TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jostler57 Archive

View 26 posts and 721 comments by jostler57 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
375

Progressjostler57/r/MensRights23/09/19 05:13 PM
372

Edu./Occu.jostler57/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:14 AM
242

Discriminationjostler57/r/MensRights25/05/16 01:33 AM
227

jostler57/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:22 PM
180

jostler57/r/MensRights22/12/13 12:15 PM
97

Questionsjostler57/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:34 AM
43

Legal Rightsjostler57/r/MensRights02/01/18 01:44 AM
42

Feminismjostler57/r/MensRights20/11/17 09:01 AM
38

Legal Rightsjostler57/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:54 AM
37

jostler57/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:54 AM
26

Social Issuesjostler57/r/MensRights07/12/18 06:54 PM
17

Opinionjostler57/r/MensRights08/01/15 08:18 PM
16

Discriminationjostler57/r/MensRights27/09/18 03:39 AM
14

Discriminationjostler57/r/MensRights16/05/18 12:34 PM
7

jostler57/r/MensRights05/12/13 04:39 AM
6

Social Issuesjostler57/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:21 PM
6

Social Issuesjostler57/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:12 PM
4

jostler57/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:40 AM
4

jostler57/r/MensRights21/12/13 02:32 AM
2

Satirejostler57/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:35 AM
2

jostler57/r/MensRights19/09/14 11:49 PM
1

jostler57/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:28 PM
1

jostler57/r/MensRights15/01/15 04:11 AM
1

Progressjostler57/r/MensRights24/01/21 02:05 PM
0

jostler57/r/MensRights25/01/15 06:07 PM
0

jostler57/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:21 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

My brother is in WA state and is living on the streets. He has schitzo-affective disorder and a meth addiction. He claims the self-medication drug quiets the voices, but it causes so many other issues. He has tried medication for SAD, but it renders him a vegetable pissing himself in bed. He lost his jobs over and over due to the SAD > medication rollercoaster. America is in-between a drug epidemic and mental health crisis, and the current safety net system slips nearly all affected through the …
/r/MensRights16/12/23 03:12 PM
1

Your username doesn't help :D
/r/MensRights05/12/23 04:12 AM
3

Google says it's the title of a song by Slayer, which is supposedly about the Vietnam war. But, since it's not capitalized in the article... maybe not?
/r/MensRights23/11/23 03:53 AM
15

I'm over in Taiwan and married a wonderful woman here, but I'm from the US. Met her in the US, actually. Maybe she's a Passport Sis, or whatever the girl version of Bro would be. She's highly educated, fairly talented, highly skilled, and her family is well off. Plus she's pretty, to boot. My buddy also went abroad to Europe and came back with a wife. I think expanding our horizons is a good thing, and women should embrace it & do the same. Let's intermix this world so much that cultures get com…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 04:37 AM
3

Having grown up participating in Cub and Boy Scouts, this shit makes me so enraged. It's one of the best outlets for boys to really feel strong and knowledgeable, and when adults take advantage of them during their outings, it simply ruins that child's avenue for security and strength. I never heard of anybody I knew going through anything like this, so maybe our group was one of the lucky ones. It's so sad to hear about this stuff happening.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 07:09 AM
3

Everyone is a good person at heart, until they aren't. My meth-head, thief of a brother is a good person at heart, until he steals and lies and ruins shit. Protect yourself from toxicity. Don't let someone drag you down with them. When the baby is born, you may have to file for exclusive parental guardianship (after a DNA paternity test!).
/r/MensRights02/11/23 10:43 AM
3

This title is stupid. Hugh Jackman is a human, and humans can change. Nobody is off-limits to having changing emotions.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 05:24 AM
2

If she's carrying men's sins, then she's a man who sins.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 10:45 AM
31

God damn! After 20 freaking years, I hope that man can finally peel the leech off his wallet. She sounds like trash.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:32 PM
2

Bears wearing wigs and dresses.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 05:25 AM
1

It's all good haha -- but you'll need to delete this current post and try again. There are Link posts and there are Text posts. Be sure to select Link, and put that website in the appropriate link section; not the title (as it is now). Titles are only for words, and links don't work inside titles. Hope this helps!
/r/MensRights11/11/22 08:16 PM
3

Somebody forgot to make this a link post...
/r/MensRights11/11/22 07:57 PM
5

Tricksy ladyses trying to get my precious! -UK Police
/r/MensRights23/10/22 05:54 AM
10

This is the most hilariously misplaced bot I've ever seen on Reddit, and I've been here over 11 years.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:09 AM
3

Sounds lovely. Just the type of shit to force down our throats. Disney has been becoming more and more extreme feminist, and it's blatant when they repeatedly bash us over the heads with this nonsense. Yeesh. Good on you for pirating -- I do the same for most of their stuff, nowadays.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 10:40 AM
2

Glad I haven't watched it, then. I've given a Go to nearly all the new marvel TV shows, but some have had such trash writing, I've decided to not even start until I've read reviews. Sounds like She Hulk will remain unwatched.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 09:46 AM
5

Worse than the garbage that was Ms. Marvel?
/r/MensRights23/09/22 09:03 AM
1

I mean, it's also a piece of some religions to avoid sex before marriage, so anyone saying it's misogynistic to want virgins is also shitting all over those religious beliefs.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:19 PM
9

That's not a act of strength for which to be proud, as you wish, but instead of willful ignorance and purposeful refusal to see your logical flaws.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:06 AM
0

I've been married for 5 years, dating since 8 years. I have a stable and happy marriage, and we have sex whenever we both more-or-less feel like it. No games or work needed.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:04 AM
2

No. Your comment history shows you spammed this same nonsense to others in totally different subs and context. Begone, strange troll.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 02:12 AM
7

From Wikipedia: He holds a doctorate in clinical psychology, though he ceased renewing his license to practice psychology in 2006.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 01:40 AM
201

You purposely skipped an important sentence that was written between those two sentences: "When he was apprehended, he was bleeding from his back and stomach." It could very well be he was yet another victim.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 02:17 PM
3

Man... that was incredible to hear. Fantastic speaker, and I'm glad he's fighting for men's rights. Those family courts are better dubbed "kangaroo courts."
/r/MensRights07/07/22 03:21 AM
2

Yes, and that's how I grew up -- do something shitty? Mom is bringing you to their house to apologize. However, there is one important difference that warrants the headline: This mom did it for the whole world to see, using social media to figuratively throw her son under the bus.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:39 AM
17

I'm on the fence about this, because I agree with a harsh lesson to mitigate shit behavior in children, but on the other hand, her making it public was just plain wrong. Parents shouldn't be world-wide publicly shaming their children; it's traumatic. If she had simply done the punishment minus the egregious social media being attached, then it would've been perfection. However, since she did, now it's going to cost them in future therapy.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:44 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwIFMCKlVK8 edit After reviewing your comment history, actually, I'm just gonna straight up add you to my Ignore list. You add literally zero value to Reddit. You're a time waster troll, and your account's entire online presence is just to harass and annoy people. Screw you.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 02:08 PM
9

How about no. You slinging "incel" and "virgin" name-calling is absolutely off-track, pointless drivel. It's harmful to people with real arguments, and makes anyone who actually cares about this stuff cringe. Just stop. That's more harm than good, so much so, just go away. Just go.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 01:45 PM
3

What is this? A sentence for ants?!
/r/MensRights14/06/22 11:44 PM
0

What does that change about my message and intent? I stand by what I said, especially because Dyslexic children often get poor grades in school.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 08:09 AM
1

I'm a new teacher at a Montessori school. I think boys, on the average, will flourish and develop better in a well-executed Montessori school. It gives them the freedom to move around and make mistakes. No tests or scores to worry about. Might want to give it a look see.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 09:49 AM
88

I'd rather we not fight toxicity with toxicity. Rather, with logic and reasoning.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 03:41 PM
170

How to D ismantle A W oman's N arrative
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:09 PM
2

I totally did reply to the wrong person... sorry! Deleted and replied to the correct person, now. For some reason I misread usernames and thought you were the same person.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 12:13 PM
23

2 or 3 days between mass shootings? You didn't put an /s so I assume you're trying to be serious. Mass Shooting definition: a shooter kills at least four victims. Using this definition, one study found that nearly one-third of the world's public mass shootings between 1966 and 2012 (90 of 292 incidents) occurred in the United States. Using a similar definition, The Washington Post records 163 mass shootings in the United States between 1967 and June 2019. If you want to change the definition, th…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 12:12 PM
6

The first Aquaman is the first time I ever even knew who Heard was, so I had no bias in place at the time. That's a preface to say I thought she acted as well as a log. Like, an inanimate log hewn from a local tree could've acted as well as her. She brought nothing to that role. I could've put on a wig, stuffed a bra, and done a better job. I'm a semi-professional actor, so I'm coming at this analysis from the craft of acting side. She sucks.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 01:54 PM
6

God DAMN it! I'm a professionally trained actor, and love Mamet's works, in general. Hate that he's ruining his reputation by spouting dumb bullshit in his old age. He should've just stfu and let the world continue to enjoy his works. Now he's tainted it all with a tinge of fucking stupidity.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 03:06 PM
2

It pains me You can blame your pain on this woman.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:14 AM
45

Holy fuck, I thought they were joking! This is blatant bullshittery. Misandry is in the law books!
/r/MensRights04/04/22 01:34 PM
2

That's horrible to hear, but luckily unless your dick is severely lacking in nerve endings, you'll know. That'd have to be some Houdini magic to sneak it off at the precise climax moment and still get it back in there without me noticing.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:29 PM
1

I'm getting downvoted just because of Reddit hivemind following the "victim blame" narrative that doesn't exist in this instance. For the downvoters: are you really a victim of robbery and assault if you constantly give an untrustworthy stranger a knife, wave your full-of-cash wallet in their face, put their handheld knife to your own neck, and then declare they must get away from you and not steal your money? You'll eventually run into someone who'll take your shit. Get a clue.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:47 AM
-9

Don't play the victim card here -- that's moronic and hypocritical of everything we espouse here. Sex with untrustworthy people has been like this since the dawn of humans. Protect your dick, because nobody else will. If you're in a long-term relationship with a trustworthy person then do what you like. Anything else and you better wrap it up or be in control at climax. Period.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 11:58 PM
21

Sorry, this is such an asinine post I cannot help it: If a man is having unprotected sex, AND not in a 100% controlled position (uncontrolled position: such as girl on top), and he proceeds to climax but request the girl to move, this is utter stupidity. PROTECT YOURSELF, MEN! You cannot rely on your sexual partner to do anything in the heat of the moment. Your dick is your responsibility, because this world is going to try to take take take things away from you. Put a god damn condom on if you …
/r/MensRights28/03/22 10:58 PM
-1

Got a reading comprehension deficiency? YOUR TITLE IS CLICK BAIT. It's not an informative title. I've reported your post for the garbage title.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 08:39 AM
-1

Seriously? Click bait title? Go away.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 08:23 AM
1

Umm, is their country China? Female infantcide happens in China... Maybe the education thing is true in some middle eastern countries. This book is pretending we either live 300 years in the past, or in some totalitarian shithole country.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:12 PM
5

Ahh, that makes sense. I thought it must be an edit -- I was so confused! Yeah, just saying "any female" is insanity.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 12:27 AM
12

In their defense, they did say "any female who sexually harasses you" as a qualifier. Did nobody else see those words?
/r/MensRights07/02/22 12:12 AM
3

Much funnier with video https://youtu.be/6HVvagEMLEU
/r/MensRights04/02/22 05:08 AM
21

No grunting?! Like, that's the natural sound people make when something is physically hard to do. And lifting weights should be physically hard to do, or else you're (probably) not working hard enough. What an asinine rule!
/r/MensRights28/01/22 06:32 AM
22

Should we tell him it's on Friday?
/r/MensRights14/11/21 11:54 PM
82

Isn't it on the 19th?
/r/MensRights14/11/21 11:53 PM
2

Are you trolling? Is this a troll account? Are you literally not seeing the LITERAL PUPPET at the start of the video? You blind, bro? Literally no eyes, or something? Puppet isn't used as a metaphor you galumphing ignoramus.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 11:12 PM
1

Oh, I'm a fool because I want you to link to the relevant part? You actually think the murder-puppet skit and random banter at the beginning are important 'facts' we all need to see? Get a clue - just a single clue - on how to link a video. You literally wasted 5 minutes of everybody's time who stopped to watch the video. Now that's foolish.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 10:23 PM
-1

Christ on a cracker /u/ThePigmanAgain At least skip this asinine video to the appropriate starting point. Had to sit through 4.75 minutes of this drivel just to get to what the hell you're talking about in the title: https://youtu.be/7eQ6AGSUoEg?t=285 FFS this video sucks. Fox is trash.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:57 PM
8

Love and Christianity is our way to go. Even though we cannot tolerate hate and attack from feminists anyone. Fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 01:21 AM
8

I'll save everyone the click: That guy is a new account dedicated to hating women, only.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 12:32 AM
3

A tip is before you post in any sub, double check their post rules and requirements. This sub has a rule to have descriptive titles.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 10:54 PM
3

If it's worth reading, then it's worth writing a title. Neglecting to do so is lazy clickbait.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:56 PM
6

Seriously, some people of any gender take up too much space when in a crowded area.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 10:37 AM
2

My buddy's wife didn't officially take his name. My wife didn't officially take mine, either. Then again, I married a woman from Taiwan, and have been living over in Asia for the duration of the marriage, thus far. If it makes life easier in the States, when we move there maybe she'll take it for the sake of an easier life.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 12:03 AM
3

What the? Are you that same kid from the gaming sub? You are! You stalked my profile and then came here to harass me? Wowza kid. Well, that's getting a swift Report to the admins. Maybe grow up a bit and keep our discussion to one part of the internet.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 02:04 PM
1

Let's see what happens. Here's what I predict: If they pay the higher wages and recoup the costs in revenue, and it's naturally sustainable, then great. If they pay the higher wages, but can't recoup the costs in revenue, then the female team will collapse. It'll either need a bailout, or it'll just go away forever.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 08:43 AM
10

Your anecdotal evidence is noted, but changes nothing. Did you watch the full video?
/r/MensRights30/08/21 01:25 PM
7

I think it's shitty of her to cheat on her husband. I also think sex work should be made legal and taxable. It's just stupid to keep it illegal.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:31 AM
2

This isn't a men's problem. Who fucking cares? Men don't spend as much money on clothes and crap, hence women get more crap in shops directed at them.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 05:06 AM
1

Thanks for the Batman theme song at the beginning, there. It really helped to set the tone. Your "hypothesis" argument isn't new or original; that's precisely the argument I'm saying doesn't work in this situation. To understand it, you must first realize that art imitates reality. In reality, can we find women smacking men during arguments? Yes, we can. This is why I said you have posed a "non-question." Art reflects reality, so can we pervert the art to not-reflect reality? Doesn't work that w…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 03:39 AM
1

Childishness name-calling doesn't suit you, try to rise above it and be a better human. Also, go learn how to analyze and appreciate art, because everything you've said is so incredibly naive and off the mark, it's pointless to attempt an adult argument with you. You're merely capable of childish arguments.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:23 AM
1

You lost all credibility when you got the message of Fight Club so incredibly wrong it's a waste of my time to discuss any sort of art analysis with you. That's a super simple message and you got it terribly wrong, which leads me to believe you're either trolling me or you can't grasp simple concepts.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 05:30 PM
1

Your examples are anecdotal and based on your own feelings. My examples are based on historical, logical debate from philosophers. Your interpretation of art's meaning is superficial at best. I don't have the time to teach you how to understand art, so suffice it to say I completely disagree with you, and you'll have to pick up a book or class on art appreciation/history to keep up.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 04:23 PM
1

Who said we're embracing it? I'm saying it's just a fact of reality and that's why art follows life. It's called Mimesis and it's an idea as far back as Plato. Sure, there are arguments for anti-mimesis, but I'd argue that art mostly reflects life, while only a small minority of life reflects art. Since I've also studied art history, I can tell you that, in fact, Van Gogh was imitating reality in his art. Everything you've mentioned is a reflection of life, and come on -- especially Fight Club. …
/r/MensRights06/06/21 11:58 AM
1

I'm saying your suggestion is the equivalent of asking, "What would happen if the salesman in Death of a Salesman was a woman?" I mean... sure, we can ask those types of questions, but with your intentions, they're fruitless. Art reflects life -- not the other way around. You're attempting to force art to not reflect life as it is. In our world, women slap men with impunity. So, she is reflecting real life and that's why it worked. You cannot flip this scenario, because you're asking for the opp…
/r/MensRights06/06/21 10:33 AM
1

I get your intention, but it's misplaced here. Their given circumstances includes their relationship and character traits. You cannot just flip a written story and ask what would happen. You're asking a non-question, because that situation doesn't exist. In real life, do men slap women? Sometimes. What're the given circumstances? In real life, do women slap men? Sometimes. What're the given circumstances? I assure you, there are plenty of auditions where a man would act violently to a woman and …
/r/MensRights06/06/21 09:42 AM
1

Well, it's all about being in the moment -- truly acting like the character. When the girl slapped me, it was improvised, but it was perfect because my character was being horrible. Then we decided to keep it. I didn't look at it as being abused -- I viewed it as perfecting and elevating an artistic moment. I would be extremely surprised if DiCaprio felt abused. I wouldn't be surprised if he felt similarly to how I felt.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 09:26 AM
5

I'm a professionally trained, and semi-professional actor. I'll be honest, an improvised slap during an audition is low, but I wouldn't rule it out. This is art they're creating - they're working off of each other to make a scene. If a slap is going to make the scene better, then that's what it's gonna get. Auditions are a time for actors to create a compelling character living the given circumstances in the moment. This slap might've hurt a bit, but they're both adult artists. I just did a shor…
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:43 AM
3

Believe it when I see it. I don’t like getting my hopes up.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 03:41 PM
2

Culture critic “That Umbrella Guy” has more details here: TUG alleges that his sources tell him that the Australia government is now coordinating with the FBI. What? You don’t want to get gritty hearsay info from a youtuber?! Or from OP’s link that regurgitates everything we already know to make for a copy-paste-at-best / shoddy-link-promotion-at-worst article? I can’t imagine why... /s
/r/MensRights01/05/21 05:01 AM
24

Oh dearest me, a whole month in jail and then being watched sometimes? The horror. Fucking cunt punt that bitch back in jail for another 5 years. She deserves it.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 04:06 AM
20

That fucking cunt should get the maximum sentence the man could’ve gotten. What a sack of shit.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 04:04 AM
2

She stabbed him with a spoon, obviously. /s
/r/MensRights15/04/21 01:02 AM
8

The article you posted has zero information about the father or anything even about a man at all. It doesn't even mention whether she's a single mother or not. Could you provide a better source with information regarding the father? If not, this has zero to do with this sub. It's just a about an insane murderer lady.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 01:51 PM
14

That’s racist against us Scots! /s
/r/MensRights08/04/21 01:04 AM
1

Ah. Well, I believe Poe's Law applies in this instance, in my defense.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 07:03 AM
3

Ooh, this was done as a stunt? Honestly, I’m American — I don’t know individual UK politicians, so I appreciate you pointing out what she’s doing. Okay, so if this is all a 1000 IQ strategy to showcase the absurdity of the situation, then she deserves applause.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 01:20 PM
1

edit someone below pointed out she’s doing this as a ruse to highlight the absurdity. I retract my original sentiment. Sounds like Green Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb is a cunt. To be fair, though, I’d be for a similar, edited version of that proposed bill if it were only for places where public spaces currently discriminate and shun women. I watched a video a few years back where, in one Muslim majority town in France women weren’t allowed in public, at all, without a man with them, and were 10…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 09:33 AM
1

Happy 50% of the world’s population day!
/r/MensRights11/03/21 08:51 AM
30

They’ll just auto-ban you. You won’t even be able to post again. Better to post the link along with your message, initially.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 10:03 AM
162

Few years back I said “Happy women’s day!” on women’s day. Tons of happy replies and thumbs up. Same year I said “happy men’s day!” on men’s day. A somewhat-buddy of mine virtue signaled by saying “men are trash.” That was the only activity on the post. Yeesh...
/r/MensRights08/03/21 05:27 AM
2

Yeah... I messaged the mods about this. It’s blatantly a rumor dressed up as fact, so I requested a moratorium on “Heard being fired” articles until it’s actually proven. Mods said they’ll help out and disallow this sort of nonsense until hard evidence is given.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 02:52 AM
2

I mean to say, the Reddit user OP added the words “if this is true,” because the article title, itself, has the word “confirmed.” I still think OP is a moron for posting this article in the first place - merely saying at least they had the capacity to also write “if this is true,” to marginally contest the article’s title.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 02:28 AM
1

I’ve read some of Jill Dolan’s work... she is incredibly intelligent. She covers some dense concepts, so I quite often had to reread paragraphs I had just read. Jill Dolan is probably the more well-renowned of the two. I know many feminists follow her work.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 01:26 PM
2

Yeah, I agree with that -- but I disagree that they're "not remotely the same." My position is very simple: They are the same general story, thus, very much the same.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 10:04 AM
0

Oh, for sure -- I totally agree that Rough Night wouldn't work the other way around. However, for us to stay on track -- let's recap: In response to "Very Bad Things" being likened to Rough Night, you said, "Thats (sic) not remotely the same." And I said I disagree, while listing all the same plot lines and illustrating how they are, in fact, the same movie plot for at least the first 1/2 of the story. To summarize: On a bachelor(ette) party in a popular party city, while in their hotel room and…
/r/MensRights23/02/21 04:14 AM
1

You drawing a fine line between a dark comedy being a-ok and a pure comedy being off-limits is asinine. They’re the same story dressed up in different clothing. Rough Night is executed poorly while Very Bad Things was executed well.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 06:36 PM
29

I'll be illegally downloading it, personally. I enjoy DC comics, although most of their movies aren't up to snuff, but I dislike Heard as both an actress and a human, so illegal downloading is what I'll do.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 12:19 PM
3

To their credit, they did say “if this is true,” but that just raises further questions and issues. I reported this post to the mods, and also sent a separate direct message to the mods about this overall issue of unconfirmed “news” being passed off as confirmed.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 11:04 AM
-1

Hmm... I disagree. Very Bad Things was a dark comedy, for certain, but that's just how it was written - that's the style. (trailer for comparison) By the way, I loved VBT... saw it multiple times. This chick-flick is the same exact idea, just as a pure comedy without the dark side, so it's written as a pure comedy. Even in the trailer you linked, though, they do seem to take the death seriously, but in a comedic-styled plot way. What I mean is, in the dark comedy version, they deal with the corp…
/r/MensRights22/02/21 06:33 AM
154

HOLD THE FUCKING PHONE: This website is a joke of typos & grammatical errors, is full of ads, and offers ZERO links to proof of the firing. They say the ‘prestigious Forbes magazine’ has a quote about it, but doesn’t provide a link, because they copy/pasted from another website: IndieWire, which also isn't an original source! Also, they spelled repercussions like this: but there were no reprocutions For FUCKS SAKE, here’s the Forbes article that mentions it in passing with ZERO FUCKING CONFIRMAT…
/r/MensRights22/02/21 04:04 AM
19

It’s not official. The douche who wrote the YT title is literally lying. It’s 100% not official and they even said it’s some rumors on social media, based on the change.org petition. I’d love for Amber Heard to lose all her jobs and sponsorships, but these fake-news, sensationalist titled videos aren’t anything but rumor-mills.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 07:21 AM
12

Wow, that "journalist" is a biased asshole.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 03:46 PM
6

That's very closed-minded of you. Everybody has the potential for greatness; doesn't matter what's in their pants. You have to first listen, and then judge.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 05:09 AM
7

SCIENCE. Fuck yeah!
/r/MensRights21/01/21 05:00 PM
10

It sounds like your biggest complaint is that he only eats meat. What does your opinion on his diet have to do with the video? I think your non-sequitur comment is mainly what has caused the downvotes.
/r/MensRights15/01/21 05:23 AM
3

At over 2 hours long, I won't be able to watch the whole thing. Anyone have a TL;DW summary?
/r/MensRights10/01/21 05:14 AM
1

In many places it’s legally required to inform others that you’re recording, else it’s not legally usable evidence. So, there again comes the initial question - is it legal to do so? Your reply was a non-answer.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 05:14 AM
2

Are we legally allowed to simultaneously record using our own device?
/r/MensRights08/01/21 04:18 AM
2

I’m certain you’re right that there’s some correlation between the two.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 04:23 PM
3

I think the Gillette ad wasn’t due so much to opinion pieces, as it was the CEO of Gillette being an anti-male feminist.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 03:56 PM
5

Do you have a source on that? I'd love to read up on these opinion pieces' causal relationship on laws.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 02:16 PM
16

Yeah, in 2014 they made some major expansions and focused on crap articles targeted towards 18-35 year olds just to get revenue. They went from journalists to bull-shit artists for money.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 12:50 PM
71

Journalism: the occupation of reporting, writing, editing, photographing, or broadcasting news or of conducting any news organization as a business. Most of Vice isn’t news; it’s opinion pieces. Calling it journalism is a stretch - they stink.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 11:09 AM
2

On the plus side: I’m a Seattleite and can pronounce Puyallup, so we got that going for us.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 04:52 AM
4

This is so insane, the article names the criminal offense: after she pleaded guilty to one count of first-degree child rape and one count of second-degree child rape. Yet KOMO News headline says “sex.”
/r/MensRights31/12/20 04:06 AM
7

Mmhmm
/r/MensRights25/12/20 05:00 AM
1

Once again you’re like a solo volleyball player setting up your own spike (note: can’t do that); you’re making a claim and then backing it up with utter non sequitur garbage. This is you: “A = B, therefore A = C.” Furthermore “What everyone in this sub does not realize” is such a hilariously blanket phrase, only a “____ist” would say it; you can fill that blank with any kind of person who thinks they’re superior to others, but in this case it’s called “misandrist.” Get off your high horse; you c…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 02:54 AM
14

Sounds like you’ve got an airtight defense there bec— oh wait, no... no you don’t. You’ve just set up some BS rhetoric that provides an unearned conclusion. Men dying in war is the result of men controlling power Says who? You? Your feminist theory teacher? You think for one hot second that women in power would send women to war? Or, do you naively think all war would end if women were in total power? Men have the jobs, so men have more workplace injuries You’ve got a cute non-sequitur going the…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 06:28 PM
3

Your belief or disbelief doesn’t change facts. Goes to show you don’t base thought in logic, but feeling. Go away. Shoo.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 08:07 AM
5

I’ve extensively studied feminism, I don’t need you regurgitating what you’ve learned. Here: https://pwestpathfinder.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Mens-Rights-Infographic-1.jpg
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:53 AM
13

Sounds like somebody took a university class. You know it’s all just rhetoric, right? There’s financial motivations to keep people thinking that way and “feminism” in the mainstream. If feminism actually gave two shits about men’s rights, they’d be fighting for men’s rights. Hint: they don’t.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:45 AM
16

That’s like... the definition of an Internet troll. “Have patience with the quarrelsomeness of the stupid. It’s not easy to comprehend that one does not comprehend.” -Marie von Ebner Eschenbach
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:42 AM
2

The comment cooldown is to stop spammers of new subs. It seems you’ve gotten enough downvotes and you’re a small enough account for the system to flag you as a potential troll. While I understand your hackneyed reply, as it’s so often thrown out, it goes both ways. Men don’t come forward because they’re often thrown in jail for any offense and often enough without proof. What’s worse for society? People who feel mildly dissuaded to coming forward for legitimate issues, or people being ripped out…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 02:10 AM
3

Now this is an excellent post! Thanks for sharing!
/r/MensRights15/12/20 05:34 PM
281

And of fucking-course the accusers' names aren't provided in full. False/disproven accusations that can literally put people in prison and ruin their lives need to have the same responsibility and repercussions for wrong-doing applied. You falsely accuse, you owe the the state your time and the accused your money. edit I’ve heard one very good point that needs to be mentioned: This man didn’t have necessarily false accusations, more that the accusations didn’t meet the legal requirement for sexu…
/r/MensRights15/12/20 01:45 PM
1

So... they’re completely different schools, with completely different management practices/policies, and completely different situations. Can you understand why comparing the two scenarios is apples to oranges?
/r/MensRights14/12/20 02:34 AM
2

in the neighboring all-girls school Were the schools managed by the same principal and administration?
/r/MensRights13/12/20 05:40 PM
8

Super agree with everything: India is never important enough to American media, and those are some major events. Why is this posted in MensRights, though?
/r/MensRights11/12/20 07:12 AM
10

I’d be like “do you think Pakistani people can’t be racist against Indians just because India is a bigger country? Or Palestinians cannot be racist against Israeli people? You think racism is a bubble in America where racism has limits? You’re dreaming.”
/r/MensRights07/12/20 12:27 PM
10

That’s a damn good point.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 03:52 AM
5

My grandma is extremely hard of hearing, and she’s also legally blind, so she can’t watch TV. She listens to the radio like 13 hours a day at maximum volume. It would be a tragedy if the government intervened and took her to jail just because she has NO OTHER MEANS OF ENTERTAINMENT IN HER LIFE. She can’t even go out walking, anymore, because she’s frail and would fall down. This article pisses me off that a government could do something so heinous as arrest an elderly person for being hard of he…
/r/MensRights30/11/20 06:06 AM
8

Certainly interesting! I wonder if there are similar studies for other countries, as well. Also, the question at the end whether the women are responding to initial violence from males can have the opposite question asked about male DV statistics.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 10:54 AM
7

Jesus... that's horrible. I'm sorry to hear you're going through that. That's really hard to fight, too, because it's simply a he-said-she-said situation, especially one wherein sex is a common and expected act. I hope justice is properly served in your case.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 04:51 AM
63

Holy shit! Let this be a lesson to us all: Take selfies 3+ times a day (just do it at your meals) and upload that shit to the cloud, or a hard drive, and/or just leave it on your phone (even better if you have the space). Good lord - the asinine things we gotta go though just to not get screwed.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 06:05 PM
12

What a crock of shite. Men have kids, too. Men need to improve their skills and training, too. You're right, it's all just bullshit. By the way, I think people were downvoting you a lot, earlier, because they think you are defending the cash to women only.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 01:55 PM
12

It's up to $5000 for unemployed women who have been affected by Covid-19 and whose application is approved by the government So, what about the unemployed men who have been affected by Covid-19 — can they even apply to the government? If no, then that’s where we find inequality.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 01:39 PM
2

A little too ironic...
/r/MensRights16/11/20 04:50 AM
7

I really dislike when people use parenthesis but forget to put the 2nd one (like in OP's title, for example
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:34 PM
7

There’s no excuse for such childish responses.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 04:22 AM
19

Please don’t hold the system responsible for their own mechanisms to use slave labor in developing countries. Blame human nature!
/r/MensRights14/11/20 04:20 AM
20

Agreed. Specifically he, Rush Limbaugh, doesn’t get a sympathy pass. It’s like, should we have sympathy for the worst people in the world? Maybe a shred if you’re the easily sympathetic type, but for everyone else - nah. Not for him. I mean, let’s not piss on his grave or anything, but he lost any chance for sympathy many years ago.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 02:28 PM
14

Instructions unclear: Wallet is now inside the local voting box...
/r/MensRights12/11/20 03:08 PM
84

Canada has been like this for a while... they’re one of the worst in the world for this shit. Think of like how bad Saudi Arabia divorce* must be for women... the opposite is true for men in Canada. *edit
/r/MensRights12/11/20 09:13 AM
223

Okay, this is the... what... 30th time this petition has been posted here? I’m all for it, however — I have a further suggestion: If they decide to keep Ms. Heard, simply refuse to spend money on Warner Bros. Make it vocal as to why. This petition coupled with lower revenue might help them connect the dots.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 08:34 AM
5

Look, I know where this is going. I saw your post history. Nobody wants to join the garbage subreddits you just created. Quit trying to build up a problem that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 02:52 PM
4

Oh... you're a child. Sorry, I didn't realize I was talking to a kid. It all makes sense now.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 02:43 PM
4

So let me get this straight: The mods need to retire because you have a newer account? Is that your full argument? Counter-argument: No, they don't. You just need to have patience to get your account and/or posts good enough for this place.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 02:29 PM
17

Why are you constantly making posts that need approval? Sounds like an issue on your end, not theirs. Generally, posts need mod approval only if they break some auto-mod rule.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 01:43 PM
96

Father, I hunger. Feed me steak!
/r/MensRights26/10/20 05:40 AM
33

So his agenda was humor. I knew he had an agenda!
/r/MensRights23/10/20 12:35 PM
82

So sayeth the law.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 12:34 PM
11

Damn... you're probably right. Never thought about it that way before -- it's all just some perception thing.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 03:36 AM
30

I’ve been loving Sia for over 15 years. Saw her in concert a long time ago, and it was extremely memorable. At first, I thought - why the hell is this important? Who cares what a celebrity thinks?! But, after some thought, Sia is an extremely popular singer and women/girls look up to her in a lot of ways. It’s nice to see someone in her position make a stand for what’s right. Hopefully more women will see that post/tweet and follow suit to believe the truth, not the gender. On a side note, thoug…
/r/MensRights17/10/20 01:43 AM
28

Your anecdotal evidence is shortsighted by a long shot. Here’s a thought: Why don’t you provide some research findings on the topic? If you can’t do that, you’re just a shortsighted troll. I’m a teacher, and the entire system is set up in a way that puts boys in a position to fail.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 02:39 AM
136

Oof, and she founded gender studies in America. What a hate-filled human.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 07:32 AM
7

Seriously. It's a disgrace how sex ed can be optional for some public schools. That sort of content needs to be mandatory in all schools, and you're right -- this kind of video deserves to be played every few years to kids starting even at 8+ I'd say.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:10 PM
17

Good lord... this is so powerful. Really great video. Thanks for sharing this! I see it already has over 2 million views, but frankly that's not enough. Everybody needs to see this.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 09:09 AM
0

I get it, loads of people are newer to the sub, or randomly haven’t yet seen this video. Both sides of this tiny squabble have fair points. I simply stated mine.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 05:25 AM
19

This gonna get posted once a week, now? I like the video content, but it's been shared here so often I just don't know what else to say.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 08:59 AM
11

That’s because Canada is the absolute worst in these matters. Just the worst.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 08:58 AM
11

Oh but wait, she raped and then married her rape victim! So, so, she's good, right? Right?! /s
/r/MensRights24/08/20 03:47 AM
5

That's great! I worked in GZ for nearly 5 years, and when I was alone with kids (i.e. parents not just outside a window able to peer through), some mothers just would stay in the classroom the whole time.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 12:12 PM
5

Yeah, that’s exactly the issue: Not enough good, male role models for kids. I worked in China and fathers there work a TON, often in a totally different city. The children of China are raised by grandparents. It’s just crazy to think about the scale. I’m glad to have been a positive part of those childrens’ lives, especially as a male, since they’re so starved for male attention. It’s similar in America, but men aren’t in the children’s lives, there, because of the divorce courts. Different reas…
/r/MensRights21/08/20 10:48 AM
4

Hey man, I totally know how you feel. I did TEFL teaching English to kids over in China and Taiwan, for a good number of years. Sometimes I had to just get away from the kids to avoid any weird looks. I mean, 4-6 year olds do stupid stuff, and I had to make sure I never got into any weird scenarios with the kids. Even just the idea of being alone with kids was enough to set some parents off. Anyways, I loved working with kids - it was absolutely rewarding and fun (nearly) every day.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:03 AM
1

Sure, but that’s on them and their mental gymnastics — I’m mainly just looking for the logical silver bullet reply to refute their claim.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 05:37 AM
1

Hey, I’m somewhat bad at formal arguments, and seriously hate the “no such thing as reverse XYZ-ism.” How can I dismantle the argument in a succinct way?
/r/MensRights20/07/20 04:58 AM
4

Here’s you: “Hey everybody! Did you read the headlines? Some guy lost his leg in an auto accident! It was horrific! I mean, they said his car was worth $80,000, but that’s not true! He had a lesser model of Lexus, actually, so it’s true worth was more like $57,000. Moreover, that’s the price at time of purchase, and it certainly depreciated lower than that, even! While it’s too bad he lost his leg, let’s all focus on the car price!” So, that’s why.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 01:12 AM
3

making your opinions based on emotion And you’ve come to that conclusion by some other means than my words. I’m questioning the facts of the story, not whether there was a false rape accusation. You literally only care about the money. The reason this story creates emotion is because it presents him as someone who lost his entire NFL career because of the rape accusation No. It creates emotion because of the false rape accusation. Only that. Who even cares whether he was a football star or a McD…
/r/MensRights17/07/20 12:20 AM
4

Whatever dude - I disagree with your fallacious methods, and I don’t give a god damn whether he’s worth millions or pennies. What matters is the legal system that dumped his life in the toilet due to a false accusation. It’s obvious you only give a care if he’s worth millions or not. Maybe this isn’t the right sub for you; perhaps go check out /r/nfl instead?
/r/MensRights16/07/20 11:51 PM
9

Straw man gonna straw man. I get it, your so concerned with that dude’s paycheck, you can’t be bothered with the rape accusation nonsense. /s
/r/MensRights16/07/20 10:22 PM
16

The downvotes are because you’re distracting from the real issue. You’ve set up a straw man argument.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 08:57 PM
1

Well, that's not me -- I'd guess one can only speak for themselves, since we're not all mind readers. Some people are more negative, while others are positive. I'm mostly positive. So, 50/50 would be a fair mix for a generalized internet picture about possible feelings.
/r/MensRights22/06/20 10:15 AM
35

Seriously - we need to acknowledge that the full range of emotions come, not just focus on the negative. This image would be better if half were negative thoughts and the other half were positive.
/r/MensRights22/06/20 08:22 AM
1

You say all radical feminists are brainwashing girls going to collage No I didn't. I said "man-hating feminists" learned it from either college or bad parenting. The "college" jab was at things like "feminist studies" degrees -- it's a misreading of my comment to think I meant all radical feminists push their ways to college aged girls; I'm sure many don't. You say well I didn't mean all feminists just the radical brainwashy ones My unedited original comment says: If you speak with man-hating-fe…
/r/MensRights17/06/20 04:52 PM
2

become a women hating chauvinist Hmm... I can understand how you’d read my comment and think I don’t like women, but that hinges on the idea that feminism = women. It doesn’t. With that mentality, I’m sure you’ll get your feathers ruffled over many comments, but truthfully, you’re conflating the two things. I think this world needs feminism, or some form of it, in many places around the world. Places where women are subjected to horrible lives because the men around them own them like property, …
/r/MensRights17/06/20 04:19 AM
2

anti-woman shit I'm disparaging men and women, alike. Read closely: man-hating-feminists That's who I'm talking about, specifically.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:20 PM
2

It is hypocritical, but you have to understand the context: If you walk into a pit of vipers, it’s very possible you get bitten. If you dance with tigers, you might get mauled. If you speak with man-hating-feminists, you might experience a lot of hate speech. You see, it’s the nature of the beasts. They cannot help being that way - they learned it in college or bad parenting.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 03:13 PM
9

So, in this Ohio man’s case, what illegal activity is he doing? I assume none.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 11:01 PM
5

Yeesh, that ending question - what a pathetically boring question. The woman host needs to be sacked for such a dismal display of hosting.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 06:49 AM
4

Here's his AGT audition video for the curious: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShgOH1u78XA
/r/MensRights28/05/20 06:28 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:30 AM
5

Sure, cause they're semi-automatic and the term is extremely inclusive of nearly freaking anything.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 06:09 PM
5

Best to just ban all foreign devils from the great USA to rid ourselves of these dangerous chancla weapons... that includes anyone not originally from America, so everybody has to go! Natives can stay.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 03:47 PM
8

We need to pass legislation banning these assault golf clubs!
/r/MensRights17/05/20 03:43 PM
34

Seriously, any gun can be used for assault. An "assault weapon" could be damn near anything, but is "strictly semi-automatic." (taken from wikipedia definition) An "assault rifle" on the other hand, can either be semi-automatic OR automatic. The automatic weapons are heavily regulated and banned nearly everywhere for civilians.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 12:11 PM
8

Disagree - having watched the full clip, their silence appears to be listening and general understanding. You have to understand that these people paid for him to be there - they’re there to digest a message; not tune it out. He’s 100% right, and whether they’ll follow his advice or not, they know it.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 12:54 PM
6

I mean to say, once the trial actually begins, I hope it’s finished quickly.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 03:21 PM
7

I hope it's swift and full of furious justice.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 01:39 PM
14

This shit doesn’t make any sense!! Like, how can anyone go and violently disfigure another human, but then be set free? These laws are a mockery of justice.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 12:30 PM
19

What was their sentencing? I want to know if justice was served properly, but I also don't want to read the article, as even just the title made me want to gag.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 10:25 AM
18

Oh my god, reading that title made me feel a kind of pain in my head and chest that I can't even explain. That's one of the most horrific things I've ever heard in my life. I hope those two horrible inhuman worms get what they deserve.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 10:24 AM
79

That's an amazingly good analogy! Well said.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 03:37 PM
4

It’s not wrong the way it’s worded. It’s misleading and veiling the truth that women make different choices from men which lead to women purposefully earning less than men. It also is just the average of all working men and all working women, regardless of job, age, tenure, skill, or literally any other metric except gender. So, it’s actually true that they do make less, and it has zero practical use except to psycho-analyze populations.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 07:10 PM
97

Can't be a victim if you're already dead! points finger on temple
/r/MensRights25/04/20 03:42 PM
29

Hope you're prepared for the backlash that will come for speaking truth.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 09:40 AM
16

That's just shit logic and shit ethics. Sounds like that person shouldn't have married a military spouse in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 06:04 AM
8

She really just needs to go away and stay away. Disgusting people deserve to be shunned.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 05:36 AM
82

Got a reliable source? This sounds like a misleading and sensationalist title, and frankly, you've simply posted a picture of a headline from some random-ass website. Literally I don't believe you until you have some real proof from a reliable source. Like... sure, I'd love to get all angry at some injustice in the world, but for something so ridiculous sounding as your title, I'm gonna need something more. EDIT I read the court document, below, and he really did have to pay $7 million. He didn’…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:40 PM
8

Palm strikes makes it sound like a kung fu move :D
/r/MensRights15/04/20 09:06 AM
27

Now, that's one thing I've always been confused about. People always saying their mom or dad would, exactly how you put it, "whoop" their ass. My parents would spank me and my brother when we were small kids -- which seemed scary as a young kid -- but the older I got, the less scary a spanking would become. So... what exactly does it mean when people say their parents would whoop their ass? I seriously don't even know what that would look like. Punches? Hitting with items? I'm genuinely curious,…
/r/MensRights15/04/20 05:15 AM
12

They're rubbing salt in the wound that people who believe in the gender pay gap are the very same people who chose to earn less in college by majoring in gender studies.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 03:31 PM
15

Did they make the choice to major in gender studies in college, or did they opt for a more lucrative career by studying engineering? Shots fired!
/r/MensRights01/04/20 03:09 PM
21

Exactly. Just because they can be a non-profit doesn’t mean they don’t pad their paychecks as fatly as they can.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 04:33 PM
1

Baby steps - we want the same thing, so conducing a petty back and forth is a waste of time. Jumping up and demanding half the months and days be focused on men isn't going to get us anywhere fast. No journey starts at the end, so let's get our act together, and make the trek to true equality, one step at a time.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 02:48 PM
0

Your quip is quite naive, and while it doesn’t dignify a response, I’ll say this for everyone: People can’t concentrate on all issues all at once; humans need focus. This is why it’s good to break things up into chunks that people can concentrate on. For example, Movember raises awareness and funding for men’s health, including prostate & testicular cancer, as well as suicide. Seeing as how zero other time or thought is given towards men, in the western world, I’d say one good month is enough.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 02:16 PM
3

I’m sure they have statistics on participation, but frankly, it’s up to men to promote November as men’s month.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 01:25 PM
0

Yes, they don’t only support prostate cancer. I get that maybe you only want prostate cancer awareness, but I see this as more than that, while still including it.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 01:22 PM
7

Since 2004, November has been a men’s awareness month due to the amazing efforts of the Movember team. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movember https://movember.com/
/r/MensRights28/01/20 05:59 AM
14

And let’s be honest, she is a terrible actress. She was boring and bland in Aquaman. She spewed her lines like a high school drama club amateur. It was absolutely atrocious. I’m a professionally trained actor, so I would know.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 11:45 AM
81

And it’s fair that you do. Your post history says you have a super part time job at literally just 2 hours per week. Your other work is being your own housekeeper. I assume that means, conversely, your husband is bringing home the bread, and probably working a large amount. Every family and relationship is different, but yours is fairly stereotypical: He works, you don’t. So, when the kiddies are crying in the middle of the night, I’d agree it’s your job to handle it, since he needs to be awake …
/r/MensRights12/01/20 05:36 AM
-6

Wanna buy a punctuation mark? Again, why I’m not voting for Trump: I literally have to. People like you are attacking me with illiteracy.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 01:37 PM
5

I was expecting an /s at the end... geez
/r/MensRights02/12/19 07:13 AM
1

Where at, and how long ago? You definitely would know better than I would. Wikipedia says 81% of homes have the Western style toilets, but many public bathrooms in train stations and public schools still have only squat toilets, as well as older buildings/temples and parks. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilets_in_Japan
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:41 PM
2

Maybe the toilets in either super remote or super outdated places, but majority? Not even close. China is like that (but worse), currently, but I’ve been to Japan 4 times, to 7 cities, and have never come across that.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 03:07 PM
2

filthy hole in the ground Is that just your regular, day-to-day way of saying toilet?
/r/MensRights23/11/19 12:08 PM
10

Seriously, I bought a Japanese toilet for my house. Bidet, dryer, heated seat... it’s the best thing to happen to my life, after my wife.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 04:47 AM
71

Was just on a vacation in Japan, and nearly every single bathroom stall had a child seat. Japan’s bathroom game is world class!
/r/MensRights23/11/19 12:53 AM
117

GATTACA
/r/MensRights17/11/19 01:30 AM
8

I wonder how much of it is nurses making a mistake when giving the parents their child.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 03:53 PM
3

Funny thing is - my wife snores, and I don’t!
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:52 PM
14

Just like when they wear heels. Met tons of girls who say the men they date need to be taller than them while she is wearing heels. Everybody has their own preferences, but that’s just to the point of absurdity.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 05:26 AM
1

the weak men we lose to suicide is a part of natural selection. Man up an ally with a different viewpoint These two things cannot coexist. Showing emotion - fine, debatable, whatever, but suicide is a fucked up thing to shrug off, and it’s a huge killer of men. Saying “man up” is either highly naive or flippant disregard for the actual problem.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 04:56 AM
14

November is dude cancer month - almost there! “Movember”
/r/MensRights04/10/19 12:02 PM
1

I know the sarcasm is glaringly obvious, but you’ll probably still need this: /s
/r/MensRights28/09/19 12:15 AM
2

WARNING TO ALL The person who posted above is an obvious troll. Don’t feed the troll - they’re a waste of breath, as their main motive is to incite a heated argument or negative reaction from you. Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 05:45 PM
3

Yeah, her solution is half-baked, but I’m just happy the message is getting across.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:38 AM
6

How about no?
/r/MensRights23/09/19 08:45 PM
11

While that’s all true, I just hope this mentality gets around. Boy, girl, sage talking tree; I don’t care who finally gets the point across, just that it does. Almost lost my brother to suicide, several times. Didn’t know how to handle it. Probably didn’t handle it well. Hearing this helps me to understand, and I need a good long talk with my big bro.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 07:16 PM
26

I’d assume so, as well, since that’s obviously a personal drawing some troll scrawled on the page.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 06:08 AM
2

It’s an old video
/r/MensRights18/09/19 09:05 AM
1

Did you even attempt to read that paper I wrote? I addressed each of your issues in great detail. It’s a short read; don’t be lazy. Furthermore, the way you’re using “should” is moot - the gap literally does exist, so saying should or shouldn’t in your manner is worthless. In an utopia, it wouldn’t exist, therefore it shouldn’t. Do you get the difference?
/r/MensRights17/09/19 11:50 AM
5

This isn’t /r/LetsAllShitOnWomen
/r/MensRights17/09/19 06:56 AM
2

Okay, here’s the deal: Your post is completely non-sequitur to the actual issues and argument with the mythical wage gap. You’re right that nobody would bring this up, because it has little to nothing to do with addressing the topic. All you’re doing is feeding the feminist beast by effectively saying that the wage gap should exist. I wrote the following paper in response to something Milo Yiannopoulos had said on a talk show, but it focuses on the wage gap, and actually talks about why it’s bog…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 06:55 AM
1

Everybody is super polarized on the 1984 movie. I read the book Dune, but never read further into the series, and I really enjoyed the movie. I am pissing-my-pants-excited for the new one, though!
/r/MensRights13/09/19 04:30 AM
13

“My name is a killing word.”
/r/MensRights12/09/19 12:39 PM
1

Yeah, no denying that!
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:13 PM
3

I actually think getting married can be good for stable, loving, thoughtful people. It’s the unstable people screwing it up and making marriage look bad. Instability can come in many forms: addiction, lack of money, mental/emotional disorders, bad upbringing, etc. These are the people who need to get their shit together before marriage. All of those would be red flags to me, and I wouldn’t want to marry anyone like that. They’re not in the right place in their life. Back to the original point, s…
/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:33 PM
4

Fuck her. Plz don’t, actually!
/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:27 PM
2

Legit question, having seen that video: What if he had whipped out his camera and started recording the entire altercation, verbally warned her, tried to get away, and then beat the shit out of her in retaliation/defense? Similarly, what if he only had voice recording, with phone video on, in his pocket? Let’s assume he gave recording warning.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 06:10 PM
49

Yup, that’s a cunt. And she deserves to be punched in the face, to learn a lesson: don’t fuck with things bigger and stronger than you.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 12:11 PM
2

Now that’s a title!
/r/MensRights02/09/19 04:59 AM
2

But not if it’s a white girl, because they’re oppressed, too. Unless it’s girl on girl, in which case the most marginalized girl is being oppressed. And white on white is just double supremacy, so it quadruples the oppression. /s
/r/MensRights02/09/19 01:17 AM
2

That’s gold, Jerry! But seriously, I could start that script.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 05:12 AM
46

Fuck yeah! I’m a drama major, and have thought about writing a play to show people this sort of content. Thanks for going against the grain, and sticking to your guns!
/r/MensRights31/08/19 11:55 AM
2

Bird is the word. Bababa mm mow mow baba mm mow mow.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 11:38 AM
7

This is just too ridiculous and horrible, yet, that woman’s face makes it all believable.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 07:31 PM
3

Online writers are the worst - simple windbags paid to have a critical opinion of anything and everything, because it sells. Screw ‘em. Chappelle is amazing.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 11:20 AM
2

May luck and the gods be on his side! He’ll need it, in this world :/
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:24 AM
0

Bottom middle contradicts bottom right. Someone with a short memory must’ve written this. I like seeing the reverses gender version, as it shows just how exceedingly pathetic these tidbits of — is it even worth calling “relationship advice?” Perhaps “misinformation” — really are.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 01:26 AM
3

That backpack in the bottom right corner is freaking awesome. Owned that same one for years - it’s just so versatile, with loads of pockets. It’s a nice thing these guys are doing, so I’m glad they’re equipped with the best kind of campus backpack.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 04:33 AM
5

I read of a study done in an elementary school, many years ago (15ish? I’m getting older). They handed out images of random children with all different characteristics: tall, short, skinny, fat, glasses, freckles, etc. They asked the children who they’d most like to be their friend. The answers were varied, but mainly the tall kids were their answer. They then asked which would they most not like to have as a friend. Overwhelmingly, the fat child was chosen. This was picked more frequently than …
/r/MensRights12/08/19 11:07 AM
2

Hey, I’ve been living under a rock. What exactly happened, here? Was it a kiss and a grope? Just a kiss? Kiss and then more?
/r/MensRights09/08/19 08:57 AM
23

babies won’t remember it Same reasoning to use rufies... greeeeaaat logic.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 01:57 AM
13

To be even more specific: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio Females outnumber males in nearly all Western countries. So, in the context of a western female saying she’s a minority is patently false. Northern Africa, Middle East, India, China, and many larger Pacific Islander countries are majority male.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:26 AM
13

Wouldn’t even call it the “classical” definition, as it’s petty much never been used to directly help men. Ideological idea of feminism, sure, but I’m not trying to dump on you via semantics - just pointing out even historical practice of the word wasn’t to help men in any shape or form.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 09:52 AM
0

Okay, don’t kill me, but I want to throw out a potential, legitimate reason for this, that I’m only speculating at. For the record, I don’t like the situation, either, but trying to wrap my logical mind around it. What if the vast majority of their clients are women, and these are their only bathrooms? Would it really matter, then? People would potentially need to queue, either way, if there’s several people who want to go at the same time, but now it’s a first-come-first served for the 2nd bath…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 03:23 PM
1

Use the right pointing arrow button > to make that indentation.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 01:32 PM
4

I’m on mobile and not in America... keep getting an invalid page response. Anyone got a mirror or something that might work?
/r/MensRights07/07/19 06:29 AM
3

Just get out of the relationship. You don’t need some shit-human who believes they’re in the right to abuse you. Nobody deserves abuse.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 02:35 AM
5

“Model piece of human garbage” is the full term. “Model” for short.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 04:23 AM
28

Yeah, when I started reading the initial post, it made me think of divorce settlements. By their logic, a woman who does not work divorcing a man who does work deserves no money in the divorce.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:12 AM
2

Schmucks?
/r/MensRights29/06/19 03:42 PM
16

Literally every single big/famous club around the world pulls this crap. The price for a thing is the amount you can get for it, and since young men are desperate enough, they’ll spend the bucks to hope for something that rhymes with bucks.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 12:32 PM
2

When reading this post’s title, “Men’s friendships can last a lifetime,” subtext and logical next steps in thought process lead one to consider several things: Why say “Men’s” if all genders share the same experience? Any logical thinker will consider the unsaid subtext: Is it meant to say that women’s friendships do not? If that’s not the case, what’s the point? Were men’s friendships ever under attack or reduced over time? Those are the next steps in thinking. So, which one is it? Men’s friend…
/r/MensRights28/06/19 05:24 PM
3

Yup, as long as one doesn’t just spread messages of hate or dishonesty, then most of the time it’ll get listened to, and debated. Good place for real thinking, here - this isn’t sarcasm.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 03:35 PM
5

I agree this sub isn’t about comparing to women, but it is about identifying where men have a deficit in rights, and working to bring attention to and/or solve those problems. Male friendship isn’t at stake, and never has been. Adults often lose track of friends, but that’s fairly common across the board. This being a pat on the back post, it really doesn’t address any problems we men face, nor console us for the problems we have. I don’t see it being anything more than /r/pics worthy, and it al…
/r/MensRights28/06/19 02:13 PM
46

Counter points and thoughts: Cosmo is one of the worst offenders for opinions, so I frankly never listen to anything they publish. The doctor’s friendship research then also shows 1/2 of women’s friendships do last longer than 7 years. I’d also guess that a healthy % of men’s friendships also don’t last longer than 7 years, but have no data on that. I don’t think showing men can be long term friends negates the (completely fictional and harmful, yet still pervasive) mentality of toxic masculinit…
/r/MensRights28/06/19 08:28 AM
207

Honestly, it’s nice to see a group of buddies through the long haul, but can’t the same be said for women? I know several of my girl high school acquaintances have kept strong friendships with their girl friends, some 20 years later. How’s this relevant to the sub?
/r/MensRights28/06/19 06:13 AM
3

I was never aware of that connection.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 04:37 AM
4

Whole (but only for) Some Memes
/r/MensRights27/06/19 03:01 AM
2

Wow, haven’t seen the “... not!” ending since the 90’s! We’re bringing it back, boys! ... not!
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:07 AM
5

I remember seeing this - she’s an absolute psychopath.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 12:39 AM
2

Comedically illustrated in Me, Myself, and Irene.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:16 AM
2

I’m okay with less militarizing of our police. I guess I just don’t support the US’s overextension in foreign wars/affairs, effectively being world police, so I wish the money would be spent elsewhere. Perhaps on public schooling, instead, and subsidies for university.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 01:30 AM
1

To be honest, I didn’t know that; not well versed on the matter. So, you’re saying (non-federal) courthouses are funded by state taxes, and since the military is funded by federal taxes, reducing military budget won’t allow them to spend it on state courts, correct?
/r/MensRights09/06/19 12:53 AM
4

I’d go even further and say end the warring in other countries. Get that military offense “defense” budget down.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 12:11 AM
2

Kinky
/r/MensRights08/06/19 11:53 AM
1

Well, not exactly - terminator 1 was the murderous machine. terminator 2 was a reprogrammed “cybernetic organism” sent back to (attempt to) stop the events leading up to the war. While both murder, the first does so to get rid of Sarah Connor, while the second murders to protect John and Sarah Connor. While they appeared the same, they were different. Anyways, I agree the Ms Marvel scene was bad, just wanted to set the facts straight about the most amazing action sci-fi of all time T2.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 01:34 PM
13

Exactly - the Ms Marvel scene is an homage to Terminator 2, albeit a poorly executed one: https://youtu.be/TaRuugE1R74
/r/MensRights25/05/19 09:46 AM
6

Seriously, what is there that’s specific for men? Inb4 feminists say “all of them are for men due to patriarchy!”
/r/MensRights22/05/19 04:12 AM
1

If those are lockable doors, I’d just use whichever is open. If they’re non-lockable doors, then it doesn’t really matter; go in the male one, and if there’s a woman concurrently in there with me, too bad for her, because I usually fart while I pee.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:06 PM
3

I, too, watch Law & Order.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 02:19 PM
26

I petition for more white people in Chinese movies!
/r/MensRights08/05/19 05:58 PM
43

“Why men ___ and why that’s a bad thing.” This is their cookie cutter headline.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 06:30 PM
9

I mean, she’s nowhere near the star power of RDJ or practically any of the other actors. Also, the character she developed is so devoid of humanity, it’s like she’s a robot. Even Nebula, a cyborg, has more life than her. Saw Endgame, yesterday, and Ms Marvel got all the screen time she needed and deserved, which wasn’t a lot.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 06:16 AM
21

That’s sexual assault, my friend - the baby is raping her!
/r/MensRights20/04/19 03:07 PM
21

Reddit has a voice activated Gold award program, so all you need to do is speak the proper command to your monitor, and it will activate: "Reddit Bot - award gold to user (spell out the username)" The Bot will do the rest! It takes a few tries for the Bot to recognize your vocal pattern, but don't worry, shouldn't take more than a few tries to get it to work. Oh, and don't forget to turn your volume all the way up - that's how the Bot listens to your voice. Hope this helps!
/r/MensRights19/04/19 04:20 PM
8

Next step is literal rape through the internet.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:12 AM
-2

Frankly, I don’t care what people say or do outside of their movies, for the most part. Think of it from James Gunn’s example - should we boycott him? I’m not. I don’t give 2 F’s what a person does outside of their career, as long as it’s not actual, physical or financial harm to others. I saw the movie, last night - decently entertaining, her acting (or direction) was garbage, and it only adds a bridge to who the F is this chick helping the Avengers in Endgame. The fact is: She didn’t write it,…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 06:12 AM
2

I DON'T KNOW HOW TO MAKE SPOILER TAGS, SORRY! PLEASE AVOID MY COMMENT IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE INFINITY WAR MOVIE! They did severely diminish his power in the movies, though. He's the nerfed version of Thanos for the movies universe. They had a choice to make: More action, or less action. They chose more action, and I'm fairly happy they did. I was super confused, at first, why Thanos, even if he didn't have any gems at all, would allow Iron Man to get even a scratch on his face, but it's all jus…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 07:28 AM
7

This has been proven for a long time. Wrote an Econ paper on it, years ago. Paper’s TL;DR - wage gap exists when not accounting for tenure, experience, education, or even job. Simply: the average woman makes less than the average man. Why? They’re highly likely to leave the workforce after childbirth. Younger, childless women are actually making more money than younger, childless men in nearly all top markets in the US.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 05:21 AM
1

Good point, you’re just a half-assed anarchist. Having totally unlimited free speech is what our country started with, and then they had to add the exceptions due to negative societal consequences. Wanna change that? Go to law school, practice as a lawyer for about 10 years, become a lower court judge for another 7-10, then higher court for 10 more, and then attempt to be a supreme justice, and just maybe your chance will crop up. Until then, you have zero compelling arguments, you’ve refuted ze…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 04:55 PM
1

Yeah, you’re an anarchist - congratulations.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 04:07 PM
1

Since you’re so adept and gnawing on your keyboard in Reddit, but somehow lack the skills in Google, here’s a great breakdown of what Free Speech doesn’t protect: https://lawshelf.com/videos/entry/freedom-of-speech-exceptions-categories-of-speech-not-protected Now you can stop asking everyone (in a non-legal sub) where the line is drawn. If it’s not specific enough for you, that’s likely on purpose, as too specific a law would create loopholes to the intent of the law.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 03:49 PM
1

No, you’re defending all speech, whether it’s abusive, dangerous, slanderous, or what have you. Free speech is not the same as all speech. You’re defending an anarchistic free speech.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 03:34 PM
5

That’s right folks - he went right back into it! Thinking he were the lone fighter for freedom of speech! His fight would go on and on, no matter how many replies he got!
/r/MensRights25/02/19 05:37 AM
6

Oh, I did - I posted earlier, and am one of the many who pointed out why you’re wrong. You just don’t realize it, because you’ve likely lost track of all the different people who’ve done the same.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 05:15 AM
1

The way she worded it, it sounds like she’s poking fun at the mother for being so limiting in thought in regards to what men bring to a relationship.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 05:13 AM
5

Your “refutations” are not refuting arguments - more they’re redirecting or falling flat.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 04:10 AM
6

You disproved nothing, and it also seems you’ve learned nothing from this exchange. You’re cherry picking parts of quotes to satisfy your side of the argument, while completely ignoring why you’re wrong. ITT a half dozen people have told you the same things, yet you still don’t get it. Troll? Or are you actually planning on/actively doing these things to someone, and attempting to practice being your own lawyer when you’re caught?
/r/MensRights25/02/19 03:47 AM
15

We do have free speech in the US, but there are exceptions to the rule for public safety, etc. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions The law isn’t complicated - the situation that requires legal action is complicated.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 02:19 AM
23

Everything is context sensitive, and I am neither a judge, lawyer, nor police officer. Nobody can tell you an answer to that, but I’m sure it’s some combination of those factors. Also, free speech is actually limited in America. Not everything you say is protected.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 01:40 AM
54

It has to do with the context: You’re not my ex-gf, nor do you know me I’m not depressed (pretty sure) You’ve hypothetically only told me once Literally everything is different about your proposed slippery slope scenario, save for the message.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 01:13 AM
18

Based on OPs comment ITT asking for “Simone” to help them with flair, I’m guessing they’re both on mobile, and don’t review their words before submitting. /r/boneappletea
/r/MensRights25/02/19 01:03 AM
9

Maybe she was worried about your terrible reading skills. /s
/r/MensRights20/02/19 08:28 AM
19

Is that a fat, shirtless Tom Cruise guffawing at a computer?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 02:42 PM
0

Note: this was in India. Shouldn’t happen anywhere, but in America and other developed countries, this extreme farce of justice wouldn’t fly.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 09:26 AM
2

Hey, original asker for source, here: I actually skimmed and thought this was a Wage Inequality chart. Didn’t realize it’s a general QOL chart. My mistake!
/r/MensRights28/01/19 12:59 AM
0

I like the idea of this post, but could you provide a source, as well? It would hold more weight with a source link on the image, or at least in the comments section. I misread bc I skimmed it - thought it was solely a Wage Inequality chart.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 05:13 PM
167

“Hey! You’re not a woman!” “Care to check?”
/r/MensRights25/12/18 11:42 AM
57

Mothers kill more kids than guns Definitely true, since guns are inanimate objects, and thus cannot be killed, as they were never alive to begin with.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 03:40 AM
8

I think the other guy understood your point, and further wanted you to produce the law the prenup contradicts. Just trying to bring clarity to you and the other guy’s heated debate.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:29 PM
8

Chiming in to point out the other dude has repeatedly asked you to produce proof of such a law that negates the signed prenup. You’ve repeatedly avoided the question. Just sayin’.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:15 PM
21

sexism in the workplace Wait, there is still sexism in the workplace, be the instigator male or female, but what you meant to say is "discrimination of pay based on gender."
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:31 PM
3

Some puns and sarcasm are hard to hear via text - didn’t get that it wasn’t an attempt at a spelling correction.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 01:16 PM
1

That’s not how Latin works.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 01:01 PM
2

Wasn’t the top comment when I posted, and I must’ve missed that one when I looked.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 12:58 PM
17

Your link is cancer on mobile. It forces a video to open, and upon hitting the X it opens again, ad infinitum. Please post a decent link directly to the study, and or copy/paste the page’s info. Downvote until then.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 10:01 AM
1

Are we taking a staged play? If so, yes. If it’s a movie? I’d just say it’s attempting to get cash from the name, so no. If it’s a book, is it a sequel, or just the exact same book? If sequel... who knows? If it’s the same book... same relevance as it has always had.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 06:34 PM
4

There was no need for dusting, its got a fresh coat of paint from their 2018 worldwide tour. It’s a currently running show, and thus presents current day issues. Again, it doesn’t matter how old a theater show is; if it’s currently being shown, it’s currently relevant.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 04:39 AM
6

It was written in the 1970’s, but the original it’s loosely based upon was written in the 1920’s. Working in theatre, myself, I can tell you that shows are always tied to current societal issues. Even Shakespeare shows will be tied to a problem we have, today, and the director, actors, and staging crew work to communicate that to the audience. This type art is not so rigid; it can and does adapt to modern times.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 12:24 AM
2

Your word choices make it easy. And now you’ve got a new title added to the mix: Simple troll.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 06:20 PM
36

He probably doesn’t even really understand masculinity; as many young boys don’t. Without fathers in the home, children grow up merely guessing at masculinity, and latch onto whatever TV/movie/internet tropes that show “masculinity,” or onto a man somewhere in their life (teacher, coach, friend of mom). That person’s comment is the sad result of homes without fathers.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 08:29 AM
89

Hey OP, I like this image, but the 40% DV statistic could use some more info, such as 40% of DV victims, but (unsure on the actual %) 90% of DV arrests, or something. edit - the below comments like the idea, but suggest it’s more specific for accuracy (i.e. female on male violence, etc.)
/r/MensRights12/11/18 03:55 PM
1

Site not loading: Something has gone wrong… It seems you clicked on a bad link and stumbled upon our 404 page
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:18 PM
3

True - I suppose a much better title would’ve simply stated he’s a famous, retired baseball player, instead of bringing up his relationship to Jlo.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 07:42 AM
70

I’ll admit, OP’s title pointlessly mentions Jennifer Lopez, since A-rod is a household name in sports. This is about A-rod and his ex-wife, divorced 10 years ago. That ex-wife is getting the major payday and refusing to work, and A-rod is attempting to reduce her exorbitant monthly checks.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:36 PM
6

You mean “shitburger,” since we’re adults. Whataburger is what the kids have to call it. ThisIsAReference
/r/MensRights05/10/18 02:02 PM
3

Good article showing the blind hypocrisy these types of narrative-driven feminists hold. One critique of the article is that it needs to be proof read. Simple spelling mistakes and typos don’t help, but it doesn’t detract from the overall message of the article - I’m just a pedant.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:39 PM
17

The people that downvoted you didn’t count the syllables to find it’s an actual haiku structure.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 10:22 AM
3

Seriously, that hashtag could be just changed to any other thing from women, and it suddenly becomes socially unacceptable. Further, if most men aren't rapists, shouldn't we #believemen ?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:29 AM
30

It’s an act - Conan has him on the show on purpose; so Bill can say the things Conan wants on TV. Conan’s job is to voice the mitigating voice, so as not to lose the audience, but to keep Bill going, so the real message is told. They work this stuff out before the show - almost like good cop, bad cop.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:11 PM
0

Who let the 13 year olds in?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:57 PM
69

This is what I was thinking. There’s issues for both genders, and men definitely need more motivation for all levels of schooling in different parts of the world, but afaik, only women/girls are lawfully/socially restricted from school in certain parts of the world.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:59 AM
3

Are you commenting in the correct thread? Your post sounds absurd.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 12:54 PM
0

Donnie, you're out of your element.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 02:12 AM
27

I moved to China, and many teaching job posts specify "women only." For teachers. Literally every time I see it, I grief them and call it out as sexism.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 12:29 PM
53

I mean, that's fair as long as those positions are either egg donation or breast feeding.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 12:00 PM
6

I did not know that... dang. Is that only for responsibility waivers, or is that all contracts?
/r/MensRights11/07/18 04:46 PM
-1

How does that cost money to any relevant amount? Just write up some waiver of responsibility of your own - can even be a single paragraph - and add in a signature line. BAM, done.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 03:27 PM
1

Third option: Cut their hair terribly and just stop getting their business.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 03:24 PM
5

Maybe we should all just start naming our family position: "As a son and brother, I..." "I'm a daughter, so..." "Being a father, I..."
/r/MensRights26/06/18 12:53 PM
2

Okay, I'm going to make am argument against what she's doing, and I want you all to check for flaws and improvements: The majority of people in America are white. Half of that majority are men. If we create a society that discourages and discounts the majority, isn't that a poorly functioning society? Why not allow equal benefits to all, based on demographic statistics? If black females are, say, 7% of the population, why not give 7% of benefits to black women? If 33% of the population is white …
/r/MensRights07/06/18 05:42 AM
101

This person needs to be given a harsh punishment. This wasn't simply wasting police time - this was an attempt to ruin the life of another; this is nearly equivalent to attempted murder.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:19 PM
5

I feel pretty, oh so pretty!
/r/MensRights28/05/18 05:58 AM
1

From the article's final paragraph: According to most progressives, the fact that only 48 of the almost 900 people awarded Nobel Prizes since 1901 were women – and the Fields Medal has only been won by a woman once – is entirely due to social/cultural factors. I'd still say the majority is due to this, but their conclusion sounds right - that in the end of utopic society, there will still be a disparity.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:34 AM
10

Hey, this guy wants to take driving rights away from women!
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:13 AM
1

Reddit: Another title gore disgrace: Man writes a title that just keeps on going, never stopping, for 30,000 characters, none of which are a period - all the while the Reddit police show inaction to properly punish the man, aged 19, with 16 months of bad titles, is found guilty
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:18 AM
7

A wise person can listen to a side of an argument they don't agree with, and when proven wrong, can accept that other side of the argument. What you're doing is the opposite of that.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 06:58 AM
1

Biologically, humans are animals. It's in our DNA to be attracted to these sorts of things. Even on a very simple sociological level, dressing like that isn't the norm in society, and thus it's typical to look at the lesser known. If a man walks around with his shirt pulled up above his belly, people will look at his belly. Punishing people for looking at the strange/unusual or attractive things in this world limits our humanity.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:45 PM
1

Good bot.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:26 PM
1

Looks like that's pretty close to the national average. On mobile, so can't link directly to the section, but look at the Stats and Demographics section of this Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homelessness_in_the_United_States
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:12 PM
8

According to this 2017 survey, 64.6% of Seattle's homeless self-identify as Male: https://res.cloudinary.com/sagacity/image/upload/v1496345607/2017-Count-Us-In-PIT-Comprehensive-Report_uxjkdq.pdf The majority are male, so homeless solutions should help men, mainly.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 01:33 PM
13

Real incidents of accidental sex.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 10:39 AM
-1

Genuinely, I think these people who say these sorts of things aren't actually feminists. Like, they say they're feminists, but in practice, they're psychopaths. This is the true movement they're a part of: The Psychopathic movement.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:36 AM
33

They empathize with other women, sometimes to a pointless and harmful degree. If one woman murders her children due to "depression," or whatever they label their psychosis, invariably there will be other women who agree with her justification, and agree she shouldn't go to prison for heinous infanticide. On the whole, though, I believe most people empathize with whomever they feel a part of. Men can empathize with divorced men, and may demonize the divorcing women. Women, the other way around. S…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 09:02 AM
13

Happened at my last workplace, and temperatures were in the 80's/90's. They wouldn't budge, so I quit.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 06:23 PM
5

Article text posted in comments, and is top comment, now.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 02:42 PM
0

If there are numerous articles about the same thing from different sources, it's easy to consider that it's somewhat prevalent.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:56 AM
3

Not trying to slow your roll, but that's the same thing, effectively.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:05 AM
1

Ah, yes, the laughter of man.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 02:12 AM
4

A colony of England, obviously.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:12 AM
1

The article's source link is broken. Here's the source: http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/news/20180206/pickens-teacher-appealing-conviction-in-sex-case
/r/MensRights13/02/18 03:08 AM
1

Exactly - this is like the professional sports player wage argument. Some are just at a higher tier than others, or their talent (for models "their look") generates more viewers, and therefore more revenue, and therefore commands a higher wage.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 02:24 AM
160

Our country identifies as ~65% White/Caucasian, and 77% if you include those of Mexican decent. How the fuck are we supposed to constantly round up diverse people to speak on every single topic? Could it possibly be that maaaybe a white man might have something to contribute to society? Fuck this racist, sexist garbage.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:16 PM
1

I saw your source, which says nothing about food, and I really don't think those are causal effects. Do you have a source to back up your claim about food abundance affecting IQ in Asian countries? You haven't convinced me. Moreover, I've looked at the Wikipedia from the source of the IQ information, and it's highly contested as a source.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:05 PM
1

Source on the Asian IQs statement? Sounds extremely false, but I'd be interested to see you prove me wrong!
/r/MensRights03/02/18 04:33 PM
23

What about my witty personality? That's gotta be worth something, right?
/r/MensRights01/02/18 10:01 AM
18

What's SMV?
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:04 AM
14

qujote Don Qujote
/r/MensRights31/01/18 09:40 AM
117

Exactly - these people are outliers, and in statistics, outliers are generally not accounted for so as to find patterns.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 09:38 AM
3

Only a 7 hour old account. So brave of them to talk down to us!
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:13 AM
7

You sayin Soylent Green is made exclusively from women? We need to fix this problem! Too many women are being made into Soylent Green!
/r/MensRights30/01/18 04:17 AM
0

This comes across as hyperbole, and seems like angsty writing. Are there sources to back up this info?
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:52 PM
4

Lobster bubble!
/r/MensRights18/01/18 04:32 PM
1

Daaaaad, get off Reddit!
/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:56 PM
3

25% of the published prison population. Many countries, including China, do not make that info public, so that % should be smaller. edit though I agree the male incarceration rate is far too high.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 12:03 PM
1

Never say never.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 02:30 PM
3

That's a fair point. As for my copy/paste, feel free to double check. I did edit out the advertisement text, so you will see that discrepancy. However, all else remains unchanged.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 06:36 PM
12

good bot
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:09 PM
42

THIS IS A COPY/PASTE FROM THE WEBSITE, SHOULD YOU NOT WANT TO VISIT THE SITE: Facebook Is Banning Women for Calling Men ‘Scum’ Women had accounts banned from Facebook for responding to male trolls with sentences like ‘men are trash,’ in part because the company classifies white men as a protected group. Taylor Lorenz 12.04.17 12:00 AM ET When comic Marcia Belsky sarcastically replied “men are scum” to a friend’s Facebook post back in October, she never anticipated being banned from the platform …
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:38 PM
10

Since anything anti-feminism is literally silenced in other places, I think this sub has become a default for saying these things without being silenced.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:49 AM
2

I'm not a parent, but I'd like to be, someday. Is it possible to get a blood test done to both check the baby's health, while simultaneously checking if they're mine?
/r/MensRights28/11/17 02:49 AM
7

Just for clarification, do you mean while your wife was a minor, long ago, or do you mean you were married to her while she was a minor?
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:09 PM
13

"I'm insensitive, and I lack empathy ..." -Kendrick Lamar, "How Much a Dollar Cost"
/r/MensRights23/11/17 03:40 PM
3

I think that it's true language can change over time, but this word has not changed - not yet, at least. It literally means a society that gives power to and favors men, while withholding opportunities from women. But is this the case in America, these days? Is it the case in other countries? In the latter, yes, in many cases, but in the former, based on economic research, I say no. (In America's past, I'd say yes) Labor statistics have found that women, on average, are making more money than me…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 05:14 PM
2

Hahaha, that's perfect :)
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:31 PM
2

Bit harsh of an outlook - sounds like you've been watching too much Matrix series :)
/r/MensRights20/11/17 02:43 PM
6

Which is weird, because we're in our 30's. He works as a restaurant waiter, so he's certainly around enough young coworkers. In the past, he's always been the guy to take a woman home with him from the bars - like, he was our group's sexual fiend. My thought is this is his way to continue to get tail. Agree with whatever hatred is being spewed, so he can get a sympathy screw.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 02:13 PM
7

The weird thing is: I actually had to think twice before posting a celebratory message about a holiday. Imagine thinking, "Hmm, nah - I really shouldn't post 'Happy Thanksgiving' because of the potential backlash." It's absurd, but I figured if I didn't post, nobody in my friend groups would.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 02:10 PM
14

Yeah, that's the bizarre part. He's some self-hating man, or something. I've been continually attempting to salvage the 13 year friendship, so I replied as if he were being sarcastic, but after so many feminist attacks, I'm sure he's not.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 01:32 PM
3

That's a good point, and Happy Men's Day to you, too!
/r/MensRights19/11/17 04:32 AM
5

This is great! Can anyone do the same for the US?
/r/MensRights19/11/17 02:47 AM
3

You're replying to the wrong person with this comment. The mod of this sub just told you "cuck" is a disrespectful word not allowed, here, and also asked you to define "swamp" since many don't understand this jargon.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 01:32 PM
4

We should build a walled city wherein we keep all our men! That'll save the world! They can stay in there and be violent evil paedos while the rest of the world can get on to a beautiful future.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 09:27 AM
1

Cool bro, thanks for the story.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 11:57 PM
1

Suckin' cocks and your girlfriend's red pussy aren't mutually exclusive, my bro! It's a wet and wild threeway when she's over with us.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 11:38 PM
5

Who said we date? It's just a casual encounter, bro. Don't get your panties all bunched. Thanks for caring so much you trolled through my history.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 05:54 AM
10

That's a great question! I'd have to say "nothing." It has nothing to do with the equality of sexes, and that's why modern feminism actually isn't about the equality of the sexes; it's about bringing women higher and higher, whether men lose or gain.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 03:11 AM
8

Does that mean all women's vaginas turn red during orgasm? Or does it only mean your girlfriend's does? This is the difference between anecdotal evidence and empirical evidence. Also, can confirm your girlfriend's vagina becomes red during orgasm.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 03:07 AM
3

These poor women have been consumed by the Patriarchy, and are simply bending to its all-powerful grip on society. These women are simply victims of a man-centric world.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 06:09 AM
43

Just because you major in something doesn't make you infallible. I majored in economics, but I'll make mistakes if I try to analyze something without assistance. Just take the note: you made numerous spelling errors, and could've avoided it.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:12 PM
22

Many elevators have cameras, these days - did yours have one? And agreed with /u/emjaytheomachy - gotta start recording when people are doing insane things in a public space. I'm sorry this happened to you, and it will only stoke their fires to do it again to another human. This sort of thing needs counter action - maybe a sign or two up on campus. If someone feels unsafe in the most normal of situations, they shouldn't leave the house.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:07 PM
1

Can't view the picture or whatever you're sharing bc of that wonky ass website. Any chance getting that on Imgur?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 03:01 PM
15

"In my book, though, sorry. Someone comes at you with a bottle, that is a deadly weapon - he's got to take the consequences ... a bottle - that could kill you." Seriously, I don't care if he cheated or said something mean to her - whipping with keys and beating with a glass bottle are too far. And then to break the bottle as if to stab him? Fuck that. That woman would get the shit beat out of her if she tried it on me.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 10:04 AM
1

Hahaha, this is hilarious! Gooooood luck, fatties! Whether you're man or woman or somewhere in-between, it's an uphill battle for an overweight person to be with a thin person. Since these overweight women are refusing to settle for an overweight guy, then they'll need to have fantastic personalities, wealth, or power to attract the average healthy man, unless they catch the rare person with a fat fetish.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:38 PM
25

Male victims of DV absolutely do have shelter: Jail.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 08:21 AM
1

That 50% statistic, iirc, is for marriages that start before the age of 25. After that, it goes down to 17%, but this is just from my memory and I believe it's considering US statistics.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 04:32 AM
13

I understood the sarcasm - don't worry, we don't all just read the first two sentences. Have an upvote!
/r/MensRights24/09/17 12:47 AM
7

First off, hell yes. Secondly, this damn quote: "Some students choose not to turn to law enforcement because many such cases go unprosecuted as police and the courts require higher standards of evidence." When they say "higher standards of evidence," they mean "pretty much anything greater than zero evidence," which is what the colleges accept.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 12:51 AM
12

Gotta wash away those false claims!
/r/MensRights21/09/17 06:24 AM
6

So, is this image the actual law, or is it just rhetoric loosely based on the law?
/r/MensRights22/08/17 12:58 AM
3

Seriously! I was just accused of being a sexist misogynist on Facebook by a personal friend of 9 years. I had posted a psychological study showing that women who had put a photo with more revealing clothing on their resume got more interviews. I wasn't advocating for it - I'm against that sort of treatment, but I didn't also explicitly and in all caps say "I think this is horrible!" or something. Bam, second comment is my friend who posted that I'm perpetuating sexism and that I should be dead. …
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:53 PM
1

Mind if I link this over to /r/fitness and see how many accept the challenge?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 05:55 AM
1

Thanks for that - I'm on mobile and it's harder to view those details.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:24 AM
1

So, it's just a joke app, right? Like, that video smacked of sketch comedy and was filled to the brim with sarcasm. Can't be a legit app, yeah?
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:24 AM
159

Cannot we have a world where a parental test is automatically given with all births?
/r/MensRights28/07/17 10:07 AM
3

It does! Awesome, thanks for doing that!
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:39 PM
6

Yes they can! So there!
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:33 PM
5

Devils advocate: Maybe they do, but still don't believe your comment was contributing enough to the conversation.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 02:53 PM
11

(Heads up: you're supposed to put an "/s" at the end in this sub) Edit - they were originally in negative karma, so I posted. Now I'm in negative karma and they're positive. Edit 2 - now everybody is positive - hooray!
/r/MensRights03/07/17 02:50 PM
7

Backwards logic is needed, here: Clearly these percentages are from the total amount of food provided and these segments eat those percentages of the food. Men are obviously vultures and taking more than their share! /s
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:54 AM
10

Great comment, just want to pedantically point out it's: "hair's breadth" not breath.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:41 PM
3

Gay bar, Sports bar, Hooters - it's just a description of what you can find inside; it's a name for their target demographic. All these places let anyone in, regardless of them not being in their target demographic. It's not any form of discrimination, whatsoever, to name a bar after your target demographic, as long as you're perfectly willing to let anybody in.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:14 AM
2

her DID YOU JUST ASSUME THEIR GENDER?!
/r/MensRights11/06/17 08:04 AM
7

Okay, yes, uh huh, wait - no. Killing sprees? No.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:30 AM
4

Just a heads up, I recently learned the technical word for circular logic in rhetoric, so figured I'd share. It's "tautological" or "tautology."
/r/MensRights13/05/17 05:27 PM
8

In case you don't want to visit the website, here's the article text (copy/paste): A high school teacher in Oregon has prompted outrage with a letter arguing that rape culture is a 'dubious' and 'hysterical' concept. David Lickey, who teaches Social Studies at Grant High School in Portland, distributed the three-page-letter among students and staff on May 2. In it he says that 'the very wording of "Rape Culture seems to me a bit hysterical' and that '"Rape culture" is a theoretical construct tha…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 04:34 PM
1

"Ooh, don't put words in my mouth, but here - take some words in your mouths!"
/r/MensRights08/05/17 03:10 AM
3

"The patriarchy has taken over my body and forced me to rape! It's not my fault!" Like a poltergeist has possessed their body or something. Patriarchy: The Ghost of Christmas Present
/r/MensRights03/05/17 08:49 AM
19

That's it - moving to Germany.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 06:01 PM
82

So what happens when it's female on female rape? Do they both just get a cocktail party afterwards at the expense of the nearest male? /s
/r/MensRights02/05/17 06:00 PM
26

Unexpected MTG.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 06:12 PM
21

I don't really care to subject myself to bad subs.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:54 AM
23

I don't think I've ever seen that word before... is it shorthand for cuckold, or something?
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:02 AM
11

Got a link? I'd love to see that :) I only ever watched Futurama off and on, and must've missed that during an off-time.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 05:46 PM
9

I just got married after dating for 3.5 years and living together for 1 of those. Sometimes I still wonder... maybe it's just because I'm reading this thread, though. (I'm not joking; just trying to self-analyze) She does act like a child when she doesn't get her way, but in other ways she's very strong. Anyways, already married.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:23 AM
3

I've always wanted my post-mortem body to be pseudo re-animated by ropes/wires while a huge fog machine and ambient music come out. Scare the shit out of my family and friends.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 10:35 AM
2

I'm an actor and can host or perform. Also decent at writing dialogue, if needed.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 10:32 AM
1

Oh, like in the movie Snatch? Good movie.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 03:45 PM
9

Did some group come in to purposely write bad comments in an attempt to make MRM look bad?
/r/MensRights06/04/17 03:43 PM
4

And what if he's going to earn less in the future? Would they discount the amount the woman is allowed or take back money, later?
/r/MensRights06/04/17 06:03 AM
23

Rolling in his/her/their grave.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 12:19 PM
1

Damn! It's been on YouTube for 7 years... hope I didn't incur the copyright wrath simply by linking to it... Was working when I posted it. And just now checked it and it's still working.... Maybe not working only for your area?
/r/MensRights24/03/17 07:44 AM
3

An inanimate fucking object
/r/MensRights24/03/17 06:16 AM
5

Highly common in India, but they're not Muslim.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:42 AM
29

Idealism vs realism - interesting to see it manifest into this argument. munches more popcorn
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:13 PM
7

Don't feed the troll - their entire comment history is full of angst and fomenting arguments.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 05:08 AM
8

Just putting the %'s here for people: 1/35 =~ 2.86% 11250/275000 =~ 4.09%
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:14 AM
1

What's a men's shed?
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:04 AM
2

Thanks for that info! I never even considered freemasons and have never even heard of oddfellas. Much appreciated!
/r/MensRights19/02/17 05:33 AM
1

Thanks for that info! I never even considered freemasons and have never even heard of oddfellas. Much appreciated!
/r/MensRights19/02/17 05:30 AM
8

I'd actually love to hear advice on how I can help create more male spaces - I just don't know where to start. What sorts of things do you do / could I do?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 04:15 AM
4

I couldn't tell if it was written by the man with anxiety or the person who teased around and left. Too confusing.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:58 PM
1

It's true, there were many things wrong with the 1st and 2nd waves, but they ended up bringing unprecedented levels of equality into western societies. The results were much more fairness for females, who previously were second class citizens. While not perfect, they did bring about voting rights and worker's rights, among other things. After these waves came the not-so-effective waves and some of the worst parts of feminism. My main point about agreeing with seeing the initial steps of feminism…
/r/MensRights19/01/17 01:53 AM
1

I agree, but I also think band-aid solutions are needed in the short run (in the context). Changing a society from often groping to pretty much not groping isn't a quick fix.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 09:20 AM
2

In Japan, they have women-only train cars. This is due to the rampant groping on overfilled trains. In some countries, I'm very much for a presence of feminism and their work, as it does what 1st and 2nd wave feminism did for equality in the US and U.K. It's the more recent waves of feminism that are seriously rocking the boat.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 06:22 AM
3

NEVER Never say never! I mean, with enough time, I'd probably guess, eventually.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 12:21 PM
1

Oh, you're a mother? Well then, feel free to commit any crime you like!
/r/MensRights09/01/17 07:37 AM
1

Again, it's completely agreed utopia cannot be achieved. I did a thought experiment on what a utopia would be like, and it seemed like a robot society. No feelings to be hurt, everyone acting perfectly, etc. So, I agree a complete society might not even be good. But, I disagree that we should not try for it. By trying to achieve an impossible utopia, we have the possibility of improving current society.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:48 AM
2

I disagree that utopia is something impossible to strive towards. In Jill Dolan's book "Utopia in Performance" she talks a lot about what is utopia and how society can and should work towards it. She basically states that utopia is something that can never be fully/truly achieved, but it is something we should and can strive towards. As we continue to work towards it, our world can improve. As a side note, she does say that utopia can be briefly achieved in theater during performance.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:10 AM
1

I'm assuming this is a sarcastic comment in reference to OP's post. If not, refer to my first sentence.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:06 AM
18

Utopia is always something to strive for, but something we can never fully achieve. 100% safe feelings at all times is a utopian concept that will never come to true fruition. Closest I can imagine is permanent drugs that simulate safe feelings.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:38 AM
2

There's a Seattle event coming up on that list, if you're willing to take a day trip or something.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 05:22 PM
3

Damn, traveling to Melbourne just a few days after their showing on the 26th.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 05:21 PM
2

Don't even stress about it. We're just going to take away your posting privileges, is all. -The Grammar Nazi Party
/r/MensRights07/12/16 03:38 AM
1

*affect
/r/MensRights07/12/16 02:25 AM
2

/u/that-snot-dick
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:56 PM
2

By the way, Ivy League schools do offer theater degrees: http://ivy-league-colleges.com/theatre I know you're just rounding out your troll, so this is the last you'll ever hear from me.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 03:20 AM
2

Don't worry, I literally wrote a paper with 15 cited sources, if you'd just scroll down a bit. I'm not being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 02:49 PM
3

Oh yes, that was one of my main driving factors: being right. I'm an asshole, inherently, when I argue, and most of my life I've been really bad at being correct. Like, 90% inaccuracy rate. But I was always really convincing! Great rhetoric, etc. I'm a natural talker and persuader. Well, I needed to get those correctness stats up, so economics helped a ton.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 01:22 PM
2

Someone else said almost the same thing, earlier. You can check out my reply there, if you care to find it.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 01:19 PM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer_theory Queer theory "focuses on mismatches between sex, gender and desire." We mainly read from Judith Butler's philosophic writings on this theory (SHE DOES NOT MAKE READING EASY), and we read the play "M Butterfly" which is a queer adaptation of Madame Butterfly. Original cast had John Lithgow as a man with ambiguous sexual attractions.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:33 AM
2

Yeah, sounds about right. Anybody who focuses on their career will find a way of making money. Sounds like she did that.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:21 AM
3

Reddit is a fickle beast.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 04:31 AM
48

The data is all over the place, just have to go looking for it. I wrote this piece about a year ago, but it's still good to reference: I’ve participated in the wage gap debate a half dozen times, and have spent numerous personal hours researching both sides of the argument. For the most part, I understand the Feminist and social standpoints in this context, and on the flip side, I’ve personally studied Labor Economics and have read many of the actual reports for statistics. I’ve created this wit…
/r/MensRights30/11/16 03:24 AM
5

Don't know if you're being sarcastic... but it sounds like you're not. My school is recently ranked by Forbes at #12 for public colleges and #37 for research universities. And by the 2017 edition of Best Colleges is National Universities, #54, but for Public schools it's #16. It might not be in the same league as the ivy schools, but it's not a "shit uni."
/r/MensRights30/11/16 03:22 AM
11

Assuming a constant rate of dance steps and musicals performed per year, 7.5 jazz hands will devalue to approximately 6.67 in the first year, making it a constant devaluation of 0.83/year. After 10 years, your 7.5 jazz hands will become a negative asset at -0.8.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 01:45 AM
14

Neither cared, actually. The theater people had no clue what economics meant, and the economics people always just asked, "why?" One Econ professor, on day 1 of class, saw I was a dual major with theater and asked, "Why, are you planning to be a politician?"
/r/MensRights30/11/16 01:40 AM
3

Why did I get 2 degrees? Or, why do they have theory classes in theater majors?
/r/MensRights30/11/16 01:38 AM
8

I guess I'll have to start identifying as a genderless unicorn prince(ss) god(dess).
/r/MensRights30/11/16 01:36 AM
92

Hah! Very funny :) Luckily, and seriously, I have two degrees: Economics and Theater. In the theater theory classes, we tackled semiotics, feminist, gender, and queer theory. Looks like I'm the best of both worlds.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 05:15 PM
361

This is a fantastic video - I didn't realize the data was so consistent from that long ago. Economists have found the same results in much more recent studies, as well: Unmarried, continuously working women earning more than the same kind of men. Right about up to the age of 35, when the data drops off and men start to make more. The general theory is that this is due to women giving birth and dropping out of the workforce. I got a bachelors in economics and have spent many hours researching the…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 04:56 PM
46

(Video from 1981)
/r/MensRights29/11/16 04:52 PM
1

That's how most events are done when using the port-a-potties. One big section of shitters and a multigender line all waiting, together. Only downside is women usually take longer, so would more often be occupying them, but that's just life. The line is all that matters.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 02:18 AM
-2

Okay, devil's advocating for a moment: We've all witnessed women's lines being substantially longer than men's lines when there's an event. Why isn't this considered a fair solution? edit I agree their solution isn't a great one - mainly did this post to generate more dialogue as to why.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 12:51 AM
14

Just stop.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 02:34 PM
1

I feel like I'm collecting Pokemon, at this point.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:42 PM
24

This is why I did my own advertising on Facebook: Happy International Men's Day, everyone! Men: Give volunteering time to be a role model for young kids, if you can. Since the majority of divorces with children end with the woman getting full or majority custody, there is a severe lack of male role models for kids to look up to! Everyone: Have the men in your life take care of their "boys" and booty by getting checked at the doctor, regularly! In 2016, it is estimated that 181,000 men will be di…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 12:51 AM
15

Don't give them ideas...
/r/MensRights17/11/16 03:32 PM
1

/r/getmotivated
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:24 PM
3

Housing in China is very expensive in cities, because rich people are buying it all up and causing prices to go higher due to this lopsided demand. She definitely couldn't buy any house in any city in China with that little amount of money. Maybe in a town or village, sure. It's probably just a down payment or some other aspect of buying housing. I live in China.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 06:21 AM
70

12 is the best one! Hahaha, amazing! Love the new term "combat gap" - it's time to end the combat gap. Spectacular!
/r/MensRights28/10/16 06:21 PM
19

This is spectacular. I'm a teacher, now, and this gives such a great and tangible goal for the younger kids. Might just steal this :)
/r/MensRights28/10/16 02:54 PM
8

Same country that brought us Movember. Remember, remember, your ass on Movember.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 11:08 AM
1

NotAllCEOs CEOLivesMatter
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:25 PM
3

It's like you get half of it, but then are blind on the other half. Weird position to be in.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:22 PM
8

Doctors recommend checking for privilege at regular intervals.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:18 PM
4

Eh, life is easy come, easy go, anyways, so nothing really matters to me.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:17 PM
1

Just finally watched that... Jesus Christ that's infuriating. That lady needs to be thrown out the door on her ass, but then she might end up screaming that it's sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 08:52 AM
1

Just finally watched that... Jesus Christ that's infuriating. That lady needs to be thrown out the door on her ass, but then she might end up screaming that it's sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 08:52 AM
34

While I don't think female firefighters can equal a male firefighter in strength, they don't act like pansies. They are strong women, usually, just not strong enough for that job.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 03:46 AM
21

Sounds like how one might describe female firefighters, as well.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 03:25 AM
6

Okay, I've been in China and missed the bandwagon with this Hugh Mungus phenomenon. What's it all about?
/r/MensRights01/10/16 02:40 PM
6

Tried on Facebook, had a friend of 10 years write me off. Wow.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 10:45 AM
6

Same happened to me! He said 26 was the cut off year to get the vaccine. So, fuck me, right? Oh wait, don't, I'm unvaccinated.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 01:41 AM
6

I'm in the US and remember reading about the vaccine and HPV and how important it is. Saw a video that said 1/5 people under the age of blah-blah have HPV, or some such number. So, when I asked my doctor, they said I had to be under 26 to get it (I was 27 at the time). Now I'm 33 and still haven't had any vaccine, although, I don't think I have HPV, I always just thought it would be a smart thing to have.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 01:38 AM
11

No life-saving medication for you, straighty!
/r/MensRights14/09/16 01:34 AM
30

This will signify the end of our 'RoMAN Empire' in future history books. FTFY
/r/MensRights30/07/16 02:13 PM
21

"You can make more money with a flop than you can with a hit!" -The Producers (a show, not the people)
/r/MensRights17/07/16 08:56 AM
1

This is correct. I have a bachelors in economics, so I can at least understand the basic theories, and this was addressed in my monetary policy class. Essentially, there are two methods to reducing crime: More police to catch criminals or increasing severity of penalties. Both will show a reduction in crime.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 10:14 AM
16

If she's still desirable at that point.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:22 AM
2

Wow, this website and videos are great!
/r/MensRights11/06/16 06:18 AM
2

Thank you! I'll definitely talk about emotional/verbal abuse, as well, and how that can fan the flames to escalation to physical violence.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:21 PM
2

Basically, I want the students to come out of this lesson with an unbiased look at DV, from both sides of the argument.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 01:45 PM
1

Good idea on the debate! Will do :)
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:34 AM
1

Not to worry, I can supplement the book any way I want, and my supervisor is actually pretty egalitarian about things.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:33 AM
2

Okay, serious question: If there's actually someone bent on bombing Milo, why would they call it in, first? Wouldn't they just let it happen so they can bomb? (Please don't put me on a list!)
/r/MensRights03/06/16 01:40 AM
4

Can't see youtube, atm, did she do this to many people? Were her victims imprisoned?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:24 AM
2

And they always feel at risk of rape because they decided to define non-rape situations as rape. Live in fear! Men are everywhere plotting to hurt you! Rape is just around the next corner!
/r/MensRights26/05/16 01:24 AM
1

Thanks very much! Yeah, China is pretty annoying; half the time my VPN doesn't work, and when it does, it severely slows down my internet speed. Thanks again!
/r/MensRights26/05/16 12:54 AM
1

I can do torrents in China, but I skipped that bandwagon so never really understood how to do it without getting viruses. That's a good point they bring up about judging the entire world. It's like the report writers are a god alien come to reward or smite the world depending on how they see it.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 11:36 PM
1

Ooh, I do know of girlwriteswhat - very cool, I didn't know who that group was, but now that I do, I'll check them out. Thanks for the recommendation and the Starship Troopers reference haha :)
/r/MensRights25/05/16 11:34 PM
3

NOTICE TO ALL: Obviously a troll. Don't feed.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 11:32 AM
3

Actually, no - I was reading about feminism on Wikipedia, and it was linked from there. I'm in China, currently, and can't view your video b/c of the internet restrictions; what is it?
/r/MensRights25/05/16 08:05 AM
4

Their argument is something like this: It's a man's world, therefore, the blame for all atrocities and bad things fall on the shoulders of men, including the suffering of men. It's like a self-fulfilling prophecy based on the faulty idea that the patriarchy is something that is inherently wrong with society, or that it even exists, at all.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 03:48 PM
5

On that note, is he wearing a cape or is that a red sweater or something on his back?
/r/MensRights13/04/16 10:15 AM
17

This picture is true, though. Women in America do make 77 cents to the dollar in comparison to men due to their self selection into lower wage careers, on average. This picture seems to be showing some of the secondary effects of the higher wage jobs that men tend to select and the subsequent complaints women inevitably mention.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 12:23 AM
40

I'd call it more of a hard candy shell.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:37 AM
2

plans to do something about it He plans to make it humorous, so that it can be a joke. /s
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:59 PM
2

Then women should be worshiping and praising the patriarchy haha
/r/MensRights10/07/15 10:19 PM
2

"Limitations for liberation!" New feminist slogan.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 06:42 PM
3

CAN WE PLEASE ADDRESS THE REAL PROBLEM HERE? MODS: We need a Game of Thrones SPOILER tag on this one!
/r/MensRights10/07/15 06:12 PM
14

Jesus Christ! That advertisement with little girls swearing like sailors makes me sad for the future generation.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:09 PM
10

She's putting on the patronizing face of "I don't even give a shit, anymore, I'm right and you're wrong because I say so." Reminds me of Dolores Umbridge.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:44 PM
3

You know, that's a really great point of view. I could have had more sugar, rather than spice, in my rebuttal. I suppose, it could have been worded less coldly, and more friendly. I'll definitely be thinking of your post, the next time I think about starting a debate!
/r/MensRights09/07/15 06:10 AM
1

Hmm... fair assessment. I guess, I was fighting an uphill battle (negating feminists with inaccurate info), so thought it would be better to fully explain things, rather than keep it short.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 05:03 AM
1

Antagonize is to be hostile or unfriendly... I don't see any language in there, other than my contempt for Buzzfeed, that would indicate me being hostile or unfriendly. Just because I'm not agreeing with them, doesn't mean I'm being hostile. Disagreeing, by nature, will be the opposite of what another is saying, so must include some kind of negation to their claims. The way I presented info was, I'd say, pretty easy going, minus the capitalized letters, for effect, on the word "long."
/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:36 AM
1

Hi, yes - it's the 5th source on Gender Pay Gap's wikipedia site. Site Report
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:37 AM
1

Yeah, these particular ladies were coworkers from around 10 years ago. I haven't spoken with them, since, and frankly, forgot they were on my "friends" list.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:36 AM
1

Seriously, though!
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:22 AM
9

Yeah... I did pretty decently on keeping my cool the whole way through, and one of my buddies saw it all and messaged me, "You must like talking to brick walls." In the end, the original poster blocked me on Facebook (that's part of the reason I couldn't screenshot the rest of the convo), and the Red colored girl said these arguments are why she de-friended me "long ago." I think I'm better off, now. I can hear a whisper on the winds with their voices cursing my name... it's a bitter sweet wind.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 11:04 PM
96

Not OP, but I tried, yesterday. Here's the beginning of that debate, and it only spiraled from there: http://i.imgur.com/TjTMwwe.png
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:52 PM
31

I got into an argument, yesterday, about this exact topic. It was astounding how the lesbian women (this is a fact, not pejorative) I was discussing with were vehemently disgusted by the numbers as well as with me defending reality. Well, I'm no longer their friend, so that's a weight off my shoulders. Here's just the beginning of that discussion, and it went stereotypically from there, but was too lazy to keep copy/pasting: http://i.imgur.com/TjTMwwe.png Wish I had waited to see your easy to re…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:50 PM
0

While I appreciate the content thought, the site is riddled with video ads that immensely slow down my shite computer's performance. Fuck your ad riddled shit site.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:51 PM
2

I have many Facebook friends who are very much like this. I've highly considered posting my counter points on their obviously feminazi posts, but realized that, if I did, I'd just be wasting my time. They're a lost cause until they see the light for themselves.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:48 PM
22

What a sad excuse for a "study." They only looked at the women's side of the equation and - surprise, surprise - it was always the man's fault. No fucking kidding, you fucking morons. This study couldn't be more biased if it tried.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:42 PM
4

Ooooh, I get it - it's written in code, and I've cracked the code! Here's the code, and then after, what it decrypts into: grow = video record everything some balls = get away from the situation honestly = and call the cops "If you're a male victim of domestic abuse, all I have to say is video record everything, get away from the situation, and call the cops."
/r/MensRights26/05/15 07:39 PM
2

Jesus, it almost reads like a really dark The Onion piece.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 02:02 AM
77

I only know what is written in this article, regarding this situation, but from that, I'd say this woman is a saint for her attempts.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 01:51 AM
2

Great article! Thought it was going to be the voice of a feminist trying to convince the world of everything is rape, but glad to see it was the exact opposite!
/r/MensRights23/05/15 01:32 AM
2

Archived article, so you don't have to give them clicks
/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:22 PM
2

Fair enough, I guess she's just a manipulative, lying, murderous sexual lover of children.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:08 PM
9

Could we get a mod thing going where, when there's an archived link in the comments, there's a Flair notice on the post saying so, and to not click the original comment?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:29 PM
2

I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore of Charlize Theron's character in Mad Max!
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:24 PM
7

What we need is some strategic wordplay. Some marketing. "We're not 'against women,' we're 'For Equality!'"
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:15 PM
2

Sounds like this pedophile deserves a rally to give her a more stern and realistic punishment. If a male pedophile plotting murder got only 60 days, people wouldn't come with a picket - they'd come with knives and guns.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:12 PM
1

I don't like pie.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:04 AM
2

Best part: Feminist - "Let's talk about your views and policies without going into longitudinal studies." Meaning: Tell me what your feel, but not why nor with proof to back it up, so when I contest everything you say, you can't prove you're right.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:14 PM
4

Well, that's one way to end a horrible marriage without having to pay her anything, afterwards - if you can survive the crazy, that is.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:29 PM
2

Requiring companies with more than 250 employees to publish their gender pay gap - the difference between average pay for male and female employees The average pay of males vs females. This doesn't take into account job titles, job levels, educational backgrounds, hours worked, tenure, experience, or god damn anything relevant to wage. Here's exactly what will happen: The average company that publishes will show the 77 to 100 ratio that is always thrown around and will, in turn, give fuel to the…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:54 PM
2

I'd like to think, for the kids who said, "both," that, when presented with the death scenario, they chose their dad due to his resilience and better chance of survival. (yes, all those commas are necessary and properly placed)
/r/MensRights08/05/15 09:08 PM
1

Former? Former.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:00 PM
3

Look up the definition of "coerce" and then think about what you just said. If anyone is coerced into sex, that's a violent rape.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:31 PM
1

I'm so triggered right now, I could eat a donut. Somebody stop the onslaught against my mental illness!
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:43 PM
1

I don't think we're disagreeing about anything at this point.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:35 AM
1

Yeah, I noticed that. I just graduated from there last year, and I'm a bit annoyed, although, not surprised.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:31 AM
2

That's possible, but even if they did, they still were able to find these people who all would vote based on a sexist reasoning.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:30 AM
1

And the ones that can, do. There are women who have competed against men and held their own, but it is a great minority of women that can do so. If memory serves me correctly, there has only been 1 woman in history to ever crack the top 100 players, and I think she was in the top 10, even, but that part might be bad memory.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:47 PM
1

This same topic was posted 12 days ago, and here's what I said, then: To be honest - I don't agree that this is discrimination against men, and here's my reasoning: In top level competition, for a great many activities, men are simply better, at our current levels and abilities. Chess, Tennis, Swimming, Running, Basketball, Wrestling, Fighting/Boxing - the list can keep going. Only the most elite of women that can compete with men, maybe the top 1%, often do, but what about the women who are pas…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:43 PM
14

Ya know? Some days, I just wanna be a shitlord without the stigma.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:41 PM
3

Should be an hourly reminder for everywhere but here.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:18 PM
24

That would be a great test! Innocently ask the tumbler feminists, in a separate, non-threatening way, whether they believe they have any signs of mental illness. Log the results. Then, ask those same people their opinions on this rape topic. Log the results. Cross reference and find the % of fucking psychopaths. Then publish the results.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 09:13 PM
2

Women's shelter? Why, so he can cheat some more?! /s
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:25 PM
3

Well, if I recall correctly, which I really might not since I read those books a long time ago, I believe Hagrid had specifically said not to do what Malfoy did and then Malfoy did it anyways, stupidly. Also, in the context of the movie, Malfoy had been a twat to the trio for quite a long time, and when he continued to be an ass at a low point in their life, sometimes human nature takes over, and an asshole gets punched in the face. It is a nice coincidence that it is Hermione though.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 05:18 AM
13

Wow, what a great message! I agree with everything except one small, mostly inconsequential point: In the movie where she attacks the boy and proclaims "that felt good," the context of the characters and situtation is vastly different from the context of a DV abuser on a DV victim. Movie story historical context: In the series, the magical wizard equivalent of Hitler is rising to power, and the boy is the son of a vehement follower. The boy follows in his father's footsteps and also hates agains…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 09:40 PM
1

Headlines don't sell papes. Newsies sell papes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFxcHcvEibE
/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:47 PM
24

Oh, I see how it is, Canada. When the men have a discussion about men's rights, there are protests and fire alarm pulls. When women have a demonstration "men will not be tolerated." Fuckin' hell.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:17 PM
1

Exactly - there are other leagues, with lower quality players, for a reason.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:41 AM
2

To be honest - I don't agree that this is discrimination against men, and here's my reasoning: In top level competition, for a great many activities, men are simply better, at our current levels and abilities. Chess, Tennis, Swimming, Running, Basketball, Wrestling, Fighting/Boxing - the list can keep going. Only the most elite of women that can compete with men, maybe the top 1%, often do, but what about the women who are passionate about the sport, but would get absolutely decimated when playi…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:41 PM
5

Yeah, I dated a girl who did this shit, but instead of squaring up with the other guy, I would square up with her and remove her stupid ass from the situation. Dumb girls brought up to think they're invincible against men.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:32 PM
10

This is exactly what happened in the South Park episode "The Wacky Molestation Adventure" from season 4. Cartman convinces all the kids of the town to claim they've been molested by their parents, so the parents go to jail, and then the kids could do whatever they want without punishment or rules. Their town quickly devolves into a Mad Max style world, and it's hilarious. Except, now, it's too accurate.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:26 PM
104

Also, if they have a Twitter account, tweet at them.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 03:04 PM
74

Does this information, research, and thought process require scholar status?
/r/MensRights29/03/15 04:10 PM
6

My brother is an example of this. He has threatened and attempted suicide for a few years, now. He grew up with a string of distressing life events, and just recently his wife left him. I'm scared for my brother :(
/r/MensRights29/03/15 03:43 PM
9

Shhh...
/r/MensRights26/03/15 12:57 PM
4

Cheers to that! She's my new favorite actor.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 01:18 AM
1

Couldn't help but notice the news anchor lady said "... had a response go rival." Either she made an honest mistake, or she's too old to understand the term "viral" in regards to internet things.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 10:51 PM
5

But men are not entirely to blame for the steep decline in marriage, Crouse pointed out. “A lot of women fear marriage. While feminism is a spent force, the ultimate consequences of that philosophy is a whole generation of women who don’t want any man to tell them what to do, and don’t really understand the give and take that is necessary for a marriage relationship.” Loved this quote.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 06:30 PM
2

Based on your spelling errors and location mention, I read your entire post in a Scottish brogue both in my head and verbally.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 06:28 PM
1

Looks like the Y axes on those graphs are for different items - they're lists, and are explained in the headlines of each graph.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 05:30 PM
1

I got about 3.5 hours of sleep, last night, and mistakenly read that as "Sex Assault Rifles" and was thoroughly confused.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:06 PM
2

Oh holy fuck - that's a terrible scenario! Yeah, that would be horrible. For some reason, I was trying to think of how one could abort money from the phrase 'financial abortion' haha!
/r/MensRights25/02/15 06:00 AM
5

Can you help me to understand financial abortion? Hypothetical examples would help me to better understand the concept.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 05:29 AM
19

Holy hell! I just read that article and it's absolutely despicable what these doctors and researchers are doing! Refusing/neglecting to tell non-genetic fathers about their situation is a terrible!
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:16 PM
0

Like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fBjbkOHsj0
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:37 PM
2

As for the job offer, I mean, if they really want a homo sapiens, that's their business, but I wouldn't settle for anything less than homo sapien sapien.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:39 PM
1

Anyone I went to high school with is at most an acquaintance on Facebook (see: Friend), except for the people who were already friends with me in high school, whom I still hang out with. I'm 31. These people don't matter, in the long run.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 09:27 AM
1

It's so absurd, I burst out laughing. This is what idiocracy looks like.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 06:15 PM
9

I'm assuming he's doing it for the latter. Even if it were my mother, whom I love and cherish, that tried to cut my dick off with a boxcutter, I'd never go near her, again.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:44 AM
5

Shh
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:42 AM
3

I think he has a point in the message, but the faux melodramatic delivery was hard to sit through.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:16 PM
1

"given the facts" What facts? I didn't hear them spout any facts.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:47 PM
2

I only buy organic beings. Much better for the bowels.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:57 PM
2

Whoever wrote this is a retard. I could point out many, many idiotic flaws in their poorly constructed argument whine, but I'll just show off this one: (in regards to so many white men being/becoming CEOs): "It doesn't look like change. It doesn't even look like America." Fun fact, ya fucking doofus, 77.7% of Americans are Caucasian. And the majority of business leaders are men. Put that shit together, and look what we've got! 8 out of 10 of the CEOs are white males! I guess, actually, this is w…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:37 PM
14

I think that it is, in a roundabout way. Essentially, a lot of men have silently agreed to bend when a woman demands something. This complacency and compliance permeates everything that these bendable men do. If it can work in minor situations, what about in major situations? I've only just now thought about this, and I think that it does deserve a thought.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 10:03 AM
3

He's a larger man with less mobility that an average girthed man. Tripping was probably the easiest way of stopping her, rather than trying to wrap her up in some sort of jiu-jitsu restraining hold. Also, with such a crazed beast, I'd be concerned of the biting factor. Tripping was likely the fastest, and easiest method to get her away. Pushing didn't work, swinging back didn't work. Tripping worked. Be water, my friend.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 05:58 PM
3

Ah, the ol' Reddit objectaroo!
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:56 PM
1

Whoa. I didn't really explore the site... that's some weird stuff, right there.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:46 PM
5

Here's my favorite
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:43 PM
11

Tried to find a funny pic, ended up with this site: http://golbatsforequality.tumblr.com/post/106660345034/breasts-are-not-inherently-gendered-penises-are
/r/MensRights01/02/15 05:25 PM
1

Totally agreed.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:20 PM
2

On a related note (I really, really wish I could find this research study source, again, but here's the gist): When it comes to dating, women have higher social capital than men in the early years. From youth until age 27, women have the upper hand in dating, as they have what men want: beauty and youth. Men of their same age range, youth until 27, don't have what women want in men: money, possessions, status, etc. So, until age 27, approximately, women will have the upper hand in dating and can…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:39 PM
9

Holy shit. That ending is horrifying. What a terrible mother - she should be publicly shamed for this, at the bare minimum.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 05:54 AM
8

Here's #11: http://i.imgur.com/caSVIZv.jpg
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:14 PM
1

Wow, what a broken process. I can understand why it didn't work - because they're fucking retarded.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 09:23 AM
5

God, I hope they do this, now.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 06:57 PM
15

Holy shit, you weren't joking! My god, I thought only in a backwards world would this be reality.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:49 PM
36

“I think that women of colour should speak first in class,” Ashburn said after the panel discussion. Wow, it's a slippery slope, out there! First women, then women of color - next: Women of color who are also disabled and unemployed. There will be some benign hierarchy of who gets to speak first, and the only way to assess this would be to go down a typed-out list of check-marked boxes of characteristics and whoever has more boxes checked gets to speak first. Silence until we determine if that p…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:13 PM
4

Childish rage, much?
/r/MensRights14/01/15 07:01 PM
5

What notnotnotfred said. And more specifically, about 1/5 down the page where it says, in bold, "Questions About Specific Issues"
/r/MensRights08/01/15 01:10 AM
1

Jesus H. Christ! I face-palmed and uttered, "Oh no..." while reading this article. I don't live in San Francisco, but if you do, and care to speak your mind, you can message the mayor here: http://www.sfmayor.org/index.aspx?page=7
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:58 PM
1

Well, at least she accurately qualified it by calling herself "Bitch Problems"
/r/MensRights18/12/14 07:05 AM
21

We put the mentally ill into institutions, so we should put the responsibly ill into fenced-off malls they can endlessly wander. /s
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:45 PM
1

This is great info! Anyone have a link to the actual government data to which they're referring? Didn't see it from mobile...
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:21 PM
1

Well said!
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:51 AM
2

I tried having a regular conversation with some feminist identifying college girls, somewhat recently. We were speaking about how a girl had been purposely bumped into on the street by a guy who said to her, "You should smile, more," or something to that effect (this was 2 months ago, so memory is about 3/4). Anyways, they went on to explain how that was a scary situation. I agreed - if that happened to me, as a male, I'd be seriously weirded out. The next part is where I had a problem: One of t…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 09:43 PM
11

Or, third option, here: We create a world that wants to celebrate IMD. Start small; change locally to change the world.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:51 AM
16

I had this exact same thought on Facebook with a similar post, and the feminists came out of the woodwork: (Color coded people, for her pleasure) http://i.imgur.com/RMtN7eV.png
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:38 AM
3

With cherry picked edits, any good producer can make any story from any footage.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:21 AM
9

If we allow things to continue as they are going, then we will have laws against offending people. To those types of people who are easily offended, I 'quote' Stephen Fry: http://i.imgur.com/fGelg.jpg
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:06 PM
17

"Officer! Officer! That man over there cat called me! Arrest him!" Or, even worse: Officer1: "We heard you were cat calling a women passing by." Black man: "What? No, I was just walking to the grocery store..." Officer2: "Well, we could've sworn we heard a cat call... up against the wall!"
/r/MensRights03/11/14 08:52 PM
2

Sounds like kids talking.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:22 PM
15

Exactly. Everyone knows that drunk people are the victims. Unless it's a drunk male and female together, in which case the female is the default victim, because women have less control over their drunken state than men. /s
/r/MensRights29/10/14 08:01 PM
3

I had dated a girl for 4 years, and this is exactly how it was - friends and family constantly badgering her about marriage, and her getting jealous when others were married. Unfortunately, my now-ex would blow up at me about it about once a month. Between the blow ups, she would complain and berate me nearly every day. This behavior showed me that she can't control herself, so I broke it off with her.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 12:02 AM
1

This is an amazing phrase! Stealing this.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 02:49 AM
9

I've spoken with a feminist about men's issues, and, after great debate, she said, "I'm want to agree with you, and everything you said makes perfect sense, but, I just can't." Some people just aren't ready to see the truth. I think it's the same as a fat person who looks in the mirror every day and doesn't care. It takes that one day, when they finally look in the mirror in disgust with themselves, and actively decide to change. So, what I'm saying is, "I want you to want men's rights."
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:36 PM
5

Many feminists have a deep seated belief based on very loose logic: They believe that, since all men perpetuate patriarchy, inherently, and patriarchy is bad, therefore all men are part of the bad power-group. Moreover, all power-groups exert their power over groups of less power, and for equality, ANYTHING that can reduce the power-group's amount of power, is an altruistic endeavor.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:30 PM
6

What are the steps to blocking their websites? I use IE at work and Firefox at home...
/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:16 PM
1

/s
/r/MensRights19/09/14 11:50 PM
1

Here's a study on the matter: CHEST HAIR In 2000 Bissing et al.31 examined the effect of chest hair on the TTI when self-adhesive pads were used. Removal of chest hair from hirsute patients decreased the TTI by 35%, so they recommended chest shaving in such patients before defibrillation. We conducted a similar study looking at the effect of chest hair with the gel pad/paddle method.31 Might an increase in paddle force in itself be sufficient to overcome the additional TTI? The answer was that i…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:50 PM
5

I guess men and boys... no mention of women or girls being lured and framed in this video.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:40 AM
2

Hey, it's nice seeing you ouside of /r/acting! I appreciate your reply, and here's what I think: I'd argue against typical definitions/thinking to say that Feminism in 1st world countries has gotten to a point where it has become a part of our culture, a la patriarchy. The problems that women face in 1st world societies are vastly different from those of men, but, when weighted, they would be nearly the same weight as those for men. Moreover, Feminists are not created equal and can hurt equality…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:24 PM
7

I think they put specific names and situations so that any one of them could be easily researched and verified, but yeah, it would be even more convenient to have links listed. I assume it was a choice for aesthetics - no links to make it succinct and clean looking.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:39 AM
6

Exactly - if "patriarchy" can penetrate and permeate society, affecting laws, culture, etc., so can feminism.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:37 AM
38

This news blurb doesn't mention anything about the woman at all, other than she was there, at some point. It makes me think she was a stranger and just ran away before police could find her. Are there any other sources specifically noting that the woman was also apprehended, but let go with no charges?
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:46 PM
25

I've had this exact same conversation twice in the past 2 weeks with 2 different people! My god, it's like they can't wrap their heads around the fact that there's a whole world outside of feminism that can also include equality!
/r/MensRights25/07/14 10:25 PM
18

Seriously. That part got me irate - I'd have said, "I'm not some stranger, I live around the corner and this is my nephew, who loves slides. If those other ladies, who aren't with the school, can be here, then so can I."
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:44 PM
3

"She added that she was bitter following her parents' divorce in 1991, and that she made up the rape story as her father had disappointing her." So, she was bitter since before she could formulate sentences? This girl was 1 or 2 years old, and bitter as hell.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:36 PM
27

I went to a public park with a fireworks show for 4th of July, yesterday. A group of college age girls, who a friend of a friend knew, were complaining about a man sitting next to them. They said he was "super creepy" because he was an older, white male, with long, gray hair, with a black child, appx 2 years old. They immediately condemned him in their minds as a pedophile, and said as much to our group, in confidence. I spoke up in defense of the man, saying he could very easily be a proud gran…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 05:32 PM
3

Depends on whether you give a shit if males continue to be productive in society. Not necessarily true. A college degree, these days, does not equate to a productive member of society, as it no longer equates to a job out of college. While many are more educated, their debt drives them to unproductive jobs, as the job they trained for is often filled. Anyways, point being: college degree ≠ productive job Furthermore, it's possible less men are going into college if there are more opportunities t…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 10:24 PM
11

But, but - who will care for the children?
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:14 PM
2

OUT, DAMN SPOT!
/r/MensRights30/06/14 03:18 PM
30

I was having a "debate" with a feminist (debate quoted b/c they didn't understand basic logic; specifically this person - not all feminists), and the feminist go-to reaction is to say the bad things that happen to men is due to men via Patriarchy, and therefore not a problem, but rather, a tipping of the scales away from male dominance. Holy. Fucking. Shit.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:19 PM
1

At least there's this ad out there: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1-zKAopUxA
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:29 AM
5

they're doing the whole "Men are evil and disgusting" thing Exactly! It's either they believe all men will rifle through underwear or they're being petty about it: girls asked for it, not boys, so only girls get to use it.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:49 PM
12

Thank you! I was wondering why the resolution was so poor.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:44 PM
1

That's a social norm integrated into society by DeBeers marketing. Before their ad campaign, almost nobody bought a diamond for engagement rings.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 09:35 PM
36

Reminds me of this quote. And just in case anybody's wondering - NO, I'm not calling all women sheep, for god's sake. Edit Also, reminds me of this one.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:44 AM
0

Let's cut the bull shit, here's what's going on: The question you're trying to posit to the public is: "Is it morally right for an adult to have sex with a minor?" The question I'm asking is: "When an adult has unlawful sex with a minor, aka raping a minor, what should their punishment be?" You've pointlessly, tangentially, and abundantly made it clear you're okay with adults having sex with pubescent teenagers; in many countries, this is lawful and par for the course. What I'm saying is that it…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:27 AM
-1

Firstly, we're discussing a hypothetical survey that neither you nor I will implement. So, what does it matter? To address your question, it's because calling it rape is the lawful term one would use in court to discuss the act during the hearing - unless you're the defense attorney, trying to save the rapist from their fate. Rape is rape, whether it's a violent rapist or a statutory rapist; so, it's rape.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 03:18 AM
0

I understand that - it's a simple concept, but thank you for illuminating it for those that might not understand.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:39 AM
2

I mean, sure - we could sugar coat the act of rape, but I don't think it would serve this kind of information gathering.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:27 AM
2

I completely understand - I just think a paradigm shift starts with facilitating learning to a large population. If, somehow, the US population could realize how out of sync a male vs a female's sentencing in this situation truly is, it would affect how the population reacts to these situations, and we may eventually see a change to the laws. In an ideal world, that is.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 11:10 PM
8

Yeah... yeah, that's just plain crazy. If anybody tries to get anyone to kill their spouse, that person needs to be locked up with therapy.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:13 PM
13

Seriously. I think what needs to happen is a massive survey that asks a simple, moral question: "If a 24 year old teacher rapes a 15 year old student, what should be their punishment? A. Prison sentence with therapy B. Prison sentence, no therapy C. Therapy, with no prison time" Guaranteed, nobody picks C.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 08:55 PM
3

but to say a super elite class of wealthy banksters with ties to royalty and secret societies is representative of male dominance over women is fucking bonkers, even for me. Did someone actually say this, or is this your own definition of "patriarchy?"
/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:31 PM
15

When it comes to studies, 2007 is very recent.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 07:11 PM
45

Exactly! Just reverse the gender of a situation to see if it's sexist or not. OP's twitter pic is highly sexist.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:22 PM
1

This is fascinating data mining! Thanks for the link!
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:17 PM
3

Your link goes to a blank page on his website.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:34 PM
11

I've been there before and it's like this everywhere in Vegas. I believe the mentality of the club owners goes like this: Women get cheaper ticket prices because men will only enter/stay at clubs that have a good ratio of men to women - and we want men in the club, since they'll spend more money. (Unsure if data backs this up)
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:32 PM
0

Wow - way to completely miss the point. Listen, I get it - some feminists are misandrists. Let's tell those misandrists to go to hell. This isn't a fucking war between all men and all women, and it's not even a war between feminists and MRM's. It's not a war at all, and it doesn't need battles. It's assholes being assholes and they need to get fucked, is what I'm saying. Not everybody in the Feminist movement hates men and/or is an asshole. At the same time, not everyone in the MRM movement hate…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:23 AM
0

Agreed. I didn't see that post until you linked it here, but I think my statements go above and beyond that person's and still stand behind this post.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:54 AM
4

Nov. 19th is Int'l Men's Day.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:25 AM
19

Looks like the right thing to do would be to keep your mouth shut and hide it from adults until you got back home. Seriously, though - if you accidentally bring something somewhere, you're a human being and made a simple mistake. It's the same as forgetting where you placed your keys, etc. Punishing children for turning in a beer or plastic gun will give the opposite effect of teaching them a valuable lesson.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 10:24 PM
3

Whoever wrote that article is doomed to having shitty relationships the entire time they engage in those actions.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 10:13 PM
-2

Your responses are pure gold - truly a rarity to find one like you in the wild. Congrats on making it this far in life!
/r/MensRights14/02/14 12:28 AM
-2

I'll own up to it, unlike OP's silly explanation. I fucked up on that word.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:22 PM
-2

You're a moron, and your lengthy explanation of "intentional" mistakes sounds like a shaky coverup for your lack of knowledge. Good luck with résumés and getting a job after high school! Downvotes only make me stronger. Ironically edited for typos
/r/MensRights13/02/14 09:17 PM
3

Okay, this one is riddled with problems, so instead of giving you every single example, which would take too long, I'll give you the overview: Lack of capitalization at the beginning of sentences Inappropriate and overabundant use of quotation marks. These should not be used to stress words or phrases, as you've done, but used to quote someone or something Punctuation goes on the inside of quotation marks Also, speeeling probelms - dood dude. dooshbag douche bag. EDIT Downvotes only make me stro…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:54 PM
1

Fun Fact: In many Asian countries they have Valentine's Day same as America, but only men receive gifts. Then, one month later, the men reciprocate on March 14th, a day called White Day.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 07:43 PM
-7

I think you definitely have a valid question, but I'm not writing to respond to that. I'm here to grammar shame you. Shame. SHAME! But in all seriousness, when I see someone's written stance on an argument, and the spelling and punctuation aren't done properly, I immediately view the argument as weak. Probably not the same for most people; I just have OCD when it comes to poor grammar.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 06:50 PM
2

"I wasn't normal." But you are now? Fuck you, crazy bitch - you've murdered 2 children over the course of 2 years. You don't get to claim you're better now, and deserve to live out a normal life, just a few years after the incidence of absolute, horrific insanity.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 04:27 PM
17

What would be a standard Feminist rebuttal to this?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:28 AM
1

To each their own, I suppose, but I was taught queer theory from a PhD theorist in my university theory class that it was a sliding scale - that's why I put it that way. If things have changed in the past 3 years, I don't know that part.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:42 PM
1

I guess there are multiple ways of saying "infinite" possibilities.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:59 PM
4

Essentially, since gender activities, etc. are a construct of society (i.e. girls like pink because pink is a girly color [see Judith Butler, Imitation and Gender Insubordination]), if we try to imagine a utopian society, where your gender isn't based on how your parents brought you up + how society treats you, your gender can be whatever you want it to be (again, this is in a utopian world > something impossible to attain [see Jill Dolan - Utopian Performative]). So, the end result is that gend…
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:03 PM
12

Since they used quotation marks for that top quote, I'd love to know who said those words!
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:22 PM
41

In gender theory, one's gender lies on a sliding scale from male to female, with degrees of each in-between.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:21 PM
12

That is a beautiful quote, hah! I've used my mediocre Paint skills to create this.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 05:57 PM
2

Here's a solid standup routine about this exact same argument: http://youtu.be/rwPg2oarG_c
/r/MensRights26/12/13 12:39 PM
1

To expand on this concept, it also can be viewed in economic terms. The value of a statistical life is equal to the derivative of wage with respect to risk, which means that, the less risk averse you are, the lower you value physical harm to yourself. In textbook form: "The value of a statistical life is based on how much people are willing to pay for small changes in risk, and therefore reflects how risk averse they are." People who take on jobs like timber cutting, hunting, fishing, constructi…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 06:51 PM
2

Soooo.... this is clearly a train wreck. It's got a model and a singer, neither of which are actors, acting in a big budget movie. It's a shitty money grab with a trite plot. Edit Here's the trailer
/r/MensRights22/12/13 01:46 PM
1

I think you're definitely right, and to add onto that, for more robust statistics, it would be beneficial to also compare, if possible, the numbers of court cases that end in conviction for males & females, to see if either have a higher chance of not being convicted of crime.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:23 PM
2

Thank you so much! This is precisely what I've been looking for!
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:34 AM
3

Ah, that definitely helps me to understand the numbers. Do you happen to know of a source I can reference? Thank you!
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:14 AM
1

Oooooh, hahaha, now I get it. I knew you were desperately confused about something, either statistically, grammatically, or overall just what's going on, and I finally figured out what it was! What you gave me is the relative incarceration rates of females to males - great. But, I wasn't asking for that. If you'd simply read my question and post, you'd know that's not what I was asking, and your short replies didn't help in the matter, either.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 05:18 AM
2

1female in 13.4430520567089 men What does this mean? Are you saying a ratio of females to males? Also, where did you find this information?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 02:59 AM
9

Can someone help me understand the 1 in 9 statistic and how it's generated? I tried throwing out this number in class the other day, but got a lot of pushback, and I didn't have a good source to cite. From looking at this website (prompted from the image's source), I'm seeing these numbers, specifically from this pdf: Prisoners under the jurisdiction of state or federal correctional authorities, December 31, 2012 Male - 1,462,147 Female - 108,766 From browsing that pdf and a quick look around th…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:57 AM
1

I hope they're seeking damages from both the guards AND the prison, if possible - the prison could probably pay more money than the guards ever could. Also, I haven't looked it up, but if it's a public/gov't owned prison, maybe they could sue the state? <----- question b/c I have very little to zero knowledge/experience in this matter.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 09:03 AM
10

The victims are seeking more than $25,000 in damages Good Lord, I hope this is just a placeholder number, because if it's around that amount, I'd say they're undervaluing their damages by a long shot.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 06:46 AM
11

If anyone ever actually says this to you (I pray no one ever does), here's my best reply: "Sure, I'll go check it next to the logic you checked on the way in."
/r/MensRights06/12/13 11:01 PM
3

There was a study published very recently that said all men (in US) prefer Asian and Latino women, Asian being #1 by a slim margin. It found that, overall, all men prefer women of a different ethnicity than their own. Similar findings for all women - except black women, who prefer black men.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 05:19 AM
6

Yup - commonplace pricing in Vegas. Women = free, men = pay. Some places have a ratio rule, where if the ratio of women to men is really good, the guys don't have to pay, but that's few and far-between. It's business and because they can.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 04:53 AM
27

So biased and uninformed it's hurting my brain...
/r/MensRights01/12/13 12:05 PM
3

I think this is great wording - specifically the "play" victim, the "make themselves" parts. When people play victim and make themselves look pitiful, it implies they're pretending. It's okay to be a real victim, and to really be pitiful, and to justly point your finger at an abuser, but playing and pretending are what fuck up the system for everyone else.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 09:28 PM
24

Cultural Feminists "would overturn the balance of power in favor of female supremacy."
/r/MensRights28/10/13 04:51 AM
1

I've always read this quote to mean that you automatically and instantly win when they resort to fighting you. Like, since they fight you, your cause is valid and/or you're viewed as a threat.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 05:05 PM
25

"Overwhelmingly, men who are fathers and husbands see their core value as that of the breadwinner, the one who provides the house, the food, the clothing, the schooling, the medical care for his wife and children." Robert Franklin But not love and care - never love and care. That would just be silly.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 03:39 AM
1

Hmm, that would make counting sense, as long as he's not counting as a sub-law, but a law in and of itself. Good call!
/r/MensRights22/10/13 03:09 AM
4

4th is actually the 0th: that a robot shall not harm humanity or through inaction, allow harm to come to humanity. It was later implemented by Isaac Asimov when robots in stories were presidents/rulers of countries/planets.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 01:25 AM
14

On a separate note: What's the 5th Law of Robotics?!
/r/MensRights22/10/13 12:18 AM
7

Do not forget about Movember! November is our prostate and testicular cancer + mental health awareness month/fund raiser!
/r/MensRights12/10/13 04:35 AM
1

When I was 18, I was required by law to sign up for any potential, future drafts. If you fail to sign up, you can get at $10,000 fine and jail time. (I live in the US)
/r/MensRights27/09/13 01:35 AM
1

While that page is full of hate, it's also full of horrible grammar.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 11:20 PM
3

Video is no longer working - any mirror?
/r/MensRights24/09/13 04:52 AM
0

Hah, this isn't even close, yet - we're gonna need a whole lot more participants in this study to get statistically significant findings.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 03:00 AM
2

That was beautiful, especially 13:17 on with her conclusion!
/r/MensRights06/09/13 03:18 AM
1

You are just a wallet to hand out cash https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze1sx9YR2Ec&feature=player_detailpage#t=35
/r/MensRights06/09/13 02:57 AM
1

IMO, for sports like this, pay should be based on the crowds and # of match watchers they can pull. That would take the gender out of the equation.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:35 AM
4

That was beautifully said - saving this for later use :)
/r/MensRights02/09/13 09:50 PM
1

I'd tell them they're all being too uptight.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 03:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter