TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hierophage Archive

View 13 posts and 164 comments by hierophage on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
403

hierophage/r/MensRights06/09/13 03:42 AM
284

hierophage/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:35 AM
83

hierophage/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:51 PM
74

hierophage/r/MensRights27/09/13 03:02 AM
67

hierophage/r/MensRights08/08/13 12:26 AM
49

hierophage/r/MensRights16/07/13 02:41 AM
35

hierophage/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:26 AM
23

hierophage/r/MensRights30/11/13 11:43 PM
23

hierophage/r/MensRights01/08/13 09:55 PM
14

hierophage/r/MensRights17/10/13 11:38 PM
8

hierophage/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:56 AM
2

hierophage/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:13 AM
0

hierophage/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:20 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Heterosexual men are probably more flexible with what kind of woman they will accept for a mate than women are with men. Rewiring biology is hard, and a lot of this stuff has more to do with biology than most feminists are willing to accept. Not that there isn't any cultural influence on gender roles at all, of course, but changing our culture alone isn't going to start producing women who are by default and in general more suited to certain traditional masculine roles, and vice versa.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:37 AM
6

But! But! But! These men must have had ulterior motives! Obviously they were just trying to get sex! NICE GUY SYNDROME!
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:22 AM
2

...in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabric…
/r/MensRights09/12/13 07:57 PM
2

Because when a "nice guy" gets used by a woman stringing him haplessly along, it demonstrates one of many areas in which women have clear power over men. Feminism can't abide this; their power comes from spreading the dogma that women are always subjugated to the abuses of men, and never the other way around. Thus, what they must do is take this well-known example of female power and twist it around to make it appear as though the victim is actually the abuser and that the abuser is actually the…
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:35 AM
3

Oh FFS, look at that tool fist pumping while the audience cheers. "Yeah, they like me, I'm such a good boy!" Blech. I don't really have any other comment.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 09:47 PM
10

With prominent feminists being awarded honors by the highest office of the most powerful government on Earth, can feminism now relinquish its outsider revolutionary status?
/r/MensRights02/12/13 04:53 AM
1

She has over 6.5k followers on Twitter, a number of whom are influential in their own right and often retweet her stuff.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 07:54 PM
17

Her analysis is nothing short of completely reasonable and rational. If more women choose to actually get involved in the game industry we will see greater output of games which have appeal for women. I don't see how this could honestly be considered controversial. And there are plenty of positions where women can get involved. Aside from writing code, they could become writers, designers, artists, composers, directors, etc. There is plenty of room for women to influence games if they want to. W…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:42 AM
11

Oh I'm sorry, we were totally doing it because we're narcissistic, lazy and inferior. Starting out with a blatant straw man. I never said that. Not because there were literally RULES and LAWS keeping us from joining. Regarding the military, sure. Of course, these rules and laws were nearly the lowest priority for women's rights activists if the chronology of feminist activism has anything to say about priorities. But what about the myriad non-military but still highly dangerous jobs for which th…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:28 AM
9

How would you suggest we attempt to change the dialogue without talking about or engaging with those who currently control the dialogue? How do we advance men's rights without mentioning a movement which actively suppresses the idea that men's rights are of any concern?
/r/MensRights30/11/13 01:43 AM
7

Right. Women aren't lining up to take on jobs that might leave them dismembered or killed solely because people think of them as weak. Well shit, sign me up! I'll gladly trade my selective service number for that lot.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 01:39 AM
8

Not according to the quality of life index. I mean, women are doing better in nearly every category, from education to housing to life satisfaction to basic personal safety, but sometimes people call women rude names! Maybe women will never "have it all".
/r/MensRights30/11/13 01:34 AM
3

My thoughts exactly. He can go first.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 04:34 AM
3

It's a good one. I liked how the interviewees who were so sure that there is zero differences between the sexes outside the genetalia were just shocked that anyone would suggest otherwise. That's some serious brainwashing on display.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 11:54 PM
4

If a woman looks at a man and notices his cufflinks and his Rolex, she is reducing him to what he has, not who he is. Do you really think she cares whether he earned it as a doctor or a lawyer? What he does is merely circumstantial. And I will still argue that this is fine. She is making a judgement in an instant as to his value to her as a potential mate. What she isn't doing is permanently reducing him to his possessions and social status and thus really dehumanizing him. Same goes for men not…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 11:48 PM
46

There is nothing inherently wrong about objectification. The idea that objectification is the precursor to wholesale dehumanization is taken for granted in the gender roles narrative and needs to be called into question more often. Admiring women's physical features for their natural appeal and signaling of sexual fitness is just as disrespectful to women as human beings as enjoying the sweet taste of apples is disrespectful to apples as fruits of the natural world. Furthermore, even if one can …
/r/MensRights25/11/13 06:39 PM
1

This is not an uncommon attitude. During a breakup with an ex she accused me of being neglectful of my dog just because she took him for more walks (a slim majority of the time) while she was staying at my place, as though that meant that the dog wouldn't get walked at all when she was gone. The truth is, she just didn't want to get kicked out of my house even though the relationship was over. Well she's gone now and I can confirm the dog is well taken care of, and gets plenty of trips outdoors …
/r/MensRights16/11/13 08:44 AM
18

I wonder, is the amount of alimony and child support paid by men counted towards their incomes, making them appear better off than they actually are and thus tilting the stats even further?
/r/MensRights16/11/13 08:36 AM
1

If you have a link closer to the source, please provide it so we can all take a look.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:12 AM
1

It turns out that a lot of data collected about consumer spending is done by companies looking to compete in the market, not so much by academia. For another anecdote, I'm actually CTO at a marketing technology firm, and the data we've collected over the last two years reflects a similar trend. Admittedly, our scope is limited to the markets we've worked with since starting business: coffee and home brewers, shoes, wine, pet supplies, and a number of others, but certainly far from comprehensive.…
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:08 AM
-1

But women do go to the doctor far more than men, and forcing men to pay the same is exactly like forcing the little old lady who has never had an accident to pay the same auto insurance as the guy who routinely wrecks his car. I can't say this line of reasoning makes sense to me. Frequent visits to the doctor lower an individual's risk of long-term, expensive health complications. A preventative health care schedule at the very least breaks even with the cost of individuals who rarely see a doct…
/r/MensRights14/11/13 05:28 AM
3

Even in a world where there are plenty of methods of contraception. ...and the vast majority are under the complete control and discretion of women.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 11:29 PM
1

I don't think I'm alone amongst MRAs when I say, "Fuck Rush Limbaugh." This is nothing but another part of the ongoing effort to turn "MRA" into a slur. First they ignore you...
/r/MensRights13/11/13 11:22 PM
3

If I hire a personal shopper, does it mean they control my entire bank account? I hate to split this thread again, but that's just a terrible analogy. A personal shopper is given a budget, a specific list of what to buy, and the only money they get from me that they get to actually control is the money I pay them to do the shopping. A personal shopper is hired to do a job, and they don't get to partake in the enjoyment of the things I have them purchase. With women controlling the majority of pu…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 11:01 PM
3

I would say that different situations might make your assertion that "you can choose to not let another person spend it anymore very easily" somewhat dubious, especially the "very easily" part, but it doesn't really matter. In the aggregate, what we're seeing is that women are in fact doing most of the spending and that whoever actually happens to "own" the wealth isn't exactly turning off the tap. In fact, everything I've cited so far shows that the trend of women coming to dominate not only co…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 10:49 PM
11

If the money is mine but I let you spend it, who really controls it? Whose money is it at that point? Seems to me that the money being "mine" at the point is no more than a symbolic distinction. But either way, I'll reiterate my reply to your other post: More women are taking the reins on their finances, holding 60 per cent of all personal wealth and 51 per cent of all stocks in the U.S., according to Virginia Tech. Also, consumer spending and GDP are not equivalent. Consumer spending is a large…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 10:25 PM
10

More women are taking the reins on their finances, holding 60 per cent of all personal wealth and 51 per cent of all stocks in the U.S., according to Virginia Tech. http://www.businessinsider.com.au/infographic-women-control-the-money-in-america-2012-2 Edit: Formatting.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 10:06 PM
12

Here's another for you, from Virginia Tech. Women control nearly 60 percent of the wealth in the United States. Shall I continue doing all the research here? Here's more numbers, from a site dedicated to advancing marketing toward women due to their increasing grip on consumer spending. The number of wealthy women investors in the U.S. is growing at a faster rate than that of men. In a two-year period, the number of wealthy women in the U.S. grew 68%, while the number of men grew only 36%. Women…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 10:04 PM
14

Fleishman-Hillard Inc. estimates that women will control two-thirds of the consumer wealth in the U.S. over the next decade and be the beneficiaries of the largest transference of wealth in our country’s history—compelling insight for anyone curious about who’s keeping the U.S. economy going these days. You're right. It validates a figure of 66% over the next decade. Hmm.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 09:45 PM
17

Well I already cited an article, but here's another one for you to corroborate.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 09:28 PM
25

Large degrees of "real power" which also come with large degrees of public exposure and scrutiny. Why would women want to put themselves needlessly into such high-pressure positions, given that women already control 60% of US wealth (and increasing, seems to me akin to "real power") without the burden of all the extra risk?
/r/MensRights13/11/13 09:09 PM
9

Guys I think we just identified that whole "rape culture" thing people have been talking about. This seems to "normalize, excuse, tolerate, and even condone rape."
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:58 AM
4

Obvious solution: Force the men in the lives of convicted women to carry out the sentence on their behalf.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:13 PM
9

Creep shaming is such nonsense. The word "creepy" can be expanded in scope to include any guy who expresses normal attraction to a girl who doesn't reciprocate that attraction. The innocent is made out to be devious and malevolent, probably driven by the irrational fear of males perpetuated by feminists. It's not merely that the girl is made mildly uncomfortable at being presented with having to reject an unwanted (not necessarily aggressive, merely unwanted) advance. It's that the guy is a "cre…
/r/MensRights29/10/13 01:03 AM
15

Inevitably someone will argue that this is still sexism against women because it reflects the soft discrimination of low expectations. Which is a legitimate point, but when the real material harm is coming to boys I think we can stop, if just for a moment, redirecting the definition of "sexism" such that girls are always the victims. Hell, it's this nonstop victimizing and apologizing for girls which perpetuates these low expectations of them in the first place. Want society to see women as equa…
/r/MensRights28/10/13 07:30 PM
9

Thanks for the info. I had been looking forward to this documentary, but didn't know anything about the creators. No examination of men's issues is complete if it attempts to corral all of the causation within the fence of masculine traits without considering the contributions of the other half of society. That kind of thinking is really just a form of "man up" and yet another attempt to strip women of agency at the burden of men.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 07:22 PM
2

Female privilege: Being treated like a human being by the criminal justice system (even as it is composed of mostly male judges and prosecutors, imagine that).
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:19 AM
6

Excellent answer. While it is good to see some self-identified feminists coming forward and expressing empathy for men's issues, the fact of the matter is that feminism as an institution has, in many instances, actively pushed for laws which fail to acknowledge male victims and has worked to deliberately obfuscate the facts of male suffering. And it's not just feminism's actions which are wrong, but the very theory to which they adhere, that of pervading patriarchy being the cause of suffering f…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 12:30 AM
2

They would have classes on fearing men and boys, probably including some useless, pseudo self-defense exercise class in there somewhere.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 02:53 AM
1

Apparently gay men are incapable of expressing machismo. Which is why there is no such thing as a gay male firefighter, motorcyclist, jock, or bodybuilder. Oh, and since gay men are not masculine, they are necessarily feminine, so teaching guys to respect women also teaches them to respect gay men. Because women and gay men are, of course, the same thing and straight men see them as such. /s What a smelly load of brain-shit. Who the hell writes articles like this?
/r/MensRights21/10/13 02:51 AM
2

A great irony that the tent city is named "Camp Take Notice".
/r/MensRights17/10/13 11:39 PM
3

+1. I did a research paper on depleted uranium and its ongoing effects and it is fucked up. Keep in mind that wherever we go around "nation building" we leave behind increased rates of cancer, birth defects, and deformity that lasts generations.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:45 AM
5

"Why being a man makes me a better [X]." = Misogyny "Why being a woman makes me a better [X]." = Empowerment Edit: Formatting.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:42 AM
3

The internet doesn't hate men or women specifically. It has enough hate for everyone! :P
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:29 AM
4

Probably because you get way more traffic if you just single out men.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:26 AM
1

I was referring specifically to the entitlement referred to in the linked post. I thought that was pretty clear, but I guess not. Context.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:22 AM
3

I have mixed feelings about this. For starters, can't we just all acknowledge the legitimacy of people's issues? Men have specific issues which affect them especially because they are men. Women have specific issues which affect them especially because they are women. Racial minorities, people with low income, people with mental illness, people of minority sexual orientation, etc. Every group of people which faces special challenges as a result of being in that group deserves to have its issues …
/r/MensRights14/10/13 02:16 AM
2

A lot of people who believe in Patriarchy openly support this assertion.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 01:48 AM
2

I don't care for her music, but if she can get this same attitude into the heads of all her teenaged fans, I'm a fan.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 01:27 AM
-4

As long as attitudes like the one pointed out in this tweet are acceptable and pervasive in society, men will never be equals. Either women need to drop the entitlement or such entitlement needs to be equally acceptable for men to possess. Addressing this inequality is a benefit to men.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 01:24 AM
2

You might be surprised that you can talk about this stuff openly when it comes up. Some might be more hostile than others, but I've never found it to be anything I couldn't handle. One of the keys is that you not be hostile yourself, that you listen to the other people, and concede when they raise valid objections which you are not prepared to counter. Reasonable people respect reasonable people. One of the first people I opened up to about this stuff was an ex-girlfriend. We had conversations o…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 06:54 AM
7

The acceptance of circumcision of boys at birth is such a core example of male oppression. It is so accepted, so transparent in our society that I had never even considered it to be a men's issue until I started reading this sub more. And even then there was a part of my mind conditioned to accept circumcision; after all, it's so prevalent, and it was done to me. The fact is, the victims don't know they're victims because they won't remember it being done to them and most other penises are also …
/r/MensRights08/10/13 11:43 PM
1

By the way you didn't capitalize the beginning of your sentence and you omitted two apostrophes. Lucky for you comments are editable, unlike post titles. Imagine, you who can't let go of a spelling mistake I already apologized for, leaving grammatical and spelling errors in every single one of your responses. Troll harder dude. You take so much joy in pointing out other people's errors and you can't even keep it straight yourself.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:35 PM
1

I will quite enjoy it, thank you. You win, sir. I claim no victory here. You can have it.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:32 PM
1

It betrays so well your own lack of maturity. Happy trails!
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:20 PM
3

Not to mention, Ganondorf isn't even brown. He's fucking green. And his hair is red/orange! FFS. People are just so bereft of real problems that they seek out reasons to be offended. In this case, to the point they don't even have their basic facts straight.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:06 AM
2

Liberal here. Video games aren't insulting to liberals. Anita Sarkeesian is insulting to video games.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:04 AM
2

I hope they go ahead and do this. They'll just dispel the myth of gendered wage discrimination.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 10:51 AM
1

Thanks for the well wishes!
/r/MensRights06/10/13 10:45 AM
1

Alright dude. You're so right. Have a good one.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 10:44 AM
29

It's tricky, isn't it? The fact is, romance doesn't happen without one party making a move first, which involves some level of crossing boundaries, the way one might dip their toes into a pool to test the condition of the water first rather than just jumping right in. The party who makes the initial move faces the risk of rejection, but in today's society they might face even harsher consequences if the advance is unwanted. It can be hard to tell how subtle to be, but some cases even the most in…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 11:50 PM
1

By the way, it's "should have" not "should of". FFS, you'd think your long diatribe about my spelling mistake would at least have correct grammar in the opening line of your post. Edit: You're so fired.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 09:58 PM
1

There were more than 3 posts by the time the error was pointed out. I looked for a way to edit it immediately, at which point I discovered Reddit doesn't allow editing post titles. Darn. Then /u/ThinkProcessThenRage flew off the handle over my response, which included an apology and a light jab in response to the fact that he felt the need to curse while pointing out a minor mistake. I'm not sure how he comes off to you looking like he handled anything maturely whatsoever. Another thing you do w…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 09:50 PM
1

Until you get married, at which point your woman becomes gatekeeper of both!
/r/MensRights03/10/13 08:47 PM
1

Reddit doesn't give you the option to edit the title of a post, and discussion in the comments had already started. Tell me, Boss, how should I have rectified the error to your liking? Delete the whole thread (and the comments with it) and re-post it? That seems like a totally reasonable thing to do over a single misplaced letter. And this is how you would handle such a minor mistake from an employee? Rather than point it out calmly, issue forth a barrage of verbal berating and insults? And then…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 08:05 PM
2

You don't think it's a slight overreaction? I misplaced a single letter, and that makes me a "fucking idiotic halfwitted douchbag" (note that dude spelled "douchebag" wrong while calling me out on my spelling mistake in all his self-righteous furor).
/r/MensRights02/10/13 12:00 AM
4

What they're skipping over is why a mostly male government would pass laws oppressive to men in the first place. It is to placate women. If a man is in the driver's seat, but the woman in the passenger seat is telling him where to drive, who's really in control of the car?
/r/MensRights30/09/13 05:35 AM
10

That right there is better marketing than we could ever hope for.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 05:19 AM
6

I was going to point this out. And as you scroll through them, the title above still says "Men's Rights Posters".
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:18 PM
27

Since the vast majority of rapes of women are perpetrated by someone the victim knows personally, and since all other forms of violent crime are perpetrated most against men, the whole "no woman is safe walking at night" line is pure, pure bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:03 PM
0

This isn't anti-feminism, it's anti-hypocrisy. Feminists who claim they really really do care about men's issues should put up or shut up. That doesn't mean there aren't plenty of reasonable people who take on the label of "feminist", but we hear a lot of talk from some of them about how they care about men's issues within the framework of deconstructing gender roles, and yet the actions of their political bodies show either a disregard or outright contempt for the idea that men have serious iss…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:45 PM
3

Can I ask exactly what makes my comment "retarded"?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:41 PM
2

Did you really think process before this display of rage? Jesus man.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:40 PM
6

81,000 straw feminists, amirite?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:01 AM
14

Handshakes and hugs? More like SEXUAL ASSAULT. /s
/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:55 AM
9

It's not only the best thing you can do, it's the perfect counter. Their own aggression gets deflected back on them, and the louder and more violent they get in their attempts to provoke a response, the worse they make themselves look. Any outsider will know who the scum really is, without anyone having to say it.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:54 AM
1

My bad. Too late to edit it. :/ Also, fuck you. /s Edit: Really though, just wanted to get the word out. She's doing a lot of great work on the crisis boys are currently facing in education, and she's one of the few talking about it openly who regularly gets her message into the mainstream. Truly sorry about the spelling mistake.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:47 AM
90

Surely feminism will work to change this law, because the expectation that men be providers and protectors is a construct of the Patriarchy, and feminism is all about fighting the Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:28 AM
3

If saying mean things to someone is violence, then there is a worldwide epidemic of violence against all people at an unfathomable scale. But let's just focus on mean things said to women by men.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:24 AM
1

I think maybe the feminist theory here is that these young women would not be sexualizing themselves if it were not for the culture of sexualization that has been set up by the Patriarchy. Because, somehow, there's no way a sane female with an independent mind, unmolested by the patriarchal media, would ever try to seduce a man by presenting her nakedness to him. Of course, the very idea that the media is controlled by the Patriarchy is absurd given the endless stream of content specifically pro…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 09:02 PM
4

But you see, all men find all female bodies attractive, to the point of an uncontrollable urge to rape them. All women, on the other hand, find all male bodies repulsive, and of course they never rape. /s
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:50 PM
2

Correct. Rape culture is what causes straight men to find women sexually attractive. Nothing to do with biology. Which of course means that rape culture precedes human evolution! /s
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:48 PM
3

Just like it's hard for (straight) women not to sexualize attractive men who sexualize themselves. I have an idea. How about we stop trying to completely change human nature, a practice which can only create an increasingly emotionally, mentally, morally, and sexually underdeveloped populace. How about we instead encourage people to embrace their natures while respecting the natures, rights, and autonomy of others? Is that so hard? As a man, I probably just need to be "educated".
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:46 PM
16

And Bill Burr. I also saw Dave Chappelle last Friday and he made a number of jokes referencing the unique difficulties faced by male victims of rape. That's the great thing about comedy: A comic is allowed to talk about topics not normally "allowed" in everyday conversation. Perhaps comics starting to talk more about these issues is the forerunner to a much more public, open dialogue.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:55 AM
1

So the value of a human life is based completely upon that life's reproductive potential? Way to turn men into sex objects.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 03:06 AM
1

But why are men between 60% and 85% of suicide bombers in these groups? Is it because men are inherently violent, or is it because the expectations thrust upon them, by other men and women, due to their gender?
/r/MensRights27/09/13 03:05 AM
4

So we're just assuming that all women present on a scene are non-militants, while also assuming that all men present on a scene are militants. This, in fact, is a matter of policy: http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/militants_media_propaganda/singleton/ And we've yet to acknowledge similar headlines which don't involve militants at all and the way they single out women as though the deaths of women are more tragic than the deaths of men, such as, "Bridge collapses, 23 killed, 8 women". Edit: Fixed …
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:21 AM
2

This.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:18 AM
2

"Rare" is a relative term. In militant groups which deploy female suicide bombers, the females make up 15% on average. But in some individual groups it can be as high as 40%. Is 15% low enough to ascribe suicide attacks to maleness? Where exactly is the threshold where female participants become negligible? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_attack#Female_suicide_bombers
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:16 AM
0

Makes sense. Which is why the KKK is widely considered a hate group, given its immense power and influence. /s
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:10 AM
1

Never drink at bars or restaurants and buy all your booze wholesale from CostCo. That's the only reasonable way I can see that number holding up. Actually, homebrew works too. My buddy churns out 50 bottles of beer every month with his closet brew setup, and he could do it faster if he staggered more batches. I think he said the cost comes to about $0.60/bottle. Not bad!
/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:43 PM
6

Guys it's all a part of the ruse. Let men think they rule the roost, that they're the kings of their castles, that marriage is favorable to them, and their egos will cling to the notion and make them blind to the truth of their subjugation. Such a good man, such a strong man, such an admiral man who will sacrifice himself for others unquestioningly, even as the whole of his sex is derided as inherently violent and stupid.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:37 PM
4

Men are a constant threat to be feared. Especially black men. And especially if you're a white woman.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:32 AM
14

Of course they would still try to argue that it's worse to be a black woman. I for one wouldn't know much about it, but I'm certainly not seeing an epidemic of unarmed black women being shot by the police being reported by the news. Perhaps the patriarchy is trying to hide the truth? /s
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:31 AM
2

As a dog lover and pitbull owner, I found this comment funny. People need to lighten up. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:28 AM
1

...which can cause some of them to act like infants, triggering a protective instinct in the men in their proximity, thus reinforcing and encouraging continued infantile behavior, and the vicious cycle of toxic norms and low expectations continues. Indeed, women need to be held to the same standards as men if we're ever going to have equality. Unfortunately, many women find this situation to be favorable, and in some ways some feminists encourage lower levels of accountability for women. It's re…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 07:02 AM
1

Define "nurturing".
/r/MensRights11/09/13 10:33 AM
69

Why don't we point at gender imbalance in the automotive mechanics industry and make the same demands? Because those aren't the "in" jobs right now.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 01:31 PM
5

Apparently it's an 8-year degree for "doctor"ing polls and stats to produce fodder for the desired narrative.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:46 AM
16

+1 same here. More than twice actually. But, of course, it's impossible for a man to not want sex at any given time, right? Therefore impossible for a man to be raped. /s
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:44 AM
4

DON'T DO IT! JK. Do what you want. But I don't know how any thinking man could having seen the nightmarish outcomes friends, family, and OPs have had with the institution.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:28 AM
5

Whether the student "wants it" or not, a high school boy cannot fully comprehend the consequences of having sex, certainly not on the same level as someone much older than him. What if his teacher gets pregnant? In the gender-flipped version, it's certainly conceivable that a high school girl might find her older teacher attractive and might be willing to have sex with him, but we as a society rightly recognize the moral offense in such a scenario in almost every documented case. But when it hap…
/r/MensRights06/09/13 03:46 AM
6

Bro Code®, brought to you by feminism. Because nobody knows better how a man should conduct himself than a woman.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 11:15 PM
3

Feminists also are Jets fans. Does that make sports fandom a tenet of feminism? If they were putting up posters advocating sports fandom as part of their dialogue about gender, yes. Feminists also are Jets fans. Does that make sports fandom a tenet of feminism? Arguably.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:34 AM
4

Feminism is an idea, "feminist" may also be a label, but the label isn't useful if you completely separate it from the ideas and practice of Feminism. How do you separate the ideas and the practice of them from the people who claim the label and act under it? If even just 40% of people claiming to be feminists support campaigns telling men to "man up", well that de facto becomes part of feminism. I understand the point that there exist feminists who are against such gender policing (though I wou…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 12:32 AM
5

No true Scotsman fallacy. The people who take up the label define the label.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:29 PM
8

Not just men: Masculinity bad.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:23 PM
3

Yes, I'm sure white supremacists are a key factor in her daily struggle. s/
/r/MensRights29/08/13 08:25 PM
0

I'm not sure how I feel about the whole "power imbalance" idea. It seems to me that almost all sex occurs in a state of power imbalance. Indeed, women usually hold the most power. The scarcity of ova versus sperm, the rarity of the female fertility cycle versus the male sex drive leads to the female having the final say over whether sex happens in the first place. This default female control over sexual access allows women to take advantage of men in a variety of ways, some of which is documente…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:02 AM
0

You see, patriarchy hurts men too. Boys are falling behind in school because of the harmful gender roles imposed solely by the Patriarchy. Lads mags perpetuate patriarchal norms. Feminism is working to get lads mags censored in their efforts to fight back against the Patriarchy, therefore fighting its harmful gender roles, and therefore helping these boys in school. Obviously your privilege makes you blind to all the good work feminism is doing for boys and men. Leave it to us, and in the meanti…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:32 AM
45

You see, men only see the world as composed of objects valuable only for how useful they are to them. Women, on the other hand, see the bigger picture of interrelations and the inherent value of people as they are. Men only care about things. Only women care about people. Learn some empathy. /s
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:26 AM
9

Agreed. I would hypothesize that the empathy for the woman will be greater than that for the man, and possibly greater than that for the dog. But science demands we test the hypothesis before coming to a final conclusion.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:54 PM
13

When I read "having an attitude", the last thing that came to mind was a woman having an opinion or doing the same things men do. No, what came to my mind was a woman talking down to a man for no fault of his own other than being the nearest punching bag she could use to vent her anger and frustration. Which is something a lot of women have a problem with and something they often get away with merely because they are women. I don't think anyone here is reading it as a woman merely expressing an …
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:36 AM
11

I've been lucky enough to have had relationships where my girl frequently went out of her way for my happiness. I've also had relationships where my girl basically did everything she could to suck up my time and resources and gave nothing back in return. It goes both ways. And plenty of good girls are stuck with loser dudes too. But with messages like this becoming so mainstream, oh so similar to the Marylin Monroe, "If you can't handle me at my worst, you don't deserve me at my best," nonsense,…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:28 AM
1

But in many instances the end result (power and social capital) comes with a lot of obligation and pressure in how you utilize it. We, as a society, expect more from people of means, and we deeply criticize, even outright hate, those who we perceive to be squandering their power. Power and social capital are not the same as a Ferrari, because a Ferrari doesn't come laden with obligations and expectations as to what you do with it (within reason, such as obeying the speed limit and not colliding …
/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:08 AM
4

The media is already trying to disassociate his name from feminism. Search his name, and the headlines all put the word "feminist" in quotes, like: Hugo Schwyzer, 'Feminist' Professor, Is Having a Twitter Breakdown I guess since he's clearly out of his mind, there's no way he could actually be a feminist too, right?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 01:52 AM
1

Well it seems to me that "social capital" and other such vestiges of "privilege" come at a cost. For example, while men may make up most of the leadership in most of our societal institutions, that comes at the cost of an immense amount of pressure, both to succeed in attaining such positions in the first place and to excel under the spotlight once such positions are secured. These expectations and pressures are exerted by society more on men than on women. This "privilege" is really just pressu…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 07:35 PM
2

An extra note on (2), women engaging in domestic violence are more likely to use weapons, such as knives or thrown objects, which pretty much neutralizes the importance of who is physically stronger. Regarding (5), I agree that either both sexes or none should be required to participate in selective service if we really want to completely toss out the notion of gender roles altogether. That said, I think it would be silly to bring women in without considering how mixing men and women on the batt…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 07:55 AM
3

San Francisco here, reporting in with anecdotes of general friendliness and common courtesy.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 07:00 AM
9

The feminists answering in that thread are surprisingly pretty reasonable.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:23 AM
9

Where is /u/Everything_Is_Rape when you need him?
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:16 AM
4

Apparently suicide is a symptom of "privilege".
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:12 AM
1

Oh, sorry about that. I didn't think twice about it though since it's a public post on a very public page.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:57 AM
8

Because this is so much more effective than actually, I don't know, participating in tech while being one of those persons of a diverse background.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:56 AM
5

"The expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect." I guess she's not being ironic because she means it in earnest.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 01:14 AM
18

I actually did have a little girl throw a rock at me. She didn't throw "like a girl", either; the good-sized rock landed squarely on the top of my skull and the gash bled for a long time before it stopped. I was like 5, she was about the same age. All I did was say "hi" from a distance. I can't say it was because of this ridiculous franchise, but hey, have an anecdote contradicting the idea that boys are somehow naturally more inclined toward violence.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 10:55 PM
8

Apparently intentionality only matters when it's convenient. Look what one of the maintainers of the software said in his capitulation: I'll start with the statement though that intention is NOT the most important thing, but impression is. So, if its seen as sexist and negative against women, then by definition it is.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 10:06 PM
18

I also find it ironic that the poster claims she was fearful about posting the bug in the first place. All of the responses thus far have been supportive of her claim to victimhood. Even to this ridiculous extent: I'll start with the statement though that intention is NOT the most important thing, but impression is. So, if its seen as sexist and negative against women, then by definition it is. So it's sexist because someone (a woman) said it was sexist. Talk about opening Pandora's box. What an…
/r/MensRights01/08/13 10:04 PM
1

The use of typography in this poster is expertly employed to get the shaming of all men transmitted viscerally before the "true" intent of the poster, presumably to actually just shame men who are rapists, becomes clear. The first thing you see is three domineering women talking down to a diminutive man with the big, bold label "rapist". It's not until you squint that you can see the tiny text illustrating that he is in fact a rapist due to his actions rather than just any other man being labele…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:58 AM
1

+1 because your username is relevant.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:51 AM
1

Louis CK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4hNaFkbZYU
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:45 AM
2

Such a campaign directed towards women would run completely counter to the typical female mating strategy of maintaining plausible deniability in an effort to protect herself from the psychological and social tolls of rejection. Hell, this campaign directed towards men could almost be considered an extension of this plausible deniability strategy, amplified across all of society.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:36 AM
2

I do want to say that I think Sarah is acting here with the best of intentions. She wants to create a more welcoming community for potential contributors who are less seasoned (such as students) to get involved. One of the comments on her blog post noted that Linus's reputation for being harshly critical dissuaded him from getting involved. Sarah helpfully pointed out that the community actually is welcoming to more novice developers, especially students, and gave him a link to a tutorial on cle…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:28 AM
1

If Big Brother wants to create Newspeak with the goal of making it impossible to think thoughts incompatible with The Party's ideology, Big Sister wants to create Newspeak with the goal of making it impossible to think thoughts potentially offensive to the sensibilities of others. Big Brother values compliance and obedience over truthfulness. Big Sister values niceness and decorum over truthfulness. Both of them are dishonest, controlling, frightened sacks of shit whose primary weapon is the sil…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:52 AM
14

Agreed 100%. It's ridiculous to assert that any woman should have to have an operation she doesn't want, and equally ridiculous to assert that she should have to carry to term a pregnancy she doesn't want. It's her body, her choice. However, a "financial abortion" should absolutely be an option for the paternal partner, such that he can sign away any rights to custody, visitation rights, as well as the obligation to pay child support should the maternal partner choose to carry the pregnancy to t…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:27 AM
3

I once joked to a Sikh friend of mine, "See, we're both privileged: I'm white and you're rich." I think it was pretty apparent which "privilege" carried more weight.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:14 AM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f--u_puzhGs
/r/MensRights25/06/13 10:06 AM
1

Why the downvote? I think my line of reasoning was sound. Looking into it more, I did find another article which includes the FDA's recommendations for other groups, including men (of course at the bottom of the list along with non-fertile women, but don't wanna read too much into that): http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2010/12/mercury-tuna-are-fdas-recommendations-too-high So the linked article is either misleading (it states explicitly, as in the title of this link, that no such guidelin…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:23 AM
0

Mercury is toxic to all human beings regardless of age or gender. Yes, different physiologies will have different levels required for toxicity. But shouldn't the FDA, which we all pay into purportedly to ensure we all have access to informed health advisories regarding the food we eat, let everyone know what they can expect? My being a man, not to mention a woman being a woman not of childbearing age, doesn't make mercury any less poisonous. It just makes the amount required for toxicity somewha…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:57 AM
2

Agreed. California here, voted for Gary Johnson.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:55 PM
1

Good point... Wasn't it originally developed for the purpose of treating some heart condition (before the popular side effect was discovered)? At any rate, I agree that insurance companies ought to be covering BC as well.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 06:38 PM
2

I would argue that there are some biological drivers which would encourage men to have many partners and discourage women from the same. I would also say there are abundant societal changes in today's world which might suggest changes to the ancient traditions of human sexual relationships. That doesn't necessarily mean just hook-up culture, but also serial monogamy or longer-term polygamy (as opposed to short-term hook-ups). That said, long-term relationships have many benefits which cannot be …
/r/MensRights09/05/13 05:04 AM
0

Excellent points. I would also posit that approaching sex in this way contributes quite a bit to after-sex regret, which is becoming more and more (in in some countries already is) equated with rape. Which just compounds the problem. That said, I think "hook up culture" can be a positive thing for both men and women. It just requires the right attitude from all participating parties, that the people engaging in hooking up are emotionally mature. Unfortunately there's a lot which gets in the way …
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:56 AM
4

I have read my shit. I suggest you do the same. I don't think it takes an academic paper to point out that men's issues don't get a lot of media coverage. We have a hard enough time just trying to convince people that we have issues at all or that they're worth addressing. Insurance companies cover Viagra but not birth control. I'm with you on this. I think birth control should definitely be covered (including the male pill when it finally reaches the market), and I think the rationale for cover…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:41 AM
2

So very touching. Why do we need the MRM? Because this is what is lost when men, boyhood, and fatherhood are routinely ignored or vilified and when fathers are forcefully alienated from their children based on false pretexts.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 11:41 PM
51

Rape culture is a concept used to describe a culture in which rape and sexual violence are common and in which prevalent attitudes, norms, practices, and media normalize, excuse, tolerate, or even condone rape. Yep. Sure seems like we're living in a world which normalizes, excuses, tolerates, and even condones rape...
/r/MensRights01/05/13 09:59 PM
2

Witholding the part we are expected to play by men and women alike would be construed as abusing our male privilege. It doesn't make sense, but I bet one could count the seconds before some feminist writes an article framing it exactly as such.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:50 AM
3

TIL only other men expect men to fulfill traditional and potentially harmful male roles. Women never expect such things of men, therefore Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:48 AM
2

So a feminist writes an article downplaying the importance of this man's work in providing actual service to the largely silent male victims of DV, and this commenter can still claim without irony that it's the patriarchy keeping them silenced? That level of cognitive dissonance must take a lot of work to maintain.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 01:59 AM
1

Okay, let's go down this road. You're still choosing to ignore the rest of my argument. Even if I might be wrong on this one point, the rest of my argument stands unchallenged if you refuse to acknowledge it. Now. Persistence hunting. Was it used to hunt the mammoth? The best information I can find is that a common strategy was actually to ambush a herd near a cliff and drive the largest one they could off the cliff. This doesn't involve endurance running so much as ambushing and startling the a…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:53 AM
2

This is just another misrepresentation. I simply said that the strategy posited by these radical feminists would not work very well. I'm not saying that women employing a better strategy (like the ones tribes actually used) would be incapable of hunting. Your choice here is to dismiss my entire argument on the basis of misrepresenting one piece of it which was not even near the crux of our argument. Would you like to try again from a place of honesty?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:05 AM
1

The last article just doesn't seem directly relivent, and to reach your conclusion, we have to suppose a great deal about what is "truly" motivating these women, and I can't see how the researchers jumped to the conclusion that women have a "greater range of career choices" compared to their male counterparts (it seems to me that standardized testing scores are not the same a course performance and enrollment in college). Why do you think that vastly more men do dangerous work than women, as evi…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:43 AM
5

College campuses are becoming ever more hostile environments toward men, and this will inevitably worsen the already growing disparity of men in higher education. Will we have equality when 90% of college students are women?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 11:29 PM
0

But I thought that men are dogs. Misandry might real, but it don't consistent.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 11:11 PM
-2

So even the ludicrous notion of a written consent contract prior to sex is insufficient to protect oneself from claims of rape? This is absurd. If I bring a notarized form to court co-signed by my accuser spelling out our equal consent to sexual intercourse at the time and place of the alleged rape, it can still be rape. Unbelievable. This basically makes any sex act able to be called rape at the whim of the accuser. Absolutely unbelievable.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 11:08 PM
2

It's pretty easy to see how much income any person has available for their education, no matter what their particular situation. If you have less than $X in disposable income for your education, you should qualify for financial aid regardless of gender, race, religion, etc.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 11:05 PM
0

True, there are. So why do we need scholarships which target some particular cause of economic disadvantages when we have a general solution of targeting economic disadvantage of the whole? I'm open to suggestions as to the legitimate purpose of targeting one factor of economic disadvantage to the exclusion of all others.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 11:02 PM
1

On average, men have superior physical strength and durability, important for certain types of jobs necessary to many of society's most basic functions. Muscle mass: After adjusting for dimorphism in size (height), adult males have greater total lean mass and mineral mass, and a lower fat mass than females. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521690X07000371 Skeletal size, strength, and density (necessary for durability under load as well as for supporting larger muscles): The lar…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:58 PM
1

It certainly is cultural to some extent. Some cultures do use the word today without any thought given to its original meaning as a vulgar word for "vulva". But where it is still used in its original meaning, one might say it's considered "dirty" to the extent that it's the use of vulgarity to describe the vulva, and not the vulva itself, causing the offense. And where slang is concerned in general, I might posit that there are many more slang words for male genitalia than for female genitalia, …
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:04 PM
2

Especially in light of the fact that social and personality qualities which have been articulated with hegemonic masculinity (toughness, insensitivity, callousness, etc) are very damaging to the mental and physical health of men... Citation needed. This is quite a qualitative, subjective interpretation in your conclusion. Qualities perceived as being masculine are necessary to the very foundation of societal coexistence, even if carried to the extreme, in rare cases, they can become a detriment.…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 11:20 AM
11

Women's genitals are sacred. Men's genitals are absurd and laughable. Same reason "cunt" is widely considered one of the foulest curse words in American English, while "dick" is fine to say in almost any mixed company.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:59 AM
1

Even without factoring in making money off the ideology, one could say it's even just because blaming men might be cathartic for women who have had bad experiences with men. On the micro level, a woman who is resentful of men might, without even thinking much about it, begin to project that resent by blaming her problems on the men within and adjacent to her life. On the macro level, patriarchy extends that resentful blaming to an overarching theory which blames the problems of all women everywh…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:54 AM
4

Exactly. Ideology is the enemy. Ideology, by definition, will always be frenemies with the truth. If your theory can't adapt to new evidence, then it's not a theory, it's an ideology.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:33 AM
22

Better yet, why not just give scholarships to people who are at an economic disadvantage for any reason? Single father, single mother, young adult coming from poverty, whatever. Gender, race, creed, etc need not apply.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter