TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

he_cried_out_WTF Archive

View 7 posts and 543 comments by he_cried_out_WTF on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Some downvotes are applied automatically to balance out the upvotes.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:22 PM
1

Cuz everyone everywhere thinks to themselves: "that person has a vagina. I HAVE to beat the shit out of them now."
/r/MensRights29/04/13 05:57 PM
1

...without them we wouldn't be able to drink chocolate milk...?
/r/MensRights21/04/13 06:54 AM
2

I was going to reply to their comment with something derisive, but I feel this one just sums it up so perfectly.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 06:48 AM
22

Flip the genders and you got yourself an argument against abortions: Use BC or have tubal ligations, but if you're pregnant you are having that baby. Sounds fucked up with the genders reversed doesnt it?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:27 PM
1

I WAS WORRIED THAT I WASN'T GOING TO HAVE ANY PLACE TO LIVE YOUR HONOR
/r/MensRights12/03/13 04:16 PM
6

streisand effect, yo.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 12:31 PM
3

You obviously don't know what the word rape means.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:07 PM
1

squirt out any crotch-goblins You paint a wonderful mosaic with words.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 11:06 PM
3

This is my surprised face. How dare anyone go against their narrative???
/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:05 PM
0

"How dare someone have to tell someone off??"
/r/MensRights15/02/13 12:15 PM
3

Personal responsibility don't real. A man must be behind every bad decision that a woman makes.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 12:19 PM
3

Good contribution. Way to go completely off topic.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 12:18 PM
48

nah, since it was a boy that was involved, its obviously rape. /s
/r/MensRights04/02/13 12:07 PM
4

hooray for indecent exposure laws!
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:22 PM
14

we gained 300 new subscribers since i logged in this morning. neat.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:21 PM
36

Don't you wish. If anything, all the hate that SRS espouses towards the MRM has just brought us more traffic. Keep feeding us subscribers!
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:15 PM
1

"I meant to say something innocent, but ended up raping every woman in the room!"
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:22 PM
32

If you think that's what men's rights is all about, you clearly haven't taken a closer look at feminism.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:19 PM
7

a drunk woman shouldnt have to think twice about driving off with a car full of frat boys!! She shouldn't be held responsible for her decisions!! /s
/r/MensRights26/01/13 07:58 PM
8

Erm, I actually learned a long time ago that if I don't want to get bullied I should not wear certain clothing.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 07:55 PM
7

streisand effect at its finest.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:26 PM
6

Escorts at least generally provide sexual favors.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:47 AM
1

As a person that struggled with depression, is currently on anti-depressants, and without them pondered suicide, I would have to tell them to: Go to the pharmacy. Get some viagra. Take it. Go fuck themselves. Depression is only a female problem amirite?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 02:29 PM
9

it isn't i don't think. I made it up.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:28 PM
26

"I accidentally shot him 17 times!" "That means you had to reload. TWICE."
/r/MensRights08/01/13 05:16 PM
10

Wait...so /b/ ISN'T politically correct?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 02:49 PM
1

But once again, isn't belief a binary thing? or at the very least, isn't the percentage very subjective? Wouldn't it make more sense for it to be at least 50.1% of the jury votes guilty vs. not guilty?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 03:00 PM
0

I believe the term is "red pilling" when someone realizes or is enlightened to just how stacked the odds are against them. Exposure will eventually help with this.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:20 PM
3

manhood101 spam. They ACTUALLY believe that women are below them.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:02 AM
3

Only if they buy them dinner first.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:17 AM
4

just downvote, report, and move on.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:12 AM
3

Apparently not 0.o I am genuinely curious. I edited my post for clarification lol
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:48 PM
-15

please tell me you are joking. How on earth is it pro-rape? Is it because they didn't censor his junk??? Edit: Honest question. No sarcasm. Honestly shocked that they would consider this pro-rape.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:28 PM
3

Elaborate.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:06 PM
7

Feminism
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:00 PM
4

And yet you are here?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:54 PM
25

Suffering more than the MEN THAT ARE DYING.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 07:33 PM
3

It wouldn't really be a problem if they decided to just change one word: "YOU can stop rape." Instead of "Men can stop rape." That way, the reader, regardless of gender, is culpable, instead of half the population. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:07 PM
17

I am so glad you decided to chime in with your wonderful contribution to the discussion at hand.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:28 AM
4

Slightly biased, but to the point
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:29 PM
22

I would bet money that any funds she received was pretty much entirely OUTSIDE the gaming community. She appealed to feminist organizations and the feminist suburban mom archetype.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:57 PM
1

deep...
/r/MensRights16/11/12 04:47 AM
7

Try fighting back when someone squeezes your nuts as hard as they can whenever you make any sort of move. It's very disabling.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 07:16 PM
5

Being labelled a creep immediately removes an credibility you might have had in the eyes of any and all of the womans friends, and most of the surrounding people.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 07:15 PM
1

road warrior meets aryan supremacy?
/r/MensRights15/11/12 05:48 PM
11

So, eventually, if enough lines of people died off, the entire earth could be populated by billions of clones of 1 single person. Neat.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:27 PM
19

You heard it here first folks! Proof feminism will doom the human race. Seriously though, wouldn't reproducing asexually and lack of genetic diversity just result in more and more retarded children until we all reach the intellectual level of a sea sponge? so, we would still exist... if you could call that an existence anyway.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:16 PM
122

finally! no more creep shaming! Also: the extinction of the human race.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:54 PM
6

Slutty Back Cover of The Giving Tree
/r/MensRights15/11/12 12:10 PM
6

I have a story of this. I made my reply to the OP not too long ago. Upvotes would be nice so it can be seen by more people instead of buried.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:56 AM
27

I will start of by saying I am very straight. However, my first club experience was a gay club, unknown to me at the time. It was picked by 2 of my gay friends, and agreed upon by the rest of my friends, as it was a pretty nice place overall. We show up, and I notice a disproportionate amount of guys. Being only 10pm, the night was still young, and I figured most of the females simply hadn't shown up yet. But seeing as I didn't go to pick up women, I went and started dancing with my friends. Eve…
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:49 AM
3

Alright, I can see your argument. However, I propose to you that given similar social skills, the less-attractive option would be labeled creepy/creepier more often than the more-attractive cohort.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:05 PM
3

Of course! Remember: Making the first move is male privilege! Also, not being attractive enough and being labeled a creep while attempting to make that first move is male privilege as well!
/r/MensRights14/11/12 12:43 PM
1

Lets start off by saying this: I am straight. However, the first club I had ever gone to was a gay club, unbeknownst to me at the time. Two of my gay friends settled on this place and the rest of our friends agreed as it was a pretty nice place overall. We walk in, and I notice a disproportionate amount of guys there, thinking that it was only 10pm, maybe the girls haven't shown up yet. I didn't think much of it, as I didn't really go to pick up ladies. I start dancing with my friends without a …
/r/MensRights13/11/12 04:27 PM
194

HOW DARE YOU JUDGE A WOMAN BASED ON HER LOOKS??? .../s
/r/MensRights09/11/12 11:53 AM
1

What pay gap?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 02:19 PM
2

two whom are you referring?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 02:49 AM
5

Feel free to talk it out man. We are here to help.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:29 AM
2

I like the 2 day stubble, as it is a perfect way to scratch anything on your hand/arms. My girlfriend thinks I am weird for it. She is just jealous.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:11 AM
0

at which point, the mustache is my face growing its own body armor.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:08 AM
2

One plus one equals two.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:03 AM
7

bout damn time.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:21 PM
1

Walk for the cure! raise awareness about breast cancer! Pro-active! Movember! Raise awareness about testicular cancer! Creepy and unnecessary!
/r/MensRights03/11/12 02:15 AM
5

That was retarded. "female signifiers - a female physique" HOLY SHIT GUYS. HAVING A FEMALE-LIKE FIGURE SIGNIFIES BEING FEMALE. STOP THE FUCKING PRESSES.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 01:05 AM
10

shit, its hard enough to stand on a train that makes frequent stops with two properly working legs. Much less one you can't bend/flex/put weight on.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 01:02 AM
1

Could you enlighten me as to what a "pfennig" is...?
/r/MensRights03/11/12 01:00 AM
6

Man, fuck those judgemental wal-mart types. Thinkin they are all high and mighty with their sweat pants and confederate flag wife-beaters.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 11:34 AM
1

Oddly enough. We supply sources for our statistics. Can't say the same for you.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 09:38 PM
1

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights28/10/12 08:54 PM
7

Good on you, EvilFuckingSociopath, Good on you =)
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:46 PM
4

Awww...the facts are too much for your poor made up world.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:42 PM
7

No linking to SRS subs!!!
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:38 PM
0

You're a long way from home little girl.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 04:47 PM
0

Erm...the first sentence says she was 15...
/r/MensRights17/10/12 05:13 AM
-2

I didn't like how the first part hints that the moral of the story is ‘girls, don't flash your breasts on a webcam,’ like it was her fault Did she flash her tits on webcam? Was there a possibility that there might be some consequences to her actions? it's not like someone forced her to flash the camera.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:00 AM
14

Here is a video from a different angle, of him very clearly being hit first. Luckily the bus wasn't in motion at the time. Skip to 2:55 if you dont want to watch the whole thing.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 02:28 PM
2

She spit on him and hit him. While driving the bus.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 02:21 PM
8

So, there is info, but they were mistaken as to whom was holding it? Insurance maybe? Should anything go south? But that would make us no better than them...
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:29 PM
8

yesterday, qwestionseverything seemed to be deeply concerned that you might release some doxxed information that you have received on several SRSers. Is his concern valid? Do you have such information? Not that I am suggesting it be released, hardly in fact. I am merely curious as to the authenticity of his claims.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:42 PM
4

You seem to be of the mindset that someone that doesn't take very precise precautions to protect their identity online might as well be asking to be doxxed.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:50 AM
7

erm...i think llort2 means copy/paste...not CP in the "traditional" internet sense...
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:38 AM
4

So, do you AGREE with doxxing people that do something "bad"?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:36 AM
3

Oh don't get me wrong, I wasn't implying that they have the qualities of a petulant child. I was merely suggesting that people seem to turn a blind eye, much like those would in my example.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:06 AM
2

You can be a mod of a subreddit without ever having spent time there. Just because they say that chromakode is a mod there, doesn't mean he necessarily supports SRS.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:18 AM
29

I don't understand why everyone was upset at jailbait, while 4chan continually posts bullshit across the internet and no one bats an eye. 4chan is apparently the petulant child that everyone pretends doesn't exist as it throws yet another vase on the floor.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:15 AM
279

Let them come.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:26 PM
3

I generally take into account what information I am releasing when talking online. I never give any sort of personal info that can be linked to my RL identity.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:11 PM
6

The PM contained directions to make it private, demod everyone, delete all the posts, and then mod the sender. We don't really know what is going on behind the curtain unless you are subscribed.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:09 PM
19

black_visions. Then sister_of_black_visions turned out to be a troll for anyone that offered their condolences. What a sick world this is.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:08 PM
22

I am beginning to think that SRS has an admin in their pocket.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:07 PM
5

Lucky for me, I apparently have a pretty common name. One which will turn up many different profiles, and even a famous person. They will indeed have a hard time doxxing me!
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:06 PM
2

EDIT:fixed typo ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:04 AM
1

I don't see it as power and domination... I just think it's hot that she is covered in my seed. Unless, of course, I am incredibly mistaken.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 03:22 AM
2

Femdom porn isn't really the mainstream though. And yet, even though rough, male dominant porn isn't the mainstream, it's enough to condemn all male-on-female porn.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:25 PM
2

It's probably for the best.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 02:44 PM
3

mahogany pipe...cognac...lighter...wood burning stove This guy was BEYOND classy. I imagine him in a maroon smoking jacket in a study filled with books with one of these things
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:14 PM
13

Mom routinely gets drunk around kids: "Good for her!" Dad routinely gets drunk around kids: "Call Child protective services! He must be abusing them!"
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:21 PM
3

STOP USING YOUR PENIS TO DEFEND YOURSELF edit: lolwat
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:12 PM
1

If a man cheats, its because he couldn't keep it in his pants. If a woman cheats, it's because the man couldn't satisfy her needs.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:58 PM
21

otherwise it's rape.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:36 AM
69

OR REMOVING YOUR TERRIFYING TOOL OF OPPRESSION
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:53 PM
41

Looks like an upvote with a set of nuts.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:51 PM
130

I CAN'T LEAVE THE HOUSE BECAUSE I CAN'T STOP RAPING PEOPLE
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:48 PM
1

You are abusing the trust of a person in a vulnerable position. Additionally, it's against the hippocratic oath, and can cause you to lose your medical license.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:26 PM
16

Ironic. Growing up, a had several friends that would shoplift because they didn't want to spend the money on the product; so they stole it instead. Fun fact: Every single one of them was female. I didn't have a single male friend that stole things.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:10 PM
1

People abusing a position of trust. Like a psychiatrist having sex with a patient. It's just not right.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:08 PM
1

I do see where you are coming from. However, I feel that the fact that she is getting off without much of an outcry at all is evidence of the pussy pass. If a man were to do the same thing, there would be people lining the streets shouting for them to change the laws to prevent such things in the future.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:17 PM
10

This, my friend, is called the Pussy Pass.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:24 PM
0

Link It's an article written by AVFM a little while back. I link the first 2 screenshots at the bottom. Seems to do the trick. What seems to me to be a little bullshit is that littletiger also mentioned RadFem's in his request, but they are conspicuously absent from their report...
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:03 PM
2

Whenever I see people link that SPLC report, I always link the proof that it was written at the request of littletiger. That generally shuts up their argument.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:07 PM
8

Breaking news: Meteor strikes earth; Women and children affected most of all!
/r/MensRights26/09/12 11:55 AM
3

That's how we roll here at /MR.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 11:52 AM
11

Yeah. we are just as likely to receive the full fury of poking a sleeping giant as she is. Beautiful, unpredictable 4chan...
/r/MensRights26/09/12 11:42 AM
5

EQUALITY.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 11:38 AM
1

Also Wilson sawed through my cane again. God dammit Wilson!!!
/r/MensRights26/09/12 11:31 AM
3

Well, to be fair, any human being is capable of irrational thoughts at the same rate as rational. But, whether or not we allow those irrational thoughts to turn into action or affect our personality, that is the key difference. I recall them saying something about PIV sex being rape because the act itself requires the woman to take something into herself that wasn't there before. The PIV sex is a violation of the natural state of her body. eye roll
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:17 PM
1

Some RadFems already do. They consider any and all PIV sex as rape, regardless of consent.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 11:08 AM
7

Conflict of interest? PSHAW.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 12:20 PM
19

or wanted.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 05:38 PM
13

Using logic is misogynistic too. Just FYI.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 05:37 PM
3

was going to follow link...then noticed web address...
/r/MensRights13/09/12 11:54 AM
2

aww....I'm not on there. YET....
/r/MensRights13/09/12 11:45 AM
3

It makes me all pissy to know they have a life to look forward filled with privilege and entitlement, for no other reason than being born with a dangly thing They jelly.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 11:43 AM
2

I don't think he would be saying that if the woman had to give up half her assets and most of her income in said divorce...
/r/MensRights12/09/12 02:06 PM
1

Well, yes...it is does continue the species...but you shouldn't base the value of your life on how many people you have fucked. Too many judge others on their numbers, or their general ability to attract women. Fuck them for thinking I'm a bad person because I live my life doing things I want to do, instead of pandering to pussy.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 10:46 PM
6

it's for their own good anyway. It's part of the rehabilitation process!
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:47 PM
10

Apparently the end-all-be-all of existence is sex. Cuz being happy with who you are, and living a good life full of things you enjoy doing just isn't it.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:47 PM
9

It's a joke and insanely misogynistic to have not even considered this massive oversight. I hate wearing high heels in real life as they are painful and extremely awkward to walk in and mostly only for pleasing dumb ass men. Scumbag Eve player: Makes comment about sexism. Makes sexist comment in the process.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 11:08 PM
1

I...I has a sad now...
/r/MensRights07/09/12 07:58 PM
1

Most of the women I meet are entitled trash that seem to have very specific tastes The problem is that some women think it is okay for them to act like entitled brats, yet offer absolutely nothing in return. That a woman DESERVES to be treated like royalty strictly on the basis that she graces you with her presence, and might occasionally provide the opportunity for sex. It allows those women to act like prudes, bitches, brats, immature children, etc, because they are told that because they have…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:46 PM
-1

That is obviously wrong. I mean, if he is divorced, the ex-wife would have to have taken the children as well. That is what always happens...
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:31 PM
2

logic is fun!
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:06 PM
7

The perpetrator of the 1989 Montreal Ecole Polytechnique massacre also claimed to be “fighting feminism,” and specifically targeted women, killing 14. This argument is bullshit. In this instance, in this thread, the woman was targeting male shoppers specifically, but NO ONE claimed she hated men. Outside of us of course.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:03 PM
7

If anyone said that rape should be decriminalized, a wave of feminist outcries would rise up like the world has never seen.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 02:59 AM
1

He is a dandy; that bot.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 01:20 AM
2

Good call. Just as equally unfair as my example, but correct >.> Welp; today I expanded my knowledge of prostate screenings!
/r/MensRights06/09/12 07:26 PM
9

it should offer cancer check ups and reproductive health aids since they are a matter of life and death, don't you think? Doesn't the health care act put forth do specifically this for women? but NOT prostate cancer screenings for men? So...they are arguing for it for women, but not men?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:07 PM
5

Don't you have more quotes to take out of context somewhere? Go do that.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:06 PM
3

I think this is more of a "NAFALT" argument.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 10:58 AM
-1

Good lord...I had never seen a picture of Andrea Dworkin before. No wonder she disliked men. No man would have her.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:53 PM
11

I dunno if its a misunderstanding or not, but I am talking about my GF, not my mother. But at any rate... The father was abusive and manipulative; like attempting suicide when she decided to finally divorce him. He was emotionally and physically violent, getting angry at her if things ever so slightly didn't go his way. The father was a product of his upbringing. He was scarred as a child due to his abusive father. He just dealt with it poorly. That being said, I wouldn't say my GF isn't entirel…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 12:22 PM
14

My GF is a single mother. But that's because the father was an abusive and manipulative prick. So, yeah. Take that for what it's worth.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 11:03 AM
4

Train the girls to see oppression where none exists. Huh. Sounds pretty accurate to me.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:48 AM
8

Particularly Aerik. He even created his own subreddit to jerk himself off to!
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:20 AM
7

So they smear and attack us in any way they can. There will be more of it as we grow in numbers and influence. which is ironic, given that any smear campaign they engage in generally nets us new subscribers when they check for themselves if what feminists say is true. Their hate is actively hurting them.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:18 AM
5

women who get hired wont be shrugged off as "quota hires". and then get to play the discrimination game!
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:42 AM
2

nor will he be shrugged off as a “quota hire”. FFS. Women complain about not having enough women in a given workplace. Workplace institutes women quota hirings. Women complain about quota hirings. Workplace gets rid of quota hirings, hiring instead based on skill alone, as it did in the first place. Women complain about not having enough women in a given workplace. Make up your minds!!!!!
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:41 AM
3

Possible troll. Wouldn't be the first time.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:04 PM
1

I've said it before, I will say it again: When it happens to women, it's a tragedy. When it happens to men, it's a statistic.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:13 AM
1

Huh. Learn somethin new everyday!
/r/MensRights26/08/12 07:57 AM
2

the genus name for human beings, Homo, reflects an 18th-century masculine bias in science. erm...isn't the genus for humans "sapiens"?
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:14 PM
9

They certainly don't have an problems dictating mens reproductive rights, regardless of their lack of penis.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:15 PM
18

Of course, citizens do, in fact, mean men. Gendered pronouns are only used for women.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:10 PM
11

Woman having sex with 150-200 men: Empowering! How dare anyone call her a slut? She is taking control of her own sexuality! Man having sex with 150-200 women: He should be ashamed! Look at all those women he has damaged!
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:09 PM
3

Be gald that you are free! I would be gald, if I only knew how to gald...=(
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:55 PM
2

yes, yes it will be. As long as you know your partner is clean, no more having to deal with condoms! Luckily my partner is not quite so irrationally afraid. It's a very welcome change. No stress about her remembering her pill, and no worry about condoms. Quite enjoyable.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:29 PM
4

Luckily my GF has a non-hormonal IUD. No worry about forgetting a pill!
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:22 AM
8

Feminism: All for bodily autonomy and decision making, until it comes to birth control!
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:20 AM
14

In my experience the guys have been thankful for a decent chat. Because a lot of the time, men don't even get that for fear of being labeled.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:36 PM
3

Of course, were it female prostitutes, they could claim the battered women defense and get off scott free.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 05:51 PM
4

Bitches man...
/r/MensRights20/08/12 04:35 PM
2

you thought it was love? Was it not?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 03:46 PM
3

Communication, sadly, seems to be a dying trait in relationships these days. In my previous relationships, it was almost taboo to talk about anything that might be emotionally sensitive. Whether or not I was dating immature women, I don't know. I do know, though, that I was viewed as a little bitch for talking about my feelings. Caused a few break ups even =/ While rape is a pretty damn serious offense, I don't think it is as black and white as some people tend to see it. There is a lot of grey …
/r/MensRights20/08/12 03:27 PM
1

Of course. Relationships SHOULD (operative word, should) have an element of understanding to them. Unless someone fucks up BIG TIME.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 03:12 PM
3

Right. It does seem like a huge gray area. In this case, it is pretty clearly NOT rape. However, I was merely pointing out that because you have had sex several times, doesn't mean a man can get sex whenever he feels like it. At the risk of sounding like our feminist "friends", it is still possible to rape your partner.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 02:52 PM
1

Terrifying, maybe. But necessary. Upholding an idea under scrutiny is the best way to find out what you truly believe in.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 02:35 PM
6

I do see where you are coming from. However, i would say it is still completely possible to rape your significant other during a relationship. Sleep sex may not be considered rape, but it is still not necessarily the best of ideas.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 02:32 PM
9

we actually don't know what feminism is. Ironically, a lot of MRA's are better feminists than any feminists ever will be; in true gender equality of course.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 12:51 PM
10

"It's unlikely, so it doesn't matter." "Oh, so you don't mind signing up for it either then?"
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:56 AM
9

Or should we all just stop being idiots, and realize that a few individual actions don't colour the rest of the group? But that would mean portraying some men as something OTHER than sexual predators!!!
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:57 PM
8

I used to be the same way. I can't say we have the same situation, but i used to tell myself that I am happier that way. That it's not worth the trouble, or the heartache. That my repeated failures in relationships were obviously based on my shortcomings. Apparently I was just meant to be alone. I was lying to myself. I was content, but I wasn't happy. However, things changed drastically when I met my current GF. The failures of the past were just the repercussions of people that I wasn't meant …
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:04 PM
3

I don't believe you...I think you really ARE A triceratops...
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:30 PM
3

Case in point.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 06:05 PM
18

WTF. if a 19 year old dude was targeting a 14 year old girl, you can bet your sweet ass everyone would call him a pedophile. There are numerous posts there that say either: A. it wasn't pedophilia, or B. It was because she found him attractive, not because he was young. So, by that logic, if I find a 14 year old girl attractive, I'm in the clear for not being a pedophile.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 04:44 PM
6

Of course she finds it threatening; it's threatening to change her cushy world view of playing the victim all the time.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 11:57 AM
3

They might have a problem with the product name and corporate history. No one is buying it. Ba-dum PSH
/r/MensRights07/08/12 08:38 PM
4

of course, you're right. After all, according to them, no matter what happens, a woman is never accountable for their actions. I mean, just take a look at drunken hookups.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 08:35 PM
9

No, no, you see, feminists can use context as an argument. Men cannot, because that would actually allow them to be viewed as victims!
/r/MensRights07/08/12 03:56 PM
8

The key difference being, you condemn a movement based on the actions of one individual, but when someone claims the opposite is true, like how RadFems call for the death of men, feminists are quick to say they aren't the voice of the movement. Practice what you preach.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 06:48 AM
22

Oh don't worry, they will manage to spin it in some direction where she was driven to it because of a man.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 06:35 AM
2

If watching porn is considered cheating, then someone has every right to get pissed at their girlfriend reading 50 shades of grey.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:29 PM
14

Only a woman could ever be truly raped. Because men not-so-secretly always want sex amiright? disgusting. *sigh
/r/MensRights27/07/12 03:58 AM
2

urgh some of the comments on OP link though. Yes, those pissed me off. Apparently, the ONLY reason that a man could possibly have to be like santa claus is to molest children -_-
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:44 PM
-6

Proof that women don't know WTF they want.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 11:56 AM
2

Yes. Yes it is.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 11:12 AM
3

I'm gonna be pissed if this gets national recognition, while we have been shouting into deaf ears about this very thing for months now.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 11:02 AM
2

SHHH!!! You're ruining the circlejerk of hate!
/r/MensRights25/07/12 12:16 AM
3

Because judges are all easily confused little children. Of course! Why didn't I see it sooner?!
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:19 PM
2

Danger zone...
/r/MensRights24/07/12 02:35 PM
7

We stood up to someone that was advocating terrible acts of violence and murder towards men. If the sources are correct, and Krista actually IS the femitheist divine, then she CHOSE to end her life. I can guarantee you, if feminists stood up to someone that advocated the murder of most of the female population, and that person then killed themselves, you would not see one ounce of remorse from any of them. While tragic that it happened, MRA's still did the right thing by standing up to hate spee…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 02:29 PM
7

FFS. It shouldn't be that they shouldn't do it because it "doesn't happen". They should do it to prevent it for when it DOES happen. If there truly wasn't any violence against men (bullshit) then where would be the harm in passing the laws? They are just trying to get away with crimes that "Don't happen".
/r/MensRights24/07/12 02:22 PM
1

No, you don't need to explain it. I thought they discovered that the brain released the same chemicals when you see something cute, like a puppy or kitten, that it does when you see someone attractive; albeit in different quantities. That was what I was referring to.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 04:49 PM
2

It's only bad when it happens to women, dontchaknow?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:26 PM
13

Apparently it's only cool when she does it. "Yeah jess kick his ass! What? He hit back? HOW DARE YOU"
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:21 PM
1

Gotcha.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 11:52 AM
1

Can anyone perhaps explain to me what a "john" is...? I haven't heard this term until yesterday, and since then I have heard it like, 30 times.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 11:25 AM
6

Yeah. that sounds a little counter-intuitive doesn't it? "A woman can do anything she wants with her body! Even if it's being a sex worker! But god help you if you actually provide her business!"
/r/MensRights20/07/12 11:24 AM
1

Chemically, the processes are the same.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 11:13 AM
2

I think it comes down to rationalization. People dislike being shown that other people are better than they are. To reduce their feelings of inadequacy or to bring that guy down a peg, they convince themselves that they are bigger "where it counts".
/r/MensRights20/07/12 11:13 AM
31

Men aren't as sensitive as women because we are told we can't be.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:22 AM
2

I'm finding myself in agreement with you. There is a difference between finding something beautiful, and finding something sexually attractive. I can view a puppy the same way I view a teenage girl. They can both be cute. But people don't say "Man, he really just wants to fuck that dog."
/r/MensRights19/07/12 08:51 PM
1

Why should anyone feel depression or shame for embracing their sexuality? I don't think that is what he meant. I think he meant that if things don't work out between you sexually, for whatever reason, be it incompatible sexual preferences, tastes, etc; you can't just return your girlfriend to the dealership because you didn't like the ride like you can a car.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:47 PM
2

Youth is a thing humans consider beautiful, for aesthetic reasons and for sexual reasons. Celebrating beauty is a good thing. in b4 someone takes this out of context and calls MR pedophile apologists =/ Seriously. Apparently things like the book in OP are only cool when it's a women that does it. Many people say they find teenage girls attractive and beautiful, but would never do anything sexual about it. And everyone will claim them to be pedophiles. This seems to be the precise mindset that th…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:39 PM
21

I've never understood that mindset. I don't even know how that idea even works. "Hey! I have a small penis, maybe if I buy this mercedes, people will think I have GIGANTIC penis!" Is that really how it works? I want a Dodge Challenger SRT8, and a Browning automatic rifle from WW2. Not because I have a small penis, but because, as the OP said, those things are FUCKING AWESOME.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:34 PM
1

If i recall, sometimes the one that reports first does tend to play a role in who gets investigated. Though the innate bias against the man might cancel that out. The police might just call it a wash and decide to not pursue it.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 11:55 AM
10

At least we can hope.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 11:42 AM
3

Turns out Karen was a sleeper agent.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 11:40 AM
28

This was x-posted to AskFeminists, one response caught my eye: Rape can't even happen to a man, that is just a neckbeard lie to justify their bigotry. Seriously? I thought we were past this.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 11:05 AM
2

Don't let the beard fool you, he's a child.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 11:00 AM
2

misleading =/= sarcasm.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:17 AM
2

Aight. Lemme go to your place of employment, watch you work, and point out everything you are doing wrong. Laugh, complain, and poke you while you are just doing your job. Lets see how annoyed you get.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:16 AM
5

Have you ever stopped to think: "Why on earth would an institution created by men, for men, also hurt men as well?" Because, frankly, the idea is a little asinine.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:13 AM
3

Renault's aren't sold in america.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 10:51 PM
9

How's that workin out for ya?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:16 PM
7

Feminism: Strong and independent until things get a little bit difficult.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 12:05 PM
10

"I'm a feminist because domestic violence is a HUMAN'S rights issue, not just a woman's rights issue."
/r/MensRights14/07/12 04:12 AM
30

The line: and added that she “would not have done it if she hadn't been drinking.” Seems to be pretty close to a confession to me.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 09:01 PM
4

Hey TJ. I love you.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 11:23 AM
6

I know right? "How dare those dirty men have validity to their claims that people hate them?!!"
/r/MensRights13/07/12 10:52 AM
8

HAHA! Time to tell that archangelleDworkin to eat it.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:03 AM
74

SUCK IT SHITREDDITSAYS.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:56 AM
2

good GOD. Is it sad that I can entirely see this as being a logical discussion? Free of sarcasm? Cuz it's certainly making me sad...
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:54 AM
2

Women don't even think that forceful acts of sex on a male even IS rape... what's worse?
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:26 PM
17

Tell that to the feminists.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 03:00 PM
8

I feel questions can be closely related to logic, and using logic is misogynistic dontchaknow?
/r/MensRights11/07/12 12:14 PM
2

Don't worry. It's alright because it's happening to a man.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 07:41 PM
3

It's cool to go down on an infant, as long as you're a rabbi.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 04:11 PM
2

Sexism is traditionally perceived as a belief that the other gender is naturally inferior to your own - it's hard to claim sexism against your own gender and don't look like a clown while doing it. Wait, I'm confused here. Doesn't this alone state that feminism is bollocks?
/r/MensRights09/07/12 11:40 PM
3

These ideas don’t stand-up to discussion and debate. Neither to her ideas presented in her youtube series. Yet she decides that anyone voicing a disagreeing opinion with her is a misogynist asshole that needs to be silenced and deletes the comments. It's only cool when the idea goes the other way.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 11:36 PM
2

In some religions it's considered religious practice to sacrifice goats, livestock, and even other people. But you can bet your ass that it's not going to be tolerated.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 10:36 PM
3

BUT DON'T YOU DARE SAY THAT A FATHER HAS THE RIGHT OVER THEIR CHILDS BODIES, ESPECIALLY THEIR DAUGHTERS!!!
/r/MensRights09/07/12 10:33 PM
5

will stop leaving the seat up, but in exchange we're going to ramp up sexual harassment against our coworkers. Then laughed maniacally as we wrung our hands at our dastardly deeds to be done. This years conference held a vote to abolish the patriarchy. We elected not to.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 05:52 PM
4

Wait. So all that "fact" claiming about women being oppressed and misrepresented in government was, in fact, FALSE? Color me shocked.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 08:17 PM
9

You never know...
/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:18 PM
22

Of course not, that would just be silly! Why would anyone EVER think that???? /s
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:19 PM
-3

She did claim that the usual sexual dynamic of men competing for female attention, and women selecting from competitors didn’t exist, and that a woman with many sexual partners was in fact an accomplished seducer in exactly the same way a man with many sexual partners was. Are...are you joking? A woman has to do fuck all when it comes to hooking up. Get dolled up, sit at the bar expectantly, get free drinks, pick a guy fawning over you, go home.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 11:56 AM
3

Better one than you.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:38 AM
0

"but then we wouldn't be able to blame those nasty evil men!!!"
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:47 PM
4

AND stuff. Well shit. Airtight case right here. Just reasons? arguments could be made. But reasons AND stuff? Fuck. We are hosed.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:59 PM
4

I'm not suggesting anything. At most, I'm saying that yogurt ad is complete bullshit. Not only does it objectify men, but then portrays them as inferior beings.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:35 PM
5

Why would you want to use somebody as a footstool? because it shows complete and utter dominance over them. That they are inferior. Fit only to give minor comfort to someone superior to them.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:19 PM
3

Lets not forget this number. Gross everyone out with the icky man's body! That will make everyone feel good.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:31 PM
3

Eat this yogurt and you too will have a pool surrounded by ripped, mostly naked men.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:26 PM
5

I felt really awkward looking for this at work.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:29 PM
3

The other part of it is, men don't complain about body image issues. My girlfriend would have to disagree. She puts up with plenty of my bullshit. Luckily she is a patient woman. Also returns fire with her insecurities. fun times.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:28 PM
1

SAVE attempted to make the violence against women act gender neutral. Along with the national coalition for men attempted to add a clause to create a clause for battered men. Oddly enough, all those were shot down by feminists and women's rights organizations. Of course, there are more. Those are just ones that came to mind off the top of my head.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:11 PM
1

Check the sidebar. It's there for a reason. Not mentioned: daddyjustice, national coalition for men, and to a lesser extent, SAVE.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:53 PM
1

The question was not directed at me. Therefore, it was not my place to answer. I patronized you on the same basis that people patronize me. "Oh, he is from /mr, his opinion is automatically invalid." lol at criticizing us for "getting mad at people on the internet" as if that isn't the core tenet of the MRM. If you think that what /mr does is even remotely comparable to what SRS does, you need to have your brain checked.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:42 PM
2

I say we don't show up on SRS anymore, you explain why we don't, I say I'm glad because SRS is a farce in the first place. seems pretty straight forward to me.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:35 PM
1

Good. I'm glad. SRS is a place full of holier-than-thou bullshit, and populated by people that are guilty of the very things they pretend to protest. It's okay though. Go back to your hole, get a pat on the back from mommy with the assurance that you are a good person. Because after all, getting angry at people on the internet makes you a good person.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:24 PM
3

Probably around this line: Hill states that because unemployment and low returns on investments occur at a higher rate during recessions, a recession may signal to women that financially secure men are become relatively scarce.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:42 PM
3

But wait, don't forget about that story of the woman that sued her husband for lack of sex, and won $10k. If men don't get sex, its a woman exercising her right to say no. If a woman doesn't get sex, it's cause for lawsuit.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:39 PM
2

Yeah, i kinda did that and noticed those... hopefully the bosses aren't watching.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:34 PM
8

I'm just sad that the privilege argument always seems to only go one way. Trying to tell a woman they are privileged is like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. It's just not gonna happen. But they seem to have no trouble telling men how it is...
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:33 PM
2

So eloquent.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 01:04 PM
4

We make it so easy to not show up on SRS...?
/r/MensRights29/06/12 12:48 PM
14

Jokes on you. We don't show up on SRS anymore. What now?
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:23 AM
0

Where are my free condoms god dammit? Also vasectomy?
/r/MensRights28/06/12 09:11 PM
3

And thus the cycle of life continues...
/r/MensRights27/06/12 09:45 PM
20

Elsewhere on reddit, this very thing is being condemned. By feminists nonetheless! Read and learn.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 12:31 AM
17

Dads start getting really anxious about the likelihood of teenage boys – aka Male Predators – coming to knock on the front door for a date. This line really bothered me. Just because boys hit puberty that turns them into sexual predators?
/r/MensRights26/06/12 02:56 PM
2

Good on you, and good on your husband. My daughter is probably going to hate me because of what I won't let her wear.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 12:41 AM
1

I know EXACTLY what you meant ;)
/r/MensRights22/06/12 12:32 AM
1

Deep man...fucking deep.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:44 AM
2

It's also unfair to be punished for doing something to someone that they agreed to have you do, which is my objection to demands that this teacher be punished. I do see where you are going with this. I think this relates to the consensual sex-->rape claim problem a lot of us have. However, I feel it's still inappropriate for anyone of any gender to search a child of any gender without consent from the legal guardian. Although, regardless, a male teacher in the same situation, consent or not, wou…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 09:14 PM
1

But feminists think they're doing the same, so why are you better than them? I don't think I am better than them. But this is precisely why a lot of people dislike certain forms of feminism/feminists. They believe what they believe is right and equal, but in reality, is far from it. You say "my interpretation of fairness and equality" like it is something that is incorrect. Is it incorrect to expect equal protection under the law? Is it incorrect to expect a similar sentence for the woman that r…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 08:19 PM
7

unfortunate, but necessary.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 08:06 PM
2

likewise.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 08:02 PM
2

So...I shouldn't prevent my child from experiencing pain...? Even though it was avoidable? Wouldn't that make me a terrible parent? Besides, a lot of parents are utterly convinced that neo-natally circumcising their child was, in fact, in their child's best interest, and would "prevent [their] child from experienc[ing] [...] pain". Except this isn't entirely true. Sometimes there are complications, but they can be rare. A lot of people believe this due to misinformation regarding circumcision an…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 07:50 PM
3

So either the survey is very flawed, or Naomi is picking and choosing her data and ignoring male victims. I wouldn't be surprised at either of them.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 06:59 PM
3

The "problem" would be the obscene amount of pain. I dunno about you, but I certainly view a large amount of unnecessary pain as a problem. Is it not in someone's best interest to avoid pain? Isn't that what the entire concept of pain is about? Your body is telling you that something is wrong, and so whatever is happening is best to be avoided. As a parent, you would do whatever you humanly could to prevent your child from experience any pain at all, especially the pain that a root canal would c…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 06:44 PM
1

52 rapes a day, dontcha know. A little over 2 rapes an hour even. Hell. I don't know how all those military boys get any training done, what with all the rapin' going on. /s
/r/MensRights20/06/12 06:35 PM
2

should never have to submit to a mandatory search. Unfortunately, mandatory means mandatory. Unless, like i said, you would prefer spending time in a holding cell. A root canal is going to be a sure thing. If you don't get it, you're going to have problems. A parent that causes their child to have a root canal is generally acting in their best interest to absolve them from any future pain. A circumcision doesn't always cause complications. A lot of circumcision complications can be prevented thr…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 06:18 PM
2

You're right in that if you don't want to be searched, don't consent to it. However, in some situations, you aren't given the option to consent. In those situations, shouldn't the amount of discomfort on part of the person being searched be reduced to as little as possible? You're right. You don't NEED a root canal, just like you don't NEED a circumcision. However, the root canal, if not taken care of, will cause an obscene amount of pain. While you can choose to not have it taken care of preemp…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 06:01 PM
2

If it's uncomfortable for them then they shouldn't consent to it. It's simple. Not so simple. What about mandatory searches? TSA? You can't just DECLINE a search by TSA. That is, unless you wanna spend some time in a holding cell. So "legal guardian[s] or parent[s]" should be able to consent for children -- even if the children themselves would not otherwise consent -- in some situations, but not others, because...? Sometimes it's necessary to gain parental consent for something that is a vital …
/r/MensRights20/06/12 05:43 PM
4

Yeah but just because laws can doesn't mean laws should. When you say this, it sounds like you are arguing that a member of the opposite sex should be able to search someone, regardless of how uncomfortable that may be for the person being searched. Additionally, that massive burden of proof would be a case of an unjust law, not an unjust application of it. So if a child shouldn't be able to give "PROPER [sic] consent" for themselves, and their "legal guardian or parent" has to, why shouldn't th…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:51 PM
4

Even if someone consents to a search, laws can still mandate that a person of the same sex performs that search. A member of the OPPOSITE sex performed a search on an underage child, while having received consent from the child, should have received PROPER consent from a legal guardian or parent, given that the child was under the age of 18 and couldn't speak for themself in a legal manner. We do rail against unjust laws. However, this isn't an instance of this. This is an instance of someone ou…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:36 PM
7

And this is precisely what we are arguing. Welcome to the conversation.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:40 PM
5

it would be interesting experiment to preface all of our comments with "as a man" for a few weeks. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:13 PM
18

Say a little girl says "search me" to a 30+ year old man? does that make it okay? He would still be getting his ass handed to him by the judge in his court hearing. Regardless of whether or not she "consented".
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:05 PM
6

I'm astounded by how many people have come out to respond to that thread. While there are a large number of people that don't quite understand the logistics behind men being raped; this thread is educational both in the informative sense, and the sense that it spreads the word that men can be raped too. Kudos for everyone in that thread that has the courage to speak out.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 04:57 PM
8

Men tend to commit suicide in ways that are almost assuredly able to get the job done. AKA, gun in mouth, jumping off a building, wrist cutting, etc. What is terrible about it, is that most men choose ways that are pretty much guarantees, because of the shame they would receive of not being able to even kill themselves. That "they are MEN god dammit, they are supposed to do shit right."
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:19 PM
1

I usually don't give a shit about anything. Glad to see you came out then.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 12:19 AM
15

Harem. But yes, the ideology is pretty much the same, with one added difference: It's only cool when women do it.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:40 PM
3

Kobe!
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:39 PM
1

fixed!
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:19 PM
1

Sweet mother of god...
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:34 PM
1

Often, drunk sex =/= rape. A large portion of the time two people went out, got drunk, and decided they wanted to have sex. I.E, consensual. The problem with this is, even though both of them were drunk, it's the man that is viewed as if he full on raped her; and should the mood strike her, she could charge him as such. Once again, even though it was consensual. Rape, when it actually is an act of rape, is not something we condone, nor is it forgiveable. But that isn't what we are talking about.…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:17 PM
4

Rape wouldn't happen if women weren't there to rape, DUH.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 04:45 PM
8

Author believes feminists can be involved in a women's center, and should also be involved in a men's center as well. Fuck those MRA's. Correction.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 04:35 PM
9

All private men's room stalls now come with free female urinary inspection expert! Don't worry, that taser is purely for self protection against any vile, mean men that may attempt to rape her because of their uncontrollable urges!
/r/MensRights11/06/12 11:34 PM
3

Fire! fire! city hall is burning! Don't worry, I'll put it out! AHHHHHH! hehehehe.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 11:32 PM
5

they're in their BUTTS! that's where cooties COME FROM
/r/MensRights11/06/12 03:54 PM
2

I wholeheartedly agree with everything you just said. I simply brought up the idea because I have been introduced to the idea recently, and it seems to be a philosophy and ideal that I can follow. Traditionally, I have been monogamous. But that changed recently when I found my current girlfriend that was polyamorous. It was a bit difficult to come to terms with at first, seeing as it was counter intuitive to everything I had been taught for the first couple of decades of my life. However, with t…
/r/MensRights11/06/12 02:56 PM
2

This may sound a little out of the blue...but have you ever happened to have heard of the term polyamory? Honest question.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 01:13 PM
12

that's some kinky shit right there.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 10:56 PM
9

Why is /r/mensrights so obsessed with women??? Because a lot of the problems stem from laws put in place by female and feminist lobbying. More directly, given the sway of power towards the female population, the focus is generally put upon those ideas of how things are unfair/unequal towards the male population; or, highlighting the obscene privilege enjoyed by the female population. I would like to direct you instead of showing that links on r/feminism aren't necessarily linking to MRA's, but p…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 08:04 PM
2

Were I not at work currently, I would make this happen.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 03:03 PM
11

Don't worry, It's okay when women do it.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:55 PM
18

no she cut it off, then put it down the garbage disposal.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:49 PM
34

chairs be pulled out of ladies Quite an interesting mental image I just conjured....
/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:47 PM
6

relevant?
/r/MensRights05/06/12 02:54 PM
-1

Isn't it a common feminist idea that the biggest sign of privilege is being unable to notice that that privilege exists? Can they not notice the connection here? Women and feminists are blind to their own privilege as men may be to theirs.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 04:24 PM
3

It's not my fault for having a penis Surely you jest. How is that possible?
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:06 PM
9

I kind of wish I was able to see their faces when the cabbie let them know he had video evidence. Even if it didn't lead to a conviction, at least it completely ruined their plans.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 01:23 PM
3

Remember everyone: All men are sex craved maniacs all the time and are slaves to their libido. Any time a man refuses a woman's sexual advances the ONLY answers are that they A. Have a small penis, B. Are Gay, or C. Both.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 08:36 AM
13

You heard it here. A man's life is worse less than a gallon of gas.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 08:30 AM
22

your choice shows that you don’t truly believe women should be in control of, and have full ownership of, our own bodies; instead, it shows you think we should use them like doggy treats whenever you do the human equivalent of a jumping trick. This would be a valid argument if some women didn't use sex as an incentive to do things for them.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 10:44 PM
1

It was definitely an out-of-the-blue comment. I had never figured this person to say something like this. She always seemed open minded and always willing to change her views on something. Except this apparently. Apparently, to deny that women have the most things to worry about ever, was a personal slight against her.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 09:37 PM
3

What really sparked controversy was the particular way the person made her comment: "it really makes you think about how LITTLE men have to think about these things compared to us." Like, they have a monopoly on being victimized. Then, when I made a comment stating how being in the big city, alone, in the wee hours of the morning, I have to be very careful about where I walk, who is about, and whatnot. Especially given the rate of violent crimes toward men being many times that of sexual assault…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 09:22 PM
1

I want one so bad =(
/r/MensRights25/05/12 09:17 PM
1

Just because you have a right to say it, doesn't mean it's socially acceptable to say.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:56 PM
2

Only because it's a woman wearing it.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:53 PM
2

Guess I'm just fugly. I...I'm not certain how I should feel about this post...
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:52 PM
7

Also a similar argument for prison rape. "Don't wanna get raped in prison? Don't do a crime to land you in prison." Men somehow deserve to be raped in prison because they obviously did something bad to be put there in the first place.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:48 PM
3

Super jealous =(
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:40 PM
2

This is the link that started on of the arguments. It's originally about how to approach strange women. I.E, don't. It was this that sparked the comment about how men have so little to worry about.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 05:49 PM
3

I fail to see how something being written by a man or a woman removes the possibility of it being written in a biased way.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 09:30 PM
2

I doubt you are capable of making a reasonable assessment of how "women" think or feel. And yet women constantly make assertions as to what all men ARE, i.e rapists, pigs, murderers, pedophiles... Not so fun when the shoe is on the other foot is it?
/r/MensRights24/05/12 08:38 PM
2

History speaks for itself.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 08:32 PM
2

Okay. Women don't HAVE to let that said man's dick in said vagina. Boom. Pregnancy problem solved. But wait. That's misogynistic isn't it? Weird how that works.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 02:59 PM
1

I'm not comparing them. But they are. I was using their terminology.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:33 AM
0

Except i'm not making any "radical" comparison of him. I was referring to the newest SPLC article that cited him as being radical; as though he was today's Solanas. Which is absolutely incorrect. The point i was making is that feminists will say a vocal extremist, such as Solanas, is an "unstable delinquent", while Paul Elam is the voice of the movement. Both points were made by the same article. I was simply emulating that most likely, once again, people will decry this woman as a fringe extrem…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:54 PM
0

I do disagree with a few things that paul says, but for the most part you're right. The opposition, however, seems to think otherwise. And at a quite hypocritically, seeing as they say he represents the entirety of the MRM, while people are quick to decry solanas as an "unstable delinquent".
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:08 PM
11

"Don't worry! she is just a vocal unstable extremist! She doesn't represent the feminist movement! But we certainly won't have a problem relating the entire MRM to Paul Elam!"
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:52 PM
7

So its alright in your opinion for someone that may contribute little, if anything, to the total household income, which more often then not will file for divorce, causing the "main household breadwinner" to split with 50% of their possessions at the time, with a possibility of alimony later on, while the person that filed for divorce rubs their nose in it that they took half, if not more, of their stuff?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:57 PM
8

Eh. My point remains valid regardless.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:43 PM
7

You women, I use that term very loosely, have no idea what the story behind these supposed horrible MRA's that you're judging are. Grow up.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:48 PM
1

I think we were supposed to vote them in, but we had to reschedule because we were too busy oppressing everyone.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:40 PM
2

had a wife that stabs him. Survives. Come back and marries a 21 year old. Bad. Ass.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 05:16 AM
8

And they will get support then too. Notice the "both parents" line.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 05:14 AM
7

Tell that to the drunk girls.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 05:36 AM
15

People's lives aren't ruined irreparably for having a false allegation of trespassing or assault.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 07:11 PM
13

Much like the idea of holding the door open for people: I do it because I'm a nice person, not because they are a girl. I also hold it open for guys as well.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:36 PM
8

Feminism needs to address this maxim soon or the males in the west will wake up one day, realize the odious and wicked nature of feminism and as a group men of every color, creed and nationality will trample it under-foot. Too late honey. That day is already upon us.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:12 PM
3

C'mon. lets be honest here.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:48 AM
1

except teefs. She is beyond the pale.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 11:22 PM
12

What a compelling argument.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:35 PM
3

Maturity is overrated.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 12:15 PM
3

You know, Lorena Bobbitt was a woman... Hey, I like this game!
/r/MensRights06/05/12 09:48 PM
12

refusing is not giving consent. It's not the same as stopping the action. Obviously she continued anyway after he refused, thus rape.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 06:30 AM
5

feminists can't math.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 08:23 PM
4

for all but the most heinous of crimes. for which they get drastically reduced sentences.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 02:55 AM
14

I would actually have to say that directly confronting them would be the opposite of effective. If he goes to them, all they need do is say he said something offensive to them and it's his ass on the line. The tape recorder idea is by far the best. Keep it with you, take your breaks by them next time it happens and copy the tapes. Deliver to HR and promise to sue if something isn't done about it.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:07 AM
3

I get it!
/r/MensRights30/04/12 08:04 PM
3

Good. They managed to get rid of female genital mutilation. Maybe we can follow suit.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:20 PM
4

Wanting to let a man choose for himself whether or not he wants to have surgery done on his penis is imposing our beliefs? Isn't circumcision imposing your beliefs onto your child?
/r/MensRights30/04/12 05:13 PM
3

I gotta admit, the tiburon looks sexy as hell. My only problem is that 172 hp is a little low for a 6 cylinder =/
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:57 PM
2

not too shabby. v6?
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:59 PM
3

Hyundai tiburon? Luckily for you it was just the windows. That spray paint would come off glass much easier than it would paint.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:54 PM
2

It is like communism, you take from the rich and give to the poor. It's like a pinko robin hood =(
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:58 PM
1

I suppose I should have been clearer =/ my bad!
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:05 PM
1

I totally agree it isn't. It's just harder to tackle than it would be secular circumcision. I think we are going around in circles -_-
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:00 PM
1

It would be difficult to get people to change their minds about something based in religious indoctrination. At least for a good start, we would spread the word to people that practice it without any basis in religious beliefs. Baby steps.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 11:51 AM
1

Yes. People that are obvious trolls are banned.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 11:01 AM
1

I suppose I hadn't thought of it that way...
/r/MensRights30/04/12 09:56 AM
1

I think it would be much easier to prevent circumcision outside of an embedded belief system than it would be to go against those beliefs. At the very least, it would be a good start.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 09:55 AM
7

You're right. This is precisely why we are spreading the word.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:47 AM
2

I can understand the necessity on circumcision for religious reasons. It's their belief, whatever. What I DON'T appreciate; is that circumcision is considered the norm for people outside of those religions. That the parents practice it with little regard to what they are actually doing, instead going with the idea that they want him to look the way they want him to look. I had a friend of mine give birth to a kid, and was going to have him circumcised. She isn't religious in any way, so there wa…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:44 AM
4

In reality, I believe all the troll is doing is just increasing our traffic. If someone thinks it is heinous enough, they may just follow the link, see the troll is full of shit, and become educated on how things really are. I've been watching our subscription numbers steadily go up in the past month. If the troll is hurting us, it can't be by much.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:20 PM
124

good god...This is horrible. Not only should she face decades in jail, she should also have to pay for any and all reconstructive surgery needed to be done to fix the damages she inflicted. What a horrible evil woman.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 03:57 AM
1

"they only pose as MRA because some icky man forced them too!"
/r/MensRights28/04/12 03:48 AM
2

I really hope jezebel or manboobz sees this thread. Prove to them that /mr isn't just a bunch of guys.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 08:35 PM
5

the original black_visions post is said to be real. We have no evidence to the contrary, so most of us generally believe it to be authentic. Since then, no one has heard from black_visions. The sisterofblackvisions post, however, was proved to be fake. Alot of people make the mistake thinking that both were. However, evidence would dictate that only the followup was false.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 05:29 AM
15

TIL we have a rather large female population...
/r/MensRights27/04/12 05:26 AM
2

Good question. I think it's because the races are relatively close with certain races excelling at certain sports, while there is usually some upset with a non-dominant race winning the sport the dominant race excels at. However, between genders; the disparity isn't even close. It's a difference of leaps and bounds.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 03:20 AM
6

They can still compete amongst each other. There's no harm in that.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 01:28 AM
5

I was more referring to the idea that the genders are equal. I would wholeheartedly agree that the genders are different at certain sports. The idea that men shouldn't use or even say they may have superior strength is taboo.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 10:50 PM
34

USING YOUR BIOLOGICALLY SUPERIOR STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE IS MISOGYNISTIC YOU PIG.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 08:37 PM
3

I figured he wasn't...but can never bee too careful =P Regardless, the original article was still bullshit. "I can't play so they shouldn't be able to either!"
/r/MensRights26/04/12 07:40 PM
5

I'm fairly certain you're right...yet at the same time I'm hesitant that it may be a bel-air....
/r/MensRights26/04/12 07:34 PM
18

Wasn't there a story in the news a little while ago that said a boys team was cancelled because there was a lack of interest in the girls team?
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:36 PM
11

If photoshopping is the best you can do as a troll, you have MUCH to learn.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 10:56 PM
2

I see what you did there...
/r/MensRights25/04/12 01:09 PM
6

i kinda meant the payment goes the other way around -_-
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:21 AM
45

In the second suit, Pilar Sanders demanded $200 million in damages for libelous and slanderous comments. Because apparently, it takes $200 million to get over being name called. Shit. You can call me a douchebag all day long for $50.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:06 PM
6

I think he may have been referring to the phenomenon that women get lesser/if any sentences for the same crimes as men.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:55 AM
9

None of this is relevant to the situation anyway. We are giving advice to the OP in his unfortunate situation. This is neither the time or the place to talk about corruption of cops. Not to mention the "we can bash women over it" comment. We don't bash women for anything outside of obvious bias.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 04:01 AM
-4

I like that you're being downvoted for speaking the truth. Particularly about online dating. Coincidentally, I started running an experiment on okcupid. I made 2 profiles, both exactly the same, but one of them has the income set to $80k a year, while the others is hidden. Guess which gets more messages?
/r/MensRights21/04/12 07:21 PM
8

Welcome to the neighborhood!
/r/MensRights21/04/12 02:46 AM
5

explain how males cannot be raped by females.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 08:49 PM
1

ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights20/04/12 08:32 PM
6

Seriously? Is anything bad that happens to a woman going to be called rape now? "My boyfriend made me drive him to the store when I could be out with my girlfriends. Vehicular rape!" "My husband took me to a restaurant that I didn't want to go to! Restaurant rape!"
/r/MensRights20/04/12 11:35 AM
5

Rape? Hardly. Medical malpractice? Perhaps...
/r/MensRights20/04/12 11:23 AM
5

From the videos I have seen (which, i'll be the first to admit, isn't many), GWW is HARDLY misogynist. She just outs the fallacies of the feminist logic. So...logic is misogyny now?
/r/MensRights20/04/12 11:20 AM
2

He has already been pointed out to the mods from a kind antisrs'er: For your viewing pleasure Celda has banned him already. At least from here...but apparently that doesn't stop him from posting shit outside of here.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 11:12 AM
2

After viewing the ad, while unnecessary to begin with, I think it's supposed to symbolize the "slap in the face" some people feel when they realize they won.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 11:08 AM
1

I just say this is pure devotion towards winning.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:02 AM
2

Is it not?
/r/MensRights18/04/12 01:04 PM
0

hmm...i'm curious as to what lesbian flavored tastes like...I bet it tastes like lemon...
/r/MensRights18/04/12 01:03 PM
1

While there is no way to tell, he has said on several occasions that he will claim a controversial post/username as his own as to garner as much hate towards himself as possible. Besides, I saw those posts as well, but pyongjang doesn't seem to follow the same style as "the psychopath". pyongjang tends to post more links to articles as where the psychopath posts mostly self posts. Which isn't to say he may not be doing a long-troll by making us assume that anyone can be him. But, we can't become…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 12:00 PM
2

some people downvote the bot so it gets hidden and they don't have to see it. I would ASSUME it's not because they dislike it... Besides, dislike it or not, it's not going anywhere lol
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:38 AM
3

ugh...I can imagine them saying that with such a pompous air of superiority. Makes me cringe...
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:51 PM
2

Abortions are covered by the state? Why did i never know this...? How the hell did they pull that one off?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:15 AM
6

Redditor with no comments and been a member for 1 month? I'm calling troll on this one.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 10:09 PM
1

my guess is 'nother eschatology attempt in the making.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 12:52 AM
4

Tennis Bracelet. its like a big diamond ring for your wrist.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 09:15 PM
8

thats a very apt analogy. I like it. "Saying I should feel guilty for rape because I am a man is like saying I'm part of the KKK because I'm white." Beautiful.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 07:26 AM
1

the screenshot openly says that MR is a hate movement. Assuming they did this trolling attempt to discredit us in some way, what did they hope would happen? What would be to gain?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 08:33 PM
1

Call me crazy, but i hardly see a link to them claiming the death of someone and MR "misogyny". I was there, 95% of the thread was grievances for the deceased. How is this hateful?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 08:13 PM
2

You mean how it directly links to a different subreddit? And a persons comment that doesn't post to MR? It's not a surprise that most MRA's hate SRS. But even in the sisterofblackvisions thread, they set that hate aside momentarily.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:59 AM
2

So, If a woman tries to steal my wallet it's cool that I rape her?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:10 AM
3

Because most of the people weren't wary of the post to begin with. Nor did were they considering it an action against SRS. In fact, most posts linking SRS and this were promptly downvoted. Try again.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:28 AM
2

Can you please make a post on your main account? Just to verify? As it is, anyone can post a random account and claim it is theirs.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:19 AM
2

This view is debunked when a single someone makes a single rape joke, and everyone loses their shit.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:50 PM
2

It's only cool when they do it.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:45 PM
4

swish
/r/MensRights12/04/12 03:57 PM
1

We need to spread the word about that thread. I'm but one man...I can't do it alone. They are STILL trolling it. The longer it exists the more they are going to gloat.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:47 AM
-1

Because you troll doesn't mean the problems that people outline in this subreddit disappear. People like you demand attention to the exclusion of all else. "Hey everyone! Look what I'm doing with my life! I'm making a bunch of people on the INTERNET look bad!" All you do is play to people that already have a solidified opinion of us. You will troll, and we will continue.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:45 AM
-1

Yeah. nice try.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:38 AM
2

Update: Lets see how much longer I can keep the thread going before I'm banned. http://theageofeschatology.blogspot.com/2012/04/my-latest-mra-troll.html Directly links to this thread. He is obviously OP, stop falling for his bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 04:59 AM
-2

Update: Lets see how much longer I can keep the thread going before I'm banned. http://theageofeschatology.blogspot.com/2012/04/my-latest-mra-troll.html Directly links to this thread. He is obviously OP, stop falling for his bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 04:59 AM
2

that "post" was a troll post designed to make us look bad. Pay no heed to it.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 04:45 AM
-36

Incoming SRS trolls swooping in to say they had nothing to do with it. Calling it now!
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:25 AM
3

Good. Then teach the rest of them to not tell us to ignore our feelings and emotions.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 11:13 PM
2

Because I was parroting the argument that so many feminists make about men's feelings towards a subject. "Don't like it? Man up."
/r/MensRights11/04/12 10:21 PM
2

Well observed. That is why it is in quotes.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:47 PM
3

Yes. Yes it is.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:49 PM
6

"Babe, who is that guy in the corner?" "Oh that's just Lars. I pay him to watch us have sex. Just ignore him cutie, tonight's about you and me..."
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:19 PM
1

yes. yes it is. Which is why i never do one night stands.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 02:57 PM
3

good find. Hopefully washington isn't the only state that has this kind of clause in it.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 02:52 PM
3

my point precisely. Is there anything else that can be done?
/r/MensRights11/04/12 02:51 PM
2

tough to say. In order to know that you would have to know which cases are actually false accusations.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 02:50 PM
5

What other options are there? A lot of people will say: "just get consent for fucks sake!" but it's not as simple as that. Say I'm getting down with a chick that is willing, but in her mind she doesn't want to. She doesn't voice her objection then decides later she is raped, while I was none the wiser. I would be going to jail for quite a while. I always figured there was some form of legal consent documentation that I could have them sign...but that's hardly romantic. Besides, I can imagine tha…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 01:30 PM
5

I'm glad I don't live in one of those states. Time to get me a security cam!
/r/MensRights11/04/12 01:25 PM
25

I feel sickened by the fact that it's getting to the point that there needs to be recording devices on at all times during sexual encounters, just on the off-chance that it may be a liberating piece of evidence someday. Imagine what would have happened to him if he didn't have that video on his phone.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 01:01 PM
2

I can't imagine his color has much bearing on the overall picture. I would agree with the rest of your point though.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 12:35 PM
8

Cuz she's a woman.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 12:33 PM
1

I was being cynical. It's based off an image macro. http://memegenerator.net/instance/9327573
/r/MensRights11/04/12 12:19 PM
2

This is all fine and dandy. Until they start trying to control US with THEIR feelings. There has got to be a LINE people!
/r/MensRights11/04/12 11:19 AM
14

low cut It's right there in the name. Low cut shirts are meant to show off a bit of cleavage. They are doing their job. Do you want me to wear a burka so people leering at me wont be my fault? Or you can not be so sensitive about it. I used to be really fat. You know, I got a lot of looks, not creepy looks but looks of disgust. Is that any less dehumanizing? Being looked at like you're a twisted, gross human being because of your size? You know what I did? I fucking lived with it. "Man up."
/r/MensRights11/04/12 04:50 AM
17

Looks like You have an SRS brigade!
/r/MensRights11/04/12 01:31 AM
19

I don't understand what the hell is so god damn difficult about this. If I go outside in a speedo that accentuates my junk, I can't reasonably expect people not to look at it, or me. When you wear something that is meant to accentuate a certain aspect of your body; you CAN'T GET PISSED OFF AT PEOPLE FOR NOTICING WHAT IT IS YOU ARE ACCENTUATING. It's that fucking simple.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 12:59 AM
11

While I would agree with the second part of the title, I would have to say it DOES sound like an accident that caused the death of their children. It may have been negligent, but it wasn't malicious. Vick got jail time because he forcefully pitted dogs against each other. This woman was cleaning the floors when it happened; she wasn't holding their heads under water. That being said, a $550 fine is a bit low...
/r/MensRights10/04/12 03:44 PM
1

My god how I wish you were right...If anything has been going on it's that feminism removes ANY accountability from a woman's actions. A woman gets incredibly drunk and goes home with a guy? It's the guys fault for taking advantage of her!
/r/MensRights10/04/12 03:41 PM
8

I...I'm so torn between the two well spoken arguments... On one hand, the AVfM is spoken in a way that I feel the way OP does...That he is victim blaming and condoning they be raped. Then GWW tells it in the way we have always been saying; that a person walking alone at night with no protection in revealing clothing doesn't DESERVE to be raped, but god damnit they certainly didn't help the situation.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:01 AM
0

Don't worry Profix, you will get your logical thinking badge in good time.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:28 PM
9

Not surprising. Seems they ban anyone that has ever posted in /mr.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 11:20 AM
7

The Patriarchy saves the day!
/r/MensRights06/04/12 11:19 AM
1

I got banned for posting: post. A little banhappy they are.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 11:10 AM
8

Honestly, what good comes from keeping srs'ers around? Everyone hates them. Not just /mr. The only thing I can possibly think of is that sometimes their trolling is so desperate that it actually makes us look good.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 11:09 AM
5

I want someone to sperm jack him. Just to see his reaction when they charge his ass for child support.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:13 AM
16

You lose MRAs. Yes, we lose because some internet troll says so. Because this makes real problems any less real. Unfortunately, in light of recent events, and the complete lack of any acknowledgement of any particular problems we face, things are going to come to a head. I feel eventually, the fingers-in-their-ears-and-walk-away tactic is only going to work so well until someone sits their ass down and forces them to listen. It's not going to be pretty.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:10 AM
4

[why do you type with brackets around everything?]
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:03 AM
2

You know what I got banned for? post. that was it. one word. I was banned. What a horrible tragedy has occurred that I will surely end my life over; that I can no longer view their subreddit.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:56 AM
0

coming from feminists that deride the male pill because they are worried that men might lie about taking it... Imagine what would happen if someone said that: "Worried that a man might be lying about taking his pill? If you don't want to be pregnant, just have your tubes tied!" The outcry would blow up the world.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:07 PM
2

mmyes....quite...
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:04 PM
0

18 years worth of child support. essentially a quarter million dollar condom.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:03 PM
1

C'mon man, think straight here. Logic obviously has no bearing on the way these people think. They are set in their ways, and nothing outside an act of feminist gods will change anything. Upvote anyway though.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:01 PM
0

aww...i liked it the other way...
/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:46 PM
8

she had to have sex, duh. Everyone knows no woman ever wants to willingly have sex.../s
/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:11 PM
-6

I like the operative word "yet".
/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:08 PM
4

I'm just worried what would have happened if she didn't own up to it in the first place
/r/MensRights05/04/12 03:00 PM
7

explain.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 05:43 PM
4

You're right. I didn't take it as that. My bad.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:21 PM
5

I feel then in this case that both situations are worthy of being derided. To ridicule one and not the other is a basest form of bias. Not to say you don't, but I didn't see anywhere that you also had a disregard for female sexual manipulation.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:07 PM
1

I already know I'm a backup plan for a girl I've known since high school. Me and her have been friends, but there was always some sexual tension goin on. One night she drunkenly promised me that when she broke up with her boyfriend she would "show me how a woman is supposed to treat a man." when I was depressed about my recent breakup. That was 2 boyfriends ago. I'm waiting for the day she hears I'm successful and she comes a knockin'. Can't decide if I wanna get a piece before turning her down.…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:01 PM
5

agreed. But I would say this is definitely a step in the right direction. It will at least cut back on some of the male unwanted pregnancies. But I would also say that there should be something as contingency, if the birth control fails, etc.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 11:57 AM
3

I don't have a link to it, but there was actually a court case that found in favor of a woman that the husband had to pay $10,000 in restitution for not providing her with enough sex. Gotta love it!
/r/MensRights04/04/12 11:44 AM
2

feelings trump facts don't forget mens rights!
/r/MensRights04/04/12 11:43 AM
5

Is withholding sex not pure manipulation of another individual as a means to an end?
/r/MensRights04/04/12 11:42 AM
3

At least 2 members in 1 post. I call that a good day. Any people we can educate, or at least get to think objectively about gender-bias instead of blindly following feminist rhetoric is a net gain.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 01:41 PM
4

Agreed. This is precisely our argument. Except, women seem to get lighter sentences for the exact same crime; if there is any sentence at all.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:46 PM
6

If he is lucky.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:37 PM
11

It doesn't matter if it's willing or not. Talk to anyone and tell them you had sex with a 13 year old girl. But don't worry, cuz she wanted to. It has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the result. it's still considered statutory rape.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:35 PM
6

You're correct. my bad.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:20 PM
4

okay, twelve rapes. 29 weeks in jail. Thats almost 17 days per rape. I want to see a judge charge a man with 17 days in jail for a rape. That will go well.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:59 PM
3

This...I really don't have words for this. So many emotions are playing through my mind right now. Frustrated is not capable of describing what i am feeling. The sheer fact that this has happened to the same poor soul 5 times in a row is enough to make me stay single for the rest of my life; just out of the sheer possibility that I might be able to avoid the trouble he has gone through. And what's worse, is that every single one of those women has genuinely believed they were right. That they we…
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:01 PM
0

fitting username.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 12:57 AM
11

Isn't it a little bit obtuse to use the supreme court as a reference? Seeing as supreme court judges are elected for life, only so many people can get elected in 220 years. In fact, considering that 3 are justices as we speak, that should be testament to feminism working its magic.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 06:14 PM
2

I gotta admit, I chuckled a little bit.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 12:37 PM
6

relevant
/r/MensRights21/03/12 03:57 AM
2

We try and avoid giving traffic to that subreddit as much as possible. Any link would give traffic to them, thus inflating their ideas that they are "important".
/r/MensRights20/03/12 01:11 AM
4

Sooner or later they are going to start yelling at us for not doing anything when we were in the position to help. A "damned if you do, damned if you don't" scenario.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 03:53 PM
3

I don't get it. I sat there and read the article that was released by the SPLC that stated that r/mensrights was a hate group. How can they say that they didn't say that? Can anyone help clarify? Was it written by a person that doesn't represent the SPLC or something?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:35 AM
2

I tend to think that cynical and careful are closely tied. Don't be a fool. Wrap your tool.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:23 AM
1

While I did crack a smile, the satire may be a bit too over-the-top. It has been proven that women are not responsible for their choices. Ever. If one line were to goad a response from feminists, it will be this one. That being said, I did enjoy it. Was a bit disappointed at the lack of a "divine bovine feminine" use =(
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:15 PM
2

because the men are "proxies in place of men" Did you mean in place of women?
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:57 PM
2

So if a 29 year old male has sex with a 15 year old girl, everything would be hunky-dory as long as the 15 year old thought it was cool? I have a hard time people would believe this.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:55 PM
4

K. We will disregard all testimony of those underage "victims" during statutory rape trials. They obviously don't know what they are talking about. /s
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:52 PM
1

I'm sorry, I didn't intend for you to get the idea that I was saying ALL men are superior. What I meant was that in the case that there is a better qualified male vying for the same position as a lesser qualified female, the female would win strictly on the grounds that they need to fill the quota. Not saying all men are superior or that women are inferior. If that woman truly deserves that position via her qualifications; then great! all the more power to her. But what isn't fair is if she gets…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 05:08 PM
1

I agree it's not just one gender's issue. I didn't mean that it should solely be the vocal women that should fight for it. I had thought it was a given that we would be fighting for it too lol Their voice just seems to be louder...
/r/MensRights14/03/12 05:06 PM
1

Slut-shaming is stupid and I'm glad those women took him to task. Now we just have to get those same women to fight against the idea of people raped in prison deserve it. It's a more common mindset than you might think.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:41 PM
6

I'm happy as a clam to see new faces in the light of the recent events. Welcome aboard. A view from the other side of the fence is always welcome.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 01:26 AM
-1

Fighting true feminism, that is, people that fight for true equality, is not the goal of this subreddit. What we fight against are the people that fight for women to get preferrential treatment. I'm all fucking for equality. When it's actually equal. When mothers get sole custody of their children when the father would be a better provider, or when a woman can send a man to jail on a whim; that isn't equality. The UK is instituting a law that will require that 40% of all board members be female.…
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:47 AM
3

Let them come.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:30 AM
1

Explain how equal rights in the court room and fighting against male genital mutilation is detrimental to others?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:27 AM
-1

No, she has not been circumcised. She is just really ignorant about what it's like.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 12:16 PM
6

No, allow the kid to make the fucking choice himself. What the hell is so hard about understanding this?
/r/MensRights08/03/12 03:44 PM
5

Counter argument: You are lucky that she is admitting that the sex was consensual. Things would be alot worse if she denied it. A different approach; consider if you had turned down her advances. There have been cases of girls that get rejected choose to falsely accuse their partner of sexual assault to make it seem like they weren't being promiscuous. It's a delicate situation. However, if I were you I would count myself lucky that it stopped where it did. If the same thing were to happen in th…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:18 PM
6

Great. Thats you. You made a conscious decision after you were of a mature age to change things. This kid has no choice.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:11 PM
3

I say, leave them in tact, then when they are of an appropriate age, educate them of both arguments. Then, let them decide what they want to do. it's their body, they should be the ones to choose what to do with it.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 02:48 PM
7

Me and a friend used to frequent a Hookah bar. Close to this hookah bar there was a regular bar that served alcohol. One night, me and him are sitting in the hookah bar, shooting the shit, just talking; when a group of girls, obviously drunk, come and start talking to us. Our table contained some of the only open seats in the joint, they ask to join us. When our night started we hadn't planned to pick up or hit on any ladies. However, these girls were very OPENLY suggesting sexual acts. I electe…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:21 PM
1

Her sentencing is in April. We won't know for another month and a half.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 03:54 PM
3

4 months in jail for resisting arrest. Her sentencing for the pushing and attempted murder is later. The graphic language, however, is bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:02 AM
1

I think the 93% of food is the amount purchased by females. Not the amount consumed by females.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 05:27 AM
1

Much. thank you!
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:07 PM
1

Yes. But one of these require a shit ton of money to be payed to the other. I'll let you figure out which.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 04:20 PM
1

Yes I have heard this as well, but more often than not its a fairly proportional ratio: As length goes up so does girth. Sure there are outliers to the equation, a few dudes that are packing a soda can down south, or others that are like a hot dog.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 12:50 AM
1

well done sir. I see she completely avoided the topic. As per the norm.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 11:19 PM
7

Since when does this apply to ALL males? Because a few dudes might do this, it's suddenly a slight against the ENTIRE female population? Shouldn't that work the other direction too? Because a few chicks lie about taking birth control, ALL males EVERYWHERE should be offended? Seriously though. You condemn people for doing this, but you seem all okie-dokie about chicks lying about their birth control? What the fuck, betterthanthee? Shame on you. Better to cover my ass than to pay 18 years worth of…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:24 PM
4

/sarcasm? Seriously, does NO ONE see the similarity in this regarding chicks lying to their partners about birth control?
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:15 PM
4

Someone needed to ask her about Taylor Lautner and his shirtless extravaganza in the twilight movies. Being fit and muscular doesn't mean being sexualized? BULL FUCKING SHIT. He can't go down the god damn street without chicks telling him to take off his shirt. That's WHY most people get fit and muscular these days: To get laid. Also, having a big bulge doesn't attract women? Survey a bunch of women, asking which they would rather have; a 3" penis, or a 7" penis. 95% of them would say the 7". Un…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:11 PM
1

I believe the people in the article were blocking a certain number of toilets in the mens bathroom; thus making the wait longer to use the available ones.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 08:18 PM
1

Not to mention the social aspect that makes the lines long: A woman brings several friends to talk to while waiting in line, because the line is so long. Thus adding to the overall length of the line. Then complains that the line is so long.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 08:14 PM
-3

Not in cases involving sexual contact. In those cases you are guilty until proven innocent; having your name slandered all across the nation.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 07:43 PM
1

I get it!
/r/MensRights25/02/12 08:58 AM
3

Unfortunately, anything said by employers would most likely result in a lawsuit against them. It's gotten to the point that the fear of backlash from a sue-happy female has allowed women a blank check to do what they want.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 12:20 AM
3

Considering what post you were replying to, I figured proper spelling would be a good thing =P
/r/MensRights24/02/12 11:41 PM
3

you accidentally a letter
/r/MensRights24/02/12 11:37 PM
2

You know, I don't ever hold the door open for a woman on the accounts that she is a woman. I hold the door open for everyone because I'm a good fucking person
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:13 PM
0

dude must be hung like an ox.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 02:19 PM
12

I think its the ads saying that only MEN can be addicted to porn, and only MEN are sexual predators. only WOMEN are sex trafficked and only WOMEN are capable of getting STDs.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 04:14 AM
3

Wait, I'm confused. You say the instructor's bias on DV was clear, but I have a hard time picturing the bias in this situation. Can anyone clarify? Obviously the child shouldn't witness a parent in such a state, but that doesn't explain the DV situation...
/r/MensRights21/02/12 04:15 PM
2

Which is one of the examples that the article gave: In some of those situations, a death still occurred, but not murder.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:07 AM
3

This is the third time I have seen this post in this thread. I understand you want to plug the subreddit, but 3 times is too much...
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:44 AM
2

The problem is, there is far too much grey area between consent and can't/won't consent. Say you get with a chick. LETS JUST SAY. You both are sober, no intoxication whatsoever. She gives consent, and you both have an enjoyable evening of consensual sex. Later, the boyfriend whom you didn't know about finds out about it. Rather than look like a slut in his eyes, she claims you raped her. Obviously, consent was given at the time of the act, but you are still proper fucked legal style.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:40 AM
2

I read his top post, seeing as it now says "functional", with the trollish-intent his board is known oh-so-well for. Before, if the second comment is correct, that they can't possibly ignore the amount of responses they get from bannings, where before they could. Meaning, they would actually have to LISTEN to the people they were dicking instead of NOT doing their positions responsibilities. The way I read it, is that the modmail will be functional in the sense that they now have to be effective…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:06 AM
-4

Whats wrong with the world when I can foresee a future where women get paid salaries of scientists even though they do no actual lab work; spending all day with the children?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:26 PM
1

If you take a child that is full to bursting with energy, then remove some of their only outlets of activity like recess, you can be damn sure that's going to have an effect in the classroom. They are going to be fidgety and antsy as shit. That doesn't mean that they have a learning disorder. They are simply doing what boys do. If boys are getting anxious and antsy in the classroom, don't pin it on the boy. Take a look at the greater cause.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 12:56 PM
2

Actually. I'm a pretty avid browser of r/mensrights. And surely, if you searched my accounts history as closely as I'm sure you did if you are decrying me for being a novelty, you would have seen that I haven't replied to a single comment saying "what the fuck" outside of your own comment. This account wasn't made out of novelty. It was actually said by my friend and I thought it was funny. So I made it my username. So quick to judge.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 12:13 PM
1

This is technically my new account. I didn't like my old username...
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:18 AM
-9

WOMAN LOGIC!
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:04 AM
1

Alright. Here's an example: Me and my buddy are talking about what's wrong with my car. I know a few things about cars that I have picked up along the course of my life. He, however, is a certified mechanic. We can talk and hypothesize about several things, but eventually, due to my lack of knowledge, there is going to be a line where I saying something incorrect, strictly because I don't know as much as he does about the topic. I see even the educated aren't immune from making straw men. How is…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 07:34 PM
0

Intellectual interest doesn't necessarily mean similar degrees. Sure, two people that graduate with degrees in molecular biology are going to have more to talk about than people with 2 different degrees, but what your saying is that environmental engineers and computer science graduates won't ever enjoy the same things. What I am saying is that there is a greater chance of being able to have a meaningful conversation of music theory, science, or philosophy with someone that is educated over some…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 06:39 PM
-1

Naturally. If I'm graduated, and my partner is graduated, there is a larger chance for common intellectual interest. Along with cultural interest. Does it take a PhD to have an intelligent conversation? Hardly. But am I wrong for hoping they paid a little bit of attention in class? I can't tell you how many times I have received the blank stare because I was talking about something beyond their knowledge. But it wasn't even anything particularly special.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:44 PM
1

Not sure if gusta...
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:29 PM
1

Totally saw this coming. Touche.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:14 PM
-1

I care about education -_- I want to be able to have an intelligent conversation with my partner beyond something they saw on TV...
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:08 PM
2

You know, I feel like replicating your experiments with the numerous profiles. Create several with differing wages, then my correct one, and see how they hold up. FOR SCIENCE!
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:05 PM
1

I apparently dont get it. Girls wear tight or revealing clothing to feel "Sexy" and "Confident". However, aren't those feelings directly related to having others, particularly the opposite sex, view and deem them attractive? In other words, feeling sexy and confident is a direct result of being looked at by the very people women condemn for looking at them. Am I missing something here? I sure as hell wouldn't believe they get that feeling from other women; knowing how vindictive they are towards…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:34 PM
7

Right. Cuz bullies buy laptops and shit for their victims. Apparently you're of the mind that you can mouth off to whoever the fuck you want with no sort of consequences. See where it gets you. My dad would have swatted me silly if I ever said shit like that. And you know what? I respect no person in life more than my dad. He has done more with his life than you can probably ever think of doing. Good parenting doesn't always mean giving in to your child's desires.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:30 PM
6

Our audience is anyone that will listen. In addition to being a direct opposition to the feminist movement, which could also be said to be our audience. I do believe you just called Feminists inept retards and trolls. Actually...You're quite right.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 03:50 PM
8

I think it's funny that both genders can float through their adolescent years without being tied down, courting multiple partners and expressing their freedom. Except when the time comes that women can't do that anymore, they expect men to stop as well, when men can fully continue their hobbies and freedom. Sorry honey. When sexual liberation came, it came to both genders. Don't pout and act morose when that shit turns against you.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:07 PM
1

An example: There is a heated argument between a man and a woman. The woman is arguing something that is proven incorrect, while the man is trying to convince her. A third party, AKA, the "white knight", steps in to tell the guy to take it easy on her, in full knowledge that she is incorrect, on the grounds she is a woman. Though, he does not mention that that is his reasoning.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 11:06 PM
1

I don't understand the problem. Surely someone can admit that something is attractive with no sexual feelings for them at all, right? I'm a man, and I can say that other guys are genuinely attractive men. That doesn't mean I want to have sex with them. Isn't this essentially the same thing?
/r/MensRights14/01/12 06:40 AM
2

I don't even understand how this physically can happen...It doesn't say the paper towel roll, it just says paper towel. What moons aligned, and what kind of shitty paper towels are they using to be able to cut flesh?
/r/MensRights09/01/12 04:32 PM
1

I believe it has a view that since women are the gatekeepers of sex, choosing to keep her legs closed and take care of business herself is regarded as a good thing. While men are designated to pursue, and giving up for a false option is regarded as abandoning his role. Thus, bad.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 04:22 PM
2

10 days? Rough. I can barely make it 2...
/r/MensRights06/01/12 04:52 PM
1

Unfortunately, Carchamp1 is right. And you can bet your ass there will be lawyers out there that will claim this precise thing.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 04:42 PM
3

agreed.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 08:18 AM
1

You're right. He'd be sent to jail.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 07:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter