TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

greenpegatlas Archive

View 3 posts and 43 comments by greenpegatlas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

And the other part is that the rectum tears much more easily adding to increased infection risk. In the gay/bi case you can lose. Your partner could find it easier to pull than you,etc. Well, you're definitely not losing if you can reliably keep your spare time fully saturated with women passing the boner test.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 11:28 PM
1

No women is worth that. That's the wrong way to think about it. Take her down. You do it because it meets your needs. In my case, it does, more so than purely plating, more so than typical LTR. If I left my partner, I'd continue with this model as a non negotiable.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 11:01 PM
-5

The last line is just an excuse ;) It should definitely be higher than your SO, but if you genuinely don't give a fuck about her behaviour you can further increase it in her eyes. Ride out the initial wave of her exploring herself without reacting and then she'll settle her behaviour. Just maintain frame when they want to close it up, and you'll have it set up very nicely.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 10:36 PM
1

You probably want to be using condoms with all partners because the only you person whose behaviour you are certain of is yours. You can consider changing this when a dynamic is set, long term, other contraceptives, but I'd really advise this. Also, disease risk isn't bad if you are diligent.
/r/askTRP31/08/15 10:30 PM
2

Try a wider condom. Even if you don't think you're big, a large proportion of men have girth too high for a condom. Alternatively, female condoms.
/r/askTRP31/08/15 10:28 PM
5

A common red pill mantra is that you've already lost if your LTR is suggesting an open relationship. If you believe this, and it happens to you, you may as well try it out. As a man, it's definitely possible to win at open relationships.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 10:25 PM
1

This exactly. If this happens to you, and you are 100% sure there is no cheating, delay, delay, delay. About 6 months to a year. Then you can open it on your terms.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 10:15 PM
11

Na, that reaks of insecurity. Try: "isn't he just!"
/r/askTRP27/08/15 11:26 AM
1

Show, don't tell. First date, always a drink. If I finish my drink before they arrive I eject. If they want me from here they can make it worth my while. I make exceptions if they let me know with some warning. I always have work with me so tend just to get it out. When they rock up I let them know that I just need to finish this bit up. 60 seconds more working while they're there is enough to get them back inline with my frame.
/r/askTRP27/08/15 08:48 AM
1

Not me. It's more likely to blow up in your face if you do, because lies.
/r/askTRP26/08/15 03:18 AM
2

My best one is me dressed as a Disney Princess just stating at the camera with a 'so?' kind of look. And they all think they're so clever when they initiate conversation and make some kind of observation about it.
/r/askTRP22/08/15 10:58 PM
1

In order: ring your doctor and make appointment. Talk to them about antidepressants (lexapro is usually the starter antidepressant of choice because of its low side effect profile). If you've not had blood tests done recently you might also mention this and get these done. if you are sedantry, add in a walk around the block each day at the same time each say. Yes, lifting or running will be great, but for the first week you want to start small. switch soft drinks for water switch snacks for frui…
/r/askTRP21/08/15 10:39 PM
4

The best outcomes for depression come from CBT (or even MBSR) and antidepressants.. But you will need to shop around for the one that works. You basically will do 6 weeks. If no improvement or side effects are too much you come off over a few days, take a week break and try another one.
/r/askTRP21/08/15 10:19 PM
1

Sedative requiring panic attacks.
/r/askTRP21/08/15 10:12 PM
5

Again, that's merely suggestive. TRP members often like to claim that women don't know what they're talking about or what they want and that they can't be trusted (this may not apply personally). To the extent that you believe this then the words out of their mouth should not be used as evidence.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 08:37 AM
1

You'd need to show that (a) the increase in dogs was happening disproportionately among single women, (b) you'd need to show that the same trend was not occurring in men, and (c) that the small dog effect was not a by product of increasing urbanisation and reduced living space by showing that it happened for both women in houses and apartments. Then you could tentatively claim it's close to a face.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 05:38 AM
8

Nothing in your story suggests the dog was not under her control. If the dog is already well trained, and behaving appropriately then there is nothing wrong with engaging affectionately with it! If you see me outside with my little fluff ball I will absolutely engage affectionately with her at times, but if I need her to do something the tone will change. It's a nice hypothesis, don't get me wrong, but I don't think your observations support it.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 03:10 AM
3

As consent can be retracted at any point in time during a sexual encounter (and for no reason) this would not protect you. That AND affirmative texts confirming her enjoyment of her evening may.
/r/askTRP16/08/15 10:52 AM
2

STEM academic.
/r/askTRP16/08/15 07:13 AM
7

They tend to last 1 to 5 months for me. I've got one running 8 months atm, not a single shit test or comfort test - most convenient fwb ever.
/r/askTRP16/08/15 07:06 AM
1

Wait, what? You guys have to think about your lines. Just go with whatever comes to mind. If it fucks you up, learn from it.
/r/askTRP15/08/15 02:09 PM
0

No, both alcohol and anxiety will do this at any age. Nothing is wrong here.
/r/askTRP15/08/15 02:03 PM
2

So, I work with a minimal physical escalation game because this plays into my frame and how I like to interact with people. I'm suggesting it because it's very few steps, and doesn't really escalate at all until the final step. I primarily use it on tinder dates, but you could transpose it quite easily to other contexts. At venue: - Contact when you meet/greet (culturally appropriate). - Some kind of contextually appropriate non-sexual contact. This should be part of a conversation. Outside of l…
/r/askTRP14/08/15 07:07 AM
1

When citing ostensibly scientific research please give a citation. Not all of us get the same google search results due to our search history.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 09:36 PM
3

The life time average is misleading as you need to account for aging and cohort effects. Best thing to do is look at the here and now. And I think the most relevant comparison metric is number of different partners in the last 12 months for people not in a LTR. Looking at 18-42 year olds, never married, not currently defacto, never had sex with men: median last 12 months is 1, top 20% is 3+, top 1% is 15+. No effect of age at all within this cohort. If you are still interested in life time partn…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 09:10 AM
2

If you look at the most recent rounds of the national family growth survey, of which this portion is administered not in front of anyone and so disincentives lying and impression management: men and women report equivalent median numbers at about 7-9 (no correction for age, but random sample, so let's run with it). From memory a sizably larger chunk of men than women had no sexual partners in the last 12 months. Also, tellingly, they attenuate the highest category of partners for women much high…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 05:01 AM
7

"Do I include the men too?" and then just look like you're doing some mental calculations. Or, "I stopped counting when I ran out of fingers, so all I can say is more than this" and hold up all your fingers.
/r/askTRP11/08/15 02:10 PM
1

The average man does similar things for different gains. I respect women to the same extent regardless of sex, but I'm wary of them in different domains.
/r/askTRP11/08/15 07:42 AM
2

Man, try the 6 weeks of an ssri like lexapro, low dose. There's no shame in resorting to drugs. If everything is genuinely good on paper, often you just need that first 6-8 weeks to recreate the correct equilibrium, then you come off.
/r/askTRP11/08/15 07:39 AM
16

Tap your ear, and go 'godammit Troy, they didn't laugh, you're fired.'
/r/askTRP11/08/15 07:38 AM
6

Tell her you'll need to see a photo of her friend before you agree to sleep with both of them, because, you know, standards.
/r/askTRP09/08/15 11:57 PM
1

'look, I get it, you want her for yourself, but you'll have to share her with me. She's coming round Xday at Y.' She'll walk away (about the same outcome as your current strategy) or she'll show up. If she show ups you'll get either a spectacular competitive shit fest, or a threesome.
/r/askTRP07/08/15 08:07 AM
2

Much of Europe has no spousal support. Australia has no spousal support. In these cases, there is child support, but, you know, implant the. Get out side of your American bubble.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 05:55 AM
1

No alimony where I live. She has a contraceptive implant in her arm. I'm not tooooo worried bud
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 11:38 PM
1

"and am not cuddling a woman whom I care about & who regularly goes out and swallows other men's ejaculate ." That you know of. I totally agree with the article. There's a reason I've never slept with anyone in the polyamorous community, it's filled with ugly people with new age ideas. It's also the reason neither I nor my partner will ever be involved in the community. At the level of pragmatic relationship model, however, I find it much less objectionable. When it is no longer is of benefit to…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 11:29 PM
1

Looking through your post history I see that you have major issues with developing oneitis. Perhaps that's part of the reason for your aversion. Polyamory is incredibly confronting for oneitis because you know that oneitis will never ever be returned for very long. I mean, you kind of know that from swallowing the pill, but I don't know if you really understand it yet.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 09:47 PM
1

Tell me, why do the terms exist?
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 09:41 PM
0

Did you ever ask about that? Perhaps do. Ask the supposed cucks here how much they fuck other people relative to their partners. Some of them have even told you that while their partner may have downed buttloads (perhaps even literally) of cum at the beginning, after a while they stop, they've had the freedom, they settle back into monogamy. The acting out is in an attempt to elicit jealousy, so that you close things up, so that they get the monogamous commitment. It dies down in a few months.it…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 09:37 PM
1

Question away dude. The point of this post was not for someone with your perspective, it's for the kind of person going 'man, the prescribed patterns don't work'. It's purely to give people options.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 09:31 PM
1

It's only ever a short term storm, at least if you're picking the women that have some kind of fucking clue about what's going on with their feelings.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 09:27 PM
0

She is financially stable, good at working to a budget, and pays her share. If she was to branch swing, her financial stability would be her own doing, not mine. There is an implant in her arm that essentially eliminates that risk.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 09:20 PM
-3

Oh, you know, cohabitation, the possibility of kids, significant life intermeshment, the fact that apart from non exclusivity you treat them exactly the same as any other LTR. Nothing at all ;)
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 11:37 AM
-2

Isn't that how one should be with every person?The only thing you are guaranteed on your death bed is yourself.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 10:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter