TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

gunmetal_silver Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by gunmetal_silver on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Ahh, but who is believed more when making an accusation of rape, a man or a woman? Can you imagine the reactions when a man pulls this shit vs a woman, offensively or defensively?
/r/MensRights26/07/26 10:09 PM
8

I think part of the reason that we aren't as physically close and intimate as a society anymore is that the trust in our once High-trust society has decayed.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 02:59 AM
8

Agreed. I can think of quite a few women in the Bible that did evil. Jezebel was the most heinous, I think, but even righteous women did evil in the eyes of the Lord. Bathsheba seduced David (both of them could have refused, neither did, she got pregnant and David had Uriah killed), one of the prophets married a woman who left him for a life of prostitution and had to be ransomed back to him, Potiphar's wife tried to seduce Joseph, Delilah betrayed Samson to the Philistines, Ananias and Sapphira…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 05:40 PM
1

Nope. Fuck Fox News, fuck Rupert Murdoch.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 09:09 PM
1

Patterns of evidence. ABC and all other corporate based media like it have been lying for at least a decade. I stopped trusting them for anything years ago. I don't bother verifying with those companies because they haven't shown anything remotely close to journalistic integrity in years.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 11:31 PM
1

My point: You are stupid, because you trust mainstream corporate news not to lie to you. Question everything you hear, verify every fact you're told.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 12:17 AM
0

Understandable to feel humiliated. They put a price on your dignity, and you were in such a low place that you felt you had no choice. But you're going to need to learn how to forgive yourself and move forward. I recommend a religious faith, but therapy can work as well.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:31 AM
2

Anyone that balks at "microaggressions" needs to get a thicker skin.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 03:28 AM
62

Because Netflix is on the far left and ideologically captured by a bunch of feminists and anti-male ideologues. This has been common knowledge for those of us in the know for years now.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 01:18 AM
1

PFFTHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA No wonder you're stupid, you trust ABC not to spin stories.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 09:57 PM
9

First, I approve of the subset, that is how marriage and society used to work. That is how it will continue working if we want it to continue working in the foreseeable future. Secondly, it is not immoral to want to start a business and succeed at being a businessman. Wanting to show off the trappings of the success you earned is not on its own a sin, so long as it does not overtake your personality and your duties to others. If God grants you success in life, remember the virtue of medieval and…
/r/MensRights17/05/25 11:09 PM
2

You want anyone to talk seriously with you, get rid of the intersectional buzzwords that pepper your diction. "Hate speech," so called, is precisely what the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights was written to protect.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 11:22 PM
2

And if you put two-and-two together, the REASON courts do not favor men as much is precisely because of inegalitarian principles and implicit association bias grounded on gendered expectations, which then lead them to place a higher-standard of culpability onto men for equivalent crimes as women. A hundred fifty years ago, a divorce could not be legally granted without cause. The very concept of a no-fault divorce was seen as an abomination. And if a man and woman got divorced, the father took t…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 11:13 PM
2

You, too, bellend.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:53 AM
1

Many, many MRAs want to destroy them. Myself included. I have my doubts about that, but I'm running too low on time to really pick your brain over it.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:44 AM
5

"We" is the general public that doesn't live on Reddit. Men are fine being "treated as expendable tools for labor and war," if we're also revered and respected as the builders and maintainers of the society you are privileged to enjoy. Despite you feminist pissants bitching about your theory of patriarchy and how "bad" you have it, most infrastructure jobs are still staffed by men, because women would fold like a house of poorly stacked cards trying to do those jobs. Oil fieldwork, electric wiri…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:40 AM
4

Names have power, OP. Most men on this subreddit have been hurt by feminism far too long and far too deep to trust the name you have presented, and those of us in the know recognize that both constituent parts are evil. We don't want to destroy gender norms. We want to restore them.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:53 AM
6

Yes it is, OP. Egalitarianism and Feminism are both evil in different ways. Egalitarianism seeks to destroy all differences in the sex of individuals, as if human biology was a social construct that could be so fundamentally altered. Feminism seeks to elevate women by oppressing men. If the word "feminism" is in it, it is against us. Edit: you have one more thing wrong, too. We don't want to destroy gender norms. We want to restore them.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:38 AM
6

Uh, you are in the wrong subreddit. We've had enough societal upheaval for at least one century, probably two. We're ready to return to the eighteenth century model.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 12:13 AM
1

Seems like my previous comment was removed.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 12:25 AM
6

Trans men aren't men, so I'm going to go ahead and guess that the vast majority of answers to the question are going to be no, because as far as I'm aware draft orders apply to biological men only.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 12:13 AM
1

A human right without a corresponding responsibility to humans is not a "right" at all, but a privilege.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 12:12 AM
1

The Bill of Rights applies to citizens only, you colossal dumbass!
/r/MensRights28/03/25 09:37 PM
0

"Anyone in the country" legally. That includes citizens and persons here on H1B visas. And only legal citizens who can furnish proof of their identity have the right to vote. The people here on H-1B visas and on scholarship visas (assuming those are even different) are here as guests and are afforded the majority of the rights of citizens so long as they remain compliant with the laws of the country and do not cause disruption in society. Illegal aliens are none of the above.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 08:50 PM
0

Article paragraph and sentence. If you can't find it in the Constitution then it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 08:45 PM
1

Finally, a sensible opinion.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 11:40 AM
1

Torture, huh? Yeah, right.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 11:37 AM
-1

Yes, it does matter. You are clearly uneducated in this topic.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 11:35 AM
1

Um, no. The Constitution provides guarantees of protection for the citizens under its purview. Illegal aliens do not fall into that category. They have no right to be here. They need to get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 11:32 AM
5

Glad I read to the end. You might want to edit for punctuation, spelling, and grammar; that was hard to read through and almost obscured the sarcasm entirely. My sympathies on having a sister like that, though.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 03:54 AM
12

The feminist movement started with assassination plans, bomb threats, and violence.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 02:22 AM
16

They love traditional masculinity but hate that it gets them wet, because they're feminists and they think that's against feminism (which to be fair it is). Conversely they hate effeminate men, but love that they're almost like women, because they think that's how feminists would act (and to be fair it does fit with the philosophy). Now keep in mind that all of this is subconscious, and that over 90% of modern feminists would not have the humility and presence of mind to articulate this phenomen…
/r/MensRights27/01/24 03:29 PM
1

We are the strong gender, they are the pretty gender. We do more damage, they do more hurt. Simple as.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 07:11 PM
1

I'm no alpha. I am lucky enough to be married, to a wonderful woman. But I stumbled across Pearl's channel when I was scrolling through YouTube, haven't stopped watching since.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 12:57 PM
1

Are you a Pearl Davis hater?
/r/MensRights11/10/23 01:45 AM
1

The Amish are growing. Their birth rate is astonishingly high by comparison to the rest of the population of the United States.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 12:58 AM
2

Christians and the Amish do. Or else I guess I'm nobody. Just a random virgin who managed to wait until marriage to have sex.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 12:56 AM
0

Perhaps in cities in the West. In the suburbs and the country, the old ways are recognized as being more beneficial than the new ways.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 12:33 AM
1

Pretty much what I said. The lower the body count the better, and men are willing to compromise.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 12:32 AM
1

No one is disputing that.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 12:30 AM
3

Can't get rid of the genetic need to ensure paternity, dude. Men are willing to compromise, but ideally, they'd want a virgin. Men don't expect ideals. Statistics show that only 4% of brides are virginal on their wedding day today, where 85% were virginal 100 years ago.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 03:02 PM
5

A correction, OP. Men prefer to marry virgins (they're usually willing to compromise so long as he is assured sexual exclusivity), but for casual dating/hookups, they like experienced women. There very much is still slut shaming, but more often than not it is women that do it to other women, not men to women.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 02:14 PM
3

The answer is no, there is not. Feminism (intersectional or not) is a Feminine Supremacy movement. Look into the transcripts of the first meetings of the NOW (National Organization for Women), and read the book Occult Feminism for further answers.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 03:39 AM
1

More the name calling. If he's a fundamentalist seventh-day Adventist extremist, then call him that, it's more specific and detailed information. Not every denomination of the Christian church is the same as seventh Day Adventist. To be frank I don't even know what the particulars of The Seventh-Day Adventists are, but calling them religious nut jobs is very much a slur, and I've been trying to be civil.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 04:04 PM
-2

That's not the part I took offense to, but nice deflection.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 03:27 PM
-6

I highly doubt your claims, unsubstantiated as they are. I am mildly offended by your claims, since I am a Christian, but I am not so offended as to return fire. Good day sir and may God bless you.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 02:37 PM
32

To add to this, it is born of a misunderstanding or ignorance of Acts 15, where circumcision was declared irrelevant to salvation through Jesus Christ, as well as a desire to honor Abraham and his covenant, despite the covenant being completed and no longer applicable.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 09:27 PM
2

The first three, you are correct, OP. Feminism is left wing to the bone.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 12:11 PM
9

I would say it's less toward women specifically and more toward female feminists.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 07:32 PM
1

Accepting trans people as what they delude themselves into thinking they are is against my religious beliefs.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 02:09 PM
2

Sleeping around is not what makes men high value, you misunderstood that. But sleeping around is a trait that shows that a man has a higher value. In other words it is a symptom, not a cause, of men being "high value". Personally I don't think either gender should sleep around, as I am a Christian myself, but I do think that if one person is sleeping around, it is less egregious if that person is a man. Men do not bond through sex in the same way that women do. If a woman has had more than five …
/r/MensRights23/08/23 12:54 AM
2

Thanks to the sexual revolution in the 60s and second and third wave feminism, the vast majority of women in Western countries are unmarriageable and unhappy.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:01 AM
1

100%. Now stop bringing up the murder of children in a men's rights subreddit.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 01:34 PM
4

OP? Shut up. Roe v. Wade being overturned is nothing to do with Men's Rights. It is the Supreme Court recognizing an overreach in power by the federal government and returning that power to the states. That is all. Now get out.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 07:34 AM
0

If you truly believe that you're an idiot. The Democrat party is responsible for all the crap that we're in right now, and instead of coming up with a good yearly budget for the government, they continue to spend money that they don't have out of the taxpayers pocket to go after a man who is no longer president. If you can't understand how an unborn child is a human life and that taking that life when it is in the womb is a wretched evil, then you are not Christian, much less Catholic, even if y…
/r/MensRights24/09/22 12:45 PM
1

Hardly worth my time, but Joe Rogan is not a conservative. I would agree that paternity leave is something that is healthy for the relationship between father and child, and that it is something that should be supported by men's rights activists, but everything else you've said here is nonsensical drivel peddled by the mainstream media.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:36 AM
0

I have never and will never support the murder of children. Good day.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:54 AM
1

Wasn't triggered, nor disparaging your decision. You do you. Have a good night.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 03:15 AM
3

Never. But I don't have casual sex with anybody so I'm not going to get in trouble for that decision. Good for you on making yourself a eunuch, though.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 12:52 AM
1

Firstly, not all of us are familiar with terminology that might be construed as political slurs. You might want to explain the terms you are using at the start. Secondly, you will find many traditional conservatives are egalitarian like most of us here, which apparently equates to being a MRA. So there is significant overlap. Thirdly, realize that we will not go off of just your say so. We are careful bunch. We would be foolish not to be. We will decide what we believe. Thank you for your input.…
/r/MensRights03/11/21 12:47 AM
0

Neither are you, dipshit. You don't get to redefine terminology. Incel is a unisex term. Just because most of the people it refers to are men doesn't mean the term is masculine.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 08:15 PM
0

Incel. The portmanteau of "involuntary" and "celibate." Neither of those words are gendered. Therefore, incel is a unisex term. Don't be a fucking moron.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:14 AM
1

Incel is a unisex term.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 03:24 PM
0

Incel is a unisex term. Nothing about either constituent word implies or states gender/sex. Don't make up another worthless term.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 03:21 PM
1

"We're going to do for blacks exactly what blacks did for the revolution. By which I mean: nothing." "The ***** is indolent and lazy, and spends his money on frivolities, whereas the European is forward-looking, organized and intelligent." Direct quotes from the violent, racist psychopath himself.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 02:23 AM
1

I asked for Che Guevara's quotes and you bring me Fidel Castro. Are you blind? Can you read?
/r/MensRights12/07/21 01:25 AM
1

Because they are fallen. If man had not fallen, and people were thusly morally perfect, it would work. But that's not how the real world and the real, broken people in it work. You can't make any person righteous through legislation. Criminals don't give a rat's ass about the law, except for how they can use it to screw decent folk over. You seem to think capitalism is a caste system. It's not. But I see you are so immersed in your false dogma and so blinded by self-righteousness that nothing I …
/r/MensRights12/07/21 01:21 AM
1

Is that right? Go find Che Guevara's quotes about the Negros, copy and paste them here. I'll wait.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 10:25 PM
1

No, actually. You are putting words (or, should I say, shit) in my mouth. Feudalism is a system of government. Capitalism is an economic system. They can work together. Socialism, and by extension Communism, can't work without an autocracy or oligarchy. Capitalism works with everything. Does it have problems? Why yes. Take a look at world history, though. Everything has problems, nothing is perfect, least of all Socialism and Communism.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 10:23 PM
1

No. I'm pretty gullible, and if I were a woman, I likely would have been a feminist. Thank God I can see the Truth.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 05:07 PM
1

Not that you gotta believe everything, but do try to have some empathy. Not all women are feminists.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 05:04 PM
1

Not much of one, really. What does the fairest economic system in the world have to do with judicial favoritism, feminine supremacists, or legal restrictions based on gender? Those sound like social and governmental issues to me.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 04:53 PM
1

Wrong. Even in feudalistic society, people were paid according to their labor. They managed their own prices. A lazy bastard from back then would be a fairly successful businessman today provided he kept to his habits. They had to.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 04:45 PM
1

It was the original lazy racist freeloaders movement, you mean. Marx and Engels were terribly racist people.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 04:39 PM
1

It was the original lazy racist freeloaders movement, you mean. Marx and Engels were terribly racist people.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 04:39 PM
1

I understand where you are coming from, but more than half of the loudest feminists will agree with what you said and then never compromise with those of us that would sit at that negotiation table. We're not fundamentally opposed to women being equal under the law to men. You seem to think we are. We're not. That is exactly what we want. We are fundamentally opposed to feminists. That is a term that doesn't mean what it used to. It used to mean someone who lobbied for women's suffrage and prote…
/r/MensRights10/07/21 12:00 AM
2

I think some of the skepticism is due to it being endorsed by Bill Gates, who is an advocate for eugenics/population control? Also the speed with which it was made caused a bit of wariness to the side effects.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 08:54 PM
2

Depends. Typically somewhere between supportive and indifferent, I would think.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 06:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter