TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

joemamafatt02 Archive

View 2 posts and 36 comments by joemamafatt02 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Right, I don't say women are asexual. But what I am saying is that most men are not attractive to women in the slightest, most women would rather be single than with the average Joe. Most women want the extra oomph in a relationship; rosy pettles to be turned on, flowers in a kneeling position and so on. Most men never see the "wild" side of women, so from our perspective as average men, women might as well be asexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 09:55 AM
1

Yup. A lot of people here think I believe women are asexual, they of course aren't. But what I'm saying is that from the percepective of an average guy, most women are basically asexual TO HIM FROM HIM PERCEPECTIVE.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 09:53 AM
1

I think you are either blind or can't read. I didn't say women are asexual, I said that they are PRACTICALLY asexual especially from the percepective of an average guy. I am an average guy, and like most guys, I have never seen the "wild" side of girls that attractive men so often boast about. They might as well be asexual for all I care¯_(ツ)_/¯
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 09:52 AM
9

Shame on you, you're a mysoginistic fat pig for being so fatphobic! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 06:18 AM
8

Exactly. Women are taught from the day they're born that "they deserve nothing but the best" and that "you have a prince charming for you". No wonder women are so shallow, after all, they've been brainwashed by Disney and other fairytales from their childhood that they're absolute princesses.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 06:14 AM
3

The sad truth IMO is that women do have a sex drive but they're just as shallow as guys are. Women want hot looking men to sleep with. See those men on the magazines at the checkout line? Those are the men women are sexually attracted to. The reality is 99.99% of men will never be able to achieve that level of physical look. Yup. My point is, most men do not visually arouse women. This makes them PRACTICALLY asexual, but obviously not technically asexual. If you're only attracted to 0.1% of all …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 06:12 AM
2

Did I say women don't love sex? Seriously, do you even understand what I wrote? I said PRACTICALLY asexual, not actually asexual. What that means if that you have to actively work your ass off to arouse most women, whereas most men get aroused spontaneously. Thus it makes females PRACTICALLY asexual from the point of a man, who has a spontaneous sexual drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 06:11 AM
1

But in first world countries men and women work together daily, like you don’t see waitresses running away from a table if it has men at it. That's not what I'm talking about. In business and work contexts, even where I live, women and men are totally okay with each other. What I'm talking about is casual encounters. Women actively minimize contact with stranger men as if said men are ebola infected.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 06:09 AM
1

The difference is women need more Psychological and mental stimulation to get their juices going. You are just proving my point further. I'm not saying women are incapable of sexual arousal, they totally are. But the fact that is requires so much effort and persuasion, not to mention perfection, to even arouse them makes me believe they are PRACTICALLY and technically asexual. As my analogy said, with enough effort you COULD make a car fly, does that automatically make a car an aeroplane? No, ri…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 06:07 AM
1

Also, the need for sex can be easily ignored and goes away. Hahaha, lol, tell that to men who haven't touched a girl in their entire life. All they think about is sex, pretty much 24×7. Sex is similar to hunger, and sometimes even more powerful.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 03:30 AM
2

You're the exception rather than the rule. You seem to have a spontaneous sexual drive, and that's great! You're what every man dreams for but unfortunately most women don't have a spontaneous sex drive (like men). Most women need a build-up; correct flowers, correct lighting, just the right perfumes etc. Most women aren't turned by Elon Musk talking about AI or by looking at their partners lips. That's why I say MOST women are practically asexual because it's just so difficult for them to be ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 03:29 AM
1

Not being that thirsty makes them PRACTICALLY and EFFECTIVELY asexual because the number of men that can relieve their thirst is basically next to 0
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 03:27 AM
1

The average guy isn’t appealing enough visually Says who? Gay men don't think like that. They're absolutely into all kinds of men. There was literally a video from Cut where people guesses each other's body count. Guess who had the highest body count? A 50 year old gay bear man with 1500+ body counts. He was unattractive in every way, yet got laid more than 99% of perfectly decent straight men will. Men aren't "not appealing enough", women just are PRACTICALLY asexual because it's near impossibl…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:21 PM
1

As in deliberately avoiding small talk with guys or in general minimizing communication with men to the bare minimum possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:19 PM
2

All I'm saying is women are PRACTICALLY asexual, not literally asexual. If you're only attracted to the top 5% of all men, you are PRACTICALLY ASEXUAL.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:18 PM
0

I don't know where you're from, but where I am from, women actively avoid most guys as if guys had some rabid disease on them. It's sad, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:17 PM
2

So if you're "hungry as fuck" and are not willing to eat anywhere but at the finest Michelin rated French artistic restaurant, are you REALLY hungry?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:16 PM
1

Did I say women are asexual? No I didn't. What I'm saying is that women are practically and apparently asexual to your average man. Women however are exceedingly sexual to men who occupy the upper echelon of male beauty. 95% of men are incapable of arousing a woman by his mere appearance and that makes women PRACTICALLY ASEXUAL. If it requires so much effort to turn you on, you are practically asexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:14 PM
4

you could equally say that men are practically hypersexual. Possibly yes. Men are hypersexual, women are hyposexual. Men are aroused by basically anything, and women are aroused by basically nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:09 PM
2

Really? Let me give you an analogy. Imagine there are two men A and B. A claims to be hungry and he's willing to eat even stale bread. B claims to be hungry but is only willing to eat golden 24k French Caviar with baguette from the finest Parisian bakeries. Who would people genuinely consider hungry? A basically every time. Almost everyone would laugh at B for pretending to be hungry.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:05 PM
3

is this historically how your relationships are going? Not really. I'm willing to do all that IF I find a woman who has more to offer than a hole to ejaculate in. In my experience, most women, especially in the West, have very little to offer to men apart from their genitalia. Sad but true.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:01 PM
-3

Women are repelled by most men in that they actively avoid them and minimize contact to as much degree as they can.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:00 PM
-4

But that’s because women can’t judge a man just by how he looks in the gym. It isn’t that she’s decided they aren’t attractive, it’s that she needs to see more of him ‘in action’. You proved my point. Women's sex drives are much more complicated than mens sex drives, that effectively and practically makes them asexual. Let me give you an analogy to better explain my point. Imagine you have a car, and you decide to add to it wings and tail and a turbine after a shit ton of efforts so that it can …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:58 PM
0

I will comment on this reply tho. My sex drive has gone down tremendously for one reson or another and from what I know from certain friends that are comfortable talking about it, I'd say at least 1/3 of men would say they experience something similar and maybe about another third on a lesser level. Yes, men occasionally undergo reduced libido in response to stress and emotions. I'm a guy, and during stressful moments in my life, such as exams or results, I basically became asexual and wouldn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:54 PM
3

If being romantic means spending thousands on a ring, pandering to each and every of her demands, being her emotional tampon, giving away half of my life's hardwork to her, in return for nothing but her vagina, then no thanks I will continue hating on romance. Fact is men have nothing to win from modern relationships; we are expectedly to provide, expected to do equal share of housekeeping, whilst being grateful for her letting us occasionally ejaculate into her. She has to do nothing, she's kwe…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:51 PM
4

I mean yeah, but that's what I'm saying. If a man had a sex drive similar to most women, he'd automatically be considered ASEXUAL by society. Women are practically asexual because what arouses them is so rare and infrequent. I'll say this, I go to a gym, and believe me when I say this, most men find most women attractive there, but most women don't find most men attractive. It's how it is. Being a male is hard, be it human, polar bear, lion, elephant seals etc. We have to work hard for females, …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:46 PM
1

Not really. I'm not saying women are asexual, but what I'm saying is that a man who had a sex drive similar to the way women have WOULD BE CONSIDERED ASEXUAL. The fact that women don't find 95+% of men attractive is proof that women are practically asexual. Finding the top 5% of men attractive makes you PRACTICALLY asexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:44 PM
3

Then why is the decrease in sex drive not true for men? Men sustain a stable sex drive despite their own pressures be those financial or other. It's not like men don't have struggles.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:42 PM
7

Yes. Most women are chadsexual, not heterosexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:41 PM
1

Yeah you're somewhat right. The thing is, when humans were hunter gatherers, superior males ruled over large territories not because they were stronger or bigger, but because they were charismatic, domineering and brutal. This meant that they could subjugate beta males into fair servitude, where they would work for him in return of a share in the hunting and the females. These beta males never did an uprising because they were happy with the status quo of a ruling alpha chad as they got a share …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 09:59 AM
1

Not really. That's not how society worked and works. Back when humans were hunter gatherers, "Chad's" as we call them today ruled over swathes of territory, where he and his associates hunted. This "Chad" hoarded women and the ones he didn't (less attractive women), he gave them over to beta males who worked for him in return of a share in the hunting and females.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 09:56 AM
1

Pussy is pseudo-abudant. Technically, there's no lack of pussy, but that's where you get it wrong. Women have historically and currently, artificially limited sex to artificially inflate the value of pussy. Pussy is a clear example of an artificially inflated commodity. It's everywhere yet it technically is out of the reach for like 90% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 09:54 AM
1

Yes that happened, and that was the original purpose of religion, to fairly redistribute the women. Left unchecked and without religion, as is in the West today, women naturally gravitate towards the same group of "Chad's". This is no surprise really. The only reason most men got to reproduce was because of marraige. Now that people have forsaken religion, we can clearly observe humanity regressing back towards its hunter gatherer past.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 09:52 AM
1

Yeah, and they aren't monogamous in the slightest. Quite the opposite, they're polyamorous all the way. Chimpanzees and bonobos are known to fuck around like crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 09:49 AM
1

Really? Humans are monogamous? Our monogamy is an example of enforced monogamy. Religion and culture has inculcated the idea of monogamy into our minds. If you look around yourself, you'll see that sexual frustration and sexual dissatisfaction steadily increases as years go on in a long term monogamous relationship. How else do you explain why people get less interested in their partner over years? If we were "the most monogamous species" then surely we would be satisfied by one sexual partner f…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 09:48 AM
1

Really? Then how do you explain the growing trend of sexless males whilst the number of sexless women has steadily decreased since the sexual revolution of the 60s? The only logical conclusion is that a few men are hoarding and having sex with a large majority of women. In essence, most women are attracted to the same kind of man- tall, athletic, and domineering, which is a rare combination.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 09:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter