TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jdtroughton Archive

View 7 posts and 210 comments by jdtroughton on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

"...suggesting that men, not women, are really the oppressed ones." The author doesn't think different people are oppressed in different ways, to different degrees, in different situations? "...who think that feminism has overreached and that men are now the oppressed class as a result." So they don't think the above; they view claim to hardship in life as a zero-sum game of 50% + 1, I suppose? And no surprise the author makes no attempt to really look into the perspectives of the people he wide…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 03:22 PM
1

Which is an example of misogyny well under control (restricted speech would typically fall upon women unilaterally, otherwise). Thank you for helping my point.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 01:11 PM
1

Bad link. "Server error".
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:03 AM
2

Because we're not changing the gender roles as we say we are. We're upgrading the female role (or rather, range of role options). By necessary extension of the kinds of upgrades being made, the traditional role of men must be doubled-down upon and intensified.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:35 PM
5

That's an interesting way to cull the chaff...
/r/MensRights29/12/15 11:31 AM
1

I wonder this every day. Never asked the question to the ends of a fruitful response, though...
/r/MensRights30/11/15 11:46 PM
1

Yep, that's also true.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 10:03 AM
370

Yep. Protip: if you can actually discuss misogyny in your culture, you probably have misogyny well under control.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 05:30 PM
3

Man, I'm thankful for that, too.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 08:11 PM
8

As much as you can when every request for equal funding, every application to form a student group, and every event held are rejected, protested, and/or shut down.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 05:42 AM
17

The discussion group at the Canadian Centre for Men and Families in Toronto is addressing a topic this month that seems germane to this story and those interested; namely: What does the incoming government of Justin Trudeau have in store for Canadian men and boys? Getting into how this kind of thing makes me feel, online, usually does me no good. The human element has, in my experience, helped me process unbelievable stories like this. It's free to attend, and a statedly non-partisan event, and …
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:47 AM
2

^ This guy.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:21 AM
5

None of it applies; but you come off as projecting, 'cause... well, look at this post and look at the subject matter.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:21 AM
1

You can't pull out two false equivocations in a row and expect to be taken seriously. But hey, good to know you keep dick picks in your car lol
/r/MensRights22/11/15 09:13 AM
1

Argument. That position of authority argument never gets refuted. No, no it doesn't.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 09:12 AM
1

A position of authority, with the completely easy option of cleaning the USB beforehand, is nothing approaching vulnerable. A female in western society even less so, that's one of the most protected, invulnerable demographics there is.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:21 AM
2

No, you have it backwards. If she DIDN'T want them seen, she'd lend a clean USB. This is the equivalent of an "indirect" direct signal.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:20 AM
2

I can't think of them like that, cause they're not. That's a faulty equivocation. The most likely scenario is that she wanted them looked at, considering all the evidence available.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 10:08 PM
2

Found the kite.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 09:35 AM
3

You must be high. She did expose herself. She gave someone nude photos of herself.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 09:35 AM
1

lol not you. I meant links in the news story to the... uh... relevant evidence.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 09:34 AM
1

He had magic glasses. Didn't hafta worry... somehow. "Superman" just showed up and did what needed to be done (according to some people's vision of the idealized American conscience of the era). "Clark Kent" just wrote whatever he wrote about, and crushed pussy.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 09:38 AM
1

A) Mindfulness of thoughts/inner dialogue, anapanasati meditation, and vipassana meditation as three spokes on one wheel. Respectively, in my experience these are: a practiced, even forced, but eventually (4 months - 1 year) habitual cognizance of presently concurring events and stimuli, rather than stories in the mind, day-dreaming, hypothetical arguments, etc. the raw ability to focus the mind on a given stimulus (usually an under-stimulating one, for the purpose of honing the ability to focus…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 09:10 AM
2

Come on. Links.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:41 AM
3

Protests, probably.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 10:56 AM
7

What this, and every addressing of this issue fails to mention (which is of the utmost necessity TO mention) is that the mate selection of females plays a central role in the behaviour of males, and it needs widespread, LOUD changing, if men are to. Anything else is a pigheaded (or sowheaded, as the case may be) denial of human biology, and the nature of humans as social and sexual animals.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 10:48 AM
3

lol great. Totally on topic. Just "religion"? Was this high school or higher?
/r/MensRights19/11/15 05:19 AM
2

What class?
/r/MensRights19/11/15 04:25 AM
2

You're supposed to voluntarily relinquish your own power and advantages to allow those weaker and less capable to seem stronger and more capable, and pretend that they actually are and that there isn't an obvious charade happening. For equality and fee-fees.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 09:44 PM
9

When there is so regularly no justice, that shitty quagmire is called catharsis, and it's a necessary coping mechanism. There's nothing "anti-woman", this is anti-this-woman. Perfectly morally valid and protected by anyone with a conscience and a spine.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:53 PM
2

You're right that it likely wouldn't be allowed. It's pathetic that you're right.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:51 PM
1

Thanks for the heads up. What a pathetic world.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:51 PM
5

Publicly available, so inb4 "waaah doxxing". It's not. Not even a little.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 05:19 PM
1

Then you don't think otherwise, cause that's what I said. Just better.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 12:37 AM
40

You want to fully switch the poster. This half man version, half muslim version confuses the point. Present both, side by side for better clarity.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 05:06 PM
6

Not as a liability. It can be a liability.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 05:19 PM
3

Hahahaha!
/r/MensRights13/11/15 02:43 AM
2

Depends on country. My understanding is that in Canada, or at least Ontario, you can record any conversation you're apart of, video and audio. Now, when the clothes come off, I'd imagine other factors come into play.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 01:12 AM
2

You already lost.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 03:11 PM
3

You can't "get raped deliberately". Wicked logic, there. I don't know why you would call out for women not to walk alone if a man got stabbed... you'd advise men not to walk alone. Again, killing it with your logic. We could try advising people to try to get raped but somehow I think that might not be an improvement. That's 3/3, let someone else think for you.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:41 PM
2

I have. Wish I could let you peek inside my brain. Point is you don't want to be raped. THAT'S why you advise people not to be raped. The delusional expectation of utopia isn't morally correct just because someone with a vagina (or someone who wants to penetrate that, or other vaginas) is possessed of it. The better question is why do people think vaginas both exempt you from responsible behaviour AND that this exemption shouldn't have ancillary societal consequences?
/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:28 PM
4

None of those things are true, especially not as you've stated them.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 11:28 AM
3

I'm personally acquainted with the guy spearheading this, I can confirm the effort is legitimate, for what little a stranger's word is worth online.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:26 AM
3

Nope, not accurate.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:22 AM
1

That's a nice opinion.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:36 AM
2

Bros before hoes.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 07:39 AM
-2

You haven't looked at any other posts, thereby also making it the smartest. Or you have a skewed perception of reality, as the titular assertion is likely as supported by historical evidence of many similar such incidents frequently taking place.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 05:24 AM
1

I can still post in r/askfeminists.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 05:23 AM
8

You're very on with this thinking. It's a glaring example of the need to update and reform our equality conversation that society, for various reasons, is not ready to hear.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 05:22 AM
1

"Belgium's female officers realistically proportioned, healthy, and beautiful"
/r/MensRights17/09/15 07:37 PM
0

Yep, in that conversation.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 07:46 PM
2

Totally does. Social life and etiquette melting away due to mass hysteria centred on curtailing men's rights for a deferential, female-supremacist worldview.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:17 AM
1

Which college?
/r/MensRights25/08/15 09:25 PM
6

Not surprising. Violence is intimately tied to threat/survival responses. What's surprising is that we don't make the connection, and endeavour to lighten these men's loads with education, experience, therapy, moral support, etc. And like, male-positive stuff, none of this "become a eunuck/cuck manlet and love it" nonsense.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 11:48 AM
1

Alright, thanks for the text-effect demonstration. Peace.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:37 PM
2

Oh wow. How helpful yo! Here I am, taking the care not to generalize about all of Canada from my experience of only part of it (and a notoriously arrogant part of it, no less), and some f gives me s about a fact I obviously know, as indicated in my response ("I can tell you..." implying partial, subjective knowledge; "TO is out" said bit of knowledge). Boo-urns.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:42 PM
2

I can tell you Toronto is out.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 09:35 AM
2

Not to mention that that's just how life is generally, for which pages like this are a redress.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 11:07 AM
1

Yes, in this context, that would be inappropriate and people might not see your point past a presumed agenda.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 11:04 AM
4

There are a lot of attitudes and behaviours women need to change for the benefit of men, so trying to extricate those two (and other) subjects is more than a little futile.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:32 AM
4

So the one against everyone, the victims of which she ignores or minimizes if they're male. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:31 AM
2

I meant the "her" of the poster.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 11:25 PM
5

And because of sexism, no one will question her behaviour.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 10:04 PM
1

I'm just saying to get a good parent out of a large, consistent segment of the population.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 06:02 PM
1

I don't disagree. I meant this with respect to a culture of adults and by extension older children reinforcing the environment that creates this. And of course not in a selfish sense, but in the sense of what the effective exchange of energy processes must be if they are to be healthy and functional. The "we" that I mentioned, contextually, is obviously not a developing child.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:41 PM
8

Um wow. That's extremely sexist.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 10:20 AM
4

You get very little that the average male needs in return for the effort. We're running the car on the battery, so to speak, using the shame and provoke the "pride" reaction to enforce beneficial behaviour. None of the respect, love, obedience, etc. is present that has historically produced more reliable fathers. A smart human won't waste their effort without the return on the biological investment.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 08:58 PM
6

Where are these posted? In what context?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:25 AM
2

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Almost_raped
/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:32 AM
2

I can only hope I board such a bus one day.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:29 AM
31

Sexism isn't a solution.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:52 PM
1

i lol'd
/r/MensRights15/05/15 10:48 PM
-1

My ex is. :P
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:08 PM
1

That's fine.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 08:32 AM
0

Alright, I'm not particularly concerned with any of that, though, A much as the quality of ideas I get from the various writers (some better than others).
/r/MensRights17/02/15 05:17 PM
1

On the basis of the interview alone, I see nothing to worry about unless one is concerned that men will be able to make their own sexual lives more fulfilling without sacrificing dignity or money or equality.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 05:00 PM
2

I see no reason to.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 04:29 PM
4

I think that's a helpful and insightful addition at the end.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:23 AM
3

lol Logically, everyone has all the rights that they have. You can't have fewer rights that you have.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 09:20 PM
1

Lol @ "different"
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:35 AM
1

Nope, it's its own word. He told me "positive, grounded in reality". Like "Based Mom" i.e. C.H. Sommers.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:32 AM
2

What's sadder than their need to validate their own prejudices and be totally blind to how fucked up that is in principle, is how they think this data (if even true or accurate, which is a dubious assertion at best) actually affects anything meaningful in the debate it's obviously being added to.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:31 AM
0

Here's mine: Sexual assault / Stop stop stop / Rapists' penises / flop flop flop / Wymmyns wymmyns / Cry cry cry / Evil penis people / Die die die
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:07 AM
1

How are you defining your use of the word "based" here? Something positive, I'm inferring.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:04 AM
2

As in to take on a date, not sleazy slewers.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:46 PM
2

Dark and cheap also come to mind ;)
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:45 PM
1

Was it? It smacks of a bitter, ignorant feminist. Poe's Law, I s'pose.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:40 PM
1

And so you reject because: - We shouldn't ignore men's issues (the movement is sexist) - Men aren't actually always better off (the movement is fallacious) Yes? If so, they sound like good reasons.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:39 PM
3

Yeah, that's what I was looking for.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 07:54 AM
1

Iunno cuzza misandry, maybe?
/r/MensRights09/02/15 07:53 AM
2

Seriously, if we lived in a "patriarchy", men would NOT need to be reminded.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 07:48 AM
5

"Who would have thought prostitution would be an unsavory experience?" from the comments. LOL.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 07:48 AM
1

I see both at play.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 07:38 AM
1

This is laughable. I'm really sorry that people are this messed in the head, and that I have to share a society with them.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 07:34 AM
-1

Depending on the contents of the wallet, whatever else was stolen, plus a probable beating, then yeah that's a fair comparison. Given that it's in all likelihood an orifice somehow lubricated, all the more equivocal.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:37 AM
1

Never bought that bullshit anyway. If you're moving of your own nervous system's volition, then it's fair game.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:34 AM
6

lol what a crock. History, late 14c., "relation of incidents" (true or false), from Old French estoire, estorie "chronicle, history, story" (12c., Modern French histoire), from Latin historia "narrative of past events, account, tale, story," from Greek historia "a learning or knowing by inquiry; an account of one's inquiries, history, record, narrative," from historein "inquire," from histor "wise man, judge," from PIE *wid-tor-, from root *weid- "to know," literally "to see" (see vision). Relat…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:15 AM
1

Glad you made your recovery ;)
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:08 AM
5

Damn that's good.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:07 AM
11

Well, we'd like if it were limited to that, because there's a valid observation. That's not what a LOT of people mean when they say that, because that distinction is too subtle and tolerant for their simple, bombastic minds.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:07 AM
1

I appreciate the clarification. And yes, I'd define them that way. Unless I knew them personally, or were in a conversation that demanded it (and felt they're strong enough to handle it), I wouldn't "call" them anything, I'd be polite and avoid the subject, and say "they" rather than "him/her" to anyone who might bring my words back to them through the grapevine.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 09:07 PM
10

Liberals aren't the source of these bullshit paradigms, but they do tend to parrot them. The radicals and the mainstreams of any group function pretty similarly, I think (as you said). As someone more liberal than anything (also a little of this, little of that...) I definitely agree. I don't need lumping in with these ideas that cut off the branch of liberalism on which they sit, to spite the fruit it grows, which just has the audacity to be white, male, etc.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 09:04 PM
3

I would make that class so aggravating for SJWs until I was exempt. :P
/r/MensRights07/02/15 08:30 PM
1

Just print your own at your local mall. Most do t's and sweaters. $10-$20 depending on the place. A logo: http://www.addictinginfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/meninist1.jpg
/r/MensRights07/02/15 08:28 PM
-1

Not as men, as that's simply not factually what they are. But yes. Of course. Why not?
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:04 AM
1

The difference, though, is a credible, actual threat (in the case of men) versus a long since diminished, if ever even arguable existent one for women...
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:14 AM
2

Surviving it?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:23 PM
1

Of course.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 01:47 AM
2

Not sure I get it, exactly.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:13 AM
1

Wrong sub.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:12 AM
-1

Can't see that as sexism. The way the genders acquire mates, and the results in society are different. This double-standard is likely existent for a tried and true good reason.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:07 AM
0

Excellent. Let your view be heard in these areas of hate.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:02 AM
2

"Too" drunk is key. Being drunk and fucking =/= raping.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:59 AM
2

I'm happy and reassured that this is being talked about, and in this light. A great step towards to equality in our society.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:51 AM
2

Glad it worked out that way for you. Victory.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:22 AM
1

Hope I used the right "flair"
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:15 AM
1

let's hope.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 02:13 PM
4

But this is gonna discourage vi- BANG Carry on.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 10:05 PM
1

We are, in fact, animals.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:23 PM
1

No shit, dumbass. She gets the shit that she gets because she's an uppity woman sticking her nose where it don't belong. lol thanks for that tactful agreement.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:23 PM
1

Who does? Nobody censors males topless in North America.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:21 PM
1

Maybe I meant inflate? "Lose value."
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:20 PM
1

I don't think the superior coin that is female sexual currency will ever deflate too dearly.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:20 PM
9

Suh-weeeet fuck all.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:26 AM
3

I don't read German but this appears to be a men's shelter in Berlin. http://www.maennerberatung.de/maennerhaus-kontakt.htm
/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:33 AM
32

The reason is her sexism, her over-simplification, and her ignorance of a lot of science and history. Merely addressed 'tropes' doesn't elicit the response she's gotten, and pretending that this aspect is what draws criticism is very disingenuous, if not simply very poor comprehension.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 10:31 PM
1

This is of quite poor quality. No names, links, references. A bunch of finger-pointing anecdotes, and not really useable or informative. It's just inarticulate sentiment.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:28 PM
1

Those two things aren't actually different. Kingdom animalia.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 09:36 PM
2

Yep, we all are. It's pretty fucked.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:38 AM
-4

And piss everywhere but the toilet.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:18 AM
2

Holy shit. Are there any article or blog posts about this you can find? Please have a look, cause I'd love to share something more than anecdotal on this. Or gimme some details to research with?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:49 AM
-2

Too many heterosexual females find themselves above such commingling, in the circles where worthy mates actually hide, so its not so much a problem as a "what if". And the indicators are enough that I can avoid them. What terrifies me is never finding a sane woman, and doing all I do for this world and living alone and shamed in return.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 07:47 AM
20

They're just conveniently leaving out: that the "don't hit women" rule we "rely on" then creates a social loophole through which all kind of heinous abuse slips; the very typically overwhelming power of the female (due, it is fairly certain, to characteristics derived from her gender) to exercise emotional and social means of control, harm, and abuse (and how these are very often that extra-victim layer of "on-going abuse patterns" that femmies like to ensure everybody knows is an addition crime…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:46 PM
1

Why, specifically. This looks completely out of line, if it's just based on this post.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:05 AM
1

To "not get political" is a political choice. "Using things" as a political tool, if it's actually connected to the political point, is not bad, and not a timing issue, save not doing it soon enough.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:46 PM
3

" shadowban Banning a user from a web forum in such a way that the banned user is unaware of the ban. Usually takes the form of showing that user's posts/profile/etc. only to that user; other users never see them. Considered underhanded chicken-shit behavior. " That lasts line's there for a reason folks.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:03 PM
2

Sounds like something mods should really just keep themselves out of.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:55 PM
3

Not all of it I support, but I thought it was worth someone's read here.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 04:20 PM
1

I reread this in light of the comments. And fuck is it good.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:41 AM
-1

I don't think so, but thank you for your comment.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:20 AM
-1

The idea is that this man is so horrendous and ridiculous (constructed of the statements of ideological feminists) that, compared to what we know men to be, he can only be a falsehood of the exaggerating unchecked imagination. Ending to put a like more grey, and a lot more white into the picture painted by that ilk of men. If you don't like rough language, it's a rough ride for sure.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:20 AM
-1

Irony is something you have to appreciate with this work.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:17 AM
0

Why not? The altered application, the group belief, the normalization, and the fact that it correctly transmits a message when mutually intelligible. That some people put it on book covers, and government charters recognize it, it's not 'more', or 'more correctly' real. These words are more widely used, only, if they're anything superlative. The brute replacement of one word with another that sounds correct is how language slides. It's what slang is. It's the transition material that being 'offi…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:38 PM
-1

I can't help but take kindly to that.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:33 PM
0

Currently it obviously has multiple meanings, given the dictatorial role of usage on convention, or "the rules".
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:46 PM
1

lol luckily better attitudes are free.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:36 PM
1

No, I meant effort. I can't donate you effort. These are things that cost that, not money. Not like a professional set. Like a presentation review, and posture, lol.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:34 PM
1

No, I got it. Thanks for the advice, though.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:32 PM
0

It's good to know this is what usage up til modernity has defined these words to mean. Thanks grammar witch.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:31 PM
3

But that's the point here. There's no victim here. Save the man suffering in a system that doesn't acknowledge or validate his feelings and needs.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:29 PM
1

Yeah, sound like it. But not done in a malice-laden, under-cautious, ideologically-blinded way, genetic alterations and conscious evolution aren't solely bad tools. Eugenics doesn't mean "poison the grains of the enfeebled and undesired".
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:15 PM
1

What I'm seeing is an acknowledgement of how men are (he vilifies it a bit, but he likes to fuck, so he can't be an "all sex is rape" feminist) and how a world that doesn't deny that could build around such facts of humanity (this dominator tendency of males, when the conditions arise to permit/reward it). I don't think it's a bad idea to consider the sexual behaviour of less human-neurosis-lad primates, their gender ratios and roles, etc. to illustrate healthy possibilities for a species so awa…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:14 PM
1

A MISLEADING TITLE? On Upworthy? No. I refuse to believe it.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 05:57 PM
1

That sounds like the entirety of the feminist way of relating to reality.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:31 PM
1

So you're trans, and didn't feel like "kowtowing to the male ego by.. blah blah blahing and wearer my woman costume".
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:30 PM
1

The 2 hour, image-on-screen format is really discouraging. Even a little more investment in the set up of your home broadcast spaces would go a long way.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 02:05 PM
0

Buttsex.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:31 PM
3

Again, with for false reasons. Arguments are cumulative. You have to keep "it's false information, that's wrong" in your head when you then reason about whether or not the danger is too great to warrant the act. BECAUSE the information is false, and not only a piece of skin is being severed, but cultural standards being affected, this is not defensible. If at the time of informed consent, they said "Also, this is really not helpful or necessary unless you detach the foreskin from the head of the…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:30 PM
2

You've done some quality homework here, good job. Sent!
/r/MensRights18/03/14 05:34 AM
4

What the low down on American Thinker?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:38 AM
-1

LOLOL discriminatory measure enacted due to lack of perceived discrimination. Well. They're "evening it out" according to their own fucked up logic. So.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:37 AM
18

I get nauseous thinking about what it might contain...
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:00 AM
2

That's racist.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 10:19 PM
-1

They're missing that one dangly bit of information...
/r/MensRights06/03/14 10:17 PM
4

That's a reaction by MRAs/etc. to the disqualification of their issues by "women have it worse!", which I agree we need a better response to than anything in the vein of "nuh uh!".
/r/MensRights06/03/14 10:06 PM
1

It's all the patriarchly so let's just keep doing what we're doing.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 01:16 AM
-4

Ahaha, amen.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:25 PM
3

From: Sweet, H.B. (Ed.) (2012). Gender in the Therapy Hour: Voices of female clinicians working with men. New York, NY: Routledge
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:24 PM
1

It's just itself another manifestation of the second-class attitude we're many not fond of, and here to argue against. I hear you though. Strategic voting will never sit well with some...
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:24 PM
2

That's ALL some people will understand (male and female!).
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:21 PM
1

That's the only reason some people can imagine. It's like strategic voting right? It don't sit well with me either.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:19 PM
3

OMG. Source? What book? I'm talking title, editors, publisher, edition.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:13 PM
1

Yeah I dig it.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 03:41 AM
1

ahhh you! I just noticed this. thanks for seeing what I see.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 03:40 AM
2

lol we had this convo above :P
/r/MensRights04/03/14 03:32 AM
1

it was one of those once in a blue moon moments. like getting to say: 1: Quick, call me a cab 2: Okay... you're a cab!
/r/MensRights04/03/14 03:31 AM
1

This is because "you don't hurt women" and nothing more. What do you mean, sir?(I am not asking in an offensive way, just some clarification) In response to your title; you're sexist because your only way to not be, by a warped definition of sexist, is to never criticize a WMYN about something she's sensitive about. I'm joking. I was given many a strict warning about the f-word and how sacrilegious it is around females (not "fuck", FAT). While play-roughing lightly with a female friend, I was ch…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 03:27 AM
1

Yeah, really. This is because "you don't hurt women" and nothing more. Find people who're smarter than to think like that and move on.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 04:13 PM
1

You got it. This is how this problem is solved.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 03:41 PM
13

Wrong. Patently, biasedly incorrectomundo. It will discourage future false allegations by the same token that any swift, zero tolerance legal punitive action deters any social crime. Rape victims are not objects. It's their responsibility to speak up about their own situations. It's horrendous to deny the rights and needs of one group from protection from active violation to coddle another from passive "suppression", which it wouldn't amount to anyway (this referring I hope obviously to the inte…
/r/MensRights25/02/14 04:19 AM
30

HOW CAN SHE SLAP
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:28 PM
1

Me gusta los lesbinas.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 09:08 AM
9

No, my mom would have used her cigarette for this.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 12:16 PM
58

Ew. Don't link her shit directly. Copy and paste it somewhere so she doesn't get the traffic.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 12:29 PM
2

There's a lot prohibiting the demand itself.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 09:17 AM
-1

You forgot to say "/s"
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:44 AM
3

Can confirm, mostly yes.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:43 AM
1

lolol
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:42 AM
0

/s means sarcasm (i;m hoping so hard)?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:42 AM
0

I really really hope you're joking.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:42 AM
1

Of course, if you come from that point of view, you're deluded by your need for the men/actor woman/object fallacy to support your prejudice.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:40 AM
-1

A guy who has no previous homosexual experience but some unexpressed tendencies gets drunk with a gay guy, brings him home and wakes up the next morning realizing that he has been penetrated in a very special place located below the belt. One for which penetration would not have been permitted had he been sober. How long do you think the gay man should be sent to jail for rape?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:38 AM
5

Perfect comment I found on this one: "Here's my idea of the perfect question to make a PC bonehead's brain explode: A guy who has no previous homosexual experience but some unexpressed tendencies gets drunk with a gay guy, brings him home and wakes up the next morning realizing that he has been penetrated in a very special place located below the belt. One for which penetration would not have been permitted had he been sober. How long do you think the gay man should be sent to jail for rape?"
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:37 AM
11

Because of the different class the deaths of men and boys apparently occupy in public sympathies (a second drawing power to women, ex.), they would be affected due to public perception of their gender. I'd say yes.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 11:06 AM
1

I would take the time to find the tools to remove those.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 01:19 AM
3

What was a "non-issue" that feminism has turned into an issue? Rape and sexual assault? Not a chance. Extremely-politicizing and radical boundary demarcation in cases that don't warrant it, maybe. Rape and sexual assault (toward women anyhow) have always been treated that way by many, many people.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 11:21 AM
1

Seem like a semantic issue. Feminist in the context here has always meant to me: "the person with x,y,x behaviours, opinions, given the label feminist", not: "the self-described group so widely diverse in thought and behaviour that it's rarely helpful to any understanding -save that of their diversity and disunity- to refer to them as a whole".
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:26 AM
1

Seriously though, I'd need to know WHY the psychological/social aspect has any reason to have analogous process to the body, in this and any case. With that, it sounds like a paper or two.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:21 AM
2

I like you. No, wait. You, I like.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:20 AM
1

Link to this?
/r/MensRights08/02/14 09:24 AM
4

I'm not sure how that's useful to what this thread can accomplish. If we're talking with Karen and giving her performance tips, sure. But this is distilling out the ideas presenting and quality testing them, and offering our thoughts there. Plus, public speak and fear for your safety at the same time, AND avoid verbal crutches, I dare you to try :P
/r/MensRights08/02/14 09:22 AM
0

Total "civil society" abstinence from violence is a class-engendered preference, as much as anything else. It's not the way a lot of people are, and their right to be so, consequentially speaking, if no one's dying. Some people benefit from having their loose lips tightened.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 09:20 AM
0

I disagree that you need to immediately denounce all violence. People can hit people. That's a totally fine thing to be happening, all things.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 09:17 AM
4

The point of this is looking at, and discussing the ideas presented, and how. It's self improvement, because yes, the focus isn't necessarily on this individual. It's not idolatry or anything to look at this salient representative of this loose group of aims and issues, and critique that four our improvement in individual dealings, as well as in group-norm setting/understanding establishing, etc. Your tone suggest you shaping us all up, and "straightening out" what are entirely subjective judgem…
/r/MensRights08/02/14 09:15 AM
4

Only in a kangaroo court.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:02 PM
1

Just curious what details men aren't oriented, and how men tend to upset the clients? As in, what field of work? That answer, with her 'observations' about male performance, might tell you if it's a sex thing.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:12 AM
1

It's pretty radical to outlaw their linking. I can see where patience with those who would link these sites could wear thin, but then, I couldn't justify censoring others because my patience is wearing... Thanks for the explanation. Answered all my questions. And taught me a new funny phrase; "The Fempire". :p
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:03 AM
3

Yes. Where can I find this email? Or please post its text in full.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 03:11 AM
2

Is there a link or something? The title link just loops back to itself.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:38 AM
3

We wouldn't complain if there were actually privileges to cash in on. See how that works? If you are privileged, it actually makes your life better, and some angry victim needn't convince you? Yeah.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 03:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter