TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jakenichols Archive

View 17 posts and 125 comments by jakenichols on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
38

jakenichols/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:49 AM
28

jakenichols/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:17 AM
28

jakenichols/r/MensRights13/07/13 07:25 AM
27

jakenichols/r/MensRights06/05/13 07:54 AM
27

jakenichols/r/MensRights16/09/12 03:08 AM
8

jakenichols/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:22 PM
7

jakenichols/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:43 AM
5

jakenichols/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:22 PM
5

jakenichols/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:44 AM
3

jakenichols/r/MensRights17/11/12 06:15 AM
2

jakenichols/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:55 PM
2

jakenichols/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:38 AM
1

jakenichols/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:24 AM
0

jakenichols/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:59 AM
0

jakenichols/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:49 PM
0

jakenichols/r/MensRights16/03/13 07:22 AM
0

jakenichols/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:02 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Theres a PDF on scribd i believe, its a hard to find book. The book outlines the Committee on Tax Exempt Foundations from 1954 in which a congressional investigation found that the big foundations were funding "subversive" programs in education and in the media. It was panned by the media and academia and is falsely attributed to McCarthyism by its modern critics. Its a mind blower for sure.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 08:55 PM
2

I suggest people read the book "Foundations: Their Power and Influence" by Rene Wormser. It can explain a lot about why the university structure was changed so drastically and this kind of "education" was promoted when it was...
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 08:41 PM
4

Its called Generation Y because Generation Z will be the last.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/13 08:32 AM
2

Its the multinational corporations who fund NGOs and non-profit advocacy groups that pose as "grassroots" organizations, they go to the local media and help them make a scene. The same thing happens in the US for "smart growth" and "green" measures taken by local municipalities. Usually a fake grassroots movement just appears from nowhere, usually funded by multinational corporations or big corporate Foundations(like the Ford or Rockefeller Foundations) and they protest or lobby the local govern…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/13 09:15 AM
3

There's a lot of clever wording it in, so you need to not only be literate, but also be able to decipher euphemisms and doublespeak.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/13 08:37 AM
22

Feminism destabilizes society, that's the whole point, so in essence you are right, it grows from a stable society to create an unstable one. If you do a little history research, you will find that the Bolsheviks used feminism to destabilize and overthrow the Russian Czar system. Its being used now worldwide to bring about a new system. Read all about it in Chapter 24 of The United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/13 10:28 PM
1

You cannot escape the Agenda 21 initiatives, they are everywhere, in every municipality. I run the /r/UNAgenda21 sub come on over.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 10:19 PM
0

You've obviously not studied the futurists of the late 19th century who said that all of this was coming and it had to happen in order to create a socialist utopia. See: The Fabian Society, Milner Group, Rhodes Round Table Groups, Royal Institute for International Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations, etc etc. All of these private "think tanks" had all of this laid out before WW1. Its actually a conspiracy, a well documented, open conspiracy. HG Wells, a very prominent member of the Fabian Soci…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 10:44 PM
2

This all has to do with the UN's Agenda for the 21st Century, which is a political action blueprint for all UN nations for "sustainable development", it deals with overpopulation BS scaremongering like that. Read Chapter 24, its all about "women's empowerment" and getting women into the workplace worldwide. Women are easier to control and easier to appeal to emotion to, meaning that women "in charge" will do "what's right" more often, meaning they'll take orders from people who are "experts". It…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/13 11:21 AM
1

I was using those two bands as examples of having their own "sound" within a genre. You can't stray too far from the formula and still be punk, just like you can't stray too far from country or jazz or classical if you want to "fit" into a defined style. There are hundreds of "underground" bands that are beyond green day and blink in terms of originality. Bach and Mozart were trained as musicians from an early age and devoted most of their time to music, they had specialized training that isn't …
/r/TheRedPill27/10/13 10:08 PM
1

In any case, this isn't the forum for arguing over musical aesthetics We can agree to disagree. Its the encapsulation of emotion and energy that draws people to punk, yes the songs are short and that is because they are usually writ in standard format (v-c-v-c-b-c) at super fast tempos. Innovative in the sense that you are creating your own sound, as in, you can tell a Green Day song from a Blink 182 song just by the sound the tonal and energetic uniqueness that is difficult to describe and also…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/13 09:30 PM
2

Tell a punk drummer it takes no skill. Its a genre that consists of simple songs, yes, that doesn't make it a lesser art form. It's not "cheaper" than rock, its essentially the same as rock, just much much faster. I was a drummer in a touring punk band, I toured coast to coast, most people who play punk music professionally are capable of playing "expert level" music, but choose not to because they enjoy simple songs, simple melodies because people like it, its catchy, its fun, its engaging. Som…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/13 08:11 PM
5

As a landowner and a politically savvy individual, I vote to end women's suffrage, shit has just gone downhill since! The Bolsheviks used a "women's rights" movement to gain power as well.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/13 08:13 PM
5

This is a poor representation as to why people play punk or rock. Has nothing to do with wanting to be the next Bach I can assure you. Also they don't want to "bring everyone down to their level". Seems you have an elitist slant to your musical tastes and that's fine, but you criticize without understanding which makes you ignorant.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/13 08:10 PM
2

This is so the uglies and fatties slowly phase themselves out of existence. No ugly or fatty wants to date an ugly or a fatty, and neither does anyone else.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/13 06:26 AM
1

In half of those pictures the guys have bags between their legs.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:46 AM
0

See The United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century: Chapter 24, all about women's "empowerment". People think its just about third world women, no it's a global agenda. We document every aspect of the agenda over at /r/UNagenda21
/r/MensRights05/09/13 10:07 AM
5

The Bolsheviks used it as a weapon to divide the people, where the women go the men follow.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:28 PM
6

You're touting the propaganda lines there buddy.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/13 10:21 AM
2

Look into the Cox Committee and the Reece Committee, they found that big tax exempt foundations were funding the educational system(and the suffrage movements) which facilitated the growth of government because it was promoted through education as a good thing. The problem is, that they only exposed these things, never stopped them, so it literally continues today.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/13 10:19 AM
1

I watched my little brother take this same course which was required before he attended a local college. I told him this is a perfect example of social engineering. It will undoubtedly lead to more rapes. Just like D.A.R.E. led to higher drug use.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:11 AM
2

This show is also attempting to change your behavior. This is propaganda about propaganda. He is inserting the current memes of today's "brave new world" into this show.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/13 08:38 AM
8

Men have been stuck in a state of perpetual adolescence. It is due to sports culture, and video games IMO. Not playing sports, but sitting around and watching them. Also programming by television. Propaganda, etc.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/13 08:01 AM
-2

Would this mean that marriage is an act of 'Affirmed Consent'? Or do you have to get this consent before each sexual act?
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 09:59 PM
0

History is always told by the winners unfortunately.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 09:53 PM
0

Best place to change a diaper is in the car, I feel.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:58 AM
28

To quote Snoop: "You can't make a ho a housewife"
/r/TheRedPill20/06/13 12:28 PM
1

they were around but it was very very rare.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/13 08:55 AM
2

...and now deduce to where that could lead....
/r/MensRights16/03/13 07:49 AM
1

Let's admit it, you wouldn't take the bus in any city in Iowa. No one does. Waterloo blows so much money on empty buses that just drive around all day with 2 people on them, tops.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 11:32 PM
2

What if his partner is a man?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 06:22 AM
2

You're right, this is just the current system. Although I wouldn't say Islamic was the first with that style of family. Christianity is older than Islam. But when you look back in pre-Christian times, there were kings and such that had hundreds if not thousands of wives. The rich guy in town basically had the most wives. I guess he could support them all. Although, destroying the family unit still is not a good idea if the point is to have the children basically raised by the state, where they c…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:49 PM
2

Yet they push the "free love" aspect. Which I feel is part of the plan as well, to destroy the family unit, which holds society together. They use positive eugenics and program the last few generations with the idea of "free love" and no one marries, no one procreates, and then this happens: http://www.csustan.edu/history/faculty/weikart/Marx-Engels-and-the-Abolition-of-the-Family.pdf
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:30 PM
2

While personal negative eugenics is widespread (e.g., contraception, abortifacients, abortion, euthanasia), we appear now also to be on the threshold of a kind of personal positive eugenics, where certain characteristics can be planned into the reproductive process based upon the desires of the parents. The impact of such artificial intercessions on the future of human reproduction remains to be seen, but what seems clear is that such intercessions are here to stay. How far Wells would have embr…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:45 AM
1

Yes, this is because they have been told their whole lives that they are powerless compared to men, so once they gain power they will do what they can to remain in power. They almost always lean to the political left, and think that they should be "given" things without understanding where those things come from. I blame it on the education system.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:45 AM
1

History is interpretation to those who don't have a clue what is going on. The Carnegies and Rockefellers and Fords, gamed the system, using money and influence in the power structure. They literally OWN the money system for fucks sake, money is nothing to them. It's about control.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:40 AM
1

They made their fortunes by exploiting the system, not through actual capitalism. The Dodd Report there proves their influence in controlling/gaming the system in their own favor. They want communism because then they have total control, it is beyond profits at this point and is more about control. They want to rule the world, this is fact.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:36 PM
1

http://www.scribd.com/doc/3768227/Dodd-Report-to-the-Reece-Committee-on-Foundations-1954 Do a little research on "social engineering" programs funded by the big-oil money foundations. This report is as of 1954, think about all the big social changes that happened after 54. Feminist uprisings, "free love", the drug culture, communitarians, etc. Also: http://www.csustan.edu/history/faculty/weikart/Marx-Engels-and-the-Abolition-of-the-Family.pdf I would say without a doubt the feminist movement was…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 10:29 PM
1

calling "it informal unpaid work, performed mostly by women" makes it sound like women are slaves in their own home, "access to social protection and eduction" is alluding to protection from men, and education about men.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 10:16 PM
-1

So in your limited, non-researched view, you think it is overboard. Do a little homework. This is the internet, not the foundation funded local library. here let me help you: http://www.csustan.edu/history/faculty/weikart/Marx-Engels-and-the-Abolition-of-the-Family.pdf
/r/MensRights17/11/12 09:32 AM
0

what?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 08:48 AM
1

The UN commissions the foundations and NGOs to lobby governments and hand out "grants" to get their changes enacted. So they are better at getting things done than you'd think. This is a covert take over. Anytime any big-money foundations are funding something, chances are it is a UN directive. This is how it is being done. The UN is what will take over once the foundations' work is done. They are using "social engineering" programs in the universities to literally indoctrinate the youth into "t…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 01:32 AM
1

Yes, exactly. The lefists are the antithesis to rights in general for ANYONE. Whats so ironic is all the minority and women's groups all push for the left. The reason being the people who started many of these advocacy groups are agents of the collectivists. More than likely funded by the big foundations. I actually guarantee that they are.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 01:02 AM
1

What is happening is that they are forcing the "western" way of life onto "developing" countries. They are using the guise of "women's empowerment" to break apart their culture. You cannot come in and take over a society without first tearing their culture apart. You should read Machiavelli. Women in "developing" countries are the staple of the family, they hold it together, they are alright with not having a "say" because they still have something called a family unit in these cultures. The fem…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 12:56 AM
1

Tell that to the borg at /r/politics
/r/MensRights17/11/12 12:47 AM
2

Collectivism is the most dangerous trend that is growing in the past 10 years or so. The United Nations is literally a free man's enemy. They want to control every aspect of your life from cradle to grave, destroy the family unit, and create a worldwide socialist government. They are well on their way. If you read this document here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/3768227/Dodd-Report-to-the-Reece-Committee-on-Foundations-1954 you will find that the big oil-money foundations funded(and still do) subve…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:44 PM
1

For more on the UN's plans /r/UNAgenda21
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:44 AM
-1

I get hit on all the time. I can't stand in line for food without a woman approaching me or being flirty. My girlfriend tells me it's my "air of confidence" that makes women come at me so aggressively. I don't think I've ever actually asked a woman on a date, they always proposition me. So I totally understand how it's annoying to get hit on, although I appreciate it because I know it's not a common thing for most men.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:29 AM
2

This mindset is what the UN had in mind when they wrote The Agenda for the 21st century: Chapter 24: Global Action for Women Towards Sustainable & Equitable Development some quotes from the agenda: "24.2. The following objectives are proposed for national Governments: ...To increase the proportion of women decision makers, planners, technical advisers, managers and extension workers in environment and development fields.... To assess, review, revise and implement, where appropriate, curricula an…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 06:45 AM
1

I'm hairy as hell, the ladies love it. I haven't been with a woman that hasn't run her fingers through my chest hair and told me how sexy it is.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:43 AM
1

This is because the ACA is lined up with the goals of Chapter 24 of the United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century. Chapter 24.2 (F): "(f) To formulate and implement clear governmental policies and national guidelines, strategies and plans for the achievement of equality in all aspects of society, including the promotion of women's literacy, education, training, nutrition and health and their participation in key decision-making positions and in management of the environment, particularly as it …
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:33 AM
2

The United Nations funding the "women's empowerment" movements worldwide and how that is affecting men in societies and how it is affecting the family structures of the world. See Chapter 24 of United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century. There are dozens of Non-Governmental Organizations that are dedicated to "women's empowerment" funded directly by United Nations foundations. Their goal is to "equalize" women in power positions. It's one of the main reasons why more women are in college now tha…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:06 PM
3

yes, they are attempting to destroy the family unit worldwide. This is straight out of Brave New World. Destroy the family, the next generation will be more malleable by the state. edit: I'm taking this link and posting it to /r/UNagenda21 good find my friend!
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:53 PM
3

They call housework: "Unpaid family work" and say that women are subject to this, as if it's horrible and degrading. wtf. some quotes: "It has become increasingly common that households with children are headed by single parents; in 85% of these cases the single parent is the mother" ----- I wonder why. "Women’s activism and feminist movements have a long and diverse history. Women’s nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have been established since the 1980’s on the local, national, regional, and…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:51 AM
1

more info about Agenda 21 at /r/UNAgenda21
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:40 PM
1

They are listed as part of a "public sector" company in the UN Global Compact: http://www.unglobalcompact.org/ParticipantsAndStakeholders/public_sector.html down at the bottom of the list.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:23 PM
1

got nothing for me? I gave you a nice well informed reply, and you backed off pretty quick didn't you? Who's uninformed again?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:40 PM
0

Yes exactly. It is a classic divide and conquer strategy. Feminists are probably closely related with the Commies not only in their thinking but literally. I've always noted that big movements like that are always "too mainstream" to be grassroots.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 02:29 AM
0

Yes, they have been heavily indoctrinated. This is a fact. They are targeting women for these roles. Because women will follow orders if they feel they are "empowered" by them. They've been told their whole lives that men are holding women down so now that they have a chance to become "empowered" they will take it no matter what. It's basic psychology.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 02:20 AM
1

hmm, probably not. More like owned and operated by very very rich interests.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 01:00 AM
1

There is a blatant agenda to empower women. The agency that put out this study that I have linked to is directly linked to an NGO that answers to the UN. Here is the UN documentation that lays it out: http://www.worldsummit2002.org/texts/report_waa2015consultation.pdf It was initially conceptualized in at the Rio Earth Summit in the early 90s as a section of Agenda 21, or the United Nation's Agenda for the 21st Century. Here is that document: http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_24.sh…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 12:52 AM
1

yes I agree being labelled a republican doesn't make you against the grain of society, but in college it does. Almost all politicians are just liberals in disguise anyway, they vote for bigger government, more laws, etc. It's a control thing.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 12:43 AM
1

Exactly, sustainability in the sense that the UN and these types of organizations describe it is very nebulous and vague intentionally so that people just nod and agree. Also it doesn't list what charities are being funded, not all charities are good. What if the charity is paying for sterilizations in poor communities? How is that good in any way? that is something the UN promotes though to reduce "carbon emissions." This is a propaganda piece.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 12:39 AM
2

I would say that you are a case of your own allegations.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 12:37 AM
6

I had to drop out of college because I could not take the blatant programming. I called out several professors on this and they scolded me in front of classes. I would be assigned to write opinion papers in just plain composition classes and I would get Fs because the professor didn't agree with my opinion. One paper I remember specifically was about how men are portrayed on television as bumbling idiots and how that is affecting the culture of men, it was a woman obviously, she gave me an F, ga…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 12:13 AM
1

well punk rock isn't really rebelling against any system because then the punk rock system would collapse for there would be too many people rebelling against that. It is the "norm" on college campuses to be labelled "liberal" and to be all about "women's rights", "equality", "environmentalism" etc, but all that shit is just a guise for future chains to be laid upon the people, it should be a good thing to be against. The next generation of "leaders" will be heavily indoctrinated into this minds…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 10:38 PM
2

Not sure why going with the grain is a good thing.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 10:29 PM
7

college liberals can be just as appalling. I'm not a republican by any means, but the majority of college students are "liberals" because they've been taught to think that way by the "lifer" professors who never leave college and live off the public dole. The liberals are the most indoctrinated of any of the groups, their opinions are molded by the system, at least the republicans on campus are going against the grain.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 10:25 PM
2

Diversity = Division. When you divide any population, they are more easily controlled. Racism is wrong, sexism is wrong, but forcibly dividing people by writing "affirmative action" laws is way worse. Probably why it is called "affirmative action" because you quell any kind of uprising against unfair practices so everyone turns into "yes men"
/r/MensRights06/10/12 10:22 PM
0

here is an article from today's local news in my area about a woman from this same organization coming to meet with business leaders about global diversity and how businesses need to get ready for the "21st century workforce", there's also a woman talking about "preparing people for the future." Agenda 21 is the world Agenda for the 21st century. Diversity is another way of saying "dividing the people", when you diversify you divide up. Divided people are easier to control and manipulate.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 10:18 PM
1

The organization that put out this article has their hands all over the planet with this kind of BS. Their goals align with Chapter 24 of the United Nation's Agenda 21. This is how they are bringing about the world government, this is NOT conspiracy theory, it is heavily documented. The more you look into it, the more you see it being set up around you. Women are more likely to go along with it because it operates under the guise of being "charitable" and "good", its Orwellian doublespeak at its…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 09:47 PM
1

At this point, it would be unfeasible to shut down public schools, only because a vast amount of people are DEPENDENT on them. BUT, we should de-nationalize them, localize them, stop relying on the Dept of Ed for curriculum.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 01:32 AM
0

You ignored most of my post but that's fine, i expected you to. I never said that people should be forced to be homeschooled that is a straw man. I said they could either be homeschooled or go to privately owned schools which could compete, have smaller class sizes, do a better job of teaching because they would have to compete, in those types of schools you could learn all the "advanced" math that you claim to need to know. Public schools don't have people who are proficient in advanced math I …
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:54 AM
1

Well first off Here is a really long article about public schooling that you probably won't read, but it sums up what the education system actually is. A way to dumb down the youth and to make obedient workers instead of free thinking, independent people. Mass education is designed to control culture and to literally control how people think. You are a product of modern schooling, as am I. You however never unlearned anything and probably took everything you learned as fact. I am a HUGE advocate…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:32 AM
1

Logical fallacies, wow, you are good at those. I never said women being able to support themselves was a bad idea. I never said children being educated was a bad idea. Those are what the people with actual logic skills call "straw men." You are an extreme case of an indoctrinated liberal zombie. I use the term "liberal" loosely because it doesn't mean what it used to mean. Liberal used to mean logical and open minded. Now it means a leftist zealot.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:32 PM
1

Well, I'm glad I was able to fight that moron's logic with reason.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:32 PM
1

Chavelah is just misguided is all, not necessarily a bad person, just brainwashed, thanks to the social engineering of the last 40 years or so. Cheers.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:24 PM
1

Related, schools are not what you think they are. I actually just read a whole history of why public schooling was brought about, you should definitely look into it because you are obviously very ignorant of the subject. The UN is doing nothing of the sort.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 10:37 PM
1

That's collectivism. You must love Agenda 21 then. Throw that individualism in the trash, you want a collectivist society where the rights of the individual take a backseat to the needs of the collective. It's not that men were shielding women from suffering, its that there was a family unit in place. The man and woman acted as a team in raising a family. Now both man and women work and the public schools raise the children, hence dumbed down kids and families breaking apart. The concept of fami…
/r/MensRights16/09/12 10:25 PM
1

Codex Alimentarius is a part of Agenda 21. They want a food, healthcare, energy, resource, money, family and land monopoly. Collectivism is on the way. The problem is that the colleges and public schools are literally indoctrinating kids into this mindset too, it is frightening. Check this out: http://www.sustainableschoolsproject.org/tools-resources/starter-kit schools all over the USA have already implemented this type of thing.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 09:35 PM
2

it all ties in with men's rights, which is one facet of the big picture, there is a very serious campaign against men in this country for sure, you can see it on sitcoms, tv shows in general all make men out to be stupid fat and dumb sports idiots. So most men, when they see this, they think that is how they should act, monkey see monkey do. There is a deliberate dumbing down of men so that women can take over, and they will be ruthless.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 09:25 PM
2

Uh, what? Okay, you are completely missing the point here. The aim of Agenda 21 is to "depopulate" and make the human "problem" more "sustainable", the entire POINT of "bringing up" women is to drop the birth rate. This is actually becoming a new normal in the US, haven't you heard of the "childfree" movement, its all college educated women "choosing" to not have kids because there are "too many people", what will happen eventually because of this will be the uneducated will keep having kids and…
/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:02 PM
1

I came here to say almost exactly this. Rothbard was the man's man LOL. Related, Planned Parenthood document from 1969
/r/MensRights16/09/12 11:29 AM
2

Related they want to empower women against men and boost them up over the men.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 10:58 AM
2

Related
/r/MensRights16/09/12 10:56 AM
7

This is probably also the reason Men's Rights organizations are being listed as "hate groups", because it doesn't align with the policies of the UN Agenda 21 plan. The ultimate goal is to break up families and promote "women's health" aka abortions/contraceptive, to lower the population levels down to a "controllable" level. Just do a little research on Agenda 21, it's not conspiracy theory like a lot of pundits would want you to believe. If you haven't read the book Brave New World by Aldous Hu…
/r/MensRights16/09/12 04:53 AM
3

Come over to /r/Agenda21 and learn more ways that Agenda 21 is fucking up the world.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 03:09 AM
2

I would like to blame TV for that incident. Television shows aimed at women are seriously brainwashing them. I am trying to "wake up" my girlfriend over the course of time, she is slowly becoming aware of the TV manipulation of women and why it is a bad thing. But sometimes I feel she is slipping back into the mindset. Sometimes when she is watching the Kardashian reality shows, she starts to ACT like that.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:52 PM
2

Some of these men are effeminate and probably not hetero, for some reason gays have a tendency to side with women. Not trying to stereotype, its just what I am seeing on some of these man-hating by men videos. There is a severe irrationality in their rhetoric and their state of mind. There is a lack of common sense and a lack of self-interest in their motives.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:45 PM
1

A high profile kidnapping happened right behind my parents' house in Iowa. Here's a Huffington Post article on it, they literally just vanished.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 08:35 AM
3

but who reads that shit?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 05:49 PM
3

It isn't sexist, women are targeted by the media, haven't you ever seen a women's magazine? They force them into stereotypes(i.e. wearing makeup, purfume, new styles of clothes) and if they don't conform they are ostracized. Men don't seem to care as much about what other men think. At least not many men that I know, there are some. But women are by far targeted more aggressively.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:03 PM
14

Music is brainwashing, just letting you know that. There's a reason the "gangsta" life is popular in the black youth, it is because it is pushed in popular culture. The same trick works on women, even more so, in my opinion, women are more prone to fall for mass media manipulation.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:31 PM
1

It was that extra chick.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:30 PM
2

half of students, i bet it was the girls.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:15 PM
1

got you, i was just making a logical conclusion based on the previous statements. LOL.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 10:28 PM
2

So you're saying that if someone doesn't believe in souls, then them saying "Niggers have no souls", they could be totally serious and also not racist?
/r/MensRights07/08/12 10:40 AM
-1

i dont really have anger, i am just arguing to argue, its the internet, none of this matters.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 10:10 AM
0

Its funny that you say a nonprofit rental system would get to choose who they rented to. So then the people who are NOT chosen to live there are then living on the street. fucking dipshit. Your fantasy world that you have made in your head is just as biased and bullshit. Fucktard. You must have never come in contact with people who just don't give a fuck, those are the willingly poor. I have debunked your shit nonprofit theory. And also someone living in a not-for-profit dwelling who has to work…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:28 AM
0

you oversimplify some things and over complicate others. also the idea of a non profit rental is retarded, because if someone does not own the property they have no obligation to maintain it. This is something I have learned from watching my grandfathers rentals and going and cleaning up a house that was trashed by the previous tenants. Every time someone trashes a house there is money involved in fixing it up and cleaning it. It almost always happens with the low-income, dirt poor people that t…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:16 AM
0

Everyone is FORCIBLY entered into the system which is wrong. Government should not force anyone to purchase anything. I think taking personal responsibility for your own actions is a much more common sense approach to anything. And I think you are missing the SUPPLY and DEMAND aspect of healthcare, when EVERYONE is automatically able to go and just get healthcare for "free" the DEMAND becomes unlimited and the SUPPLY obviously goes down, driving UP costs, meaning that the insurance companies wil…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 10:16 PM
0

Honestly the mortgage on my house is less than rent. And your assumption that people DON'T make bad decisions is ignorant. People make bad decisions all the time, that isn't the systems fault. Trust me I hate the system, but rental properties DO provide a service, what about college areas? So you are then assuming that people who go to college and want to live near campus want to BUY the place they are living, that is wrong wrong wrong wrong. What about business people who need living flexibilit…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 10:12 PM
-2

herp derp, hellloooo. I think you are forgetting something. If medical bills for everyone are SOOOO much, and EVERYONE gets insurance, doesn't that mean that the cost of insurance is going to skyrocket? As well as the cost of the medical procedures that are being paid for? I mean, THINK ABOUT IT. If everyone is going to get exorbitant medical treatments over a lifetime that they would never be able to afford, how does an insurance company pay for that insurance based on the fact that every one w…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:38 AM
-10

bitches are bitches. Thats how it works. If someone is a bitch, they bitch.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:42 AM
0

Heres the thing though, small time landlords, like my grandfather, are actually providing a service, that service is housing, not only that, he has a guy that mows the lawns, provides upkeep to the house and fixes things that need fixed on the property FOR the persons living in the rental property, not everyone WANTS to own a home, maybe they have shitty credit because they made bad decisions, maybe they have a job that requires them to move a lot, maybe they are just starting out in life and ne…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:31 AM
-1

so that would be ME. I can afford it, I don't want it. So how is that a good thing? that totally fucks me.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:13 AM
0

It was passed as a new tax, we will ALL be paying it. Look it up.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 09:47 PM
0

it passed as a tax, look it up. ITS A NEW TAX. that is not free.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 09:46 PM
1

well they got rich from being entrepreneurs, they started a home improvement business in the mid-80s, and also owning rental properties, basically buying homes to live in and then just never selling them and renting them out. When I was a kid and they were just starting we were very poor, lived in a 3 room apartment with 5 people, now they are millionaires because they accumulated capital and invested it. You should be anti- CRONY-capitalism. Because that is the problem, business and government …
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:48 AM
0

i am definitely on board.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:44 AM
-6

Yes, prices for healthcare may actually go up because demand will go up.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:34 AM
-2

The insurance companies wrote Obamacare, they are going to profit beyond comprehension. Think about it dude, a MANDATE, that EVERYONE gets insurance. Who's benefitting? Not me, because I: A)don't want health insurance, B) cannot afford to buy health insurance, and C) don't trust doctors.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:32 AM
5

what if politics affects Men's Rights? We should just ignore that for your convenience since you have an unpopular stance on politics? I see that your name states all we need to know about your stance on things, problem is a lot of people made their living from capitalism. My grandparents are self made millionaires, so are my parents, they engaged in capitalism and are doing just fine. I assume you didn't make it out so well.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:27 AM
3

Now they should probe who was paying him to pimp out little boys.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 10:04 AM
1

Its part of the brainwashing that is done by the media. People think the fathers are inept because on TV, men are inept. That is because of the liberal media moguls who want to destroy the family unit and emasculate the supposed man of the house.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:31 PM
2

http://jakenichols.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/the-portrayal-of-men-on-television-reverse-sexism/ check it
/r/MensRights27/04/12 07:17 AM
1

yes it does. that woman needs to go to jail. especially because she knowingly did it.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:27 PM
5

Seems there is no law to make the woman, who knowingly was stealing money, pay back the money. OOPS I POSTED THE WRONG LINK THATS THE COMMENTS PAGE here is the real one http://wcfcourier.com/news/local/grundy-county-man-isn-t-the-father-asks-justices-to/article_efb24e91-f03c-5aba-9a40-64932a9bcc3b.html?mode=story
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:50 AM
1

Love this story. Reminds me of real life.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 07:14 AM
1

Humans in general get the shit side of advertising, it is all at our expense.... literally. If you really think about it, the products they are advertising are overpriced and a good chunk of that money goes towards advertising. So it's like we are paying to be degraded by these companies who don't think much of us other than they want what we have... and that's money.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 10:40 AM
1

Amen sista
/r/MensRights13/03/12 08:31 AM
3

this reminds me of THIS blog about how men are treated like shit on TV CONSTANTLY!
/r/MensRights13/03/12 07:47 AM
1

"it isn't exactly an act of genius to figure these things out" Yeah exactly! Some people are too thick headed though to think that they can be manipulated so easily. Which is why there are so many useful idiots out there pushing the propaganda and aiding in the decline of rational thought as well as society as a whole.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 05:51 AM
3

The blog that I linked to there, has some interesting quotes and sources. Women are interesting creatures in that they are easily influenced(as are men) by other women in places of perceived authority. Kind of like how advertising works, when you see a commercial that has a woman on it, that product is being pushed at a woman, obviously, but some people don't think at that level, and those people are the useful idiots. Just like they got women to start smoking on a mass scale by having "independ…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 03:18 PM
1

These are just my thoughts on this. Anyone care to add to this?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter