TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

i_cri_evry_tim Archive

View 0 posts and 1,969 comments by i_cri_evry_tim on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,969 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I’m a bit baffled by the question “why aren’t companies marketing sex toys as they will never make you self conscious or ridicule you?” I mean, do you not really see the amount of backlash a company would get for saying that you can actually have more fun with a toy than with an actual woman?? That would mean women are replaceable, and the only gender for which this is an acceptable thing to say is men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 08:13 PM
1

Nah. My husband is balding since he was 33. He is still fairly successful (in the sense that I can see women noticing him and displaying IOI’s fairly often).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 08:02 PM
1

What do you think Critical Race Theory and intersectionality judge everyone by? The amount of oppression points they have by virtue of race, gender, orientation and socioeconomic status. This is common knowledge. Funny enough, absolutely none of those things have anything to do with “the content of their character”. Now please stop soiling that quote.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 07:40 PM
8

in my view women still have it worse Grass is greener. No matter which side you are on, there is one set of experiences you are missing out on. All your argumentation relies on choosing to believe that one side’s perks or problems are bigger than the other, while absolutely everyone arguing for either side has absolutely no knowledge of how easy or hard it is to be part of the other group. Male/female privilege is likely the most stupid exercise of bellyaching and navel gazing that people indulg…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 11:36 AM
-1

I know plenty of trans men I doubt you know “plenty”. who are much happier being men A trans person being happier after transitioning/presenting as what they identify as? No shit, Sherlock. what kind of argument is this? The argument of “a lot of idiotic brainwashed morons who happened to be women were so convinced that men had it way easier that they decided to prove it by pretending to be a man for a while, only to discover that being a man sucks just as much as being a woman and that all the …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 10:59 AM
7

You clearly failed to understand that “my problems, my issues, my perks” are not referred to me in particular but rather to the kind of argumentation you are making. You: “Women have these problems!!” Somebody: “Well yes, but men have these other problems that women know nothing about” You: “I don’t even care. You can’t compare how serious these things has are” Since you asked me to show you how you should see the world: here’s a little piece of advice. Feel free to take it or ignore it: Try not…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 10:52 AM
2

“I’d pick man every time I was about to be born” Multiple idiots have already attempted this by passing as men after having lived as women. Invariably, all of them found out they were fucking wrong and they would rather not have all the supposed privilege cause the costs are simply not worth it. But narrative on, my brother, narrative on ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 08:50 AM
7

Typical “grass is greener” comment. My issues are much more serious than your issues. My perks are a lot less perky than your perks and my problems are a lot more problematic than your problems. The bitching and moaning about male privilege is female solipsism at its finest.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 08:43 AM
0

I can’t take seriously anybody who says “there is more than sex that goes into gender privilege”. Q: does gender privilege exist? A: if you look at race you realize that... Please take your agenda somewhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 08:38 AM
12

I think this is it. I am a man and I lurk here mostly because my wife often uses my phone and tablet and she has some of “her subs” on my account. What you are saying here is the same reason why a lot of TRP looks like it’s made up solely of and for angry, misogynistic dudes.
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/21 04:02 PM
1

How exactly does cheating coexist with being respectful? Why are you adding “ugly, overweight”? Is it news to you that whenever people list the qualities they want in a partner it is always assumed that they include “I’m physically attracted to them”?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 06:26 PM
1

If you think TRP proposed that there is a magic formula that explains every and all human beings... all you know about TRP is the surface, most likely angry rants at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 06:23 PM
3

/thread. The only ones getting mad at RP standards are the sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 06:21 PM
2

We do celebrate female body builders. We give them gold medals for lifting weights that don’t even qualify as top 25% for men bodybuilders. What are you even talking about??
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 06:18 PM
2

It matters not what you call it. What matters is what is meant when the argument is being proposed. If you have an issue with whether it is the right word, by all means go ahead and argue semantics. The point here is that you are arguing against your misunderstanding of the concept rather than against the concept itself. The n-count issue is precisely men upping their standards. Nobody is telling those women not to sleep with however much people they want. What those men are telling them is “I w…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 06:11 PM
6

So... male spaces that receive tax payer money need to be shit down on the basis of what, exactly? You, a moment ago: “men need to get together” You, now: “but without taxpayer money”.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 10:15 PM
4

Lmao. Your bias is showing. “Plenty of ways to cultivate male only spaces” “No drama if men only spaces are shut down” Pick a lane.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:50 PM
3

As can feminists? Why do we need feminist spaces?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/21 09:36 PM
6

Feel free to point out those privileges and make sure that: 1- they are granted (as opposed to earned) privileges that all men benefit from, solely on the grounds of being men, 2- they are not a natural consequence of biological differences, 3- they are not an unintended result of trying to give unearned privilege to women and 4- that the same privilege doesn’t apply to women in similar scenarios
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 07:41 PM
4

I didn’t say the world doesn’t treat women with preference. Literally what you said. Me: the world treats you with preference when compared to how it treats men. You: but this is the thing: it doesn’t. By all means continue to explain to us how hard your life is because of your gender and totally not because you can’t even own up to your own words.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 06:38 PM
10

Who has spoken about privilege at all? Do you realize you contradict yourself? “The world doesn’t treat women with preference”. “It’s more difficult to see benefits than disadvantages”. The word doesn’t treat men with preference for the sake of being men. Men need to prove themselves over and over again. Feel free to have a look at the various available resources about the experiences of women who transition into men. How do you reconcile having to prove yourself continuously with the supposed “…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 05:40 PM
8

We don’t need studies because we have all seen it happen And with this you just lost the respect of more than half the men here. “I don’t care to see, analyze and discuss the validity of empirical data. What matters is how I feel about it”. Way to go.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 04:26 PM
12

I am unlikely to go to jail, be on a sinking ship, be kidnapped But you are very likely to need help from strangers, having to interact with other humans and, in general, existing in a world that treats you with preference when compared to how it treats men. As the poster above said, all you see is the negatives you receive while taking the benefits so much for granted that they don’t even register for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 04:21 PM
1

Nah. You totally missed the point of what I wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 08:30 AM
2

This is the way. More than half the women I dated have fewer homemaking skills than I do. Most of my friends who are in couples are better cooks than their girlfriends. Lmao women definitely need to get off the old and tired horse of “men don’t do enuff round da house”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:20 PM
-1

Often times?? You need to re-read the comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:19 PM
0

I’m confused. Why do the men you get into relationships with need a maid or a cook from their romantic partner? It sounds like you date man-children to me. Do you know of any children who value the “work” that the adults put into making their life easier? Or do they take it for granted? If they are not man-children... Are you taking on these burdens by yourself when there is really no need, then expecting gratitude?? Is the amount of gratitude you expect reasonable? I don’t mean to be harsh here…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 11:16 PM
0

This has to be the most retarded post I have seen in a very, very long time on this sub. “Men want the best woman they can get” “Women want only the best men” “Men and women are the same in this regard”. If I facepalm any harder it will count as self-harming.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 07:55 AM
-3

90% of the women are not having the sex life they want because they think they should be doing far better than they are doing. They keep being told how they are all beautiful strong women who deserve the best. And they are not getting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 10:50 PM
2

The difference being that “genuine me” in a relationship gets a pass because there is security to be won and commitment to be lost. Married “genuine me” doesn’t get that pass. Your whole “the relationship would have failed on its own” argument doesn’t stand the bare minimum scrutiny. One would think people always make the sound and wise choice so all it takes is for people to be genuine for relationships to magically sort themselves out lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 08:53 PM
0

You sound way too mad about something that should not really affect you. Just pick a genuine person to be with and TRP is of no concern to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 07:37 PM
1

Why wouldn’t you want to be your own genuine self in your long-term relationship or marriage? Because for some men, multiple traits of the “genuine me” are a sure path to a dead bedroom, infidelity or divorce rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 07:23 PM
3

so what? I still got my sick wet Translation: I am emotionally dysfunctional so increased promiscuity benefits me ergo it benefits all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 02:03 AM
2

The irony on you calling anything “low IQ” is just too much 😂 Let me just show you how we fix it by using your own logic the solution is to crank up promiscuity even further Yeah. Just print more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 12:26 AM
7

it doesn’t make sense that an increase in promiscuity would increase sexlessness And with that statement alone you have proven you are unable to manage multiple variables, making it pointless to even address any of your points. If more and more money keeps being generated, how is it possible for there to be poor people?? IT MAKES NO SENSE!! Smh.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/21 05:27 PM
4

my friends who are just as mediocre as I am look down on guys who [...] My wife often comments about how multiple friends of hers repeatedly turn down guys who are just perfectly fine or constantly argue that they feel lukewarm about guys who are definitely well within what those women should aspire to. Yes, I get that sometimes people just don’t click. None of those women have to be over the moon just because the guy who is interested in her is more accomplished than she is. However, when you r…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 01:51 AM
1

What is AFC?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 10:50 PM
4

Dunno what attracted them. I see a 6/10 guy with mid education or a stable job interested in a 6/10 woman with basic education level, dead-end job or no much career prospects, no remarkable interests or skills and she looks at their potential relationship like the guy is waaaaaay below her league. This is a scenario that has developed multiple times in several social circles. I baffles me. But it downright pisses my wife off. According to her several of her friends are guilty of this behavior ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 10:49 PM
6

Even the worst losers can hit the middle of the pack Being easily above the middle of the pack myself, I can’t help wonder if “hitting the middle of the pack” is any use anyway. I see it often: mediocre (at best) women rejecting guys who are more than reasonably their looks match and have way much more to offer than they do. My wife says her there are much worse cases than I have witnessed and that it is way more frequent than I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 05:06 PM
1

Putting somebody in a pedestal puts one at fault... how, exactly? And how is it any different from remaining in a situation if abuse because you refuse to see that what you need is to get out? You truly engaged in some severe doublethink there. How you fail to see that you are literally victim blaming in your original argument is quite mind blowing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 04:54 PM
6

Men buy themselves toys all the time. See? Anyone can be purposefully intellectually dishonest and present an argument they know full well doesn’t fly. I refuse to believe that all the women (and I imagine a few men as well) who keep arguing “jewelry” are actually stupid enough not to see the very clear difference that exists. It is just as apparent as what separates “any toy” from “sex doll”
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 06:05 PM
1

Buying yourself an engagement ring is self-delusion. How does this need to be explained in any way? Why are you conflating the delusion of such an act with the completely separate concept of “buying things for yourself”?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 05:57 PM
5

The fact that if a woman swears off men, because she has been burned too many times by bad relationships, it is understood (if not even applauded) but a man swearing off women for the same reasons needs to be questioned, justified and clarified is admittedly baffling to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 05:55 PM
3

This comment alone. Red flags red flags red flags
/r/RedPillWomen21/12/20 04:53 PM
1

I hardly ever take assertions of the kind “she turned me down just because X”. Quite frankly, do you really think that’s more likely than having been turned down because they weren’t actually into you that much and your virginity provided a convenient excuse??
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 09:27 AM
1

Yes. The way I see it, trying to live up to standards that are not compatible with whatever hand you have been dealt would be the source of most guys’ insecurities. “Hey I’m not six-five. But I make up for it with a dazzling personality” is a rather confident way to go about things, so long as it is an attitude that comes from true acceptance of the self.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 07:15 PM
19

Meh. At this point in the gender wars, pretty much any nice person is a unicorn. Make of that what you may.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 11:57 AM
56

For what it’s worth: a guy I know was a virgin until a few days ago. His first time has been with a girl who had more experience than him. I’d say quite a bit more, but I’m not sure how much. She is a really nice girl and when they confided in me about getting together (maybe cause I was a matchmaker for them?) he said she was really nice to him about it all and apparently both of them had a great time. You don’t need a virgin just because you are one. You just need a nice person willing to exer…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 08:24 AM
1

The difference between a wife and a maid is the same that exists between a husband and a maintenance guy. The husband doesn’t expect payment for fulfilling his obligations as a functioning adult. Imagine how absolutely delusional one needs to be to think that you can work part time, then spend time at home doing things that you also need to do if you are single and expect compensation for them, while bitching about how part of the work for which you expect compensation should be done by the husb…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 06:52 AM
1

I’m pretty confident that you can put two and two together and realize that accepting who you are and wearing it openly is pretty much the definition of becoming confident?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 11:38 PM
1

Having two full time jobs and outsourcing domestic labor while splitting the rest of the chores to be done and the responsibilities of parenting is actually the most financially sound way to run a household. The rest is just women wanting financial safety regardless of whether they meet any standards on the obligations they incur on as SAHM.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 10:55 PM
2

love and warmth to the husbands. Damn I had to scroll really far down to start reading comedy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 10:05 PM
3

Nah. Women who work part time and do a lot of work at home are entitled to the salary of somebody who comes to clean your house as a part time job.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 10:03 PM
1

This. I would never marry somebody who intends to stay at home or allow my spouse to become a SAHM. I don’t financially support functioning adults that prefer to stay home.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 10:02 PM
2

False accusations do not exist. Feminists say so. Ergo women will be just fine and this hypothetical is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 10:00 PM
4

That’s all fine but I don’t see how it debunks the notion of Prince Charming wing the equivalent for a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 09:29 PM
1

She said, while hordes of women demand that more be done for their benefit. Indeed. Marriage is a pretty bad deal when you can instead coerce and victimhood your way into receiving the same benefits without having to give anything in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 01:03 PM
3

This is the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 09:21 AM
7

Personally I don’t care about society-wife equality. You can very easily achieve equality in your personal sphere. And in the end that’s exactly what affects you. Woman expects special treatment? Treat her like a man. Woman expects preferential treatment? Remind her that this would mean she is being considered inferior to men and thus deserving of deference. Don’t act thirsty. Don’t pay special attention to them. Don’t do things for them that you wouldn’t do for some dude. That’s how women learn…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 09:17 AM
7

Monk mode. It’s actually pretty good.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 09:11 AM
2

So you are furthering hypogamy If you want to make up hypogamy as a term by arguing that men prefer younger women (hurry up and get it published before somebody snatches that groundbreaking discovery from under your nose), and then want to grasp at anything that advances the concept, have at it. doesn’t redpill love Evo psych Who cares what RP loves? Is this what you are after? A gotcha post? RP is full of vindictive bullshit. Wow. Another groundbreaking discovery. Dude you are on a roll. if you…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 05:58 PM
2

Plenty of evidence that men are attracted to young women. There is about the same amount of evidence that women are attracted to status. The shitty parallel between “what a woman will actually do” and “what men are attracted to” is not gonna fly. it would be of detriment to the children Non Sequitur. Are you trying to argue that women as a whole act in the best interest of children even over their own? use your brain kid. Even before the condescension it was obvious you are here to whiteknight a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 04:50 PM
2

Because even if you accept that men will look to “date down” as a means to keep the upper hand in the relationship, it’s not the case that they will be on the constant lookout for something even lower below to trade down in an attempt to get an even bigger upper hand. If people are gonna post whataboutisms, at least think them through.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 03:59 PM
3

Neither of them are PUA I would argue that bagging a younger woman who happens to be above your looks match and responds well (aka toes the line) to RP “tactics” is pretty much the definition of success if one is gonna promote TRP as a way to stop failure in the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 12:14 PM
9

I’m pretty sure that the previous commenter means that being on the “losing side” of a situationship is not the exclusive domain of women. Plenty of men have been in what they thought was a relationship while the woman still evaluated other possible options. I disagree that anything in dating is gendered. Certain problems or consequences can definitely be exclusive to one gender but you can be sure that the cause for those problems (in this case, situationships) can happen to the other side, eve…
/r/RedPillWomen20/11/20 08:19 AM
1

Thrue
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 12:26 AM
3

Nah. Definitely execution. You keep those fuckers alive and eventually some moron decides to try and make a case for them and other morons follow suit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 08:22 AM
0

Must be a troll post. Nobody with a modicum of intelligence could make the argument that you would get exactly what women get by going against your sexuality. I mean, women don’t have to go against their sexuality to get whatever they supposedly get. How did you arrive at the conclusion that yours was an argument that would stand the most basic scrutiny? Not even radical feminist allies are this dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 10:27 PM
1

Stahp
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 08:47 AM
3

100% agree. You can’t logically talk a woman into liking whatever you say. You need to shame and socially punish her for not liking the right things. Take a look at fat acceptance. That’s how it’s done.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 08:44 AM
1

Mi partner is aware that I have slept with a few more women than the average guy. I have had no ONS and I don’t go to bed with just about anyone. She knows this, so I guess that factors in when it comes to why she doesn’t care too much. The “being left alone because sexual past” doesn’t really apply to my situation. Either we wouldn’t have started anything or I would have had to lie to her for her to now find out, care and leave because of it. So I can’t really answer. As I said, I would have th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 02:05 PM
1

No I didn’t assume you were a woman. I was mocking any woman hypothetically making such an argument. Not that it is important whether I assumed your gender. I would like to draw attention to some of your assumptions though. you pretend to devalue men and women alike for having lots of sex. I do devalue both men and women for having lots of sex. Equally. I devalue them as good relationship material, not as people. Getting into a LTR with a man-whore is not any better than committing to a slut. Fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 09:35 AM
2

Nah. You can twist it all you want, but the reality is that when you are a slut, regardless of wether you are a man or a woman, what you are doing is signaling that you lack certain traits, namely discerning ability. You are also showing that you value immediate reward more than you value the rewards of long commitments. That you value variety over quality. So yeah. Dudes care about that a lot more than women do, just like women care a lot more about accomplishment than men do. Now you can keep …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 07:33 AM
5

Am Man. Can confirm.
/r/RedPillWomen01/11/20 12:56 AM
1

You are free to consider men to be “less” for sleeping with as many women as they can. Nobody is stopping you. Are women in general hypocritical for preferring successful dudes when they (women in general) often choose balance between personal and professional lives at the expense of their success? Is any given woman a hypocrite when they consider an indecisive or non-assertive guy to”be less” even when those women are utterly indecisive and non-assertive? Both genders are equally guilty of dema…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 12:20 AM
2

Not sure where you get that I’m offended by it. If anything it benefits me that the “average guy” is so low. By that standard I would be well above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 04:40 PM
2

that’s still slut shaming. How dare men have standards. Hey. Remember to date every short, ugly, unemployed, porn sick and any combination of the above dudes that want a relationship with you... cause you are only allowed to have the standards that are acceptable to men, not your own. Lmao the entitlement. they are not socially rejected Neither are unproductive women. Or misandrists. Each gender has their woes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 04:35 PM
7

being chad is more important than having a happy sex life I agree with that assessment. I think it happens because too many guys think that the only way to have a happy sex life is to have the Chad sex life. but if a woman had sex with too many guys it’s icky. I think this is a dishonest interpretation of what really goes on. The woman is not icky. Most dudes who are against high n-counts will still fuck the high n slut. But they won’t want a relationship with her. Women would be wise to adopt a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 01:15 PM
1

Without the unnatural solution of forced monogamy some women would be losers too. Except we have created the unnatural solution of daddy government looking after single moms... at the expense of the losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 12:46 PM
1

No it doesn’t. I am a straight man and I do have a litmus test for whether other men qualify as datable in my opinion. Not sure why you’d think that makes you a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 12:43 PM
8

But it is true for the framework of SMV. In order for there to exist high value individuals, there must exist low value individuals. The question of course, is whether men are, as the OP implies, low value on average. Or even low value as a standard. Are women really that high value that they can make demands such as “be interesting”? Because your average girl is not any better than the average guy who apparently is a porn sick loser with video games as his only hobby. If their higher average or…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 12:34 PM
8

Lmao. Back-in-my-day memes galore. I also grew up in the nineties. I have a 2yo son now. I wouldn’t want to grow up and have to approach women in the scene he is likely going to have to do it. With the [potential rapist] tag all over him, and all on the grounds of having been born with a penis. “They wouldn’t survive a day in the 1990’s” Ok, boomer.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 11:18 AM
0

Yeah. But it’s (some) men and the pill-esque rhetoric. She is totally not absolutely confirming the pill-esque stereotypes that (some) guys have come to observe in (some) women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 11:15 AM
7

I’m the husband. My wife comments on this sub sometimes tho, which is why this is on my feed. I can wait for her to come and reply if you prefer, but I would say our relationship is an understanding of each other where she defers to my judgement on instances of difference of opinion over what the final call should be. This said, I very rarely make a decision that is 100% “my way” and I think I can say I NEVER made a decision that affected both of us without first asking for her input and views t…
/r/RedPillWomen29/10/20 11:26 AM
4

I think there is a difference between submission (choosing to follow) and subordination (having to obey). So yes. Trad women choose a submissive relationship that is partnership in which they choose not to listen to the rabid cacophony of screeches telling them that they are always right and entitled to everything. Instead, they defer to the judgement of a husband who has proven himself to guide his decisions with the best interest of the partnership in mind rather than his own individual best i…
/r/RedPillWomen29/10/20 10:57 AM
11

Pretty bold of you to assume you are running anything when you can’t even keep your wife loyal lmao. “I’m running this company”, he said. Meanwhile, the accountant is playing beer pong with the receptionist and the maintenance guy has drilled his way into the safe.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 10:43 AM
3

Agreed. Anecdotal experience here: absolutely all of the women I know who make “must not be balding” a dealbreaker are the kind of woman who ain’t good for anything else than a P&D. Yes. Some women will prefer a dude with hair. But it isn’t a dealbreaker for the vast majority of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 09:06 PM
11

Dude if your hair is gonna go, it’s gonna go no matter what. Don’t poison your body for a few extra months of having just a little more hair. I have a friend who did everything from Monoxidyl (whatever spelling) to scalp treatments. He went bald anyway. And all that time his hair looked like shit anyway because, even though he kept some of it, it wasn’t in his genes for his body to keep that hair healthy. Just accept it and find ways to make it sexy. The blackpill nonsense about baldness is just…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 07:51 PM
3

Spot on
/r/RedPillWomen28/10/20 05:01 PM
15

Meh. If you are balding you can always get a nice athletic body and ride the Fast&Furious bald-but-sexy wave. Source: been balding heavily since 30yo. Was more successful than when I was 25-30 and just started balding but could still pretend I wasn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 04:37 PM
2

Maybe it is something he has discovered while living together. Even when we don’t feel our personalities change, the people we are out on the street and the people we are at home are not the same. Not saying anyone is putting up a front. Just saying that seeing somebody while both have their own space/refuge and living together are completely separate experiences.
/r/RedPillWomen28/10/20 01:21 PM
0

Yikes
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 11:56 AM
1

The fact that you are adding “YIKES” at the end of your argumentation there just proves that you have become used to think highly of yourself and to leverage how much people men are conditioned by the possibility of displeasing you. Imagine living such existence. Not that the dudes you are arguing against come off as anything other than scum. But I find it hilarious when somebody complains about their hardships while living life on deity mode.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 11:56 AM
1

Username checks out. Low effort troll though. 1/8.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 11:51 AM
9

I don’t understand how “men are programmed to be attracted to women who exhibit signs of fertility” is a mishandling of science just because the indicators of fertility/good health were different 200 years ago. Men are naturally attracted to whatever indicates beauty and good health. 100 years ago it was pale skin and extra chub, today it is fit bodies and youth. I’m not even sure what your point here is other than “lmao RedPill go brrr”.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 01:26 PM
6

That’s just weird. Balding. Not raking in the dollars either. Never had issues getting a girlfriend. This whole “all girls just want to fuck 8-9-10 dudes even if they are just a 4 themselves” is completely foreign to me. It doesn’t even apply to the socmedia-obsessed teens I work with. Plenty of completely average dudes getting together with looksmatch girls. There’s plenty of truth in much of the redpill rhetoric. The whole 80-20 rule doesn’t seem to be part of it in my anecdotal personal exper…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 12:28 AM
6

She is He-bernating.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 06:53 AM
6

No harm in making decisions together. A big part of understanding submission is learning that not getting your way doesn’t mean you didn’t make a decision together. When my man listens to my input and either gives me a solid argument about why “his way” is more beneficial for us or we reach a compromise that’s a decision that was made together. Many women find it hard to see that. I’ve given a real life example above about instances of imposing will and then holding the man accountable. Society …
/r/RedPillWomen17/10/20 10:01 PM
11

I am like that too. Let me tell you my BF’s mom told him after I met her: “I liked her. She is well mannered, she offered to help with things when she could and she was prudent enough to err on the side of shyness rather than boisterousness. This one is a keeper. Don’t screw this up” It’s never good to be too closed during first interactions, but it’s definitely better to be a little shy than it is to be “a little too much”. Just relax. Your bf chose you and if he wants you to meet his parents h…
/r/RedPillWomen17/10/20 02:46 PM
4

I’m so sorry to hear that. But also congratulations on finding a better path for yourself. Yeah I meant it exactly like that. So many of my friends have a warped vision of men. Either “they are out to exploit me” or “they are useless, selfish, abusive” and all kinds of not very nice things. I used to think I had just been lucky to find a good man. Nowadays I realize I just happened to meet him when I was already growing out of the “men are useless” phase that modern (and awfully misunderstood) f…
/r/RedPillWomen17/10/20 02:38 PM
6

I agree with this. But I have a few too many friends who have been taught to be the wrong kind of “strong and independent”. I often get the feeling that those who chastise the concept and the people who defend that being strong and independent is good for a woman are talking about completely different understandings of what strength and independence means.
/r/RedPillWomen17/10/20 01:29 PM
3

The shocking part is that, no matter how much people explain it to them, women continue to try to get the best guy they can’t get (for anything other than, if she is lucky, a few P&D, that is) and end up believing they are actually of higher worth than they actually are because they got fucked by somebody well out of their commitment league. The inevitable clash of reality with this delusion results in a predictable spiral of bad attitudes that affect the relationship market as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 11:59 AM
60

I’ll tell you the story of a (former) close friend of mine: Mary. Mary marries John (obviously fake names). John is a good husband. Makes decent money, helps in the house, is a good son and friend. John has his faults like all men. But overall he is a great man. After a few years Mary starts nagging John about a bigger house. They make good money. Why not. John tells Mary it’s not a good idea. Economy. Job situation. They don’t actually need a bigger house. Big house means more work and more exp…
/r/RedPillWomen16/10/20 02:46 PM
50

Not the same person you replied to but to me it means choosing a man that you are comfortable following. A man you trust will always make decisions not based on what’s best for him but rather what’s best for the two of you. We live in a society that keeps telling us not to submit. To be independent. To take the wheel. But then it also gives us all the tools, both metaphorical and otherwise, to shirk the responsibility over the consequences of our supposed independence and dump all the costs of t…
/r/RedPillWomen16/10/20 02:25 PM
3

Nobody is talking about staying. That’s a red herring that keeps being thrown on top of the argument. The argument is about whether the position of “used to do it with other(s), won’t do it with you” is a matter of male insecurity or an issue that should be taken as an indication that one needs to bail because AF/BB. Feel free to re-read the OP. “What do you care?? It’s all about your insecurity. Don’t blame it on x, y or z”. Followed by a bunch of tangential arguments about other situations ent…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 04:56 PM
7

It’s most likely gonna be a lie by omission, so yeah, it’s lying. Maybe the not engaging in a particular sexual act is not a dealbreaker for the guy, but being with somebody who attempts to paint a dishonest picture of herself is. I don’t know who is more autistic here, the morons who think that just because the girl tried anal once in college and didn’t like it now she has to do it for them or the morons who think every dude is incapable of differentiating “tried it, didn’t like it” from “used …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 03:55 PM
3

Nah it’s absolutely on him to dump the dead weight that this theoretical woman is. It’s called taking charge instead of bellyaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 03:37 PM
8

No. They would only solve men’s problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 03:03 PM
8

Nah it makes all the sense in the world. You ask for whatever sexual act and she will not tell you “oh I used to do this but not anymore”. She lies her ass off about how she just doesn’t like it. It’s not men’s ego. It’s women’s dishonesty.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 02:59 PM
4

I’m not sure why the fact that being with somebody who doesn’t engage in [whatever] as a matter of principle and being with somebody who doesn’t engage in [whatever] with you are completely different beasts. If your girl was a kinky slut for her ex and is not a kinky slut for you, she is clearly not as willing to give herself to you as she was to give herself to others. Make of that what you may. This argument keep coming up over and over, and it’s transparent at this point that it is just women…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 02:55 PM
2

I’m not even sure my husband understands self consciousness, embarrassment or shame Aaah I’m like that too. It drives my “wife” crazy sometimes but it’s actually rather liberating. I wish more people would try it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 08:31 AM
2

Nah. Many men are secure enough in their own skin to not mind a few extra pounds. It’s only blackpill losers who think only hard body 8+ women are worth any attention. Also, chubby chasers exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/20 02:17 PM
2

Nah. Only bottom men are actually truly desperate. Your average average guy is nowhere near the psychosis levels of an actually average girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/20 10:16 AM
5

I think only average men with low self esteem would do this. This is true in my experience. I know several average guys who have dumped arguably above-his-league women for acting out of order.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/20 10:15 AM
2

Let’s see. Step 1: get a habit to do some cleaning every day. We all understand that coming from work to even more work at home is less than inviting. But a messy house is absolutely not inviting and it signals laziness. Besides, spending the weekend doing what one was too lazy to do during the week sounds like an awful waste of what would otherwise be wonderful free time. Also Step 1: don’t be in a relationship with somebody who disrespects you by calling you a dumbass. Or stupid. Respect shoul…
/r/RedPillWomen06/10/20 11:26 PM
3

Facepalm
/r/RedPillWomen06/10/20 11:22 PM
5

we need more data before we start beating up on men Yeah that’s not how modern society operates. Sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/20 11:15 PM
1

Hey by all means go ahead. Call men names. I’ll be here eating popcorn. Just pointing out that the argument “they did it first” speaks volumes of what one can expect from the person wielding it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/20 03:42 PM
8

If the gym opens at 7am just be there at 6.50 Either he is already there and you get 10 minutes to establish acquaintanceship without interrupting his workout... or you get there before him which sets you up nicely to break up the ice with some joke about how you beat him to it and got there first this time around.
/r/RedPillWomen05/10/20 10:33 PM
1

Fair enough. I have edited my previous post to avoid unfairly accusing you of a position you don’t hold. we rarely question it from that angle and why not? Because men’s position towards women who have lots of sex and women’s position towards men who have lots of sex is very different and it is not at all about anything society has decided but rather about how each sex selects for a good match. The fact that society doesn’t care at all about how good relationships are formed is proof enough that…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 10:18 PM
2

Wanting to equate the positions of two parties involved in a dynamic where each plays a diametrically opposed role is ridiculous. Men pursue, women select. Arguing “why are women not struggling with the tsunami of man-whores” is vacuous. If anything, those man-whores have proven themselves over and over again. If getting sex was actually difficult for women, high n-count women would demonstrate value. But because it is so easy, what it demonstrates is low ability to discern. Your That position o…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 09:32 PM
5

It’s called solipsism.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 06:59 PM
1

Lmao. “They started it”. Best moral argument ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 03:59 PM
1

No. It’s the same with mainstream dating and men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 03:58 PM
9

I do not care if they get it or not But I will take offense about the advice they get towards getting casual sex, even though I don’t care whether it works or not. This seems to be the rather extended position among women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 03:57 PM
1

All lies. Women never worked because they were not allowed to. Also, electric appliances are a tool of the patriarchy, so your claim that they have somehow helped women is misogynistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 09:48 PM
1

Aaaah ok lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 08:26 PM
1

Nothing wrong with looking for the best you can get. Plenty wrong with always looking for the next best thing, specially if it means ditching whatever you supposedly committed to. Hypergamy is not about looking for high value but rather about always being looking to trade up. If TRP was against looking for high value it would go the feminist way. “You are worthy”, “you are perfect the way you are”, “it’s society’s fault for pushing expectations on you”. Instead it advises to work towards acquiri…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 03:25 PM
1

Yeah I agree with all f this. I think my sarcasm on the previous responses went unnoticed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 03:23 PM
1

One contributes to the conversation by agreeing with whatever the narrative is. Women were never allowed to work and they were always treated like slaves and broodmares. That’s the narrative. Please stick to it and ignore reality. Thanks for your cooperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 01:41 PM
0

I’m almost certain that the reason women go on the defensive and/or avoid the issue is most definitely not so much about how poorly it is presented as it is about how poorly it makes them look.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 01:38 PM
1

Please don’t ruin narrative with history. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 01:36 PM
1

No it doesn’t talk about it. But it puts you in the softy-fag mindset where you think that’s what women wanna hear men say. And that’s how incels are born.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/20 08:36 AM
11

Lmao. That moment when you think that “lying to the opposite gender because it serves them better” is something only one of the sides does.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/20 06:55 PM
-4

I’m not sure what kind of guys you hang out with but I can guarantee most guys would not “be thrilled”. Society keeps selling this image of men and most guys feel like if they say they are not like that people will look at them weird. But the reality is other. Also, most guys do not fall into the “i love holding hands and looking into each other’s eyes”. Please stop consuming feminist media, dude. Sounding like a girl is a hint that you think like a girl. Maybe that’s why “male culture” confuses…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/20 06:54 PM
3

Yes. If you take your appearance seriously on top of being gifted with physical appeal and social acuity and financial status and and and... See where I’m going? Yes there are a handful of men who will be able to attract a much younger woman. They will still not be swimming in offers from every other 22yo out there though.
/r/RedPillWomen29/09/20 03:33 PM
7

My man is 40 now. Around the time we got together he was 35 and had a few 20-something year olds chasing him. He does look a bit younger than he is and is attractive but nowhere close to a 10. I think it’s his young energy and his active spirit. Even nowadays I can see younger moms look at him with “I’d hit that” eyes at the play park. It’s definitely possible for a certain type of older man to attract arguably much younger women but the TRP nonsense that most men can be fucking 20yo bimbos well…
/r/RedPillWomen29/09/20 02:37 PM
0

So women don’t need to be held accountable for their actions... on the basis that the well known possible consequences can be “scarring”. Awesome argument. XD
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:52 PM
-1

Lmao I love the “parasite” argument. It’s so utterly dumb and blatantly malicious. I couldn’t agree more with your counterargument there.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 09:28 AM
2

How about “one is money the other is ripping your genitals inside out to your anus”? Is that your argument? “Women don’t need to be held accountable because vagina”?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 06:41 AM
5

“We changed the name, so now it’s a different thing” That’s Squarepants Spongebob level of discourse. Congrats.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 11:57 PM
5

No. It’s about holding women just as accountable for their actions as we hold men. Any argument you can make against a man who doesn’t want to be financially responsible for a child he sired is just as valid against any woman who wants a voluntary abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 11:55 PM
1

I have slept with enough women that I feel it’s safe to extrapolate. Most women are indeed sexually submissive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 02:22 PM
3

Lmao. The pink tax. I can’t take you seriously after that. Even if it were a reasonable comparison this still falls under personal preference rather than necessity. (Feel free to buy men’s razors and unscented soap, you don’t need “the female version” of toiletries). Unless you can provide solid evidence that women’s affordable clothing is actually more expensive than men’s affordable clothing, the argument is just something somebody pulled directly out of their ass. Dunno if it was you or someb…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 02:38 PM
2

if two people are wearing affordable-but-nice clothing the female version will cost more. That is simply not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 10:11 PM
1

I don’t know what kind of mental masturbation you are all engaging in. Women initiate the vast majority of divorces because, statistically, men have more to lose from getting divorced while women have more to win. Whether the divorce happens because one party is abusive/unfaithful is pretty irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/20 11:33 PM
1

I don’t see how any of your points apply to one gender exclusively. They all seem pretty universal to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 12:17 AM
8

blue pill is rewarded and seen in a more positive light by women. Please explain how blue pill is rewarded. I predict: “you receive women’s approval”.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 03:36 PM
5

Not to even mention “women get defensive about men becoming aware and speaking about women’s true instincts because they are toxic about it” Remember, boys: speaking about women’s true nature is toxic. Blue pill said so.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 03:34 PM
1

It comes from the assumption that... Aaaah that’s where the disconnect between your argument and mine lies. I don’t think this applies to anyone who pays for sex or to anyone who engages in casual sex. I think this applies to those who derive validation from those activities. In order to need validation from casual sex (for money or not), one must of course lack validation in their life.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 03:02 PM
1

Most people who derive validation from intimacy either have a lack of intimacy in their regular lives or have a need for constant reminders that they are indeed “valuable”. That they are indeed worthy of love, attractive and desirable. I think that’s what most people talk about when speaking of validation in the context of casual sex. I don’t think this is such a foreign concept that anyone would enter a discussion about the semantics of “validation”. Not in good faith, that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 09:17 PM
1

Well I’m glad to read that he understood it was important for you and was happy to oblige. I wish you two all the best
/r/RedPillWomen18/09/20 09:12 PM
4

I don’t want to be harsh here but this amount of stress over the issue does make you seem a bit juvenile. Personally I don’t like to put much personal stuff on social media. I think it’s kinda weird. Everyone is different about his social media. Maybe your bf is heads over heels about you but thinks that the profile pic is not a suitable place to profess his love for you. Maybe he just really really likes his football pic. I would encourage you to think about how people express love in their own…
/r/RedPillWomen18/09/20 09:06 PM
1

I guess that positive attention and compliments or just regular interest (even if they are faked) do feel validating when your regular experience with your spouse/gf consists of complaints about things you do, nagging about things you don’t do and criticism of things that are part of you. Dunno. I guess it must feel pretty validating in contrast.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 06:36 PM
8

What kind of argument is this really? Your whole post is predicated in the woman lying. “You haven’t had sex or pressured her or even brought it up because she says she doesn’t like to sleep around” “She has casual sex with some dude, no effort needed on his part” She presents herself to you as something she isn’t (a woman who doesn’t sleep around). Why are you bothering with dissecting why? Just move on from this obvious low value.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 01:23 PM
6

A person you have sex with should be your partner You forgot to add “in my personal opinion” these men should stay out of the dating game r/gatekeeping it’s an instant dealbreaker for me and I would drop any friend that I know has visited a prostitute. This is the only part of your reply that makes any sense. By all means feel free to establish whatever boundaries you deem appropriate in your personal relationships. Just make sure you are not passing moral judgement on actions you engage in your…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 01:10 PM
3

A prostitute is an employee, not a partner. What kind of delusion makes you think somebody you pay to perform a labor for you is your partner? The prostitute is there to perform and get paid just as much as the person who gives you a pedicure. If you pay somebody to take you out on a boat tour and their sour mood ruins the day for you and everyone else, do you think “hey guys it’s not ok to get upset. That person wasn’t happy with what they were doing. We are being selfish here”?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 10:47 AM
5

I’ll ask you a seemingly simple question: Do you think that absolutely everyone who has ever worked at a place where you went to enjoy some sort of experience (holidays, a massage, a pedicure, for example) enjoyed what they were doing to provide you with that experience? If not, do you have any qualms about your enjoyment of that experience? If you didn’t enjoy the experience because somebody who was supposed to be professional didn’t act like it... did you feel like they ruined it for you or di…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 10:16 AM
3

You are confusing sexual partner with prostitute. They are different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 09:52 AM
6

I’d be horrified if You would definitely be utterly insecure if you suddenly found yourself in the shoes of the average man then. says something very unpleasant about him What does it exactly say about him? The amount of women who see “pay for me to be there” as an given part of the date is by no means small. Have you really never encountered a woman who thinks that if a guy invites her out it is on him to pay for the date?? How os that any different?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 09:35 AM
1

If one feels like the women around them wouldn’t consider them suitable/worthy of intimacy and sensuality, I’m pretty sure that receiving it is somewhat validating.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 09:22 AM
2

I only know one escort IRL. According to her, most men just want to hang out with a pretty woman that makes them feel great instead of an average hag that nags and complains about them. Seems to me like validation and positive attention are indeed the main motive, with sex being just the cherry on top.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 09:19 AM
11

Exactly. The idea that a dude would rather pay for guaranteed, satisfactory sex than pay for a date with the off chance of maybe sex that is more likely to be mediocre than anything else is outlandish. No no no. The man must certainly be a pathetic incel who can’t get women without paying for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 09:15 AM
1

Men don’t have the presumption of innocence, for starters. Due process is being eroded as we speak. All in favor of “protecting wamen”. Just a couple examples of “going against rights”.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 04:08 PM
1

1- They are your children. 2- Are you paying rent? Utilities? Food? Clothing? How the hell can you afford all those things if you are not making any money because you are a SAHP??
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 04:06 PM
1

No I think everyone is responsible for their own situation. Blaming it on immigration, or on whatever is a cop out. I was merely speaking of raw facts as much as I’m able given my own bias. I’m not even placing blame on the left either. Yeah that’s what I meant about elites.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/20 08:13 AM
1

I suppose immigration can be detrimental to less qualified workers but so what? Why should immigrants be blamed So nothing. Also, I don’t think I implied immigrants were guilty of anything. I made the point in support of my argument that left-y policies (like favoring immigration) are far from working in benefit to the poor. immigrants becoming a burden I don’t see cultural ghettos as a burden. But you can check that historically they tend to lower property value. This is a matter of racism and …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 08:52 PM
1

There’s two main causes: immigration policies and labor contract law. Higher immigration in the name of fairness, equality, justice or whatever one wants to call it is ultimately detrimental for the less qualified workers, who also are often the poorest. More competition and the competition is very willing to work for less money. In fact, immigration keeps all salaries down, not only those of unqualified-worker jobs. Immigration eventually leads to the creation of cultural-ethnic ghettos, which …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 01:50 PM
1

I’m not really entering the debate of whether the economy does better under one group or the other. Whether the country sees more money overall is irrelevant to the average citizen. I’m actually more interested in seeing which bracket sees the bigger financial benefit. Western culture has been largely duped on the issue of “left policies benefit the poor”. Only looking at “stock market returns are larger under Democrats” already tells you that the already rich become richer (unless one wants to …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 12:09 PM
2

I think the other responder meant the US is home to the best possible health care rather than “we have the best health care system”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 10:37 AM
1

And I would agree with you on those points. The question is, the person I replied to is obviously left-leaning and, according to them, America is in utter shit right now and the problem is conservatives. Interestingly enough, the left wants to do away with all of those things you are arguing make America great. I would be interested in seeing what their mental gymnastics look like. PS: MAGA reference accidental.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 08:39 AM
1

Wow. Imagine thinking that “I don’t have it all” is a valid counter argument to “you are being shielded from consequences” XD
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 11:00 PM
1

slut around? What is she missing out on by getting married then? What exactly is precluding her from doing whatever “she really wanted to do” while also being married? If she doesn’t want to be a SAHM, why does she do it? It’s hilarious how nobody forces women to get married or, even if they do, they are free to choose work over SAHP... but somehow they need to be paid a compensation if they choose not to work. It’s almost as if you actually believed women are entitled to being protected from th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 10:52 PM
1

I see. It is immoral to go against the rights of one half of the population in favor of those of the other half. Except when convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 10:46 PM
1

Better social safety network, no social unrest, no riots, fewer convicts per capita... It’s really easy to go ahead and argue that racial homogeneity has no bearing on any of those issues and that the reasons America is doing worse in all those aspects is something else, but I wanna see how one defends, at the same time, that all of them just need more diversity to be solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 10:45 PM
8

Diversity isn’t keeping America back Nobody said it was. You argued “more diversity is good”. I insist: what evidence do you have to support your claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:16 PM
0

Lmao. women give up their youth and ability to be self-sufficient when they marry. Alimony and child support is compensation. Excellent example of being shielded from consequences. Give up your ability to be self-sufficient and, if at any point you don’t feel like holding up your end of the bargain, just get paid. Literally no risk, guaranteed reward. I’m gonna politely gloss over the fact that when you say “women give up their youth” what you are really saying is women give up their chance to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:14 PM
-1

it’s morally wrong to reduce woman’s rights in favor of men’s rights. This is the best argument there is against feminism, female empowerment and just about any push for change that has been made in the last 50 years where any part of the argumentation was “because women”.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 04:02 PM
9

this can be done by welcoming greater diversity US is one of the most diverse countries in the western culture. Every other more homogenous country is doing better than the US. What basis do you have to assert that diversity is good?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 03:53 PM
4

women’s exploitative behavior is biologically ingrained. What we need to change is the not biologically-ingrained men’s attraction to women. Wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 08:46 AM
1

In mainstream media? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/20 07:22 AM
6

“I fall in and out of love every day”. r/selfawarewolves
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/20 09:40 AM
2

Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/20 07:16 AM
4

you are literally judging them right now for their sexual experiences. Where did I judge them exactly? keep trying to get in there they’ll give you a chance eventually XD
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 11:33 PM
6

It’s rather rich of you to assume I have a toxic relationship with my female friends lmao. Where do you get that I obviously judge them lol. Care, your sexism is showing. We are definitely not the same. You got that right.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 11:31 PM
8

So why are you confused as to what reason could another woman have to lie to you about her n-count?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 11:17 PM
12

what are their motives to lie about their number to me? We are not having sex together I have three female friends i don’t have sex with that I have already caught lying about their n-count right to my face. I literally know more “boyfriends” of theirs than the numbers they claim to have, and I know of a few ONS that have happened on the side. Women lie about their n-count. That’s just a reality. The only ones who don’t lie are the ones with very high counts who wear the count proudly.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 11:07 PM
2

tens of thousands of times between 2017 and 2019 Giving the most generous possible amount of time there (3 times 365 days), whatshisname would have had to visit the misogynistic site 19 times a day every single day in order to be able to score the lowest possible “tens of thousands” It is at that point that simple math helps me know I am reading garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 10:51 PM
4

Personally I find it hilarious that nobody is angry or scared about their male relatives having to deal with the man-hating screechers of fringe feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 10:47 PM
6

I don’t see why it wouldn’t. It’s like men’s RP. We can be aware of it but it doesn’t make us immune to our instincts. I wanna clarify that I am talking about the things that reveal “blue pill is a lie”. Emotional manipulation and mind games aimed at “spinning plates” do not work on level-headed women. But I guess it is the same for women’s RP. Fake femininity and pretend submissiveness will be spotted a mile away by any man worth his salt.
/r/RedPillWomen07/09/20 03:37 PM
24

the mgtows are here because, from what I can tell, their communities are too toxic My husband and I have a friend that would arguably qualify as MGTOW. We spoke to him of this sub during a conversation about how he has given up on women because there are no traditional women left and he has admitted to hubs that, since then, he lurks here because seeing women speak of femininity, loyalty and accountability gives him hope that not all women are instathots deep inside.
/r/RedPillWomen07/09/20 02:13 PM
4

She actually got blackpilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 02:07 PM
4

Not all women gatekeep sex. Even if it is much easier to get laid being an ugly girl than being an ugly guy, ugly girls take what they can, which is not much. I don’t know what kind of morons think all women have the opportunity to reject guys left right and and centre, cause I know a rather high number of women who don’t getting laid nearly as much as they would like. Ugly and average women are not really gatekeeping sex any more than ugly and average guys are gatekeeping commitment. Disclaimer…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 10:54 PM
15

I’m not rich and I’m past my physical prime and I spent years rejecting girls who wanted a relationship until I met my wife. Quite frankly all you need is not be broke and not be ugly. The myths that wamen only want the top 20% men is only spoused by the morons who only want the top 20% girls. Plenty of ugly couples out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 03:23 PM
8

And what is confusing to you then? Women gatekeep sex from those they deem below their league and give it up for whoever they wanna snatch. Men do the same with commitment. Those men that meet the high standards of the women you mention are gatekeeping relationships from them and other girls of similar SMP value. Those men will likely fuck them if they have nothing better to go for, but they won’t give them a relationship. How did you think “gatekeeping” works?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 03:19 PM
0

They are not rejecting everyone. They are rejecting you if no signs of invitation are given. Meh. Considering that the morning I met my now wife she was just entering the room and had no time to give any signals of any kind, I approached her as soon as she came in and she agreed to go out on a date that same evening... I’m gonna conclude you literally have no clue what you are talking about. We don’t need permission to approach because experience has taught us that approaching, even if uninvited…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 10:46 PM
0

whether or not you are actually encouraged you are gonna do what you want Of course. Imagine needing external encouragement before you decide to go ahead and do what you want to do. Having your own ability to act out of volition rather than permission is actually a virtue, just so that you know. It’s called assertiveness. If someone is showing clear signs that the don’t want to interact You just injected this convenient bit of nuance for free. It has been discussed ad nausea already. Normal peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:19 PM
8

Fully agree. But I have also witnessed my own sister nagging the most dutiful of men. Some women simply don’t learn to value the things men do for us and always find reason to demand more.
/r/RedPillWomen01/09/20 09:18 AM
0

the specific mindset the other user was spousing I am the other user. The only mindset i spoused was “I don’t need your consent to approach”. It was you who read it as “following teenagers around, harassing and open mouth drooling”. The most interesting thing about all this is what it reveals about you. Just like all those male feminist youtubers that eventually wind up exposed as sex offenders. They are fucking creeps inside, so they think all men are just like them and, naturally, women need p…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 08:33 AM
1

to say that a man should feel free to approach any woman they want is silly What the actual fuck. Loosely quoting the guy who already responded to you I am free to approach anyone, man or woman. They are equally free to decline, at which point I’ll back off. No harm done. This is how it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 08:22 AM
2

My self-importance bar is set to max when it comes to using “me” as reference, yes. I encourage everyone to use the same settings themselves. The problem is thinking others, specially strangers, need to hold you in high regards as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 08:20 AM
9

Do you realize how utterly stupid that is? What does anyone care whether they want to be approached or not? Does the world need to bend its behavior to what the individual wants?? Let’s say I don’t want elderly people in my immediate vicinity. Do they need to stay away?? “I don’t want you to approach me”. Yeah ok. I don’t give a fuck. It really is that simple. If you don’t wanna be approached don’t dress provocatively just like if I don’t want elderly people around me I’ll just stay away from pl…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 10:48 PM
1

Nah. I’ll still pick making sexual innuendos to strangers because I think it’s funny and I don’t really give a fuck if they think it makes me a douchebag. People really need to lower their self-importance bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 09:30 PM
2

Preach. Imagine thinking that people need your permission to be attracted to you. Lmao. Feminism really has done a number on women’s perception of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 09:28 PM
1

It’s called toxic femininity. Dress in a manner that elicits sexual response, then get mad when you get sexual comments. Literally “I want the boons that come with generating attraction but I don’t wanna put up with the downside of unwanted comments”. Somehow feminists have duped you into thinking it is ok to want to have your cake and eat it too, so long as “woman”.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 09:26 PM
4

guys would rather jack off Imagine thinking that the fault for your product not selling lies on the customer.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 03:51 PM
2

I’d expect her to do more if she’s VP That’s a big IF.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 03:46 PM
2

“It was meant to say the opposite of what it actually says. Relax, little guy”. That’s cute. I fixed it for you, big guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 06:33 AM
2

personally I think women are wonderful. Also a lot of men are. Imagine thinking one gender gives you wonderfulness by default, the other only sometimes. The programming is real.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 11:15 PM
13

You don’t read enough huffpost and other shit media then.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 11:13 PM
1

women think affection and kissing is an important part of bonding and relationship building That’s all fine and dandy. Men think that sex is important for bonding and relationship building. See where this is going already? instead of thinking this is a woman I like and wanna do things she likes with her. in turn, she will think... It is kinda hilarious that you spoke of “transactional” and then pulled this. “Give me what I want and in turn I will give you what you want”. The most hilarious part …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 12:55 AM
3

“When talking a woman into sex becomes illegal”. what?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 04:50 PM
4

Of course they don’t. Remember that women think they are the only ones entitled to withhold affection/sex to get their way. When a man does it they call it emotional abuse and manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 04:49 PM
7

Agreed. And that’s when the person who wanted to stop things has no right to question you about why you are suddenly just doing some other stuff instead of giving them affection. You don’t consent to affection and they need to respect that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 04:42 PM
-2

I agree. But the comment I replied to seemed to me like the kind of argument that puts the value of physical standards above all else on an instance where OP clearly states that the rest of virtues outweigh the physical downsides and is looking for ways to come to terms. It’s like saying “After all, what is marriage and many personal virtues if your partner’s looks no longer meet your physical standards?”
/r/RedPillWomen18/08/20 12:49 AM
0

maybe she’s entitled to have physical standards for the person she’s dating That sounds like a carte blanche for just about any reasonably attractive/fit man to dump his woman when her looks inevitably fade before his do.
/r/RedPillWomen17/08/20 11:11 PM
2

Abusers, abandoned, drinkers, gamblers... Unlike today. Definitely the alleged newfound ability for women to choose has changed that. Women were not stuck with losers a hundred years ago any more than they are today. What is exactly your point??
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/20 01:11 PM
2

Loser women were not stuck with losers. They just reaped what they were worth. Your comment implies women, as a norm, were likely to be stuck with some loser. Your very mindset is proof that 80-20 is much more real now than ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/20 12:11 PM
8

What an absolutely a historic thing to say Agreed. Everyone knows that women could never work until feminism liberated them. Also women were property. And men had the right to vote for all history but women didn’t. Please guys learn some real history please.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/20 12:07 PM
2

This is the real answer
/r/RedPillWomen14/08/20 12:37 PM
8

A 28yo with a body count of 4 out of which 2 are LTR is as close to a unicorn as a modern woman gets.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/20 10:48 PM
1

Where exactly is the overlap between TRP and MGTOW? MGTOW dudes don’t bother with “game”, “plates”, “shit tests”... What are you on about?? Also you seem to have a big mix between TRP and incels. I suspect you don’t know much about TRP other than “ewwww manosphere bad”.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/20 05:07 PM
9

Teaches you that it is ok to be a dancing monkey... I was almost sure by your first lines that you didn’t understand TRP much. This particular line confirmed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/20 05:04 PM
0

Who says you can’t have an interesting conversation/interaction with people you don’t have a sexual interest in? I get the feeling that you have an overinflated sense of your own value. Last but not least, how delusional are you to think that the way you operate is the way most people operate??
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/20 01:42 PM
0

Who says the dinner is awkward? Do you need to particularly like people to have a meal with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/20 01:28 PM
1

I’ve never seen this in real life. Either you live on a different planet or you have a very selective perception of reality. women now earn their own money. I earn my own money and you can be damn sure I’ll take free dinner if one is offered to me. Lmao what kind of arguments are these?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/20 01:04 PM
1

I see. Sex workers are objects in your book.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 07:11 AM
1

Nah. I’m really good at it. So good that when you try to bullshit your way from one argument to the other, I don’t let you by holding you accountable to the shit you claimed previously. Again: what are those places specifically designed for objectification in which treating women like sexual objects is completely fine??
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 11:31 PM
1

No. You said it’s reasonable not to want to be objectified when you don’t want to be. Then you had to move the goalposts cause you had to claim objectification is only about thought, which you can’t control at all, so now it is about places. I’m still waiting to hear what these places are so that women know they aren’t safe from objectification if they go there. Also, here, have an additional example of how nobody pushes against objectifying thoughts
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 11:26 PM
1

I never said you did. But I am enjoying watching you try to dig yourself out of the hole of “it’s reasonable to want to decide when you can be objectified”. Yeah I imagine that trying to quadruple somersault your way out of such nonsense claim is not really much fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 11:19 PM
1

So it’s reasonable to expect people to only have sexual thoughts in places where you think it’s appropriate. Lmao. Nice mental gymnastics. Please share more about which are these settings specifically designed for objectification and how any woman is subject to being objectified while in those places, regardless of whether she wants it or not. I’m specially interested in how we have moved from “when you don’t want to be objectified” to “when you are not in a place specifically designed for objec…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 10:56 PM
1

Try reading again. Asking to not be objectified when you aren’t choosing to be in an objectified position is a reasonable thing to want. That was you. If objectification is a way of thinking, how reasonable is it not to want to be objectified when you don’t want to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 10:37 PM
1

Objectification is a way of thinking So you argue that wanting people to think of you in a certain way only when you approve of it is a reasonable thing to want.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 09:53 PM
1

I know you think you are helping your case but you aren’t. What exactly is it that you are against when you speak of “objectification” as something different than street harassment? People’s thoughts? Asking to not be objectified when you aren’t choosing to be in an objectified position is a reasonable thing to want. Translation according to your attempt at moving the goalposts: “I don’t want people to have thoughts that I don’t approve of and that’s a reasonable thing”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 09:28 PM
1

ok, I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 05:36 PM
1

What part of “the women demanding something be done about it” is tripping you up? If you are not part of those women, this clearly doesn’t apply to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 05:10 PM
1

Yeah. Asking to have actionable law that you can wield against those who dare not follow your royal desires is entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 11:46 PM
0

I wasn’t asking for the world to care I don’t think I implied you did. But the women complaining about objectification, and specially those demanding something be done about it definitely want the world to care and fix it. Personally I find it just as entitled as all those incels who want government-mandated girlfriends for all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 10:21 PM
2

being objectified feels bad And the world needs to care. Imagine if men argued that feeling rejected feels bad and rejection needs to be stopped. By force of law if needed. Oh wait. Incels did it. And it was deemed utter entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 10:02 PM
2

“Educate yourself duh”
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 10:00 PM
3

That’s cute
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:47 PM
5

The point is “slutty women are not marriage material”. Whether you made it on purpose or not is another matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:42 PM
2

Not confused about anything. I’m just laughing my ass off at your contradicting yourself in only 2 comments. Person: TRP is not about getting married You: X number of people say it is. Person: what they say has no bearing on what TRP is. You: I never said it was. 😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:34 PM
2

You seem to confuse people who favor TRP with people who actually have any actual knowledge of what TRP really is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:29 PM
5

Lmao what
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 08:33 AM
6

Person: “The Earth is flat” World: “no it’s not”. Person: “Three people said in the last few days” Case closed.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 08:33 AM
0

I probably made that when I was 15 making minimum wage part time at krogers lol. $15k/year is $288/week. That would be $14.42/hr for 20 hours of work a week. Either you weren’t working part time or Kroger’s was a pioneer of the $15/hour minimum wage.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 11:56 PM
6

that’s why they’re mad. Have you not seen their push for financial abortion, rights to abolish child support and shit? TIL men who want the same reproductive rights as women... are just mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 11:45 PM
5

black women might have a different dating strategy than white women. TIL being a single mother is a dating strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 11:42 PM
1

White supremacists Partisan idiots are pretty much hypocrites they think it’s only ok when their party does it lol There, I fixed your utterly ignorant statement for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 05:50 PM
1

That’s all fine. But none of those swing votes would have anything to do with the alleged white supremacy of the Bible Belt.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 01:51 PM
1

Meaning that if Obama had lost the White House for having a pornstar wife it would have been as a result of the liberals not voting him, which means that the white supremacist Bible Belt’s position on pornstar First Ladies is irrelevant, making the person I responded to originally a raging moron who wanted to make it about racist hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 11:22 PM
2

So you argue that the Bible Belt voted Obama into office and if his wife had been a semi pornstar they wouldn’t have because they are ok with a black First Lady but not a pornstar black First Lady? Your logic doesn’t hold. If Michelle had been anything like Melania and it had cost Obama the White House... that would have been on Obama’s voter base. I’m pretty sure that the hurrdurr white supremacy Bible Belt doesn’t fit the bill. I just wanted to make double sure that your idiotic comment was ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 03:26 PM
9

Why not? Are you arguing the Bible Belt is happy to have a pornstar First Lady so long as she is white?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 02:05 PM
32

a lecture on pornography at a nearby high-school, talking about how to prepare for anal-scenes and the like Prime educational content.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 02:01 PM
1

Do... which is it? We need to end the stigma or is porn an awful exploitative industry???
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 01:58 PM
19

Some men are trash. Just like some snakes are venomous. The wisest course of action is to take precautions as if the snake in front of you was venomous. Even if it is not. Until you have enough knowledge to be able to tell the venomous ones from the rest. Men (and women) give this advice to their teen daughters, not to grown women. Because it is safe to assume that a girl can’t tell the good boys from the bad ones at 15.
/r/RedPillWomen31/07/20 10:00 PM
1

I don’t know what to tell you. Do you have trouble reading? I didn’t say “the shortcomings of all women”, I said “the shortcomings of their gender”. The way I see it, a lack of strong role models is a shortcoming of men. As a gender. Not a shortcoming of every individual man. In case you missed it, I am mocking the irony of arguing “don’t blame X shortcoming on societal rhetoric” when that’s literally what the mainstream accepted gender ideology (feminism) is all about.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 08:43 PM
2

Modern men bitch and moan about having to give up seats for pregnant women, elderly women, any women because it's now sexist against them to say maybe an elderly person needs that seat more. Hey you can make up shit if you want but it doesn’t help your case. I am almost 40 and have never heard a man complain about this. That would be nice if most of that was even necessary but no boys in my community or family experienced that. Sounds like you are projecting your lackluster community as represen…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 08:36 PM
2

Yes. Loud and clear because of the Eustachian tube. What problem do you have with this argument? Or are you just trying to induce shame and hoping it will be enough to shut down a discussion?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 08:04 PM
2

This depends on specifics. We don't know enough to determine it on an all or none basis Hence the word often. particularly this is usually for pregnant women. I as a woman have given up a seat for a pregnant woman before. I have also given up seats for the elderly Again, what does this have to do with your argument about decency towards women depending on whether the guy can fuck her or not? You keep standing on traditional social customs to justify your inane argument regarding decency towards …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 07:57 PM
2

Decency is kindness No. I guess we are gonna have to agree to disagree here. Kindness is kindness and most decent people are also kind. Decency is when I see a person struggling to carry things I offer to help them, male or female. I hold the door for people regardless of gender. I try to help people around me... That's kindness Yes. That’s kindness. And kindness is a hallmark of decent people. But those examples do not apply to the realm of gender dynamics. Unless I am very mistaken here, gende…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 06:51 PM
1

meaning guys pretending to be nice in order to get laid, as opposed to guys who are genuinely nice all the time I always understood NiceGuyTM to mean somebody who thinks that being nice should result in a woman’s undying infatuation rather than simply somebody who fakes niceness. We are gonna need an official glossary
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 06:28 PM
3

Agreed. Only women get to blame societal rhetoric for the shortcomings of their gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 06:25 PM
5

a trope of men looking for a wedding band before they decide if they want to be nice to a woman or not - what's the point in having decency if you can't fuck her? You are conflating niceness and decency. Why? Most men I know are decent with women by default, wedding band or not. If they are not decent with women, wedding band is also irrelevant. The issue arises because women are so used to people being nice to them solely on the grounds of being women that regular decency registers as insuffici…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 06:16 PM
5

Lmao. “Women weren’t allowed to work”. Being it so that your argument is predicated on an absolutely ignorant claim, this is all I can give you: Please read some history. I think you will find the period of the Industrial Revolution particularly illuminating.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 11:26 PM
6

I don’t think this is true at all. My personal experience is completely the opposite. I have heard a lot more about how exploitative it is of women (abuse, assault, coercion, trafficking) than about how deeply it affects boys or girls who consume it. Even when hearing about the effects on porn users, I mostly hear about how girls have to now engage in practices that their boyfriends demand because they have been normalized by porn. But that’s my personal experience. I guess YMMV.
/r/RedPillWomen30/07/20 10:00 AM
2

I think the argument you are trying to make is “men are sexually attracted to the madonna, but women are not attracted to the beta, which means a heavy imbalance in the misery experienced by the people whose partners settled for”
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 09:50 AM
2

I would say that somebody is a failure if they need psychiatric medication and don’t take it. You have a problem and are taking the needed measures to fix it or make it manageable. Not sure about other places but in my house we call that winner attitude.
/r/RedPillWomen28/07/20 11:34 PM
1

Ah yes. Men who find contentment without having a varied and wild sex life with beautiful women are “silly”. Smh. Talk about having pussy on a pedestal.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 06:09 PM
1

I'm saying it's low value in both. Yeah. And you are mistaken. It’s is an observable fact that women perceive men who are desired by other women as higher value than those who are not. You may not want a high n man for yourself, but arguing against observable reality is delusion. Men don't grasp high value in men bc you're not women Hey at least you are capable of producing multiple nonsensical arguments in the same post, so you got that going for you. “Humans can’t know what food cats like beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 06:06 PM
2

Nah. In reality most of those men who enjoy such “wild and varied sex lives with beautiful women” did have to put a fuckton of effort somewhere in order to become objects of desire. If your outlook on life is “anything other than wild and varied sex life with beautiful women is some shade of disappointment and not worth living” i can guarantee that you are the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:06 PM
0

Lmao. I like it. Trolling an utterly delusional statement by This!’ing it. Well played.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 01:38 PM
3

I am not entirely sure where you have gotten that somebody is making the argument that men get to decide what women judge as high value. You seem to have gone on that tangent all by yourself on a few comments here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 01:36 PM
5

No they are not. It’s fine if you wanna have masturbatory fantasies, but do your best not to confuse them with real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 01:35 PM
2

Likewise, the town slut would be high value by the same means. Plenty of men want to fuck her. But how many want to marry her? Nah. Faulty parallel. “If high n-count is an indicator of high value on a man, it is also an indicator of high value on a woman” Sorry, that’s not how it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 10:24 AM
3

Your incredibly insightful revelation about how women have better lives when it comes to the ability to get sex has totally changed my views on the world as I used to know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 02:36 PM
3

I see two possible scenarios here: 1- your partner has some insecurity about life, goals or your relationship and is taking his frustration out on you. If my partner either doesn’t talk enough or their talk irritates me, there is a problem with me 2- most of your communication is nagging or complaining or focused on things he perceives as stressors for your relationship. You could be being cross and not aware of it. It sounds like you two need to have an honest adult sit and talk. Avoiding your …
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/20 02:42 PM
0

It’s ok. You don’t need to be interested for me to think you are pure comedy gold. I already called you a whambulance.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 05:52 PM
0

Is too manly to need police. Police are terrorist oppressors, despite how manly he is. You larpers never disappoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 05:51 PM
1

Yeah when you need to put your weight on somebody’s neck to be able to handle them, they are most likely not docile. What kind of moron argues “see? This tiger is very docile. I can take the cage anywhere I want and handle it very easily” The moron who died cried wolf too many times about feeling woozy, about not being able to breathe, about feeling claustrophobic inside the vehicle. So much so that the idiot officers ended up not listening to him any more. Except this time the wolf really was t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 04:49 PM
1

If you or others do, that's fine XD
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 04:30 PM
1

Yeah you need to go and research what docile means. You also need to watch more videos than the bit that MSM wants you to see in order to be able to sell you a particular narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 04:29 PM
5

Therefore the value of women will keep increasing. Look at onlyfans. We all want what we can't have. Women don't really need redpill. I don’t think you understand what RedPill Women is it what it pursues.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 04:11 PM
1

And you saw a docile man in the detainee?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 04:02 PM
1

Lol. “I’m against police because being for police is a failure at being manly”. You are so out there that I can’t even tell if you are trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 04:01 PM
1

And you're telling me you saw something OTHER THAN a completely docile, helpless, and subdued man Helpless and subdued? yes. Docile?? Did YOU watch the video??
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 03:32 PM
1

Police are a special kind of evil, but their worshipers are a special kind of stupid. Agree we need more CHAZ in the world. Just look at how awesome it was not to have police around. We had our own gardens and we were autonomous and self sustained and there was almost literally no crime and those who committed the very minor crimes were put to justice immediately. Police is stupid and fans of police are even more stupid. Honk honk.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 03:30 PM
–

Ooh that sounds like a nice bit of self-affirmation. I like it.
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/20 04:51 PM
–

⁠Doing I love yous I too want to know what this is.
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/20 06:51 AM
2

Bluest piece of advice ever. “If you are ugly at least be nice or nobody will love you”.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:44 AM
5

Originally about frequency, but now there are performance issues. My wife asked me to chime in as a man here. First: it sounds like an excellent idea so long as you actually use it to work on issues and not as a means to escape the problem for a while. It is vital that he (and you) abstain from masturbation/porn. Second: if there is a difference in drive that is not caused because he is pleasuring himself (leaving not enough energy left for you), and you are nagging him about it, sex becomes a c…
/r/RedPillWomen20/07/20 12:39 PM
3

It is genetics and hormonal imbalances. I once knew a girl who had a very very thin coat of hair all over. It was only noticeable if you were really close, but it was there. Apparently it was a result of being born premature. She went to a doctor and they gave a her a hormonal treatment that got rid of it completely. It DEFINITELY doesn’t have anything to do with whether your mom took good care of you. Don’t despair. Keep seeing doctors. And remember that you have a boyfriend. I would say that t…
/r/RedPillWomen20/07/20 12:16 PM
-3

I simply find your previous post self-contradictory. You argue that you agree that lack of role models has produced undesirable effects in behavior on young men, and immediately proceed to argue that we are in no moral position to get puritanical and condemn certain behaviors as unacceptable. How does that work? Either we avoid puritanical behavior and deal with young men being crass, or we go a bit puritanical and curb the undesired behaviors on both sides because they are essentially feeding o…
/r/RedPillWomen16/07/20 10:41 PM
1

That said, what do you define as "unacceptable behaviors"? If everyone participating is a consenting adult, which is true for the most part, why is it our job to step in as the culture police and act puritanical about it? I ask myself this often. The conclusion I always arrive to is the same. What difference would it make if our young men had good male role models, fathers to teach them how to engage in positive behaviors... if we are not doing the same for our girls?? “Yes, Johnny, my son. You …
/r/RedPillWomen16/07/20 10:06 PM
1

Propaganda is communication that is used primarily to influence an audience and further an agenda, which may not be objective and may be presenting facts selectively to encourage a particular synthesis or perception, or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information that is presented.[2] Propaganda is often associated with material prepared by governments, but activist groups, companies, religious organizations, the media, and individuals can als…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 08:32 PM
1

You know for there to be propaganda there would have to be some powerful entity My wife made the propaganda comment but you literally pulled this out of your ass. An individual can spread propaganda about whatever if they think it is in their personal interest. No need for “powerful entities”.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 08:24 PM
2

Do you come across many places in which incels are told their bitterness is a valid reason to go on murder sprees?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 06:12 PM
1

First you need to learn what redpilling oneself means.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 05:00 PM
6

I mean, they do though... They do indeed. Now let’s see. Women sometimes kill infants. If you read a definition of women that went “sometimes they kill their own babies”, how long would it take you to judge the source as clearly misogynistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 04:20 PM
3

Women want to chase commitment. The second they know they have the guy hooked is the second they start getting tingles for the next seemingly unattainable prospect. It’s funny how much has been written about how men just want to chase, when in reality it applies to both sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 04:17 PM
1

This isnt about manipulation its about dehumanising language to lessen guilt. People keep trying to explain to you that this is not a matter of manospheres or pills. Everyone does it. Women reframe reality to suit their behavior in order to lessen guilt. Why do you have a problem with language?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 04:11 PM
3

No, it's because if I found out the guy I'd been getting to know and sleeping with was referring to me as a cum rag I think I'd be pretty deeply hurt. Redpill yourself and assume that, until he proves otherwise, the dude you are fucking more likely than not refers to you or thinks of you as a cum rag.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 04:09 PM
5

everyone is expendable and susceptible to being exploited for all their worth. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 04:07 PM
1

Meteor hits Earth. Women most affected.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 04:03 PM
4

Do you realize how stupid it is to argue that oranges are the worst fruit because they can rot? ”Yeah I know other fruits can rot too but that doesn’t mean I can’t use the fact to criticize oranges!”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 04:02 PM
3

Confirmed. Men are more creative.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 04:00 PM
1

typical rp tactic and avoid at all costs? Your bias is showing
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 03:59 PM
7

sometimes go on murder sprees. At this point in the definition, one should know they are reading propaganda and not information.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 03:58 PM
3

Oh so you just put salary, position, and perks up on a pedestal. I see. What you are doing here is trying to smartass your way into a parallel where you goal (pussy) is just as valid as anyone else’s goals, so if we tell you that you put pussy on a pedestal, you can easily reply “how you like them apples?” You don’t seem to comprehend that “getting pussy” is a rather sad life goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 12:37 AM
14

Monogamy and hypergamy do not mix Facepalm. Which one of the two concepts do you not understand? It is perfectly possible to be a serial monogamous monkey branching hypergamist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 11:26 PM
1

Agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 11:21 PM
2

I go out of my way to perform well at my job because I know my bosses, and our customers, will appreciate it. Am I putting them on a pedestal? Yes. Your reason for doing those things is getting the appreciation of those people. Personally I go out of my way to perform well because of the benefits it has for me. I couldn’t care less if the customers “appreciate it” so long as my performance gets me a better position, higher salary or extra perks. What the fuck do I care whether my boss appreciate…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 11:20 PM
2

What if I want to have sex with hit chicks because it improves my QOL? If you think banging hot chicks improves your QOL, you already have pussy on a pedestal. Is it "doing it for myself" to become more attractive so I can achieve that result? That depends. Is “getting pussy” your goal in life? Does that really not sound to you like having women on a pedestal?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 11:15 PM
1

Ideally, yes. But that clashes way too much with the tidbits of “men oppressors” that are needed for feminism to stay relevant. I don’t see it happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 05:34 PM
4

I don’t know that it can be done. Does the existence of soyboys alleviate the presence of “toxic masculinity”? Will a few women picking more “traditionally non masculine men” actually change the general notion of holding men to standards? Women with what you call imperfections are attractive cause men are not as selective. We don’t need perfect measures, checks-all-boxes kind of women. And one of the reasons men are not so ridiculously selective is that we don’t grow up being told constantly tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 04:36 PM
16

But how can women enforce it day to day in a significant amount? Women are the greatest enforcers of traditional gender roles. Take the question of why do men continue to resist being a SAHP, for example. Given two divorced men: one has a traditional career and the other has a part time job and is also on alimony from his ex, because they decided to be modern and ditch traditional gender roles so he could stay home with the kids. Everything else being equal (attractiveness, values, personality, …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 01:29 PM
2

The men over at asktrp advised me to disconnect myself from being so cautious and take what I want rather than thinking about what she wants Exercise caution though. That particular mindset escalates from bold to rapey pretty fast.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 12:23 AM
6

Please bear with me cause your post hurts to read. There is quite a lot to unpack there. He claims that it’s the Principal of things. He shouldn’t have to block friends for me That’s a valid principle. So long as it exists in relation to people that are merely friends. Using it to shield yourself from having to respect a boundary related to maintaining contact with people with whom there is sexual/romantic history is a whole different matter. And that’s fine but he then made me feel bad about it…
/r/RedPillWomen12/07/20 04:15 PM
2

Oh wow. Thanks for the explanation and the resources! Edit: this stick out to me: a Servant Leader should be focused on, "Do those served grow as persons? Do they, while being served, become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, more likely themselves to become servants?" I have often heard my man analyze his decisions by the standard of “is my leadership making my workers better?” I have to read more about this. Thanks again.
/r/RedPillWomen12/07/20 01:48 PM
2

The desire for blue pill nonsense to be true is often followed by disappointment.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/20 10:46 AM
13

The reason why it hurt you is that he chose to give up something that was both of yours and keep something that was his with an external person. Whether you did right or wrong in setting that particular boundary is for you to decide after the hurt has passed.
/r/RedPillWomen12/07/20 10:38 AM
1

Oh this is so nice. If I ask myself these questions about my man he checks all the answers I think are right. True smile, able to articulate, asks for cuddles and ambush-hugs me. Altruistic and a damn sight better than me at reading other people’s emotions. He does sort of avoid his mother if he can but in all fairness both his parents have become kind of toxic since they split. Can you expand on what servant leadership is? He is the kind of guy that leads by being the one to put his hands to th…
/r/RedPillWomen12/07/20 08:55 AM
8

You made the part up about me wasting months in a relationship [...] we would have been on a couple of dates, perhaps over a few weeks. The title of your post literally says “if I don’t mention it until a few months into dating”. I’m gonna tell you a little story. My “husband” is fairly RP. Of all the RedPill Truths About Women that he has shared with me throughout our relationship, “women’s unashamed reframing” has always been the one I disagree with because it feels a bit like an attack on all…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/20 04:03 PM
8

Personal Judgement: you are lying about something that you know it’s a dealbreaker for some people. You tell yourself that your lie is ok because you know better. You are preventing them from making the mistake of passing you over. In reality you are denying them the agency of making their own choice because you have decided they are too ignorant to make the right choice. Maybe you actually are a catch, child or not. But you know you are being duplicitous, and that’s why the hamster is working o…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/20 02:49 PM
11

Don’t gloss over the fact that she admits she would likely swipe away a single dad. “I’m a catch so I hide that I have a kid, and if you waste X months in a relationship that includes something you are not ok with, so be it. Am I immoral or smart?”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/20 02:06 PM
6

“I would probably filter out a single dad” But also “It’s ok for me to hide that I have a child in tow cause that child doesn’t mean I’m not a total catch” Nice double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/20 02:04 PM
1

The global increase in thots-per-capita increases the sexual opportunities for men, it does not decrease them as you fear. I agree. The problem only exists for those men who want to find a devout, meek, traditional woman that upholds crazy values like respect for her partner. Sadly, the numbers of those women are dwindling by the day. Thots are abound. Men who complain 20/80 more often than not are guilty of wanting to be with women above their league. If you wanna get laid, you can get laid. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/20 12:42 PM
3

Have you ever considered that, as a feminist, you think about rape far more than the average man does? That would be a self aware feminist. We have a better chance at finding the fabled rainbow-horned Snorkack.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/20 12:40 AM
2

Hahahaha. Please tell me you made these up. Except the bonnet one. Always craft thyself a modest bonnet.
/r/RedPillWomen08/07/20 01:50 PM
4

Shrimp salad with tons of dill, served with your favorite crackers (Vinta?) Waaaaa that sounds delicious
/r/RedPillWomen07/07/20 07:07 PM
1

not pandering enough Literally your own description of bad sex by men. Also: I am a woman. Get your facts straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/20 11:41 PM
0

Awful sex by women is because they're not enjoying it or were coerced Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/20 11:24 PM
0

What does this have to do with my argument that “they only give good sex to people they love and care about” is something that doesn’t apply to all men and also applies to some women ? You just described awful sex by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/20 11:06 PM
3

I’m pretty sure this is true for women because they didn’t have to deal with porn sick men, and most likely only a low% of guys demanded anal or whatever kink they had. But I’m not sure how that correlates to the sweeping generalization of “all ONS men are this shitty stereotype and only women suffer from dealing with people who meet this shitty stereotype”
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/20 08:29 PM
0

fuck what's her name it's all about theirs. Guys only give good sex to ppl they love and care about. If you think this exclusive to men you are sorely mistaken. If you think all guys that have ONS are like that, you are sorely mistaken too. I’m not saying #notallmen. I’m just saying you sound extremely biased here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/20 07:31 PM
0

Oh i also disagree with the govt mandating them. I think it’s a terrible idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:40 AM
2

I mean nobody should pay for it on behalf of the man. The man goes, takes the test and pays for it. Arguing “free tests” is just as stupid as arguing “free birth control”.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:32 AM
2

I don’t think they should be mandated or paid for by anyone. I simply think all men should take these tests and stop being fucking retards.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:00 AM
4

afaik a woman cannot receive welfare unless she names a dad or a list of men it could be so the state can track and put him on child support And this doesn’t stand out to you as utterly ridiculous? I never said welfare could be collected though. But I think it’s an interesting thing to look at. Some woman named me and suddenly I am on the hook, just because she wants welfare? What the actual fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 11:58 PM
6

But then I had already given him no reason to doubt my fidelity in our 12 years together beforehand. You know what? I took the decision that I wanted to do this when I found out that a person had actually been cheating on her fiancé a few months before the wedding and decided to abort the baby that resulted from it. They have been married for 11 years now. 6 together before that. He would have killed for her. Absolutely nobody suspected the slightest. If we had held a vote we would have elected …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 11:55 PM
5

Society being concerned about legal aspects they disagree with is how laws end up getting changed. Look at 2A, for example. Have you ever heard anyone berate a single mother who chose not to tell the father?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 11:04 PM
1

He never replied back. I wonder why. You are so rude I am not even sure you were not trolling him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 11:02 PM
-2

It's a long way from being a standard conversation Yes. It’s a very uncommon conversation to have. I can't imagine how this conversation would ever come up I brought it up as soon as we talked about infidelity. It is important to make it abundantly clear that you are equally convinced of your own right to have this as a hard boundary as she is to think you are a raging idiot and dump your ass on the spot, because you think that a woman who would put her feelings before the peace of mind of the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 11:01 PM
0

All single mothers are single mothers by choice. Either they chose to sleep with so many men that they can’t even narrow down who the father is or they chose not to utilize the gargantuan legal apparatus that exists to make sure deadbeat fathers are held accountable one way or another.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:53 PM
6

How does the fact that the she denied the man access to the child for years negate the fact that the child needs to eat lol Nobody is negating that. I never argued against retroactive child support. I merely pointed out that being denied the chance to raise your child is no concern at all for society or the government. Otherwise, women who do not tell the father would be doing jail over the fact that they quite literally kidnapped a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:51 PM
4

Think about what your relationship would look like going forward. It would probably be a little tense. I did. That’s why I made it abundantly clear to the three women with whom I had this conversation: this is not about trust. This is about the fact that I have every right to be 100% sure that 20-25 years of my life efforts go to kids that are actually mine. Vetting is not infallible. Everyone makes mistakes. And because I know I could have made a mistake, I deserve to take measures to double ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:47 PM
6

Lol no. This was extremely early in the relationship. What kind of fucking idiot gets a woman pregnant and then has this kind of talk? I recognize every woman’s right to think I am a fucking asshole for even thinking about it and walk away as a result. Two of them actually did when they tried to brush it off as some sort of unfunny joke I had made but I told them I was dead serious about it and I meant every word.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:35 PM
1

By your logic the consequences of being completely alone rests solely on men's shoulders. The consequence of being completely alone rests on the shoulders of anyone who doesn’t manage to pair up. Man or woman. That’s how things are already. But the responsibility of reproductive consequences is shared despite, as you said, women having all the power over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:30 PM
13

Meh. Considering women can retroactively claim child support for children they never told the father about without getting in trouble for denying said man the opportunity to get to raise the child, it looks like society thinks that’s not too much of an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:19 PM
10

Which goes to show that most women think that their feelings are more important than the peace of mind of the man they supposedly love so much. Imagine that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:18 PM
1

She attempted to make it about trust. I told her it’s not about trust but about me having every right to be 100% certain, and that a woman who has nothing to hide but still puts her feelings before my peace of mind probably makes for a poor life partner. Case closed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:16 PM
2

That’s why you have the paternity test talk early in the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:14 PM
8

marriage is what creates paternity No. This nonsense is easily rebuttable by the fact that paternity can be assigned without the need for marriage. What you want to say is that marriage imposes a presumption of paternity because it is convenient for the government. Actually it is convenient for everyone except for the alleged father. so married men should have to prove they are the fathers of their wives issue before they have rights over them? If the mother chooses to contest paternity, then ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:13 PM
8

Yes. That’s the position society holds. As I said in other comments, I explained this to every woman who eventually brought up the topic of parenthood. “I will want a test. Take that however you like. Feel free to walk away”. Some did, one stayed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:10 PM
0

Women have all selective and reproductive power here. True. Which is why the responsibility of reproductive consequences should rest solely on women’s shoulders.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:08 PM
2

If that's what he wants than he should accept responsibility regardless of if it's his genes or not. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:06 PM
25

I am paranoid about our baby being swapped at the hospital. Aaaah the horror of raising a child that is not yours. Imagine that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:04 PM
4

Yes. The man needs to accept that offending her royal highness is a much higher crime than robbing him of his freedom. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:02 PM
9

How would the government successfully go about this without looking like it is labelling women as sluts? Ah yes. The feelings of women are more important than the rights of men. Business as usual.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:01 PM
10

I would have been unhappy if my husband had demanded a paternity test Solipsism at its finest. “My feelings are more important than your right to parental certainty. How dare you want to make sure you are not being robbed of 20 years of life efforts”. I told my now “wife” exactly that. I will want certainty. If I too much for you, feel free to walk away now.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:00 PM
1

There is the burden of having to contest paternity. It shouldn’t exist. Fathers should voluntarily choose to accept the child as theirs. Whether they decide to take a test beforehand or not is up to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 09:57 PM
8

Lmao. Imagine asking your partner if they are std-free without it sounding like an accusation... oh wait, that’s a perfectly normal thing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 09:55 PM
-5

Who cares about the stigma? I don’t have to trust her. I don’t have any guarantee that the fiscal and legal burden i am about to be charged with is actually mine, so I want a paternity test and I don’t give a fuck how she feels about it. That’s pretty much what I told the mother of my two children right the first time we spoke about eventually becoming parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 09:53 PM
3

why protect the deceitful women who commit paternity fraud Because it lowers the chance of govt having to pick up the tab in the form of benefits for single moms.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 09:50 PM
19

Agree. One of my top 2 friends is a woman. It is perfectly possible so long as there is absolutely no sexual attraction on either side.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 03:14 PM
2

I had to read the whole thread to even know what this was about XD Me and my “wife” share the reddit account because it keeps syncing on our devices. The conversation is actually hers. My posts usually earn me a “Be civil” response from mods. It’s funny that she is much less tolerant of feminist bullshit yet she manages not to tell them to get over their idiocy. I agree with most of what you said there though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 02:25 PM
4

I like it when I am going to give a piece of advice and somebody else has already put it in better words than I would have.
/r/RedPillWomen02/07/20 11:45 AM
1

'm going to try to become a better version of myself. I want to spite the women that were cruel to me. Almost there. Now you just have to find it in you to want to be your better version for yourself rather than to spite others.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 05:58 AM
1

Who has said anything about fetuses? Lmao please watch less alphabet network news. You are arguing against talking points nobody is making. Women kill literal babies. Like... born babies. Nobody is talking about abortion here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 01:44 AM
3

pretend every single crime statistic in the history of ever is FaKe NeWs Who has made that argument? that men aren't (by far) the more violent and depraved sex lmao Meh. Killing babies seems pretty depraved to me. Ruining a persons life to spare your own reputation seems pretty depraved too. It all depends whether one willfully ignores the inconvenient data points or places more importance in one type of victim than the other, supposed equal victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 12:27 AM
2

Here is the question: Are you supporting your argument that women can be pickier than men on “they are pickier”? Or are you basing it on other observations? “Men are more violent than women because they commit more crime and they commit more crime because they are more violent” Literal circular logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 12:25 AM
2

Aaah. I see. We are operating on conviction rather than actual reason here. Ok then.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 12:04 AM
2

“For example, the CDC found that 89.5% of bisexual women reported only male perpetrators of intimate partner physical violence, rape, and/or stalking and that almost a third of lesbian women who have experienced such incidents have had one or more male perpetrators.” Nothing in that paragraph debunks the statistic that lesbian households see the highest percentage of DV though. All it does is play on the old narrative of “men perpetrators, women victims” by pointing at cherry-picked data points.…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 12:03 AM
3

I never contested that men do that. The question is whether this means that men are more violent and immoral than women or just more capable of coming out on top when acting on their immorality and violent impulses.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 11:52 PM
0

Funny how abusive relationships work. Titty streamers, being strung along, sex as leverage, damseling after running your mouth... Yeah men definitely need to learn the abuse women are capable of.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 11:11 PM
7

I mean idk I've met men and I've met women. That's enough for me to know one group is way less empathetic and safe to be around. I agree. Clubbing with my male buddies had gotten us into a lot less trouble because they don’t mouth off with zero regards to wether it will get the whole group into a sticky situation. I definitely appreciate my male buddies being empathetic enough not to get me into trouble just cause they don’t feel like piping down. It’s definitely safer than when girls come with …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 11:08 PM
13

And yet you see the highest prevalence of DV in lesbian households (while gay men households see the lowest) and women are the main killers of defenseless babies. What is your point? Here? “Hurr durr guns equalizers”?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 11:05 PM
3

No. The truth they need to learn is what percentage of men vs what percentage of women will want to cause them any form of harm. Women can be as much a piece of shit as men. One may break your heart the other one may break your face and another may break your spirit. Why do you think boys don’t need to learn women are equally capable of being a fucking nightmare as men?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 10:59 PM
21

I have no doubt women do those things, but the percentages are very different. Men are violent and immoral in much larger numbers than women. You seem to confuse capability to inflict harm with inclination to inflict harm. Women will never be able to “achieve” (for lack of a better word) the same rates of violent behavior as men because they are not able to act on their violent impulses and come out on top as reliably as men do. It’s not that they are “more moral” or “less violent”. It is that e…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 10:54 PM
4

He’s appointed new the role of first mate, not first slave. This particular idea stuck with me. I like how well it underscores the difference between following the leadership of your man and being just a slave/servant to your man. I’m not sure I understand your whole situation though. It sounds like you start strong and then lose steam on your projects as a couple but... what about him? Is he an active part in keeping your joint goals going or does it fall on your shoulders exclusively?
/r/RedPillWomen01/07/20 08:32 PM
1

Yeah Edit 2 days it is the fault of male instinctive appreciation of beauty that “forces” women to alter their appearance. Funny how most men would rather women don’t nag but that doesn’t seem to “force them” into not nagging. Also apparently it is that (supposedly) incorrect behavior that leads us to the extremes we are today. I don’t see how that justifies why being a “superior conscience being” is in any way an improvement, seeing as how you haven’t yet provided any evidence that male prefere…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 02:38 AM
1

Can you explain exactly what are the benefits of being “higher conscience beings”? Additionally, can you explain how becoming beings of higher conscience hinges on men changing their preference and what role women play on humanity achieving a higher echelon of conscience?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/20 11:45 PM
8

Lmao the amount of narrative in this no post. “Ensure that lower status men had access to women”. “Women lost rights”. “Women depended on men to survive”. “Domestic violence became a reality”. “Agreeable and emotionally stable men are more attractive to women” Pure bluepill comedy gold.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/20 02:57 PM
3

If sex work were legalized and seen as normal, women’s value would plummet to reasonable level and things would fix themselves with time. And this is exactly the reason why most feminists oppose any form of legalization or normalization of sex work.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/20 07:06 PM
1

Why would a sex positive woman not looking for a relationship be traumatized when she got what she wanted? I know plenty of women who spent their 20s and even early 30s being sex positive and getting what they wanted and not looking for relationships. When, after a time, the reality settles in that most of those men didn’t give a fuck about you and that the ones who did wouldn’t touch you now with a ten foot pole, the trauma comes crashing like a fucking wave.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/20 12:27 PM
1

I want sex after a given amount of time getting to know someone That’s absolutely fair. It’s within anyone’s rights to call something off because sex ain’t happening soon enough for their taste, no matter of they are a man or a woman. which I thought we had already done because of how much he talked about sex and asked for pictures and to see me on cam and asked to see my legs all the time That’s a little bit out there. If one doesn’t want sex it’s weird to be the one escalating things like that…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/20 08:29 PM
7

My point is. What is actually dangerous is red pill armchair psychiatrists diagnosing sweeping problems with society and women caused by social media without any research or data supporting their positions I agree with this part. Dunno if dangerous, but definitely detrimental or, at the very least, counterproductive. Results indicated that social media use was not predictive of impaired mental health functioning But I also think this is indicative of exactly nothing related to what those RedPill…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/20 06:51 PM
5

I don't understand, what do you do when she's asking you for sex and not the other way around? Not the same person as above. I’m at a point in my life where I don’t want more casual sex. Up until I found my current LTR I simply told women who would pursue sex before I wanted it that I’m not into that any more. I guess a few potential relationships may have fizzled because they took that to mean I’m insecure. Or gay. Or not attracted enough to them. Who knows. Most took it just fine after the ine…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/20 06:36 PM
14

They are insecure. I am insecure Again, if you are insecure and it helps you to think that all men who don’t want a high n-count woman are insecure too, by all means go ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/20 03:18 PM
24

Framing men as insecure because you disagree with their standards is hardly good advice, but you keep telling yourself that if it helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/20 01:05 PM
19

don't expect commitment from insecure men Nice. Found the shaming attempt right at the top thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/20 12:31 PM
2

Not everyone is the same. I can be perfectly fine having random sex with two other people when there are no feelings involved but not want to include a third person when in a committed relationship. I may be ok with sharing some random girl with other dude or fucking two slut friends. But I don’t wanna share a person I have feelings for with some other dude or give myself to another woman when I have feelings for my partner. I didn’t think this needed explaining. If those for whom sex and feelin…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 12:02 PM
1

In the realm of threesomes in particular, anyone thinking “if you did them with FWB why not in committed relationship” is a fucking fool.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 11:35 AM
1

I’m not debating anything. Just pointing out that you made an inane argument that was not in opposition to what the other person said. They never said non-abusive men were unsuccessful. Maybe you should reread. Ideally get an introductory course on how Venn diagrams work.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 12:49 AM
2

I didn’t misunderstand. I did reread. They said “abusive men tend to be this type of man” You replied “not every man of that type is abusive” No need to debate anything here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 12:32 AM
2

He can stop blaming women and start blaming his dad. Ah yes. If only women didn’t do most of the child-rearing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 12:22 AM
0

You argued something unrelated to what the other person said. Them: toes are fingers You: not all fingers are toes. Do you even get out in the real world?????
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 12:21 AM
4

FDS women complain all the time about how they used to date absolute losers Given women’s ability to reframe reality so that their hamster can keep that wheel going, I don’t really put a lot of trust on women talking about how their previous love interests were losers. More often than not “loser ex” is womanese for “guy who didn’t give me what I wanted”. It really has no bearing on whether the guy had values/career/money/looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/20 10:03 PM
14

Women don’t fare any better when they are rejected. I’d say they do even worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/20 03:59 PM
16

I was called a whore for not wanting to have a coffee with a dude I have been called everything from “rude” to “gay” for not wanting to have a coffee with a girl. Not sure what your point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/20 02:54 PM
8

you know real people who know TRP? I've never met human beings outside the internet who know anything about the gender theories going around here. I was raised in a fairly Red Pill home. I’m pretty sure none of my parents know shit about TRP itself. But the advice, principles, values (whatever you wanna call it) that I received from both of them growing up lines up almost perfectly with the “gender theories” in TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/20 02:50 PM
4

Your friends tell you about the fenomenal sexcapades. What they don’t tell you about is the times they tried to fuck their way into a relationship for the guy to “pump and dump” them. The times they have felt used as receptacles for men that didn’t offer them more than mediocre sex, if even that. The times they feel absolutely nothing special when they fuck some random guy on the grounds that “he is cute and I have nothing better to do”. Sex is intimate. For some more than others. Hearing about …
/r/RedPillWomen17/06/20 10:58 PM
1

I have no desire to move up, so my only motivation for impressing the higher ups is my annual raise. I'm not climbing a ladder. I've already climbed it and I'm happy with the view. Yes. I think this mindset is key if one wants to balance home and work life.
/r/RedPillWomen17/06/20 09:08 PM
6

I work and have a decently paying job. But I don’t consider myself a career woman. My husband is a career man. He makes big personal time sacrifices for his career. I don’t. I could, but we decided long time ago that even if I worked we both wanted a “traditional” distribution of roles. I do most of the daily housework except cooking (cause he is a pretty amazing chef) and he takes care of the “dirty work” that doesn’t need to be done on a daily basis. How do you balance time between career and …
/r/RedPillWomen17/06/20 05:40 PM
1

We will have to agree to disagree. Business, psychology and social sciences are easy majors. Health sciences is not just “doctors and nurses” it also includes things like nutritionist, podologist and chiropractor. Biomedical includes things like lab assistant. Before you go ahead and tell us how “lab assistant” is really difficult, allow me to inform you that my brother and his wife are both pharma lab assistants. The knowledge of math, physics and chemistry that it requires is barely above that…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/20 09:03 AM
3

I didn't lash out with this comment. Your reply to that comment was “you don’t like relationships with women and the problem is you”. But hey. Whatever
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/20 08:50 PM
1

If your a real punk you live rebelliously even though neurotypicals want you to kill urself cos ur ugly Agreed. Also I kinda enjoy thinking that wanting somebody to kill themselves is considered neurotypical. Think of the picture that paints.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 06:48 PM
1

Is that misogynistic enough for you? Personally I don’t care. I also think women fail more because either they are too incompetent or they really don’t have it bad enough that they actually want to end it all. I just enjoy the shitshow that usually follows pointing out women are less competent than men at whatever it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 05:26 PM
1

Women too incompetent to suicide properly has to be a misogynistic argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 04:32 PM
2

If a guy lives in the gym and a woman commented on his arms, I don’t think any guy would have an issue. Meh. That depends. I was not too fond of the way women took the liberty to comment on my arms while reaching out to touch.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 05:21 PM
4

A week after I met him I spent a night holding his hand while he waited to see if his other mother was going to live. You missed that? No I totally saw it. But I also saw that you said When he asked me to go to the hospital with him he would have been fine if I had declined because our relationship was new That doesn’t sound like a man who needs a rock but rather a man who is actually a rock all by himself. (Emphasis of the quote added by me) You keep confusing men who allow you to see them deal…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/20 05:02 PM
-1

Can you please quote the part where you describe how he needed you and you were his rock? I think I have missed in both my reads of your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/20 04:06 PM
7

They want a strong dude that can handle his shit so that they are safe. She's not your bro. You are literally confirming that women are not to be confided in with moments of weakness or distress and that one is better off sharing those emotions with “bros” if at all possible. It’s kinda hard to tell if you are against OP’s idea or if you are just disgusted by his need for female reassurance.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/20 03:33 PM
7

All you have described in this post is “my husband is a rock”. Not sure how you think your personal life anecdotes actually debunk the idea that “if women don’t see you as a rock they will leave, ergo you can’t show weakness to them”. That’s all the argument says. It’s not about not showing any emotion. It’s about not showing any weakness. Are you having a hard time? You can’t tell her. Because you will be lower than other guys who either are not having a bad time or do a better job of pretendin…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/20 03:30 PM
1

Not nearly as unique as an autism insult. That shit is fresh.
/r/seduction03/06/20 08:39 PM
1

I don’t want to use social media to show people that I’m like 50% of the population. I use it to show uniqueness. Which is why one posts pictures of cool food, nice places one goes to, or how family-oriented they are. Yeah that sounds unique as fuck.
/r/seduction03/06/20 03:03 PM
3

This seems the most appropriate curse of action.
/r/seduction03/06/20 02:55 PM
17

love goes deeper than looks. When you really, truly love someone, they’re not replaceable anymore. And that’s pretty much everything anyone needs to know. Well put.
/r/RedPillWomen03/06/20 08:21 AM
7

I think that if you have four kids you are allowed to eat one. The other three still cause enough distractions that it may be weeks before anyone realizes. Use those weeks to get a cat and blame everything on it.
/r/RedPillWomen03/06/20 01:37 AM
2

Lmao. No. I have friends girls constantly fall over for. They still have to ask. Granted, 99% of the time they know she will say yes, but they still have to ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 05:29 PM
5

Men in r/RedPillWomen actively encourage women to have sex on the first date... Me and my “wife” use the same Reddit account so I am subscribed to some of her subs, so to speak. I have lurked in RPW for over a year now. I have NEVER seen a single instance of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 10:30 PM
5

I don’t think you betrayed your ex. You did betray your principles. Or at the very least the principles you purported to uphold. The unease feeling in you is not about betrayal towards ex. It is about the knowledge, deep down, that you have poisoned what you had/may have had. Are you gonna return to him and lie about the racy pics? About Bumble guy? If you tell the truth, will he believe your word moving forward when you did exactly what you said you wouldn’t? Even if he accepts you owed him not…
/r/RedPillWomen30/05/20 06:58 PM
12

I’m not entirely sure what kind of dynamic is going on here. You sleep with him after a few hours but then you expect him to plan in advance and you like him but a cheap restaurant is not good enough for you. You are sending mixed signals all over the place.
/r/RedPillWomen29/05/20 01:18 PM
1

The term is irrelevant. They still believe all the feminist bullshit. Having turned a few women into staunch anti-feminists, I have to disagree. Also, it’s not like there is a lack of anti-feminist women out there in media.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/20 09:55 AM
3

I disagree with premise that women are privileged over men I never argued they were. I argued they get unique privileges. Men get other unique privileges. And the reasons that grant them those privileges also carry downsides. When have you heard men complain about those downsides other than to point them out to women when they complain “we only have downsides you only have privileges”? I disagree that they are less reliable as workers Their very nature as potential baby carriers makes them less …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/20 01:54 AM
1

I didn't say it was? You utilized “feminism is cancer” as proof that “people attack girls too”. Again, since when did criticism of feminism equal “attacking women”? I'm saying men just critcize Brie Larson for having an arrogant persona when RDJ gets praise Brie Larson gets attacked because she is an obnoxious cunt with zero people skills and a chip on her shoulder. Meanwhile RDJ is an arrogant dude with tons of charisma. Brie Larson is the perfect example of why women confuse leadership with bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/20 01:49 AM
3

Data about perpetrators of abuse on children. Taken from childrenprotectionresource.online Mother Only 1,452,099 Mother and Other 222,836 Mother total (alone or with someone other than the father) 1,674,935 Father Only 661,129 Father and Other 37,836 Father total (alone or with someone other than the mother) 698,965 Feel free to quit your bullshit. Unless you want to argue that there are millions of households with brothers and stepbrothers exercising violence and that sisters and stepsisters ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/20 08:09 PM
0

The article mentions 10 drugs. In a 3 year period literally twenty years ago. Only 8 of them actually speak to the case of “more severe effects on women than men” and in 4 of those cases it was because they were more often prescribed to women than men. 10 drugs in 3 years is almost laughable. Unless you have solid numbers describing an industry bias in testing only with men, I’m gonna call this cherry picking.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/20 04:08 PM
2

Best comment.
/r/RedPillWomen28/05/20 04:03 PM
3

i can see why that might make a HV man insecure It’s not so much insecurity as judging the woman to be a bad bet. Why bother with a woman whose behavior invites potential suitors that may misinterpret her actions when many other women don’t come with such burden?
/r/RedPillWomen28/05/20 04:02 PM
0

also medication, safety measures and general biological and even psychological research tend to be tested on male bodies You literally pulled this out of your rear end. women are more at risk to domestic violence This too. According to statistics from the CDC, 24% of relationships have in one point experienced some type and level of violence. In these violent relationships, half of it is mutual, meaning the man and woman are both or have been both violent in the relationship. The other half of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/20 03:31 PM
4

You keep missing the point the other person is making. Arguably because he is being way too emotional. Women are afforded unique privileges on the grounds of their biological nature. Sadly for them, this biological nature also makes them less reliable as workers. So that translates into oh, the horror, a 2% downsize in average earnings. Hey I’ll gladly take a 2% paycut if it affords me only half of the privileges women receive. How about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/20 02:11 PM
2

But guys attack girls too, "feminism is cancer, Brie Larson is awful” Since when “feminism = girls”? Since when “Brie Larson = girls”? You are literally proving the above argument. “Criticism of feminism is criticism of women”. “Criticism of one woman is criticism of all women”. Feminism has turned into a shitty ideology that has sold the ridiculous idea that a woman, no matter how obnoxious she is can’t be criticized because that’s muhsoggynee. If that isn’t cancer, please let us know what is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/20 02:02 PM
2

It is exhausting to maintain a flirty energy when yoi have to keep up with 30+ thirsty dudes. No shit, Sherlock. Woe is me. I don’t know which of my cars to drive today. My day is ruined. Imagine saying that “X was a bad experience because I had too much choice” XD
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 10:20 PM
1

Thanks. When I try to contribute nothing, it’s nice to have it appreciated.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 08:37 PM
1

Agreed. I just wanted to jest about the futility of their comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 06:10 PM
3

But it still took place.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 05:48 PM
2

If you did “simp stuff” for a woman that was giving you only mediocre sex either she was just bad in bed or you were going out of your way for somebody who just wasn’t that into you. Ironically, the going out of your way makes them even less into you, not more. Your story of disillusion from romanticism is literally the roadmap of how NiceGuys are made. Next time vet better. Don’t let your appetite for romance and companionship drive you down the simp road. Read your own books and get her to rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 05:04 PM
1

The reason for single moms existing as a noteworthy demographic has nothing to do with ideals or love. It has to do with a government willing to foot the bill in exchange for votes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 04:55 PM
1

I thought the sarcasm in my comment was obvious. Of course “wamen has been appressed” is a stupid argument to defend anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 08:57 AM
2

But women have been historically oppressed so it makes sense to have a legal system that enables a woman to leech off you for her entire life solely because you were fool enough to enter a contract with her
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 12:12 AM
4

I guess it stems from being invisible to practically all women in my teens and early twenties I have never been invisible to women and I couldn’t give fewer fucks of empathy for their problems. They are capable humans. They are just as resourceful and capable as men are. They don’t need us to care. And you don’t need to justify your not giving a shit on any sort of past trauma as if the default mode was to care unless forced not to.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 10:43 PM
6

This whole thread is heavily failing at holding OP accountable for her duplicitous behavior, her lack of asserting boundaries and her multiple attempts at blame shifting. But above all, it’s failing to hold her accountable for her complete train wreck of choice of a partner. Quite frankly this reads more like a RelationshipAdvice thread than RPW.
/r/RedPillWomen25/05/20 04:02 PM
2

Your bf sounds unstable but you allowed a dude to disrespect you and your relationship and never told your bf anything “because you wanted to have a nice night”. He asked you if the dude had been out of line but you say “I handled it”... just to go into explicit detail afterwards? You were blatantly shit-testing him and it blew up in your face. Sorry and better luck next time.
/r/RedPillWomen25/05/20 12:52 AM
7

Visa-versa??? What the actual fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 12:22 AM
3

I think that the OP tries to touch on the subject of Dad Bod Dave with a bad attitude getting mad at a variety of Fitness Girl Stacy who are majoritarily not being attracted to him while also deeming any girl with any less than a super hot body as not good enough for him. To your point, yes, even being fit wouldn’t entitle you to the affections of Fitness Girl Stacy because she might still prefer some normal body dude who has other qualities that she values over fitness.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 02:54 PM
1

You are right. I assumed Eastern Europe cause I’m European and it is closer to my cultural references, but it could be many other parts of the world. Also, not throwing EE under the bus here. I know it gets a lot of flak but it’s actually a rather nice and underappreciated bit of the continent.
/r/RedPillWomen23/05/20 11:33 PM
3

you are realising that his love/ your relationship isnt as unconditional as you thought it was I think it’s important to know that relationships are in no way unconditional. Love... can be. I guess. But even loving somebody unconditionally doesn’t mean you will stay with them either. As for OP’s dilemma, seeing as they still have male military conscription I’d guess maybe some Eastern European country so the cultural differences are too much for most of us to weigh in meaningfully.
/r/RedPillWomen23/05/20 10:42 PM
3

bc they usually deny the hate within their own sub That’s because actual RP men are no longer “in the sub”. RP men don’t need it anymore, so there is no need to defend it. The TRP sub is full of contempt and misogyny because it is the beginning of the RP path and the first step in that path is to deprogram all the blue pill shit and AWAW that has been drilled into most men’s brains since they were born. Like it or not, the most effective way to do that is to knock the effigy off the pedestal. Wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 12:35 AM
21

Women are already bringing more to the table with pregnancy and childbirth Even if this were true, it would only apply when/if the woman actually gets pregnant and has the baby. Meanwhile they are simply being leeches. I hope you understand that you literally just argued “women deserve it because vagina”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 11:49 PM
23

Women are actively oppressed Everything you said before this made sense. The rest not so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 11:46 PM
2

Point for sublimemongrel
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 02:25 PM
1

Note how the woman doesn't have to do shit. Oh man. Responding to bluepill shit with blackpill shit. I’m gonna get the popcorn started.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 02:24 PM
2

Well women don’t generally lose attraction with a snap of the fingers out of thin air completely unrelated to their man That is so blue it hurts.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 02:22 PM
1

OTOH are you envisioning that this hypothetical man has actually put forth some effort to maintain attraction and tend to his wife’s needs? What difference does that make though? The reason why she lost her attraction seems rather irrelevant to the advice being given here. By all means feel free to engage in some self-criticism after you exit so that, in case it was your fault, you can take the appropriate measures next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 02:21 PM
2

Are you sure? Because you should read again. I actually went and read again before replying. She makes the same level of claim you made. She likes “essence”, you require physical attraction. Would you date the dick-chopping psychopath? She is objectively hot, she doesn’t lie and it is fairly reasonable to believe she won’t have better options because of her history.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 04:57 PM
3

Hot girl with issues finding a partner because men don’t take kindly to her disclosing that she chopped off her last boyfriend’s dick and got away with it on the grounds that he was abusive. You can claim “oh but then I wouldn’t be attracted to her on the grounds that she is a psycho”. Just as well, the person you replied to could argue that a homeless man doesn’t have an essence they would be attracted to for whatever reason. Notice that you were the one that assumed “essence” in her reply stri…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 04:32 PM
4

If they want to be completely honest. Yes. That is counterproductive for communication though. If they had clarified “not a homeless person, though” you could have always come up with another gotcha kind of example. Taking people’s word as they come is fair, but it is always possible to dig around for bases they didn’t cover. “What about transsexuals?” “What about somebody blood relation to a mass murderer?”... it’s impossible to be “completely honest” if the other person is looking for whatabou…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 04:07 PM
5

If I take those words literally, the woman that says this would have no problem dating a homeless man that never stops being a homeless man just because she saw some kind of essence in him. That’s kind of reductio ad absurdum tho, isn’t it? Whenever somebody argues “physique is not important as to me as good character”, do they need to clarify things like “but I’d most likely not start a relationship with somebody in terminal stages of cancer no matter how much of a good person they are. Or some…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 03:32 PM
5

The question of whether she is deserving of consideration lies in what has changed. Where you a dope-head, lazy NEET 10 years ago and now you got your shit together? Can’t blame her. Where you a dude starting out his business/getting ready for a promising career and now that you are reaping the benefits she wants in? She can go suck a lemon
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 03:09 PM
14

That sounds like a divorce that had been cooking for a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 03:06 PM
13

No need to be a unicorn. Being able to see good character is not exclusive to men and not all women are “I want my ROI now”, “bottom 90% need not apply” harpies.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 03:05 PM
2

Since 2004, the South Korean government has followed the "Employment Permit Program" for foreigners, the product of a decade of interaction between Korean citizens and foreign migrant workers. Legally, foreigners are allowed to enter mainly to fulfill low-wage jobs, and they are excluded from receiving social services. To apply for permanent residency, the applicants must have an income that is twice the per-capita gross national income, or their property tax levied here must be 500,000 won or m…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 11:45 PM
2

Because I hate seeing people voluntarily try to turn their country into North Korea. Lmao. I'm sad watching people voluntarily destroy their own living standards Yep. We need to open borders and exert zero control to maintain our living standards. Lmao wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 10:45 PM
1

In your world, the economy is a single-size pie In the real world, the economy is a growing pie with a fixed growth rate. So yes. Suddenly injecting more people to the table means everyone gets a smaller slice of pie. A pie that we baked. You and your cousins coming to eat our pie can fuck right off. One of you can stay cause we can manage to share with one, though. The rest, no. But hey, if we are so wrong and we are gonna fail and the change is inevitable, why waste so much energy in being but…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 10:31 PM
3

someone else living and working in the same country as you is not a legitimate greivance. I’ll try to explain. If I cause you to inhale 1 microgram of mercury, it is absolutely harmless. If 10,000 people make you inhale 1 microgram of mercury each, their individual actions are all harmless. Neither of us had the intention of making you inhale mercury. Neither of us knew that the other 10,000 had also inadvertently done it. But you are fucking dead. Your whole “somebody working and living in your…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 10:04 PM
3

I don’t think that the limitations imposed by national sovereignty and national borders have anything to do with authoritarianism. And no, people don’t have the right to do whatever they want with the only condition that what they do doesn’t harm anyone, if nothing else because the concept of harm is not set in stone, which means that anyone’s definition of harmless could be ignorant, as is your case. Is one immigrant “harmful”? No. Are 100 million immigrants harmful? Yes. Undoubtably so. Where …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 09:18 PM
1

I believe all human beings have the inherent individual right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness That’s cool. And you are free to interpret that the “pursue of happiness” includes whatever nonsense you want, too. Luckily, people much more intelligent than you and me have made a proper interpretation of what that entails, and it doesn’t include leisurely entering whichever country picks your fancy. This results in you defending a right that doesn’t exist and getting outraged over a “d…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 08:57 PM
3

My job is to defend individual liberty in a world of your tribalist tyranny. I’d be willing to bet that’s not actually your job, but I’ll play along. So your job is to try to prevent the rise of those who potentially would exercise tribalist tyranny... by defending an inexistent right to enter your country supposedly held by those who potentially could exercise tribalist tyranny. All while engaging in the cognitive dissonance of ignoring the fact that tribalist tyranny is kept in check in our cu…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 08:19 PM
3

Your argument is that the Western religious right is somehow different from the Muslim religious right. The truth is both of you Pretty bold of you to assume I’m religious just because I debunked your shit argument. you're too wrapped in ignorance to see it. They said, while making increasingly ignorant arguments. Secular classical liberalism is the only saving force from the depredations of right-wing religious tyranny, and our enemies are many. Oh boi. Another western idiot who thinks they are…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 07:47 PM
6

Nice logic you got there. “Actions of Christians in the 19th century justify my lunacy about what might happen if Christians reach power again despite my own argument that they don’t do it anymore because checks and balances” “Also, they are still the bigger risk when compared to another culture that hasn’t managed to let those checks and balances prosper”. Yeah. Air tight.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 07:30 PM
7

There are no such places in the world currently I see. So the neofascists that may or may not come are a bigger danger to LGBT than the immigrants from countries where anti-LGBT is the current cultural norm to the point that it is the actual governing ideology. Makes sense. Islam and Christianity are the same root religion But neofascist Christians are the real danger. their followers believe the same core ideas (sexual deviancy is evil, women are inferior to men, infidels must be prosecuted.) T…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 07:10 PM
11

People's "views" shouldn't mean the government gets to violate their individual rights. Imagine being so ignorant that you think “immigrating” is a right. The neofascist right, in their pursuit of Christian theocracy, are a much greater danger to homosexual rights than immigrants are As evidenced by the fact that, in those places where the neofascist right has the power to do and undo as they please, it has made it legal to throw them homos off the rooftop. If only they learned from the much mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 06:15 PM
2

That alone should allow you to ballpark his IQ
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 05:17 PM
3

Capital doesn’t have will. Not sure what kind of backwards brainfart you had to accept that assertion as anything else than sheer idiocy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 05:16 PM
2

Always farm the best loot areas. It’s basic game knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 05:14 PM
8

I’m personally enjoying the decline. I’m likely not gonna be there to suffer the consequences and the bleeding heart idiots who beg for such immigration are only inviting more and more people whose views run opposite to theirs. I do feel sorry for all the gay/lesbians of the future tho. Poor fellas are having 30 years of progress made reverted by people too unintelligent to see beyond their own need for virtue signaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 05:12 PM
2

Were you agreeing that AWALT can lead to difficulties in finding relationships then? I’m agreeing that a failure to understand what AWALT means can lead to difficulty in forging healthy relationships. Notice the difference in words. Words matter. I haven't known many men who didn't have some kind of bar they wouldn't go below when it comes to physical attraction Something completely natural, regardless of whether you are man or woman. I'm talking about in the context of dating/relationships, not…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 02:54 PM
1

I think you need to re-read the comment and actually understand what it says if you are able. It will help if you leave aside your emotional triggers, cause that’s not at all the argument being made. Men only care about women if they have a pretty face or good body. Also: no to this, but feel free to live in your angry and sad world if this is your experience with life.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 01:34 PM
1

No need for a study. Society has vilified male sexuality. Society has encouraged women to be the worst they can be because they deserve it all just for existing. How is anyone surprised that, once a man secures the perks of a stable relationship, he would rather have a quick fap to a screen than deal with bs and act as if he had to be thankful he is even getting sex in the first place? My predication is that we will either see a return to more traditional gender dynamics (RP) or we will dwindle …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 12:04 PM
2

Yes. If one takes the lesson of “look bro, women aren’t all sugar, spice and everything nice. They are human too” and understands “women are utter worthless shit”, then yeah, one is gonna have a hard time getting in a relationship worth having.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 09:31 AM
6

manipulate women to get sex for validation If you are basing any validation on whether women approve of you enough to give you sex you are already doing TRP wrong. Validation must come from within yourself. Getting sex/women is just an added perk. If anything, TRP encourages men to direct their search for validation inwards instead of towards women, which is what society has taught them to do. The Red Pill looks at women as simply sex objects and nothing else. They don't give any value to a spec…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 09:10 PM
1

I’m not even sure what this means.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 07:13 PM
2

All you have argued is “she did nothing wrong because she told the truth”. But, by all means, feel free to justify why you think she did nothing wrong so I don’t risk missing whatever you have to argue in her defense. Maybe there is a super illuminating response by you that I haven’t noticed. I’m listening.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 02:38 PM
1

Dread is just giving women options. Except, of course, women mostly don’t like being given options. They want to have their cake and eat it too, so when you give them options they accuse you of manipulation. Yes. You can go out with your girl friends to the dance club and get shitfaced drunk in your slutty outfit. Of course you can. But you can’t have that and be with me. Feel free to choose. Behold the manipulation lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 02:31 PM
3

Yes, yes. Only me. You don’t need to care. The argument has already been made to you by several people. If you don’t see anything wrong in disrespecting both your partner and your relationship by airing the details of how they compare to your previous sex partners, I don’t think anything I can say will make you see it. By all means continue to be yourself. Happy life.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 01:55 PM
2

It means that if you don’t see anything wrong in what she did, you are likely not any better than her.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 01:10 PM
3

She didn't do anything wrong. Low value spotted.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 11:18 AM
1

Go team!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 09:01 AM
10

The study referred in the first comment you linked was made by a woman. I very much doubt she would put all that effort in finding the answers for t he benefit of men. Sexual behavior of societies is a topic of study among zoologists, anthropologists, psychiatrists... Men are simply more outspoken about it because it directly affects their selection process, but I’m highly skeptical about it being a guy thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 09:14 PM
2

In all honesty that sounds like Season 2 content when they have to dial everything up to eleven in order to live up to the success of Season 1. But yeah Karen has better odds.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 07:29 PM
1

Well in all fairness I’m actually holier than many, so there’s that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 07:27 PM
6

None of my business but it might be a good idea to consider disclosing that info early in your conversations prior to meeting rather than on your profile. Even if only to avoid catching the eye of potential predators. I’d most likely swipe whatever direction is “pass” if the immediate info I got regarding children in the life of a potential interest was “I have 2 adopted children”.
/r/RedPillWomen13/05/20 07:19 PM
2

Being a single, foster mother to children that are in need and blood related to you or being what most people will understand by “single mom” are very different things. Yes. Some (or many, I can’t tell) men won’t be interested in that dynamic, but having these children in your life says something about your character that is very different from what having an out of wedlock biological child would. Of course there is hope.
/r/RedPillWomen13/05/20 07:14 PM
1

an obligation on me/women to be 100% responsible for the child you/men wanted but couldnt make. I don’t think I ever made the argument of not supporting a child. Any man arguing they shouldn’t support a child just because the woman didn’t uphold her end of a bargain is a moron. When you talk about 50% of a man’s wealth I interpret alimony/distribution of assets because of a divorce. What kind of male conditions and limitations dont impose obligation on women exactly ? I’m not the one carrying th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 05:17 PM
1

Except the advice is not to avoid oneitis and “search for greener pastures”. The advice is to have pastures on rotation. Between this and your other response, I’m gonna declare your argumentation to belong in the realm of creative interpretation.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 05:13 PM
1

Parents encouraged girls to date around Yeah no. A serial monogamist in the 50s, let alone earlier, was a de facto slut. and to take precautions against pregnancy so you didn’t have to marry the one that knocked you up That’s some creative reinterpretation of a society in which premarital sex was very frowned upon.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 05:11 PM
5

Next episode: tiger vs SAHM. The final duel.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 04:33 PM
1

Yeah I suppose I take objection to the notion that your/women’s bodily conditions/limitations somehow impose an obligation on me/men, when we as a society have agreed that men’s condition/limitations don’t impose obligation on women. Not really upset. Just in disagreement.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 04:19 PM
1

I’m arguing against the notion that the give and take is not established over sharing and honoring mutual commitment, but rather over the fact that you ruined your body by having a kid. If it is your personal belief, more power to you. You are completely entitled to it. But I fail to understand how that can be seen as a morally sustainable position separated from gold-digging which, in the end, is nothing but “the benefits afforded by my vagina are worth money”. Mind that this is not a personal …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 03:41 PM
2

Hey if you think that’s all FDS teaches, by all means. But if deep down you know that’s not all it teaches, then you are being purposefully ignorant and/or dishonest, all for the sake of claiming high moral ground on a debate over the Internet. More power to you either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 03:29 PM
1

It's your problem if you dont want to be financially responsible for a woman to stay home and care for said child I have made it pretty clear that this is not t he issei for me or other men who agree to t he provider/nurturer dichotomy while in a relationship. Not sure why you keep trying to paint a different picture. That fact you would be willing to send your post pregnant wife off to work and stick your child in god knows what place to prove some kind of point which lacks the quality care of …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 03:21 PM
4

That's cool and all but your female cousins are not representive of all womankind. No. But they are proof that however women are raised is not universal. Big shocker: women are doing most of the raising. This will come back to bite you in the ass when you complain that “men set the rules”. Whatever woes of men you dismiss because “other men enforce them” fall right in the same category as any complaints about how women are raised. The physical labors of men are typically paid handsomely both fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 03:13 PM
2

Is that why you lot are so upset about it? Who is upset? FDS teaches a shit mentality. The fact that this shit mentality is better than being a doormat that others can take advantage of is only worth of praise from those who are utter morons. Call me crazy but I think women are capable of more than “l’m content with being shit so long as I’m not a doormat”. Still unsure where you got that I’m upset of more women not being doormats. But I guess not much can be expected of somebody who defends tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 02:57 PM
1

If she cant shove it back in, and maintain her value after having kids , a man cant either. This is exactly wanting your biological disadvantages (of which men are not responsible) to be insured against. Ponder the implications of this, cause it is the utmost degree of entitlement. You had a child. It is your child as much as his. It is your problem if having a child ruins your body. Don’t want a ruined body, don’t have a child. But you don’t get to have a child and then pretend that you need re…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 02:35 PM
1

Yeah I have read it over and I think I replied with an argument to a more recent conversation I was having on here too, where somebody equated being a people pleaser with having your partner be the center of your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 02:28 PM
1

that's supposed to pass his genes on long after he's dead Same goes for the woman. Men diminish the value of this because women keep putting it out like it doesn’t apply to them just as much. When you as men continue to diminish the contributions of women because you lack the foresight to see what that received message does, you get the rise in sexlessness, the lower birthrates, the heightened promiscuity, the more ruthless valuations, the rejection of family and the commodication of sex for not…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 01:29 PM
1

When I talk about give and take in refer to the standard which is good men and good women.im not basing this on shady people or users. Yeah that’s the whole point. Which means that your deserving of the 50% has nothing to do with the pregnancy or the ruined body but rather with a lifelong observance of a commitment you made to that man. Any thot can do the pregnancy. Only an actual woman sticks to her commitment. Conversely, only an actual man observes his responsibility. I’m not trying to make …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 01:19 PM
2

Yes. That’s the point I was trying to make in my other response to your other response lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 01:05 PM
1

The older women in your family were not getting plowed by 20% of the user base of Tinder and the likes. “You don’t owe each other anything” meant a very different thing back then, I’m afraid.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 01:04 PM
3

is what I would called entitled lol. 9 months is only 9 months, she needs to stay home to care for the child and teach the child until the child goes to school lol. 9 months 🤣🤣🤣 So you are saying she needs to act like a mother and a wife... until the child goes to school? Ok so instead of nine months... it is 4 years? In exchange for half a lifetime? Who is the entitled one? No one said women should use a baby for life insurance 😂 that would impose they arent married and she trapped him. What ty…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 01:01 PM
5

You aren't bred the way women are to defer to men as the defacto authority no matter how many men are not qualified to assert the way they do Probably. But neither were my (numerous) female cousins. And I come from a rather old-fashioned family upbringing. I was also not raised to keep women happy no matter the cost. Neither was my brother. And I have met many men who were indeed raised like that. “Happy wife, happy life” Right? Your line of argumentation is nothing short of the feminist “men al…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 12:49 PM
5

I’ve been reading your exchange and even though I agree with the provider/child-rearing dichotomy, I think you are both missing the point in this. Men don’t object to providing. Men object to providing on the grounds of “I woman, you man”, which is essentially what you are defending. Thinking that you are entitled to half a man’s life work for 9 months of pregnancy is nothing short of ridiculous. I haven’t seen any (reasonable) men objecting to supporting their wife and mother of their children.…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 12:31 PM
3

Your arguments all over the place here. You keep repeating feminist-ish mantras to trudge through the garden you have wandered into. First you argue that the fact that both subs focus on men needing to improve is quite telling (misandry spotted). You continue to argue that so long as a woman is happy, that’s all that counts (lack of accountability, hedonism) I try to remind you that the argument is not whether an individual, hypothetical woman is happy, but rather whether the advice in TRP and F…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 12:19 PM
6

It’s important for people who have low self esteem to be aware of red flags in people I fully agree with that. What I object to is the connection that being a people pleaser (who often miss or overlook red flags) has anything to do with your partner being the centre of your life. The first is a matter of how one is raised. The second is a matter of not having things going on in your life. They are things that can go together but have no relation to each other. Additionally, telling anyone “you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 12:06 PM
4

Except seeing as women gatekeep sex and men gatekeep commitment, advising women to sleep around is not a good way of gaining the commitment of a high value man. The logic couldn’t be any more backwards. “Sleep around to make the high value dude with lots of options be afraid that he might lose you” How does anyone think that actually works?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 11:06 AM
7

I’m saying your argument makes no sense. FDS is a set of relationship/dating guidelines. Arguing that “the advice they give is not bad so long as the woman is content with staying fat and single” is nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 11:01 AM
0

If you have a man in your life (boyfriend, husband) and you are a people pleaser, he will be the center of your world I’m think you might be confusing your own experience with general behavior there. I know plenty of people pleasers and, for some, their partner is not the center of their life. Both men and women. Hell, they have ruined relationships over being people pleasers because they just can’t put their partner before friends of family in instances where they should. You can of course be a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 10:59 AM
11

It depends. Is she happy to stay that weight and be single? What the fuck is she doing in a “how to get a good man” subreddit then?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 09:59 AM
4

One leads to another. It’s not a circular thing tho. Being raised a people pleaser doesn’t mean a man is the center of your life. You argued women are raised as people pleasers so they need to be taught men are not the center of their lives. Sounds to me like you are defending “go queen” mentality for its own sake by using tired old feminist tropes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 09:53 AM
20

I have had low self esteem/worth since childhood Yeah. Places that promote “yas queen” mentality are popular among people with low self esteem. After all , who doesn’t want to be told “you are great you deserve the best”?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 09:46 AM
5

no monogamy until marriage Lmao is this a real thing? I don’t go to FDS but if this is something they actually advocate, pretty much nothing else matters. There’s no way anything is gonna work out for those women, no matter how many supposed success stories they post.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 09:44 AM
1

I was like, didn't I just say the opposite? Yeah you did. Quite clearly, which is why I thought my sarcasm about people who get mad at words would go through.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 07:41 PM
2

Fair enough. But native American nationalists are subhuman too right? And the blacks in South Africa that want all the whites out are also subhuman. Is that the logic?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 07:39 PM
2

I’m afraid my sarcasm went unnoticed. Of course we need to care about actual violence more than mean words. I thought my slight on “is that a logic you want us to use” made the sarcasm obvious. My bad. On a different note, I hadn’t seen a single N word on purge week til this post so either I am not paying attention or it doesn’t make it to my feed. I have also not seen people make fun of Indians or Asians in general. Sometimes I think I have a different version of PPD than the rest of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 06:09 PM
5

The true N word
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 05:58 PM
2

Honest question: does the subhumanity label apply to all nationalists or just white?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 05:53 PM
2

Unlike words. Those do kill in the real world. Right? Is that the logic you are coming with?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 05:52 PM
4

It’s China Town
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 02:17 PM
1

Hey you are the one denying that feminism touts single motherhood as empowering when it is observably true. But of course feel free to reframe that it is only about poor single mothers. How about you show us examples of feminists saying that single motherhood is only empowering when you are rich, and that women who are struggling should stay the hell away from it? I mean, at least you will have some ground to stand on.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 11:32 AM
3

The denial is strong. Poppy: “Show me a feminist that says single motherhood is empowering.” Article: Being a Single Mother is the Most Empowering Thing I’ve Ever Done Poppy: “she is a divorcee” Also Poppy: “your examples don’t count because reasons and you are all pathetic” 😂 🤣 🍿
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 11:10 AM
-1

I’m sorry to burst your bubble but this is not an alt. But hey. Your insights really do tell a lot about what we can expect from you: denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 11:07 AM
0

Lmao poppy. When challenging somebody to give you an example of feminists proclaiming single motherhood empowerment... you were given 2. From mother.ly no less. I see you have decided to ignore them. You go girl. Don’t let observable reality get in the way of your fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 10:25 AM
1

I don’t think neutral means that the prevailing culture is not skewed to one side. It means they won’t censor you for defending the opposite side.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 08:45 AM
2

Lmao. “50 men being sexist”. “Downvoted female responses”. Woe is me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 08:40 AM
4

Women can't really come here and engage in good faith because they will just get overly censored while diminished. The men will just shit post and dominate the discussion. Woman wants to debate. Men dominate the discussion. Woman interprets her inability to compete as a male problem. Shocker.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 01:04 AM
5

Not sure what kind of logic you are applying there. It has nothing to do with facts lol, if that were true then there would be no woman friendly or left leaning subs left That’s like saying “if facts had anything to do with it, there would be no flat earthers”.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 01:00 AM
7

I only have Reddit and I barely upvote/downvote anyone. I don’t give a fuck about karma. I have often been told I am a karma masochist cause some opinions on certain subs. I don’t understand the point of people being happy with upvotes. Or awards. I think I don’t understand social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 01:37 PM
3

I've seen people who claim they date an X and the reality looks a lot different. What you consider a 8 might be a 5 in my perception. Seems like the problem is your perception. I have yet to meet anyone who complains “where are the good men/women?” Who is not both toxic and holding unreasonable standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 01:27 PM
5

There's a difference between my looksmatch and a woman way below me Let me share a tidbit of wisdom I was made aware of a while ago. Your product’s worth is not what you say it is, but rather whatever you can make people pay for it. If all you can get is a 2, it matters not whether you think you are a 6. I'm 6'1, not overweight and still have hair on my head. I’m 6’1 and balding heavily. I had no issue getting a 7. I in fact traded up from an 8 with a toxic personality. And I was overweight at t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 12:15 PM
8

That’s a rather untenable position. “No woman is better than an ugly woman but I’ll complain endlessly about having no woman”
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 11:57 AM
1

I’m not talking about you personally. Feel free to exchange those “you” for “women”. the difference in physicality of men and women in defending against things like lions is fairly redundant This is a severe case of Dunning Krüger. Even the weakest men are heaps stronger than the stronger women, and they are left behind on anything that involves physicality. This is not ancient history either. Multiple practices in today’s aboriginal tribes speak to this. It is telling that we are much less sexu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 07:52 PM
1

Interestingly enough, before women had been conned by feminism, many of them were all too aware of what that “responsibility” meant, and they were quite happy with the deal they had, fewer rights and all. By all means take whatever position you want on the issue, but at least be intellectually honest and accept that, back when women were oppressed and before they got all the free security you have now, many of them would rather give up independence for the sake of the security they were afforded…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 06:30 PM
1

You are in such deep denial that you argue opposite points one after the other lmao. if things got bad enough you too would beg Yeah, but not you. You would rather die than. Cause you stronk: I would rather die than do so with my current life experience Also: Regardless, human males are weak as shit compared to most other large mammalian predators As are human females. Weaker than both males and females of other mammalian predators. What’s your point here? Without weapons you wouldn’t have been …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 06:25 PM
1

the fact that men generally had more rights than women did Yes. They also had more responsibility, obligations and accountability. You can be mad all you want at that period of history but, if it can teach us anything, is that men don’t take privilege without shouldering the corresponding burden of responsibility and accountability. Women, as evidenced by the last 50-75 years, not so much. I'm not a feminist You repeat the same nonsense they spout, so it makes little difference. I can draw my ow…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 05:58 PM
1

The majority of dangers women faced in that time were from other men. Yeah. That’s pretty much the reality of every predatory species in nature. If only you didn’t exist at all honestly Hahaha the true colors always come out. If we didn’t exist you would have been eaten by sabretooths. If somehow you had managed to survive, you would still be living in grass huts, shitting in holes in the ground and dying at 32. Rereading I’m not sure why you think I’m judging women for making that decision back…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 05:55 PM
1

wealthy, white men So... how much of the population was “wealthy”? and you know it. No I don’t. And neither do you. All you “know” is the bullshit you have been fed by feminists and other idiotic progressives.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 05:48 PM
1

I would far rather be given the opportunity to be free without the “protection” of men than be treated as a child Fair enough. The modern world has freely available weapons that equalise the sexes Cool. If only those women had lived in the modern world with all the security and opportunity it offers. Imagine being so dense that you judge how life was arranged hundreds of years ago through the lens of the safety that you are afforded today. I would honestly rather die than be under the thumb of s…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 04:01 PM
1

No, it happened to women and certain men That’s a rather bold statement. Assuming you weren’t there to witness it: how do you know and on what basis do you conclude that only “some men” were affected by it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 03:37 PM
0

Limiting a person's choices Are you under the delusion that this only happened to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 02:59 PM
-1

How about you explain to me how it is oppressive? male children were allowed to grow up Keep in mind that this assertion is going to come around and bite your ass after your explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 02:28 PM
1

Yeah and husbands are treated like their wive’s property and wives are treated like their husband’s property and so are pets. That doesn’t excuse the intellectual dishonesty of arguing “women were property”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 02:07 PM
0

Nah it’s purge week and after that it’s not allowed to tell raging morons that they are raging morons. You are simply trying to argue the semantics of what property means really Indeed. rather than any real functional difference The functional difference is substantial. It’s the sustaining structure of feminist intellectually dishonest narrative. Women have never been treated as property. They were, quite literally, treated like children. You can argue that this isn’t good either and I will agre…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 01:51 PM
-1

No, you raging moron. But seeing as parents control the lives of their children, have the power to do things to them against their will and, apparently, those are the conditions upon which “women were property”, it follows logically that children, as of today, are property. Unsurprisingly, a whiteknight is too fucking illiterate to follow a rather simple logical parallel. Also yes: feminists are closer to children than they are to adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 01:19 PM
1

always being in control of our lives and being able to do things to us against our will... meant we were being treated like property. TIL. Children today are property.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 11:56 AM
1

Extreme feminism that wants to do away with men’s rights is absolutely stupid. I don’t think anyone takes them seriously, except maybe the Internet. And Canada.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 11:53 AM
20

Women make better doctors, teachers, chefs, parents, and role models, but a male will be chosen everytime over a woman for these rolls. I love purge week. People say the stupidest shit. Keep it coming.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 11:47 AM
3

Best purge exchange ever
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 11:45 AM
2

Yeah. Female penis is ok. Is the male penis that makes you an evil misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 08:42 AM
1

misogyny being more of an urgent issue to discuss in the context of women being like, trafficked or assaulted Not entirely sure how trafficking is misogyny tho. I’m pretty sure the human scum traffickers won’t object to procuring a few boys if anyone asks for them. Same goes for assault. Pretty damn sure the human scum who do it will assault men so long as they thing they can get away with it just as easily as with women. That’s another of those feminist arguments. “Any tragedy befalling women i…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 10:39 PM
2

Do you have a male penis? Then yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 10:36 PM
-1

Female blood is life giving Yeah that’s not how babies are made. Sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 10:35 PM
8

I know one dude who is grossed out by the idea of having sex while she is on her period rather than by the blood itself. But he is grossed out by completely random mundane things like raw meat (except chicken) or grime on remote controllers (but not on the PS gamepad). The inside of that brain has to be a fucking party.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 10:33 PM
1

Didn’t say it was my problem I’m using “you” in an impersonal way. Substitute for “one” or “anybody other than the person being talked about”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 02:37 PM
1

Some girls aren’t into it tho How is that your problem? By this logic, they would have good reason to be offended By all means they can be offended. It’s their problem to deal with. Also how do you know that the particular woman they are talking about is actually offended? Are you getting outraged “just in case”? Also how do you know she is not actually a complete slut, which makes the comment not only none of your business but actually entirely valid and true? See the concern trolling already? …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 02:07 PM
2

The hypocrisy lies in being sexually aroused by degrading behavior while sustaining that people who sustain degrading opinions are wrong. I love receiving massages from my partner. Does that mean I’m ok with anybody touching me? No. But I would be a hypocrite if I argued that people who engage in physical contact while socially interacting are doing something terrible. There is a difference between observing social norms of personal space and intimacy and placing a double standard on objectifica…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 11:26 AM
2

It makes her a hypocrite. “I like to be treated like a slut by the man I choose but the filthy men of the world need to treat women like princesses, on principle”.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 02:03 AM
12

“I like to call my partner a slut but I respect women” Oh boy. Another male feminist ally sexual assault case in the making.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 02:00 AM
1

What if your dick is very identifiable? Like... if you have a papa smurf tattooed on your bellend. Asking for a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 01:26 AM
3

You need to stop watching porn. Would be a great start.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 01:25 AM
3

I was hoping for Enormous Cuck
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 01:18 AM
1

Is that Modern Warfare 2?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 01:08 AM
1

I’m like 65% sure that’s Nurggle itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 12:51 AM
-4

That’s because the below average white girl is still a superior partner when compared to the average queen of the ghetto.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 12:49 AM
3

404
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 12:42 AM
2

Math checks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 12:42 AM
2

What they mean is “men don’t have anyone to go bitch to that will haul ass to sort it out for them” By all means go and bitch to your other female friends about your woes, but accept that none of them actually give a shit, less so the rest of the world. Aka solve your own shit instead of demanding the world changes to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 12:40 AM
4

Start with the basics. Learn how to boil pasta and rice before anything else. Start by using cheap, basic, jarred sauces to add flavor. Eggs are your friend. No way to screw scrambled eggs or an omelette other than a pan that is not in good shape or you forgetting to stir. Balance your diet with plain grilled/roast meats. Use vegetables as sides for the meat. A simple chopped lettuce with salt, oil and vinegar goes well with almost anything. If you feel your diet is lacking in something, source …
/r/RedPillWomen08/05/20 12:31 AM
4

While I don’t understand vegans at all (meat is bae), I disagree. You can have amazing vegan and gluten-free food. But it does take a lot of experience and know-how in the kitchen. Definitely not for beginners.
/r/RedPillWomen08/05/20 12:22 AM
1

Cry me a river.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 12:23 AM
1

My god this had me in stitches. Top quality shitposting, sir
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 11:59 PM
1

I didn’t argue the contrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 04:59 PM
3

Your argument: The threat exists. I was hurt by the threat. I choose to live in fear and hatred of the threat. That choice is not my responsibility, it’s only a natural consequence. Wtf.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 04:28 PM
1

Go check videos on YouTube. Plenty of people making nutrition and workout videos. Search specifically for resistance conditioning training. Congrats on deciding to work on yourself and best of luck.
/r/RedPillWomen03/05/20 08:59 PM
2

It could be a bit of both. You sound confident. So yeah, right away that’s gonna turn some men off because frailty is not something that is easily faked when you are confident and assertive and will eventually make half a million bucks a year. If you try to fake it, it’s gonna come through as “I’m downplaying myself for the sake of your ego”, which will further scare most men away. It could also be that you have a bit of a blind spot about your own behavior and you actually give the impression o…
/r/RedPillWomen03/05/20 09:12 AM
2

You said intelligence correlates with looks. They didn’t say that at all. They said both are due to good genetics so it is a natural inclination to see association. If something is aesthetically pleasing, I will want to know if it is also useful. If something is not aesthetically pleasing at all, it’s gonna need to prove a lot more useful that the other, aesthetically pleasing something for me to consider the former over the latter. Because it is encoded in our primitive brain that “aestheticall…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/20 08:05 AM
3

Physical attractiveness is not subjective, no matter how many people insist in repeating it. In b4 “thicc used to be considered the beauty standard and slim/skinny was seen as unattractive”: People attracted to femininity are attracted to signifiers of youth and fertility and people attracted to masculinity are attracted to signifiers of dependability and capability to protect. All are attracted to signifiers of beneficial genes such as apparent good health (good teeth, healthy skin, etc). Even …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/20 07:02 AM
4

It “just happens” because they remove all their agency and responsibility over every choice they made that resulted in the branch swinging. TRP calls it “reframing”.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/20 02:28 AM
3

Lmao. What a post. Argument 1: Men achieve higher than women. Never mind that their are also Gail harder than women. Also, Hollywood. This proves that world is male. Argument 2: An industry with an overwhelmingly male user base has a majority of male representation. The world is male. Argument 3: Women have body image issues. Men don’t. I totally pulled this out of my ass but the world is male. Also, men work harder, take less days off and are willing to sacrifice more for their career, but the …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/20 02:19 AM
1

TRP respects men based on physical appearance and the amount of sex a man can get. Among the things that elicit respect from RedPill men, those would be rather far at the bottom. If you think you know or understand TRP, at this point I would suggest you go back to re-reading some of the source material.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/20 02:08 AM
10

Let’s add up some numbers. 8 years worth of: 9-month average relationships with “good guys” but... “it just doesn’t work out”. 3-month average break up time in between these relationships, where the girl sleeps around. Let’s say not too slutty. Just one guy every 3 weeks. Simple math. 1 partner for 9 months, then 4 more in the remaining 12 weeks. Every year, she adds 5 different partners to her count. “Well, that’s ok I’d say”, I hear from the crowd. Is it though? That’s an n-count of 40 only be…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 08:34 AM
25

Serial monogamists that “sleep around between relationships” are quite literally riding the CC. Not entirely sure what you think riding means.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 12:49 AM
3

Most men here are angry manchildren who spill over from other subs in which the main theme is revenge fantasy for their shortcomings. The only way one thinks that the arguments of men here are representative of the majority of men in the world is if they have no contact with actual men in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/20 10:59 AM
1

I’m 99% sure that it didn’t have the flair at the beginning. Could be wrong and maybe I just missed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/20 10:57 AM
2

Actually the only realistic answers he is getting are from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/20 12:30 AM
2

See? Not that hard to explain. Next time don’t hide behind bs “it’s self explanatory” claims just because you are too lazy to put your point across. All you are doing is make it look like you don’t have reasons behind what you argue.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 08:50 PM
-2

That doesn't explain the young women criticizing it. Literally explained it here: trying to secure betas for when they want to retire from the slut life Young women being vocal about “old men chasing young hotties” are simply trying to preemptively shame men their age into putting up with their used up saggy asses in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 08:34 PM
2

The question was rather simple. You said “hypocrites twist words”. They demanded to know how the words were being twisted. You claim “it’s self explanatory”. That’s not a circular argument or a self explanatory one. It is one meant to be taken at face value, no enquires made. Either explain the twisting being done or your bullshit gets called out as unable to reconcile the double standard. You can deflect all you want but all you are doing is plugging your ears. Mañana a I’m not listening is har…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 08:16 PM
2

Being worried about wether total strangers are getting a good deal on their personal relationships with no other condition to care than their demographic is deserving of concern. Maybe get a few hobbies.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 07:17 PM
15

This is what worries me about myself. I'm not a stuck-up person, but deep down, I know that this would likely become an issue for me. I make low six figures. I could be making high six, but chose to do other things mostly because I wanted time for my family. Dated plenty of six figures women. The only ones who both made more than me and were bothered by why I wasn’t making 3 or 4 times as much when I clearly could were the ones who cared about how much I made over how my brain worked. Lack of in…
/r/RedPillWomen28/04/20 07:12 PM
1

Whatever makes their game work.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 07:05 PM
1

Complains about circular argument. Sustains that their argument is “self-explanatory”. Wtaf
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 07:02 PM
2

Feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 07:01 PM
4

Still unsure how the frat boi flipping burgers while he majors in budhism (who also only wants sex) is ok but the dude in his late thirties who actually has the game to pull a woman 10+ his younger is “settling for less than she can bargain for” But ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 06:58 PM
3

/thread Women criticizing attraction to young women is just them trying to secure betas for when they want to retire from the slut life. Or if they are already retired. It’s like metoo. A bunch of hypocrites trying to avoid being displaced by younger newcomers willing to exchange booty for success just like they did in their day.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 06:53 PM
3

I was reading the post (and OP’s replies to several comments) and all I could think was “wow. Try for self awareness, bro”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 12:44 PM
1

My last boss was born in 1980 she flirted with me and a few of the guys My last boss Let that sink in. Are you sure it’s people online and not the shitty social circles you are in?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 11:36 AM
2

If you are 36 and think “women your age still look and act college-age” and you are freshly out of your party and clubbing bays, I’d say you and your social circles are the ones who have been stuck in 2009. Please grow up. You really need to catch up with reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 11:33 AM
2

Unless you are a doctor I’m gonna take your “knowledge” of how oxy works with a pinch of salt. Just so you know. As I said, I don’t care whether RP dudes are right or not. I have my personal reasons to reject high-n women and they already go along the lines of bad personality and relationship traits.
/r/RedPillWomen28/04/20 12:24 AM
3

I have no clue if their theory of oxy is correct. Personally I subscribe to the theory that women with high-n counts simply have low discerning ability and a tendency to value only the returns that require low investment which makes them unfit for LTR. But I think I you are misunderstanding immunity to oxytocin with lower production of oxy because repeated exposure to the stimulus.
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/20 11:59 PM
1

Isn't that kinda wanting to have your cake and eat it too? Maybe. I don’t know. I never said any of those guys were worth a damn. I just pointed out the bs supporting your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 11:39 PM
2

No relation between releasing oxytocin due to sex and releasing oxytocin due to other stimuli. Your relation between “if I release less and less oxy the more partners I have eventually I won’t be able to breastfeed” is nonsensical. You also seem to be making the assumption that the argument sex-orgasm-oxy-bond implies oxy only comes from orgasms ergo no breastfeeding or bonding with dogs because no orgasm. (Wtf) Not saying that the RP theory of oxy because sex is correct. Just pointing out that …
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/20 11:36 PM
1

I didn’t say traditional men I said men who want a traditional LTR. They would go out with tinder thots for sex. Obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 11:23 PM
4

Nice read but you make multiple logical leaps that make absolutely no sense.
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/20 11:20 PM
2

My point is: I hope you are right that most marriages are kept together by bonding. I hope I am wrong, because I believe most are kept together by a combination of sunk cost fallacy and plain inertia. Well I do agree with that. What I said was in response to OP’s argument that we can never really know if a high-n woman breaks a relationship because her bonding ability is damaged or because the relationship was unfulfilling. Bonding is (in my humble opinion) literally the thing that prevents the …
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/20 11:18 PM
7

With all due respect, I don’t think you properly understand sunk cost fallacy. Let me paint you two scenarios: • His snoring is annoying and he refuses to have his sinuses checked but I care about this man too much to let it ruin our relationship. I’m staying. • His snoring is annoying and he refuses to have his sinuses checked but I have been in this relationship for too long to consider leaving now. I’m staying. One is bonding, one is sunk cost fallacy. Shouldn’t be too hard to identify which …
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/20 10:39 PM
3

Not from what I’ve read You may wanna read some RP content from actual RP creators instead of Huffpost. They resent paying on the first date or being the one to initiate romance ffs So your argument is “men want a relationship with traditional women without having the burden of traditional relationships” and your evidence is that dudes in RP fora don’t want to pay for first dates with tinder thots? Solid evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 07:23 PM
8

Is it really that her ability to bond is impacted? Or is it that she is less likely to remain in a relationship that isn't working for her or that is abusive or is unfullfilling? But what is bonding other than something that lifts the bar of what one considers a dealbreaker? Isn’t bonding precisely the difference that separates “we need to work on X” from “fuck it I’m not putting up with X any more”?
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/20 05:54 PM
5

Oh I see. So we need laws to protect women from their disadvantages due to biological realities in the cases where these realities put them in a position that they consider unfair. Now let me ask you: should we have laws that protect men from the disadvantages of their biological realities when they are put in a position that they consider unfair? The privileges that women enjoy because of the implications that these biological realities encompass... are they also unfair? Or are those privileges…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 05:12 PM
1

So... like alimony? Keep in mind: those sacrifices are derived from a biological reality upon which we also grant corresponding privileges. Are those privileges unfair?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 02:27 PM
4

Do we need to have laws that protect from those inequalities/downsides? Even at the cost of forcing another person to go against their personal wishes?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 02:14 PM
4

Why is she not working?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 02:11 PM
5

So you are saying that the downsides of your biological reality (you are the one who carries the child) are not fair?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 02:11 PM
6

How is that any different from, for example, the man working longer hours because now there is an additional mouth to feed? On another note, are you implying that there need to exist laws to protect you from the downsides of your biological reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 02:02 PM
3

What did you say? That’s what I understand from what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 02:00 PM
8

If we're having a kid, I'll be making personal sacrifices that will be permanent for the rest of my life Sounds coherent with the fact of having a kid. I don't think it's fair that I have to keep on living with these sacrifices, while the other party continues to benefit from my sacrifices Wait. You no longer benefit from having had a kid? What happened??
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 01:52 PM
3

What does having babies have to do with divorce laws? Genuinely curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 01:49 PM
2

/thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 01:48 PM
1

Well, maybe you vetted the best you knew how, and you were lied to, or you didn’t think you needed to vet quite as thoroughly as you really did need to Agreed. And this is one of the things I liked when I found out there was a whole movement around things I had learned at home. What always surprised me the most about my male friends growing up and well into our twenties was how most dudes just... don’t vet. At all. It’s like they were blinded to how women actually behaved. The amount of delusion…
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/20 01:08 PM
2

I do not subscribe to ‘trust but verify’, I would admit my mindset is ‘verify or nothing’. I thin TbV is often misunderstood. If you actually trust you don’t really need to verify. I always understood “trust” to mean “don’t go around challenging responses and don’t be so paranoid to immediately disbelieve”. And then “Verify” is where the famous “look at actions not at words” comes into play. TbV is really just “don’t be a paranoid contrarian but don’t take people at face value. Wait to see if th…
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/20 12:16 AM
1

I am pretty sure we are in agreement that these are the two options. Most definitely. Mind that I never denied the validity of what you proposed. What I am was saying is that in the context of what I normally find here, it all sounds like if a guy went to TRP and started arguing along the lines of “so long as she gives you sex what do you care about her bonding ability or her sexual past”. Is it a viable mindset? Yes if that’s who you are and you are content with the illusion of a working bond. …
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 10:57 PM
1

That’s a perfectly valid way of going through life but I’m not entirely sure how the mindset of “bluff your way through, if dumped for gym instructor there’s always divorce court, not everyone wants to be somebody’s mommy” aligns very well with a strategy aimed at vetting good men to marry and start a family with. This is not meant to police what belongs or doesn’t. I just find the whole line of argumentation rather at odds with what one normally finds around this particular sub.
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 10:26 PM
0

I don’t disagree with anything you are saying. My argument is that, given how men don’t really value career or IQ beyond a reasonable point, an endeavor to excel in those areas does very little for a woman’s SMV while substantially increasing the amount of dealbreakers. As you said, it’s hard for most women to respect men who are far less accomplished than they are. Nothing wrong with singledom or with achieving in typically masculine fields. Just be aware of where those efforts are taking your …
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 08:39 PM
1

Men are not the only selectors in the SMP if the woman is of high value. Nobody said they were. If anything, this all proves that when a woman tries too hard to win at men’s games she earns herself independence and self-perceived value at the cost of drastically reducing the pool of suitable men to select from.
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 05:44 PM
1

No I agree with the reality that is behind your post. People already pointed out that you have discovered RP reality and I think I agree. I’m only trying to shoot down the bullet points that risk throwing you into black pill if you don’t process them appropriately. That’s exactly what I meant by “admit defeat and stick to the Internet”. I’m re-reading it and it may have come through as a snide remark but I meant it as cautionary advice. Yes most women are attracted to a handful of qualities that…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 04:08 PM
38

All very attractive qualities. All I would say is don’t glorify them though, they aren’t all the same and just because they’ve been military doesn’t automatically mean they have the above qualities Very well put
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 04:04 PM
3

I'm saying that men don't have anything inherently attractive, that's all. That was my point. The fact that you don’t understand that women find broad shoulders, square jaws, strong forearms and other masculine traits to be “inherently attractive” makes me think you need to hang more around actual women instead of drawing your conclusions about the human race from the Internet. This is not intended as an insult. You are 18. You haven’t really had time to hang around women who actually value masc…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 03:56 PM
3

Next thing you know I’m crushing my garlic in salt Any other way to crush your garlic is heresy. Just sayin’.
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 03:48 PM
4

The love of cooking stems from enjoying that act of service towards the people you value. Some people have it, some don’t. Most people who enjoy cooking probably picked up from their mother or somebody they lived with who knew how to cook but if it is something that interests you (and you didn’t have this growing up), all you need to do is find dishes that inspire you and practice. After a few dishes you enjoy and get complimented on, your joy for cooking is gonna grow exponentially. If you wann…
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 03:45 PM
5

said I created a ‘safe space‘ for him because with me he could keep his independence and continue to pursue his career and other life goals without me expecting him to consider ‘us’ or to change his direction in doing so Translation: you provide the benefits of a relationship without any of the demands of a relationship. As somebody else said a little below, looking at this as something good indicates that you desire the label of “in a Relationship” more than the relationship itself.
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 03:35 PM
11

Bro you are only 18. I suggest you try to focus your efforts in getting to crack the mystery of women on real life rather than the nonsense you are gonna find online. You are young; there is still hope for you. Although seeing as you argued “men don’t have nice thighs or boobs ergo they are not objectively attractive”, maybe you should just accept defeat and stick to the Internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 03:26 PM
5

For the purpose of the analogy with the checking under the hood, he already “took the car home” by asking her to be in a relationship.
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 03:19 PM
4

As for sex, the reality is that some people are just not naturally sexy, and without these people engaging in some kind of mimicry, their partners will never lust for them That’s the stupidest and most superficial thing I have read in a long time. Apparently those couples of obese people who love each other to bits and fuck like bunnies are just faking it and are not really attracted to each other. Please refrain from talking about human relations until you have grown the fuck up.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 02:57 PM
4

In all honesty and without meaning to offend, I think you have taken too much of the “accomplished woman kool-aid”. You are measuring yourself and your value by masculine thresholds and pondering whether a man you could look up to has to beat you in those departments or if his shortcomings there can be made up for in other areas. You career and your IQ mean very little to men. Sure, they are nice to have and show a lot of virtues in you. But those virtues have nothing to do with whether your val…
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 02:20 PM
5

Is it possible? I think it is possible for two people to mutually and genuinely admire each other, yes. Admiration in the sense of elevation, not in the sense of finding redeeming qualities. As t he previous commenter said, it’s an ideal. By its very nature, it’s bound to be uncommon. Does it really matter if it is 50/50 tho? Or is it enough if it is genuinely mutual? beauty and youth against money and power and all of them being weighed according to the sex which possesses them I don’t see any …
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 01:29 PM
9

Yeah but you check under the hood before taking the car home. If you take the car home and then start being an ass to the car about the terrible mileage it has engaged in, you are a moron.
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 01:19 PM
7

There’s an argument for that. Mutually seeing the other as higher value pushes both people to strive to be their best, both for themselves and for the other. Of course, this requires the condition that both parties are in a healthy and balanced state of mind if the relationship is to avoid going down a spiral of destructiveness.
/r/RedPillWomen26/04/20 01:14 PM
4

I would say that your first step is to process that him not being appreciative of your more feminine look doesn’t mean it doesn’t look good on you. Unless his choice of wardrobe bothers you I honestly wouldn’t push the subject much further than letting him know that you enjoy dressing feminine and that compliments are always appreciated. Any mention of the contrast between your newfound style and his more plain clothes and whether it relates to his lack of appreciation is bound to backfire and b…
/r/RedPillWomen25/04/20 01:15 AM
2

Does your bf wear anything other than basic clothes? Let’s face it. No dude with an ounce of taste or style will compliment jeans and leggings over a nice dress. This sounds like a case of “you dressing up makes me look like a slob and I don’t like it. Please be more mediocre” If he is a jeans & T-shirt kind of dude, he is most likely having a subconscious reaction to your effort. You look all nice and dolled up and he is there in his plain clothes, so he appreciates when you look more basic.
/r/RedPillWomen25/04/20 12:27 AM
3

Women who use tinder are the bottom of the barrel. Low quality thots that need a constant dopamine rush from getting attention and want a notification service, least they miss on a potential cock to suck. Stay the fuck off tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 08:18 PM
13

/thread
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 09:23 AM
2

So live with the consequences... except for negative judgement from others? How is that not unaccountability? It’s not that I agree or disagree with FDS position on this issue. It’s that you are arguing for the trope of “support wamen no matter what”.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 02:55 AM
1

I’m gonna disagree there. If you want to argue that a 35yo dude compared to a 25yo dude “loses” just as hard as a woman does, you are sadly mistaken. Men are not impervious to the wall. But it definitely hits them a lot later than it hi ya women, and it also hits them a lot less drastically.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 11:33 PM
9

There should be an indication in the sidebar about how the community is just there for you to vent your angry phase away, then move the fuck on. It certainly isn’t a place a balanced person would want to be in.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 11:30 PM
7

We should support women and their choices even if it’s not a choice we would personally make for ourselves. I’m gonna disagree there. You are entirely entitled to an opinion on whether sex work (or whatever other life decision) is acceptable or not. But you seem to be arguing “always support women’s choices”. Should I support a woman’s decision to do recreational drugs “even if I wouldn’t make that choice for myself”?? That sounds a lot like unaccountability to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 11:27 PM
3

Chill dude, you are selling shoes or whatever meaningless shit you are doing, you aren't liberating Africa. Nice one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 11:23 PM
21

Red Pill: plating as a default form of engaging with women. Pushing through LMR. These dudes need to drop the porn fantasy that they will plate every woman who is not entirely subordinate to their whims and desires, continue to act this way until they are half way through their thirties and then somehow magically find a high value 22yo almost virgin who is also a 9/10 and will want them over the wide variety of 25ish high value dudes available to her. It hardly gets any more delusional than that…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 11:21 PM
6

I will take your anecdotal evidence as irrefutable proof. 🤦🏻‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 08:41 PM
1

Who said men don’t buy things? Lmao. One needs to be purposefully stupid to miss several times in a row that the argument being made is “overwhelmingly, men don’t make a hobby out of shopping” You did it on purpose, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 09:38 PM
1

The only comment with some resemblance of sense in it
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 07:18 PM
1

The males you supposedly talk to aren’t men either. Lmao. “Men” hanging around in malls for 3h shopping. Wtf alternate reality do you live in?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 07:17 PM
2

No one is arguing that men change. Are you living under a rock?? Objectification continues to be one of those things feminists use as “proof of oppression”. men don't get to be the only one who profits from their degeneracy anymore how do men “profit from their degeneracy”? Genuine question. I don’t even know what you mean by this. men adding to the bile against perfectly innocent women What bile and who are these innocent women you speak of? when people lump men together suddenly it's a crime L…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 01:04 AM
3

It’s not any woman’s fault that other women create a world of objectification, but anyone arguing that fixing objectification of women requires men to change is a fucking moron, more willing to shift blame than to demand responsibility of those who facilitate it. The argument that the fault for objectification of women falls on the shoulders of men is just as stupid as arguing that the guilty party on the drug problem are the addicts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 06:31 PM
3

you explain away womens half of the problem As has always been done. Women complain about objectification while women consciously make the choice to objectify themselves. Men are to blame. That’s your average 21st century woman’s mindset. Absolute incapability to accept fault. It’s like a child complaining that he shouldn’t be punished for burning the house down. Parents simply shouldn’t have left matches lying around.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 11:25 AM
1

You were just defending Hitler by saying "anyone can say it's in self-defense". That alone should have informed you that the argument is “you can’t claim self defense when history is there to prove otherwise”. But hey, you were defending wamen. Of course you are gonna shit on history for the sake of narrative. Are you just mad that I'm pointing out that men dont give two shits about other men? Nah. As you can see, I haven’t defended the argument that men don’t do what you said. I merely point ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 09:15 AM
1

From THE VERY FIRST SENTENCE, he made this about men vs women. By all means feel free to dismantle his shitty narrative. But if you come back with equally shitty narrative, don’t be surprised when somebody else makes you look like a hateful fool. So the Allies were greedy assholes for trying to stop Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan? Good to know. That’s not how the logic works, sweetie. Lmao what are you? 12?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 02:52 AM
1

Lmao. Losing sleep because there are incels on Reddit dubs sounds like a really stupid thing bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 02:41 AM
1

Instead you're blaming all women for some bad stuff some men go through. Maybe check who makes which statements. OP couldn’t be more mistaken about what the disposability of men is. My reply to your comment was to point how your argument is laughable. Maybe this is the crux of your problems. You see the world in a men vs women lens, and because in your head it’s all a matter of making women good and men bad, anyone arguing against your nonsense must certainly be on the reverse of that absurd pos…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 01:29 AM
1

You literally blamed automod. 3 posts ago. The truth is you just like to cry incel at the slightest hint of disagreement with the wamyn narrative, and then build all the justifications around it to confirm your preconceptions. As I said, full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 10:26 PM
1

Nobody said there’s no incels. You said there are many. And that you know babies of the vocabulary they use, despite searches of the sub rendering meager results of said words. Then you claim it’s all because of the automod. Yet somehow you were able to spot those words and that’s how you know. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 10:12 PM
3

Lmao. Nice poisoning the well. Please take your man hating somewhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 09:25 PM
1

Ah yes. The automod that removes the comment when that word is used against women but fails to remove your comment because context. Also you were there in time to see the words posted right before the automod removed them, which is why you know it’s so prevalent. Sorry you are too full of shit to even take seriously at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 08:13 PM
7

Ah yes. A female majority government all over the world would absolutely end wars. Not like the most notable Queens and Empresses through history have been war-rabid nutcases or anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 07:41 PM
5

Imagine only working part time while enjoying the purchasing ability that comes with full time employment, and then calling the work you do at home “unpaid”. It’s hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 07:39 PM
2

They think theyre the bottom 80% but theyre actually the bottom 10%. Savage. And true.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 06:21 PM
3

unfortunately they’re so bitter and scorned The fact that OP thinks that the concept of the disposability of men refers to sex and relationships makes me think you are on the right track here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 06:21 PM
1

That’s not what “the disposable male” means. At all. If it were about that it would actually not be a problem whatsoever. You people need to expand your horizons beyond getting your wieners wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 06:17 PM
6

I’m gonna leave the womanly advice for the women but know that it’s never too late. I was lucky enough to grow up in a fairly redpill home but a close friend of mine was blue pilled well into his thirties. He started listening and is now one of the most redpill, stand up dudes you can find. Awesome man and a great husband, father and captain for his family. I also know a woman who was everything but RPW when she was 29. She started taking care of herself and correcting course. Last I heard, you …
/r/RedPillWomen18/04/20 08:18 AM
1

Did a search for “roastie” in the entire sub. Literally 5 posts. The youngest one is over 100 days old and is a Purge post. The next two, 187 and 188 days old. By the same person. The remaining two are over a year and over two years old, respectively. I mean, I can totally see how this can make you feel like there are many woman-hating-variety kind of incels here. Smfh.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 06:50 AM
1

Not sure what your argument is here. Apparently, here we have many men who have a strong reaction to all women, not just women who say stupid shit, and it’s definitely not about the fact that some women say utterly stupid shit, but rather about how these men come from old incel forums... despite having nothing on your hands to establish that correlation other than “if you talk poorly to any woman you surely must be an incel”. That all sounds like you have a really tight construct for confirmatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/20 12:52 AM
1

Incel is a common term, there are plenty of them here. or more specifically very bitter woman-hating people, who may or may not be incels but have a very strong reaction to women In light of this, whatever goes on on old incel forums seems irrelevant to the argument you made and I responded to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 10:23 PM
8

Come at me, bro!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 10:03 PM
2

Has anyone ever considered whether these “men who hate women” have that reaction with all women or just women who say stupid shit about issues that those men consider important and, often, deeply personal?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 09:52 PM
21

Disagree!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 09:50 PM
3

Acrimonious is my word of the day. Thanks
/r/RedPillWomen17/04/20 04:59 PM
1

I disagree with the last part. Even in the case of separated co-parents. Most are single-parenting in turns.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 04:48 PM
2

I think children of divorce can be really good at avoiding divorce themselves. I think it's because we knew what divorce is like and were determined to avoid it. Couldn’t agree more. That said, divorce happens and I don't like to cast blame. In my limited experience, sometimes people who grow up in great families just assume that every marriage is bound to work out, and so they dont vet carefully. And this too.
/r/RedPillWomen17/04/20 04:46 PM
1

If you abandon your children you are a piece of shit. When you abandon a pregnant woman you are abandoning a woman. Whatever she does with her pregnancy is her business. Do not confuse that with abandoning a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 04:44 PM
2

Not entirely sure how that is related to single parenting. Are mothers who receive child support not single mothers? Cause many are gonna be really pissed off about no longer being hailed as heroes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 04:40 PM
2

I didn’t mean to accuse you of that. I agree that most single parents don’t set out to be. It’s one of those things that happens as a consequence of bad choices. Bad partner sometimes, bad attitudes in the majority of cases. People who end up single parenting often find themselves t he te because they didn’t vet appropriately before having children or failed to make the relationship work, which is doubly condemnable seeing as there are children in the picture.
/r/RedPillWomen17/04/20 03:54 PM
12

It is of importance to know why the relationships that deteriorated reached that point. There’s a veiled insinuation there that all those single mothers were either innocent or victims of circumstance.
/r/RedPillWomen17/04/20 03:33 PM
2

In the case where the single motherhood is because abandonment, maybe. Maybe the mother was an insufferable cunt, in which case both are to blame for irresponsibly having children. Pretty bold of you to assume that single motherhood is a matter of men leaving.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 03:28 PM
2

Nobody criticized you for being honest. It’s just that what you think is pure shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 09:03 AM
12

Stealing this. And the winning pig too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 01:29 AM
1

The difference lies in whether one thinks legislation should exist to protect a few gullible airheads at the expense of curtailing the rights of 50% of the population. What you would be arguing here is “a few women being protected from a bad experience is more important than the ability of all men to make a free choice about their lives”
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 12:25 AM
1

When I talk about financial abortion it is something that should always be done before the baby is born. Within time for the woman to abort if she doesn’t want to raise a baby with no financial support. Ideally the system would require a father to voluntarily take responsibility within the first trimester of pregnancy. If voluntary support is not secured, the woman has t he option to either abort or go ahead by her own means. In any case using a fringe scenario that would need to be avoided as a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/20 09:54 PM
4

Sooo... women who sleep with minors are not true pedophiles? Just asking cause you are literally confirming the argument you replied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/20 08:27 PM
4

As a coaxial cable, I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/20 08:15 PM
5

You heard it here folks. What women do is less rape than the other rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/20 08:00 PM
1

Any (married) woman not enjoying being a wife should most definitely get a divorce.
/r/RedPillWomen16/04/20 01:19 PM
8

Should I call my son and daughter by their names instead? They definitely are more than just my son/daughter. Should I start calling my parents by their name because they are more than just my parents? This is just another of those tidbits of idiocy brought on by modern feminism.
/r/RedPillWomen16/04/20 01:18 PM
3

Who said anything about sympathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 10:25 PM
2

I will clarify that when I say you in my post I don’t mean you personally. I mean women in general. In all honesty, your reply sounds like a lot of unresolved issues. With all due respect, if you act like a doormat, you will attract the kind of guy that thrives in stepping on you. The strongest benefit of being sweet/loyal/honest and avoiding “setting hoops” is that it attracts the men who value that. But for it to work without making you a doormat you need strong boundaries first. No sex withou…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:15 PM
1

These women should read the part in RPW about not submitting to what they call drunken captains. There is a difference between being submissive/loyal/whatever you wanna call it by principle and submitting to one man. What I’m saying, here and in the other comment I made and you replied to, is that women can’t really be surprised if the men they find act/are how you describe in your OP. The current iteration of western culture doesn’t really offer any benefits to men. How is anyone surprised that…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:09 PM
3

I had a friend become an alt-F4. Haven’t seen him since.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:56 PM
3

those women are in return very loyal, very helpful, and very sweet to their men This should help you realize all you need to know. Perhaps if more women tried to be loyal, helpful and sweet by principle, and not in return, they would experience different outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:45 PM
3

Face it. You are not worth the squeeze. Let’s see. The guy did the approaching, the work to get in your pants, jumped through whatever hoops you put in front of him. When he is familiar enough with you to be fucking you, he doesn’t even bother with you. And that happens with all men you have been with. Other than having one or more holes to fuck, what exactly are you bringing to the table for these men? Did you care how they felt while they were pursuing you? Or was it an obstacle race in which …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:42 PM
6

Men are notorious for editing stories to make themselves look like victims. Lol. This alone disqualifies anything you have to say lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:32 PM
10

99% poor people are poor by choice. It’s only logical.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:24 PM
1

Same question came to my mind when reading this ridiculous post.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:20 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 03:39 PM
1

I don’t see paying for stuff I want as providing, though. If I want to have an expensive car that has terrible mileage and we both go on trips in it, am I “providing”? If I want to enjoy a dinner at a fancy place and decide to enjoy it with you, am I “providing”? To me, providing is paying for things that are “yours”, so to speak, but you can’t afford on your own, or to pay for things that you insist on having/doing when you require my resources to be able to afford them. Ie if you insist we mov…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 03:29 PM
2

Aaah I get it. Women oppressed. Lmao. With the new cars, there are actual car mechanics for whom it's their job This just about shows how much you know about maintaining a car. You are literally the equivalent to those males you complain about who think “kitchen” is just cleaning a few counters. Before you bother to respond, keep in mind that your feminist “us vs them” mindset is made transparent by your employ of “y’all” as in talking to me is about the same as talking to any other man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 01:41 PM
2

'Typical female complaint' means that according to the feminist argument, women are doing this. It's part of the 'we do more and you should do half'. Aaah fair enough. Seeing as she used to be a feminist I’d say she would have noticed I was the one doing those. So she does 12 hours a month. Does your monthly job take 12 hours? I never counted the hours, but seeing as she realized doing part of “my jobs” interfered too much with her life, I will say yes. I don't have floor rugs, I need to vaccuum…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 12:16 PM
2

typical female complaint Not sure what you mean by this. fair, but how often does that happen It’s not about how often it happens. It is about how when it needs to be done I’m the one doing it, getting my hands dirty and carrying weight. About once a month. Keep in mind that the things she complained about (ironing and vacuuming) take a total of 1 hour a week vacuuming and (because most of our clothes were dry cleaned) maybe 2 hour ironing. Heavylifting - fair, same as moving things In my house,…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 11:11 AM
0

I never thought about chores as feminine of masculine I was always tought to both cook and use a hammer. Good mentality to grow with. That’s how I was raised too. Mind that I didn’t list anything as masculine. I said (some) women often look at “chores” and think they only include the typical “housewife work” like cooking and cleaning, which means they disregard things like paperwork/bills, car maintenance and heavylifting. In my case, particularly the heavylifting, storage management and pet car…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 10:53 AM
1

It’s in one of my other comments. Feel free to check.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 10:41 AM
1

Yeah for us it went a bit like that except we didn’t do it at the start. She insisted in moving in when I had to start chemotherapy and was living alone and had no family in our city. I am by no means a lazy person and she knew (my home was fucking pristine) so my contribution to house chores was not something she felt we needed to agree on. It’s just that after some time the feminist propaganda started to seep in. It was at this point that she complained about dishes (despite the fact that I di…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 10:37 AM
1

😧
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 10:22 AM
2

I have dated several women who made a lot less than I did. I also dated a woman that made noticeably more than I did. The only instances in which it worked is when the “expensive outings one can’t afford” happened because the other party proposed them (and thus happily paid for). We don’t care if a woman makes less. So long as her lifestyle matches what she can afford. If I feel like doing something expensive with you, I’ll pay. No problem. If you are the one suggesting we do things I’m gonna ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 10:18 AM
1

That’s fair. But even in city apartments there are “chores” that often fall on men and are invisible to women. I did have this exact conversation with a formerly feminist girl I used to live with when she complained I didn’t do enough housework and wanted “a more equal share” I offered her to give me a list of things she wanted to split. After she did, I gave her a list of things I did entirely in my own and also kept our lives running. After a few months of “exchanging chores”, she started tryi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:54 AM
1

But let’s suppose what you say is true than that would mean any parent could legally abuse, neglect, abandon or even kill their child if they “didn’t want to be a parent anymore” God you are fucking stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:20 AM
1

they merely decriminalize a behavior rather than legalizing it. That’s the most moronic thing I have read in a while. “We are not making it legal. We are just no longer making it illegal”. that would mean that parents do not have legal obligations to their children. Which is what you claim to be the case. No. Having talked with you a fair bit by now, I am aware that your intellect is nearly as limited as your bias is monumental. I merely said there isn’t such a thing as an inherent right, on the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 11:30 PM
1

Thanks for all your useful information. I really appreciate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 11:01 PM
1

Yeah that’s the discussion with my French family. Are there instances where a husband can contest paternity, the wife refuses dna test, and the judge still decides that “for the benefit of the child”, the husband is gonna be the father anyway? Or does a refusal by the wife automatically mean she kind of “admitted guilt”? Btw sorry for so many questions but you seem to know quite a bit more than the bs I have heard from my French relatives and it kinda pisses me off cause I have been arguing in p…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 10:44 PM
1

The argument is that t he supposed “right of the child to support” does not exist. Mother or father has nothing to do with it, but the fact that you keep bringing it up is highly illuminating that you are aware that all the bullshit about “for the benefit of the child” is just a facade to hide the truth. It’s really all about the mother getting her way.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 10:39 PM
1

Lmao at this point it is obvious you are being either purposefully stupid or downright intellectually dishonest. It’s not legal to kill a person Yes. That’s because we think people have a right to live. Would you still argue that this right exists if we allowed people to kill others in “safe killing spaces”?? You know, places where you can kill people ”anonymously”. Just go to to it closest fire station and shoot that motherfucker you don’t like. Even better, you don’t have to do it yourself. Ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 10:28 PM
1

However the thing you can not do is to bring a DNA test to start the suit since these must be allowed by the judge once you have started the suit with enough evidence of your suspicion. Yeah I figured things out up to this point. Question is: if the judge seems a DNA test necessary to determine whether that sufficient evidence actually translates to a reality of the child being from another man, can the mother then (in the name of the child, I assume) refuse to allow the DNA test??
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 10:24 PM
1

nobody knows who the parents are so no one can be held accountable for the child Which proves that the child has no right to support from those people. If the baby did, those people would no be able to just say “bye bye I have no obligations any more”.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 10:22 PM
1

When a child is given up via safe haven laws nobody actually knows who the parents are, so it’s essentially the same thing as finding a baby in the bushes Except leaving a baby in the bushes is a crime, and Safe Haven Laws were created to make surrendering a child perfectly legal, which means there is no such thing as “right to support from parents”. Even if you want to insist that the right still exists, clearly we are ok with creating law that puts the desires of those giving the kid away befo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 10:04 PM
1

When a child is adopted all of the rights and obligations of the natural parent are conferred onto the adoptive parents Lol. Okay you really don’t understand this topic. Ah yes. When children are given up under the protection of Safe Haven laws, who the fuck is the adoptive parent? The Chief Fire Marshal?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 09:00 PM
1

the law says if you're married to the mother at the time of birth, you're the dad, or if you went declare yourself at city hall So what happens when you are married but you suspect the child is the product of infidelity? Cause I suspect this is the issue that has been discussed the most with my French family.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 05:00 PM
1

I read the link for the law and it makes a provision for DNA testing with the purpose of medical/scientific research and also for identification of deceased people and something else I don’t remember. From what I could make out given my mediocre command of French, it’s mostly aimed at DNA testing with the intent to change paternity/child support status. The legal framework, as I understand it, already allows enough wiggle room that somebody with doubts about paternity has a reasonable time margi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 03:30 PM
1

Aaah I like this. Thanks. I’ll confront them about their bullshitting and making shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 02:50 PM
2

“Us” being the people here reading this. You are providing the argument that “if you are the one at risk of facing tremendous burden, keep it in your pants”. Again: how is this not at all an argument against women undergoing voluntary abortions when they could have just kept it in their pants. Lmao. Mandatory vasectomies. Please stop trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 02:05 PM
2

I’m sorry but you are gonna have to provide evidence for that. A court-ordered dna test that you can refuse?? What’s the point of the court order then? I have close family in France. The discussion of familial filiation and “peace of the family” has been a very discussed-over topic in family gatherings. I get the impression that you have heard “something” about DNA tests in France and are bullshitting your way through without understanding the slightest about what you are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 02:03 PM
2

And yet women already carry all the genital burden of birth control control and abortion and often carry even after the children is born. As the nut owner and the one facing an 18-year-bill I think you should leash your dog, mate. Lmao. Why do you keep giving us arguments against voluntary abortion for women?? Are you against it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 01:45 PM
2

It’s equally as funny as not letting dudes nut inside you and never have to deal with any of this. There. No need for voluntary abortions either. Imagine a world where you argue that men are women are equal, but then set up extra steps for women not having to take responsibility for their actions, yet argue that the same steps being taken for men can simply be avoided if they simply take responsibility for their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 01:40 PM
1

Feel free to provide any evidence that the state can go after you for child support after you give the baby up for adoption.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 01:34 PM
2

The infant is born and the infant should have rights to the support/care of their parents The fact that you can give a baby up for adoption clearly demonstrates that this argument regarding a supposed “right of the child to support from parents” is complete bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 01:25 PM
5

And yet women already carry all the genital burden of birth control control and abortion and often carry even after the children is born. It’s funny how the biological reality is used as an argument for “my body my choice” when it suits the woman’s desires against those of the father but suddenly, when the biological reality inconveniences her, then it’s a problem that needs to be fixed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 01:23 PM
1

Until the mother died for child support and you are on the hook anyway. Not sure where you get your information from.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 01:20 PM
1

The ability to give children up for adoption isn’t any fairer to the kid. It’s all usually about the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 01:15 PM
9

Terrible idea. I’m all in with “my body, my choice”. I also happen to think that if it’s your choice it’s also your responsibility unless I decide voluntarily that I also want in Also, no backsies. If you say you are in, you are in.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 01:14 PM
3

Would just incentive her not to inform him untill after the legal cut-off date. Something that is easily solved by the same means any other legal notifications already employ.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 01:12 PM
1

I just want men to have the same options women have. If abortion is legal, financial abortion needs to be legal too. If men don’t have an option to choose whether they become fathers after an unwanted pregnancy, no voluntary abortions for women. Feel free to take your pick.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 03:34 AM
1

What corrections? You are the one claiming that because the mother is the one to carry the child, it’s thought shit when men face adversities like their rights not being protected, no efforts being made to find them in the case of mothers claiming “oh I don’t know, some rando”. It’s “just nature”. But aaaaah, when being the one carrying the baby means adversities, of any kind, suddenly you are not ok with the woman being the only one to suffer complications that arise from the fact. We need to f…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 01:51 AM
1

We did not. The man is a father because his sperm collided with her egg So when “the sperm collided with her egg” he was already a father but had no rights which is why she can abort freely. Absolutely. Your obligations begin before your rights kick in. Solid position to hold. Again that’s just life Ah yes. When we make every effort to protect the wamen but no effort to protect the men, thats just life. Men are still responsible even though their rights don’t mean shit. Yeah totally not a system…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:46 PM
30

Congrats and also I’m reporting you two for breaking the Stay Home Stay Safe thing. Black helicopters will soon be arriving at your place to transport you to an undisclosed location where you will await sentencing.
/r/RedPillWomen13/04/20 09:45 PM
1

a father is generally in control of whether or not his sperm makes a child Lmao. No. Clearly not. Not in control at all. We have already established that the man only becomes a father by means of the decision of the woman. This is a total lie the state doesn’t care whose paying the child support they care about not having the child in foster care Sure. That’s why literally zero efforts are made to figure out who the father is. I mean. Imagine not even bothering to look after the rights of an obv…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 09:34 PM
1

It was somebody named Tracy
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 05:22 PM
0

If 98 men are 7- and 2 men are 8+, which is the top 20%?? 2 men out of 100 are the top 20% of men? If the top score in an exam is 8.6, nobody in class is within the 90 percentile of that class? Illiterate dumbass. why do over 85 percent of men and women women be up getting married over their lifetime in the US? It’s called “settling for betabux”.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 03:22 PM
1

You’re failing to prove a concept that’s unique to women. The concept that is unique to women is the part that you conveniently left out: the vast majority of women pursue only the top 20% men. Math is rather black and white Indeed. And that’s what makes your statement of “the top 20% men are the ones who are 8+ out of 10” utterly ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 02:30 PM
1

The 80/20 rule states that 20% of men sleep with 80% of women No. It means that the vast majority ofwomen chase the top 20% of men, meaning that this top 20% is the one with access to 80% of the women. It doesn’t describe actual pairing. On a scale from 1-10, these would be men that are 8-10/10 That’s absolutely not how distribution works. Not only do you misunderstand concepts, you suck at math.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 01:16 PM
1

That’s a lot of words circling around “the baby is here because the mother, and solely the mother, wanted it”. When one needs to bullshit around a simple concept as much as you did, it’s transparent that they are engaging in muddying the waters to get away with their nonsense. but because the state wants to avoid footing the bill they will go after the natural parents first. Bullshit. If a woman wants to give a living newborn up for adoption and does not tell who the father is, the state is happ…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 11:05 AM
6

Yes you are important too. Sigh.
/r/RedPillWomen12/04/20 11:38 PM
1

I know you weren’t disagreeing. Sadly, that’s the state of the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 11:33 PM
1

The reason a man is the father is of a child is not because the woman gave birth but because he had sex with her So when he had sex with her and she got pregnant he was already the father? Or did he become the father the moment she decided to have the child? It’s funny how female supremacist like to play Schrödinger’s cat with pregnancy and fatherhood. All to avoid personal responsibility. I’m pregnant and I don’t want it. The pregnancy is mine and you have no say. I’m pregnant and I want it. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 09:41 PM
1

Yeah that’s why I said another
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 09:38 PM
0

No. The man is only a father because the woman decided it would be so. He had literally no control over whether he became a father once the pregnancy happened. But the woman did. You can skip the crucial step of the woman’s decision all you want. It doesn’t change reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 06:29 PM
1

Yeah I agree with that. All I’m saying is both people don’t garner the same degree of concern by the larger population.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 06:24 PM
2

All that is very fine and dandy, but in the end what you are arguing is that we hold women accountable for living children, so it’s fair to hold men accountable too. Of course, you conveniently forget that the child is alive solely on the decision of the woman, which means we hold men accountable for the result of women’s decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 05:02 PM
1

And that is all perfectly fine. I don’t have an issue with higher pickiness by women. But in their higher pickiness resides the reason why we don’t talk about them. Anyone wanting to argue that not wanting intimacy from a 400Kg person with mold between their fat rolls is comparable to not wanting intimacy from a person whose nose is too big is delusional at best and intellectually dishonest at worst. Wondering why people don’t pay attention to those who lack intimacy because their selection crit…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 04:58 PM
2

Whether we hold women responsible for their sexual decisions, including carrying pregnancy to term, is utterly relevant to whether we hold men responsible for their sexual decisions. It is absolutely a debate about abortion whether you like it or not. Only a ridiculously entitled person would think they are free to argue for the responsibility of others while banning the subject of their own exempt-from-responsibility cards from the discussion. You just said it yourself: the illegality of aborti…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 04:20 PM
9

Oh god. Another one of those “this flaw of human beings that I choose to make a post about but only applied to one gender”.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 02:53 PM
2

So wanting abortion to remain legal means you don’t give a fuck about the rights of the unborn child which means that those who want abortion to be legal are all about freeing the mother of her obligations.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 09:23 AM
1

Aaawww here come the victimhood arguments. Woe is me. If you don’t like sex don’t have a partner and you can skip all that. If you have to “overmedicate so dudes can skip condoms”, get a better fucking partner. If you are being treated like a living fleshlight I can guarantee that the fault lies with you and your vetting process, not the pharmaceutical industry or men as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 11:34 PM
1

It’s ok. I also assumed things that I shouldn’t have.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:54 PM
2

It doesn’t exist because it hasn’t gone past stage 3 of the testing and approval process, which is blind testing in small samples of voluntary patients. The results made the medical authorities stop the testing process. Your narrative about “men not being willing to take it” is literally bullshit that you are either making up or parroting from somebody with an agenda. Lmao. Market studies on a drug that is not even past stage 3. What a fucking joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:53 PM
2

As I said, you are truly ignorant. The equivalence you would be trying to make here would be ED vs vaginal dryness. Low libido has nothing to do with it. In fact many women who suffer vaginal dryness have perfectly healthy libidos and the use of contraceptives has nothing to do with vaginal dryness. For God’s sake inform yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:50 PM
1

I said in an above comment that men shouldn’t HAVE to be a parent if the mother decides to have a child I don’t check every comment made by people and that is actually nowhere in this particular thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:45 PM
1

Can you read? My argument, from the very first comment, says intimacy. Maybe you should visit some actual incel sites and see if they talk as much about fucking as they talk about intimacy (holding hands, kissing, hugging) or even simply having a woman treat them with anything that is not utter contempt or, at best, indifference Exit: But, of course, all you likely know about incels is that, in all those conversations about how they really wish they could have those things or are so desperate th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:39 PM
6

Let’s give people an option to rethink if they are fit to actually be parents. You mean... let’s give women an option to rethink. Allow me to remind you that you are intervening in a thread about how women already have this option but men don’t, and you are justifying that the option is not without consequences. You are literally the oblivious moron complaining about having to peel a banana... to the guy who is starving and doesn’t even have a banana.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:36 PM
1

Lmao you are the one defending that “pretend is the same as reality” in a futile attempt at justifying that incels not being able to get intimacy with anyone is equivalent to femcels not being able to get intimacy with guys who are hot enough. You are so deluded and lost in your victimhood complex that you think that your preferences not being met deserves just as much discussion as actual needs not being met. That female preference should be elevated to the standard of an actual need. You are b…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:33 PM
-1

Yeah if it doesn't benefit you then it's horrible Literally what feminism is based on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:28 PM
3

Great argument against abortion. If you don’t want a baby, use contraceptives/don’t fuck. I like how all these feminist morons are pro-life.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:26 PM
1

Please do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:25 PM
0

ED/low libido, same diff Sorry but you are so fucking ignorant that it hurts. Being in wheelchair/being lazy. Same diff. That’s your fucking logic. Please go away, your lack of common decency is disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:25 PM
1

There's a pill for EVERYTHING these days... except, remarkably, male contraceptives. Oh god. How can somebody be this ignorant. Imagine being so illiterate that you think that a process triggered by hormones (ovulation) being controllable with pills means that a related process triggered by physical stimulus (ejaculation) should be equally easy to control with pills. By the same logic, hemorrhages and broken bones can also by solved with pills. Yeah. No male contraceptive pill is all a conspirac…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:22 PM
1

Hahah Imagine being so entitled that you think that your advantages are just because biology, but your disadvantages because biology need to be corrected by laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:15 PM
3

Then let’s make abortion illegal so that women don’t have to put themselves through those consequences. Since they will be, as YveisGrey says, “fully aware of the law, all they have to do is follow the same options men have. Wow you just solved the pro-life vs. pro-choice conflict. Congratulations.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:11 PM
6

Unilateral decision means unilateral responsibility. Except if woman. Something about having cake and eating it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:05 PM
5

Because a man already is well aware about the abortion laws You heard it here first, folks. Anything that is in the law is morally ok. Slavery was ok. By YveisGrey. Also women couldn’t vote but it was ok cause it was in the law. People who defended slavery and the inability for women to vote were on the right side of history... because it known that this is how laws were.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 10:05 PM
1

Hey you are right. In fact you just solved every issue that feminism is trying to fix. We are going to pretend to pay women more so that the wage gap disappears. We will also pretend that they are the ones running companies. Bye, bye, glass ceiling. Oh yeah. And we will pretend Hillary won the election. That way we also do away with the Patriarchy. I mean... pretend is just as good as reality. Right??
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 09:56 PM
3

You do realize that getting intimacy and getting the illusion of intimacy are not the same, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 09:27 PM
3

Yes. With a solipsism. Q: We talk about incels. Why don’t we ever talk about femcels? It is also concerning. A: we talk about incels because incels are actually not being able to satisfy a need for human intimacy. 99% of Femcels simply don’t like the men who are willing to give them intimacy. YOU: Hurr Durr ugly men don’t meet a woman’s needs Sorry, cupcake. If you reject a plain cheese sandwich because it’s not good enough for you, you don’t really get to wonder why the world isn’t talking abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 09:21 PM
2

Nobody (except you) has made that argument lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 09:17 PM
3

I love the real-life proof of solipsism. Imagine thinking that your preferences are actual needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 08:09 PM
3

That is some helleniclady/lilithofbabylon levels of bullshit True story: I read this and thought “they must not know poppy yet or they would have included her in there”. Then I realized who you were responding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 08:05 PM
6

I kinda agree with this line of thinking. Worthy of mention is the fact that hamster is more often than not used in TRP to describe a mental process of “spinning your wheels”, overthinking stuff without filtering for emotion, running wild scenarios in your head, each one wilder than the previous. It’s also one of those things that are seen as “men don’t do this, it’s a typically feminine weakness”
/r/RedPillWomen11/04/20 07:11 PM
1

Ah yes. The classic unfalsifiable argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 05:27 PM
1

Lmao. Way to concede the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:32 PM
1

Aaaaaanf another strawman. Who said men never do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:32 PM
1

How does polygyny relate to loyalty exactly? Mind that even if actual polygyny was even closely as prevalent as hypergamy, there is no commitment made to any of those supposed harem members.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 02:10 PM
1

Hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 01:39 PM
1

You definitely need to learn the difference between loyal and faithful.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 01:35 PM
1

Imagine a world in which o my virgins and sluts exist. Lmao get off the Internet. Or find a better neighborhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 01:34 PM
1

The fact that, after your shit original argument, all you can object to the explanation is “ha! But what about when the wife is being a shit partner, huh?? What then???”... should tell you all you need to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 09:38 AM
4

Insisting on debating a cherry picker that cherry picks from among the cherries. You are a brave person.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 01:37 AM
3

WAWE exists for rational reasons so long as one decides to ignore the rational reasons that also show women are more neurotic, more toxic, less loyal, less reliable. Yeah. The typical rationality of cherry-picking.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 01:36 AM
2

Lmao. All these “boo n-count sucks” threads. Always from the same people. Always giving shitty life advice under the table. “If you don’t wanna be a loser who cares about n-count you should start having sexual early!!!” God we need a new glacial age. We have totally failed on this attempt at civilization.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 01:29 AM
1

Yeah the concept is simple. As is the concept for a unicorn. One horse, one horn. The problem is that your simple concept, like the unicorn, does not exist in reality. Men fuck sluts. But they don’t tell them “all I want is a nice, good girl”. Men start relationships with good girls. But they don’t miss the sluts. Men are also not looking to upgrade their nice girl into a slut if the chance presents itself. Last but not least, men desire the good girl just as much as they desired the slut. Furth…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 01:14 AM
2

My god poppy. This is just sad. “If it’s right for men to differentiate women’s value based on n-count, why is it not ok for women to give Chad a good time for free and allow Billy to get sloppy seconds in exchange for resources while treating him as if he should be thankful??” Is that really what you are asking??? What kind of fucked up, incoherent logic are you applying here? Wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 11:42 PM
1

Hahahaha “Men need to stop pursuing women who they don’t intend to wife” Coming from the same gender who complains about slut shaming. Imagine destroying the social balances that hold people’s sexuality in check... then complaining that you don’t like the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 11:58 AM
2

You are trying to explain accountability to the being on Earth for whom accountability is the most foreign of concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 11:56 AM
1

I don’t know why men are excused for lacking control over their sexuality If men are... so are women. this is really unprecedented in human history It is. And the reason is: women fought for a way out of responsibility for their sexuality. Imagine wanting out of one responsibility while berating the other sex for doing the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 11:55 AM
2

Best argument against abortion. You let a dick inside you, you are responsible for the outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 11:52 AM
0

Lmao. In a world where women have all the options to avoid being single mothers... single motherhood is still men’s fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 11:48 AM
2

It’s ok to be submissive/follower/beta. Life with those traits is easier if you are a woman than if you are a man. What is not ok is to be a doormat, insecure, depressive or codependent. Learn to love your femininity and the aspects of it that can be enhanced by your natural follower/submissive traits. Go visit RPWomen and ask for help and directions fixing your lack of self-love. Fixing your personal issues is paramount if you wanna be able to have healthy relationships in which you let the oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 01:08 AM
14

Mate, at 17 you have no business reporting somebody you are intentionally dating. Not on the grounds of age of consent. Specially when that somebody is 23. While it may be technically a crime, you would be literally being a moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 01:02 AM
5

While I concur with the thought behind your comment, that “you’re” in place of “your” and the use of “irregardless” are knocking the value down a few notches, brother. Not meaning to be an asshole here. Just offering constructive criticism. Proper command of language will definitely add to your value.
/r/RedPillWomen10/04/20 12:57 AM
1

Sometimes I have trouble deciding if comments like yours are low effort shitposting or actual products of a purposefully obtuse mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 10:29 PM
2

I wouldn't say so, not always, it's not like male sexual assault is all that common Hahahah. Fuck you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 01:59 PM
2

Lmao it’s so easy to spot the bitter manhaters in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 01:57 PM
2

why have the women’s rights movement at all? To gain privileges without having to pay the corresponding price or even accept the responsibility that comes with it. This is pretty observable with just a couple looks at history. Suffrage without service. No fault divorces. Tender Years doctrine. Representation quotas.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 08:54 AM
1

They understand words. They just don’t want to accept that women as a gender are nagging as fuck. This moron is the kind of person who argues “women in general” means “all women”. What did you expect??
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 08:50 AM
0

Lmao. Imagine being mad about times you didn’t even live in... because feminism has told you to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 08:29 AM
9

/thread
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/20 07:52 PM
3

I agree. Healthcare available to all should be a thing. I just feel sorry for all the people who think they will get the same care, but for free. There’s a reason why people with money leave their countries and go to the US to get medical treatment. Although, arguably, the people who experience the change will be t he biggest winners. The system will be very similar to the current, but they won’t have to pay. 10-15 years down the line will be a very different story.
/r/RedPillWomen08/04/20 03:55 PM
1

Hillary said it best. “The primary victims of war are all the women who lose their husbands and fathers and sons in combat”
/r/RedPillWomen08/04/20 11:57 AM
1

I get your point and seemingly nobody else wants to. If 70% of victims were women we would be facing a whole barrage of articles and twitter posts about how this proves it: society just hates women TM
/r/RedPillWomen08/04/20 11:53 AM
2

Consider that the two countries that have been hit the hardest by CoVID (Spain and Italy) have had single payer healthcare for decades. In particular, Spanish healthcare is often praised. We are the leading country in organ transplants. Our healthcare system has been absolutely clogged for weeks now. March 10th the govt asked citizens not to engage in activities that may cause need for medical assistance such as going hiking or practicing dangerous sports because of the little availability of me…
/r/RedPillWomen08/04/20 11:42 AM
3

How is this any sort of mystery to anyone? I can get food no problem. Good food too. And if I’m out and get hungry I’ll eat a crap Burger from McDonald’s to satiate that hunger and move on with my day. If I have a week where I’ve had to eat at McDonald’s 4 times because logistics I’ll complain about my shit fast food week. Yeah life is good for me. The rest of the things I have to do are more easily accomplished because fulfilling the basic need for food is not an issue even if at times I have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 03:26 PM
3

I’m genuinely curious about why normies would think my wife is stupid for not marrying when having children out of wedlock is pretty normie these days. Not particularly concerned that you/they talk shit or value our relationship as less than. We are ok with that. I mean, even if I take the previous comment at face value, the woman being stupid and me having lucked out literally spells that marriage is a bad business for men where only women have anything to gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 10:40 AM
1

It explains perfectly why all the “woman bashing”. You just don’t wanna see it. The explanation this person gave couldn’t be any more clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 12:03 AM
3

Why would men focused on casual sex create so much content bashing women on these topics? Because 99% of the content of TRP boards is aimed at former blue-pillers that need the idea of relationships, WAW, etc. beaten the fuck out of them. Convincing all the newcomers (of which there is a constant influx) to abandon the dream of a nice relationship takes probably 95% of the effort of TRP. The concepts are easily explainable and don’t need the existence of message boards. It’s enough with reading …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 12:02 AM
3

it's a fals equivalency to say that it's the same pairbond by choice as marriage is by government I guess the crux of the issue lies here. Neither of us consider ourselves a religious/spiritual person, yet we both agree that marriage should be a deal between two people and their respective faith. In our eyes, the government plays no role and we both share the opinion that it shouldn’t meddle in marriage. Thus, we consider ourselves bound by the same promises/commitments that any other couple adh…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/20 02:45 PM
2

It’s shorter than saying “the person I live with who is also the mother of my children” but then it's only fair to opt out of all the financial, legal, professional, logistical, social, cultural benefits if it, too This is where we disagree. We are bound by the same obligations as any married couple with children. The difference being that if we ever decided to break the arrangement the government has nothing to say about what we do regarding each other. If we do if after the kids are of age the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/20 01:00 PM
3

How is she stupid?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/20 12:14 PM
6

I’m in Spain. I have several lawyer friends who actually specialize in family law and not being married but having children is indeed akin to be being married for the purpose of family law, but not for the distribution of goods. What’s mine is mine. Most of the manosphere stories I see are actually about men selecting low value women then getting divorce raped. Men don’t need to be taught “lift”, “have frame”, “dread”. They need to be fucking taught to vet who they stick their dicks in. Even if …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/20 09:01 AM
4

From where I’m standing, if the legal benefit of marriage is the so very limited and specific scenario you propose, I’m gonna stick to my judgement of “raw deal for men”. Also saying this as somebody who has spent many years abroad.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/20 07:12 AM
3

Common-law marriage doesn’t apply in my country. Other than for tax purposes if you so wish, that is. Those nightmare stories of dudes getting divorce-raped just for cohabitating seem like an American fearmongering thing to me. What would having to move abroad have to do with anything? Not being confrontational. Genuinely curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/20 01:26 AM
0

If my “wife” and I had actually legally married it would have been at 38 when our second child was on the way. I am against marriage and she understands it’s a raw deal for men. Gotta say it’s the best kind of marriage. One of will rather than one of papers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/20 12:51 AM
1

Being alpha has nothing to do with physical strength. I know construction peons who are literal beasts and are still whipped by their thot wives and also scrawny engineers that are the epitome of all alpha traits. Not sure where you got this “physical labor is alpha, brains are beta” nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 02:30 PM
4

Of course they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 01:14 PM
5

If a relationship is the goal, then seems that men have it easier, no? No. What kind of world do you live on? Do women want relationships with dudes with whom they don’t want sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 01:12 PM
2

Sex has to inevitably happen if you want to maintain a relationship Ah yes. I don’t want to pay thousands for a car, but they need to be paid if I want to drive my own car. I’m definitely being coerced into spending money on a car. Lmao what a load of bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 01:35 PM
1

You don’t know what coercion means.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 01:32 PM
1

No. They can go hand in hand but they are not the same. ASD means the girl needs an excuse to why she put herself in the situation of being fucked. She is not a slut. She put herself in the situation for a different reason, but sex ended up happening. LMR means the girl will say no at the last moment to see if you back off but come and try again (meaning you are willing to “pay your dues” in order to gain access to sex with her). Personally I took to training women into not doing LMR by sending …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 01:28 PM
1

Lmao. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 01:27 PM
7

Lmao so true. What kind of bs argument are these people wielding? “I let him rape me cause I was afraid he would rape me if I refused” Fucking circular logic man.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 01:26 PM
1

Society forgiving and safeguarding women from shit choices doesn’t mean that the role they fulfill in society is negligible. I agree we should stop looking the other way when they fail to fulfill it tho. Also that we should stop encouraging shit behaviors and attitudes, let alone cater to them. men would be more valued for what they provide. That’s the crux of the issue. Our society will fail just like every other society before failed once it became complacent. For what it’s worth, thinking tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 01:07 PM
0

It depends at how you look at it. Would society have the same levels of homecare and nurturing if women didn’t do it? If it was all left to men, society would likely be a much harsher place to grow in. Men value contribution and productivity. Something children and elderly don’t provide. I do believe they contribute equally. In the sense that both genders contributions are complementary. The problem is all those idiots who think their gender would do better of let alone. Sadly, this means all th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 12:28 PM
1

Nice victimism.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 10:11 AM
1

Why don’t they eat cake?!?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 02:29 AM
0

But the fact that the virus can live on surfaces for up to 2 weeks, and the fact that it can be spread despite people not showing symptoms is what’s scary So... like flu?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 02:27 AM
13

Truer words have never been spoken. I will go as far as saying that when jealousy rears its ugly head, a man’s certainty in his wife’s utmost respect for him will assuage any feelings of lack of trust much more effectively than any certainty of love. Edit: as a consequence of this love-respect correlation, women should know better than to trust the words of a man who purportedly loves them but fails to respect them.
/r/RedPillWomen03/04/20 11:35 PM
3

Don’t bother. The solipsism is too strong. So used to all the commodities afforded to her that she never stopped to think where they even come from. “Assuming men don’t leech off the system”. As I said on my first comment: “just leave me alone while you continue to work to keep the world running” is how these morons function. “I reject your interference but demand your cooperation and compliance”
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 08:08 PM
3

Lmao. Bias. Women want a better life-work balance. Bias, I say! Women take more sick days and work less hours on average. Bias, I say! Women are less likely to take jobs with long hours or long commutes. Bias, I say! Firefighting. Police. Army. All lowered the standards so women could have a chance. But yeah. It’s all about bias. Even if we lowered the standards men would still come on top. Quotas are not even a lowering of standards. It’s literally a reservation of positions for those who refus…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 06:03 PM
3

Yes. That exact system. The one women wouldn’t be able to sustain alone (ergo they still need men to toil away). Also the system in which only women claim to want to be left alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 06:02 PM
4

Not women on welfare. Any woman who claims wanting to be left alone. Meanwhile, she also expects to be protected, provided for in case of need, propped up when the world around demands too much for a poor woman to face alone. You know. The things men used to do for their women. Learn basic critical thinking instead of parroting political talking points.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 05:08 PM
4

Hey, it’s fine if that is your personal position on the matter. But I can’t take that seriously from a society where women quotas are a thing that women pursued. Quite literally the epitome of whining because they wanted what others worked for.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 04:37 PM
6

Who is screeching about pickmes? Pickmes are precisely the opposite of what you describe. “Women who want men to leave them alone”. This sounds like you have a problem with both men and the women who don’t think most of them are “subpar and from the sewer”.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 04:22 PM
12

It’s not my objection. The person I replied to seems to think that these “disappointed men” would just do ok if they weren’t lazy slobs. The reality is that lazy slobs are abound. But the female lazy slobs keep being told they are wonderful unicorns who deserve everything, so the male lazy slobs are just not good enough for them. Her very own comment is the reality of the society we live in. “Men just need to step up and there wouldn’t be any problems”. Solipsistic, entitled, condescending. Trul…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 04:19 PM
12

I believe the vast majority of women sincerely want men to leave them alone Women want men to leave them alone because they have reached a position of thinking it’s not worth putting up with shit in order to receive from men what daddy government will provide in their place. Meanwhile, those same women also expect the pesky, annoying men to continue to toil away so that daddy government can afford to fulfill the role instead. “Women just want men to leave them alone” is the apex of solipsistic f…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 04:01 PM
10

90% of the women in the marketplace are not worth the effort. Even worse, society keeps encouraging them to be even less worthy of the effort because “gurl power”. Get ready for a generation of herbivore men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 03:53 PM
1

And you seem to be confusing actual rights, like the right to an education, with social norms that have nothing to do with infringing rights. Nobody was forbidding women from getting an education. You can argue “oh but most schools didn’t accept them”. Found your own. Fund your own. By your logic, all those “women only” businesses (like gyms) and functions (like so many pro-women events) are a form of oppression that feminism proudly engages in. You don’t see men being hypocritical enough to dem…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/20 07:57 PM
2

"I don't want to believe it so I'm not going to". You summed up this person’s position in that sentence. So deep in the own narrative that they don’t even register their own self-contradictions. “I don’t believe this because women can’t forcibly rape men” “Also forcibly rape is just a form of rape, there are many others”
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 05:32 PM
1

Yeah you have explained the “multiple forms of rape” to me and then everyone else. Yet, the impossibility for women to forcibly rape a man is the foremost reason why you doubt the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 04:55 PM
0

The first being lack of possibility. You expect me to believe the average woman can pin the average man down, hold him still, and successfully fuck him while he's actively struggling? You heard it here, folks. This is how rape happens. If victim didn’t struggle it was not rape, just something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 02:06 PM
1

Troll
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 02:04 PM
1

rumors only ruin a man's life if people are already suspicious of him Top quality shitposting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 02:03 PM
2

As in code for “isolated hole separate from all edges of surface”?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 09:54 PM
2

FWIW, French and Italian for the word “window “” are Fenêtre and Finestra, respectively.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 07:23 PM
1

AWALT and AMALT posts are only written by bitter, low value people. It takes a rather large amount of anger (and failure in the SMP) to think that one entire gender shares such morally questionable attributes as are presented here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/20 08:26 PM
22

As always, the behavior of women plays no role in this, of course. I know a fair amount of successful women. They all argue the same tired, old lines: “men are intimidated”, “their ego can’t handle it”. The truth is that these women, without exception, are insufferably condescending to the guys they date when these dudes happen to be on a lower scale of success. I have seen behaviors on them that actually made me wonder why the fuck they were even dating when they clearly resented the dudes. Yes…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 02:42 PM
2

Aah yes. It’s not like there are entire careers that are predicated in the existence of this sameness. Marketing, advertising, lotteries, hospitality... all fools errands. How is the same thing gonna work in the vast majority of people??
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/20 05:32 PM
1

XD Please go on. I have always been curious to know what kind of nonsense was being spewed in those gender courses. I mean... I always knew it was gonna be vapid unsubstantiated victimhood narrative but oh god. This is just golden. "Women experience poverty at higher rates than men Lol what Men receive more income than women from all sources, including wages and salaries All you have to do is work the same hours as men and take the same amount of days off. investment, retirement Hmmm. Invest bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 08:53 PM
3

Each individual is most definitely unique. It’s just that your “it doesn’t work on everybody specially women” is the kind of idiotic thing one says when they are convinced every woman is a unique special little flower/unicorn hybrid. Full of uniqueness and complexity. The reality is that most people are almost the same and things that work or don’t work do so almost universally. By all means argue that “Everyone is different” but don’t be a snowflake dumbass adding “spesshially wamen”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 08:46 PM
2

Slaves and broodmares XD Gender studies is a goldmine of comedy
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 07:44 PM
4

It’s hilarious how women all think they are unique. “It doesn’t work for everyone. Specially women” Because, you know. Women are much more different from other women than men are from other men. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 04:38 PM
3

Shocker. Employers don’t want women who will prefer to attend the kid’s piano recital than stay in the office til midnight but want men who have been raised with the idea that a man’s obligation is to care for his family, which makes them both more likely to work hard and put up with more bs for the sake of providing. Who would have guessed. “Booo gender roles!” Never mind it’s women who enforce those gender roles by 1) selecting providers 2) leaving men who fail to provide up to the woman stand…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 04:32 PM
2

I know my mom went with my dad because he had a give-no-fucks attitude paired with money. Not that he was a bad boy, but he wouldn’t have fitted the nice guy stereotype. He certainly told my mum to fuck off when she complained he hadn’t called her after their first date. They are 70 now so we are talking 50s dating/courtship norms. I have to say I was fucking lucky to grow up with a fairly RedPill couple of parents. Even my mother taught me that the best way to get girls is to pay no attention t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 12:57 PM
1

It’s right there. In between the parenthesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 11:36 AM
0

Go on hating sister. You are every bit as bigoted as he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/20 08:53 AM
2

Combining earning and caring roles is challenging, so women are more likely than men to reduce their work hours or take time out of the workforce to care for family Lmao. Whoever wrote that pulled causation literally out of their ass. Men don’t take time off work to care for family because it is a suicidal bet for men. The day position and status stops having so much weight in how women select men I’m pretty sure many of them will gladly stop dealing with office bs to stay home and enjoy their k…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 11:21 PM
2

Lol. Literally years of feminists lobbying for men’s rights to be removed in their favor (due process and presumption of innocence). Ah yeah. I forgot. People like you don’t take women seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 11:17 PM
8

Lmao Especially by misogynistic men like you who think we're all less than. Dude is literally responding to a comment of “women are not shitty enough to do the things men do”. But sure, go ahead and call out his misogyny. You may have nothing to lose Attempt to shame number 1 Women could (and have done) violent things if they wanted to, but they don't; it's mostly men Sound a like you think one gender is “less than”. I wonder how many women would still want to fuck a guy after knowing he posts t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 11:15 PM
-1

Quality shitpost right here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 08:29 PM
3

Without fail the problem is that she's completely blind to the favors, help, support, charity, privilege etc that she's already receiving I had to teach this to a former gf. She once complained that, even tho most tasks were split fairly, she did more dishes than me. Never mind that I cooked 90% of the meals... Apparently that didn’t count cause I’m the one who can cook. So I said “ok no problem. From now on we split dishes equally. One day I do them after lunch, you dinner, next day we swap. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 08:25 PM
6

It’s Lilith. Queen of the indefensible BS positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/20 06:28 PM
3

Who cares? The argument is not whether Chad or Virgin are this or that. The argument is “why be repulsed by sluts when a prude could also be settling for you”.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 11:35 PM
1

Omg. Yeah whataboutism is great. Lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 11:33 PM
1

Whataboutism.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 08:35 PM
3

I don’t think you understand any of the concepts you are speaking of in this post, but ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 08:34 PM
2

no women live in the fantasy womrld abotu men that young modern men apparently live in about women
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 04:29 PM
3

Cheating is in the picture for everyone. Desire is in the picture for everyone. Don’t poison the well. The base premise tries to compare the act of getting it on with multiple women and the act of window shopping for a better man. They are barely comparable and the societal reaction to trying to curb either behavior is completely opposite for one and the other. By all means continue your charade about how women just handle it better than men or how they are more realistic if you so desire, but t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 03:45 PM
9

Even if that was the question, the anger comes from the vast difference in difficulty of men fighting against their woman trying to find a better partner vs women trying to fight against their man getting it on with multiple women. More so when the attempts at limiting hypergamy are condemned as “controlling” and “insecure” while society does the work of attempting to limit polygamy by frowning upon infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 03:10 PM
0

Agreed. The caveat is that even if men only care about what their woman is like, hypergamy y is still in the picture for literally every woman. The base premise is flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 03:06 PM
2

All women can engage in hypergamy, only a few men are able to engage in polygyny. Why would women be upset?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 03:04 PM
1

I disagree. Incels do have options. Many incels failed to do the work to avoid inceldom. People are not born incel. I have ugly friends with girlfriends. Dudes who weight 300 pounds and are married. Are their gfs espectacular? No. They are well below average. But those dudes are happily paired up. If a dude gets to the cat-lady age and remains an incel it is because he failed to do his duty and either work himself out of inceldom or lower his fucking standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 01:20 PM
2

I called the solipsism in the argument right in my first comment. I’m n out surprised she doesn’t understand the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 01:11 PM
2

Nice answer. Deep boat neck cuts with short sleeves work wonders for rectangular shapes too. Tight fit and flare are your friends. Source: dated a personal shopper for a while. I know way too much about female clothing.
/r/RedPillWomen21/03/20 12:37 AM
-1

I don’t think TRP argues all women can easily get a man. All women any TRP advice may apply to? yes. Absolutely all women? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 12:22 AM
-2

In not sure how you come to the conclusion that cat ladies choose to be cat ladies. I’d wager most of them just failed to catch a man. A cat lady is the female equivalent to an incel really.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 12:21 AM
3

Yeah I follow your argument but I don’t understand it. You want empathy for having only two bad options from dudes who are not afforded any options? “Girl I’m starving. I have nothing to eat”. “I’m starving too and the sandwich i have is not the one I would like”
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 11:30 PM
5

Oh boi. I understand. You don’t wanna rock the boat. Enjoy your turn.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 11:21 PM
1

But one voluntarily engages in having sex. Not sure why you expect empathy for that sex being unfulfilling or a bad choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 11:20 PM
7

My girl is a solid 8 she prefers being in the company of men Allow me to translate, directly from womanese, what your gf meant when she told you this: ”I like to lead a social life that allows me to constantly window-shop for an upgrade.” Dude.... red flag red flag red flag 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 11:16 PM
0

Not sure where your argument lies here. You are demanding empathy or denouncing a lack of it... about an experience that is supposedly void of meaning or reward for those women but one they nevertheless engaged in voluntarily?? The solipsism and lack of accountability for one’s own actions is through the roof in that argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 11:11 PM
1

The question remains: if you are not gonna take my word, why bother asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 04:55 PM
5

I got banned for saying I was against modern feminism.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/20 03:14 PM
7

This is a good definition of that sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/20 03:13 PM
1

Yeah I kept telling my doctor it wasn’t UTI. I was just having very stimulated blood circulation in my urethra.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/20 03:07 PM
1

Asking a question just to conclude that the answer you receive must be untrue because it doesn’t align with what you hoped they would respond is not a sign of good mental health. Why do you even bother asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 02:52 PM
1

Girl. Not all of us subscribe to an anger ideology, be it TRP or feminism. Not all of us who have opinions in favor or against things are “mad”. I understand you are. It’s evident by your inability to follow simple conversations and your need to turn them into confrontation on matters that you made up, about offenses that you imagined. Please take care of your mental health. You are borderline unhinged.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 12:08 PM
1

I get that from men who bitch about paying for women's lifestyle through child support. You literally said it “benefits the woman” yourself. Are you OK that women can opt out of taking care of a child when an unwanted pregnancy occurs? I have already told you multiple times that I am perfectly ok with abortion. You just keep thinking I’m not because I’m using it as evidence of the privilege women enjoy no matter how much they bitch about their oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 10:59 AM
1

Lol you need to spend less time on the Internet. Who has mentioned child support at all?? Not to even mention that you just admitted that you see child support as being “for the benefit of the woman”. yes, you do hate it when women exercise their right to an abortion when it "benefits" the woman. Where do you get this from? You can't tell me you're for a woman's right to choose when it "forces" a man to pay child support. Do you want more rope?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 05:57 AM
1

So yes, you do hate it when women exercise their right to an abortion when it "benefits" the woman. Where do you get this from? I already told you hours ago that it was clear that you were making this assumption, and I also told you that you were wrong. You are very clearly projecting your anger about your disadvantages on things men “benefit” from and it is all making you think everyone is just as petty and miserable as you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 11:03 PM
1

We keep going back and forth because no matter how many times I tell you I don’t give a fuck about abortion you keep screeching “but it’s muh right!!!” I already told you “yeah it is”. But you keep coming back with the same tune, convinced that I have some problem with it. You clearly have something against abortion because men cannot get one. I literally told you I have nothing against it in my last comment. You replied “I never said you did”. Now you are saying it. You don’t seem like a very b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 10:29 PM
1

Hence the fact that you don’t have the responsibility that men have in having to become a parent after an unwanted pregnancy. By all means keep reaffirming your freedom of choice if that’s what floats your boat. I still have to argue against it, yet you keep repeating it. Why have you convinced yourself that it upsets me? Are you dealing with something?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 09:05 PM
1

You seem to be wanting to see wamen’s oppreshun everywhere. Nobody objected to abortions. We were arguing different responsibilities, somebody claimed there were none while pointing out precisely the one that is derived from the existence of abortions, and you got mad cause how do we dare use abortion to argue against wamen.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 07:42 PM
1

I never said I had a problem with that. I was merely pointing it out as the prime example of responsibilities women don’t have that men do. I thank you. The entertainment value of giving people rope and letting them hang themselves helps with the coronavirus boredom.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 03:01 PM
1

Thank you. You just conceded that women, because they are women, don’t face the responsibility of having to be parents when an unwanted pregnancy happens. Instead, they get options, granted by our society.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 01:31 PM
1

So... abortion is a right.... because biology?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 09:55 AM
1

Men have the exact same options women would have if abortion wasn’t legal. So explain to me how this “bodily right” is such, given that the options available without it have just been deemed fair and sufficient by you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 02:52 AM
1

You just repeated a bunch of buzzwords without refuting my argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 02:31 AM
1

Who else's concern would it be? Mine. I am learning to rollerblade so I need to know if the gay dude in my class scraping a knee is a health hazard. I changed my mind. please continue. Your bs is entertaining. Apparently my parental status is the business of Karen because precautions, but other bigoted questions are the exclusive domain of professionals and intimate partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 02:29 AM
1

Ah yes. I always take precautions and ask gay dudes if they got AIDS. It’s not bigotry. Just concern. Precaution over feelings amirite? /s Please get lost with your apology of bigotry
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 12:08 AM
1

Nobody said it wasn’t. They asked about responsibilities women don’t have that men do: unwantedly becoming a parent without options is one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 12:04 AM
4

It’s funny because she is a fucking bigot. How does this elude you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 09:27 PM
1

If men don’t want children get a vasectomy or be willing to deal with the consequences You just outlined the perfect example of responsibility men have and women don’t. Voluntary abortion wouldn’t be legal if women were held to the same level of responsibility. “Have your tubes tied or be willing to deal with the consequences” are the options you would be given.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 09:21 PM
11

Lmao. Imagine a society arguing that women not getting the jobs they want is a problem... but men not being able to fulfill a basic biological imperative is no issue. What a fucking moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/20 06:41 PM
6

I agree that the role that women play in enforcing gender norms is underappreciated and rejected as an acceptable topic of discussion in polite society. Ask any woman refusing to admit to this responsibility about the following scenario: Two couples. One traditional (man breadwinner, housewife). One “modern” (woman breadwinner, SAH dad). Both couples stay married from age 25 to age 45, when they divorce. Who, of all 4, has the hardest time getting a new romantic partner? When they eventually con…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/20 01:34 AM
0

Lmao. Most dudes will fail at trying to rack a body count even with women well below their league. Sex workers? Have you ever seen anyone praise men for having fucked many many prostitutes?? Wtf are you on and how can I get some?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 10:39 PM
1

No. I’m saying we deal with murdery dudes but let bitchy gals run rampant. Can’t you read? Also whatever you find my comment to be is fully irrelevant because you, as any other individual, are irrelevant to the grand scheme of things. Lmao the solipsism.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 01:07 PM
0

Pushy entitled fat girls are bitchy; pushy entitled men can get murder-y. We put murdery men in jail but allow bitchy women to carry on so I guess OP is right. Women are worse for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 09:18 PM
8

Thats why the hotter the women the less likely he is to cheat on her. Not the same person who said this was baloney, but it is. For every super hot woman you see anywhere, there is a guy, somewhere, for whom her hotness no longer factors into whether he will fuck other women on the side.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 09:07 PM
0

More to the point, why is it my responsibility to do so? Imagine not wanting responsibility over correctly vetting who you engage in your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 06:46 PM
5

What about equally sharing responsibilities and benefits? Women don’t want equal responsibilities. No matter how much they say it. They still want men’s protection and preferential treatment. Women also want the benefits that society affords men while keeping the other, different benefits that society only affords to them. All this “equally sharing benefits and responsibilities” is probably the biggest display of solipsism and double standards that the current western culture is engaged in. Disc…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 05:37 PM
7

Control, dominance, but her windpipe is totally fine. I have absolutely no desire to hurt my partner. Same. I’ll dominantly hold her neck all day long if that’s what she’s into but if she starts demanding to be actually choked I’m gonna freak the fuck out.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 10:52 AM
1

Yeah I was typing more for the sake of onlookers than for you two. Just trying to sum the concept up.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 04:04 PM
14

If it is eating at you, you need to bring it up. You can’t have a marriage if you can’t discuss these things and it is relevant enough to be discussed. Take it as an exercise in both going into your future with a clear conscience and expectations and as a means to vet what he really is like. My money is on him really, really not caring at all unless he is a massive hypocrite and not marriage material at all.
/r/RedPillWomen06/03/20 03:42 PM
8

he should feel badly for making you feel guilty daily I don’t think this is what the OP says is happening at all.
/r/RedPillWomen06/03/20 03:39 PM
8

Now, as a man, go and get your spiritual, mental, and emotional needs met by a friend and see if it means nearly as much to you as if you had this needs met by your sexual partner. Beautifully put. Also, not a woman but I doubt it is any different for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 03:34 PM
1

FWIW, double leg amputees can still have sex. Intercourse is not the only thing one can do. The intimacy and desire to please and enjoy your partner doesn’t die just because accidents. One may decide not to engage in a relationship with somebody with whom sex can be that much of a challenge from the get go, but stick to a relationship in which it becomes a challenge after the relationship was started. See my previous comment regarding defining condition vs. indispensable condition.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 03:32 PM
3

You two are arguing different things. Or the same things from different perspectives. While sex is not the only defining aspect of a relationship (your argument), it is most definitely a condicio sine qua non for a relationship to exist (the other person’s argument). Barring very rare circumstances, both things are true for 99.99% of healthy relationships between couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 03:29 PM
14

I just saw a meme the other day exactly about this. What women think men want: (photo of sexy lady in lingerie and sexy pose or something like that) What men really want: (photos of dude hugging his girl, chilling with her on couch, playing video games, having beers with friends). The amount of posts about sex really makes me see how many incels and sexually unsuccessful men plague this sub. Yes sex is important. Yes a dead bedroom is probably the worst thing that can happen to a relationship. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 03:22 PM
0

How is it news that mainstream media and politics cater to the female imperative cause that’s what is politically correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 05:08 PM
6

Nice post.
/r/RedPillWomen03/03/20 11:11 PM
5

Wholesome. I wish you and your family a happy life.
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/20 04:55 PM
5

Whoever argued that girls go all out in explicitly and directly approaching “attractive guys” is a bitter sack of sadness. Girls do exactly as you describe. Indirect approaches, excuses for conversation/proximity, short interactions initiated by them, eye contact and the likes. I guess there could be the occasional thot that goes around telling hot dudes how she wants to suck their dicks behind the dumpster or whatever. You never know. But even describing this supposed mega thot already looks li…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 04:49 PM
1

I don’t think it’s just approaching girls. I have worked in the US for a short while and a couple times somebody random started talking to me at the bar and bought me a drink. It sounds a bit like a cultural thing. No, it wasn’t gay dudes hitting on me. One of the times the dude was there with his wife/gf and I very much doubt they were looking to hook up.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 11:43 AM
1

Awww. Did somebody have lazy parents?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 10:52 AM
1

Yeah sorry. On mobile it is sometimes hard to keep track of who is who.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 10:51 AM
1

Enough with the politics. You are the one complaining about capitalism. How many kids you make is up to you, but its also up to you to OWN YOUR ACTIONS. Indeed. Which is why I want inheritance to be a thing. So that my kids can benefit from me owning up to my own actions, and the kids of the lazy motherfuckers don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 09:11 AM
2

That sounds like responsibility for parents. Shocker. Have a kid, be responsible for it. Damn, capitalism really be cruel. Actually, it is equality of opportunity. Manufactured equality is equality of outcome. Regardless of what I do, my family gets the same as the family next door, who hasn’t worked a day i their life. Why even bother. Communists are the laziest fucking people in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 08:13 AM
1

Well, people can't be responsible for what their parents did when these people were small kids or were not even conceived. Where do you get that the kids are responsible for what the parents did? If your parents didn’t do shit, you start with zero. If your parents work their asses off, you start with plus something. But what I meant is a society where isolated families are a thing of the past. Ah yes. Equality of outcome for all. The trademark of the lazy and the untalented.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 01:27 AM
3

I agree, a man should be able to walk away from a child anytime with no support if he gives up custody No. You don’t get to be part of the decision to bring a life into the world then give up half way through. Either you decide you want to have a kid or you don’t. If you don’t, give up your rights and obligations within time for the woman to make a choice whether to abort or go ahead as a single parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 12:59 AM
2

I actually have an opinion that inheritance should not be a thing Ah yes. Upon losing their respective parents, my kid should receive exactly the same as that other kid whose parents never managed to hold a semi-decent job while me and my wife worked our asses off and made sound financial decisions. Makes perfect sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 12:57 AM
0

For hundreds of years, women who got knocked up had no protection whatsoever, it's just now we got that end of the contract fulfilled. The very institution of marriage is exactly what society created to prevent men from impregnating women and not taking care of those children. Adultery is heavily frowned upon because it breaks both the vows and the intent of the institution in the first place. Why are you talking such nonsense? let the one who suffers the highest consequences decide. Who are you…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 07:45 PM
1

You want something out of a sexual encounter and want to avoid something that you know could be a consequence of the action Great argument against abortion. If you choose to do it despite the risk you have to take responsibility for preventing the unwanted situation Another one. Or what about STDs? Is that as well always the woman’s responsibility? Or do you think both should be responsible in avoiding unwanted complications? That’s exactly what people do. They protect themselves. Nobody asks th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 05:26 PM
1

Lol no. Always good to get some comedy on sundays.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 05:22 PM
1

Lmao. “Whoever asks the other person out pays” cop out. “You don’t have to date” cop out. “Men insist on doing it” cop out. Hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 04:36 PM
1

It’s men’s right to take care of the children after the divorce provided they wanted said children in the first place. It really is that simple. If you have to carry the baby for 9 months it is your problem and your responsibility to take care of not getting pregnant. You don’t get to say “my body, my choice” and also “my choice, your responsibility” If you hold unilateral decision power, then you have unilateral responsibility. But ah, that’s a “contract” you don’t like. So of course it is fine…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 11:24 AM
1

Since you don’t account for how you need a man when you make an unilateral decision to abort, men don’t need you to make an unilateral decision not to take responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 12:49 AM
1

That sounds fine. Let me know when women stop telling men to act deferentially to them, feeding men lies about what women are like and stop using daddy government to force men to comply with women’s interests if they deviate from “the contract”. Example: remember men never signed the contract about how they need to take responsibility when you, a fully capable and functional being with complete agency, get pregnant. Stop using daddy government to bully men. Suddenly people not following contract…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 12:03 AM
1

Ah yes. The one that tells men that what they need to do is act more like women. Best movement ever. Can’t wait for it to tour in my city.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 11:38 PM
0

Have you ever heard of a girl complain that her man was being too clingy? No. This dude lives in stereotype land. What a load of crap. Please go out on the street and meet real people. Explain to me why all the married men in my family have cheated on their wives yet none of the women have cheated on their husbands? The men in your family suck. And the women are probably ugly. No relation to cheating, but your life looks like it’s really shit. I know men like to date multiple girlfriends, most w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 11:33 PM
1

The fact that so many people think that the part of “the contract” that women are not fulfilling is the sex part just comes to show how deeply BP the mainstream culture is. “The contract” used to be an exchange in deference and protection for loyalty and respect, which used to be enforced by means of social pressure. Othering and ostracizing those who broke it (adulterers being the most clear example). Modern culture did away with women’s obligations in “The Contract” because apparently they wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 10:55 PM
1

Mainstream media
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/20 11:13 PM
3

Also trp: society will collapse if women have choices we need to bring back socially enforced monogamy and 1960s gender roles. LMAO. People seriously need to start actually reading TRP instead of regurgitating the nonsense they have been fed about it in MSM. Ability to distinguish shitposting from actual TRP ideology is a plus
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/20 05:42 PM
9

“Dancing monkey” is a lie (it’s called flirting and everyone does it) Oh boy. OP flirts by being a dancing monkey. Now this post makes a lot of sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/20 05:39 PM
1

The hamstering, part 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/20 02:30 AM
3

I have been reading your convo with Smoogs and your knowledge of what red pill is goes only slightly past the misogyny labels that it receives from MSM and blue pill leaning communities. You don’t understand what TRP entails when it comes to hypergamy, “dread” or pretty much anything. You are like that obnoxious kid in class who has no fucking clue but thinks he is smarter than anyone else because his dad is a teacher. You are getting by here on borrowed knowledge, stumbling your way from one in…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 11:54 PM
2

Guess we should tell RPW that their entire community is based on a lie RPW don’t look for men who follow the “plate and next”, pump and dump strategy. RPW look for men who exhibit the traits of having ditched the blue pill. Dominance, assertion, leadership of the woman in their life among others. RPW simply don’t want a BP soyboy that has been brainwashed to the point where he constantly needs their approval, self deprecates and emasculates and himself in a futile endeavor to show how much of an…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 09:06 PM
1

Fear of women? Wut?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 08:59 PM
3

Yeah guns are a lot of fun
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 08:47 PM
16

The hamstering never fails to entertain
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 07:36 PM
7

Bro get off the porn. It’s never too late.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 01:02 PM
5

This sounds like terribly boring and unenthusiastic sex lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 01:01 PM
1

This guy knows his logistics
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 11:22 PM
2

I do 100% of carrying babies so yeah, you need to show me you’re not useless upfront. Free Womanese-English translation of today: I have vagina ergo I have inherent value
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 11:19 PM
1

I like to stare stone-faced at my date without saying anything to assert dominance Same. If they say they are going to the toilet I swiftly pee on their ankles before they have time to get up. To mark the territory.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 11:15 PM
5

No. I don’t know anyone who would be happy being treated like less than an equal. You must know very few women. Pretty much anyone who tells you “chivalry is nice” is telling you they don’t want to be treated as equals.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 11:13 PM
1

Always have cheap first dates, and be quick and decisive. A few bucks is a cheap price to pay to learn about someone This is pretty much everything a dude needs to know about the financials of first dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 11:11 PM
1

Lmao the confirmation bias is hilarious. “What usually happens”. Do you have a source for this? How do you know how many people lie and get caught? Has Depp’s name been dragged through the mud Very much so lmao. He was kicked from PotC, for starters. despite the fact that this was a mutually violent relationship? Lolz. “Yes officer. I was punching him. Well, not punching. Just hitting. And then he pushed me away. It was mutual violence, as you can see.”
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 09:01 PM
1

I already pointed you to how Amber Heard benefited from her “claims” (aka accusations). If you wanna argue “oh but she got caught and now she is unhirable” that’s fine. It doesn’t disprove the point of “there’s gain to be made from making accusations”. But hey. By all means please teach us all about evidence and logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 08:06 AM
1

Bro if you have an argument to make just make it. Although, in my experience, those who keep asking leading questions trying to land in some sort of gotcha rarely have anything intelligent to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 07:35 AM
1

Is your argument that people won’t steal because there is nothing to gain... if they get caught? My god. Not even pointing out the stupidity in your argument is enough for you to see it. You continue to double down.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 02:11 AM
1

Let us know when the credits start rolling at the end of your revenge fantasy. We need to get rid of all the spilled popcorn.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 09:50 PM
3

It’s lack of niceness from other men, Facepalm
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 09:47 PM
2

You mean how she became an ACLU ambassador for women’s rights and used her allegations to paint herself as a “spokesperson against violence”? Oh gee. Let’s argue that people won’t lie because they have nothing to gain by pointing out people who gained from lying. Dude you are a true genius. Smh.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 09:28 PM
2

Men still don’t give a fuck that she is a homewrecker even after what she did to Johnny. They do care, however, that she is an abuser who got praised solely on the grounds of being a woman throwing accusations. They also care that, after evidence is out, she is en still being excused of her behavior solely on the grounds of being a woman. Well I guess stupid men will still agree with Amber because vagina and being good ally and what not. But at least your position is clear. Those being abused by…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 06:45 PM
2

Men don’t give a fuck that she is a homewrecker. No you don’t. I don’t think you understand what a strawman is.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 06:35 PM
1

There may be a correlation somewhere but I doubt it’s as simple as “if you have low libido you are a low-T man”.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 05:12 PM
0

Oh darling. It’s not a “men ignore red flags” thread either. You just mad that PoundMeToo has taken a blow so you keep trying to make it all about men‘s mistakes. Imagine dismissing DV as “meh that’s just wamen ignoring red flags”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 05:10 PM
6

Low T and low libido are different things bro. I had a period of low libido and my T levels were still above average. I checked. With doctors.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 04:41 PM
3

Lilith you really need to get over how Amber Heard has been exposed as the piece of shit she is and dealt a terrible blow to the “wamen are victims” and “always believe wamen” narratives.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 04:40 PM
2

If a stay at home husband actually did all of that for me, I’d be real happy with him. But I would still end up fucking some other dude who didn’t do all the feminine chores. I just like to speak nonsense while disregarding the mountains of evidence that show that the more housework a man does, the less masculine he is viewed as by his partner. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 04:35 PM
-1

Another feminist lie. “Wamen were not even allowed to get educations or even workkkkkk”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 04:31 PM
1

Yeah that was me. Still not seeing where I said anything about your arguments being “untrue” when what I explained is how they are misguided. First off, not what I said. It is exactly what you said, just with extra steps. Your argument is just a huge circle around “just shut up and believe women and stop trying to shine a light in liars”. “Making accusations of crimes that are difficult to prove is dangerous because victims are automatically not believed and also look at how many cases go unrepo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 04:21 PM
1

Yeah it’s almost like those who argue “believe all women just means... the regular judicial process” are entirely full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 02:10 PM
3

Ah yes. We all saw how Amber Heard was questioned over her accusations and not at all backed by the entirety of MSM. Yeah she was definitely assumed to be lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 02:09 PM
3

Nah. Weinstein got a rush of wielding his power over these mumbnuts. Paying wouldn’t have done it for him. What baffles me is the concept of agreeing to “suck my dick and I’ll give you work” being rape. I honestly fail to see how it is any different from “fuck me and I’ll give you money” aka prostitution. Not that any of it makes Weinstein any less of a scumbag or Hollywood any less of a shit place and industry but I find it funny that these women could have walked away, yet decided to go ahead.…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 11:55 AM
2

I never said you are wrong about the system. You are wrong about the motives and connections you make from its nature. Taking the reality that rape/assault is hard to get a conviction for (hence the pointlessness in pressing charges most of the time and the pursuit of plea deals) and using it as an explanation of why “victims have nothing to gain from lying” is making an emotional argument with no basis in reality. People lie and that’s why we shouldn’t automatically believe anyone. “But look at…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 11:49 AM
3

The actual argument to be made is “how can you argue accusers have nothing to gain when so many accusers have clearly gained a lot?”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 10:51 AM
1

For those unfamiliar with the American legal system, the burden of proof is on the accuser, not the accused. In most if not all states, rape is a felony crime that requires the state to charge your rapist, and in something like 75% of cases, the state does not pursue charges or pursues reduced charges in order to get a plea bargain You must be utterly unfamiliar with the American legal system. Most rape cases boil down to he said, she said, which means there’s no way to get a conviction under du…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 10:47 AM
52

Even though I am against porn use, I don’t think your bf has done anything wrong. It’s a matter of personal choice, just like I am against unhealthy food too but I don’t think people who indulge in it are bad or damaged. This said, it has all clearly stirred something in you, part insecurity part feeling of betrayal. First I would weigh how much of it is rooted in insecurity and how much is rooted in an actual belief that porn equals cheating. You are perfectly entitled to thinking that some typ…
/r/RedPillWomen16/02/20 10:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter