TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hugolp Archive

View 0 posts and 676 comments by hugolp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The big issue for men is that women are the significantly higher group that attend college and attain degrees at a higher level. This is extremely concerning that young men are either not motivated or not financially capable of attaining college degrees. Not as much as you think. College is becoming more and more useless so it does not bother me too much. What I think is more concerning about college is how they treat the males that go there, but that less males are going makes logical sense.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:07 PM
6

From the FAQ: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq#wiki_2._what_is_the_.2Fr.2Fmensrights_perspective_on_the_wage_gap.3F
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:47 PM
8

True feminism is about equality, not just for women, but men too. Feminism has never been about this. Study early suffragettes for example. You can decide you want feminism to be like something, but the reality and history of the movement is another thing. Being anti-feminist is not extreme, is the normal position men's rights advocates have always had.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:46 PM
12

Men's right has been anti-feminism since the start and rightly so. Also, being anti-feminist does not mean being woman hating, on the contrary.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:36 PM
19

gender wage gap There is no wage gap because of gender discrimination.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:35 PM
5

The patriarchy works in mysterious ways. Have faith and feminism will guide you to salvation.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 10:58 AM
1

Maybe Obama directly didnt, but his campaign did non-stop (and there is no way he was not aware of the strategy).
/r/MensRights27/04/16 06:41 AM
3

USA colleges look more and more like soviet burocracy.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 10:39 AM
6

The tags of the article are: Gender, Women, Reddit, Internet. Even in a piece about men, men do not matter, just how men affect women. Also, the article was unberable, I had to just quckly browse over the last half to see if it was going somewhere or was going to continue with the nonsensical rambling.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 09:53 PM
6

You are correct. His father is a psychiatrist in NY. I have corrected my comment.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 12:56 PM
39

EDIT: I was wrong. Her father is a psychiatrist in NY.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 10:21 AM
2

She is trying to safe face.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 05:43 AM
6

They do, its called college.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 05:10 AM
10

It is a textbook narcissistic "apology": I am sorry you understood me wrong.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 11:48 AM
3

Think for a moment. Why do you think that is? Because only positive comments were written or because feminists censor anything that go against The Narrative?. What good is a comment that will get deleted?
/r/MensRights30/01/16 10:58 AM
5

That is the fucked up thing. Colleges have done what they have done because of federal government pressure and now are being pressured the other way by the local government. I am sure some crazies in colleges loved the federal gov mandate, but the people just following orders must be between confused and really fed up of the whole show.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 07:46 PM
12

So she is a real feminist then?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 01:47 AM
2

And once they get that they will say they are bored and they will go fuck a guy that fits their description of misogynistic pig (aka a normal dude).
/r/MensRights18/01/16 12:07 PM
6

Also muscular does not mean knowing how to fight. Muscular guys with no martial arts training are intimidating because most men don't know how to fight nowadays, but in front of a trained guy they fall quick.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 04:55 PM
13

She is a feminists, delusions run hard on her.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 08:59 PM
-1

are a direct response to the idea of constantly making women feel it's their responsibility alone to prevent sexual assault. This is not the case. I understand it is tempting to play the victim because of a few jerks, but it is not the case that there is the general trend of blaming the person being raped instead of the rapist.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 04:20 PM
17

Press conference are not hip anymore. Making criminal accusations with a twitter message is all the rage nowadays.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 08:18 AM
1

Self-defence is not premeditation. You can carry a chisel around for multiple reasons.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 03:33 PM
1

Men are expendable. It has a biological basis so you might as well get used to it and use it as motivation to push you farther.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 10:36 PM
11

I wonder how feminists realize the obvious behavioral differences between men and women yet still keep believing that men and women brains are absolutely equivalent, that sex is only a few external and muscular differences. If we are mentally equal, why do we have strong behavioral differences?
/r/MensRights11/12/15 10:33 PM
3

She said it because otherwise it opened her for libel or whatever is the legal figure. But to her belivers she just has to say that being forced to say it is proof of the patriarchy in action.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:33 PM
77

That's not true. She did go to the police, they investigated and saw it made no sense, so they dropped the case. Then she decided to hide it and started telling everyone that she did not want the police involved.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 07:07 AM
1

Next time use archive, don't give them clicks.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 02:36 PM
6

Wow, so she is a more manipulative piece of shit that she even appears. Why would anyone vote for her?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:40 AM
3

Bill Burr explains it with humor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIOY2ezMy9A
/r/MensRights28/10/15 06:41 PM
11

She will win and she will do very little for feminism other than keep giving feminists tax payer money, which is what feminists actually care about. There will be a bunch of gestures towards women and feminism that will be heavily publicized and that will be all.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:35 PM
38

Ronda is not transphobic. She just said that a trans woman should not be able to compete in the UFC women divisions because she has a bigger bone structure and muscle development from years of exposure to high testosterone levels as a male. Which I think is completely reasonable.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 09:05 PM
3

Someone being mean is not abuse. Not having your feelings hurt is not a right. If you live in society you are going to get your feelings hurt one way or another. Feminists are going to dilute another word so much that real victims of abuse are going to get ignored among all the noise.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:25 AM
12

It is also the way feminists have been bullying the rest of society and how they forced this men to make this stupid test.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 06:09 PM
131

The fact that they chose politics, from all the less controversial options, as the option that abusers dont use is all you need to see. This is indoctrination.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:40 PM
2

There is a difference between trusting and being a moron.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:04 AM
1

In a scale from a lot to insanely how delusional do you think you are?
/r/MensRights18/09/15 11:06 AM
8

You are assuming that women who don't do as good as men in the workplace is because of discrimation, when all studies show there is no indication of such. Women don't earn as much money as men because they have statistically different preferences. But a particular woman that choses and does the same as a succesful man will have roughly the same success. But there are biological reasons as to why more women than men chose not to do so. And assuming this false pretense that discrimination exists, …
/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:12 AM
2

Is it me or this USA elections are very ridiculous? Its hard to look back and find worse candidate than this time.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 05:04 AM
2

Why is encouraging women to do better in the workplace a good thing? Each women has the right to try to achieve that that makes her happy within the constraints of reality. Who are you to determine that doing better in the workplace is what women need?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 05:03 AM
2

fix the underlying problem - that real rapists rarely get charged This is a completely bogus and unproven claim. For all we know is false. It's basically feminist propaganda to create rape histeria. Let me repeat, the claim has never been proven, it's made up.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 06:27 AM
12

If you want to be fair, you have to acknowledge that women have strong in group bias. Its hard for a man debating a woman to get support from other women. Women will tend to side with the woman.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:50 PM
3

Progressives have always been authoritarian. Since the start, check their early ideologues from the early XX century. They just complain and use all their theatrics when the censorship is against them.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:20 PM
-5

I'm lazy too so if you want proof look for it.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 03:09 PM
6

Yes, there is lots of studies showing how women have a hard time empathising with men, have ingroup bias while males don't,..
/r/MensRights22/08/15 01:46 PM
12

Women have a hard time empathising with men for biological reasons. Feminism is just another expression of this phenomenon.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 09:31 AM
2

No, by acting like a woman I mean exactly what he means that he felt like a bitch. There is a claim by feminists that says that men are misogynistic because they see acting like a woman as bad. But that is another stupid claim by feminists to add to the list. That a man sees a man acting like a (traditional) woman as bad does not imply that he sees a woman acting like a (traditional) woman as bad. In fact, women get insulted for acting like a (traditional) man.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:11 PM
3

You are not correct in the characterization of the problem. That a man sees him acting like a woman as bad, does not imply that he sees being a woman as bad.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 02:43 PM
3

Stop claiming I don't understand and answer to what I'm saying, not something you made up. I don't care whether you consider something an object or not, its just a methaphore anyway. My question is why do you have a problem with sex being used for advertisement to the point of calling it exploration but not with anything else?
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:56 PM
5

Adverstisment often focus on one or few ideas to send a clear message. Why this obsession only when they do with sexuality (to the point of calling it exploitation)? I don't understand why it bothers you so much that they use sexuality but not for example the desire to get rich or to have a family or whatever.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 05:51 PM
7

So using something humans like to attract attention and create a positive sensation is not natural at all? It is precisely the fact that it is completely natural why it can be used for advertisement so effectively. People feel sexually aroused with some body parts, people like to feel sexually aroused, and advertisement uses it. It is not a plot of The Patriarchy(TM), its how we are. If you have a thing against advertisement, then its a different issue. And sex is not the only natural inclinatio…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 04:52 PM
5

I want to believe that it means that she was avoiding studying sex difference exclusively, but during her research these differences kept popping up so she finally gave it a go. It's basically trying to play nice with feminists, so they don't bully her like they have done with a lot of other scientists. Basically, because feminist dogma says that men and women have no brain differences and that all perceived ones are cultural, scientists that try to look for differences are demonized by feminist…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 02:44 PM
14

Objectification is bullshit. Its a stupid concept. Humans feel attracted to the body of other humans. If we didn't humanity would not exists. We can also feel attracted to other things once we meet the person, but there is absolutely nothing wrong in feeling attracted to a body. It's the normal state of being human. If you don't you should consult with your doctor and/or psychologist. Let me repeat this: You should feel sexually attracted to the body of other people. If you don't something is wr…
/r/MensRights13/08/15 02:36 PM
1

If you think a porn convention is a bunch of women I have a road to sell you.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 08:45 PM
1

If she is flesh and bones, she is one of the crazy ones, not the fantasy version.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 08:42 PM
37

When two lesbians fight you arrest the nearest man. Duh!
/r/MensRights08/08/15 07:33 PM
2

Make him sleep with his clients? Or would that be soft love?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:58 PM
34

Because pussy. Github nerd makes money, suddenly girl notices him and with the power of pussy convinces him something needs to be done.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 07:17 PM
2

Just because you talk and cry about something does not mean you are empathizing. And just because you remain silent does not mean you don't. I can not imagine a bigger proof of empathy than making the discovery of a solution your life mission.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 09:11 AM
6

Well American liberals are not real liberals to start with. That's why classical liberal was created to describe what the rest of the world calls just liberal. The word evolves.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 08:28 PM
6

Society makes her want men attention! Zero personal responsability.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 09:07 PM
1

That already happens in r/adviceanimals and nobody claimed harassment. In fact it's one of the most successful subreddits. They uploaded their pictures and made them public on the internet. They should accept people making fun of them. Nobody has the right to not be made fun of. You might say is in bad taste or whatever, but its not harassment. And even reddit admins have admitted the harassment reason you are so hard trying to defend was bullshit by abandoning it and giving a different justific…
/r/MensRights20/07/15 07:39 AM
1

Well, I'm sure your mum and grandma are wonderful women and maybe not just an exception. But I am still not convinced this is a new phenomenon.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 02:44 PM
3

This is a good point about not only being career women having very high expectations. But I'm not sure this is a modern phenomenon. Genetic studies have showed that we come from a limited amount of males while most females reproduced. It was calculated that we descend from only 20% of the males, which fits perfectly with females finding 80% of males beneath them that you pointed out. Maybe that's how human evolution works. Male are much more variable than women, which also points in this directi…
/r/MensRights19/07/15 02:18 PM
7

The problem is the second part of my comment. Feminism has told women that men and women are the same. So these women feel attracted to high status, rich, powerful men, even older men, and (since we are equal) they think men also feel the same way. Men are just dating down because until now there were not many powerful women, then when there were powerful women, because social conditioning and all the rest of feminist justification for their dogma. So these women have been pushing themselves har…
/r/MensRights19/07/15 02:00 PM
13

Women are not refusing to budge conciously, its what they are attracted to. There is nothing they can really do. Asking them to change is the equivalent to ask a man to be attracted to a 400lbs piece of fat. Sure it would make it easier for the man, but its not how we are hardwire. And there is probably very good evutionary reasons as to why men and women are attracted to what they are attracted. The problem is when feminism comes in, lies to everybod,y specially these rich women, by saying men …
/r/MensRights19/07/15 08:30 AM
0

They did not incited harassment. The imgur staff identified themselves publicly. Fph just got info and pictures publicly available and made fun of them. That's not harassment.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 07:45 AM
0

They used publicly available pictures in their subreddit, that is not harassment.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 07:41 AM
-3

Posting a publicly available picture is not harassment. In fact, they claimed harassment I itially but yesterday they changed the reason, showing that harassment was just a fabrication to ban the sub.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:27 PM
-1

Seriously that should get half reddit banned and I'm sure I'm short. That reason is absolutely ridiculous and basically admitting that they made up the harassment accusations and just wanted to ban that subreddit.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:16 PM
-2

Using publicly available pictures is not harassment.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:13 PM
-3

When asked in the AMA they deny it. This is the second time you have linked to a big post that turns out to say the contrary of what you claim. https://np.reddit.com/r/casualiama/comments/39mqr0/we_are_the_rfatpeoplehate_mod_team_ask_us_anything/cs4njev
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:11 PM
-6

That's the story of what happened once fph was banned, it does not prove, not even tries to, that fph harassed imgur staff.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 04:07 PM
4

Ok, show the source of that.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 03:39 PM
3

She is crazy. She could be doing the same legally.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 02:32 PM
14

Some reddit admins have been part of SRS since very early. They are like the chosen son that can do no bad despite actually breaking all the rules. I'm surprised people don't know reddit is like this.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 02:20 PM
13

VictoriaCruz (or something like that) was a famous one by SRS.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:27 PM
73

SRS has benn brigading, doxxing and harassing users in reddit without consequences. FPH did not brigade, dox or harass, yet they were banned under those accusations. Why do you think this will be any different?
/r/MensRights17/07/15 11:39 AM
3

Why are you giving this guy traffic? Use archive.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:47 AM
8

Yes, but you are being reasonable, and the justice system and the media don't work like that. This is about the "Opreshun Olympics", now its not anymore a man defending himself from a woman, now its a black defending from a woman, and that makes it completely different in their eyes.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:58 AM
-2

But it is sexism. Thinking that men and women are different other than reproductive organs and strength is sexism. And there is nothing wrong with being sexist. Nature, reality, is sexist. Being sexist is different from being misogynist (or misandrist).
/r/MensRights06/07/15 10:49 PM
16

The solution is easy, accuse every person you sleep with of rape. Whoever gets to the police first wins!
/r/MensRights29/06/15 12:54 PM
22

So you believe feminism has no mission anymore? No, I believe feminism has a mission and that is misandry, the hatred of men That was hilarious.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 01:18 PM
8

The fact that we are doubting it is the most worrisome.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 11:41 AM
8

Alleged brutal anal rapist
/r/MensRights27/05/15 08:03 AM
3

I know, she is nuts.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:43 AM
28

This is not true. Its worse. She went to the police, they investigated and decided there was no rape so they dropped the case. After the police had decided to drop the case, she lied and said that she asked the police to drop the case (to gain credibility maybe?). This woman in insane.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:50 PM
12

I like kale.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 06:09 PM
22

You are assuming feminism is not rooted on female sexual strategy.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 08:25 AM
52

Women don't hate players, they just pretend to so they are not labeled as sluts.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 07:32 AM
3

Liberal in the USA and liberal in Europe mean different things. In Europe it still means what you would call classical liberal in the USA.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:07 AM
2

The freedom of working endless hours in the mines while their wifes were at home comfortably opressed. I understand that females are biologically programmed to ignore male suffering, but enough is enough.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:02 AM
25

Funnily enough pornhub released their data on what men and women watch, and women watched hardcore aggressive sex (chocking, slaping, ... what you consider indicative of male on female rape) much more than men. So it seems its mostly women, not men who crave this type of sex. As for the comments of your friends, you have to understand male communication tends to be hiperbolic. I understand so.etimes it can cross the line, but its how we men communicate in certain situations. I really don't see m…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:46 PM
2

Certainly is not a requirement, but it helps a lot.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:58 PM
3

Check any IQ distribution graph separated by sex. You'll see that the mean between men and women is close, but men have more variance. Thus there are more high IQ men than women (it also mean there are more low IQ men them women). And the results are universal, they repeat through countries and races.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:50 PM
1

I think it's not something you can establish. Sure, homogeneity might have some minor benefits, like maybe easy initial integration because of similar culture, but so diversity has some minor advantages like different perspective and new stimulation. It's not something that you will be able to give an answer to. Too many variables and possibilities. I suspect it has very little impact, but who knows.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:22 PM
110

It's not an issue of homogeneity, it's as simple as hiring the best person for the job without regard for sex or race tends to give the best results. Big surprise right? The issue is that for careers that require high IQ you will have more males than females because there are more high IQ males than high IQ women, plus more men seem to have the personality traits to feel attracted to technology than women. But feminist dogma has decided that beyond a few physical cosmetic differences men and wom…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:05 PM
11

The answer is easy. One of the males says (s)he identifies as a woman. Problem solved. Remember that under feminist theory gender is a social construct independent from sex. If you believe otherwise you are a misogynist shitlord. I'd like to see them justify how what I proposed is against the rules.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 02:07 AM
1

I think the starting idea that a genuine man will get hurt while a cunning manipulative guy would not is wrong. And basically rationalization of ones failures. Women like more a man that they percieve out of their league than a man they percieve is well within their possibilities or even lower. We men are the same btw, we like a women that we perceive is a great catch to us, than some women we perceive we could pull easily. So when a man is very affected by a rejection it signals the woman that …
/r/MensRights29/03/15 11:53 AM
6

She was pregnant of 7 months, doing coke and fucking two extrangers. Such a lovely girlfriend...
/r/MensRights27/03/15 09:20 AM
3

The issue is that any violent confrontation is dangerous, no matter how small your opponent is. There are a lot of factors the man does not know when a woman attacks him, is she armed?, does she has allies that will join?, will I lose balance trying to avoid her charge and hit myself in a bad way, will she go for my sex parts and seriously injure them?,... There are unimaginable variables when you engage someone violently, that's why experts recommend running away as first option and if not poss…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 09:12 AM
3

You are correct from a theoretical point of view but I think he is just referring to common courtesy. If I identify as a part of a group and someone tells me someone from that group said or did something hurtful there is a difference between answering: 1) well, we are not all like that, or 2)I'm sorry that happened, hopefully you get to know us better and get a better impression. Its obvious that you are not directly responsible for what another individual does, but no need to be a dick about it…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:37 PM
-7

Revisionist history is something we really need to be calling women out on more often. As things stand now, revisionist history is one in which females were allowed to work and were not constant victims of men abuses.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 08:22 AM
2

You are implying that USprogressivism is not authoritarian. It has been since the start, its just trying to impose a different moral code than modern conservatives.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 07:52 PM
6

Until feminism men were the ones getting legal custody of kids when a separation happened. Feminism, not traditionalism, was the movement that turned this around and promoted laws where women were given preference getting the custody of the kids. Some men issues come mainly from traditionalism, others come from feminism and some others come from both. So save the insults and study some history, otherwise you will keep making a fool of yourself.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 07:50 PM
2

Dont worry, since your overlords know better, just by living two years with a women you become de facto married under the law (it depends on the state you live). Now youll have to cycle them also.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 07:54 PM
0

Then you need to read more what the earlier feminists wrote and said. There were man hating feminists from the start.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 03:22 AM
-14

You know what is funny about this? Now youll get non-students going into campus bars to pick up willing drunk chicks because the students can not pick them up without getting into trouble and the girls still want their fun. Its going to be like a tourist route to fuck easy young pussy for thirtysomethings. And is all thanks to feminism.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 09:09 AM
2

Feminism is much worse and insidious that only those two laws. Of course I'm going to argue against it. I disagree with your view, not criticizing feminism and trying to apise them is going to get you nowhere.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:32 AM
5

So when the injustice men face has been promoted by feminism, like f.e. alimony or child custody, how do you solve it without going against feminism? I understand this generation we have been brought up with strong enfasys on being non confrontational, but when it's in front of your face like this you should see that enough is enough.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 07:19 AM
3

Even if that is your position you still have to explain why feminism lobbied to get women to vote without being drafted, but never lobbied for equality in the draft. Wave after wave they have ignored the issue since the start. They had decades, they have protested about multiple banalities, but such an important issue has been ignored. No matter your position in the draft issue it makes his point, feminism has only cared about "equality" when it gave rights to women. And that is only an example,…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 04:32 AM
3

This is crazy.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 04:22 AM
2

The funny part is that the stereotype of the single old sufragette was a lot of the times accurate.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 07:26 PM
3

Girls hate male feminists.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 10:35 AM
4

Most feminist and MRA's want equality. I dont believe this. I dont think most feminist want equality.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 09:18 AM
5

Nothing. Some time ago it was discovered that lefty USA journalists had a similar mail list. What happened? The list was closed down, but we dont know if a new one was set up and the lefty press did not change at all. Why would this be any different? Journalism is a profesion that can easily promote narcissistic tendencies.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 11:35 AM
5

Everybody has a bias, it's not a bad thing to have a bias since it's inevitable. The issue is people say somebody does not have a bias as a way to give credibility to what they are saying, but in reality "not having a bias" means that the bias alings with the bias of the person or group. Saying someone does not have a bias it's basically a fallacy, but that works surprisingly well on the Internet.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 07:52 AM
1

Insurance is about finding factors to discriminate on. How wise do you assest risk? The law is dumb.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 07:39 AM
-2

Because it feeds the hysteria and gives them money. Feminism is about money.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 08:48 AM
5

You think? ;)
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:45 PM
14

You are over-reacting, those are not real feminists. Feminists are about equality between men and women so we are going to see a backslash from real feminists against those fake feminists very soon to address the issue. You just wait and remember thats not real feminism.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:38 PM
2

He doesn't like red pill so he is trying to taint the name by mixing it with radical feminists. Also he is using it "casually" within the context of another issue as if that's a common expression. Op thinks he is being clever.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:10 AM
0

Pre nups can and are not obeyed if the judge decides that there is some reason not to.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:26 AM
20

The first thing I though is that she was going to be outed or was being blackmailed.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:25 AM
11

This is also a common theme in marxism which is the biggest influence of feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:57 PM
2

You don't need to become a conservative. I was educated as a social democrat (I'm in Europe and liberal still carries it's original meaning unlike in the USA) but the cracks started to show and I had to admit to myself I disagreed with certain core parts. This lead me not to conservatism, but to libertarianism. Check it out, it might work for you too.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:54 AM
3

Dont use Facebook. I dont. Its easy not to.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:53 AM
1

The problem is they censor what they don't like so you don't realize it's happening. I was the same as you. It even surprised me when someone announced he was leaving because of the mods policy. Then it happened to me and decided to leave too.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:25 AM
1

This is a subreddit that can be good for people with narcissists parents, to realize that other people went through similar stuff and get ideas on how to deal with it. But be aware that the moderators are SJW and will use their mod powers to censor opinions they dont like. So go there if you need, its a useful subreddit, but be careful of the political ideas the mods are trying to push.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 05:55 AM
1

But you are not being honest, probably with yourself first. Everybody wants something from their partners and at some conscious level you too do some things for your partner expecting to get something back. Its very "un-self-aware" or dishonest (or a mix of both) to believe that you are over any desire and that all your action towards your partner comes out of a 100% pure impulse, "an end to themselves". Once you admit everybody has desires and everybody do things to obtain those desires, the qu…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:26 AM
32

Not mad, outraged. They are addicted to their righteous rage. And this subreddit is not completely inmune to that.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:07 AM
10

She didnt force him. She demanded it and he agreed. Please dont turn mensrights into feminism.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 02:08 PM
3

Its not weird. Its pretty common.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:23 AM
11

There is no obligation, but there is the expectation. If the expectation is not met he has the right to leave the marriage. He is trying to save the marriage by trying to fix the situation with her. Claiming that it is wrong from him to expect sex from his wife because it could be misunderstood as an obligation is stupid since he has never forced her at all and will only fustrate him more showing him the only option is to leave the marriage. The only one trying to work on the marriage is him, tr…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:08 AM
6

You are missing the point though. She is turning it around saying it that inequality is the fault of the capitalist system (implying, Im guessing, a marxist system would achieve her true equality). She is saying that the capitalist system is inherently afecting the minds of people and stuff like that.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:40 PM
3

You're not really being fair. Social sciences aren't as hard as physical sciences but they are absolutely science. "Social sciences" are not science by the classical definition of the scientific method. Decades ago they were considered theoretical fields but since the sciences got so much prestige among the people, they decided to coin the term "social science" to leech on the popularity and prestige of the sciences. The name has succeeded and I dont really care what name you give it, but social…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:51 PM
0

Because she settled and does not really respect her husband, nor does he look or knows how to look for that respect. Therefore she is not happy. She stays and even probably rationalizes her situation, but her real feelings come out from time to time and ends up lashing up at her husband for not being who she wish he was. At the same time, she is proud of how dominated she has her husband and brags about it in the public view without worrying about the husband reaction on being ridiculed in front…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:07 AM
2

But brains do have som intrinsic internal factors.. You don't need to go from believing that brains are set for life to believe they are 100% adaptable to anything. It's true that brains are surprisingly malleable and can adapt in surprising ways to outside stimulus, but there is also evidence showing there are some underlying intrinsic properties.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:10 AM
2

It's a clear evolutionary tactic. If I shame people they won't have so much sex and I get more chances.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:11 AM
-1

You are forcing a DNA test on a person. I agree it should be rutinary, the default option and we should push for it culturally and socially, but there is a difference from it being mandatory by law.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:50 AM
-5

Yes, compulsory testing circumvent having to stand up to your partner and give her your reasons for doing the test. Forcing a GPS chip on your partner or your partner on you by law circumvent the need to ask for explanations on where you or your partner were last night. If you are in a relationship in which you don't dare saying that to your partner you are in trouble. There are many ways a women can fuck you over. I am currently living with my partner and she Knows I will do the test. She was o…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:16 AM
-1

It's not about the price. I will test my children, but I don't want to be forced to. If you don't have the balls to get a test done you have even bigger problems.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:37 AM
13

Let them dig a bigger hole for themselves.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 04:31 AM
6

It's not really like that. Feminism or because the influence of feminism (whichever you like more) changed the tradicional model of a man, but the new feminist model is ridiculous even misandric or at least does not care about the needs of men. So now we have a bunch of men that have been taught a new model that does not work for them and are super confused because men under the old model seem to be doing better in a bunch of areas despite the constant shaming. It's understandable those men are …
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:20 AM
6

I dont understand why nobody is mentioning the real reason: Money. Feminism is a big comercial machine from who many people are making a living of. They fear MRM will take at least a big part of the money they are getting now.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 09:27 AM
9

Blaming it in video games was getting old. They needed something new.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 02:05 PM
0

USAProgressives have never been about progress. USAProgressives supported racism when it was useful to their goals for example. Or they were the promoters of the military expansion of the USA over the rest of the world. But highjacking the name is useful.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:15 AM
5

They are correct, feminism doesnt blame males directly, they blame masculinity, which is worse.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 04:46 AM
1

I still dont get whats wrong about it. We meet lots of people daily and its impossible to have a deep connection with each person. Its normal to objectificate the guy that sells you the train ticket on your way to work. If he gets replaced you might not even notice. But the time and energy we have is very limited so we prioritize who we want to have more deep relationships with. If you are only capable of very shallow relationships you are probably going to be a pain for others but mainly for yo…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:29 AM
0

Indeed. I still dont get whats wrong with objectification. Most people, both men and women like to be found physically attractive, we like being objectificated. Now, if physical attractioon is all you got or all you care about, you have a problem or you are an asshole, but there is nothing wrong with objectification.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:29 AM
2

And before both genders did it too. I was refering to the day to day conversation and decission making. Also voting is inmoral ang mostly meaningless, so I dont see how that is a big deal.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:07 AM
3

men used to impose gender roles( because in that time only men were allowed opinions) But you know both are false, right? A lot of men and a lot of women imposed and impose gender roles, although nowadays my personal experience is that women do it more. Also women opinions were taken into account as much as the ones of the majority of the men, which means very little.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:02 AM
10

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate group. You can cite me as reference.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 07:42 AM
18

Salon spoke to Rebecca Solnit about her new book, gender-based violence, and why "rape culture" is a useful phrase Not why its real or not, no, why it is useful. It says it all.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 02:22 PM
0

Not all the left is marxists. Unfortunately most of it is marxists or heavily influenced by it, but not all of it. I guess I just inagurated the new term: NALALT...
/r/MensRights09/05/14 06:48 AM
2

Record the next time it happens.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:57 AM
1

Because they are voluntary. Its very different allowing someone to have your DNA information, than having someone forcing you to give it. I dont understand how you can not see the big difference.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:05 PM
-6

Are you trolling? A DNA analysis is not even comparable to a id card.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:04 PM
-6

Secondly, mothers' consent is irrelevant. Fathers also have rights. Why do you think I disagree?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:24 PM
-6

That sounds like a nightmare. Science also benefited from the experiments the national-socialists did on the jews (and yes I win the Goldwin). Its no reason to get behind it.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:35 AM
-5

First, I dont think a forced ADN test by law is anything to run behind. Its crazy. But even if you have your moral doubts, imagine how it would make us look in the public opinion: Making it optional just sets the male to be painted as an asshole for requesting it. "This MRA's are just scared man-childs that want the government to protect them from their imaginary dangers, because they are not good enough to go up front and reach an agreement with their life partner"... And in a way they'd be rig…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:34 AM
19

It should be the right of any parent to ask for one if they wish so.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 05:57 AM
22

Having a paternity test should be the default, but it is lunatic to force people by law to have it. Its radfem level and would only make us look bad. If a particular couple does not want the paternity test is their choice. What we should do is always demand it until it becomes the default option and unless specified everybody gets it.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:44 AM
3

USA progressives are not progressive thinkers. Its kind of a shame that they chosed that word because it confuses the hell out anyone starting on politics.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 08:27 AM
1

Well I said "deregulation" not "GS". How on earth would GS have made things worse? As I said: GS did not forbid credit swaps, not any of the regulation that was removed
/r/MensRights19/04/14 02:31 PM
1

GS did not forbid credit swaps, not any of the regulation that was removed, so please stick to facts. About not rescuing investment banks... the government saved even hedge funds during this crisis, so I doubt it would have let investment banks fail. Too big to fail is the government doctrine now.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:58 PM
1

Well, precisely removing GS act was positive. If GS would have remained in place the crisis would have been even worse. But its a moot point to discuss economics on r/mensrights
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:45 AM
5

I dont understand why americans think republicans work for millionares but democrats dont. Its kind of funny to see people repeat it.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 06:45 PM
1

Dont tell them to their face, but they are retarded.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 03:46 AM
28

If someone had not figure this out by him/herself that person is retarded.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:58 PM
2

I hope you at least laughed in her face.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 01:20 PM
5

I think if feminism is inherently sexist, as many MRAs claim it to be, then the inverse must also be true. This is not true. MRM is not the inverse of feminism just with males instead of women. There is more profound differences between the movements and its quite obvious.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 07:36 AM
1

As I said, democracy is just an authoritarian system where politicians and specially the politically conected have the power. Its working as intended.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:24 PM
1

Im not saying democracy is failing, democracy is working as intended.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:42 PM
1

Media outlets are busines and their job is to push a political message, not the truth. Why is it crazy that they push the message of their political allies? I honestly think your problem is understanding how real democracies work. You probably think democracy is about power for the people and all the rest, but democracy is just an authoritarian system where politicians and specially the politically conected have the power. What you are seeing around is the natural result of a democratic system.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:57 AM
25

Its not crazy, its just political strategy. Obama wants to get women votes so he says what will get him women votes. How is that crazy? this is how democracy works, if lying is politically profitable you lie.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 06:36 PM
0

Liberals dont give a shit about workers rights, they just give us the crumbs of the system to get our votes and keep promoting corporate welfare. You keep believing the talking points that make you feel good while fucking us.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 07:40 AM
6

Liberals alredy did that.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 06:58 AM
1

Its gotten to a point where I see stadistics supporting a feminist talking point and automatically dont believe it. Its unfortunate because Im sure some are valid, but I dont have the time to check and the feminists have pulled up too many bullshit to deserve any trust.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:00 PM
13

He is right. What does not exist can not be under threat.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 04:44 AM
0

The authoritarian left only pretends to care but they just want to get government power.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 04:40 PM
1

I Sorry but the US progressives are heavily feminist. On top of that assuming that the US progressives care about the 99% is ridiculous. They use them to get to power and thats it.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:42 AM
3

If you mean progressive in the sense of social progress then yes. If you mean progressive in the sense of USAprogressive ideology then no.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 05:27 AM
2

The people running /r/feminism or /r/Askfeminists don't represent feminists. They are a minority of hateful people (who've come out here to take their anger (of their past) out on people with happy lives) with the loudest voices. I know this line is being pushed now, but its just not true. Those people do represent feminism and are a big part of the movement. I understand there is still a social stigma to criticizing feminists (rapidly falling though) but I dont care and preffer to say the truth…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:52 AM
11

Shaming men its not all the womens objective. It does not empower all women. Its the objective of a subset of miserable women known as feminists.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:35 AM
7

Ill take the risk with the judge once I know Im alive. In modern society the justice systems expects you to do nothing and just wait for police.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:45 PM
5

While he should have forcibly removed her from the bus... What you are saying is very dangerous even if you dont know it. When you are being physically attacked you need to remove yourself from the situation, and if not possible like in this case, defend yoursefl as drastic and quickly as possible. Not just forcibly remove her from the bus. When someone attacks you a lot of bad things can happen, for example she could make you slip and make you hit your head with something killing you. When some…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:18 PM
7

I dont like the article. I can handle seeing fit bodies without destroying my selfworth. I hope mensrights doesnt turn into feminism.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 08:07 AM
3

Not victim blaming because something something patryarchy (tm).
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:07 PM
2

He has for sure fucked tons of groupies. Taken advantage of them? Probably never.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 11:11 AM
1

I agree. I'm an atheist too, but I don't view theists as enemies by default. Only the ones who are bigotted, ignorant or hateful based on their belief. As an atheist I tend to get along better with atheist, probably because more similar mentalities, but I can not stand ignorant ateists that parrot constantly about ending religion. I much rather have a chat with a sensible believer than with that type of atheist. Untolerant people are anoying no matter what they think.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:46 PM
2

But the point is that we know and it has reported again and again that women dont like to collaborate between them in work positions. But suddenly this is not about women having an attitude, this is some rocanbolesque explanation about internalized patriarchy exhonering the women of any real responsability. Dont you see the patern?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 03:19 PM
20

They are not offenders because they dont have privilege you shitlord!
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:39 PM
3

You know exactly what she is talking about: "Please feminists dont bully me, Ive included some non-sensical reason as to why men are still to blame, so we are cool, right?"
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:37 PM
1

Police is by definition a private army.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 07:34 AM
2

Entitled ideologies help people in a weak moment to become someone else. Sure her mother was not in a right spot in life, but if she had found some other ideas the outcome might have beendifferent.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 02:57 PM
2

Also, s/he got the science part wrong. The role of testosterone is in the male behaviour is much more nuanced than s/he describes. Its been proven that both lack and excess of testosterone induces more violent responses for example. Its just the old feminist view that men are beasts while women are sensitive beings.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 01:04 PM
0

I dont. I like variety, I would get bored of being always under. Also, being on top allows you to have the rythm you like. I understand what you are trying to say, but its not exactly true. Also, I dont think women like being under because its more comfortable, but because they like having a male fuck them hard.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 02:05 PM
2

Different places though, its a bit disingenuous.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 01:34 PM
3

At least shes being open and honest about it, unlike a lot of others.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 06:02 AM
15

This kind of statement will come back to hunt down feminism down the road. They will again use the "thats not real feminism" excuse, but the evidence is starting to pile up.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:50 AM
3

Thats unfair. The picture op posted is creepy but the one you posted could have happened in a normal way and just got a frame that looked a bit dodgy.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:46 AM
2

Why do you assume that just because there would be more men in congress, the rest of the men would get better treatment?
/r/MensRights13/02/14 05:55 AM
4

Bitcoin does not meet the definition of pyramid scheme.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 03:57 PM
6

Science is just a device of the patriarchy to opress women. Check your scientific privilege you shitlord!
/r/MensRights11/02/14 01:35 PM
3

Is this for real or ironic?
/r/MensRights11/02/14 07:37 AM
32

He is implying its very dubious that all of this came out only after they broke up.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 02:19 PM
3

It does not mean you did not do it either? See how it goes?
/r/MensRights08/02/14 06:47 AM
5

They are, at least some. Politicians listen to them and create laws because of their ideas. And I dont see how it is strange or controversial to blame USprogressive intellectuals.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 06:53 AM
1

after all the only reason all companies stopped having people fall into vats of food and melt because they were too cheap to afford railing, or stop hiring children who got fingers crushed in gears and all while working, and pay these workers who risk this nickels and all is because the government stepped in and said they couldn't. Thats not true though. For example in the USA, children working was in heavy decline when the government stepped in and forbid it. If the trend had continued children…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 11:08 AM
6

Feminism is about money. Ive said for a long time that the main reason feminists oppose MR with so many lies and manipulation is because they fear MRM will take money away from feminism.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:18 AM
14

Why not? I dont think patternity test should be mandatory by law, but it should be common practice.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 09:39 AM
2

Insurance should be able to do their jobs, that is using any risk factor to calculate their fees, both in car insurance and health care.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 07:45 AM
1

Social democracies are a form of capitalism, not socialism.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:41 AM
0

Sweden and Norway are not socialists. Thats just ignorant.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 04:20 PM
20

've also had women tell me it looks better than non-circumcised penis'. Oh yes, yours is the biggest Ive had. Women will say anything to boost a mens ego if they want to keep fucking him.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:37 AM
0

not only do the women outright reject certain men for superficial reasons (short, bald etc) There is nothing wrong in rejecting people for those reasons. Sexual attraction is an important part of dating.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:39 AM
-1

This is ridiculous. This fixation on quotas should stop, specially now that the original reason for its implementation has disappeared. Obviously politicians dont want to let go because its very useful for them as a voting grabbing tool, which was the main reason it was implemented in the first place.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 04:03 PM
4

Science has been infected with The PatriarchyTM. The same that happened with statistics.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 10:38 AM
3

Internalized patriarchy.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 08:31 AM
9

There is also the issue that feminists have tried to paint this romantic vision as male being the agressive genre while females being the sensitive peaceful genre. These cases shows that being agressive and an overall bad person is not a male monopolly.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:35 AM
11

The kid probably made her force him to do it. But the patriarchych court system would never believe her, so she was forced to lie to protect herself from her male son. And now everybody will see her as a bad mother when she only was unlucky to have a male child. The patriarchy strikes again opressing women!
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:33 AM
6

Thats not true though. Just because you shares some traits with some people in jail does not mean your chances are the same. Race is not the only factor that matters when looking for your percentage chances of going to jail. If you are poor white trash you have higher chances of going to jail than if you are a upper rich black guy. It just happens that there is a lot more upper rich white guys than black, thus the overall percentages you get. But dont forget that you are not your race.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:28 AM
7

Yeah, alcohol is mainly a depressant. Why we keep using such a lousy drug is beyond me.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 07:10 PM
1

Thats not what insider trading is though.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 02:41 PM
1

This has nothing to do with banks, first and third world. Its more basic than that.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 12:09 PM
2

In a free market, resources naturally flow to where they belong. Slight alterations to the environment can increase or decrease the efficiency, but the tendency is always there. Yes, but this does not happen magically, it happens because the market participants (which includes managers) are allowed to freely do their job. Meaning it allows managers to create wealth by correctly allocate resources. But in the end, the limiting factor - the "ceiling" so to speak, lies in the level of technological…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 09:36 AM
2

No, the problem you are having is not realizing that the state of an object is also wealth. In your example an ipad in one place is not the same as an ipad in another place. The extreme example is how in the soviet union they had tractors in the north in excess doing nothing, while they were lacking them in the south and missing crops. Had the location of the tractor been diferent there would have been better economic activity and more wealth. In this situation a tractor in the south is worth mo…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 09:18 AM
4

There you are wrong. If Im a manager at a company and decide to produce more tomato sauce at the expense of producing carrot sauce (resources are limited) and it turns out that there is a decrease in tomato sauce demand and an increase on carrot sauce demand, now the price of carrot sauce is going to spike up (less offer, more demand) and fewer people will be able to afford their desired carrot sauce, while there is an excess of tomato sauce nobody wants. Instead if I had decided to reduce tomat…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 08:36 AM
7

Its for "equality".
/r/MensRights07/12/13 08:14 AM
3

Allocating resources correctly creates wealth.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 08:13 AM
4

Oh man, you are up for a big disapointment. Hopefully it wont cost you too much both emotional and finantially.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:38 AM
9

Because they are labeled as minorities and the USliberal myth says that minorities are to be thought as inferior beings that need to be protected and 'educated' to achieve the elightenment of the USliberal class (which is clearly the superior class). They have no agency, everything wrong is due to their 'condition'. Instead the white male is this mystical all powerful figure that is always at fault unless it knees down and asks for forgiveness, no matter how hard his circumtances have been in re…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:35 AM
2

This guy was a car mechanic. Your answer does not apply here.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 04:24 PM
14

Everything in life is about sex, including power. Except sex, that is about power.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 06:05 AM
1

Exactly pshychology can not even be called a science, more like a pre-science. I hope that with the development of neurology we will get a better picture than the stuff they teach now.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 07:16 PM
36

Muscle development is a cultural phenomenum and if you dont believe me I have several studies from women studies scientists to prove it.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 07:12 PM
6

There is no such thing as a rape gene.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 08:45 AM
23

Something something internalized patriarchy something something its men fault
/r/MensRights28/11/13 08:26 AM
17

Its about money.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 03:59 PM
7

Feminists have allies. We dont, we have people who agree with us. Leave this allie bullshit to the bullshitters.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 08:27 AM
2

USProgressivism has always been a very aggressive and authoritarian ideology, despite its pressent rethoric. For example, the imperialists ideas of the USA were initially promoted by progressives (Bush's "expand democracy in the world" moto was created by progressive to justify their imperialist views in the early XX century). Conservatives were initially opposed but ended up adopting the warmongering from progressives. Thats why, despite the rethoric, democrats always support the USA imperialis…
/r/MensRights26/11/13 08:14 AM
5

The privilege of working in coal mines wins any other privilege.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 08:07 AM
2

I use Gilette too. Im going to look for an alternative as soon as I finish the supplies I have. This is beyond rididiculous into insulting. Thanks for reminding me to vote with my money.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 03:55 PM
2

She is not a moderate by her own words, she is rational and levelheaded. IMO not being a moderate is a good thing. She has her opinions regardless of what part of the spectrum they fall in the present culture. Being a moderate is having no personality and trying to fake one. I despise people who are proud of being moderate. I may have some moderate particular opinions but thats just because its what I really think. I see no value on the opinion being moderate.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 03:47 PM
1

I dont think thats all there is thogh. I think the MRM is more egalitarian than feminism and does not care about your gender.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 03:31 PM
10

Thank you. I have suspected for long that MR will go the way of feminism after a while.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 10:15 AM
31

Not really. I dont agree with her, but she is asking for help on how to take away the doll from her kid and accepting suggestions on how to do that, not on how to overall raise her kid. She seems quite convinced on that part.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 07:07 AM
1

My point is that they aremostly symbolic so people are ignoring them more and more and they barely raise any awareness any more.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 05:01 PM
1

I usually pee standing up because its quicker, but when I wake up in the morning or Im tired it feels great to pee sitting down.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:45 PM
6

I know there is good intention behind this but xxxxx days are just stupid. People are noticing and ignore them more and more.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:42 PM
3

Barry Goldwater would not be a liberal by today standards at all.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 02:42 PM
1

Department of Treasury also. Initially it was meant to be just that, a treasury for the government, but over time it became the department of economy and macro-manages the economy.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 01:44 PM
8

The difference in punishment is a MR issue.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 07:37 AM
1

Thats terribly original arguments from Noah.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 06:23 PM
2

No. Im just discussing your assertion that if something is not science then its at the same level as religion.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 06:58 PM
6

There are a lot of theoretical disciplines that are not science but are still worthwhile, for example politics or moralilty.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 06:36 PM
1

Yes, but the support needs to be teaching how to stand up to bullies, not solving the issue for them.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:24 PM
9

Getting individuals to change their mind is how you create a movement and how the MRM has been born. Being always confrontational can be lots of fun if you are into that but it is hardly efficient and lots of times even negative.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:17 AM
11

One thing is to capitulate to feminism and another very different one is to get individual feminists to realize there is a real world outside the patriarchy ideas.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:05 AM
5

Ah, english is not my native language, but I think its clear what I wanted to say.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 08:08 AM
2

So when a women is fucking a guy with a condom, she is not using condom?
/r/MensRights28/10/13 07:51 AM
0

Not the greatest example. Condoms are used byboth members even when it goes in the penis.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 06:53 AM
1

No, thats because its a very coherent fit. Both movements share a lot, more than with anyother partof the politicalspectrum. That does not mean libertarianism has to be the standard or anything, as I said you can make it work with USliberalism and conservatism, but its not such an easy fit.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 09:52 AM
3

One can be a USlibersl and support MR. One can be a conservative and support MR. There are ways of make it work whille more or less still mantein a coherent position. But the easiest match for MR in the political spectrum is libertarianism.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 06:07 AM
0

Exactly, most feminists turn into puritans when they theoritize. Curiously enough I believe they dont like it in their real lifes either. Its also an anglo thing. Im from a south european country and we allow more touchy and direct verbal engagements. Its in our culture. We can be much more forward and expect the other party to tell us if he/she is not comfortable. We expect our children to learn that if they dont like something they say it, they dont expect the other person to read their minds.…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 09:08 AM
18

No she is not at all. She just played the feminist game perfectly and got lots of money for it.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 09:00 AM
18

What a lot of newcomers to the MRM dont realize is that there is a lot of money in the line for feminists. There are people who's standard of living depends on feminism being well funded. When that is threatened, do you think they will stop at anything? No, they will lie and bully all they can to keep the money flowing. So dont be surprised and expect more like this.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:58 AM
3

Reason being is with mainstream marketing when you use such bodies that are photoshop you subconsciously feed into people's mind they should look like this. But this can be applied to any part of marketing. If you show the best car, people will assume they have to have that car to feel succesful in life. If you show the best looking fruit, people will assume they have to buy fruit like that. Etc... What really should happen is that people should learn to live with the fact that there will always…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 02:22 PM
3

The USA is a big country with lots of different opinions, but for some reason the prudes get to bully everyone else.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 05:28 PM
7

Whats up with USamericans and nudity? In the rest of the world striking is an offense but not one that will put you in a sex offender registry. People find it more anoying that sexually offending. Its just a naked body, not anything sexual.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:53 AM
1

I think it should be a routine and MRM should advocate for it. Thats very different than having the government forcing it by law.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:28 AM
1

If paternity test are forbiden you should do it in secret. That does not mean that I support banning of paternity test by law or that doing it in secret is the ideal situation. Its not that hard to understand what I was saying.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 06:02 PM
1

You dont. It was a response to other comment. I was not suggesting it should be the MRM position. Everybody else but you got it.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:37 PM
1

I did not say what you are implying I said. You need to red the thread.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:53 PM
1

I did not say what you are saying I said. Read again.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:34 PM
2

Yes you are, but that was not the point.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:16 PM
0

I know its ilegal in some countries and its completely bullshit, but at the end its impossible to stop you from doing it in secret. Obtaining a dna sample from your kid is trivial. Regardless, I was not advocating doing it in secret. Just saying you can in response to the comment.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:01 PM
-1

Paternity test dont look crazy to me. In fact, I believe everybody should do them as default. What Im saying is that demanding the government to force them makes us look like nutjobs.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 03:10 PM
-2

Well, you dont really need your wife to make a paternity test, just get some sample from the kid and yourself.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 01:50 PM
-2

If your problem is that you can not deal with the wrath of your partner because you want a paternity test its better for you to opt out of the whole relationship because that shit is not healthy. These type of rethorics will only hurt MRM.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 01:49 PM
-9

And this is how MRM turns into what feminism is. What about spreading the idea that everybody should demand paternity tests without the need to force anyone? No, we need to get everybody to obey exactly what we think is right. Btw, demanding mandatory paternity tests is the best way to make MRM look like a fringe crazy movement.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 11:36 AM
5

I dont think MRA is exclusively US "liberal" at all. If you mean liberal in the classic liberal sense, then that might be a valid generalization.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:16 AM
14

Also interesting how she feels opposition to feminism is right wing. Its clear that these people feel feminism is left wing.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:40 AM
2

Apparently not. Silk Road was just a small fraction of all Bitcoin trade, but it was the most juicy for reporters so it was repeated always. Thats why the price is not "suffering" much.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 02:50 PM
4

Bitcoin users not affected.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 12:13 PM
11

Thats the sad truth. Zero Tolerance protects administrators, no necesarely the kids.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 11:17 AM
17

Mens rights is not going to be made about anti-feminism because mens rights was since the start anti-feminist. That does not mean that it will be impossible to work out the differences, for example, you can see how feminist are very quickly changing their discurse of female on male rape is impossible to accepting it and condemning it. But if there is any collaboration possible is because feminism is letting go of their supremacist and unequality views.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 03:40 PM
2

Class is a theoretical construct that is too big of a generalization to be called a strugle by itself. Class is nothing but a simplification, and while it might be useful sometimes, you have to be very aware of its limitations.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:34 AM
2

Me too. I still fail to see what is so bad about 'objectification'. Yes, if you only see women as holes then you are an asshole, but liking someone physically and wanting to fuck her while being able to have emotional relationships with other women does not seem bad to me. Sometimes you connect only sexually, and that is fine.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:25 AM
2

We dont have freedom of speech in most european countries. I know americans find it shocking. Its sad but governments regularly censor certain speeches.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 04:41 AM
5

Democracy is a terrible system, even when you compared to the alternatives.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 04:57 AM
0

Ther is absolutely no reason the government should keep medical records. There are much better ways of keeping records. I for one dont want to die because some government is employee fucked up the records. Regardless, there is absolutely no reason for the government to force you to contribute your personal healthcare data to them. What you are saying is insane.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 07:34 AM
2

Can we please stop using the word 'objectifying'? Its stupid. Its ok to desire someone sexually.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 07:07 AM
1

Do the test. There is no reason for it to be mandatory. You keep giving reasons as to why every father should do the test, none as to why it should be mandatory. Trying to get the government involved in a family cultural issue only makes the MRM look like lunatic feminists.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 06:57 AM
3

A lot of respected neurologist (an actual science) have publicy stated their doubts about the efficiency of psyquiatric drugs and the possibility of long term damaging effects. I have no doubt that in 50 years we will look back at the current psycological and psyquiatric practices as barbaric, the same way we look at the (so called) doctors who opened heads and cut parts of the brain in the name of psyquiatry only a few decades ago.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 08:31 AM
2

Im a man and I suck at FPS. I dont even enjoy them that much. Ive played a bit of Halo and its fun, but at the end, all seems too similar to me. You could probably could beat my ass easily. Now, if we were to play starcraft that would be another issue...
/r/MensRights16/09/13 08:03 AM
-1

There is no reason for it to be mandatory.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 06:50 PM
8

Remember, always get a dna test. Always. No exception. Dont make it about trust, its just rutine.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 05:45 AM
1

If more females get interested in gaming, yes, oc they can. Thats the point of what I said.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 04:32 AM
-1

There is space in gaming for everybody, its not like only one type of game can be done.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 06:19 PM
5

Replace it with anything feminists try to highjack really.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 06:18 PM
5

We need to double the government subsidy or the patryarchy TM will prevail.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 12:10 PM
44

There is absolutely zero problems with girls going into gaming. There is absolutely zero problems with gaming culture cattering more to girls because their increased presence. Hell, most gamers would love to have more girls around. But what gamers dont want is the histeria, the guilt trips, the attention seeking antics and in general the drama of power-hungry feminists. There is a big difference.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 12:09 PM
13

Sir, are you an engineer? Because your answer is technically correct, but doesnt solve the problem.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:21 PM
2

Tell her human beings have something called empathy and, while it will never be the same as direct experience, it helps us understand other people experiences. Tell her that only sociopaths dont have empathy so if she does not feel empathy and therefore thinks others dont have it she might want to check herself with a psychyatrist.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:40 AM
8

Or you might want to ask the kid if he even wants to eat meat.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 07:12 PM
3

Is this an example of the caring and loving sensibility that feminists claims defines women mentality?
/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:23 AM
8

It impossible, absolutely impossible, that "I have a boyfriend" is code for "You have no chance with me today mate". When you believe in pathriarchy everything is because pathriarchy. And if its not, you make it be anyways.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 09:50 AM
2

I mostly agree, but want to point out that historically not all the left is marxist, despite marxism being completely dominant in academia and very ingrained in left wing political parties, because of how useful it is to mindlessly rally people around.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:37 AM
9

Authoritarian leftism has always had a big hypocresy problem with big mental gymnastics to justify it. At least, righ wing authoritarians are more direct and honest, they are going to use violence to force you to do stuff because thats how you achieve order, or how god wanted it, or the only way society can function. Youre fucked, but at least you are not lied. But left authoritarians always try to hide the violent solutions they propose and when they cant they try to say its for your own good o…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:31 AM
3

Wow. So many people with a egocentrical self righteous attitude... Those people are toxic for society.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:18 AM
0

No, this is patriarchy backfiring.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 03:38 PM
4

You can not act strickly rationally, all human decissions are emotional. This is a neurological fact, not an opinion (if you want to question the most accepted neurological theories, its respectable, but you will have to be very convincing to overturn stablished scientists). Btw, its a good thing that all decisions are emotional, since we could not make a decision based only on rational thinking. We dont have enough "computing power".
/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:13 AM
11

There is a difference between sexy as in cute and sexy as in I want his dick now! Also, that someone says they find it sexy, does not mean they find it sexy.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:42 AM
1

Thats not the only reason. Murder triggers strong emotional reactions too, yet its not being used. There is a intentional push to debate rape in an unhealthy way for political gains.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:39 AM
3

Emotional reactions never stop. All human reactions are emotional, its a neurological fact. Even when people say they are being purely rational, they are being emotional. I think what you meant to say is that people should learn to be emotionally mature and have healthy emotional reactions rather than shitty and spoiled emotional reactions.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:37 AM
2

Its not agains the reddit ettiquete to comment in a subreddit you usually visit.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 04:36 AM
9

Generalizing is much more politically profitable.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 10:12 PM
3

Even if she does not understand it, gets pissed and does not show it, belive me, she will respect him more. What a person say they want and what they really want are two different things. Thats why you see a lot of yes-man "good guys" not getting any and guys who apparently are doing what she does not want getting it. It does not mean that just because you oppose a girl you are going to get it, but everybody, including hot girls you want to bang, respects a person that stands his/her ground. She…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 10:38 AM
0

Its so stupid. The girl would have probably respected them more if they had disagreed.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 05:34 AM
1

If you force a person...
/r/MensRights04/09/13 06:13 AM
-1

The situations are not comparable though. One was statutory rape and the other one rape.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:06 PM
2

No biological reasons? At all?
/r/MensRights31/08/13 09:52 PM
2

SRS all feels no rilez!
/r/MensRights31/08/13 08:52 PM
3

I agree. And offtopic but: Some things in life are non-falsable and there is nothing we can do about it, for example the scientific method.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 08:09 AM
63

I felt a divide between us when he said that. No, you felt a divide between you and his money. And that was a great concern to you.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 05:59 AM
6

Heteronormativepaternalism, get the names right you shitlord.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 05:42 AM
1

Can we have the private sector take care of these things you call human rights and if you want the government involved in something be it luxuries? I mean if some service has to be scarce and shitty I would rather it not be health care. (And I live in a country with government health care so Ive experienced first hand)
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:25 AM
2

But an insurance company has no way before hand to know how much you personally are going to use the doctor services, but still need to provide a quote for you. So they use the only information they have available and that is that, on average, men use medical services less than women. Car companies do the same, since men on average cost them more money they initially will charge you more for being a man, because they have no possible way to get other information about you. Once you show you have…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 06:32 AM
3

Its unnecesarely verbose and the language forces you to overengineer even for a simple task? Check. Its clearly Java. Clearly. ;)
/r/MensRights24/08/13 06:22 AM
20

Feminism is full of pathetic people. And its not just some random bad apples here and there. The whole ideology has attracted these type of people because the way it is.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:29 PM
42

4) She could have used her own money to pay for a lot of stuff for the kid, depriving herslef of her own stuff, and when the childs money arrived she had decided to use it to buy her own stuff. or she could be a horrible selfish mother. But we dont know any of it.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:50 AM
10

No, but she has a point, she is just completely lost with all the sociology nonsense poisining her head. She has a point that she was being "used" as an adventure, and while that might be cool for a while, it can also be tiring. But instead of attributing it to some assholes using her when she does not want to, she puts all "whites" together because she is a bit racist (which is ironic) and decide that all the whites look at her as a exotic commodity. Because all whites are the same. Its all abo…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:34 PM
5

Usually most protest against MRM have come from "the left", so the most progressive your university is the most protest you are likely to get. F.e. the protest recorded in the now famous video of the talk of Warren Farrell was organized by the socialist union. Its getting better now and a lot in "the left" are starting to get a more rational attitude towards MRM, but still most of the backslash against MR comes from "the left".
/r/MensRights20/08/13 07:52 PM
3

Reason to tell your wife before even having kids that you are not signing any document until you have a paternity test. And dont discuss it more, its your position, you are going to do it and thats it. We should get everybody used to see paternity test as the natural thing to do.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 07:42 PM
5

I feel this is a moment when "man up" applies.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 08:34 AM
3

Sexual joke is sexual abuse now? Seriously? I understand a sexual joke out of context can be obnoxious and even offensive, but sexual assault? Definitions lose their meaning if you make them so broad.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:21 PM
1

Im outside the USA but can chip in with bitcoins. The bitcoins will get there on time, but I think if they need to be converted to fiat someone will have to take the bitcoins and pay the dollars.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:16 PM
2

My point exactly. If you are very very left (my case) you dont like the nordic systems. Also, I dont think you are very aware about the politic situation here in Europe. France is easily more to the left than most nordic countries. Denmark is rated as having more economic freedom (that is being closer to a free market) than the USA, and oc more than the rest of the european countries (except Switzerland) by the Heritage Fundation. In Sweden you can fire any employee at any time without compensat…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:44 AM
0

Exactly, and there is nothing very very left about a social-democracy. Also, some southern european countries have stronger social protections, like Spain or Grecee, they are just not used as examples by the defenders of social-democracy for obvious reasons.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 04:33 AM
-1

Exactly, and there is nothing very very left about those, hence my question.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 04:23 AM
3

If you are very very left how do you like the political system in the scandinavian countries?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:21 PM
21

People dont realize how important it is to protect the free speech of assholes. When you start making exceptions acd censoring speech, youve already lost and its just a matter of time until it hits you.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:18 PM
5

Everybody shoul do this. I wonder, is it possible to do a paternity test before the child is born the same way the fetus gets tested for illness. Anyone know if its possible?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:24 AM
18

There is a big difference between the 'school explanation' of feminism (femism is a movement to make everybody have the same rights) and the feminism promoted by feminist academics and activists. Some people dont really understand why anyone would oppose feminism based on the 'school definition', but if you look at what people within the feminist movement are saying and doing youll find that it does not fit said definition.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:19 AM
27

Im willing to guess they received presure from somewhere.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:09 PM
7

The analogy is very good, because in both cases is not only about worldview and the discomfort of chaging it, but also (and I would say mainly) about money.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:08 PM
-1

I agree with you. But even if they dont wear it to show it, they should be aware that people are going to notice.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 07:37 PM
14

Its all about the money. There is a lot of money, specially tax money, in social movements.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 07:35 PM
1

She is not saying anywhere that feminism is anti-left.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 04:20 PM
1

Thats ok, I plan to do a patternity test, but op said mandatory. Thats means forced.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 03:42 PM
-2

Yes, thats a good point, but if you can justify forcing people to do stuff for their own health, why stop there? Why not force a government dna database for all the citizens? Why not forced regular blood analysis? Why not forced exercise? All those things would help peoples health. Are you in favor of all those mesures?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 03:24 PM
-11

Marriage existed before the government made it a law. Regardless, the fact that its a government law does not imply that its there to police your partner, it has defined objectives. The demand is absolutely stupid and makes us look like control freak loonies. Not that it matters to you but if this proposal goes big I wont use the term MRA for myself. Its an embarassement.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:47 AM
-9

Again, you are being dishonest. That in some places a patternity test is ilegal does not mean the solution is to make it mandatory. Also you did say all those things. Its this type of demagogery and dishonesty you are displaying that also characterizes radfems. Its sad that this is in the MRM now.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:41 AM
-8

No, thats exactly what you were doing, you are implying that if someone says its crazy for the government to force paternity tests, is the same as arguing that paternity test can not be done. You can do a paternity test right now, even in secret.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:39 AM
-14

You are not being honest. You are implying that not having the government make a paternity test is the same as not being able to do a paternity test and its at the same time supporting unjust child support laws. This is the type of stuff I mean when I say this is the MRM version of radfems.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:09 AM
-14

Seriously? You dont see this is a request similar to what crazy feminist do? "I want the government to police my husbadn/wife..." You dont see a problem with that?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 07:53 AM
-24

No, its an embarassment for MRM that anyone is demanding it.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 07:21 AM
2

Thats the problem when you make random groups and try to apply laws to centrally manage.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 11:19 AM
1

The guy earned 120.000$ btw.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:27 PM
3

Did you just compared GOP stance about gay people to national-socialist stance about jews or kuklusklan about blacks? Seriously...
/r/MensRights13/08/13 09:11 AM
3

That would work if there were no politics. When the guys with guns come for money and you know part of it is going to go to feminists, what are you going to do? Ignore them? And when you divorce and want to see your children as much as your wife but the judge and the guys with guns tell you nope, hat are you going to do? Ignore them? Etc...
/r/MensRights13/08/13 09:05 AM
16

People like that dont really have a problem with fascism, they just criticize it when they are not in power.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:49 AM
3

Its great that there is no gender bias but I dont like the first two. If someone comes to your room to watch a movie the possibilty that s/he comes for sex exists. Also if you offer someone to go to bed and they dont say yes or no explicitely, it does not necesarely mean they dont want to have sex with you, they might be playing around (because playing and flirting is fun) or they might be still thinking about it. You have not gained consent, but its not like they paint it. The problem with thos…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:42 AM
0

Im an anarchists (a left-wing market anarchist to be precise). But this is not the right place to discuss these issues so PM me if you are interested on some constructive discussion.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 04:29 PM
1

That makes sense.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:21 PM
2

Democracy is not a good system, is an authoritarian system. I dont understand how you can call it baseline at all.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 01:00 PM
0

In the USA sense, not in the european sense.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 07:48 PM
4

Being female doesn't exclude you. something something patriarchy.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:57 PM
1

The problem with journalism today is that its more profit driven than truth driven. Not directly related, but journalism has always been terribly biased. Go check newspaper from 100 years ago and youll be incredibly surprised if you think they were more fair and honest. Its become a meme that journalism is getting worse, when in reality it has always been the same.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:08 AM
21

You have internalized The Patriarchy (TM), and should go to your nearest feminist church, confess and repent.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 06:08 PM
45

This is not exclusive to women though, it is known that people will answer to questionaries different than how they really act once they find themselves in the situation.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 06:25 AM
25

So what? You still used it wrong.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 01:11 PM
18

Thank you. I honestly hope MRM doesnt turn into the mens version of feminism and its used to repress sexuality.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 10:13 AM
1

Mysoginy, as well as misandry, racism, facism and any other stupid idea someone wants to use to feel superior, are still speech and are and should be protected by freedom of speech. So even if those magazines are mysogynistic there is no reason to ban them. Shame them, shame the people who buy them, all kind of social presure is acceptable, but they should not be banned by law.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 10:06 AM
-1

Its not libertarian nothing, even the most hardcore corporatist have not proposed that the government gets into your daily life and forces you to do exercise or paternity test so you dont have to deal with your partner. This whole thing is utterly ridiculous. I dont know in the USA but in my country you can provide a patternity test as evidence.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 10:35 PM
-1

There are lots of things that are good for you, like exercise for example, but you dont ask the government to force everybody to do exercise because you dont want to create tension with your partner by telling him/her to exercise. Its the same. Thats something you have to deal with it like a person, and you are trying to get the government to pass some stupid law because you are afraid.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 10:18 PM
-5

I have never said women dont matter, on the contrary, Ive suggested to be very upfront about it. Neither I think Ive been snarky or cruel.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 08:43 PM
-8

With cheap shots like those the MRA movement is going nowhere.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 08:29 PM
-2

Women would fuck around as much, they would just be more careful when getting pregnant. You can be sure of that. A paternity test is something you should talk to your wife beforehand, even better before she is pregnant, just tell her its something you are going to do no matter what. And if she refuses you have a big red light there. And if she refuses after the child is born, just get a sample. Its impossible for her to stop you from getting a sample from a kid you have contact with. There is no…
/r/MensRights28/07/13 07:46 PM
-4

You keep telling me reasons why it is a good idea to make a patternity test. And I agree, I will do them. I still dont see why it should be a law.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 07:41 PM
-5

That you are afraid of doing something inconvinient for your girlfriend is not reason enough to pass a law.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 07:38 PM
-3

Then tell her before that you are going to do it, or do it secretly. But you should be able to tell your wife that you are going to get a paternity test. Dont be so scared of your wife.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 07:37 PM
-4

You are focusing the wrong way. What if your fiance told you that a paternity test was something he wants to do automatically, that it has nothing to do with you. That you could be the person who he trusts most in the world but he wants to have that peace of mind. Its not you, its him (sounds familiar ;) ). Also, if it was common, it would not be such an issue.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 06:26 PM
-9

You cold make this argument for lots of stuff and its not a valid one. Its not the role of government to live our lifes, to take our hands and guide us through life. Thats not what the law is for. You can spread the idea and tell everybody, but there is no need for it to be a law.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 06:07 PM
-10

Then tell them, but there is no reason to make it a law.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 05:41 PM
-4

If you can not face your wife or partner and tell her you are going to test because it will make you feel better or whatever, you are in trouble, big trouble. Nevertheless if you have such trouble dealing with your partner/wife you can do it secretely. Im fine with telling people about the benefits of having a paternity test, but I dont see why it should be a law. There is no reason.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:19 PM
2

Why would you force a paternity test by law? I will get a paternity test, but thats because I want to. I dont understand neither banning them nor making them mandatory.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:10 PM
4

The interviewer was so incredibly biased it wasn't funny. Do you think pairing Warren Farrel with a Theologian was random too given the HuffPost demographic? This interview was a set up to make Farrel look bad.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 08:40 AM
5

Its sad. I believe most feminists wont realize but, for the ones that drink the kool aid, the ideology works against them. Feminism stops them from being able to question with something near objectivity whether they are in the wrong, and pushes them to find an easy scapegoat in "The patriarchy TM". Without being able to spot their mistakes and shortcomings, they dont evolve as a person and get stuck in a circle of misery. Its really sad.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 11:53 AM
28

Not only tough shit, if you have a problem with it you are a misogynyst.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:34 PM
2

Why did the court reduce your time with the kids? Even if its bullshit, there might have been some kind of rationale.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 08:14 AM
3

And with men and boys i also mean homosexual men and boys too Why did you feel the need to say this? Do you think homosexual people are less or something? Do you realize that by saying it you are single-ing them out and promoting the idea that they are somehow "out of the norm".
/r/MensRights25/07/13 08:12 AM
2

The campaign tries to protect victims in two ways: It protects posible victims of false rape acusations. It protects rape victims because a lower amount of false rape acusations give more credibility to any person that denounces rape. At the end it was just a jab at the stupid "Dont be that boy" ad.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:23 AM
7

Sometimes I just want to have sex with someone I feel atracted to, but not necesarely someone in particular. So, lets say, I dont have a girlfriend and I go out to find someone to spend the night, Im objectificating?
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:18 PM
27

I completely agree with you. What I dont understand is the word "objectification". The word gets thrown around but it does not make sense. When can I want sex with a woman and not objectificate her? Whats the difference between objectification and desire?
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:57 PM
3

How is this voluntary arrangement from both parts similar in any way to violence? I dont think you have thought about it enough.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:41 PM
-5

Imagine this situation: you find a famous hot model in the street on in a bar. You are going to probably be intimidated by her and make you feel inferior as well. You might even feel more attracted to a "girl next door" because its more practical, but deep down you are very attracted to the hot model, its just that you are too intimidated to do anything. Thats what I meant.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:18 AM
-5

The fact that you feel inferior points that you find it more attractive though (even if you dislike the feeling).
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:18 AM
-7

I bet you a designer dress, a BMW or a Porsche also makes a women more attractive in the eyes of most guys. Money and power is attractive.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:39 AM
3

It depends on the context though. It is true that multitasting tends to produce worse results in whatever you are doing, but some situations do call for multitasking. You produce better results by focusing in one task and then the next one, but its not always possible to do so, and in those cases having better multitasking will help. As a related issue, Ive always wondered why there are no women at the top of Starcraft competition. Starcraft is a game that requires mad multitasking skills. The p…
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:50 AM
1

They should be allowed though.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:41 AM
-1

Instead of working towards outlawing it you should focus on changing the culture of those that support it.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:25 PM
6

This girl would have probably been a feminist if not for the abuses shes suffered from feminist laws. They are creating their own demise. The "only" problem is that we have to suffer until the whole charade comes down crashing.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:07 AM
10

They should blurry the face of anyone, male or female, who is accused but still has not been declared guilty. Innocent until proven guilty, male or female.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:46 PM
86

Before reporting her, try to get a recorded conversation with her where she tells you again that if you report her she will accuse you of sexual assault or something similar that will take away her credibility. A recording of her saying something like that will make your life easier. Most smartphones can record.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:42 AM
4

Isnt that a tautology? Even if someone was very poor and ended up succeding, he still had enough money to pursue success to begin with, even if it was very little.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 07:13 PM
8

Succesful people have very different characteristics, but they all have something in common: they dont get inspiration from facebook pictures. Only losers that "want to believe" do. But making people believe is a profitable market.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:37 PM
14

"Dont give your money to them, give it to me! They are greedy, Im just faboulous!"
/r/MensRights08/06/13 09:38 AM
0

Be a good feminist and cut your legs.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:38 AM
5

Black people had white slaves for a couple of centuries in west-north Africa. Tell them that next time they say discrimination against blacks is worse than against any other random group they decide to make because blacks had it worse.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:34 AM
26

"I'm sorry but even if he says nice things, a man is not entitled to comment on my body, just because I'm a woman!" Yes, yes he is. Anybody is allowed to comment on your body. When you live with other people, they have opinions on you and are allowed to share them. Wtf is wrong with this people?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 05:54 PM
3

Its not only in the USA. Some european countries are even worse. Its everywhere.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 03:16 PM
3

"Progressivism" is becoming the new conservatism.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:43 AM
6

Not really. He could have harassed several people but only one person could have complained. So giving details could help a real harasser identify the accuser. That said, assuming he is guilty and sending him to a course without any proof is bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 06:05 AM
11

Watch out her next article. It will be: Why gamers are mysoginist and dont accept cool and understanding women like me in the gaming community?
/r/MensRights26/05/13 09:27 AM
-9

After reading the letter I think they have a point. She told him in a serious manner that she did not wanted him to hold the door for her. Then he proceeded to joke about it while still holding the door for her. If she would have said nothing and then complained to the company I would agree that she was being oversensitive and unreasonable. But she told him first and he not only ignored her but joked about it.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 09:54 AM
9

But you can not really test the theories. Or at least not with repetition as science traditionally requires.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:17 PM
0

Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral and unbiased. It's an encyclopedia, not a hate platform. Wikipedia is another platform for propaganda and political groups will figth for its control.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:14 AM
4

'Modern progressivism' has been very regressive since the start.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:10 AM
8

I disagree. The same way a man can give his opinion when it comes to feminity, a woman can have a valid insight into masculinity.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:12 PM
8

5 times. Thats some in depth driving lesson discussions.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:14 AM
4

Hard science degrees and related, like engineering, are somehow better because they can not get away with so much bullshit, but the same type of dynamics are there. Students in hard sciences degrees are there to pass exams and not really learn. Teachers have egos that dont fit in their bodies and will fight for stupidity. Misery is the norm.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:50 AM
4

You are correct, but the funny part is that there was systematic white slavery by black owners in north Africa for a couple of centuries. But those dont count.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:43 AM
4

Nothing was ever mentioned about my being loved. I was so brain-washed into feeling sorry for her that I could not have blamed her for the sexual abuse, even if I had wanted to. Using sympathy and guilt worked wonders for Mother, enabling her to manipulate me into just about anything. She told lies upon lies to make me feel sympathy for her. She's still doing it. This is my mother, very well described. Luckily she did not wanted to sexually abuse me, she "only" hit me regularly, but the mental m…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:34 AM
2

Then portray a woman that is being abused if you want to give the idea that she is being abused.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 10:32 AM
0

Thats the problem of feminism becoming morally more intollerant than even most conservatives.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 10:53 AM
3

That kind of question is manipulation. If you answer yes, it makes you appear weak, if you answer no, it makes you appear as a fanatic. Its not a question meant to promote constructive debate, its demagoguery. Just evade it by saying thats not a propper question or something similar.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:22 PM
22

Yes, they call themselves MRM's and meet on reddit, havent you heard?
/r/MensRights01/05/13 05:09 PM
1

Money is a service.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:38 AM
17

Im convinced right now that feminism is about increasing the power of feminism, not necessarely women.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:23 AM
3

If I had to bet on something she wanted to have sex with him, and when he did not respond to the advances, she decided to fuck with him.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:07 PM
12

In a way false rape accusation by women do affect other women, as it decreases the chances they will be believed if they ever find themselves in that situation.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:05 PM
-1

Its because promoting myths about Sweden (and not its reality), suits a political agenda so the propaganda keeps flowing.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:44 AM
7

I dont know why you are getting downvoted. Psychology is hardly a science, it would be better named as a pre-science.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 09:39 AM
1

Nature is part of the patriarchy. It made aerodynamics have phalic form so men could play with their inherently violent toys from longer distances. Sisters, end patriarchy by ending nature!!!
/r/MensRights20/04/13 06:25 AM
2

Men and women do drive differently statistically, but carefully is not the word that should be used. At least in my country women do have more small accidents than men, so they are not more careful, but they have less big and mortal accidents, so probably you could say that women drive less carefully but also less agresively.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:57 PM
2

In modern school? To get you used to comply and get you ready for corporate work.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:52 AM
70

Also, since when is patriarchy theory commonly-accepted outside femminist circles? I bet you most people dont even know the theory exists.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 12:33 PM
6

The problem with hookup culture is not that leaves out love. Not everything you do in life has to be deep and very meaningful. Fooling around from time to time (not only sexually, in everything) is fun and can help you have a better life. The problem is thinking that hooking up is everything there is. But if you treat hooking up like this fun thing you do that does not substitute getting to know a person, then there is no problem and its even beneficial. You just have to be sure to understand wh…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 10:17 AM
5

No, you dont train them in the literal sense. The word training implies a position of dominance and submisiveness. The trainer and the trainee are not a couple knowing and adapting to each other. There is a very clear defined hyrarchy, one rules the other obeys. In this context the word is extremely offensive, because it implies that one side is right without the need to even discuss and can do whatever it feels to make the other comply. A girlfriend might need to discuss and workout things with…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 08:23 AM
1

Thats fine, but then they have to show the judge order and it wont get solved until you are in front of the judge. You wont get manhadled by a police officer abusing your rights.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:47 AM
1

You and youll girlfriend should start using Textsecure: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.thoughtcrime.securesms . Its an app that automatically encrypts your text messages and keeps them encrypted in your phone if you both have the app. Let the cops try to break the encryption. :)
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:42 AM
6

I guess that when africans had white slaves, it was not racism against whites neither. It was the white privilege to be a slave.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:14 AM
2

The SPLC is a hate group. It has been for a long time.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:35 PM
4

Killing brown women in the middle east... its ok because national 'security'. Telling a women she is good looking... intolerable!! Thats some priorities.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:41 PM
4

Only physical 'skill' where women on average outperform men is in flexibility, and, except in things like dance, flexibility its not the biggest factor. There is not much discussion.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:28 AM
1

Why do you believe there would be no law under anarchy? Anarchy is simply the absense of government.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:20 AM
10

I was not planning on reading the whole thing but it just kept me reading... My god (some?) feminists are zealots. They act like a cult.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 11:03 AM
-1

Indeed. You can be a liberal and MRA and you can be a conservative and MRA, but the political ideology that best matches with MRA is liberatarianism. It does not mean you have to be a libertarian to be an MRA, but I dont think there is much discussion that its the easiest match.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 07:36 AM
16

Im sure you would find a way to claim sexual intention if someone said he likes chicken.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:19 PM
5

Probably a troll, but just in case, why?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 09:37 PM
10

But from a scientific point of view, specifically in neurology, its interesting to ask if one gender is better at one area than another. It can help understanding how the brain works by comparing the differences. The problem is that when you mix pop-pseudoscience like feminism and a lot of social (so-called) science everything gets complicated and extremely stupid.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:53 PM
10

What you say makes sense but its not so cut and clear. In a lot of these cases, the individual might not be thinking of what they are doing as rape. They might think, "Well, we were making out, and we were naked, and she said she didn't want to have sex, but when I started anyway, she didn't fight me off or scream no, so she must not have minded." There is a problem with this situation. Some women say no and then change their mind. Some women even like to play to say no and then being dominated …
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:27 AM
27

Racism should be dealt socially and erradicated. Making racism illegal is stupid. Its just a good sounding law to gain votes from morons.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 04:55 PM
35

Nothing is a uniform church, not even the church, but feminism has a history of expelling from their ranks the more honest and common sense people they have. I would not be surprised if she is treated badly if she does not backtrack.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:50 AM
6

Men dont need to be teached not to rape, the same way that blacks dont need to be teached not to steal. There are people that will do bad stuff, but its not because of a lack of knowledge or education. You can take mesures to stop rape. Teaching men not to rape is not one of them. The sentence is trying to create the image that raping is a culture extended among men. Its discusting.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:43 PM
2

Oh, we have two surnames, not just one combined surname. Meaning that legally only your first surname does not describe you, so for example, in your oficial documents, credit cards,... whatever, you always have your two surnames written. And when you apply for whatever you have to write both surnames. When a couple has a kid, only the first surname of each partner is used.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 07:21 PM
1

Nope, why would you need to shorten it?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:43 PM
3

Its funny because in my country we get both surnames the fathers and the mothers. So in my country you are labelled automatically Smith Jones (you can chose the other order as well since like 10 years).
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:07 AM
20

Its a start.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 10:01 AM
2

Im a left libertarian market anarchist sympathetic to MR. Does that break your friends one dimensional political scale?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:24 PM
16

And then say its for their own good.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 06:17 PM
7

Get out whenever you can.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 06:16 PM
1

Assuming this theory is right, Im guessing that those opressed men still have to pay for the opression other men (not them) do on women, right?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 11:10 AM
5

You go and stop the person beating the person laying down. The people who stood there should feel ashamed for doing nothing. If she tries to hit you, you defend yourself.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:43 AM
2

Its so "funny" how they play with statistics, throwing numbers around for the sake of political gain. If it did not have real life consequences I would be laughing my ass off. If you put this shit in a movie or a tv series people would refuse it as not realistic.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:37 AM
3

And regarding gay marriage, he wants the state to be out of marriages and have them handle as a normal contract. So gays could "marry" the same way as anyone else if Ron Paul got his way.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:27 PM
2

Sometimes I think we should embrace the feeling-consent theory. You see, if you want to divorce you just say: I accepted marriage out of guilt and fear, so it was not really consent. It seems we were not married all these years after all. Bye!
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:17 PM
1

Ive never used an iPhone so I can not tell. Does the iPhone not have basic recording capabilities?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:20 PM
0

Every phone now can record phone conversations. Also, it can record any sound with the mircrophone, it will not deliver the best quality but you might catch enough.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:49 PM
3

Why are you not recording all conversations?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:43 PM
1

Siobhan Rosen is a pseudonym. The author would rather her grandmother remain ignorant of her hearty sexual appetite. Seriously? Using a pseudonym because she does not want her grandma to know she wants to fuck her official boyfriend 4 or 5 times a week (and whe calls that hearty sexual appetite...). This girl needs to grow up. Probably her grandma is more sexually liberated than her.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:26 AM
1

Michael Jackson stopped being black ... In all seriousness, you can change them to a point. If the company requires an engineer its not something you can change easily. Sure, someone who was horrible at math at school can try, but realistically he wont become an engineer and will always be discriminated from that job. You and I agree that a person should not be discriminated from a job just because his religion, gender, race or ethnicity, etc... Where we disagree is how we go about it. Governmen…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 01:29 PM
2

Discrimination happen all the time. Some jobs discriminate based on education or experience or whatever. As long as the goverment is not discriminating Im fine with whatever private people decide to do. Their lose.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 11:41 AM
6

Yeah, but he probably should not discuss the context on the Internet unless a lawyer tells him he can.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:16 AM
27

I dont go to the gym. I dont even have a gym membership.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:49 AM
42

Apart from the hate: happy fat women. How sad your life has to be that you see fat as the normal state of a person and that being fat would make you happy if it were not for looking good for the opposite sex? I love exercesing and eating healthy, and while looking good is a plus, exercising is its own reward, you feel better than spending hours in the couch. These people are sad.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:00 AM
9

Good on you for going and tell her first. If you accept some recomendation from an extranger on the Internet, next time just try to explain things in a calm way, instead of going all raged up. It usually works better if there is any chance of an amicable solution. Her answer is nasty though, and 100% deserving of you going to the manager. Im just saying this because I believe feminism, in her defense of women right to say no, has adopted a puritan view where you can not say anything to a women w…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:55 AM
4

Redditor is the new gender? Is it the no sex gender?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:02 PM
0

Im not saying that you can only be a feminist if you are a marxist or anything like that. What I am saying is that it is not possible to deny the close relationship both movements have, because they do.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 10:36 AM
2

But it is true that feminism and marxism/leftism has a connection. The protest in the canadian university was organized by a socialist group, and most of the blog post that were not from feminist website were from socialist/marxists websites. Feminism and marxism/socialism have a cozy relationship.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 10:23 AM
2

I dont get it, why it would be contrived as anti-gay? Are you being ironic or something?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 06:46 AM
11

Dont take that sentence literally. She is just giving credit to men, not suggesting that women did nothing.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:38 PM
21

tl;dr: You are wrong because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 05:54 PM
35

Do women get anonymity when they are acused of rape?
/r/MensRights20/02/13 05:52 PM
21

I think that by rape she means that they engage in consensual penis in vagina sex. But yes, by her own standards she is victim blaming.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:42 PM
0

Rough, bashing (the kind Moxicontin was probably referring to, though I don't presume to speak for her) can be kind of awful, especially if you aren't prepared for it. It feels like being punched deep in your abdomen. As you said depends of the women. Ive been with some that liked this sensation. I remember one that complained every time but did not want me to stop doing it... Pain and pleasure together is a strong feeling.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:15 PM
13

Its about time we stop looking at race and gender and just hire the damm person.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:11 PM
2

What worries me more is that MRM will become like modern feminism once it starts gaining power and changing stuff. I fear it will run out of rational things to change at some point in the future and some people will try to keep it alive just because its their way of getting power, just like modern feminism. It seems a lot of civil rights movements end this way.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:23 AM
6

Ideally everybody would be happy, thats a nice desire to have, but its not a guarantee as it is something impossible to guarantee. No one "deserves" to be happy all the time, in the strict sense of the word deserve. Realizing life can be aggressive and you have to learn how to deal with it is one of the steps of becoming an adult.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:54 AM
10

I dont usually read personal post that are long, but your kept me reading. Thanks for sharing your experiences and good on you for not accepting the role you were imposed by the community you were born in.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 07:04 AM
2

I just pictured the image of Homer salivating and saying "Donutsssss......" :D
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:53 AM
13

And they are also trying to take revenge on the wrong people. Present males are not the same people that the ones 50 years ago. Some are "still around" but for the most part, we are different people!! Most of us (from all ages) support the changes that have happened towards equal rights. Whats the point on taking revenge on us for something we did not do and dont support?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:51 AM
7

Its going to be a SRS clusterfuck... I honestly wish SRS and the likes were a bit more sensible and less histerical so a conversation could happen, but with those people around you know already how its going to go.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 02:43 PM
10

But it is natural to have the type of reaction she had. We humans are not capable of processing our feelings instantly. For big "events" like the one she had we require time, and during that time we sometime have or even need to have stupid opinions. A lot of men have the reaction of hating all women for a while after a important break up (and that can not be compared to rape). Its natural. She dealt with it on time.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:25 AM
3

But then whats the point of evaluation? Everybody writes what they feel? That kind of class has no place in the present model of standarized education.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:39 AM
3

There is nothing wrong with the concept of social justifce. On the other hand having a government monopolized education system where they teach kids (who due to their age still dont have the better judgement) one type of view of social justice exclusively is extremely dangerous. The school should teach kids basic stuff that helps them to be better thinkers and make up their mind on their own, not give them a bunch of stuff they have to believe in. School should teach math, logic, basic science a…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:47 AM
5

I brought that up because while you and I might agree, youll have to admit is a very common misconception or at least something that is commonly overlooked.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:56 PM
3

how is cheating EVER going to save a marriage in a meaningful way? That depends on what you consider cheating. Monogamy is not necessarely the best arrangement, at least it might not be for everybody. Although if the partners give each other permission then technically its not cheating, but most people usually refer to cheating as having sex with someone outside of the marriage without considering non-monogamous arrangements. I am personally convinced that most couples are non-monogamous whether…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:43 PM
7

I just wrote that Im decived that most women dont chose to be financially independent, so Im happy to read your comment. Honestly I hope Ill find a women with your attitude. Ive always told my partners that I want a partner, someone who can carry themselves, not a pet to take care of.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:34 PM
-2

I think there is an important difference between doing something on your own and being forced to. I will do somethings on my own that I would hate to do if I was forced to. What Im trying to say is that chosing to be financially dependent is not the same as being asign the role because thats what women do. That said, if this woman is right, Im decived. I would hope that most women, given the choice, would appreciate being financially independent even if that means working harder and having more …
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:28 PM
14

It was never an accepted idea that men were bad for kids. Society though mothers should take care of kids and fathers go to work and bring back the money. But not that men in general were bad and dangerous for kids. Think the incident with the australian airlines where they did not let a men sit next to a child, thanks to the efforts of feminists groups. That a kid could be in danger because he was sit next to a man was never an idea. There was a separation of roles, men should do certain things…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:31 PM
14

Its possible. Its normal that if the majority of teachers are women, the majority of abusive teachers are women. Still, its good to point it out because it breaks the feminist imposed idea that women are automatically good for children and men are automatically bad.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:32 AM
2

By people finding out she was pretending to be someone else. I was refering to the people she was interacting with. How would you feel if you are in a therapy group explaining all your internals and suddenly you find a person dressed on a costume spying on you? People can easily react violently. Not only the therapy group, people you bound with, the group of friends can feel betrayed and react who knows how in the heat of the moment. Or they could react in a more civilized way, but the problem i…
/r/MensRights13/01/13 02:49 PM
32

Why do you find it so surprising? Being someone you are not can be very taxing. Add to the mix that she was possibly stressed by the thread of being discovered and what reaction she would get by the percived betrayal.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:07 PM
12

A lot of feminist are very mean and now they are fighting each other to see who can be more of a victim. Its the blame game, but internally. Honestly, this is first class popcorn material.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 08:17 AM
1

When I try to explain There is your problem. Dont explain yourself, just smile or joke around. If she gets serious about it and wants you to stop for good, you have two options you accept that its going to go one way only or you stop allowing her and see what happens.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:29 PM
3

Yes, but the thing is right wing authoritarians tend to be more direct and open about it. They want the government to force something on the rest and thats it. Left wing authoritarians are way more anoying because everything is justified as being good for you. They dont do it because they are authoritarian assholes, no, its because they care for you... If you are going to be an authoritarian shithead and force me violently at least tell me straigh to the face, dont be a hypocrite and try to suga…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:58 AM
16

So for SRS insisting verbally, without threats or anything just insist, and then getting a consent from her is rape. The fact that she could say no does not matter. You are only allowed to ask once or otherwise is rape? Or twice is ok but not three times? Soon enough if you dont use the feminist approved written form to have sex with a female it will be rape. Ah, and even if you used the written form if she decides that it was not worth it the next morning, its still rape. Is this a very elabora…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:10 AM
7

Can anyone link to the SRS acusations? Im just curious about how can you bend that into accusing him of rape. The rethorical malabarism that SRSers can perform never stop amazing me.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:38 AM
9

Regardless of that discusting sexists, I still say that fucking up with prices by law is the recipe for disaster. Insurances need to be able to set up the prices they see fit based on their calculations and expectation to give the best service and best price but dont go bankrupt and being able to pay you the money when you need it. This stupid laws are going to create a big problem at some point.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:11 PM
9

As much as we like to think we are civilized, we are animals even if civilized. And the reality for any animal, one we can not scape from, is that at the end of the day, if everything else fails, violence will settle whatever dispute there is. No matter how right you are, how rethorically powerfull your argument is, how good would make for everybody if your suggestion is applied, ... if someone else can impose him/herself violently over you, their option will be the one that will happen if they …
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:25 AM
2

Im not at the last in this case. Ive read in different places that there is proof that she was raped and in others that there is not. What proof is there? A link would be appreciated.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:22 PM
8

There are a lot of us with feminist education. I would not say I was a full blown white night but I had strong leanings at times. I still think certain values that I was taught are valid and lead to equality, but the state of modern feminism is completely out of control.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:10 PM
2

I dont agree. Men and women respond to different emotional triggers but the idea that men are more rational seems false to me.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:34 PM
4

I am going to call bullshit on this one. Men and women probably react differently to different type of ads (and a lot of it is probably cultural), but I dont think its cut clear who reacts more. I mean, Im pretty sure that if you use hot girls in bikini to advertise a beer you are going to see sales go up.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:35 PM
208

You should write back to thank him for the change (if you have not done it already). This little things are appreciated by people and will keep him receptive for other ocassions.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:32 PM
4

Thankfully I have a lot of experience to the academic world through my family and I know since I was little how it really works. The academic world is usually full of drama and personal ego. Conspiracies and power fights are a constant, and when it comes to getting funding its even worse. Full departments full of people just because they are friends of the director and the director using them to gain more control, etc... There are some good academics that do work mixed in there. But you would no…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:49 PM
3

Does the study compare kids from the same economical level? While my intuition tends to agree with the case that having a father figure would tend to help the kid through life, it is also true that a lot of single parent families tend to be poorer which is also correlated with worse conduct.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:37 AM
2

Can you point to what point in the video (or somewhere else) where he identifies as a MRA.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:37 PM
1

Yes, it was quite reasonable. I do feel that a lot of women are tired of radical feminists as well (understandable), but what I am missing is that they start speaking openly about it. It is not acceptable that some feminist proposes to cut dick's because men are evil and the rest of feminist laught it off and downplay it as intellectual experimenation or something. Its unacceptable. When a man says that women should be in the kitchen and a good slap puts the wife on its place (or something simil…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:42 PM
-1

I was not talking about /b/ or /v/
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:25 PM
1

Hey, at the end of the day nobody can tell you what to do. Anyone can say shit from behind a computer, but non of us know what we would really do if we were in your position. Only you know what you are feeling, and hey maybe its better for the kid to not have a parent that does not love him. Maybe you can not go back in the feelings you already have. Only you know. Whatever happens and whatever you end up deciding I just think you need to think it twice and dont blame the kid for what the mother…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 01:17 PM
48

If you talk weird someone somewhere is going to think you are very intelligent.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:03 PM
1

Listen, if his suspicions are true, the mother is a bitch and he should dump her. And btw do it carefully and in a planned way. But the child is not at fault. If the child is recent and he has not exercised as a parent then he should leave and dont look back. But if he has exercised as father for lets say 2 or 3 years, he might want to reconsider. Not only for the child but for himself. If he has been exercesing as father, he also has created a bond with the child. He should consider him an adop…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:57 AM
-1

How long have you been being the dad of the kid? Depending on the timeline, are you sure you want a nullify the paternity even if the kid is not biologically yours? At the end of the day the kid is not to blame here, and if you are already exercising as father, its kind of your kid. Not in front of her, but in front of the kid. At the end of the day is your decision, just think about it.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:13 PM
5

The question is if they're reasonable. You have the right to have an opinion because of his/her opinions.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 07:30 PM
6

Its funny because she is complaining that when a white dude kills is because of illness but when a non-white kills is a thug (thats basically her point but she extended more). But r/mensright was not promoting that idea, it was the women who wrote the facebook post who said it. And she says that she agrees mostly with the post... Sometimes the mental gimnastics they have to do to justify their self-rightiousness is so big that they break. Seriously, this is pathetic.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 07:24 PM
2

There are a lot of well-educated dumb people. Education and learning to speak correctly does not give you common sense and intelligence.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 07:15 PM
2

It is real. Seriously, I feel sorry for the guy. You dont recover from something like that.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 07:14 PM
6

So how did it go?
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:27 AM
3

My mother use to hit me regularly, like at least once a week. Most of the time she would get remorseful and come crying back to ask me sorry afterwards, but she would keep doing it. I actually hated the apologies even more than the hitting because I knew they had no meaning, but she would not leave me alone until I said I accepted the apologies. She only stopped when I was 14 and had just grew taller than her. She got angry and aproched me with her hand raised to hit me. I grabbed her hand and r…
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:10 AM
4

Reddit has a no doxing policy because people here have a expectation of anonimity. You are operating under a nick that does not identify you if you dont want to (except if the government asks for the ip address). The situation is completely different if you are publishing under your name. Also, the reaction she had its great and should be praised, but if you want to be realistic the backlash she got helped her see a different perspective. Knowing that there are broad consequences because of some…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 07:02 AM
14

singling out one person to martyr is unethical. No, its not unethical at all if you are not lying. If someone is a racist would you think its unethical to single him or her out just because there are other racists? Its ridiculous. When someone publish something in public they become responsable for it.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 06:46 AM
34

Check your privilege!
/r/MensRights25/12/12 07:15 PM
2

For the call center (read: rape crisis center) at which I volunteer, up until very recently (due to a change in leadership), men were not allowed to be advocates (I don't want to be too wordy and explain what an advocate is; hopefully you folks know what it means). We have very recently allowed men to become advocates, but that doesn't mean that we have men rushing to become advocates: What do you think about women potentially responding to cases of rape against men? What do you think about men …
/r/MensRights23/12/12 07:45 AM
5

I dont think he was saying rape is never about power. He was suggesting there can be multiple motivation, different in each case.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 07:40 AM
2

Fucking EU nanny state burocrats...
/r/MensRights23/12/12 07:17 AM
1

If they are using different factors is because they believe they will be able to adjust the prices better that way. Its not a conspiracy against men, the same way that health insurance being more expensive for women is not a conspiracy against women. Its just insurance companies trying to offer the best deal they think wont bankrupt them. As I said to the other guy commenting, if you think you have the better method that will produce better results start a company or sell the method to an existi…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:57 PM
0

As they should. The fact that they are making money while not violating your individual rights shows that they are doing a good job. Its a signal that provides invaluable information in a world with infinite information and unpredictable future. Competition will force them to pass those savings to th consumer, so its a good thing for everybody that they found a way to do better than the rest. Again, if you are sure you have found a better way as you said, you should go ahead and become rich.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 08:45 AM
0

If you are sure there are better ways to guess risk then start your own company, outcompete the competition with those better methods you know and get rich. What are you waiting for? You get rich and you give people a better service, its a win-win.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 08:09 AM
1

Because insurance companies have no way of knowing before hand who is who. They need to use statistics to guess risk and if they are not allowed they become inefficient and risky. Ive said this before, but private insurance company need to be able to use any parameter they dime necessary to guess risk. Btw, this applies not only to car insurance where males pay more, but also to medical expenses where males usually pay less. It puts the whole industry to risk if they can not do their job and the…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:12 AM
1

Thats what happened when you dont support free speech and start regulating it. Everybody lobbies to get what they find offensive banned and its a clusterfuck.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:00 AM
26

Its not only the laws though, its worse, its the culture. Men nowadays tend to be called creeps if they express their sexuallity, while women are encouraged to. Its a complete reversal of the typical roles. Even in the extreme cases, if a men grabs a women ass he is sexual assaulting her, while if it is a women grabbing a men ass its cute. Remember the older women grabbing and kissing Justin Bieber on TV? You know what would have been the reaction if it was a men doing it to a teenage girl. Its …
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:43 AM
1

Are you really going to deny the influence between marxists and modern feminists in western societies? The majority of dedicated feminists belong to some kind of ideology derivated from marxism if not directly marxists.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:02 PM
1

Yes, and class analisys is not even marxist, in reality Marx copied it from classic liberal (libertarian) philosophers. But my point stands that femisnism got that language and the way of thinking behind it (and also denying logic as valid) from mixing with marxists.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 12:03 PM
-2

"There is no question about it being sexist, we don't need to discuss this. You are all white male privileged..." This was the first time I heard feminist slang. In reality that language and the way of thinking behind it is not strictly speaking feminist, but marxist. The thing is marxism and feminism have mixed together and you can see the result.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:55 AM
9

I was raised with feminism values of equality, f.e. I would have to split the house duty with my sister. I still believe in those values, but as I grew up and listen to more things feminist said it rubbed me the wrong way at the direction they were taking, so I distanced myself and just ignored what they were saying. Then I discovered mrm and it made sense. Actually, mrm just showed me that there was a lot more people thinking the same way I was when I saw what was going on with feminism. Also, …
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:52 AM
2

I agree with you. While stopping taking the birth control pill was bad and unjustificable, it could have been way worse. He did not want to have anything to do with the kid, so it wasnt her separating him from the kid, he separated himself and she did not tried to get money off him. What she did has no justification, triking somebody to get you pregnant without him knowing has no excuse, but she could have abused the situation way more and she did not.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 04:57 PM
8

You said that r/mensright attacks the other gender, but if it was a mistake and you wanted to say that r/mensright attacks feminism then you are correct. r/mensright attacks feminism, and rightly so IMO. The problem you have is that you are assuming that feminism only looks to defend the rights of women without attacking men or equality and mensright is the same but for men. But its not true. Feminism was a movement that looked for equality in its initial incarnation, but it has evolved into som…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:17 AM
12

Sight... let me try: Yes, you said that r/feminism attacked men and r/mensright attacked women. I answered that r/mensright does not attack women, only feminism. Then you denied to have said that r/mensright attacks women. I pointed what you said, and your defense now is that you argue that both groups attack the other gender, which has nothing to do with my point. IMO r/mensright does not spread hate, only defends from the attacks of feminism on men. It is unfair to clumb together the aggresors…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:54 AM
2

Ive babyseat when I was younger. Im not in the USA though.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:45 AM
17

You wrote: ... r/mensrights provides an excellent way for people to spread hate against the other gender ... But now you claim that you never said r/mensright attacks women? Are you going to argue that by the other gender you meant men? Come on, and dont be so quick with the downvote interent warrior.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:42 AM
15

Ive never seen r/mensright (or any other respectable mens rigth group) attack women in general. Ive seen attacks on feminism (most 100% justified imo) but not on women as a group. Feminism and the interestes of women are different things.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:36 AM
-2

Michael Moore is such a mangina...
/r/MensRights16/12/12 06:53 PM
2

Its curious that CATO was initially created as a way to promote Rothbard ideas, but, after he refused to compromise in some areas, he resigned and the division started.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 06:18 AM
5

For the people like me who dont know, who is Ozzy Frantz and why is it relevant?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:19 PM
7

Im fine with it, but this time let girls be the ones being chivalrous vs men. Since obviously there has been a disproportionate amount of time where men have been chivalrous towards women, now to compensate (any feminist should subscribe this line of thinking) the women should be chivalrous towards men for some decades. Now they buy our drinks, come to pick us to our home, give us preference on the door, allow us to exit first a place in danger, like in the case of fire alarm, etc... Yeah, bring…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:07 PM
4

For what Ive read of r/relationships they have a marked misandric tendency. They tend to pass a lot more stuff and demand less from women and the contrary from men. Im guessing its a mix of females, who instinctively identify with the woman, and white knights.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:55 PM
10

My major gripe is the way that this is presented. I really doubt that men are accusing their ex-wives of molestation in family court on mass. So, when its women who are 'bad' its presented as a genderless issue of parents being 'bad'. When men are 'bad' its presented as men being 'bad'. I think you are correct, but the way forward is to try to have the news where gender is not a key factor genderless, not the other way around. We dont want to become like the feminists. When there is a disparity …
/r/MensRights13/12/12 03:04 PM
3

Elititists have always favored eugenics. The government of Sweden has admited that it practiced eugenics in the 50's by sterilizing women of poor clases. Early progressives were in favour of eugenics. Etc... Its not surprising that a person in a position of power thinks eugenics is a good idea.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:57 PM
0

First, since you have not answered to the rest I dont know if you concede or just ignore it. As for the definition of universal healthcare, isnt it a bit too broad? Anyone can argue their system offers universal healthcare. For example, someone supporting a free market health care system can argue its the best way of offering universal healthcare (and before you jump, no, the USA does not have a free market health care system, not even close). Whats the point on having a definition that can mean…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:03 PM
0

By universal health care, Im guessing you mean government run health care. Not all european countries have government run health care, for example Germany. Germany has something similar to Obamacare. Spain, the UK or Greece for example have government run healthcare. There are way more differences and points where the USA is more "socialist". For example, the USA has government run education centers while Sweden runs on a voucher system as proposed by Milton Friedman. The USA has a higher corpor…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:02 AM
1

No plus sized men? Rocco Siffredi would like a word with you ;)
/r/MensRights12/12/12 07:32 AM
0

I dont know where you got the idea that there is socialism in Europe but its just false. Not even one of the countries here in Europe is socialist. All are capitalist, usually some type of social-democracy. And btw there is not much difference between the system in the USA and Europe. The rethoric is a bit different (not much) but the system are quite similar.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 07:22 AM
6

Im not anthropologist but it would make sense for a tribe or a small community to try to save kids and women first over men to ensure the tribe/community survives and thrives again. One man can impregnate several women and repopulate much quicker than one woman and several men will ever be able to, for obvious reasons. Its not ideal since genetic diversity is always a plus, but given the situation it makes sense to save children and women first. The thing is right now its "probably" not needed a…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:38 PM
1

Yes, sorry for doubting he is the saviour of the country.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:57 AM
12

Agency means the capability to act and take responsability for those acts. For example, a slave has very little agency. If a slave is forced to press a button at gun point, and pressing that button means 3 other people die, we would not blame the slave for the death (because s/he had no agency), but the person forcing the slave to press the button (because s/he had agency). The whole debate around agency is because feminist tend to remove any responsability from the acts of females (thus giving …
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:52 AM
1

Obama is actually very good with casual conversations, as seen with his informal tv interviews. He is funny and almost the perfect PR machine. He just seems to not care too much about the issues, so without the teleprompter he is lost when speaking seriously.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:24 AM
2

They are both kind of right. Exercise will help, but if it completely depletes your energy it will drive you down. The best thing you can do right now is do light exercise, dont try to force your body too much.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:14 AM
3

What you are missing (and this is not really a mr issue) is that "in the best interest of the kid" is a code for the government burocrats to take over the autonomy of the parents to raise their kids. Its not about the best interest of the kids.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:34 PM
4

EDIT: I correct myself after reading the whole thing. She admited she was lying, so the article is completely correct. You are being downvoted but you are right. The distinction between not guilty and proven innocent is important, specially if we want punishment against false rape acusations. A person that accuses someone of rape but can not prove it, should not receive a punishment. Only a person that was proven to be lying when accusing of rape should be punished. The distinction is very impor…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:28 PM
12

They are code words that have been ingrained into a lot of socialists brain to produce an emotional reaction, so when they use those words they react to them no matter the argument. Its meant to say: MRA = bad!. Its basic but extremely powerful.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:34 AM
3

The "hen" pronoun is not added to replace han/hon (him/her), but to complement it, if you are speaking about a doctor, it makes sense not to refer to "him" (or "her"), and "hen" looks much better than "han eller hon" (him or her.) I wish every language had this. I hate having to write his/her or s/he everytime I try to speak in general. It makes the sentence hard to read.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:13 AM
-2

They were volatile initially, as expected for any small market, but they have been pretty stable lately. I predict there will still be some volatility because the market is still relatively small, but it keeps growing and growing and it gets more and more stable. Regardless, I was thinking more in a quick way of anonymize and retrive your savings somewhere else in the world, not suggesting putting all your savings on one asset long term (you should not do this no matter the asset). Im guessing t…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:11 PM
-4

Or just buy bitcoins and anonymize them, you can acecess them anywhere in the world. Probably easier and cheaper.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:44 PM
2

It leaves little room for misunderstanding the real reason behind the practice. This is bullshit and you know it. I dont understand why people make this outrageous claims that actually weaken their position.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:41 AM
7

Also, while we dont have to accept biology as a destiny in the sense she means, in reality we do. The physical limits of what humans can do are real. The limits of the mental capacities of our brains are real. And all those factors should be taken into account, its useless to try to improve the standard of living without taking into account the biological reality.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:52 AM
8

Monopolizing the education system is the first thing most regimes do (most of the time under the excuse of helping the poor) because avoiding education competition allows the governing elites to indoctrinate the people when they are more tender and are easy to convince. Its a very effective way of keeping power in place.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:47 AM
0

Left wing does not automatically mean state sanctioned shit. In fact a lot of left wing people acknoledge progressivism was a industrialist creation.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 02:40 AM
7

What you dont realize is this campaign is not about stopping rape but about fearmongering for political gain.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 02:23 AM
3

You forgot emotion. Just because men chose to show emotions in different ways does not mean we dont have them. In fact, a lot of the emotional solutions that men adopt are superior to that of women IMO (others arent tbh).
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:25 PM
7

I replied that I thought she was being sexist. Evidently,this confused the second coworker, who claimed my inaction "did not make me look very sexy". She once again reitirated, that she had thought better of me as a man This is manipulation 101. She thinks you are manipulable or she does not have a problem manipulating anyone.In any case, you had a good reaction, but I would watch out in the future.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:11 PM
2

I don't know why we can't accept that women who like sex and are comfortable with sex aren't broken. Implying that porn stars like sex more than non-porn stars, which is completely bollocks. Porn is a job. Like every job in the entertainment industry is not your tipical 8 hours a day in an office job, but at the end of the day they are not fucking because they can not resist the guy, they are fucking because its their job and they are acting for the camera. I bet their real sex is very different…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:01 AM
16

Its amazing that a person comes to help a disable person that is stuck and the rest of the people in the building treat this person as a pariah. Its so disrespectful, its out of this world...
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:55 AM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phimosis Its not uncommon and luckily quite easy to solve.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:09 PM
1

I have no idea. But it sounds interesting, wonder if some insurance company is doing this already.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:07 PM
2

Mainly because there is no other way of doing it. The future is uncertain but they have to still guess the risk. Without knowing the future, how else would you do it? Its very easy to say, if a person lifes more than other why should they pay the same? But the point is that we dont know, but we still need to asses risk in some way. Yes, there is going to be some degree of generalization and once all is settle you can argue some people payed more than other for the same, but the point is that the…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:49 PM
4

They include the individual record in their assessment, but there are too many possibilities and unexpected's just to base the decission on individual records alone. Its not like you are going to be able to predict the possibility of cancer of a person only with the individual medical record of the person.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:34 PM
13

Its not stereotypes. Its using statistics to predict risk, which is what insurance companies do. Its impossible to do a fair individual assestment of each person. It sucks that you get stuck in one group that they use, but if you think you can do better you should start your own insurance company.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:13 PM
-1

I have no idea, I was 14 or 15.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:43 PM
5

I do. In fact, Im happy I am circumscised. I would be blooding my underwear every time I had an erection if I was not circumscised.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:56 PM
-4

And what does it say about you that you're willing to tolerate this sort of sexism? Insults and now blatant maniuplation. You are more of a bitch than the feminazis (if you are not one in disguise). Go fix yourself first and leave us alone until then.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:53 AM
1

Marx was very aware of where he was coming from. In fact, Karl Marx is not his real name. He changed it because his original name gave away that he was jew and at the time jews were usually associated with certain parts of society and certain activities.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:16 AM
2

Well, that's not to say that Marx wasn't right in some of his estimations, especially when threaded through Trotskyism and permanent revolution as necessary antidotes to predation of the weak by the strong. Even a broken clock is right twice a day--just because Marx himself was bourgeois doesn't mean he was unable to write against bourgeoisie. No, in fact Marx was right in a lot of the criticism he had, what he saw wrong in society was fucking wrong. The problem with Marx and marxism in general …
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:52 AM
-4

At first I was going to answer to your points, but then I kept reading. Good luck getting something done with that attitude, keep being a good internet warrior.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:57 AM
3

Commercials are not a femminist or mra issue. These people tend to mix feminism into anything for the sake of it. Anyone who has not figured out yet that commercials are there to sell you something no matter what, usually trying to play with your emotions, is stupid as fuck.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:54 AM
2

How is it ironic or at least extrange? Karl Marx was a jew from a petite bourgeois family. He did not see poor people until his twenties when he went to see other intellectuals and was very surprised by the conditions they were living in (at his twenties!). Then he went on to write the communist manifesto denouncing all this injustices and proposing his "solutions" while he was travelling all around Europe in first class train (being served by those he said were being forced to serve unjustly) a…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:49 AM
-4

I see things wrong with circumscision, in fact Im happy my parents did not circumscise me. But I dont think it should be banned, it should be a civil campaign to convince people of the stupidity of it. If you start taking away that decission from parents, then you should as well ban earing holes in little children as well. Its not the way to go about it.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:40 AM
5

Not only dated. She married him after 3 months.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 12:34 PM
0

I think the tecnichal term for people atracted to teenagers and not children is ephebophile or something like that. The distinction was all over reddit during the period where the "special" subreddits ended up being closed.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:42 AM
5

I actually like that they do that. The answer is easy: "So you know me for 10 minutes (or 1 hour or whatever it is), dont know anything about my life and my personal experiences, have not done any type of even basic psicological analisys, but even then you dont hesitate of accusing me of something so psicologically obscure and subtle and that, curiously, is the perfect excuse for not having to refute my points in a logical way..." It makes them look like the wackos they are.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:29 PM
1

Am I understanding correctly that the journalists are not going to be fired, only reprimended? I dont understand this world.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 06:50 AM
8

The funny part is they probably dont get that much pussy because of it. Even some radical feminist wrote a blog post saying women dont like white knights/manginas sexually. And its not the case but, even if it got me more sex I would not like it. In my experience Ive found out that I enjoy sex much more when I am myself and dont try to blend myself to get it. It feels more real and authentic and its incredibly more fullfilling. I might be getting old but I discovered I preffer quality sex over q…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 06:42 AM
7

The funny part about SRS is that when they appeared most of reddit though they were trolls and they were joking. Until we started discovering they were serious, also completely bashit crazy.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:15 PM
3

Femminism is not communism, BUT it is true that most, if not all, of the radfems and white knights are communists/marxists. They have used femminism as a new form of cultural marxism.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:44 AM
5

She is angry because you rejected her. She will always assume its because you dont want her sexually, not because you were afraid of stupid laws. So she is hurt and wants revenge. Thats why she is lying to your friends.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:43 AM
2

At worst, I think I might be guilty of poor tact, but I don't see how I'm blaming the victim. You are not blaming the victim, but it is more than poor tact. When a person is raped, s/he is in an state of mind that does not allow him/her of processing his/her thoughts as a "normal" person would. A person who has just been raped needs closure and support, not advice on how to be safer. That can wait to when the person has recover mentally. Stating something like that to someone who has just been r…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:34 AM
5

Politicians, bankers, arm dealers and elite statist in general win with war.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:12 AM
5

Just let the centers allocate their resources as they have the local information about what they need exactly.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:09 AM
3

You mean the War on Drugs has not ended drug use and the War on Terroristm has not ended terrorism? Color me surprised.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 03:32 AM
11

You would be surprised on how many rich and filthy rich people vote Democrat. Democrats just pay lip service to the poor, they dont give a shit about them. They just use all these causes to get more central control.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:22 PM
7

Im a left libertarian and I have no remorse when I say that Obama is a murderer. You deal whith your concience if you support him. You dont have to be a republican, not even like them, to see that Obama is a disaster and Obamacare is just a present for the insurance companies.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:21 PM
1

The law is stupid thought. If someone wants to specialize in cutting men or women hair and not both, s/he should be allowed. Its stupid to force it otherwise.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 05:03 AM
3

So now we need an alcohol test before hooking up? Whats the alcohol limit to be considered drunk, is a couple of beers drunk already? Its so stupid.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 04:47 AM
8

And lastly female heterosexuality Thats a fair one. Men are somehow guilty of female heterosexuality. Ill take that one.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:07 PM
6

But sometimes that isn't feasible. You should seriously consider taking a second kid with you if you are going to be somewhere out of general sight with a kid. Its not a big deal, just tell another kid to come with you, and it can save you from a life ruining situation. Think about it, all it takes is a kid acusing you. Your life as you know it is over because you did not take a second child with you. Its easy and simple to do, and the reward is unmesurable.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:40 PM
1

I would not be for such company but I dont think it should be banned. What I expect is a company with stupid rules to go down after a while, or at least remain irrelevant with few customers. Think about it, if being black (whatever that means) is not a good parameter to forecast risk, the company is losing clients and therefore money just because its being stupid. How long do you think the shareholders would allow it?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:32 PM
33

I worked taking care of children during the summer. The parents would leave the children with us for 1 week or two and each counselor would have a group of 7 to 15 children for that time (big group had two or more counselors usually). We did a child abuse course and the main advise was to never be alone with a single child. If the child decides to say something and it comes down to your word vs his/her word the judge will always take the child side. For example, if one and only one kid wanted to…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 01:42 PM
1

I guess it depends on the sensibilities of each person. At the end its impossible to know what is more common because they are unreported crimes so there is no data, just guesses.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:27 AM
6

I was thinking some type of homophobia could be an issue. While reporting rape is unpleasant anyway, some men might be afraid of what others might think if they know they had sex with another dude, even if it is non-consensual.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:28 AM
2

80% of male victims report only female perpetrators Is it possible that males feel more shame when another guy rapes them and decide to keep it secret more?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:28 AM
2

People should be equal in front of the law and people should be considered innocent until provent guilty in front of the law. I absolutely agree with this ideas. In fact they are the basis of our society. But we are not talking about the law here. We are talking about a company trying to forecast risk. Let me give you a closer example: When you meet a person for first time and you dont like him/her and notice something shady, you probably trust your instincs and try to stay away from that person…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 11:54 AM
-2

Same I wrote applies for health insurance.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:54 PM
-10

There are reasons why insurance companies should be able to charge different: they are there to forecast risk and they need to be able to do it propperly otherwise they go bankrupt and you dont get any money when you need it. Insurance companies are in the bussiness of guessing risk. They usually use statistics, that is look at past events and guess that the future is going to be similar. To be able to offer you the best price and at the same time not going bankrupt so you get the money from the…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:44 PM
1

Exactly. At the moment is just one word vs the other, and taking sides because of a internet post is stupid. I could make a post acusing anyone in the next five minutes. Although giving the parents phone number is because (according to her) this 29 year old lives with his parents (probably the reason why he can spend so much time on tumblr discussing socialism). Not that Im justifying it, but I dont think she targeted the parents, just the house where he is living.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 04:31 PM
1

As far as I understand it, part of his job is being someone who doesn't have any skeletons in his closet But this is only a skeleton in the closet in certain societies. In the USA it is, but in most european countries it isnt. In my country for example, recently a video of a woman masturbating for a man was published on the Internet. This woman was a married politician and the video was for her lover. When it went public her first reaction was to quit, but ther party and in general the public (e…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:35 AM
1

Better even, tell them women want to have the custody of the kids because they dont want to pay child support to the father.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:26 PM
27

I was going to reply exactly like you did. Men do all those things. And yes, some people live in their imagination and not in the real world.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:18 PM
-7

Right. When elections are won or lost because of the color of a tie, me thinking that Obama being cool is what got him a lot of votes is completely stupid. Right.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 01:33 PM
1

Assuming a gausian distribution by default is a mistake.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:30 AM
5

How is it relevant if Romney is better or worse to what he said? Answer to his points.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 04:27 AM
-23

What a bunch of bollocks, like if there where no "welfare male queens". Women voted more for Obama because the guys is sweeter and apealing than Romney. Obama is the cool guy, and that is why most women voted for him. Sometimes when I read all this complicated speculation about why people voted what I think that people forget too much how democracy really works.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 03:04 PM
3

You have a reading comprehension problem. You were arguing that because a person has a "sensitive", not aggressive personality s/he will have a more broader view of the world. I challenged that idea and said that the idealization of the ... bla bla bla. In any way I say what you are are saying, and its not even possible to mischaracterize what I wrote in that way. I did not say being senstive, non aggressive is bad, just that idealizing that type of personality is stupid. You just read what you …
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:34 PM
5

She's arguing that boys are forced to "be tough" and "be strong," and as a result they aren't allowed to approach the world as broadly as women. Which seems true to me; it's part of sexist culture that consistently victimizes men and forces them to adhere to a bullshit gender role. Women, on the other hand, tend to receive more nurture, and aren't stigmatized for expressing feelings or sensitivity to emotions. You are implying that the way women behave is a better way of seeing in a broader way,…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:20 PM
5

it's that women as a class (not as a gender) are raised to approach the world differently than men Dont be dishonest. Not different, broader, implying better.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:42 PM
11

But women (and men) should be acting in ways to prevent rape, the same way anyone should take precautions to avoid being robbed as well. You dont need to be histerical abou it, just take common sense precautions. And it does not mean its your fault when you get robbed, just that you should try to do your best to expose yourself to risky situations. I dont behave the same way when I am in my home than when I am in the street, nor do I behave the same when I am in a crowded street at day light tha…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:34 PM
2

I do fear that MRA will end up the same way. Everytime a social movement emerges politicians attach to it and a industry of payed activists appear. They dont want to promote the cause just serve their own. They turn a good movment into shit followed by brain dead people. You can see it with feminism and evironmentalism. And the dynamic of feminism vs MRA is perfect for politics.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:04 PM
2

USA progressivism is traditionalist and "conservative" at its core. Its just the rethoric they use that makes them look different.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:09 AM
-12

You have to be mentally ill to assume that someone telling sexy to a kid is saying it in a sexual way, unless there are other clear indicators of that person being a pedophile. Its just a stupid compliment for the kid, nothing more.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 07:25 AM
-21

Am I understanding this correctly? A women telling a little boy that he is sexy on his costume is creepy? Why? Are we not allowed to talk and compliment children anymore? This is getting stupid.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 06:20 AM
5

Resell them at the same price to everyone else.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:27 AM
2

I live in an european country that is quite sexually repressed. It depends on the family. Ive allways seen my (close) family naked and I see it as normal.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:56 PM
8

Yeah, and its not even corruption at the intellectual level most of the times. Its not Ill take the money and Ill write the results you want. Its more: Find me a scientist that has a theory that is politically useful for me and give him/her money. The big problem is that a lot of these people believe they are good and thats why they are getting money, instead of realizing they are just being politically used.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:50 AM
0

Its not like your argument is any better, this seems more like a contest of stupid arguments: WHY are fathers showing off their dick to their sons? In my home we moved around the house naked if we happened to be naked. Even when we the children became adults. It was natural so Ive seen my mother and my father naked more than I can even remember.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:11 PM
4

The privileged position argument has some merit (with everything, not only feminism) because a lot of our perspective is based on what we feel when we face some situation. Its not all logic. The problem is it is used completely out of context to shut up opposite ideas. While it is true that going through certain experiences or not going through certain experiences changes how you view certain issues, it does not mean: One part is right and the other is wrong. The same idea can be used to argue t…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:16 AM
1

But the series is a comedy and the husband has a very weak will. In a episode from a previous season they show how his best friend and his wife have educated him to obey certain commands and stuff. So it fits the series that he is too weak to oppose her and they end up deciding it based on the result of the game, because in the series their lifes revolve to an insane degree around the fantasy league.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 05:49 AM
2

The best self-defense is always to run away. Always. There is not better tactic than avoiding conflict. Even if you are clearly supperior you never know if the other party has a knife or something similar that can hit you in a bad spot and kill you, you dont know if you will fall down and hit your head with something, .... fighting in the street is very different from the controlled environment of a gym, its very dangerous, even if you have a clear advantage. Stupid fights have killed people bef…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 05:29 AM
16

or even taking pictures of people without their permission is wrong I dont know much about that subreddit either, but if you are in a public space taking pictures is legal (at least in my country). I have always assumed that if I am in a public space anyone can take pictures of me. If you dont want to be pictured doing certain things, dont do them in public. I was tought that since I was very little and assumed it as basic knowledge.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:14 PM
6

And dont get me starting if we apply the same idea to ethnicities.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:40 AM
1

Cultural means is the best way to reign sense in the circumscision issue. I was circumscissed when I was 14 (or around that age) for medical reasons, but the doctor made the point of only cutting what was strictly necessary and leave as much skin as possible, which I am very thankful for. Promoting information and convincing people, like the doctor I found, is the best way to "solve" all this. I see a lot of posts with radical and completely out of place rethoric, trying to shame and denigrate p…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:35 AM
1

It is sexism, but I think its ok. Government should not be allowed any kind of sexism at all. Everybody should be equal in front of the law, no exceptions. But when it comes to private organizations, I dont see a problem for them being sexists. I think women only or men only associations are fine and should be allowed. Otherwise you run into absurds or criticizing images like the op did. If you dont like some conditions, just dont join and even start your own think if you think you can do it bet…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:30 AM
10

They are playing the legitimicy card. Every stablished movement does this when it comes under valid criticism that does not want to accept. And it kind of works for a while because in the counter-cultural movements there are a few gems with really good ideas on how to change society mixed with lots and lots of whackos and people have little time in their lifes. You can see how from the beggining MRM was tried to be branded along with a lot of other "outside of mainstream" ideologies. It works fo…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:24 AM
1

Im not a feminazi, but insurance have to calculate costs based on previous events. If they can not, they risk going backrupt and leaving everybody who have payed without insurance. Its that simple. If you think you can offer insurance based on other parameters go ahead and do it, you will get rich if you are right.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:27 AM
-5

Because its how insurance works. Insurance is based on trying to determine the cost of what it is being insured. If the company does not calculate the cost accordingly it will go bust. To calculate the cost of future events they use statistics based on past events and hope that the error because of how the future is different from past events gets compensated by having a big pool of people. So for example, if you want insurance for your home in a zone where statistically there has been more stor…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 03:53 AM
1

Almost everywhere else, its the original name. In the USA liberals used to support free markets and freedom in general, like everywhere else. But the progressives highjacked the democrat party changing its ideology but keeping the name liberal. Thats how liberal in the USA became what it is now while in the rest of the world did not change. Thats why classic liberals is used now to reffer to the original liberals. Its worth noting that libertarianism/liberalism is not classic liberalism exactly …
/r/MensRights06/10/12 02:29 PM
4

Class analisys does not originate from Marxism. Class analisys was first developed by classic liberal thinkers (now called libertarians in the USA and liberals in the rest of the world). Even Marx acknowledges in some letters to Engels that he got class analisys from reading classic liberal thinkers. It just happens that Marxism applied it in their own way constantly so people think class analisys is a marxist thing.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:51 PM
7

I dont even agree with Milton Friedman economic theories but what you just said is the biggest bullshit ever promoted against Milton Friedman. You should not read the pseudo-historical fiction novels of Naomi Klein. Its retarded, get a real history book. Milton Friedman also visited and wrote a letter to the chinese comunist. Are you going to blame him for the deaths of the comunists in China?
/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:26 PM
1

Im european not american, just in case you are getting confused. As far as I know the UK has anti-racist laws that punish racist opinions and other "hate discurse" laws, which are in direct contradiction with the right to freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 08:44 AM
2

There is no free speech in the UK That is flat out wrong. UK citizens have freedom of expression under common law and they also have freedom of expression under the European Convention, which has been incorporated into UK law in the Human Rights Act. There is of course some exceptions to freedom of speech in the UK, just as there is some exceptions in the United States. For instance shouting "fire!" in a crowded theater would not be protected speech in the UK. You are the one in the wrong. There…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:52 AM
13

Poor bloke. And poor child if there is one at the end. Imagine having a mother like that including that she only had you to profit from the present laws.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:43 PM
6

If what you say is correct (only if, because its not clear), I believe most men would think the same. Dont you want to make enough money to retire early and spend more time with your family? I dont know who would say no (if your interpretation is correct).
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:31 PM
35

There is also the issue that when you are working, you would love to quit. And when you are not working you would love to find a job. People always think something else would be better. I bet this women are not considering that by not working they would be completely dependent on their husband, they would not get out of the house as much, etc... They would be a lot more vulnerable.* (*) This is not an attack on women that decide to stay at home. It can work, but it is true that they are taking s…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 12:43 PM
1

The republican side, formed by all types of factions, fought against the fascists. But there was in-fighting inside the republican side, with the marxists (who were not anarchists) fighting against the anarchists. And when I mean fighting, I dont mean politically, I mean physical fighting, shoting guns at each other. There is a famous episode in Barcelona, where the marxists ocupied the building that used to hold the catalan government and in front across the plaza the anarchists ocupied the bui…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 12:01 PM
6

Yep, the marxist faction of the spanish civil war was "controlled" by the Soviet Union. Orwell was very influenced by socialism in his youth, so much that he went as volunteer to fight in the spanish civil war, but what he saw lead him to become very disatisfied with most types of socialism.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:34 PM
10

Its ends by the pigs sitting on the table with farmers from other farms. They basically become the oppressor. The book is a metaphore on how you can not fight against oppression by substituting the pressent system with another centralized system, even when the new system promises whatever they want to promise, because at the end any centrallized system will create abuses. Orwell was very impressed by the events at the spanish civil war were at some point, whith the war against the facist going o…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:44 PM
96

Thats the point. A fake thank you says: "I know you are trying to be a bitch with me to get me angry but it did not work". It will fustrate her. She is feeling all clever and fuzzy about how she is going to piss you. Imagine how she is going to feel when she realizes it did not acomplish it. The only thing is this response only works for a while, if she gets too pushy you have to stop her on her tracks, but by then you will be completely justified to do so in the eyes of anyone.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 02:33 PM
2

But it is wrong that feminism per se is (US) liberalism. The thing is (US) liberalism uses and adopts any ideology that helps them gain more power. Expect (US) liberal elites adopting MR in the future if that allows them to seize more power.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:46 AM
3

How is he going to puch cocks if they are not there? He is just looking for himself.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 05:54 AM
51

I agree with you, but there is still the problem that if it was in the opposite direction it would not be allowed.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 10:59 AM
2

I think he means you can judge them for it, bu not force them to do otherwise. You are always free to judge anyone the way you want. I personally agree with him that a business should be able to hire anyone they want with the conditions they preffer and if they are stupid they are only hurting themselves. But regardless of opinion on this issue, a law prohibiting from discrimnating because of sex is useless. Even if it was ilegal for them to expicitely say they are only hiring women, whats stopp…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:56 PM
3

In a lot of parts of the world (including my country, somewhere in Europe) it is legal for a 16 year old to have sex (consensual obviously) with whoever s/he wants. This obsession with the "jailbat" taboo is a USA thing.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 11:02 AM
29

I dont think soldiers are really respected. The "respect" soldiers get has always striked me as a cheap way to convince them to go to die.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:23 PM
4

Honestly, I dont want to be neither the men in the "men then" or the "men now" of the picture. Most of the first will probably die and all of the second seem stupid.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter