TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jmnzz Archive

View 3 posts and 591 comments by jmnzz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

jmnzz/r/MensRights18/07/11 09:12 PM
12

jmnzz/r/MensRights20/06/11 03:48 AM
10

jmnzz/r/MensRights25/06/11 05:34 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well, see, I actually can tell you what your words mean. No. You can't. You can tell me definitions of the words but not the context in which I spoke, or in this case, typed them because one of the mind blowing things words can do when thrown together in these things we call sentences is have different meanings. If you didn't mean to say that, then that's clearly not what you meant, but don't pretend it's my fault that you'r not using the words correctly. Right. Let's go over a brief grammatical…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 05:56 AM
-7

I didn't know that pointing out the obvious meaning of your words was considered trolling. What you call obvious, I call perceived bullshit. You can't tell me what I mean. That's just a simple fact of life. Learn to live with it. (Maybe don't use the plural form next time if you can't back it up?) Seeing as how feminists have disrupted more than one male issues meeting, the plural was justified. Whoops. The number of tactics used by feminists was never a point of contention. It became one when y…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 01:47 AM
-1

You said they used it to disrupt lectures and meetings. Those plural forms suggest more than one instance, which suggests feminists routinely pull fire alarms to disrupt men's rights lectures and meetings. Nah. You're just an againstmensrights troll looking to twist words into your own perceived bullshit in order to be pissed off about nothing. I said it was a (singular) proven tactic to disrupt lectures and meetings. Those plural forms suggest more than one instance but, this is the important p…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:59 AM
-2

I said pulling fire alarms was one of their proven tactics. The word routine was added by you. Question answered. Woman friendly safe spaces An all male barracks or company is by definition, all male. Not a "safe space" set aside for women. Men should not be forced to walk on egg shells for women in their own living and work areas. That is what I was complaining about. does not cancel out the recorded instances of sexual assault - against women and men. No it doesn't. However, that comic ignores…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:24 AM
3

Are there any instances of soldiers pulling fire alarms to disrupt rape/sexual assault awareness meetings? Also, DAE notice that feminists ignore the fact that that same data shows a staggering number of male victims? Also, have any soldiers barricaded doors to rape/sexual assault meetings and brandished weapons, threatening violence like feminists have at male issues meetings?
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:01 AM
-2

Because it does happen when a nation becomes a superpower...like america...which is why I said I was referring to the here and now...
/r/MensRights24/08/13 11:45 PM
0

I was kind of referring to the here and now, since it has and is still happening to western superpowers.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 08:52 PM
-2

Yeah...that's what happens when a nation becomes a superpower. The rules and standards of its fighting force are lowered for the sake of "equality"
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:58 PM
5

I was in a tanker company attached to an infantry battalion. Battalion commander knew fuck all about the M1A1 Abrams so I was basically infantry. Didn't matter that my company or living quarters were all male. If any women were near all of the commanders would run around like headless chickens to make sure the areas were "female friendly" Now women can join a combat MOS, which is good because that is one step closer to either ending the draft or including women (most likely ending because societ…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 06:47 PM
70

Funny how they end it with a guy wanting to pull a fire alarm, as this is a proven (through video recordings) tactic used by feminists to disrupt lectures and meetings about male issues. Also its depiction of the military is utter bullshit. When I was in the army they beat it into us to be extremely cautious around women and never be around them alone. Also in all male Companies, anything a woman might find "offensive" like something as harmless as a maxim magazine had to be hidden if a female w…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 05:21 PM
2

Wow.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:01 AM
1

And here...we...go...
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:09 PM
2

Zomgitschris
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:35 PM
1

Kind of like the reverse of what happened to Chris.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:57 PM
0

I threw up in my mouth a little after reading that.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:36 PM
2

You're stupid and you should feel bad.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 01:11 AM
3

So male reproductive rights are whiny bullshit?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:20 AM
11

I'd call her a zealot. But that's way too much of an understatement.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:50 PM
1

I already said I understand and agree with the point about abortion. The point I am making is that everything you just said in the comment I am replying to isn't going to get you anywhere in any western society. You aren't going to garner any support with that argument. But (and this is like the 4th time I am repeating this) if you start the argument after the pregnancy, when a baby is born and argue about how women can still relinquish their financial responsibilities and men can not then those…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:41 PM
1

I believe the term you are searching for is, shitlord.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:37 AM
1

I understand the double standard when it comes to abortion and women having 100% of the decision. The point is that no one is going to gather enough support in any western society to give men the legal right to relinquish their parental responsibilities if they argue for that right by comparing it to women's right to abort. So while I understand and agree that since women have 100% of the decision on whether or not a child will even be brought into this world men should't be held responsible but…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:01 AM
2

Yeah I've never gotten a response to that. And you never will unless it is some hypocrite who just flat out says they believe women should be able to maintain this privilege over men and men must be obligated to pay. Every time I see the argument brought up that men should have the right to relinquish their financial responsibilities it is always put forth with "women can abort." And the "WELL IT'S HER BODY" comments flood in. Then I bring up the fact that women can relinquish their responsibili…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 04:42 PM
1

They actually have a leg to stand on if you just keep complaining about how women can abort their responsibilities by aborting a fetus. The argument needs to start where an actual life is born. Women can relinquish their responsibilities after a baby is born. Men can not. Anyone who argues in favor of this double standard will have the hypocrisy oozing effect you desire.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 04:39 PM
2

Bit hard to do in this case. Not really. And the reason why is in the rest of my comment that you should read before snipping out things to respond to. Isn't that the reason behind the question proposed? No. The reason is to argue for men to have the right to relinquish their parental and financial responsibilities because women can through abortion. The problem is, the argument isn't strong enough when started with abortion because there is no baby when you start the argument with abortion and …
/r/MensRights30/04/13 04:36 PM
26

This discussion would be a lot easier if abortion was left out of it. Every time it is brought up with abortion there are always the "what a woman is aborting isn't a baby but after the pregnancy there is a life that needs to be taken care of!" people who don't give a damn about fairness for men and will seek any excuse to maintain the current privileges women hold over men. Leave abortion out of the damn conversation. Women have the legal right, the legal right to abandon their child after a pr…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:52 AM
2

David Futrelle is a misandric, self loathing, hypocritical bigot? No...
/r/MensRights29/04/13 03:54 AM
28

I actually love the jezebel comments. The ones who are reluctant to acknowledge that Peter has a valid argument. "MISANDRY DON'T REAL AND MRAS ARE MISOGYNISTS AND WOMEN HAVE IT WORSE IN EVERY WAY POSSIBLE IN LIFE...but...AND I DON'T AGREE WITH MRAS SO PLEASE DON'T KICK ME OUT OF THE FEMINIST CLUB...but...isn't his whole argument about...you know...equality? MRAS ARE MISOGYNISTS..." Too hilarious. But please feminists, keep arguing in favor of discrimination based on sex. It does nothing but help…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 10:22 AM
1

YOU MAD?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:52 PM
4

I know he took a plea deal. That doesn't change the fact that her words sent him to prison.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:11 AM
2

Because every time I put them on train tracks they have the nerve to get up and run away while I'm twirling my mustache.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:09 AM
18

She can be seen and heard saying, "No, he did not." She is asked if Banks kidnapped her. Again, she replies, "No, he did not." Soon after, Banks was exonerated. It disgusts that words can end a man's life. "She recanted? Whoops! Better let that guy out of prison! Gee, I wonder if we should start convicting men accused of such a serious crime only when we have that thing called 'evidence' ...naaaahhh who needs evidence anyway." The school district wants to press criminal charges against Wanetta G…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 04:08 PM
14

That's not what was said Oh, yeah? I think someone needs to directly address you. I’m sure you’ve seen the countless articles detailing why your cause is offensive and why you’re not worthy of attention. But maybe someone should explain why your group doesn’t need to exist. Sounds a lot like "feminism is the answer to men's issues" to me. Turns out that when women try to get uppity, people get upset. Undoing thousands of years of oppression? That doesn’t sit well with MRAs. That sounds a lot lik…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 02:41 PM
4

I get your point. But at the same time that's like saying the reason why neo-nazis get bad pr is because of people who point out the bigoted things they do. Yeah the people pointing it out are the ones responsible for bringing the bigotry to the attention of the public, but if the neo-nazis were just going around rescuing cats from trees the pr wouldn't be bad. It's their actions that make the pr bad. Same with feminism. They do bigoted shit and we point it out. It's their own fault their action…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:44 PM
12

The obvious ilk to blame for feminism’s shitty PR is anti-feminists. Uh huh. Or the obvious ilk to blame might be, oh I don't know...feminists. People tend to start disliking a movement when its members vehemently and publicly state that half the human race are violent animals that need to be trained like dogs from a young age not to beat and rape the other half. But no let's just go with Samhita's theory that all of the bad PR is the fault of anti-feminists. We point out the hateful things that…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 04:15 AM
24

"Quit disadvantaging yourself! Quit disadvantaging yourself!"
/r/MensRights19/04/13 02:39 AM
36

Your reading oppresses me. So I'm going to create and support laws and policies that deny you the right to read. Then I'll blame it on patriarchy. Oh and if you point out my hypocrisy or bring up how my not letting you read is ruining your life then you're just a misogynist.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 11:08 PM
138

"Feminism is the answer to men's issues, now shut the fuck up when women are speaking. Women are oppressed and men are not. Women deserve spaces and men do not. You aren't the disadvantaged group, so shut the fuck up and we'll get to your insignificant issues when we feel like it." Ah feminists. Champions of equality indeed.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:15 PM
2

He's just pissed off because feminist bigotry is actually getting attention from people other than MRAs. Androids and iphones combined with youtube tend to make sweeping stuff like this under the rug impossible. Only thing his small mind can come up with for damage control is to try and make the bigots seem like victims. It's all he's ever done when feminists are bold arrogant enough to spew their hate in front of a camera. But that isn't going to work anymore.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 04:05 AM
1

Actually a lot of my non MRA friends have already seen the site and don't take any major issues with it. No one has said it should be shut down because a lot of them know that false rape accusations aren't taken seriously in any society and there is definitely no registry for false rape accusers. False rape can destroy lives and even worse, cost people their lives. There is a registry for sex offenders but no registry for false accusers; because the primary false accusers in all societies are wo…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 11:51 AM
1

It's not dependent but it helps and I gave a valid reason as to why, answering your question I quoted. I'm not interested in changing your mind on whether or not the site should stay up. But simply saying that it hurts more than it helps and should be shut down without refuting any evidence given to you about how the site does indeed have its uses is just basically a case of you saying "I don't like it so it should be shut down" It isn't up to you.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 02:14 PM
1

Your questions are valid, but the success of AVfM gives more validity to my explanation than your baseless assumptions. So like someone else stated, find someone who is doing this better, or do it better yourself and then you will have legs to stand on when it comes to telling people how to go about promoting men's rights and exposing anti-male bigotry.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 03:00 AM
2

I don't like commenting on other conversations. And I don't comment on reddit in general that much any more. But. Anyway, can you really say that register-her.com is accomplishing anything besides giving the Men's Rights Movement a bad name? Register-her is a statement. The bigotry part of the registry is what gets the most flack and when people who are turned off by it ask why it is necessary you can ask them where else feminist bigotry and anti-male bigotry is put on display. Not on the SPLC, …
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:01 PM
1

Those who oppose us - The remix
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:19 AM
8

I'm reminded of Gabriel loosing his powers in the movie Constantine and satan smiling; "Looks like someone ain't got your back no more"
/r/MensRights05/04/13 03:59 PM
1

Every so often they let the mask slip off in the public sphere.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 02:09 AM
19

Is this how they feel when people bring up mens rights issues? Yes.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:28 AM
3

Hey look someone's taking a jab at my article for about the 11 billionth time. "There can be no common ground." And look at this. A quote has been snipped from it...again. So I ask why not? Well. There are many answers to that question, one of them happens to be in the article. But as with mostly everyone who decides to bring up my article, everything but what they want to point out or attack is ignored. I say this because there is only one way common ground can be reached between the MRM and th…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 01:48 PM
2

The problem is (most often) in the comment section Agreed.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:36 AM
1

You know what will help solve the problems faced by men? Focusing on the problems faced by men. This is relevant. You know what doesn't help? Endlessly criticizing feminism. This is not. Feminism is the direct and indirect cause of a lot of male issues. Western societies are infested with the ideology as seen through laws (many of which were either created by/influenced or supported by feminists) that strip men of their civil rights and through the media. Continuously badgering MRAs to stop crit…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:04 AM
-8

This thread again.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:27 AM
1

Ahhh...I see. Lost my sense of humor there for a second. Feminism will do that to me :(.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:04 PM
21

Rape happens all the time even with those measures in place. So do other crimes. But you don't see anyone claiming that telling people preventative measures for crimes such as thefts and assault are "blaming the victim" and "encouraging crime culture" The only preventative measures for rape feminists want propagated is "teach men not to rape" Because only men rape, right? And telling rapists that rape is bad is really going to make them stop. One of the biggest and most obvious examples that fem…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:22 PM
1

Forgive me. But I happen to be of the notion that men are human beings and women are adults. So, no. Never gonna be a feminist.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:00 PM
2

No. I'm not.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:05 AM
5

I like you. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:45 PM
0

There are too many shaded for pro equality.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:40 AM
2

Feminists; hypocritical bigots until the end.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:43 PM
1

Patriarchy actually does still exist. It's called feminism.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 04:06 AM
1

So I get a comment reply from someone and naturally, I wonder what it's about. Look what I found while checking it out. So now I'm accused of being someone that sees, like I do that you're a lying fucktard. Look man, "get" this. You were wrong, from the start, all the way to the end. Other people agree with me on this. You being a stubborn infant doesn't change that. Learn from this experience and move on knowing that when you want to assert something, you'll have to have facts to back it up. Mo…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:01 PM
1

My bad. Didn't realize "looking good" was more important than being right.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:48 PM
1

As usual, the facts favor my side: Not. Antagonistic. Towards. You. Which, if for once you would stop leaving out things that refute your bullshit, I wouldn't have to do it again. More lies. This was the first thing you said to my initial claim: You either have a genuine mental illness or you're a troll. I said my first reply to you. Not my first comment on your post. Why don't you quote that comment, I dare you and then you can drink a nice tall glass of stfu. My honesty was never seriously in …
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:21 AM
1

So, by your own admission, you even came into this angry. I remember saying that I wasn't being antagonistic. Bu you can keep trying to rewrite history. You just confirmed that observation not contradicted it. Besides, if you really want to try and deny that your writing is absolutely infested with derogatory remarks, then you’re even more of a liar than I initially thought. .............This is what I said a while ago; I give what I receive. Remember when I said that? Of course you don't becaus…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:10 PM
1

Wow. Look at all that text, the strain, the struggling, the desperation You reeeeaaally got nothin else do you? So much crying and so little reason. It's amusing to watch you try so hard Says the simpleton that can't accept the fact that they asked for one example, expecting none, and after being given that example went into a temper tantrum. So much crying and so little reason. It's amusing to watch you try so hard Uh huh. Keep thinking you can gauge emotion from text in a comment box. Or maybe…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 04:52 AM
2

Anyone still reading this can see that you're just a liar. And the fact that you don't have the guts to just admit a mistake also shows what a pathetic coward you are. There you go again. Begging for that cookie. By the way, child, if anyone is still reading this then they are bored or have no life. This isn't about impressing some audience. But you can keep stamping your feet in your little tantrum for their and my own entertainment. Then your initial comment was based on a false assumption. Bu…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 10:52 AM
2

One (valid) example suffices to refute my claim. The fact that I'm interested in more examples doesn't change that. God you're dumb. You received that example, the fact that you're too much of a childish dipshit to accept what you were given doesn't change that. I never said "serious". I said "most serious". You know that so don't try to spin my words around now. It won't work. I take that back; you're not dumb, you're not even a fucktard. You're a god damn simpleton. I know that's what you mean…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 10:51 AM
2

Like I said, I'm genuinely interested in seeing those examples. Your silence in that matter is costing you credibility. Uh. No. This is what you said; One example suffices and you know it Here is a brief recount of current events. Your OP: Ozy's site was the most serious attempt to focus on men. Me: No. It wasn't. You: Prove it wasn't Me: Well, Ozy's site was never a genuine attempt at tackling male issues, therefore I don't think it was in any way serious, and besides, there have been actual se…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 04:31 AM
1

(except for you apparently Again, because you say so right? So where is the falseness of my equivalence? 2) You're basically still just saying "I said that ozy's site is the only site that does this so it is because I say so" Let me try that It also holds under any scrutiny of the terms: GMP being feminist is undisputed, that it focuses on men is also undisputed and without any other examples, it automatically fulfills the definition of "most serious". Whenever there's just one of something, it'…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:24 PM
1

Yes and Ozymandias is the feminist who has put forth the most serious focus on men because I say so. Hahahaha. See how that works? Again, I SAY GOOD DAY.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 07:46 AM
1

Dude you need to calm down. I'm sorry, I didn't realize you could gauge my emotional state from words typed in a comment box. I stopped reading after the 3rd quote (where you made yet another assertion nothing to support it). Um...actually my "unsupported" assertion is correct. The fact that you don't want to accept that it is correct doesn't make it any less correct. I know that's sounds like an excuse but the only thing in this conversation that I might still have any interest in, is what othe…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:15 AM
1

Also, GMP is arguably not a feminist site. The GMP is run by self identified feminists and features heavily feminist centric articles. There are many opinions that deviate from or contradict mainstream feminist dogma. Even Paul Elam has an article on it (and GWW) Because they invite MRAs to post there from time to time under the guise that they are open to the support of male issues. Because unlike Ozymandias, they make serious attempts (and fail) at trying to tackle male issues, because they ca…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 09:33 AM
1

You said feminism is the cause of most male issues. No. No I didn't. You seem to think that me calling it feminist's "most serious attempt" implies that I was somehow praising it. You seem to think that you can tell me what I'm thinking. Get it now? Their "best" is pathetic. Yeah. My statement still stands. I'll be very interested to see what you've found but won't hold my breath. You wouldn't have to hold your breath. The GMP is a much more serious attempt by feminists to tackle men's issues th…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 06:36 AM
3

Actually, feminism isn't the cause of most male issues. It has caused some, worsened all, and sure as hell never helped (and never will help) fix any. I fail to see the contradiction between our two statements. Yes. And that was feminist's most serious attempt to focus on men. If you know of another, do share it with us. How about you gather a list of every feminist attempt at trying to tackle male issues in order to prove that Ozy's was the "most serious attempt" Or maybe you can take option tw…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:48 PM
8

Feminists' most serious attempt to focus on men has failed miserably No...no. It was just some teenage girl who got pissed off at the MRM for pointing out the hypocrisy and bigotry of feminism. So she started a blog to try and propagate that feminism is the answer to men's issues. Trouble is, she (and her cohorts) didn't just want to ignore the fact that feminism is the direct and indirect cause of many male issues, they wanted everyone else to ignore this fact as well. She cared about saving fa…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:16 PM
110

MRA: Men suffer and require aid just as much as women in DV situations. Feminist: NO! Men can do more damage with their bare hands so they are the biggest problem and women require 99.9999999% of shelters dedicated to their needs!! MRA: Shouldn't men get at least some of the shelters? Feminist: NO! You just want to tear down women's shelters!! MRA: You know...this seems kind of misandric. Feminist: Misandry don't real! You misogynist!! MRA: So men aren't hated for just being men? Feminist: NO! W…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:44 PM
3

But I feel that, as men, you all don't know what it is like to be a woman. Followed by; Men have never experienced gender inequality the way women have. That...is why you fail.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 07:04 AM
2

Someone on reddit brought up my article and didn't quote mine a sentence or paragraph in order to attack the MRM or this subreddit. ...I belive this is the first time this has ever happened... ...And the heavens parted...the sun shined bright over the new world of understanding...and the people learned that hell could in fact freeze over.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 03:19 AM
18

Wait a minute....wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute... So...an intoxicated woman who jumps on a sober guy, straddles him, and proceeds to fuck his brains out is a rape victim... But an intoxicated guy who fucks a sober woman is a rapist? Keep batting a thousand, feminism and society.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 03:09 AM
4

Read my first comment again. It's for people who have been a part of this subreddit for more than 8 days.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:03 AM
9

Ok.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:42 AM
7

redditor for 8 days Whatever you say.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:22 AM
27

If it isn't obvious...and it really should be...that post is just bait to gather a bunch of "she's gonna trap you with child support!" comments so certain...individuals...can post them places as more "proof" of the "rampant misogyny on reddit" Just thought I'd point that out.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:46 AM
2

That sounds like something you would hear on one of those legal shows of the past; The Practice or especially; Boston Legal. "Yeah judge I stabbed him but I didn't murder him! It wasn't my fault he died! It was the doctor's fault for not saving him from the knife I planted in his chest!" I think she better forget about representing herself and call Alan Shore. Or better yet, Denny Crane.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:43 AM
13

MRAs blame the cultural norms that devalue men and for the circumstances (like marriage being a financial package for women) on feminists and their work. Uh, no...MRAs claim that feminists capitalize on the cultural norms that feminists claim they are against. Example; feminists will blame "patriarchy" as the reason why men are viewed as potential rapists, because our supposed patriarchal society socializes men into thinking women are sex objects. But then feminists will come up with hate-monger…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:23 AM
8

My experiences on the internet have demonstrated that most people who are antifeminist have an extremely outdated understanding of what modern day feminism looks like. Yeah? Well, as an anti-feminist, I think modern feminism looks like anti-male bigotry. Let me check right quick. This photo was taken on July 23, 2012 using a Canon PowerShot G10. Yep. I was right. Looks like my understanding is just fine.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:31 AM
1

I wish a politician would tell the truth at least once in their life. Regardless, even if the groups were the ones that went to him with the names instead of him going to them the point still stands that more men than women were interested/applied for the positions. That is, if the part about most of his applicants being male is to be believed. And that is one of the most important points in the issue of female employees. If more men apply, and we assume that both the men and women who apply hav…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:53 PM
12

I think Romney explained the "glass ceiling" best. "The only applicants I was getting were from men, so I asked several women's groups if there were any women who wanted the jobs" "I had more women on my team because of my recruiting drives." Basically, mostly men applied so mostly men were on the table for hiring. The man had to start a recruiting drive just to get female employees. Women not interested enough or don't have enough drive to apply for jobs? GLASS CEILING Oh and I love the bit he …
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:30 AM
3

Womanizer? What is this strange term you type? Clearly there is no male equivalent word for slut! I mean...there are no people who think less of men for having sex with a lot of women! Your foreign terminology offends me! You must be an agent of the patriarchy! In all seriousness though, feminists are fucked up in whatever part of the world you live in. Those psychos in France can still walk through the streets carrying signs saying "men are pigs" and "let's take men out of their caves" with no …
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:04 PM
1

You gotta think about it this way; a woman has consensual sex with a lot of different men and lies about being raped on several occasions with those men. The trick prosecutors use with rape shield laws is that the fact that she has lied about being raped can't be brought up as evidence because in order to do so her past sexual partners would have to be brought up. Evidence successfully withheld. Feminists think bullshit like this is justified because according to them, the jury might be inclined…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:32 PM
25

So if he was drunk...then wouldn't that mean she sexually assaulted him? I'm just using feminist logic here. Oh wait I forgot he's a man so regardless of who is intoxicated he is always the one doing the assaulting and raping and beating and patriarching and what not. My bad.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 10:17 PM
14

Hmm. I got a message from her/him too about my comments. And he/she was right, they were antagonistic. I was antagonistic towards HertzaHaeon, someone I met some time ago on r/masculism, back when I used to check out the posts there. I was also antagonistic against redyellowand in that thread. Now why was I antagonistic against these people? Well, redyellowand decided to let everyone know that according to her strong feminist beliefs, apparently men, and only men, are automatically consenting to…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:17 AM
9

You know, normally I don't get involved in other conversations. But I just have to point something out. I hate the "us vs them" mentality. That statement is in direct contradiction to this one; I'm not saying men don't suffer, I'm saying women suffer more in underdeveloped countries. This is why I said it's men's rights vs. feminism. Those who advocate for women's rights; advocate for women's rights. Those who call themselves feminists claim to advocate for women's rights but in reality they jus…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:23 AM
78

wouldnt you agree that the whole men's rights vs women's rights takes away from what it truly is? It isn't men's rights vs. women's rights. It's men's rights vs. feminism. There is a very big difference.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:55 AM
1

He's got plenty of cats.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:08 AM
8

Co-opting supporters in defence of an alleged rapist is a betrayal of victims of sexual violence Gotta love that feminist logic. Rapists should be prosecuted, but according to SlutWalk London, the fact that many who are accused of rape ultimately aren't convicted means that this particular accused rapist shouldn't be subject to due process. Men (and only men, mind you) that are accused of rape and not convicted are just "rapists that aren't convicted" All of them. False rape isn't real. We just …
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:41 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 05:55 AM
9

Wow...I am shocked...fucking astonished...he actually added on "unless it's in self-defense." Omfg... Oh wait... but then he said that other bullshit about all violent criminals being illiterate or seeing someone beaten by their father. Biden...you just can't get rid of that fucktard status for one interview, can you? Not. Even. One.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:26 AM
4

No. Feminism is blaming men. Hence the phrase, "Teach men not to rape." Also the main basis for the feminist theory of rape culture is that we normalize and encourage the rape of women when in fact the opposite is true. Men should not be obligated to stop any crime unless they are a part of law enforcement. Men are not the only rapists, even though all of the studies done that show parity between the numbers of male and female rapists do not classify forced envelopment as rape. I could say the s…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 04:01 PM
59

Here are some thoughts... It's feminism that says "Teach men not to rape" It's feminism that says "Men can stop rape" It's feminism that says "Domestic violence is a gendered crime against women" It's feminism that says "Men are privileged" It's feminism that says "Our society encourages the rape of women" It's feminism that says "All violence against women is a gendered crime" Looks like feminism promotes the same bullshit that feminists claim they are against. Knew there was a reason why I did…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 02:37 AM
5

So SRS does get out in the sun sometimes. Who knew?
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:20 AM
10

All I see are complaints All I see is a 23 minute old account.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 03:09 AM
9

What a fair and unbiased piece of journalism this is.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:35 AM
14

"Women are 17% of the senate" "Yet women are 51% of the vote" Whoops.........
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:51 PM
68

I'm not a feminist because I like to think of men as human beings and women as adults.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 05:03 AM
2

You're a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:36 PM
1

I think the second one would be more likely to get a congratulations because the first one is relatively more easy to do.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 03:09 PM
8

'Grabs popcorn'
/r/MensRights17/08/12 03:43 PM
-1

...You say what?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:36 AM
5

That's the point. Feminism is the very nonsense that feminists claim they are against.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 04:39 PM
13

Simple response to a misguided criticism: The goal of feminism is to bring down patriarchy in order to achieve equality. Feminism is nothing but a form of patriarchy on steroids. Therefore, anti-feminism is pro-equality. There you go.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:16 PM
-5

Fake.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 12:36 AM
5

No. I don't have the time because I'm about to go to work. So maybe later. But I'll say this for now. The main focal points of feminism, and I mean every different "division" or "School" that I have seen subscribes to an identical set of base theories. Patriarchy, rape culture, male privilege, toxic masculinity, and sex discrimination being the cause of the "wage gap" Each and every last one of these theories is an outright lie and hateful towards men in general. Now some might say "but hey Chri…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:58 PM
5

Yeah I know. I've been subscribed to her for some years now. The point I was making here and in my comment on her video is that "some feminists" are not the problem. The ideology of feminism is the problem. From what I saw in her past videos I thought that was what she was beginning to believe. Now I'm not so sure. Now it looks as if she might go the "The radicals did it" route. Which is a copout in my opinion. If that is the route she takes then that would be unfortunate. You can't blame "the r…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:22 PM
13

She didn't describe patriarchy in the usual "Men are advantaged over women" feminist BS. She actually got it right in my opinion; The old system of gender roles that was necessary but sucked for both men and women. The part where I feel she falters is when she basically says that feminism is trying to break down the expectations those gender roles place on men and women and that anti-feminists should join forces with feminism. She identifies several cases of discrimination men face in western so…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 03:51 PM
12

My bullshit detector just broke. It's gone. It's done. Feminism, the bullshitter of all bullshitters killed it.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 01:53 AM
4

I mean, really, how is saying there is something inherently wrong with the male half of the species equate to vilifying men? For fucks sake people can't a woman have an opinion? Oh and any and all claims of misandry are false by default and anyone who makes those claims are automatically a misogynist. Why? Because...PATRIARCHY!!!!
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:26 PM
1

I could say same of you. And you consider your own advice. Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 08:16 PM
1

Ok, you having become boring. Please just die, and let you nor anyone mention "Troll". Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 07:24 PM
1

Trooooololololollllll And might I add... LOLOLLLLOLLLLLL LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLL
/r/MensRights13/06/12 06:49 PM
1

Troll. Troll. Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 06:35 PM
1

Troll. Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:24 PM
1

Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:55 PM
1

I am beginning to think that YOU are the real troll here. Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:44 PM
1

Is that really all you can say? Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:14 PM
1

Wow, now you are just being the idiot.. Ha ha, and goodbye to you. Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 06:50 AM
1

I certainly can. Now you are just being an idiot. Goodbye. Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:51 AM
1

I have never called you a troll... can you say the same? Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:12 AM
1

There you go again. Seems to be the only thing you are capable of saying. Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:01 AM
1

I guess my arguments were just too difficult for you to refute. Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 04:50 AM
1

Now you have proven to everyone you have nothing meaningful to say. Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:42 AM
1

Bridge. Go. Troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:12 AM
2

Yo. You know that bridge. The one you live under. Go there. Get under it. Troll.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:55 AM
2

Hey...hey troll... Bridge. Go.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:26 AM
2

Good. Now go rest under your bridge. Troll.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:19 AM
2

Bridge. Go. Troll.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:10 AM
2

You simply ignore the links I posted like a trolling fucktard in order to continue claiming the only thing I have said is that you are a trolling fucktard. Nice way to show you are a trolling fucktard. Bridge. Go. Troll.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:01 AM
3

Well actually, they are. So, what you're saying is, every scientist, freethinker, inventor, engineer, astrologist, archeologist, and every other person on this planet with a wealth of knowledge and wisdom; all of their intelligence is null and void if they ever cussed? That what you're saying? And you wonder why I call you a fucktard... You still fail to grasp the difference between sex and gender. You still fail to grasp the difference between backing up your arguments with evidence and just sa…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:44 AM
2

Actually my argument was that gender has many recorded meanings, many of which support the claims I made in my very first comment. I provided facts for my argument. Your "argument" has been to say "NU UH" over and over again like the trolling fucktard that you are. Oh and by the way, troll, cuss words aren't a measure of one's intellect. Being able to back up what you say with more than "I'M RIGHT BECAUSE I SAY SO" is. So once again, and as many times as you will need to be told hereafter with y…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:06 AM
2

Hey look, the troll came back after saying it was "done" with me. Guess I must have pushed some buttons. And it's too stupid to understand what a metaphor is. Oh and hey troll, you were proven wrong. You have brought nothing to refute what I have said. Now you are an angry little troll who apparently can't find its bridge. Fucktard :).
/r/MensRights12/06/12 05:19 AM
2

No need to apologize, fucktard. When you reduce yourself to that of a troll when you have been proven wrong then a troll is what I will call you because a troll is what you are. Troll. And a dose of your own trolling medicine is what I will give you. Now go back under your bridge.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 04:45 AM
2

Hey troll. When you can pull some magic that refutes the facts I linked to out of your ass then I'll stop calling you a troll. when any halfway intelligent person can spend a few minutes going through my history A halfway intelligent person can see the spew of idiocy you have left all over this thread and deduce you are a trolling fucktard. Hence the downvotes. Troll.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 04:26 AM
2

Hey troll, guess what? It's been 11 minutes. And you're still wrong. Oh yeah and everything you say or have ever said is meaningless. Troll.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:45 AM
2

Actually, you are a troll. Your history is meaningless because I say so. Oh, and by the way, you have been proven wrong. Troll.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:31 AM
3

Is the troll angry? Don't be angry troll. It's ok to be proven wrong.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:22 AM
4

I provided the history of the word and the merriam webster definition. You ignored it. Oh wait no, you didn't ignore it, you just said the dictionary definition and all of the people who coined different meanings for the word, meanings accepted by several different societies were all wrong. Because only you can decide what it means. And if that meaning just happens to refute your BS then that isn't the real meaning. You don't get to decide what meaning of a word is correct or incorrect so kindly…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 02:45 AM
5

You appear to be one of those who when faced with facts that disprove their bullshit, resorts to just saying "I'M RIGHT BECAUSE I SAY SO" Stupidity. How hilarious.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 02:22 AM
2

Uh huh. Guess you answered my question, fucktard.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 02:04 AM
4

Well I'm glad the world has you to tell us which meaning is the real meaning of a word with multiple meanings.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 01:49 AM
11

I have a question, in all seriousness. Are you being willfully ignorant, obtuse, or fucking retarded? Gender Has several different meanings. One's sex being among those meanings, as in male or men. Now, I SAY GOOD DAY.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 11:29 PM
8

I know that sex is male/female That is why I asked Does every gender sit down to urinate? And no, every gender doesn't. However, the gender that mostly stands to urinate is men. So once again, I have confused nothing and my first statements still stand. Good day.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 10:57 PM
11

No. I'm not. Does every gender sit down to urinate? No? Not fucking genderless. Which of the genders stands up to urinate the most? Men? Then it's discrimination. Discrimination that is trivialized/ignored/excused/downplayed because that discrimination affects mostly men.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 10:47 PM
13

The Left Party's Viggo Hansen, a substitute member of the county council and the man responsible for the proposal, wants the office toilets to be genderless and as a result, is pushing for the "sit-down only" requirement. If you dictate how one gender can and can't urinate and force that gender to urinate the way the other gender does then it is not fucking genderless. There is a war on women if a political party doesn't want taxpayers to be responsible for women's birth control. But if it is th…
/r/MensRights11/06/12 08:59 PM
7

Bye.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 08:53 PM
2

It's so refreshing to see bigots slowly turning from mockery to fear.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 04:39 AM
16

Wouldn't it be funny if in their defense they said "Well there are reasons why these women earn less than the men...hours, time off, children...some of the men were more aggressive with asking for promotions and raises and..." Yes I think that would be funny indeed.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 03:15 AM
2

Women can choose not to be parents and relinquish all of their financial responsibilities even after the child is born by legal abandonment or putting it up for adoption. Whether or not the father knows the child exists. Men do not have an option to relinquish all of their parental/financial responsibilities because if the mother decides to keep the child, then the father (or in many cases some guy she points out) has to pay or go to jail. So creating a legal option for men to opt out or in befo…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:14 PM
5

Woooooooooow.... When the separation occurred, Lola didn’t take it lying down. She decided to challenge Quebec’s law and ask for everything a married woman would have been entitled to. Just wooooooow... Province makes a law granting both men and women the right to their own finances and property because the province recognizes their rights as free citizens to chose whether or not they want to be married and/or obligated to support their partners after a break up. 17 year old girl shacks up with …
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:33 PM
3

Sometimes the only way for things to get better is for them to get worse. Women are routinely held to lower standards in the military and placing them in combat units would most likely endanger the lives of their male comrades. But when all of the talking and "philosophical" debates are over and the body bags start filling then maybe, just maybe those body bags will shock the western world out of this politically correct bubble it has been consumed by. Or then again, maybe shit will just continu…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:15 PM
13

but rather than engaging in a victim-war, rather than saying "I have suffered, and my suffering is of more important than yours," why not accept that we all suffer, in some way or another? Very next line It is of course, a matter of historical fact that women have been systematically sidelined and regarded as second class citizens for much of our time on the planet The more feminists spout their bullshit, the more people will realize that bullshit is what they're full of.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 03:19 PM
0

Funny how NOW usually claims women are oppressed... But one of their vice presidents just said what many MRAs have been saying for a while; that women control 80% spending. So basically she is saying, "do what we want or we will run you out of business" So oppressed... What's even funnier is how she said Rush is trying to silence all women and that NOW is representing all women in taking him down...then dodged the question about the women who are supporting Rush. This is what happens when people…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 03:36 AM
6

I don't see how this can be at all acceptable in an equal society. We don't live in an equal society.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 02:01 AM
4

I don't want to co-opt anything. There isn't any need to co-opt anything and there is no way to turn a word like kyriarchy or patriarchy more egalitarian. There are already words to describe the advantaged and disadvantaged. Those words are; the advantaged and the disadvantaged. The warped definition and nonsensical theories feminists attached to the word patriarchy and the creation of the word kyriarchy were made for only one purpose; to put one group of people against another. Feminists have t…
/r/MensRights14/05/12 09:18 PM
1

Sometimes they'll acknowledge it. Feminists: We live in a patriarchy where women suffer and men are privileged. Men: Wait...but men suffer too...and there are many privileges that women have... Feminists: MISOGYNISTS Men and women: Um...no... Feminists: ....OKAY! So maybe men do have some problems and maybe women do have some privileges...BUT WOMEN'S PROBLEMS ARE WORSE AND MEN HAVE MORE PRIVILEGE. That's my observation of kyriarchy. It's a smokescreen used because feminists can't keep saying men…
/r/MensRights14/05/12 08:13 PM
2

The feminine manner thing could be sexist if used in a sexist context. But considering he was referring to a society in the 1800s, saying a woman did something in a feminine manner isn't really sexist. Because in that time there was a much bigger difference in the way men and women did things. Besides that, the author of the article said specifically that his theory about her being jealous of fertile women was sexist. So yeah, I don't see the sense in that. The guy could be sexist, I don't know …
/r/MensRights12/05/12 02:54 PM
7

Oh riiiiiight. I forgot about that. And I forgot because of the privilege I'm too privileged to know I have. Thanks for the save. Wouldn't want to be a misogynistic oppressor because of my curiosity.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 02:12 AM
17

..........How is claiming a woman murdered other women because she was jealous of their ability to have children sexist?
/r/MensRights12/05/12 01:13 AM
2

Things like facts and reason are just misogyny to them.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 03:47 PM
10

Why does everyone think that feminism is about demanding more rights for women and hating men? Well... Dude tip #3: if you offer someone a ride, remember not to rape them. (Meetings Mondays 5pm Rolfe 3120 Bruin Feminists For Equality) And there's also The website lists support for the idea of a “male allies project” that would “bring self-identified men together to talk about masculinity and its harmful effects.” Masculinity, it says, “denigrates women by making them into sexual objects, is homo…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 12:50 PM
58

I can really understand why feminists need their "safe spaces" now. I mean, where else would they be able to discuss how all men are evil rapists because of their masculinity and print up nifty flyers in order to inform the public? If men centers were created guys might discuss how offended things like that make them feel and might actually try to formulate ways to combat it. And we can't have that.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 04:42 AM
2

I think that women are more afraid of rape than they are of murder I disagree with you. And I will upvote you because I disagree with you. Good day sir.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 03:02 AM
-1

This is true. But I didn't say that it's impossible for two people that are afraid of two separate things to display that fear in the same way. I was pointing out the stupidity the quote endorses; that women are more afraid of rape than murder. Don't know if an actual study has been done, but a brief glance at the culture we live in, where countless men and women throw their intoxicated selves at one another on a nightly basis, I highly doubt rape is what makes most women deadbolt their doors. E…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 02:45 AM
2

And I briefly explained the stupidity of that quote.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 02:10 AM
12

In my very next line I say forced sex is horrible. But in reality that is what happens in most cases of rape outside of prison. When women or men are actually beaten and or killed, that is being beaten and or killed. Killed being the most horrible thing out of the three that could happen to a person. I don't downplay rape at all, I just call it what it is. The psychological issues that can occur afterwards make the crime detestable, but that in no way makes it comparable to murder. I am just dis…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:18 AM
33

Rape is to women as lynching was to blacks: the ultimate physical threat. ..........I would think that lynching is to women as lynching was to blacks. That is, unless lynching, something that causes a slow, agonizing death, is less of a threat than rape, which usually just involves forced sex. Forced sex is horrible. But I think death is just a little bit worse. Just a little bit. Of course, I'm not a women's studies major, nor am I a feminist, so I guess I wouldn't know. However, as I think abo…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:22 PM
7

Offline? No. I was being fair because I don't know if there may be some kind of PSA that brings awareness to male rape victims on some obscure website. A non-feminist website of course.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:05 AM
3

...................? "Redditor for 19 hours" Ooooooh, ok. Now I get it.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:53 PM
7

Or that the people who see them might be men who have been raped by a woman, because 9 times out of 10 the PSA will only depict a man raping a woman and how it is the responsibility of all men to police other men, in just about every form of social media on the planet.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:53 PM
2

Thanks. I've grown tired of arguing all the time. Pretty much the only thing that will set me off is if someone lies about what I say.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 05:21 PM
3

Your article begins with an imaginary conversation between you and two people who you are smarter than. Neither one of these people exists. You engage in imaginary conversation where you mock one of them and their inability to understand what you are saying. However, these people don't actually exist; they are merely inside of your head. You label the dumber of the two people "femimist." So basically you are saying that you have no argument to support the bullshit you said about my article and n…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 05:19 PM
11

You don't like my article? :( Why? Because you are lying about its content instead of addressing its points? That's usually why people don't like things, ignorant people that is. From "overweight angry lesbian," all the way to the bottom Let's see where you Futrelled (quote mined) that from. From the article: When people hear the word feminist, even if the first image that comes to their mind is an overweight angry lesbian, they still tend to associate the word with women’s rights. You see what …
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:32 PM
4

That. And to see if they have horned red tails growing out of their ass cracks.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 07:08 PM
18

The saddest thing is that what you say in sarcasm is what these assholes say seriously. Not just to college administrators but to the government as well and they are taken seriously and the small minority of people brave enough to point out the blatant misandry in statements like that are labeled as sexist woman haters. Western society disgusts me because thanks in large part to feminism; equality for men = the hatred of women.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 06:55 PM
78

I'm so glad SFU has all of these women with so much experience in masculinity and being men. Otherwise there would be no one to tell men what forms of masculinity are acceptable for a men's group or a men's space. Or a man in general. God forbid men decide for themselves. I'm so thankful these oppressed women, who are the only ones who know what it's like to be cat called, followed, beaten, raped, sexually assaulted, and victimized, are there to tell all of those privileged men what they can and…
/r/MensRights04/05/12 05:12 PM
10

So even in a men's center we should be talking about how terrible we are? Yes. And if you don't, you hate women.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 12:59 AM
1

Exactly? But realistically, You should have just stopped at exactly. Well, to be fair, by a massive margin most rapes are committed against women, I can believe that the majority of rapes are committed against women, but women have only recently been able to be convicted of rape. They used to only be convicted of sexual assault. So that right there skews the reality of rape from the start. So the "massive" margin, while backed backed by statistics, still isn't conclusive. Because the statistics …
/r/MensRights23/12/11 03:56 PM
2

When you need someone to get it through a male feminist's head that feminism is anti-male, Amanda Marcotte is the bigot you want to call.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 11:49 AM
1

However, I think your perceptions of feminism My perception of feminism is that it is a hate movement and I have seen no conclusive evidence to suggest otherwise. Individuals with good intentions who are not bigots that are a part of a hate movement are still a part of a hate movement. in parts, anti-women rants Criticism of women and the unfair privileges they enjoy is not the same as anti-woman rants. (read: extreme few) You have absolutely no way of proving that the bigots within the feminist…
/r/MensRights21/12/11 12:11 PM
3

Yeah. Because the majority of men and women in this subreddit have already met you, several, several, several, several times. Not you personally, but your pointless argument. When I said according to feminists in my original comment, it was already implied that I wasn't speaking of all feminists. However, when you say all feminists, you are generalizing out the ass. That's how it is with your argument. Something bad is said about feminism it is denied. Something good is said about feminism and i…
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:30 AM
4

No.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 09:25 PM
1

Ok?
/r/MensRights20/12/11 01:24 PM
4

If you don't know that many feminists view sexual activity with a drunk woman as rape then obviously you need to do more research. Seems pretty hyperbolised to me. You clearly don't understand feminism. You haven't been reading the right feminist blogs.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 12:48 PM
1

Patriarchy is the word they use as a smokescreen for men more than anything else. They changed the very definition of the world just to conflate it with one of their male demonizing theories (men are privileged/oppressors).
/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:51 AM
7

Damn those anti-feminists. Always protesting those discriminatory laws feminists worked so hard to put into place!
/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:43 AM
5

Then we are in disagreement.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:42 AM
44

According to feminists, this boy is a rapist. Clearly this woman is the victim. I mean she was drunk so she had absolutely no control over her actions. The boy (the male) should have known better than to place himself in a position to be taken advantage of by an innocent drunk woman, which in turn means, because she was drunk, she was the one being taken advantage of.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 05:38 AM
1

I have no words.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 05:14 AM
0

..................................
/r/MensRights17/12/11 10:34 PM
1

Only the extreme MR people would misconstrue my statements to mean that. Not an MRA. Try again. EDIT: Hit submit by accident. VASECTOMIES PREVENT PREGNANCIES IN THE FIRST PLACE. But they shouldn't be forced, just like women are not forced to use any pregnancy prevention or abortion. Under the current set-up, in which any failure of birth control results in a woman being forced to either abort or carry a child to pregnancy, the ONLY humane strategy is to try to lessen this burden. So to lessen th…
/r/MensRights17/12/11 08:38 PM
2

Haha okay, you're not going to bully me into backing down, but nice try There is no bullying from me here. Only you suggesting that because of the nature of reproduction, something neither men nor women have control over, men should be forced to endure some "price" because biology selected women to be the ones who bare children. You are suggesting we use technology to make men pay a "price" to counter the so called "price" nature selected for women. You. Are the bully. If we're going to go with …
/r/MensRights17/12/11 08:26 PM
0

All that I am suggesting is that if you insist that a woman must pay a physical cost, than the man at least consider also paying that price himself. Ok. So let me get this straight. Because women have to bare children, men have to pay some "price?" Is that what this is boiling down to? Men are not god, men are not nature, men are not evolution, men are not aliens who genetically engineered the human race. Men are human beings bound by biology. Men did not make the female half of the species the …
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:43 PM
3

But just because that is the case, doesn't mean that she should necessarily have to pay the physical cost. She doesn't have to pay any physical cost. Women who choose to have abortions, choose to have abortions. Men do not force them. If she doesn't want a child or can't handle the financial responsibility that comes with having a child, then she can give the child up for adoption, or abandon it, legally. She can do both of these things without the father even knowing the child exists or if he d…
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:09 PM
9

Get one well known self identified feminist to step in front of a news camera or reporter writing for a major newspaper and have her/him acknowledge the injustice the feminist movement has caused men. Just one. ONE. And then when people working to end anti-male bigotry hear a feminist say NAFALT they will actually believe it. Then a dialogue can be opened between feminism and people who are working to end the legal discrimination caused by feminism. Just. ONE. Or, all of the "good" feminists out…
/r/MensRights16/12/11 07:26 PM
2

Yeah...it's possible that you might get a legitimate post in that subreddit with a legitimate example sometime after we colonize mars... But I doubt it.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 06:52 PM
10

Look, unless you can explain to me accurately what Patriarchy, rape culture and male privilege are, don't spew this MRA Bullshit. Right. Because everyone who realizes the hate those theories spawn is an MRA. Seems to me like you read too much feminist bullshit if you think something like that. Oh...and I see we are just going to ignore VAWA. Yeah I can understand why you wouldn't want to go down that road :). You guys think those ideas are dangerous because you don't understand what they are. No…
/r/MensRights16/12/11 01:05 PM
10

Mainstream feminism made VAWA. Mainstream feminism propagates the same hateful theories that demonize men and give rise to "us vs. them" mentalities; Patriarchy, rape culture, male privilege, toxic masculinity DV and rape PSAs are usually put out by mainstream feminism. ALL of them, every single one on the planet only depict men as abusers/rapists and women as victims. I admit there is now information on male victims of abuse on the internet, due in part to those Mens Rights Blogs but the mainst…
/r/MensRights16/12/11 12:45 PM
5

In one statement... "For a number of reasons in our society, it's really difficult to believe that this happens to men," she said. "It's difficult for a man to be able to say that this has happened to him because our culture doesn't accept male vulnerability. Our culture really puts a lot of pressure on men to be able to protect themselves." Now gee, I wonder what helps influence stigmas like this for men? "Women are disproportionately impacted. They experienced high rates of severe intimate par…
/r/MensRights16/12/11 11:23 AM
1

How can we feminists help you men fight that inequality. I have two responses to this question. One is at the top of the sidebar; "On the differences between feminism and the men's rights movement." The other is here. In short; acknowledge that feminism has created (and yes I do mean literally created) and supported discriminatory laws and policies against men and then publicly protest that discrimination. Not in some obscure blog article. I am talking about the media mainstream, the news; telev…
/r/MensRights12/12/11 11:30 PM
0

So if you have any ways in which we can be more respectful to male issues as we fight for women's issues, please share! I have a humble suggestion. Stop censoring those you disagree with. There was nothing "hurtful" in my comments on your blog and there was nothing "hurtful" in my articles. If you feel providing valid points and evidence of discrimination by the feminist movement is "hurtful" and deserves to be censored then I don't think you are going to be opening up any long lasting dialogues…
/r/MensRights12/12/11 11:12 PM
7

So. Just like with ozymandias over at what about teh menz, this seems to be just another attempt to say "hey I want to help with male issues" but any mention of feminism being the direct or indirect cause of those issues is shunned and/or deleted. I submitted the comment below this one to her blog and she let it through the moderation and replied. We went back and forth for a few comments. I made no insults, only provided the links I provided in my comment below this one and kept reiterating tha…
/r/MensRights12/12/11 01:14 PM
2

I agree that misogynists make the MRM look bad. But I think feminism makes feminism look bad.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 11:44 AM
3

Ok, question. What if society strikes you first?
/r/MensRights08/12/11 09:05 PM
1

When someone is raging You can't tell if I am raging from text. and calling names as part of an argument People don't need to be angry to call someone names. You went to public school, its written all over your posts, derp. You remember that thing you were talking about, fallacious arguments? ...Yeah you might not understand what one is, but you sure do know how to make them. Moron.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 04:55 PM
1

So now you are going to tell me how I feel? You can read minds? That's funny, because I don't remember seeing you in class at Xavier's school for gifted children. Maybe you had a different class schedule?
/r/MensRights05/12/11 04:44 PM
1

I can see how you would think that with my emotions spewing out into these comment boxes...because typing insults and cuss words are common indicators to how someone must feel in an argument. Oh wait...no. They aren't...lmao... Thanks for the recap of how fucking retarded you look though. Great laughs. Fucking retarded...fucktard...get it :D?
/r/MensRights05/12/11 03:59 PM
1

You refuted nothing, you pulled shit from your ass and cited none of it so I didnt bother getting into with you. Um...hey fucktard? I refuted your bullshit by pointing out that you were the one who pulled shit out of their ass and presented it as fact with no evidence. Moron... Youre passionate, but you lack critical thinking skills and the ability to support your point of view with cited references from legitimate sources. I'll respond to this with one of my earlier comment... "Says the fucktar…
/r/MensRights05/12/11 03:14 PM
1

An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it. In other words, if you were to say the sky was green and I said something like "only an idiot would think something like that" That would be an ad hom. Sort of like... You see, when you call me a moron and a fucktard, thats an ad hominem and it does nothing to support your case. It…
/r/MensRights05/12/11 02:58 PM
1

Name calling someone with no argument against their points is an ad hom, which is what the definition you just posted says. You gotta work on that reading thing... Why are you so angry? Angry? No, no, no you misunderstand. I'm calling you a fucktard because that's what you are, not because I'm mad at you. I actually find you quite amusing. So don't feel bad :D.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 11:31 AM
1

You see, when you call me a moron and a fucktard, thats an ad hominem It would be. If I was saying you were wrong because you are a moron and a fucktard. Instead I said you were wrong because the only thing you have cited was a bullshit statistic you pulled out of your ass. Also... I didnt read one sentence of your uncited wall of garbage. People, you in particular, who don't even read what someone says and then claim they are wrong, are fucktards. See what I did there? I insulted you and proved…
/r/MensRights05/12/11 11:22 AM
1

I didnt read one sentence of your uncited wall of garbage. Says the fucktard who hasn't cited anything, and doesn't understand what an ad hom is. Good job, moron.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 05:16 AM
2

You know, this could go on in some snarky back and forth text of nonsense but that would be pointless. The fact that you think black men aren't charged with hate crimes, that alone proves it would be pointless. You are set in your beliefs that blacks are more privileged than whites while I am set in my beliefs that you're a fucktard. Our beliefs won't change. Knowing that, I will say this; Do you really want to start an oppression olympics back and forth argument with anyone with even a sliver o…
/r/MensRights04/12/11 11:29 PM
7

That's a neat statistic you just pulled out of your ass.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 09:01 PM
2

Finish up the weed. Take a nap. Then try again.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 07:00 PM
2

Black people still have rights. Everyone has rights. It's just men have less rights than women. Including black men.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 06:58 PM
1

Sick? No. The only way chivalrous men in power who let feminist bigots continue destroying the lives of men will ever change is if the discrimination starts effecting them. Sad. But not sick.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 06:56 PM
11

You might have a point there, if boys didn't have to pay their rapists "child" support and if the legal definition of rape included forced vaginal sex and if men weren't arrested for defending themselves against violent women. Oh and I almost forgot, you might have a point there, if women, and only women, weren't able to admit in a court of law that they murdered their spouse/lover and be found innocent due to the "battered woman defense." I think, just maybe, this case would be a clear cut exam…
/r/MensRights04/12/11 12:38 AM
86

Holy shit...how the fuck did justice manage to sneak its way through all of the feminism/chivalry induced bullshit within the legal system and keep this man out of prison?
/r/MensRights03/12/11 11:11 PM
12

He has none. He does have an obligation to pay child support though.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:40 PM
2

*Puts on his Scotty from Star Trek 11 costume* Left wing: We are traveling at warp speed, how did you manage to beam aboard this subreddit? Right wing: You're the genius you figure it out. Left wing: As acting moderator of this subreddit I order you to answer the question. Right wing: Well I'm not telling, acting moderator. ...What that doesn't frustrate you does it? My lack of cooperation...that doesn't make you angry...talking about men's issues from a traditionalist perspective...that doesn't…
/r/MensRights01/12/11 04:09 PM
1

Yeah. But that's always a given with an article 15 except for rare exceptions with company grades. You can get that back in a few months though.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 12:58 PM
2

They have to have a reason, a charge, for giving you an article 15 so what is the reason they told him he is getting the article 15? If it is the sexual assault charges that wouldn't really make any sense since the case is ongoing. Another question is, are the charges being handled by the civilian system or the military system, or both. Because if it is being handled by the civilian system, even if the case is still ongoing, the army can still slap him with an article 15 for the alleged crime. H…
/r/MensRights01/12/11 05:25 AM
10

when this outcome is applied to both genders. Men being able to use western legal systems as weapons in the same way women can? ...That might happen a few years after we colonize mars. But I wouldn't hold my breath.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 10:19 AM
9

I get the distinct impression that what they are actually protesting is the existence of a sexually powerful male human being. Ding! ding! ding! ding! ding! Bob, tell him what he's won... ...A NEW CAR!!!
/r/MensRights29/11/11 05:26 AM
1

I had my own suspicions considering she ignored points in my article in order to misrepresent it. I did my standard check with posts here that get my troll senses tingling before I comment; checked over her comment history and checked to see if there were any SRS or AMR connections. So far all I am seeing is the standard form of feminist arguing; deny any wrongdoing feminism has done and ignore any evidence that suggests otherwise and the occasional "no true feminist" tactic. I wouldn't have eve…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 07:22 PM
1

My point is those "feminists" who deny men, create VAWA, etc. aren't true feminists. That is a point I cannot agree with. These people are feminists. People like Jessiva Valenti, Amanda Marcotte, Michael Kimmel, and the hundreds of thousands of people who support them and share their views. These people are feminists. The people of N.O.W are feminists. There were nazis who didn't participate in the persecution of Jews but if one of them were to say those that did participate "weren't true nazis"…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:40 PM
3

Feminism isn't doing anything to discriminate against anyone. So you are just going to ignore the feminist organizations I mention in the article that actively denied men, and men with children aid in government funded domestic violence shelters in two states and that it took lawsuits to end their bigotry? Or how about the feminist created VAWA, which is the law that is mostly responsible for the allowance of this bigotry in the first place. Feminism isn't about making men pay more child support…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:03 PM
2

First of all, the author uses a "feminist bigot" and a neutral-ground person to support his claims. That would be like trying to prove Democrats are better by using a undecided Centrist and a Republican. Wouldn't it make more sense to have a MRA also interviewed? The article is very biased. It wasn't an interview. It was me telling the neutral observer that the difference between the MRM and Feminism is that feminism as a movement has created, supported, and still supports laws and policies that…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 05:43 PM
3

Let's see if they'll ever make a PSA displaying the dangers of women who cut off men's penises. To fully encompass the horrible nature of this very real problem they would have to show the same woman who did it hosted on talk shows as a hero, talk show hosts joking about the abuse, and finally, people coming forward advocating that no criminal charges be pressed against the female criminal.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 07:50 PM
1

It's cool. No harm done.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 06:57 PM
5

I really thought I wouldn't have to add a /s in my comment O_o.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 04:13 PM
8

I really don't know what all these people are upset about. All of the differences between men and women are socially constructed, including strength, so the boys don't have any unfair advantages over the girls.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 05:39 AM
20

Damn that male privilege! .....Oh wait...
/r/MensRights22/11/11 06:42 PM
3

When you do call some actual misogynists out, instead of people you disagree with, then you will be an honest person. Good day :).
/r/MensRights21/11/11 10:43 AM
3

Calling men misogynists doesn't make you an egalitarian. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 10:33 AM
1

i wasn't claiming it did. From you earlier: the action itself is a hateful one, regardless of the emotions of the person doing the action. you don't even have a point anymore do you? From me earlier: That's your opinion. I made my point a while ago.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 02:18 AM
1

inciting laughter doesn't mean it's not hateful And it doesn't mean it is hateful either.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 02:10 AM
1

it being my opinion does not preclude it from also being factual. It's your opinion because it isn't factual. You can't dictate whether or not a word or a sentence is inherently hateful or not for anyone other than yourself. To believe otherwise is the stupidest thing, in my opinion of course. Depending on the context in which the sentence is used it could incite hate or laughter or a variety of other things. If it was inherently hateful towards women, there would be no other context in which it…
/r/MensRights17/11/11 02:02 AM
1

but it is a hateful thing to say Like I said. That's your opinion.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 01:46 AM
1

What? Are you trying to say it's a literally hateful thing to say towards women? I can't tell because I think you left some words out of that sentence. If that is what you're trying to say then that is your opinion. It's of my opinion that it's an ignorant thing to say because like I already stated, you do not have to hate women in order to say it. The context in which someone says it is what's important. Words themselves are not inherently hateful unless someone hateful uses them in a hateful w…
/r/MensRights17/11/11 01:22 AM
0

Thanks but it's aight. I deliberately invited bizarro world in here. I want to say the response was exactly what I expected but it wasn't. The sandwich pushed things over the limit. That is, the limit of hilarity. But honestly it helped me put some of my thoughts on this issue in order so I could write about them on AVfM.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:57 AM
0

Not a scab then? Maybe you're more like a pimple? Or maybe a tumor?
/r/MensRights11/11/11 07:18 PM
0

You got anything else besides this grade system? Or do you trolls all come with one plan in mind and when that doesn't work you just shrivel up and die on your own? You know, like a scab :D?
/r/MensRights11/11/11 04:53 PM
1

Lmao...
/r/MensRights11/11/11 12:10 PM
1

You're trying way too hard guy.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 12:02 PM
1

Yawn.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 11:55 AM
1

Yeah. You're definitely simple.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 11:51 AM
2

PROtip: Ideological dogma+fucktard=your comments. Have a bone, dumbass.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 11:45 AM
1

Woof? SRS keeps sending the trolls and their stupidity keeps knocking them down.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 11:37 AM
0

And on the other side of the coin, when the actual meaning of a word as powerful as this gets saturated in ideological dogma, sandwich jokes become "inherent" woman hatred.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 05:23 AM
-3

Considering that I'm being told that a sandwich joke is inherent woman hatred, it was a necessary exaggeration.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 05:21 AM
0

I keep scratching but it still won't come off!! MEDIC!!!
/r/MensRights11/11/11 05:19 AM
-1

What do I do? The troll...it won't come off...it keeps blathering idiocy and throwing letters at me... What do I do!?!? It. Wont. Come. OFF!!
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:19 PM
1

The hilarity of you group thinking fucktards...it's too much. It's just way too much :D.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:43 PM
-2

Yes. It assumes that the male party is a command authority who can order the female party to do whatever he wishes. That's one way to tell a sandwich joke. There are several others that don't involve "assuming the male party is a command authority." Also, "assuming the male party is a command authority" has nothing to do with hating women. Finally, it ignores all the wants, wishes, desires, dreams and opinions of the female party. Right...a sandwich joke... Take a look at this and go to 2:23. No…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 11:36 AM
-4

So a sandwich joke is inherently woman hatred? Really? Go away.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 10:30 AM
-6

Yeah...but that isn't always the case. Which is why you can't classify everyone who makes a sandwich joke as a woman hater. Of course that's according to my "logic."
/r/MensRights10/11/11 04:52 AM
-4

You do realize these things can be symptoms of hatred for women or even promote hatred for women, right? Can be. Can promote. But these are not absolutes. Which is why neither represent the definition of misogyny because doing them does not automatically mean you hate or wish to promote hatred towards the female sex. In other words, the only way these are not misogyny is if your first point of what is misogyny is wrong. So let me get this straight. Misogyny means whatever you feel it means when …
/r/MensRights10/11/11 04:50 AM
0

So you think they're 'ignorant assholes', but not misogynists? Maybe because the definition of misogynist doesn't include saying things that piss people off. Also saying something ignorant about someone doesn't mean you hate them. What are these people ignorant about? Women perhaps? That's the general idea. For comparison, I think people who hate gays are also ignorant about them. Some are ignorant about them. Others aren't but still hate them. But neither you, I, or anyone else can just say tha…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 03:03 AM
1

So I guess everyone who says that heterosexual white men, and only heterosexual white men, should not have a voice for whatever bullshit reason they want to give (privilege, patriarchy, etc) hates all heterosexual white men. Right? Or maybe they are just ignorant assholes, like someone who would say all women are liars when it concerns rape. Or maybe they have had a very bad experience, like homosexual men have had, and they are angry or misguided. But no let's follow your "logic" and just say t…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 01:36 AM
-4

Thanks dumbass :D.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 12:40 AM
-5

Yeah. It's stupid to say that the definition of a word is what that word means. Let me check the /SRS intelligence level right quick...yeap still 0.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 12:36 AM
-1

I'm telling you that you can't read minds. So what you think I feel is completely different from what I actually feel. That is...unless you are a graduate from Professor Xavier's school for gifted children?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:41 PM
0

An assumption is not a fact. why would they say it other wise? People have all sorts of reasons for saying things. Not all of those reasons are hate. Like I said before, unless you can pull out that citation that says everyone who calls all women liars in concern to rape, actually hate all women then you have no leg to stand on.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:39 PM
1

Well the thousand+ people in the audience and hundreds of thousands, maybe millions who viewed the show on tv or online disagree with you.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:36 PM
2

you made up a false scenario that proved nothing. Hypothetical scenario. Fixed that for you. Im not going to provide evidence to disprove you if you wont even give me something substantial that proves what you've said. I said that the word misogyny means the hatred of women. I gave the definition. Claim proved.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:35 PM
0

Well your interpretation doesn't override what I, the person you are trying to interpret, is telling you.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:28 PM
1

Usually if something is funny, people will laugh at it. I mean, I know I don't have a case study to prove that claim but....O_o...
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:27 PM
-3

GOD DAMN THOSE FILTHY That's a nice additive there. You cannot prove that someone who says all (insert whatever) are liars actually hates whoever they are talking about.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:25 PM
2

You have no evidence and the fact that you won't accept mine doesn't make it any less valid. If you really believe that you can decide how someone feels without actually asking them then that is on you. I want you to tell me how calling every woman a liar does not mean the person hates them. I just gave you a perfect example.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:22 PM
0

Good thing you don't get to decide how I feel.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:20 PM
1

I'm not a comedian. However, I did watch Dave Chapelle back when he was more mainstream. Don't remember what particular show it was but in one of his stand-ups he made a joke that among other things, involved women making sandwiches. The joke was met with laughter and thunderous applause, from both the men and women in the audience. I guess Dave Chapelle has nothing but contempt for women.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:19 PM
-1

You are as passionate about this conversation as I am Again you have no way of knowing that. and if thats not the case, why are you still talking to me? Besides the humor factor? Well, when someone starts an argument with me, I finish it.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:17 PM
0

So no one can say something offensive without hating the people they are talking about? Really? Today I learned...
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:14 PM
1

please tell me how a sandwich joke is funny Really? That has absolutely nothing to do with anything I have said.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:13 PM
1

Nice try though. cut the smug attitude I would like to point out that you have absolutely no idea what state my attitude is in from words I type in a comment box. Just like you would have absolutely no idea if someone who made a sandwich joke had contempt for women. give me some real evidence, a census, survey, study, anything but the definition The definition of a word is the only thing I need to prove the meaning of a word. Oh, and I'm still waiting on that citation I asked for. Just thought y…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:11 PM
-3

Hey man, you threw out the insults What insults might those be? and you are arguing just as hard as I am I don't consider linking to a word's definition "hard." Can you tell me whats funny about it then? The fact that you can't accept the meaning of a word even when it is shown to you.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:08 PM
1

Ok. EDIT: Says the person who has decided that a sandwich joke equates to contempt for women. Turns out the sudden voting increase is because this thread has been linked to /SRS So basically the people who believe that heterosexual white men should have no voice are in agreement that the dictionary definition of a word does not equate to the actual meaning of that word. That's an interesting development.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:06 PM
1

Linking to a definition to support your claim that the meaning of a word is exactly what you said it is, is enough evidence to prove your point. Nice try though.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:02 PM
-5

So the people who believe that anyone who is heterosexual, has a penis, and is white should have no voice are offended because of my political incorrectness? Because I have stated that the definition of a word should be considered the meaning of that word? I don't know what to do...should I laugh? Yeah I think I'll laugh.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:00 PM
1

you have no idea what you are talking about. Right. Says the person who has decided that a sandwich joke equates to the hatred of women. Oh and what's this? An upvote in under 8 minutes in a comment thread that has gone on long enough to require a link to a whole separate page from the OP. I think someone is utilizing a few throwaways >_>..... It's ok though. I won't tell anyone.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 10:37 PM
-4

Seems like you are insinuating that you know what each and every person thinks and feels based on the fact that they say something you don't like. Seems like you can't accept that you are wrong. Keep going though, this is getting funny.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 10:34 PM
1

I personally don't care what is good enough for you. I have backed up my claim with facts. You have as of yet to provide anything but your opinion of what you feel a word should mean. It doesn't work that way.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 10:33 PM
-12

Hypothetical scenario: Person: You know what? When it comes to rape, all women are liars. Other person: Wow. Do you hate women or something? Person: No. I just risked my life to save a woman I have never met from a turned over car that was on fire. If I hated all women I would have never put my life in danger for a female stranger. I would have just let her burn and been glad about it. Other person: Then why do you think all women are liars when it concerns rape? Person: I have my reasons. Peopl…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 10:31 PM
1

I'm aware of the sociological theories and opinions attributed to the word. But that doesn't change the fact that the hatred of women is its meaning. Hypothetical scenario: Person: You know what? When it comes to rape, all women are liars. Other person: Wow. Do you hate women or something? Person: No. I just saved a woman I never met from a turned over car that was on fire. If I hated all women I would have just let her burn and been glad about it. Other person: Then why do you think all women a…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 07:36 PM
-11

calling ever single woman a liar who accuses someone of rape is a misogynistic thing to do. No. It's not. Its like if i said its not misandry if we assume all guys are rapists. It's not misandry. Here is the fundamental thing you can't seem to grasp. Calling every man a rapist is something you would expect a misandrist to do, but that doesn't make the act itself misandrist. Calling every woman who accuses a man of rape a liar is something you would expect a misogynist to do, but the act itself i…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:49 PM
-3

No. It isn't. Misogyny is the hatred of women. A sandwich joke does not imply the hatred of women.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:43 PM
-4

Yeah. I read the definition.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:41 PM
-3

Ok. Here you go.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:16 PM
-11

If you call every woman who accuses a man of rape a liar you're a douche bag at the very least. Or an asshole, like I said. Why would you do that if you didn't think women were inherently untruthful? What does this have to do with my statement? Is there a non-misogynist reason why someone might do that? Yeah. A reason that doesn't involve hating the female sex, which would make it non-misogynistic.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:01 PM
-1

Citation please.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:35 PM
1

I blame the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 12:28 PM
2

The thing is, a lot of the things that we call misandry also cover a range of things just as wide, and yet, we use that term all the time And we are just as wrong for doing so. Sometimes, it happening doesn't imply hatred of a gender, but instead, sexism. Sexism is sexism. Not misogyny or misandry.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 12:20 PM
-8

When you use words like cunt and bitch, your actions are misogynistic. No. They aren't. Even if you don't hate women or whatever, those are powerful words. If you don't hate women then you aren't a misogynist. Period. Those words are only powerful because feminist have tried to classify them as hate speech. Especially the word cunt. But whenever I read a feminist blog I see the word "dick" slung around more than patriarchy. I don't give a damn how much feminists want cunt to be the new "nigger,"…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 12:17 PM
-21

That's what I said. And not every person that does that literally hates women. So there you go.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 12:14 PM
0

Y'know, things that are bad for your self-esteem. Bitch it's called self-esteem! It's the esteem of yo MUTHA FUCKIN SELF bitch! How the fuck can somebody fuck up how you feel about youuuu simple bitch? Sorry...couldn't resist.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:26 PM
-1

I think we should create the circumstances that allows us to contribute toward determining what is and what is not misogyny. Misogyny: The hatred of women Not misogyny: Bad taste jokes about rape/abuse/etc. Logic. Counterarguments. Disagreements. Harsh language. Saying cunt. Saying bitch. Calling women names. Being pro-life. Calling every woman who accuses a man of rape a liar. Why are none of these things misogyny? Because you do not have to hate women to do any or all of these things. You migh…
/r/MensRights08/11/11 07:03 PM
1

Fair enough. However, if you are speaking about feminism when you say we are on the same side I would have to disagree.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 06:41 PM
2

I know what pregnancy is. I just don't see it as a disadvantage. And in the context of the comic it is implied that men are advantaged over women because men don't have to carry a kid around for 9 months and give birth. Well...neither do women. Not even if they want to have kids. Furthermore many women see giving birth as something to be proud of. So the whole disadvantage bullshit is just that; bullshit. More feminist inspired propaganda about how men are forever privileged over women.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 06:08 PM
3

I don't know how the people in the navy like to do things but in every EO class I went to when I was in the army the standard was that rank overrules just about everything. So while you have a legitimate grievance in concern to this officer exaggerating what happened I'm pretty sure the only thing that will be looked at is you disrespecting someone of a higher rank. I understand where you are coming from because I have told many a sergeant off before I got promoted but if they decided to take ac…
/r/MensRights08/11/11 02:08 PM
24

they don't have to give birth Last time I checked women don't have to give birth either.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 11:42 AM
4

And the fucktard continues to make our case for us.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 11:40 AM
3

And the bigots continue to make our case for us.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 11:38 AM
6

living off of my kids’ child support. The feminist version of "the best interests of the child."
/r/MensRights07/11/11 10:50 PM
6

If you show them evidence of feminists, not just the "batishit crazies" or "radicals" but of feminists endorsing legalized bigotry against men and they want to end the discussion then there is nothing you can do. Their minds are already made up before you even speak to them.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 10:47 PM
4

Posted by the fucktard who believes that heterosexuality (male heterosexuality) is an evil harmful act against women and that the penis has been a weapon throughout all human history. I know you're a troll, but stating something that bigoted and ridiculous just invalidates any and everything you say in criticism of the people you troll. Don't misunderstand me either. Some of the things you say may be valid, but since nothing you can quote out of context or quote from another troll or grab from s…
/r/MensRights06/11/11 10:01 PM
4

If you look at the actions of family court judges, you will realize that "child" refers to the mother. You're right. I blame it on misandry the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 09:29 PM
20

He added that even if she is found guilty of statutory rape, “that has no bearing whatsoever on the right for child support.” Question...if she is found guilty of statutory rape...shouldn't she be...I don't...imprisoned? Wouldn't that mean...the child would go to Beiber? Or the woman's parents? ...So how is it that she would receive child support? Another question...why would a rapist be given child support? How can a court of "law" order someone to pay their rapist? Here's a good one...how can …
/r/MensRights04/11/11 09:11 PM
12

Hey...hey dumbass. Read the article again. The abuse is ignored while the destruction of the toys is highlighted.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 11:27 AM
1

Yes, they agreed they are going to get married, which includes joint ownership... No. Actually it doesn't. Not of the things owned before the marriage. Stupidity? Do they not know what joint ownership means? They know that joint ownership doesn't mean if you bought a house before you got married then that house belongs to your ex-wife upon divorce. So all marriages are just women trying to take men's money? You are a misogynist. So, we have the first lie about what I have said joined by a claim …
/r/MensRights03/11/11 05:54 PM
2

This agreement was made when they chose to marry each other. Unless they agree on who gets what when they get married then the only agreement that has been made is that they are going to get married. Semantics. Nice try. Nope, they both should be making that assumption, since they're both... married...? So you are telling me that men who are shocked that their ex-wife is somehow entitled to half of the things he bought with his own money, including his house, assumed that this would happen if th…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 05:36 PM
2

I was never talking about a case where both spouses agreed that the one who stays home will be entitled to financial compensation in the event of a divorce. And you know that. If a woman, or man for that matter decided to stay at home then that is their choice, period. A husband and wife can discuss it, they can argue over who stays and who works, but ultimately the decision is made by one person. If both cannot agree on who stays home then they don't get married. If that assumption should not b…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 05:16 PM
3

One spouse is choosing to forego a wage in order to benefit both spouses. And no one is forcing that spouse to make that choice. It is a choice one makes, and both agree on.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:49 PM
25

Classic case of battered husband syndr.....oh wait...men are held accountable for their actions. I forgot.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:47 PM
5

No, this is a choice both of them made. No. It's a choice they both agree on. But unless someone forces a man or woman to stop working in order to stay home then it is ultimately their choice and as I said before, the only person responsible for the bad things that happen because of their choice is the person who made the choice.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:38 PM
4

So...what does that mean life isn't fair...? If a woman chooses to become a stay at home parent and then later divorces a man for whatever reason, these were all her choices. It doesn't entitle her to half of the things he bought with his own money. Just because a choice puts you into a bad position it doesn't mean it is the responsibility of someone else to get you out of that position. Women aren't children, regardless of how much feminists would like society to treat them as such.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:14 PM
11

Does the law in China restrict women from going to work, getting a job, or owning property? If the answer to those questions is no then detractors to this new law need to, as feminists would say it, check their privilege. Imagine a society where what men buy with their own hard earned money can't be taken away from them by women. A feminist's nightmare, and an egalitarian's dream.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:01 PM
8

She was just talking out of her ass. Picking and choosing what to be "outraged" about while ignoring everything else that might be offensive to others but doesn't have anything to do with her worldview.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 02:09 PM
22

So...the guy pushing her into the other room and calling her a stupid bitch is "going to far?" Fucking really? I don't watch television so I haven't seen the entire episode but I don't agree that the clips shown were good examples of the show going too far. Also, I think that "doctor" they brought on to talk about why the show supposedly went too far is a fucking moron. She blatantly states that she is upset because the female character was portrayed as stupid and thinks the show was pushing som…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 12:22 PM
8

Those stats on me are waaaaaaaay out of date. Funny thing is I'm not even an MRA. Those bigoted fucktards can't handle the fact that everyone, not just MRAs are waking up to the fact that feminism is a hate movement. When it gets to the point where a man can't even have a Halloween display in his store without it being vandalized and he then being insulted as a "typical male" by feminist indoctrinated trash, people start realizing it's time for a change. But anyway, the most active fucktard from…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 05:17 AM
3

That would be brilliant. I can imagine it now; everyday people who walk by would laugh or stare for more than 30 seconds thinking back about horror movies or something. Then finally when the big reveal came their smiles would turn to frowns because everything that has been thrown into their faces by feminists and the media clashes with what they are seeing. They would think back to how assuming it was a man behind the mask was normal and didn't bother them in the least and then knowing that they…
/r/MensRights01/11/11 04:43 AM
3

Helping people walk away from abusive relationships is far beyond my realm of expertise. I don't want to give any advice, besides telling you to try encouraging him to walk away, because anything else I can think of might just make it worse. There is someone who I am almost 100% sure can help your brother if he is willing to contact her. Dr. T is an excellent source for men that are in abusive relationships who need help. Since you subscribe to two feminist heavy reddits you might be put off bec…
/r/MensRights01/11/11 04:39 AM
10

I'm sure if he had a few male manikins in the beds covered in blood then no one would have had any problem with the display at all. Because male victims of violence aren't important. That is, unless they are the butt of some joke made on national television.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 08:17 PM
3

I wouldn't mind such a project so much if it didn't just target her. You are ignoring the point. It only targets her because she gets away with crimes for reasons he cannot. Rather than "they are let off because they have a vagina," the emphasis ought to be "men are locked up and given cruel and unusual punishment because of the stereotypes of the threatening male." That I completely agree with. Well whether you agree or not, the fact is women are given lighter sentences and sometimes no sentenc…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:47 PM
13

Can you tell me of any other registry that lists false rape accusers so men can know if the woman they are with has a history of lying about rape for trivial and/or vindictive reasons? No you cannot, because false rape accusations are not considered a serious crime in any nation. Because it is a crime committed predominantly by women. Can you tell me of any other registry that lists murderers that walked free because they used the "battered woman syndrome" defense so men can know if the woman th…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:36 PM
2

It's going to have to get to the point where millions of boyfriends and husbands are dropping all over the western world at the hands of their girlfriends and wives before any type of real attention is given to the insanity of the battered woman defense. Until then, women get a free pass on murder.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 06:52 PM
11

I didn't know my penis gave me power. All this time I just thought it was there for me to urinate and fuck with. But power? Holy shit can I fire laser beams out of it or something? Oh and quick question...if I am being abused by a woman is it ok for me to take a butcher knife to her vagina? I'm only asking because it seems perfectly acceptable for a woman to chop a guy's dick off. And not just when she is actually being abused either, it's ok even when she only claims to be abused. Come to think…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:45 AM
2

I never said women were oppressed. I never said you did. Not all women are crying oppression. Most feminists are though. If anything, my natural fear of other men is completely in line with that post. Remember how everyone was calling you a bigot and you were upset about why? Well now you can't be upset anymore. Other men have no biological concern for interests of my child. No. But if your child were in an accident or another form of life threatening danger, it would most likely be a man, a com…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:38 AM
1

So why is this list just for women? The explanation for that is on the front page of the register-her website. It looks like this list to combat sexism is sexist. Combating sexism is not the primary function of the registry, it is a convenient byproduct. Shedding light on the crimes women commit that are rarely or lightly punished is the primary function of the registry. So it is in no way sexist. If you want to be upset about someone being put on the registry, be upset with them, because it is …
/r/MensRights25/10/11 09:21 AM
6

At the end, only one Tool can graduate, taking home with him £25,000 and the greatest prize of all: the love of a good woman. Because a "good" woman would trick you into attending a bigoted boot camp aimed at breaking your will and making you subservient to her.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:37 AM
2

There's no point to remove her. Ignorant or not she still incited hatred and bigotry against men. Not just online either, she caused the school her daughter goes to, to consider implementing her sexist wishes as policy. Her apology, the barely sincere garble of "but...(insert excuse here)" that it was, was a good first step. But it does not change the hate she spread. Register-her is a record of female criminals and the women who enable female criminals with falsified statistics and hate campaig…
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:35 AM
5

Damn...dude wasn't joking when he told me the troll wars have begun.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 08:41 PM
1

If you didn't realize, I was being sarcastic. Oh and I read every article I comment on before I comment. Thank you.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 04:17 AM
3

Ah Sweden. The nation setting the standard for justice and equality.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 05:20 PM
4

I sense an /AMR plot to destroy the jedi...
/r/MensRights21/10/11 02:37 PM
9

Interesting. So now when a feminist bigot realizes she/he can't spew her/his bigotry without being called on it, they backpedal, lie about what they said, lie about what others said to them, and then proclaim themselves the victim of the whole situation. I gotta say...strange way for someone who "rules the world" to behave.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 04:46 AM
9

Women rule the world? Really? Wait...then how are they oppressed? I want to figure this out logically but according to the pro-feminist DV industry logic is a form of abuse so...yeah I don't know what to do.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 02:02 AM
7

You can say anything you want. You can say cunt and legally nothing will happen to you. Socially is a different story. Socially you can get fired from your job over using the word because some have logged it down as hate speech. Forget about the several jokes and phrases associated with the words dick and cock that both men and women use all the time. Those words are related to men and there is no such thing as offensive language against men. Because of the PC whirlwind that hit western societie…
/r/MensRights20/10/11 01:50 PM
6

Explain that to them the next time they want to spout BS. Completely pointless. Feminists don't want anything explained to them, they just want everyone to agree with them and do what they say.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 08:24 PM
24

They didn't attack him. The unbiased media said that the attack began fucking after the guy started defending himself. Male defending himself against a woman=attack/assault/male domination/patriarchy Didn't you read VAWA?
/r/MensRights17/10/11 04:03 PM
9

Interesting. I didn't know that false rape allegations, VAWA, forced child support, the sentencing disparity between male and female criminals, and genital mutilation were all "the straight white man's" issues. Kind of weird that men of all races are discriminated against in these areas.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:30 PM
1

That's cool. I don't think you know what you're talking about either.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 09:52 AM
0

I'm not ignoring that, I just think you're wrong. Well that is where we will agree to disagree.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:36 AM
0

It's not a law, it's a business setting its own rules. Don't like it; don't go there. And the hypocrisy of this statement just went whoooooosh, right over your head.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:30 AM
1

You're joking? No.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:30 AM
2

because breasts and penises aren't analogous to one another in the first place, there are other differences between peeing and breastfeeding than the body part involved in each activity. That wasn't what you were ignoring. Keep deflecting though. Doesn't make you any less wrong. That's a different question with a different set of criteria. I feel like most women who are having a heavy enough period to noticeably affect the water around them probably don't need to be told that swimming is a bad i…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:29 AM
5

Then your analogy isn't applicable. Yes. It is. You just decided to ignore why it is applicable. No, because one involves sitting in pee and the other doesn't. Actually it's because discrimination against men is socially accepted in western cultures and discrimination against women is blasted over media outlets. I don't think I need to describe the public outrage and media coverage that would ensue if a public swimming area implemented a ban on women who are currently on their periods using the …
/r/MensRights12/10/11 09:17 PM
6

The word "ban" keeps coming up Because the author of the article claims that peeing standing up has been banned in the restaurant. If this is not the case then good. It doesn't seem unreasonable to say "Hey, we're doing things a little differently now, and we'd like you to change things a little to make sure everyone is accommodated." That isn't unreasonable. Forcing men to do this is unreasonable. The analogy to breastfeeding still doesn't quite work here. Actually, it does because this; You're…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 08:57 PM
7

My point is that taking a natural act that is done by a human being all of his or her life and then suddenly placing a legal ban on it is discrimination. No one is talking about men pissing in the middle of restaurants. Men urinate in the restroom and yes sometimes they miss. This makes people uncomfortable but so what? It is in a restroom where waste is disposed of. The natural act is done where it is supposed to be done, where it has been done for a very long time. Breastfeeding is also a natu…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 08:30 PM
7

If your point is that all natural acts are the same and we should therefore keep people who are crying (or eating) out of public view, then I suppose it does. No. No that's not the point you were supporting. Good try though.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 08:11 PM
7

Right...you do realize that you're supporting my point right?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 08:01 PM
7

That snark might have some merit if I was actually proposing a ban on breastfeeding. Since I wasn't...well...I could insert an insult here but you know what? I'm in a good mood :). Good day.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:53 PM
7

So like I said before. Banning one natural act is scorned. Banning the other isn't. That is the point being made and it is one you cannot refute. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:45 PM
10

Soon feminism Soon? Already happened.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:26 PM
10

Peeing in public Which is why people pee in restrooms. Banning one natural act is scorned. Banning the other isn't. That is the point being made and it is one you cannot refute.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:23 PM
10

No. What you fail to understand is that both acts, breastfeeding and peeing are both natural acts of human beings. What you fail to understand is that banning one is considered a crime against humanity and banning the other is accepted. The peeing everywhere defense doesn't fit because both acts, breastfeeding and missing the toilet make people uncomfortable. Again, banning one is scorned and banning the other is not. And the reason why banning the other isn't scorned is because discrimination a…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:10 PM
22

To be fair, it's pretty rare for men to piss in the middle of a restaurant.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:44 PM
24

A ban on breast feeding at public restaurants? Misogyny. Discrimination. Bigotry. Breast feeding is a natural part of being a woman. Who gives a fuck if you sexist men don't want to see a woman pull her tits out in public to feed her baby? A ban on men peeing standing up? Meh.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:10 PM
1

Ooooooooh....so she's a SRS poster. That explains a lot about the last conversation I had with her on r/masculism. I guess she just can't get over the fact that feminism is a hate movement and almost everyday feminists, "radical" and "moderate" prove it with their proposal, creation, and support of anti-male bigotry. That's kind of hilarious.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 04:29 AM
11

Oppression is the experience of repeated, widespread, systemic injustice due to factors that are often beyond one's control at the hands of another group in society. Hmm. You mean like...VAWA? So...who was it again that said feminists don't claim men are oppressing women? Who was it that said feminists didn't twist the meaning of patriarchy into meaning men are privileged oppressors? Who said all of that smokescreen bullshit trying to shift the blame from the hate movement that has caused the su…
/r/MensRights10/10/11 11:01 AM
1

Here we go again...you know, back in the day I would type out some long reply to this ridiculousness but now...I get to do something cool. See that link in the side bar over there =====> (On the differences between Feminism and the Men's Rights Movement) Read that.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 04:33 AM
16

As one people, united, we acknowledge the reality: that the future of the human race requires the cooperation of its members; that our system must protect our rights, and upon corruption of that system, it is up to the individuals to protect their own rights, and those of their neighbors; that a democratic government derives its just power from the people Now all of you oppressive men step back, especially you white men. Everyone get in the equality line. Civil rights will be handed out from the…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 05:19 PM
1

Your logic is misogynistic!
/r/MensRights07/10/11 02:02 PM
4

But...according to feminists, since you have a penis that means you will cause more damage when you defend yourself. That means humans who have penises never have the right to hit back. They can't be wrong. I mean...the fucking president and the vice president support this claim. Hell...the vice president made this claim law through VAWA! This has to mean that only woman hating men hit back when a woman hits them! This comment is misogynistic!! I'm reporting you to the manboobz egalitarian autho…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 01:56 PM
7

How many times are people going to get drawn into this bullshit? Here is the basic setup. A fucktard from AMR or manboobz makes a troll account. Said fucktard then makes a post here claiming to be all for men's rights but has just one little problem about whatever. Once the troll is called out as a troll the troll then proceeds to slander everyone here as a misogynist and slings pointless insults. Finally, AMR and manboobz light up with retaliation comments from people here who decide to use vul…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 12:25 PM
13

Sexual contact with a 16-year old Funny. When it happens to girls they call it statutory rape.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:24 PM
2

It's kind of combination of both.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:23 PM
7

SRS and AMR are a bunch of internet trolling fucktards with no real influence over anything. The real opponents that should be resisted are the feminist groups like the ones currently targeting Walmart or the ones enacting the disgusting rape hysteria policies in colleges. These are the bigots who seek to distort western laws and policies even further to give more privileges and advantages to women at the expense of men. Bigots like Jessica Valenti who seek to reform our legal systems so that me…
/r/MensRights06/10/11 01:13 PM
3

Another push for privilege equality for women from mainstream feminism. I'm still waiting for all the "good feminists" to come out of hiding and protest these groups.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 11:59 AM
5

Why do women think they have the right to determine what is or isn't masculine or manly? Because men let them.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 09:49 AM
-1

Thanks :D.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 04:20 AM
3

Feminists believe that any man (and only a man) that has sex with a woman who has been drinking, whether or not the man has been drinking too, is a rapist!?!!!?!!?!!!!?!? What the fuck else is new? I'm actually glad this double standard exists and is supported by egalitarian feminists such as these. If it didn't, then by now I would say I've been raped quite a few times by all of the women who have jumped my bones while I was intoxicated. I'm glad it's only rape when a penis, a sober or intoxica…
/r/MensRights05/10/11 09:28 PM
4

why do they expect a higher standard from us? Two words mister president; plausible deniability.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 01:00 PM
7

and were displaced by third wave, queer-theory-influenced and post-colonial feminisms. Right. Third wave "moderates" right? Like Jessica Valenti? Or maybe the moderates that enacted VAWA with Joe Biden. Or the moderates who continually fabricate and misrepresent DV statistics in order to continue pushing their bigoted claim that domestic violence is a gendered crime that only men commit and only women suffer. How about the "moderates" at N.O.W who post "Action alerts" against shared parenting po…
/r/MensRights04/10/11 09:24 AM
1

Yes. It does. But seeing as how I pointed out the troll was a troll before I started my copy and paste replies, The hilarity of their stupidity remains solidified.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 04:22 AM
1

Some people think that r/mensrights is in the same category as r/white_rights and r/jailbait. Some people are fucktards. Accept it and move on.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 04:35 AM
2

I wouldn't waste time with /AMR. They are more than just trolls, they are pathetic. They create troll accounts for the sole purpose of quote mining this reddit. Proof? I copied and pasted every ridiculous and hateful thing feminiazibitchyoumad said about men here and replaced "men" with "women" just as a test and to make the idiot try and come up with more smart ass retorts while all I had to do was hit a few buttons. Not even an hour later, muforceshoelace has the comments posted on /AMR as mor…
/r/MensRights01/10/11 04:33 AM
5

That’s enough for now. Tell me, dear readers, what misinformation or generalizations about feminism have you heard and would like to debunk? I heard that feminism was responsible for almost all of the public funded domestic violence shelters in West Virgina denying men who suffered abuse from women admittance. I heard they made it mandatory that anyone who worked at these shelters had to believe only men could commit DV. I also heard they only raised awareness through PSAs that DV was a gendered…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:53 PM
4

Go feminism.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 04:11 PM
2

right, right, right. keep workin girl. ;)
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:12 AM
2

damn dude... hey honestly i really didn't mean to hurt you that way. the fact that you're repeating everything i'm saying is really telling... i'm sorry. for the record i love women. it's just that girls like you need to get over your jealousy of men. that's all i'm saying. :D Lmao. It's funny because all I have to do is hit copy and paste to your bullshit and you have to keep trying to come up with smart ass retorts. I love making trolls work. Makes it that much more hilarious.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:09 AM
0

lol it's pretty sad that the only retort you have is a lie. look it up. most trans people are women who hate being women (because they know that you're inferioir) and want to be men. very few the other way around. :) enjoy that truth!
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:05 AM
2

Lmao anyone being honest can tell there are tears coming down your eyes. Maybe if you're a really REALLY good girl karma will favor you and make you my gender in the next life.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:04 AM
0

There's a reason most transexuals are women who sew their dicks on... haha! Damn it must suck being you.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:01 AM
3

lol I can tell the truth has hurt you and every other misandrist here. That's the roor of your hatred... you aren't a handsome man, and you aren't pretty enough to get one.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:00 AM
2

You're trolling this reddit because you can't find dick off of the internet, aren't you? Truth stings, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:57 AM
6

I'm a misandrist, yet I just donated over half a grand to a boy's shelter. Uh huh. And I'm not a racist because some of my best friends are black. You've been exposed bigot. Accept it. Most of you will never do that much for your own kind. Why? Because of your own self loathing. For our own kind? So you are under the misandric feminist impression that men and women are of a different species? Wow...you've got to be a troll... Oh yeap, redditor for 57 minutes. That explains a lot. That's two for …
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:54 AM
5

Ok misandrist, whatever you say. It's ok to be made a fool of. It happens to a lot of feminists I speak with and bigoted fucktards like you will never stop me from exposing your misandry cause I'm bustin' five knots wind whippin' out my coat...you can't stop me mutha fucka cause I'M ON A BOAT.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:47 AM
5

This from your OP; What i don't believe in is the amount of misogyny in your mra movement. I know that a number of you don't hate women, but what are you going to do about these blatant misogynists? And this from right now, after you have been called on your bullshit; And another android male shows itself for what it really is. This is a good example for people who frequent this sub reddit. Take a look. Most "good feminists" who claim to be against misandry are only against misandry that isn't i…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:39 AM
7

So it takes me being a real woman for you to be a real man? So I ask you to get together and advocate against misandry, you know like you claimed you do, and this is the response I get? Right. Another "good feminist" bites the dust.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:29 AM
5

Can you get together with your feminist friends that supposedly call out misandrists and advocate that feminists with political influence and that feminism as a movement should advocate for VAWA to be reformed. If you do that then I'll take anything you say about being a feminist against misandry seriously.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:15 AM
2

You're the bad guy because physical attractiveness is a patriarchal construct created by men to oppress women. If you don't find a woman with a gut so large she can't fit through the front door attractive then you are shallow and an oppressor.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 04:24 AM
1

Who is trying to do away with due process? Feminists. But rape is a special crime in that it can leave much less evidence than other crimes. No. It isn't. The only reason why it is considered "special" is because men have an innate sense to protect women, and women consider it the most horrible crime ever, when it's not. There are times when murder, theft, or any other crime can be harder to prove than rape. but it probably deserves a look-see to determine if a better legal standard can be set. …
/r/MensRights29/09/11 04:52 AM
2

As long as no one fucks with my article on the side bar I don't care what happens to the other stuff over ========> there. My 2 cents.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 05:33 PM
2

But where rape is different from most other crime is that it is one where you have to prove that the crime actually happened in the first place. You mean like every other crime? It is easy to prove that something was stolen or that you were assaulted. No. Not always. "I see that bullet in your chest, but I bet it was consensual," Really? So there are no murderers who claim self defense? Everyone who is found dead is just automatically assumed to be murdered? "Look at how you were dressed; you we…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 05:47 AM
4

Yeah, it's great being so privileged in this male dominated patriarchal society.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 09:54 AM
20

"The video makes no reference to physical abuse being carried out exclusively by either men or women or indeed by fathers or mothers," Except for the fact that you assholes only depict a man beating the crap out of the kid. From just watching that "PSA" it is obvious that they could have easily shown shots of the mother hitting the kid because with the editing, the kid was in different parts of the house for each attack. But that wasn't their intention. That wasn't the message they wanted to sen…
/r/MensRights27/09/11 05:27 AM
11

The statistics on how many rape accusations are false range from above 40% to under 2%, and (as is usually the case) which number someone chooses to use in their argument tells you more than the number itself. Uh huh. And someone who starts off an article saying; There's a lot of talk out there about "false rape accusations," which tends to come up in every discussion of a rape that did not involve a virgin in a prairie dress screaming "NOOOO" while being beaten on videotape in front of thirty-e…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 11:45 AM
8

I love how the author justifies the discrimination against men in one country by citing an instance of discrimination against women in another country. Go equality.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:17 PM
3

Lmao...
/r/MensRights25/09/11 03:37 PM
15

But... you were the first woman to sit on the supreme court. You kind of are an example of feminism at work, Sandra Day O'Connor. Feminists: We got you where you're at and that's final! You're nothing without us bitch! Your hard work and dedication don't mean shit mutha fucka! Without us all of those evil men would have kept your wrinkly ass out of that chair! Now be grateful! BE GRATEFUL!! Seriously be grateful or the world will realize just how full of shit we really are...
/r/MensRights24/09/11 07:12 PM
2

As someone who starts off a proposal to fire someone with false information about the person they wish fired, you qualify as deceitful. As someone who starts off a proposal to fire someone with false information that can easily be proven false about the person they wish fired, you qualify as a deceitful idiot. As someone who argues that men aren't sent to prison because of false rape claims and that false rape claims are not a men's issue, you qualify as a fucktard. If I was a mod I'd ban you be…
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:48 AM
7

So...I couldn't help myself and replied to the article. "All too often, the mainstream men’s rights movement is not gender egalitarian at all. " Ok. The mainstream Men's Rights Movement hasn't created any legal discrimination against women like feminism has created legal discrimination against men. I elaborate on that point here: http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/whats-the-difference/ The main goals and beliefs of the mainstream Men's Rights Movement are not bigoted and fabricated theories…
/r/MensRights23/09/11 03:50 PM
3

I don't know my shit That's about the only honest thing I've seen written from that feminism apologist.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 02:54 PM
8

If they truly cared about equality they would be feminists. Uh huh and if they truly believed in god then they would call themselves Baptists instead of Catholics. Fucking idiots.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 09:28 PM
5

Well...the only thing I can say is I threw some harsh accusations as to your motives in response to that article. I was in full attack mode because rape culture is one of the feminist theories I despise the most. If you weren't promoting that hateful theory then like I said there was some misinterpretation or miscommunication. Although I do still stand by my responses to the points you made about rape jokes and drunk sex. But all of that is in the past. You say you are against the bigotry femini…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 09:03 PM
5

I responded to your article a long while ago and explained why I came to the conclusions that I did. Now there may have been some misinterpretation on my part or miscommunication on your part but I currently stand by my conclusions and assertions. I'm just one person so whether I support your efforts or not means nothing but I'll say this much. If I don't see any promotion of the bigoted core beliefs of feminism from your reddit and if I see feminism called out on the bigotry it enables then I w…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 08:39 PM
2

I'm not familiar with your activities but I responded to an article wrote from that site by godlessaltruist. Maybe you should read both. I won't presume to know his motives nor will I claim to be a mind reader but anyone who promotes "rape culture" is no ally of mine. Don't get me wrong, mostly everything pumped out of that site is trash. But his article is what turned me off from giving NSWATM a chance.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 07:59 PM
5

If you didn't realize what the real motives behind NSWATM was about maybe you should have read the two blog posts I wrote about the site. The second one being the last one because the promotion of the "rape culture" bigotry disgusted me. EDIT: Nevermind...I thought your name looked familiar...the second article I wrote was about one of your posts from that site. Right...well consider my support withdrawn.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 07:49 PM
5

I'm sure feminists would love to be another one of those 'hovering" groups. They already are.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 06:16 PM
9

Those feminists are real champions of equality aren't they?
/r/MensRights22/09/11 04:58 PM
6

Feminism is a great thing. As a movement, it has allowed women to be seen as people... ...Pretty sure women were seen as people long before feminist bigots decided to convince the world women were children unable to stand on their own two feet without the government holding one hand while forcing men to hold the other. Women still don’t earn as much income as men in comparable occupations What the fuck is "comparable occupations?" It's like people can't get over the fact that men work longer hou…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 12:28 PM
1

In case you needed further evidence that the mods in /r/againstmenrights aren't egalitarian No. I didn't.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 05:24 AM
10

Hey, dumbass, check the side bar, there is an explanation of why offensive comments on the internet pale in comparison to the bigotry spread by people like you. Oh but wait, since we are playing this game; what if i cry rape (and let loose the dogs of war) This. This is why you have a bad reputation. It's nobody's fault but your own.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 08:27 PM
5

Oh. Well then carry on while I remove my foot from my mouth :D.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 05:18 PM
5

difference is we havent made those assumptions I know that I was being sarcastic because that is the mentality they have. That's why I said screen cap it and send it to them to show them how retarded they and their websites are. Because when you do send it they will just say "oh but he/she wasn't being serious blah blah blah..." I just felt it would be nice to have their own bullshit thrown in their faces.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 05:02 PM
-1

And by this one comment and the 3 upvotes it has received I declare all feminists, especially the manboobz and /amr crowd to be bigoted misandrists. Yes I know it is only one comment by one person but that is enough to generalize everyone I dislike/disagree with. Just make sure you screen cap it. Maybe send it to Futrelle and /amr so those idiots can see how retarded their entire program of comment picking is.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 04:45 PM
1

Just doin' my part.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 08:22 PM
8

Social stigma says that mothers must have full custody or something is wrong with the mother. Social stigma says that mothers must have full custody because something is wrong with the father. Fixed that statement. If she is considering "letting" the father have the child that would insinuate that custody was contested, which would mean that she won. Now, even with child support, she cannot handle the financial responsibilities and wants to do things with her life other than take care of her chi…
/r/MensRights19/09/11 07:36 PM
10

Feminism said they oppress women so the word has become taboo.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 06:04 PM
10

The solution here is simple. Let's make some female only quotas for the awards. Meaning there will be a problem if 50% or higher of the winners are not women. Pure equality, feminism style.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 05:32 PM
1

Feminism - Creation and endorsement of legal bigotry against men MRM - Some offensive BLOG COMMENTS Good job fighting the good fight against offensive BLOG COMMENTS. You can go back to your troll reddit now.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 04:57 PM
2

Thanks. I'm truly honored.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 02:04 PM
6

Wonder how this one is going to go... THE PAST Men during the mancession: We need help! Government: Ok, here, have a stimulus package :D Men: :D Feminists: PATRIARCHY!! Government: Um...sorry guys I gotta take some of that stimulus package back. Men: :(? How much? Government: Like almost all of it. Men: !!! But why!? Government: Meekly glances over at the feminists Men: :'( THE PRESENT Women: Hey government...we need help!! Feminists: YOU BETTER GET YOUR ASS IN GEAR GOVERNMENT. Government: But t…
/r/MensRights17/09/11 01:59 PM
2

The mods of r/feminisms are bigots? Who knew...?
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:35 PM
1

LOOOOOOOOLLLL WSJ, known GOP chauvinist heaven. Gtfo here with that garbage. From the article: "according to an analysis of Census Bureau data released Wednesday by Reach Advisors, a consumer-research firm in Slingerlands, N.Y. " Lmao and I'm the one with the creationist mentality? Come back to me when you have some relevant statistics that debunk government data: Here's a hint, you won't have any. Last time I checked, government data didn't say that single women were paid less because of pregna…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 04:28 AM
1

No, you're an idiot who doesn't know how to interpret facts. You have poor reading comprehension. No. You're a bigoted fucktard who stated; but all women are penalized for actions of other women. That's why all women are paid less, regardless of whether or not they have children. All women are not paid less than all men, that is a blatant lie. All women are not penalized because some women have children. You are not just a liar, you are fucking insane. No, just punching holes in your stupid stat…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 06:44 PM
2

Well, to be fair, this isn't really that big of a challenge. When you are speaking with someone who feels that half of the population should be stripped of their civil rights because of things that happened over a century before they were even born...refuting their nonsense is more of a comic relief than a debate. Thanks for the support though.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 05:37 PM
2

but all women are penalized for actions of other women. That's why all women are paid less, regardless of whether or not they have children. Wow. I know you are a troll and all but that lie right there is just pathetic even for trolling standards. But men aren't supposed to want? Compare the number of men who leave their child vs. the number of women. What's this? Another attempt to jerk this argument in a different direction? Yeap, I think it is. Except the cut in pay is not only for the matern…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 04:58 PM
2

Women have a biological obligation for at least 9 months to care for the child. Women are not obligated to have children, and women who choose to have them usually want to care for them, and they know before having children that they will have to leave work to give birth and recover, and will take a cut in pay, because they aren't there to do their job, until they return, troll. The government numbers I've project do not discuss the decrease in salary only for maternity leave periods. Neither do…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 04:13 PM
2

Yes, they do. That's why a woman's pay goes down when she has a kid, but a man's pay goes up. Women leave work when they have a kid. It's called maternity leave, where they are paid while not being at work. I think it is reasonable to not pay someone their full salary when they are not working. And it is done to both men and women. When they return their pay is returned to normal. Men usually do not even take paternity leave, when it is actually offered, when their wives or girlfriends have chil…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:38 PM
2

Yeah, but go ahead. Keep telling yourself these things don't actually exist. You have the mentality of a creationist. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL First of all, I said there were several studies done by people, institutions, and governments all over the western world. How about you take a look at the CONSAD report, learn how pregnancy is not the only thing that effects what women earn, and then go back and read everything I said. What you said; There's no lie there, it's the truth. Because women a…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:15 PM
1

The reason you refuse to tell me the reason is because you know research has already disproven all of your dogma. I find it amazing you can say my "dogma" has been disproven when you don't even know what it is I would say. Oh wait, it's because you want to quote mine me, because you are a troll. You're clinging to the past. Let it go. The new world isn't a bad place. This from the nutcase who feels that all men should have their rights taken away because of things that happened to women before t…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 01:01 PM
1

You can't say what it is because it isn't true. It's quite simple, really. No. You are expecting me to say something you can quote mine, because you are a troll, and I am done feeding you. There is a difference. No, what I said is that women are the only ones who can become pregnant, therefor, businesses use this to categorize women as a "risk" to pay less. No. Yet another lie from the lying troll, what a shock. No, you only proved my claims: r/mensrights isn't about mens' rights, it's about big…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 11:54 AM
1

You keep avoiding the question. I'm not avoiding anything. There have been numerous studies all over the western world by people, institutions, and governments that explain why men earn more than women and none of them say it is because of sexism. I don't have to provide you with information from any of them because I already proved what I set out to prove, as stated in my comment above. As I said before, google is a powerful tool. Get into it. I elaborated why child birth as a reason is a farce…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 04:24 AM
1

Are they inherently poorer performers? Do you think you are clever? I'm asking because you need to know you aren't clever. Any other type of suffering, women inherently suffer. Really? So women were forced to fight each other and wild animals in Coliseums for the amusement of royalty and the wealthy? It was legal to murder women accused of rape? Women were and are still forced to sign up for selective service or not receive the right to vote? Women were forced to fight any and all wars in any co…
/r/MensRights13/09/11 06:41 PM
1

Basically you're arguing for the destruction of all humanity instead of giving women equal pay. Actually I'm arguing that men are not systematically paying women less than men because of some sexist discrimination conspiracy and that getting pregnant isn't the only reason women earn less. They are men, are they not? You are one very hateful person. Both men and women of all races were discriminated against in the past all over the world by the rich and by royalty. It wasn't just women who suffer…
/r/MensRights13/09/11 06:23 PM
1

No, it's not. Women have to get pregnant to perpetuate the species. There's no choice in that. Men have no biological obligation to carry a fetus. A woman's role is much larger than a man's when it comes to the perpetuation of the species. That's not a choice, that's a biological fact. Last time I checked women are not forced to have children. Also, pregnancy isn't the only choice involved in what women earn, and it is a choice make no mistake about that. An eye for an eye is not bigotry. Actual…
/r/MensRights13/09/11 06:03 PM
3

Men continue to make more than women for the same jobs. Because all men who own business are systematically paying all women less than male employees right? This lie was debunked. There is a reason men earn more than women and it is because of life choices that both men and women make. Want to make things equal: have men get less pay than women for the same job for 50 years and lose voting rights for the next 3 presidential elections. And there in lies the bigoted rub. Remember how I said people…
/r/MensRights13/09/11 05:02 PM
3

Except that isn't true. Except you're a lying troll. This is the problem with pesky MRAs - they confuse legal equality with bigotry. This is the problem with pesky feminist bigots, they confuse bigotry with legal equality. Like this; In order to level the playing field, you men need to be oppressed for the same amount of time. I'm just stating facts. You are just stating antagonistic bullshit that has nothing to do with what either of us were talking about. You want to subscribe to a sub-reddit …
/r/MensRights13/09/11 03:44 PM
2

Yeah, that's not true. Only white men were allowed to vote in nascent America. Yes, only white rich men and their white rich wives if those white rich men died. And then after them all white men because of registering for the draft and after that, all black men because racism was slowly being abolished from the legal system. So what I said was true, and as I said before you are a trolling bigot with no argument. Case in point; your denial that feminism has created any legal bigotry. Feminists an…
/r/MensRights13/09/11 03:15 PM
3

If you can't even get your first point correct, I'm not even going to bother reading the rest of your post. Uh huh. In order to level the playing field, you men need to be oppressed for the same amount of time. Except, it's now measured that women have a higher aptitude for math and language than men do, so don't expect the playing field to equal out. So as I thought, you are a troll with no argument. All men were not able to vote, only elite families were allowed one vote. If the husband of tha…
/r/MensRights13/09/11 02:38 PM
2

Same thing for your assertion that men commit a majority of crimes. GTChessplayer went down that route? Really? Yo don't let him/her get to you man. I have had that weak argumentative point thrown at me many times and you know what my response is? While men may commit the majority of crimes it is men who are the majority that save peoples lives everywhere on the planet. The majority of everyday common citizens that become unsung heroes for saving people from natural disasters and criminals are m…
/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:17 PM
5

Right...there are a few problems with your line of reasoning. Women and men were denied the right to vote. Men received the right to vote before women but only if they registered for the draft. Women were given the right to vote very soon after. MRAs didn't exist back then. This one fact pretty much makes your entire statement pointless. "Men" does not mean MRA. So just because a small minority of men, the rich ones, had laws in place that denied women and men their rights it does not mean that …
/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:11 PM
3

MRAs do not seek to abolish laws that destroyed womens' rights. That's the dumbest thing I've ever read. ........................ "Feminists created laws and polices that allow legal bigotry towards men. MRAs and anti-feminists seek to abolish these laws." That's what I said. If you aren't going to bother reading what I type then why reply to me?
/r/MensRights13/09/11 12:07 PM
4

Um, Men actually had laws that prevented women from working and voting. Now here's what I said; Feminists created laws and polices that allow legal bigotry towards men. MRAs and anti-feminists seek to abolish these laws. Men, does not = MRA because MRAs are men and women. Same goes for anti-feminists. MRAs have not created any laws that deny women any rights. Period. Women, does not = feminists because feminists are men and women. Feminists have created laws and polices that allow legal bigotry …
/r/MensRights13/09/11 11:50 AM
5

How are any of you different than the feminists you so despise? Feminists created laws and policies that allow legal bigotry towards men. MRAs and anti-feminists seek to abolish these laws. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 11:06 AM
26

This is what happens when feminism controls your nation. Being a firefighter ceases to be about saving lives and putting out fires. Instead it is about making sure women who apply are let in, whether they can do the job or not. If they are not let in then all fire departments are misogynistic institutions of the patriarchy. It isn't just Sweden by the way. This quota bullshit hit American fire departments years ago. And police departments. And the army.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 11:47 AM
1

But...but...every patriarchal, rape culture influenced male knows that no one gives a damn about women being raped. All men know that women need substantial amounts of evidence just for an accusation of rape to go to trial instead of just their word. So why did he let her go? Also, everyone knows that women only lie about rape because of slut shaming. Not for personal gain, money, getting out of crimes, covering up infidelity, not getting a ride from a buddy, not having enough drinks bought for …
/r/MensRights12/09/11 11:28 AM
2

Now remember everyone she isn't a "true" feminist. Remember that just because one "radical" says or advocates for something bigoted doesn't mean that there is anything wrong with feminism. Valenti is part of the 34th subdivision of feminism, subsection C. You know, the one that everyone knows is just a bunch of radicals. What's that? You say she's the poster girl leader for the entire third wave "moderate" and "sex positive" feminist movement? Oh...well...shit...
/r/MensRights12/09/11 10:55 AM
1

Gender studies has sexist anti-male bigotry throughout its text books!? No...there must be some mistake... Another MRA is born.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 03:00 PM
15

So let me get this straight...men who complain that they don't get enough sex from their wives are selfish and misogynistic and all that other bullshit. But when a woman complains...she gets to have a judge force her husband to give her money because he didn't put out enough? That privilege men are too privileged to know they have is a sneaky mofo. I can't see it anywhere in this.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 04:16 PM
2

Whenever a feminist or a feminist supporter asks anyone to prove that feminists have done anything discriminatory or bigoted against men, when that proof is given it is ignored. "The radicals did it" is the most likely response you will get. However, sometimes you get the "that's not a true feminist" response. When you prove that the bigot is indeed a feminist you still end up with the "radicals did it" response. It is pointless to mention that feminism has caused legal and social discrimination…
/r/MensRights05/09/11 01:50 PM
1

So who was it that said child support isn't just code word for alimony? Who was it that said men (and only men) who protest child support are selfish deadbeats? Who was it that said child support payments are not for women, but for children? Who the fuck was it that said all of that bullshit? ...Oh right it was feminists. Now, who thinks any feminist will admit that people who call for an end to forced child support aren't just irresponsible and selfish "misogynists"? Who thinks feminists are ju…
/r/MensRights02/09/11 02:55 PM
0

So the subreddit filled with liars who routinely re-word what people say are also reinforcing the bigoted notion that a man standing in an elevator with a woman is automatically cornering...no wait, now it's trapping her. Oh and they are also reinforcing the lie that this guy was already turned down by watson before getting into the elevator. So they are basically a bunch of liars....who knew?
/r/MensRights01/09/11 03:55 PM
2

Colleges are now above local law enforcement. There was a case where a college man was accused of rape by a woman and the police found that she was lying. However, the college had already ruled he was guilty through this farce of a system they have set up that these bigot feminists are supporting, so he was kicked out. So as you can see, equality and fairness is the last thing on the minds of feminists and their supporters. Oh but don't forget, there is no legal discrimination against men anywhe…
/r/MensRights24/08/11 04:15 PM
23

So let me get this straight. Feminists don't want men accused of rape to receive a fair trial? No...there must be some mistake...
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:30 PM
9

I have some advice. Don't talk about a trial in which you are a juror on a sub reddit. Oh, and... Don't ask for advice on your decision as a juror in a trial on a fucking sub reddit. Finally, inform the judge presiding over the trial that you have asked for advice about the trial on a fucking sub reddit. Hope this helps.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 04:20 PM
7

Hey I wonder when this is going to show up on manboobz or r/againstmensrights? Oh...wait...I forgot, they don't like it when feminists display bigotry. Kinda gives some validity to the points anti-feminists make and we can't have that. God forbid people learn that feminism is the cause of and supports many of the problems men face today.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 07:53 PM
8

Mandatory date rape prevention programs are spreading to most colleges in the US. As for Kimmel blaming masculinity? I suggest typing his name into google.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 08:43 PM
19

Feminist woman that frequents manboobz and supports all of the lies and misrepresentations Futrelle smears anti-feminists with gets frustrated with not being able to dismiss all of the many valid points about male discrimination and feminism that anti-feminists present. Feminist woman writes an article addressing some of these points to try and show that not all feminists are man haters. Later, feminist woman creates a blog with some other feminists with the intent to divert any and all blame fo…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 02:02 PM
3

So let me get this straight. A bigot gets pissed because more and more people begin calling out the discriminatory bullshit of feminism. Said bigot and his/her bigoted companions create a reddit for the explicit purpose of invading one of the main reddits responsible for exposing feminist bullshit with downvote brigades. Bigot and his/her accomplices censor and ban any refutation of the bullshit posted on their reddit. Bigot and his/her accomplices censor and ban anyone associated with the main …
/r/MensRights13/08/11 10:19 AM
1

I'm sorry if pointing out feminist bigotry upsets you. Wait. No. I'm not sorry. Good day.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 11:32 AM
4

How is it normal to shove a piece of plastic in your vagina? Because when a woman uses a sex toy to masturbate she is showing how women have active sex drives and basic sexual needs that cannot always be fulfilled by another person. When a man uses a sex toy to masturbate he is just showing how any man who uses a sex toy to masturbate is a pathetic loser who can't get laid because he is a "creepy" misogynist who needs to "corner" women in elevators just to interact with them. I mean duh. Did you…
/r/MensRights10/08/11 02:56 PM
20

I didn't know getting in the same elevator with a woman is the same as "cornering" her. I also didn't know that as a man, I have a set curfew as to what time I can ask a woman out. Must be my male privilege blocking my capability to understand all of this but I would just like to thank Ms. Watson and feminism especially for explaining it all to me. I have to know all of the rules that men, and only men have to follow in order to ensure women maintain their right to not be made uncomfortable by m…
/r/MensRights10/08/11 02:46 PM
7

I'm sure these facts will stop feminists using made up statistics Don't hold your breath.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 11:12 AM
1

I thought I already covered how that blog is a scapegoat for feminists to use when people say that feminists don't give a shit about discrimination against men. How the blog pushes bigoted feminist bullshit theories such as "rape culture" and will never place any blame for the systematic and legalized discrimination against men in western cultures on feminism. Yeap...covered it already. Besides all of the bullshit littered throughout their blog posts, they link to anti-male sites such as "men ca…
/r/MensRights02/08/11 02:21 PM
1

Hypocrisy and lies from feminists? No...must be some mistake.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:46 AM
-1

I'm only replying because you seem to have some kind of mental disorder where you have to get the last word in. And I'm only replying because you have some mental disorder where you have to keep replying to me, denying facts while getting the last word in. :).
/r/MensRights28/07/11 12:28 AM
0

Come back when you start using reason instead of emotion. This from the person who wants to deny the fact that if you don't show up to a job then you are affecting that company's productivity. I'll stick with my facts, you stick with your emotion.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 12:25 AM
0

Hahaha, I've never talked with someone who couldn't understand the word "proof", or the difference between "fact" and conjecture. Probably because you don't understand the difference. You're a troll, or you're willfully ignorant. And I'm leaning towards the former. Sticks and stones.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 12:21 AM
1

You don't always need a study to prove a claim. Attendance is a factor of productivity. Men in general have better attendance than women. So there you go. No study needed. Unsourced opinions like yours add nothing to this forum. My opinion is sourced by the several reports that indicate women take a lot more time off than men. People who cannot accept facts just because they don't like the way they sound add nothing to this forum. You are just like the feminists who even to this day still deny t…
/r/MensRights28/07/11 12:13 AM
1

Prove it with a study or a peer reviewed journal article. Lol? Why would someone go out and do a study with the intention of seeing which sex is more productive? Seeing as how attendance is a factor in productivity then the facts speak for themselves. Unless you are denying this fact, if so then that is on you. Unless you are going to assert that every woman who takes more time off than men comes back and is twice as productive as all of the men, and the women who didn't take as much time off, i…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 11:50 PM
1

Put up or shut up. Prove your assertion, or this conversation cannot continue. I already did prove it. Attendance is a factor in productivity for a company. Men on average have better attendance.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 11:35 PM
1

Yeah...ok...so let's ignore the fact that employees who bring in more money to a company are the ones who most likely get the raises/promotions. Let's forget about the fact that employees actually being at a job is what makes the company money. And let's forget about the fact that men in general work longer hours and take less time off than women, which is one of the reasons listed in the department of labor as to why men earn more money in the first place. When we forget all that then we do ind…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 11:31 PM
1

I know what a sick day is, thank you, and there are other ways of taking time off besides sick days. You can request days off from your managers while you are at work and no I am not talking about vacations. You can't correlate being away from work more with being less productive. It isn't that simple. Productivity is measured by more than "just showing up I didn't say that not showing up was the only measure for productivity. That would have been understandable. Instead, he claimed women earn l…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 11:18 PM
1

One extra sick day does not mean someone is less productive. All women do not take one extra sick day than all men. It is already established that women take more time off than men with sick days and other reasons besides sick days. I never said I was speaking only about sick days. You can ask for time off on jobs that aren't sick days, I know because I have done it on my previous job. Also, besides childless women taking more time off than men, there are women who take time off for maternity le…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 10:18 PM
1

What I am saying is that taking less than one extra sick day does not make you less productive. And what I am saying is that one employee taking more time off than another means they are less productive. What everyone is upset at this guy for is making unsubstantiated claims. One is unsubstantiated and the other is true. He had no research to back up any of his statements. I can't speak on new Zealand because I don't live there but in America that time off for children claim is covered by the de…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 09:58 PM
1

And you are saying that explains the entire wage gap? Oh boy... Go back to my very first comment. Read it over again and see where I said that taking time off is one of the reasons that women earn less. Now take a look at my last comment and see how I explain that taking more time off means you are less productive, no where in that comment did I say it explains the entire wage gap. This is the process I am talking about. People who get butt hurt because someone says something they don't like wil…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 09:39 PM
1

It's not that you are replying, it's that you say "sorry, I don't care" about 50 times every reply, especially when presented with facts. I've been presented with exaggerations and falsehoods about what has been said, not facts. The ones who care the most make the biggest show about how they "don't care". Uh huh, saying I don't care about your foil hat accusation is a huge show of how I actually care about what you think. You claimed he can't prove himself because feminists control academia. No.…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 09:15 PM
1

For someone who doesn't care, you are making a really big show about how much you don't care. I reply to you because you replied to me. I don't have to care about what you think to correct things I feel need correcting. I'm sorry you think this man getting fired is a huge, tin-foil hat feminist conspiracy. Yes that's exactly what I expect. Men being fired because of words is downplayed and treated as bullshit. Just gives people like me more fuel for the fire. Prove to me that women are less prod…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 09:01 PM
1

If you cannot equate "women take off work because of monthly sick problems" with "women take off work because they have periods", you're hopeless. What I won't equate that with is this: He said it is okay to pay women less money than men because: Which is what you said he said. And he did not. I have acknowledged this twice already. You seem to gloss over it intentionally in your quest to be needlessly outraged. Wrong again. You keep trying to push that he said the only reason women take more ti…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 08:51 PM
2

again, are these reasons verifiable in some way? Or is it his opinion/speculation. One is. One isn't. CoonTown did not claim this. You are trying to put words in his mouth. Putting words in people's mouths is just about the only thing coontown has been doing. However, I said if he doesn't believe, so I did not put words in his mouth. Apple vs. oranges. It's funny, anytime someone someone here is asked to defend their position they just bring up unrelated issues. Read my very first comment and se…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 10:53 AM
2

He said it is okay to pay women less money than men because: I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding, where you claim someone said something they did not say. He said women take leave more because of periods and children. He did not say women should be paid less because of this. And the only conclusions to draw from his claims are that women are paid less because they take more time off and one of the reasons he gave for that was an unproven guess. The other reason was true. The more tim…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 09:58 AM
2

He got fired for claiming that women take more sick days because they cannot work through periods. Nope. When quizzed about who takes more leaves Leaves are not always sick leaves, this is why he also mentioned children. Now I won't claim to know what this guy thinks but considering the question asked and his response it seems to me he said women take more time off because of periods and child raising. So he didn't say it was only because of periods. Picking through facts of this case is not "tr…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 04:44 AM
3

You won't have any problems convincing me of that. Try telling it to feminists. I suggest you bring some ear muffs with you, might be some shouting. :)
/r/MensRights27/07/11 04:14 AM
1

I like the part you conveniently didn't bold: I didn't bold it because you won't stop bringing it up as if it is the only thing he said and I was waiting until you did bring it up because I knew that was the only reason you decided to reply to me; to see if I will say that I think all or most women get paid less because of their periods. Dude is literally saying women take more time off because they have periods. I also like how you keep lying. This is why I put everything else in bold. Because …
/r/MensRights27/07/11 04:04 AM
3

His statement was that women make less because they are less productive while they are on their period. His statement: When quizzed about who takes more leaves, he said, "Women do, in general," adding. "It is because once a month they have sick problems. Not all of them, but some do. They have children that they have to take time off for, to go home to. Therefore it's their productivity... it's not their fault." He said that women take more time off and that their productivity is less than men a…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 02:00 AM
-5

Out of curiosity, do you have a source for the claim that most women's productivity is imparied while they are on their period? What I said: Typical. A man makes a true statement about some of the reasons women earn less money and he is fired. Read the article and the reasons other than menstruation mentioned and then you will see why I said what I said. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 01:00 AM
3

Typical. A man makes a true statement about some of the reasons women earn less money and he is fired. But women who laugh and celebrate a man's penis being cut off go on with their jobs with no problems. Furthermore he didn't say that menstruation was the only reason and he didn't say he meant all women. But that doesn't matter, he pissed off some women with money so he had to go. All this male privilege must be blinding me because I cannot see how men are dominating anything when simply speaki…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 12:02 AM
3

I don't blame women because it isn't just women. It is feminism that holds my blame. From bigoted feminists like Amanda Marcotte and Jessica Valenti to bigoted feminists like Michael Kimmel and David Futrelle. People like them are the ones responsible for this bullshit. People like them will vilify men with no fear of repercussion because over six decades of feminist propagated bullshit has poisoned the minds of the public. People don't get upset when a bunch of women sit around a table and deba…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:16 PM
1

And thank you for speaking from your heart. Ha.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 09:37 PM
12

If the reason she is leaving, if she is leaving, is because of the bigotry she displayed then I would just like to point out that she is being used as a scapegoat. She was obviously the most offensive and energetic bigot but she wasn't the only one cracking and laughing at jokes and she wasn't the only one debating why a man would deserve to have his penis cut off. I understand that something is better than nothing but the fact still remains that if a group of men did the same thing these women …
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:10 PM
2

He knows misandry exists. I've seen him mention it before. However, like with the farce ozymandias blog that supports his website, he will never acknowledge the misandry that feminism promotes. The only misandry he will speak of is how men are poorly treated when they want to wear a dress or something like that. He only cares about man hate when that man hate is directed towards men who want to act feminine.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:01 PM
2

So if what you're saying is true...then David Futrelle is a hypocritical bigot....? So what else is new?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:36 AM
2

MRAs are masters of self-inflicted victim-frenzy This coming from the moron who mods a subreddit made for the sole purpose of claiming eternal victim-hood because those "intimidating MRAs" called you and your feminist bigots out on their misandry. Keep going. The more people who witness your idiocy, the better. and are utterly incapable of ignoring people who disagree with them. Like I said, you will no longer be able to discriminate against men with your blatant sexism and not be called out on …
/r/MensRights20/07/11 05:29 PM
5

That's the thing about misandry. Every time you think you've seen the most bigoted thing that can be done to or said about men, you remember that misandry isn't even recognized by any spellcheckers. The "worldwide" web doesn't recognize the word used to describe the hatred of men. Misandry no longer amazes me. It's not only ignored in every society on the planet, it's also not recognized by the largest and most innovative free source of information the world has ever seen. Don't ask me to try an…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:41 PM
5

Which is why I say; feminists, keep doing what you're doing.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:24 PM
6

The commentator who was told his views were not welcome in r/feminisms because he is a man was a male feminist. As for your new reddit I doubt any MRAs will lose sleep over not being welcome.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:15 PM
14

The entire world is filled with people who have an internet connection that seek amusement by pissing other people off. But there is a difference, let me show you. Whereas r/mensright's daily attacks on r/feminisms, r/racism, r/transphobiaproject, etc. -- those prove that MRAs are the true champions of equality! /s As opposed to r/feminisms mods, not random commentators and many other feminist websites denying men and male views because they are men and male views You see the difference? Of cour…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:03 PM
12

The sequence of events A man is censored in r/feminisms and told his views and opinions as a man are not welcome by one of the r/feminisms mods and another mod supported this sexist policy This man shows people the sexist discrimination he has suffered Unlike the past 6 decades of feminist hatred, people speak out against this bigotry Feminists become shocked that they can no longer be misandric bigots towards men without people becoming upset A bunch of feminists create a subreddit for the sole…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 12:48 PM
0

I aim to please.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 12:04 PM
6

So basically feminists are butt hurt because people are calling them out on their bigotry and now they want to take the David Futrelle route and use the comments of a few to paint everyone they don't agree with as "oppressive". It's been a long time coming. Feminists have openly vilified men for decades because they could. Because hardly anyone opposed them. Because almost no one stood up and said "your bigotry is not welcome here" Well now that bigotry has opposition and feminists better get us…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 11:53 AM
5

I'm just waiting for that jackass Futrelle to defend Osbourne on his site and snag a few of the comments as "proof" of how all MRAs are misogynists like he did with that bigot skepchick. And no that wasn't sarcasm, I'm really waiting for it.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:19 AM
0

Yeah it is but I enjoy black backgrounds :). I made a change to the font though. It's white instead of grey now so that should make it easier to see. Oh and thanks for pointing it out. Changes don't happen unless people voice their concerns. If it remains too much of a problem I'll probably just revert back to white backgrounds, no biggie.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 11:01 PM
3

lol my bad. I recently changed blog themes and I'm just trying out this new layout.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 10:43 PM
4

I'll take the admiration route. Admiration that a lot of feminists are no longer feeling the need to hide their misandry anymore. They are pulling back the curtains and getting into the 1970s mode feminists. Feminists introduce more on the fence people to the hatred feminism creates with one statement than any anti-feminist can with an entire news segment. I've said it before and I'll say it again; feminists, keep doing what you're doing.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 05:20 PM
5

So a feminist believes that men should have no voice and male issues are irrelevant. What else is new?
/r/MensRights18/07/11 05:15 PM
3

I don't even think what she was talking about (or NOT talking about) was rape.. it was cheating. I thought that for a second also but it isn't what Leah Remini was talking about. I wouldn't recommend watching that video a second time to anyone but if you do you will see that the first time Leah says she can only think of one thing a man would deserve to be mutilated for, she lowers her head and can't say the word rape, which is what she was thinking. Then the other women chime in with "cheating"…
/r/MensRights18/07/11 02:06 AM
5

I actually like the way mine sounds better because what I said is common practice throughout western societies.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 10:01 PM
4

Discrimination is a-ok when it isn't happening to women.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 09:00 PM
4

It was a 12-14 year old girl who got caught in the crossfire during a tribal feud (sunni and shiites). It was just another day for me so I don't remember everything that happened but my platoon ended up taking her and her mother to the green zone in Baghdad for emergency surgery.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 07:52 PM
27

And then when one of them says she can think of an instance where that would be a necessary punishment for her husband, that's the thing they're all hush-hush about. Basically. And that hush-hush thing was rape. All of them went silent and couldn't even udder the word rape. But chopping a guy's dick off? Well that's just fucking hilarious. Also the hypocrisy of that "I can only think of one thing a man could deserve that for" statement is obvious because if someone were to suggest to any of them…
/r/MensRights17/07/11 07:48 AM
127

There are no words to describe how fucked up that was. One of them even mentions how fucked up and sexist they are all being and then Osbourne just shrugs it off with "it's not the same" and they all start laughing again. It isn't the same to cut a woman's breast off though. The same would be taking a knife to her entire vagina. I saw a young girl who had been shot in the vagina when I was over in Iraq and no one thought it was a fucking joke. But thanks to this fucked up society feminism has gi…
/r/MensRights17/07/11 04:40 AM
30

Do I get a chance to lose my mind for a moment to make a mistake? I have no criminal history :D Only if you have a vagina.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 06:01 PM
56

But Blau says, "I think it was a nice balance...This is a woman who we'll say lost her mind for a moment, made a mistake. I can support that with no criminal history." Wow. Just wow.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 04:35 PM
11

I like how every time men's rights is listed it is listed with quotation marks as if the rights of men are a joke while feminism is blasted across both the MRM and feminism page as the be all end all solution for inequality. I also like how they shrug off the bigotry they chose to list for feminism by pulling the "radicals did it" knee-jerk defense...every...single...time they mention any reason someone should have a legitimate criticism about feminism. Oh and I just love how they throw everyone…
/r/MensRights16/07/11 08:36 AM
3

That woman is so fucking stupid...
/r/MensRights14/07/11 08:32 PM
1

Wooooooooooooow.........
/r/MensRights12/07/11 11:23 PM
0

Have an up vote.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 10:59 PM
33

Because they don't view those things as privileges. They think that there is systematic discrimination against all women in every country on the planet so they feel that job quotas and female only scholarships are the "balance" to all of this discrimination. Because we "privileged" men are more likely to be hired they feel that forcing companies to hire women is equality. In short, they are moronic bigots.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:16 PM
8

The more famous men feminists attack = the more fans of famous men are exposed to feminist hypocrisy and bigotry = the more people realize that feminism is a hate movement bent on controlling what people can do and say = the faster feminism is reduced to a ridiculed group such as the neo nazis. In a way feminists are doing more good for anti-feminists than any incarnation of an anti-feminist movement can. More people care about what feminists have to say so when they see morons like Watson tryin…
/r/MensRights11/07/11 04:51 PM
1

Yeah but you're still pointing out how women have an unfair advantage over men. Which means you have a resentment towards women. Which automatically means you hate women. You have to understand feminist logic (or lack thereof) to come to the conclusions I have come to. Once you begin to think like a feminist it will all make sense and you will realize that saying anything in conflict of the feminist ideology is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 02:42 PM
8

Don't point out how women have a blatant unfair advantage over men within a legal system. Don't you know that stating facts in criticism of women means you hate women? Just ask a feminist.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 05:45 PM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 07:45 AM
1

While I have no way of knowing if men are shamed as much as women for sleeping around, there is an equivalent to slut used for men besides "man-slut" that I haven't seen anyone in the feminist-MRA argument mention; womanizer. Men are indeed often congratulated by other men for bedding a large number of women but I feel there is a more practical reason for this. Women are the choosers. Sure there are women who will ask a guy out but the overwhelming majority of people who have to initiate dating …
/r/MensRights08/07/11 07:28 AM
3

That is the same as what I said. You're being a dishonest asshole in addition to a misogynistic asshole. Fuck you. No. What you said was: "Resentment is the experience of a negative emotion (anger or hatred, for instance)[1] felt as a result of a real or imagined wrong done." You snagged a wikepidia definition because it had the word hatred in it. I used the fucking dictionary definition, which does not. Because to resent something doesn't automatically mean you hate it. What you wish to do is m…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:59 AM
3

You're being very intellectually dishonest. I can tell what you think, because you are telling me what you think. Yes I did tell you what I think. But you have said that what you think I think is what I think. So the intellectual dishonesty is yours. I can't believe I have to do this but the first line of the wikipedia article on resentment reads: "Resentment is the experience of a negative emotion (anger or hatred, for instance)[1] felt as a result of a real or imagined wrong done." so yeah you…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:49 AM
2

Assuming you say things that you think, then yeah I can discern that. So you went to the Xavier school for gifted children to harness those psychic powers of yours then? yeah the part where you bitterly resent shit about women or whatever lol So even with the definition of resentment right in front of your face you still add things that aren't there. Resentment is hatred because you say so. This is too hilarious. Keep going.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:23 AM
1

Yeah common sense is a mofo ain't it?
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:13 AM
2

Without some kind of qualifier in front of "women", this phrase refers to women in general. So then I am to assume that every time a feminist says "men are this" or "men did this" or "because men" I should assume that each and every individual feminist who says something starting with "men" is referring to all men? pretty much yeah So you are psychic and can discern what I or other people think and feel through typed comments? Cool. You don't have to put "some" or "all" in front of men or women …
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:08 AM
1

Thanks for pointing it out but I already explained why the person assuming that about my statement is a hypocrite. EDIT: Also I said that women can get away with murder. So even if I was referring to all women, which I wasn't, my statement does not imply that all women get away with murder. At the very least it can be misinterpreted to mean that all women are able to get away with murder, not that all women who murder get away with it.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 05:34 AM
3

Without some kind of qualifier in front of "women", this phrase refers to women in general. So then I am to assume that every time a feminist says "men are this" or "men did this" or "because men" I should assume that each and every individual feminist who says something starting with "men" is referring to all men? Feminists who say men are pigs are referring to all men. Or if I said, "I resent women," it is still misogynistic even though I didn't say, "I resent all women." First of all if someo…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 05:32 AM
3

That's not what you said. You said that women get away with murder, not that there are women who get away with murder. I can play that game to. Did I put an all in front of my statement? No? Thought so.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 05:01 AM
2

Actually, it shows your resentment of women. (Your misogyny). So let me get this straight. Pointing out the fact that there are women who get away with murder means I resent women? Are you psychic like the other jackass that tried to claim how I feel from a few sentences in a comment section? Did I read that correctly? Oh and misogyny now means resentment instead of hatred? You wrote the definition for misogyny? Oh wait I forgot there is a different definition for misogyny, the feminist definiti…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 04:52 AM
2

Feminist bullshit is universal. It cannot be contained by simple things like distance and borders. Bullshit feminist statistics in one country will be used in another to incite hysteria and garner government funds.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:55 AM
1

and not make broad statements like jmnzz made saying ALL women can get away with everything, which is ridiculously ignorant. Good thing I didn't say that or I would be ridiculous and ignorant. Like you.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:45 AM
1

Yeah, and your reason was dumb. I don't see how a reason that is true can be dumb. Must be because I don't think like you. No, facts are out there for everyone to see. So you have read every single case around the world pertaining to men and women getting away with murder and know with all certainty that for every woman who has gotten away with murder, there is an equal number of men? And you also know of all murders that have not gone to court? And you also know of all murders that are not of p…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:01 AM
2

You're right, I don't agree with your false and misogynistic view that women can murder whomever they want and get away with it! Thinking that a woman can murder someone and get away with it, because you've seen cases of women murdering someone and getting away with it, is not the same as hating women. Thanks for proving my point.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 02:39 AM
3

I heard there was misogyny is this subreddit but I still don't see it. I heard that a lot of people who are feminists or support feminism view things they don't agree with as misogyny. Even if that something they disagree with is true, whether that something they disagree with equates to the hatred of women or not.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 02:27 AM
1

People like you that are full of hate are cancer to equal rights movements. People like you who think they can discern what someone thinks, how someone feels, and if they are full of hate from a few words typed down in the comments section of a website are cancer to the idea of intelligent thought. I stated an opinion. That opinion is that this woman will get away with her crime. I stated my reason for having that opinion and seeing as how what I stated is true I think it is a damn good reason f…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 02:25 AM
4

Who else thinks she's going to get away with it? Seeing as how women can murder whomever they want, be it their husbands, boyfriends, or even their children and not spend a day in prison for it...I'm gonna have to go with yeah she'll get away with it.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 09:04 PM
2

Even now you group feminists into one group, and act like feminists who call men barbarians are the rule not the exception. No. What I did was give an example of how the only time feminists are marching through the streets about something it is when they are vilifying men or advocating for women only. By the way, the barbarians signs came from a feminist march of over 3000. That's a pretty big exception. Not all feminists march through the streets, but the ones who do only do these things so the…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:42 PM
2

I didn't say feminists should call themselves MRAs I said they should actively protest and seek to abolish the bigoted laws their movement created. They wouldn't even have to speak to an MRA to do this and if they did, just about every MRA would flock to stand beside them. Instead of the pointless slutwalks that are springing up across the world, spreading the same misandric bullshit feminists have been spreading for 50 years there could be a group of feminists marching down the streets holding …
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:46 PM
2

The fact that feminists have passed bigoted laws has nothing to do with gender equality. You lost me on that one. As I have already pointed out, not all feminists agree, not all MRAs agree. I want to strip the crazy feminists of their power by joining the rational feminists with the rational Men's Rights Advocates to band together on Gender Equality. The fact that there are crazy bigoted laws only proves that its necessary that we do something to strip the bigots of their voices. AGREED. Now go …
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:29 PM
1

Feminism has created bigoted laws that have stripped men of many civil freedoms. That is what I said. That is what I meant. That is what is true. You posted this topic on this reddit in defense of feminism. Now when I give you proof that feminism has done legal harm to men and society you switch it up to "the women's rights movement" I can play switch up to. The women's rights movement is widely known as feminism So I challenge you to find a law specifically passed by the Women's Rights Movement…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:15 PM
4

MRA is a fairly new term. I can point you to many many laws where men have made laws that only give advantages to males That is men. The MRM is not men. The MRM is a movement of men and women. The same men who created laws that advantaged men now create laws that advantage women, because of feminism. The MRM advocates against those men just like they advocate against feminism. Making me search for laws is a time waste, we both know that both groups have bigots, I am not a lawyer and I will not w…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:01 PM
4

No, I will not help you circle jerk. So I am correct in assuming that you cannot find even one law created by MRAs that strips civil freedoms from women? I thought so. Like I said, you can bring up disagreements within the MRM. You can bring up men who hold low views of women within the MRM. You can bring up whatever you want. What you cant bring up, however, is one law that MRAs have created that denies any woman her civil rights. I can bring up many laws created and supported by many good, bad…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 05:12 PM
4

Every domestic violence shelter in california and west virgina actively denied men, boys, and even girls, if those girls were their with fathers instead of mothers, help because they operated under the lie that only men are perpetrators of domestic violence. Because of feminist lies, which led to VAWA, the law did not even recognize men as victims of domestic violence. Everyone who worked in every domestic violence shelter in california and west virgina were mandated to believe or at least opera…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 04:24 PM
5

First of all there is no "proof". There was evidence to suggest but no proof. There is overwhelming evidence to suggest that she lied for money. There is overwhelming evidence to suggest that Kahn's political rivals influenced Kahn's treatment while in America and even a small insinuation that Diallo was being paid off to lie about her accusation. And now...after eight years literally right after the first attempt to destroy Kahn's political career backfired there is another woman "coming forwar…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 10:21 PM
8

Here we go again. It is so obvious now that this was all about destroying his political career and removing him from the IMF. 8 years. 8 fucking years and now ALL OF A SUDDEN because his chances for the presidency were increased after exposing one liar, another alleged victim decides to go after him. I don't care about politics or whether or not Kahn is hated or like. The most sickening thing out of all of this is that these lying money hungry women and these spawn of satan lawyers are all doing…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 07:17 PM
11

I find it interesting how feminists claim that the things printed in the media about Diallo will make it harder for women to come forward. They say that the media is wrong for publishing all of the things that Kahn's investigators found that prove she is a liar. I have a few questions. What about all of the bullshit the media and especially feminists published the same day Kahn was paraded in front of reporters by police? What about all of the feminists parading through the streets with signs sa…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 02:35 PM
3

"You brought up rape culture - the negative pressures on mean that lead to sexual violence are an issue addressed by feminism as well. You walk right up to an issue addressed by feminism and then chortle about how feminists are stupid. The rest of that particular segment goes on to completely miss the point of the 'rape culture' issue - which is something that negatively affects people of all genders. If you want to isolate it as being only an issue about women blaming men for bad things, then y…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 03:15 AM
5

"Patriarchy's negative effects on men includes the negative stereotype that men are too strong or otherwise dominant to be raped - leaving many male victims silent and ashamed." You know what could also be the cause of men staying silent and being ashamed? The hordes of feminists who to this day still claim that only men can rape. It also might be the fact that women couldn't even be legally convicted of rape until about 20 years ago. You can attribute this to your feminist version of patriarchy…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 02:41 AM
6

"Did you not hear a single word that was just said." Seeing as how you are typing, not talking, no. "Male rape is an example of how patriarchy negatively affects men, and is an issue raised by feminists." Male rape is an example of men raping other men. It happens just like women rape other women. Or is women raping other women an example of patriarchy too? "I'll speak very slowly in big words." You mean you'll type very slowly because you're an idiot. "Feminism. Addresses. The issues. Of. How. …
/r/MensRights04/07/11 02:13 AM
3

"Your entire article is a diatribe about 'feminism at its core' and you sloppily cite issues that are in fact arguments for feminism (male rape in particular) but then use them paradoxically to attack feminism" First of all, I did not bring up the issue of male rape in that particular article. Maybe instead of skimming through something that you already made up in your mind you are going to disagree with, you should read the entire thing and then list your disagreements. "as though feminism does…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 02:04 AM
3

"It's interesting that you bring up a lot of the examples of patriarchy issues affecting men that would make someone want to turn to feminism, such as male rape" Actually I think the issue of male rape is one of the main reasons people have begun to see through the hypocritical bullshit of feminism. For example, feminists claim that raping women is encouraged in our culture. This is a lie. Prison rape is encouraged in our culture. MALE prison rape. Hypocrisy much? "but then you babble that femin…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 01:48 AM
3

There is not one strawman attack in my article. The only time the word patriarchy is used from a feminist perspective is when it is used as a definition of men "dominating" or "having power" and "privilege" over women. If you can point me to a feminist group, website, or organization that does not define patriarchy as men having some type of power or privilege over women, whether that power and privilege be intentional or not, then maybe you will have a valid point. But as it stands, the definit…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 01:39 AM
5

"Unfortunately, allowing men to choose whether or not they want to be fathers is not in the best interest of the unborn child." That can happen, it not being in the best interest of the child, but that scenario is not an absolute. Also it is not an advantage over women. "The man could walk out on the woman and child, leaving the woman to shoulder the physical, mental, monetary, and emotional burden of raising a child on her own." A woman can use abortion as birth control regardless of whether or…
/r/MensRights03/07/11 10:40 PM
4

"Don't MRAs and feminists both want gender equality?" No. My reason for believing this is simple.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 07:18 PM
1

Yes. This is why I said cooperation with feminism is not possible.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 01:28 PM
2

I already read your other comment and I agree with it. I just don't feel that what Paul is doing is a personal attack. Also I don't feel that the MRM has anything in common with feminism. Furthermore, I don't want to argue either I was just telling you my difference of opinion and a small part of the reason why I feel cooperation with feminism is not possible if one wishes to find solutions for male issues. Lastly, asking someone to address your argument instead of picking a statement out of it …
/r/MensRights30/06/11 11:38 PM
2

"Sorry I don't but that argument" Well then it's a good thing that wasn't the argument. It's ok though, you don't have to address the actual argument I put forth.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 11:18 PM
19

Now if someone were to comprise a list of the 2000+ ways men are tougher and smarter than women, I'll bet Oprah would be the first to blast the author of the list on her show and brand him or her a sexist. Aren't feminist double standards fun?
/r/MensRights30/06/11 06:11 PM
0

I'm not falling for it.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 05:13 PM
3

There are a lot of things I have learned about feminism over the years that has led me to believe there will never be any middle ground. But I'll just point out one thing that should make it obvious for all. Feminists are pushing to ban men from being able to urinate standing up. They started the Us vs them mentality. Not with feminism vs MRAs but with feminism vs men. There will never be middle ground because they do not want middle ground. Even with their bullshit attempts at trying to look li…
/r/MensRights30/06/11 02:15 PM
2

There are inequalities for both men and women when it comes to gender roles. But the people at this school are more concerned with changing society to fit their worldview rather than teaching equality between men and women. They would rather deny that there are any differences between men and women and promote the idea that heterosexuality is abnormal rather than let children decide for themselves. The faculty does not let children be who they want. The faculty influences children to be what the…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 06:33 PM
2

Exactly and I suspect the faculty of this school already knows this. They have made it obvious that equality isn't their goal and freedom of expression isn't their goal. They only wish to indoctrinate children in an attempt to reshape society to fit their worldview.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 05:49 PM
10

They are women. The law dictates they don't need evidence. Read the constitution.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 04:58 PM
3

I responded to her bigotry a little while ago if anyone is interested.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 03:59 AM
1

I appreciate the honest criticism. I'll admit once I read it over I immediately thought it was pretty long but I meant what I said that it was the last post concerning ozymandias's site I wanted to put on my site so I just said fuck it and put up the whole thing. I'll work on the writing.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 03:57 AM
4

Marcotte only spreads bigoted propaganda about men though. So they'll probably let it slide.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 08:59 PM
3

You got a point....well then I'll make sure I keep a really big stick in my closet :).
/r/MensRights27/06/11 02:27 AM
4

And so the bigoted push to destroy gender begins. All I have to say is this; I'm a fucking man and if I live to see the day when it's illegal to refer to myself as a man, because thought policing fucktards have decided the dick between my legs is a "social construct", I'll shoot the first mother fucker that tries to haul me off to prison.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 07:41 PM
2

Feminists created VAWA. Feminists are pushing for female criminals to no longer receive jail time in the UK. Feminist run domestic violence shelters have routinely denied male victims of abuse any help and actively propagate that there are no male victims or female perpetrators of domestic abuse. Men being the disposable workhorses and bodyguards of society is a problem and that problem has made it easier for feminism to cause the damage it has done. But that in no way absolves feminism of the b…
/r/MensRights22/06/11 10:33 PM
1

"I don't know what you people are bitching about." Neither do the people over at "What about teh menz" Which is why it, like all feminist blogs, will be called out on its BS.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 01:53 PM
3

Well...I was right. I said that they would be unable to call out feminism for its bigotry and they can't. Take a look at the newest post. Mindbeam calls out feminism on its lie about helping everyone but when he gets to his critique of the MRM he says the MRM is wrong because MRAs place the blame for a lot of men's problems on feminism. I feel this will be the running theme of all the contributors. They will speak about some issues men have and complain about the majority of feminists not wantin…
/r/MensRights22/06/11 01:37 PM
1

I hold most of your viewpoint about the blog. Give it a chance? Sure why not. But do I think it will actually work out? Hell no. Because besides my own personal reservations about the creators of the site, most of which to my understanding come from David Futrelle's "manboobz" blog of bigoted hypocrisy, I feel there is one thing that will prevent just about any of the writers there from genuinely addressing male issues. Feminism is the direct cause of many of the problems men face today. Laws an…
/r/MensRights21/06/11 10:04 PM
28

They won't remove the misandrist affiliations because they cannot see the misandry in them. Organizations like men can stop rape, which brands only men as rapists, insinuates that all men are potential rapists by suggesting all men need to be taught not to rape at a young age, and proclaims all men are obligated to be the bodyguards of women, uphold the beliefs of the contributors. They are feminists plain and simple and feminists cannot support the rights of men simply because their core belief…
/r/MensRights21/06/11 02:02 PM
9

I wonder which half of the human species has been the main force designing the buildings mostly everyone everywhere on the planet has lived in since the beginning of the human species? Men were designing and building homes and other establishments before professions like building designers and construction workers were ever created, by men. So to reiterate the point I made with my first comment; feminists, their inferiority complexes not withstanding, see a profession or establishment men have c…
/r/MensRights18/06/11 04:11 AM
9

When over 90% of fatal jobs, like CONSTRUCTION, are not dominated by men because women choose not to go into those fields then feminists can bitch about how things are built. You know, when things are actually built women and EVERYTHING isn't built by men, then feminists can decide. Don't hold your breath for that day to come. No. Instead these bigots are just going to do what they always do; get the government to appease all of their inferiority complex driven gripes and force all of those "ant…
/r/MensRights18/06/11 12:34 AM
8

"One of the girls revealed the attack to a school counselor, who subsequently contacted police. Officers arrested the boys the same day." It's not enough that we arrest grown men because of words. Boys are fair game too. Doesn't matter if you are fourteen or forty. If you have a penis and your accuser has a vagina you are going to be arrested because of words, before anything is proven, before any evidence is gathered, when a woman or girl points, men and boys are locked up.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 06:28 AM
9

Next time she says that ask her if the hordes of women lining up for breast implants feel it's ridiculous that guys check them out. Just sayin.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 04:06 AM
3

I am not a "birther" in fact your comment is the first time I have ever heard the term. What I mostly know about Obama is 1 he is black, like me, and 2 there was this big media controversy over whether or not he was born in the United States. I don't care about politics so those are the two main things I know about Obama and that was the point I was making. I don't know or care whether or not he was born in the United States. I was making the point that that is what the media focuses on, scandal…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 05:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter