TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

godfatherchimp Archive

View 3 posts and 542 comments by godfatherchimp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Minimize validation you receive from other men that aren't your boyfriend or family members. That means get rid of all beta orbiters, minimize the amount of men you contact, don't chill with other men unless he's there, and don't use social media to get validation and attention from men.
/r/RedPillWomen18/06/17 01:21 PM
1

Feminism is a Sexual Strategy That Has Caused the Breakdown of the Nuclear Family
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 01:40 PM
2

I think you're unqualified to decide who's qualified
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 12:39 AM
1

Who gets to decide who's qualified? Qualified people?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 12:32 AM
2

The only ideology that is compatible with TRP is anarcho capitalism: https://np.reddit.com/r/theredpillright/comments/6b7aad/government_is_the_1_enemy_of_the_red_pill_man/?st=J2V0ZPU4&sh=8d3a3261 It must be incredibly confusing for statist red pillers to reconcile their red pill free market view of the dating world with their blue pill statist view of politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/17 11:15 PM
1

No one should have the right to vote. We need to dismantle democracy and the state...look at all the damage it's doing to our liberty and prosperity
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/17 10:57 PM
2

No one asked you to speak for her, so why are you even addressing me in the first place? The only hamstering that is done in TRP are idiots who don't understand what's on the sidebar
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 10:46 PM
1

Because alphas have beta genetics that they pass on to their children. Natural selection did weed a lot of them out, and continues to
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 07:56 PM
9

The main reason GLO does that is so he can sell more t shirts
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 05:56 PM
1

Proletariats are not bourgeoise by choice this day in age, so there is no difference. You didn't show me anything Engels said, you just made some claim about something he said without backing it up with any sources
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 05:41 PM
–

Nothing you just said contradicted anything I said.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 05:35 PM
–

No my source is the communist manifesto...
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 05:29 PM
2

I don't care about the posts, I care about what's in the sidebar. What hamstering is done in regards to that?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 03:42 PM
–

What loopholes am I complaining about?
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 03:14 PM
–

What did I say that leads you to believe I am one?
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 01:29 PM
–

Yes you are wrong. I specifically said Marriage 1.0 is undesirable, or did you not read my whole post?
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 01:28 PM
–

You called me a batshit crazy conspirtard for it
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 01:14 PM
–

Implementing a strong inheritance tax to destroy bouregois families is one of Marx's 10 planks of communism. So no, that's not what they said.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 12:43 PM
–

I said it's the reason me and you are here instead of the children of the billy betas of yesteryears
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 12:41 PM
–

You're delusional if you don't think humanity will one day have a world government
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 12:33 PM
1

Nice straw man, I said destruction of the family is what Marx said was necessary
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 12:31 PM
–

Nothing you said contradicts anything I said.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 12:29 PM
3

TRP doesn't pretend pair bonding doesn't exist. Impaired ability to pair bond is one of the main reasons we say to avoid sluts for LTRs. What do you mean by "opening up" to one another? What do you mean by "closer"? Where does TRP say anything about women being attracted to power for themselves? What insistence on libertarian spiced relationships? Please elaborate on all of your points because you are being way too vague.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 12:27 PM
1

One reason /u/Redpillschool created the r/redpillright sub so that it wouldn't be hijacked by displaced alt-right idiots trying to spread their racist ideology under the red pill banner. But anyway that is why I think right-wing politics are "masculine" and left-wing politics "feminine", because like women, statists want to use other people to commit violence for them instead of holding frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 12:47 AM
1

GayLubeOil the favorite man of TRPillers used to be a moderator at /r/AltRight. Good for him. So you basically admit there are political connotations in TRP. I never said there weren't. I disagree with you though, because you see many alt-righters are in fact ancaps. If you knew a couple of things about the alt-right you would see there is an overlap between the alt-right and anarcho-capitalism as well. That makes no sense. The alt-right's ideology is entirely centered around nationalism, and an…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 12:43 AM
1

The alt-right is incompatible with TRP because it is a statist ideology. Anarcho-capitalism is the only political ideology that is compatible with TRP. The government is the number one enemy of the Red Pill man by robbing him of his liberty and property. Women need government to forcibly extract wealth from men in ways that would never happen in a free market society. They need third-wave feminist laws to forcibly impose their sexual strategy on society. Blue Pillers believe that they need gover…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 12:27 AM
10

It wasn't "hyperbole", it was outright false.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 12:24 AM
12

Stop moving the goal posts. You didn't call them cult-like, you called them a cult.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 12:05 AM
9

Religious thinking is about claiming to know the absolute truth and then with confirmation bias try to relate everything to this absolute truth. TRP fits perfectly this description. Confirmation bias also includes rejecting evidence contrary to those beliefs, which TRP sidebar doesn't do. The problem is that the evidence of this truth is very thin There's plenty of evidence to back up TRP sidebar material, both objective and subjective. they keep making extraordinary claims like that women invit…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 11:59 PM
10

There's nothing wrong with believing that conjecture like TRP is correct, since it hasn't been disproven. That's not "religious thinking". People who engage in "religious thinking" continue to believe in things that have been disproven because they are close-minded. Besides, even if TRP used "religious thinking" (which it doesn't), that wouldn't make us a cult. So what exactly is it about TRP that deludes you into thinking it's a cult? Or do you just like throwing that word around because it mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 10:52 PM
10

It wasn't "very hyperbolic", it was outright false.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 10:42 PM
28

We don't have any hierarchy (much less leaders), we don't engage in mind-altering practices, we don't demand that people think/act a certain way, we have don't have membership (in fact, we actively discourage recruitment), we don't make profit, we don't have any group related activities or expect anyone to devote any time to us, and we don't isolate each other from the outside world. Simply believing that the sidebar is the truth doesn't make it a cult. So what exactly is it about TRP that delud…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 09:49 PM
1

They only "belong" to those groups because you and a bunch of other people made up those groups in your minds and placed those people in it. The groups aren't objectively real and there is no scientific basis whatsoever for classifying people that way. It's no different than grouping people together based on the color of their eyes. Most people have a problem with Islamist culture. That's not the point. The point is you conflate genetics with culture - nature vs. nurture. Take any white baby and…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/17 01:04 PM
1

No, I think everyone is different underneath because we all have different DNA and genomes that are outwardly expressed. Grouping people by a certain subset of those genomes (what you call "race") is no more rational than grouping people by the color of their eyes. Africans being lower IQ on average than Europeans could be due to Africans being less educated. Europeans are not more moral than Africans. No, I don't think that it would be fine and dandy if we had Sharia law in the US. I don't care…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/17 12:48 PM
1

I'm not advocating inviting Islamists into our country, I agree that we shouldn't do that
/r/TheRedPill14/05/17 12:41 PM
1

Not any more than people dying is
/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 11:43 PM
1

All aspects of race are societal constructs. There is nothing scientific whatsoever about classification of individuals based on "race".
/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 11:37 PM
1

Race is a pseudo scientific, purely social construct. Any replacement of white people that's going to happen is just made up in your head
/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 07:10 PM
1

No it's not. Government is the the only threat to our prosperity
/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 07:09 PM
1

What is a "white" country? None of this is genocide
/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 05:09 PM
1

Where is there white genocide happening?
/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 12:56 PM
1

Yes I was. I said you don't get mad at a fish for swimming
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 06:10 PM
1

Sure. I was talking about getting mad about it at all
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 05:12 PM
1

Wanting to destroy things that personally offend your worldview is the chimpanzee part of the brain in action
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 04:50 PM
2

That wouldn't happen because it's not a right out of high school job. The only way anyone can do what I do without some type of post high school degree is by having tons of experience
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 04:49 PM
1

My starting salary at my job was 20% higher than my boss's current salary, entirely because I have a Bachelors degree he only has an Associates degree. How is that a scam?
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 03:53 PM
1

Except you don't need to do any of that when you get married
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 03:49 PM
1

Why? It's just a business trying to make more money. You don't get mad at a fish for swimming do you?
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 03:48 PM
0

You call it flipping the script, I call it gaslighting. It's a classic technique that abusers use as a weapon against their victims in a relationship.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 03:44 PM
1

Absurd. You can cohabit with her if you plan to have kids with her soon after moving in together.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 03:36 PM
7

I don't know, you tell me. You identify as purple
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 03:06 PM
9

So you don't actually disagree with anything in the sidebar, you just consider yourself purple because the majority of people who post on TRP sub are idiots?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 02:19 PM
1

Communists seized power from everyone except the wealthy Wall Street bankers that financed Trotsky and the October Revolution. Stalin nationalized all the banks - except Rockefeller's national city bank. The Soviet Union's agriculture and industry was propped up by US subsidies throughout its entire existence. The Cold War was nothing more than controlled opposition by Wall St and the US government. Socialism cannot survive without being subsidized by capitalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 01:27 PM
2

There's no such thing
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 01:11 PM
5

What in TRP theory have you decided to reject?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 01:07 PM
6

This is nothing but an advertisement for some blog
/r/TheRedPill07/05/17 04:32 AM
3

Was she commenting on how badly you want to be touched while touching you?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 12:28 PM
13

can only view it as a sign of weakness and ineptitude. And they ruthlessly view it so. Look at the way women treat betas they perceive as failures. They're basically not even people.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 12:01 PM
6

They've clearly been drinking. Alcohol lowers the hamsters inhibitions.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 11:54 AM
11

Women don't want to discuss anything sexual with men they don't find attractive.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 11:54 AM
2

or other forms of coercion such as lies and verbal pressure. She told me she only slept with 3 guys but later admitted was actually 9. I was raped.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/17 07:36 AM
72

This is a prime example of losing frame. What are you talking about.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/17 07:33 AM
24

I don't do any social media except Reddit, I don't have cable TV, I don't listen to any kind of radio or stream music. I still feel like I am constantly being bombarded (trolled) with advertisements (spam). Just yesterday I was pumping gas and noticed that at this particular gas station, they installed TVs at the pumps. I start pumping gas and this advertisement starts playing LOUDLY talking about Beyonce and her newest album. The height of my remotely giving a fuck about Beyonce was when I was …
/r/TheRedPill04/05/17 04:03 AM
12

"Do the shit you want to do" and "just be yourself" are only superficially different.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/17 11:33 PM
24

Telling guys "just be yourself" is not helpful advice at all. It's worthless bluepill advice. If the shit you want to do is beta, then it most certainly is not alpha. If you're going to attempt to redefine "alpha", at least have a logically consistent definition.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/17 08:16 PM
1

It's aimed at whoever wants the knowledge and that person decides how they want to apply that knowledge to their life. So it's always been aimed at people who want to be in LTRs.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/17 08:15 PM
1

Just because we can't quantify emotional intelligence at this point in time doesn't mean it's fake
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 02:14 PM
4

Men aren't smarter than women. The average man is naturally more logical than the average woman, and the average woman is naturally more emotionally intelligent than the average man. The average woman can reconfigure her default programming to be equally as logical as the average man. And the average man can reconfigure his default programming to being as emotionally intelligent as the average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 02:45 AM
2

"Alpha" and "beta" are just terms used to describe certain sets of behaviors and outwardly expressed genetics. Alpha behaviors and genetics are what cause a dopamine response in women, while beta cause an oxytocin response in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 08:12 PM
1

Most Women only learn that alpha males are more high risk after getting either alpha widowed or pumped and dumped a number of times. Sometimes a woman will get lucky and score an alpha male at a beta rate (unicorn Alpha Bucks) who is alpha but will also provide for her and their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 08:02 PM
2

I could go on forever. But the major ones for me are high partner count, alpha widowed, consistent desire for male attention, dysfunctional family, impulsivity, certain kinds of mental illness, and drug addictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 05:00 PM
2

My cousins wife is a heroin addict who has been in and out of jail for the last year for multiple counts of burglary, theft, possession, skipping bail, and skipping court. They have a child together and he has temporary full custody. He works full time and is a totally responsible dad with a clean record. She has skipped out on four custody hearings because she has warrants out for her arrest and he still hasn't been awarded permanent custody. Despite all of this, she keeps getting more and more…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 04:37 PM
6

This article made me even more determined to never have a dad bod. I am going to lift extra hard at the gym today.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/17 02:38 PM
1

Once you pick up in those behaviors, you can get a pretty good gauge on a woman if she has a high partner count or not. If she exhibits these behaviors then you can almost guarantee she has a high partner count. If she doesn't exhibit those behaviors, she still may have a high partner count but it's less likely.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/17 02:24 PM
2

SMV: Be hot, don't have any STDs, and don't make me feel like you're going to falsely accuse me of rape RMV: Also have no red flags
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 02:15 PM
2

So the answer is no. Got it. And no, the burden of proof is on you for making the claim
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 02:06 PM
1

Got a credible source to back it up? Or is it just a baseless assertion?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 01:53 PM
-1

Donald trump is a left wing statist, he loves big government spending and debt
/r/TheRedPill26/04/17 06:33 PM
2

Exactly, I think what most people are missing is that on the pill, women are going after Alpha Bucks instead of when they're off the pill ovulating they'll want either Alpha Fucks or Alpha Bucks. Beta Bucks is there for post wall women to settle down with, regardless if they're on the pill.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/17 03:43 PM
1

Literally how my first relationship went, minus the getting married and having babies part
/r/TheRedPill21/04/17 03:41 PM
15

But by writing the article, she did just give out free advertising of rpw to countless amounts of women out there, who will no doubt visit the sub and convert. Maybe if she actually spent some time on the sidebar, she would have read the 48 laws of power and know that ignoring our existence is the best way to reduce our power.
/r/RedPillWomen20/04/17 01:49 PM
2

How are they objectively inferior to the average male human?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 11:46 PM
1

Superior genetics get passed on due to hypergamy whether you like it or not
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 11:15 PM
3

We don't think it's evil either. AF/BB has ensured that the most superior genetics pass on. It's a huge reason for the evolution of the human condition. Hypergamy is necessary for the human condition to continue to improve.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 07:16 PM
2

And often times the only practical difference between a beta and omega is the amount of money she thinks he has
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 09:02 AM
5

The iron will teach you a lesson you won't forget
/r/TheRedPill17/04/17 02:01 AM
1

It's not just that. If you make sacrifices for her on a daily basis, not only will she be ungrateful, but she will actually begin to loathe you. Sacrificing for a woman indicates that you are beneath her, and women are repulsed by men they feel are beneath them. Rightfully so, for evolutionary reasons.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/17 01:17 AM
1

More accurately: make sacrifices if you feel that you personally have more to gain than to lose by doing it
/r/TheRedPill15/04/17 12:44 AM
3

You know how we control quality? Voting and reporting posts. Not making posts about it.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/17 02:24 PM
2

They don't hate alpha males. Feminists love to rail against "toxic masculinity" but at the end of the day, guess whose cock they want to ride? Always watch her actions, not her words
/r/TheRedPill14/04/17 02:17 PM
1

I trust women in the sense that they will act how I expect them to act: like women. I trust that my girlfriend will cheat on me if the right Chad comes along and games her under the right circumstances. AWALT. I also trust that she will avoid intentionally putting herself in that scenario, as all LTR-worthy women will do. It's the women who seek out attention and validation from other men that I automatically do not trust. I trust men in the sense that I expect them to be loyal and honorable. If…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/17 09:23 AM
1

All you have to do is hold eye contact with her during this period until she breaks it
/r/TheRedPill14/04/17 09:15 AM
1

But not all women do those things. We are talking about things that all women do (AWALT)
/r/TheRedPill14/04/17 09:12 AM
3

Unfortunately women will never be more honest, because men keep rewarding them for being dishonest by having children with them, thus passing on the genetic propensity for dishonesty. Only way to change that would be through the course of evolution and natural selection, which will take way more time than you or I will be on this planet.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/17 09:07 AM
1

Their search for a mate, independent of morality, is an instinctual need to track down specific genes, and it's a great example of our cold, indifferent universe that is completely at odds with the "win the girl by being nice!/yourself!" sentiment the emotional world of movies teaches us as children. Bingo. In my opinion, a lot of the "anger phase" is just guys coming to terms with the fact that their worldview was based on the Just-World Fallacy, and it's been shattered by TRP truths.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/17 09:03 AM
1

That is why beta males make terrible friends. They will pedestalize pussy so high to the point where they are willing to throw you under the bus just for a taste of pussy a few times a year.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/17 08:21 AM
1

Had to minimize contact with my blue pill cousin because he is engaged to a dark triad HB7 and won't dump her because he has severe oneitis. He has allowed her to drive a stake between us, so I can't stand being around either of them anymore. The bad mood they put me in is enough to distract me from achieving my goals.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/17 08:05 AM
13

I agree, it's real life. I don't want to fuck every time she does either.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/17 07:40 AM
2

Have you felt unappreciated for your efforts? That's no reason to break up with her, that's just AWALT bro. Women are inherently incapable of fully appreciating the sacrifices men make for them
/r/TheRedPill13/04/17 09:13 PM
34

Mind you, in a LTR there will be times when she legitimately doesn't want PIV sex at a given moment because reasons. Yeah like her pussy being too sore because she's already fucked you five times that day
/r/TheRedPill13/04/17 09:10 PM
1

I don't engage in logically fallacious arguing tactics like the vast majority of people
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/17 09:07 PM
1

Absolutely. When arguments boil down to a difference of opinion, then it's easy to argue the opposite side's position
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/17 08:24 PM
14

Speaks for itself. Two lessons to take away from here: 1) be attractive. 2) don't be unattractive. This guy broke both rules
/r/TheRedPill13/04/17 04:17 AM
5

High school girls want the freedom to date men in their 20s, but once they start approaching the wall, they want the age of consent raised in order to artificially limit competition from women younger than them lol
/r/TheRedPill13/04/17 04:13 AM
2

I agree with your conclusion but the rest of your post gave me cancer
/r/TheRedPill13/04/17 03:02 AM
3

I think that's because the dating pool for high school girls is much more limited than it is for 18+ women.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/17 02:59 AM
4

Woman femsplaining the men on why they're wrong
/r/TheRedPill12/04/17 07:36 PM
3

Why why why didn't you archive.is that?
/r/TheRedPill12/04/17 07:29 PM
2

She also might be mention her boyfriend as a shit test to see how far you're willing to go. Context is key.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/17 08:20 PM
21

Production is an alpha behavior; consumption is how women and betas behave. Don't be a consumer, be a producer. Be the guitarist on stage that is making all of the pussy in the audience wet instead of the beta consumer in the audience whose girlfriend is getting turned on by the guitarist on stage.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/17 01:53 AM
19

Definitely not. There will always be betas attracted to land beasts. Just make a fake tinder profile with an obeast woman and watch how many hits you get from thirsty men. Then do the same with an obeast male and watch how many messages you get. Zero
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/17 03:39 AM
1

Crap I scored lower than almost everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 08:04 PM
4

That's not a male gender role, thats what women are biologically attracted to. You can't control attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 07:06 PM
4

Chuckqueening is just Pre selection taken to the absolute extreme
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 08:52 AM
5

Yep, the late 20th century was definitely overall the peak of the American Empire
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 08:47 AM
9

I refuse to believe that. The authors are highly sophisticated trolls.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/17 03:08 AM
1

The only high school job that can get you anywhere is starting at a grocery store and working your way up to management.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 04:35 PM
1

You can't prove that
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 10:26 PM
1

Who's we?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 08:41 PM
2

Sure it is. She's never had piv sex so she's a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 08:39 PM
1

Because the idea that we only want to date virgins is bogus.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 04:19 PM
1

48% is probably a little high. I would've thought it would be closer to 40% Nothing special about Gen Z, that's just the way it's always been.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 03:28 PM
1

No you're wrong. What's the point of a virgin if she's sucked 20 cocks and been fucked in the ass by another 20?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 03:21 PM
1

It means she loves you for the way you make her feel at that current point in time. She doesn't actually love you for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 03:19 PM
1

I was ENTJ in my blue pill days and still am
/r/TheRedPill05/04/17 03:17 PM
9

MGTOW is no guarantee you won't get hit with a false rape accusation. If a woman wants to falsely accuse you of it, she will. She can ruin your life even if you've never met her before.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/17 01:03 PM
2

My girlfriend doesn't even know third-wave feminism exists. It's dangerous though because then she may be susceptible to their propaganda if they ever find her. I'm trying my best to pre-emptive strike that.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 11:50 PM
7

She will perceive him as being too alpha, and it will destroy the relationship because she is being expected to think and act in a way that contradicts her nature. So yes, those alphas are destined to live with plates forever.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 11:43 PM
1

No, I'm only friends with girls that I don't want to fuck. And I use the term "friend" loosely.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 01:17 AM
1

Red Pill answer
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 01:16 AM
1

They both go hand in hand. Guys always talk about how much makeup is deceptive. I disagree. You can only polish a turd so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 01:16 AM
1

desperate for validation AWALT
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 01:12 AM
1

I'm not friends with any women that I'd ever want to fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 02:20 PM
2

Not sure about age demographics but at least 77 percent of Americans are fat. Disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 02:16 PM
77

You're glad you're a male? Better make it 2000 lashes for that comment.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/17 02:10 PM
5

That's because your misguided belief is not realizing that ALL p.i.v. sex is rape
/r/TheRedPill01/04/17 02:09 PM
25

You forgot to mention that SCIENCE is sexist too and we need to do away with the patriarchal "scientific method": http://archive.is/XOMWh
/r/TheRedPill01/04/17 02:06 PM
3

We wouldn't be the men we are today if not for our female ancestors repeatedly doing whatever it took to get Chad's DNA, generation after generation for hundreds of millions of years. I am very thankful for female hypergamy.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 02:27 AM
5

Not just hurt a betas feelings. Women will destroy their entire lives and the lives of everyone around them just to get access to ultra alpha sperm once.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 08:31 PM
1

I mean he looks like a Chad in that third pic, which was probably what he looked like when they started dating. His game is probably solid. He's put on weight since then so she might branch swing after a while of being married.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 08:06 PM
1

I've fucked girls in committed relationships too. I turn down girls that are in relationships with my friends though.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 07:59 PM
19

Yes, when your girlfriend is shit testing you by telling you how many guys hit on her constantly, the proper response is amused mastery. Personally I take it a step further and tell her she should get with one of them because they'd make a great couple. Of course the underlying PowerTalk that I'm conveying there is if she doesn't watch herself, she is going to permanently lose access to my commitment and all attention. It's a threat without actually making a threat or coming off needy, and inste…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 06:43 PM
1

What a shame, our BP friend Herman is going to die now because he lost frame over an HB7
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 04:55 PM
2

It's irrelevant to the fact that she didn't anticipate it. Mother Nature doesn't give a fuck who deserves blame. Both of them are going to be selected out of the gene pool for the benefit of future generations.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 04:51 PM
7

It's a very kind of black and white thinking that only the tolerant left can spin as "progress"
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 04:11 PM
1

We don't believe all women cheat. We believe all women would cheat under the right circumstances. Also, we don't think there is a conspiracy among women out to get us. It's just biology, theres nothing conspiratorial about nature. That whole tirade about us believing the false dichotomy that people are either "good" or "evil" is therefore nonsense. We don't think all women are evil or all the same. Why do our opponents always have to straw man us to make their points?
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 03:36 PM
7

Chad Thundercock can't rape women because all women want to have sex with him all the time.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 01:22 PM
12

Any time a woman starts a story with that line, I always assume it's going to end with her getting blackout and fucking some guy
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 01:15 PM
6

He's also a white knight for wanting to hurt the guy
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 01:07 PM
3

Translation: Hot = good looking alpha Cute = good looking beta
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/17 01:20 AM
1

Definitely the most accurate description in this thread. Fortunately the RP mods have itchy trigger fingers when it comes to banning alt-righters and their hideous racist propaganda. They don't tolerate that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/17 01:17 AM
2

8 years of liberal control of the White House where 95% of the wealth gains since the recession went to the top 1% and global-warming-causing failed car companies get bailed out. Your liberal paradise is the strong screwing over the weak. Compare that to 19th century America, which saw the largest outpouring of charitable activity in history, and the fastest increase in the standard of living of the poor. It was also relatively libertarian compared to today...at least for white men. The economic…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/17 01:13 AM
1

I could be a short, fat, balding, smelly, ugly, unemployed, broke slob and fuck three HB1's a year for 20 years. Does that make me alpha? Being alpha is your ability to get high SMV (HB7+) women wet and want to fuck you. Period.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/17 01:10 AM
9

Even in my bluest of blue pill days I knew that was insane, especially as a man
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 07:14 PM
2

Sex with condoms sometimes doesn't count either
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:15 PM
2

Drinking just lowers the ASD
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 04:10 PM
3

I bet she gets knocked up within the next year and has a kid, the baby daddy bails and father in law is left with the bill. Betas raise fucked up children
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 03:56 PM
12

I feel no pain for any idiot that gets engaged a month into a relationship
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 03:52 PM
1

And 47
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 10:15 AM
1

Why wouldn't there be urinals in a gender neutral bathroom?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 09:36 AM
2

They're called "MILF"s and are a very hot commodity
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 02:04 AM
1

I'm not too bothered by the concept I guess you won't mind your daughter walking in the bathroom and "accidentally" seeing my giant erect penis
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 02:02 AM
1

Nice humblebrag
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 01:52 AM
8

The Thousand Cock Stare is always the biggest giveaway. It seems like somehow every dick a woman encounters makes her hit the wall sooner than she would have.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/17 12:41 PM
5

That's embarassing. Even in my bluest of blue pill days I still recognized that the average women peaked at around age 22
/r/TheRedPill25/03/17 12:39 PM
9

The truth drives people insane, they absolutely hate to hear it and recoil in fierce denial because it challenges their weak worldview. I learned this lesson big time when the Republicans refused to nominate Ron Paul in 2008. He told the truth 100% of the time, but people do not want the truth. They want to be fed a bunch of bullshit because it makes them feel more comfortable.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/17 12:36 PM
1

Whether you "follow" AWALT or not is irrelevant to the fact that AWALT And believe me, id like to stand up for my fellow men but most of them do not want to be saved and it's not my place to save them. If they want to be saved, they'll find their way here
/r/TheRedPill25/03/17 06:36 AM
4

She just gets a little weirded out at the suggestion and then goes off into an explanation of why I'm her alpha bucks, etc. the sex is very consistent with her so I'm obviously is not fucking it up
/r/TheRedPill25/03/17 02:08 AM
3

Or you could just go after an older guy again
/r/RedPillWomen25/03/17 12:45 AM
8

If I even suspect my girl is flirting with another guy, I start talking about how great of a couple they'd make and she should go after him, get his number, etc. do the exact opposite of mate guarding.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/17 12:41 AM
1

AWALT bro, no need to be upset about it. That's just the way all women act in that situation.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/17 09:09 PM
1

I personally get a kick out of hearing women talk like that. Why shouldn't she settle for less if she can get some filthy rich beta to wife her up? Direct your anger towards the betas who enable these women to act so entitled.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/17 08:08 PM
1

Your mistake is assuming it won't happen. You can bet your ass it will. She will lock down a rich beta and eventually cheat on him or divorce rape him. There is no lack of men willing to wife up a slut
/r/TheRedPill24/03/17 08:03 PM
1

You just need to know what to expect from women. They are a specific kind of fun that you can't have with your male friends. And your male friends provide you with a specific kind of fun you could never have with your women. That's why it's important to fill your life with one or more women that you fuck, and quality male friends. It's very fun to have both when you know what to expect.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/17 08:01 PM
1

I don't recommend going around whipping your dick out
/r/TheRedPill23/03/17 07:17 PM
9

The only reason men think women are complicated is because they are solipsistic. They believe the average woman's default programming is logical thinking over emotional thinking. Hypergamy is not logical. Hypergamy is whatever gets her the most alpha genes possible.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/17 06:48 PM
1

I cringed when I read that the OP asked her to stop talking to him.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/17 01:18 AM
5

Most feminists don't hate men. Feminism is a sexual strategy, and it's in a woman's best interest to support feminism in politics. It puts her in the best position to exploit her dualistic nature (AF/BB). TRP is men's response to that sexual strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 08:29 PM
32

Of course you can have a dating resume. Just lift up your shirt and show her your abs. There's your resume
/r/TheRedPill22/03/17 07:50 PM
13

You're gonna have a bad time if you LTR sideways though
/r/TheRedPill22/03/17 07:49 PM
15

This should be a post in of itself.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/17 07:45 PM
33

Yep. The truth is irrelevant to women, feelz are the only things that matter
/r/TheRedPill22/03/17 07:44 PM
24

Don't listen to a word this guy says. Playing an instrument is NEVER a substitute for lifting
/r/TheRedPill22/03/17 07:41 PM
1

These are the same kind of people who would say that the reason I lift is because I'm insecure and my masculinity is fragile. "Truly masculine men are confident and secure with their dadbods!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:55 PM
2

Expressing weakness to women repulses them in the long run if the guy doesn't act sufficiently alpha for long enough to recover "Happy, healthy". Sure, he's happy that his oneitis thirst has been quenched and she's happy that she has a beta bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 08:41 PM
20

It's not materialistic vs chemical. It's oxytocin vs dopamine
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 08:32 PM
-12

Yep seriously, short guys are worse than convicted pedophiles. I get your point, but no need for absurd hyperbole to make it.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 07:51 PM
2

Emotional intelligence is a subjective buzzword because it cannot be objectively quantified
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 06:56 PM
3

That's because they are solipsistic. Unless you're a creepy beta, then not only do they think you're a virgin, but they want you to be a virgin.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 05:17 PM
1

Yep I never confirmed nor denied the number. I just smiled, winked and changed the subject. She didn't ask if she was wrong or right because the truth didn't matter to her.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 03:34 PM
2

Because she's on the verge of being fat
/r/TheRedPill21/03/17 01:54 PM
14

It doesn't matter if you have high partner count. All you need to do is give off the perception of higher partner count. At the bar, I got into a convo about partner count with an HB8 slut my friend is banging. I told her to guess my partner count and the number she gave me was about 3 times what my actual partner count is. If you look and act like you've fucked a lot of women, they will think you've fucked a lot of women. Regardless if it's true or not. The truth is irrelevant to women, feelz a…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/17 07:52 PM
3

This should be the top comment. Clearly a troll.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/17 07:45 PM
5

I've straight up told my LTR that I will dump her if she gets fat. The other day she said her BMI is 24 so I told her to lose 5 lbs. she called me an asshole and started tearing up. I held frame and guess who was riding my dick 10 mins later.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/17 07:38 PM
1

It depends on the context. In every day conversation, I think there are a lot of funny women. There are a lot of female actresses that make me laugh when they are in-character. But when it comes to actually writing comedy, men are funnier by a landslide.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 04:21 PM
-1

The average woman is more than capable of being just as logical as the average man. It's just not her default programming - she has to work much harder than the average man does in order to reconfigure herself to having a consistent pattern of logical thinking. The same can be said about men and emotion. That is one of the big reasons that the average man doesn't emotionally connect with his child on the same level that a mother does.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 04:16 PM
2

That's because proper grooming is not exclusively a TRP issue, so why bother mentioning it a lot? Blue pillers advocate being well-groomed too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 04:28 AM
2

What does cheating have to do with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 07:11 PM
3

Even if you develop basic musculature and don't want to gain more, it still requires constant lifting in order to maintain that basic musculature. According to you, that is "obsession".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 07:07 PM
3

They're not mutually exclusive. I can obsess over lifting and also put in the minimal effort it requires to be well-groomed. Being obsessed with lifting is how you get a toned body.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 06:30 PM
3

In other words, TRP needs to quit lifting and get well-groomed. LOL. You don't get "toned" by quitting lifting. Being well-groomed takes very, very little effort and time compared to sculpting a toned body. Piss-poor conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 02:22 PM
1

What's wrong with men seeking information on how to raise their SMV? Blue Pillers love to criticize Red Pillers, but are never capable of offering any other practical solutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 02:12 PM
2

Incels are not real. Anybody can purchase a $5 crackwhore
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 02:04 PM
1

That ken doll analogy is fantastic and perfectly appropriate. I will remember that one
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 06:04 AM
6

He didn't care. He made his millions on MySpace and retired, and he will be living comfortably for the rest of his life. Good for him
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 05:57 AM
18

The camera guys laugh was easily the most cringeworthy aspect of this video
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 05:52 AM
1

God cucked Joseph
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 06:55 PM
1

Don't be dissing God, God is alpha as fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 06:35 PM
103

Immediately after that she says "every character I've been with has been too perfect" Lol. Yeah,that's just what I want. A woman to settle for me because I'm not "too perfect" like the other guys she's probably fucked.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/17 01:46 PM
4

Yeah I forgot. If he's wearing a condom and it "accidentally" slips off, then it's still not cheating because it's just an accident that his raw dick came into contact with her raw pussy.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 09:40 PM
1

Porn star virgins? What do you mean by that phrase?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/17 09:38 PM
1

I am more than capable of explaining why I have certain feelings towards a topic. It doesn't have to be entirely emotionally based. I do have reasons and justifications. It's a fact that higher partner count increases the likelihood that she has STDs. In my opinion a woman with a higher partner count is more likely to branch swing and/or cheat and cuck me, because her ability to pair bond is damaged, so she is bad LTR material. Why would I risk either of those scenarios when I can find a woman w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/17 09:32 PM
1

Nice trolling
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/17 09:08 PM
3

Marxism is an ideology based on an oxymoron. You cannot have a Marxist society without a monopoly on force (government). It is purely an emotional worldview because it would only ever amount to state socialism. And we've seen what that always devolves into. Women who are in LTRs with men who have an emotional worldview rather than a logical one will not respect him because he has weak frame.
/r/RedPillWomen15/03/17 08:31 PM
1

Shit I will "become" a feminist for the right amount of money too. Where do I sign up?
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 05:36 PM
7

If he's wearing a condom, she's not cheating
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 05:30 PM
2

Sometimes with online dating is impossible to meet a girl anywhere but a public place, where you are automatically in her frame But yes, I agree for the most part. Even in my blue pill days, one girl I met in college who was obviously interested, she just straight up invited me over. To fuck obviously
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 05:14 PM
2

Not necessarily. To women, A hot toxic guy is more attractive than a hot non toxic guy. To men, a hot non toxic woman is more attractive than a hot toxic woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/17 02:24 AM
1

Women prefer bigger-than-average penises There was a study done recently that showed that the average woman prefer's a penis length of about 6.4" with an average circumference of about 5.0". So while it's true that the average women prefers above average-sized cocks, we're talking about not even 3/4" above average, both length-wise and circumference-wise (not accounting for margin of error). Probably not coincidentally, having a 6.4" or longer penis puts you in the top 20% of men. http://howlong…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/17 12:04 AM
2

Difference is that men don't find toxicity attractive in women. If she's hot, we find her attractive despite her toxicity. Women actively select in favor of male toxicity because they find it an attractive trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/17 07:40 PM
2

The divorce rate is 0% among red pillers because the marriage rate is 0%
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/17 05:30 PM
3

First thing id think is how many cocks has she sucked and jacked off
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/17 05:29 PM
2

Not at all. Redpillright mods ban alt righters. So while some alt righters might be red pillers, the mods and the sidebar blogs certainly are not. Red pill and libertarianism go hand in hand. MRAs are just a bunch of angry betas, they are just as bad as feminists. they want to create more shitty laws to benefit men to balance out the shitty laws that benefit women, instead of repealing bad laws. PUAs are blue pillers and fake. Instead of actually improving their SMV, they specifically only focus…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/17 03:33 PM
1

No, I think self hatred is the biggest indicator.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 07:15 PM
3

Not to mention that in places where it's illegal, hookers are way more likely to carry STDs. And if she feels like it, she can claim you never paid (even if you did) and then you're in trouble with her pimp
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 07:11 PM
3

I disagree. Promiscuous women are more likely to be just that, regardless of relationship status.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 07:09 PM
6

So you're not disagreeing that high partner count is a red flag, you're just disagreeing on how many partners constitutes a red flag. Even TRPers can't agree what that number is but we definitely on average agree that it's lower than what blue pillers think. The point is that It's up to each person to decide for himself what constitutes a red flag. For me, I have no desire to be in a long term relationship with a woman who has had sexual activity with more than 10 guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 07:06 PM
2

I.M., you are the best. Anytime I see a post from you I always expect it to be high quality and am never disappointed.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/17 03:41 PM
9

How about get rid of all social media period. Maybe leave a Facebook profile that demonstrates SMV. Never do anything on it except accept friend requests. Social media is for women and betas. people who use it crave attention. by using it you are automatically entering a woman's frame. High SMV men don't waste their time
/r/TheRedPill11/03/17 02:32 PM
3

It's entertaining for sure. But it's certainly not funny
/r/TheRedPill11/03/17 02:17 PM
4

I like her. She's standing up there straight up telling it like it is in plain English. Don't misunderstand me though, she's not funny in the slightest.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/17 02:13 PM
6

That's why I don't feel bad for him. She was a 7 at best in her prime
/r/TheRedPill11/03/17 02:10 PM
1

I thoroughly enjoy that. It makes it easier to filter out women who aren't LTR material
/r/TheRedPill11/03/17 02:08 PM
1

Thanks I needed that today. I lost frame with my LTR last night and have been beating myself up all day for it.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/17 08:55 PM
5

I'd have more nerve endings on my dick if my genitals weren't mutilated as a newborn. Feminists don't care about that though, they only care about genital mutilation when it happens to girls
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 06:28 PM
2

Lol @ the shirtless guy with a dadbod, his girlfriend says "we should have a foursome." Cucked in front of the whole world This video is awesome, I'm going to go lift on that note
/r/TheRedPill10/03/17 05:47 PM
5

It's a great analogy as a matter of fact, when you consider the hierarchy of love. Men love women, women love children, children love puppies (or cats)
/r/RedPillWomen10/03/17 02:55 PM
0

That's up to each person to decide for himself whether or not it's worth it. I'm just providing information.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/17 03:15 PM
-2

Women don't branch swing unless they feel they can do better. So why give her a reason to think she can do better than you?
/r/TheRedPill09/03/17 03:41 AM
-1

Whether you like it or not, there is always competition in a free market, and that includes the sexual market. That's not insecurity, that's acknowledging reality.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/17 03:36 AM
-5

It has nothing to do with insecurity. It's purely logical basic economics.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/17 03:34 AM
4

Buzzfeed is a tabloid designed to appeal to a specific demographic, ie. liberal millennials. Of course they're going to post a bunch of articles that are just advertisements, opinion columns, and fake news. That's how they make money. You don't get mad at a fish for swimming
/r/RedPillWomen09/03/17 12:44 AM
2

We look down upon moralizing and people who get caught moralizing are usually banned
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 12:41 AM
–

It has nothing to do with insecurity, it has to do with not giving her a reason to branch swing. If she's sitting there wondering "why isn't my guy as alpha as that Chad" then she is going to start looking for your replacement pronto.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/17 12:28 AM
2

Yep. If you're going to take her to a concert, you better be that badass alpha guitarist on stage that has the attention of all the women in the room.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 11:00 PM
1

There's a reason the 48 laws of power are in the sidebar
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 03:15 PM
2

I'm saying to avoid purposely putting her in those situations, not try to control what she does. How do you honestly not see the difference?
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:56 PM
1

I agree for the most part, but in an LTR I still think the cons of doing so outweigh the pros.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:45 PM
1

More like she gets tingles for the lead singer of the local rock band you saw at the bar
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:43 PM
2

Its not about insecurity, it's about power.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:42 PM
1

Yeah because not going to some events with her is totally the same as controlling what she does
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:41 PM
2

Its not about insecurity, it's about power.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:40 PM
1

Until you become a Major League Baseball player, those players are definitely the situational alphas in the ballpark. Whether you admit that fact out loud to yourself is totally irrelevant.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:40 PM
2

Also it's basic economics. There are two ways to improve the relative value of a product: make it better, and destroy your competition. So to increase SMV, 1) Keep improving yourself, and 2) draw zero attention to the fact that other alphas exist. You will appear more godlike to her by doing both. It has nothing to do with insecurity and everything to do with power.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:32 PM
1

How about you spend more time worrying about increasing your own value and less worrying about who is better than you. This sentence is inherently a contradiction. SMV stands for sexual market value, as in, your value is determined by the sexual marketplace. Your value is not absolute, it is relative and depends on the value of other men in the marketplace. The ONLY way to judge your own SMV is to constantly be comparing yourself to other men. Obviously this is profound enlightenment for you bec…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:25 PM
1

I just don't understand why you'd ever want to intentionally have a man of higher SMV make you look like a joke in front of a girl you're banging. It's almost like you get off on the idea of being cucked.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:16 PM
1

First of all, being alpha is not the goal if you want a girl to stick around. Being a mixture of alpha and beta is how you keep a girl around. Second, spending that time improving your SMV is definitely more alpha than taking her to a show so you can get Chad to serenade her. That's borderline cuckoldry. "It has no meaning to me". Stop beating around the bush and admit that you gain nothing from it. The negatives, of which there are plenty, outweigh the positives, of which their are zero.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 05:09 AM
1

How old do you think I am? And for all I know, you're a dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 04:59 AM
0

Yes, you already said all of that, and I already rebutted all of those points. And you still keep dodging my question. Go troll someone else.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 04:54 AM
1

You didn't answer my question, what a shock.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 04:38 AM
1

You dodged it again. And yes, it is about getting your dick wet...the Red Pill is a sexual strategy...
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 04:04 AM
2

I figured you'd dodge my questions. It's a nice way to avoid actually thinking your positions through to their logical conclusions. I can't conceive a way those situations will not get me laid. I already told you. Purposely pointing out that your SMV is lower than Chad's will fuel her hypergamy. Maybe she won't branch swing with Chad, but you're giving her reasons to branch swing in general. So I'm going to ask a third time because you've dodged multiple times - Explain to me how purposely putti…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 03:52 AM
-1

1) wrong 2) It's not insecurity as I've already explained ad nauseum. Simply repeating your initial disproven assertion doesn't magically make it true this time. 3) It's not a question of her leaving, it's a question of her not thinking that you're the shit. What do you have to gain by purposely pointing out that you're lower SMV than the Chad on stage serenading her? That's not a rhetorical question, I want an actual response. If she doesn't think you're the shit, she WILL branch swing to someo…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 03:37 AM
3

Not a native speaker, I formulated that wrong. What I meant is that by following TRP you should end up being a man with a high SMV who's able to have options, options that DO want to feel the tingles you can provide. Also it means her leaving isn't gonna drag you down into a depression because you can line up a shit ton of plates in the blink of an eye. And when did I say you should do otherwise? I'm not giving power to anyone over me. Purposely pointing out that your SMV is lower than other guy…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 03:30 AM
1

There's a difference between taking her out somewhere where she might see some alphas and purposely putting her in a situation where Chad Thundercock can show your girl how low status you are compared to him. If you can't see the difference between the two situations, then that's your problem.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 03:20 AM
2

A lot of people think that other services provided by people are human rights, like healthcare and education. So making sex a human right goes along that same line of logic. Rape would no longer exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 03:11 AM
-3

public places Nice straw man, I said specific events. It has nothing to do with insecurity, it has to do with not being stupid. But you don't have to take my word for it - have fun getting cucked!
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 03:05 AM
2

I should have known by now that you wouldn't give me a serious answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 02:59 AM
2

If she's gonna leave, then so be it, you got other girls lined up who are actually willing to appreciate you for who you are. Blue pill nonsense. Women don't appreciate men "for who they are", they appreciate men for how men make them feel. Wake up from your Disney fairytale. She will always appreciate the way Chad Thundercock makes her feel more than how you make her feel. You're the one breaking law 36, you're giving way too many shits about the other alphas around you. Purposely giving people…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:55 AM
2

Except people who are fat are fat because they eat too many calories. It's a choice. People who are depressed often times don't have a choice because their brains don't work right.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 02:25 AM
3

One time I was talking to this girl. A guy took her on a date to the game I was playing in. She drove her own car so she could come to my place after the game. This is exactly why I'm not fond of taking my girl to events where she can see alphas with higher status than me demonstrate their status. It does nothing for my SMV, doesn't lead to sex with her, and only fuels her hypergamy. It takes the situation out of my frame and puts it into Chad Thundercock's frame. Why would I do that?
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 08:55 PM
2

Yes, you may ask. It's because it's my own penis, and you're right, I do throughly enjoy measuring it. I just don't know whether I should consider it 9-3/32" long or if you think that's cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 07:09 PM
1

I'm just asking for your opinion about whether or not she's a size queen. I'm not asking for your opinion of the phrase itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 05:32 PM
6

That's his problem. Guys who commit to cheating sluts, get cucked, and don't realize it will be selected out of the gene pool. If he knows what kind of girl she is, then he deserves it.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 04:22 PM
3

That's why you must always be prepared to end things with her at the drop of a hat
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 04:12 PM
1

Seriously, it's Red pillers' favorite straw man. If I wanted a lecture about how self improvement should be priority #1 then I'll visit the MGTOW sub. My primary reason for increasing my SMV is to get laid, that's why I come to a sub about sexual strategy. I wish those guys would just fuck off forever.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 04:09 PM
1

How is the phrase "size queen" "ManGlish"?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 01:54 PM
2

Ok let me reword that. Suppose the guy measures his curved dick in front of you. It comes out to be 8-5/16". Then he bends it straight and it now measures 9-3/32". Then suppose later on, he claims his dick is over 9" long. Would you think he was being dishonest, since he bent his cock straight to obtain that measurement?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 01:46 PM
1

I think what you're saying would have to do with how thick the head is relative to the thickness of the base.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 01:43 PM
1

I'm confused. Are you saying that you wouldn't care if you were dating a guy with either a cock slightly bigger than what you prefer, or an insane monster cock?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 12:26 AM
1

Spot on analysis
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 11:11 PM
1

Every study has a small sample size compared to the entire human race. That's how probability and stats works, so of course there is always going to be a margin of error
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 10:26 PM
1

Ok we still are on par with donkeys and horses when it comes to that ratio
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 10:25 PM
1

Could be, but if also means it's the size that will satisfy the largest number of women
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 10:08 PM
1

Well would you consider her a size queen?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 10:07 PM
1

I never said anything about body size, I said body mass to penis length ratio
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 10:03 PM
2

Well if this guy says he has a 9+" dick would you think he was being dishonest for measuring it that way?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 10:02 PM
2

lol apparently criticizing your partner is abuse, and is weighted the same as rape. This quiz is a joke
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 09:13 PM
1

It's not meaningless. In fact, one study showed that women on average prefer cocks that are 6.4" long (bone-pressed) with an average circumference of 5". It's no coincidence that both of these figures are almost exactly one standard deviation above average. Let's face it. The average woman prefers a big cock.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 08:59 PM
1

How long would you consider the line between above average and monster?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 08:49 PM
1

I don't think that's true, I think it's more so women become more experienced and thus they find that they tend to prefer bigger cocks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 08:46 PM
1

Every one of my girlfriends has said that they'd prefer a cock that's average length and 10% thicker than average over a cock that's average circumference but 10% longer than average.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 08:43 PM
1

Yes, almost all women absolutely love 7" cocks. It's right there in the sweet zone...not too big, but still satisfyingly big.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 08:41 PM
1

I agree completely. Women deserve to be allowed to ensure their partners can have high quality erections. Suppose a guy has a penis that curves upwards and he measures it properly and it comes out to be 8-5/16". But if he bends his cock so that it's straight and it comes out to be 9-3/32", is that cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 08:39 PM
2

My girlfriend openly admits that she prefers above average (6+") cocks and actually likes them huge. Does that make her a "size queen"? Or does she have to say that she will only date guys with huge cocks in order to be a size queen?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 08:27 PM
1

So you're saying you'd be perfectly content dating a guy with a micro penis and would never ever wish that he was bigger?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 08:24 PM
1

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 08:06 PM
2

The dick/boob analogy gets thrown around all the time in penis size discussions. We've all heard it many times and it's just not even remotely a good analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 08:04 PM
1

Risky click
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 08:00 PM
1

Which is a meaningless statement that everyone already knows
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 07:59 PM
1

Constantly. It's possible he was actually 10 or 11 inches though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 07:57 PM
1

Girls can find out about a guys wiener size before having sex. Sometimes you hear rumors, sometimes you can see his bulge. Maybe you accidentally walked in on him naked, taking a piss, or masturbating. Maybe he straight up whipped it out to show it off. Besides, you didn't answer my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 07:42 PM
1

Prove it then. otherwise you're just trolling
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 07:28 PM
1

I never said massive dicks don't exist. Straw man That's not a credible source, that's a tabloid that shows a picture of a guy wearing a stuffed sock and a low res scan of an X-ray of something. Ok well your definition of normal and mine are different. 13 inch dicks don't exist either.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 06:22 PM
1

Please provide a credible source that proves 14 inch dicks exist. And don't cite Jonah Falcon either because he's never once proven it. Yes she was taking about it in front of her partner Are you trolling? 8 inches is not the upper end of normal, in fact it's in the top 1%. 9" is a statistical anomaly
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 06:09 PM
1

What if he was the perfect guy in every way but he had a 9 incher? Would you still refuse to have sex with him?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 06:06 PM
1

There was a study done that showed the average woman prefers cocks to be about 6.4" long (bone pressed) with an average circumference of about 5.0".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 06:05 PM
1

This entire universe has always been an objectively shitty place full of an incomprehensible amount of suffering. I don't know why it's allowed to exist
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 06:01 PM
1

For some women it does. I know one woman who said one guy she had sex with was awful in bed and the only reason she didn't stop was because he had a huge dick so it felt good. Btw 14 inch dicks don't exist so anyone who believed you was an idiot to begin with
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 05:58 PM
2

If that were true, then why are some women so carefree about revealing the fact that they've been with huge dicks before?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 05:52 PM
3

So guys with big dicks are low IQed clunky gorillas? Sounds like someone believes in the Just-World Fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 05:42 PM
2

There are Machiavellian ways of finding out. Like pretending to be totally non judgemental and encouraging her to reveal all of her past exploits in complete detail, saying hearing about them excites you, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 05:40 PM
1

The only way a woman will ever think that is if you're better than the previous guys in every single way
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 05:28 PM
1

Except guys did exist before him and you will always be comparing him to them in the back of your mind, whether you like it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 05:27 PM
1

Your source links to brain size Vs. body mass. If you compare penis length to body mass, you'll find humans are on par with horses and donkeys.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 05:21 PM
1

My girlfriend is a size queen, she openly admits that she prefers larger cocks and she had been with a couple of huge guys before me. Fortunately I am the biggest and thickest she's ever been with by a half inch or so. She really enjoys it and lets her friends know it. This doesn't bother me because I think almost all women prefer guys with larger cocks if they've ever been with one who knows how to use it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 03:46 PM
1

No at least 77% of men are overweight by BF% according to one study. Just by not being fat, a man is in the top 20% automatically.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 03:39 PM
1

Red pillers aren't niceguys
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 03:37 PM
1

Posters are not TRP theory! Try again, your sub is full of straw mans that attack men venting in their safe space instead of the theory itself. Blue pillers are just butt hurt because TRP works
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 03:35 PM
1

Who's complaining?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 03:27 PM
1

Actually if you go by body fat percentage instead of BMI, the amount of overweight people in America is actually closer to 77% according to one study. Basically if you're a healthy body fat percent as a man, you're automatically in the top 20% in that category. Pathetic.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/17 02:27 PM
1

No you don't necessarily have to get her into bed first before dick size comes into play. Girls notice bulges. Also if you have a big dick then women will talk about it in their group of friends and then some of her friends will get curious and want to try it out. But I do agree that negative qualities you can't control like being short, balding, etc. are mitigated if you are shredded, have good game, and can demonstrate status.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/17 02:19 PM
0

Yes she said that to me, about a week after she fucked me she got a new boyfriend and then friendzoned me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 01:35 AM
21

If the wage gap is 77% like feminists claim, then let's fire all the men and hire women. We can save 23% on our payroll budget! Why didn't we think of this before!
/r/TheRedPill03/03/17 09:33 PM
4

Being alpha is about characteristics you exhibit, whether theyre genetic or behavioral. So yes, it IS about things you can't control, like your height or dick size.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/17 09:32 PM
1

Mate guarding her would have been detrimental to her perception of me I made this mistake in my blue pill college days. A girl I fuckzoned was wanting me to commit to her, but that was never going to happen because she cheated on her boyfriend with me (and a few other guys) months before she dumped him. We went to a party and she started hitting on other guys in front of me and I confronted her about it later. Uh oh. SHIT TEST FAILED. She nexted me immediately.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/17 09:00 PM
5

Exactly why getting violent over a woman isn't worth it. If a guy disrespects your woman in front of you, demand that he apologize and then tell him to leave. If he takes a swing at you then obviously defend yourself (if you've been lifting like you should, then he will be less likely to get physical with you.)
/r/TheRedPill03/03/17 08:49 PM
1

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink
/r/TheRedPill03/03/17 04:09 PM
1

They make it pretty clear in T2 that Sarah is alpha widowed by Kyle Reese's death. She and her son still need protection from the terminator, even if it is by a beta robot. Sure, she may be more masculine than she was in the first movie, but that's because she went crazy and hardened after being alpha widowed by Reese's death. Kyle Reese didn't have any protection, it was just him vs. the terminator. Sarah still needs protection. She has not assumed the masculine role in the story. And yes the m…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/17 05:11 PM
5

Hanging out with female friends seems like a fantastic way to instill dread when you're in an LTR. But TRP also says to give minimal attention to women who you aren't banging, i.e. Don't have female friends. So which is it?
/r/TheRedPill01/03/17 04:12 PM
3

It gets easier and easier to neg. there's a reason we teased girls when we were boys, because we knew. Maybe not why, but we knew. They love it, but now they will only go with it if you're alpha enough.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/17 04:03 PM
13

In my blue pill days, all relationships id been in ended because of branch swinging. I thought the ease with which they had transitioned to their new partners was incredibly sociopathic. But that was before I understood AWALT.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/17 03:57 PM
1

By definition a man who commits to a slut is beta. This isn't a difficult concept to grasp
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 10:12 PM
0

That's ok, the guys who fall for it will be selected out of the gene pool. Let them go down in flames
/r/TheRedPill28/02/17 09:55 PM
0

It's amazing how many posters don't understand something we learned in first grade
/r/TheRedPill28/02/17 09:49 PM
2

Jesus Christ, stop being an apologist for the white knight. She should have called the police and he should have stayed as far away from her as possible.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/17 09:33 PM
–

What if my girlfriend calls me "my man" on social media. "My man and I did this..." etc.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/17 03:58 PM
1

Then why did she listen to him?
/r/TheRedPill27/02/17 08:00 PM
9

Sometimes people's brains just don't work right and they feel suicidal even though there's absolutely nothing wrong. Those people need to lean on meds because nothing else works. It's better than being dead, or perpetually wishing you were dead, now isn't it?
/r/TheRedPill27/02/17 07:55 PM
1

Sometimes people are unhappy for no reason
/r/TheRedPill27/02/17 07:36 PM
11

If she's not on anti depressants she needs to be, and if she is, it's the wrong medication/dosage. And she shouldn't be drinking if her anxiety is that bad, but she uses it to self medicate which means she may be an alcoholic. That's what's wrong with her. Generalized anxiety is no joke, it ruins a persons life if not properly treated.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/17 03:31 PM
0

They're a yellow flag. Lots of people are on anti depressants not because they're crazy or damaged goods, but because their brain just doesn't work quite right for some reason. Depression can be something as minuscule as simply being tired all the time. Plenty of people aren't on anti depressants when they should be, so it really doesn't mean anything in a vacuum. If she's got her Depression under control then it shouldn't be any issue even for an LTR. You need to keep an eye out for signs that …
/r/TheRedPill27/02/17 03:28 PM
3

This thread is so autistic
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 03:15 PM
6

If she outright says hes wrong because he hates women, that would be an ad hominem. But when she's accusing him of mansplaining, she's typically not outright saying he's wrong, she's just saying that hes talking down to her. It's s form of PowerTalk because she appeals to the emotion of the audience in order to make it look like he's wrong, without actually saying "he's wrong". If he holds frame then it doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 02:47 PM
8

Mansplaining is when feminists get their arguments logically dismantled by a man, and so they reframe the debate to be based around an appeal to emotion fallacy where they accuse the man of talking down to her because she's a woman. Whether it's true or not is 100% irrelevant. If he holds frame and walks away, then he wins this debate. If he loses frame and continues to argue, then he loses the debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 02:19 PM
2

True. It depends on what time of the month it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 05:39 AM
1

True but irrelevant. When MTV came around, popular music slowly started becoming primarily about the artist's image and the ability to entertain, rather than the actual quality of the music. If your artists have video associated with them, they don't have to focus on the audio as much and can still turn solid profit. It's the path of least resistance for both the artists and record companies.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/17 05:31 AM
1

So yeah, she was fucking some obese Her hamster still hasn't come to terms with herself
/r/TheRedPill26/02/17 05:27 AM
1

I didn't say it's useless...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 10:29 PM
1

Male attention is worth less the higher on the HB scale a woman is. It's practically worthless for an HB10, because it is so easily replaceable. An HB10 on social media can easily have millions of beta orbiters that are constantly validating her with attention. On the other side, male attention is worth a lot more to an unattractive woman because she gets less male attention in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 10:17 PM
13

Every man should always feel that he's not as attractive as he could be. Always be improving SMV. Other than that conclusion, you make good points.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/17 10:51 AM
2

Men with artistic/creative souls who are aggressive and shredded are more attractive to women than both
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 07:40 PM
1

Chad's SMV is effectively infinite, so every woman wants to fuck Chad. That's what it means to be Chad. I never said that guys who get dumped are beta. Just because you're an alpha male doesn't mean you don't have some beta characteristics or can't do beta things. Every man has beta characteristics and does beta things. No man can have infinite SMV and be alpha 100% of the time like our archetype Chad Thundercock. Some rapists are alphas, some are betas. But rape itself is a beta action.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 05:02 PM
3

I was talking about him specifically. Nobody gives a shit how many gym bros he can take
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 01:46 PM
0

Beta males most certainly can be aggressive. There's a difference between being aggressive while holding frame and being aggressive while losing frame. Alphas do the former and betas do the latter. Genghis Khan doesn't bother with "attracting" women cause he just doesn't give a fuck. He fucks whoever he wanted with or without consent. Chad doesn't need to give a fuck about attracting women either and fucks whoever he wants. The difference is that he always has consent because his SMV is so high.…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 01:45 PM
6

A good time to remind everyone that rape is necessarily beta behavior. You think our alpha archetype Chad Thundercock rapes women? No, because any woman he wants to fuck also wants to fuck him. It's logically impossible for Chad to rape a woman. Rape is for men whose SMV is not high enough to attract the women they want to bang.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 04:21 AM
0

Some of his actions were beta...like raping women because he wasn't sexually attractive enough to them. He should have lifted more. It is impossible for Chad Thundercock to rape any woman because any woman he wants to fuck also wants to fuck him. Rape = aggressive beta behavior
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 04:09 AM
1

No, I'm defining "aggression" as the libertarians define it in the Non-Aggression Principle
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 04:07 AM
0

No such thing was proven, I never said Chad Thundercock is a real person, and you have failed to make any actual rebuttal of my arguments. You are the one who is being intentionally obtuse.
/r/RedPillWomen24/02/17 04:00 AM
9

She is the definition of "dark triad woman". Look into her eyes...there's no soul. She was willing to send two men to jail to be raped for the rest of their lives entirely because her anti-slut defense kicked in and she didn't want her potential beta bucks to find out she gangbanged two football players. She should be locked up for life before she reproduces. Truly the scum of the earth
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 02:51 AM
11

The distinction is very important though. For example, women who have cheated in the past are not LTR material, whereas a woman who has never cheated might be LTR material. But never be under the delusion that your LTR (who has never cheated) won't cheat in the future if the right Chad comes along. Because she would.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 02:24 AM
3

Of course there might be the odd time when a gf doesn't want to have sex for legitimate reasons, Yeah like if you fucked her pussy raw last night and she needs a day to recover.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 02:14 AM
11

NAWALT does exist though. For example, not all women are cheaters. But all women would cheat under the right circumstances (AWALT).
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 02:12 AM
8

Sometimes people are tired all the time because they're depressed. If you're tired all the time, you need to talk to a doctor.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 02:09 AM
0

I never said anything about morals. How the fuck are you an endorsed contributor? Take your straw mans elsewhere.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 01:58 AM
0

Chad Thundercock gets all of that and more for free, anytime he wants
/r/RedPillWomen24/02/17 01:33 AM
1

None of them actually understand TRP theory. All they do is mock people who post here
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 04:21 PM
2

That's the rush I get after deadlifting
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 04:16 PM
2

You're telling me. I am getting close to the point where I am looking in the mirror deciding i need to start cutting in a month. My gym bros tell me I should start cutting now but I told them that I am not big enough yet. They think I'm like a heroin addict
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 04:10 PM
3

No one gives a shit how tough you are
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 04:08 PM
1

I laugh too because the day you start lifting is the day you are forever small.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 04:04 PM
3

Yeah that guys hair and beard were infinitely badass. He totally lost frame and should have told her to fuck off
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 03:59 PM
2

This really isn't the place to debate Red Pill Theory. That's why the purplepilldebate sub was created. Go over there and start a thread about this topic and invite Red Pillers to participate. I will gladly join the discussion if I see it.
/r/RedPillWomen23/02/17 04:22 AM
1

Calling the source biased without actually disproving its claims is a meaningless statement. No professional medical association in the United States or anywhere else in the world recommends routine circumcision as medically necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/17 04:18 AM
1

Why are you even on this sub if you don't even agree with RP theory? You should head over to the purplepilldebate subreddit if you want to debate the definition of "alpha".
/r/RedPillWomen23/02/17 04:14 AM
1

Being alpha has everything to do with the availability of women willing to have sex with you because they find you sexually attractive. That is literally the Red Pill definition of "alpha". Again, you need to spend some time reading the sidebar because the way you define "alpha" is not the way we define "alpha" in Red Pill theory.
/r/RedPillWomen23/02/17 03:57 AM
1

By your logic, when a low SMV man rapes a woman, that's alpha behavior because it's an initiation of aggression, despite the fact that he is not sexually attractive at all. So do you really not see the inherent contradiction in your viewpoint? Chad Thundercock (the alpha archetype) has a high enough of an SMV that he gets whatever he wants without having to resort to initiating aggression against anyone. He always holds frame. You are the one who is putting yourself in a self-limiting box by ref…
/r/RedPillWomen23/02/17 03:32 AM
1

Utilizing beta behavior in order to enhance one's status (power in this case), thus resulting in increased SMV, is certainly a valid strategy because it works. But that doesn't mean it's not beta behavior.
/r/RedPillWomen23/02/17 03:17 AM
1

I didn't say aggression is beta or that being alpha has anything to do with morals. I said initiating aggression is beta behavior. You can be dominant and conquering without initiating aggression against another individual. Morals have nothing to do with it; it's entirely about holding frame. You should spend some more time reading TRP sidebar because it sounds like you do not understand the concept of frame at all.
/r/RedPillWomen23/02/17 02:44 AM
2

One is about gender equality the other is about economic Equality. You've lost your damn mind. You don't understand feminism or socialism. Feminism has always been about female privilege, and socialism has always been about elite privilege.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 02:26 AM
0

I'm not assuming anything about how other people think, it just sounds like you don't understand RP theory. Initiating aggression against another individual is breaking frame, which is also beta behavior.
/r/RedPillWomen23/02/17 02:19 AM
1

You said so yourself that you're opposed to individuals having the freedom to draw up their own marriage contracts.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/17 02:18 AM
0

Because Chad Thundercock doesn't pay for sex ever. He can get the wildest and craziest sex anytime he wants from his litany of HB10 plates, for free.
/r/RedPillWomen22/02/17 10:59 PM
2

This can't be real. It's too perfect. She also forgot to mention that she will choose the nice guys after her pussy has been all used up by 15 chads
/r/TheRedPill22/02/17 10:39 PM
1

I wouldn't support "marriage contracts" that dictate child support or child custody because I don't believe that two or more individuals should have the liberty to enter into voluntary contracts based on their own personal wants and needs. They can either submit to the government's monopoly definition of marriage (which excluded gays until very recently) or fuck off. FTFY Whether I think the laws are fair or not is irrelevant to the point that lawmakers created the laws without regard to what is…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 10:16 PM
1

I disagree with your opinion that what I stated is untrue. Your argument boils down to semantics and your opinion that people shouldn't be allowed to draw up their own marriage contracts and should instead be forced to rely on arbitrary laws. Arbitrary: adj: done without concern for what is fair or right
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 08:27 PM
3

Was her husband your biological father?
/r/RedPillWomen22/02/17 08:20 PM
1

Paying for sex is a beta action no matter how "alpha" the person doing it may seem
/r/RedPillWomen22/02/17 08:10 PM
1

http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/ Williams and Kapila estimate that a realistic rate of complications from neonatal circumcision ranges from 2% to 10%. To many men who become aware of the function and value of the prepuce, the fact that this genital sensory organ was amputated from them at birth is itself a complication of circumcision; in which case, the actual complication rate is 100%... For males fortunate enough to survive the surgery without immediate complications, there is a gro…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 07:57 PM
1

It's not just about consequences I don't like, it's about unintended consequences You don't have an argument, you're just resorting to arguing semantics with me
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 07:42 PM
1

The link between FGM and women being treated as property is far more of a superficial apples to oranges comparison than FGM being illegal and MGM being legal in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 06:00 PM
1

Simply asserting that doesn't make it true and doesn't disprove how I told you it's unsafe
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 05:58 PM
1

What is a mild harmless form?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 05:46 PM
1

Yes it is. How can you comment on the proprietary of something you know very little about? No, it's not valid. That's called an argument of dismissal logical fallacy. Simply me I'm wrong without explaining why is a logical fallacy and invalid argument. I know the definition of arbitrary. I disagree with your opinion that enacted statues are necessarily not arbitrary. Plenty of laws get passed with very little thought as to the consequences. If you don't think that's true then you put way too muc…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 05:34 PM
1

Male circumcision is not safe as I've already proven to you. So which is is? Should it be legal or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 05:30 PM
1

That's exactly the point. Babies don't consent to having their genitals unnecessarily permanently mutilated so it should be illegal. Are you arguing that we should legalize female genital mutilation?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 05:29 PM
1

Piecing a newborns ears... is it ok to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 05:19 PM
1

It's not apples to oranges. MGM is legal in the US and FGM is not. Apples to apples. Why is this so hard for you to comprehend?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 05:18 PM
1

Why do you want your husband to make the decision for you? Are you not a strong independent woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 05:09 PM
1

So that makes it ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 04:48 PM
1

We are talking about non consensual genital mutilation. Stop moving the goal posts. And yes female circumcision still invites complications like infection and sepsis
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 04:47 PM
1

Read some of the legislative history. The reasons for enacting these laws were not anything akin to Hitler's reasons for wanting to exterminate the Jews. That's a histrionic comparison to even make. I didn't say they were. I'm saying that you telling me that there were "reasons" and to "read the history" is not a valid argument and doesn't defend your position at all. I don't think you know what "arbitrary" means. Then tell me why you don't think I know what it means and explain to me what it me…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 04:45 PM
1

Initiating aggression against another individual IS the issue. GM is an act of aggression initiated against a child, therefore it is the core of the issue. Treating women like property is its own related issue under that same umbrella. And they need the same solution. To outlaw the initiation of aggression against non consenting individuals. Ban FGM and circumcision. And to say that it doesn't remove pleasure is scientifically inaccurate. Circumcision removes nerves that were once present and al…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 04:42 PM
1

There are "reasons" why the Jews were exterminated in Nazi Germany, does that make them justified? No it doesn't. That's not an argument. The government having a monopoly on the terms of marriage is exactly the reason that gays weren't allowed to marry until a few years ago. It's the reason polygamists still aren't allowed to marry. And it's the reason that single people still have to pay a tax penalty. Just because they are legislatively enacted statues doesn't mean they're not arbitrary. That'…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 04:20 PM
1

That's because you never let the holes close up. That doesn't mean they're permanent.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 03:43 PM
2

All forms of genital mutilation are demonstrably harmful. I just explained that to you in a previous post. You're obfuscating that point
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 03:43 PM
1

Why does it have "no place" in that discussion? Who made you the official arbiter of what's allowed to be discussed in a conversation. I disagree that it's apples to oranges. You have to address the core of why it's wrong: because it's painful, non consensual, permanent mutilation of a child's genitals. Otherwise you're just addressing a symptom of the problem rather than the problem itself. That solves nothing and distracts people from the main issue. The motivations are irrelevant to the fact …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 03:38 PM
1

I understand perfectly. Ear piercing is not permanent.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 03:25 PM
2

I understand perfectly. You admitted to being in favor of genital mutilation for both sexes as long as they're done in a hospital environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 03:24 PM
2

At least you're honest and admit that you think non consensual permanent painful mutilation of children's genitals should be legal, regardless of gender. You make me sick.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 03:20 PM
1

Ear piercing is not permanent mutilation. Besides, just because it's legal that means it's ok? Is that what you're arguing? Because FGM is legal in third world countries, so by that argument that makes it ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 03:18 PM
3

So if someone doesn't remember their genitals being mutilated that makes it ok? 0 ill effects? Tell that to the men who had botched circumcisions that removed their dick. Can't talk to all of them because some of them died from it. How about I can't feel my dick as well as I could if it hadn't been mutilated at birth? How about the body image issues I suffer from? Once again we see that you refuse to condemn non consensual, painful, permanent mutilation of children's genitals. You only condemn i…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 03:17 PM
2

I'm not conflating them. I'm very clear on the differences between the two. You refuse to condemn both because you're a hypocrite
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 03:11 PM
1

I disagree that they're superficially the same issue. In fact, they are fundamentally the same issue. Either you condemn non-consensual genital mutilation or you don't. If you think circumcision is ok in non medically necessary scenarios, you are a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 02:14 PM
1

What is your point exactly? That some forms of painful, non consensual mutilation of a child's genitals are ok, but some aren't?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 02:11 PM
2

What relevance does it make weather or not I'm a western male? That's an ad hominem fallacy. It's non consensual, painful mutilation of a child's genitals. Either you condemn it or you don't. Stop obfuscating the issue
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 02:05 PM
1

No I wouldn't, I'm with the man I've been most sexually attracted to in my whole life, and we got married. Quit making inaccurate assumptions about me because you read TRP. If you persist in doing that, I'm not going to continue talking to you because I don't wish to continue discourse with someone so biased. I'm not making the assumption "because I read TRP". I am making the assumption based on the nature of female hypergamy. It's nothing personal. If you are going to be offended by discussion …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 02:00 PM
2

Yes it should. It should be up to the married couple to draw up their own terms of their contract, not for the govt to decide based on a set of arbitrary, blanket and generalized laws that somehow are supposed to apply fairly to every single couple.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 01:12 PM
2

So the fact that they're both non consensual, painful, permanent mutilation of a child's genitals means they're only "superficially" the same issue? Lmao k
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 01:06 PM
2

Keep obfuscating by claiming one is worse than the other. They're both genital mutilation and the fact that you refuse to condemn both is exactly why I am not a feminist. It is about female privilege, not equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 01:04 PM
2

No I don't think they're equivalent in every way, but they are both non consensual mutilation of a child's genitals and should be stopped. Feminists refuse to acknowledge this because they are hypocrites and think genital mutilation is ok if it's done to boys but not girls. But they will never outright acknowledge that they are hypocrites, and will instead obfuscate the point by accusing opponents of circumcision of derailing. They attack allies who agree with them that FGM should be stopped. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 12:58 PM
3

I don't see feminists actively pushing to abolish the selective service, alimony, or child support. Well, of course they did push to abolish the selective service ONLY when the threat of women being forced to register for it became real. Because they only care about female privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 02:46 AM
6

The point is that there shouldn't be a distinction made between circumcision and FGM in the first place because they are both genital mutilation done to non-consenting children. It's the same issue, but feminists don't see it that way because they don't give a shit about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 02:37 AM
1

Because it's a huge sacrifice to make with someone who can walk away at any time. Because there are legal protections for married women that benefit both her and her child during the marriage and in the event of a divorce. OOW is a bad deal for women, objectively. Of course it does. Splitting of the marital property and potentially getting alimony -- things you cannot get if you agree to be a SAHM and just cohabitate. Things you cannot get if you sacrifice your career for the family and he just …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 02:35 AM
3

How did I make a mess in my own house?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 02:29 AM
7

Feminists call it "derailing". I've seen it on 2X. https://twitter.com/richarddawkins/status/400788792979636224?lang=en http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2013/09/18/how-intactivists-are-ruining-the-debate-on-circumcision/ http://www.derailingfordummies.com/derail-using-entitlement/ https://www.google.com/search?biw=1280&bih=600&q=FGM+derail+reddit&oq=FGM+derail+reddit&gs_l=serp.3...8381.9040.0.9158.7.7.0.0.0.0.121.658.4j3.7.0....0...1c.1.64.serp..0.6.553...33i160k1.YM8ViIWPyOU
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 02:26 AM
6

Feminists don't give a shit about MGM though and get outraged if it even gets brought up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 02:07 AM
9

I am anti-feminist and genital mutilation vehemently outrages me
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 11:44 PM
6

They do support that. Why do you think men get hit up for alimony, or child support. Especially if the child isn't his because she cucked him., but he still has to pay. Why do you think I have to provide for and be the BB for single mothers on welfare out of my paycheck. Why do you think as a man I have to register for the selective service so I can sacrifice my life for women I'm not even fucking. Because feminists very much support the existence of BB. The current paradigm benefits them immens…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 11:25 PM
1

Why is it stupid to have children OOW as a woman? Her career sacrifice isn't going to mean anything in a divorce either, so I don't see how marriage fixes that. "Marital property". So being high quality means she wants me to agree to give her half my property if we split, otherwise she won't start a family with me. That doesn't sound like something someone who loves me would do. That sounds like something an extremely poor quality woman would do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 11:16 PM
2

No, I want feminists to fix gender inequality like they claim to want to do
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 11:03 PM
2

Whoever caused the issues is irrelevant. If feminisms goal is equality then they'd be fighting against female privilege as well. Besides, not all men caused the issues
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:35 PM
1

I am saying it would not increase my attraction in any way. And I am saying I don't believe that's true
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:32 PM
3

Feminism isn't about equality. If it was, that would've ended long ago
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:16 PM
1

I'm not necessarily talking about SAHMs per se. Just women who want to be homemakers. Why would they want to get married?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:09 PM
1

That's because the men hitting on you aren't high enough SMV to warrant branch swinging, much less cheating. Prove that men cheat more than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:05 PM
1

So let me rephrase. The amount of high quality women that would also want to be stay at home is almost non existent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 09:56 PM
1

So you're telling me that if you found out a guy you want to sleep with had abs, that would be a deal breaker?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 09:54 PM
1

I'm not talking about super cut abs. That just sounds like you're talking about guys with super low unhealthy body fat percentage. They don't have abs because you're not insisting on sleeping with guys who have abs. Obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 09:30 PM
1

Not every girl is attracted to me but every girl is attracted to abs. You say this isn't true but as I said before, what women say they want and what they actually want are often contradictory.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 09:26 PM
8

Exactly why betas aren't sexually attractive to women, because they act like women
/r/TheRedPill21/02/17 09:10 PM
1

abs wouldn't have added anything to my attraction to them. I don't believe that for one second. Every girl I've ever been with, girls that I haven't been with, and girls I don't even know love looking at and touching my abs without my permission.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 09:04 PM
3

Females being the breadwinner is how they lose attraction to men. If there's anything that disgusts them more than a beta provider, it's then having to provide for a man. Feminism is has never been about equality, it's been about female privilege. Why do you think men have always been the ones to get drafted to war or the selective service. Why are men raped more than women when you include prison abuse. Why do men commit suicide at much higher rates than women. Why do men get divorce raped, hit…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:58 PM
1

I disagree with your opinion. All women will even go so far as to cheat on their partner with a man who has a high enough SMV
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:47 PM
1

No I meant that women who have acceptable partner counts are one of the criteria for being high quality
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:46 PM
2

We want other men to be beta bucks, just not us personally. That means less AF competition for us. The more beta bucks, the better. How is that not obvious?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:36 PM
11

No it hasn't. Many self proclaimed feminists still want men to pay for them on dates lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:34 PM
1

That's false. Some men never want a relationship, ever. If their SMV is high enough, they don't need one to get the sex they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:25 PM
1

A woman who is intelligent enough to screen for pumping and dumping won't have sex with a guy outside of commitment no matter how high his SMV is. You are naive if you believe that
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:21 PM
1

Because society expects women to be in the workforce, most of them are. If they weren't, then it would be a lot easier to find a woman who wanted to be a housewife. Out of the small subset of women in our society that want to be housewives, an even smaller subset is LTR material because most women these days have an unacceptable partner count. It's basically impossible to find high quality women these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:18 PM
1

And I'm sure some of the guys you've slept with have had abs. And if they didn't, I'm sure you would've been even more attracted to them if they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 07:47 PM
2

Bill gets split equally = anti-femnism? Thanks for proving that feminism is really not about equality but about female privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 07:45 PM
1

Maybe if we lived in a society that actually adhered to traditional gender roles than yes. But I'm not about to be the provider for a woman who has a job instead of staying home and cleaning the house, cooking me dinner, doing my laundry, etc. if she's working, she can pay for her own shit. You're right, it is a vetting technique. It's how women vet men to see if they're beta bux
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 07:34 PM
1

lol there's no winning with feminists, that's exactly why less guys are taking it seriously. You want equality, then when you get dosed with it, you complain about it. I'm sure you're a real catch Why should I want to pay for a woman before having sex? Why does that matter for any reason other than seeing if I'm capable of being a beta bux?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 07:29 PM
2

All girls will have sex with the right guy outside of commitment, outside of him paying for anything. If she doesn't, it's because the mans SMV is not high enough. AWALT
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 07:27 PM
1

I'm not talking about who you've been attracted enough to try something, I'm talking about what you really want in a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 07:13 PM
1

It's not weird at all. The dadbod is a very important topic when discussing TRP. What's weird is when a girl refers to herself as a frigid slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 07:08 PM
1

There was a study done recently that said people often misinterpret text written in neutral tone as being angry. I'm not angry about dadbods. In fact, I love dadbods and wish as many guys had them as possible. Less competition for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 06:33 PM
1

Words have multiple meanings, just because he never was a competition level body builder doesn't mean he wasnt an amateur bodybuilder. You're the one who is being childish by refusing to admit this
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 06:00 PM
1

So you don't think Brad Pitt was a bodybuilder based on either the dictionary definition or my elaboration?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 05:56 PM
1

No I agree with their definition in the strictest sense of the word, which is why I cited it. You're the one who claimed it was a bad definition, and now you're back pedaling. She linked to another definition that involved competitions, and then proceeded to argue against me using that definition. That's called a straw man
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 05:46 PM
1

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bodybuilding Bodybuilding Noun the activity of doing exercises (such as lifting weights) to make the muscles of your body larger and stronger First you erroneously said that I linked to a verb, and now you are erroneously claiming that I didn't use the definition on their site. Why are you being so dishonest? Brad Pitt was a bodybuilder, even by the strict definition in the dictionary. No amount of hamstering will change that. You are grasping for straw…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 05:44 PM
1

Feel free to write a scathing letter to the scholars that write the Miriam Webster dictionary. I'm sure they'll be glad to take your complaints into consideration.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 05:34 PM
–

Want a medal?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 05:31 PM
1

You were not going by "my very definition." You posted an alternate definition and proceeded to debate using that definition. One does not have to be at a competitive level to be considered a bodybuilder. Common search results also show amateur bodybuilders that look exactly like Brad Pitt did. The definition I posted proves that he was a bodybuilder. There are many articles and threads about Brad Pitt on bodybuilding websites. You are being dishonest and grasping for straws
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 05:23 PM
1

What women say they want and what they actually want are often contradictory. I'm not calling you a liar, I'm just saying you don't consciously know what you prefer.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 05:15 PM
1

What women say they want and what they actually want are often contradictory. I'm not calling you a liar, I'm just saying you don't consciously know what you prefer.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 05:00 PM
1

It's very different. Thinking that you should go on a diet and walking into a gym are very different than actual bodybuilding. You were using manipulative language to try to make a point. Bodybuilding isn't just about "watching your macros". It's about constantly recomputing your macros, because your muscle composition is continuously changing, and thus your macros are too. It's about eating the exact same amount of carbs, protein, and fat every day. It's about cyclicly losing weight and gaining…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:57 PM
1

Who are you trying to convince? Me or yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:34 PM
1

You think it's better for long term relationships because dadbod = beta security. But for short term, let's not kid ourselves. You'd rather fuck a power lifter than a guy with a dadbod, all else equal
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:28 PM
1

I never said all girls are attracted to the same thing. You are straw manning me. I said all girls prefer abs, and you deny this. Who are you really trying to convince - me or yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:20 PM
1

TIL "thinking about what you eat" and "going to the gym" is the same as controlling your macros and methodically targeting muscle groups to make them larger. You are again being deliberately misleading.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:16 PM
1

That's only the goal of some bodybuilders. The point is that someone who lifts weights and diets in order to get stronger and sculpt their body is a bodybuilder. That's absolutely what Brad Pitt was doing at that time, and saying otherwise is denying reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:10 PM
–

How about instead of going off your subjective, emotional interpretation of what a body builder is, we look at the objective definition given by Miriam Webster: "the activity of doing exercises (such as lifting weights) to make the muscles of your body larger and stronger" Saying Brad Pitt wasn't a bodybuilder is hamstering.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:01 PM
1

What you're failing to mention is that girls who want short term with dadbods would be even more attracted to him if he didn't have a dadbod and had abs instead. I agree that lots of girls don't mind dadbod for long term because dadbod = beta security
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 03:51 PM
–

http://www.newnownext.com/wp-content/uploads/backlot/2014/12/0cc224c0-d111-45c7-99ca-1a7492ffacb5_Fight2.gif Lol totally "not a bodybuilder"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:59 PM
2

I meant for short term AF partners. Girls obviously "want" dadbods when they're not ovulating because dadbod = beta security.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:46 PM
1

They're not power lifters. Power lifters are massive guys with higher body fat percentage. And yes underwear models that are jacked with abs can get laid. Women are far more attracted to that than they are dadbods. Bodybuilders are guys like Brad Pitt, who is often cited as the archetypical Chad Thundercock
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:40 PM
2

Of course she says she wants all of those things. Then the second a guy opens up to her, she dries up and begins looking for the next Chad. It's ok for a guy to open up emotionally if he doesn't care about keeping her around.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:32 PM
5

All else equal, girls would rather fuck a power lifter over a dadbod any day of the week
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:28 PM
3

Lol @ all of the hamsters that conflate powerlifters with bodybuilders.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:25 PM
2

No. Alpha males are at the top of the totem pole because they are the ones that HB10's will do just about anything for.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:39 AM
14

The only reason Facebook should ever be used - a tool to demonstrate SMV. Never comment, like, or post any text ever
/r/TheRedPill20/02/17 11:33 PM
38

That is exactly why social media is cancer
/r/TheRedPill20/02/17 11:30 PM
45

Girlfriend material, yes. No woman is wife material.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/17 11:20 PM
23

Dumb and solipsistic. Women think that men think like them, ie. that preselection makes men desire women more.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/17 11:16 PM
1

They don't necessarily communicate it
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 11:07 PM
1

Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 10:49 PM
1

Every potential sex partner
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:41 PM
1

Yes, and seriously they can make dicks look 2-3 inches bigger
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:22 PM
1

Get fat
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:20 PM
1

Face + Tits 26, white, western US, Red, lower middle class
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:18 PM
1

Red pill has nothing to do with alt right. The mods ban people who post alt right nonsense on any of the red pill subs. Seriously, where do you people get these weird ideas about us? It's like you're trying to defame us.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:17 PM
1

Also remember that porn producers are experts at making dicks look bigger than they are. It's their job
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:15 PM
1

The sidebar clearly states that we strongly support equal rights for men and women. If that's not feminism at its core, then what is?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:11 PM
1

Anarcho capitalism sub has a lot of people that aren't ancaps too. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:10 PM
1

Not at all, the sidebar in TRP clearly says we support equal rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:03 PM
1

Trump is old, obese, has a terrible sense of style, and high SMV women find him sexually repulsive. Definitely not alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:00 PM
3

Half of the posts on Reddit are made by 4chan trolls
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 07:50 PM
3

Wrong. "Is she hot?" is how men shit test. AMALT
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 03:57 PM
1

What's the difference between a nerd and a geek and a dork?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 03:10 PM
2

Women fucked and chucked me in my blue pill days. Now that I'm red pilled I can keep them around much longer because my frame is strong, so they don't just treat me as a walking dildo.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 05:38 PM
2

The word omega doesn't appear anywhere in TRP sidebar. It's not part of the theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 04:09 PM
1

Omegas aren't a thing in TRP theory, because omegas can get laid too
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 03:37 PM
–

LOL @ all the women in this thread mentioning big muscles as a turnoff. Notice how they didn't mention obese pimply neckbeards that haven't bathed in a week and wear clothes from Hot topic and Walmart. Not even a mention of the dadbod! Oh wait, that's because betas are invisible to women. They don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 02:58 PM
0

You must really hate dadbods then
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 02:55 PM
26

Newsflash, she was probably fucking other guys this entire time, including the guy she dumped you on Valentine's Day to go fuck. And you fucked up big time by letting her move in with you. Then you committed to cheater. How the hell could a cheater seem like a unicorn? I thought I was years past the anger phase but your poor decision making just made me re-enter it. Not even in my most blue pill days would I have been so reckless.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/17 12:07 AM
63

It's really hard to not treat them like children. Especially when you wake up and see your girlfriend sleeping while cuddling with a teddy bear
/r/TheRedPill15/02/17 11:56 PM
1

The Last American Virgin. It demonstrates the AF/BB dynamic very well.
/r/RedPillWomen15/02/17 09:42 PM
4

Not to mention that Grey is a white knight as well. But he's still more alpha than 99.9% of men They don't tell you the end of the story, which is that Anastasia succeeds in further betafying him and she loses attraction to him and is alpha widowed forever.
/r/RedPillWomen15/02/17 08:48 PM
2

Yes, the wives withheld sex as a punishment against their husbands for Trump winning the election. And why shouldn't they? They're not sexually attracted to their hubby's dadbod, and they can get sex from a higher SMV man anytime they want, so of course it makes sense for them to weaponize sex and use it as a tool to encourage good behavior and punish bad behavior. Beta husbands need to be trained like Pavlovian dogs to continue their primary function of providing and submitting to her will.
/r/RedPillWomen15/02/17 07:49 PM
11

Yep. Weak frame is not alpha at all
/r/RedPillWomen15/02/17 04:59 PM
1

That's why you're attracted to alphas and not betas, because alphas know that no woman is capable of loving them that way, so they kill that expectation. Betas try to get their S/Os to be more like mothers, and that kills their partners attraction to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 03:51 PM
1

I always thought a one night stand was you meet somebody, fuck them the same day, and never talk to them again. Am I wrong about this? Why is the article so ambiguous with its definition?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 03:47 PM
1

It's different though. Not all men would sleep with their best friend's girl, under any circumstances. All women, on the other hand, will cheat under certain circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 02:52 PM
1

Except not all men try to sleep with as many women as they can, so I don't know what that has to do with AMALT when clearly what you're describing is NAMALT. Women can be just as loyal as men, given that you're her best option. Say goodbye to her loyalty if you're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 04:41 AM
1

Because hypergamy prevents women from being as loyal as men can be to each other. Loyalty is a patriarchal construct. It is the number one quality I look for in a male friend, so if I feel he is or will be disloyal, I disassociate myself from him. If I feel he will be loyal, then I trust him.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 01:37 AM
1

What is AMALT about the situation we are discussing?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 10:30 PM
5

Never liked trump. He's a fat fuck, which means he's automatically not the "quintessential alpha". He is a statist, which is the antithesis of Liberty. A man cannot be Red Pill without liberty.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 10:18 PM
1

What does that have to do with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 08:18 PM
1

I never said humans are a billion years old, but we are the result of billions of years of evolution and natural selection. Women were programmed by billions of years of evolution to being attracted to men who look like they can protect them and their children. That didn't disappear just because of a few thousand years of civilization because there was no reason for it to be selected against. You are confusing "alpha" with aggressive betas. Alphas don't initiate aggression against others. That's…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 06:40 PM
1

I am not best friends with men who I think would do that to me. What does polygyny have to do with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 05:52 PM
1

/r/asktrp
/r/RedPillWomen14/02/17 05:02 PM
5

I actually enjoy the fact that hegemonic masculinity is being increasingly seen as taboo by western culture. It turns the hegemonic alphas into bad boys, which makes them even more appealing to women. The feminists are working in our favor.
/r/RedPillWomen14/02/17 04:48 PM
6

My girlfriends professors cancelled classses the day after the election because too many special snowflakes were triggered by Hillary losing
/r/RedPillWomen14/02/17 04:43 PM
1

I will trust her in the sense that I trust that she will act the way I expect her to act, which is like a woman. But holding women to the same standard of trust that I hold men to is foolish. Hypergamy inherently prevents loyalty, because women are only loyal when you are their best option.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 04:37 PM
1

First of all, there's nothing wrong with being a beta. Nobody ever said there is. The problem is that most men find it difficult to continue to justify being beta to themselves after swallowing the pill. You can never be sure that she doesn't have / won't entertain better options. That's why TRP has the saying "she's not yours, it's just your turn". That's why If you want to reduce the likelihood that she will have or entertain other options, you need to continuously improve your SMV There's no …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 02:51 AM
1

Billions of years of evolution had it so that women were attracted to men that appeared that they capable of providing her with superior genetics that could provide and protect for her and her children. Just because humans developed civilization in the last few thousand years doesn't mean suddenly billions of years of evolutionary programming were wiped from women. That's not how evolution works because there was never any reason for those traits in women to be selected against.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 02:46 AM
1

Infinite. But if he is continuously improving his SMV, that decreases the likelihood she will find a better option. As time goes on, her SMV will drop so that will also decrease the likelihood of her finding something better.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 01:08 AM
1

Only in so far as that all men are a mixture of alpha and beta characteristics. There is no man that is 100% alpha 100% of the time, that's why the Chad Thundercock archetype was created.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 12:47 AM
1

Interesting perspective, I never thought about it that way but it makes sense. If I ever have a daughter, I want her to reproduce with the best genetics she can get because then that means my genetics are more likely to survive and be passed on as well. If the best she can get is black then that's just fine with me. I care infinitely more about whether she is a slut or not. Of course I'd want her to be LTR material.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/17 12:43 AM
1

Who's more likely to protect you from a sabre tooth tiger? The assertive asshole or the nice guy doormat?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 12:37 AM
1

It's proof that he's her best option at that current point in time
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 12:35 AM
1

Apparently you missed the point I was making. The guys you are referring to as alpha are actually aggressive betas that can't control their testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 12:23 AM
1

If it's between the hot douchebag and the hot niceguy, all else equal, a woman will go for the hot douchebag
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 09:37 PM
1

And lots of those same women say exactly that "I really love my husband" and then immediately follow it up with "but I'm not sexually attracted to him." Because they love their husbands like a brother or a friend. Not like they love Chad Thundercock.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 09:35 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with being a beta. It's just that after swallowing the red pill, it's hard for men to justify to themselves to continue to be betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 09:33 PM
1

There have been countless posts on TRP about how being alpha does not necessarily mean being an asshole. Betas, especially aggressive betas who can't control their testosterone, are frequently bigger assholes than alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 09:25 PM
1

Having uncontrollably high testosterone is not necessarily alpha. A lot of who you call "alphas" are in jail because they are stupid (beta quality) or lost frame and initiated aggression against someone else (also a beta quality)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 09:21 PM
1

Doesn't last long though
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 09:20 PM
1

There are only alpha and beta characteristics. Anything else is hamstering
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 09:12 PM
5

I don't have to worry about being assaulted at night? Great to hear. I'll promptly stop carrying my gun on me and walk around by myself flashing $100 bills wearing diamond rings. Nobody is ever going to assault me if I do that! Well except for the fact that men are overwhelmingly the victims of violent crime. Men don't have the privilege of opting out of being fathers like women have the option of opting out of being mothers. Even if I get raped, if I can't prove it in a court of law I will stil…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 04:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter