TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

great_sco0tt Archive

View 3 posts and 87 comments by great_sco0tt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm very experienced, and moans mean shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 01:37 PM
2

It's not objectively true, it's about our familiarity with the mirrored refection of ourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 01:36 PM
3

I think guys usually overestimate, girls underestimate their attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 01:35 PM
22

the only true way of determining whether or not you have a chance with any particular person is by making a move and seeing what happens. That's what I'm trying to tell to some miserable fucks in this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 02:49 AM
1

Get lost, you dumb racist, nobody wants you even here.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 02:11 AM
2

No, but I don't think I underestimate my attractiveness. I'm pretty objective about how I look, and I'm honestly not that concerned about it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 01:54 AM
1

I don't think I'll be able to be in a relationship with someone who is significantly younger/older than me. Maybe, it wouldn't matter after I'm 35, but right now, I want someone with similar worldview and background as me. I usually tend to be attracted to women a bit older than me because of their experience and confidence, but it mattered more when I was in my late teens and early 20s. Right now, women my are and slightly younger are very likely to display the level of sexual and emotional mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 11:11 PM
2

Well you desperately tried to post this shit to many subs, happy now?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 11:03 PM
11

You assess how attractive you are by the attractiveness of the partners who want to be with you You said yourself, that it's about attractiveness. Why are you contradicting yourself post factum?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 11:01 PM
4

Doesn't ring true to me. Most of my partners were visually way above my league visually, and it's not just my assessment, but some of the people who know me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 10:47 PM
67

The problem is that unless people are in the top, they likely have no idea how hot they are. Everyone thinks they are more attractive in the mirror than on the photos, for example. And I think, people tend to overestimate how attractive they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 09:47 PM
8

In my experience, older women with more partners and who know their body, openly communicate. I'm a bit shocked by the answers hers "they moan if they like something" I mean have you even had sex with a woman? They all fucking moan during sex, unless openly in pain. That's what they are taught they are supposed to do. Moaning does not mean they are close to orgasm. They might even enjoy it and moan, but it does not equal good sex. The biggest problem is that many women are ashamed of their sexua…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 03:05 PM
1

Maybe it's because of where I live or who I talk to, but I never notice those horrible trends I see online only. Perhaps because people who engage in these communities tend to sit at home? Dunno. So yeah, my predictions are more optimistic because my experiences are. I believe,there will be more acceptance of human sexuality, competent sex Ed will be pushed in more schools, more people will be educated about consent. I believe, porn will be more mainstream and normalized. I'm already seeing a tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/20 02:54 PM
5

As a counter example; women think they're a catch because they have a good career, are projecting, because a lot of men do not give a damn about that. Actually, not true. Maybe thirsty desperate men who didn't have sex for months or ever, are okay with any woman who is more or less attractive. But in fact, people date and marry people of similar class, as a general rule. It's not about career only, also upbringing, family, education and so on. So for a hookup, sure it doesn't matter, but if peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/19 01:41 AM
3

Pale eyebrows. Matt Smith pulls that pretty well
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 05:38 PM
0

ok
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 05:35 PM
0

Of course I rely on my experience because it is mine, it works for me and relying on it makes me happy and fulfilled. Why should I instead surge in a puddle of a group of miserable, unattractive and lonely men's experience? Or made up rage porn? You think THAT means being intellectually capable? How insecure you must be, to think that will feed your ego?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 05:09 PM
0

Yeah of course it's invalid because it shows the overall picture and doesn't dictate anyone's life specifically. Everyone is so different that you can literally find proof to whatever worldview you want. My worldview and experience contradicts whatever TRP tries to push, so why should I follow the flimsy arguments created by people desperately trying to fit "scientific research" and "evolutionary theory" into these arguments? Redpilled aficionados don't even realize how these theories work. For …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 05:03 PM
0

I found out, it doesn't matter at all. Thankfully found out about all this internet cultures long after I had sex and dated so it didn't affect my worldview, but I cannot imagine what kind of person I'd grew up into if, say, I found out about PUA or TRP at 16. I'd probably be pretty miserable and scared of any interaction with women or something. Because in fact, it all just doesn't matter, just like in any other aspect of life. It's all about luck partly. You are lucky if you a good first job o…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 04:32 PM
1

Actually I think there would be a lot of "ruin the bitch". The don't ruin the family is actually in this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 12:55 PM
0

No they aren't. They just show there is certain percentage of something, they don't show correlation, they don't explain and also you can easily dismiss them since they often cover certain group in a specific country so if you are not from that country, it won't apply to you. Also nobody bothers to include the source and use just stats, so it becomes absolutely pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 12:54 PM
4

Because people tend to forgive mens infidelity while treating women's infidelity like the worst thing. In my opinion, cheaters are garbage no matter what circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 01:44 AM
3

Would you tell same thing if genders were reversed? Don't think so
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 01:07 AM
3

No she's not. It's about what she feels about it. She is the only person who can dictate what's right and wrong for her. I'd tell. In fact, I was in a scenario where I found out about someone's infidelity and told the person,even thought I wasn't involved in any of it. Because I'd fucking want to know if my woman was cheating on me, and I act the way I want people to act.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 12:14 AM
1

This applies to every single issue. "People who lived together before marriage have 14.5% more chances to get divorced!" Okay so fucking what, why would some random percentages dictate you how to live your life?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 12:08 AM
2

It's not about job it's about morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 12:01 AM
1

I feel like every girl I've been with was out of my league. And almost all of them have higher count, so yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 11:39 PM
2

Older: 6 years. I was 16, but it was all legal lol. She was my first fuck and taught me everything. When was awesome and we still text. I kinda went for a bit older girls after her because I enjoyed when they were more experienced. Younger - never really, the youngest was my age. I'm not really into younger women because I want someone at the same stage of my own development or higher. Meaning if I'm in college, I want someone in college, not high school. I'm working full time, so I want someone…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 11:36 PM
5

I'd want to know I'm living with a cheater. Also I'm sure most replies here will change if genders were reversed. Somehow people here are willing to let the cheater live his comfortable life because why again? Family will break? It's already broken. Cheaters don't deserve your pity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 11:30 PM
1

Not untrained
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 11:26 PM
1

Fantasies of 14 year olds is an indication of what women are into — the entire premise of TRP. But hey, it's up to you, continue to believe crap about women made up by bitter men who cannot get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 02:35 PM
1

A hot liz
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 02:49 AM
1

My dick is bigger
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 02:49 AM
1

Yeah well I cannot claim that I had an academic approach or anything, but neither can anyone here, so like everyone in either pill, I'm just pulling stuff out of my own experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 12:38 AM
4

Nope. I recently found out about them really, but skimming through TRP subs, it doesn't really fit into my experiences. Like some things are true and basic, but in general I find it all way to dogmatic and frankly speaking, inhumane and depressing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 12:35 AM
3

Why are you sharing your r/iamverysmart library like anyone asked for it? Nobody cares about your flair and how many books you read lmfao, like that's a fucking argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 12:33 AM
4

My parents were fine, maybe underbearing is the best word, but they did what they could being business owners and working insane hours. In some issues they were extremely liberal, in other — extremely strict. Drinking and seeing girls was okay, but smoking — hell no. I'm okay with women, there are women in my friend group, I had several ltr, occasional hookups, and now have a fwb. Didn't really struggle, I mean I had dry periods but I always could entertain myself and handle alone time pretty we…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 12:30 AM
1

Am I though? By questioning the contradictions of people here. If questioning your dogmatic philosophy is pushing an agenda, then maybe your philosophy is extremely flimsy to begin with
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 12:20 AM
1

So what is personality?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 10:47 PM
1

So what characteristics of a person is not based on appearance?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 10:47 PM
1

Because it's not based purely on physical appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 10:05 PM
1

Sounds like the opposite of shallow to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 10:04 PM
5

Wait, another post about the same topic? So I'll just repeat myself. Everyone here is protected by law. If you are born into a middle class family in a developed country, you are already coddled and protected for your entire life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 08:49 PM
1

You are contradicting this comment: looks,money,status and game. So basically, judging a person by the entirety of what makes them a human is yess, not as shallow as solely judging by looks. Otherwise, tell me what is not shallow behaviour in your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 07:01 PM
1

I guess, if one group judges another by looks only, and the other judges the first one by everything including looks, then the second group is kinda less shallow. But that's just the definition of shallow. I feel like TRP tries to change this definition because they desperately want to call women shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 06:11 PM
1

Bluepill sub is a sub to troll redpill. There is no a universal thing as bluepill. Saying people are divided into blue and redpillers is like saying there are feminists and misogynists. Both are just just lazy ass and narrow worldviews.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 05:09 PM
1

Thanks, but not interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 05:03 PM
1

If mods banned anytime someone used ad hominem attack, there would be two people left unbanned on this sub. I don't find your arguments worth arguing against since you clearly despise women and it's kinda boring. I was looking for some more sound arguments than "women bad", that I can easily find in any incel community.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 05:01 PM
1

Well if you dictate anyone who doesn't follow your strict dogmatic set of rules that don't hold much weight in real life scenarios, is bluepilled, then I guess there is nothing I can do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 04:51 PM
1

A lot of those fictional character's fans are low value weirdo nerd women. Got proof? Because it's bullshit of course. Sherlock's female fanbase is much bigger than Thor's. Fugly women know that they don't have a chance with a hot Chaddish guy like Chris Hemsworth. Lmao this is so silly. Teen girls know these are fictional characters. When it's a fantasy, it can go whereever they want, and aren't limited by what they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 04:50 PM
1

Neither pill. Firstly, blue pill isn't even a thing for anyone who isn't in red pill. It's a false dichotomy created by redpillers to enhance us vs them mentality. Nobody calls themselves blue pill unironically, or for any other reason than to demonstrate they don't agree with TRP. Blue pill doesn't have a philosophy and culture around it. It's a fake group for "everyone else" that redpillers made up to emphasize how different they are. I honestly prefer incels term "normie" because it's more ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 04:09 PM
2

Gold diggers aren't attracted to money, so they might be shallow or deep - doesn't matter since their attraction is fake. I'm talking about a real attraction, not acting in love to set your ass for life. By your own words men are more shallow since all that matters to them is womans appearance, 7+. Women can easily fall for a below average visually (Driver, Cumberbatch and so on) if they have a personality and charisma.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 04:04 PM
3

I think you are contradicting yourself, because "shallow" means judging someone solely by external factors like looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:31 PM
1

Oh come on, don't call Cumberbatch hideous. Even I had a mancrush on him so I see the appeal, especially when his hair is longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:17 PM
6

Then I'm really confused, because I thought TRP likes to call women shallow, but by their own admission, women aren't really shallow at all because they judge person not by or status or money only, but by everything together — basically same criteria you'd judge any person out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:08 PM
0

Many women find brains sexy
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:06 PM
1

For some, it goes further. Starts with the character but continues with the actor, especially if he is well spoken, charismatic and charming, and Benedict is all three.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:05 PM
2

Good point, most female marvel fans do. Yet, according to TRP, Thor should be more attractive because he is more masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:02 PM
1

I feel like you are right. There are a lot of men who have status but are not attractive at all
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:01 PM
4

Maybe Benedict Cumberbatch used to because of Sherlock but even then, it was mostly tumblr girls, who are mostly somewhat awkward. It's the majority the female viewers of the show, tumblr girls make up a small part of them. I personally found out about the show when a chick from my school told me about it, and she was swooning over him already. Btw she used to swoon over Snape as well, lol guess she has a type. but almost every woman I’ve seen who is a dedicated Driver or Rickman stan has been i…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:59 PM
3

I have a friend who fucking swoons for him. She is a short ultra feminine gal with a cutest button face who rejected hot dudes who were after here. And yet his face is 10/10 for her, because I believe for women it's never just face — it's the entirety of the guy. His voice is a major turn on for many women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:45 PM
1

Why call it "game"? It's confusing for people on the outside, and make them disagree with TRP because they don't really know what it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:40 PM
1

And what about charisma? It's I believe is the second most important quality to get laid. Does TRP include it in their list?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:38 PM
1

Sure, they were theoretically honorable, if they indeed could join the military. If a physically strong young man dug pits or plowed ground for weed for all his short peasant life, there was not much honor or power in him being physically strong. And the majority of people were part of poor lower class, not warriors.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:36 PM
3

I'd say Cumperbatch is way above average looking, but as a whole — when you hear him speak, move. He is tall, has a good body, great voice and sounds very educated. But I agree, if you just snap a pic of his face and put on Tinder, he'd be way below the average. So yeah, it directly contradicts red/black pill idea that women only want to fuck men with perfect faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:32 PM
1

Yeah you're talking about very popular people or celebs. Which most men will never be. No. I was talking about characters. So improving your looks is the easiest and perhaps for many men only option they have to improve their chances with the opposite sex. That's 100% true. In fact, I encourage anyone of any age, men or women, to focus on improving their looks. But you are wrong that changing personality is impossible. We do it throughout our lives, our brains are very plastic. One can grew into…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:29 PM
6

I get what you are saying but this only happens with characters.What these women like is the narrative.Irl she wouldn't fall for a guy that looked and behaved like Snape . Yeah, they have weird sexual fantasies that cannot really be recreated with real people, because in their heads they are the main character. But it's just an example how it's not just looks or money that turns women on. And again, it's just about sexual attraction, not partner selection. Snape would be horrible as a partner. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:25 PM
3

There are many that would turn down women depending on how they approached. But since women don’t usually approach, it’s not an aspect considered often. Oh, definitely. But I'm talking here purely visual first experience. Of course anything can turn off men from a woman. But in the opposite scenario, where a woman is completely unattractive to a man, I doubt that there is much she could say or do that will make her attractive to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:21 PM
2

I understand myself and other men, and women I met aren't that different from men in many areas, so I think it's not that hard to understand them either.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:19 PM
1

I honestly don't really get difference between them. Is black pill like red pill but more depressing?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:18 PM
2

Not just any character, teenage girls love this broken smart and mean type.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:17 PM
3

Alan Rickman, Adam Driver, Benedict Cumberbatch, Bryan Cranston, etc. seem to be popular amongst mostly geeky older women Actually no, especially for the first three. I believe they definitely have the older fanbase as well, but they have insane following amongst female teens. Hemsworth is conventionally more attractive, as I said in my post. He just isn't a common female crush unlike the first three in your list. Cranston isn't a teenage crush either, after all the Breaking Bad target audience …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:17 PM
1

Actually yeah, if you can control it and it doesn't become an addiction. But from what I've heard, very few people can
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 04:34 AM
1

Of course there are. Most of people are in the average, but there are extreme examples in both sides. In my case, I had experiences with women who were hypersexual periodically. All my exes had this special week when all they wanted to do is fuck. My current FWB is fucking crazy, she can go for weeks ignoring me and then have this insane sexual drive that I can barely keep up with. I mean it's hot, when she's horny I can do anything I want to her and she'd love it but she's also insatiable and a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:37 AM
1

If you are balding, shave the hair off, you are not fooling anyone by keeping it. Sure, bald head will require a buff body to work it, but it's worth it. If a guy has good hair, in all cases, using gel to comb the bangs back will make things better. Truth is, with short bangs most guys look like nerds, even if they are attractive. Side emo-bangs is not in fashion anymore. Honestly don't get why someone would think "after" is better". The dude is attractive but with the bangs down he looks like a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:30 AM
1

As a guy whose family has a branch of drug addicts, I'm definitely for a virgin loser. I've witnessed shit drugs to do people and I don't want to deal with that ever in my life. I'm pretty chill and calm, but if I have a son who becomes a drug addict, I'll force him into treatment by any means necessary, including illegal methods.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:23 AM
1

Average means majority. If majority of people are what you describe, then they are truly average. But I guess you are talking about US, and I seriously doubt that majority of people are debt-free or non-obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:20 AM
3

I feel like this kind of discussions just further push the us vs them mentality and gender war. Relax. Men and women take advantage of societal protection. It's not like all men just protect all women, and all women protect all children. You all are pretty much cuddled and protected your entire life, especially if you have the privilege to be born to a middle class family in a developed country.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:15 AM
1

Da Vinci wasn't physically strong, not that we know of, and he didn't become the most famous painter or inventor because he was strong. What does that has to do with anything? He had a bring mind and was lucky enough to get a good education. Like you are just arguing because you like the idea of being physically strong and masculine. But it's a feature of 20 and 21 century, and it's basically only related to health and attractiveness. In any point in history since agricultural revolution, physic…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 03:06 AM
1

Military coup is not a single strong men, is a group of men led by another man, who doesn't even need to be the strongest, just the richest or best leader. Examples you use, are not about physical strength at all. Julius Caesar was a great leader and general, but he wasn't the strongest man. It didn't even matter how strong he was, he just was the most cunning. He outsmarted everyone and that's how he brought down the Roman republic. And mind you, he was born into a noble family, perhaps now the…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:55 AM
1

Everyone watches porn. And like everything in life, it becomes a problem when there is excess of it. Nofap is just another extreme. You are still an addict, you just manifest it differently. It's like when fat people start a died by cutting off everything slightly unhealthy, consuming huge amounts of protein from day 1 and obsessing over calories. It's like yesterday's nazis turning into communist marxists. Calm the fuck down, most things are okay in small doses.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:48 AM
1

...and the two major ways families became powerful were through military prowess or trade wealth. First of all, no. Second of all, which society are we talking about? Because since agricultural revolution and up until the rise of capitalism, it was all about inheritance. Lorenzo de Medici was famous as a politician and banker who also happened to rig a whole bunch of tournaments he also happened to sponsor so that he could strut about saying what a big strong man he was. Lorenzo de Medici was bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:43 AM
2

Sounds like you just made shit up, that never happened in history. Btw, in all times, low rank soldiers were extremely disposable. Doesn't matter how strong you are, best case scenario — you are going to come home crippled with some trophy gold.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:31 AM
2

Having a dick is gay
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:30 AM
1

This is some fictional view based on medieval books. In reality, were you born into powerful family, you were set. Also, there surely was no common thing of being a "strong physically powerful man" because 7/10 chances you were dead before you turned 2, and in best case scenario, slaved your ass until you died from a tooth infection by 40. So I get how it's pleasant to think about strong men ruling the world, but it's bullshit wish fulfilment. Get a history book or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 02:29 AM
3

No, some women are into anal and it's often impossible if the dick is on the bigger side.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/19 11:16 PM
13

I mean... That's basically how it worked for most societies throughout recorded history No, it wasn't and it directly contradicts the idea of male disposability. Throughout history, there was a class divide, not a "physical power" divide.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/19 11:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter