the most invested people so far. There is a reason for that. And it's either because you want to stop it, or keep it going. Nobody who thought it didn't happen would bother spending this much time and effort on the topic. Disinformation.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 08:23 PM
6

Because nobody ever manipulates on reddit. Never. Nor do any groups of people with similar intentions for controlling narrative plan to cooperate or conspire to do so. Never. That never happens. Not once. It has never in the history of this site ever happened.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:39 PM
4

Anyone who comes into this thread claiming paranoia is part of it. This happens. It happened (for different reasons) to r/technology. It has happened in r/srd. It happened in r/gaming. It is suspected to have happened here. This is a thing. It is a very concise and intentional maneuver by people claiming to support freedom and equality to squash the very voice of anyone who might disagree with them. The only way that it works, though, is for people to not know that that is what is happening. Whi…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:58 PM
19

that isn't just a shallow hit-piece. Of course not. It's about the women. If Vice hit female MRA's with the same mealy mouthed viscosity that they hit male MRA's with, they'd risk accusations of misogyny for daring to criticize the actions or motives of women. So they chomped down on another fistful of mealworms and attempted to hedge their bet by trying to get some journalism in on the ground floor in case this thing takes off, feminism gets left in the dust, and hipsters start claiming they we…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:16 PM
6

Doesn't this alienate the men's rights advocates who are circumcised? No, sock. No it doesn't.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:09 AM
1

You might want to reread my post. Sound it out if you have to.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:29 AM
1

Lesbians are also more likely to have an intense and deeply rooted resentment of men and male anatomy as well as a history of being assaulted by cocks.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 11:42 PM
-1

It is a mental health issue. There are shrinks involved. Vis a vis, the transgendered are going through mental health issues. That's how words work. They have definitions, and where those definitions apply, so do the words that represent them.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 11:26 PM
1

Word policing makes you feel useful, huh?
/r/MensRights03/08/14 11:25 PM
-1

Except, that's exactly what transgendered people do whenever anyone is critical of transgender theory, ideology, or point of view. So. Yeah. Boo hoo.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 11:24 PM
1

Men are neglected and ignored in all matters of familial distress. Including miscarriage.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 11:21 PM
1

Looks like JB is about to make a grab for some media presence. I was wondering when that would happen. Now I'm wondering what endgames she has in mind.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 08:42 PM
39

Ice T gets to say what he wants, though. When SJW's try to PC cow him, he can pull the race card. And they know that. So he gets a certain freedom of expression that allows him to abandon and deny PC ethos.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:11 PM
1

There is making an argument against a person's viewpoint, and there is intentionally slandering them as publicly as possible with the purpose of ruining their livliehood with intentional mischaracterization and manipulation. And you know this. Although, you hope few others do.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 11:05 PM
12

Before I start, I am. I know a lot of people here are. I can't say I've seen any disapproval of people because they are gay getting much truck here. The consensus seems to be "I'm not in the relationship, it's none of my business," although I do think that you will find some opposition to legalizing gay marriage albeit not a majority voice. I think that it's important to state that nobody should be pushing for anybody to be forced or pressured to accept homosexuality. If people want to dislike h…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:15 AM
1

Point of order; Have you seen what's been going on in Japan lately?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:09 AM
-5

I think that you will find that the majority of people who post regularly to this thread believe that all people should be provided with equal rights and have those rights protected equally. Myself included. Transgendered people, though, have a specific self manufactured problem. They think that they have the right to control other people's thoughts and expression. They think that they are entitled to force people and bully people into thinking that they are their target gender and to not contra…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 04:36 AM
4

The amount of easily accessable "me first!" that she had to abandon to get there is irresistable to most, though.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 11:33 AM
1

In my book, if someone physically assaults you, you ought to have the right to beat them until you're done.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 11:32 AM
-2

You fucking pansies. This IS a partisan political issue.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:58 PM
1

Call the police. Tell them that your wife is planning to mutilate your son's genitals against his and your will. Do not leave your son's side until she is seperated from him. File for divorce. File a restraining order that will prevent your wife from contact with you or your son. Don't be so easily swayed by the stench of cunt that you marry someone this fucking delusional and batshit crazy again.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:08 PM
1

Yet I keep hearing that this never happens.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:14 PM
0

What if she's in heavy debt, her husband left her, and she's got some fatal disease? Do you have any idea how many people are going through that right now? And what percentage of them don't throw histrionic attention fits in public places about it, but marshall on with respect for the other people that have to go through the same and worse? Fuck that.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:10 PM
0

mehhhh, yes and no. Treat women like adults. And adult should be able to handle themselves so that they don't degenerate to a sobbing mass of tears on a park bench in public. And if they can't... evolution and shit. You shouldn't step into other people's business until you see blood.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 01:16 PM
1

Defranco usually does say in his shows its not worth the hassle for most things go give out full opinion and likes to hear from others to see their point of view to learn and review keep the dollars and female approval rolling in. ftfy
/r/MensRights14/07/14 01:07 PM
3

The whole reason that they paint straight white males as privileged is to avert empathy away from us and keep us disposable.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 05:31 AM
2

Phillip DeFranco is a pandering mangina. He has potential, but he always falls short of it and reaches right for the pander button. I have no suggestions because they're all full of shit. Thuderf00t is great. GWW is great. AMazing Atheist has his moments. There used to be a great dude named Snake Pliskinist, but he got shut down by SJWs.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:49 PM
3

Now do the same thing that happened with the Robin Thicke song and do a parody of doctors singing about carving about vaginas. Oh. Wait. That would be bad.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:26 AM
17

Of course they are. Cenk's a big fat fucking mangina who knows very well that if he actually held women to equal standards as men, he'd lose 70% or better of his audience and all of his fucking money and while Ana might step outside her cage every now and again, she's not going to turn away a society biased toward her own personal benefit. She's far too used to using that personal benefit to advance her career and her finances.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:26 AM
6

I have yet to hear anyone argue against the points. Just ad hominem attacks and generalizations. Ironically. Without any self conscience.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 12:21 AM
34

Men of privilege pushing other men under the bus to sell tickets to their show. Gee. Never seen that before.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 05:46 PM
2

Thought terminating cliche you got there.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 05:39 PM
1

You're a libtard so you can't possibly see any 'logic' in what conservatives say Except, what you say is patently false. bw13187 explicitly stated that he/she saw logic to what Kelly wrote. Therefore, your claim that they don't see that logic is mostly idiotic and intentionally mischaracterizing. Obtuse cuntery begone.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 08:18 AM
1

the rest of them.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 08:15 AM
2

Your reasoning is short sighted. It's like claiming that people who live in the middle of nowhere are more likely to live without electricity or plumbing. Yes. They are. Because that electricity and plumbing is not available to them. Men are more likely to pursue careers that don't require degrees because those degrees are not available to them. Take a look at how much free college money is available to women. Take a look at how much incentive there is in admissions for women. Now take a look at…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 05:50 AM
-2

look at all these socks.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:49 AM
-1

Now pull back on the shot and take a look at the bigger picture. Anybody notice that feminists, the LGBT community, and the left are pushing for more and more young boys to be enculterated into cutting their dicks off and living as girls? Consider for a moment, how this all might relate into a larger theme in our culture.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:31 PM
1

She's going to get a book deal out of this. Maybe even some of those lucrative academia speaking engagements. Watch. She'll be a rags to riches type for the feminists to slobber and slather after.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:26 PM
1

Not when you're trying to buy back the female audience you lost.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:23 PM
-1

Shut the fuck up and get back to work. That's what about men.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:21 PM
2

And I'd prefer "His Galactic Highness, Lord and Emperor of All He Surveys and Beyond." But "guy," "dude," "male," and "asshole" are probably still accurate.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:49 AM
9

The thing that T hates about Laci's face is the smug condescension behind that fake smile.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 12:34 AM
3

The reason they don't admit it is twofold; One, they will lose all their Renfields (familiars, purses, men who unquestioningly hand their balls to them). Two, they will lose the newbs who are actually concerned with equality and haven't yet been brainwashed. It's the same reason that Scientology doesn't admit that it's a pyramid scheme.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:09 PM
1

Because the one who can perform are actually performing. These women cannot perform, so instead, they are pandering.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:52 PM
1

Have you noticed that the left is working rather hard to fuzz the meanings of words? That has a purpose. That is leading somewhere. It actually terrifies me.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:02 PM
1

Is she single?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 12:58 PM
15

Try being a white male living in a black city neighborhood. Street harrasment? Shit. That doesn't even begin to describe what goes down.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 12:52 PM
-1

Explanation accepted. For now. I'm watching you.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 03:39 AM
-2

the person is baking off Did you mean to say "begging off"? Really? Fucking "baking off"? Are you fucking kidding me? Jesus fucking christ, people. If you're going to use the words, know what they fucking mean. Holy fuck, man. Jesus fuck. Fuck. Dumb ass motherfuckers.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 03:06 AM
3

It is your responsability to participate in the conversations that you would like to be involved in. If you fail to assert yourself and express yourself clearly and cogently, that is your fucking problem not mine. This isn't special ed class. This isn't speech therapy class. This isn't fucking AA. Participate or don't on your own fucking recognizance or go fuck yourself. Welcome to the world of adults. It isn't fucking Romper Room.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 11:02 PM
4

I don't live in Canada. I have, though, noticed that there is a generally larger and more immediate amount of PC uppitiness amongst Canadians. They are quicker to take offense and quicker to shut down a discussion because they've taken offense. They seem to have less grit than your average American.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:40 PM
2

Let's see. Is her top low cut? Oh. Look.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:45 AM
3

they use the word "ally", they mean "toadie".
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:01 AM
1

Hope defeats disposability. If they give us hope, we stop strapping ourselves to bombs and bombs to ourselves so that they can have their petrochemical products and conflict baubles.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 10:00 PM
2

God, this guy is such a douchebag.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:36 PM
1

The problem is that most women conveniently vassilate between whether or not they consider themselves feminists.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:32 PM
-3

You told someone sympathetic to fuck off Speaking of ridiculous assumptions. Can you quote the line where I said "fuck off?" If you've got nothing but hatred Can you quote the line where I said "I hate..."? you've never met and now you're responding Speaking of which... Without intentional mischaracterization, you've got nothing. Cling to it, baby. Cling to it. It's the anchor to the identity you've so carefully crafted. And. It's. Sinking.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:59 PM
-2

what a concise and cogent counterargument to my claim. Bravo. You have addressed each and every one of my points, deconstructed them wholly and presented well thought out positions of your own. Oh. Wait.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:48 PM
1

For each of those the labor is 99% volunteer This kind of heavy, nearly unilateral exploitation of labor defeats our purpose and reinforces disposability and caste inclusion. I am against it.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:23 PM
-2

She doesn't care about men. She kinda sorta cares about her little brother. But only if it doesn't get in the way of her unearned privilege to dominate the social paradigm.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:16 PM
0

still, i'm more or less indifferent to the material. Just as you are to the safety, well being, and social inclusion of men. You just summarized and copped to the general line of complacency that poisons the average feminist and enables the rest of them to engender and enable the abuse, disenfranchisement, and disposability of men.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:14 PM
7

We do. And the favor is not returned.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:12 PM
3

I don't see a trigger warning on your post.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 02:08 PM
0

Once his wife finishes dragging his balls across the minefield of their divorce, he'll probably be ready to do a doc on men's rights in divorce or lack thereof. Watch. He's going to suddenly get sensitive to it once he loses more than half of what he has and has to dissolve nearly all of his business holdings. You will be saying my motherfucking name (about his divorce, not necessarily his recognizing why he got fucked over in said divorce).
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:19 AM
-1

not because they are liberals On the contrary. Liberal ideology is rotten to the core, and feminism is a large reason why.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:02 AM
1

And if everybody in the video was black, they would have kept their mouths shut entirely.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:00 AM
2

John J. Rambo is an example of the man that society has chewed up, spit out, and kicked the dirt over. He isn't toxic. He is trying to survive with little to no resources and "support" structure that really only intends to use him up further. I wouldn't say that he is toxic masculinity, per se, he is sabotaged masculinity; sabotaged by a society that he sought to serve and to save and was punished for. I can't speak for anything past first blood part two. Most men I know understand this, few wom…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:58 AM
3

he should post it in /r/feminism too, since they claim to be fighting for men so hard. Let's see how quickly their credit cards run.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:52 AM
1

lawyer. lawyer. lawyer. fucking lawyer.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:50 AM
39

No, it's completely fucking idiotic to expect trigger warnings in an adult academic situation. It is fucking COLLEGE. You are there for the explicit and express fucking purpose of hearing ideas outside of your comfort zone. If you can't fucking handle that, go the fuck home.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:48 AM
6

You're tipping your hand, sock. I didn't say that there are celebs trying to suppress the men's rights movement. I said that there are more celebs with more money to spend on feminism who spend that money on feminism.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 04:23 PM
5

If we can out-advertise the feminists We can't. At all. Your average feminists celebrity blinks away a million in a day.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 04:05 PM
2

Define "power in society".
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:47 PM
7

The most efficient thing that I can think of is a fundraising event. Red carpet. Celebrity endorsement. Politician stump speech. Press photos and video. And then you get stuck in the stupid charity cycle where the charity only exists to keep itself going. Then the MRM become no different than feminists. A million dollars isn't really very much money. It doesn't really get you all that much any longer, especially when it comes to making bigger social changes. Are you going to toss a mil into a sh…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:44 PM
0

How many women do you know who are willing to eschew any and all socialization, social approval, or social advancement to get good at anything? That's why. edit: And as a sidenote; I've never found women to be particularly better at verbally expressing themselves than men. I have, though, found them to have an easier time getting people to listen to what they are saying, meet their demands, and cooperate with their plans. The mechanism for those, though, has nearly nothing to do with their abili…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:39 AM
9

I'm not interested. Well. That about sums up your contribution to the discussion.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:26 AM
2

When feminists act directly and explicity against the equal civil rights and civic access of men, then it's kind of necessary for us to speak against them for it. That is, if we want that to change. How the fuck are you that stupid?
/r/MensRights30/06/14 10:42 PM
3

That's not true at all. Oz was enormously popular. Before The Sopranos, there was Oz. It was HUGE. And Oz was sympathetic and empathetic to every character on it's roster. As I recall, Edie Falco was the only female regular in the cast.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 10:36 PM
0

I still feel pain that my body and the role I'm expected to play in society don't match how I feel but overall I'm happy with my choice. So does everybody else in the world.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:52 PM
1

She's done the media talking head/talk show/"journalist" thing. There was some sort of a push within the half decade after the whole thing happened to establish her in that world, but like I said it's hard to market a person whose only contribution is dick sucking up the ladder. Just because an autobiography hasn't been published doesn't mean one hasn't been shopped.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:33 PM
1

So, you are arguing that the article is not full of strawmen, then?
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:44 AM
2

keep swallowing that cognitive dissonance, cochese.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 11:15 PM
2

Demographics. Anthropology. Psychology. Behavioral science. Have you heard of them, motherfucker?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 11:10 PM
1

Monica could've made herself a fortune doing pretty much the same thing if she wanted to. No, she couldn't. She tried and failed. It turns out that when your only accomplishment is "I ratted on the married guy whose dick I sucked voluntarily", your shelf life as a talking head is short and limited. For all of Clinton's positives and negatives, he did a whole lot more than get his dick sucked in his office by an intern, and that is why he gets hired to publish and speak. The blowjob is just an or…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 11:04 PM
1

So... can anyone tell me, aside from sucking dick to get ahead, what marketable skills Monica Lewinsky actually has?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 11:02 PM
1

Except when the administration denies the civil rights of boys and men who are victims of sexual assault and domestic violence equal access to victim's services. Except when those boys are brown enough.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:50 PM
2

I liked it. I really enjoy Atwood's style, but the metaphor is extremely heavy handed to the point of absurdity. Worth reading, just keep a shaker of salt handy.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:46 PM
1

Sidenote: if there was no money in STEM this controversy would disappear overnight. Sort of. The whole STEM debacle is about a lot of things, most of which revolve around social, economic, political, and industrial control of resources. Ultimately, though, it's little girls looking in their neighbors' bowls and crowing about not getting as much... of something that they don't even want to eat, won't eat, and with full bellies (that someone else provided for them) already. The only time you look …
/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:43 PM
3

I can't listen to this. Fix your audio feed. Chances are you've got a line from the room and a line from the guys mic going into whatever is sending. Fix it. It isn't an echo. It's multiple inputs with different timing.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:34 PM
1

I would claim severe metal illness we such a case. and you would be right to. It's almost as if there's a trend among the mentally ill...
/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:29 PM
2

patterns. they exist. learn to recognize them.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:27 PM
-1

but I am saying that if a person chooses to identify as a woman, then we should address that person how they would like to be addressed. That's not quite how words work.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:26 PM
1

Which means women get higher test scores for less performance So... they get more pay for less work, huh? Where have I seen that before? Where? Where could it be?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:24 PM
2

She's dead, so there's no chance of a trial. Let's take a look and see what I can find amongst the jibber jabber of the inter... the fuck? She married a member of NAMBLA? Are you fucking kidding me? She knowingly married a man who professed that he should be free to fuck underaged boys. She knowingly married a man who was a member of an organization that pushed to legalize fucking underaged boys. She knowingly married a man with multiple fucking convictions for sexual misconduct with the underag…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:59 PM
1

blame it on the black man, what the heck.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:50 PM
0

I don't think that's called for. Thinking of the earth as flat might give you better feels than thinking of it as ovoid. That makes it no less ovoid.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:49 PM
0

Gay trumps white in victocrat policy.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:45 PM
4

All those cries of "Why don't you go start your own group!" responding to questions of why we're left out of advocacy initiatives, and now when we do start our own group, we're pushed out. Say my motherfucking name.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:41 PM
12

Pretty much this. I will not be participating in feminism. Ever. If they want to start something entirely new that actually promotes equality, then perhaps. But feminism? Your actions have repercussions, girls. This is what we have been trying to explain to you.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:31 PM
0

Daaaaaaayaaaaaammnnn, gurrrrrl. I'd like to stick mah deeeeeeeeeyuck between dem tah-tahhhhhs.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:21 AM
-2

Feminists love their fantasy rape porn. You know those silly jokes that people tell where you're like "Oh, that's just silly. I mean, I've seen some Irish in my time and I've seen some Irish drink in my time, but they aren't that bad, right?" And then ten years later, you've had enough experiences to see inside enough Irish cabinets and enough late nights and you're like "Damn, these niggers draaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnk!!! Like.. you can't even exaggerate that shit. They be draaaaaankin'!" Well. Damn. …
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:02 AM
-15

tits or gtfo
/r/MensRights27/06/14 03:58 AM
3

I doubt it. Chances are that her prison experience will essentially be a three and a half year long Saturday detention. Not a picnic, but neither is it Attica.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 03:54 AM
-9

You certainly live up to your handle.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 03:51 AM
10

Protip: It isn't actual victims they're worried about.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 03:49 AM
15

Among feminists, there are those who hate men and those who enable the hatred of men with complacency and ambivalence fueled by all the free shit and excuses it gets them.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 03:48 AM
1

The only time I'll wear a hat is in the winter, and then it is a regular knit wool sock-cap thing. Other than that, I never wear hats. So. There's that. I also weigh 150lbs soaking wet and am in good (not great) shape because of all the manual labor that I do. I also shave daily unless I have a stretch of days off, when I admit I get a bit lazy and can grow a full beard in a couple days. I also rarely eat cheetos, although I have to say those flaming hots and a lager are an excellent combination…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:27 PM
2

It's funny to watch them project and transfer in their desperate attempt to play both dragon and damsel.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:12 PM
2

opinions are not, and actually cannot be facts. You're a bit off. It is my opinion that the earth is a spherical/ovoid shape. It is my opinion that the oceans are comprised of salt water and lakes, fresh. Opinion ought to reflect fact. Resting on it being valid regardless is an intellectually dishonest, manipulative, thought terminating cop-out.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:06 PM
3

He talks about it in The Vice Guide to Sex, Drugs, and Rock and Roll, on his every single appearance on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, and if you were to read any issue of Vice published between '98 and '01 (at least), there will be an article glorifying one of the three's latest conquest. He's ironically rather un-selfconsciously candid about it all. Or at least he has been until recently. If he were smart, and intended to stick with his "women are such glorious creatures that we should all …
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:04 PM
1

Nine..... .... ..... ..... ...... Eleven (drop mic). No shit. Politicians pandering. Fuck, this guy's worse than Bush Jr, but about as bad as Sr.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:34 AM
1

weeeell.... let's call it "inaccuracies". The word is "lies". The person speaking them is a dishonest scam artist with a history in pyramid schemes.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:30 AM
1

Men should complain about any game with a female-only lead. Maybe even threaten boycotts against female-character-led games and refuse to give these developers any of our money? Fuck that. Portal is too good.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:29 AM
2

and submit it to /r/askfeminists[1] . You'll be able to set your clock by how quickly the banhammer lands.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:26 AM
0

I've seen Maher roll out a good one. He's still an ivory tower left elitist who knows more about pandering than intellectual honesty.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:25 AM
1

I don't have the necessary skillsets to be a game dev. But let's call them skills A, B, and C. Let's say that to get work as a reasonably paid dev, one must have minimum levels of competency in those skills of X, Y, and Z where A=X, B=Y, and C=Z. If A=X, B=Y, and C=Z, then you will get hired. There is not a single woman in this world with those skillset requirements who won't get hired. Not one. Not a single fucking one. Not one. If a woman can't get work as a dev, it is because she doesn't have…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:23 AM
1

Her name was Roberta Williams. Her name was Roberta Williams. Her name was Roberta Williams. Her name was Roberta Williams. Her name was Roberta Williams. Her name was Roberta Williams.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:15 AM
18

Just for the record; Shane Smith, Saroosh Alvi, Gavin McInnes and co started Vice as part of a welfare scheme against the Canadian government with the admitted and stated purpose of coercing models into fucking them and acquiring cocaine that they might use themselves and use to help coerce those models into fucking them. Smith has copped to it in print and in interviews. I bet he talked about how much he respected women the whole time he was mashing up 8balls. Smith knows how to market. He's go…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:12 AM
5

Murder most certainly is worse than rape. Rape causes physical damage. Rape causes psychological damage. Rape could cause social damage. Rape could have repercussions that reverberate through the remainder of the victim's life. Murder ends the victim's life. Period. There is no more victim once murder has been committed. There is nothing good left to happen in the victim of murder's life, since that life has been ceased. A rape victim, with proper treatment and support, will smile again one day.…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:07 AM
1

You went straight and exclusively for sex, huh? More like "whatever daddy's little girl wants, daddy's little girl gets." But hey. You keep fucking that chicken.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 08:59 PM
1

Reddit collectively just shat itself.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 08:57 PM
1

This guy's TOTALLY wearing a shirt that says "if you want to date my daughter, you need to let her rape you". That's not what I said, nor is there any implication of such in what I actually said, at all. How many straws have you got left in that fist?
/r/MensRights21/06/14 02:03 AM
1

First, I have no idea what 4chan is. Second, if I have ever been to 4chan, I can assure you that I would have no trouble finding male users posting pictures of their dicks. Third, if I have you have ever been to 4chan, I can assure you that you would have little trouble finding a thread demanding that men show their dicks. Fourth, I have never been to 4chan, so I have no idea what this could all be about.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 01:42 AM
1

The issue with this shirt, in case anyone would like to drop their bullshit "gawsh, guize I jus don' sees da problem!!!" line, is that a relationship consists of two people. The shirt insists that the daughter of it's wearer make the rules and implies that daddy will be there to enforce them. It's no less paternalist than the sentiment that it attempts to nullify. In fact, it reinforces them. It keeps the power balance of the relationship one sided. It isn't just the daughter that should be maki…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 10:49 AM
0

gotta have a special club just for you, huh?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:04 PM
2

I think that a difference is that with men the competition and the collaboration tends to be more cut and dry. We're on the same team, we're on opposing teams. Loyalty is extremely important. Women, probably by pre-historic necessity mingle the two.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:03 PM
12

Equality means that you pay them off for something that someone who sorta kind maybe might look like you to a half blind idiot did to someone that they heard about. It's all about the money.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:58 PM
3

I don't know that I'd ever use the phrase. It's silly. But at the same time, if you're going to bitch about male failure to be "involved" in the pregnancy process, then you ought not to bitch about them describing themselves as involved in it. One. Or the fucking. Other. Pick.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:20 AM
2

Feminists are allies. Then why does NOW actively lobby against even application of the law for men and women?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:31 PM
1

You have completely and totally failed to comprehend the point.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:24 PM
2

so as a man, if i am ignored for whatever reason, You don't get it. You're a man. Nobody ever ignores you. Everything that you say is taken seriously.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:19 PM
1

The crash of '08 was devastating. All told, it probably set my career back five years. At the time, it set my standard of living back a good 10. All the gains that I had made in my 20's (I had just turned 30) were erased. All of them. I have no idea how I survived it. Getting the rent paid was a struggle. I had a lot of days where I didn't eat. I was on my own, and I had to pull myself out of it on my own. Women, though... they've always got someone willing to feed them and put them up. You're g…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:12 PM
0

say my name, bitch.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:47 PM
0

You've got one. Facepalm.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:12 PM
10

Gee. I never heard NAFALT before.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:09 PM
4

I don't think I heard a single mention of the death threats that have been levied against the Doubletree employees and conference attendees in this interview. I wonder why that is. I'm sure Heather is familiar with AMR...
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:09 PM
0

She's here to admit her wrongs and try to get some help and fix it, And in this task, she will fail entirely until she can admit to the veracity of my allegations against her character. Those qualities are what cause this problem. That denial is what sustains it.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:59 AM
0

I take it that you can't define the term "tone argument".
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:24 PM
1

put up with a lot Of abuse. Because you are in a mutually abusive relationship. You are very rude I bet you say that to all the guys... who hold you responsible for your own actions and think you ought to face their repercussions.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:58 PM
0

I don't feel the need to air dirty laundry What you mean to say is that you don't feel the need to admit your own complicity in this abusive relationship and your own responsability to rectify the problem. but me being "cray" is far from the reason. Bitch, you even more cray than I thought. I feel bad for your kids. That's who I really feel bad for. I can assure you, they will have drug problems. They will have behavior problems. If any of them are smart and a little lucky, they'll run away from…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:22 PM
1

This watches like an Italian fumbling with Japanese after only hearing it a few times. There's a lack of a fundamental linguistic root. She's trying, sort of, but it doesn't quite fit. There's a little cargo cult for the purpose of clickbait going on here.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:04 PM
2

This reads like a paint by numbers portrait of "crazy abusive wife". Bitch. You cray. You two ought not to be in a relationship. In fact, you two are not in a relationship. You're instead, competing over living space and emotional resources. You aren't fit for one another. Get the fuck out. And try being a fucking adult and controlling yourself every now and again. Jesus fucking christ, lady.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:59 PM
4

I wouldn't go around expecting rational behavior from a church.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:56 PM
10

Flashbacks to when I was a kid and my sister would pick a fight, scream for mom when I reacted, then look smug when I was punished. Every time they pull this shit, I think the same exact fucking thing.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:53 PM
38

Because it gave her bad feelz. She thinks that everything that gives her bad feelz is or should be illegal.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:01 PM
2

You save that apology. Then you contact a lawyer. Then you sue the every living christ out of her.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:23 PM
-5

Does a matador demand to be gored? Does he deserve it?
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:22 PM
5

That would be a bit of a setback and a disappointment in the short term. In the long term, it will be more definitive proof that feminists don't want equality but supremacy and primacy and that they are a bunch of fascist bullies.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:55 PM
2

But like those coked out lab rats, the more you yank on it the less it does for you. That applies to more than just lab rats in a cocaine context. Just FYI.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 11:20 PM
2

Are you a white hispanic?
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:34 PM
2

I don't know who got the idea that we're traditionalists, or how he got it. He got the idea because there are traditionalists among us and, because we are egalitarians, we see no reason to tell them that they can't live their lives the way they want to, given that others are not forced to participate. We tolerate, so we must be complicit.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:28 PM
2

Masculinity is what I want it to be. Izzard's right.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:27 PM
0

Smith's deconstruction of the character and relevance of the interviewees is adroit. Her lack of familiarity with one of the greatest and most important humorous publications (it's been around since before Chang, and played an enormous role in my burgeoning sense of humor as a lad) just makes me sad. It's like she's a poor waspish girl stuck in a victorian house who's never been taken to the circus.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:24 PM
4

I must ask, is there any ammo that you can give me against MRAs and The MHRM relative to racial politics? ftfy
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:53 AM
2

I'd love to stay home. Work is an exhausting pain in the balls. I'd much rather not go.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 05:06 AM
1

I think Michael Moore levies a valid social critique, some more accurate than others. I also think that Michael Moore's perspective on gender is heavily informed by the fact that if he didn't belly up in the face of every woman in his presence, that he would never ever ever have been able to convince one to touch his penis. And that chicken would come home to roost one way or another eventually.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 04:57 AM
3

This is the first I've heard the term.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 04:52 AM
1

There is an alternate universe where Laci Green is arrow titted and homely looking, with terrible skin. That Laci Green says the same stuff, but nobody listens.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:12 AM
1

That there is an observation of this as a behavior pattern doesn't annoy me. That it is being presented as a prevalent pattern of behavior is rather histrionic, though.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:33 PM
2

No, higher education isn't a right. It is a privilege. If I weren't paying for it, it might be considered a privilege. At the costs I signed on for, it is absolutely 100% my right to receive a solid, workable, and functional educational product, commensurate with the dollars that I invested into it.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:16 PM
-1

But it is biological. Keep thinking that, if it makes you feel better. But it is purely fantastical.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:16 AM
-1

Trans-ness is primarily biological Not a mot, a dot, nor an iota of it is biological.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:08 AM
1

This statement The mere existence of trans people, many of which report feeling like they were born the wrong sex at a very young age should be enough to reevaluate ones stance. contradicts this statement; science has effectively proven gender expression is primarily biological
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:35 PM
4

Well, kitten. That option isn't on the table. In fact, it hasn't even made it into the room. You can keep crowing about that, and watch your support dwindle, or you can move onto something with potential for forward momentum. No skedaddle and make sure daddy covers that credit card bill. Tis the first of the month after all.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:32 PM
1

Nope. They aren't joking. There's a troll amongst them, and some choas in a strategem or three, but the sentiment is honest. They abhor the idea of men receiving the same amount of respect, consideration, and provision that they demand for women. They hate it like Daryl Gates hates black people.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 03:22 AM
13

"I would be offended if you did what I'm doing, but I'm going to keep doing it because I don't have to follow the same rules as you and I'm incapable of comprehending axioms over endpoints." Fuck. The stupid hurts.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 03:17 AM
1

"furry feminist" Google's down. Yahoo and duckduck ain't showing shit. Got any links?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 11:58 PM
4

So, I just watched the episode. I liked it, but I like most of the show. I think that it did a good job of showing how hard it is for fat women. Vanessa was a good character for confronting the social and romantic difficulties that fat women face. Here's the thing that he forgot to add to the context; average men have the same kind of difficulty as fat women. And... she should have insisted that it be a date, and not hedge that one.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 09:59 PM
-4

It is. Protip: Violence can be a source of and for humor.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:25 PM
2

Looks like I now know why I won't be moving to Canada.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:17 PM
1

however if my reading is correct then it seems that furry fandom has become the next target of Intersectional-Feminist invasion as part of the general campaign to make nerd culture All About Teh Wimminz. Oh, dear lord jesus, please let this happen. Please, please, please.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:16 PM
1

All ideas should be considered. If you think that your idea is so weak or that some opposing idea is so strong that you can't possibly stand a chance in an open forum, then you ought to consider that you are wrong. I'm not afraid of ideas. I want to hear as many of them as possible, and the ones I find weak or ineffective, I will smash with those I find strong and efficient. If you aren't interested in that, then you are quite literally anti-progressive and anti-intellectual.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 12:27 AM
1

You stick around. I like the cut of your jib.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 02:48 AM
2

Ok. You're a nigger.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:13 PM
2

I don't see anyone addressing me as "his highness and grace upon all that exists, emperor of the universe, lord gieger,". Yet it's the only title that I consent to.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:13 PM
1

What the fuck does that even mean? Words have rather specific definitions. They either apply to their subject or not.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:11 PM
2

Don't label me with labels I don't consent to. That's not quite how language works.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:51 AM
3

Point of order #1: Drag is a flat caricature of female and feminine appearance and behavior. There's no way around it, it's a cartoon. It can be compared to black face in that they are both caricatures of one group by another group. It is theater. Right or wrong is up to you to decide for yourself, but I have yet to meet anyone who suffered a bruise, an abrasion, or a broken bone when someone else did drag. Except for that one time some ballcap townie asshole got douchey and pushy with a drag qu…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:14 PM
1

There's plenty of hostility to be had here. Some of it justified, some of it out of order. I think that you will find that when it is justified, it is more hostility toward an idea or a behavior than the sum of that person. That is hard to differentiate for many, though. Your best bet is to be honest and constantly critical as well as constantly processing, comparing, and extrapolating information. Criticism is a workout for your brain.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 07:55 AM
2

this nigga right here.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 12:03 AM
1

translation: Let me dox you.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 12:02 AM
3

backstory?
/r/MensRights21/04/14 11:53 PM
1

Fuck all that noise. How to be a better female MRA; See rules on how to be a better male MRA. How to be a better male MRA; See rules on how to be a better MRA. How to be a better MRA; Comprehend equality. Support it. Open your fucking mouth. Move along.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 07:19 PM
5

I've never worked for a company that didn't have a "no dating coworkers" rule. It's just that some are more vigilant about it than others and some are willing to nearly entirely look the other way as long as no crazy shit happens. I smell fishy. BTW, I am a grill.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 07:17 PM
1

Good man. Protip: Never enter a negotiation that you can't walk away from. Lay out your terms, accept your hedges, if neither are met then thank them for their time, pack up your shit and walk away. My consulting bill is in the mail.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:21 AM
1

Tell your boss that you're going to quit if he doesn't pay you enough to actually make more, then. If he doesn't, then quit.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 12:33 AM
0

I'm certainly not interested in that stupid shit.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 11:36 PM
3

Is this staged? The chick was pretty standoffish from the moment he started interacting with her and the answer was to walk the fuck away by her second sentence. That he was recording sets off my spidey sense for fuckery of some sort. She isn't attractive. She knows she isn't, that's why she's so suspicious of people trying to interact with her. She's probably been the 2AM beer goggle catch quite a few times and that's why she's so hateful. This guy is a dickbag. Listen to the shit he's saying. …
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:43 AM
5

or if Amanda Marcotte is an SRS twat herself. You actually think there's an "if" to that?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:43 PM
2

Remember what I said the last time I had to smack down Wil Wheaton. He is the stereotypical privileged white male that the feminists are always railing about. He loves the idea of having less empowered males, especially white heterosexual ones, to throw under the bus while he keeps collecting those checks and dividends (speaking of dividends, if little Willy is such a saint, let's see what companies his investment portfolio contributes to and relies on. Anyone wanna bet there are some problemati…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 03:45 PM
3

That's how a valued population treats a disposable one.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 12:39 AM
2

Yes. There is. No, I'm not explaining it.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 12:38 AM
5

They aren't looking for equal pay. They are looking to get more pay for less work. They want to sit on their asses at desks all day and get paid the same as men who work on high iron, in coal mines, and on the decks of commercial fishing boats. They want everything that anyone else has and to damsel their way out of doing the same work for it.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 08:25 AM
22

It isn't bad, necessarily, to re-enfranchise women in the penal system. Nor is it virtuous, necessarily, to enfranchise men in the penal system. It is bad to refuse to offer both equal opportunity for reform and reintegration. Beware of that distinction. It is of primary importance.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 08:03 AM
8

There is hope for this one. Never apologize, certainly not for a drunken rant. Or I'll punch you in the mouth.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 08:01 AM
1

SJWs are anti semetic. Ahah! hahahahahahaahahahaahahaahAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAAHAAHAHHHHHAHAHAHAHA! You must be joking.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 08:45 AM
2

If you haven't noticed that jewish white males get a pass where gentile white males do not, then you may want to consider removing your head from the sand.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 02:21 AM
1

It isn't just feminists. It's the entire left. Men are the scapegoat for the left. Straight men even better. Straight white men even better betterer. Straight white goyim even better betterer better. Why? It's complicated, but ultimately because the few straight white goyim who actually have power are just fine with throwing everyone who looks like them under the bus while they play hero for joining in the chant. We should also be discussing why male heterosexuality and physiology is so popularl…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 02:03 AM
1

Gaming hasn't been a boy's club in ages Her name is Roberta Williams. It never was a boy's club. Women were just as welcome as men, they just had to be willing to do the work. She did. And she is a legend.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 07:23 PM
33

Say my name. also, I have to hand it to cowkitty. She did a masterful job of being judicious and neutral. I honestly have little faith in being judicious and neutral, but seeing how cowkitty played it made me a sliver more interested.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:40 PM
10

Be prepared to have the cops called on you. Disagreeing with a woman is literally rape and assault.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 11:02 PM
7

Well. that's pretty fucking dumb considering that we actually want women and feminists involved.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 10:53 PM
1

Before I begin, let's address something, here; Dude, what do you want? A blowjob? This was a combination ad hominem attack and a derailment. You know very well what I'm after here, but you distract from that with this bit of misdirection. That way, you can portray yourself as the innocent victim and me the drooling sex offender lying in wait. To answer your question, I don't want you anywhere near my dick. It's got a minimum sanity and intelligence requirement. Now, back on topic. First, I'd lik…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:18 PM
0

Fine, I got the right to vote for free. Excellent. So we've established that you've gotten shit (a right) for free. Your initial assertion was that you did not. Are you now ready to retract your initial assertion?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:50 PM
0

How does any of this change that you got a right without having to sign away a right that half the population has to sign away to get that right? You have the right to vote. You did not have to register with SS to get it. You got that right for free. Until you can recognize and admit that, you'll remain mired in cognitive dissonance. I mean, you're still going to remain mired in cognitive dissonance, but you'll be a step further through the quagmire if you can recognize that you got the right to…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:41 PM
10

Yet another example of feminism being fueled by a woman seeing someone doing something that doesn't include her and having a tantrum. And then demanding a dozen things for herself that others can't have.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 05:46 PM
1

According to the social reaction that seeks to absolve both he and his daughter of any and all responsability, he did.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 05:45 PM
3

In a manner of speaking, people looking to accumulate wealth without fetter are looking for global domination of wealth. That is global domination. Extinction of the human race? Why would they want to get rid of their drones and pawns? They just want to squeeze as much out of them as they can. You haven't actually argued against my point, though. You've just made an attempt at derailing.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 04:37 PM
1

The thing is... that's the pattern. For a couple thousand years or so. Men value women for reproduction, women value men for providing for them in their reproductive capacity. That's the oldest and most oft repeated human relationship after that of the parent and child. That's the axiom. The male puts the baby in the female, the female cares for the baby while the male provides for both. That's the pattern. For thousands of years. We can change that, but not if we don't acknowledge it.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:56 PM
21

Except... those female politicians support endless war and spying without limitation.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:51 PM
3

It's like we were connected through a borg matrix. Smart girl with a humanist ideal.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:50 PM
0

What free shit? I don't have any free stuff. You have the right to vote. You did not have to register for selective service to get it. We're starting there. vitriolic comments Intentional hyperbolic mischaracterization. Can you quote the vitriol? You can't. You consider any statement that you don't like or that makes you feel criticised as "vitriolic" to villify the speaker so that you can dodge the allegation.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:45 PM
1

Are you acknowledging that you get the right to vote and secure funding for college for free whereas men don't?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:41 PM
0

Let's start with the right to vote and to secure funding for college without registering for the draft. Let's start there. We can keep going if you'd like.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:34 PM
0

Women look down on men's rights because 1) it threatens their free shit 2) it threatens their free shit 3) it threatens their free shit Men look down on men's rights because they think that protecting the growing exclusive feminine pipeline to free shit will get them some dicktouch. That's all. It's really fucking simple.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 04:45 AM
1

How bout you head on over to /r/askwomen, /r/TwoXChromosomes, or /r/AskFeminists and ask that question. Let us all know when your ban hits.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 04:42 AM
1

Idiot. You forgot rule #1. Feminists have no sense of humor.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 04:40 AM
1

This is an exercise in how the left will devour it's own for stepping too far out of line. You're seeing social machina in action here. It's a rare pulling back of the veil to reveal how it all works. Remember it.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:38 PM
5

I was looking forward to Mirror's Edge 2. And that's the one they specifically hired her to ruin.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 11:28 AM
2

This, kiddies, is what we call "rationalisation". It's what stupid, weak, manipulative people do when they can't accept the parameters of reality.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 11:23 AM
1

Ask her who paid for her college. First she'll squirm. Then she'll lie. Then she'll start an argument about something else to avoid admitting that it wasn't her.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 11:15 AM
4

Last I checked, footwear was entirely fucking optional. For women.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 11:14 AM
2

It isn't like that everywhere. It's stupid where it is. I don't give a fuck. The point that "if dudes can walk around topless, then women should be able to also" works for me. Whatever. Walk around naked for all I care. I'm busy. Don't dawdle when you're walking in front of me.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 11:11 AM
10

This young lady is doing a commendable job of staying even handed. It's got to be hard to be an artist and a person of principle and see your art stolen by a person who lacks principles. It's got to be difficult to see your simple plea that your work be respected be used as polarizing political fodder. She's being very intelligent about this all.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 11:58 AM
1

End this dumbassery.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 11:53 AM
-2

What systematic oppresshun!?!?
/r/MensRights15/03/14 11:49 AM
1

I think your movement would off a lot less unpleasantly, bossy, manipulative, duplicitious, and bullying if you'd avoid the sophistry.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:45 PM
7

The second your role in the experience was examined, you abandoned your agency and began damseling. I'm not buying that at all. Well look at at you, gumshoe. We'll make a real detective of you yet.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:45 PM
4

Women aren't good at suicide You're making a mistake in attribution here. I'm sure that women are just dandy at suicide... when they actually want to commit to it. They just don't want to do it as much.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:29 PM
4

You can't send a kid to boot camp. You can send a kid to a private school that functions similar to a boot camp. Private school. Let's take a look and see what tuitions are like at those schools, shall we? Camden Military School costs $23,390. New York Military School costs $36,190. The Marine Military Academy costs $35,000. You're worried about your mother blowing social security checks. Do you think she's got $24-35 floating around? Neither do I. Get CPS involved.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:44 PM
2

Say my motherfucking glorious goddamned name.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:29 PM
14

The truth hurts her scam. If you hurt her scam, you prevent her from making money. If you prevent her from making money, you upset her. If you upset her, you must be threatening her. If you threaten her you must be assaulting her. The truth assaults anita sarkeesian.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:27 PM
1

trying to liberate women as a group from judgment The leftist ideal of liberation from judgment is one of the main columns that prevents it from having any worth. Nobody is immune from judgment. Nobody should be. You want to argue the parameters or accuracy? Sure. Let's do that. But judgment is necessary to survival, it's called "thinking". Death to all thought terminating cliche.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:23 PM
2

Word banning makes their feelz tingle.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:49 PM
1

Goddamn it. I know.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:07 PM
0

I have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:57 PM
5

I find it kinda sickening that people like this can think men don't face any discrimination of their own. It isn't quite that they are unaware. It is more that that is the way they want it to be. And moreso.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:59 AM
6

Feminists control the /r/FeMRADebates sub. They are doing the banning.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:58 AM
16

I can't help but wonder if it completely eludes them how much they prove our point It does. At this point, it's intentional. You know those older people who refuse to learn how to use their VCRs? Same rules apply. The fact that people actually go to the trouble of working against men It all boils down to competition for resources. They don't believe in nor do they want equality of any kind at all. They just want. Anything that contradicts the fulfillment of that want, or holds them responsible f…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:57 AM
8

Can you cite the silencing? Can you show us where your ability to express yourself has been prevented?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:54 AM
8

Miss Don't fall into their jargon traps. The only way to win stupid fucking games is by refusing to play them.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:53 AM
1

Intelligence gap more likely.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:41 AM
2

Still refusing that apples to apples comparison. Gee. I wonder why that is.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:04 AM
1

unskilled mining and manufacturing labor is not the same fucking job as "skilled" childcare. At all. You can't really compare the two for this purpose.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:04 AM
1

Watch out for Michelle Rhee. She is a fucking snake.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:03 AM
2

What are you, a five year old? Essentially, yes. By about five, her idea that she should be able to go through life unchallenged and untested was cemented. Blame her parents. She learned it by watching her mother make demands and her father cave to them. emotional truth, Another term for "emotional truth" is unsubstantiated bullshit, easily proven absent of fact, that I use to hang over other people for the purpose of controlling them. There is no such thing as emotional truth.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:02 AM
1

Network network network. It's time for you to learn how to use your social connections for profit. Tell everyone you know that you're looking for work and what kind. At 17, my suggestion to you is to keep your options broad and be willing to do whatever work you can get. That may be a temporary strategy, but it's a good one for a teenager desperate for work. Good luck.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:42 AM
5

Lawyer. Lawyer. Lawyer. And sue her for defamation. Make sure to press charges for filing a false rape report or see that your lawyer puts pressure on the police department to follow through with those charges.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:25 AM
3

Your numbers look good enough to me to work with. I think that the value in prostitutes for a cartel isn't directly related to hard currency. I think it's related to the political capital it gives them against the people who patronize those prostitutes. Senator fucky fuck likes him a ho, the cartel is happy to provide, and now they've got senator fucky fuck in their back pocket. Now, if prostitution were legal, senator fucky fuck could engage in a transaction with a woman not controlled by a car…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:10 AM
1

If you've got a baby in you, and you think that you shouldn't have a baby in you, and you haven't reached the third trimester, then you should get an abortion. The rest is window dressing.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:06 AM
7

Women who are good leaders, who have technical proficiency in the field that they are working toward leadership positions in, who know how to work with the people whom they lead as a team, who are willing to pull their own weight, roll with the punches, and get their hands dirty when necessary don't get called bossy. They get called "boss". There's a woman in my business who I've worked with a bunch of times. She doesn't sign my paychecks, or my crew's paychecks, but she is put in a position of …
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:03 AM
1

We don't because that's a fail plan.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:45 AM
2

In a manner of speaking, they are. Not even a hundred years ago, it was not possible to engage in this sort of exchange of ideas. When you tried, you got locked up or otherwise removed. Just for speaking out politically. It still happens to some degree. Ideas and dialogue are the most primary and important component of social change. They fuel activity. The guy at the gym who shows up every other day or so to maintain an athletic build is a weightlifter. The guy at the gym going for the beefcake…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:47 PM
1

An activist is someone who participates in social change. One could arguably add "intentionally" to that. I certainly am an activist. As are they. Whether or not they, or I, are activists isn't in question. What they are activists of and for is.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:26 PM
7

They're completely unself-aware.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:19 PM
0

Protip: They aren't anti rape activists. I am a fucking anti rape activist. Just like I'm an anti murder activist, an anti theft activist, an anti child molestation activist, and an anti gang violence activist. By conflating everything they don't like with rape, they use rape as a costume for their activism of something else entirely.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:02 PM
2

It wasn't written nor performed with generosity as an intent. It will, though, result in people saying "Wait? What's this thing?" and starting to ask questions. Questions are the enemy of our enemy. Answers are their undoing.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:29 PM
1

Modern psychiatry is a scam. It's not far from scientology in method, goal, and practice.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:55 PM
2

I'd rather die, than give you control. Assimilate. oh, yeah. Nail polish is fucking metal.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:53 PM
2

Nail polish is color that you put on your nails. How is it that women should only get to put colored laquor on their nails? I like Black Metal. We don't frown on that in the land of the ice trolls.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:48 PM
3

You would have the mole be kinda like the "penis enlargment" guy from that Chapelle skit about the internet. "Hey... buddy...." whack "Hey... buddyy... you wanna get laid?" whack "Whassa matter? You don' like pooozie?" whack "Don't neg me, bro!" whack And then a feminist comes along and blames the mole on the MRA. You could then close it with a slapstick whack of the padded mallet on the feminist, but I think that the whole of it doesn't lampoon actual MRAs enough yet. It needs a little salt and…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:26 PM
4

Somebody arrest this guy. His wit is a deadly weapon. I'm going to just drop "knock knock" as a meta way of communicating hijacking from now on. Too good.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:24 PM
-2

Three: One to demand they get their union break soon.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:22 PM
0

Alec Baldwin as a MRA sold. So you see him retired from public life, countryside of New York state. He's boasting out loud to a friend about how he finally got custody of his goddamn, f*cking pig of a daughter, and he couldn't be more happy or proud. Someone give this man a year end bonus. who is actually in a pig pen with other pigs This could work. Something about it feels a little awkward. You could have her be an actual pig. You could have be a human who wears a pig costume (a la Artie Lang …
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:20 PM
0

Definitely needs refinement, but I can see it working. Add in free bleeding, cocaine, prostitutes and a PUA and we're. The closing tag line with a "wakka wakka!" followed by the looney toons thing where the camera pushes in on his face while an oval border closes around his head and maybe a slide whistle and we're in business. You have an option of going for Punch and Judy slapstick the whole way or you go super serious in tenor with a last minute switch to that slapstick/looney toons aesthetic.…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:15 PM
3

Poor delivery. I'm not one to shy away from the word "nigger" or doing a soft shoe to make a point, but you've got to deliver that shit with better style.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:04 PM
1

That's interesting because every single feminist in my FB feed posts jezebel and gawker links to their feed every goddamned day.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:03 PM
6

At least somebody gets it.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:20 AM
17

Good for her. She met a lowered bar.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:16 AM
0

They should be called upon to issue a public apology. No they shouldn't. It's comedy. Stupid comedy, but comedy. All fucking things are allowed in comedy or the entire fucking purpose is defeated. Even if you don't like it.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:55 AM
0

This guy's a sock. You're smarter than that. Lesbianphobic? Come the fuck on.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:53 AM
5

Whore is a term with a definition. If you are selling sexual services, then you are by definition a whore. If you are not, then the term is not an insult, it is inaccurate.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 07:21 PM
1

Thank you, batman. That's very generous of you to say.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 07:19 PM
2

It depends on the party, really. Probably not the ones that /r/john2kxx throws. The kind that involve summoning the deep ones though...
/r/MensRights09/03/14 07:18 PM
2

Gee. That's not a sock or anything.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 07:15 PM
4

Whore isn't a slur. Manipulative lying stupid whore is. Can you guess why?
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:28 PM
2

Looks like Scalzi is starting to realize that he hasn't a chance in hell of becoming Bradbury so he's decided to go for the status of Futrelle and Myers. Let that disappointment sink in for a minute.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:25 PM
0

No one is going to take it upon themselves That's mathematically improbable.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:49 PM
14

It's funny how Lena Dunham clings to feminism even after the hatchet job that Jezebel attempted.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:46 PM
1

It's a trope. There is a pattern. Recognize it and stop being obtuse.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:50 PM
1

Another term for prejudging is "working with available data". You work with available data. The whole "prejudging" nonsense is yet another thought terminating cliche. When new data comes in, you parse it. It's really fucking simple.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:44 PM
2

I took the brush out of my coat pocket and handed it to her. Who the fuck carries a brush around in their jacket?
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:43 PM
1

You're right. But they are old.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:41 PM
1

start the hashtag. Do it now. collegedegreegap: Women have earned almost 10 million more degrees than men since 1982. I think it would be interesting to look into how those degrees are being paid for, too. How many women have their degrees sorted for them vs. how many men are stuck footing their own bill.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:39 PM
4

The racist comments Quote them.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:37 PM
2

mra's speak as one... That's not true. There is flutter and sway in the ideas and values that mra's hold. We just happen to be willing to often trim the fat and focus on the actual problems, although our ideas of those problems and what their solutions might be have variance.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:37 PM
2

What systematic oppresshun!?!? I think it's ironic that all these chicks are definitely going to be the type who cunt on about "hate speech". As they deliver "hate speech". Lulz.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:34 PM
1

You fucking idiots know that this is a sock, right?
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:31 PM
2

Doesn't that second one happen pretty frequently though? If he's black or asian. edit: Or old.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:30 PM
0

Cruelty? I imagine not. Grounds for anullment? If your honeymoon isn't a slip and slide fuck fest, you've done it wrong, you're with the wrong person, and you need to get the fuck out. Fast.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:26 PM
-16

Get the sand out of your vagina.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:25 PM
1

If you recognize the contributors as new, please upvote them so that the conversation can stay vital. Even if they're saying stupid shit.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:22 PM
4

but this pushed the line. It's comedy. There's no such thing as a line with comedy. Don't upvote this fucking idiot. Jesus christ, people.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:17 PM
6

So. Which sock is the writer of this sketch?
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:16 PM
10

I see, sir, that you have very big penis. In a manner of speaking (and I haven't seen the sketch yet because I was out raping minority women with my frat brothers last night while bribing every employer we ran into to pay women less, but not bother to hire them anyway), the sketch did us a big favor by stirring up ... oh. You said that already. You're not playing devil's advocate. You're being a rational and intelligent human being. Carry on. I'm watching you.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:14 PM
1

It's a change by measure in the process to an actual sex positive society. You are correct that the monetization aspect means that it can't be totally sexually empowering for anyone. Look at it like this; The intellectual aspect has women being incentivized to actually be intellectual since dudes can get sex anywhere and that whole game drops off. The sexual aspect, though, will have women saying "Wait. I have to fuck like a hooker now too". They'll have to compete with prostitutes for sexual at…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:55 PM
1

No feedback on the paragraph breaks? Jesus. I put a lot of time into that and only asked one thing in return.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:45 PM
2

The idea is to make practice and theory meet. It's not that fucking hard. Fuck. Why do I have to keep explaining the most basic of shit to people. You motherfuckers keep dragging me back to 101 levels and I'm trying to get some fucking doctorate shit sorted out over here.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:44 PM
0

Another friend, an adult female, recently got a DUI. A friend of mine also recently got a DUI. Also not his first. (You saw the "his" right? You're smarter than the average redditor and I don't have to explain what "his" means and explain further, right? Dem context clues?) You know what we did? Offered to loan him bail while laughing in his face. It's a fucking DUI. You don't get fucking supported through a fucking DUI. DUI's are proof that you aren't mature enough to have a fucking license. Gr…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:10 PM
3

Throw the book at that evil piece of shit little faggot. because you know just as well as I do that gay hate comes into that one pretty heavily.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:07 PM
-6

Ever zoom in on grey? Know what you get? a rapidly alternating pattern of black and white. Grey is an illusion perceived by those whose sensory organs lack ability.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:06 AM
2

I'm 100% serious. Convict people for this shit. She did not consent to his load in her snatch, that's why they wore the condom. He poked holes in the condom so that he could stick his load in her snatch without her consent and by his intentions have that load meet her ovum without her matching intention and make a monkey that she wasn't ready to have. Toss the cocksucker in the fucking clink. And toss every guy who does the same in the clink. And toss every chick who takes a guys load without hi…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:02 AM
104

The male experience is one of being told "get the fuck out, you don't belong here" at any and every opportunity. The female experience is one of being told "come on in! you are sooooo welcome!" constantly.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 04:54 PM
1

He deleted the post, so chances are he's going to issue some sort of lame apology that equates to "Me so sorry! Me so sorry! You still buyz my rekkids, girlz!?!?!"
/r/MensRights08/03/14 02:35 PM
7

Wow. You fucking got me. I lost so hard. I'm sure I would have figured it out, but I seriously saw red for a split second after reading That's not "work", shitlord. Real work is worrying about what the kids until I saw the /s. Damn. slow clap, motherfucker. You almost had me going on a rant about how many loaders I know whose hands are useless as anything but claws because they've been smashed so many times.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 02:14 PM
1

Then you suffer from myopia.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 12:56 PM
1

So, you're asserting that Gordon was incorrect in her request?
/r/MensRights08/03/14 12:52 PM
5

The problem with this is that women would need to improve Mother nature abhors a vacuum. What would happen is this; There would be a lot more prostitution. A lot more of it. It would be a lot safer for those who participate. Physical and mental health resources would be made available. Legal resources would be made available. Shit. There'd probably even be some sort of union, although I think the current union model would hurt them too much for it to be worth it. With so many women (and men) in …
/r/MensRights08/03/14 11:40 AM
2

Where the fuck have you been?
/r/MensRights08/03/14 10:53 AM
3

Yes. They do. That's how war works.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:58 AM
2

I like how articles like these are thrown up here in hopes of getting some of us to demand he be exonerated, and instead we're managing to be intelligent enough to say "No. Fuck that guy. Fuck every guy that does that, and fuck every woman that does that too. Welcome to equality, bitches."
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:39 AM
3

And he's also more likely to get a bullet in the head just for existing.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:38 AM
-1

Jesus christ, the author looks like Eugene the Jeep. Probably has something to do with her need to be given things she hasn't earned.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:36 AM
0

Sidebar. You. Reading it. Be.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:35 AM
3

It's more progress than we've seen before. Good note, BTW. That really ties the sentiment together.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:33 AM
6

Women perform 66 per cent of the world’s work Funny. You know how many women I've seen on a loading dock at 4AM this year? One. I've seen one. She was a union worker. She stood inside, drank hot chocolate, held a clipboard, and pretended to push gear every so often. Meanwhile, those people dealing with the forks, outside, pushing tons of steel? All men.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:32 AM
17

Why would any guy spend $100+ on a date, even more money buying girls drinks in a club or a bar, and wait several dates just to have sex once, when you can drop $100 for a good looking escort and be guaranteed to fuck her? So much of the dating world is based on men's desperation to get laid. Men jump through hoops and play along with ridiculous games, building up tons of resentment and psychological damage from the whole shuck. They waste tons of time, money, and personal intent on people who a…
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:29 AM
1

Her lawyers will play the race card and the gender card, she'll get a pussy pass and be reunited with the kids by this time next year. Mark my motherfucking words.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:20 AM
10

Roosh and the PUA world are douche factories. They stink up the joint.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:17 AM
3

"Only" which is an absolute.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:16 AM
3

The mistake that most people make is thinking that men have shaped work. They're wrong. The work has shaped men. That is why we're so much more willing to work. It goes that deep into the male cultural development and physiological development over generations.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:15 AM
6

I have no problem with this ruling. Now we have a precedent and we can be sure to convict and sentence women who do it identically, right? Right?
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:14 AM
11

If by stone aged work culture, they mean one where they are expected to carry their weight and do their work, then sure. Let's go with that.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:13 AM
1

Good point. Your phrasing took me a few rereads to comprehend the point, though. It could be because I'm lacking in reading comp. I'd suggest, though, that you read that sentence aloud to yourself a few times to feel how awkward it is. It feels like an upright toothpick in the middle of your mouth.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 01:40 AM
1

Guess he couldn't handle the backlash. And now we see why he married Kim Gordon.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 12:37 AM
1

Dave Barry established himself as a whiteknight decades ago.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 12:32 AM
3

This statement aside, I would think that Lilly Allen would make the Lillith Fair crowd go wrist deep.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 12:11 AM
-2

Your body image is your own to reconcile. If you are so weak of will, intellect, and mind that your perception of yourself changes because somebody else told you it should, then you are prequalified for the Darwin Award that you will eventually earn.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 12:01 AM
1

This one's hunting for cherries.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:59 PM
5

Like you may have to work Unless I luck out on a rare cake contract, my average day bottoms out at ten hours. Usually, I'm doing 12-16. Often, I do 20. My job involves loading and unloading industrial equipment from 18 wheelers and then installing, calibrating, and operating that gear. When was the last time you unloaded a truck before dawn on a loading dock by the seaport in February, motherfucker? not just get things because you're a white man? Can you quote the part where anyone demanded anyt…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:56 PM
9

Wow. Fucking Wow. This is a HUGE thing to come out of Thurston Moore's mouth. His ex wife, Kim Gordon is a founder of the riot grrrl brand of feminism and their band, Sonic Youth's song "Kool Thing" is a manifesto and anthem for that group. From an artistic standpoint, I really like Moore, Gordon, and their band. When I first heard the song ask the question "I just wanna know, what are you gonna do for me? I mean, are you gonna liberate us girls From male white corporate oppression?" I thought "…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:50 PM
4

She certainly didn't make the money with her adroit and in depth intelligence.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:27 PM
4

She isn't strictly white.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 09:24 PM
2

Heck, if I do not have to pay for my internet access, hot drinks, the video games and the recording equipment, and it even allows me to get new and improved versions, you bet that I will have more money left over in the end. You might want to read Kickstarter's TOS. It explicitly says that the money is not to be used for personal living expenses. Has she sold the specific picture that was fradulently obtained? Nope. A single penny from the youtube affiliate program dictates otherwise. If you mea…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 09:16 PM
4

You are too Sarkeesianesque }*¬) You cut me deep.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 09:10 PM
1

but I used induction, deduction, and abduction You seem to have ignored all of the evidence that this woman is using her daughter as a proxy to commit fraud. You know, like the part where the daughter admitted to having lost interest in bothering to do the game and wandered on to other things? Like that. Man, you are lost in delusion and rationalization. Being around you must be a constant chore of parsing your fantasies with reality. Do you just wander out into traffic and stuff?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:38 PM
3

I love the sound of my own name.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:26 PM
10

Rather brilliant, neh? She bitches and moans about women not making gains, and then steals from one, preventing her from making gains.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:13 PM
5

Did she make money out of the sale of things? Nope. Youtube affilliate program. Speaking engagements. Paid media appearances. She's also been trying to license her work to educational institutions for classroom materials. So. That "nope" of yours is patently false. Does that allow her to live pretty comfy? Yep. That is not the purpose of those funds, nor is it something she claimed the funds would be raised for. By using the monies raised on kickstarter to fund her lifestyle and not her media pr…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:10 PM
3

Argument accepted.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:04 PM
0

Can you quote the ad hominem attack?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:04 PM
2

one, the father claims as much The father claims what? That people were picking on the kid? He could claim the fucking sun was the moon that wouldn't make it so. Skepticism is good for you. two, the headline provided by the OP does not target the mother "Remember the millionaire who exploited gender issues" The millionaire in question is the mother. The headline targets the mother. You're a fucking idiot. The daughter is being treated as a victim of her mother's exploitation. I'm surrounded by s…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:03 PM
0

The game might come out. And Obama might stop advocating for the surveillance and murder of american citizens and deliver on some of that hope and change he was promising. But probably not.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:34 PM
-1

Turns out it wasn't a guess. Induction. Deduction. Abduction. Turns out they work.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:00 PM
30

The videos themselves are free to watch for the end user but they have been monetized through kickstarter, youtube's affiliate program, and the dozens of educational institutions that have payed her to speak. Free to watch doesn't mean they haven't been monetized. Just look at basic non cable television and terrestrial radio. Both are free to watch, and both are very lucrative, which is why they too have to pay licensing fees for content and images.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 12:13 PM
3

Andrea Yates begs to differ.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:46 AM
48

The issue is that she made a fuck load of money with that art. She did not pay a licensing fee to the artists and media producers she plagiarized nor did she even bother to get their consent. She saw something she wanted and she took it. She stole. Because her indignant philosophy of self gives her an entitled outlook when it comes to other people's labor Not only did she make a fuck ton of money with that stolen art work via kickstarter, but she compounded that with her media star status and us…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:45 AM
3

The sign said "No blacks, No dogs, No Irish."
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:39 AM
2

where the deli workers are majority women Interesting. Why is that? Any differences between the way delis are run or what they carried in Ireland when compared to the states? General curiosity.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:38 AM
-12

In this case, the accuser was 14 and described as borderline mentally retarded. I have to say, I'm really not into prosecuting tards like they aren't tards. That isn't to say that correction to their behavior shouldn't occur, but tards don't really have the ability to control their behavior like non-tards. The question is, what the fuck do you do with a misbehaving tard?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:36 AM
5

Fuck the upvotes. I want recognition of truth.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:12 AM
1

catalysts need not be recent, nor in close proximity. All things affect and effect all things and are affected and effected by all things. Butterflies and tsunamis, capitan.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 03:15 AM
21

He was me and he asserted rather vehemently that this bitch was using her daughter as a proxy to metadamsel her way into some free money. He is also still me.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 03:09 AM
2

huh?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:57 AM
2

It's not clear at all, You're right. It's not clear at all. To you. To those who have a bit more intelligence and willingness to use deductive, inductive, and abductive logic to feel out situational probabilities? To them it was as obvious as the fucking sun. That it wasn't clear to you should worry you for your own cognitive and observational abilities.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:54 AM
5

mmmmmmmmmmm. The sweet sweet taste of acknowledgment.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:50 AM
1

Yup. You're really not that complicated.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 12:06 AM
2

That's not a woman in a coal mine. That's a model in a PR photo.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 12:05 AM
17

Nobody's picking on the kid, you fucking idiot. They are holding the mother accountable for fraud.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:27 PM
26

Say. My. Motherfucking. Name.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:26 PM
1

Physics governs all. Action. Reaction. The conceit of the human is that so many think otherwise.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 09:13 PM
2

What the fuck does a promo picture of one person standing in front of gear prove?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 09:13 PM
1

Protip: Same thing.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:53 PM
1

Uh women are already in coal mines LOL. Yeah. And they're on the decks of commercial fishing boats and the front lines of war too, right? LOL. No they aren't.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:53 PM
-5

A 20 watt bulb may resent a flood light for it's brilliance, but that makes the flood light no dimmer. A spoon full of water may resent an ocean trench for it's depth, but that makes the trench no more shallow. The earth may resent Jupiter for it's distance from the sun, but that makes neither planet any closer. A rotten stump may resent a sequoia for it's vivrance, but that make the sequoia no less alive. A model T may resent a formula 1 racer for it's land speed, but that makes the record no l…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 01:21 PM
-4

An ant may resent a giant for his height. It does not make the giant any shorter.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 01:04 PM
0

They ain't never gonna let you sleep in the big house if you don't learn how to kiss their hand right.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 01:02 PM
6

I wish I had cocaine money. I definitely do the alcohol, though. How the fuck else am I supposed to handle a world that constantly tells me I don't belong in it, shouldn't belong in it, am at fault for all it's ills, and won't ever belong in it?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:59 PM
11

Let's pretend we're talking about running a ship. I'm the captain and I need a crew. I want a navigator. The best fucking navigator I can afford. First thing I'm looking at is their history and their skillsets. I don't know, maps of places they've navigated. Then I'm looking at their asking rate. Then I'm looking at their personal so that I know who I'm talking to when I make the offer. Their gender and their ethnicity only matters so that I know what language to talk to them in. It's fucking wi…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:55 PM
-1

Can you invite the cocksucker to the table to participate in the discussion?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:39 PM
-3

It is common for an observer of lesser intellect to consider the observed greater intellect as narcissism. She isn't a narcissist, she's just taller than you. And it upsets you that she knows it.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:36 PM
2

Not all change requires a catalyst. The laws of physics and observed chemistry dictate otherwise.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:27 PM
0

soooooooooooooooooooooooooock pppuuuuuuuuupeeeeeeeettttttt
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:33 AM
2

It's another example of men pursuing the frontiers out of necessity and then women putting their hand out and demanding the fruits of their labor and their risk.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:32 AM
4

You won't see change until men's issues are effecting women You won't see a change until women have to venture into the coal mines out of necessity because the gravy trains have stopped. Change needs a catalyst.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:27 AM
2

What systematic oppresshun!?!?
/r/MensRights05/03/14 10:07 PM
5

In the US, the mother's demands are considered full parental consent.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 09:21 PM
1

same formula, slightly varied integers in the variable.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 02:14 PM
4

trigger locks I'm going to co-opt this term so fucking hard. I'm forking your dongle and I'm not even asking for your permission.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 01:52 PM
1

Wait, what? If I comprehend what you're saying, you're asserting that feminists join the military to somehow equalize the demand for men in the military? And that a better option would be to demand an end to selective service? I may be having trouble getting what you're saying here, but I'm going to go with what I think you're saying. And it's ludicrous. Feminists aren't joining the military to equalize anything. They're joining the military so that they can play soldier from way behind front li…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 01:49 PM
8

Why get over your problems when you can use them to blackmail, bamboozle, and bully people into giving you free shit?
/r/MensRights05/03/14 01:06 PM
3

that conversation and interactions become stilted. That's the goal. That's the whole fucking point. Stop the dialogue so that you can control it. He who is most offended has the most control.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 01:05 PM
2

"Trigger warnings" and enforced observation of and navigation around "triggers" are about one thing and one thing only; control. It is a very simple but extremely dishonest and manipulative power play that spits in the face of personal liberty and freedom of expression. No society that panders to them nor insists on having them pandered to can ever ever be one of liberty nor humanitarian or humanist ideals. None. As soon as someone starts bandying about "triggering" rhetoric, you can be assured …
/r/MensRights05/03/14 01:03 PM
2

but doesn't the need to have something that another has and which isn't an object equate to needing to be like that person? To possess the same qualities isn't imitation a necessity? Very astute question. The answer is... sort of. The best example that I can come up with is the whole "girl gamer" and "geek girl" thing. Few women, much fewer than men, are into video games and any other sort of geekery, but since the 80's geeks have been trudging into "cool" and wealth. Seeing that "cool" and seei…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:28 PM
8

What systematic oppresshun!?!?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:34 PM
3

Unwelcome sexual advances? Like asking a chick out but being too ugly or broke for her taste? Gee. Not like this is an inflated statistic or anything.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:32 PM
1

SRS sock.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:27 PM
-2

Hypergamy in action. They have no use for men whom they consider inferior to themselves unless those men are shining their shoes or hauling their trash.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:22 PM
6

It's breathe rape now.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:21 PM
2

It isn't that women want or need to be just like men. It's that they can't handle the idea of anyone having anything that they don't. The herd mentality goes deep.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:17 PM
-4

Cuban Missile Crisis. My mistake.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 04:32 PM
8

Pattern recognition is a thing. Learn it.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 02:47 PM
4

They would fabricate them. That's what they'd do.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 02:42 PM
-11

You really don't think we're in another Bay of Pigs?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 12:58 PM
2

you don't start saying she's too rich to know what's going on. Yeah. You do. You immediately discredit her as out of touch, and prove her as such, because she is.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:56 AM
-16

At the very moment that you're reading this post, we are standing at the threshold of world war III with our toes across the edge. That isn't hyperbole. We're looking at another Bay of Pigs. Cuban Missile Crisis (For some reason, I've always conflated the two. It happens.) That people are in such denial of this infuriates me. It makes me want to grab them by the collar, hem them up against the wall with an elbow in their throat and ask them how serious they think that is.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:54 AM
0

What systematic oppresshun!?!?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:20 AM
1

It's all about edge in conflict. Hobble your opponent and they can't swing back.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:19 AM
15

Because he's a lap dog with no interest in parsing inconvenient fact against the orders of his massa. Meyers is obsessed with getting laid. So obsessed, that he can't control it enough to keep lewd and inappropriate invitations out of his rhetoric. Because he's obsessed with getting laid, he's obessed with getting female approval since he thinks that this will get him laid. He's the type of guy who can walk into a room with a soaked umbrella and thunder chasing him, shake the umbrella off, hang …
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:13 AM
2

You wouldn't be putting this time in if you weren't feeling threatened and you would be actually making cogent arguments rather than flippant deraling and "aw shucks" misdirection.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:09 AM
1

Actually you attack both since the two are inextricably linked. Or you end up fighting a rigged match with one hand tied behind your back.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:08 AM
0

LOL....so you think that Obama is just an ignorant moron[1] when he claimed I think he's a boldfaced lying sack of shit who panders to whatever wave he thinks will get him to shore. And there's plenty of proof of that.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:59 AM
1

Ask "Who's paying for your tuition?"
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:57 AM
1

Well. A real interesting experiment would be this (and I'd love to do it myself); Buy all the cupcakes. It's near impossible to find a woman willing to turn away her own privilege, so it would have to be a dude out of necessity. So, you buy up all their cupcakes for what, less than $100? Whatever it is, you buy them all. Then you pull out a sign that says "Raising Awareness for Equality; All proceeds go to (some charity... I'm cheekily thinking prostate cancer or MGM awareness, but whatever thin…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:55 AM
2

Find some female friends. It is a rare woman who breaks ranks and rejects her free shit like that.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:51 AM
2

I don't yell at church booths Shall we bring the WBC into this?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:50 AM
2

And you're spending way too much time in this thread trying to convince people that they are reading way too far into it. Which goes to show; we're doing the right thing. You feel threatened.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:48 AM
1

People's attitude toward the Germans after the war was pretty identical to that of the Germans attitude toward the Jews before and during it. In a lot of places, it still is.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:46 AM
1

Actually, the point is that worrying about something that one's opponant doesn't have to worry about gives those opponents an advantage. It's all about edge in conflict. Hobble your opponent and they can't swing back. But then, you know this. You're one of them.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:45 AM
0

There's no need to be a dickhead about it. Except, once you get here; Next, ask whether those stats account for # of hours worked per week (they don't), They immediately stop listening and start damselling and name calling. The facts are inconvenient, so they avoid them at all costs. They cannot be convinced to voluntarily consider and accept those facts. They have to be forced. It's the only way.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:42 AM
1

And you have to unload trucks for ten hours.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:40 AM
0

You may believe that business owners should have the right to set prices according to any discriminatory schemata that they choose. You may believe that that's how it should be. But that isn't how it is. This is actually illegal. Nobody cares, though, because it is the "blame" group that is disadvantaged by it, not the "help" group.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:39 AM
1

What a bunch of thought terminating nonsense. you can't prove things about that person Actually. You can. For example, you can ascertain the schools that Wolfe went to. You can find out which jobs she has worked and from that, you can abduct which jobs she hasn't had. You can easily find out her net worth. You can easily find out who her parents are and what they did for a living and thereby the kind of environment that she was raised in and the resources that she was raised with. You can find o…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:34 AM
3

Squicked me out a bit SJW jargon spotted. This an SRSer/AMRer. Jesus. You fucking people are so in love with your jargon that you can't drop it to maintain your cover. Fuck.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 03:50 AM
4

Wouldn't it be $1.00 for white people and $0.75 for black people? You'd be fine with that because you hate white people.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 01:35 AM
0

I think that OP is due some punative damages for the assault on his civil rights. Don't agree? Ok. Cupcakes. $.75 for white people, $1.00 for black people. Now you agree.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 12:54 AM
5

they are manufacturing it themselves. Of course they are. It's much easier to bitch about a problem with your hand out demanding reparative freebies than it is to actually do the work.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 09:03 PM
2

You should actually be able to to sue for this sort of thing. As far as I know, it is illegal.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:54 PM
3

It does help. It lets all the men in the area who haven't the courage to speak up, but who suspect that there is something fishy about the wage gap thing know that they are not alone. Knowing that they are not alone leads them to speak out more.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:54 PM
15

If you live in a major city in a western nation, then being gay is pretty good. There are a lot of social support networks and tailored events and spaces for you to patronize and get involved with. There are clubs, bars, art spaces, health centers, fitness centers, sporting teams, charity organizations, outing groups, you name it. People will tend to welcome you in all strata. Being gay friendly is a merit badge in urban western culture. Women tend to want the company of gay men, lesbians see yo…
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:15 PM
1

It's pretty cut and dry. The song is about the steady erosion of a human being until they die used up and beaten. That very much is the male experience. It's funny, I was just thinking the same.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 01:37 PM
2

So, in a nutshell "What systematic oppresshun!?!?!"
/r/MensRights03/03/14 01:16 PM
1

I would think that anyone who kidnapped, assaulted, and attempted to sexually assault any other people would fit the "ill mental health" category.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 01:10 PM
2

Men do it too. The difference is that people don't tolerate it from men. If you're a male and in conflict with someone and you bring up that time that whatever the fuck happened, the best you're going to get is "What does that have to do with this?" It'll work sometimes in familial relationships and the like, but overall that sort of throwing old dirt in people's faces just isn't accepted when men do it.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 01:05 PM
2

People who do that betray a fundamental dishonesty and reflexive ignorance on their part. They are disinterested in considering new ideas or any concepts outside of their prevailing ideology. You will find this cropping up elsewhere in your relationship.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 12:59 PM
-1

Can we avoid generalizing entire genders? Not if you want to discuss demographics. If you can't handle discussing demographics, then you don't have a place in a discussion of sociology and behavior pattern by demographic. SOME women are not willing to put in the work, SOME are. So, how many? 50%? 80%? 20%? "Some" is a bullshit term. It's a weasel word. If there were more women then men willing to do the work, there would be more women in that field. There are more educational incentives, there i…
/r/MensRights03/03/14 11:04 AM
1

The truth shall set ye free.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:17 PM
1

When you use the tactics of the Sith, you become the Sith. But you knew that already. You're not here to participate honestly. You're a troll pulling silly troll bullshit. Poorly.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 03:35 PM
1

I don't know. Concentrate on shit that isn't dumber than a mongoloid child eating his own fist? Maybe something like that.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 03:31 PM
-1

That still doesn't explain how you're connecting maregal to GHCQ. I'm honestly curious what lead you to the conclusion. Unless you're just being silly.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 03:20 PM
0

OK. I get that. But how are you connecting maregal to that?
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:42 PM
1

Men still outnumber women in science because they are fucking willing to put in the work and the hours. That is why. That is all of it. That is the end of it. There is no other reason for it. Everything else is a bullshit smoke screen.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:33 PM
0

GCHQ? The british internet spy org? What makes you say that?
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:32 PM
1

To psychologicaly rape someone, you'd have to be a fucking telepath. Cut that shit out.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:31 PM
3

Funny. Just the other day, I was walking to a friend's place and having myself a think. I was thinking about how feminists are increasingly co-opting and appropriating public spaces for themselves by using damselling tactics to criminalize male participation in those spaces. It's a lot like when you're sitting in the back seat of the car with your little sister and she decides to be a brat. "Moooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, Gieger's touching me!" "No. I'm not." "He keeps putting his elbow on me!…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:28 PM
1

trollololololllllllllll. I smell you, troll.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:12 PM
6

How much does Camille Paglia's popularity here have to with her tomboyish attitude? None. Dr. Helen Smith isn't tomboyish at all and she's very popular here, moreso than Paglia. Her popularity is based on... dah dah dahhhhhhhhhhhh, her ideas and intelligence, not her appearance.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:10 PM
3

on the commune where I live aaaaaaand I'm out.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 11:20 AM
-1

A lot of single mothers and convenient lesbians.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 10:01 AM
1

All this typy typing there, Anty Karen, and you have yet to say my name. It's what they say when you're getting under their skin. Don't I know it. You performed wonderfully, BTW. I know, I know, they barely let you get a word in edgewise. That's why your "seed the population" strategy works better than my "scorch the earth" strategy.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 03:59 AM
10

So, are the cops protecting women from rape male power fantasies too? It's funny how whenever a "male power fantasy" gets women more free shit, it stops being a "male power fantasy"... until they want something to throw in that male's face for failing to provide them with more free shit.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:28 AM
1

I am here to honestly debate Not if you're drawing comparisons to Stormfront, you're not. an overt fascist who uses that exact term, Hitler was a vegetarian. I'm sure he used a lot of words. Oh, Godwin? OK. Not like we're talking about national socialism or anything.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:26 AM
2

It's a constant feminist tactic. Ignore the paragraph. Avoid the sentence. Concentrate on the word. simple derailing.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:20 AM
1

Mehhhhh, Anthem is short and worth reading because Rush did a concept album based on it (2112). Sure, go ahead and get through The Fountainhead. It's a good read about the struggle of individuality against collectivism, but it is a bit of a self congratulatory philosophical wank fest. Rand imparts way too much virtue on to the wealthy and seems to villify the needy and disenfranchised. I wanted Atlas Shrugged to be good, and the concept of individualists boycotting society until it cut the shit …
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:15 AM
2

Nothing makes a feminist's giney tingle like a smug sense of indignance, superiority, and self righteousness. Same mechanism. Different band.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:07 AM
4

as your wealth increases so does your standard do your demands, and as your standard demands increases the costs of maintaining that standard those demands also increases. Let's say that a decent comfortable standard of living costs 60k/yr. For that you get a vehicle, a place to live (I'm thinking the equivalent of a small but comfortable house or a good spacious apartment, both with enough room for you to work and play in), you're out of debt, and when you're hungry you get to eat pretty much w…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:02 AM
3

GWW isn't far right. She's a libertarian. For the most part, I can't stand libertarians. I think they're the kind to bitch and moan about government intervention and presence, and then wonder why their roads aren't in good repair. I think what it's really about for most libertarians is being pissed off that their inheritances get taxed. But of all political ideologies, I find libertarians to be the most open to new ideas and to be the least dogmatic and easily offended by questioning their ideas…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:24 PM
1

Now this you make sure to play up. Naomi Wolf accuses rape survivor of rape apology. That is a PR man's wet dream.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:17 PM
-1

Are you going to argue that Naomi Wolf rents a ratty room in a shithole with people she doesn't know?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:09 PM
0

In 2013-2014, my rent has consisted of either $650/month or $800/month (latter being a nice large bedroom in a well maintained coop building). Pics or it didn't happen. Eating out and groceries like fresh fruit are vastly cheaper, as are many other things like college tuition. Lie.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:41 PM
7

What she should have done is exactly what I suggested when this was announced. Go in there with a heavy handed hammer of class warfare and decimate Wolf by bludgeoning her with her own ivory tower. Over and over again, giving examples of how Wolf has near zero experience with the average population and asserting that she is fighting a rich white woman's battle against her father, not a humanist battle for equality. The goal should have been to sever Wolf's affected connection with populist ideal…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:22 PM
-4

My girlfriend is regular cat-called lie.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:14 PM
4

It doesn't really happen. Certainly not like the people who blither about it try to assert. Women don't walk out of their houses and have to wade through a Walking Dead like shuffling crowd of catcalling zombies whose dicks control their mouths. I've seen it happen on the strip outside of the meatmarket bars. I've seen it happen amongst a crew of teamsters, who of course are waiting on every street corner. I've seen it happen in black and latino neighborhoods. I've seen it happen at sporting eve…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:13 PM
1

Do you really think Obama, the president of the US and leader of the western world really believes women make 77 cents on the dollar due to sexism? I think that he believes it. I think that he believes it because he's never had a job that involved being on the docks before sunrise.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:52 PM
11

, I think it's very hard to argue that women aren't more at risk from casual street harrassment such as catcalling. No it isn't. That shit is blown way the fuck out of proportion. Men are more vulnerable to street violence then women. "Aye baby, can I holla at you?" is nothing compared to getting a brick smashed in your face, stabbed, robbed, and beaten.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:23 PM
1

Antigone Darling is a new and interesting name. The whole "anarchy for everybody!" bullshit needs to go, though. She's a bit too Jeanine Garafolo, though. edit: Take a look at Wolf's page. She doesn't mention the debate at all. It isn't even listed in her February appearances. Gee. I wonder why.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 01:08 PM
2

If you want to read something that summarizes the better parts of Rand's work, just read Plato's The Allegory of the Cave.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 01:07 PM
7

Wolf flipped her shit when a waitress called her (a Rhodes scholar educated at Oxford and formerly married to a Clinton speech writer) wealthy. Say it.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:59 PM
3

"You gonna let him sleep in the big house!!!" A male feminist response every time an MRA issue gets social recognition.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:54 PM
8

She is pretty much the antithesis of feminism, Actually, she's perfectly representative of it.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:52 PM
0

One thing that isn't considered is that women tend to be given things by other people rather regularly. When mommy and daddy pay your rent, that doesn't get listed under income. All those free meals and gifts that guys who want their attention pay for? Not listed under income. All the freebies that society offers them? Not listed under income. A telling factor is the idea that women control more than 80% of spending power. This means that men control less than 20%. That's poverty.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:50 PM
4

what systematic oppresshun!?!?
/r/MensRights27/02/14 05:56 PM
-1

What systematic oppresshun!?!?
/r/MensRights27/02/14 05:55 PM
27

The real problem is that women actually out earn men but they've managed to package it to appear that the opposite is the case. That is the real problem.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 05:54 PM
1

but women are the majority of those in poverty, That doesn't parse well with the fact that women control more than 80% of spending.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 03:04 AM
4

Duly noted.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 12:31 PM
-5

Of course they don't. That shit gets you killed. They'd rather get the same compensation for someone who is exposed to high mortality without that exposure. Feminism. There are five lights.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 10:27 AM
2

not being compensated for it appropriately. citations?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 10:26 AM
3

Half the time I'm arguing with them, I feel like I'm shouting "There are four lights!" while they dangle approval with one hand, and cock back a hatchet with the other.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:17 AM
2

Or maybe you were just exceptionally prone to exploring ideas Wait... you mean that intellectual curiosity is a thing? Well blow me down.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 07:15 AM
5

That fucking kool aid drinking smile. Jesus christ. That smile is straight out of Jonestown. So gross. I think homeboy is trying desperately to reincarnate the spirit of snakepliskinist, but I don't mind the style bite since he's not around any longer. When women start spouting this "you are male, you are privileged, you have shit that I don't," especially when they're clearly middle class or better, I want to get in their faces and scream "What? What do I have that you don't? What the fuck do I…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 07:12 AM
2

what systematic oppreshun!?!?!? Women and feminists have no idea what it's like to have complete and total abandonment of your personal value be the norm. None. None at all.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 09:36 PM
55

Now that shit is a greatly appreciated olive branch. Please participate in this sub and keep us appraised of your progress. I think that you will find /r/mensrights largely supportive of protecting and preserving the agency of all human beings.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 09:32 PM
1

D&D doesn't make them into occultists, Welllllllllllll... sorta yes, sorta no. My love of D&D certainly paved a path for a fascination with fringe religions and heavy metal. And before it was D&D, it was Choose Your Own Adventure books. And before it was Choose Your Own Adventure, it was He-Man. So... there is a progression.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 08:34 PM
1

It just seems to me that you're asking a non question for the purposes of making yourself feel clever. "What happens to the statistics about water in a desert? Hurr durr, I'm so clever! Got yoU! Got YOU! Got Youz! Guize! I gotz dem! I asked dem if da statistics about Zebras apply to elephants! Dere iz no zebras in da elephant penz! Hurr durr guize! Hurr durr! Me so clever!" How do stats affecting women apply to situations where there are no women involved? Uhhh.... well... how do stats affecting…
/r/MensRights25/02/14 07:02 PM
8

Step 1) Go to a college campus Step 2) Ask where women's center is Step 3) Ask where men's center is Step 4) Start there.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 05:26 PM
3

I hear the doppler of my name being said in the near future. Over and over again.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 05:25 PM
2

You neither said "some" nor "most" in your initials statement, thereby without further clarification, both could possibly apply. You really need to learn the definitions of the concepts you work with before you try to apply them. It makes you look foolish otherwise. If you're like, we can start tossing around definitions where I point out to you that a generalization does not necessitate an all inclusive statement and you further try to deny it. Or you could just admit you're wrong.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 06:03 AM
1

Connor Oberst strikes me as about as liable to commit rape as Morrisey. I wouldn't be surprised if he came and was like "Yeah. I've been gay for the last 20 years. These guys are my ex boyfriends, and I've never been interested in women sexually." Does that make it impossible for him to have committed rape? No. And there is a legal system in place to determine that. I think it makes it highly improbable.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 12:20 AM
-4

"some" If you were literate enough, you would comprehend that "some" is implied. Generalizations are not necesseraly all inclusive, therefore differentiationg "some" from all is not necessary. The whole "not all! You said all! not all! generalizaaaaaaytyyyyyy yshun!" bullshit isn't even an argument, it's a bit of semantic misdirection and intentional misinterpretation for the purpose of feeding your own ego.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 12:14 AM
1

Oh my fucking god. The rules. The fucking rules. Holy shit, the fucking rules. I had no idea that a recognizable portion of women live by this garbage. I had no idea that it even existed. Then a woman I was dating started talking about it. Holy shit, that was wierd.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 12:09 AM
3

I have to agree with you on this. I've read Tucker Max a few times and had a chuckle here and there. Then there's a moment where you're like "Oh. He isn't being hyperbolic or polemic at all. He actually means this shit. Meh. I'll pass." And that's mostly my reaction to Tucker Max. Meh. I'll pass.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 12:07 AM
11

I have no idea what the fuck anybody was saying. The chick who slapped, though, watch her posture. It's the posture of a 9 year old obese child who spends most of her free time stuffing cream horns in her face and lashes out when they get taken away.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 09:55 PM
19

So... where do I go for my three scoops? Because I haven't gotten one yet. I sure got a bill for them, and to subsidize the fourth. But I haven't gotten the one yet. So, where do I go for my three scoops? When I get them, we'll chronicle my reaction to it.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 09:50 PM
1

what made it bad?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:27 AM
0

Most of the time, when I ask a woman what she offers as an equivalent reciprocation of a man's potential purchase of a jewel encrusted diamond ring made of precious metals, her response is "what do you mean? He gets meeeeee!" So. To beak this down mathematically, with A = male, B = female, and X=expensive gifts, you get A+X=B. They can never quite explain how that equation balancs out to me. In my opinion, A+X>B, and in order to balance it out, X needs to be removed from the equation entirely or…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:26 AM
1

I always like the customizable character options. The player gets to pick. They can be their own gender, they can be the opposite gender. I'm sure in the near future, there will be demands for transgendered game characters and it will be silly to watch devs struggle with that minefield of eggshells.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:15 PM
1

Oh, stop. This woman shot hours and hours of footage. Documentary filmmaking is a summary of the subject, with editing for the best encapsulating pieces as the object. So, stop. Really. You're blowing on a fire that just won't burn. Most of the people in this sub are going to be quite appreciative of this documentary. It's biggest flaw is that it wasn't long enough. I wanted more. Which means that the documentarist was wonderfully successful in her goal. There is nothing judgmental in her proces…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:31 PM
1

You know that thing where dudes are all like "OMG! I so want to watch two chicks fuck!"? She's got that. Only for dudes. For some reason she can't or won't or is afraid to pursue it as a past time, so it turned into an unhealthy fixation and obsession for her where her shame and guilt and fear got transferred and transmogrphied into hatred. So, to express her sexual frustration, she turned to sexual violence. Jesus. This shit is easy. How much do profilers make a year and where do I sign up?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:09 PM
3

The fuck do I owe you? Seriously. Tell me what I owe you and tell me how you reciprocate that.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:05 PM
7

The ending was wrong. The ending should be; Bart: Thanks for the friendly debate, Lisa. You made some good points and I think we can go a long way to seeing each other's perspectives. How about a hug? Lisa: DAAAAAAAD! DAAAAAAAAAD! BART'S BEING A FILTHY MISOGYNIST PIG! HE'S ASSAULTING ME WITH HIS LOGIC! HE JUST TRIED TO RAPE ME WITH HIS HUGS! HE IZ DA BULLY! HE IZ DA BIBIBIBIBIBIBIBIGGGGGGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOOTTT! OT OT OT! enter Homer, who runs in in a rage without asking any questions, grabs Bart b…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 10:59 PM
8

She isn't a satanist. She never has been. It's a ruse for the defense she's building. She's literally going with "The devil made me do it" as her defense.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 10:45 PM
0

Too complicated for them to grasp, unfortunately. On this one, I think that the idiots are going to far outnumber the assholes.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 10:43 PM
1

There have been others. There will be more. The SJWs are getting more and more violent and crazy over time. There is a cold front of entitlement that's rolling deeper into their ranks. They feel entitled to assault people who offend their sensibilities. You think this will be the last one? Give it a year. There will be another. And another.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 10:28 PM
0

That someone fit his definition of gay.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 07:26 AM
0

They attacked him for his ideology.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 07:06 AM
15

A lot of rich and famous people participate in NOW. You can be assured also that a lot of wealthy women (business owners or not) also participate as part of their social networking/activism circles. They write big checks. And they make sure as many people as possible see them doing it.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:30 AM
1

It's gonna get higher. I'd even be willing to bet that the generation born in the 70's has already outnumbered the boomers in suicides.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:28 AM
1

good girl.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:27 AM
10

Video games don't handicap by gender. You either play well or you don't. I wonder if that has something to do with it...
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:27 AM
11

First; this is a hate crime and a civil rights violation. Second; I told you fuckers that this shit was a forgone conclusion. Third; say my motherfucking name.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:18 AM
2

This director (Sara Gardephe?) has the potential to be a Herzog and Morris level talent. This doc is excellent. I hope to see more work from her and I hope she meets her potential because I fucking love Herzog and Morris and can't get enough of their calibre of doc film making. edit: Finished. If she'd had a Morris or Herzog budget, this thing could have won Cannes. It's really good.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:37 AM
2

It is really common for women to play men's emotions for entertainment and profit.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:27 AM
10

Because then you have one less thing to claim martyrdom for.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:21 AM
6

I honestly have a hard time differentiating the two. I know that both phenomena exist over there, but jesus christ is it hard to figure out the difference between idiotic and malicious without seeing someone's face.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:20 AM
1

Just thinking about how nice it would be to be a girl and get schmoozed Be careful. In another six months, you'll be claiming you were a girl all along.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:19 AM
5

Work the door at one for a couple years Stories. Nao.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:17 AM
2

Absolutely true, except for the men paying at the strip club. If it were true parity, men would be able to saunter into the strip club without paying at the door and drink for free. No dollars in the G-string though. If you're going to go for the G-string, you ought to get a brazillian. Otherwise, you'll never be able to wipe quite enough.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:16 AM
9

The funny part is, your sarcastic attempt at dismissal is actually true. People are responding to the evidence that women behave just as badly as men and that therefore and thereby men need just as much protection from women as women need from men.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:12 AM
1

I've spent a fair amount of time around gallery artists. They're all frauds. They hide their fraud behind cliques and a culture that pisses on any skepticism that they don't approve of. The whole thing is a cult of personality. It's a lot like scientology. Figureheads are surrounded by the desperate for attention and career growth who use each other to jockey for social position and money and who attack anyone who breaks their ranks visciously. They do this because their work, nearly unilaterall…
/r/MensRights15/02/14 10:45 PM
3

That would be because he was. Crazy is as crazy does.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:07 AM
1

No. The last time I looked at it was when we had our exchange. I looked at it again because she'd said she was going to publish an op-ed about the event and I wanted to read it. I didn't find the op-ed, but that took my notice.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 04:13 AM
5

If higher education is a privilege, then wouldn't that make the 63% female population privileged? Maybe they should check it.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 04:04 AM
1

I'm starting to think that /u/sillymod is a sleeper. That would explain why a smug progressive would mod a sub like this. He or she is here to control dialogue, gather intelligence, and point our antagonists to items they might find brigade worthy.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 03:54 AM
-1

watch out, /u/sillymod might come along and white knight against you for criticizing a feminist.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 03:52 AM
1

What was that about intellectual arrogance being immature? Hmm. Interesting. Still.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 03:06 AM
2

You're right. Absolutely and 100% right. I agree whole heartedly. However, it is worth discussing the jokes that they make that we can't, and it is worth discussing why those jokes work or do not work.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:28 AM
2

I agree. You can't, though. So, there's that.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:27 AM
1

Only if his dick shoots hundred dollar bills.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:26 AM
1

What was that you said about edgy teenagers again? What was that about intellectual arrogance being immature? Hmm. Interesting.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:23 AM
-1

So, you haven't got any examples of emotion trumping logic? One might want to take note of that.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:04 AM
1

So you're claiming that logic and reason don't trump emotion? Interesting, I've never heard of a skyscraper built with emotion as the basis for engineering. Nor have I ever heard of a new medical application being created using the principles of emotion over those of physiology and chemistry. Nor have I ever heard of a seismogrpahic imaging software being written nor applied using the principles of emotion. In 5 years, son, I'll be in my 40's. And I'll still think the same thing. It's rather pro…
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:19 AM
0

That doesn't actually offer a counter argument. It instead responds with emotion, the exact thing that I was criticizing, thereby proving my point by exercising it.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:12 AM
3

Here you go. In this thread, a young lady who had previously damselled because I suggested that her homosexuality (among other things) was an attention seeking put on, proves that her homosexuality was an attention seeking put on. And then gets whiteknighted by sillymod and a few others.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 12:42 AM
-1

So you're just going to leave them on the floor and cry, huh? Are you this much of a whiny little bitch IRL or just on the internet? Or is it only on this part of the internet?
/r/MensRights15/02/14 12:35 AM
1

You really ought to pick those balls up.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:48 PM
1

Yawn. I'm not arguing with someone who believes that an invisible magic ghost controls all of existence. Invite the invisible magic ghost over to participate in the conversation and we can talk. Until then you're just babbling.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:36 PM
0

Are you done crying over your hurty feels yet? Those big boy pants will still fit you if you have the gumption to put them on.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:35 PM
2

Oh wait. Are we allowed to criticize feminists directly here now? I thought we recently banned that. Are we back on the criticizing people directly? Weird. I swear I just got chewed out by a mod for doing just that. Also. Can we mail 47 cases of due process pamphlets to the list of people whom /u/ma99ie emailed?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:27 PM
1

You realize you look like an ass for all to see, right? Just you and your brigade, princess. See they (gay and lesbian people) can marry someone of the opposite sex too... Sounds like that. And I didn't cover that in the statement that; I believe that transgendered people are just as entitled to equal civic, civil, human, legal, and economic rights as everyone else. I also believe that their body is their own, as is their mind, and it is completely their choice what they do with either given tha…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:08 PM
1

People used to completely and legally disapprove of black people for the color of their skin. We worked to change that socially too. Or we could just halt all social progress because it hurts your pandering.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:47 PM
4

So you won't be mentioning any of our feminist critics names or describing them at all? Just their ideas?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:05 PM
-2

You're still in your child pants. Try the big boy ones. They're stored on a higher shelf.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:03 PM
5

So I guess we won't be discussing the writings of any single of our feminist critics, then. At all.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:03 PM
1

Then you are for the changing of laws to legalize and legally recognize gay marriage?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:04 PM
0

Who's on first?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:04 PM
0

pair bonders are turmeric. Fuck that shit. I'm motherfucking cilantro. edit: Also. Were you saying that my answer was incomprehensible or yours was?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:01 PM
1

So you are against the changing of laws to legalize and legally recognize gay marriage?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:59 PM
1

Your hypocrisy bothers me.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:58 PM
1

Then what was the point of calling this comment's OP a sexual deviant? If you don't think it's disparaging, then why would you be trying to use it to disparage?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:42 PM
1

Then why are you trying to get gay marriage legalized?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:41 PM
1

You're a sexual deviant.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:39 PM
1

So, you're saying that you are willing to abide by and respect without challenge every single piece of paper backed by law?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:39 PM
1

Hypocrisy: a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings You would lose your shit if someone called you a sexual deviant to discredit you. Yet you call others sexual deviants to discredit them. This is definitive hypocrisy. Level with me. Are you really this dumb or do you actually comprehend what I'm saying and choose to pretend you don't for the purpose of disingenuous argument?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:25 PM
1

On paper: Corporations are people On paper: men can change into women and women can change into men. Neither are true. Both are bureaucratic shucks performed for the benefit of someone's wallet and ego. If I write down "Galactic Overlord" on a piece of paper and get it notarized, does that mean you're my subject?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:22 PM
1

dont see how my comment makes me a hypocrite either. That's probably the crux of a lot of your problems.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:19 PM
0

As much as I was offended by your idea that I am 'balless' Put your feelz away and don that thinking cap. It's big boy pants time.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:11 PM
-4

I'm not really seeing male disposibility. You never do. And you never will.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:07 PM
1

Yawn. The obtuseness gets tiring.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:04 PM
3

The person whose twitter this is from has been in this very sub (inviting people to her twitter, BTW) taking umbrage at assertions that her claims that her claim to homosexuality is false. This is proof that her claims are false and that the lynchpin is the service that the disposable male offers her. It's related and you know it.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:03 PM
1

red pill guy screams sexual deviant to me Don't you scream "bbb-b-b-b-b-igigigigigigiggiiggototototrotrottotototoot! DA BIGOGGOGOGOGOGOTT!" when people accuse you of sexual deviance? Don't get me wrong. Homebody is a douchebag. But your statement makes you a hypocrite, something infinitely worse. Speaking of disingenuous subversion...
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:00 PM
1

I would defiantly tell her that I am Cuban. The important question is; Are you Cuban?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:56 PM
-1

But should I tell my partner about my hypothetical kinky porn? Let me put it to you this way, and it's analogous; If you don't, you're in for a lot of frustration, denial, and heartache. So you should, and if they don't like it then you are not a good match. God damn, the Gieger is like Jesus sometimes.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:43 PM
0

I like this "mission creep" phrase. I intend to use it. Did you make it up? I really really like it a lot.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:41 PM
-1

what fraud is committed when one is legally certified a woman and goes on to have sex with somebody else as a woman? The law recognizes corporations as people. Stop hiding behind bureaucratic shucking and jiving.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:40 PM
1

Nothing they have admits that the MtFs studied had already been emulating female behavior for decades before studied. It's all skewed and heavily interpreted to meet the results that they want them to.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:36 PM
-4

It reflects male disposability. Give her what she wants and you exist to her. Fail to do so and you do not.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:34 PM
0

So, you're saying that promiscuous people are only interested in running laps on a bare course and not the entire rest of the track and field course? Really? How droll.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:33 PM
1

The poor poor deluded people. Don't hurt them, for they are too stupid to know otherwise. Don't hurt their rights. Don't treat them horribly. Not quite. What it amounts to is that they are human beings who are entitled to human rights, delusional or not. And they are delusional. Notice how you're pushing for more than human rights? Well. Too fucking bad. You're entitled to your rights. You're not entitled to approval or agreement. Get used to it. You're going to lose that one in the long run. Ju…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:31 PM
1

Two attractive women speaking up for men's rights. Each one of them represents a few hundred men and a few dozen women swallowing red pills. The resistance grows stronger.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:13 PM
1

What systematic oppresshun!?!?!?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:56 PM
1

You're not all wrong. But you're not all right either. This isn't something that we should be looking at legislating or any of that shit, but it is an issue that we should work to socially change. You know the way that healthy people with healthy habits try to socially change the behavior of those around them? You know, "Hey, Billy, why don't you come to the gym with me?" or "Gina, I think you should quit smoking." or "Tommy, I'm going to tell you, man, it's really just in bad taste to hit the b…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:53 PM
0

I am skeptical of Woody Allen's innocence. I am skeptical of Woody Allen's guilt. That is why I pay my taxes to support a legal system that I have hired to do the work of investigating these cases. If Woody Allen is innocent, it stands to reason that Dylan Farrow was brainwashed and coached by her mother for years to think whatever Mia Farrow wanted her to think. Satanic panic, bitches. It's happened before, it will happen again. If Woody Allen is guilty, it stands to reason that he's a rich and…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:30 PM
1

Except there is more free money available exclusively to women from academia, the government, and mummy and duddy. I see more women getting bailed out of their student debt than men.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:26 PM
1

What systematic oppresshun!?!?!?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:22 PM
-2

Before I begin, let's get something straight; I believe that transgendered people are just as entitled to equal civic, civil, human, legal, and economic rights as everyone else. See that? Let's try it again, just to be clear. I believe that transgendered people are just as entitled to equal civic, civil, human, legal, and economic rights as everyone else. Let's add a little to that. I also believe that their body is their own, as is their mind, and it is completely their choice what they do with…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:17 PM
1

Even if a girl destroys me emotionally, she is a lady to me, Jesus christ. Pick up your balls.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 04:44 PM
10

I've done this before. I'll do it again. Let me explain, not just porn "addiction" but porn consumption by heterosexual males in general. I'm sure some of this will touch on things that affect bisexual males, but you're going to have to hang fast and loose with me on that one since there'll be a lot of flutter when that comes along. I know that this comes as a surprise, but heterosexual men like to fuck. One might even argue that the desire for and appreciation of sex is the most basic behavior …
/r/MensRights14/02/14 04:40 PM
1

You didn't read the lines in the script she'd imagined for you. Women punish that as severely as they can.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 04:01 PM
0

This is quality analysis, motherfucker. Adding to that; Remember the "hints"? You know, those obsequious little things that women pretend to drop to show their interest? You know, the hedged little bets that allow a women to imply an implication of a suggestion of a possibility of interest? That's what a woman does when she is "inviting" advance. Guess what. She handles rejecting advances the same way. Why? Because she doesn't want to face the repercussions of actually rejecting another person. …
/r/MensRights14/02/14 03:59 PM
0

Continue the deconstruction; A woman fucks and gets fucked by a bunch of people. She does not think much, or consider, the psychological nor physical repercussions of her decisions and actions. She potentially exposes herself to pregnancy, STDs, the impulsive behavior of others, and the psychological repercussions of treating sexuality casually. Someone tells her "Hey, you ought to ease up on that shit. Your chances of being negatively affected by your own behavior and your own choices get highe…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 03:55 PM
2

What systematic oppresshun!?!?!
/r/MensRights14/02/14 03:45 PM
7

Where you will find frontiers, you will find men. If women want to be included in those frontiers, they will need to learn to break from the herd and adopt early. Or they will be left behind those frontiers. That's how innovation works.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 07:27 PM
9

First it was "no all male panels". Now it's "No men on panels". See the progression?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 07:20 PM
6

There's making a lot of money. Then there's making more than is reasonable in a functional society. It turns out, in a system of limited resources, that when you horde egregiously large percentages of those resources for yourself, the system suffers. So. Sure. If you want to play "my money! myyyyyyyyyyyyy money! MY munnnunnnnunnnnunnnnunnnnney!", go right ahead. But then you can't really complain when other people decide that they're tried of starving and decide to make your money their money. O…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 11:22 AM
3

I remember a while back when it seemed that half the women I talked to claimed to have a stalker. I recall one woman in particular. We worked together. She claimed to have a stalker. I was like "Damn, girl. We gotta do something about that motherfucker. Are you cataloging his calls? Emails? Have you told him that his attention is not welcomed?" No. She didn't. He showed up to our work one day with flowers for her. She dated him for six months. After that one, I stopped giving a shit if anyone cl…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 05:37 AM
6

She wasn't even insisting that it was physical or sexual violence. She was complaining about noises. The lynch pin of her argument was that men can't have safe spaces because in public, there are men who have made noises at her. That's was her argument. Noises. Men are how many more times likely to suffer violence at the hand of a random stranger than women? And she's upset about noises. Noises, which she doesn't hear anywhere near as much as she'd like you to think. And they lie about catcalls.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 12:36 PM
3

This is a wierd post. edit: This post reads like someone with aspergers trying to write a bait post.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 07:00 AM
-10

evening of Kaluha shots What are you, gay? Jesus christ. I know dudes who take like 90 dicks in their ass in a single night who would be embarrassed to admit that. They're like "Gieger, I just took 90 dicks in my B-hole, but seriously, Kahlua is for queers. You wanna suck it? Oh. No? You're not into dicks? Ok. Cool. Call me if you change your mind, but leave that sissy ass kahlua shit at home. You got any real booze?" And I'm like "Nah. I don't touch that sissy shit. Hey, do you need any lube or…
/r/MensRights08/02/14 11:10 AM
-1

Or you could be an adult about it.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 09:36 AM
2

Hey buddy, it's the "young lady" from Twitter. Good for you. You breaking that arm yet? You are proving a fantastic point here Which is? That you can't stand to avoid attentionwhoring? you are deflecting to calling me a "severely learning disabled" not so much a deflection as a cognitive analysis. Having grown up with a sister who has a severe learning disability, I'm pretty attuned to spotting them. You've got one. I know you might be great at deflecting that, and that people might fall all ove…
/r/MensRights08/02/14 09:32 AM
-1

blahblahblahblahblah you're going to have to learn to write posts that I can process when I'm drunk. Because this is just words.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 08:31 AM
2

Hot. Pass the lube. I dunno. What the fuck else am I supposed to say?
/r/MensRights08/02/14 08:29 AM
2

I try to be a little bit more like Patrice O'Neal every day. That man is some good Irish.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 12:44 AM
1

Man. Obtuseness smells a lot like burnt oranges.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 12:00 AM
1

So, in other words, her damselling worked on you. Poor little baby can't handle a debate forum. Poor little baby. Everyone get out your doillies and your ether so the poor little baby doesn't have to call for her fainting couch.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:57 PM
1

I fight for men's rights too. Your involvment with SRS undoes anything that you "fight" for. And BTW, you don't fight for men. At all. You just say that in hopes of attracting more lap dogs.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:48 PM
1

Feminism isn't even saying saying that Not only is feminism saying that it's OK for women to hit men, but it is also saying that it's OK for women to murder them.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:43 PM
3

I'm guessing that this person is the "Xena" on CAFE's blog announcing the even Looks like it. I was unaware that "huehuehuehue rape apology!" and "huehuehuehue what systematic oppreshun!" were strong debate maneuvers. I mean. They are among laymen. Not so much among people who actually comprehend how classical argument works. I kind of wish Justin hadn't stepped in and ended the discussion. I have to agree with you there. I think you started out strong with "Skepticism isn't rape apology". That …
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:35 PM
1

I think I see what you're going for, but we both know that this conversation gets filed under "shit that never happened".
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:20 PM
3

I really fucking doubt that. There are gangs of dudes (who always seem really secretly gay to me. And I'd rather believe that there's some diversity to the motivation behind the trope) who bait gay men on the internet, lure them somewhere, and then beating them or videoing them and outing them with social media. I would find it easy to believe that there have been suicides and death as a result. There is a strong vein of conflating homosexuality with pedophilia and a desire to punish all as such…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 11:19 PM
2

"consent is sexy" Sure. Except consent can be withdrawn after the fact. So, consent doesn't actually exist.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 10:29 PM
2

I refuse to consent to suspending or encroaching upon the right to trial of any American citizen. All American citizens have a right to a trial by jury of their peers when accused of a crime.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 10:20 PM
2

I don't think it went that far. Her impulse was "I have a right to go disrupt this lecture and I am entitled to do so, so that's what I'm going to do." They don't self reflect much past whatever slogan they need to justify their latest impulse.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 09:51 PM
0

Triggers are a real thing, Sure. Triggers are a real thing. But they're your problem, not the problem of everyone else. Your triggers are yours to deal with and bullying everyone into accomodating them by damselling is counter productive. Nobody should walk on egg shells to accomodate your mental issues. Their yours to deal with and accepting that is the first step to actually dealing with them. This culture of pandering to every single "boo hoo muh triggers!" actually prevents those with them f…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 09:50 PM
1

She went alone and got treated like an equal.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 09:27 PM
3

From that young lady's twitter; "Feminism cares about men" and "my only assertions were that feminism cares about men as well" and "like feminism cares about men & men's issues as well, quite a bit. Smh, Altho some guys spoke to me after & they were respectful" Which she proves with tweets like "I'm actually 45 but I bathe in cishet white male tears every night to stay looking young & beautiful" "My goal of becoming the face of misandry is coming true" "I want to be the new face of #misandry" "I…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 09:26 PM
2

With the frenzy of posting Manhood Academy has gone into since Karen's speech, I think we can safely conclude that it is a feminist sock.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 09:10 PM
1

The name isn't giegerwasperfect.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 09:09 PM
7

So... she fantasizes about men fantasizing about other men getting raped. That's quite a convoluted fetish. I personally would love it if rape didn't happen at all.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 09:08 PM
14

What systematic oppression?
/r/MensRights07/02/14 07:46 AM
3

Well. It is funny. The problem isn't that people shoot people in the dick in expensive make pretend play acting in front of cameras for profit. The problem is that people protest when women get shot in the vag.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 07:38 AM
16

So. I'm not posting links. But a friend of a friend was on twitter having some words with the young lady who doesn't seem to comprehend that her being catcalled has nothing to do with men's need for safe space. Before the event, she posted that her goal was to cause a "shitstorm" at the event so that security would take her out and to make "so many "smart points" that she gets ejected. Jesus. She's got to be learning disabled.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 07:02 AM
2

I actually know a chick who pretends to be a dominatrix for money. Dudes pay her to kick them in the balls. They pay her to do all sorts of humiliating shit that I don't ask her about because it's none of my business and I think that whether or not you agree with what she does, she should probably respect her clients enough to respect their confidentiality. But no. She loves to brag about the stuff she makes these dudes do. Here's the kicker. And you knew this was coming. She's a typical AMR/SRS…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:40 AM
3

Assault is bad. Except when I do it. ~Feminism.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:33 AM
3

dat dedication to the cause
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:28 AM
10

I'd like to know what your clinical diagnoses is and what meds you have been prescribed.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:22 AM
7

How was the crowd? Did you engage anyone in discussion? Make any new friends? Was anyone outside waving placards?
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:20 AM
2

There was definately a lot of attempt at grooming cherries. Were their protests?
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:16 AM
10

"I know that men suffer more violence! But EVERY space is a safe space for men." Actually, sweetie pie, by the transitive property, that means that NO spaces are safe spaces for men. Or even better "So you're advocating hitting women!" when she clearly knew that what GWW was addressing was a girl hitting a boy. I mean, she intentionally mischaracterized that right then and there. How deep was the pout on her face? I wish I could see a picture of it.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:12 AM
20

I really liked the way that Shelly Marsh got shut down. "huruhherhrehehee I'm gay (so my opinion matters more) hurhruhrurhrurhr rape apologist!" "Skepticism isn't rape apology." "hughhgheuheuhge What systematic oppresshun!" I get the impression that that was the first time that that girl ever experienced having her opinion outnumbered and her opposition's opinion applauded. Lock yourself in an ivory tower long enough and street level becomes traumatic. And then there was the "All these groups sh…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:05 AM
3

My guess is that they have to upload the recording seperately, but I can't say for sure.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 03:58 AM
3

What did you like about it?
/r/MensRights07/02/14 03:57 AM
5

First impression, just from the picture; The two guys on the left are against it, the guy on the right might be amenable to it. First guy on the left, Rajean Hoilett is against it. No surprise there. “It’s troubling to see that people will go ahead and have these conversations in ways that marginalize people,” All conversations marginalize people, you idiot. You just support your imperative to marginalize over that of others. Roble Muhammad, the guy on the right, supports it. Again, no surprise …
/r/MensRights07/02/14 03:20 AM
1

Well... you could at least say the whole damned thing then.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 01:09 AM
2

You underestimate the power of women to place the onus of whiteknighting on men.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 01:08 AM
0

What did you expect? She's an actress. She makes money by saying things that people want to hear and being pretty. She knows what side her bread is buttered on and she knows how to use every asset at her disposal for PR purposes.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 01:02 AM
4

Say it louder. You know you like it.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 12:56 AM
2

Caterpillar, how you have grown into butterfly.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 12:31 AM
3

They need to get their tech shit together. Edit: Damn. She is throwing the fuck down.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 12:17 AM
6

Say my name, bitch.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 12:00 AM
3

Our concern emerges out of a real fear of the type of space that this group creates on campuses. One that fails to cater and pander specifically to us and only to us. Yeah.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 11:29 PM
30

The union claims the decision “actively (facilitates) the creation of a men’s rights movement on campus, which targets women, feminists and works against (Ryerson’s) mandate to provide safe spaces on campus.” "Equal rights for wimminz, nao! Equal rights for wimminz, nao!" "Hey guys, I could use some help." "Fuck you. Go start your own group." "OK. Hey, guys. Let's start a group to discuss and address our own issues." "Fucking scum! Fucking scum! Fucking rape apologist! Fucking scum! Cry me a riv…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 11:27 PM
8

One such story started in Toronto, when a woman known online as “Charlotte” was publicly heckled outside a U of T Men’s Rights event. Even though she was trying to read an article sympathizing with men’s issues from a feminist standpoint, she was shut down and insulted by a crowd of male demonstrators. Is he talking about Big Red? The chick who was shouting "shut the fuck up, fuckface!" and singing "Cry Me a River" when people tried to engage her in dialogue? Is he actually damselling this chick…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 11:24 PM
3

Wanna bet a dollar that she's maneuvering herself to be able to take the moral high ground against the feminists who are going to do crazy shit at Ryerson tonight?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 11:08 PM
3

At this point, it's kind of like a Broncos fan talking about how they liked the Seahawks all along. Did I sports right? I'm bad at sports.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:34 PM
1

Who owned a computer in a time when few people did. That's how a lot of people got into hacking back in those days. Parents who were not computer people had a computer and the kid figured it out better than they did. That's how I got predisposed to a STEM field.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:28 PM
4

Try this sometime. Ask a woman, any woman whether you're romantically interested in her or not, what she could offer you in a marriage. What does she do or what is she interested in doing that would make it worthwhile to you. You know what she'll do? She'll call you an asshole. She'll turn her nose up at you. She'll give some half assed "He gets meeeeeeeeeee" bullshit non answer. But she won't answer the question. And that's why marriage isn't worth it.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:23 PM
1

I think nobody should be whining about being mad fun of on the internet. It's stupid, weak, and petty. It's worse than making fun of someone on the internet. This is an assault on open dialogue and free speech. Just like every other time some idiot does it.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:19 PM
5

Now, you're thinking like a leader.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:17 PM
5

It's funny how every girl who goes to those private universities does it. Every single one.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:16 PM
7

I take great enjoyment from watching Marcotte turn coat and throw her peers under the bus with the same exact criticism levied at her. Fucking priceless. It's like... she's completely unaware of the irony. All the shit that she is saying about feminists right now is exactly what has been said about her. Fucking hilarious. So. Did Marcotte sniff out more money and attention from criticising feminism? Did she feel the wind change and decide to stick a sail out and see where it took her?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:14 PM
7

Meh. I had sports dropped on me all the time as a kid. It never took. I wandered away from it every time and found something else to do. The thing is, that often meant that I was doing it alone while the group become more and more exclusionary of me. The joy that I got from my pursuits, though, was more than I got from inclusion in a pursuit that I had no interest in. Women can't really deal with not being included in the group. So, they aren't often willing to make that sacrifice.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:07 PM
12

I think that what it's really about is women being raised to be entitled to their whim fulfillment. They aren't really taught that sometimes, they can't have what they want or that they have to work to get what they want. They are raised to stomp their feet, cry, damsel, tantrum, and spit when they don't get what they want so that men who want them to cool out their drama will give them what they demand. But that doesn't work when it comes to buildling and employing technical skills. No matter w…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:03 PM
6

Hackers, technical people, they are born, not made. Literally, no. They are made. They're just made early. Nobody is born with magic skills. They are, though, born to circumstances that make certain avenues and skill sets more available and more enticing. They still have to do the work of pursuing them.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 08:50 PM
6

It can work. I didn't embrace my STEM specialization until my early 20's. Up until then, I was a wandering generalist, sticking my fingers in many pots. The thing is. If you're going to get into it that late, you've got to work hard enough to make up for lost time, you've got to know that going in, and you've got to fucking stick with it. Hard. In my experience, there really aren't many women willing to do that. They could do that. They just don't want to be bothered. I'm not a coder. I hate cod…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 08:47 PM
13

She is a hacker, then she's a woman. Hacker first. Woman second. That's what makes her a bona fide geek. That's why you are not.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 08:43 PM
2

That's a valid point. Consider this as a reason (not THE reason, A reason); Women can take dead end jobs with short hours that don't pay much because other people will pay for her in life. Women get a lot of freebies. Free rent. Free food. Free money all over the place. Every guy I know who has a wife and/or daughters is constantly talking about the money he shells out to them. Every guy I know who has a son is constantly talking about how his son is going to get a job if he wants this or he wan…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:46 PM
2

"The differences in raw wages may be almost entirely the result of the individual choices being made by both male and female workers." http://social.dol.gov/blog/myth-busting-the-pay-gap/ That was easy. Shall I pile on the evidence and make this a decimation or are you willing to admit that you are wrong?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:39 PM
8

I think I just figured it out and I think reading your post unfurled it for me. Here's what it is. Streaking/Flashing is OK when it is self depricating or it puts the flasher in a lower position of power. Run through a bar naked on a bet? The bartender can toss you out. Everybody will point and laugh. You might get some free booze (this was a huge trend in the 70's. Huge. You have no idea). Run through a party or across someone's lawn in the buff and people will point and laugh or turn their spr…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 06:12 AM
4

Can anyone explain to me why Anti-Nazi isn't Anti-German? You can stick Godwin up your asshole. The analogy holds.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 05:57 AM
14

So. Here's the deal. On one hand, I see nothing wrong with flashing. I'm not talking whipping out your dick and jacking it in front of people. I just never lost my teenaged appreciation for a good moon or streak. The human body is silly and when confronted with sudden nudity, I always laugh. As a matter of fact, if you ever want to see me lose total muscle control and fall to the ground with laughter in a single breath, moon me when you roll by. Better yet, make it a pressed fruit bowl. I will l…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 05:47 AM
1

Damselling.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 05:22 AM
5

I'm too immature to distinguish perception from reality It's so common, I feel like fucking Galileo talking to the church. Constantly.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:24 AM
1

and we are past all that nonsense now No we aren't. Ever hear of the field of Anthropology?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:32 AM
1

Great. Sidebar. These posts are daily, BTW, so you can scroll down (if you're using RES) or hit "next" a couple times and you'll find a thread identical to this one from yesterday. Or you can just read the sidebar.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:27 AM
6

It's the thing now. Find any excuse for special treatment. Call whoever won't accept it a bigot.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:26 AM
12

You ever steal something? I have. Hey, I was a teenager testing the bounds of authority once. You ever buy something? If someone stops you after you've bought something and said "Hey, man. That's not yours. You don't have a right to that," what do you do? You might get a bit pissy, but you will get out your receipt and say "I think you're mistaken, dude. I have a receipt." End of transaction. If someone stops you after you've stolen something and said "Hey, man. That's not yours," what are you g…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:20 AM
0

piss flaps
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:11 AM
9

every thing that makes them uncomfortable is rape.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:08 AM
13

It kind of shows you how trained to hate men women are at those places, huh?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:07 AM
7

If the statue was female, made by a female, they'd be schlicking over what a fan-taaaaastic tribute to femininity it is. But. It's an unattractive man. So. muhmuhmhmuh tr-tr-tr-tr triiiiiiiiggggg-g-g-g-g-g-g-geeerrrrss!!! I know. Put a dress on it and say he's transgendered and that they are therefore bigots for not liking him.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:06 AM
14

Usually people say "stop the debate" when they want to silence people disagreeing with them by a combination of authoritarianism and damselling. The debate is over in that the wage gap has been debunked. However, getting people that continue to lie and misrepresent the facts to support their dogma is not. Notice how as soon as you start pointing out that "Agriculture Industries" isn't a specific job title, they start saying "The debate is over!". You can't compare every wage in "Agriculture Indu…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:02 AM
1

Argue this constantly.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:53 AM
3

"That's a generalization" is a bullshit argument. Your problem isn't that something is a generalization, your problem is that you think that the generalization is inaccurate. Argue against the inaccuracies. All statements can be construed as a generalization one way or another, so using the position "that's a generalization" is a manipulative fallacy that makes it hard for others to challenge your assertion because it is true. It is true no matter what you say it about. It's a cheap derail. When…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:51 AM
2

Well. I think that that's going to happen. GWW is someone who I think the feminists think should be one of their number. So it drives them batshit crazy to see her tell them to go fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:12 PM
1

You haven't realized it because it's worked so well.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:02 PM
0

The issue is, you used the wrong term to express the idea that you're trying to convey and you focused on the wrong aspect of the idea that you were arguing against. This results in thought terminating cliche. It's very bad.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:02 PM
1

I think you're mostly right. I've noticed a lot of women blithering about sex positiveness seem to conflate it with sleeping around without much consideration for the repercussions. Then they end up with HPV or pregnant. Then they blame their hpv or pregnancy on sex negative culture.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 08:28 PM
3

I would be very surprised if they had a civil protest. They really just can't control themselves. I think that the impulse to act out is too strong. I think it's more likely they do something zany and ridiculous that makes reasonable people say "this is why I'm not a feminist" or nothing at all. Although, I think that their motivation will be more along the lines of "Let's make Ryerson and the public blame the MRAs for something bad that happened". That makes me think that they'll try and proxy …
/r/MensRights05/02/14 08:22 PM
2

I want them to be. I understand the feeling. Control that feeling. It's at the root of what turned them. Want them to be smarter and more cooperative than that. That would be better.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 04:29 PM
4

OP claimed to have evidence to support people doing fucked up shit in the name of politics. So do you. Everything on /r/worldnews, /r/news, and /r/politics would be in support of the statement that people do fucked up shit in the name of politics.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 04:28 PM
3

It's actually a really important point. Cries of "that's judgmental!" or "that's a generalization!" are far too often accepted as argument. They are not. They offer zero argument. All they do is describe the statement. That's it. But it works far too well because it is not an allegation that you can argue against, since all statements are judgments and all statements can be portrayed as generalizing of something. It's a thought terminating cliche that has wormed it's way into dialogue in place o…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 11:14 AM
8

False flag. Shit never happened. OP - 12/hr, $50 bonus 4mo 2 - 14/hr $0 bonus 5mo 3 - 14.25/hr $500 bonus 12-24mo 1 - 15.75/hr $500 bonus 120+ mo There is nothing wrong with the way this money breaks down other than that the guy who's been there for 10+ years is only making 3.75 more than the 4 mo rookie. We have no idea what the bonus' are based on or how the company structures that. File this under shit that never happened and got put on /r/mensrights by a sock.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 10:37 AM
2

Be prepared.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:50 AM
21

You might want to take a look at the Female Privilege Checklist for starters.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:39 AM
3

Larry Summers
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:36 AM
4

I think they might. It's definitely possible. I have a twinge, though. In my brain. It's kind of shaped like an upside down Y where the legs go in each ear and the stalk exits about where the Sohasrara Chakra is posited to sit by the yoga dorks. And that twinge tells me that they'd probably initially planned to go with the standard strategy; pickets, posterboards, chanting, hissing, spitting, harrassing, blockading, and attempting to (but not necessarily succeeding in) pulling fire alarms. Maybe…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:19 AM
2

We can all laugh when there are barely any submissions.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 08:59 AM
4

I'm not suggesting they're going to toss a Russian nuke, for fuck's sake. I'm clearly stating, though, they are going to at least try to pull something fucked up, underhanded, cowardly, and manipulative. Pattern recognition, bitches. It works. The people who want you to abandon it are the ones who don't want you recognizing their patterns.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 08:41 AM
1

Stick around, kid. My name bears repeating.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 08:39 AM
0

false false You are correct. Soon Yi is Mia Farrow's adopted daughter with Andrew Previn. While Farrow and Allen were never married, they did live in a common law type of arrangement from 1980 to 1992. Allen wasn't her step-father on paper, but functionally, he was. They admit that their relationship started when she was 19 and he 56, but I suspect that there's some fibbing going on. I don't see a reason to assume molestation I don't assume it. I do suspect it. different moral values than most o…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:49 AM
1

What do I think are the standards for the ideal man in American society? Generally speaking; Brad Pitt. Johnny Depp. George Clooney. Attractive. Wealthy. Able to work a career of self fulfillment. Able to afford to take looooooooooooooong periods of time from that work to pursue leisure or ideology. Recognized by all, desired by most. For me? John motherfucking Constantine. Hardened. Skeptical. Clever. Unafraid to dance with the devil. edit: NOT the fucking Canoe version. Nothing against him, bu…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:34 AM
0

You're unnecessarily disparaging fecal matter. It makes excellent fertilizer. Things can actually grow in it. Feminism is a barren diseased revenent corpse of an idea.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:29 AM
7

Then it would be the Vice Provost. That's where the buck stops. If agents of your office do something, you did that thing. That's how proper chain of command works.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:26 AM
7

They'll regroup. And consider this. They can't resist their need for vindication. So now they are plotting. They will do something, or at least try to, and it will be an escalated version of what they had initially planned. Now that they've had to absorb a return volley, they'll be out for blood. They're operating on emotion, not logic, and are unused to controlling that emotion. Too many of them in collusion with one another to hear any reason. They're going to do something. Prep for it.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:25 AM
0

Work is becoming a woman's world. As long as it doesn't involve unloading trucks at 4AM. Work is becoming a woman's world. As long as it doesn't involve working the deck of a commercial fishing trawler in deadly seas. Work is becoming a woman's world. As long as it doesn't involve cleaning up chemical waste spills. Work is becoming a woman's world. As long as it doesn't involve mining for coal, where you daily face the threat of explosion, cave in, or suffocation. Work is becoming a woman's worl…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:23 AM
1

According to a staffer, Ryerson president Sheldon Levy felt the cost was a barrier to freedom of expression. The president of a university standing up for men's right to free speech? He's fuuuuuuucked. They'll be accusing him of harrasment or misogyny or some other shit within the next year just like that dude at Harvard. Watch for it.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:14 AM
1

It falls under the "cray shit feminists do" category. Contribute or fuck off.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:12 AM
1

She'll get commuted. Watch. The pussy pass goes deep.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:11 AM
-1

Is he? Well, that's what a trial is for. Here's what I do know about Woody Allen. He's married to his foster daughter. He divorced Mia Farrow, his ex wife, to marry their foster daughter. There is no way that there wasn't inappropriateness to their relationship at least, if not sexual assault and molestation at worst. This sets a precedent with his behavior. He likes young girls. Chances are that the biggest attractive factor for them is the power that their naivete gives him. It is possible tha…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:09 AM
-3

yawn. This is me making a jack off motion with my right hand.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:03 AM
1

To the top with you.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:00 AM
5

It's nearly the only reason for it these days.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:58 AM
14

It was downvoted because it is ignorant of the vast amount of lobbying and politicking that feminists to do directly prevent social resources from reaching men.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:58 AM
9

It isn't a competition in the NBA this team over here, this team over there, we all follow the rules and there are referees to make sure of it, may the best man (or woman) win sense. It is far far more sinister than that. It is a siege. MRAs have comitted the mortal sin of banding together and standing up for themselves and are now pushed back into their own garrison that they must hope for reinforcements to and fight to the last in. They want us all gone. They want us all silent.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:57 AM
9

Your point is taken and concurred with. However. We've got to stop using "judgmental" as a debate tactic or an argumentative stance. It's a thought terminating cliche and a fallacy (I'm not digging out the list... maybe I will later). Everything you say is judgmental. Everything. Every word you speak and idea you perpetuate is a judgment. And here we have the judgmental Here, you've judged the speaker and the statement as judgmental. prick Here, you've judged the speaker to be a prick hating on …
/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:50 AM
13

Considering the lengths they go to to remove female MRA's femaleness Examples? This is an interesting topic. Have you done a Honey Badger Radio show on this? If not, you might want to.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:42 AM
8

I think in addition to people like this, I think there are plenty who attack the MRM in order to appear more "manly" (by rejecting that men are in any way underprivileged or denied rights) or to pander to women. It's a pretty classic response of the powerless to those in power. Look at the church and how wherever they went, the desperate and conquored would fall into a tizzy accusing one another of heresy. Often to draw attention away from their own "heretical" behavior. Fascist regimes? Long li…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:40 AM
4

Get back in the basement. We need someone to take care of the servers. Don't worry. We pay in plex.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:36 AM
17

No. They don't. They're indoctrinated. It's kind of like people with that left brain right brain disorder where they can hold an object in their left hand and another in their right and be completely incapable of processing the fact that they are holding two objects because the connection has been severed. They sever their connection voluntarily and intentionally as part of their initiation rite to their cult of ego.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:34 AM
-2

Grasping at straws, huh?
/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:31 AM
1

It would be quite far from it. It would be burning in the flame of every piece of nuclear ordinance on the planet flung when someone decided to hit the button because they got of-fe-fe-fe-fe-feeeeeeeeeeennnnnnnded.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:31 AM
44

"Hey, ladies, we could use some help too." "Fuck you, whiner. That's not my problem. Go start your own movement." "OK. Hey, guys. Let's start our own movement. We can have some lectures. Let's put some posters up to advertise them." "Fucking scum! Rape apologist! Fucking scum! Cry me a river! Fucking scum!"
/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:29 AM
1

nigga please. I've done better. easily.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:26 AM
1

case in point.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 03:43 AM
1

At least you only voted for him once. There's still no excuse for allowing myself to be suckered so easily. I take full responsibility for my role in electing this cynical treacherous liar and should be given zero forgiveness or understanding for it. Maybe next time, I'll fucking learn. Many of the people on reddit, even on this sub, voted to reelect him in 2012. Obama passing the NDAA, reinstating the surveillance clauses in it after they'd been struck down, and then passing it again was my bre…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 03:36 AM
1

I wonder what has made her think that? Arrogance. A need for attention. Being enabled by society to exploit a victim narrative for that attention. Complete absence of concern for the welfare of other human beings, especially those who do not serve her purposes.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:02 AM
1

I think they shame suitors because they spend a lot of time passive-aggressively "dropping hints", that they refuse to acknowledge, that they contradict with other hints that they "drop". They become frustrated with the non-mind reading suitors who either countermand their passive aggressive, coded "orders", which they hide, until it evidences in hostility.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:00 AM
2

Willfully misrepresent what someone says and then reply to that, instead of what they quite clearly meant. It's one of very few tactics that have any efficacy for them. Truth, honesty and integrity are certainly not on their side. Two could play at that game. It really isn't worth stooping to their level. There are some things that one just shouldn't bother doing. Even if it means the crowd judges against them.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 01:51 AM
14

made me look like this. I probably spend 90% of my life like this. Thank god for drugs and alcohol.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:16 PM
8

I did... the first time. And I'm very sorry for it.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:07 PM
2

Yes. Get over it. When I see you haranguing people for using "dick" "douch" and "asshole" derogatorily just as much, I might be willing to take you seriously. But since word policing is all utterly stupid, it'll just prove your a consistent idiot and not just an idiot.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:05 PM
37

You're reasoning principles are a bit crossed. Reread the post. He isn't saying that men who are raised by a single mom who had a horrible taste in men tend to be male feminists. He is saying that male feminists tend to be raised by a single mom who had a horrible taste in men. All oranges are fruits, but not all fruits are oranges. This is basic logic 101. You've got to catch up.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:04 PM
36

Funny, because when I ask women what they plan to do about men's issues, they sneer and spit "Go start your own group," and then shout "fucking scum!" when I do. Men aren't failing women. We're tired of being taken for granted. We're tired of women being entitled to our service. And every day, more and more of us ask "Wait a second... what do they do for me?" and finding their answers lacking.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:03 PM
0

An abortion pill isn't a poison. It's a medication. Poison is defined by use.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 05:46 PM
2

Fund me, bitch.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:22 PM
3

Lets say I have a heart attack. I can't speak, and can't give consent. You give me an aspirin and wait for the EMT to arrive. You've now poisoned me and you deserve 14yrs in prison. False equivalence and you know it. The girl wasn't incapacitated and unable to give or retract consent. Did you consent to the SSRIs, or fluoride in your water? I am informed about them. I didn't consent to the synthetic estrogen I am forced to consume if I want to live. I have no idea what the fuck you mean by that,…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:21 PM
1

they just haven't read the textbook, That's not true at all. They comprehend the concept. They reject it for the purposes of politics. This rejection is all about politics and social manipulation. Gay people (understandably) want to distance themselves from pedos. The problem is, there are pedos among their number and this distancing causes them to refuse to admit it and to brush them under the rug for fear of harming their politicized cause, thus they contribute to the problem rather than the s…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 01:23 PM
3

Do you think the problem might be you're fixated on 19 year old blonde cheerleaders? LOL. Far from my type. The reality of intimate relationships isn't anything like your theories. Oh really? Can you quote my theories? Offer any concise counter argument to them? Oh. Right. You can't. Because your just blithering shit form your mouth that has no real meaning.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 01:21 PM
11

When you put physiology altering substances in another person's phsyiology without their consent, it is definitively poisoning.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 01:19 PM
6

14 years for slipping a medicatio to poisoning someone is bullshit about right. FTFY, motherfucker. Stop trying to conflate poisoning with "oopsie gave you the wrong pill, sweetie." Fuck you and fuck that.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 01:17 PM
1

Keep in mind. Boys are scoring this high with a fraction of the support services that are available to girls. The deck is stacked against these boys, but they are still managing to score high. Girls could score just is high. But math is hard and it's much easier to pursue humanities and bitch about lack of women in STEM.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 12:01 PM
1

You don't know what kindness is I could counter with the same assertion. It doesn't actually mean anything. That and basing your worldview on blogposts from OK Cupid. Yes. My entire worldview is based off of a single blogpost on OK Cupid and hypergamy hasn't been proven over and over again.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 11:33 AM
1

Go to a left oriented subreddit and suggest that a male pedophile who exclusively abuses or fantasizes about abusing males is a homosexual pedophile. Count how many times you get called a bigot.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 11:32 AM
51

It's funny because he clearly states that he finds women and men "every bit as formidable" as one another. But since he questioned the victim narrative (that has been CLEARLY and REPEATEDLY disproven), he is pariah.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 11:08 AM
2

Electricity is really condensed pressure that can be channeled to create friction. Done. One sentence. Not even a paragraph. One sentence.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 10:28 AM
14

I'm fine with the guy getting 14 years for assault and poisoning. However. If it is legal to abort the fetus because it is not yet legally considered a person, then it is not murder nor assault against that fetus, since it is not yet legally considered a person. Fucking pick. And fucking make it consistent.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 10:10 AM
1

It's been a good month for /r/pussypass.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 10:08 AM
35

Stop thinking about “proof”, stop thinking about “innocence and guilt”. No. No, I will not, thank you very much. A civil society necessitates certain standards and concessions to function. One of those is due process of law. Another of those is skepticism in investigation. And you should never trust someone who insists that either be suspended. For any reason at all. You can be assured that those people do not want an equal, merit based, democratic society. They want a fascist theocracy based on…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:30 AM
1

but out of a general misanthropy. It isn't misanthropic. That's a simple minded conclusion. I think it's rather realistic. She's claiming that all people are strongly motivated to take what their urges tell them to and that the ends justify the means. Society comes in where these people, in interacting with one another, recognize that survival is more probable, and more pleasant, if they can all work together toward common goals often paying the price of controlling or transcending their urges f…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:01 AM
1

reread it. Maybe you'll figure it out.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:23 AM
1

then it's more about how you approach a woman As long as the woman you are approaching doesn't consider herself above your station.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:20 AM
1

Or rich. I know, I know, "what about the rich ugly dudes that still get called pervs?" They're just not rich enough. Men can buy away their ugly and undersirableness, it just costs quite a bit for some.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:18 AM
1

The freedom that you are exercising, to contribute to and participate in /r/mensrights, even if it is negatively or critically, is not one that is offered mutually. Enjoy :)
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:17 AM
1

Seriously? Are you positing that there are not many feminists who are lesbians? Most young women don't want 99% of the men who hit on them to drop dead You're only right on technicality. Women consider 80% of men to be below average. So, it's 80% of men, not 99. And they don't want them to drop dead literally, but they do only want them around for as much utility as they might serve that woman's life and no more. Any attempt at or intention of transcending that utility is met with zero tolerance…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:14 AM
1

The only responsability of someone who was not directly involved with any of the above, or who does not manage to profit directly from above (like being a wealthy person whose industries got their start in the slave trade... all those people, by the way, are easily found and named. There's a reason why they want the blame mitigated, though... Protip: It's money) is to learn from those events and do what they can where given agency to do so to stop it and not contribute to it. That's it. I don't …
/r/MensRights04/02/14 07:39 AM
1

Ugly women saw pretty women having fun with an attractive rich dude. They got angry because they're ugly, they want to fuck a dude like Thicke, but know that they haven't got a shot. So they damselled the best way they knew how. Then some other pretty women saw that they could make some money and get some attention by using those ugly women as their herd. Then the white knights smelled pussy.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 07:36 AM
10

"wants". See that word? "wants". The term "wants" is rather important here. When someone "wants" to has sex, and then does have sex, that sex is not rape. Because they "wants" the sex. "wants". The key word here is "wants". If the shirt said "She doesn't want the D" then it might be implying a rape narrative. Since in this case she does "wants" the D, rape is not possible.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 07:11 AM
1

Because you're a bigot if you call them male. That's why.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 07:09 AM
2

Who wants to bet that they count the boys in Thailand who are groomed, given HRT, and given surgeries as girls?
/r/MensRights04/02/14 07:07 AM
3

They so do. Chap. If you find someone you like, just trying being kind to them. That's funny because the friendzone argument seems to dictate that being kind to a woman because I'm interested in having a relationship with her would make me a manipulative creep. So which is it? Also. Yeah. Women don't really give a fuck if a dude is kind to them or not as much as if he has a fuck load of money to spend on them. Protip: Agreeing with someone about everything and coddling them isn't a very kind thi…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 06:52 AM
4

Men comment on my breasts Yes. Because you put a lot of effort into showing them. Then you put them on video. Then you put that video on the internet. Then people allover the world watch that video. If you want people to comment on more than your tits, how about taking them out of the equation? Better yet, how about offering them something that will draw their attention more. You know? Like a consistent ideology. Give that one a shot. People will comment on your fucking wallpaper if it stands ou…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 05:55 AM
3

Ok, Laci. You have a problem with being sexually objectified. I can't help but notice that you seem to tie all male sexual desire to objectification. It's as if you've built this narrative where men can't possibly feel any desire for or attraction to women without objectifying them. And you're not completely wrong, you're just not being complete. Sexual desire is an integral part of attraction. Sex is an integral part of an intimate non-familial, closer than friendship, relationship. Oh noes! Oh…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 05:55 AM
2

We've addressed the issue. We've offered women a bunch of free money and admissions incentives to participate in STEM fields. They won't do it. They refuse to do it. The answer is to make those same resources available to anyone who wants to participate in a STEM field, regardless of gender or ethnicity. You know, equally. If you want to talk about making those resources available by economic necessity? Fine. That's cool. It'll take a while to fine tune it, but that works for me. But right now, …
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:32 AM
4

So. Someone get the PR agent for this event to explain to me why the fuck I would want to pay money to be berated for shit I haven't done.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:27 AM
1

I've said this before, I'll say it again. If Jennifer Lawrence, Kristin Wiig, and what's her face, Red from Mad Men, came out in the press today to talk about how much they love working glory holes with their boyfriend at their side, face full of manmeat, there'd be a ton of dudes sucking dick tomorrow and a ton of chicks begging their BF's to take a trip down to the local RamRod cafe for an evening of hideyhole.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:26 AM
1

Her bias against gays seems to be mainly related to a false equivocation of homosexuality and pedophilia There is an issue here, though. If a person abuses someone of the same gender as them exclusively, they are homosexual. If they abuse both genders, they are bisexual. If they abuse someone of the opposite gender exclusively, they are heterosexual. The idea that pedophilia somehow replaces orientation (and pedophilia is not an orientation) is ridiculous, but prevalent among the left mostly bec…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:24 AM
-9

I have a hard time feeling bad for a rich junkie who ODd.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:15 AM
1

The nice guy has suffered at the hands of more than one female "friend" having failed to realise that going shopping with her and giving her lifts is not the way to ask her out while the woman has failed to realise that the reason she keeps losing her male "friends" is because they were trying hard to show her that they wanted to date her. Meanwhile most women go wrist deep over When Harry Met Sally.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:07 AM
2

How do handle this; Gender exclusive baffrooms be discrimina-shun! No more gender exclusive baffwooms! Ok, princess. That's fine. All bathrooms are now unisex. Unisex baffrooms be da rape! Be da micro-aggreshun! Be da bad badz! No evil boy pee pees! no ebil boy pee pees! So, should we switch back to gender exclusive bathrooms then, princess? No! Is di-scrim-in-ayyyyyy shun! Is bad bad! You iz bad, no gib me what I wants!!! Ok. So what's your solution, princess? Mansplaining bigot! Misogyny! You …
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:06 AM
2

I know my first thought were a woman to walk in while i was taking a piss would be to zip up Interesting. My first thought is "don't talk to me, you'll make it crawl back up and I'm almost finished."
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:03 AM
7

Don't forget, this young lady has never lived outside of the PR shuck and jive. If she has half a brain, she's had a huge opportunity to learn how to play the game to sell the product. I honestly don't give much of a fuck about Miley Cyrus. She's a person selling a product that I haven't much use for doing her thing. I do, however, enjoy watching how much of a tizzy she seems to also enjoying putting feminists in.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:02 AM
1

I have no problem with the concept of "mating down". A person's social status and income have never mattered to me. The amount of stuff that they had has never mattered to me. How much free shit they got from other people just for existing has never mattered for me outside of how it colors their perception of others who do not have the same amount of free shit handed to them by others just for existing. None of that is important. Ambition, though is. You've got to want to do something with your …
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:00 AM
5

The issue isn't that women can't. It is that they don't. The issue isn't that men are more prone to genius. It is that women in power, who do not want to do the work, who have not harbored any sort of virtuosity in their persona demand that men who have done both be punished and ignored for it while insisting that women who have not be rewarded and acknowledged for something that they refuse to do.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:23 AM
4

I'm sure we're all familiar with the phrase "tits or GTFO"? The phrase "tits or GTFO" is an incantation of the concept that "there are no girls on the internet" "If I can pontificate a bit, for your edification. One of the rules of the Internet is: "there are no girls on the Internet." This rule does not mean what you think it means. In real life, people like you merely for being a girl. They want to fuck you, so they pay attention to you and they pretend what you have to say is interesting, whe…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 10:58 AM
3

Women consider 80% of men below average.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 08:32 PM
4

I don't understand how so many people think Blurred Lines is about violence against women. It isn't that they think it's about violence against women. It's that they want it to be about violence against women because they like playing moral crusader. It gives them a victim boner and a moral outrage sploosh. Here's what happened. Song came out. Some feminist got sand in her vagina about seeing the naked women and a cockshure guy in the same picture, cherrypicked the lyrics, and then posted to her…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 08:32 PM
1

That's fair enough, but I'm going to insist that you meet me at recognizing that London is the most expensive city in the world to live in and that if one wants to live in that most expensive city in the world, one will need quite a bit of money. If one wants to remain unemployed long enough to pursue a vanity career like modelling in the most expensive city in the world, that one is going to have to be rather well off.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 03:39 AM
2

You want to touch my monkey, don't you?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 03:19 AM
0

Here's how I define maturity; Do you pay your own rent (or are you at least breaking your balls at underpaying jobs to try to get that shit covered in time)? Do you have a driver's license? Do you have a job? Do you have some career ambition in life? Are you working to accomplish those career ambitions? Do you take responsiblity for your actions? Do you recognize that the truth isn't always convenient? Are you the type of person who "faces the music"? If you answered yes to all of these question…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 03:19 AM
7

Delevingne was born in London, England, the daughter of Pandora (née Stevens) and Charles Hamar Delevingne, a property developer.[3][4] She is the younger sister of model Poppy Delevingne and the granddaughter of former English Heritage chairman Sir Jocelyn Stevens. Her paternal great-grandfather was Canadian-born politician Hamar Greenwood, 1st Viscount Greenwood.[5] Her maternal great-great-grandfather was newspaper proprietor Sir Edward Hulton, 1st Baronet, and her maternal great-great-uncle …
/r/MensRights01/02/14 11:59 PM
2

Das true, nephew.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:56 PM
1

This guy, for the winrar!
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:28 PM
2

He loathes himself that much because he think he'll get a "good boy" biscuit for it. Remember, for a male (especially a straight white male with little to no political or social capital to trade) attracting the attention of females is very difficult. It takes a lot of work. It's like competative athletics. You've got to take any advantage that you can get, and most advantages are about percentages of a point of extra efficacy. So you do everything you can. For this guy, the best thing that he ca…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:27 PM
0

Sci-fi should question the gender binary, regardless of what its writers and readers think it should be doing. I see nothing wrong with questioning gender binary. It's dictating the answer and when the question should be asked that's the problem.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:24 PM
1

There was a time when Australia bred a different breed of woman. It still happens, but they've unfortunately lost the hardiness and pluck that they once had.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:16 PM
1

It goes deeper, my negro (Oh nosies! He said "negro"! He must be da raaaaaacist!). Maturity does equal real manhood. That isn't the issue. The issue is how we define maturity. Collect comic books? Oh, you must be a manchild!!!! Write or draw comics for $150k/yr or better? Ohhhhhh, schlick schlick schlick! Take a look at the schlickfest that is any thread involving Neil Gaiman. Uh... he wrote comics for a living. You know what people who want to write comics for a living usually do? They immerse …
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:15 PM
2

I'll tell you what, son. I have never, not once in my entire life, felt valued just for existing. Never. Not for a second. Not for a fucking millisecond. And I'm actually OK with that. There is no reason to value me just for existing. As a result, I have striven to acquire skillz and warez that make me useful and thereby valuable. The problem is, unless the skill I have is owning a bunch of money, that never seems to be enough with women. Men, however, they always seem to be easily impressed. Ar…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:06 PM
0

How the 77% argument goes; "Da wimminz onlies makes seben seben percenties! Me wants equalities!" "OK. But that figure isn't apples to apples. It doesn't compare identical job title in identical industry with identical time served and identical worker output." "Links, shitlord!" "Yeah. Ok. The table in that link compares all jobs in the agriculture industry. It still isn't an apples to apples comparison." "What are you, some kind of MRA?"
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:52 PM
2

The whole latino machismo induced chivalric "We don't hurt no women, maaaaaan. We respect our women." is suuuuuuuch utter bogus bullshit. It's about as qenuine as the religion. They just repeat the phrase because that's what they think they're supposed to do.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:48 PM
1

Are there any women who admit that they commit domestic violence, let alone as primary aggressors?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:43 PM
-1

My first reaction when reading the story went something like this; 18 year old girl accidentally runs over 2 kids hiding in a pile of leaves Ohhhh, man... that poor girl, those poor kids, their poor families... Bitch then ran off and tried to hide it Are you fucking kidding me? Are you serious? Two fucking kids are dead and you're going to hide your role in it? Bitch gets off without jailtime, but her lackey goes to prison This can't be fucking reality. Oh. Wait. Right. Pussypass. (Oh nooooooo!!…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:38 PM
11

Geek culture is a meritocracy. Not only that, but it's an intellectual meritocracy. Who is a geek? A geek is a person who's dedicated him or herself to a non mainstream hobby, creative pursuit, intellectual pursuit, or fascination. Comic books are a great example of geekery. Most people who are into comic books have been since before they were 10. They have shared experiences, like cleaning out the couch to go get the next issue of X-Factor. They understand that feeling of spilling their soda on…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:13 PM
6

BENNED! BTW, what the fuck is up with feminists and their adoration for jargon? It's almost like they form proprietary linguistic patterns for the purpose of keeping others out of their discussions...
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:41 PM
6

Sit down, shut up, tow the line, give money, and remain dispoable to do the hard work that women don't want to interrupt their cosmo lunch to do themselves.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:36 PM
4

Now, say my name.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:35 PM
28

I need feminism because... they shouldn't be treated like men. IE. I need feminism because I don't believe in equality. Simple.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:28 PM
-8

and are financially independent. You don't know many models, huh? A career in modelling isn't possible if a person has to be financially independent. If you want a career in modelling, you aren't going to be able to work other real jobs while you build it, so somebody else is going to have to foot the bill. Most models live off of somebody else's money for years until their vanity career starts paying back. I'm not judging that. But it's pretty ridiculous to claim otherwise.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:28 PM
1

So, I take it you haven't heard of the field of anthropology yet. Not only are the groups self defining, but they are quite easily observed and will readily define themselves upon request. Of course, self definition doesn't necessarily hold the final say in what group a person belongs to. Really? Not even anthro 101, huh?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 11:21 AM
5

Don't downvote this guy, assholes. he's right. Wuornos did get the death penalty. It was the right sentence for her. She was, however, still a cause celeb among feminists and they did attempt to get her off. Unfortunately for her, she was too ugly, too lesbian, and too crazy for the pussy pass to work.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:42 AM
-5

Someone needs to take an econ 101 class.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:34 AM
8

I had this long comment that I wrote out. It got all ahoefnweoncabsao;ihdob;a;hblahblahblahblah woooooooo peddly. It talked about empathy and generosity and individuality and being a friend who inspires their friends. Then I realized I hate all that woo peddly bullshit. So I deleted it. It did, though, mention shieldmaidens. Anyway. I really appreciate the vast amount of work and self sacrifice that women like Helen Smith, Erin Pizzey, Gdub, TB, and the lot have done on my (and everyone's) behal…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:31 PM
-7

Fact is, if you got two parents and a kid, and you're taking home less than 60k a year between the two of you and either of you is working less than 40/wk, you are the weak fucking link.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:03 PM
0

wordsies! but but but you said wordsies! You must be da da da bigigigigggggggg-ooooooot!
/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:01 PM
0

The other fact is that sometimes smacking a motherfucker is justified. Regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:01 PM
1

What, reins? There's nothing wrong with reins. Kids wander. They're stupid. They're suicidal retarded midgets. It takes them a long time to grow into sensible decision making. So, if you're worried about your kid wandering, reins are fine. They're not just about stranger danger. Do you really want your kid wandering and getting cinched up in the gears of the escalator at a mall? Yes. Your kid is that fucking stupid. If you are able to recognize that, you might be able to work to alter it. Otherw…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:58 PM
2

Good for them. I have a lot of respect for sex workers. I'm not talking crack heads. I'm not talking human slaves. I'm talking women and men who recognized their own agency and made a conscious decision that this is something they wanted to pursue in their life and who chose to do so in a safe (although unfortunately because of the law not as safe as it could be), sane, and consensual manner. I think that if two people can fuck for free, or because one bought the other dinner, or because one bou…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:49 PM
12

I oppose feminism because I'm an egalitarian. Feminism is not egalitarian. It demands "bottom row on the top rail now, massa!" instead of equity. It demands that they be rewarded for what their grandmothers might have been through, while they have been provided for completely by society and government. I oppose feminism because I need to survive and feminists want to keep me disposable. I oppose feminism because I want to see my world move forward socially and not be held back by this bullshit "…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:41 PM
9

Name of speaker? College? What has she done to make up for the damage she caused (and who wants to bet that the answer is "absolutely nothing but charge colleges to hire me to talk about how I used to be a feminist")?
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:38 PM
17

She's out. It's all over her youtube page. It's all over AVFM. I think that that would absolve any OP of complicity.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:35 PM
5

Well, that is absolutely and completely true. And as another user said, notice how he actively participates in that paternalism? I wonder if any of the feminists have ever touched his dick. Do you think that they fulfilled his fantasy of making him their sissy cuck yet or does he just yank himself dry with hopes of it?
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:34 PM
1

I honestly think that this is going to be how I go out. I've been fighting the good fight for a long time and told "go fuck yourself" by most people. I've watched women living in properties owned by their parents collect welfare, get free health insurance, and milk scholarships out while I worked two jobs to put myself through college and haven't seen a doctor in over a decade. Those same women were the ones telling me to go fuck myself when I asked them how I, a man with no free property to liv…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:30 PM
7

I'll donate a C-note. If five people match me, I'll donate two. I'm beginning to think that the answer isn't to chuff at this stuff. The answer is to laugh in their face while you pull out your checkbook, just like Sting to the judge in Quadrophenia. Five people match me and I donate two hunj. I'd donate more, but I work for a living.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:26 PM
13

Pro the right of adults to do whatever they want with their body? Yup. That's me. Pro the right of adults to do whatever they want to the body of a non consenting minor? Nope. Fuck that, and fuck you.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:22 PM
0

You haven't known many gay men, have you? There are behaviors common among gay men that need to be reigned in. A common callous disregard for others and hyper narcissism that is celebrated by the culture is among them. So. The guy isn't wrong.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:21 PM
0

O'Reilly is a bad choice for this. Over his career, he's said one or two things that I think are actually rather profound. The rest has been intentionally inflammatory, alarmist, counterproductive, and divisive. So. Mostly, like 98% or better, fuck Bill O'Reilly. Get someone less purchasable.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:20 PM
28

He's kinda sorta right, actually. I will agree that there are men who are punished too harshly. Look at non violent drug offenders. It's a fucking gold mine of cases of men being punished too harshly. However. I think also that the problem is that women aren't being punished harshly enough. We can say that this is caused by paternalism, and I think to some degree it is, but damn those feminists seem pretty keen on inciting and taking advantage of that paternalism when it suits them. See; Andrea …
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:14 PM
4

She won't have lost it. She will have failed to earn it.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:07 PM
2

It's ironic because I would think that "bitch" is quite apropos for a woman who killed three of her own children. But, that's feminists, SRS, and AMR for you. They don't actually give a fuck about real justice. Just feelzies.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 09:53 PM
-7

Really, bitch? That's interesting, bitch. Because, bitch, the way I see it, bitch, is that, bitch, if I fail to use the term "bitch", bitch, then that would be sexist, bitch. How about dropping the fucking word policing and getting on topic, you derailing little bitch?
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:48 AM
5

No, man. Be a GoodBaby. Respect women. Know when not to be born.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:46 AM
-7

I'm fine with 14 years for poisoning.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:45 AM
3

No. You see. That 2 year old girl raped that woman. And beat her. And said mean things to her. And the woman had post partum depression by proxy. Haven't you heard of it? It's when a woman gets depressed because somebody else had a kid. At some point in history. What's that? You haven't head the post partum by proxy defense yet? Wait for it.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:45 AM
11

Excellent. How about the inverse?
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:44 AM
-3

Laziness and lack of ambition. All the doors are opened. The support structure is there. If you're a woman who can string a sentence together and do algebra, you can get money to put you through a STEM program. In that program, you will have access to a lot of resources that the men in that program won't have access to. But women still aren't enrolling. You know why? Because they can't be bothered. Math is hard. There are plenty bitching. From Gender Studies departments. From Humanities departme…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:43 AM
9

Guys. Listen. You have to understand. Those babies raped her and leeched off her for nine months. Did you see what they did to her vagina? They deserved to die.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:40 AM
172

His actions were immoral and inexcusable. He poisoned another human being. The question isn't "why is that guy doing 14 years?" the question is "Why is this bitch not in prison for life?"
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:39 AM
2

Please, argue against ideas, not groups or labels groups claim to own which often dont even exist as a homogeneous entity in reality. Have you heard of the academic field called "anthropology"? It is dedicated to the study of behavior by group. People behave in patterns. Groups of people evidence similar behavior patters. Some of those patterns are good. Some are bad. This isn't even 101 level shit. This is pre-req to admission shit. Catch the fuck up. Your ignorance prevents improvement. Stop b…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:24 AM
1

I'll just go by this: the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men You've conveniently ignored the part about large feminist groups actively campaigning against equal availability of resources for men. They say they support men. Their active and vociferous (which I've already proven exists to you) opposition to providing support structures and resources for men contradicts this. Why do they act differently than they say? Because they are fuckin…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:21 AM
3

Now, say my name.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:18 AM
26

I've always found the toilet seat debate to be a great microcosm of the gender debate. In this corner, we have women demanding that everyone who uses the bathroom before them meet their demands for how that bathroom should be. In this corner, we have men insisting that women take agency and, god forbid, look before they leap and put some effort into altering the situation if they don't find that it meets their expectations. edit: And they do not demand that others anticipate their demands and pr…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 09:03 PM
7

some women seem to automatically assume their preference should be mandatory for everyone. Most women automatically assume that their preference should be mandatory for everyone. That's the basis of the MRAs issue.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 09:00 PM
5

Feminists are preventing equality from being achieved, and are actually causing and increasing inequality. Reminds me of when I was a kid and I'd play games with my little sister. She liked to cheat. If we were playing Monopoly, she'd just eventually start reaching into the bank and taking money with a smile on her face. "No, little derpette, that's cheating. You can't do that." "But I don't want to lose!" "Then you're going to have to play a better game" "Waaaaaahhhhhhh Moooooommmm! Gieger won'…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 08:27 PM
2

So, now that you've been unequivocally been proven wrong, you're going to stomp your feet, take your toys, and go home, huh? Kinda typical.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 08:17 PM
4

It's kind of hard for men to participate in said political activity when there are people pushing against us with the power of NOW and popular media and punishing us by interrupting our public lives anywhere we dare show interest in said political activity.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:23 PM
7

And they've done what about enforced selective service registration, male workplace deaths, male mortality, lack of healthcare available to men, and lack of homelessness resources for men? Can you tell me what these equality loving feminists are doing about these issues? Or are they focused only on that which they think directly affects them? Right.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:48 PM
0

Pandering.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:47 PM
6

Don't. Don't pursue that. Look at the shitstorm and blowback that identifying "fucking scum!" girl and "Big red" caused. I support your goal of keeping the video up. It makes some great points. Don't fuck it up for all of us by giving them something to undermine us with.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 06:00 PM
2

sjambok South African?
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:28 PM
2

She'll get free college out of it and a career as a gender studies lecturer if not professor. Girl just made the smartest decision in her life. She cashed in a golden ticket.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:28 PM
1

They're conflating being charged more for more usage with being charged more for equal or less usage. It's such a cheap and easy piece of misdirection, but damn conflation works well.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:26 PM
-1

Here's how jobs should work; You put time in, you do the work, you get paid. Simple. That's it. If your job is to make 100 widgets in 8 hours and you make 100 widgets in 8 hours, then you should get paid for making 100 widgets in 8 hours. If you make 50 widgets in 4 hours, then you should get paid half of what the fully employed person makes. If you make 0 widgets and don't show up, then you should get nothing. But. Feminism isn't about equal pay. It's about giving women the opportunity to live …
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:24 PM
3

because they want to discredit anything that threatens their gravy train and cries of "misogyny" work, just like cries of "witch!" or "heretic!" used to work for taking out political opponents. Describing a behavior as herdish isn't inaccurate in this case. Not that you've ever cared much about accuracy.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:18 PM
10

Notice how vehemently they deny challenges to their dogma? That chick at 4:33 is a perfect example of how feminists react when their ideology and victim narrative is challenged. When challenged, she became hostile and abusive. Also... what's up with this know-it-all thing with Indian chicks. I can't tell you how many times I've heard "I am Indian and I am a woman, therefore I must know this better than you." Edit: As far as releasing the complainant's info, I would say don't. I think that sort o…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:10 PM
0

Homeboy makes assertion. People who disagree with assertion will get banned if they do so too adamantly in that thread. Homeboy won't come here to defend his assertion. This is how intellectual cowardice works. Always control the expression of your opponents and never engage them on any territory but that which you directly control. People who have truth on their side don't need to do this.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:45 PM
0

Nobody is disagreeing with his right to express his distaste. They're disagreeing on his motive for that distaste. Catch the fuck up.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:43 PM
2

I wonder, if he asked for a dress to take to school would she be so loving as to enable that for him? She would be ecstatic. She would immediately decide that that means that her son is really and truly a girl trapped in a boy's body. She will then be able to project further onto the poor kid and make him live the vicarious life that she wishes she had for herself. She'll have a sopping wet squirting year long orgasm at the idea of all the attention that it will get her. She'll have a PR agent w…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:40 PM
0

If a guest in my house luridly insults me, my dog and my grandmother I am entitled to kick them out and it has fuck all to do with free speech. Fuck all? It defines your household as a place where freedom of expression is not respected nor present. Good or bad doesn't really matter. Justification doesn't matter. All that matters is that speech in your house is definitively not free. So. You haven't countered my statement, you've just offered an example of an environment where you think restricti…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:33 PM
2

It isn't about lowering the standards, though. Recognize that those guys who evidence high amounts of the sociopathic behavior that women find attractive also fail to evidence much of the other beneficial behaviors that women claim to find attractive. One causes the other. When a woman goes for a guy like this, she isn't meeting high standards. She is meeting one standard and ignoring the rest. It's about making their standards reflect the reality that they live in, not necessarily lowing them.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:29 PM
23

Hey guize! Hey guize! Equality! Equality nao! I wants me equality! Oooh! You know what would be even better than equalizies! Mezies! Me first for everything! Matriarchy am betters den equalzies! Is like equalzies only me first! Feminists have always wanted a matriarchy, or more specifically whatever political system will provide them personally with the most free shit. They're just looking to put the bottom rail on the top row, but what they won't admit is that they've been on the top row all al…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:26 PM
2

Children are little animals. You've got to run that shit out of them or they go crazy. Take a border collie and lock that little fucker up in a room for a day. Good luck working out the crazy it develops from being cooped up for a single day. Kids are no different, but a bit more resilient.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 07:24 PM
1

I find it adorable that people are so trusting of corporations and governments that they believe those institutions won't use this power to silence people inconvenient to their interests, but I for one am not that trusting. What's really terrifying is that just 20 years ago, this wasn't quite the way it was. The people on the left used to be constantly up in arms about corporations and marketing practices. "Don't trust the corporations!" used to be a street level attitude. Then those corporation…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 07:21 PM
3

Are large industries not courting women? Oh, I think they are. Yes. That's how we know that women are closer to equality than feminists will admit. Courtship by large industry is a strong indicator of perception of social and economic value. When the mainstream industries want your money, you are, guess what, the mainstream. Surprise!
/r/MensRights28/01/14 07:18 PM
6

Consider this; her job isn't to provide women accused of murder with proper resources for their defense. Her job isn't to get women who are innocent of these allegations released from erroneous charges. Her job is to help the women who are guilty of murder get as little punishment as possible. That's her job. To help murderers get away with as much as they can. How is she not guilty of hate speech, speech police?
/r/MensRights28/01/14 07:11 PM
-1

Hi, I’m Anthony Burch, lead writer of Borderlands 2 and its DLC. And today I’m going to talk about inclusivity pandering to demographics for the purpose of sales. Fixed it for him.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 07:04 PM
0

We have finite resources (time and money) We have the winner. The one who figured it out. The problem is that women are raised to think that the men in their lives are convenient and bottomless spigots of the time and money they want from them.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:59 PM
6

I agree. I think you're right. She isn't attracted to him. And that is an acceptable reason. And she should admit that. But we both know what happens. See. Women know. They know when a guy is attracted to them. And they use it. Maybe it's so reflexive that they don't notice they're doing it, but I don't think so. She knew that he was attracted her and she drew it out so she could emotionally milk him more, all the while saying "Go ahead. Say something. I dare you. We both know what's coming if y…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 02:19 PM
31

The entire "anti-nice guy" friendzone argument is based on misdirection. The way feminists portray it is that "nice guys" aren't really nice, but are instead trying to weasel their way into a woman's affections or who arbitrarily decide that a woman 'owes' him sexual attention because he has given her social attention. Well. These guys exist. My experience with them leads me to think that they are more likely to identify as a feminist, though. That's part of the strategy. After all, what guy ins…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:24 AM
4

People often come to this thread with victim narrative walls of texts for the purpose of inciting comments that they can then cherrypick and misrepresent, or comments that they post themselves so that they can then quote later, for the purpose of slandering MRAs. If you're not a troll, make sure to read the sidebar, I hope it helps.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 11:18 PM
-2

Well. Neither are going to end. The best thing to do is to look at the motivations for it. I stand by the idea that most slut shaming is about cautioning women against STDs, unwanted pregnancy, and relationship with unsavory people who they haven't taken the time to personally vet before allowing them to rub their genitalia on them to the point of orgasm. Virgin shaming is different, though. The purpose of virgin shaming is to deny the contribution of the accused. "Oh, you think that? You must b…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 11:15 PM
8

Not that there isn't a grossly quantifiable reason for men to go their own way.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 10:14 PM
10

The fashion industry isn't exactly dominated by women, although it is fair to say that they are quite prevalent in it. I would say that it's about equally split between men and women. The thing is, most of the guys in fashion are gay. And they do shame women for their bodies a lot. The worst fat shaming and female body shaming that I have ever heard or seen (from his twitter and FB) has been done by a gay man in the fashion industry with an affinity for MtF transexuals. The thing is, nobody want…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 10:07 PM
1

but it still would be nice to see more action. In order for that to happen, the MRA is going to have to be able to protect those who speak out from loss of livlihood. Unfortunately, if the method is employment within the "organization", we're going to end up with an org that is bloated like feminism and more focused on self sustanence by any means necessary than anything else.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 09:36 PM
-3

Troll.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 09:34 PM
5

I often wonder how outsiders perceive this obvious imbalance. They don't. There's a huge trend these days of people who don't actually comprehend that speech is either free or restricted and if you restrict it, in any way then it is not free. They argue for their own freedom of expression out one side of the mouth and against that of others whom they disagree with out the other side. They're too blinded by zealotry and low intelligence to understand it.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 09:33 PM
4

tone argument.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:51 PM
1

No, man. You really don't wanna do that. Unless you've got a colon like a tractor trailer.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:22 PM
0

Here's a question. If you're a dude and you meet some chick on the internet who convinces you that she loves you so that you'll send her a bunch of money, who then convinces you to fly to wherever the fuck she is to meet and bring her more money, who then dips out or something, were you sex trafficked? It may be a bit of a stretch, but it seems that that is a more available method of profiting from male genitalia.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 08:05 PM
2

Wow. This is interesting. Was the thread brigaded before it even dropped? She's right. And I took a look at a list of her other articles and they all look interesting to me. The doors are open, the same carpet that was open to everyone else is now open to you. Step up or move along.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 08:00 PM
1

Like Aokna2736 said, no matter the issue if a male opts out, there's still a baby. We can't, as a society, force women to get an abortion. It violates every principle of bodily autonomy. But we can't have unprepared and irresponsible people creating new lives that they will fail to provide for. So. What could be done that would prevent new life from being created in unsustainable or unsustained conditions without violating anyone's bodily autonomy and respecting the agency of both potential pare…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:53 PM
1

Irresponsible reproduction is probably the biggest issue facing humanity and nobody is having a serious discussion about it or working on realistic solutions to it The only solutions available may not be pleasant. We have to accept that if we think we're going to sustain the human race on the planet earth. Otherwise, we're going to wipe ourself out of pure mathematical probability.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:49 PM
118

You know what's an unrealistic standard about video games? respawning. And shooting fireballs out of your hands. And single handedly taking down an invading armada of aliens. And summoning demons. And bullet time. And magic swords. And pretty much fucking everything.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:45 PM
1

I barely understand what you're talking about. It's cool. I need that brain space for other shit.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 12:22 AM
1

Just a single sentence down Percent of married women ages 15-44 that are infertile: 6.0% 10.9% + 6.0% = 16.9%, rounded up to 18 because I prefer round even numbers.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 10:11 PM
5

No wait. Nature! No wait. Nurture! no wait. Nature! No wait. Nurture!
/r/MensRights25/01/14 08:55 PM
2

It's possible that you failed to comprehend his point. Given that you did comprehend his point, then you are wrong and he is right. But if you want to contest that, you should shelve the tone argument and work with the actual idea. Like a grown up.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:29 PM
1

If we were discussing the catholic church's effect on scientific advancement or human rights in the dark ages, I might describe it with a bitter tone. That would make nothing I said untrue. Learn to separate the tambre of the instrument from notes that it plays.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:47 PM
4

Hadn't you heard? If you sound bitter or angry, then everything you say is categorically false.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:45 PM
1

So. Here's the deal. Here's what happened here. This young lady isn't mind numbingly facepalmingly stupid. She's articulate, she has a vocabulary, she forms a coherent narrative in her sentence and paragraph structure. So she isn't stupid. But she isn't as intelligent as she thinks she is. What you have here, is a pretty bourgiose white woman with opinions. IRL, this young lady is probably rarely challenged on those opinions, no matter what they are. She doesn't have the tempering experience of …
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:36 PM
2

True, but they really oughtn't. Sort of yes, sort of no. Consider this; what percentage of women are infertile? CDC stats give us a number, including "impaired fecundity" of about 18%. Fuck it, call it 20%. That leaves us with 80% of the female population who have the ability to get pregnant, which will lead to them taking extended time off of work or leaving the job alltogether. Of that female population, I think that it's easy to believe that around 80% intend to reproduce, that is reproductio…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:18 PM
1

Having seen the what, now?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:10 PM
15

When you can afford to litigate, they will take you seriously.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:03 AM
2

It makes me think who would believe me if it ever happened to me? If it ever happens to you, you go straight to the police, get a rape kit done, file a police report, and then seek medical and psychiatric treatment. In that order. And you make sure that anyone you know does exactly that if they need to. In that order so that people who actually commit rape can be caught and prosecuted.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:01 AM
8

If pissing in public gets you registered, putting a baby's dick in your mouth damn well should.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 11:55 PM
1

L-A-W-Y-E-R
/r/MensRights24/01/14 04:03 AM
1

I'm fucking telling you. Judgybitch is the Misanthropic Bitch grown up and married. Not figuratively. Literally. They are the same human being. Internet mystery, solved. By the Gieger. Again.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 03:08 AM
2

I'm not sure how the hell someone measures how much one has done for "Geek Culture" or even what is meant by that term What he meant was that they needed to shut up until they've made half as much money as she has off of geek culture.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 02:34 AM
16

This is a thing. Question the feminist narrative "What? Are you some kind of MRA or something?" Just say yes. You're more welcomed here.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 01:25 AM
2

Women are more war mongering. By proxy violence is their modus operandi.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:00 PM
56

And that, my dear lad, is how the wealthy mangina maintains his status. Key word being "wealthy", a distinction that the unfortunately unwealthy manginas don't recognize. Always. Follow. The money.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 02:23 AM
280

Wil Wheaton has never had to live life as a regular man. He has never been treated by women as a regular man. He is a privileged white male. All those things that feminists say that white men have that we recognize are actually really only reserved for rich white men? Well. He's a rich white male. So. What do you expect? Perspective? LOL. He has media to sell and pussy to pander to for approval, hanglowstankin, and profit.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 01:38 AM
22

In this type of case, feminists will offer the false dichotomy that punishing the woman properly will somehow absolve the man and that the man is always the mastermind of this shit.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 06:36 PM
1

I'm not against the mail order bride thing per se (or whatever they're calling it now). Those services, though, do seem to rely on the willingness of economically or socially desperate people to put hope for financial security above personal safety and integrity. I think that there is a "how dare you!" aspect to it, but I also think that these services are shady.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 10:23 AM
0

One thing I mentioned, and will continue to point out is that female slut shaming and male sexuality shaming (which is basically slut shaming of men, exponentially increased) stems in large part from the centuries long use of access to sex and companionship as a commodity by women. We should be sure to maintain a distinction between "slut shaming" and sexual shaming. The so-called "slut shaming" that's the flavor of the moment isn't sexual shaming. People aren't really shaming women for being se…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 10:20 AM
5

sociopolitical faint by use of linguistic sleight of hand. Brilliant observation.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:55 PM
3

Which works since it keeps the money filtering through their daddy's pocket and into their own. And they can claim "who me!?!?!" the whole time. Jesus. It's like a macroeconomic proxy abuse. By design or by accident, they are masterful.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:54 PM
8

She wouldn't. The politicization would cause her to rationalize not doing it, so she wouldn't. Lesbian couples don't report DV because they are afraid of how that will affect the public idea of lesbians and feminists and they have a hard time recognizing that they are being abused until it gets to a point that they're embarrased about how far it went. I've watched it happen.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:48 PM
3

Minesies! It's miiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiine! Myyyyyyyyyyyyyyy precious equalities! Only I'sies cans has it and you can'ts! No equalities for yousies! only meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! Pretty much.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 07:16 PM
2

Refreshing to read an honest and astute analysis on this issue after so much bullshit from academia. Feminist 'studies' always compare women in comfortable, enjoyable, non-taxing work with no commute and men who work jobs that are dangerous, dirty, isolating, require moving, etc. But but but whyyyyyyyyyy!?!?!? Whyyyyyyyy cantz da allz jobsies paysies da sames? Why no secretaries make samesies as high iron workers and da oil platform workersies? Why nots da samesies!!!!!!
/r/MensRights17/01/14 03:37 PM
1

This is a solid and masterful argument. Your chain of logic is inviolate and ironclad. I would be willing to accept an argument for circumcision where the readily available antiseptic resources of first world nations aren't so readily available but would say that it would be best to let those cultures speak for themselves. As far as the culture that I belong to, and that I have a right to effect change upon, that issue is null and void and so your argument holds. A secondary show of how our soci…
/r/MensRights17/01/14 02:36 PM
1

Thats pretty poor logic. I know the weight a false rape accusation holds, Not quite as poor logic as you insist. You're just missing the difference. You know the weight of a false rape accusation. You already know it. It doesn't have to be explained to you. You haven't ruined lives by preaching to the virtues of making false accusations and protecting those who do so. However if you had, then you would need to face the actual repercussions to learn them.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 05:01 PM
2

I use Galileo as an analogy a lot. The context that I go for is this "People called Galileo a heretic too". The issue wasn't whether he was right or wrong. Galileo's claims could be measured, tested, and discussed in open dialogue and the truth could be found. Quite easily, actually. The problem was that rather than actually exploring his claims, he was silenced and censored by people who made more money and shored up more power for themselves by keeping those claims silent. They were supported …
/r/MensRights15/01/14 04:18 PM
12

No. No, it isn't. Because she won't learn if she isn't held to the embers. She will continue to flutter through life, changing her worldview and ideology according to her convenience.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 04:14 PM
1

spot on, fats.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:42 PM
3

So. In a relationship, what do women offer men other than sex? See. I've seen a lot of women stick in relationships that were neither personally nor sexually fulfilling because of the things that the man provided to them. Mostly money or the results of his work. So... other than sex... what do women bring to a relationship? Support? I don't really see that all that much. Campanionship? Until a guy with more money and utility comes around. What?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:41 PM
9

It's never been about the same job. Feminists have wanted women to be able to get jobs as the water boy and demand that they be paid the same as the QB the whole time. Because they're fucking lazy, entitled, ignorant, and self involved.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:38 PM
1

It's the law of conservation of energy in effect. Women don't have to compete for survival and advancement the way that men do, so they tend not to want to bother. Men have no inherant value to society or women, so they have to earn it through accomplishment and possession.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:37 PM
5

Judge: "Likewise, nothing I can do to punish her is more important than her memory of what she did." I think that we should apply this to ALL criminal proceedings. Equally.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:31 PM
2

It seems people are unable to accept that most women don't derive enjoyment from throwing themselves down a set of stairs for 8 hours a day, or hitting the ground hundreds of times over and over. That has nothing to do with sexism. It's the same reason most men don't skate either. There it is. I firmly believe that any woman who wanted to, and who was in sound enough mind and body, could achieve anything in skate that any man has. They just don't pursue it. As a matter of fact, the world would g…
/r/MensRights15/01/14 06:19 AM
1

I believe in human equality not outcomes So. You're going to be paying my rent for the next few months since I'm just not up to it myself, huh?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 05:10 AM
0

As others have pointed out we wouldn't care how Naomi paid for college. Then you're fucking idiots. Her politics are based on "privilege" and assumes men are and women aren't. If you are insisting that a group of people are privileged and you're from sweater set ivy league pinky out tea time at 2 society then you've got some 'splainin' to do. How the fuck are you that stupid? Oh wait. You're a NH libertarian. That's how. Right.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 05:01 AM
1

Then you're a fucking idiot. If person A has to work 40 hours a week just to keep a roof over there head and person B has every single necessity provided for them without having to work for it guess who works harder. Do you even comprehend basic mathematics? I'm talking addition and subtraction, here.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 04:56 AM
4

Chastity belts. In all fairness, those can serve certain recreational purposes for the creatively inclined.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 10:32 AM
3

and actually get her to understand some things we care about. First, her illusions must be destroyed and shattered long enough for reason to shine a light in. Those illusions are the shield that feminists use to avoid truth. They aren't going to put them down nor reach across the aisle of their own volition. One of the reasons that these shields remain so is that too many people are either incapable of intelligent debate (your Paul Ryan and Scott whateverthefuckhisnameis types) or too soft in th…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 10:26 AM
0

In libertopia rich = better. Really good point. However, there is also a strong vein of bootstrap bullshit within libertopia. Libertarians tend to go more ga ga over a person who has had to work full time and support themselves and who does things like repairing their own rental house than they would an upper crust ivy league grad who had everything paid for by mummy and daddy. At least they put on a good show of it. .I'd pin your hopes to someone with lots of experience at public speaking, beca…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 08:21 AM
22

GWW, if you see this, I'd like to offer you a little advice for this. I don't know much about you personally, but the impression that I get is that you are from a working class - ish background. Make sure that you get elbow deep in that identity and the context of class identity and conflict. Naomi Wolfe is bourgiose. Painfully so. Possibly even more wealthy. One of the weaknesses of her arguments is that she is a limosine liberal. She came from a wealthy family, grew up in that wealthy family, …
/r/MensRights14/01/14 05:08 AM
5

First; I honestly don't give a fuck if people piss in public during "get drunk" hours. I like how Amsterdam had these outdoor stalls that you could use. One weekends, they even drop these giant plastic things that look like human sized orange juicers that are actually temporary urinals. It's fucking great when you're loaded and there's nowhere to piss. I wish we had them in the US. That being said. There are plenty of behaviors that I actually find quite distasteful and worthy of my disdain, and…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:45 AM
0

Duh. I'm a men's rights advocate because I believe that all men should have the right to rape all women, put them to work in coal mines for profit and eat turkey legs out of your grandmother's asshole whenever they feel like it. For starters, I don't see how there could be any discrimination towards men on a large scale in our society. Read that again. Now look up the definition to "oxymoron". Now read it again. Now look up that definition. Now read it again. Repeat until you recognize that that…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:39 AM
1

Yes, but it isn't real in the sense that it's completely arbitrary. I worded that poorly. Except it isn't arbitrary. At all. It's relative to the regional market. And the basic necessities of survival have already been defined for quite some time now. IE it isn't simple but it isn't arbitrary either. It isn't undefinable either. You just don't want it defined because you're afraid that some day someone might tell you that you have to pay a person at least this much and it might be more than you'…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:29 AM
0

If you have any female employees, you're a fool if you have any interactions with them at all that aren't recorded.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:59 AM
0

You sound more and more like someone without the fortitude to make a cogent argument who prefers intellectual bigotry instead.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:57 AM
0

Alright. So let's consider this. It looks like the assertion being made is that Gutierrez is primary physical aggressor. I didn't see that in the video. I couldn't tell who was primary physical aggressor from the video at all. I could tell that two girls were beating on Gutierrez and I didn't really see him fighting back much, or at least very well. It looks like he got ganged up on and his ass beaten a bit. But let's go with it. Some girls were harrassing Gutierrez (anyone want to talk about th…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:55 AM
1

Well, it isn't any secret that our society allows women to get away with murder. Even if it's of her own 3 infant children.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:55 AM
2

Living wage isn't real You claimed that a living wage isn't real. Then you described multiple conditions that could be considered a living wage. evil capitalists. Not really. I fucking love capitalism. I don't, however, like fraud. When you pay someone an egregiously and destructively low price for a product and use economic leverage to put them in a position where they have to take the deal, you're committing both fraud and racketeering. I don't like those things very much at all. What I do lik…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:35 AM
3

See. That's where we're at now. We're at the point where accurate descriptions are now being made villanous if the person being described doesn't like that description or that it's accurate. That's where we are. Swapping out logic and reason for feelz. It's going to get worse, dude. We are rolling right the fuck into newspeak. It's terrifying.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:22 AM
0

You do know that people in the US fight actively and overwhelmingly successfully against paying employees a living wage, right? That's class warfare. Definitively.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:20 AM
6

I'm telling you, man, I'm telling you for real; mental illness can be cultivated like a fucking pox culture. And that is what feminism is about now, it's about taking this bundle of insanity held together by strings of BPD and shooting it straight into the veins of every woman on the planet. Gross.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:15 AM
2

Therefore I would like you to imagine how it is for an growing boy in the age of ten to hear every day from his mother that men are the cause of all trouble in the world, that men are guilty of all crime and war and repression in the world, that all men should be castrated after their semen has been deep-frozen to ensure the existence of the next generation, that men should live in different cities than women, so that they could all kill each other and so solve the problem of their own existence…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:12 AM
1

bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bigot bi…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:00 AM
1

How are those pull ups going these days?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:56 AM
12

Trickle down equality.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:56 AM
5

Well. I have no problem with the statement per se. I mean, if I were in a movie with Claudia Black I'd be pretty psyched. If I then found out she were going to be twice her size for our on screen kissing scenes, I'd be disappointed. I'd get over that disappointment rather fast (maybe) but I'd be disappointed. I might even tell some p... No. I don't think I'd be dissing her for it in the interviews, though. Here's the thing. Jennifer Lawrence just this moment proved to me that she's an idiot. Jus…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:55 AM
0

It's the intent, pure baiting, and contrarian towards the science because you want to make someone angry. It's funny how someone who will make the argument that one can't know the minds of others will then argue that they know the mind of another. I'm not interested in making you angry, but I refuse to relent just because you are. I'd much prefer, though, that you be reasonable and remove your emotional attachment and need for conclusions to turn out in a manner that please your ego. But you won…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 11:59 PM
0

An argument with the only intent to possibly cause anger by being contrarian and stupid, is trolling by definition. And that isn't the intent of my argument. And you know it. Money from who? The powerful Bill Gates Transsexual Incorporated lobby? Surgeons. Pharmaceutical companies. Hell, even clothing companies. Lobbyists. Lawyers. Publishing. Other media. Grants for study. Name it. There is plenty of money to be made from telling transgendered people exactly what they want to hear. Just like wi…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 06:54 PM
-1

It's trolling You're calling it trolling as a propagandist tactic to prevent any ideas outside of the ones you approve of from being discussed. It's blatant and obvious and basic and unfortunately terribly effective. Claim transsexual people exist Never claimed they didn't. I can't say that I've ever heard or read anyone claim that they don't. I imagine somebody must, but I can't imagine there being many. and that their brain's seat of identity is that of the other sex Fantasyland. That's how yo…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 05:33 PM
-1

It isn't trolling. It's a reasonable counterpoint to your own assertion. But if it weren't for conflation, you wouldn't have much to stand on. So you conflate anyone with a solid position against your own with trolls so that they can be dismissed. AKA Ad hominem fallacy.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 03:23 PM
-1

And I'm the King of the Universe. Because I feel like I'm the King of the Universe. Pay your taxes to me or you're a bigot.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 03:11 PM
1

Bullshit. Men seek help. They get turned away over and over again by identity politicians, lazy bureaucrats, and the HR mentality. So they learn not to waste their time with an avenue that will just tell them that they aren't entitled to any help because of their gender.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:16 AM
-1

Not doing any favor saying trans women are men. Not doing any favor saying that it's raining outside. It's still raining. They are men.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:11 AM
1

Lets talk about the sex trafficking of men. Now, I've weighed in on the topic of sex work with the opinion that if an adult person chooses to pursue sex work in a safe and healthy manner, then that is their right. I think this goes for men and for women. I think that (non consensual) sexual slavery is very very bad. I think that there are many women who suffer from this. There are also men. Let's talk about Bangkok. You know, the place where young boys, underaged boys, are trained to pretend to …
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:10 AM
7

Well. If every man (and woman) in the world was in a relationship or relationships that provided them with complete sexual satisfaction, then there wouldn't really be a porn or prostitution market. No demand = no supply. Sex is as much an emotional act as it is a physical act and I am of the opinion that when people watch porn of have sex with a hooker they are still looking for that intimacy. They might not get it, but they still want it. The act might make that desire for intimacy subside a bi…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:25 PM
8

OK. I got you. My experience isn't that they couch surf. It's that they usually have a pretty easy time finding someone to room and board them completely until they are ready to be independent again. I also often see women in this position completely sabotage it with the same behavior that lead to their homelessness. A difference between men and women in homelessness is that it actually takes a lot for a woman to end up homeless, whereas with a guy... one missed rent payment.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 11:29 AM
9

Not a single thing you said in this post actually makes sense.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:57 AM
3

People learn that their double standards are OK by having those double standards catered to, pandered to, and tolerated by others more often and to less detriment than facing repercussions for those double standards. People put up with women's double standards a lot. They cater to them. When women get called out on them, they cry, and so anyone with criticism is usually going to shut the fuck up for fear of whiteknights.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:02 AM
3

One of the biggest problems with the "gentlemen" concept is that it is a predefined cookie cutter persona. Women tend to spend a lot of time going for predefined cookie cutter personas in their life. This is "Father", this is "Mother", this is "QuirkyBestFriend", this is "SluttyBestFriend," this is "ProfessionalBestFriend" this is "ArtsyBoyfriend," this is "HottieBoyfriend", this is "CowboyBoyfriend". They do that shit incessantly. And they need to cut it the fuck out. Whether or not women deser…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 09:43 AM
23

Thanks for your contribution, participation, and support. I think you're right. One of the things that I've always struggled with is trying to get people to comprehend the desperate lack of resources to help marginalized men, especially when compared to the surplus of resources to help marginalized women. Usually when I try to brooch this topic in conversation, I get a flippant and dismissive "Oh yeah, well why don't you start a men's shelter" as if I can do that just by clicking my heels three …
/r/MensRights11/01/14 09:31 AM
43

It's funny because feminists did exactly what they flipped out about 4chan doing to Sarkeesian.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 11:19 AM
5

Oh lordy do I remember this. And yes, the two things taste very similar.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:06 PM
10

This is the smartest advice in this thread.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:03 PM
1

This puts a monkeywrench in my plan to marry the first Idoru.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:39 PM
24

"What ever happened to chivalry? I don't know, let's ask your chaperone."
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:37 PM
3

This wasn't a pro MRA article. It was a pro equality article. That's how I prefer it.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 12:26 PM
3

Anyone reading this post will be dead or in diapers in 50 years.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 12:18 PM
3

I would posit that more men live in poverty than women. How did they define poverty? Are we looking only at income? Well. On paper, you might have men having more income. You also, though, would have fewer men with someone else paying their way. That's the thing. A lot of women survive without or with little income because somebody else is paying their way. So, on paper, they could live in a fucking three bedroom condo and still be poor.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:20 AM
4

But still temporary. Not for any of us.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:18 AM
8

I would posit that more men live in poverty than women. How did they define poverty? Are we looking only at income? Well. On paper, you might have men having more income. You also, though, would have fewer men with someone else paying their way. That's the thing. A lot of women survive without or with little income because somebody else is paying their way. So, on paper, they could live in a fucking three bedroom condo and still be poor.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:02 AM
1

Are we name dropping now? Aileen Wuronos. Jodie Arias.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 01:14 AM
0

Right. And Sasha was explaining the reason why those police decided to shirk their duties and fail to do their job.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 01:12 AM
4

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/bikini-bridge
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:13 PM
1

Go back to /b/.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:59 PM
3

It's funny because the feminists are trying really hard to toss the MRM under the LGBT bus. They're doing everything they can to attempt to get MRAs to disparage gays and lesbians and transexuals. But it doesn't work. The worst you get is "I disagree but live and let live" or a semantic argument on theories of transgenderedness. Meanwhile... among their own camp...
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:37 PM
0

Take a look at the numbers on women in the military.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:21 PM
2

Say my name, bitch.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 08:59 AM
1

You can take the term "misogynist" out. See. Trolls are trolls. And trolls gonna troll. If you're a woman, they'll use that. If you're a man, they'll use that. They'll use whatever the fuck it takes to get you riled up. That's what trolls do. Some are dedicated. Some are talented. A few are both. Men get the same shit. Male journalists get the same shit. The difference isn't who gets it. The difference is who thinks they should get special treatment because of it. The difference is who chose not…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 08:54 AM
-4

Protip: They don't love playing video games. Or they don't want to play them with you.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 08:50 AM
7

This is not the behavior I would expect of a feminist, sex-positive 21st century lady. Well. It is the behavior of a 21st century feminist. But sweetheart, you are far from sex positive. Being sex positive means seeing your partner(s) or potential partner(s) as equals and treating them with the respect of an equal. Feminism does not allow women to do that when their partner(s) or potential partner(s) is male. All PiV is rape, remember? It’s not behavior I’m particularly proud of either. But you'…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:59 AM
1

Time to start calling the police on every single canadian feminist who behaves similarly. Start with Big Red. Then get "Fucking Scum" girl.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:42 AM
5

There's no way that this post isn't some sort of troll. If you have spent five months engaged in a relationship and never figured out what she looks like under all that makeup, you've got to be terribly unobservant. That being said, you can break up with anyone for any reason you want. It may or may not make you an imbecile or a dick. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:41 AM
1

I have a female relative who recently decided to be the sole caregiver for her son. Now, I love her and I love her son quite a bit. I don't think that she necessarily made the wrong decision, but it WILL impact her kid greatly. There will be fights between the two parents. He will fail to make payments on time. He will fail to be a good parent to his son, he's already done it with two other sons by a different mother. Cut to, 1 year ago: I have a female relative who is having a hard time with he…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:32 AM
1

Well. It's both complicated and simple at the same time. Islam is a patriarchal religion. The society that it envisions and posits as an ideal is one where men have the majority of the power and as long as the women behave, they are allowed by that patriarchy to maintain some amount of autonomy. It does not treat women equally. It does not advocate for equal rights and responsibilities for men and women. Not a mote of it. Not a jot nor an iota. All this "spiritually equal" malarky is just that. …
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:19 AM
6

Let's look at it this way; If there were two unisex bathrooms, feminists and women would complain, but the transgendered and men would be fine with it. If there was a unisex bathroom and a men's bathroom, feminists and women would complain, but the transgendered and men would be fine with it. Those women would also sue the owner. If there were two women's bathrooms, feminists and women would complain and probably sue because rather than complain, the men would just wait until nobody was using on…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:03 AM
0

Protip: Women are masters at playing sick to get out of shit they don't want to do. So well that most of them actually believe that they are sick. One might even say that they don't "play sick" as much as method act it. So. I'm going to doubt it has anything to do with motion sickness for most of the women, if not all, that you know and any of the ones you don't.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:51 AM
10

A short Recap: Aw shucks, golly gee guys, maybe she kinda sorta maybe swindled ya a little. Maybe. But only if it doesn't lower our pageviews.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:49 AM
1

He says as he exercises a right that he does not extend to others.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 03:24 AM
4

You do understand that that adamance on respecting open dialogue puts us miles ahead of pretty much every other civic group in existence, right? Because that right to unfettered free speech is the most fundamental right of them all. If you don't have that, you won't have anything else. And we've got that. How about you?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:55 PM
2

I would call it labor market saturation (or equilibrium). I have no idea what other people would call it.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:50 PM
4

That she didn't win last time gives her run a certain "vindication" appeal to it for women who want any woman in the office, no matter her policy. There are more of those than realize it. That she got nasty just means she's willing to play dirty. Which makes her more likely to win.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 02:09 AM
2

God, this election cycle will be painful. She will be an awful candidate. And she'll fucking win too because this country is so easily cowed by identity politics. Gross.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 01:12 AM
3

Here's something to consider; In (some) theory, Feminism pushed and pushes for women to be equally represented in the workforce. For better or for worse, by allowing this, society has dilluted the workforce by roughly 100%. Whereas before you had 200 men going for 100 jobs, you now have 200 men and 200 women going for 100 jobs. For better or worse, this affects those who control the supply of labor ie the worker. I'm fine with women being allowed to equally compete for jobs. I would even say tha…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 06:19 PM
1

Demonspawn is right. "Man Caves" are for men who have handed their balls to their wives. The "Man Cave" denotes that the man has control of and prioritized access to a single room in his home, that his wife may take away from him at her leisure, while that wife has control of and prioritized access to the rest of the house. A room of one's own, ne pas? I do think that people living in a shared household need to have a room of their own. But that leaves the entire rest of the house that should be…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:04 AM
2

You guys did this to yourselves.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 02:24 AM
3

Reality cares not for validation That this is still debated fucking kills me.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:25 AM
8

If men are so obsolete, let's take a walk by the local Stevedore's unions and talk to the guy who get your fucking Kate Spade handbags to the shishi boutiqe you spend more than most of us make in a month on them at. Then you can tell me how obsolete men are.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 11:25 PM
2

If it wasn't simulated, it would have been the most punk rock thing I've seen since The Genitorturers in '95.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 11:09 PM
-3

This is kind of a silly video. But what's with the convulsing/kibbying thing? Does Diana Davison have tourettes or parkinsons or something? Was she on Adderall? Did she have to pee? Was she doing some sort of punk rock transgressive thing where she's banging some dude who's off camera while reading a tract about the evils of PonV sex? Serious question. And don't be a little bitch about that last one, it kinda looks like it and you know it. The supervillain makeup is silly in an entertaining way.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 08:15 AM
2

And this, kiddies, is what all that intersectionality bullshit will get you.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 02:52 AM
6

That's because feminists are greedy and manipulative. If someone asked this chick if she were an MRA and she responded identically, I'd think "Even better. Moving along."
/r/MensRights01/01/14 12:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter