TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

imironman Archive

View 4 posts and 52 comments by imironman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The difference with woman and coat hanger abortions was that the harm they were inflicting was on themselves. The drug this man gave his girlfriend is not a light one, women have died taking it. I think we can all agree that the laws prohibiting assault, poisoning, ect are valid?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:29 PM
1

I agree 100%. Desperate people do desperate things, and putting men in a situation like this sets them up to do something terrible like this. I feel no sympathy for any person (male or female) that would dump a baby in a dumpster or kill their own child. These are fucked up people, obviously. Safe haven laws should apply to both men and women, to save the babies (already born) who may end up in dumpsters otherwise (desperate people, desperate actions).
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:24 PM
16

While I agree that there should be an option for men in this situation, I think its ridiculous to claim that the woman in this case is not a victim, or the he "rightly fought back". Should it be a murder charge? No. But he DID poison her. The law should change, but that doesn't mean people can just take it in their own hands like that.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:54 PM
2

Never once did I say that these things would justify killing another human being (in fact, I pretty explicitly stated: "If one were to assume that the fetus is a human being [...] then none of these would matter, they don't justify "murder"). While I do not believe that abortion is murder, that is not the matter being discussed. I also don't agree with "manning up", "keeping it in your pants" or any such foolishness. I strongly agree that there should be some option of financial abortion or lega…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:59 AM
2

Regardless of your stance on abortion, pregnancy isn't only a risk of "making you bloated, making you fart and want to eat ice cream and pickles for a few months" and making such a ridiculous statement only weakens your argument. Pregnancy changes a woman's body, permanently. There are major risks including gestational diabetes, ectopic pregnancy, high blood pressure, extreme fatigue, Hyperemesis gravidarum, Preeclampsia, ect ect. While not all of these are life threatening, they certainly have …
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:10 PM
10

I would probably be afraid about going out alone at night in a city too... as I think would most men. Afraid of being robbed or assaulted. It's just not something that makes a lot of sense to do. I just don't think there are rapists lurking around every corner as this would have you believe. And slurping sounds, really? Where do you live/work? I've never encountered more than whistles (which I'm not gonna lie, most of the time I'm just flattered), but yeah... slurps would creep me out a bit.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:55 AM
52

What the actual fuck? As a woman: 1) Rape is not that prevalent and certainly doesn't occupy my every thought 2) PEOPLE, men and women both, install deadbolts, don't go out alone at night, and avoid certain neighborhoods because that's fucking common sense. 3) While I'm not trying to belittle rape, to say it is the worst thing that can happen to someone is just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:11 PM
1

I was thinking that myself! I was a little hesitant to post the question here but I figured it was where I was most likely to get a fair, honest response (not just one automatically in my favor cuz I happen to have boobs). I was really impressed with the responses!
/r/MensRights24/03/12 06:39 PM
1

While I appreciate the advice on the financial side of things, I don't want to take him to court. Going to the financial support calculator for our province shows that they would require him to pay FAR more than I need, and far more than I consider fair. I don't want to gouge him. I get lots of help from him (well, from his parents and siblings) in the form of hand-me down clothes, moral support, ect and its not something I'd want to put at risk by being petty. As far as trusting him with my dau…
/r/MensRights24/03/12 05:50 PM
1

Bahahaha poor Randus... Reddit will eat you alive for spelling errors. Thanks for the support though! My baby girl is lucky to have such a sweet uncle! disclaimer saying nice things to you on reddit does not extend to real life.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 05:44 PM
7

Hahaha Its good to hear! I have a lot of (male) friends who've gotten majorly screwed over for child support and I don't want to do that to him. He's a great dad and we have a really good relationship. I mean, were not friends or anything (obviously) but try to be considerate of each other. I just don't wanna screw up a good thing over money I could get by without if I had to, its taken a lot of patience and putting our own feelings aside (on both sides, including his current girlfriend who had …
/r/MensRights21/03/12 12:44 AM
8

Our expenses and incomes are fairly similar. He makes a bit more than I do, but has a second child as well. Honestly, at this point I don't even think its worth it to bring up with him. I don't want to cause a fight where there isn't one and I can I can get by without it, just mildly annoyed that I have to.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 12:33 AM
20

I will never take him to court over money, reasonable or not. My daughter is not a commodity to be fought over or drug through a court system. I just don't want to even bring it up with him and cause drama where there isn't any now if he could see me as in anyway being unreasonable.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 12:31 AM
8

Our financial situation is very similar. He makes a bit more money than I do (about $500/mth) but he does have a second child to support as well. As far as debating the truth behind me statement that my pregnancy was planned, there's not much point in me arguing it with you. There's obviously no way for me to prove it to you so take my word for it or don't.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 12:29 AM
2

At least its encouraging to see that this is the top comment
/r/MensRights28/02/12 11:46 PM
3

Affirmative action causes men to question the merits of women's successes-even legitimately hard working, talented women. As a woman, I 100% agree with this. Not only does affirmative action work on the presumption that a woman is incapable of receiving a job based on her own merits (I would be just as offended to get a job based on the fact that I'm a woman as I would be to be denied one for the same reason), but regardless of how she does in that position the men working there will never take …
/r/MensRights28/02/12 11:24 PM
1

By fighting against equal custody presumption feminism places more of >the burden of child care on women, which make it harder for women to be career oriented. This exactly. Another major problem feminism creates for woman with the assumption that women will have full custody is that is creates a social stigma for those women that actually do want to have 50/50 custody with the child's father. Because its not the norm society automatically condemns any woman with a 50/50 arrangement. The automat…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 11:22 PM
1

The more I read this thread the more this issue comes up. I agree that it would be a terrible position for a man to be in, but forcing a woman through a pregnancy she doesn't want is bound to end with a child that has issues related to that pregnancy (fts, ect) as the woman is far less likely to take care of herself or receive proper pre-natal care. Perhaps the inequalities on either side do balance out if financial abortion were an option.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 07:09 PM
1

hahaha I should know better than to fuck up spelling on reddit!
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:09 PM
1

Valid point, thank you.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:07 PM
1

Thank You! This is exactly what I was looking for!
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:05 PM
2

Not offended at all! I certainly agree that the system is faulty. Men are given almost no options and get screwed over regardless of what they do. Don't wanna be a dad? Too bad, pay her all your money. Wanted to be a dad and want to see your kids? Too bad, pay her all your money. I've seen way to many male friends and family members screwed over by a system that is fundamentally broken. That being said, of all the options available for a woman faced with an unwanted pregnancy, none of them are e…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:50 AM
0

No, I think that's certainly a possible way for it to work. It would still create problems in the event that birth control was used and a pregnancy occurred anyway, but it would eliminate the small (jesus, I hope its small!) percentage of women who deliberately get pregnant knowing that the man will be legally responsible regardless.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:10 AM
2

I certainly agree that any abortion, be it medical or financial, should be avoided if possible. My concern would be for situations where both parties took all possible precautions and a pregnancy still occurred (ideally the only circumstances under which either of these things would need to be considered). If both people are doing all they can and there is still an unwanted pregnancy the options are very unbalanced between the sexes. That being said, there isn't really anything to do about that.…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:07 AM
2

I have a few questions about the idea of financial abortion (in the interest of full disclosure, I'm a women, but fully believe that family courts are drastically broken and biased in favor of women). On one hand I find myself in favor of it, if women have a right to choose post-conception then men should as well. On the other hand, these are in no way even remotely equal decisions. A woman would have the option of either raising a child herself, with no support, knowing that they are depriving …
/r/MensRights22/02/12 01:09 AM
3

Agreed. As a female I would be just as offended by getting a job (acceptance to school, whatever) based on the fact that I have boobs as I would be being denied one for the same reasons. EQUALITY means just that. What feminists and other activists pushing things like this don't realize is that it only strengthens the stereotypes they claim to be trying to eliminate. If women are equal to men in their capacity intelligence (which I obviously believe they are) then why would they need help getting…
/r/MensRights17/01/12 05:42 PM
6

What I found hopeful was that everyone in the comments agreed that the system is crazy and sexist.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 02:29 AM
-1

Bahahaha reading all the things that boys are more likely to do just made me think boys are awesome. "More likely to microwave something other than food" (My nephew microwaved his moms cell phone). "More likely to pee in the fish tank" (well, yeah. How exactly is a girl gonna pull that off....?) I'm a woman. I have a daughter who I love very much. But damn! Boys are way more fun!
/r/MensRights22/11/11 06:47 PM
6

I think the word coercion is misunderstood there. Definition: the act of coercing; use of force or intimidation to obtain compliance. force or the power to use force in gaining compliance, as by a government or police force. She was not coerced. She was convinced. So what? She's a big girl. She can say no. If something like this has had this large of an effect on her she should really seek professional help. One of the commenters suggests that: It is possibly that she was afraid of being physica…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 07:01 PM
0

Heard them before. And yeah, I do find them funny. ACTUALLY doing those things to women, obviously not. Its a joke, not intended to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 12:24 AM
6

Oh come on, women are often the butt of the joke. A few examples: Why is a woman's wedding dress white? To match the appliances. Why do women have smaller feet? So they can stand closer to the stove. Their just jokes! As a women I don't take them offensively and alot are funny!
/r/MensRights05/07/11 10:02 PM
8

Maybe not for 1st degree murder but manslaughter or neglect for sure
/r/MensRights05/07/11 09:58 PM
4

None of those things are right. Neither is hating a person based on their gender. One does not negate the other. Regardless I refuse to argue with you any further. I'm bound to be wrong... I have tits so I must be stupid.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:49 PM
4

Hating people based solely on their gender is right? Making assumptions about a persons intelligence, and general worth to humanity on their absence of a penis. I am happy that you are a minority and I don't live in a world where many people think that is "just and right"
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:30 PM
5

Oh wow. THIS is why people have no respect for r/mensrights. THIS is why people think that this place is full of bitter men who hate women. How do expect anyone to take you seriously with comments like this: Thats why I believe women shouldnt be given a choice. Children should automatically be the property of the male (again) You clearly have no desire for equality, you just want someone to hate. Taking a moment to review your previous comments in this subreddit only further illustrates that fac…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:13 PM
2

Again, you are perfectly capable of not getting someone pregnant. What would happen to a woman if she said to a man "I want to get pregnant. You must reverse your vasectomy, I will force you not to wear condoms and I will have your child"? It's the same thing. Most women don't want to get pregnant with a child a man doesn't want (I said most, not all. There are some crazy bitches out there, just like there are some crazy stupid men). MOST men are not stupid. They are perfectly capable of wearing…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 05:49 PM
6

It baffles me that you can imagine that men have no responsibility for their children. But still feel they should have rights to those same children. You can't say "women get pregnant not men, therefore children are the responsibility of women" and also believe "children are equally the product of a man, thus he has equal rights to have custody of them". It's one or the other. Men are not stupid in my experience (although there are certainly some exceptions that come to mind). You are aware that…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 05:44 PM
2

Men have no choice in reproduction. If a woman wants to get pregnant, she will. There are no forms of contraceptives available to men? Condoms? Vasectomy? Is the crafty evil of women going to somehow reverse your vasectomy without your knowledge and get pregnant because "if she wants to she will". Either the women you encounter are magic or the men you know are too stupid to realize condoms exist. But again, we go back to women not being able to take personal >responsibilty. Do men bear no perso…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 05:20 PM
3

So men have no responsibility to their offspring? If that's the case then they also have no rights to their offspring. You can't have both. It takes two people to make a child. Thus, two people should be equally responsible for it. And equally reap the benefits of parenting as well. While it is the woman who gets pregnant does she get that way all on her own? No. Your a typical female that you want to be supported no matter what >your actions. This coming from someone who wants to be able to hav…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 05:09 PM
3

I'm saying each person should be responsible for their own birth control and that the issue of consent for the possibility of a child is one and the same as the consent to have sex. Adults should understand that sex may result in pregnancy. If you are unwilling to take that risk with that person then you should not have sex with them. Once a pregnancy has already started it is an entirely different situation. In a world where a man could say "I don't want it. Have an abortion or do it on your ow…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 01:02 AM
1

No, I'm not from the US. That these things are legal baffles me and I certainly agree that they shouldn't be. And what I meant by you can't force a person to carry a child for 9 mths is exactly that. You can't. Even in places where abortions are illegal they still occur. If a person doesn't want a pregnancy they will terminate it in one way or another. Or there are women who'll continue to use drugs, drink, ect during an unwanted pregnancy, harming the child. It's a biological difference that no…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 12:00 AM
3

It's not as if she's getting pregnant entirely on her own. The majority of men's complaints (that I've run into anyway) is about not being able to see their children often enough, not being granted 50/50 custody. I am 100% behind that. But how can you say that a woman is entirely responsible for a child if the man doesn't want to be involved, BUT if a man WANTS to get involved, then she should have to give up half of her time with her children to their father whether she wants to or not? Father'…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 11:46 PM
1

Abandonment is illegal, is it not? Adoption without the consent of the father is illegal where I am also. Abortion unfortunately is just something that will always be purely a woman's decision. I mean, there is no way to make that an equal opportunity. You can't force a person to have a surgical procedure like that, nor can you force her to carry a child for 9 mths if she doesn't want to. It is unfortunate, but there are some biological inequalities that can't be avoided. I just think its only c…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 11:16 PM
0

Which is why I agree the system is in need of serious change! I just don't think that a man should have the option of saying "I told her to have an abortion, so now I have no responsibility whatsoever".
/r/MensRights04/07/11 11:08 PM
1

Wow that's crazy. I never realized that the payments could be that high, or extend that long! I just think that its not a comparable choice. If a woman gets pregnant (assuming an honest accidental pregnancy, not something deliberate or manipulative), her choices are: 1) raise the baby alone, 2) have a serious surgical procedure which may have long-term moral and psychological consequences or 3) carry the child and give it up for adoption causing long-term physical and psychological consequences …
/r/MensRights04/07/11 10:44 PM
-1

Consent to sex is consent to the consequences of sex. Because of that wearing a condom, having a vasectomy or otherwise being responsible for your own birth control is important. a mans rights end after ejaculation while a womens rights extend >forever and to the point of being able to force a guy into bondage for >25 years It's an unfortunate reality that men and women do need to be treated differently regarding pregnancy. It is physically her body. And an abortion can be very traumatic for som…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 09:52 PM
-1

So a woman should be forced to undergo a serious medical procedure with debatable moral and psychological effects because someone else decided to be irresponsible? Takes two to tango. BOTH people should be EQUALLY responsible.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 09:28 PM
4

If women are allowed to make fathers of men who havent agreed that in >advance, then shouldnt men be able to run away from their responsibities? How? I'm fairly certain that men are intelligent enough to realize sex may result in pregnancy. In the case of the psycho women who decide to lie about being on birth control it still doesn't negate the responsibility of a man to wear a condom. In those instances, yes the women is in the wrong. Yes she's a bitch and bat shit crazy, but be responsible fo…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 08:10 PM
1

I'm a woman and wouldn't call myself a feminist because of the many things that word has come to mean. Equality is not a pendulum. You can't just swing everything in the opposite direction and say "Look! We gave you girls stuff! We fixed it!". Women have equal rights at this point in the west in most things. There are some where they are still discriminated against, both negatively and positively and those are the issues that need to be addressed by both men and women.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 10:17 PM
1

This is in the US I assume? In Canada to list a person as "father" on the birth certificate the man has to sign. Otherwise you can list the father as "undeclared". If the man the woman is claiming to be the father denies that he is, or refuses to sign the birth certificate, then they can go to court and have a paternity test done.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 09:51 PM
2

It's paid @ 60% through EI. Many employers will supplement that though to bring you up to your full income.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 06:06 PM
11

In Canada (at least in New Brunswick where I live, it varies from province to province) there is maternity leave (17 weeks) separate from parental leave (35 weeks). The person pregnant is the only one eligible for maternity leave (it is also not available in cases of adoption or surrogate pregnancies) as it is leave intended for the physical ramifications of pregnancy and childbirth and their affect on a person's ability to work. But either parent can take the parental leave, or they can split i…
/r/MensRights20/06/11 08:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter