TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kaithekender Archive

View 0 posts and 124 comments by kaithekender on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-47

In this sub, the only answer you are likely to receive, no matter what details you add to the story, is yes, the female is wrong and being an evil manipulator.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 04:59 AM
2

This entire sub has entered the chat
/r/MensRights30/12/24 11:52 PM
-7

I mean, pretty weird behaviour for most people But not terribly shocking behaviour for a cop
/r/MensRights28/11/24 05:23 AM
0

Well, first, let her go. Second, get therapy. Third, resolve your anger issues. Fourth, and this is crucial, do not even consider approaching another woman until you have completed the first three steps.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 10:13 AM
-9

So, as a 17 year old, you not only had sex with a 15 year old, but a long term relationship that lasted until you were 18 and 16, having sex the whole time, and it never occurred to you that maybe you should find out if that's even legal? Or you knew it wasn't, and disregarded that? You went to jail for statutory rape in an absolutely clear-cut case where you definitely not only committed statutory rape, but also just admitted here to defying a court order to not communicate with the victim in a…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:30 AM
2

You're literally comparing men to German jews in the 30s and Muslims now, I'm really not interested in your opinions on what constitutes "hate". This is what makes the idea that you have "female feminist friends" laughable. Any feminist will tell you, correctly, that unlike those groups, men are not an oppressed class, and the problems some men have are caused by other men. By patriarchy. Jews didn't start antisemitism. Muslims didn't start Islamophobia. Men created the idea that men and women h…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:11 PM
0

You describe the doctrine of male disposability, but then conveniently forget that it is men(and only men) who have (and always have had) the power to change that, and then refuse to do so, because the whole "nobly sacrifice your health and wellbeing to protect and provide for women" thing is literally baked into the patriarchal cake, and it's not going away until patriarchy as a whole is destroyed, and that won't happen until the kind of men you describe in your OP stop trying to blow up societ…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 05:26 PM
0

"Victim blaming" is only possible when somebody has been victimised. For that, an injustice must be perpetrated upon them by another party. So unless you have some seriously impressive mental gymnastics explaining how the democrats and women forced these men to get hurt at work or become homeless or get addicted to drugs, they are not victims. Unfortunate, yes. In need of help, yes. But nobody did those things to them, unless you wanna talk about societal pressures coercing them, in which case y…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 04:45 PM
0

Being told that, as a white person, and as a man, you have privilege that was not earned by merit, but rather accident of birth, is not "being berated". It is being educated. You are free to reject that idea, but living in a fantasy world where white men are oppressed is a huge part of what makes this sub the absolute joke it's been since shortly after it was established. Men succeed at killing themselves more often than men. Women attempt suicide more often than men. Men are much more likely to…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 03:09 PM
-8

Everybody IS entitled to feeling safe in public, and everybody IS entitled to exist in public. It doesn't actually matter how it makes you feel that it means you're not allowed to do things that make others feel unsafe. Your choices are to stop doing those things, or face public shame and possibly legal repercussions. Cope and seethe.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 04:23 AM
-35

I can assure you queer men really don't mind straight women being in our bars. They're literally just there having fun in an environment where they're not likely to be targeted. It bothers nobody.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 11:01 AM
2

The sort of additional rhetoric that happens in the context of some salient point being made about the way patriarchal society harms men who don't live up to its unrealistic standards of manhood.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 03:34 AM
0

I ain't reading all that but congrats or I'm sorry that happened to you I guess
/r/MensRights28/04/24 10:23 PM
1

Oooooh I missed 'murder" in your first comment Sure, they can get the dirt nap too, depending on circumstances.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 02:04 PM
2

No, they didn't rape any minors
/r/MensRights28/04/24 01:36 PM
5

I mean I would support death for any rapist provided it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Which is vanishingly rare. Along with permanent loss of employment for anybody in the justice/enforcement career track who mishandles evidence or is shown to have dismissed a crime or valid threat of a crime. That goes for men being raped as well, by women or other men.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 01:32 PM
4

Sorry but this post doesn't mention a female offender, and neither have I. You're simply projecting the garbage this sub and the other "Men are the REAL victims!" Spaces you may or may not frequent use to keep you on a constant "women bad" drip tell you I must inherently believe, if I also believe that a man who was punished for something got less than he deserved.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 01:19 PM
1

Nope.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 01:11 PM
6

Did they rape a minor several times or no
/r/MensRights28/04/24 10:08 AM
11

Shockingly, you can sexually assault people without ever leaving prison. Little know fact.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 09:25 AM
-6

Most crimes, absolutely not. Raping a minor? Several times? Castration is a kindness I would prefer they weren't given.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 09:22 AM
-11

If you think a pedophile deserves the time an effort to be "rehabilitated", that it's a realistic goal for a retirement aged pedo, or that regardless of all that, that it's gonna happen in prison of all places, I think the rest of society rightly can and does disregard your opinion on what constitutes justification.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 09:08 AM
-28

Jfc you guys are arguing in defence of a proven sexual predator You love wallowing in this muck that your views have placed you in, don't you?
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:52 AM
0

Yes, 100%, without hesitation. Stopping 1 child from experiencing the horrors of child abuse is without a doubt more important than how anyone else feels about losing custody unjustifiably. That said, losing custody unjustifiably, while a thing that happens(to both men and women) is far rarer Than most of the men in this sub seem to think, and quite frankly family courts do more good than harm in the world. It's bizarre to think otherwise, and the shit that you said in this discussion is literal…
/r/MensRights27/04/24 10:15 AM
0

Sometimes that agenda is "hey, stop raping your kids" and I feel like giving the state the right to intervene in such cases is absolutely worth the risk that they might occasionally overstep.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 11:30 AM
0

It's absolutely fucking unhinged to say this in a world where child abuse exists and is almost always at the hands of a blood relative. Just fucking insane dude.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 11:04 AM
1

A man is not "vulnerable" because he played an online game with a young girl. Even if you were a sexual predator trying to get her to talk dirty to you, literally nothing would happen to you except maybe an account ban, IF she reported it and IF they could confirm you did something inappropriate. You ARE overthinking it, and it's fucking weird. Play the game with her or don't, your choice. But you're in no way "vulnerable" because you're a dude and you played an online game with somebody who is …
/r/MensRights05/10/23 04:44 AM
1

"creep" to me has always just been synonymous with "asshole" or "jerk", except when it's used as a verb
/r/MensRights17/05/14 04:47 AM
118

What I learned from this is that women are machines you put money in but sometimes they don't work so you have to hit them until they do.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 07:48 AM
4

Are you retarded or something?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:15 AM
2

Because some issues are real, and many men are denied certain rights. No white person(in the west at least) is denied rights given to other ethnic groups. However, I don't disagree that much of the mrm is comprised of reactionary misogynists looking for any reason to hate them. This sub has many, although certainly not all of us are.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:49 AM
1

Not turning yourself in isn't in any way, shape, or form an attempt to cover up the crime. Washing off the evidence absolutely is. So no, he was solely responsible for the coverup, unless she specifically told him to go and do it(which I doubt, considering the fact that he was already a criminal known to the police AND on probation at the time)
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:14 PM
1

Apparently he actually did cry on the stand. Also apparently being on probation already didn't help his case, lol.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:02 PM
1

all we know, and the key part of that is know, is that she ran over the children, almost certainly by accident, and that he tried to cover that up, certainly with forethought. We don't know if she knew he was going to do that. Besides that, apparently he was on probation already so his sentence was going to be worse regardless of anything else whatsoever.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 01:51 PM
2

Ah. Well yes, being on probation would definitely fucking do it then, lmao
/r/MensRights02/02/14 01:40 PM
-9

"Your honour, I covered up the crime because she told me to!" "Oh well in that case, throw an extra charge on her! can't believe we didn't just ask him in the first place! Case closed gentleman, beer and handjobs from the front desk girl all around! good work!" seriously bro this is a courtroom, you gotta prove things, not just suggest them.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:50 AM
-8

"I wouldn't cover up the evidence of vehicular manslaughter for my girlfriend" is a pretty far cry from "I would never help someone". And about your rape vigilante group, there's a pretty good chance, if her family is full of thugs and idiots, which is sadly common. If you have any sense, you involve the police and then you leave it the fuck alone, because beating up a rapist isn't going to reverse the rape, it's just going to land you in fucking prison. Shit, some people's children. I'm sorry i…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:33 AM
-13

Covering up a manslaughter as either sex is worse than committing manslaughter as either. Again, intent. One is accidental by fucking definition, the other is not. She showed remorse for what was absolutely an accident, and, in accordance with the wishes of the victims' family, was afforded a lighter sentence. He did not show remorse for his crime, which was absolutely not accidental, and meant to impede the authorities, and as such, was sentenced more harshly. Does anything about that suggest t…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:09 AM
-11

She didn't take it to a car wash to eliminate evidence though. Only he did.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:57 AM
-10

You guys must have missed the part where it said "On Friday, the judge took the wishes of the victims' family into account when the sentence was handed down. " "I'm sorry I accidentally ran over your children" sounds a lot more meaningful than "I'm sorry I accidentally tried to cover up the evidence that my girlfriend ran over your children" 2 separate crimes, 2 separate sentences. It is impossible for there to be a sentencing discrepancy here because her crime was accidental, his was done with …
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:36 AM
-9

uh why would you do anything for anybody that sounds remotely illegal chances are you deserve to be the fall guy if you're that retarded
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:26 AM
1

Right, so the alternative is wishing you had that tub of ice cream and some girlfriends to cry about it with you. Just because there is an infinitesimally tiny chance that you could one day potentially be drafted doesn't mean this list is legitimate or that it deserves to be upvoted or even taken seriously. God damn, you people.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 07:38 AM
1

No, it won't happen. It's idiotic to think that it will. Furthermore, if it is going to happen, do something about it instead of upvoting trash like this and complaining about complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:15 PM
-1

No, they are up in arms that they don't get to wear pretty underwear and cry into the arms of their bffs over a tub of ice cream because it isn't considered masculine by mainstream society, oh fucking boohoo. On a scale of 1 to 10 how worried are you personally about there being a draft ever in your lifetime? If it is over 1 then you are deluded and trying to find something unfair to whine about. Sure it's unfair. But it won't happen and it isn't a big deal. If it was, you'd be out protesting it…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 08:36 PM
0

(yet all of these princesses, except for the most recent ones in the past 2 or 3 years, have had to be saved by a man. Despite being strong, able to fight, smart, resourceful, and unique, they all have men to save the day and fall in love with. After all, how is all that smart resourceful fighting supposed to get you a husband amirite?)
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:36 PM
3

I have never seen a male privilege checklist that featured something like that, and I have seen a lot of male privilege checklists.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 05:52 PM
9

... what the fuck is "the sisterhood"? And "Having it all"? this list is garbage. Man why am I even subbed to this trash anymore, you people are a bunch of whiny assholes, not a movement.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 01:43 PM
4

a women's penitentiary is definitely a place where social norms are strictly observed, can't refute that nope no way no how.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:56 PM
8

The problem isn't whether or not the man was sexually assaulted, it's whether or not his being male caused him to be assaulted. While not a cause for his assault, his being male allowed the assault, because you're allowed to stick your fingers into a man if you're a doctor and he might have drugs in there. If you did the same thing to a woman, this would be a potential sexual assault lawsuit. Same reason men and women get patted down differently, which is why it's so much easier for a woman to s…
/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:28 PM
5

The problem isn't whether or not the man was sexually assaulted, it's whether or not his being male caused him to be assaulted. While not a cause for his assault, his being male allowed the assault, because you're allowed to stick your fingers into a man if you're a doctor and he might have drugs in there. If you did the same thing to a woman, this would be a potential sexual assault lawsuit. Same reason men and women get patted down differently, which is why it's so much easier for a woman to s…
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:46 PM
1

Absolutely!
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:32 PM
1

Somebody who is a nationalist and also a socialist! Look them up on the internet if you need further definition!
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:15 PM
1

well.... if you're a nationalist socialist but you don't believe Aryans are superior and Jews are evil, then yeah, you're still a Nazi. Heh.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 12:40 PM
2

...... how in the blue fuck does removing the right to vote from half the population enhance the rights of that group?
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:19 AM
0

Doesn't that logic kind of rule out complaining or being an activist on nearly any level? I mean how can you have an opinion about feminism if you're not a woman, amirite?
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:48 AM
10

It disgusts me that the practice continues to be defended when all arguments in favour of it are easily dismissed as parental preference, or at best, a pre-emptive, permanent solution with damaging side effects for a problem that most likely will never occur.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 12:11 PM
5

The person above you insinuated that he raped the girl in the picture, and then you reinforced the insinuation. Neither of you did so in a terribly clever way. Just because this subreddit is more critical of rape allegations doesn't mean rape jokes are inherently funny.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 10:00 AM
2

Yeah. That's what connections are. That's how people get ahead in life. Opportunity gets you ahead, and work ethic keeps you ahead. One without the other gets you a job at a convenience store your entire life.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 09:46 AM
10

Dude The guy comes across as creepy as fuck, and that's completely ignoring his age. That man is a creeper. That chat is all the evidence necessary.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 07:57 AM
2

Only if you're okay with that, I don't want to be an agent of the gastrointestinarchy.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:46 PM
2

There, there, it's not your fault you're genetically inebriated, 5th_law_of_Robotics. You are a beautiful and unique person and I shouldn't have spoken without thinking. Let's make some cookies together.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:20 PM
19

If you drank less, you wouldn't stumble so much.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:37 PM
51

Check your privilege-checking privilege, shitlord
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:42 PM
1

1: With regards to the law, men and women are largely equal in the first world. Elsewhere, not even close. Socially, men and women both face numerous inequalities. You seem to think that I'm of the opinion that one sex holds huge advantages over the other while the other faces none. Men and women both face their own challenges, socially and legally, and for fuck's sake, just google something, ANYTHING, and you'll have the examples you so desperately seek. Both groups face discrimination. Both gr…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:12 AM
1

I'm actually kind of exhausted from answering the past 4 textwalls, and I'm finding this very tedious, so it's time for short answers. Apologies. 1: Power might be there, but most don't use it. It might happen all the time, but common sense and logic says it doesn't. Yes, a male secretary or janitor could even more easily do so. What's more shocking and damaging to a male CEO: sexually harassing a woman, or sexually harassing a man? Gay harassment, clearly. However, what's more likely: a female …
/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:30 AM
0

You realise your attitude toward me is exactly the same as a "political lesbian" toward non-lesbian women? So how long have you been Smashing The Matriarchy with other dudes? Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:09 AM
1

I don't think of the patriarchy as The Patriarchy, a secret society of powerful men trying to marginalise and abuse women. I don't think patriarchy is a conscious thing, it's just what happens when gender roles evolve in societies that are honestly way too complex, varied and vast to continue to accommodate them. I see patriarchy as an unnecessary remnant of times long past. I don't see patriarchy as something that benefits men exclusively, and I don't believe it exclusively hurts women, either.…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 07:59 AM
1

It's kind of hard to get specific considering the wealth of legal and social inequities, so I'll just mention one of each: Access to legal abortions and slut shaming. I don't care about reconciling the groups, they're both lost causes as far as I'm concerned. Only the fundamental ideal of both is valid to me: Complete equality under the eyes of the law, as well as society. While we're here, yes, men are unfairly advantaged. We are the dominant sex by far. That doesn't mean everything works out t…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 07:48 AM
1

How often exactly does some random woman say "That CEO of that Fortune 500 company said I looked pretty, sexual harassment! Rape!" and actually get anywhere? Seriously, provide 10 high-profile examples from the past month. Then I'll provide 10 high-profile examples of men in positions of power influencing society from the past 24 hours. Do you see the problem with your logic? Every person wields some power, and men and women from lower stations can both do exactly what you just said. Do they? Ye…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 07:20 AM
0

So what you're saying is that you have nothing of value to add. Good to know, will ignore in future.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 10:12 PM
0

So you think I'm "betraying my sex"? Or are you referring to the second definition, which states that "uncle tom" is a term used by black people to convince other black people that moving out of the ghetto and buying land and improving their station in life is "selling out"? Because if it's the second, I agree.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:45 PM
1

I'm a feminist for the same reason I'm an MRA: because society and law treat men and women differently. While there are certainly good reasons for some of these differences, most are based on the antiquated expectations I mentioned elsewhere placed on both groups by the societies we live in. Also, The Men's Rights movement and feminism are not opposites, as that would imply that they cannot be reconciled with one another. That's silly thinking. Stop it. They are EXACTLY like each other, in that …
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:35 PM
0

I believe there is a patriarchy. My definition of patriarchy is a society in which positions of power and influence are held predominantly by men. That this is true isn't really debatable, you only have to look at statistics. I don't believe the patriarchy is some horrible nefarious force actively working to consciously harm women, but rather the result of centuries of gender roles becoming ingrained into a society which no longer requires these roles to be followed. Feminism is the result of wo…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:22 PM
0

I have no idea what that is.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:12 PM
2

I already do.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 10:39 AM
4

I'll fix that. I'm male, a feminist, and an MRA. However, I distance myself from the terms "feminist" and "MRA" because both groups are chock-full of fucking retards. You don't have to believe in rape culture to be a feminist. You don't have to think that false rape claims are particularly common to be an MRA. I support equality for men and women and don't really care to tow either party line, because the extremists are the most vocal and therefore seen as representative of both groups.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:08 AM
1

to be fair, I didn't even see the comments made originally. Completely empty when I clicked this link. So I don't know why they were deleted, they may have been inflammatory in nature or broken one of the rules of /r/feminism. They may have been good, thought-provoking comments, but a feminism mod decided they didn't belong. Honestly? I don't have strong feelings one way or another. If those comments were important, they can be posted here or other places where they're welcome.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 02:36 PM
1

It's actually about the way society almost romanticises female suicide. Plath is an example, as well as a few other female "suicide poets" like Virginia Woolf. The author actually goes out of her way to mention that male suicide is also romanticised, but in different ways. I don't have a problem with it honestly, it's a feminist subreddit talking about the female side of a problem affecting both sexes. Yes, we kill ourselves more often, but we don't need to be the focus in a conversation about h…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 12:36 PM
6

The article is about female-specific suicide though.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 12:09 PM
1

I assumed I hadn't come up with the idea but I never knew there was a term for it, thanks.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:00 AM
1

That's a pretty solid suggestion actually, I'll consider it in the future.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:50 PM
1

That's what I was trying to say. In opposing marriage as a government institution, I also oppose gay marriage. Unfortunately, I feel the need to explain myself further every time it comes up, as being against gay marriage is usually tied to bigotry. My issues stem from an issue I have with the institution of marriage as a whole rather than specifically gay marriage. Sorry if I wasn't clear on that.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:34 PM
-3

I personally support gay rights, although I can't speak for anybody else here. Since gay men are men, I support them as men, but men's rights are not gay rights. There is overlap, obviously, just as there is overlap with feminism and gay rights as they pertain to lesbians, but the movements are separate. However, I am opposed to gay marriage. Not on a religious basis mind you, but from a social justice basis. Traditionally, marriage was created to pass off a woman to another family that was bett…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 06:23 AM
0

yep
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:40 AM
95

Glad that fathers are welcome wherever that is Not glad that "dad" isn't implied by "family"
/r/MensRights16/07/13 12:27 AM
1

I'm not sure how we got onto the topic of Dune, but yes, Dune is a good book.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:05 PM
1

They sound more like a cult than anything. I hate cults.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 07:38 PM
1

Who are these people? What is the deal? I know nothing about them. Somebody please explain.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:26 PM
-2

By consenting without making sure, he consented to having sex with her while she wasn't on the pill. Lack of knowledge of intentions is not an excuse to cry rape. If that was the case, "He told me he loved me!" would be sufficient justification for a rape conviction.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:43 PM
0

I disagree. Lying isn't rape. Rape is rape. I believe all parties involved should be responsible for their own actions leading up to sexual activity so they can make that decision to fuck in an informed way. Ignorance shouldn't be an excuse. That just leads to the same logic as "I had sex and now regret it, so I was raped." The point is, if you agree to have sex with somebody without taking responsibility for knowing the consequences or trusting the person you're with, you still agreed to have s…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:49 PM
-1

I suppose if you didn't wear a condom at all, and she never noticed, then it wouldn't be rape. But you'd have to find a pretty stupid girl for that to be a legit scenario.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:03 PM
-1

No. He consented to having sex with her while she wasn't on the pill. Before the sexual act occurs, each party is responsible for knowing the terms under which they are consenting. If the act changes during sex, that is rape.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:50 PM
-5

While I have a hard time believing anybody could not notice a guy taking off a condom in the middle of sex, if you managed to do it, you would be performing a nonconsensual sexual act upon her without her knowledge. That's as rapey as you can possibly get without holding her down and forcing it in. If, in the middle of sex, a woman reached into her vagina and pulled out a female condom without YOUR knowledge, that would also be rape. However, if she lies and says she's on the pill, then you have…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:12 AM
-9

If in the middle of having sex, you change the conditions unbeknownst to her, it is still rape. If she stops taking the pill and doesn't tell you(or even lies to you), it is still not rape. Dishonest as fuck, but not rape. Think of it this way: You can trick a girl into having sex with you by telling her you love her and want to be with her forever, and that's not rape. If you're having some nice, consensual sexual intercourse, then partway through you switch to anal, that's rape. Changing the c…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:26 AM
-11

You're having sex. You've agreed that you are going to use a condom. If you change your mind partway through, take it off, and she doesn't want to anymore, that's rape, because she changed her mind. It has nothing to do with the condom being on or off. Similarly, if you consented to having sex with her on the understanding that she's on the pill, it's your responsibility to be sure that she's actually on the pill, not the state's.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:53 AM
0

A better question is why you feel robbed by not being mentioned in a shout-out that isn't about you, and in no way harms or denigrates you?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 06:12 PM
3

And? Like mothers, not all fathers deserve to be a part of their child's life, nor do they necessarily want to. Not all single mothers fucked over a man for the sheer joy of it to raise a child on their own.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 05:02 PM
8

Yeah. Not everything has to mention dads too. I second the message in OP's picture. I have a lot of respect for single mothers. I was raised by one. That doesn't mean I don't have respect for single dads too, but just because I do doesn't mean I cry discrimination every time somebody mentions single mothers and not fathers. However, I imagine if this same thing were posted on mother's day with the sexes reversed, it would cause a shitstorm of epic proportions for whoever posted it because these …
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:11 PM
1

.... are you actually dropping the word "biotruth"? Seriously?
/r/MensRights12/05/13 04:49 AM
0

I didn't say what you're implying I said. I think you know that's not true. What I am saying is that it's silly to perpetuate sexual segregation just because women may not at this point be completely and totally physically equal. Keeping men and women separate is a large part of the reason that women's sports are not taken seriously. They don't have the same level of competition, and that's a large part of why they are not as skilled. The best women at some sports are not as good as the best men…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 04:14 AM
0

In the majority of cases, yes. However, I have a very hard time believing that there are no women who could outperform the majority of men at the top level of any sport. The fastest person on earth, for example, could be a woman. The smartest person on earth could be a woman. Even the strongest. To deny even the possibility that a woman might be better than every man in the world at something is silly. Women will tend to be less physically gifted in certain aspects, yes. However, there are alway…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:52 AM
1

Bigger, stronger, faster, more heavily muscled, perhaps. More naturally skilled? Less likely. You give me a group of 5 boys and 5 girls to train from a young age at any sport, and I'll produce 10 children of similar skill nearly every time. Sports are learned. Skill is learned. Variation in natural ability is what sets the greats apart from everybody else, but when the selection pool for males is 1000 players deep, they'll ALWAYS have a better team than the female group that's only 200 players d…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:00 AM
4

The main problem is that if we only have coed sports teams and instead separate only by skill, there will be very few females playing in the top tier, which will be blamed on men for being better. And it's not even that we're naturally that much better, it's that men's sports have always been taken more seriously than women's, and as such they are better organised and boys are encouraged more to pursue them. If we suddenly abolish gender segregation in sports, we may see a few women rise above m…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:08 PM
2

One would think the obvious answer is "most school shootings in America are perpetrated by white boys because most students in America are white boys."
/r/MensRights07/04/13 07:52 PM
0

where do the man-hating racists come in? Did I miss something? I admit I stopped paying attention when the gun lobbyists started talking out of their asses about how there should be more guns in schools so I might have missed them.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:06 PM
1

Oh well, I'm sure I'll get over it and so will everybody else involved.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:46 AM
1

If we lived in a world where grapefruit and watermelon were sentient beings who also get raped a lot, primarily by straight men, then I would consider it creepy and literal for him to say that as well. If you're going to pick apart my analogy despite it being pretty fucking apt, I'll return the favour.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:49 PM
1

No, I am not trying to justify my response. It doesn't require justification. I'm also not trying to prove anything, as nothing has been said that requires or even facilitates proof on either side of this. Furthermore, you're acting as though you somehow expected me to actually apologise for making somebody feel ostracised and slandered when I've made it very clear that I believe his comment warrants ostracisation and slander? I would never apologise for that. Indeed, I apologised mainly to myse…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 11:39 PM
1

I do not feel bad for "slandering" or "terrorising" him, nor do I feel badly about anything I posted. Why would I delete my account or comments just because you disagreed with me? He said something I thought was incredibly creepy, and through all of the argument, despite my arguments at times being inconsistent, I still feel that he said something incredibly creepy. Whether or not it's okay for gay men or women to say the same thing, or whether he actually wants to fuck children, or anything els…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:44 PM
1

I wasn't privy to their thoughts regarding me.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:28 PM
-1

I don't see how any of this conversation relates to my sexual history
/r/MensRights01/04/13 07:12 PM
-1

When I was about 8 I was repeatedly molested by a 14-year-old girl, and when I was 16 I was raped by a girl my own age.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 03:18 PM
-21

Perhaps I read too much into it, but "adorable in a dressup doll kind of way" to me implies that he would like to interact with said girls the same way one would interact with a doll. Although reading that back to myself now it kind of sounds off. Maybe I am reading too much into this. I'm going to bed.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 05:05 PM
-44

I am a man. I don't think I am by default creepy or sexually depraved. I also don't see an adorable little girl and immediately think I'd like to play dressup with her, or equate her to a doll to be accessorised. I think that is incredibly creepy. Therein lies the difference between us. And perhaps you're right, maybe I am the weird one, maybe I should want to play dressup with little girls, but I cannot bring myself to even acknowledge that the idea isn't incredibly creepy by any standard that …
/r/MensRights31/03/13 04:42 PM
-74

"the cute little girl looks just like a doll!" isn't what was said. What WAS said was "That little girl is adorable in a dress-up doll kind of way!", which, to me, and I'm sure 90% of the rest of the planet, is just a really creepy thing for a male to say about a little girl. Or a little boy. Because while the intent may not have been to insinuate that he's sexually attracted to the little girl, the insinuation is still there, regardless of actual intent. It's probably best that he suppress his …
/r/MensRights31/03/13 04:21 PM
-27

I should have really said "a grown person" rather than man, I don't think there's any real reason for a woman of a similar maturity to be playing with dolls either. And no, if you say "cute as a baby duck", that sounds perfectly acceptable to me because it actually sounds like a comparison, rather than a statement of intent. IDK, maybe it's just an unfortunate choice of words but the original statement as posted came across as really, really creepy to me.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 04:06 PM
-17

Only if he then also said he wanted to dress it up in a cute little skirt and a tiara.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:53 PM
-83

And rightly so, for the same reason it wouldn't be creepy for a gay male to say the same of a little girl. MRAs seem to forget the differences between genders at very convenient times for when they want to piss and moan about how they have it so tough, much like feminists like to ignore them when they feel aggrieved that they can't have something we do. This is why I refuse to label myself a feminist or an MRA; both are tainted by idiots.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:42 PM
-87

Because A: you're (ostensibly) a grown man who should not really have any interest in playing dolly dressup with anyone or anything, and B: A duck is not a human being. It's creepy to look at another human being like an object to decorate.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:29 PM
1

you only get what you give I suppose
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:26 PM
0

super obvious troll is incredibly tear duct rapingly obvious and you should feel bad about not realising that
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:08 PM
1

This is the stupidest thing I've read all day
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:03 PM
-120

any way you look at it this comment is creepy as fuck even if you try really hard to not acknowledge the sexual undertones of a man expressing the idea that he looks at little girls like dress-up dolls
/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:53 PM
36

I lost it @ "online dating has given men too much choice" basically admitting that anybody who would get with them is desperate
/r/MensRights31/03/13 11:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter