TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

intactUS_throwaway Archive

View 0 posts and 1,271 comments by intactUS_throwaway on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,271 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

coughs in Mary Kay Letourneau
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/25 04:47 AM
2

Exactly! 14 years old, neglectful father, abusive guardian and peer housemate, the one person who seems to be a real friend to him turns out to be an Eldritch Horror, oh, and he's also expected to personally shoulder the fate of the fucking planet! Gee, why might he be a complete and total psychological wreck? I can't possibly imagine!
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/25 04:32 AM
2

I challenge anyone who calls Ikari Shinji weak (or whatever word they want to use) to spend a week - no, a day - walking around in his skin without shattering. I know I couldn't pull it off.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/25 12:57 AM
5

Educate all your kids that you won't put up with that shit - coming to them or from them. Sounds simple enough to me. 🤷🏻
/r/EverydayMisandry16/10/25 05:01 PM
12

My thoughts exactly. Can I have her dealer's number? She's obviously hooked up with the good shit if she's that disconnected from reality! 🤣
/r/EverydayMisandry20/09/25 11:58 AM
4

There's also genital mutilation - considered a horrible offense and usually a crime when done to girls and women, but often merely a punchline when done to boys and men and is illegal precisely nowhere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/25 01:14 AM
10

Which is a great way to end up dead or on the street - something they like to ignore (or worse).
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/25 12:10 AM
6

It's a joke referring to flamer.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/06/25 04:11 PM
10

But according to the idiots in the post, it also makes you a dirty lying queer. 🤷🏻
/r/EverydayMisandry08/06/25 03:59 AM
27

He's showing an emotion that isn't anger. He must be setting off every fire alarm in the county.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/06/25 03:49 AM
18

They want to eat their cake, have it too, and blame men when they find out it doesn't work like that.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/25 04:03 AM
1

Are we sure (at least these days) it's not because of all the fucking creepy-ass gay men online whose way of talking about men they find attractive strongly suggest they may not grasp the concept of boundaries? And let's not pretend there aren't hordes of them. Just wander over to the LPSG forums to find ample evidence of this.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/12/24 02:15 AM
2

Then quit wasting his time and fucking leave!
/r/EverydayMisandry19/12/24 02:08 AM
43

What, is she's an adult and he's a child and that's fucking creepy not enough? Bloody hell!
/r/EverydayMisandry19/12/24 01:52 AM
4

That would be a first for this otherwise poison rag.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/24 07:49 PM
7

That wording appears to be what the charge is called. Again, this is a law problem, not a media problem.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/24 07:46 PM
14

It's not the publication's choice of wording in this particular case. It's literally the way the law is written. Rape in that jurisdiction requires use of a penis by the perpetrator to commit.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/24 03:49 PM
4

I agree 💯%.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/24 03:47 PM
10

They have to call it that because of the way the law is written, unfortunately. In this case, it isn't a media problem for once.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/24 03:47 PM
5

The body keeps score, one way or another. I can't help but wonder how many things link back to that somehow.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 01:32 AM
2

And if we're not into women, full stop? We're useful as the token GBF if we fit the white effeminate stereotype in the media. Otherwise we must hate women so much we'd rather screw men. 🙄
/r/MensRights18/07/24 05:31 PM
2

Height too. Those of us on the short end of the bell curve, but still within one standard deviation? I think oof says it all there.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 05:08 PM
2

Women can rape, too. Ethically, yes. This isn't even a question. Legally... Unfortunately, this is not always the case. Sometimes the laws are explicitly written to make rape something only a man can commit. Disgusting, but that's the world we're in.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:42 PM
0

It's unfortunate that Mrs. Smith doesn't have a choice in the matter, but if I'm being honest? She totally rocks the bald look, for what that's worth. If she's a good performer (I've never seen her work, so I can't say) and they did want to do another GI Jane movie... she should audition.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:38 PM
2

True, it does. But now that it is a massive cash cow, you can bet your ass they'll ignore any red flags against it to keep getting that blood money, including the horrifying screams of its victims.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:27 PM
24

As my late father would put it, money talks and bullshit walks.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 11:53 PM
5

And he wasn't even particularly important in the story of 'Murrikuh and its sick love affair with male genital mutilation. He was just particularly blunt.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 11:52 PM
8

It shouldn't be. At least in a sane world, when you start pulling knives on people who weren't asked first, it stops being religion and starts being assault.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 11:50 PM
11

A bunch of wackos between 1870 and 1900 thought - I shit you not - that jerking off wrecked a man's health and that removing the part that makes it so easy and so much fun - his foreskin - would make it not worth the extra effort it took for the greatly reduced reward. Initially it wasn't babies that were subjected to it, but school-aged boys, adolescents, and young men. They eventually found other bullshit to use in promoting it and also shifted the focus from victims who absolutely would remem…
/r/MensRights16/07/24 11:40 PM
3

The only thing I'm itching to "murder" is some breakfast pizza. 🤤
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/24 12:32 PM
13

This... probably explains how things went so off the rails in 1930s Europe, now that you put it that way. A large portion of the youth of the era were deprived of their fathers, uncles, &c., as well, although their fathers were taken away by the meat grinder that was WWI. We all know the big names who took advantage of this. There were a few others who weren't quite as notorious outside their own borders. We all know the end result.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 12:30 AM
11

Suggestion for retitle to better reflect the reality on the ground: People need to stop forcibly mutilating newborn boys' genitals. Let's call it what it is - infant male genital mutilation. And it, like its female counterpart, should carry the death penalty.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 12:20 AM
1

Usually if it's a .com it's selling something.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 09:53 PM
9

Yes, because physical strength means anything when you're staring down the barrel of a gun. 🙄
/r/MensRights09/06/24 11:58 PM
1

Some people have raised reasonable concerns about the DNA profiles being covertly used for outside nefarious purposes once paternity has been established, so I have to say no to mandating them for every birth. That said, if you have reason to doubt, absolutely get one anyway, and they should be mandated for any case where child support is in question.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:16 PM
7

That's an insult to circus performers.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 10:54 PM
19

TIL that the British Medical Journal is not credible. 🙄
/r/MensRights29/05/24 05:56 PM
22

That's a debunked lie.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 05:35 PM
2

Only war I see on the horizon is one no amount of cannon fodder will have any effect on. The spark could come in the Himalayas, or the South China Sea, or the plains of Eastern Europe. But whichever it is, that shit goes nuclear fast.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 05:47 PM
1

If you want a national service, be a nation worth serving first. They'll come to you voluntarily.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 05:44 PM
9

When the people who have personally been through the same kind of hell you decry are telling you that your own actions on another group stain your hands the same colour as the hands that hurt them, that ought to be one hell of a wakeup call.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/05/24 05:33 PM
26

That's putting it beyond mildly.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 01:58 PM
36

At least when the Aztecs were sacrificing people, they thought the sun wouldn't come up if they didn't. Not that they were at all justified, not even a little, but they were literally afraid of the end of basically all life. This? This is child sacrifice for the vanity of bougie biddies. Fuck your wrinkles. Get away from the kids.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 01:54 PM
3

Well, yeah. She's ruined three lives - the father who isn't, the actual father, and the child.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 05:32 PM
2

I don't disagree. After all, these days it just takes a quick Google search to find out who was who early on and the biases they brought in (that never seem to have left).
/r/MensRights12/04/24 12:20 AM
8

That was really only rich women - not coincidentally, it was rich women who started feminism. Probably explains the feminist assumption that all women were born and bred to be the same kind of seen-but-not-heard trophy wives they were. What the fuck do the idle rich know about how real people live? Bupkus.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 07:38 PM
2

Creep. Sexist creep at that. Fuck outta here with that hatred of boys.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:41 PM
2

FAFO. Or, in other words, if you're stupid enough to start trying to beat up someone you know you couldn't take down and you end up the one groaning on the floor, that's on you and no one else. Put on your big girl panties and - [le gasp] - actually accept the consequences of your own poor life choices.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:31 PM
6

I seriously doubt that.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 04:02 AM
-14

Calling the ongoing ethnic cleansing in Palestine what it is doesn't constitute antisemitism.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 02:15 AM
5

It should be a capital crime barring something exceedingly rare like gangrene to do that to a child.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 01:26 AM
6

If anything, we've forgotten or straight-up buried a lot more than we've learnt.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 09:21 PM
6

In some, it would legitimately be a mixed bag. In the western and westernised world, yeah, 1000% a step down.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 09:20 PM
94

Except perhaps us making a note of it and wondering if they were excluded because male or if the best candidates actually were all women (which is statistically unlikely but weirder things have happened).
/r/MensRights12/03/24 08:52 PM
5

This could have been avoided if one sex didn't get special rights. 🐸🍵
/r/MensRights12/03/24 04:35 PM
2

Or even having to put a little effort into getting hard before having a wank. Alone.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 05:24 AM
5

Most Christians through history - even in 'Murrikuh before the 20th century - would like a word with you.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 09:33 PM
25

No. We don't need another euphemism. The one we already have is bad enough. Male genital mutilation. That's what it is. That's what we need to call it.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 09:33 PM
5

Funny thing is, Catholicism forbids it outside of cases where it's a treatment for something that could pretty quickly kill you - so basically only cancer or gangrene. But 'Murrikuhn Catholics tend to care more about being 'Murrikuhn than being Catholic, so... yeah.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 09:29 PM
6

You assume they'd ever enforce the law to a man's benefit.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 12:44 AM
4

As if it would ever be enforced that way.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 12:43 AM
7

Dumbass got numerous warnings about her. At this point, it's on his simp ass if he ends up in a ditch covered in blood. Let this be a warning, lads: it doesn't matter how good the sex is... DON'T STICK IT IN THE CRAZY.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 03:45 AM
26

We're not talking about you. We're talking about people who were forced.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 07:47 PM
1

feminists only theorize about committing genocide For now.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:46 AM
1

China's censorship has absolutely nothing to do with keeping our cultural garbage out and everything to do with keeping the light off their administrative garbage. They don't give two shits about their people. As usual with politicians, it's all about them. 0/10 massively shit take.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:41 AM
2

Basically everyone but us is fine with it tbh.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 12:47 AM
5

Can attest. My dad wanted to be there for all the school functions, but we had to eat, have clothes, and have a roof over our heads, so off to overtime he went. He showed up when his schedule allowed it, but that wasn't often. Thanks to her eye injury, it also meant my mom wasn't there either (no license).
/r/MensRights27/01/24 11:38 PM
6

But only for men, of course. Don't forget this critical detail. Women can drop them off at the fire department without telling anyone. Or arrange an adoption without telling anyone.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 11:33 PM
2

Oh, you sweet summer child...
/r/MensRights27/01/24 11:31 PM
2

That would be less of an issue if said people didn't have sway over public policy, no matter how diluted and filtered it may be. Still absolutely a serious problem - stupid people, especially those who are proud of it, are a massive fucking liability to any society that wants to call itself functioning - but marginally less of one.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 01:11 AM
1

If he ain't right in the head to that degree, he really needs to be inside padded walls, not on the street. 😱
/r/MensRights24/01/24 12:26 AM
4

It's not just political parties. It's politicians, it's democracy, it's the notion that the village idiot should have the same weight, even theoretically, on the direction of public policy as someone like Stephen Hawking.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 02:44 AM
2

Don't bother me with the talking points from one gaggle of lying fuckwads about why the other gaggle of lying fuckwads sucks. I don't care what either has to say. It's all bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 02:31 AM
2

Spare me the simping for a state doing ethnic cleansing on the frog-in-a-pot plan. 🙄
/r/MensRights21/01/24 02:17 AM
12

Eh, politicians in general are just not on our side. 🤷🏻‍♂️ OP is as much a fool for simping for one party as anyone would be for simping for the other.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 01:07 AM
3

When was the last time you heard a pop song that had much of any message? 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights21/01/24 01:06 AM
45

Because we're men. Everything we do is put under a microscope because they're looking for any excuse to lock us up, whether behind iron bars or padded walls.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 01:05 AM
3

I agree, but you gotta know they'll never allow that. They basically just want us out of public life and in literal chains and are willing to stoop to any low to make that happen.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 05:52 PM
22

This is murder. Too bad the courts will never recognise it for what it is.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:35 PM
1

Humans are humans. There would just be different problems.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:30 PM
225

TIL that merely randomly walking near someone now constitutes sexual assault. 🙄 Stop the world; I want off.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 10:18 PM
4

The block button is a thing for exactly this situation.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 11:32 PM
4

troll That should tell you exactly how much that person should get of your time. 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights15/01/24 11:31 PM
1

That's assuming you have the earlier number when the smoke clears.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 10:52 AM
2

I agree in principle. They didn't sign up. In practice, how do you tell the volunteers from the conscripts when counting the bodies, especially in places where the infrastructure is just gone or wasn't there to start?
/r/MensRights15/01/24 06:48 AM
6

And here I thought MTG couldn't get any more classless with the whole Jewish Space Laser™ business. 🤦🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:08 PM
4

Obviously don't do it before the second opinion if the first doctor wants to start something irreversible. This of course is an exception.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 12:01 AM
1

Hey, don't pin this on me. 😒
/r/MensRights09/01/24 11:18 PM
2

She's in the House, so almost certainly. Basically the only way to get rid of a House member via election is for the incumbent to decline to run, get caught spying for someone like Kim Jong-Un, or get caught diddling a 5-year-old (as long as that 5-year-old isn't a boy and it isn't happening with a knife, because then no one cares). Notice even dying isn't enough to do it. Dead people still win) House races. Even when people know they're dead.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 11:18 PM
1

On the average, of course.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 11:00 PM
11

Most men are hardwired to crave women. Some of us... not so much. (And still others aren't wired to crave anyone that way, and I envy the fuck out of them.)
/r/MensRights09/01/24 10:58 PM
11

obey the fucking doctor's orders I would add a caveat to this. Not every doctor is necessarily taking the best path (and this isn't always due to malice or incompetence - some mean well and are generally good but just stick to outdated practices on some things, for example). If something doesn't seem right, it's your right and a good idea to get a second opinion. Just make sure it's not from a quack and also don't merely be looking for what you want to hear either.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 10:57 PM
7

Probably both at first. From what I read here, my guess would be the men in his life would be quicker to change their tune than the women.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 10:48 PM
5

If an innocent man was merely accused, he'd be out on his ass. Even if a court proved beyond a reasonable doubt he was innocent (by convicting the accuser of lying), he'd never be welcomed back into society either.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 10:45 PM
6

I mean, I'm all for helping people with gender dysphoria (because the suicide rate is terrifyingly high - last number I saw was 52% will try at least once), but we definitely need to slow down for the sake of actually getting the right people to the right help. Lives are at stake here.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 10:40 PM
18

Norah Vincent, right?
/r/MensRights09/01/24 10:37 PM
4

Sounds more like you just have a lot of shitty people around you.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 06:34 PM
13

Such garbage. When my dad died, it was hell. I didn't really have any time to prepare since it was really sudden. This motherfucker can cram this nonsense back up the ass it was pulled from.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 01:08 PM
7

We still live in the same spaces and are still subject to false accusations. Not like they give a shit that we don't swing that way.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 05:55 PM
5

As bad as 'Murrikuh is, I hear Canada is at least 10× as batshit.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 05:53 PM
4

Don't subject innocent cats to someone as insufferable as that.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 05:51 PM
6

That gives me major paedophile vibes. Don't let the author within 500 feet of schools. 😰
/r/MensRights31/12/23 05:50 PM
7

You answered your own question. It's blatant misandry, that's how.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 05:49 PM
9

What they say it is already has a word - asshole. What they actually mean though... is, as usual, simply men bad.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 02:47 AM
-4

People (who can) not having kids is a big part of why there's a societal collapse right now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/23 10:30 PM
4

That's dangerously vague. If this is some bizarre social experiment to use fear as contraception...
/r/MensRights13/12/23 02:18 AM
26

It's really as simple as men bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 02:12 AM
29

As much of a dumpster fire as SVU can be, they actually got this one spot-on, and the character on the receiving end was played by Kathy Griffin of all people.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 12:35 AM
1

I'll be here all week! Try the veal.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 11:33 PM
4

I don't date bi women because they're women. 😛
/r/MensRights10/12/23 11:26 PM
169

Could it be that deep down, they think male sexuality is somehow polluting and being with a man somehow corrupts, that he's tainted? That one comment in particular where that one asshole said she would have to bleach her boyfriend (seriously , WTF?) if she ever found out he'd been with a man is telling, methinks.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 08:26 PM
-9

Legally innocent. Doesn't mean they're not incredibly suspicious. Everyone who is or ever has been in that cesspit they call Washington is crooked as hell. Some are just better than others at keeping light off it.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 08:05 PM
9

Not a credible source. As for the claim, assuming this story hasn't just been invented for ratings - Claimant looks suspicious; still needs to be investigated... but if she turns out to be lying for publicity, throw the book at her.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 08:03 PM
3

If you're forcing a certain ratio, more qualified candidates who don't fit the quota are necessarily going to be declined in favour of less qualified candidates who do.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 04:23 AM
7

The point is to have them everywhere or (better) have them nowhere.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 04:21 AM
1

Not getting help after is probably one of the big things.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 12:30 AM
1

Well, obviously not every victim or even most go on to repeat history. But if we don't acknowledge a piece of the puzzle, we're doing everyone a disservice.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 12:03 AM
1

That isn't surprising tbh. The concept of the cycle of abuse is a thing for a reason.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 10:07 PM
221

How many people are saying he was in prison so he deserved it? 😒
/r/MensRights15/11/23 02:16 PM
7

And maybe not even then.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 10:00 PM
4

Impossible anymore. This year is just one lump of shit after the next.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 10:00 PM
17

Yeah, and the Final Solution wasn't about extermination. They must think we're stupid.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 06:28 PM
3

The only reason it's common in Anglo-America is because Anglo-America is a society of sadists. Taking a knife to a child's genitals in particular (because of the sexual nature of the assault) is a crime warranting the death penalty unless you're doing it to fix an imminently lethal condition.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:14 PM
8

But if Jake was also drunk, why the hell was Josie also not arrested? We all know the answer: Because penis evil.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 01:24 AM
48

On one hand, it should be... just for the sake of showing how stupid both implications are. On the other hand, we both know that won't fly because penis evil.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 09:43 PM
17

In most of those cases, they're both plastered. Charge both or charge neither. Either women are adults or they're not. Or at least that's how it should be.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:56 PM
46

"erection implied consent" Ugh, not this shit again. For all this vile bitch knew, the only thing it actually implied was the poor lad she raped had to take a Texas-sized piss. 😒
/r/MensRights27/10/23 06:18 PM
27

Says someone who I guarantee gets profiled all the time because of her ethnic origins. But then, she's a politician, so... even ignoring literally anything and everything else about her, we're already dealing with someone far more approving than the general public of absurd double standards.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 05:47 PM
1

Except it's not. If you're at it more than 10 seconds at the extreme end, you're not cleaning it anymore. 😉
/r/MensRights21/10/23 02:33 AM
1

About 100 that we know about - you better believe they're cooking the books every which way to hide as many mutilation deaths as possible.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 02:30 AM
1

🤦🏻‍♂️ You're completely missing the point. We know it's too late for those already subjected to it. It's about the boys - and the men they will grow up to be - who can still be spared. We point all this stuff out so they don't get robbed.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 01:06 AM
42

Feminists are also the biggest roadblock to that.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 12:14 AM
0

The part we're out to change is the part where it's still being forced on yet more boys based on a combination of outright lies, fraudulent studies, naked greed, bourgeoise vanity, and more than a little paedophilic sadism.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 12:11 AM
3

I can't even imagine how difficult it is for [intact] dudes. Please be sarcasm. Please be sarcasm. Please be sarcasm.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 12:08 AM
1

It takes less than a second to roll it back. 🤦🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights20/10/23 12:05 AM
1

In a sensible population, it would be, but you have to remember that we're dealing with 'Murrikuhns. I don't remember who said it, but holy fuck was it accurate - 'Murrikuh can always be counted on for doing the right thing only after exhausting all other options.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 12:01 AM
1

Pretty sure tying him down and ripping, crushing, and slicing off healthy tissue is nothing but child abuse. Yet somehow it gets a pass in this sole instance because penis. How can you not grasp how fucked up that is?
/r/MensRights19/10/23 11:58 PM
1

Given that it's 100% unnecessary to do it and the one who has to live with it isn't even asked... even one fuckup is grounds for never doing it again to anyone.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 11:55 PM
0

The people who asked shouldn't have been asking in the first place because they shouldn't be doing it at all.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 11:53 PM
4

I would be far more shocked if they weren't cooking the books about those fuckups tbh.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 11:52 PM
1

Follow the money.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 11:44 PM
25

Everyone should be radically against child abuse.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 05:27 PM
4

So be it. 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights05/10/23 10:10 PM
89

They want us to show vulnerability so they can use it against us. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 07:59 PM
25

Women in the draft is probably the quickest way to no draft at all.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 05:09 PM
22

Men should stop going to those subs simply because it's a complete and utter waste of time. One would get further attempting to nail Jell-O to a solid inch-thick tungsten wall with a gold nail... no pre-drilled hole.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 04:56 PM
1

This one I don't see as much of an issue with since everyone is well aware of what a heart attack is likely to look like for us men. The symptoms for a woman's heart attack, as someone else pointed out, are usually very different and quite often very subtle and knowledge of what they are isn't exactly widespread. Yeah, the name of the awareness campaign could definitely use a change but having one given the background info is fine.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 03:50 AM
20

Consider where feminism began - a bunch of idle bougie biddies with too much time on their hands. The real women of the day were busy doing real life shit. Seems it hasn't changed much in 175 years.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:45 PM
9

Same concept. 😛
/r/MensRights28/08/23 06:43 PM
45

She's a politician. Boys don't matter to them. Never have, never will.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 09:02 PM
0

Are a small number of particularly sick feminists experimenting on boys? Maybe, but I want some pretty hardcore fucking proof from someone not screaming about groomers. If I were looking for an explanation for the explosive growth of cases of gender dysphoria, I would first and foremost look to the fact that it's actually not going to get you blacklisted from everywhere to say you have it. Then I would start looking at all the hormones we pump into our meat and dairy animals (plus what gets excr…
/r/MensRights24/08/23 08:18 PM
4

Work on yourself for you, not for someone I guarantee wouldn't lift a finger for you.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 06:42 PM
4

304?
/r/MensRights14/08/23 06:29 PM
1

On one hand, you absolutely did get fucked over by a sick culture. The very first person way back in prehistoric times to take a blade to someone else's genitals should have been executed for it. On the other, surely you are more than just a sentient penis?
/r/MensRights14/08/23 06:22 PM
12

And even there you need to be careful with who you trust.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 09:28 PM
1

Legally, yes. Factually, I don't know.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:57 PM
5

No one is found innocent. That's not how it works. A verdict of not guilty simply means the jury members weren't all absolutely positively sure he did it. They could have been mostly sure and that still wouldn't have been good enough for a guilty verdict.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:52 PM
38

That's... not what happened. His conviction was overturned because he cut a deal with the DA's office that was later disregarded, which meant that the prosecution's evidence, damning though it was, didn't hold up in court. He's factually guilty as sin and admitted it himself, but legally that admission was off-limits for a criminal trial. That's all.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:49 PM
5

🤦🏻‍♂️ He wasn't tried in a US court.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:45 PM
2

Given the numbers, you're not missing anything from not sleeping around.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 09:33 PM
5

I think the question was meant along the lines of What does he stand to gain by doing it now? as opposed to anything else. Personally I can't help but wonder the same thing. Like someone else said, this is going to piss off a lot of people who suddenly can't fleece their soon-to-be-ex-spouses (and they're a huge though hardly monolithic demographic, though one known to be highly vindictive). So what's he really up to with this?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 11:02 PM
8

Even a hopelessly broken clock occasionally reads true.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 07:44 PM
1

You can put makeup and perfume on a pile of Nazi garbage... and, what a shock, it's still Nazi garbage! 🙄
/r/MensRights21/07/23 11:09 AM
1

To be blunt, your mother's an idiot (as are most 'Murrikuhn so-called Christians) and you deserved (and still do) better.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 01:28 AM
1

It actually doesn't. Galatians 5.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 12:53 AM
2

How much is the KGB paying you for this? 🤣 And before anyone says they don't exist anymore, you can put makeup and perfume on a turd and it's still a turd.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 12:30 PM
6

LAWYER!!! This isn't something you can get answered here. This is a seriously complex legal issue and you need to get in touch with a bloody good lawyer PDQ.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 12:05 AM
39

Are you on cheap drugs?
/r/MensRights17/07/23 09:02 PM
3

They know. They actually enjoy that. Makes it easier for them to get away with it.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 08:00 PM
4

They need to reread Paul's letter to the Galatians.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 07:57 PM
2

It's on the same level as those sparkly stones woo-woo stores sell for measles.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 11:18 AM
2

Technically not paedophilia since he isn't a prepubescent child. This falls under ephebophilia. Still, however, disgusting and, because he's still in secondary school and she's an instructor at said school, if it isn't covered under the statutory rape law it fuckin' well should be given that she has power over whether or not he graduates.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 06:41 PM
88

Because one is a hate movement and the other isn't.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 01:25 PM
1

And just when I thought she couldn't be any more disgusting, she manages to turn my stomach even further. 😒
/r/MensRights30/06/23 08:22 PM
20

He may be an asshat, but ho-lee shit has he been the target of a whole lot of creepy conduct.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 01:26 PM
3

Their only idea of healthy masculinity is femininity. Simply put, they think men are merely defective women and thus any masculinity at all is inherently toxic.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 08:08 PM
17

Or they don't bother since they know the odds are high that no one will lift a finger until the stalker becomes a murderer.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:31 PM
25

Tell me you're highly sheltered without actually using those words. Reactions to men reporting their female stalkers like the ones u/Warder766312 and u/63daddy got are not just not rare, they're what we expect since that's how it almost always goes.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:28 PM
18

Damn. 🫂 At least someone did something about it this time though.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 01:06 PM
1

Thirty? I think you're off by about a century and a half. Feminism has been at war with men since the very beginning at Seneca Falls (because of course it came out of the shithole that is upstate New York) in 1848.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 01:03 PM
111

No one expects to be stalked... but I guarantee you when it's a man being stalked, next to no one gives a fuck, so it goes unreported a whole hell of a lot more than when it's a woman.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 01:03 PM
18

It's a hug. Seemed like you could use one.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:20 AM
14

🫂
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:00 AM
13

Are you privy to why he had no friends at the time? You don't have to put the specifics here if you happen to be, but the point of bringing that up is to rule out (or in, but hopefully not) a pattern.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 02:46 AM
124

Yikes. 😬 Dude would rather stick with a bunch of psychos who would treat him like a dog on a good day than with someone who stood by him when he was in the gutter. The programming is strong. Sucks that you lost a friend, but you may have dodged a bullet in the long run.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 02:13 AM
2

Mutilation of any child's genitals should carry the penalty of hanging.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 03:50 AM
4

For fuck's sake, 'Murrikuh, leave Jamaica alone ! I mean, leave everyone else alone too, but since Jamaica is the topic of this article...
/r/MensRights30/05/23 09:29 PM
8

You need to make sure he knows to make as much noise as possible about what a massive conflict of interest this is.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 10:24 PM
12

Because men are considered pack mules and cannon fodder, and this is the pack mule end of things.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/04/23 02:42 PM
6

Both. The cause isn't a gendered issue. The effect, on the other hand, most definitely will be, and it will be men and boys who will be hit hardest between being denied any help and being sent into the inevitable meat grinders just because they have dicks.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 01:52 PM
6

This sounds less like a problem with women as a whole and more like a problem with a system built to push women ahead just because they're women whether the specific individuals are suited for the positions or not - and built to not give a damn about bad actors as long as they happen to be women (or, worse, actively reward them for bad behaviour).
/r/MensRights06/04/23 01:33 PM
35

Amputating the foreskin over it being tight is medical fraud in the extreme.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 10:15 PM
5

The United States of America can bite my ass. Let it burn. The world would be a far better place without its toxic influence. So no, I ain't lifting a finger for this rat hole. Depending on who shows, I may help them... unless they go digging around in my potatoes (assuming they take).
/r/MensRights04/04/23 04:05 AM
10

I want people to stop insisting I have to be a meat shield just because I have a dick. 🙄
/r/MensRights04/04/23 03:55 AM
14

Conscription in general is a waste of time and resources. If you're left with that as one of your last options, that's a good indicator of the necessity to throw in the towel. It's the principle of the thing though. Either everyone has their rights and privileges linked to being on that hook or nobody does. That's what equal protection of law requires.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 10:39 PM
17

If memory serves, during the debacle over delinking the draft system registration requirement from sex, he was one of those Trojan horses going wut about da wimminz gettin shot from the tradcon side.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 10:16 PM
22

He claims to want to do something about the man crisis, but then turns around and enshrines into law the same bullshit where men are pack mules and cannon fodder. Josh Hawley is not our friend. If anything, he's even more dangerous than any feminist since he masquerades as a friend.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 09:16 PM
1

Never mind that the school system is stacked against boys and men from the first day of preschool... which they won't say a word about, even under the radar.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 09:10 PM
2

This says the dollar-store porn star. Yeah, okey-dokey.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 06:43 PM
14

Bullshit! She was at best an accessory to this shit - thus just as guilty.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 06:37 PM
1

Don't remind me about Chanty Binx... 😒
/r/MensRights28/03/23 10:12 PM
-3

When was the last time you saw a biological male either pregnant or nursing? No, that one disturbing scene in Family Guy doesn't count.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 11:09 PM
-4

You do realise a father with young children would also qualify for this to help feed them, yes?
/r/MensRights27/03/23 10:49 PM
25

Could be they were all that was left after the misandrist filters that are K-12 and undergrad did what they were intended to do (which is a huge problem itself).
/r/MensRights27/03/23 10:44 PM
4

Yeah, this one is more about the children the mother is either carrying or nursing if the food is (supposed to be) going into her body. 100% with you on this one.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 10:42 PM
32

They might be the best left after you consider the misandrist filters that are K-12 and undergrad.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:47 PM
1

They have existed. Usually they were highly malicious, but they did exist.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 09:55 PM
1

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights24/03/23 05:10 PM
0

Spare me these tired old lies.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 04:34 PM
2

Get the rope.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 02:17 PM
1

Rapists are fucking ugly where it matters. So are rape apologists.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 02:17 PM
59

Rape apologists need not post here.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 12:00 PM
34

Get the fuck out of here. Rape apologists have no place here.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 11:59 AM
12

We'll assume a lynch mob with two consciously-functioning brain cells for this purpose.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 04:05 AM
27

I used to think lynch mobs were never justified. Horseshit like this is making me reconsider.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 03:44 AM
19

A Victorian high school teacher has not been sent to jail despite admitting to raping a male student in the back of her car and at her house on multiple occasions. Fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 03:42 AM
-2

Yep. No one gives a shit about us... until one of us ends up off the deep end in such a way that ends up taking others with them. And even then, it's only just long enough to berate all of us for being pieces of shit (to which I say: Projecting much?).
/r/MensRights24/03/23 02:15 AM
3

My mom was a stay-at-home mom. It doesn't seem to be anything anyone forced on the other. It just seemed to be what my folks decided worked best for them (Mom not being able to drive thanks to an eye injury probably had a lot to do with that). So I started off thinking other situations were unusual only to discover that it was actually my situation that was the anomaly.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 01:10 AM
1

He might have made the money, but did he actually control it once the paycheck was cashed? Not saying it was all sunshine and domestic bliss for women - not by any means - but what's yours is ours but what's mine is mine is not new in fact even if the law had something else to say. Unofficial, under-the-table power is still power.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 12:15 AM
9

...which are all traits that make for good pack mules and cannon fodder, so I figured those were covered.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 12:02 AM
11

If you're arguing for traditional family, that still isn't the nuclear family. That becoming the norm was a consequence of the Industrial Revolution, a particularly disastrous one. Also, if you're arguing for tradcon things, you're not going to find much sympathy here. That nonsense isn't all that different from feminism in how it actually sees men - not as human beings, but as pack mules and cannon fodder.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 11:42 PM
-1

Your post history doesn't change what this right here is.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 11:35 PM
-4

Spare me the white-knighting. 🙄
/r/MensRights23/03/23 10:58 PM
5

All of them do. You'd have to be inattentive or stupid not to see that. We have no friends in politics. We never will. Get used to it.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:06 PM
8

Don't drag partisan political horseshit in here. 🤦🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:03 PM
7

You come into our space and make it about you and wonder why you're met with skepticism about your motives. Here's your sign.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:00 PM
1

Yeah, you're just digging yourself deeper with this. You want to be taken as sincere? Don't vent it. Prove it.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 07:43 PM
-2

I know why abuse is bad. I just don't believe that's your real reason for being here.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 07:15 PM
-11

I don't trust your motivations for coming here, therefore I must like being abused. Helluva leap there.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 07:05 PM
-11

And yet 1/3 of the commentary in your OP this side of the link to Imgur is about you. Curious.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 06:53 PM
-8

Consider what this is really about and where you're posting it. Honey, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, my first guess ain't gonna be Tweety Bird.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 06:43 PM
64

She offed herself because... she was facing the likelihood of being held accountable for something it sounds like she actually did and couldn't be arsed to put on her big girl pants and take a bite of her humble pie like any man would have to? Cry me a river. No apology should have been issued. If she didn't want the publicity of an assault trial, she should have kept her hands to herself. I'm not wholly without sympathy for her mother. She still had to bury her child. But the fault for that lie…
/r/MensRights13/03/23 05:24 PM
32

Let's call it what it is - CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 05:20 PM
5

He looked and sounded prepubescent at the time on top of that. Makes my skin crawl. 🤢
/r/MensRights13/03/23 05:19 PM
140

Given that it's the UN, probably. 😔
/r/MensRights13/03/23 04:42 PM
13

Ew. Just... ew. We're talking about a kid (technically an adolescent, but he neither looked nor sounded like it for quite a while) being turned into a sex object here. How is that not nauseating to more people?
/r/MensRights13/03/23 07:41 AM
1

Projecting much?
/r/MensRights11/03/23 11:45 PM
1

And you think those genocidal fuckwads are capable of doing anything except digging the hole deeper? You must be a special kind of stupid.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 11:41 PM
-1

Play stupid games and win stupid prizes. Just don't force the rest of us to take your stupid prizes as well.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 11:33 PM
0

Nazis are not on our side any more than the reds are. They weren't 80 years ago and that hasn't changed.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 11:26 PM
0

Wrong. We get fucked in all of those cases, and I don't mean in the fun way.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 11:10 PM
4

One wants our balls in a vice. The other wants them facing the business end of a rifle. Helluva choice we got there. 😑 To Hell with them both.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 12:45 AM
2

"Yeah, yeah, but you're so focused on whether or not you can that you're not stopping to think whether or not you should!"
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:47 PM
1

Preach it.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:09 PM
2

Au contraire, mon garçon. Most people are sick and tired of both.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:10 AM
3

Not so much middle ground as much as wholesale rejection of both.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:08 AM
3

Or we go our own way and tell both to go make sweet, sweet love to a live socket. Did that never occur to you?
/r/MensRights04/03/23 02:04 AM
14

Literal Nazis are not on our side. They might get a thing or two now and then since it's impossible for anyone to be wrong about literally everything (they're going to blunder their way into the right answer on something eventually), but on balance, they'll put us in positions not all that different from what the feminists have in mind for us. We neither need nor want their "help" seeing as it isn't actually help in the first place.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 01:46 AM
-1

No, we objectively do not. Conscripts get in the way and nothing beyond.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 10:53 PM
5

And I guarantee you only land there if you're a man.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 12:53 AM
12

Someone who has to be sent there at gunpoint is a liability, not an asset. Conscription is useless.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 12:51 AM
22

"And a digital tool to help police officers identify likely perpetrators - even those without convictions - will be developed." You were saying?
/r/MensRights21/02/23 12:40 AM
54

🤦🏻‍♂️ So much for innocent until proven guilty even as a legal principle.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 02:53 PM
4

Or maybe, and I know this is probably a crazy idea, but... maybe this is just what you get when your society spends over half a century now saying that the liars can do no wrong because vagina and their victims can do no right because penis. They're not individually sick. They're just assholes who simply don't see men as human beings - with society's blessing - and have acted accordingly.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 08:35 PM
11

A group so small as to be insignificant on a societal influence scale.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 05:37 PM
5

Probably at one point, but sure as hell not anymore. Not in the west and those who followed it.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 05:36 PM
23

As far as society is concerned, we're only as important as we are useful. We have no intrinsic importance and never have.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 01:42 PM
1

On the average, only insofar as we're useful and nothing beyond. We're garbage besides.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 01:39 PM
3

This from a cable "news" outlet is the pot calling the kettle not just black but greasy too.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 12:55 AM
11

Or playing in the PGA tournament as opposed to a one-off tourney in some podunk backwater in upstate New York. The prize for winning in the one-off probably won't pay what merely showing up at the PGA will.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:34 AM
36

They seem to have forgotten the for equal work part. 🐸🍵
/r/MensRights01/02/23 10:17 AM
1

She might be a scumbag for suicide-baiting, but so are you for doxxing.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 01:02 AM
3

The only predator I see here is people like you trying to police the behaviour of a grown woman who can make her own decisions.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/22 12:00 PM
6

Fun fact - it can be both at the same time. Racism and sexism always benefit rich fucks like him.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 10:38 AM
8

Since it's usually an extrapolation from claiming that misandry doesn't exist, I usually just roll the eyes and walk away since any effort to try to convince someone like that is completely wasted.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:38 AM
4

I don't know if it's the same in Aussieland, but here in 'Murrikuh, it's only accurate because a lot of men - even some dads - are fucking terrified of being seen alone with children. Karens tend to accuse any adolescent or adult male alone with children, even if the village idiot could see he's their dad or older brother, of being a paedophile abductor. 😒 Not to say that the sign itself isn't ridiculously biased, of course.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 01:35 AM
15

Look at the definitions they use. The books have been cooked six ways to Sunday.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:45 AM
4

Honey, you're not fooling anyone as to your true intentions.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:17 AM
5

I don't trust him either. Too chummy with too many alt-wrong types. OP is still spot-on about the no-win situation all of us guys are in.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 10:28 PM
4

Lucky for me that I have a scan of the newspaper photo of my great-grandfather that was published when he was KIA near Ypres about six weeks before the armistice. I don't think he was full-blooded and I definitely don't qualify to enroll in any recognised tribe, but let's just say there's no way in hell anyone in 1918 would have thought he was a white guy.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 10:00 PM
28

I've seen enough actual racism to know it when I see it. Denying someone a promotion solely because of the box ticked under race on the HR file? Yeah, that's racism. I don't give a flying fuck which box it is. It's racism in any case. Racists of all stripes (and sexists, and so forth) will find themselves hamstrung in the end when they've screwed themselves out of the talent they need because the right person for the job isn't in the in-club and therefore wasn't considered. Call me crazy, call m…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 09:47 PM
61

Their own admission that they don't collect data on women who rape men is the source that the number is bogus.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 09:01 PM
1

QED.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 03:51 AM
3

It should, but it never does. Juries are always chock full of Karens and white knights.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 10:09 PM
64

[sniff sniff] Smells like pussy pass. He should be at work and she should be behind bars.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 07:41 PM
3

It's a combination of reporting and deliberately cooked books.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 11:22 PM
3

I don't know what the law is in India, but it doesn't matter in the United States if an adult woman rapes a teenage boy - he's still on the hook for child support and has to pay his rapist. It's happened at least once.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 11:01 PM
3

Absolutely true. Still fucking creepy.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 12:39 PM
20

🫂
/r/MensRights27/07/22 03:37 AM
43

Can I give you an e-hug?
/r/MensRights27/07/22 03:26 AM
4

Prove it.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 11:49 AM
2

I'm curious as to how one works, but more... clinically than erotically, if that makes sense?
/r/MensRights26/07/22 11:48 AM
1

Bullshit. A newborn can't ask for a pain pill. For that matter, a newborn can't say "There's nothing actually wrong with me, so you're not doing this." And, no, foreskin isn't a birth defect no matter how much Brian Morris and Andrew Freedman repeat the lie.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 10:13 PM
1

If it makes no sense at 18 years old, it sure as fuck makes no sense at 18 hours old.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 10:07 PM
1

No, it doesn't. Not his penis. Not his decision. Unless it's literally rotting off right then and there, it really is that simple.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:45 PM
1

Intact men don't have anything extra. Foreskin is not extra. Circumcision causes an iatrogenic deficiency.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:42 PM
207

What. The. FUCK?!
/r/MensRights25/07/22 06:22 PM
11

Men, hands down. Even in places where the number of arenas isn't so skewed against men, there's nothing resembling a structure in place for addressing the problems in any way that can reasonably be expected to get results, and in some cases the structures that should be working on problems instead actively create more of them.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 04:39 AM
10

Both/and. There are still guys who won't for a whole range of reasons. Society needs to stop ignoring (or worse...) those of us who do.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 01:38 AM
4

Either everyone has to put up with it or, ideally, no one does.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 08:11 AM
2

It's not a Christian rite. Not since the Council of Jerusalem in 49.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:16 PM
6

You got scammed. Even if stretching didn't work, the most radical thing that should have been done was a dorsal slit.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:14 PM
2

Not every religion prescribes it, and some actually proscribe it. Sikhs and Catholics (although 'Murrikuh and the Philippines never got that memo) are actually forbidden unless there's something seriously wrong.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:12 PM
2

Did you not read the reported comment? Conduct at work was specifically referenced.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:04 PM
1

No. If it would be considered assault and battery if it were anywhere else but penis, it should be considered that for penis too. Consistency is a beautiful thing.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:00 PM
2

Even if the fraudulent claims of benefits were true, it still wouldn't justify doing this to a minor. Seeing as basically everything they claim only applies to adults, it could wait anyway.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:53 PM
1

She's just plain evil.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:04 AM
4

He should definitely not be financially liable for the mother's lie, but just ditching the poor lad altogether without a word... It takes a cold hard heart to do that.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 02:54 PM
8

As if maintaining the home isn't work. That shit is fucking hard, and that's just the normal, routine tasks done every day. That's ignoring the things only done a few times a week or so.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 10:39 PM
9

"I don't have a problem," said everyone who ever had a Very Big Problem™.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:14 AM
1

Attitude like that, I suspect your wife is inflatable.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 01:17 PM
1

The mutilation itself was medical malpractice. Of course the emergency department should be raked over the coals for their idiocy - that ought to go without saying - but why are you so hot to trot to bury the fact that he shouldn't have been in a position to be bleeding like that in the first place?
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:41 PM
9

That they have to force it on those who can't say no and blackmail most of the rest into it should tell you everything about what it really does to a man's sexuality.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:52 PM
3

Making it gender-neutral is also the only way in hell we're ever getting rid of that bullshit altogether.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:28 PM
11

No, that's actually a problem. Generalising a whole group based on bad encounters with a few is what feminists tend to do. Either we put a stop to it now or we watch ourselves end up just like that.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:34 AM
23

They still think children are property and are particularly heavy-handed in applying that to boys. As for why we still harvest foreskins from newborns, ask Sandra Bullock.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:31 AM
6

Oh, I'm well aware of Sandra Bullock's dirty little not-so-secret.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 06:45 PM
43

He wouldn't have bled at all in the first place if they had just left well enough alone and kept the knives and other implements of torture away from his genitals. But that's none of my business. 🐸🍵
/r/MensRights03/07/22 06:39 PM
27

Dangerous, yes. Noble... Debatable at best.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 04:31 AM
2

That's kinda my point.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:36 PM
3

If the alleged vic stopped it by KO.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:04 PM
21

If the alleged victim did so as a means of stopping the attack in progress, that's one thing. If the attack was already stopped and then it happened, that's a different story and both should be charged. I would hope it's obvious what should happen if there was no attack.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:33 PM
1

Tucky-boy isn't courageous. He's a backstabbing son of a bitch.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:36 AM
2

Tucky-boy is using this to shill for a bunch of fuckwads who think male disposability is totally hunky-dory. Not helpful to our cause. And before anyone accuses me of shilling for the open feminists in the other party, they can go straight to Hell too, no passing Go or collecting $200.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:27 AM
1

When the messenger is using this to push an agenda that's just as anti-male as any, it isn't useful or helpful.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:32 AM
13

Typical politician. MI6 should check his accounts. He's probably getting a cut.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:35 PM
1

They're not the answer either.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:32 PM
5

They can all suck me arse. Cable "news" isn't news.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:30 PM
0

Chippy-boy "Not My Daughter" Roy, anyone?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:25 PM
2

You'd have to be drunk or stoned to sell your soul to cable "news" (they're all equally shit) and expect to be taken seriously by anyone who isn't an ideologue.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:20 PM
17

Hell no. They don't give a fuck about us anymore than the other shitstains.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:18 PM
2

Politicians and pundits are not the answer and never will be. They don't care. We're just talking points at best for them.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:15 PM
3

Genocide of 90% of men, bare minimum, with the rest kept as little more than breeding slaves.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:11 PM
7

Water only. Soap doesn't go under the hood.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:14 AM
16

Should be death.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:46 PM
36

They would have to care first. The vast majority never will.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:24 PM
4

That's still 4 more than I thought she would serve.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 09:07 PM
30

You're not obligated to maintain relationships with those who see you only as a punching bag. If someone else can't handle that, that's a them problem, not a you problem.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:14 AM
2

Awesomesauce!
/r/MensRights25/06/22 12:27 AM
5

No, nothing changed for us. We still have exactly the same rights we had all along - none whatsoever.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:26 PM
19

Not to mention that it's legal in every country in the world to call on a doctor to remove a piece of your infant son's genitals for any reason whatsoever... and no one bats an eye. Do that to your daughter and half the world (rightly) loses their shit.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:23 PM
32

I tend to avoid those cesspits, so I wouldn't have noticed. Not really surprised though. 🙁
/r/MensRights20/06/22 02:03 AM
186

Well, this satirical headline is depressingly accurate...
/r/MensRights20/06/22 12:41 AM
3

My brain doesn't function well in the heat, so I feel that. A therapist, definitely a good call. His family... tentatively a good idea. Hopefully this bad relationship is just a stroke of bad luck and not part of a pattern stemming from things he saw growing up. It's hard to say without knowing him better.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 01:51 AM
3

The sad part is if they find anything going on, they'll probably arrest him even though it's pretty obvious she's the problem here. Duluth model.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 01:44 AM
3

If your religion demands that you do something like that to someone else, you need to get a new religion.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 12:48 AM
5

It's hardly a good thing for a society to have half the population running around with unnecessary trauma that they're constantly subjected to gaslighting about either. There's absolutely positively nothing good about continuing male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 08:37 PM
9

Your religious rights end where someone else's body begins. End of discussion.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:52 PM
2

Do... Do you actually think that's satire? Do I need to pull up where she went on Ellen - international television - bragging about it?
/r/MensRights08/04/22 04:47 AM
2

Go watch one on YouTube with the sound on and then say that. I dare you.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 07:06 PM
5

Sandra Bullock's face. I wish I were making that up. https://metro.co.uk/2018/05/21/truth-behind-sandra-bullocks-controversial-penis-facial-amid-worldwide-rage-7565989/
/r/MensRights06/04/22 04:34 PM
2

There are many things people have done in the name of religion that abso-fucking-lutely will not fly today. Fucking maiming a baby, and that's what it is, needs to go on that list yesterday.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 04:31 PM
4

Yeah, that's what I meant.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:48 PM
3

There's definitely one very easy way to find out. It's probably unethical af, but the United States is full of heavily traumatised newborn babies. 🤷🏻
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:29 PM
-1

Yeah, that's the biological component to male or female as opposed to the social bullshit of gender roles that's gotten stuck to it over the millennia.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:24 PM
7

There's something in the brain - hell if I know what or where - that has to do with whether someone ends up identifying as male or female. And that's really the extent of my knowledge of it.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:14 PM
13

No. There's an obvious biological component to the concepts of male and female. A lot, though not all, of what has accreted to what those concepts entail, however, is socially constructed. The contradictory ideas of what it means to be a man or a woman between cultures is proof enough of that.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:56 PM
15

That's a trans woman.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:32 PM
7

No, you have it right.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:32 PM
-3

I don't think you're wrong in the slightest.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:31 PM
11

It's right on the first one.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:23 PM
14

If you bothered to read, you would know he didn't get a chance to do that.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:21 PM
8

Just don't force it on your kids.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 10:46 AM
22

The mental gymnastics this allows are unacceptable. If "survival of the state" cannot garner enough volunteers, perhaps the state doesn't deserve to survive.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 12:09 AM
2

Only because feminists have cooked the books to get female sex deviants off the hook. We've been over this more times than I care to count.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:28 PM
6

Is rape overwhelmingly male because of testosterone or because the definition of rape was deliberately written to exclude female offenders? Anyone who has been here more than about five minutes knows beyond the slightest shadow of a doubt it's the latter. The evidence is plastered all over. You're just choosing to ignore it.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 11:31 PM
7

MGM, along with FGM, should be a capital crime.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 03:47 PM
3

You can't work with someone who wants you either dead or enslaved. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 03:46 PM
11

I've found her obnoxious for years now. This just adds to that.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 05:50 AM
2

I assume you're going somewhere with this?
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:08 PM
4

Either your sarcasm detector is busted or you're just that stupid. Either way, piss off.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 06:04 PM
8

This should be plain as day, not to have anything that isn't cancerous or literally rotting cut off your kid. But what do I know? 🤷🏻
/r/MensRights25/02/22 05:56 PM
3

I thought that was the FBI's domain.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 05:48 PM
2

Yes, worrying about whether or not we're going to have to be staring at the business end of guns with guns at our backs to get us there is so cookie cutter. 🙄
/r/MensRights25/02/22 05:44 PM
8

Get lost, simp.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 03:20 PM
1

I opted not to dignify his mutilation support with a response. It's fairly typical of 'Murrikuh. What really pissed me off was his invalidation of my love for my special someone based on not liking public debauchery.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 05:24 PM
1

Same here. I'm a regular $3 bill over here. Also, it's intact men he's shaming.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 05:17 PM
20

I'd love to hear these biddies try that in front of Judge Judy. That happened once and... it didn't go well for the woman who went there.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 04:44 PM
1

That's not sexual harassment. That's sexual assault.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 02:57 AM
3

They make me look like that when they go around pulling that shit. As if you would ever grasp this. 🙄
/r/MensRights22/02/22 06:26 PM
4

That's not what she was saying and you bloody well know it.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 05:51 PM
8

Gender doesn't matter for this one. Bit young for this, methinks.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 12:49 PM
22

She can bite me arse. 🤬
/r/MensRights17/02/22 08:03 PM
1

Will she pull an Andrew Yang when she faces the backlash from the sheep? I don't trust political figures of any stripes on this. Not after Yang.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 08:56 PM
2

Follow the money behind that.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 08:52 PM
9

How far does it have to go before it's not fine?
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:45 PM
1

I'm assuming everyone involved is of age and not falling afoul of some other law. Addendum: If you're not 18 or it's illegal for some other reason, it's not worth a double-digit prison sentence.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 03:13 AM
19

Because men are predators and women are prey, always, everywhere, and without exception. Or so the feminists would have you believe. How about this instead: Don't send nudes without clearing it with the recipient first. Shouldn't matter who you are.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 05:36 PM
31

I think this gives an entirely false sense of who are victims. That's the point. The goal is to delegitimise men who are attacked, to bury them.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 05:24 PM
6

Consider who writes these apps.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 01:03 PM
2

But that's one of my favourite hobbies. 🙁
/r/MensRights10/02/22 04:31 AM
4

Hot take that might blow OP's mind: taking no shit and being traditionally masculine - really traditionally masculine and not the mockery the turn of the 20th century made of masculinity - is in no way whatsoever mutually exclusive with being sensitive and tender.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:14 AM
4

Well, that tells me which of the two of you I would rather have around me. Spoiler alert: it sure as hell isn't her.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:06 AM
34

Get lost, simp. Every comment of yours in this thread has been in bad faith.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:00 AM
2

Politicians don't actually give a shit. If you want them to but you're not rich enough for a bribe, become as loud and impossible to ignore as you can. They might do it just to shut you up.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 02:56 AM
9

The slap was definitely not the smartest move, but hell if I don't sympathise completely. Bitch was way out of line.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 02:53 AM
3

Oh, right, how foolish of me!
/r/MensRights09/02/22 09:35 PM
4

I honestly don't care what women find sexually attractive.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 07:47 PM
25

Don't forget the home invasion.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 03:28 PM
6

Same kind of result when "wife yells at me" is changed to "wife beats me". Fuck you very much, Google. 🖕🏻
/r/MensRights09/02/22 03:16 PM
1

Unlike you, I'm not part of an obvious hate movement, so yeah, it doesn't bother me one bit. The fact that it bothers you is telling.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 03:11 PM
15

Why don't you go ahead and do that anyway? We don't need more of your ilk running about.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 03:09 PM
4

Sadly true.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/22 03:07 PM
12

What the fuck?
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/22 11:02 AM
2

Either way, whoever it is has nothing but contempt for men. That's the important detail.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 09:42 PM
2

I could be wrong, of course. But when I poked around this morning, something just gave me the impression it's a guy behind that screen.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 08:23 PM
2

Not only that, but anyone who actually says what she says needs to hear the following: Tell me you have no business being a parent without using the words "I have no business being a parent."
/r/MensRights08/02/22 08:19 PM
3

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1251868/Of-course-women-dont-want-male-pill--end-happy-little-accidents.html This is only one person going public saying exactly what you're getting at, but if there's one bold enough to say it out loud, it certainly invites the question of how many agree vehemently but quietly.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 08:08 PM
2

Agreed in full with your points here. That said, I get the impression based on profile that OP is actually a guy. Just thought you might want to know.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 08:00 PM
10

Your personal views betray the real reason you're in this sub. Don't try to deny it.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 11:03 AM
9

Guys need all the defences we can get in the war on us. And anyone who can't see a war on men and boys isn't paying attention.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 10:08 AM
2

How much do you want to bet there was a metric fucktonne of cherrypicking to get those images?
/r/MensRights07/02/22 06:49 PM
5

You ain't kiddin'.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 05:32 PM
19

🤦🏻‍♂️ Another handwave of something that, because (ignoring the liquor, which is another can of worms itself) she is in a position of authority over this young man, effectively negates any meaning to any consent he may have given. No surprise here. 😒
/r/MensRights07/02/22 04:47 PM
2

The dad being a dumbarse does not a men's issue constitute.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 09:55 PM
6

I was referring to everyone who wasn't Jewish or Roma.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 03:10 PM
11

'Murrikuh has a nasty habit of sweeping about half of the Holocaust under the rug, yes.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 06:32 AM
29

Yeah, the lion's share of the victims - Jews and Romani (most of northeastern Europe's Slavs would have been on the list too, had Hitler not blundered his way into defeat) - were there because of their perceived race, but OP is absolutely correct. To say it was entirely about that is to ignore a few million others who are just as dead - and it would be a moral crime to sweep under the rug that the very people who are hailed in the books as the liberators of these camps threw not a negligible num…
/r/MensRights02/02/22 06:31 AM
1

🫂
/r/MensRights31/01/22 08:45 PM
16

OP is active in a sub called FeminismoRadical. Yeah, it's a safe bet she's not looking out for us at all.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 11:34 PM
19

Are they legally and socially men? There's your answer.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 11:36 PM
7

Bless you for this.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 08:22 PM
8

Literally never needed for phimosis. Dorsal slit opens it right up without removing anything, if all else has failed.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:10 PM
4

Motion seconded! The ugly people are the ones who would shame you for being whole!
/r/MensRights27/01/22 07:09 PM
6

Not at any age unless it's cancerous or literally rotting off.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 03:19 PM
16

Anyone who wants you to have a perfectly healthy (not to mention really really fun) part of your body cut off for any reason is straight-up not worth your time. Consider your foreskin bimbo repellent. 😁
/r/MensRights27/01/22 06:39 AM
0

What the hell is wrong with your inner circle?
/r/MensRights25/01/22 08:57 PM
1

Damn. 🫂
/r/MensRights25/01/22 08:56 PM
48

You can choose your degree or your principles. You're not allowed both anymore, unfortunately. (Don't worry about your English. It's fine.)
/r/MensRights25/01/22 08:44 PM
1

Probably would have happened anyway tbh. But let's be real - he's only being named and shamed because penis.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 08:19 PM
15

Because men and boys are cattle. Simple as.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 08:17 PM
7

Genital mutilation of minors should be a capital offence.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 06:33 PM
160

Is it still that if his chosen hobbies involve those tools? In general you're definitely not wrong though.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 03:24 PM
8

🫂
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:01 PM
5

You ain't kiddin'.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:07 PM
39

What the fuck?! We really are just cattle now. 🤬
/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:06 PM
14

Absolutely not. Put on your big girl panties and do it yo'-damn-selves.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 04:26 AM
10

The only difference is what privileges they wanted without the accompanying responsibilities.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:10 AM
14

Feminism has been out for our blood since 1848 in Seneca Falls. Hard pass.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:03 AM
1

Your funeral. 🤷🏻
/r/MensRights15/01/22 08:24 PM
0

I hold it to be not radical enough. It permits the current disaster of a system to continue existing.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 07:41 PM
0

is same-sex attracted finds anal repulsive It's not a requirement. I don't know where the hell that notion came from.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 07:39 PM
1

The law is making that less and less possible.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 07:36 PM
1

Courts are increasingly treating unmarried couples as married for this very reason. There's no winning unless you don't play the game in the first place.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 07:35 PM
1

Your simping impresses no one.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 07:33 PM
1

This risk isn't worth it.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 07:31 PM
1

Too individualist. One at a time walking away from the bollocks only to end up with his focus exclusively on himself isn't actually going to change much. We have to walk away together (as in all at once) and build something together if we're going to make any change stick.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 03:21 PM
8

Feminism has been out for male blood since 1848. Took you long enough to notice.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 08:14 PM
2

Yeah. Sure.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 01:37 AM
2

Probably to throw fags like me into a fire. I'm used to it.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 01:30 AM
2

trying to learn Bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 01:25 AM
1

It is not wrong for me to tell a homosexual man that he has a chromosome abnormality. Thanks for making me feel like even more of a filthy disgusting freak than I already did. Really needed that. If this is the kind of reception I'm always going to get for something I didn't fucking ask for and don't even want, what's the use of not taking a swan dive off the bridge downtown?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 01:11 AM
63

Consider the source.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 09:04 PM
7

And behind a paywall on top of that.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 08:25 PM
2

Not sure if not paying attention or just simping.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 08:24 PM
2

I have only one thing to say to anyone trying to handwave what this child sex predator did: Eat dirt and die, trash.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 10:52 AM
8

Saudi Arabia doesn't have an age of consent, but 14 is definitely under the age of common sense.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 10:40 AM
28

Bless you. 🫂
/r/MensRights08/01/22 03:22 AM
282

All you can really do at this juncture is stand by him. You'll probably take a lot of shit for it, but the right thing is rarely the easy thing.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 02:41 AM
13

Sick to death of politicians. Liars and thieves, all. Put, I dunno, hamsters in charge or something. They couldn't possibly fuck things up worse than politicians have.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 01:31 PM
3

Fuck your gaslighting.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:29 AM
1

Shove your gaslighting up your arse
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:29 AM
0

No need to thank me. Anyone with a conscience should be calling this what it is.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 07:58 PM
13

Is gaslighting your preferred form of copium?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 07:52 PM
0

Brian Morris is the paedophile. 🤦🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights02/01/22 07:12 PM
-7

Spare me the paedophile-spawned bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 07:11 PM
17

Shove your gaslighting too. 🖕🏻
/r/MensRights02/01/22 07:03 PM
12

Did you take an extra dose of stupid pills or something?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 06:58 PM
12

Fuck this gaslighting horseshit and fuck you.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 06:58 PM
-16

Not saying your feelings are invalidated Bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 06:57 PM
10

Fuck you.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 06:57 PM
16

No one asked you to gaslight OP, so fuck off.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 06:56 PM
11

Cram your gaslighting up your arse.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 06:56 PM
3

Let 'em screech.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 02:58 PM
2

If he's taking care of the home front, he's soooooo not getting a free ride. That shit's no joke.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 01:58 PM
-8

Can we cleanse 'Murrikuh and its genital mutilation culture in fire already?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 01:43 PM
44

Shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 12:08 PM
9

Some people are frauds on other things.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 02:56 PM
18

My God... 😢
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:21 AM
15

The guy may be a fraud politically, but no one deserves that.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 09:32 AM
25

I've heard it called the women are wonderful effect.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:48 PM
26

Sick to death of politicians. Put... I dunno, cats in charge or something. They couldn't possibly do worse.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 06:52 AM
4

Ah, I see you too are a man of culture. 🍷
/r/MensRights22/12/21 09:53 AM
6

If it once belonged to a guy named Khashoggi, you'll at least have fun. 😛
/r/MensRights22/12/21 09:49 AM
44

Anyone even thinking deeply about the men-are-cattle narrative in society is dangerous to something they're after. 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights22/12/21 09:42 AM
4

Beaten up for showing compassion. This world, I'm telling ya. 😒
/r/MensRights21/12/21 08:55 PM
29

If Terry Crews being open about his sexual abuse isn't manly, we all might as well pack it in because there's no such thing anymore. 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights21/12/21 11:53 AM
14

It doesn't matter who's doing it to them. Genital mutilation is still an attack on their masculinity.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 12:31 AM
-9

Why are you giving that cesspit the dignity of attention?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 01:28 PM
24

yikes.gif
/r/MensRights20/12/21 09:53 AM
1

There are different types of therapy. I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with all of them to describe them, but I know they exist. And what works for one person won't necessarily be right for the next. In my case, just someone to listen without judgement is a huge help. That isn't going to be enough for everyone though, and that's just fine.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 09:51 AM
1

Whatever you ultimately decide to do, be choosy. It sounds like you already know this (others reading, however, may not), but a bad therapist is worse than no therapist at all. And I hope this goes without saying, but we're here too.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 09:42 AM
30

I could just about explode right now. Fucking feminists.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 09:26 AM
50

What the fuck? She hit you and you were arrested and charged for it? 🤬
/r/MensRights20/12/21 09:21 AM
7

Louder for the back row, please.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 07:39 AM
5

That could have ended so much worse. Thank God it didn't. You don't have to have everything in your head sorted out right now. Is there any man-friendly professional in your area that might be available to help with this?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:39 AM
8

He would have been sentenced to life and shoved in genpop - basically executed by proxy - had it been in reverse. Four years less time served isn't merely a bad joke. It's a fucking insult. Rest in peace, lad. You deserved better than that.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 09:35 AM
2

where the fucking legislation is fucking bullshit Fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 06:08 AM
1

Hanging the old-fashioned way, without a trapdoor, would be sufficient.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 06:04 AM
5

The fact that rape requires the victim to be penetrated when most men are not raped (from an ethical definition) in this way fucking well is unequal.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 06:02 AM
2

Because children, male children in particular, in the Anglosphere are still regarded as property and not as people. Addicts, instead of being seen as ill and needing care and compassion, are seen as those who rape children ought to be.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 06:00 AM
4

...I forgot about that.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 11:21 PM
16

You're not a piece of meat. You're a human being who is allowed to say no to sexual activity. I just wanted to reaffirm this for you and for all our brothers reading this.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 10:16 PM
23

Nothing about what you described was funny. How the hell can they laugh? 🤬
/r/MensRights18/12/21 06:51 PM
18

They shouldn't be walking at all, free or otherwise. 🤬 I would offer a hug, but this screen won't let me.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 06:43 PM
2

Unfortunately, since this is a British case, that's correct from a legal standpoint. We all know what it is ethically, but the law doesn't care.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 06:38 PM
19

Please tell me you were able to get some kind of justice for what they did to you. 😢
/r/MensRights18/12/21 06:33 PM
5

I'm so sorry. 😢
/r/MensRights17/12/21 04:43 PM
1

I've heard it with a very few people where it's so obvious that even a dipshit like me can tell, so for what it's worth, I don't think you're crazy.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 05:03 PM
4

Usually when I ask if I'm making sense, it's because I think I've sounded disjointed and ramble-y, but when you put it that way... now I feel like a douche. 😟
/r/MensRights16/12/21 04:49 PM
8

Explain. Maybe I'm just a socially inept dumbshite, but I'm not sure what you mean.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 04:36 PM
1

One continued counter to what should be obvious bullshit, coming right up! 😁
/r/MensRights16/12/21 04:33 PM
10

https://www.circumcisionisafraud.com/ Here's a great place to start.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 02:34 PM
6

Males in general are sneered at, but yeah, add those other demographic specifiers - or even the incorrect assumption that they apply to you - and holy fuck the level of caustic thrown at you goes up to 11.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 09:13 AM
20

The feminists openly preach this though.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 06:37 AM
6

You rang?
/r/MensRights16/12/21 04:47 AM
4

🤣 I needed that laugh. Thank you.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 01:39 AM
28

I shouldn't be surprised, but... that's a thing?
/r/MensRights16/12/21 12:42 AM
3

The nasty ones among women aren't usually sending dirty pictures though. No, they go straight to slapping your arse or groping your willy. Which, exactly like you said, gets a pass because it's a woman doing it to a man.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 12:19 AM
8

That guy is pretty open about his hatred of men. Your time and breath are wasted on him.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 12:16 AM
4

Is this a US thing or a worldwide thing? Because if it's the former, I'd bet real money on what the culprit might be.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 11:42 PM
22

They claim they're worried enough to talk, but their actions show they can't possibly be that worried or they'd actually, you know, do something about it.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:53 PM
10

There are, of course, exceptions, but that's what you're probably going to see... and it starts basically as soon as he's out of the womb, when the poor little lad is handed over to a sadistic money-grubbing paedophile.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:52 PM
5

If you look at actions and not just empty words, it's pretty obvious it's not true for the overwhelming majority.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:33 PM
3

When humanity started. It evolved largely organically until the Victorian era. That bunch had a bad habit of making shit up and calling it traditional.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:28 PM
68

Let's be real here. The father protects his girls and no one gives a flying fuck about the boys by comparison.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:21 PM
5

A moron who thinks tradition started in 1945.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:12 PM
2

Thank heavens, not here.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:12 PM
5

Please tell me they're honest about genital mutilation. This is useless otherwise.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:00 PM
29

They say they are, but their action - or, rather, inaction - tells us all we really need to know.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 06:56 PM
26

Probably less dirty pictures and more outright sexual assault when it comes to what unwanted contact women force on men. Far too many women think they have complete carte blanche to touch us in any way they want at any time they want. Thanks to the way society and thus the law doesn't give a fuck about us, there is often no legal recourse for us even if we are taken seriously, which is so rare as to be newsworthy.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 06:51 PM
11

Don't read the comments.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 05:14 PM
53

Considering they keep sending their sons to that fucking butcher shop when they're mere hours old without any question, I find their sincerity incredibly difficult to believe.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 05:11 PM
2

Damn. 😟
/r/MensRights15/12/21 02:18 PM
5

I'm not.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 01:29 PM
2

Someone I was talking to was... I don't even know what to call it, but it's the result of something despicable that was imposed upon him. I teared up because (among other reasons) I don't know where he is and thus I can't go to him in person and comfort him. Words are not my strong point, but a hug might have said what my mouth just can't. It takes a great deal to get me to tear up, never mind cry.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:20 AM
4

Save yourself the heartache, the bills, and the potential criminal record and just don't go there. Like, ever. It's not worth it. You'd be better off buying a homestead with your bros and dropping off the grid.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 04:20 AM
2

Avoiding women, fine. That entanglement definitely isn't worth it. Neither, however, is porn. We should not encourage our brothers to be getting involved with something that addictive.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 04:17 AM
11

Believe all women though. They'd never make up such a heinous accusation. And if you'll buy that, I got some oceanfront property in Old Delhi.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 07:36 AM
6

And no one apart from us actually gives a damn at best.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 05:05 AM
2

Lucky for me, I just have to remember how ugly I am. That puts things in perspective in one hell of a hurry. I wouldn't touch this with a 10m pole. 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights14/12/21 05:01 AM
3

Robin Williams was right. Brain, penis, only half enough blood. 😩
/r/MensRights14/12/21 04:57 AM
2

Funny, that. 🤔
/r/MensRights14/12/21 04:53 AM
4

Humanity's ridiculous priorities are why it's a bloody miracle we haven't won a collective Darwin Award...
/r/MensRights14/12/21 04:52 AM
6

Casual sex should be an oxymoron, especially since 1981. Ignoring all the legal complications that can arise and the potential baby, there's this little thing called HIV lurking out there. Best-case scenario with that is you're on really unpleasant pills until the day you die. Worst-case scenario... You die slowly and in hellish pain. And you can't tell just by looking who has it. Is that really worth a few minutes of whoopie?
/r/MensRights14/12/21 04:45 AM
5

Someone linked a Discord not too long ago.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 02:48 AM
3

They can't cause something that doesn't actually exist, so... 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights14/12/21 02:43 AM
2

You'd be surprised.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 02:16 AM
8

How much do you want to bet the 86% not believed mostly have women as the alleged attackers? 🤔
/r/MensRights14/12/21 12:47 AM
9

Cannon fodder. That's all we are to that motherfucker. 🤬
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:56 PM
3

She'll probably weasel her way into a plea deal.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 05:17 AM
2

That was kind of my point to him.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 05:16 AM
4

Right wing and left wing part of same bird. Open your eyes.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 10:56 PM
2

Rape apologism won't get you anywhere here. 🙄
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:47 PM
164

Ethically? Absolutely. Legally? Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:19 AM
95

"wHeRe WaS sHe WhEN i WaS iN sCHoOl?" 🙄
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:13 AM
68

Don't read the comments on this story over at r/HolUp unless you want to develop a massive drinking problem... 😒
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:10 AM
13

Or pro-male in any sense. Or anything but a huge hypocrite who won't do to himself what he expects of everyone else. I feel dirty just linking those slimeballs, but it's the bastard's own words, so...
/r/MensRights11/12/21 05:07 AM
22

Believe it or not, men are not living sex toys. We're completely capable of not wanting to have sex. We can be overpowered, drugged, blackmailed, or threatened too. Even by women. Shocker, isn't it? And our penises aren't the brightest crayons in the box in this department. They don't particularly care if a touch is wanted or not. They react the same to both. So physically it's completely possible. As for the law... Seeing as most societies don't give a flying fuck about men and boys when you ge…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 02:26 AM
3

Any child of mine would be screwed, but a son would be especially screwed, so between the two, I would rather have a daughter.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 11:17 PM
14

I'm surprised, given the source, that the tone wasn't one of jumping for joy.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 02:28 PM
3

That's just it. There's absolutely nothing left for me. Not without some serious divine intervention, and I've used up all the miracles I'm likely to get. Once the last fumes of my usefulness are exhausted, all I have to look forward to is increasingly ill health and the destitution that comes with it.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 02:26 PM
7

No, seriously, that's what he is. Just like Vidkun Quisling or Philippe Pétain.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 07:31 AM
17

Or a collaborator with the enemy.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 07:28 AM
4

Same, honestly. At least right now. But once I'm truly no longer needed in a few years and I truly have no purpose, I'm going over the side of the upper bridge downtown and into the Oswego. And that fall should do the job. And there's no point in wasting your time trying to talk me out of it. My life was over years ago. The biological processes just haven't caught up yet.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 07:16 AM
17

Not just now. That's been what they've wanted all the way back to Seneca Falls in 1848.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 07:14 AM
4

But it's hunky-dory for a man to be cannon fodder. The author of that drivel can go fuck himself with a rusty nail bat.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 07:09 AM
2

More like Rep. Philippe Pétain. 🙄
/r/MensRights10/12/21 01:16 AM
2

Left wing and right wing part of same bird, genius. 🤦🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:16 PM
22

Probably.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:47 PM
6

Is this about the man who was just exonerated as a result of the movie they're not doing anymore?
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:45 PM
12

"Toxic masculinity" is nothing more than a talking point used by feminists to demonise all masculinity.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:44 PM
14

Toxic masculinity doesn't exist. 🙄
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:42 PM
1

The left stopped giving a shit about the working man 60 years ago when they got in bed with the feminists. The right these days thinks we're only good for cannon fodder and ATMs. Men have no friends in politics. Anyone who simps for any of them is either delusional or crooked.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:41 PM
12

As sad as it sounds, this may be what it takes if lawsuits fail.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 03:17 PM
1

I'm so sorry. 😢
/r/MensRights09/12/21 01:51 PM
4

I said no such thing, so I'll thank you for not putting words in my mouth going forward. 🙄 What part of fuck both is unclear to you?
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:40 AM
1

It's all a load of codswallop. Simping for one or the other just fucks us all in the end.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:34 AM
7

It's all snake oil. Fuck all of them with a splintery baseball bat covered in rusty staples and glass shards.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:29 AM
13

99.998% useless, or something like that.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 04:01 AM
14

Iceland didn't ban it. They tried to, but the usual suspects raised a shitfit and they backed off.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 03:52 AM
27

It actually isn't banned anywhere. It fucking well should be, but it isn't.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 01:10 AM
5

Don't date or hook up either.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 12:32 AM
8

From the same bunch that brought us the continuation of male-exclusive conscription. Fuck off with that snake oil.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 11:54 PM
7

No. You're smarter than the rest. And I think deep-down, the so-called friends calling you gay know that.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 11:41 PM
55

You're not overreacting. The only way to win the game is to refuse to play in the first place.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 11:28 PM
0

Heh. SAUSAGE Party. I like it.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 07:00 PM
3

Damn. 😟
/r/MensRights08/12/21 07:52 AM
7

They all suck. Fuck all of them.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 05:12 PM
2

He's a Quisling. Men bad, women good, the whole nine yards.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 04:55 PM
33

With friends like her, who needs enemies?
/r/MensRights07/12/21 03:43 PM
7

Absolutely nothing. She's not interested in giving men a fair shake.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 03:39 PM
30

That sounds like a harbinger of things to come. Bail out now while you still can.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 01:55 PM
3

It's just more dishonest feminist bollocks. If they didn't spend the last 50 years cooking the books and threatening anyone who exposes the cooked books (ask Erin Pizzey all about that), this shit wouldn't be a thing.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 01:51 PM
14

Never was.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 01:43 PM
11

In case you haven't been paying attention, just about nobody gives a flying fuck about men and boys. A unisex draft is basically the only path to no draft at all while any of us reading this now are still alive.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 03:31 AM
7

Expanding it is the only way it's ever going to be abolished. If you can't grasp this... you haven't been paying attention to how utterly few fucks are given about men and boys.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 03:29 AM
20

Making it unisex is the quickest way to get rid of it.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 01:45 AM
6

A combination of open Quislings and quiet chickenshits is responsible for this move. Never trust a politician.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:56 PM
144

Republicans are red Democrats are blue Neither one gives A flying fuck about you
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:55 PM
1

Doesn't she win if you do that? Don't give her the satisfaction.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:53 PM
13

I don't even particularly trust cops and this kind of behaviour is still obvious.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:51 PM
25

Reread the Declaration of Sentiments, the very first piece of feminist writing. Feminism has been about punishing all men from its very inception.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:49 PM
45

I wouldn't even then. Affection can be feigned.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:07 PM
2

No, not even this. Back before child labour was outlawed, the kid's pay went directly into the parent's pocket from the employer without stopping at the child's pocket. At no point whatsoever was the kid entitled to a penny of his own wages.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:06 PM
31

This is, unfortunately, what we've come to.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:02 PM
11

What the hell kind of feels-over-reals world are you living in? 🙄
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:01 PM
1

Not the same thing. The kid did the work and the check was made out to the parents. That money was never legally the kid's to start.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:57 PM
1

I'm surprised they still pay us. As opposed to the way child labour used to be handled, where the kids never actually saw the money. It went straight to the parents. It's surprising something similar isn't going on here.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:50 PM
8

That guy is a Quisling. He doesn't give a rat's arse about men. Best not to engage.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:46 PM
287

Yeah, you totally raped her. /s (She probably unironically thinks something to that effect though. Be on your guard for the rest of the year.)
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:55 PM
1

The kid might not grow up in the three-bedroom, white-picket-fence house in Suburbia, so we just kill him and throw him in the trash? What the hell is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:20 PM
0

You mean fruit flies? That's what I call 'em. Probably for the same reason racists bother to have a handful of friends who don't match their ethnicity.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 04:33 PM
16

Maybe someone swapped out his cologne with Eau de Simp. 🤷🏻‍♂️ (Humour is my coping mechanism.)
/r/MensRights06/12/21 04:30 PM
3

Between this and Biden's Title IX crapola, I only have one thing to say... Republicans are red Democrats are blue Neither one gives A flying fuck about you
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:53 AM
5

Between this and fuckwads like Waters, all I can say is this... Republicans are red Democrats are blue Neither one gives A flying fuck about you
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:29 AM
10

Which is currently restricted to the zone within 300 miles of this planet when it comes to even semi-permanent habitation. So at this point? Same bloody thing.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:27 AM
18

Because penis. That's literally it.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:24 AM
1

Are you talking about Mary Kay Letourneau?
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:15 AM
10

Men and boys are men and boys no matter where we are.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 03:09 AM
6

Can't drive if we don't sign up to be chattel either.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 10:01 PM
0

ExxonMobil can go sit on a barbed-wire dildo. 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights05/12/21 09:49 PM
2

Roughly half the people killed in first-world abortions are boys. I expect this proportion to tilt as feminism continues to grow ever more radically anti-male. It's not a huge leap from where we are to androcide.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 05:19 PM
2

Draft only the politicians who want the war. If they really want it that bad, they can go get themselves blown up for their bullshit. Leave the rest of us out of it.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 01:36 PM
404

I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 01:29 PM
17

In the unlikely event that you're not being sarcastic...
/r/MensRights05/12/21 07:26 AM
3

In his time, 5'6" was that kind of tall. The average Frenchman was 5'2".
/r/MensRights05/12/21 03:36 AM
43

Manslaughter? Should have been murder.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 03:31 AM
2

Bonaparte also wasn't actually short.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 02:00 AM
134

Yep.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 01:20 AM
1

🥱
/r/MensRights05/12/21 01:15 AM
2

To a Quisling like him, there's no difference.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 01:10 AM
2

Bullshit. Boys are not allowed to remain whole.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 01:08 AM
3

Touché.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 01:06 AM
23

They want us to think the zero-sum rat race is the only way. Fuck that noise and fuck them with a cactus.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:37 PM
2

Unborn boys are still boys.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:43 PM
2

Probably paid someone off for that.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 07:25 AM
1

Who cares what some billionaire thinks? He doesn't have to live in the real world with the rest of us.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 07:17 AM
4

Until there's a fundamental shift in the state of affairs, any involvement with women is the absolute last thing a man needs. It's not worth the risk to life, limb, liberty, or reputation.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 07:09 AM
-2

Our semen doesn't work anything like the uterine lining (and thank heavens for that). If you seriously can't put that off until you get home, you might want to consider being evaluated for either really bad premature ejaculation or a sexual addiction.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 06:55 AM
22

Turn the tables on them by not giving a fuck what they think about it. If they're attacking you for it, they already think you're subhuman anyway.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 06:07 AM
6

Better idea: Only draft politicians who are responsible for granting approval for a war. You want it so bad, you get your arse up and go fight it. Leave the rest of us out of your bullshite.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 11:31 PM
16

You're not overreacting. We're fucked, and not in any way that could be considered fun. The only viable option we have left is to agree en masse not to participate in this society anymore. To walk away and build our own thing.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 07:09 AM
24

What a douche.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 07:00 AM
3

Because strong men end up in prison for things they didn't do. It doesn't pay not to be a total pushover anymore.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 03:14 AM
19

Absolutely nothing unless it actually gets used. Which we all know it won't.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 09:03 PM
23

I'll believe they take misandry seriously when I see hard evidence.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 07:31 PM
24

Yeah, that's not suspicious at all. /s
/r/MensRights02/12/21 03:27 PM
10

We have a ringer here.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:47 PM
94

I have serious doubts about her being sorry for anything that happened to him.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 06:16 AM
9

Shut up, Quisling.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 10:16 PM
2

We should call you Ptolemy 'cause you're the King of Denial.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 07:15 PM
2

I couldn't tell you if the term is unique to this rat hole, but moronic laws like that most certainly are not.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 12:57 AM
3

Not just in 'Murrikuh. This bullshit is far more widespread than you think.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 12:54 AM
3

In far too many places, it is if the rapist uses her vagina.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 12:52 AM
5

Wouldn't shock me a bit if that's what really happened. But we all know even if it is, at least one of them will definitely get away with it.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 12:11 AM
21

Well, of course. They don't care about us.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 09:22 PM
8

Odd flex to get him on board, but if it keeps the little lad out of the butcher shop, take the win.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 09:10 PM
29

He's a simp and a Quisling. Of course all that matters to him is replacing men.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:19 AM
3

I do have to give the mods here props. They have a hell of a lot more patience than I do. (Let this comment stand as a Shermanesque statement regarding ever joining the mod team here. You couldn't pay me to wade through all the bullshit streaming in from both feminists posting in bad faith and the admins acting in bad faith...) As for a possible connection, it does look similar enough to me to warrant digging, but I'm not the best judge of that.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 06:11 AM
2

If you can get this Quisling his just desserts in this manner, more power to you. I'm no good at spotting these patterns.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 05:13 AM
2

That wouldn't shock me, but I have yet to see evidence suggesting it.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 05:04 AM
16

They absolutely would do this in real life if they thought they could get away with it.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 04:12 AM
55

Plus the whole it's only rape if it's a penis bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 02:10 AM
5

You could have stopped with ...it wouldn't exist. Anyone who takes telling the truth about feminism as an attack on women is either stupid or neck-deep in Kool-Aid.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 02:08 AM
36

Another Quisling for the list. Sit down and shut up? Ain't happenin', Benny.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 02:03 AM
0

Vidkun Quisling - Norwegian dictator during WW2, in league with occupying Nazi Germany. Name is now synonymous with traitor.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 02:01 AM
3

The proposed not-solutions make perfect sense when you consider OP is openly Quisling.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 01:55 AM
5

He's in league with that ilk.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 10:19 PM
14

He doesn't seem to think it actually exists. If he did, there wouldn't be a constant stream of whataboutism from him.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 09:41 PM
32

And of course the first comment here is the usual whataboutism from none other than u/EnvironmentalWar4627. Doesn't he ever get bored with his Quisling shtick?
/r/MensRights24/11/21 09:04 PM
1

🤦🏻‍♂️ A win in this situation would be leaving the situation without being arrested for something he didn't do, hospitalised, or killed. Society at large and especially the pigs will always take the side of a woman over a man no matter what, so he's fucked.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:44 PM
1

What I'm saying is there's no way for a man to win at all. He's fucked from the moment the situation starts.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:36 PM
1

Problem is there are almost no decent human beings amongst the pigs. Almost all the ones who aren't personally abusive know where the rot is and choose to say nothing.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:27 PM
1

I'm not talking about the hyperindividualistic nonsense that is MGTOW. I'm talking about all of us leaving the dumpster fire together at the same time, building something we can actually call our own together, and leaving Clown World to wallow in its rot.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:26 PM
1

No, they'll just arrest him.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:20 PM
0

This is our only real option. A man in this society flat-out is not welcome unless he's rich. We must leave. Together, all at once.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:18 PM
1

The authorities don't give a shit if it's a man being hurt by a woman.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:14 PM
1

As much as I sincerely wish that carried weight, the law and the rest of Clown World doesn't see it that way, and that will lead to either legal troubles, a lengthy hospital stay, or an early grave.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:13 PM
4

Bad bot
/r/MensRights24/11/21 03:55 PM
2

Bad bot
/r/MensRights24/11/21 03:55 PM
11

Attempting to doxx someone who calls out his simping. Is there no low to which u/EnvironmentalWar4627 will not sink?
/r/MensRights24/11/21 03:54 PM
8

She wasn't crazy. She was an arsehole. There's a difference.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 03:34 PM
9

People who adore that Nazi-sympathising paedophile are in the way of it.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 03:34 PM
9

It sounds like your mother has seen this before. Also, shame on your brother.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 12:43 PM
2

This does look on the surface like a textbook case of, as my dad would put it, money talks and bullshit walks. Not having access to what the jury saw, however, it would hardly be fair to say definitively. Both disgusting conspiracies and the rich getting slaps on the wrist for execution-worthy crimes have happened before, after all.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 10:52 PM
0

Yes, advise him to get himself hard time or even two in the chest for an "unprovoked" assault (yes, we know it isn't, but they don't give a fuck ). Great idea.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 10:13 PM
37

Why the hell would that have been on her mind to begin with? That was beyond harassment, and further I would wonder if she was a paedo.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 10:09 PM
6

[cough]Comrade Napoleon [cough]
/r/MensRights23/11/21 09:56 PM
3

Feminists and anyone who drank their poison Kool-Aid.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 09:30 PM
3

Most things are easier than winding up with massive alimony and child support payments that drive you to the poor house and kids you're not allowed to see because some biddy who got tired of you made shit up to win in court.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 09:28 PM
0

Can still lose? More like almost certainly will lose.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 09:25 PM
11

The "most perfect world possible" for an openly gay man... is one without men? It takes a simp or a moron of a man to say that, and since he isn't about to be simping, that kinda narrows it down, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights23/11/21 09:24 PM
4

We're not allowed to. We're barely above chattel at this point.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 09:22 PM
9

bEliEvE aLl wOmeN
/r/MensRights23/11/21 09:19 PM
5

Film that shit before telling anyone. Society's default is to assume you're either lying or deserving of it. If the pigs don't believe you, laugh you out of their presence, or, worst of all, actually arrest you, you're fucked. This is the clown world we're in.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 09:18 PM
8

As if it isn't good for the other party too. 🙄
/r/MensRights23/11/21 04:41 PM
2

Hooking up is asking for all kinds of horrific trouble. If you must indulge in carnal pleasures, Rosie Palmer or a fleshlight won't file a false report based on second thoughts after the fact.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 04:40 PM
2

Unfortunately, to Wall Street and Capitol Hill, the word of a male isn't worth much. It's sad that Debbie Downer is the realist these days, but that's the hand we're dealt so long as we keep playing this game.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 12:45 AM
1

It hasn't worked yet. That remains to be seen until next November. And to be blunt, the best-case scenario to expect is nothing at all. At worst... see that UN tweet.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 07:11 PM
20

Elisabeth Bathory, is that you?
/r/MensRights22/11/21 04:39 PM
3

That goes without saying.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 06:52 AM
10

Sadly, you're probably right.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 12:14 AM
42

If they're talking like that about something that matters to you, they really aren't.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 11:09 PM
23

I saved a load of money on my car insurance by switching my legal gender thanks to poorly-written laws with loopholes big enough to accommodate both Panzer VIIIs at the same time with room to spare!
/r/MensRights21/11/21 11:08 PM
6

I like it.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 10:07 PM
2

Nuclear families separated from the extended family, largely a product of the Industrial Revolution, was never sustainable.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 09:23 PM
6

On one hand, this is Red China we're talking about. This is totally something they would do (and have done before and will invariably do again - and before someone pisses and moans, 'Murrikuh does this shit too). On the other, it's the motherfucking Guardian.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 07:45 PM
11

I doubt the misandry in journalism is that new.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:58 PM
47

Men absolutely should do this. But not just in pairs. Hell, whole homesteads.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:56 PM
41

🐔💩 is what they are.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:54 PM
5

Fucking America. 🤬
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:32 PM
25

Part of me wants to hug those guys - a lot of them sound like they could use it - but also doesn't want to bring back those memories. Another part of me wants to put their attackers through a woodchipper.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:31 PM
3

toxic masculinity Doesn't actually exist. It's a victim-blaming talking point, nothing more.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:09 PM
4

Sick to death of politicians. Hang every last one of those fuckwads.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 05:53 PM
16

He's a shill for the Sauds and also a politician, the latter of which is by definition a liar.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 05:50 PM
20

No politician is our friend.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:21 PM
8

does this women believe that men are like failed women or something? Feminists believe either exactly this... or that we're rabid beasts that must be exterminated at all costs. The only thing that's changed from the 19th century is that it's males instead of Indians.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 07:58 AM
8

They do know. They don't care. But they know.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 07:51 AM
5

Despite the infighting, they can all seem to agree on one thing all the way from Seneca Falls on down to now - everything bad is all the fault of all men everywhere.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 05:32 AM
4

Ever since western communists went hardcore Woke-sa Nostra in the '60s, they haven't exactly cared much for logic. Or the working class, for that matter.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 04:47 AM
4

You're dealing with a victim-blaming communist. Good luck. You're gonna need it.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 04:43 AM
4

You'd get further talking to a brick wall than you would a communist.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 04:41 AM
3

What the fuck? And she'll probably weasel her way out of having to accept any consequences or responsibility for it too.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 04:33 AM
1

The casual observer would probably wonder what gorillas ever did to you, but I'll let that slide. 😛
/r/MensRights21/11/21 04:19 AM
5

The feminist patriarchy bullshit holds that men have all the things in our hoard and women have none. Thus any gain men make must somehow be at women's expense.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 04:18 AM
5

Feminists. I've seen women in here who genuinely give a damn about what happens to us and are disgusted by this. It isn't right to paint them with the same brush as the lovely specimen of humanity that wrote the post OP brought to our attention.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 04:15 AM
5

The world would be better off if 'Murrikuh were blown to oblivion for that reason (among far too many others to attempt listing).
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:55 AM
4

And the mask comes off. It's all about women in the end with you lot. You don't give a flying fuck about us. Never have. Never will.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:53 AM
10

Not technically geographic Scandinavia, but cultural Scandinavia... and has just as bad a feminist infestation as geographic Scandinavia, from everything I hear.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:50 AM
3

If it's misery, why the hell are you still with her?
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:46 AM
3

Using that victim-blaming slur and trying to pretend it's something it isn't shows you came here in bad faith in the first place. We're done here.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:46 AM
10

All of Fennoscandia is held hostage by feminism, except the Muslim ghettos... and you don't want to go there either.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:42 AM
5

Everyone who thinks toxic masculinity is actually a thing also thinks all masculinity is toxic, so... yeah, you are.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:40 AM
5

The very phrase is victim-blaming by its nature since no one who uses it outside of pointing out that it doesn't exist doesn't think all masculinity is toxic.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:39 AM
5

We get it. Men bad. Everything is men's fault. If we would just cut off our balls and stop being men, everything would be perfect. We've heard it all before. 🙄
/r/MensRights21/11/21 01:46 AM
5

Your victim-blaming bullshit won't gain any traction here.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 01:37 AM
1

Broken link.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:43 AM
12

If she's so blatantly disrespectful of you, why is she still your girlfriend?
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:41 AM
4

🐔💩, amirite?
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:34 AM
3

Well, that explains everything.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:27 AM
0

That's what they say they hear. What they probably hear any time a man says anything other than yes mistress, whatever you say mistress is the sound effect from any of the Peanuts specials played whenever an adult speaks since they don't actually care listen to us.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:24 AM
6

🙄
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:21 AM
4

A small number of men do seem to see women as less than; they are shamed for this six ways to Sunday. A disturbingly large number of women (as well as men, for that matter) quite clearly see men as less than; far from being shamed, this behaviour is applauded in every conceivable way.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 09:53 PM
3

You're sadly probably right. 😟
/r/MensRights20/11/21 09:48 PM
5

It's not tone-deaf, it's an outright attack.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 09:41 PM
21

Goebbels would be immensely proud of the feminists.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 09:40 PM
5

Even cats and dogs are afforded more legal protections than men and boys these days.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 09:04 PM
16

Don't apologise for being a guy, even in jest.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 08:52 PM
16

Toxic masculinity doesn't exist. It's just a device feminists use to shut down discussion on actual men's mental health issues by blaming the victim.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 08:51 PM
3

Big cuddlepuppers are best puppers. 🐶🥰
/r/MensRights20/11/21 08:48 PM
5

Sad but true. 😟
/r/MensRights20/11/21 08:39 PM
2

Kitties are awesome.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 08:35 PM
5

Cat, dog, either way. Just make sure your potential furiend picks you too before you commit.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 08:29 PM
11

We get it already. Men bad. Everything is men's fault. 🙄
/r/MensRights20/11/21 08:28 PM
8

This is why I have a cat. He insists on squishes many times a day. Good kitty.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 08:22 PM
7

Throwing out that slur shows you were never on men's side to begin with.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 08:14 PM
13

And the mask comes off!
/r/MensRights20/11/21 08:04 PM
7

You're insisting being a man means kowtowing to people who hate us to the point of wanting at least 90% of us dead and the rest of us in chains. That is not going to fly here. Maybe go on back to r/MensLib.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 08:02 PM
13

But we're the only dangerous ones. Yeah, and I'm the Queen of Jan Mayen.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 07:53 PM
16

You're not fooling anyone.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 07:51 PM
7

The one going out of the way to defend a misandrist attack is pointing fingers at other people saying they're going to be tripped to placate a bear. Which is both hilarious and fitting for a Quisling.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 07:34 PM
21

You're literally defending a sexist attack on all men, which the post the OP brought to our attention is. You haven't a leg to stand on here.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 07:30 PM
7

Yeah, okey-doke, Vidkun.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 07:27 PM
6

Quisling.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 07:25 PM
15

Save it, Patty Hearst. I'm not buying any Stockholm syndrome.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 07:24 PM
12

Toxic masculinity doesn't exist. It's a bullshit term invented by feminists to engage in victim-blaming on men's issues.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 07:22 PM
166

It's shameful, but is it really surprising?
/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:13 AM
29

Stupid people gonna stupid.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 10:33 PM
1

They would probably expel any boy that went along with it, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 12:18 PM
6

It doesn't apply to anything in CANADA.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 09:53 PM
4

Not applicable in Canada.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 09:51 PM
3

Which is meaningless in Canada.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 09:51 PM
4

Title IX doesn't apply in Canada.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 09:50 PM
2

With the main point being anti-profiteering. The con artists keeping it going make beaucoup buccs from butchering boys.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 03:35 PM
2

Applying Selective Service registration to women as well as men is probably the quickest way to get rid of it completely. That's what I'm hoping for, anyway.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:50 AM
11

Count the ritual genital mutilation that's essentially forced on Filipino boys and that number shoots up to about 95%.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 04:41 AM
9

The only people who don't think we look ridiculous are us. The rest are on a steady diet of feminist Kool-Aid whether they intend it or not.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 01:18 AM
8

He didn't want it. She didn't respect that. It doesn't fucking matter why he didn't want it. We all know you wouldn't be going anywhere near there if he were a she.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 01:15 AM
10

They want men dead. That's the end game.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 01:10 AM
10

Profit is the main driver of MGM. It's definitely relevant.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 01:03 AM
1

Knowledge of history never has been 'Murrikuh's strong point, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 06:05 PM
18

You seem to be aware, and I'm definitely aware, that we are, unfortunately, not in a sane world. Not by a longshot.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 04:58 PM
1

There's a difference between the enemy outside the walls and the fifth column inside the walls that pays lip service when convenient but is actually engaging in sabotage.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 04:56 PM
2

The Industrial Revolution all but obliterated the actual traditional European family. Whatever was left of it in the ethnic immigrant neighbourhoods in US cities was itself destroyed by the rise of suburbia.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 04:43 PM
22

We all know you wouldn't be saying that if he were a she. 🙄
/r/MensRights16/11/21 04:08 PM
1

Isolated nuclear families aren't even traditional in the first place... unless their idea of traditional is 1950, which was a massive departure from any traditional concept of tradition.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 03:58 PM
19

Perceived perks.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 11:20 PM
2

We live in a fundamentally sick society full of sick motherfuckers. That isn't news.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 06:46 AM
3

This binary bullshit again. Unimpressive. Useless. Safely dismissed.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 06:43 AM
7

The apologists in this thread not seeing this for exactly what it is - and I agree 110% with you on that - are just wasting our time.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 06:39 AM
2

That presumes we have the same goal. There is ample cause to doubt this is the case.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 06:37 AM
40

People, unfortunately, don't often give a rat's arse about evidence. In this case, it's innocent children who are made to suffer directly.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 11:50 PM
5

Let this rat hole burn to the ground. No one who isn't thoroughly brainwashed will miss it.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 07:02 PM
22

Especially the chickenhawks.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 06:37 PM
12

Thank you for your concession. Feel free to see yourself out at your leisure.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 05:39 PM
13

If your cause can't win enough support to survive when it depends on feeding off the literal blood of others, perhaps it doesn't deserve to exist.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 05:34 PM
29

Saying only men belong as cannon fodder seems pretty hateful to me. 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights14/11/21 05:11 PM
8

Know your enemy and all.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 02:11 AM
4

That something ghastly was going on and Europe's Jews were square in the bullseye wasn't exactly a secret. Almost no one on the outside lifted a finger. The US, for example, only took in 986 people (and stashed them in a little corner of nowhere called Oswego).
/r/MensRights10/11/21 08:52 PM
4

I would sign it in a heartbeat if I were in the UK.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 08:44 PM
3

Good ol' PM 🐔💩.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 09:17 AM
14

And they're going to address the other stealthing - that is, lying about the pill - when, exactly? (Spoiler alert: When Hell freezes over.)
/r/MensRights10/11/21 09:16 AM
2

It's all human sacrifice any time a knife is taken to another person in the name of a ritual. The only difference is how much of the unwilling victim is being sacrificed.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 09:10 AM
3

iF wE mAkE mURdeR IlLeGAl, pEopLe wILl dO It oN tHE sLy aNd MAkE a mEss!!1! 🙄
/r/MensRights10/11/21 09:04 AM
12

Ironically, not banning this makes them less safe. Jewish boys die from it too.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 09:00 AM
6

Rape masquerading as surgery or ritual is everyone's business.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 08:59 AM
37

Right this minute? Probably the Sentinelese. Their home is sinking and they have literally nowhere to go where they won't die in droves of diseases that make the rest of us merely uncomfortable for a week or so. Gender doesn't really matter there. Men and women alike are fucked six ways to Sunday on North Sentinel. What brilliant (/s) plan do the Wokesa Nostra have for that?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 07:02 AM
2

Normally it would be the case that one can want in the left hand and shit in the right and watch which one fills up first, but at this rate it's only a matter of time before husbands are legally obligated to wear shock collars.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 06:54 AM
4

A non-damaging pinprick to a girl will land you in prison, as it should be. Why the ever-loving fuck should it be any different for a boy?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 06:45 AM
7

And they should be told to cram that excuse up their arses. They want to cut themselves up? I'd treat it as one of Bill Engvall's signs. But the moment they go after someone else with that knife, they need a date with the hangman.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 06:44 AM
5

Let me guess - 'Murrikuh?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 06:41 AM
8

Not sure if poor attempt at duplicity or just that stupid. I've come to expect both from upstate New York. 🙄 In either case, the situations don't compare in the slightest. Try again.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 06:41 AM
12

It probably was. Hell, half the circumcision article was written by one of Creepy Brian's flunkies.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 01:41 AM
23

We don't get to decide how much of our bodies we get to keep. It only goes downhill from there.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 01:16 AM
3

It never wasn't about hating men, even all the way back in 1848.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 12:10 AM
21

No one has to. 🙄
/r/MensRights10/11/21 12:06 AM
4

The Telegraph has lied about the coronavirus before. How can we trust they're not lying this time?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 12:03 AM
10

What a load of shite. Anyone who puts a knife on a healthy child should be executed on sight.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 11:46 PM
22

Someone has to. Might as well be me.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 11:45 PM
10

No it fucking doesn't. Piss off with that century-old lie.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 10:49 PM
35

You're a vile child butcher apologist. You're sick.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 10:39 PM
36

No. Leave the kids the fuck alone.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 10:36 PM
13

Cutting a child for any reason other than they are in immediate danger of death otherwise (which basically means never) should be punishable by execution on sight. The only language cutters understand is brute force.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 10:20 PM
25

This has nothing to do with woke bullshite and everything to do with not butchering children.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 10:15 PM
23

Why do you value the lives of Jewish boys less than the lives of other boys? You an antisemite or something?
/r/MensRights09/11/21 10:07 PM
12

I feel bad for the cats.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 11:21 PM
9

Nasty. Just plain nasty.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 09:15 PM
13

Cutting healthy kids should be punishable by death.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 05:22 PM
0

Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 07:46 PM
0

Voting is utterly useless. 🙄
/r/MensRights07/11/21 06:19 PM
0

Ugh, woke. That lot is the worst.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 05:32 AM
2

The ones who know they're upholding a pile of shit, yes.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 04:38 AM
2

When you put it that way... Probably.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:28 AM
15

Encourage him to get evaluated and, if it comes out as you suspect it will, you need to expose her ableism at her workplace in so damning and irrefutable a way that she cannot possibly deny it. Anyone who would mock someone like that has absolutely no business working with the kinds of people she does. They need the kind of patience and compassion she quite obviously lacks. And to further rub salt in the wound, if you're old enough to pick where you want to go, go with him. Maybe then she might …
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:25 AM
-2

Flawed would be if it's built to do one thing and it does something else. That is hardly the case here. This dumpster fire of a system is doing exactly what the scum who built and perpetuate it built it to do.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:13 AM
-5

They're either naive or just plain sheep at best.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:11 AM
7

Why the fuck should an unrelated charge have anything to do with this fuckup on the part of the state? 🤦🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:04 AM
39

Don't date and definitely don't hook up either.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 12:12 PM
48

He's putting himself behind bars to get the hell away from her. It's implied.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 12:05 PM
3

All of this, plus the absolutely demeaning way she references other women. If anyone ever thought sisterhood was supposed to be part of feminism, I hope this helps to remove the rose-coloured glasses. I'm not anywhere near a feminist and I found that rude af on principle.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 03:55 AM
11

Speaking of Jesus, it's beyond bizarre that they do that in the Philippines since they're supermajority Catholic, and Catholicism absolutely forbids this unless there's a life-threatening problem.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 08:32 PM
7

I wouldn't mind the suggestion to help stay-at-home parents so much if they didn't assume it would be the mother doing it. News flash, mainstream: Fathers love their children and want to be there too. I know it tore mine up that he couldn't be around much until I was 13 since we depended on his income to have food and a roof, and it sucked ass on my end too. There was a whole lot we didn't get to do because it had to be sacrificed so we could eat.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 08:03 PM
38

Because men don't actually matter. We're pack mules, ATMs, and sperm banks. Nothing besides.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 07:42 PM
2

🤣 That's my line! 😛
/r/MensRights05/11/21 07:41 PM
44

Men of Portugal, drop out of society. Together. Build your own.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:22 PM
2

We want the draft gone. This is merely the best candidate for getting it done quickly.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:18 PM
8

Do I have to spell it out for you in little words too? I like cock, and even if I didn't, I wouldn't touch you specifically with a 10m pole.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:47 AM
8

People would have to give a shit about boys and men as a whole. I don't see that ever really happening unless we've suddenly and en masse left the picture entirely.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:42 AM
12

This is why we need to walk away. Not one by one like MGTOW, but all at once and together.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:40 AM
9

Good thing I don't want "bitches" (charming of you, by the by) in the first place. 😉
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:35 AM
13

It's not just grown men. It's boys too. Children. And a particularly unlucky few are growing up with their mothers being the very people doing what you're describing. I shudder to think about how bad they must be to those sons at home. Yet because they're only boys and therefore only future pack mules, no one cares at best (and they actively cheer it on at worst). Intervention to rescue them from that? Never gonna happen.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:33 AM
1

Every time I've ever seen stats on sentencing disparities (a place where we can quantify this stuff) across ethnicities and with gender factored in, they strongly suggest a black man gets fucked over way more for being a man than for being black - but he still does get fucked over for being black. Both are wrong af and piss me off, of course, but if we can only move on one thing at a time (since some people seem to think that's how it works 😒), the higher priority is pretty obvious.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 01:40 AM
-23

He's blue once that uniform and badge go on.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 01:28 AM
-19

In this situation, he's blue.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 01:27 AM
-12

I don't actually believe that to be his opinion in the first place. It would be just like him or his scumbag father to use this to woo support.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 12:58 AM
17

So he says. Can't trust a word out of anyone from that family.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 12:57 AM
2

Not getting fucked in court six ways to Sunday would certainly ease the financial burden and the stress that comes with it, but it doesn't change the loneliness aspect of it.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 11:18 PM
8

Too many people refuse to think beyond the surface.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 09:04 PM
10

Exactly. I fail to see how the constant infantilisation is anything else but demeaning, never mind empowering.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 09:03 PM
16

Because men don't count as human. It really is as simple as this.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 08:48 PM
13

Fuck the pigs.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 08:46 PM
5

So... a Quisling.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 07:21 AM
4

Selective Service
/r/MensRights04/11/21 07:21 AM
8

How is this a men's issue?
/r/MensRights04/11/21 06:21 AM
1

GTFO with the whataboutism.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 12:49 AM
5

If what we often get is stop being toxic, can you blame a lot of men for not going that road?
/r/MensRights03/11/21 10:58 PM
15

Loneliness is so deleterious to one's mental and physical health that some guys are willing to take that risk. I get it, but at the same time I don't. I definitely get not wanting to be so bloody alone, but to risk that again to only maybe lift the pall? The risk-to-reward ratio seems stacked far too much in favour of risk to be worth it to me.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 07:34 PM
1

Perhaps new is the problem. Perhaps God hasn't been tried and found wanting, but instead found difficult (that little self-control problem already mentioned, mostly) and not actually tried. But you're probably right about a massive collapse being necessary. It'll probably take that before more people might even consider that hedonism got us there.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 07:24 PM
8

Unironically a smart move these days. Not to mention far, far safer and cheaper.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 07:20 PM
19

We don't actually count for shit, remember?
/r/MensRights03/11/21 07:19 PM
7

I found it odd with Prince Philip too. Scotland, to the best of my knowledge, didn't seem to care about this with Mary I's consorts (although her first husband Francis was King of France in his own right, so there was that).
/r/MensRights03/11/21 07:18 PM
14

Subconscious? Seems quite conscious to me.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 01:00 AM
7

BINGO.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 11:23 PM
2

I said nothing about evil. That merely isn't something I care to see.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 01:31 PM
1

... Thank you for that mental image.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 11:43 AM
10

Flowers make me sneeze. But, yeah, I get your meaning.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 12:17 AM
26

He may be an insufferable fuckwit, but this particular wording is an attack on all men, not just him.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 07:42 PM
7

Unless you have money, you have no friends in politics... and even then, those friends are fair-weather at best.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 08:30 AM
10

"had multiple sexual encounters with a 15-year-old student" No. Bitch raped a 15-year-old student multiple times. Call that shit what it is. EDIT: At least the sentence also keeps her away from Kentucky kids professionally on a permanent basis.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 08:22 AM
5

Kids need their dads too. Mine wasn't there a whole lot for the first 13 years of my life (and it would have been longer if his workplace hadn't ceased to exist at that point) not because he couldn't be bothered but because it was necessary if we wanted to eat. That wasn't the greatest situation. So, yeah, it would be awesome if we recognised that fathers aren't extra. They're integral.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 01:25 AM
2

Innocent in the eyes of the law. The idea being (in theory, of course) that if a court is going to rule incorrectly, it would be better for the incorrect ruling to let someone who actually did the deed go free than to lock up or execute someone who didn't actually do it and then leave it up to Heaven to dole out justice in a more final sense. Obviously, in practice, your mileage will vary wildly based on genitals and skin tone.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 01:14 AM
24

Charming. 😒
/r/MensRights28/10/21 11:09 PM
1

Not gonna happen. They, along with CNN and the rest, can kiss me arse.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 11:00 PM
1

Smug angry hobbit? When did they raid The Shire for Bilbo's ranty cousin? But, yeah, cable "news" across the board is a dumpster fire.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 10:59 PM
5

It's pretty bloody worthwhile insofar as women get off with a slap on the wrist for it - if they're punished at all. Part of the wider pussy pass problem, really.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 10:56 PM
5

What they claim happened centuries ago.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 02:36 AM
20

For the doubters... I wish that were a joke.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 06:36 AM
5

No, we really don't. Not while it's a lifelong debt sentence.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:47 PM
7

If you have this many doubts about your potential wife, this may be a good indication that she shouldn't be your wife...
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:27 PM
-1

No? What is this I don't even?
/r/MensRights16/10/21 12:46 AM
5

Eh, I would say it isn't worth it in any case at all. Even if you were attracted to men, I'd still say the same. People in my experience are deceitful above all else. Best to hang out with a cat or dog and avoid the nonsense.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 11:34 PM
65

As a silencing technique. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 10:26 PM
10

I wish I could unequivocally say in flames, but after the last 12 years or so, it's like the dog whistles have stopped being dog whistles and we're on the verge of seeing burning crosses in the open again. 😟
/r/MensRights12/10/21 12:38 AM
12

It would more or less necessitate that unless they want a majority of society to consist of spinsters. Which probably sounds like paradise to them. Just step away from the cats. They don't deserve that.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 11:30 PM
9

I have one word to describe this guy. Quisling.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 11:27 PM
2

Do we really want to be associating with pickup artists? 😒
/r/MensRights11/10/21 11:17 PM
35

Correction: the perceived perks of male privilege.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 10:36 PM
4

Absolutely yes.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:05 PM
2

I would make an exception for WW2 despite Pearl Harbor not actually being on the mainland. It was still a pretty clear direct attack. And even then, enough people were thoroughly pissed at Japan that they signed up in droves. Not to mention Hitler and Mussolini made the blunder of declaring an intent to attack at some future time (this was before it was obvious that they had overextended themselves in the Old World, so the threat was real).
/r/MensRights07/10/21 01:19 PM
2

If your cause can't draw enough support on its merits, it deserves to fail.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 05:11 AM
17

You can't negotiate with the irrational. It simply isn't possible.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 01:59 AM
1

The only thing conscription is "good" for is providing warm bodies to fill full of shrapnel. If your cause can't garner enough support on its merits, perhaps you need to reconsider it.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 01:54 AM
6

My great-grandfather was a doughboy who never made it home. He died for nothing. Worse than that, really. He essentially died so Hitler and Stalin could have the world handed to them on a silver platter. Necessary, my ass.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 01:50 AM
4

Because they don't give a rat's backside about anything outside their little woke bubbles. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 07:31 PM
2

That sounds terrifying, and for all of the same reasons. Although Japan may be left with few options if they don't want to go extinct as a whole.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 05:33 PM
7

So why the hell is this obvious paedophile taken seriously? I mean, we could ask the same regarding known rapist Lena Dunham (she confessed in a book she wrote herself, so...).
/r/MensRights01/10/21 05:03 PM
3

I'll be here all week! Try the fish.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 04:56 PM
4

Looks are very much secondary to spewing the most enticing flavour of bullshit. Reagan looked like a prune. Billy-boy Clinton looked like an aging frat boy (and acted like one too, as it turned out).
/r/MensRights01/10/21 04:46 PM
4

All the way back to 1848 in Seneca Falls (because of course it was fucking upstate New York; nothing good has ever come from this rat hole).
/r/MensRights01/10/21 04:36 PM
16

300 pounds of what? Bullshit?
/r/MensRights01/10/21 04:31 PM
5

Yeah, while I enjoy rubbing in the feminists' faces just how much they're fucking themselves over long-term by alienating all the men who will not surrender their balls... let's not reduce ourselves to bio-robots.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:59 PM
6

No skin in the game, no opinion. Sit down and shut up, Margie.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:54 PM
2

Dabbling even a little in politics is a surefire way to find yourself saying fuck it all to the very concept of humanity...
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:41 PM
11

I truly wish I had some magic spark I could toss out that could convince you not to go through with this, but I have absolutely positively nothing and would be lying through my teeth if I said I've never considered this very course of action myself for many of these same reasons. All I can really throw out there is you're genuinely not alone in this shitshow, for what little that may yet be worth.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:22 PM
56

That's all it's ever been.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 10:24 PM
187

Didn't you know? We're not allowed to have anything. We're cattle, nothing more.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 10:18 PM
21

If that's what it takes to save our boys...
/r/MensRights28/09/21 08:11 AM
7

Welcome to the Autobanned Club! 😁 Hell, we need a badge for that at this point. And, yeah, this is one of the only places I've seen where you can tell your story as a guy without being subjected to whataboutism, gaslighting, victim-blaming, and the like just for being a guy.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 06:49 AM
63

That's supposed to be the end game here. My cynical side has serious doubts, of course... but if the girls have to go too, it tends to be seen far less favourably for anyone to be sent that way.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 06:28 AM
5

Definitely smart ones, if you look at every single one since Korea.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 06:23 AM
6

I quit looking since the answer was always no.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 04:29 PM
5

All of the below, coupled with looking at any bill. A guy has to put up with all that nonsense and he's becoming a debt slave to do it. Soooooo not worth it.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 04:24 PM
1

No, you don't execute the child for a crime one of the parents committed.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 08:50 AM
25

Anyone caught doing that to a healthy child should be shot on sight.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:15 AM
1

Doesn't matter what his age is as far as consent is concerned. She's in a position of authority over him. His consent is therefore to be considered null and void as it could well have been coerced.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 06:36 AM
2

You might want to note that in your original comment...
/r/MensRights11/08/21 11:13 PM
4

Mostly Ontario and Alberta, apparently.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:41 PM
-1

Not everyone who is same-sex attracted adopts that label, so no, approving of that label (and the baggage that comes with it) really isn't necessary.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 09:09 PM
8

Unfortunately true, in my experience. One reason I walked away from that world.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 09:07 PM
3

The women who treat SSA men as collectibles.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 09:05 PM
-3

Fruit flies. That's what you're describing, yes?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 08:55 PM
4

You must really enjoy the flavour of boot leather.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 09:47 AM
5

Film every interaction with your daughter, supervised or not, and immediately send them to your lawyer. Your videos will be something to shove in your ex's face if she tries claiming further abuse.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:44 PM
36

Which would be a valid concern iff a custodial parent or guardian had called it in. That was clearly not the case here. Stop making excuses for police misconduct.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:39 PM
22

Female Dating Strategy - more like Fucking Over Men 101.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:37 PM
41

Kid's reaction should have cleared that up in one hell of a hurry.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:30 PM
91

And people wonder why I don't trust cops... Bullshit like this!
/r/MensRights02/08/21 06:37 PM
3

Except the money isn't going to the kids. Not really. The court gets a cut and she could be blowing the rest on coke for all anyone knows.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 08:42 PM
9

I don't. The brainwashing is getting worse.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 08:32 PM
9

That happens to male nipples as well. #WeirdBodyThings 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights21/07/21 10:13 AM
2

Only about half of humans though.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 07:42 AM
162

Exactly. The penis is... not the most intelligent organ there is. It does what it wants. It's like Honey Badger - it doesn't care. It doesn't give a shit.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 10:34 PM
23

Damn. 😥
/r/MensRights18/07/21 11:00 PM
9

I don't work with hate groups, and that's what feminism is. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 09:08 PM
13

I should probably not be laughing at this, but I can't help it. 🤣
/r/MensRights18/07/21 09:07 PM
24

Yeah, this is totes cool, but if it were inverted, holy shitstorm, Batman! I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:57 PM
4

Even in Nazi Germany, the pussy pass was a thing. 😒
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:38 PM
13

Why on earth would we work with people who actively seek our destruction?
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:35 PM
130

Depressing but utterly unsurprising. Cats and dogs are held in higher regard than boys (as well as the men they become).
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:34 PM
56

It sounds like she's the kiddie-diddler.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 01:04 PM
22

Because we don't actually matter. Never have and, at least out here in Clown World, probably never will.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 01:02 PM
6

It should be, but it won't be. We're worth less than cats and dogs in the eyes of the law, remember?
/r/MensRights17/07/21 05:02 PM
-4

Not a credible source. Cable "news" isn't news.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:22 PM
-1

That's the bloody point. 🤦🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights14/07/21 01:02 AM
12

TIL that trying to avoid getting your date sick or even killed is creepy. 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights10/07/21 05:04 AM
10

The patriarchy doesn't exist. It never did.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 06:50 AM
33

Did he walk out or was he kicked out?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 03:51 AM
12

The simple solution would simply be to stay the fuck out of the men's locker room... but since that doesn't blame the men for the problem a woman created, it won't happen.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 06:14 PM
8

Don't degrade chimps and H. neanderthalensis by comparing them to sexual harassers.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 06:12 PM
17

But that doesn't blame the men, so they're never going to do that no matter how much sense it makes.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 06:11 PM
125

Because men are subhuman rape machines. Didn't you know that?
/r/MensRights03/07/21 04:27 PM
9

Apparently as with Bernie Madoff, the name says it all.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 07:10 AM
34

It would require acknowledging our humanity, after all.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 04:28 AM
10

Who is that? Not clicking that; I don't do cable "news".
/r/MensRights02/07/21 04:27 AM
1

Yes, and I'm the Queen of Estonia.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 03:49 AM
2

What the hell are you on about? Are you on drugs or something?
/r/MensRights02/07/21 01:56 AM
1

Neither. They both nauseate me thoroughly.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 01:09 AM
3

It smells like a trap to me, specifically one where a woman is the bait.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 05:47 AM
18

You can't cut off a cat's toes or a dog's ears, but a man's foreskin is fair game.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 07:17 PM
42

Because men are not seen as people. Hell, even the law affords cats and dogs more legal protections.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 06:30 PM
131

Didn't you know? Even in fiction, the man is always the piece of shit.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 06:02 AM
12

Call me paranoid, but this reeks of honeypot.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 05:59 AM
2

It can't be done. Feminists are impervious to logic.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 05:55 AM
5

No. He may be a piece of shit in his own right, but he didn't commit a blatant hate crime.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 11:15 PM
2

Never heard of him. I was an econ minor. This is pure risk vs reward analysis. Assuming basically all the risk for almost no reward at best is a shitty investment, and this I find to be doubly true when it isn't money on the line.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 10:48 PM
15

What she's saying: "People value my input. Poor me!" What she needs to hear: Shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 10:23 PM
3

I would have to lean no since the extremist individualism is a shot in the foot and not in the arm. We absolutely positively do need to walk away, but to do it one at a time, and especially in pursuit of what sounds to me like simply a different kind of hedonism, isn't going to help anyone. If men walking out is going to have a meaningful impact, we have to do it together in noticeable numbers at a time and build our own society. No, not with blackjack and hookers. Well, alright, maybe some blac…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 10:19 PM
4

In this Clown World of ours, the absolute last thing any of us ought to be doing is drawing in women. Yes, I'm well aware that the vastest majority are perfectly fine people, but you can't know who's who until it's too late and you're either an alimony slave on the street or behind bars and on the sex offender registry for something that never even happened. Sex isn't worth the very real risk of being blindsided with your life being ruined. If you want the muscles, do it for you, not for someone…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 10:03 PM
1

The first and last victims were murdered 13 months apart. This isn't that hard to figure out.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 09:53 PM
2

Quit trying to find an out for a cold-blooded murderer.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 09:48 PM
1

Smother the first one and the last one 13 months apart. This isn't rocket science.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 09:47 PM
2

Because they do. Frequently.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 09:44 PM
2

Yet. Give it a few years.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 09:42 PM
3

She isn't mentally ill. She's simply a hateful piece of work. Stop trying to excuse her hate crime.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 09:41 PM
3

Or maybe she was just using that as a cover for the logical conclusion of feminism. Did that never occur to you?
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:46 PM
3

No, you're trying to excuse it because of who the killer is (should be was) and who her victims were.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:44 PM
-7

In some places, it actually is. There are neighbourhoods where the only accessible DMV office is open maybe 12-24 hours every year.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:41 PM
6

Or it could be that was just an excuse for the logical conclusion of feminism.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:40 PM
5

Bullshit. She slaughtered her sons in cold blood purely because they were boys. She should have been hanged.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:34 PM
1

Those murdered boys getting justice would be the cold-blooded bitch who slaughtered them just for being boys facing the hangman.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:33 PM
6

Which is the only thing we're capable of being according to feminism.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:30 PM
9

It was cold-blooded murder. Quit trying to excuse it.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:28 PM
3

Quit trying to excuse cold-blooded murder, and quit pretending that isn't fucking well what you're doing.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:27 PM
6

She murdered her three children in cold blood purely because they were boys. Fuck you for trying to explain that away.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:22 PM
5

Yet because they were merely boys in the eyes of the sheep... all we hear are crickets.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 04:42 PM
4

They oughtn't be surprised when it blows up in their faces and people start avoiding them because they're bloody psychopaths.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 11:16 PM
9

No, it definitely belongs here. She's getting away with it because of what boils down to the pussy pass. If the situation were reversed and he reacted that way, you bloody well know he'd be thrown behind bars.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 11:02 PM
28

Because we aren't really seen as people. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 08:04 PM
1

Bir Tawil, between Egypt and Sudan. Claimed by both to be the territory of the other, meaning no one runs it. Only problem is it's basically uninhabitable.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 01:31 PM
1

So she claims. Why does the whole innocent until proven guilty thing not apply to him too? Methinks we already know the answer.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 01:14 PM
1

So she claims.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 01:13 PM
9

I'll believe the sincerity when it has its 5th anniversary of operations. Not before.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 11:55 PM
10

Louder for the back row!
/r/MensRights18/06/21 11:49 AM
3

Apparently the whole thing was burnt off in the massive botch.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 06:48 PM
8

Well played.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 08:33 PM
17

And they'll probably still find a way to put him away for it.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 05:02 AM
7

Which is highly likely to see him tried as an adult, convicted, and saddled for life with a felony record. Clown world, remember?
/r/MensRights15/06/21 04:48 AM
3

You're forgetting that we don't live in a rational world.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 04:45 AM
3

Unless they try him as an adult, which I wouldn't put past them. EDIT: The pigs you're now encouraging him to call will find some excuse to fault him for this and arrest him.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 04:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter