TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

greyngreen Archive

View 2 posts and 78 comments by greyngreen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

greyngreen/r/RedPillWomen16/04/14 11:05 PM
2

greyngreen/r/askTRP13/08/14 02:40 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Take a look at r-selected and K-selected reproductive strategies. It's a theory that tries to explain reproductive behaviour in nature. Essentially, the r-model is about low-investment parenting, promiscuity, and quantity of offspring produced (birth control changes the quantity variable in humans). The K-model is about high-investment parenting, monogamy, and quality of offspring produced. I think it's an interesting way to think about the difference you're talking about. I would argue that Wes…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/16 02:21 AM
1

Narcissistic people or those with other dark triad traits are essentially "me first" personalities. As such, they will be kind to you, helpful for you, fun, yielding only to the extent that it serves them. If you combine hypergamy with narcissism, you get constant trading up, cheating, and general sluttiness. Just expect to be cheated on and manipulated by this type of person.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/16 08:05 PM
3

I've recognized recently (and there are statistics to back it up) that you can't talk about humanity as a whole with these things. Not all men (or women) are equivalent when it come to sexual preferences and strategies. Some men really are cads, don't pair bond, and just want to sleep around as much as humanly possible. But a great deal have a more K-selected strategy. They "naturally" value pair bonding, monogamy, and high investement in children. Virtually all people have a sex drive because t…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/16 05:45 PM
3

It seems that both men and women come in two distinct types (phenotypes): sluts/cads & moms/dads. I've seen multiple studies that point to this, and there are clear biological markers and evolutionary reasons for it. I used to think that callous people that slept around and didn't have much concern for those around them or for the future were just damaged, and maybe some are. But apparently some people are predisposed to this behaviour. I guess the big question is: are you more of a cad or dad? …
/r/TheRedPill25/11/15 03:37 AM
2

It's not a question of career, but of values. What priority does the work have in the woman's life? How much debt is she carrying from student loans? How much does her self-esteem depend on the status she gets from her job? Would she be willing to scale down her career efforts to raise children? A "career woman" is simply a woman that holds career as a primary goal. In reference to standard traditional mores, this means sacrificing family for work. There are trade-offs in this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 07:09 PM
5

The guy who started this thing, Dan Savage, is a promiscuous gay man who boasts about his long marriage. But what is marriage if you're not being exclusive? It goes against the fundamental principles. When I've heard him talk, I get the impression that he just wants the status of being married (fine upstanding guy!) without any of the responsibilities. I personally think it's ridiculous. Savage's rationale for monogamish is that some people just aren't naturally very monogamous and they shouldn'…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/15 01:40 PM
4

I definitely think wealth allows people to live in a fantasy world. One of the biggest factors in my mind is government welfare. People don't have to worry about starving because the government is always there to pay their way, no matter what. Therefore, people can do and believe anything they want without consequence. Before the welfare state, people had to depend on family or charity to help them. Real people were helping them and good values could be encouraged. EXAMPLE: I know a young woman …
/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 12:37 PM
3

Yes, you're right. It's only been partially liberalized, which is what makes it dangerous. They wanted to increase freedom of choice, but in the process they made things extremely unfair. The rationale is often that it's "for the children." But when children are removed from loving fathers for no reason, it's not in their interest. Alimony isn't going to raise a child.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 12:14 PM
10

Marriage imposes restrictions that are ultimately unacceptable to the true liberal. So the definition of marriage has been changed. It's no longer a serious commitment, but just a cute ceremony to glorify the couple's supposed love. I agree that you can't support a functioning, just, ordered (aka civilized) society without marriage. In my mind, the main reason is that it destroys family as the protector of children. Without that stability, children (the future of society) can be damaged and mani…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 09:06 PM
12

The way I see it, people that sleep around are the ones missing out. They never get to know what it is to have that sort of simplicity and exclusivity. You get great sex without the baggage of casual sex or past relationships.
/r/RedPillWomen22/04/15 09:20 PM
15

Feminism is about putting the state in the role of provider and protector, i.e. replacing husbands. If women no longer need men for resources and security, they are freed from having to marry. Even aside from "female nature," women in general have real needs. If they have children in particular, they become vulnerable. They need someone to be providing support. Feminism makes this possible without the institution of marriage. The point is to take away the power of men, and "equalize" things. Wit…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 09:20 AM
3

I think it's part of a completely different worldview, honestly. Most young people, at least around me, are very liberal, feminist, empowered, etc. I can't see a good way of explaining such values to them if they are closed to it. They have to already lean that way or else they need to be searching and open to different points of view. I think the red pill for women is about finding value in femininity even though it is largely devalued, called old-fashioned, mocked and scorned by society. Femin…
/r/RedPillWomen25/01/15 03:17 AM
2

I agree that there is always some degree of settling when choosing a marriage partner. It's the nature of dealing with human beings. You will never find someone who is perfect for you in every way. From my point of view, all you need in a mate is "good enough." It doesn't even matter if there is someone better out there because you've found enough of what you need (still have to do the work in figuring out what that is though). The part that is often forgotten is that relationships grow inside m…
/r/RedPillWomen25/01/15 02:56 AM
1

People with this mindset don't believe that a business is primarily profit-driven. They think that businesses have a duty to promote equality, despite damage to the company. Competition and true fairness is not the goal; cooperation with their liberal vision is the goal. They want to remake businesses into government-controlled pseudo-charities. It may be unjust in a true sense, but they rationalize that it is for a good end (equality for all). This societal restructuring makes businesses less e…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 02:48 AM
1

Being jealous means you're insecure, and too much insecurity isn't nice on either side. Imagine a girlfriend constantly complaining because you looked at another woman or you texted your female coworker. However, I think if you value someone, there's potential to get jealous sometimes. I don't even think it's a bad idea to share such feelings with the girl. But it's not good to let them take over.
/r/askTRP13/08/14 03:11 AM
3

I don't think it's possible to explain the red pill viewpoint to people with a completely different worldview. Most people don't want to have to think too deeply. I believe it's best to just walk quietly along this path, and share your hopes and heart with people that love and accept you. It seems to me that "making people listen" just won't work.
/r/askTRP13/08/14 03:04 AM
1

Any girl that has had a deep attachment and sexual relationship with a man before is going to come with baggage. I think it just depends on how much you want her, and how much you're willing to work through it.
/r/askTRP13/08/14 02:52 AM
5

I agree that men have little choice in the matter. They're generally expected to be the providers, while women can do whatever pleases them. And yeah, for some women it might just be about escaping "hard work." The current generation of young mothers is more selfish in general, I think, so they may not be thinking so much about their husbands. But they're programmed to really care about their kids. Demanding jobs like engineering take them away for too long. So maybe it's a combination of priori…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 02:29 AM
2

There are two styles that I find particularly melodious: Celtic. Kate Rusby's music is a good example of this style. Christian/Christian-inspired. Search for JJ Heller's music.
/r/RedPillWomen13/08/14 01:05 AM
2

I don't think people are necessarily biologically wired to be monogamous. You don't fall in love with one person and instantly lose all attraction for other people. There's always a potential to move away from the initial relationship into another one. However, I do think that monogamy is the preferred state, although it requires a bit of thought and planning. Luckily, humans can do that! Deciding to be monogamous within the confines of a healthy marriage creates the foundation for many other be…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 12:41 AM
1

The men that work weekends and overtime in demanding jobs have wives to pick up the slack at home. Women don't have that, and get overscheduled. The fact is that men with supportive wives will always be better in a job than a woman without such supports. It's not "fair," but it's reality.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 12:15 AM
1

It's just too bad that they're lied to about what real life is like before they train for these careers. They basically spend their young lives getting ready to be men.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 12:08 AM
4

Yeah, I think the long hours in engineering is a big part of the problem for women. They don't want to be totally defined by their careers. While men can settle into it as a big part of their identity, women have many other priorites - not the least being children and husbands. I don't even think it's socially conditioned. Most women just delight in homemaking and doing other traditionally feminine things.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 12:03 AM
9

Yes, you got it. The majority of women will want children at some point. And high-status, competitive, and demanding careers do not mix with raising a family. It's not sexism. Women just want to be at home with their children. It's more important to them than fiddling with machines.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/14 11:55 PM
2

There are many ways to protect against infidelity in a marriage. I think the most important thing is to maintain open and honest communication about what he needs and then do your best to take care of him. However, as you say, infidelity can creep in even if you are the perfect wife. I view marriage as a covenant to love and care for your spouse as long as you're both alive. As a result, I don't believe in divorce, and I would try to forgive my husband even if he was unfaithful. However, this do…
/r/RedPillWomen10/08/14 03:26 AM
3

Being a good spouse requires you to take the needs of your partner into account, whether you're a man or a woman. It's just loving behaviour, which should always be present in a marriage. It's unloving for a man to pressure his wife for sex all the time. But it is equally unloving to deny your husband sex constantly. Both should make an effort to yield to the desires of the other. The wife's desire to avoid sex shouldn't trump the man's desire to have it.
/r/RedPillWomen10/08/14 03:07 AM
3

Marriage is a very changed social institution compared to the past. I feel sorry for men that don't realize what a bad deal it can be. Luckily, some people are waking up to it. There won't be any wide-scale acknowledgment of the problems until enough men boycott it, which seems to be happening.
/r/RedPillWomen10/08/14 02:59 AM
1

Maybe some confusing semantics there. I think sensitivity can be considered weak in certain situations, i.e. a workplace. If you're emotionally tuned in, strong emotions like anger and sadness could be overwhelming. You might cry more easily, etc. I view it as a strength overall though.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/14 02:39 AM
1

I think TRP is all about exploring the truth of gender and how it affects our lives and societies. Remember that there is a "Red Pill Women" too. I feel that feminists tend to create an environment rife with political correctness. They know they are right and any dissenting views are shamed to hell. But saying something is wrong over and over again doesn't make it so. It's important to acknowledge truth, even if it's uncomfortable. RPers are hitting back against what they perceive as lies that a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/14 01:48 AM
1

Women, on the whole, are truly the "weaker" sex in my experience. They are physically weaker on average, but also emotionally weaker. While this is a drawback in some areas, it can also be a great strength. Emotional weakness or sensitivity gives you the ability to connect deeply with other people, empathize with them, want to help them, and generally increases loving behaviour (in the giver and receiver). This is only true for the healthy female though. Many women today have horrible attachment…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/14 01:40 AM
-2

I think patriarchy was previously part of the dominant culture in the West because it was successful. When men protect and provide for their families, and women take on a more nurturing role, lots of healthy children are produced and wealth increases generally. Women were complicit because it gave them the easiest and most fulfilling possible life, I'd say. Feminism only started to take hold after society was wealthy. Suddenly, there was enough order and money around to imagine a life free of so…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/14 01:25 AM
1

The most basic tasks of running a home might be easy enough, but when you put it all together, it can become daunting. You can make some kind of food, but is it nutritious and in line with the budget? You can load a dishwasher or washing machine, but can you find the motivation to do it every day, multiple times a day? Sure, it might be easy to supervise your children, but are you helping them become loving, functional people in the world? I really dislike the argument that homemaking is beneath…
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/14 08:42 PM
1

My mother stayed at home with us, but she didn't like homemaking. She could probably be called a feminist, although she didn't agree with leaving young children in daycare. She made meals, but they tended to be easy things like spaghetti and canned sauce, or hot dogs etc. She also didn't keep our home all that clean. In terms of the homemaking "arts," she hated them all, it seems. "I don't have the patience for that." So I really didn't learn a thing from her. If I have a family, I will do it so…
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/14 08:26 PM
1

I so wish that I'd been taught these things. My family enforced the feminist line. I was to get a good career, support myself and maybe the people around me, then I could do whatever I wanted. It certainly wasn't about choice for me, but maybe I'm not the norm. However, I'm rebelling with great effort. I refuse to pursue a career. I'm actively taking steps towards marriage. And I'm doing my best to learn homemaking skills in my spare time. It's just so much harder this way. I'm actually jealous …
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/14 08:07 PM
4

It's just pure selfishness. Our culture promotes it. She needed to do it for herself. She didn't end things with her boyfriend first. She didn't tell him her thoughts. She just went ahead in her exploration without considering anyone else. She says "I am not a bad person without morals." She doesn't think she is, but this is immoral behaviour by my standards. Liberals have a completely different value system though.
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/14 07:54 PM
2

Not exactly a popular option, but I'm old school and think it's best to commit fully first. No marriage, no sex. My boyfriend respects this, and is willing to wait. If I were you, I'd be careful about getting into a committed relationship with a slutty woman. It's reasonable if she regrets her past actions and wants a different future, but otherwise you might just get cheated.
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/14 07:45 PM
5

Yeah... define smart. I love Pinterest, but I also love reading. I just don't go to Pinterest to read. It serves a different purpose. It's also funny that they call Pinterest materialistic when I find Jezebel quite materialistic, and absolutely obsessed with pop culture. From what I've seen of Jezebel, there are no highbrow debates going on. It's just a bunch of feminists crudely insulting anything or anyone they disagree with.
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/14 07:35 PM
4

From an evolutionary perspective, the babies that thrived were the ones with mothers that loved to serve them, nurture them, feed them, clothe them, and build homes for them. What do we see on pinterest? Food recipies, sewing tutorials, home organization tips, etc. This is what women, as a whole, enjoy and feminists can't change it without a massive amount of effort to reprogram them. Women that disliked children and serving families did not pass on their genetic material. Babies do not thrive w…
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/14 07:21 PM
4

Yes, I think settling is a definite positive. It's so easy to become a perfectionist and waste time looking for your soul mate. But there is no such thing as a perfect person. In my opinion, soul mates are created. You find a man that you are reasonably compatible with and you build a relationship. I believe in the ideal of a perfect relationship with an imperfect person. Also consider that sex outside of marriage was not the norm in the past. If you wanted that kind of physical relationship wit…
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/14 06:59 PM
3

One thing is for sure: feminism is adept at transferring power from patriarchs (fathers) and giving it to the state. Women believe that feminism helps them - gives them the power, and maybe it does briefly. But ultimately, you get single mothers that depend on governments to support them, and children pushed into government-controlled schools. The governing class benefits from cultural marxism. It concentrates power with the state rather than with families... which I actually find pretty scary.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 12:40 PM
3

I'm thinking about overall acceptance. "I love you, but dislike some aspects of your physical appearance." Maybe that isn't red pill. Don't know.
/r/RedPillWomen18/06/14 05:57 PM
3

I've also been very troubled over the past several years about giving up on having a career. I'm well on my way to transitioning into a new, more feminine way of life, but it's still hard sometimes. I spent my entire life (even as a young child) imagining myself as an independent career woman. It's what everyone expected of me. In order to please my parents (mostly my father), I was pursuing a high-status career. I haven't told him that I've had a change of heart, and he is confused as to why I'…
/r/RedPillWomen18/06/14 12:17 PM
1

I am a people pleaser and always have been. I used to look at it as a flaw that I needed to fix. It makes it easier for people to take advantage of you. Now I view it as part of my personality. I think it's an element of being an empathetic person. If you're sensitive to the needs of others, you want them to be happy. It's not something I can even really control. When other people are unhappy/upset, I feel bad.
/r/RedPillWomen18/06/14 12:05 PM
3

It's a difficult situation. The only real way to communicate these things is to have very open and honest discussions. Marriage requires that you prioritize the wants and needs of your spouse. She can't do that unless you tell her. Some ideas: Try suggesting changes in a positive way. Instead of saying "I hate those old baggy clothes," say "you're so beautiful when you wear..." Ask her how she's coping with current events in her life. Ask how you can support her. See if she can suggest any impro…
/r/RedPillWomen18/06/14 02:32 AM
2

Yeah... people are imperfect. Like I said, it's an ideal. Forever might not appeal to everyone. Maybe depends on whether you meet the right person too.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 01:29 AM
2

There are different kinds of love. When most people talk about love these days, it's "romantic" love. That's when you feel really attracted to someone and can't stop thinking about them. You care about them, and feel really happy when you're with them. This type of love doesn't take any work. It's natural and fun. Then there's "unconditional" love, which is often considered the truest love. Most parents experience this form of love with their children. It's not about a feeling per se. It's about…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 12:44 AM
3

A BPer would probably reason that women haven't been free to build and create - most women being slaves to husbands, children, and domesticity. It could be true to some extent, but based on studies that are coming out, women and men operate very differently. It seems that there is such a thing as an average male brain and female brain. It may not even be just about ability because women can be very able in many areas. In my experience, it's also about motivation. Designing a new machine simply d…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 12:24 AM
5

The Red Pill is politically incorrect. Political correctness is a term that refers to enforced language, ideas, or policies that address perceived discrimination against "protected classes," i.e. women. Historically, the term was used by Communists in political debates, referring to the "party line", which provided for "correct" positions on many matters of politics. Western culture is quite BP (has many associations with communism in my opinion). And to be BP is to be controlled. There are cert…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 12:08 AM
2

The entire BP worldview is built on the values of equality and autonomy. That is: a woman should strive to be equal to a man in every way, and she should never submit to a man or depend on him. Whether an individual enjoys a more patriarchal system or not doesn't matter. It is, at its core, evil to BPers. I agree that most women want to submit to male partners. It's part of nature. But BPers aren't concerned about what is happy or natural. They want to remake society to fit their idea of justice…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 11:53 PM
2

I have a similar problem with a parent, but it's my Dad. It feels so bad to go against what he wants, but ultimately, I have to do what I know is right. My main method of dealing with it is avoidance. The overreactions are a form of emotional abuse used to gain power over the people around her. Unfortunately, you're probably not going to be able to hold your ground without any conflict. If you want a relationship with her, you have to set boundaries. I would act as though these boundaries exist,…
/r/RedPillWomen30/04/14 08:51 PM
2

It seems to me that the only reason to marry a woman is to claim her as "yours." Through marriage, she pledges to remain by your side no matter what happens, take care of you, and be faithful always. But there aren't many true marriages these days. People might say the words "till death do us part," but it's just a show. As soon as there's some turbulence, many will conveniently forget their vows. So, basically, I don't think women bring anything to a marriage unless they are serious about marit…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/14 12:22 AM
1

It's important to ask "how much money does a family need to survive?" It's different for everyone, obviously. But I believe a family could live well on much less than most people think.
/r/RedPillWomen16/04/14 11:41 PM
4

I would just like to point out how many people actually shame stay-at-home mothers these days. They can be seen as childish, immature, dependent creatures - women without brains that just couldn't make it in the "real" world. The social stigma can be discouraging. Also, it is scary to financially depend on another person (your husband). If you don't build a career, and stay at home to look after your family, you are vulnerable. A woman can become virtually unemployable by staying out of the work…
/r/RedPillWomen16/04/14 11:36 PM
2

I agree that that sounds nice. I just can't see it working in reality. People are not equal, and you can't make them equal. There are always some that are more/less intelligent, more/less talented, more/less productive, more/less whatever. Communism says "we are going to force the productive to take care of the unproductive." That leads to the producers dropping out because they don't want to be taken advantage of. Over the long term, you don't have a civilization any more. A state of anarchy so…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 08:07 PM
1

Yeah, that sounds crazy. At least you saw some of the costs. In countries with socialized health care, it's all basically secret. From my point of view, the only way to keep costs down for such things is to have competition and choice. Don't like one hospital? Go to another. This insurance company doesn't cover you properly? Look for something else. When the government steps in, you get a monopoly and choice goes out the window. I don't view health care as a right. However, there is a lot that a…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 07:53 PM
1

The way I see it, sending all women out to work will make you richer for a little while. But who's going to raise the next generation? If all the women are busy in their careers, it's going to be the government for the most part. There are a few problems with this: Government schools are, by and large, blue pill. So the next generation will be even more feminist. Babies and young children do not cope well in day cares. It has been shown to cause emotional and behavioural problems. I'm not sure I…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 05:10 PM
4

Most people in the West don't have a good grasp on masculinity and femininity, i.e. they are blue pill. They look to superficial things like "real women wear high heels" and "real men buy their girlfriends coach bags." Don't take cues from them.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 04:52 PM
1

I don't think it's about distrusting everyone and only relying on yourself. Any human being is dependent on others for at least some of their life. We need parents to care for us as babies, and others to care for us when we are old. Ill or debilitated people can't be independent either. It's important to take responsibility for yourself. But it's also good to find trusted friends and family members to depend on in times of need. Everyone has those times.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 04:37 PM
1

The strand that binds the two is that they want everyone to be "equal." There should be no upper class/lower class division. There should be no man/woman division. Everyone should be perfectly the same. However, it takes extreme government intervention to create that illusion.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 04:07 PM
1

There are many problems with socialized health care. Daniel Hannan speaks out about how it has failed in Britain, and cautions Americans about going down that path. The main issue with such a system is that there are no incentives for users to keep the costs down. It becomes incredibly expensive. And as Mr. Hannan says in the video I linked, once you go that way it's very hard to turn back. The system grows large and employs a lot of people, and they don't want to lose their jobs.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 03:57 PM
6

I gave the quote as an example of a socialist drawing on communism. They're at least related. And, I could be wrong, but it seems to me that women's liberation is a direct result of feminist ideas.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 09:15 PM
12

This socialist writer agrees: INESSA ARMAND, the first leader of the women's department of the 1917 Russian Revolution, made the following observation: "If women's liberation is unthinkable without communism, then communism is unthinkable without women's liberation." That statement is a perfect summary of the relationship between the fight for both socialism and women's liberation--neither is possible without the other. Socialism and feminism go together. There's no such thing as truly liberated…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 08:55 PM
4

Yes, good point. I think some of TRP posters are just the male version of feminists - "masculinists". They might start from a place of truth, but they get too extreme. Some are true misogynists just the way some feminists are true misandrists. And, of course, that doesn't help anyone. I think it's also pertinent to point out that a lot of them are probably young and angry. Their vitriol could diminish over time on an individual basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/14 04:44 PM
1

I was a STEM major at university too. I think there's some truth in saying that women aren't predisposed to the logical/scientific style of thinking. Studies have been done to demonstrate this (check out Simon Baron-Cohen's work). The "female brain" is predisposed to being interested in socializing and empathizing. This is true for me. It's not that I can't think rationally and excel in a scientific field. It's more that I'm naturally drawn to feminine things. I love taking care of people and ma…
/r/RedPillWomen23/03/14 04:20 PM
3

You don't have to date women your age. There are more innocent, less experienced women in the early-20s category. Just a matter of finding a good one and appealing to them. Don't be ashamed of your past. You can do better.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 03:30 PM
2

I think you'd be very attractive to RPW if it means that you are only sexually attracted to those to whom you have a strong emotional connection. If you don't like sex for the sake of sex (one-night stands, prostitutes, etc.), it's a great thing. And I think it provides an extra level of stability in a committed relationship.
/r/RedPillWomen23/03/14 03:18 PM
1

This isn't really popular culture, but I watched a documentary about young Amish adults a little while ago, and the women are excellent examples of what you're looking for: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnFKzYj-i38 The young women they follow aren't vapid or weak, but they are beautiful and feminine nonetheless. If you watch it all, you'll see how they view themselves and their place in life. They are concerned about having a feminine heart, perspective and skills rather than superficial things…
/r/RedPillWomen23/03/14 03:01 PM
1

Love this advice. I really needed to hear it when I was a young person (wasted too many years). There is so much "build your career now!" and "there's lots of time for family later" out there, and it's all wrong from my point of view now. It comes from the liberal mindset that you need to prove yourself in the world - become an autonomous person. To truly take care of a husband and children is to be dependent - the dirtiest word around. Feminists shame women out of this role by calling them help…
/r/RedPillWomen14/03/14 09:04 PM
2

I think there is something to be gained from the red pill sub, although I often disagree with what's written there. Some of the core "truths" that they preach are good. The antifeminism is good, which is why I read it. It's hard to find a place without political correctness these days, but red pill is one that's rather free of it. However, many people that post there seem quite cynical. There are posts about how "women can't love" and "never trust a woman." I think it's great advice to distrust …
/r/RedPillWomen14/03/14 08:56 PM
2

I'm almost 30 at this point, and I have been thinking about this question for most of my 20s. I've always had a desire to have children. But I was so confused about when and how to do it. There was always this extreme push to get me into a good career. My family never discussed my having a husband or children. Basically, at this point, I have a wonderful boyfriend that I want to marry. I'm over the idea of attempting to balance a career and family. I, personally, do not believe it can be done. T…
/r/RedPillWomen14/03/14 07:44 PM
2

It makes total sense that the average woman would reject libertarianism. Women, as a whole, need more help. And it's in large part due to the fact that many have children that they are highly motivated to care for. If you believe that the government is there to protect you from everything, including your poor life choices, welfare schemes make perfect sense. It's hard to take a broader view when you're young and in need NOW. The thing is that welfare doesn't help anyone much. Even those that rec…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 07:07 PM
5

Forget preparing for that high-powered career. You're only doing it to please your feminist father anyway! Cultivate your femininity, develop a relationship with a good man, and move along the path that will truly fulfill you: serving family, friends, and community.
/r/RedPillWomen25/01/14 04:03 PM
1

I think the disgust is linked to your core values. Those may be partially informed by your basic psychology, but I think it's developed more by your family and culture initially. As you get older, personal experiences and introspection also inform the values you hold. Valuing virginity, in my opinion, means that you acknowledge some of the deeper aspects of sex. People that are able to feel love know that attachment is an important and powerful part of life, and having sex is one of the most int…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 03:52 AM
6

This is great advice if you want to throw off the remaining shackles of civilization and be completely "free." But it comes at a cost, and the women that promote this advice are sadly oblivious to it.
/r/RedPillWomen01/01/14 05:03 PM
8

I think a successful marriage requires the ability to accept imperfection. You'll always come across people that are better than your spouse in various ways. The important thing is that you deemed your spouse "good enough" to marry. Chasing perfection is futile. This woman's cheating says more about her than it does about her husband.
/r/RedPillWomen01/01/14 04:58 PM
1

Oh yes, I agree that this is forced on women. I didn't understand the concept of submission in marriage until fairly recently. Absolutely everyone around me pushed the opposite. It was important to be independent because you can only truly rely on yourself. To follow a husband requires trust, which feminists constantly seem to be trying to destroy. It's really hard to escape the feminist mindset in my experience. I still have moments of fear and confusion.
/r/RedPillWomen01/01/14 04:31 PM
2

It bothers me when people complain about men that don't "man up" and get married, i.e. responsibly provide for a wife, put her first, remain faithful. I feel annoyed because women are never told to "woman up" in any way. It is assumed that women, in general, are doing everything right. But the women I see are not attractive wife material. Men don't want to marry because there is nothing in it for them. I would say that there is a problem with men not being marriageable, but there's an equal prob…
/r/RedPillWomen01/01/14 05:15 AM
1

I took a math-based degree too, and I don't think it matters a great deal. Being good at math means that you're intelligent, and going through engineering means that you are organized enough to achieve your goals - both good things. Where I see a problem is the masculinity involved with actually being an engineer. It is a competitive field that requires you to develop a degree of assertiveness and to devote a fair bit of your time to a career. It seems to me that masculine men (or most men for t…
/r/RedPillWomen18/12/13 11:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter