TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

j0hnan0n Archive

View 6 posts and 240 comments by j0hnan0n on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'd like to suggest that the 80% resort to BP tactics to secure a mate, as opposed to strictly procreating. There are plenty of blues raising someone else's kids, whether it's knowingly or un. In general, I think your point still stands. Fair?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/18 08:35 AM
1

It's true that efficiency can be increased, but the rule still applies. Even if you drop the lowest 80%, the remaining group will still demonstrate a version of the Pareto principle. It might shift to 70:30, but it might also shift to 90:10. That's the weird thing about that principle: it's ubiquitous in the universe. Everywhere we look we find that effects are related asymmetrically to causes and outputs are related asymmetrically to inputs. You can hire or fire as discriminately as you like, b…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/18 08:31 AM
1

Then in your 1000 employee example instead of standard Paretos 200 employees doing half the work Did you mean 80% of the work? This is the first I've heard of Price's law. I'll have to learn more about it.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/18 01:25 PM
5

That's not how the 80/20 principle works. Even if all men were redpill-aware and practiced the principles, a minority of them would still get the majority of the benefits. Even if everyone were getting laid, some would still bag more babes than others do. Think about it this way: in just about every company, ~20% of salesmen produce ~80% of sales profits. You have 1000 salesmen, and want to keep only the cream of the crop, so you fire the bottom 80% of salesmen. Despite this, the remaining 20% (…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/18 10:10 AM
1

Let's start with California
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 03:01 AM
1

I see what you're saying, but I'm not asking if people give a shit. I'm asking strictly whether slander and/or defamation of character are illegal according to current legislation.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 10:33 PM
3

Anything you say can and will be used against you. Anything you say to the cops that could, even IN THEORY, be used to help exonerate you is hearsay.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 06:02 PM
3

Slander and damage of reputation isn't a crime?
/r/TheRedPill26/05/17 05:59 PM
96

Emotions make excellent servants, but tyrannical masters. John Seymour.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/17 02:07 PM
2

I stand corrected. Thanks for the heads up!
/r/TheRedPill20/02/17 10:17 PM
2

I know it's bipolar disorder, but I think I'll always read it as bluepill disorder.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/17 06:08 PM
4

Exactly what I was thinking.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/16 01:37 PM
3

Does not sound like the response of a Trigglypuff...
/r/TheRedPill17/10/16 07:14 AM
1

Seems reasonable to me. Have an upvote.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/16 01:16 AM
2

See, THAT makes perfect sense. Almost exactly the same as what I do: act as if they know (or should know) even if they might not. Makes it much easier to train better behaviors. "What's that, Suzy? Why am I acting this way? Because you should be acting this way, and you really ought to know it by know. I'll forgive it this time, but you'll pay in pain next time. [smack on the ass]"
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 09:23 PM
6

You mean you've dated women you THOUGHT were stupid before, yet still interpreted them to 'know' what they can and can't get away with. They can be acting on instincts without knowing what they're reacting to, and without knowing how they're reacting. Still waiting on your definitions...
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 01:05 AM
15

Blatantly false. Smart women know how to behave. Stupid women don't. Alternatively, how do you define the difference between smart women and stupid women? I'm also interested in your definition of the difference between smart men and stupid men. Have an upvote.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/16 11:57 PM
3

Her life turned out the way it did because she chose it. She chose the option that - at the time - seemed to be of the highest quality to her. What she didn't realize was that current quality doesn't necessarily reflect future quality, and that present high-quality can very easily lead to future low-quality. (see alcohol: drink a lot and you can feel GREAT, but tomorrow you can very well feel like shit) Solipsism blinds women to external reality, and thus to the future. Future consequences would…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/16 11:50 PM
28

TL;DR Bring on the hatemail and the downvotes! I'm not convinced that this is universal. Some women are genuinely ignorant that some of their behavior isn't optimal, due to solipsism. If a woman isn't genuinely aware of other people in the universe, they can't know that their behavior is wrong in relation to those other people. source: I've dated women that were raised under strict traditional gender roles, and neither change behaviors when with me, nor change behaviors away from me, nor do they…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/16 11:21 PM
1

I find it funny that they claim that TRP is an ideology, and that you have to take it wholesale, without picking and choosing. I'd call it more of a mindset/methodology/philosophy, but that's probably up for personal interpretation. More to the point, what system works if you purposefully leave out parts of that system? Does anyone know of any? And to be clear, I mean does anyone know of any aside from TRP, or does anyone know of any aside from the fact that one starts by implementing parts of i…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/16 08:36 AM
2

I'm very confused. Your title says 50% Your post says 4 out of 5, which is 80%. Dafuq is going on here? I wouldn't be surprised with the 80% figure, but we're all over the place here. What gives?
/r/TheRedPill27/05/16 04:18 AM
2

They'll work. The limitations will be slightly different from an LTR, but no: you don't necessarily need to be physical with an organism in order to condition it.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 02:47 AM
3

since men are strong, intelligent and imaginative, while women are weak, unimaginative, and stupid, why isn't it men who exploit women? We have all the strength and intelligence. What could we possibly exploit from them? What benefit is there in them that we could extract? In order to exploit something, it has to have something which you lack. I cannot exploit a desert in order to slake my thirst; I must find water. The desert has nothing to give, thus I cannot exploit it. Make sense? I mean, I …
/r/TheRedPill23/04/16 01:17 AM
3

I like thinking of the male hamster as a guinea pig. Oink oink, motherfucker.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/16 04:08 PM
1

Have you neither read nor watched fight club? Not to mention it's practically a cardinal rule of TRP... But to spoon-feed you (sorry, everyone else...I couldn't help myself) the exact quote that explains what you're asking... "The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system an…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 08:56 AM
7

1 - Don't talk about TRP 2 - DON'T TALK ABOUT TRP 3 - No shirts, No shoes 4 - The anger phase goes on as long as it has to 5 - If someone yells stop, taps out, or goes monk-mode, the conversation is over. Bonus: 6 - If this is your first night at TRP, don't post; just read the sidebar material
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 07:12 AM
1

Can also verify this type of phenomenon. e.g. Was walking across the street from the overflow parking lot to my college (important note: Jaywalking all of 2 meters from the designated crosswalk) having seen, and in clear sight of a police car about to head in exactly my direction. I cross, he woop-woops, I stop and say "Good morning officer, how are you?", he says "Don't tell me you didn't see me there." I say "I saw you. But me and my girlfriend were making sure that we crossed without endanger…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/16 04:10 AM
3

How much sex would you have to have to burn 7000 calories?
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 01:52 PM
1

29 out of 30 posts As of the time I checked, it was more like 50 out of 50 posts. Thank you for bringing this to our awareness.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/16 06:00 AM
4

I'll probably get downvoted to hell, but I don't care
/r/RedPillWomen02/12/15 04:45 AM
0

Maybe I wasn't clear enough...I'm talking about OP or u/HearTheRaven making an AskTRPwomen subreddit...and I'm talking about OP getting out of (what sounds to me like) a shitty relationship that isn't working for her. Calm down with your reactionary anger, SemenMoustache. Reddit wouldn't be any worse with a new reddit for TRP women to ask questions amongst eachother, and you won't be any worse off if OP does (or even doesn't!) next the dead-bedroom boyfriend. I am curious how exactly you think i…
/r/askTRP20/11/15 05:04 PM
-8

|not sure what /asktrpw URL is Make it. There's nothing stopping you. You need no approval for creating your own subreddit. Edit: in almost any context, I'd tell you to next him/her/it/them. I'd bet you could do better. Do better.
/r/askTRP20/11/15 06:29 AM
1

Any way we could get a link to the ELI5 post, or even just the cited sources?
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 02:39 AM
5

She read "Sex at Dawn" and it got her wheels spinning. Would recommend.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/15 03:23 PM
11

Agreed. Only thing I'd add is is to make the agreement a little more pointed: "Yes. I am a heterosexual male and I find young women to be the most attractive. Surely you won't try to argue with me that an 18-year-old is more attractive than you are, right?" They're trying to make it personal? Let's get personal.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/15 02:29 PM
1

And how long have you been married now?
/r/TheRedPill09/07/15 07:51 AM
5

Strictly, no. Does he have his moments? Yes.
/r/askTRP17/06/15 04:42 AM
7

I love when people tell me they're offended. My response is always a variation on the theme of "So what you're saying is...I should censor myself and my speech because you can't control your own emotions. It's the mark of an educated mind to be able to consider an idea without necessarily having to accept it. Would you rather I be honest with you and tell the truth, or would you rather I lie and try not to offend you?" I love being labeled by people. I like to turn the tables and label them righ…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 06:12 PM
30

Look at that guy, Ramss. Look at his face in the tweets. He looks like an apocalypse survivor...SJW's done sucked the life right outta him. Guy's going to be paying for a long, LONG time.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 05:46 AM
6

Know your ABC's. Always Be Coachable. Always Be Compassionate. Always Be Curious. Find a mentor, or a few different mentors, and learn as much as you possibly can from them. Emulate their best traits. Welcome to the community!
/r/RedPillWomen31/05/15 09:14 PM
9

http://redpillcomics.blogspot.com/ You're welcome.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 06:40 PM
57

Just fyi, I'm taking your phrase: Bitches be clockwork. Also, I'm pretty sure you meant 'cue hamster' (as in, 'that's my cue' <as in, a cue to enter or exit a scene>) unless you were going for the spanish 'que' for much/so (as in 'much hamster' or 'so much hamstering') Figured you'd rather learn that here, on anonymous reddit than sometime in the future at a board meeting where it's on a powerpoint slide.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 03:07 AM
21

I'd always heard this as 'you can't trust a dog not to eat a steak you leave out; you can trust the dog to be a dog.' as an analogy to women being women. But I've realized that yes, you can, in fact, trust a dog not to eat a steak...assuming you've trained it properly and it understands you're the alpha of the house. So now if certain women are behaving uncooperatively, I point out that they're being antisocial and wonder aloud if it'd be easier to train a dog to obey commands. This rarely fails…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/15 08:37 AM
1

Hey. We didn't save you. You're saving yourself. TRP is the tool; your the craftsman making something of your life.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/15 03:14 PM
4

Glad to bring some needed comedy to this dystopian thread.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 09:33 PM
1

I'm'a take that and add 'attack-helicopter-kin' just to see what the reaction is.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 08:15 PM
5

Makes sense. My only question is: why is it named after a guy who has magic powers, rather than a woman with magic? If the woman can work magic, wouldn't it be a "Witches Law" ? Just saying...
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 05:13 PM
1

Believe what you want to believe. Then, consider asking the academics how their relationships are going. Then, try putting TRP practices quietly into play in your life and observe the results. Then decide again what you want to believe and why.
/r/askTRP03/04/15 10:20 PM
28

If you don't like it, then it wasn't meant to be, and we should get divorced. That'll be half your stuff, thank you very much!
/r/TheRedPill26/03/15 02:45 PM
2

Thanks, man. I doubt I'd've gone as far as looking to RPW, but 'failure permits no alibis; success requires no explanations.' You have my upvote. Thanks again!
/r/TheRedPill17/03/15 04:47 AM
9

I'm inclined to agree. It seemed like something offhand enough that I really should've come across it already. I reread the sidebar from time to time, but I have TRP working for me well enough that it's internalized. Which link(s) in the sidebar is (are) it (they) under? I don't mind brushing up if there's something that's been added which I didn't notice. Have an upvote. Edit: I'm betting it's in the Acronym and Term Glossary. second edit: it's not in the Acronym Glossary. third edit: ASD (Anti…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/15 04:37 AM
5

probably a dumb question, but: What's ASD? Alpha-<something>-Disorder? Alpha-starved?
/r/TheRedPill17/03/15 03:47 AM
1

Well thanks. More realistic and less cynical is what I aim for.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 07:32 AM
1

It's how human female nature evolved. Shit tests are cost-effective ways of determining which men have certain mentalities and which don't, and then being able to sexually discard/disregard those males that don't meet her standards - ie, pass the shit tests.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/15 11:54 PM
8

You know what just clicked for me, reading this? For women, the post-divorce benefits incentivize a dead bedroom. On a primitive level, women know that they're essentially dropping the price of their man's labor to zero when they go from paying for it with sex to getting it package with the marriage. Then there's the added layer of hoping that because the passion isn't there, the marriage wasn't 'meant to be' and they should break up, thus dropping the price of his labor further, now disincludin…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 12:10 PM
12

I hate to nitpick, overthink, or miss the forest for the trees...but I'd hate more if our sub fell to the same mental pitfalls as so many other philosophical/social movements. I agree with you on what you're saying - your general point - but Schrodinger used the cat thought experiment to prove some of the absurdities of misconception some people had about quantum mechanics. His whole point was that a cat CAN'T be both alive and dead at the same time. One (~possibly) better way to work what you'r…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/15 07:26 PM
1

Maybe we/they appreciate the essence of her message, but don't like the politicians who use (twist/warp/misquote) that message for their own purposes. Just speculation on my part.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 05:44 PM
1

I don't see any hubris here. I don't understand why you'd get banned for this. Maybe the mods are having a bad day and overreacted...? Maybe I'l get banned for asking this question. I hope not, but that would certainly be an interesting development...
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 09:12 AM
2

My all-time favorite song is 'This is your life' by the Dust Brothers. I've made a few additions/modifications, but the most important lessons of TRP are summed up in <4 minutes. (and it's useful in getting almost any other song unstuck from my head.) Abridged and paraphrased: This is your life, good as you make it to the last drop. If you don't make it any better, it doesn't get any better than this. (And in fact, if you don't make it better, it's all but guaranteed to get much, much worse.) Th…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 09:02 AM
7

just as easily More easily. The 23yo will have had less time to build up the entitlement mindset and trade up to men with traits she'll now consider dealbreakers.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 03:10 AM
6

I taught them the worst set of expectations they could possibly have for future love interests. This is basically the standard I set for myself in general. I figure they can go after whomever they want, but they're exceedingly unlikely to find someone who provides my quality and depth of affection combined with my animalistic physicality and general mentality. They might find individual traits in multiple different men, but they'll never duplicate me in one guy, And they understand this on a sub…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 03:04 AM
-3

You asked who's talking about politicians. I pointed out that plenty of us are talking about politicians. Then I gave clarification on the specific libertarians who I've seen take AS out of context, as opposed to ~most libertarians (like yourself, most likely) who aren't guilty of that act. What I actually said was that Atlas Shrugged is to Libertarians what the Bible is to fundamentalist christians; cherry-picked and taken out of context. And that while you might not have had the same experienc…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 03:03 PM
2

Mm...well, yes and no. Dagny never says explicitly that she feels guilty/ashamed of trading up, but it's strongly implied. Eg: when Francisco arrives late to the valley to find her in Galt's house, she hangs her head in response to his declaration of love. But in support of your viewpoint, he's quick to establish that he sees her as justified. I'd say she's realistic about the facts, but not the interpretation. Most guys (BP guys) wouldn't take it in stride in the way Francisco does.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 02:52 PM
-1

Maybe you're talking about non-politician libertarians, but pretty much everybody else in this post/thread is talking about politicians. OP didn't start out talking about government, but the conversation went in that direction pretty quickly. When I say it's taken out of context, I mean specifically that it's taken out of context by public figures in a public forum. Private individuals tend to stay (more) true to the source material because they don't have to pander to a constituency.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 02:46 PM
-4

Hey, that's neat. I don't identify as a libertarian, but I've read through AS 15 times on audiobook, and twice in print. If you have yet to see it, perhaps you should consider going a little further out of your way to find examples that clash with your preconceptions/biases. Maybe most politicians don't misrepresent AS because they don't tend to quote that particular book very often, but when I see it being quoted +/ talked about, I see it being cherry-picked and concepts being taken to extremes…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 02:15 PM
-2

Atlas Shrugged is to Libertarians what the Bible is to fundamentalist christians; cherry-picked and taken out of context. edit: To make it absolutely clear, I'm a huge fan of Objectivism, and Rand in general. This is a good post, OP. Thanks for sharing a quote I wasn't familiar with.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 06:07 AM
13

When a woman forms a theory, her mind then sees in every object only those traits which support that theory.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 04:30 PM
1

mm...if you're going to tell them both, it's not really an affair, right? Maybe there's a better descriptor we could use that would get more useful information for you...
/r/askTRP19/02/15 03:25 AM
1

I can see where you're coming from. I don't disagree with you.
/r/askTRP17/02/15 02:34 PM
0

Actual morals following a actual religious belief structure Implying religion isn't the source of the majority of immorality in the world, and that this girl is choosing to be moral instead of just parroting an iron-age dictate. edit: also, maybe you missed the basis of our (trp's) definition of the trade between men and women: the value of men is our commitment and the value of women is sex. This girl isn't providing value for value. She'd like to have her cake and eat it too, which in this cas…
/r/askTRP17/02/15 10:40 AM
3

Do you mean, do you need to have a verbal justification for your initiation? I'd say No, not really. Your reason to initiate kino and physically escalate is to transmit the information that you want to fuck her. You might not realize it, but most american women don't know that most american men want to fuck them. You don't wait for an opportunity. You ARE the opportunity. Kino is your way of letting her know that she has a window of opportunity and she should take it. You're right; if you wait f…
/r/askTRP11/02/15 03:54 PM
2

"Yes." Or: "True."
/r/askTRP11/02/15 07:24 AM
5

I wasn't aware that anyone here allowed their options to be 'offered' by women. OP: in my experience, the best reply is 'I have enough friends; that's not what I'm interested in you for. Thanks, though!'
/r/askTRP04/12/14 12:00 AM
5

I usually go with 'uh-huh' and continue to escalate physically. It tends to work. Actions speak louder than words, and women don't know what they want until you give it to them. The best verbal response is to ignore the fact that they have a verbal capacity.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:29 PM
1

The answer is no, OP.
/r/askTRP05/11/14 06:22 AM
3

Lel
/r/askTRP04/11/14 04:51 AM
1

Yeah. Keep your eyes on the ground; there's dogshit everywhere.
/r/askTRP04/11/14 04:46 AM
2

See that word 'one' up there in the title? That's a red flag. Make your mission more important than females. When you're dedicated to your mission, females notice.
/r/askTRP31/10/14 07:56 AM
6

Get up to use the bathroom, find your server on the way. Ask to speak with him/her where the chick can't see you talking, and have him split the bill then and there. Pay your half and leave before her half is delivered.
/r/askTRP27/10/14 05:15 PM
1

Problem: now that he's on her radar, ignoring her will drive her crazy. Op might very well have to cut these two out of his life permanently to avoid further trouble.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 02:49 AM
7

I'd argue that there really isn't such a thing as two people being equal in SMV. From the female's perspective, the two males will have distinctions between them that she might not be able to explicate, or maybe even consciously identify; no matter how similar they appear to each other, they will appear different to her. In general, you shouldn't try to 'win' the girl. The better route is to simply work on yourself: lift, fuck, read, hustle. This would raise your value and make her see you as th…
/r/askTRP09/10/14 07:36 PM
1

Call Triple-A. Always Agree + Amplify. That, or walk on. If it's not worth dealing with, don't deal with her. That said, all females are more attractive when they're on their knees sucking you off. Just sayin'...
/r/askTRP27/09/14 02:21 AM
1

Answer: Yes. That's why TRP allows so many men to find more mates, allowing them better choice of the mates they have available to them, and ultimately allowing them to choose the best long-term, emotionally-fulfilling, companionship-providing mates. TL;DR: No, you're an idiot. edit: women want to be led. Good women want to be led by Great men. No resentment is accumulated there. Sounds like you don't have much successful experience with women. You might be enjoying the benefits of TRP tactics, …
/r/askTRP19/09/14 05:40 AM
9

I volunteer as tribute. When's the next meetup@
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 05:52 AM
3

Could you be more specific?
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 08:55 PM
2

Which countries are these?
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 05:30 PM
2

Go ahead, Cypher. We won't miss you. You're free to swallow the blue pill and re-enter the matrix whenever you want.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 04:09 AM
1

Regardless of what he's pursuing, if it was insanity and terrible for my frame, I'd still consider getting TFO. None of us knows what he's organizing his life around. My advice isn't pussy-centric. You're making unwarranted assumptions.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 05:01 PM
1

Why are you there? Sounds like you need to GTFO
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 06:18 AM
2

I agree wholeheartedly. Especially to make sure the witnesses on your side aren't exaggerating and thus making the story implausible by inconsistency.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 11:10 PM
2

Yes and no. A larger pool of women means you can afford to 'next' them that much more often. More competition between women will tend to mean they have to be better in order to land the better man. When men see that they have more options, shittier women get selected for less often and they can't be quite as entitled. That said, the usual female insanity is still there, it's just that circumstance can conspire in our favor to weed some of it out/keep it more suppressed. You're not wrong, but the…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 11:04 PM
2

This is correct. That's why you have the right to remain silent. But in order to describe the assault and have her taken off in the first place, you're probably going to have to use some words. That's where the catch-22 occurs and possibly follows u/rocsNaviars narrative. Our legal system is a motherfucker. Still, I know I would've gotten the cops involved. It's not too late.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 11:01 PM
1

Nah. They aren't lying when they say they like 'nice' men. They just aren't conscious of the fact that that's not the only characteristic. They're attracted to hot, dominant men...it just so happens that those men balance between being an asshole and being 'nice'. Push/pull. Reminds me of a comic: two females are standing in line behind a tall, buff, bald dude. f1: Bald guys are hot! A shorter, overweight bald guy approaches and asks 'is this the line for ice cream?' f1: Never mind. Hot guys are…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 04:40 AM
1

"Things could be worse. A woman could cut off your penis while you sleep and throw it out the window of a moving car." Crazier things have happened.
/r/askTRP12/08/14 06:07 AM
3

I could see the hormone-abortion-IVF complex overtaking the military-industrial complex, given enough time. You need a war to really use missiles, but given enough hormones people can be fucking 24/7.
/r/RedPillWomen12/08/14 04:13 AM
0

So...you say the phrase 'emotional blackmail' is useless....after you've said that you can interpret anything as blackmail? Looks like inconsistency to me. Witholding sex for any reason isn't blackmail, whether done by male or female. Demanding the sharing of chores can be a bad thing, if one party is at work all day and the other is home with the kids (or pets, or neither) I'm willing to agree with you that blanket statements always have exceptions and usually don't apply to the majority, much …
/r/TheRedPill09/08/14 06:39 AM
2

I look at it (and explicitly present it) like this: I'm looking for the best possible mate, someone who's hot, can please me in many ways, and with whom I enjoy spending time with. If I find a better woman than the girl I'm with, she should know that I might very well leave her for the better woman. At the same time, I recognize that if she finds a better man (I don't personally believe she will, but I'm always improving myself and my skills and capabilities) then I shouldn't expect anything OTH…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/14 05:54 AM
1

This might sound shitty to any lawyers present, but is there such thing as a pre-nup template? Something that anyone could simply fill in their and their allegedly-to-be-spouses' names in and you call it a contract? The undersigned parties agree to take only what they've brought into the marriage, agree to equal and joint custody of any and all children, and agree to split/negotiate/idfk any capital and income earned and appreciated up until the point of divorce. Anyone not adhering to the lette…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/14 04:55 AM
1

Hey, sure. I don't mind a little psychology. This is going to sound racist (and I'm not even going to qualify it with 'but it's not' it probably is) but I wasn't even thinking of myself when I said that dads aren't constant. I was thinking of inner-city African American dads. I had like, one and a half dads. Other than that, I don't see anything wrong with your logic. I do think of my parents as individuals, that's true. But it might be useful to know that my biological parents were never marrie…
/r/askTRP09/08/14 02:58 AM
1

No problem. Interesting observation. Yes and no. I was raised mostly by my mom, but I had both my dad and my step-dad involved closely in my life. No offense taken. I imagine some parts of my personality are indicative of a single-parent home. I'm willing to admit that there's at least a possibility of me projecting. If you don't mind, I'd be interested in learning what parts came off in that way. No point in the opportunity to learn a little more about myself.
/r/askTRP08/08/14 08:41 PM
1

It's a fine line you walk with this one. It'll be an ordeal to identify all the ways she relies on them. You can't necessarily trust what she says in that matter unless she's an exceptionally self-aware and honest girl. One of the biggest differences between you and the parents is that you're immediately available. Face-to-face conversation is more powerful than over the phone. Luckily, she'll be more than happy to talk about herself at length. Just be sure to watch her body language as much as,…
/r/askTRP06/08/14 05:57 PM
1

Lqtm, you are correct.
/r/askTRP06/08/14 03:30 PM
4

Three words, as explained in various replies in the thread: sunk cost fallacy.
/r/askTRP06/08/14 05:55 AM
1

I'm still waiting for you to say something interesting, much less informative. It's hard to learn from trolls.
/r/askTRP06/08/14 01:30 AM
1

Oh look, you just googled what an ad hominem is. I'm guessing you never took nor read any logic whatsoever. You're still avoiding answering and delivering ad hominems. I'm waiting, Miss Troll.
/r/askTRP05/08/14 11:57 PM
1

Were you planning on answering, or just making ad hominems? Oh, and the point was that OP wanted our opinion. I gave it. What was your point again?
/r/askTRP05/08/14 10:48 PM
1

says the guy who's shitting on people because they disagree with him. Hokay.
/r/askTRP05/08/14 10:48 PM
1

I help with insecurity by being there when she feels anxious. As for feelings of rejection, one way you can help with that is by being with her; literally the opposite of rejection. _- um... >fathers will never leave this is patently false. There are fathers around the world leaving every day. "A father is constant" False. There are plenty of fathers who are volatile, mercurial, and unpredictable. "A fathers' love is unconditional." although I agree that we have to reward good behavior and estab…
/r/askTRP05/08/14 10:43 PM
0

I hope that metric works for you. Mine's somewhat different. Good luck on your many journeys, though!
/r/askTRP05/08/14 10:28 PM
1

No, you're fine, man. Our deepest sympathies on losing a loyal friend - those are hard to come by.
/r/askTRP05/08/14 09:29 PM
1

ITT: trolls doing troll things because they're trolls
/r/askTRP05/08/14 09:26 PM
1

Oh, and a couple more things: there's no reason to discuss the 'point' of a thesis if its' premise is flawed. I addressed the flaw in her premise that this was a RedPill ideal. Secondly, I like how you get on my case for saying the article was about religion, then you continue on to say how the problem lies in, quote, "modern white/suburbanite/affluent/fluffly-haired-and-straight-toothed Christian communities" nice consistency there. /s
/r/askTRP05/08/14 09:26 PM
1

Remaining a virgin until marriage is a hypothetical ideal. What TRP values is the understanding (statistically verified in multiple studies) that as a females' sexual partner count rises, the likelihood of her marriage ending in divorce also rises. Those two datasets are correlated. It's not a hard-and-fast rule, it's just a trend that holds true in most circumstances. You're taking a philosophy and pushing it to ad absurdum levels, then getting mad when people point out the flaws in your logic.…
/r/askTRP05/08/14 09:20 PM
1

Where outside of religion do people make virginity promises? Also, you can't fly to the moon on a horse, and Apollo didn't miss the moon, they aborted the landing after an equipment failure. (oxygen tank IIRC) I absolutely DO recognize the insanity of virginity promises, but you yourself note that they're implemented by Christian communities.
/r/askTRP05/08/14 09:15 PM
1

Sure. I'm currently with a girl who's had a highly emotionally-abusive (and less physically-abusive) father. She herself has anxiety issues, but receives no emotional support of any kind from her dad, but rather gets insults, gets told she'll never amount to anything, and can't rely on him as a sounding board for her thoughts. I'm more than capable of just listening to her with respect, rather than talking down to her. When she asks for advice or speculation, I offer it, usually without telling …
/r/askTRP05/08/14 09:11 PM
1

Correct. Parents can fill certain roles, and lovers can fill those roles and then some. What I said was not supposed to be literal. It's about identifying the emotional needs of the female and knowing how to fill them. Often parents leave some (or many) emotional needs unmet, even unmentioned. The lover who also neglects those needs will inevitably lose the female to the next lover who is willing to meet them. Hope that clears that up for you.
/r/askTRP05/08/14 08:50 PM
1

No problem. Happy to help. Sex God Method should be somewhere in the sidebar. The Art of Seduction, 48 Laws of Power, and 33 Strategies of War (all by Robert Greene) are excellent books that can be applied in almost any situation. There's always the Prince by Machiavelli and the Art of War by Sun Tzu. The key with these books is to look beyond the usual, stereotypical way that most people interpret them. Read them slowly, and pause frequently to think of different ways to interpret what's being …
/r/askTRP05/08/14 04:54 PM
2

No part of the red pill ideal has anything to do with religion. She was a mascot for the religious ideal, not ours. If anything, a RPM would want a woman who's willing and eager to satisfy him sexually, rather than ashamed and guilty of what she's doing. Is it tricky to find one who will also stay loyal to you? Maybe. That depends on how well you fulfill her sexual and emotional needs. I make it clear that if she finds someone better, she's free to pursue that. But if she does, she can expect th…
/r/askTRP05/08/14 04:50 PM
1

You haven't asked a real question. Are you 'right' for feeling a certain way about her behavior? I'm going to say that it's understandable how you're uncomfortable with what she's doing. That's what you're doing right, although how you're bringing it up to her might be flawed. My suggestion is you tell her not to keep up this dysfunctional behavior. But before you do that, institute some new behaviors of your own. You should be her Daddy. She should look to you for stability and direction. If sh…
/r/askTRP05/08/14 04:37 PM
8

One of the biggest breakthroughs you can have with the 48 Laws is moving past using them in your own life to the stage of examining other peoples' actions and interpreting them through the lens of power. If we just focus on us, it's easy to forget that everybody else is in the same power race, but playing for their own ends (often at the expense of ours.)
/r/TheRedPill03/08/14 05:55 PM
1

No problem. Walk on!
/r/askTRP03/08/14 05:11 PM
1

The short answer to your question is yes. But it might take you more time to get used to the RP mode of thought. There's going to be some growing pains before you get used to it. Look at it this way if it helps: the point isn't to fabricate a different, better person and sell yourself as that person. The point is to present and highlight your strengths, while actively working on your weaknesses. The easiest example is your body itself; if you're not muscular, you don't lie and say you are. Just …
/r/askTRP03/08/14 12:05 AM
1

Oh look, a hater. And some upvotes. I must be doing something right. Here, hater - have an upvote. It looks like you're having a bad day. Also, notice how you proved my point by initiating the equal and opposite reaction. I'm honored to have been a villain in this thread, and to have lived up to the threads original intentions. You're not wrong. It is of course possible to take what I said too far. You can do that with anything.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 10:25 PM
2

David Greene. Machiavelli. Teddy Roosevelt
/r/askTRP02/08/14 08:04 PM
2

Kudos, man. It's good that you can recognize your discomfort and stick with your program. Listen: lean into your discomfort. Most people choose to turn back or try to avoid it. This starts a habit of avoidance that turns into a lifetime of failures. When you instead lean into it, you can then move through it and past it. The shortest route between two points is a straight line, not a detour around or turning back and giving up. You're already developing this mentality. Consider this encouragemen…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 08:01 PM
5

Gotta love it. For every action there's an equal and opposite reaction. If you're changing yourself and making progress, then of course the sedentary and changeless are going to resent you for breaking away from the pack. I've always figured that the more haters I have, the better I'm doing. Every great truth is first ridiculed, then violently opposed, and finally accepted as self-evident. In the face of ridicule, maintain amused aloofness. In preparation for violent opposition, maintain fitness…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 05:42 PM
1

At this point, I'm thinking you've never read Fight Club and that you're either a troll or are too obstinate to actually try to genuinely understand what I'm saying. Debt by itself isn't a bad thing. It's certainly possible to safely pay off debt and use it wisely. That's not the point. Subjecting others to risk without their permission is only tangentially related to vanity. For the most part it has nothing to do with it. Yes, people can subject others to risk because they're vain, but that act…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 02:30 AM
1

first off: happiness. ftfy. secondly, you're still misunderstanding the point of what I'm saying. The point isn't that we should feel guilty of what we own. It's that many people wind up in debt for trying to get the latest flashy car, the bigger house, etc, etc. A healthy respect for one's appearance isn't vanity. It's confidence and pride in how one presents one's self to the world. vanity isn't healthy. By definition, it is excessive. I agree with you that controlling and improving one's appe…
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 05:20 PM
1

Oh, ok; we're going to play games today. XD Do I own my body? (seems a silly question when i stated that fitness and martial arts matter to me) Yes and no. In one sense, I own my body and my body owns me. I dictate my body's actions, but my body dictates that without food, water, air and shelter I die. I own my flesh and blood. Do I own the dead skin cells that fall off of me in the shower? Do any of us want to own those dead cells? I absolutely agree with you that you can take the FC message (a…
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 01:23 AM
6

Idk, the Dr. has a point, but I'm a bigger fan of Mr. Durden. I say let me never be complete; I say may I never be content. I say you have to give up. I say evolve, and let the chips fall where they may. I've always taken 'give up' in this context to mean give up the blue pill mindset, give up trying to get validation from others instead of one's self, give up trying to get EVERYTHING and focus on getting what matters to me (fitness, reading, martial arts, you get the idea) because we can't get …
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 09:48 PM
1

make some survivors fucking love it. My experience backs up your thesis. Hadn't instituted a safeword until now. Will try and provide field reports. Cheers.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 04:52 PM
7

atomize her panties.
/r/askTRP23/07/14 11:45 PM
3

Your question would be best answered by trial and error. Some females will indeed walk away, but you'll be surprised how many will follow the flight plan scheduled by robesta.
/r/askTRP23/07/14 11:44 PM
15

for the interested more of the same
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 06:13 PM
1

I'm not saying your feelings are wrong. They're valuable feedback on the situation. But I also implore you to recognize that you'd feel much, MUCH more guilty and ashamed if things had progressed further than they did. However slutty you feel, that's nothing compare to how slutty you could've been. You might not see it now, but you should feel proud that you stuck to your guns and stood by your values. There's plenty of people who don't have the courage to do that. Just because it went farther t…
/r/RedPillWomen15/07/14 08:01 AM
4

RPM here...I'd like to say that, while things could've gone better, they also could've gone much, much worse. You made the best of a bad-ish situation, and stuck to your values. Kudos on your willpower. It doesn't look to me that you fucked up nearly as badly as you seem to think you did.
/r/RedPillWomen14/07/14 05:08 AM
1

Hi there! RP male here, relaying a message that got deleted because the poster was too new and got deleted. Here you go: Avocado is a Polish brand with beautiful embroidery. They're extremely comfortable and offer excellent coverage for larger breasts. Victoria's Secret is probably the most affordable and comfortable, and it helps that they have a wide selection of styles. I'd also recommend Harlow & Fox and Agent Provocateur (Both in the UK) though they're pricier and might not be what you cons…
/r/RedPillWomen14/07/14 04:52 AM
1

checking in: how you be?
/r/RedPillWomen10/07/14 06:11 AM
1

You can move the wall. The better you maintain your health, fitness, diet, habits, mindfulness, etc; the better you push the wall back and deal with it on your terms. The better your relationship with your husband, the better he'll help you through the changes. Obstacles (like walls) are there for us to demonstrate concretely how much we want something. Those whose desires are weak will hit a wall and give up. Use the bricks in your wall to build a path.
/r/RedPillWomen10/07/14 06:06 AM
4

Congratulations on inspiring my girlfriend to make this recipe. Keep up the good work, and have my upvote!
/r/RedPillWomen04/07/14 06:33 PM
1

Sometimes our instincts aren't going to please the PC police. I don't mind. Sorry you're getting downvoted...
/r/RedPillWomen02/07/14 12:38 PM
4

Kierkegaard called envy 'unhappy admiration.' For every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction. Every great concept, person and cause has been first Ridiculed, second Opposed, and finally Accepted as self-evident. We shouldn't get worked up over these people's negativity. Let them kill themselves with Cortisol. We're better than that. Carry on, ladies. Don't let the trolls feed on you.
/r/RedPillWomen01/07/14 03:10 AM
2

light-minded perhaps you mean light-hearted...?
/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 05:58 PM
17

As a guy: ^ this. An alternative: offer to go shopping together, and have him point out things that spark his interest. Then consider clothing that has some properties that work for him and ALL the ones that work for you. Feel free to push your boundaries within reason, especially in private as turtle# says.
/r/RedPillWomen17/06/14 01:35 AM
1

I think most of us in this thread support you. I know I do. How best to go about it...?
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 11:43 PM
0

You should watch your quotations, sir. I said you're an exception, not 'the exception.' You mean it's not like you know of the tens of millions of men running around with the various issues you've stated. In general, men's problems tend to be personal, not publicized. The problems can very well be there without your awareness of those problems, and the problems are there, see this thread. Definition: Mutilate: Inflict a violent and disfiguring injury on; inflict serious damage on. Cutting off a …
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 11:42 PM
1

It works, yeah. But it'd be more like your tongue was dry AND the tip was cut off or the nerve endings were seared to non functionality. Have an upvote. She wasn't worried about the female view, just that I'd have some sort of existential quandary when I saw my penis wasn't exactly like my dad's.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 11:29 PM
5

I'm glad that you're an exception to my statement. That being said, if part of you was cut off from the rest of your body, then you are, by definition, mutilated... Even if that mutilation has scarred over and you cover it with pants. Would you say you're for, against, or neutral to the mutilation of infants?
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 04:19 AM
8

I'd like to make a suggestion: given the level of violation this seems to evoke in us, can we make this a movement on a greater order than the other issues that are gaining traction? People say 'teach men not to rape' as if it had legitimacy, so why shouldn't we say 'teach parents not to mutilate their kids. You don't circumcise your daughters; don't do it to your sons.' They consider female circumcision an atrocity abroad...we've got a foot in the door for opening their eyes to atrocity happeni…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 03:06 AM
2

What's the name of the book, man? Edit: the name of the book is Circumcision: the Hidden Trauma or on Amazon
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 02:56 AM
3

Already have. In my case it wasn't even my dad saying this, but my mom. When asked, she said she didn't want me to feel different from my dad. Because...I'd be regularly comparing penises? Idk. As to whether it makes a difference, people should be saying that it doesn't make a difference AS FAR AS WE KNOW. We don't currently have the instruments or methodology to truly test this, so saying that it's harmless is pure speculation. Bodily mutilation, as a rule, is not harmless. We evolved a certain…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 02:55 AM
1

I'm inclined to agree with HakunaMoscato (great username, btw!) your 'who' only tells maybe a quarter of the story. Who are you looking for? Are you trying to get with another biologist, or an artist/musician or some other type? What kind of person are you attracted to? your 'when' is violating the commandment of specific objectives. If you want something done, put it on a timeline. Choose your SPECIFIC goal (to meet an eligible bachelor whom you find interesting by, say, September 10) 'the soon…
/r/RedPillWomen02/06/14 02:48 AM
4

The facts, ma'am. Nothing but the facts. 5 w's and your specific objectives.
/r/RedPillWomen01/06/14 10:08 AM
2

Let us know how it goes!
/r/RedPillWomen01/06/14 02:58 AM
3

As a guy, I'd personally feel better if my SO took me to the place of purchase and showed me what would've worked better. Exchange it then and there, without being apologetic for your taste or his ignorance, educate him so he can do better and you guys are a better match.
/r/RedPillWomen31/05/14 04:52 PM
1

Right? But would we really have much of a problem with the hot people being able to go topless? We show our good example, and hopefully motivate the rest to improve themselves. Don't let breast cancer steal second base.
/r/RedPillWomen30/05/14 06:53 AM
1

Damn, girl...way to give a cogent and well-thought-out reply. Kudos to you; have an upvote and keep on doing what you're doing.
/r/RedPillWomen29/05/14 04:10 AM
5

Motivating as fuck. Thanks for sharing; have an upvote.
/r/RedPillWomen28/05/14 01:37 AM
2

Perhaps it's a better policy for myself, and less so for others...
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 06:40 AM
1

I get 'Ayn Rand Mentor' so maybe your search history is a little biased on that count, chris. Not to mention the fact that for every action there's an equal and opposite reaction. 'All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.' So it doesn't surprise or bother me that other people would claim she's mentally ill. your whole second paragraph here is more ad hominem arguments, which won't get you any inte…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 05:02 AM
19

NEVER date on the first fuck.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 04:09 AM
7

unfortunate to see you getting downvoted for curiosity. Hopefully you've picked up on the lesson here: Shit tests do not reflect a woman's genuine desires. (more generally, sounds that come out of a woman's mouth - aside from moans and screams of pleasure during sex - do not reflect a woman's genuine desires. Women's words do not reflect what they actually want.) Her game is not to leave. The betas in her past stopped her from leaving by supplicating her. The alpha in her present prevented her f…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 04:45 PM
1

What was the lesson? I've got a copy, but haven't gotten around to reading it yet. Might as well be aware of and looking for the lesson rather than trying to stumble on it blindly...
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 03:25 AM
3

That works too. Do what works for you.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 02:58 AM
1

Yes! Hatemail! I like how you don't address any part of what I talked about in the post, nor gave any type of example of how the philosophy is wrong or incompatible with TRP. I first figured you were a troll when you used nothing but ad hominem attacks for most of your sentences. I've seen Rand in interviews and debates, and I didn't see any evidence or suggestion of mental illness or deficiency. Mind telling me exactly what her mental illness was and how you came to that conclusion? Code green:…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 02:57 AM
1

Truth is incontrovertible. Ignorance may deride it, and malice may attack it, but in the end... There it is. Winston Churchill
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 02:53 AM
12

We're the pirates of the modern day. The flag of The Red Pill is the black flag scorned by the rest of 'civilized' society.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 02:50 AM
1

But before I go, yes, she's not the best writer, but I think that's more than made up for by the cogency and consistency of the philosophy itself. Have an upvote.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 10:44 PM
1

Hm. Even Stadler can have a good point, despite his many failures. I'll get back to this later. Serving wine to milfs for cash. Peace, brothers. War on passivity, and peace within ourselves.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 10:42 PM
1

How about Galt himself? Like him, we can't maintain absolute transparency. We don't reveal our plans or TRP principles and ideology to the biased that will reject it. Our movement is more underground, allowing the Bluepill mentality to destroy itself, as in reality it must. BP's have only managed to survive this long because the Redpillers have had to support them in silence. We ARE winning the right way, improving ourselves, building our small community of people who see things properly. But I'…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 10:41 PM
1

Correct. Eking out a fraction of a cent of profit per microsecond transaction doesn't add value, and that's what makes it basically immoral. Even Rearden took a loan, but that was from Midas Mulligan, a man who only loaned to those with collateral, those worthy of the money divested to them. In the same way, TRP is - about bagging endless pussy, but rather about opening one's eyes to the reality around them, objective reality, sexual strategy. The benefits one derives from TRP arose from the val…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 10:34 PM
1

I've got a copy of fountainhead. Now to find time to read it...
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 10:21 PM
2

Who said so? I did. End of discussion, progress is made.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 10:21 PM
1

The movie is vastly inferior to the book. That said, watching it before reading it could mean you get more out of the book.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 10:15 PM
1

Dink is MGTOW
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 07:58 AM
7

Accept it, MrPeoples. The people who accept this kind of rationalization are removing themselves from the sexual marketplace. The gifts, cash and favors that the betas give their female gravity wells turn into the benefits that alphas enjoy. It's only unjust from the viewpoint of the betas themselves, and they put up with it because they hamster just as much as the females. From TRP perspective, everything's happening exactly as it should. Don't get mad at reality, at the patterns you observe. A…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 03:02 AM
18

http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=2773 We should all be aware that the word 'unconditional' is pretty much always a lie. I, for one, strive to be one of the most conditional people on the planet. Life depends on specific conditions. So does attraction. Anyone who appears to profess a genuine belief in ANYTHING unconditional is deluding themselves, about the topic at hand, and likely about almost anything else.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 04:01 PM
2

True. But on the bright side, any improvement, No matter how small or slow, puts you leagues ahead of most people, and all betas. Even if you're just walking, you're still lapping the people on the couch. Eventually the maneuvering becomes subconscious, less forced, less distracting. Mastery.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 05:33 AM
1

Mm...Yes and No, right? If that's your only card, of course it's not going to win you much, but if you're successful in it, keep yourself physically fit (probably going outside the normal realm of nuclear engineers) and have high confidence (now entering into the top 1% or .1% of all nuclear scientists) then I'd bet it wouldn't be hard to use it as an icebreaker. Now, could ANY nuclear scientist really use TRP to get laid all the time? I'd bet not. BUT the world's BEST nuclear scientist should p…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 05:12 PM
2

Good. The dumb ones will follow this advice and make themselves painfully obvious. This will make is supremely easy to spot the quality girls from the shitty ones. Sure, it'll mean there'll be more fat, entitled hambeasts around, but at least they'll die sooner of heart disease. ProDeath
/r/TheRedPill26/03/14 04:36 PM
2

Are you only looking for female opinions?
/r/RedPillWomen23/03/14 04:29 AM
1

Glad I could help you on your way.
/r/RedPillWomen22/03/14 03:31 PM
1

Perhaps it's less about the respective attributes of the males and females involved, or the communities talking about them, and more about the phrase itself. Maybe saying 'not all (x) are like that' is just a phrase that doesn't move anything forward, similar to 'Si eso si que es' or 'it is what it is'. It's less advice/information and more empty tautology. Simple fact is, people tend to interpret words and phrases according to their own mental models (rp frame, bp brainwashing, independent conc…
/r/RedPillWomen22/03/14 12:34 AM
1

I agree with you and OP. I hope, but don't expect that the answers to your maybes (maybe she'll think twice, maybe her mother will think twice, maybe other students) are all 'Yes'. But what do you think is more likely? A) The females view the event through a mindset foreign to them (RP) THEN refuse to bow to peer pressure of the BP's around them AND internalize the lessons despite their years of indoctrination and millennia of evolution or B) they cave to their emotions, resent you, rationalize …
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 11:57 PM
2

Half in jest: engage in more boner-inspiring actions. for tips (although I personally think a graduate degree wouldn't hurt...) maybe consider reading this: http://www.rooshv.com/its-the-boner-stupid and have an upvote!
/r/RedPillWomen16/03/14 06:26 PM
3

Before I watch the video, this immediately reminds me of The Defining Decade by....oh, would you look at that. By Meg Jay. A good read. Would recommend.
/r/RedPillWomen23/01/14 03:36 AM
1

Pointy ears. I figure Vulcan-something hybrid. Could be romulan, I spose.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 01:02 AM
3

Even in the future, even when they're VULCAN, bitches be crazy.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/14 10:06 AM
0

My, what a compelling argument. /s
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 03:04 AM
4

Honestly, I have no argument against this. But he DID get the British out of India. Even if his overall philosophy is flawed, I'm willing to take bits of it, as long as they work. Fair?
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 02:02 AM
5

Things don't change on their own. Changing things changes things. As Gandhi said, "Be the change you want to see in the world." We see the world, NOT as it is, but as WE are. Change, and the world changes for you. There's a flowchart on the internet somewhere...ah, here it is ninja edit: formatting
/r/TheRedPill25/12/13 10:02 PM
-2

I'm not here to provide compelling evidence. Based on your response, no amount or type of evidence would seem compelling to you. The evidence is all over trp, and in every slutty female in the world. The evidence is there. Whether or not you choose to see or believe it is up to you. I'm not compelled to make it compelling for you. But as a final note, consider this: who do you think will have more opportunity and motive to get laid faster; the slut or the quiet introvert? The introvert will tend…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/13 01:17 AM
1

You've got time. If you focus and keep the proper mentality, you'll dig yourself out. Don't get distracted, don't dump money into females and meaningless sex. From now on your money goes to assets, not ass. There are quality females out there. Don't buy anyone any drinks. I'd wish you luck, but it's not a matter of luck, simply a matter of time. I'm not saying it'll be easy. But you can do it.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/13 01:07 AM
19

What you're experiencing is the conflict between the bullshit you've been fed your entire life and the reality of the world we live in. "Why do my eyes hurt?" "Because you've never used them before. Rest, Neo. The answers are coming." Phaseonx11 has it right. There are no contradictions. If you think you've found one, check your premises, and you'll find that one of them is wrong.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 07:17 PM
1

Yup. 48 laws. People will really forget past good deeds, preferring instead to believe they are where they are because of their own a actions and virtues. OP: keep us posted, if you'd be so kind.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 04:51 AM
1

Have you read the art of seduction? I'd go out on a limb and guess you haven't. Consider looking into it. It's one thing to maintain your frame and seek consistency. It's entirely another to ignore what individualities the other person does genuinely have. It's not about seeing them as a snowflake, but being in the moment, giving people what they want, rather than blunt honesty. Truth is powerful, that's why red pill theory works. But honesty is a blunt tool that usually bloodies more than it cu…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 04:43 AM
4

You're confusing cause and effect, sir. Sluttiness CAUSES early initiation into intercourse, it isn't caused BY it, it just reinforces it.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 04:24 AM
3

How old are you? I racked up 17k by the time I was 21, I've got all but... I'll check to be sure... 400 paid off, and I'm turning 25 this coming year.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 04:20 AM
1

Ha. I agree. Again, my point wasn't to try to win arguments or convince them, but to shut down such arguments before they could even arise through improved syntax. I think the problem with my original approach was that it would've required too many qualifiers and disclaimers in order to make such posts...shall we say...camouflaged enough to bypass WK+F attention. Plus, the very fact that a post was in this sub would flag it for their attention.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/13 08:51 PM
0

lqtm. I like it. I'd like to look into how to write an algorithm to search out those with such a mentality and preemptively ban them until they're legitimately ready to give TRP and RPtheory a decent try.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/13 08:46 PM
5

H'm. I see what you're saying here, and I agree that neither I, nor you, nor TRP is trying to gain their approval, per se. I suppose the point I was trying to get across is that by being more conscious of the syntax we utilize, we might prevent them from raising objections at all, thus improving the signal-to-noise ratio of the subreddit. If they can't misinterpret us (because we've preemptively worded it in an unambiguous way, one that meets with RPW approval) then their most common objections …
/r/TheRedPill22/12/13 08:45 PM
2

I'm inclined to think that RP's are averse to short hair when seeking mates but are probably more tolerant to changes when already in a relationship. We tend to see short hair as a red flag indicating a potential militant feminist. But I know I personally like how shorter hair doesn't get in the way as much, and how it can be pulled without getting seriously tangled. I'm open to other viewpoints, though. Let's hear 'em!
/r/RedPillWomen22/12/13 08:14 PM
2

I hadn't thought of this. Does he ever pull your hair? Do the wigs ever fall off, and if so, do you try to put them back on, or just carry on regardless?
/r/RedPillWomen22/12/13 08:10 PM
2

Male here, and this is obviously just my opinion, but I've personally enjoyed it when my mate changes color. When asked beforehand, I always say they look great as-is and that if they're thinking of changing it, they're probably thinking of a color that will look good on them. When asked after the dye job, I'm always enthusiastic because they always put in an effort to MAKE it look good, and they rock it with confidence. But in a larger, more general sense, I'd guess that variety would usually o…
/r/RedPillWomen22/12/13 08:09 PM
3

Oy! No getting down on yourself. For at least this post, you were seeking advice from a group of people you can respect, and you have an informative answer to someone seeking it. Be proud that you're improving Yourself; it puts you way ahead of the curve.
/r/RedPillWomen22/12/13 04:12 AM
2

Wow! Thank YOU for your prompt reply. Makes sense. Carry on!
/r/RedPillWomen22/12/13 03:39 AM
3

Hello! Male here...Just wondering why short hair is advised against here. I'll happily accept either an explanation or just a link, but I'm fairly new here and haven't gone through your sidebar. Regardless, good luck with your issue, and I'm sure you got some quality advice in the comments.
/r/RedPillWomen22/12/13 03:16 AM
2

In response to your question: "Are gina tingles emotions?" The answer seems pretty clear: Yes. They're definitely not rational thought. Tingles are sensations, sensations are felt, that which is felt is a feeling, and feelings are emotions. But maybe you're not convinced by this. So if they're not emotions, and they're definitely not rational thought, what are they? I look forward to your reply.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 07:47 PM
1

48 laws, Art of seduction (also by Robert Greene) NLP (neurolinguistic programming)
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 05:10 AM
2

Your premise is flawed, and reflects a lingering bluepill mentality. TRP and RPt isn't just about getting laid. It's about shifting your mentality, throwing off the chains of conditioning that blind you to the realities around you, and creating your own frame of mind instead of subjecting yourself to the service of others. It sounds like you're on your way to MGTOW, which I don't have a problem with. Good luck to you, and have an upvote.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 01:48 AM
2

I'd say it seems that the rejection of the concept of 'oneitis' would extend to the rejection of a one true god, but I'm sure others will disagree. Atheist here, if it's not already obvious
/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 05:42 AM
2

Who said anything about dating? Pump and dump and let her find her perfect beta. You know, the one who sees her as a princess on a pedestal.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 05:37 AM
7

Reminds me of "If you're going to be crazy, you have to get paid for it; otherwise they'll lock you up." Hunter S. Thompson
/r/TheRedPill28/11/13 04:42 PM
1

TLDR I agree with OP and explicate my method (apology, then move on regardless of forgiveness) Something that I've found to work very well for me is to make a distinction between offering your apology and her 'forgiving' you. To a certain extent, at least for me, forgiveness has to be earned, not requested or taken. So I like to point out that after I've apologized once I won't do it again for the same infraction, regardless of whether she wants to forgive me or not. After that, the subject usua…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/13 07:11 PM
1

I'd say that as long as you can even RECOGNIZE where you are honestly, you're WAY ahead of the curve. It's NEVER too late to turn things around, and you've got a big community to lean on now for information and moral support. Never give up. Never surrender.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/13 03:18 AM
0

You create it yourself through your frame.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/13 01:23 AM
9

Reminds me of the Feminists outside Hooters with the sign saying 'women are not decorations' while the happy Hooters waitresses deliver coffee to the men.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/13 12:15 AM
2

Remedy: use your newfound powers to get laid.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 06:06 PM
1

This is what successfully reproductive females did with successfully reproductive males. AFBB all the way back, baby. Get them good genes, then lock down a provider (more likely a series of providers cuz...death)
/r/TheRedPill09/11/13 03:53 AM
11

Isn't it c'est la vie? Pretty sure...
/r/TheRedPill09/11/13 03:49 AM
2

I'd hit it
/r/TheRedPill27/10/13 04:59 PM
4

I'm taking this one. Sauce? or should I just credit clack-a-lack?
/r/TheRedPill20/09/13 12:58 AM
23

Use it as a test. If it's inconvenient for her and she does it, it's a good sign.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/13 05:16 PM
0

Start with 48, then art of seduction, then mastery. 33 strategies of war is optional, but with a flexible perspective its lessons can be applied to any area of life, much like Sun Tzu's Art of War.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/13 01:38 AM
5

Dat motherfucking reading list. Like a breath of fresh air. Rand, Hill, Carnegie. But most of all, Greene. Learn from this man, people. He knows his shit.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 11:31 PM
4

Everybody's shallow to a certain extent. Just part of the human condition. We're all here to elevate ourselves. Rock on, dude.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/13 12:31 AM
1

TLDR: I see where you're coming from, but I don't agree with where you're heading. Yes, we are, with one important caveat: You can't count betas as male here. We work on our skills, knowledge, and the most important tools we have: our minds and bodies. They tend to work on their makeup and keeping up to date with celebrity trivia (women) OR working hard to keep in that orbit (betas)
/r/TheRedPill13/09/13 12:29 AM
6

Profit
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 10:33 PM
7

The media has a vested interest in keeping role models BP. There have been articles linked showing correlations there. Looking...
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 03:50 PM
0

The pre-emptive GFY is important. Don't take any guff from these swine! and have an upvote.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/13 09:44 PM
2

Ah, I'd only seen it without that last sentence attached. I like it your way.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/13 04:14 PM
3

You've met them. They're just not always obvious.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/13 09:49 PM
14

Seconded. Let's hear it.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 07:27 PM
3

We're here to sort, not convince. It's easier to discard the low cards in the deck and assemble the aces than to try to white out a seven and Sharpie in an 'A'
/r/TheRedPill18/07/13 03:22 AM
14

Basically? Evolution. Honorable women die out and fail to propagate their genes. Cutthroat bitches accumulate more resources from males because they compete more. That dynamic's been skewed in America and other feminist-affected countries because males have been conditioned to be less than worthy of that competition. So, actually, both evolution and supply-and-demand. Hope this clears it up for you. http://no-maam.blogspot.co.uk/2004/01/book-of-bonecrker.html
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 04:17 PM
1

googled Iron Rules of Tomassi and came across ASD. Anyone know that one or where we can find the full list of Iron Rules? Seems like they should be a link in the sidebar. edit2: the rational male has the Iron Rules further down, for whoever wants to add them to the sidebar. Forgive my incompetence. Other useful stuff in there as well. A good resource.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 04:10 PM
1

Your happiness is the ONLY happiness in your power to create or destroy. Her happiness is up to her, her choices, etc. HalfysReddit is correct.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/13 04:55 AM
0

Have an upvote. I'm not saying it's her fault, and I'm not saying she can't learn better. You chose 'no deal' and it seems like that was the best outcome that could've developed from that situation. I almost feel sorry for her future patients/clients. Stay strong, carry on.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/13 12:31 AM
5

I am like math. Logical and self-consistent. See you when you're back on my continent. Until then.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 10:02 AM
0

'you have to be prepared to walk away if you want to win at this game' reminded me of the 7 highly effective habits. Win-win or no deal is often the best solution for everyone. And if she can't learn how to get a guy off properly, her genes won't Propagate. Chlorine for the gene pool.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 09:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter