TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

is_done Archive

View 2 posts and 84 comments by is_done on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

the bible does nothing of the sort. The bible has many contradictory messages. There are passages that talk about loyalty, there are also passages that endorse having sex slaves. besides it really does not matter what the bible says or doesn't say, what matters is to what extent was the nuclear family truly considered the norm throughout human history.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 09:45 PM
1

I am currently in a 24/7 Dom/sub relationship and I come from a long history of only having boring vanilla sex before I discovered TRP and rebuilt my whole way of thinking. I used to think BDSM was stupid and no woman would ever like that kind of stuff (was I ever wrong lol). what changed your mind?
/r/RedPillWomen14/01/20 09:36 PM
1

the nuclear family as the backbone of society absolutely does not. besides if it only went back to biblical times it would hardly be a measure of a functioning civilization.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 08:49 PM
2

The nuclear family unit is the backbone of any functioning civilisation. Wrong. Nuclear family as the norm is less than a century old. didn't read the rest
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 08:34 PM
1

the fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 08:30 PM
5

Imagine waking up every day less valuable than you were the day before and there's nothing you can do about it because your value is tied to your youth and beauty. jfc its gotta be brutal. I do not envy them.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/20 03:26 PM
2

okay so you just don't have anything
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 06:46 AM
3

i a a lurker and i don't understand what you mean. Please clarify
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/20 08:11 PM
3

im a Marxist-Leninist so
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/20 12:58 PM
2

u got a link to that video
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/20 07:22 PM
3

Sigh
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/19 12:33 PM
-2

The red pill
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/19 01:54 AM
1

The traditional family unit was a lot stronger in Soviet Russia and eastern block in general than in the West.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/19 02:16 PM
16

the whole soy scare is complete bullshit. Soy has a lot of phytoestrogens, thats true, however we also eat a lot of animal products with animal estrogens and other hormones in them which are a thousand times more potent.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/19 01:48 PM
17

never thought i would find someone as based as you on a subreddit this godless
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 09:13 PM
1

don't drag Marx into this hes based af
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 09:09 PM
1

This is an interesting question. It used to b the case that men and women had sort of completely different worlds that they lived in, obviously this is not true anymore. But it also seems that the performance of gender has become way more pronounced. In fact, you could argue that the postmodern observation of gender as a performance is not the observation of something that always was, but rather of a new phenomenon. I think there are also studies on this, how gender equality under the law leads …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/19 09:00 AM
18

No, if anything this "left-wing" sub is being taken over by centrists & "classical liberals".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 11:03 PM
1

hi, is there any specific topic that you are interested in discussing? I think i have a pretty good understanding of a lot of leftism. I also won't just attack you for having any "immoral" beliefs etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 08:37 PM
1

so i don't really like Peterson himself, but the basic idea that you have here, of synthesizing (natural) gender roles with class struggle, is something that ive been thinking about for a while as well. This approach explains the world we find ourselves in very well and also points to an inspiring solution. Socialism + personal growth + jordan peterson + a little red pill - the misogyny and emotional detachment/emptiness + a little white knight-ism/heroicism/balls. Whatever you want to call it. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 08:33 PM
3

And can be boiled down to the fact that lots of men, even myself for a long time, are largely unsocialized, taking jobs with ever longer hours that allow for less and less human interaction much less genuine connection— along with the norm of not having close bonds between men. On the issue of lack of socialization - incels ofetn point to a famous Graph in the NYT that showed that young male celibacy is absolutely skyrocketing since 2008. They of course blame this on sexual liberalism. But the t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 08:10 PM
1

god this sub is gonna be full of classical liberals before long
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/19 02:11 PM
1

no, we know that the number of people not having sex has in fact sharply risen since 2008, it is not just perception. next
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 08:18 PM
1

That just sounds like you want to make everyone miserable in the service of a completely arid ideal of 'equality' that noone even really wants to pursue. This kind of equality will not make men happier or healthier and it won't empower us either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/19 09:45 AM
1

am i wrong?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/19 08:23 PM
0

check out my reply to the other comment
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/19 08:23 PM
1

bc women want masculine men and we wont make them not want that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/19 06:08 PM
-2

no its not possible and largely not desirable
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/19 01:10 PM
2

Because im a communist and have been forever, i just happen to disagree with patriarchy theory, especially in a western context
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/19 01:02 PM
-3

This is all due to a lack of communities where systems of trust and reputation exist and also shared cultural understandings of boundaries. Also, sigh,, did you have to post quillette cringe
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/19 04:46 PM
2

why did you think this anything but insanity
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/19 04:43 PM
1

a thousand times this. All of this is so much better and more useful than the endless feminist-friendly approach that i see on menslib and even here sometimes. Only by acknowledging the fact that its a harsh competition can this reality ever be dealt with in a somewhat healthy manner.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/19 10:42 PM
0

your post is still extremely hyperbolic and seems hysterical. there is inequality in dating that favors women, but not nearly to the degree that you are making it out to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 01:12 PM
-1

This seems hyperbolic. This is maybe the opinion of a few isolated feminists who have somewhat of a voice online, but in reality women scrutinize themselves to a high degree. But yes they mostly do expect their men to be above them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 01:06 PM
4

this. It takes two to Tango. Men make themselves extremely available, thus their value decreases, thus women become more choosy, thus men make themselves more available etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 01:04 PM
1

best thing ive read in a while
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/19 06:29 PM
2

how do you feel about masculinity nowadays? I know there is this feminist-friendly version of masculinity with places like r/menslib, but i really can't bring myself to identify with that shit. i sometimes feel like i am just what a lot of feminists say i am in terms of aggressiveness, competitive mindset etc., im just tired of seeing anything wrong with it. I can't really imagine how im supposed to "let go" of stuff like that, it feels like suppressing what comes naturally, and its deeply unhea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/19 03:38 PM
1

what the fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/19 07:45 PM
0

they hope that "she will change her mind any day now because she always says her boyfriend is such an asshole and im much nicer to her". Like when a girl thinks she can lock down some fuckboy eventually if she pressures him to go on actual dates with her instead of just fucking
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/19 11:05 PM
7

A woman having orbiters is the exact same as a man having plates. In both cases a higher SMV individual exploits lower SMV individuals to get what he/she needs primarily without meeting the primary needs of the other parties. Women primarily want commitment and a meaningful relationship and use sex to get it, they are plates in high SMV men's harems ----> they get used for sex and their primary need isn't met. They do this instead of adjusting their standards. Men are after sex with the woman th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/19 08:41 PM
8

This reads like r/menslib shit mostly. except for the bit at the end which cautions against totally prohibiting physical altercations between boys. Edit: This has been talked about a lot here on this sub but it must be said again bc it was such a relief when i first heard that i wasn't alone in my thoughts. This whole "feminism for boys" thing is not good. This article is a perfect example of why. It mostly talks about males as potential offenders to feminist morality and how to get that out of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/19 04:00 PM
8

I think men are not attracted to body hair because it seems "unclean", and women are supposed to be clean much more than men. I think the preference for a lack of body hair is largely cultural.
/r/RedPillWomen15/09/19 03:02 PM
1

the Mongols Very recent and insignificant in evolutionary terms. People turn much much more violent after the advent of civilization Violent deaths are exceedingly common in the animal kingdom. women from poorer backgrounds tend to more strongly favor large, muscular men. Why? Likely because they come from rougher areas where it's an advantage. Amateur evopsych is so funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/19 06:42 AM
4

Because we live under Capitalism andie therefore capitalist ideology has hegemony.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/19 12:43 AM
1

Biological desires and learned preferences are often very closely intertwined. You have a basic, biologically determined need, which inherently responds to certain stimuli, and throughout your life you learn associations of those stimuli with other stimuli, often in long chains and interconnected nets. The new associations have the power of the original, genetically ingrained ones, but they are still learned. I would argue that height is one of many such things were an original preference exists…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/19 12:08 AM
1

You really overestimate the role that violence played throughout our evolutionary history. Common mistake though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/19 12:01 AM
4

I guarantee you if not every movie romance (or really any couple in the media anywhere) featured a tall man and a shorter woman women would give way less of a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 09:38 PM
2

what i'm saying is that the necessity to feel small in order to feel feminine is learned.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 09:36 PM
15

Ive said it before, most of the height craze is not because of "evolutionary preferences" that women have, it's because women need to feel sexy & feminine with their partners and they feel small next to a guy that's bigger than them (and being big is mostly determined by height). It has more to do with learned stuff than biology. If height wasn't as venerated and being small and tiny wasn't as much of an ideal for women, i.e. they could still feel attractive when with a short man, it wouldn't ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 05:46 PM
1

how good-looking would you say u are?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 02:27 PM
2

Morality as such is not important, but yes it has been shown that women prefer men who display less empathy. Denying this is ludicrous at this point
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 08:42 AM
12

I mean that was just straight up gangrape lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 06:22 AM
2

thats a bunch of wankery. But not what i meant to say anyway. What i think OP was getting at is that because of feminism, acting masculine is punished unless you're rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 02:55 PM
2

What he is saying is that in a feminist anti-masculine climate, it is only rich men who can afford to be masculine, since their resources give them an artificial leg up on the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 02:36 PM
4

Gold digging is first and foremost a result of widespread financial insecurity and inequality. This is what drives women to gold-dig. its a smart move for them. The ideology that justifies this comes after the fact. An ideology that justifies golddigging both to the golddiggers and the buyers could take many forms. Atm, it takes the form of a particular brand of feminism, which is selling what is essentially prostitution out of necessity as an act of empowerment and liberation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 02:34 PM
1

You cant even ban porn without people finding a way around it. Plenty of stuff is banned. Yes i know that some people are finding a way around it, but thats not what matters. What matters is normies. the masses. They use apps and the internet in general only when its simple and convenient. It should be fairly easy to draw up a workable legal definition of a dating app, and banning that will eliminate 95% of online dating overnight. Doesn't matter what the other 5% do. If its no longer available …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 02:26 PM
1

obviously other forums like reddit are never gonna replace the efficiency and mass appeal that dating apps like tinder have. This is dishonest. A ban on dating apps (and sites) would be very easy to do. Yes you could still meet up over the internet but since it won't be streamlined in such a brutally efficient way with literally 10s of thousands of options to choose from, the impact will be comparably tiny.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 02:15 PM
1

why is it impossible? Its gonna be discussed in the mainstream before long, wasn't there a NYT op-ed about 'the redistribution of sex' last year already?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 02:08 PM
1

Because the fact that some people have more drive/talent/beauty etc is what creates culture and human civilization. Obviously wrong but whatever. I see the benefit of having "drive/talent/beauty", i don't see the benefit of inequality in these things. And especially when it comes to something like physical beauty, which is in large part a coin toss at birth, i see no reason why we shouldn't seek to endow everyone with it. If we could for example eliminate a hereditary disease through genetic eng…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 12:31 PM
1

The simplest solution to the current problem is artificially reducing the pool of partners to choose from. For example ban dating apps. With that alone i think you would balance 80/20 out to 40/20. No need to coerce anyone, just make the pool smaller
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 09:55 AM
1

why is that dystopian. I think our current world is dystopian. What he says sounds cool
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 09:51 AM
1

From what we know about how dating & sex under socialism was, this is completely false. It was much better.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 09:48 AM
10

Good symmetry, high cheekbones and square jawline. I hope you know that everything you've achieved with women is probably due to this. I always find it funny how delusional some chads are
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 09:40 AM
3

that 4/10 who should be VERY VERY FUCKING HAPPY to date a 7/10, 8/10 guy... is not happy at all because he can't satisfy her in the way that a big dicked muscular 9/10 did the 20 times she had one this year. The 4/10s don't date a 7/10 or 8/10 dudes, they get used as fleshlights. Thats why they're unhappy, these guys completely devalue them. The reason why low value women don't lower their standards more towards low value men is the fact that they can still get laid with guys way out of their le…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 09:35 AM
2

Dear god this article enraged me. Not because of the main content, but because it completely ignores the absolute pussy drought that 2/3rds of guys are experiencing, as if they don't exist. These top tier chads are a stand in for men in general, and then its all about how unfair it is that they don't commit to their girls
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 09:27 AM
1

and then theres the bottom
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 09:14 AM
1

There has been quite extensive research that shows that women had better sex under Socialism. A short summary I would recommend the whole book. It boils down to several things: Due to the enormous social safety that women (and men) enjoyed, and because childcare was cheap and available in good quality, the entire phenomenon of women being financially dependent on men completely vanishes. (and no, it did not lead to a decline in marriage, it led to happier marriages) Similarly, the socialist econ…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 07:04 AM
1

slaves were often castrated
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 09:10 AM
4

It really depends on how women feel about being used for sex by top tier men. I think atm the prevailing feeling among young women who do this is one of an ego boost. This is because they still think in the old paradigm. But more and more it becomes clear that they'll never get commitment out of guys like that and that getting laid with hot guys as a young girl doesn't mean shit. The unwillingess of young women right now to adjust their standards accordingly stems from wanting to keep the illusi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 09:08 AM
1

it does indeed suck
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 08:49 AM
1

I agree with this. I actually think the same thing applies to fake moaning
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 07:17 AM
2

Thats pretty cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 07:03 AM
5

Important thing to understand about the 6' number is that women do not understand height. If you ask most women, they think most men are 6' and over, which is completely false. What they mean by 6' is "seems tall to me", so basically if you're 5'9 and not fat the 5'4 women most likely thinks you're "tall" and therefore "6'". It's just a meme. I think the enormous focus on height among women is only somewhat because of raw physical attraction and in large part due to the women not feeling feminin…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 06:48 AM
1

except mewing
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/19 07:43 PM
-1

quilette Stephen Pinker This is what happens when your left-wing sub allows centrists in
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/19 04:20 PM
5

It becomes the only cue for social dominance in an atomized environment without relevant reputation-building and reciprocity.
/r/BlackPillScience19/08/19 03:26 PM
5

the digit ratio research is such suifuel
/r/BlackPillScience19/08/19 03:24 PM
1

lmao what
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 03:01 PM
3

I feel like many people here aren't really leftists. Obviously that is just my opinion, everybody is gonna have a different definition of what leftist means, but i'd say if you're not at least very critical of Capitalism, anti-war, anti-nationalism, etc. then you should go somewhere else. There are subs to critique feminism, I would like this one to be genuinely left-oriented, otherwise it will be overrun by centrists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 02:05 PM
6

Mens Lib is a good recruiting ground.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 02:00 PM
4

Mainstream feminism right no makes men responsible for both causing and solving everyday issues women face. As such, it resembles the role of the "nagging wife" in the structure of an unhappy marriage. It is incredibly traditional.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 12:20 PM
1

Her argument that sex is the most fundamental class distinction was based on the observation that evolved sex differences in reproductive roles led to a sex-based division of labour as human society developed. Most feminists today seem to have dropped the biological basis of her argument, which is why it no longer makes any sense. Yes. I wanted to go further into is but its already a Wall of Text. But yeah, the argument only makes sense with a somewhat essentialist base assumption
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/19 06:10 AM
1

Classical liberals out
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/19 07:02 PM
1

Marxist-Leninist AMA
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/19 04:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter