TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jjrobs Archive

View 18 posts and 23 comments by jjrobs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Sure there is but you can have all of that without being fenced (agreeing to sexual exclusivity)
/r/MensRights12/05/15 08:08 PM
1

See her previous article
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 09:12 PM
2

A Key To Unlock The Relationship Matrix - By Jack (USA) This book "Sex 3.0" is a key to unlock the relationship matrix to be free to decide for yourself how you want to live your intimate relationships. If something doesn't seem right to you, like a splinter in your mind, with how you naturally desire to have relationships versus what about 98 percent of the matrix of society is telling people is the only way to have a relationship, then you may be ready to have a look at what's in "Sex 3.0." Di…
/r/RedPillBooks31/01/14 04:22 AM
1

Ha!
/r/TheRedPill28/01/14 05:59 PM
0

If you doubt that marriage is a transaction you might like to read this : http://markmanson.net/male-female-relations
/r/TheRedPill28/01/14 02:36 AM
1

It is a terrible reason for leaving a nontransactional relationship like a marriage. One should enter a marriage looking to fulfill a spouse, not be fulfilled by one. First of all marriage is a transactional agreement. Always has been historically always will be. Second of all the idea that relationships are based on "looking to fulfill a spouse" is blue pill thinking. I am not saying that you that you should enter a marriage to "be fulfilled by one" either. 3.0 is based on neither of those conc…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 07:51 PM
0

Yes essentially the 'holy grail' of 3.0 relationships are what I call ULTRAs Unfenced Long Term RelAtionships Those are the only kinds of relationships that I am really interested in Founded on mutual reward Run on the basis of communication, honesty, trust and respect and bounded by the autonomous choice to remain together Unfenced in this context means 'not based on sexual ownership'. Does not mean 'lots of partners' - one can have an unfenced relationships with one person - it simply means th…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 07:15 PM
0

Hypergamy has a very specific definition. It is about 'marrying up'. Marriage was created after the invention property hence it has only been around during the 2.0 era (the last 10,000 years). Even if you widen the definition to regard it as 'discarding current mate for higher value mate' hypergamy is still a 2.0 concept because in 2.0 the mating game is played as a zero sum game where being in a relationship means fencing in your sexuality to the exclusion of everyone else.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 06:13 PM
1

Exactly. Blue pill thinking keeps us trapped in a zero sum game. 2.0 = zero sum 3.0 = non zero sum
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 06:01 PM
0

Hypergamy has a very specific definition. It is about 'marrying up' in any dictionary definition that you look at. Even if you widen the definition to regard it as 'discarding current mate for higher value mate' is still a 2.0 concept because in 2.0 the mating game is played as a zero sum game where being in a relationship means fencing in your sexuality to the exclusion of everyone else.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 05:42 PM
0

It took 10,000 years to get from 2.0 to 3.0 so I wouldn't hold your breath for 4.0 just yet.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 05:31 PM
-1

Dat hypergamy! Hypergamy is about finding someone richer not someone better. Women are hypergamous by nature, not men, but even men fall into the trap of believing that 2.0 (blue pill) relationships would work if only they could find a 'better woman'. This kind of flawed thinking has nothing to do with hypergamy. So basically they have no NEED for each other, as all their economic needs are already being met elsewhere, so there is no glue holding them together. 3.0 (red pill) relationships a hel…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/14 11:38 PM
1

Blue pill taker comitts suicide
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 07:27 PM
1

None of which contradicts what I wrote.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/13 07:07 PM
1

You don't understand 3.0 at all. First of all it is not possible to be cuckolded if you are in an unfenced relationship. Secondly, I never said that possessiveness was not natural.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/13 07:06 PM
0

You can still be 3.0 and chose fenced relationships. I am not promoting either fenced or unfenced. Don't want your partner banging someone else? Then chose fenced. Don't let the choice promote fear in your relationships though. That's what the post is about.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/13 07:04 PM
2

One of the problems that the manosphere shares with what I call "type 2" feminists is that they both attempt to portray themselves and their gender as victims in the the sexual marketplace and regard those that do not portray themselves as fellow victims as "working for the other side". It's a classic trap that you have fallen into. I myself am not a victim, not a member of the feminist movemnt or the manosphere. I am just a guy that understands the sexual marketplace and plays the game in full …
/r/TheRedPill02/02/13 10:35 PM
0

HAHAHAHAHA There is actually a chapter in the book called "Feminism Is Dead And How Feminists Killed It" Please read what somebody has written before you comment on it or you just make yourself look silly.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/13 09:34 PM
1

If I get a chance, sure, why not.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/13 10:54 PM
0

itsmehobnobm , well the last day of the promo period (for free kindle version) is today and free paperback only for a few days longer. Why not grab a free copy while to offer is still on and decide later if you want to read it. The amazon reviews suggest its worth your time.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/13 12:48 PM
2

Bobsutan, acutally the book is written to embrace is completely different paradigm on relationships and to ditch the current Sex 2.0 model because its fundamental design is based on fear & control. In other words, the current design for relationships that society promotes is essentially a matrix (though the book does not use that metaphor). The book promotes freedom of choice when it comes to the number of partners you have so it is not correct to say that it promotes "hookup" culture. It certai…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/13 12:45 PM
1

thanks
/r/TheRedPill07/01/13 12:15 PM
3

Yup, so many people mistake this for alpha behaviour when it is nothing more than throwing your toys out of the pram
/r/TheRedPill06/01/13 08:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter