TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kick6 Archive

View 1 posts and 5,319 comments by kick6 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
22

kick6/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 09:15 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 5,319 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes it's high standards. No, you shouldn't lower them.
/r/askTRP22/10/19 10:37 PM
2

You feel inadequate, and you’re just looking for something to hang it on.
/r/askTRP28/09/19 05:01 PM
20

If 3cm makes you feel like less of a man, you’ve got mental game problems.
/r/askTRP28/09/19 03:34 PM
1

Beta is a mindset. You can have alpha physical traits, and still fuck it all up with your head. It’s the same the exact opposite with the overweight guy with the hot plates
/r/askTRP28/09/19 02:55 PM
0

You’re overvaluing busted ass old pussy. That’s inherently wrong.
/r/askTRP22/09/19 06:39 PM
3

He probably wants to play world of Warcraft and masturbate all day too. Part of TRP is controlling your shitty impulses in order to create useful ones.
/r/askTRP22/09/19 05:58 PM
-4

Don’t
/r/askTRP22/09/19 04:44 PM
1

Heavy Squats and intermittent fasting. Rich Froning talked about doing IF for the last year, and his test levels doubled...and that’s a dude who eats perfect and trains 3-a-days basically all year.
/r/askTRP15/09/19 03:25 PM
3

If you’re this upset about it, you weren’t trying to plate her.
/r/askTRP23/08/19 07:53 PM
4

Every chick wants every breakup to play out the romcom fantasy. Your roll in that fantasy is to be a regretful wreck after having dumped her. Her role is to be the girl that’s SO AMAZING, she had no trouble replacing you with an upgrade. It doesn’t matter that the new dude is a dud, she’s still attempting to play that movie out for herself at your expense. So no, she probably doesn’t want you back, but she does want to make it appear like she’s better off without you. Especially when it’s not tr…
/r/askTRP19/08/19 10:04 PM
3

Gonna have to budget just like counting calories to cut weight.
/r/askTRP19/08/19 09:59 PM
7

All he has to do is tell her to prove it's his by taking a paternity test. Either she's such a cum dumpster that she's actually unsure, and he could get off scot free, Or she'll start rolling out excuses as to why she won't do it, and it will be obvious she knows it's not his.
/r/askTRP14/08/19 07:13 PM
3

Have better things to do, my man.
/r/askTRP12/08/19 08:58 PM
1

Well, shit. Yea, that's fucking lonely. But don't out that on bitches. You gotta fix sort out your living situation.
/r/askTRP06/08/19 07:19 PM
1

Where are your bros in all of this?
/r/askTRP06/08/19 06:34 PM
1

Trade school. ​ Welding Plumbing Run construction equipment. Appliance repair ​ Odds are a desk job isn't in your future, but the above all pay damn good money if you buckle down and learn your trade
/r/askTRP23/07/19 09:54 PM
23

If she actually enjoys your company, of COURSE she doesn't want to she share you.
/r/askTRP21/07/19 01:44 PM
12

They get alpha widowhood. It's like oneitis, but only after he skates.
/r/askTRP21/07/19 02:10 AM
0

Your mom thought your dad was an unfuckable beta she could safely assume would kiss her ass because he had no other choice. Your dad proved this wrong.
/r/askTRP14/07/19 04:00 AM
11

She will get away with whatever she can get away with. Based on your statements: you’re not willing to walk away from this relationship so...yes, she will always treat you this bad because there are no negative consequences for her.
/r/askTRP13/07/19 05:14 PM
31

Women don’t like the idea that they’re calculable. So they’re going to despise men who have the formula.
/r/askTRP02/07/19 02:20 PM
3

With kids in the picture you have a responsibility to teach them what a healthy relationship between a man and a woman looks like. Is your son learning that the proper way to be treated by a woman is to get shit on? Is your daughter learning that it’s ok to be fucking awful to her future boyfriends including cheating on them? If so, get out.
/r/askTRP12/06/19 10:43 PM
7

They're getting good dick once a week, and enjoy your company. Of COURSE they want the D more often, and not to have to share.
/r/askTRP06/06/19 02:01 PM
1

There’s a difference between being alone and being lonely. The latter is a choice. The fact that you’re externally validated (or invalidated) by the presence of a female in your life causes you to choose to be lonely. You have GOT to be comfortable alone or you will overvalue any girl that you’re with and slowly drive her away.
/r/askTRP23/05/19 01:24 PM
8

Stated that way it implies that the intent of college is to have fun. It’s not. It can be fun, but if you’re splashing out for a degree, you better be acquiring some skills you can make a job out of.
/r/askTRP08/05/19 11:08 PM
5

You’ll never know the truth, and I don’t even know why you’d care. Move on.
/r/askTRP08/05/19 08:37 PM
1

I stand corrected.
/r/askTRP29/04/19 06:17 PM
2

Only downside for OP is it’s at the opposite end of the shit weather spectrum from his current location.
/r/askTRP29/04/19 05:24 PM
7

Houston, but you’d be working energy industry finance. Lots of oil & gas PE shops plus Citi, Wells Fargo, Credit Suisse, Scotia, Barclay’s, JP Morgan, UBS, and a bunch of smaller names.
/r/askTRP29/04/19 04:09 PM
9

"time to think" is TV bullshit.
/r/askTRP25/04/19 08:35 PM
2

They have no problem using sex to get the relationship. Why should you feel bad about doing the opposite?
/r/askTRP21/04/19 02:14 PM
8

Then find better plates.
/r/askTRP12/04/19 10:18 PM
8

Go do something you want to go. Bring them along. Boom, date.
/r/askTRP12/04/19 10:04 PM
2

No you didn’t. You asked a question figuring out how to be as irresponsible as possible without harming yourself.
/r/askTRP12/04/19 10:00 PM
2

Fat girls that like dick gotta be aggressive. I see’nt it many times. Actually had a hamplanet call me and say “you know you’ve turned me down 4 times.” Yes...yes I have.
/r/askTRP12/04/19 07:00 PM
24

If she wants them, she can buy them. They’re almost guaranteed to destroy the relationship, and then she walks out the door with $5k of your money on her chest.
/r/askTRP11/04/19 02:03 PM
3

Deep squats with proper form. None of this knock-knee shit so you can use more quad. And none of this partial-depth shit because it’s bad on your knees, it’s not. I’m 37, have one “bad knee” from soccer, and still squat north of 300 for reps regularly without aggravating that knee. Proper form deadlifts will help a little. Weighted good mornings will do work too. GHD extensions will pull it all together too.
/r/askTRP11/04/19 01:55 PM
3

Pretty sure every criteria list I’ve seen has a “fucked up in the head” clause. And guess what...
/r/askTRP19/03/19 09:41 PM
2

Maybe, but why would he?
/r/askTRP19/03/19 08:49 PM
1

Because no amount of steroids will ever grow one a dick, and therefore cannot create the psychological firmware to use one.
/r/askTRP15/03/19 07:25 PM
7

You “ended a soft next” after 2 days? Da fuq?
/r/askTRP15/03/19 05:15 PM
1

Go to your local library and check out a book on prison fitness. There are plenty of ways to work out that require zero equipment.
/r/askTRP01/03/19 11:45 AM
2

We're told from day 1 that men are shit. We believe it. TRP teaches us that, oh by the way, women are shit too. It's hard to swallow. Eventually you'll find a way to move forward with it. However, nothing says you can't set your own moral code for you. You've gotta navigate this life for yourself. So if you don't want to fuck married women...don't.
/r/askTRP21/02/19 01:14 PM
1

Ok, this has to be a troll.
/r/askTRP20/02/19 10:43 PM
3

been with 2 months, lives with you makes negative comments about your dick has been with 30-40 guys ​ ​ Jesus dude, can you fuck this up any more!?
/r/askTRP20/02/19 03:38 PM
20

Talk to women
/r/askTRP19/02/19 02:55 PM
2

Should have just said “old enough”
/r/askTRP14/02/19 02:52 PM
38

You’re only looking in the clubs and the 25 year old bars. Old dudes that CAN plate girls that age know their game better than to play it there.
/r/askTRP13/02/19 01:15 PM
0

If you want good women, raise good daughters ​ Unless you're suggesting incest, this doesn't help me at all. ​ ​ Your problem is that you expect the world to change to suit you. It's not going to. All you can do is hold yourself to whatever standard you deem appropriate and move forward.
/r/askTRP06/02/19 01:32 PM
6

You don’t comprehend it because you haven’t read the sidebar.
/r/askTRP01/02/19 03:31 PM
4

You have to find your own meaning.
/r/askTRP26/01/19 01:47 PM
8

Back in the old days, we read by candlelight, and pooped without reddit too.
/r/askTRP19/01/19 04:55 PM
2

Simple: don’t use online game.
/r/askTRP19/01/19 01:50 PM
27

Well that’s certainly an interesting way to get your pussy where you get your paycheck. And it’s still a bad idea.
/r/askTRP19/01/19 01:48 PM
2

Fix that first. Moving to a major city might put you in a target rich environment, but it won’t matter if you’re still a needy phaggot.
/r/askTRP04/01/19 08:18 PM
2

Look, your game being weak aside, you care whether or not they respond. You see your lack of success as a reflection of your worth. You don’t actually want to smash, you just want them to want to smash. Vis a vis, acceptance.
/r/askTRP04/01/19 08:12 PM
2

You do care about acceptance. You want a woman to accept you enough to be your girlfriend.
/r/askTRP04/01/19 08:06 PM
3

I get that you’re painting a picture. I’m just telling you it’s a shitty picture. You are entirely externally validated. Which means that even if You get a fat bumble bitch you will allow her to treat you like garbage just to save the shitty relationship. You have to solve your esteem problem yourself...not through the acceptance of others. Besides, if you don’t even like you, how is anyone else?
/r/askTRP04/01/19 07:54 PM
2

You mentioned that you haven’t had a relationship TWICE in your post. Do you not see how that’s a problem? You will never make it “out of your situation” when you’re externally validated at that level. And I’m sure every girl you do meet smells that “please date me so I can have some esteem” on you like you just shat your pants.
/r/askTRP04/01/19 07:17 PM
2

Birth control, abortions, child support, and welfare have removed all barriers.
/r/askTRP24/12/18 06:36 PM
1

Skinny generally isn’t a problem unless it’s a problem for you, and then your lack of confidence will hang on you like a wet fart in every interaction. That being said, lift.
/r/askTRP23/12/18 06:10 PM
2

If you’re actually looking for a unicorn, you didn’t take the red pill, you just used it’s tactics to achieve your blue pill fantasy. That being said, you can live a monogamous life in a red pill context, but certainly not if you think your partner is “the one”.
/r/askTRP20/12/18 05:25 PM
2

And for all you know, she’d been using the “catholic loophole” for a decade.
/r/askTRP17/12/18 05:11 PM
10

Everyone wants to find the loophole that this one girl they met “totally isn’t like that.” Riiiiight
/r/askTRP17/12/18 03:34 PM
24

Is she attractive? Is she not a virgin? Cock carousel.
/r/askTRP17/12/18 03:02 PM
4

It’s cyclical.
/r/askTRP15/12/18 04:39 PM
1

If you’re not pulling those types of numbers, you’re probably not lifting heavy.
/r/askTRP13/12/18 09:22 PM
1

1x bodyweight bench, 2x bodyweight squat, and 2.25x DL are kind of my “rule of thumb” numbers for a well trained individual. So yea, kinda.
/r/askTRP13/12/18 09:06 PM
1

Says the guy with student loans. Lol.
/r/askTRP13/12/18 08:47 PM
1

Actually, I don’t. But you’re to busy trying to weasel your way out of being uncomfortable to actually look at what lifting is in the abstract. That’s fine, you’re just not going to make progress on anything in your life worth having without discomfort.
/r/askTRP13/12/18 08:46 PM
1

LOL. Because medical malpractice isn’t the 3rd leading cause of death in the US. But ok, you take the moral high road, buddy. Good luck getting your MSN.
/r/askTRP13/12/18 08:39 PM
1

I mean work on yourself. Besides, 60 hours a week ain’t shit. I was doing that, still, at 36 in investment banking.
/r/askTRP13/12/18 08:32 PM
1

What do you weigh?
/r/askTRP13/12/18 07:16 PM
0

If after 3 years you have no self esteem or confidence increase from your gains, it probably means you never actually picked up anything heavy. It’s not just the increased musculature that comes from lifting that builds confidence, it’s also the dedication to constantly step outside your comfort zone, and come back better for it.
/r/askTRP13/12/18 07:01 PM
1

sigh Come back to the red pill when you're ready to do work.
/r/askTRP13/12/18 05:30 PM
1

You may go to the gym, you may even pick up weights, but if your natural inclination is not do what’s uncomfortable...you don’t even lift.
/r/askTRP13/12/18 05:15 PM
1

Every kind of growth is uncomfortable. If you read the sidebar, and actually lifted you’d understand that.
/r/askTRP13/12/18 01:29 PM
1

The thing I want most in the world is a 240 lb snatch. Does that mean I can wake up in the morning and tell myself I'm just going to go out and overhead squat 350 in service of that goal? Fuck no. You have to set tiny ass goals and then stack them on top of each other over a long period of time. So you want to turn your life around? Maybe all you do tomorrow is make your bed. And then maybe after a week of that you make your bed and pick up your room. And over a long enough grind, all of your sh…
/r/askTRP29/11/18 03:46 AM
4

Because of (anti)social media.
/r/askTRP22/11/18 02:36 PM
1

I never said lifting solved everything, but accomplishment through hard work DOES solve an inferiority complex.
/r/askTRP16/11/18 07:32 PM
1

Just because you typed "lifting doesn't do that" doesn't mean it's true. If you actually lifted, created a program, stuck to it, and saw progress from hard work...you'd be proud of yourself. Don't try to outsmart the sidebar.
/r/askTRP16/11/18 07:23 PM
0

Lift. It really is that easy.
/r/askTRP16/11/18 02:04 PM
1

Stop using a shitshow like tinder, then.
/r/askTRP13/11/18 05:32 PM
7

Outcome independence, you lack it. And it’s probably because you have no SELF esteem, and instead rely on the quality of women attached to you to fill that void.
/r/askTRP13/11/18 02:11 PM
3

You don't need her back, you need to sort out your fucked up life, and stop using a bitch as a crutch.
/r/askTRP13/11/18 12:25 PM
11

Because you need to learn discipline, consistency, and patience. playing a fuck-off game of rugby does none of these.
/r/askTRP05/11/18 01:51 PM
5

This is a troll, right?
/r/askTRP22/10/18 01:43 PM
3

Society will judge you for daring to have ANY performance. Shit, you'll be judged if you only want to date ACTUAL GIRLS instead of trannies so I wouldn't sweat it. That being said, chubby chasing is often settling so go fuck a few skinny chicks first just to make sure.
/r/askTRP16/10/18 03:05 PM
11

If she googled the book, she got the BP takedown of it, which is exactly what she wanted to hear. If that's the hill she's willing to die on, let her. There's absolutely nothing objectionabl in that book. Hell, I don't think he even discusses "spinning plates" so I'm sure whatever she read had a whole bunch of anti-TRP stuff packed into it that has nothing to do with the book.
/r/askTRP15/10/18 01:55 PM
2

Social media is bitchworld. Of course saying pro-bitchshit in bitchworld is getting them zero-effort likes. ...but is anyone fucking them?
/r/askTRP08/10/18 10:44 AM
3

It is shaming. And it’s shaming again in your reply. We’ve heard this “certain type of woman” shit before. It’s bunk. The degree to which you can be self-invested, outcome independent, and antagonistic might very depending on the esteem level of the girl, but the concepts work broadly. I’m sure your next reply will be along the lines of “of course working in your self and your pursuits is attractive that’s common sense.” Except it’s not...and we’ve hard it before.
/r/askTRP05/10/18 02:57 PM
4

sigh we’ve heard this all before. “This stuff only works on damaged women.” “You all are just damaged men.” You obviously DIDN’T do much research if you thought anything you typed wasn’t tired ass shit that TRP doesn’t hear literally every day. Look, we get it: you’re so ego-invested in your blue pill fantasy that the truth that women are just people is almost physically painful. We were all there. We all watched the naturals act slightly disinterested and get showered in pussy. The difference i…
/r/askTRP05/10/18 02:10 PM
2

What do you mean "work?" As a pussy gimmick or as a life strategy so you're not burning time on people who won't reciprocate? Cuz it sounds like you're really only interested in the former.
/r/askTRP27/09/18 02:52 PM
6

Isn't your time more valuable than her 4-5 orbiters? Isn't your attention still more interesting than her cadre of sycophants? You're still the prize because you're not a boring ass-kisser.
/r/askTRP27/09/18 02:08 PM
2

Yes, she’ll tell the same lies. And you’ll find out just how “mutual” those friends actually are.
/r/askTRP17/09/18 07:32 PM
11

It’s form a movie with actor Will Farrell
/r/askTRP15/08/18 11:58 PM
22

I like referring to this as “lawyering up”
/r/askTRP15/08/18 11:58 PM
1

You shouldn’t give up on your dreams, but if all you have is a dream...you’re don’t have shit. You need intermediate, attainable steps. For instance, if you’re currently a fat piece of shit, having a goal to “get jacked” is both unspecific and so far out of reach that you’ll quit. If your goal is to lose 5 lbs. and the another. And then another. Well...you might actually get there.
/r/askTRP12/08/18 01:46 AM
2

You can have a single monogamous relationship, but you want to "fall in love forever." Which means you HAVEN'T taken the pill. You just want to co-opt RP tactics to consolidate your blue pill fantasy.
/r/askTRP06/08/18 06:54 PM
2

What’s so “FFS” about going on vacation by yourself? You go on vacation to get away from your bullshit life, but you want to take your bullshit friends?
/r/askTRP03/08/18 07:53 PM
9

Stop being an omega, and you won’t have to worry about this.
/r/askTRP03/08/18 01:16 PM
1

A scumbag that smashes, though. So, you know, I’m still up on you.
/r/askTRP01/08/18 04:41 PM
1

Perfect! You have every excuse to just never leave your room again. Do that.
/r/askTRP01/08/18 04:37 PM
1

No, that’s not true. You’re using it as an excuse to literally do nothing. Just have your mom buy you a PS4 pro, and forget that women exist.
/r/askTRP01/08/18 04:22 PM
2

Yes, because I LOST 80 LBS. That in and of itself is great. Just being able to tie your own shoe without gasping for breath would be amazeballs regardless of how the world reacted to it.
/r/askTRP01/08/18 04:16 PM
1

Ok, so you don’t want to do anything to get what you want. So you’re going to be a virgin phaggot until you die...which because you’re fat will be a lot sooner than it could otherwise be. Good luck with your fapping and not having a stroke goal in 2018.
/r/askTRP01/08/18 04:11 PM
2

First off: a girlfriend is a shitty goal. Set a new goal. Make it an INTERNAL goal, not one that requires someone else’s validation of you. Cuz fuck them. Secondly: life isn’t World of Warcraft. You don’t get to sit on your ass farming long enough, and then you reach your goals. Goals require you to get off your ass and do something slightly uncomfortable to achieve. So start doing something. You’ve already admitted you’re fat and ugly (but I repeat myself) why aren’t you doing anything about th…
/r/askTRP01/08/18 03:19 PM
1

I have a racecar. I have a Jeep. I have a safe full of guns. I have an Olympic lifting coach. Jobs suck. But it’s how you earn money to do all the things you want to do.
/r/askTRP31/07/18 12:24 PM
13

If she’s actually a girlfriend this might be a comfort test.
/r/askTRP30/07/18 07:31 PM
1

This pre-emptive banning is so incredibly fucking pathetic it actually makes me angry. And then the idea that “if you kiss the feet of the anointed ones we will reverse the ban” shit is even fucking worse.
/r/askTRP29/07/18 03:29 PM
1

Your friend is a blue pill phaggot, why are you letting him dictate your actions?
/r/askTRP28/07/18 12:23 PM
10

I think your friends are lying to you. Nobody works 16 hour days AND has sex multiple times a day.
/r/askTRP26/07/18 10:58 PM
1

What is this "few days alone" shit she's talking about? Did you agree to a break? There are no breaks. She fucked that dude.
/r/askTRP19/07/18 04:53 PM
4

Your entire life is through an app. Get off the fucking internet.
/r/askTRP18/07/18 02:53 AM
1

Everything about this question is wrong. Apps for friends? Female friends? Come on, dude.
/r/askTRP18/07/18 02:50 AM
-1

Who said anything about dating?
/r/askTRP18/07/18 02:42 AM
1

No, it's an excuse not to move on.
/r/askTRP16/07/18 11:09 PM
1

I am, but I came from the energy industry so my progression has been different from what yours would be.
/r/askTRP15/07/18 10:29 PM
1

Know what you're getting into, try to work smart not hard (not always possible), and try to get on as many different types of deals as your market segment will allow so you have the best chance of a good placement at the end of your program.
/r/askTRP15/07/18 10:25 PM
5

I'm in IB too. It's possible to train sporadically, but you're not going to make gains while cortisol and sleep deprivation eat your body. The absolute best a junior banker can hope for is maintenance. I work with D1 football players who walked in the door with ON POINT training, and even they're tubby after 9 months.
/r/askTRP15/07/18 09:36 PM
19

The way corporate America works these days, if you want to afford a high-priced wife like that you're gonna work 80 hour weeks. Mad stress (extra doughiness) Dinners at work (extra doughiness) No time for exercise (extra doughiness) Loss of sleep (extra doughiness) So he probably started out as a highly motivated guy, and his bosses have had their boot on his throat so fucking long that he's become a beta bitch. I see it all the time in my line of work, and that's why I'm getting the fuck out.
/r/askTRP15/07/18 04:26 PM
1

Tough call. You're not going to get laid so disengaging makes sense, but the fact that she's even entertaining your advances with a 3 week old is a prime opportunity to black-knight that piece of trash.
/r/askTRP13/07/18 01:40 PM
1

3 weeks ago? She ain't fuckin
/r/askTRP13/07/18 11:09 AM
1

There's no such thing as a break.
/r/askTRP13/07/18 11:06 AM
28

I got married because I wanted kids, and a two-parent household is a huge advantage.
/r/askTRP01/07/18 02:19 PM
1

There is no lifestyle in IB, you will only have a workstyle. You will have no SMV because you will be miserable despite making good money.
/r/askTRP23/06/18 07:43 PM
1

It doesn’t matter if it has meaning or not. If you were ACTUALLY busy living your best life, you’d find trying to reply to all of it a nuisance.
/r/askTRP20/06/18 05:58 PM
2

Then why aren’t you annoyed that she’s blowing up your socials? Ain’t nobody got time to chase a bitch across 4 platforms.
/r/askTRP20/06/18 11:28 AM
3

No, you should a get a fucking life so that when she blasts you on 42 different socials you’re doing something else and not waiting by your damn phone.
/r/askTRP20/06/18 02:21 AM
1

It sounds like girl B thought there was monogamy. Which means she want a plate.
/r/askTRP18/06/18 12:53 AM
7

You’re ugly AND a fuckboy. Gotta love when they contradict themselves in succeeding sentences. Surprised she didn’t tell you that you had a small dick. That’s always a favorite.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/18 02:16 PM
3

Eventually, yea. You can’t really do compound movements without a legit barbell. Of course I’m biased: I train Olympic lifting.
/r/askTRP09/06/18 02:51 AM
2

The smith machine bar doesn’t weigh 45 lbs either. So in that case, I’d just track the plates you add.
/r/askTRP09/06/18 02:46 AM
1

Her post implied she HAD to have a career. The choice to have one or not was the entire point of second wave feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 12:29 PM
4

sigh See what feminism has done to you? It was supposed to give you choice. Instead, here you are assuming you STILL don't have one, it's just now you're stick with a soul-crushing job instead of a loving family.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 01:45 AM
1

I’m pretty sure we’ve had this exact discussion before and your definition of “older” was some hyperbolic 20 year gap. At 25 a 29 year old man is a LONG way up in career and maturity.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 12:02 AM
1

Was that intended to refute my statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 11:57 PM
4

You suffer under the fallacy that you should be settling with someone your age.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 11:34 PM
3

Most people have zero exposure to firearms. They only know what they see in the news. The news says guns are bad, and nobody has the integrity to actually confirm it. Well, except the one lying ass “”””journalist””” who claimed he wanted to cry after one round through an ar15.
/r/askTRP04/06/18 11:06 PM
3

Sex is easy for women and hard for men. So it follows that men are going to use whatever attributes they have that makes it easy for them, and women aren’t going to like when they’re offered EVEN MORE dick that they don’t want than the average.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 06:57 PM
1

I don’t think it was JUST that.
/r/askTRP25/05/18 09:41 PM
1

The blue pill worked when female sexuality was constrained. It’s based on the “old book of rules.” The rules your parents partially played by and your grandparents fully did. However...it doesn’t work anymore, BUT it still “feels right” for parents to teach their sons these rules...while it simultaneously feels right to teach daughters to shit all over them.
/r/askTRP25/05/18 08:29 PM
1

It doesn’t mean their teachers will be male.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/18 11:26 AM
1

It’s more about the principal. If you’re such a bitch that people are comfortable insulting you to your face, it’s going to take a pretty big jolt for them to respect you.
/r/askTRP24/05/18 10:50 PM
1

Disagree. There are a lot of things you do unconsciously as part of your home life that simply staying over a night or two at a time doesn’t reveal, and might be deal breakers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 04:03 PM
4

Go no contact at the very least.
/r/askTRP24/05/18 03:57 PM
1

You let someone tell you that your hair looks shit without unhinging their jaw?
/r/askTRP24/05/18 03:55 PM
1

The nature of women and the correct way to treat them
/r/askTRP24/05/18 11:23 AM
2

The red pill rage has more to do with the fact that society and people you trusted have conspired to lie to you about the nature of the world.
/r/askTRP24/05/18 03:33 AM
2

You shouldn’t be worried about whether she’s interested. You should be worried about how to move on.
/r/askTRP23/05/18 05:42 PM
2

Is English not your first language?
/r/askTRP22/05/18 06:56 PM
3

Watching Instagram stories=coming into play again?
/r/askTRP22/05/18 06:54 PM
2

There are loads of women out there who are pretty, feminine, smart, and accomplished. Gotta love meaningless phrases like this. What's loads? Is loads enough to go around? Is loads 10 out of the 3.5 billion women? 100? 1000? You've made a complete non-statement, but what's worse: you've used it as evidence in your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 05:12 PM
4

Just like feminism itself: the idea and the practice are two VERY different things. By design.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 10:59 AM
2

Yes
/r/askTRP10/05/18 07:32 PM
1

Because we will then no longer be able to pretend that only one gender “doesn’t take precautions.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 02:55 PM
1

You’re hard of reading, aren’t you?
/r/askTRP08/05/18 02:10 AM
2

Rich women were having to pay alimony.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/18 07:26 PM
5

All it took was a few black knights to get alimony from their rich wives, and BAM...reform.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/18 07:25 PM
4

Personal responsibility now with 100% more “complete moron.”
/r/askTRP07/05/18 05:48 PM
6

Alcohol doesn't cause anything. It's just a scapegoat.
/r/askTRP07/05/18 11:00 AM
3

"shooting for the stars" implies the possibility of missing. This is more like an expenditure of acquired status.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/18 03:15 PM
4

When you work for a long time to save to buy a new car, are you owed that car? No, the answer is no, and for the same reason I did nothing of the sort you're claiming.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/18 03:10 PM
5

We call it a "mid life crisis" to gloss over what's really happening: a man's comfort in his career and social status outside the home is at its most stark contrast to the sexual attention he's recieving inside it, and he wants to cash in that status for something more than a roommate situation. But that puts some burden on the woman, and making it even .0000001% her fault is unacceptable. However, when women do it, it is fully acceptable to make it 1000% his fault for making her "unhappy."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/18 02:06 PM
1

Your line about the games is mad butthurt. Yes, it's definitely games, but your option is to just stop playing.
/r/askTRP02/05/18 11:27 PM
7

I just tell people it's massively, hugely, average.
/r/askTRP30/04/18 04:21 PM
1

You're absolutely right. Women and children weren't prioritized and the world through a collective shit fit for breaking the unspoken rule. They wanted the captain dead for it. Maybe hold your snark for a little more surety than one gewgle search.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/18 11:04 PM
1

How about the costa Concordia?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/18 02:20 PM
1

Ships sinking, terrorist attacks, plane emergency landings. I'm actually blown away that anyone finds this in the least contentious.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/18 12:14 AM
1

Guess you haven't been involved in too many dangerous situations. Which fits the pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/18 12:10 AM
17

When shit hits the fan it's always "women and children first." When people are selected to die for a cause, women are explicitly excluded. But I guess the free-shit parade isn't better for y'all so I'm wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 04:32 PM
9

There are zero consequences to them for bailing ever. Why would they even bother to remember they had set something up?
/r/askTRP27/04/18 02:04 PM
7

Are you really asking if a girl that re-inititated contact with you wants to re-initiate contact with you?
/r/askTRP23/04/18 11:39 PM
3

Because most people don't date in their age range. Most men date a woman a few years his junior. It's not the wild 40->18 this post implies, but the average is ~3 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/18 04:51 PM
-2

You're absolutely right. It's WAY more than several.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/18 04:49 PM
1

We wouldn't need to become puritanical. If women placed value in modesty and chastity, there simply wouldn't be "models and hot celebrities." It would not be something women would want to participate in.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 11:08 PM
6

So you caved to her emotional manipulation. So red pill.
/r/askTRP18/04/18 04:38 PM
0

That's what I'd call breaking out of the hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 03:48 PM
0

You have a degree, almost literally, in finding artifacts and trying to extrapolate them into the world in which they existed, yet you can't start from OP's premise and do the same? Or are you just unwilling?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 03:18 PM
-1

A master's degree from a Western University, and you can't even have a discussion in the confines of a hypothetical. K den.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 03:08 PM
-1

You've just tried to stuff a bunch of "this world" stuff into the hypothetical world we're discussing. If every woman wanted commitment before sex, there'd be no porn. There'd be no Victoria secret models. If you de-sexualize the media because no woman was willing to risk her chastity, men would be more satisfied with their wives because they wouldn't be INUNDATED with reminders that hotter women exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 02:50 PM
8

The 75% of the men in the middle of the bell curve would be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/18 02:19 AM
1

But you are. Your argument is "If you can't beat this permanently, why try?" And, again, you're assuming SMV is fixed and that ounce a woman has decided a guy is "out of her league" she will ALWAYS think that way. She won't. First because she'll always be questioning that assertion (especially in the age of social media where even fair 3-5s get wild amounts of e-attention), and also because his SMV isn't fixed. People lose their wealth. People lose their confidence. People get fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 03:04 PM
1

Then why are you trying to tell men not to try?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 02:54 PM
1

It seems to me like you're trying to convince yourself not to try. Vis a vis "if I can never best hypergamy permanently, why bother with women at all?" Which is a similar argument to "SMV is all genetics, I don't have good genetics, why bother with women at all?"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 02:50 PM
1

That's both hyperbolic and untrue. Other people in this thread have said the same thing I have: hypergamy can never be permanently satisfied. SMV is not fixed, there is no one that is "superchad" enough to permanently avoid hypergamy. Although maybe you're one of those that think it's all genetics, you don't have it, and that gives you permission to quit. It would fit with your OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 02:42 PM
1

What difference does it make if I get a raise now of there's always a threat I'll get laid off? What difference does it make if I get fit now if there's always a threat I'll get run over by a bus? Your autistic brand of nihilism makes no sense in the context of having to actually make it through the 60-90 years of being alive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 02:34 PM
2

Hypergamy can never be permanently satisfied.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 02:25 PM
1

Your argument hinges on him only dating women his own age. We ALL knew the girl in HS dating a guy in college. We all knew the girl in college dating someone who already graduated. And we all knew the girl fucking her professor. 30 year old men can AND DO date 25 year old women. They not only date, but marry. Only ONE of my married friends has a wife that's less than 4 years younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/18 05:42 PM
3

Divorce rape is an inequitable distribution of assets and/or future payments sometimes coupled with horrendous (and false) accusations and legal restrictions. A woman CAN be divorce raped, theoretically, but it doesn't happen often in practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/18 03:15 AM
3

You didn't follow the rom-com plan of chasing. You're fucking her movie relationship up, man!
/r/askTRP11/04/18 12:50 PM
1

If the beast you once loved has been stripped raw...find a new beast. This is the problem with trying to take the pussy off the pedestal whole simultaneously making pussy your primary hobby.
/r/askTRP11/04/18 02:01 AM
1

If your list is hyperfeminine....what does "just" feminine look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/18 06:49 PM
1

Marketing doesn’t have to be truthful or logical. Just because they’re ACTUALLY two different things has no bearing on whether or not people conflate the two for rhetorical purposes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/18 02:46 AM
1

You’re still confusing marketing with truth. I don’t know how to pierce your autism on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/18 02:17 AM
1

I don’t have it backwards at all. We’re not talking truth here, we’re talking marketing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/18 12:36 AM
0

I’m well aware what words mean. I’m also well aware how political branding works. You’ve defined it perfectly: people said “today is cold, no global warming.” So they rebranded and now every day that’s different than any arbitrary day is proof of “climate change.”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/18 10:17 PM
0

That sounds like a clever attempt to rebrand without changing the underlying issue. Like global warming > climate change.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/18 06:03 PM
5

In this case credible means “you actually are the guy you pretend to be in front of them.”
/r/askTRP05/04/18 05:10 PM
1

If you’re a credible dude, OF COURSE they’re going to get attached.
/r/askTRP05/04/18 04:05 PM
2

You need to listen to the exact advice you gave your friend.
/r/askTRP04/04/18 08:06 PM
2

No, they probably started at 300 a piece and ballooned to 500 together. Yes, as I’ve seen enough of them with little sausage children to make one ponder the physics of that copulation. Houston is a special case because there are just so goddamn many massive humans in one place.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/18 02:03 PM
2

Sure you can. Most cars sold aren’t Ferraris.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/18 01:44 PM
1

Go to Houston. A statistically significant number of “1000 lb couples” around.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/18 01:43 PM
3

Welding Auto repair Electrician Plumber Steam fitter hvac
/r/askTRP29/03/18 12:23 AM
1

I gave you the evolutionary prospective. I agree that there’s thousands of years of culture software running on that hardware.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/18 12:15 AM
1

Why are we like that? Immortality. How do we become immortal? Genetics. To expound on the tribal scenario you mentioned in OP: what is more likely to assure your genetics pass on into the future? Getting hung up on your husband that was killed at war, or moving on from him to the next best thing (whether that is another man in your tribe or one in the tribe that captured you). What is more likely to assure that your genetics get passed on to a THIRD generation? Breeding with the man who’s geneti…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/18 09:55 PM
1

You were trying to guide people towards VALID responses that directly addressed the question as opposed to invalid responses that skirt the question such as “I would never allow myself to be in the position to have to make this decision.” The person I was responding to got hung up on the “I have a secret” part of your hypothetical instead of answering whether or not they would date someone who used a sex doll or prostitute.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/18 06:44 PM
1

The source is obvious. OP tried to setup a scenario to prevent responses like “I would never date a guy like that,” and you got hung up on the scenario instead of the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/18 03:40 PM
1

You missed the point entirely
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/18 02:07 PM
1

You’re way past setting “ground rules.”
/r/askTRP27/03/18 09:52 PM
1

There are few things more satisfying than a job well done. I’d start a business, and now that you have enough to not worry about making rent, it can be something risky that you actually enjoy.
/r/askTRP26/03/18 01:17 PM
6

You’re welcome. I guess the actionable thing is: just date. Tell yourself that your dataset on women is flawed, and you’re “just doing it to learn.” Hopefully that will keep the bitterness at bay.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 10:34 PM
8

Even your mother’s love is conditional. If you murdered a sibling or her husband in front of her, she’d likely hate you. Are the benefits you providing really superficial? A relationship is an exchange. It sounds like what you really want is a relationship where you can withdraw your offering, and the co-party will still provide there’s. You are going to have to realign your conceptualization of relationships with how humans actually work. It’s no simple task in no small part because your unders…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 10:18 PM
6

I think you need to unpack the “love me for me” meme in order to make any progress. What is it that women love you for that isn’t you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 10:07 PM
3

There are ways to infer it, but the point OP is making is that generally most people don’t. They just demand that the world find them attractive because of certain traits they possess. I’ll note that looking in the mirror, as you’ve previously mentioned, is a way of inferring it, but is the second most inaccurate way of doing so. SO inaccurate that my previous statements ring true in practice if not in concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 06:49 PM
1

You have committed a category error. NOTHING in social science - the anointed academic kind or the anecdotal red pill kind - is as hard and fast as integers. The concreteness you desire will never be available.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 06:29 PM
2

There’s still powerplays that work in a relationship. It’s just that they’re all nuclear.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 03:42 PM
3

No, you can’t. Attractiveness is what others think about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 03:40 PM
5

That’s literally not possible. Even identical twins aren’t actually identical. Just take the point, trying to undermine it by inventing impossible hypotheticals is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 03:02 PM
7

You’re getting it twisted: you do not get to determine how attractive YOU are. You absolutely get to determine how attractive everyone else is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 02:53 PM
5

That misses part of the point: you have to BE a king AND act like it. Being a pauper and acting like a king is just going to get you laughed at.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 02:50 PM
3

You believed in the fallacy of “relational equity.” There’s a lot written about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 02:49 PM
5

They’ll never replace relationships for every man. But what you’ll see is a further fractionation of the dating market. The bottom 75% will drop out entirely because they couldn’t win anyway. This will be a financial crisis for everyone, but most especially women as you can’t “gotcha-baby” a beta if he’s content fucking his doll. And then women will chase the new top 25%...or the top 5%. Harems galore.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/18 07:51 PM
1

By a couple of kettlebells and transport them back and forth.
/r/askTRP18/03/18 04:15 PM
1

Which brings me back to my first point: you’re arguing for consequencelessness for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 03:52 PM
1

You’ve seen to it that birth control doesn’t cost money. All of your excuses were valid a decade ago, but they’re not anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 03:26 PM
1

It may take two, but not one sex has access to before, during, and even after methods of prevention. Modern medicine makes pregnancy 100% a woman’s choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 02:51 PM
1

No. In no society should you be entitled to other people’s property because of choices you made. You’re using “egalitarian,” but what you mean is “consequenceless.”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 02:26 PM
6

You lost me, and everyone, with your “it’s the current year” garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 12:49 PM
2

Resources. You’re playing the what if game with the assumption that you could rip marriage out of the social contract while still maintaining the state’s ability to separate men from their resources to transfer to women. I don’t see how you’d convince a government that a woman is deserving of a man’s resources for no reason whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 12:47 PM
13

Yup. I can get fucked too.
/r/askTRP14/03/18 07:00 PM
1

That's a lot of surprises. Is today your birthday?
/r/askTRP14/03/18 05:28 PM
1

I've never even heard that term before. But don't most STEM men read sci-fi? I do.
/r/askTRP14/03/18 05:27 PM
2

I read up on it right after reading what a madonna-whore complex was. You should try it.
/r/askTRP14/03/18 05:24 PM
32

"talk you you as a man" Anyone who tries to make a play against your masculinity can get fucked. If he was a man...this scenario wouldn't exist, he'd have either kept her from straying or tossed her back into the trash.
/r/askTRP14/03/18 04:37 PM
6

Step 1 of being a badass: stop checking up on your ex.
/r/askTRP14/03/18 02:58 PM
2

Ohhhh snap. He declared his intellectual superiority instead of demonstrated it, and then bowed out. Clearly the work of a genius. I am outclassed.
/r/askTRP13/03/18 04:50 PM
1

Yes, I know, putting in the effort to know what you’re talking about is clearly boring for you.
/r/askTRP13/03/18 04:47 PM
1

Still not the madonna-whore complex.
/r/askTRP13/03/18 04:45 PM
1

That’s not the madonna-whore complex at all. You can help yourself by knowing what you’re talking about instead of using buzzwords to make it seem like you do.
/r/askTRP13/03/18 04:43 PM
1

Still not seeing the madonna-whore link.
/r/askTRP13/03/18 04:39 PM
1

I don’t see the similarities, please elaborate.
/r/askTRP13/03/18 04:27 PM
13

If you’re still in the “fake it til you make it” stage of internalizing red pill behaviors it’s quite hard because you KNOW you’re faking it. However, there are things about you that are true, and that you’re proficient at, and even if those things have nothing to do with your game, you gotta remind yourself of them, and remind yourself that mastery of all things (except world of Warcraft) is attractive.
/r/askTRP13/03/18 03:47 PM
12

Liking yourself is very subjective. The objectives may not matter at all.
/r/askTRP13/03/18 03:39 PM
39

Seriously. It’s the “Why does she like me? I don’t even like me” problem. Why aren’t you worth liking?
/r/askTRP13/03/18 03:34 PM
114

Because you know you’re fucked up, and if they can like something fucked up, you’re disgusted. Try not being fucked up.
/r/askTRP13/03/18 03:30 PM
2

Any man participating in one night stands has seen enough porn to find a clit. They just don’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/18 01:42 AM
10

You got high on your own supply. If she spread for you fast, odds are good she’s spread for others faster.
/r/askTRP12/03/18 02:49 PM
1

Rollo Tommasi talks about this occasionally. Inherit in the "be yourself" meme is the idea that masculinity is a mask, and that every man is actually a gooey sack of emotions hiding behind it, and if you'd just drop the mask...women would line up to be with you...just like they think women should be for them (but they're not).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/18 01:29 AM
8

When men say "lady like" they mean not promiscuous, intoxicated, or deceptive. The fact that you needed a novel to convince yourself of something else tells me your view has already been changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/18 05:38 PM
2

Well that's certainly the rosy version. My guess was that he couldn't pull hot girls his age so he settled for old, busted, and easy and convinced himself that his handicap was a preference.
/r/askTRP09/03/18 02:36 PM
4

Why the fuck are you dating some old, dusty, vagina?
/r/askTRP09/03/18 01:03 AM
1

If you do complex movements PROPERLY...you don't have to do ab work. If you just go in and do concentration curls, bench press, and leg price then yea...your core is undertrained.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/18 12:10 AM
8

You have no life outside pussy or you wouldn't even be thinking about this. Get a fucking hobby, man. You should be GLAD they're fucking you but not blowing up your phone constantly.
/r/askTRP28/02/18 12:17 PM
7

Conservatives are uncreative losers, but theyre really good at keeping the wheels on things that already exist. You want a liberal to think of new products, and make a company, but a conservative to run it so it doesn't implode. The problem with conservatives is that they reliably fail to conserve anything. Well, except for liberal progress. Then the libs move the chains. And conservatives begin to conserve that.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/18 09:56 PM
3

Implicit in the ultimatum is "I'll take my pussy and go home."
/r/askTRP27/02/18 12:59 AM
10

I can't say she had never heard no before, but it was probably a rarity. Blame daddy...if she even has one.
/r/askTRP26/02/18 08:14 PM
53

Women are generally unprepared for not getting what they want. Add in yiu rejecting her sexually/relationally, and you literally just dropped the biggest bomb on her she's ever faced. It's no surprise she's acting absurdly.
/r/askTRP26/02/18 06:22 PM
3

It's not semantics, a collection of ideologies is a worldview, and that's a pretty human thing. If your underlying premise is that TRPers are humans, but ones with a different collection than you...well...there's no point in changing your mind because this is self evident.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 07:27 PM
5

First off, you don't know what an ideology is or you wouldn't try to pluralize it. A plural of ideologies is, by definition, not an ideology. Secondly, TRP is a praxeology. I'll leave that for you to Google and then use incorrectly elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 06:26 PM
5

A combination of "waiting for the perfect person," "waiting for the perfect financial situation," and the wealthy locking them in labs and offices to extract as much value out of their intelligence as the can to the detriment of the social life (and thus mate selection) of those individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 12:36 AM
2

You want one because you haven't had one. I've already said this: you want a relationship to validate that you're a guy worth having a relationship with. It's a character flaw because that's not an accolade in our culture. You're basically hanging your self esteem on the ability to be some slut's doormat. Yay?
/r/askTRP24/02/18 06:29 PM
1

You're digging your hole deeper here. Think about what you just said "I entertained her, and she didn't validate me." So...yea. It's exactly as I've said.
/r/askTRP24/02/18 05:38 PM
1

The terms you use to describe a relationship aren't based in reality. Which tells me that you haven't had one, and don't actually want a relationship, you want to know you're able to convince a girl to have one with you. Ergo, you want the relationship to validate you.
/r/askTRP24/02/18 04:58 PM
3

Because you say things like "I just want a bitch I can share a life with."
/r/askTRP24/02/18 04:42 PM
55

First off: being drunk isn't an excuse for anything. You're a man, you're in control of yourself. Secondly... you did it because you wanted to. You're just going to have to deal with the consequences...cuz that's what a man does.
/r/askTRP24/02/18 01:47 PM
1

Based on the your description, I'm guessing you've never had a relationship, and what you actually want is validation.
/r/askTRP24/02/18 12:52 PM
35

Make finding a mission your mission. Learn to program, knit, work on a car. Just keep trying shit til you find something you actually want to be good at. Then get good at it.
/r/askTRP23/02/18 05:07 PM
2

TRP isn't about being emotionless, it's about being the master of them so they don't run your shit.
/r/askTRP23/02/18 02:48 PM
37

It's simple: there's no such thing as a break. You're either a couple or you're not. This waiting patiently while she "tries on" being single...or really other dudes...is ridiculous. Put it another way: if being your GF is SO FUCKING HARD that she needs a vacation from it...she just doesn't like you that much.
/r/askTRP23/02/18 02:42 AM
7

Competence breeds confidence. You want the smallest shred of the latter? Put in the effort to get good at something. That's why we advise lifting. Yes, it makes a body look good, but also doing the hard work to accomplish it builds confidence.
/r/askTRP23/02/18 12:31 AM
11

Because you're a man and self improvement is part of your OS anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/18 02:04 PM
26

Pussy excuses this? Come on, bro...
/r/TheRedPill21/02/18 03:14 AM
50

Why the FUCK did you agree to have a drink with her? "What the heck" was NOT the proper response.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/18 02:49 AM
4

They don't know. They're working off some subconscious impulses they don't understand.
/r/askTRP20/02/18 11:34 PM
4

It's both: older women are indeed worried about the power balance. The balandr that that tilted and they slid off of.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 05:02 PM
3

And the SJWs, are in the process of trying to share be their garbage into all of them.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/18 12:12 AM
10

I don't think the problem is that they're shunned. Men throughout history have not been "the cool kids," and survived. They used to retire to their basements where they couldn't be picked on to play D&D and society left them alone. But we can't have that anymore. We have social media. The ridicule is now literally inescapable. Not to mention, they can't even have their D&D without a heaping serving of leftist shit. There is literally no respite for them, and no guiding force (thanks to the new s…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/18 10:04 PM
1

yesallfieldreports
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 08:18 PM
5

Make your intentions clear. Just respond yes with no explanation or punctuation.
/r/askTRP14/02/18 03:08 PM
1

There's no such thing as taking a break. The relationship is over.
/r/askTRP13/02/18 02:11 AM
1

Using Pew Research's numbers, middle class is a household income of ~$39k-$118k. So you asking how many TRPers make six figures is probably not the right price point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 11:30 PM
1

She's still a one-itis.
/r/askTRP12/02/18 11:19 PM
1

sigh welp, good luck with your #mentorher campaign. Sounds like your misplaced anger and lack of any obligation to do anything in return is a winning case that every man is going to race to sign up for.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 12:10 AM
0

Neither, it was an insult which is all your ideologically-driven word-vomit of a hate-post deserved
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 12:02 AM
0

Your feminist boilerplate is tangled into a giant yarnball the likes of which your cats will love to play with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 11:59 PM
3

You've been programmed by society, but most importantly your parents, to play by those rules. Why? Because prior to the sexual revolution of the 60s...they worked for your average dude to land an average wife.
/r/askTRP11/02/18 10:54 PM
1

No, I don't know you're right.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 01:25 PM
1

All modifiers on relationship to let you know it's not a heterosexual monogamous pairing. Yes...even romance.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 12:54 AM
1

That's why you use the modifier "business" to distinguish it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 12:31 AM
1

Maybe, but if you're mate shopping, you don't start open relationships while still mate shopping. You just """date.""" Again, words have meanings, and a relationship implies monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 11:05 PM
3

I think the latter only happens in very rare cases where a woman has outkicked her coverage.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 10:54 PM
2

What does dying sexless have to do with the birthrate?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 10:53 PM
11

Just think about the way you stated that: "the bottom 75%." That's not the bottom, that's the overwhelming majority. Do you know what happens when, for one reason or another, you deny MOST men sex? They sign up to die for 72 virgins. If you like things like heat and shitting in a toilet instead of a hole...this is a concern.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 10:18 PM
16

No, because I think when a women gets there, she's not trying to be fair. It's more like "this dude is such a chump he'll let me take other dick and still finance my life."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 09:58 PM
1

I assumed "better mate" meant she already had a mate. Vis a vis, was already in a relationship, and trying to open it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 09:10 PM
2

...in the OP? Am I taking crazy pills?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 09:00 PM
22

Every man has a small dick when a woman is mad at him.
/r/askTRP10/02/18 08:57 PM
8

Were they actually plates or did they think you were monogamous? The fact that one blocked you leads me to believe you were lying to one.
/r/askTRP10/02/18 08:56 PM
2

But that's not what OP said at all. OP said that when a woman wants to convert a normal relationship into not-a-relationship-but-still-calling-it-a-relationship that she has alterior motives. At no point did he ask for details on your was-never-a-relationship-but-called-it-a-relationship. Your first post is "huzzah, gotcha! This thing that doesn't even match your premise somehow disproves your premise. Come at me bro."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 08:53 PM
5

It won't necessarily get you the bang, but the alternative...butthurtiness... ABSOLUTELY won't.
/r/askTRP10/02/18 08:00 PM
3

Words have meanings. The fact that you know to use the modifier "open" to distinguish it from just a relationship says all that needs to be said.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 07:54 PM
8

It sounds nothing like that. You know what normal is, you know your situation wasn't it which is why you posted it as a "gotcha." Stop trying to play universal relativist.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 07:45 PM
6

It doesn't nor does it have to. Exceptions don't disprove rules especially when it comes to complex systems like humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 07:19 PM
32

I'll change your view, but not in the way you think: a woman suggesting an open marriage doesn't desire to find a better mate, she's already found him, and wants to to attempt to stick the landing with current SO as a safety net.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/18 07:18 PM
12

So what's your question? You already know how this is going to play out. But there's no need to block her on everything. That's butthurty.
/r/askTRP10/02/18 04:41 PM
3

The best way to act is to not go. "I don't want her back I just want her as a plate" is hamsterization, bro. You still got the fee-fees for her.
/r/askTRP10/02/18 03:04 PM
1

If you can't even fathom how to stop pedestalising, the odds are you're not even capable of going too far the other way.
/r/askTRP10/02/18 03:02 PM
1

Betas all have tells early on. Once they tell, you should expect the entire handbook of beta behaviors from them.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 07:05 PM
21

He ran "I'm not that kind of guy" beta game with you as the example. You should have seen this coming. That being said, where you actually failed is letting these girls shitty, fake, attitudes get to you. They're just running "I'm not that kind of girl" game on you, but they would have fucked...if you hadn't unleashed the butthurt.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 02:08 PM
1

When did you start? All you did is insult me.
/r/askTRP07/02/18 09:19 PM
1

I'm not getting bent. I'm trying to teach you how to not get mowed down in public discourse. The instant you end any sentence with "lol" you're communicating your utter lack of conviction in what you've just said. Either take the lesson, or keep projecting this "child" thing. I don't care, but at least consider that your unmeasures response here is because I'm hitting close to home.
/r/askTRP07/02/18 09:15 PM
1

Lol isn't "just fine." Who giggles at the end of asking a question? Betas...betas with no self confidence nervous-laugh when try to ask a question as a self defense mechanism, that's who. Don't tell me I sound like a child when you talk like your testicles have yet to descend.
/r/askTRP07/02/18 08:13 PM
1

I don't worry about concern-trolling from people who end their posts with "lol." Seems to keep me disease free.
/r/askTRP07/02/18 08:05 PM
3

Start by getting up and making your bed. Seriously. Then once you've accomplished that, set another small goal for the day, and just keep resetting ever larger goals.
/r/askTRP07/02/18 02:33 PM
2

Unless you bang the fatty, you're asking for trouble.
/r/askTRP06/02/18 06:26 PM
1

It wasn’t the thought of being rich, she assumed that because she was attached to him his wealth was hers to consume. Vis a vis, she already WAS rich
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 08:07 PM
1

She's a plate, why do you care?
/r/askTRP26/01/18 04:52 PM
5

They are not currently driving the dumpster fire that is feminism, though.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 02:51 AM
2

She didn't tell you that she thinks you're wrong, she actually told you her FRIENDS think you're wrong. Gotta take a step back and look at the whole conversation. You're dating a hive-mind girl. Which, most of them are. They're not useful relationship material. Toss her back.
/r/askTRP14/01/18 04:26 PM
1

Such an astute observation! I'm sure with that powerful skill you can reread the posts that you digested well enough to quote to figure out why I haven't, and won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 04:14 PM
2

Since always. every opinion is not a political one. But, as I've already stated, this is entirely incompressible to the left...as you've so graciously demonstrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 03:59 PM
3

Thank you for proving the point you so kindly quoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 03:52 PM
1

Not really, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 03:38 PM
6

Easy: TRP isn’t a political movement, it’s sexual strategy. This isn’t a concept that anyone on the left can grasp because they don’t make such distinctions. EVERYTHING is political to the left.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 02:51 PM
2

Exactly. That’s why I was trying to get her to define fascist. Wanted to see what potato definition she came up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/18 01:01 AM
3

If judging by the first two sentences that your post was a mish-mash of leftoid boilerplate that didn’t require rereading is “understanding,” then yea...it’s pretty clear. If they made it all the way to the third sentence they would have noticed it takes a complete left turn from the previous two as well as attempting to create a false dichotomy. However, as the entirety of your stance is just the same brainless shit being spouted from hundreds of other holes all over the internet..reading beyon…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 09:19 PM
4

I’m glad you said that. Please, enlighten us as to what a fascist looks like, acts like, and speaks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 09:11 PM
2

Fun facts: being anti-semitic doesn’t make you a fascist. Promoting Nazi propaganda doesn’t make you a fascist. Being BOTH anti-semitic and promoting Nazi propaganda doesn’t make you a fascist. Being a fascist does make you a fascist. Take the time to learn what things mean before you try to use them as insults...oh wait, you’re a leftoid. You’re patently incapable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 08:27 PM
6

Jesus Christ your post is just a junk-drawer of shit, OP. Can you limit yourself to one thought per paragraph so someone can at least try to show you why you’re insane?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 08:24 PM
7

You’re taking about “his rhetoric.” He didn’t use rhetoric. That’s why we’re arguing. It’s like talking about eating a steak with a knife and I say “well he used a fork” and your response is “yea...he ate a steak, we agree, why are you arguing?”
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 01:33 AM
8

Look up the definition of dialectic. He had an opinion, and used establish science to corroborate said opinion. It’s classic dialectic. He didn’t think he needed appeals to emotion (rhetoric), he had science. He was wrong, but that’s another topic entirely.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 01:26 AM
6

In the classic sense, he used dialectic, not rhetoric.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 01:19 AM
10

It wasn’t rhetoric, though. He literally cited scientific consensus. Guys like that don’t think they need rhetoric because they have the truth on their side.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 01:09 AM
2

Bro, are you ok? Tripling-down on the same lame ass authority play wreaks of insecurity. Or mental illness.
/r/MGTOW06/01/18 03:20 AM
2

Still older than you. Does calling other people “kid” fill you with a false sense of authority? How’s that play with the women? Lotta busted has beens with a middle school football coach fetish?
/r/MGTOW06/01/18 02:54 AM
2

First off, I’m probably older than you. Secondly, it might not be a felony, but it is insulting when you ask a question that could be answered in 3 seconds by googling “bitcoin.” You’re supposed to be an alpha...do work.
/r/MGTOW06/01/18 02:43 AM
4

That 13 year old could use google, apparently. This dude can’t.
/r/MGTOW05/01/18 07:18 PM
4

Not anymore
/r/MGTOW05/01/18 07:07 PM
1

Yea, but make sure they’re ACTUALLY involved. Lots of companies are changing their name to <x> blockchain to scam a bump in stock price.
/r/MGTOW05/01/18 07:06 PM
17

If you don’t know how to find this yourself, you shouldn’t be investing in it.
/r/MGTOW05/01/18 07:04 PM
29

So you can’t call bullshit on the fact they’re in a new relationship 10 seconds later.
/r/askTRP04/01/18 03:35 PM
1

Beta worked in her generation. It’s just that her generation raised women to be men, and they’re somehow blind to the fact.
/r/askTRP04/01/18 03:27 PM
7

We don’t hate hypergamy, we hate hypergamy with no consequences enforced by the full power of the state. Hypergamy is natural. Hypergamy where every beta you step on while climbing the ladder owes you cash&prizes on the way up, however, is fucking bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/18 02:25 AM
13

I think it’s less tortuous knowing that she wasn’t “finding herself,” but actually being pathetically incapable of taking the risk of being alone.
/r/askTRP28/12/17 06:00 PM
2

People don’t like to see others better their situation, in any context, because it highlights that it’s possible if you try...and they don’t want to try. Better to believe it’s not possible and be a lazy sack of shit than to put effort into something.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 04:21 PM
61

Odds are good it’s not “other dudes” in a generic sense, but one particular dude she wants to attempt a monkey-branch too while keeping you as a safety net.
/r/askTRP28/12/17 03:54 PM
55

Gonna be hard to squat to depth with those.
/r/askTRP28/12/17 03:51 PM
7

That’s like asking why a fusion of diarrhea and Cheerios doesn’t make the best breakfast. How much diarrhea is the ideal mix for you?
/r/askTRP27/12/17 03:26 PM
1

When he was 20, people were generally fit because they didn’t spend 8 hours every night playing WoW. You need to lift because you don’t engage in any kind of physical activity so you’re either fat or skinny fat.
/r/askTRP26/12/17 02:51 PM
3

A girl that won’t fuck you is in a good place to be a fuck buddy? How does that work?
/r/askTRP25/12/17 06:00 PM
18

Probably not. Even with the best of techniques, some girls just aren’t going to want to fuck you.
/r/askTRP23/12/17 06:13 PM
3

One of the tenants of the blue pill religion is that talking fixes things. Trouble in your relationship? “Just talk to them.” Trouble at work? “Talk to HR.” So from this set of rules, of COURSE talking to a therapist is good advice. In fact, it’s basically the only piece of advice they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/17 05:38 PM
1

She can fuck other men even if you have both.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 01:26 PM
10

You are your money, though. Ev n if it’s daddy’s money only you can spend it.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/17 01:40 PM
1

You’re reading comments about what to avoid. They’re, obviously, not about that middle ground.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 11:44 PM
1

They do rail against both, but where it becomes a DIchotomy is when you pretend that it’s only those two options. There’s a shitload of granularity in the middle.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 11:12 PM
0

I think you’re trying create a false dichotomy with career woman on one end and gold diggers on the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 01:22 PM
2

Don’t deal with them.
/r/askTRP15/12/17 05:59 PM
1

No, the state generally divided it evenly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 05:11 PM
2

No, you’re reaching. A woman can at any time decide the amount of resources she is receiving for any reason are insufficient and dissolve the relationship, but keep the resources enforced by the state.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 04:57 PM
1

Which is exactly my point.
/r/askTRP11/12/17 12:37 AM
1

That works too, actually
/r/askTRP10/12/17 09:46 PM
1

Rappers and their unshakeable confidence write bitchass songs like “I hit it first.” Sorry dude, 90% of it is acting.
/r/askTRP10/12/17 09:45 PM
5

Pro-tip: ANYTHING online: Facebook, Instagram, shit even match and tinder...is a HIGHLIGHT REEL. Always assume that’s it’s the absolute best that person is capable of...not their average. So if they look like a 7 on tinder, you can be sure that they only look like a 7 10% of the time OR LESS.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/17 08:36 PM
30

It’s a ASD. Same play as “we’re not having sex tonight.”
/r/askTRP03/12/17 03:57 PM
1

They spring full formed from the high school. Every year.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 11:55 AM
0

The problem is that it won’t be talked about. There is still a large portion of the population that thinks the news is the news and is to be believed on its face. That journalists are still journalists so if they’re publishing an opinion, it must be well researched. Since nothing could be further from the truth...they SHOULD be shamed for publishing this shit.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/17 12:47 AM
2

You're in the wrong sub if you're asking how to sneak around.
/r/askTRP28/11/17 10:05 PM
3

Nobody is saying you have to be monogamous, but the way you've stated your intentions it sounds more like "I want a loyal girlfriend who thinks I'm also loyal...but I'm not" and less like "I want a main bitch and the occasional side piece" The former is bitchmade, hence the need for the clarification.
/r/askTRP28/11/17 09:29 PM
1

Plates is a type of relationship. Are you saying you want a monogamous relationship while "low key" being not monogamous? Kinda confused here...
/r/askTRP28/11/17 09:23 PM
19

She just got fucked&chucked so she doubts she’s “worth having.” She’s looking for you to still be torn up and “””lost without her.””” This would validate that she’s worth having. Rest assured: she DOES NOT want be had
/r/askTRP22/11/17 08:53 PM
2

Women can’t have it revealed that they’re rational, selfish, actors with regards to sexual provisioning (and I don’t mean that in a bad way, that’s how all markets function). Who gets sex must be seen as an unsolvable mystery so that men continue to do things for women in the HOPES of a sexual return as opposed to REQUIRING a sexual transaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 01:43 PM
23

You won’t lose the circle if they know what she did. Or you might. That’s ok, build a new circle.
/r/askTRP18/11/17 11:10 AM
1

TRPers don’t just hand out money because potato.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/17 06:50 AM
2

I think you’ve probably burned it with this girl, which is fine. If she’s on tinder she’s a washed up slut trying to stick the landing with a beta boyfriend. Sounds like you don’t want to be that guy so move on.
/r/askTRP11/11/17 05:31 AM
1

If by “gatekeeping” you mean “disproportionate inclusion and aid when compared against talent” then yea...there’s a lot of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/17 03:25 AM
2

Sensitivity training only makes for a courteous work environment by a definition of such that doesn’t include actually accomplishing anything of value. The point of a company is to offer a product or service that someone else will pay you for. If you can’t even tell someone they made a mistake because feelz, you will pay people to make garbage that no one will buy anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 11:22 PM
4

Your entire post is couched in the idea that the things being covered in sensitivity training are the right things. TRP rejects that out of hand. The lairs of this onion are so numerous to CMV that nobody has the time to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 11:17 PM
1

The US military actually pays more if you're married. This incentivizes soldiers to make hasty decisions.
/r/askTRP03/11/17 12:09 PM
2

So she just quit a career where she fucks people for money and has just started a career where she fucks people to get roles for money. Yea...I can see how this makes her relationship material.
/r/askTRP03/11/17 01:40 AM
3

But you knew whatever number came out would sound worse. Doesn't matter if it was just 10,000. That sounds a lot more severe than 6%.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 01:55 AM
5

I'm surprised it took someone this long to do some math to try to make the numbers look really huge and "problematic" to speak in BPer parlance.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 12:08 AM
2

Because all this rape is happening in public arenas where we can all play the "not rape or rape game?"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 12:05 AM
6

Well, that’s on you. They’re our their waddling around everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:43 PM
7

When 65% of the adult population is OBESE fitness does indeed guarantee attractiveness. You might not become a 10, but you’ll be a 7.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:28 PM
6

I’ve had the same thought, but as weight control is 80% diet. Getting diet right takes more effort more consistently than an hour a day.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:26 PM
4

They outperform boys by metrics that assume all bachelors degrees are equivalent. Therefore, since girls get more degrees, girls outperform. But it’s simply not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 08:47 PM
1

You should do an AMA, you’re probably one of the oldest users of reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 07:54 PM
3

Not since the 1950s they haven’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 07:25 PM
8

Most men that end up in STEM programs in college had 12 years of primary education wherein they were known as the smart kid, and had women bat their eyelashes at them and hope that was enough to get free help at the best, and the smart kid to do their work for them at the worst. Every group project wherein the teacher conveniently assigned them the stupid but pretty girl so the smart kid could do the whole project added to this natural distrust for women in academics. The smart STEM kid, quite r…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 07:08 PM
14

No, you just do you, and understand you can’t gaurantee the situation you want. All you can do is be as dope as possible and hope that’s enough to keep her around. If not...well...that’s why you have other women.
/r/askTRP27/10/17 10:58 AM
25

If she’s worth dating, she’s offered dick 100 times a day. You don’t “open yourself “ to that. It’s a constant threat.
/r/askTRP27/10/17 10:52 AM
1

You didn’t say that you learned that men were yummy and that the world was full of new dicks? You didn’t then get married, vis a vis, traded in yummy new dicks for the same old dick? Strange, I must be hard of reading today.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 11:45 PM
1

I did none of the above. I used your words to describe your scenario. If your own words constitute “drive by bullshit” then I’m fine with that retraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 11:29 PM
0

do you have some actual point to make or just cheap shots and bad guessing. I didn't settle, I was chosen and I accepted him too. What's the matter, does my story conflict with your reddit contrived theories about whores and marriage? Why make a point when you get uncomfortable discussing the history you sounded initially so proud of? I'm not sure why it even interests you since Red Pill guys are not in support of marriage or whores. I think you just wanted to take a cheap shot and were wrong an…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 11:11 PM
1

Most people to, but then someone slightly better comes along, and then someone sliiiightly better than that, as nauseum.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 10:57 PM
1

No leaders, no laws, no ideology. I think you should rebrand to MDWTFTFL: men doing whatever the fuck they feel like. Seems more in line with what you actually advocate.
/r/askTRP26/10/17 07:56 PM
1

So MGTOW doesn’t mean MGTOW. Fascinating.
/r/askTRP26/10/17 07:43 PM
1

So despite a world full of yummy new dick, you settled for one old one. Fascinating.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 07:32 PM
1

I notice you don’t include married in that list of attributes. Still chasing that yummy new dick?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 07:26 PM
1

Yes but it’s MEN going their own way. Implying it’s a way without women. To say you’re going without women except for these particular ways with women is like saying you’re a vegetarian except steak.
/r/askTRP26/10/17 07:10 PM
1

I don’t like that version of MGTOW. You either go your own way or you don’t. It’s not a buffet.
/r/askTRP26/10/17 06:45 PM
1

MGTOW isn’t the next level of evolution, it’s the decision to stop playing the game. You have to know the game first, though. So it makes sense that it turns one way but not the other. That being said, there’s a lot of incels masquerading as MGTOW.
/r/askTRP26/10/17 05:51 PM
35

How do you casually tell someone you’ll suck their dick?
/r/askTRP25/10/17 11:00 PM
3

It’s not that they explicitly filter out educated or career women, it’s just that those types of women happen to have other traits which makes them a pain in the ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/17 09:55 PM
2

We don’t know anything about the quality of time, though. I know a lot of people who will mail it in for a looonnngg time to convince the world that “they tried and it didn’t work so it must not work.” How many people do you now that “try” to lose weight for “years” and end up gaining? Must not be possible....
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/17 02:35 PM
6

If your options were a car that didn’t start 99% of the time or having no car all....you’d choose the unreliable car. Some of game is chance and circumstance. I don’t subscribe to the idea that any guy can get any girl if he just games hard enough, but you certainly improve your odds significantly if you’re savvy, and you remove all risk of fucking up the occasional sure thing. At the end of the day, whether it’s chance or skill...you still have to play the game to have a chance of winning. That…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/17 01:44 PM
7

You obviously didn’t next her if she thinks y’all talk about ex’s.
/r/askTRP24/10/17 01:48 AM
3

A lot of none RPers claim that RP isn’t RP, it’s “just common sense.” So maybe it has caught on quite pervasively...just under a different brand name.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 07:06 PM
1

Eating is most efficient for gaining mass. You need a 500kcal surplus.
/r/askTRP23/10/17 03:01 PM
1

Is it working? It doesn't seem to be working. Unless of course you meant to say "broadcasting my butthurt." In which case, standout job!
/r/askTRP20/10/17 09:37 PM
1

Still on this tangent, and getting more absurd with each post. Why?
/r/askTRP20/10/17 08:27 PM
1

Unnecessary tangent. Stick to a topic.
/r/askTRP20/10/17 08:09 PM
1

That's not how this works. I don't have to be disciplined because putting my penis in things requires effort. You should really go to /r/trp and read the sidebar. You're still making phaggotey blue pill equivalences between men and women.
/r/askTRP20/10/17 07:36 PM
1

This is TRP. We don't talk about moral compasses here. Take your shit to r/relationships if you want that kind of phaggotry.
/r/askTRP20/10/17 07:25 PM
1

If your mom wanted the D, he'd probably hit that too. Doesn't mean he'd steal.
/r/askTRP20/10/17 07:12 PM
1

AWALT. Your sister, your mom. Even grandmammy
/r/askTRP20/10/17 06:46 PM
2

Trust him to what? Not bang your sister?
/r/askTRP20/10/17 06:45 PM
2

No. I don't tend to make cross-sex correlations for obvious reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/17 06:10 PM
2

Wondering what I did to communicate that I was open to their advances.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/17 06:06 PM
2

Confused mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/17 05:56 PM
1

Macroeconomics...not even once.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/17 05:45 PM
3

Being a part of the marketplace simply means you're trying to buy or sell. I've been hit on by hamplanets in recently memory. They're 3s, and they are in the marketplace trying to buy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/17 05:45 PM
1

Oh, in that case you're just delusional: she has no responsibility to tell you if or who she is dating.
/r/askTRP16/10/17 10:39 PM
20

He paid $4k a month to the daughter. My dad took care of my mom, my brother, and I on less. This bitch wanted the ULTIMATE payday for having a fuck dumped in her. Impressive.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/17 10:16 PM
14

I'm going to do nothing better because trying to be better for a woman is sexist and I don't want to be sexist. blackknight
/r/askTRP16/10/17 10:06 PM
2

I don't know where you live, but based on your terrible English and the fact that you think your sister should inform you that she is dating, I think you live in a Muslim country. TRP rules don't really apply in fundementalist Muslim cultures.
/r/askTRP16/10/17 10:05 PM
1

You can be a gold digger literally stripping him of his success. Or at the very least consuming it in a way that there is no retained value (spending it on vacations and whatnot) You can't strip a woman of her pussy, nor can you fuck it enough that it has zero value afterwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 08:31 PM
8

Sure, but it should be used sparringly, and only with LTRs.
/r/askTRP16/10/17 05:27 PM
1

Spend 10 minutes in r/deadbedrooms. Whole shitload of couples who made a lifetime commitment when they thought the sex was good and it STILL wasn't. It's a none issue: a wife drying up is a concern across the board.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 02:48 PM
1

But that's an entirely seperate issue that is not unique to virgins. I've seen bukake sluts dry up for their beta bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 02:28 PM
1

If you're one place away from getting your pro card as a bodybuilder, you can worry about insertions. For everyone else, lift heavier phaggot.
/r/askTRP15/10/17 08:37 PM
5

If she's "saving herself for marriage" and has made it to 35 without being married, I'm worried there's other issues. At 30 it's still a concern, at 25 it's no big deal. Sex isn't hard to get good at so the lack of experience isn't a concern it's the lack of being able to create a lasting relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 04:48 PM
1

This is an almost a clever way of saying aesthetics is all that matters and aesthetics is genetics. Almost. Except it’s patently untrue. There’s a bunch of fuck-ugly, broke, semi-pro hockey players with missing teeth that defy your assertions.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 01:55 PM
5

I fail to believe you managed to live in a place where there’s no Hollywood no American cable networks no American terrestrial radio commercials no billboards for American companies no Democrats no therapists But yet you’ve managed to find reddit. No. Fucking. Way.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/17 08:17 PM
9

Yup. It’s called “she’s the boss” and “it’s what’s on the inside that counts.” I can list several more tropes you’ve heard countless times that convey either of the two messages about which you feign incredulity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/17 07:21 PM
7

It isn’t “what we used to believe” it is THE NARRATIVE. It is what all of society tells us is Truth. It’s far more insidious than some cobbled together misguided shit as you’re attempting to convey our past blueper beliefs as.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/17 07:12 PM
71

At some point they’re going to hit the wall, but most women don’t see it coming, and live right up until the moment of impact as if “dick is abundant and low value.” And then an instant after they hit the wall they lament “where have all the good men gone?”
/r/TheRedPill10/10/17 07:05 PM
1

You get to decide your own morality. If you think it’s shitty, don’t do it.
/r/askTRP09/10/17 04:18 PM
1

The devs maybe, but it’s user base isn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 12:23 PM
1

If reddit is any indication, middle class shitlibs OVERWHELMINGLY outnumber RPers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 12:17 PM
1

That demographic isn't all that narrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:46 AM
1

I main heroin
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 11:11 PM
1

Admit it: you were 3 in ‘96, and that shooting occurred on the other side of the continent. That isn’t “lived experience” that’s stuff that happened to happen while you also happened to be alive. The more hilarious part to me is every. single. Australian. that comes to visit my good friend here in the US wants me to take them to a range and let them fire my AR. And do you know what they get from that? an actual lived experience a feeling of understanding and enjoyment (not unstoppability) And if…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 04:49 PM
1

But you have no lived experience. You, nor your mysterious experts, have ever fired a weapon. Yet here you are...with an opinion and shit. Gun control is irrational, the stats that support it infinitesimal and quite easy to argue with. You seem to like stats (despite having provided none here), so I’ll give you one: in America which has a “””””””terrible”””””” problem with gun violence you are THREE TIMES more likely to die from a car accident than a gun. Ban guns? If maximal preservation of hum…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 04:28 PM
1

You claim to source your words and opinion from experts. Which is hilarious because you then claim experts don’t say those things, you do, and you list zero experts. So I’m pretty so I called it right earlier: you don’t know anything. Nor have you even bothered to see what the experts are saying to ape their commentary. And yes you DO have to have fired a weapon to understand what it does. You can’t make wildly subjective conclusions like “feelings of unstoppability” based on stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 04:00 PM
1

Experts defined as journalists who’s only goal is to convey the message that “guns are scary?” Experts that have ever actually fired a weapon they claim to be experts with? Cuz serious, “feelings of unstoppability” isn’t something experts say.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 10:44 AM
1

No, expect to make fun of their ignorance until they scurry away.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:20 AM
1

You gave me media boilerplate instead of an answer. Neither of the things you listed is unique to semi-autos or even RELATED to semi-autos. Which means you probably don’t even know what makes a semi-auto a semi-auto.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:38 AM
1

In other words: you have no idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:20 AM
1

Would it? Care to explain to me how semi-automatics in particular are an issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:03 AM
1

Are you calling me fat?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 01:05 AM
1

So the amendment was ratified in 1868, but what it is “traditionally” known for didn’t occur til literally 100 years later. No wonder you libs can’t be reasoned with.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 01:03 AM
1

Considering it was a Supreme Court case decided in 1973 that established abortion, I think your use of “traditionally” here is incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 12:46 AM
1

You can’t keep people from killing people. If the last 12 months of vehicular homicides in the UK, France, and even Canada have shown us anything it’s that when a motherfucker wants to kill a motherfucker (or lots of motherfuckers) he’s going to do it. And he’s going to use whatever tool is easiest that he has at his disposal to do so. Banning guns won’t ban mass murder, it’ll just turn mass shootings into mass runoverings.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 12:40 AM
1

Which amendment is the abortion amendment?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 12:37 AM
1

Because the decline has control of too many institutions. You can’t fight on that many fronts. There aren’t enough anti-fragile employment opportunities to fund such a fight either.
/r/askTRP05/10/17 04:10 AM
1

You’re Canuckian!? Bwahahaaaa. So much for distance. You literally share a border with the country you so arrogantly think you have figured out. Maybe you should be focused on telling your terrorists sourry so they’ll stop running people over instead of feigning a commanding view of other’s politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 02:41 AM
1

....what? No, I’m talking about literal distances.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 02:21 AM
1

Of course a foreigner would think that their distance is an advantage. Funny thing about distances: the ones between between parts of America are so incomprehensibly large your foreign dispassionate elitism actually makes it impossible to get the whole picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 02:16 AM
1

So despite the fact that all of our major media screams BAN ALL THE THINGS at every opportunity...you see us the exact opposite. Fascinating.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 02:09 AM
2

Americans defined as what? The rabid anti-gun, anti-sense, anti-American liberal media? Cuz no.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 01:47 AM
2

Go nuclear: ban white guys entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 01:45 AM
7

The most arrogant part of this whole thing for me is the credentials: the equation of intelligence with education. Some of the smartest people I know don't have an associates degree, and some of the dumbest, must useless sacks of shit I have the displeasure of dealing with have masters and Phds in...well I'm sure y'all can figure out which advanced degrees have value and which don't. Funnier still: it's never the STEM masters holder that has to lean on his paperwork so you know he's smart...
/r/TheRedPill29/09/17 09:38 PM
3

I've never met a man intimidated by a smart woman. This is just a hamsterization: these women suck (not literally or they'd have less problems getting dates) and it's a convenient cop-out.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/17 05:18 PM
2

The world revolves around beta bucks. You gotta feed them the fairy tale that they still have a chance. Otherwise, they might stop being the parachute for the end of women's ride on the carousel. We can't have that.
/r/askTRP29/09/17 10:18 AM
5

Get fit, they'll stare at your 6 pack and capped delts instead of your face.
/r/askTRP28/09/17 12:33 AM
1

Most girls like to be the aesthetic one in the relationship. Useless hot ones REQUIRE it because they know they have nothing else to keep you with. Sounds like she's the latter.
/r/askTRP27/09/17 10:51 PM
2

That's the reality of the market. So stop making pussy your primary hobby. There's no strategy that somehow blocks the 4000 offers for fuck she is going to receive every day.
/r/askTRP26/09/17 01:48 PM
1

Blame hip-hop
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 02:17 PM
2

Telling her nevermind is butthurt as fuck
/r/askTRP22/09/17 04:51 AM
1

I'm probably still cray.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 08:20 PM
6

They're either all ok, or none of them are. Equality isn't a buffet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 05:20 PM
3

Not a difference, just breadth vs depth. The sub is focused exclusively on sexual strategy whereas the greater manosphere adresses many facets of being a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 04:15 PM
1

Did you read the post I was replying to? She literally said she wanted a conversation with Groovy. Just Groovy. still think it's weird?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 04:13 PM
-1

If it exists only to have a conversation with one person it should have been a PM lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 04:08 PM
1

Well I'm actually just interested in having a conversation with Groovy Right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 03:13 PM
0

You're more than welcome to, but if you're not interested in other people participating...take it to PMs.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 02:56 PM
1

PMs are a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 02:19 PM
1

What the fuck does her height have to do with penis size? Do you think vagina depth scales linearly with height? Does dick size!?
/r/askTRP20/09/17 11:51 PM
5

I think you fail to realize the low bar required to be declared a professional in that field.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 11:47 PM
1

Yup, that's it exactly.
/r/askTRP19/09/17 04:28 PM
152

How crass of a human being do you have to be to accuse someone of such a heinous crime for fucking free pizza.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/17 09:23 PM
2

If you're asking how to get one particular girl, you're missing the entire point of red pill. Bitches are fungible. Move on.
/r/askTRP15/09/17 07:09 PM
1

Any advice here about the difference between a frame of "outcome independence" and a frame of "I'm happy with whatever I get"? Sure, the latter isn't a frame, it's a rationalization. You're not happy. Stop lying to yourself.
/r/askTRP15/09/17 02:39 PM
2

His advice was sound: dread isn't going to work because 5 years of being a beta makes a sudden switch to dread WAY out of character. Maybe for your anniversary instead of doing some gay shit for her (when she has no interest in reciprocating) do something for you? You can even play it off as "I know you're so so tired so stay home and rest without the kids, I'll just go do something fun alone."
/r/askTRP15/09/17 02:28 PM
3

If you believe in gay shit like meyers-briggs, no, you can't become an alpha.
/r/askTRP15/09/17 02:02 AM
53

The subtext wasn't that she hadn't decided if she was going to fuck you, she was going to fuck you, the subtext was that because she SAID she wasn't going to fuck you "it just happened" and she isn't a slut.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/17 01:07 AM
3

Considering the only prostitution stings I've ever seen where to prosecute men willing to pay for sex instead of women willing to sell it (prostitutes are always a victim)... I'd say the ban is to control male sexuality
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 02:39 AM
2

Hate isn't the opposite of love, indifference is. You have to care to hate. Think about it...
/r/askTRP08/09/17 04:42 PM
2

That was the most confusing apology coupled with some rather vague and terribly unhelpful """advice"""
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 08:22 PM
4

What is it the left is always saying about straight white males? Oh, that's right, your privilege is that you don't even recognize that you have privilege. Granted, what's posted is an exaggeration, but you don't see what's going on behind the scenes to make things easier for you than an equivalently penis'ed human.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 05:04 PM
2

The law resides in the pocketbooks of those who are able to afford your services.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 11:25 PM
3

Everything you're typing tells me you want to convince me that you did, and that you're trying to bury the truth under carefully chosen words and an appeal to authority.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 11:20 PM
3

The fact that you have to say "minimal due process" tells me that you know damn well they're kangaroo courts.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 11:17 PM
6

It's not false. There is no gaurantee they're able to face their accuser, there's no gaurantee of legal counsel, and there's no gaurantee of appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 11:06 PM
5

From the unsubstantiated claims of guys who were the victim of these tribunals. Not only are there no public records...There's also no due process. Once again, by design.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 11:04 PM
3

There's probably a private scholastic record, but as it's neither a criminal nor civill proceeding there's no public record your average person can go look up. And that's by design.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 10:08 PM
6

Which there's no public evidence of. That's kinda the point of the tribunals: you don't have tell the public anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 09:54 PM
4

You are unable to find cases because cases require courts and there aren't any. Just " tribunals" and such within the university.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 09:02 PM
1

Keep losing the good fight, secret king.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 04:23 PM
1

Are you kidding me? You came into this sub, and now you want to pretend like you didn't? Jesus Christ you're cucked beyond sanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 04:14 PM
2

We've all suffered for a generation because of people like you who are willing to lose to the crazies on the left so long as they "play by the rules." TRPers don't care about your noble defeat; they want to win. And since the left has decided that they "stand on the right side of history" which justifies suspending ALL rules to defeat their enemy...guess what that means?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 04:02 PM
2

An honest discussion about this is impossible. Look what just happened at goolag when someone tried that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 02:13 PM
1

It's about pointing out the unabashed hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 11:22 AM
1

Yes, yes you do. Noble defeat is still defeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 11:16 AM
1

Girls sleep with guys, they don't sleep with penises.
/r/askTRP22/08/17 04:52 AM
1

Because they're sluts. They've seen hundreds of dicks. Do you find the 101st pic of anything still interesting?
/r/askTRP22/08/17 04:34 AM
1

Or it's a shit test that you're failing with your thirstiness.
/r/askTRP22/08/17 04:27 AM
1

Why send dick pics? The sluts have seen 100 dicks. You think yours is impressive enough to be worth sending?
/r/askTRP22/08/17 02:36 AM
1

You need a hobby. For fuck's sake even just walking around playing Pokemon go would be so much better than what you're doing.
/r/askTRP21/08/17 05:32 PM
1

There's a chasm between being vulnerable and being the emotive phaggot we think of as being "in touch with our emotions/feminine side." One is a shit test placed on all men so that women didn't have to work to filter alphas from betas, and the other is part of being human. A man isn't supposed to be emotionless, but a man should be IN CONTROL of his emotions. You can't be anybody's rock if you have to express how you feel about the role. But if you're dog dies, you should be hurt by it.
/r/askTRP21/08/17 04:26 PM
1

Why the fuck would you plate someone who threatens to trap you? Plating here is NOT ideal.
/r/askTRP15/08/17 12:33 AM
1

By assuming that only 10% of the population is open to being taken home due to otherwise being "locked down."
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/17 05:55 PM
2

You completely discount the fluidity of all relationships, monkey-branching, and outright cheating. Your "facts" are so steeped in blue pill conditioning it's actually impressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/17 04:40 PM
6

Yea dude, the "hoping she reaches out to me later" is oneitis.
/r/askTRP08/08/17 07:43 AM
1

It's always "just" <insert minor thing here>. One of my least favorite words for 2 reasons. it's never "just" that, it's that and 20,00,000 other tiny little things that when combined add up to a big fucking deal it's always more nefarious than whatever someone is trying to hand-wave with the word "just." This applies to life, not just feminism.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/17 12:05 AM
1

It might not be good, but it certainly beats some of the alternatives such as incel.
/r/askTRP02/08/17 09:22 PM
2

There's 150 million adults in just America equating to roughly 50 million pairings. You've listed one exception. Looks like you're well on your way!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 01:07 PM
2

Ooohhh buddy. If you don't learn that exceptions don't disprove generalities, you're going to have a real bad time around here. Ask yourself this: do you know a lifetime smoker who didn't get lung cancer? Does that mean smoking didn't cause lunh cancer? Thought so...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 12:59 PM
2

The simple definition of hypergamy isn't branch swinging it's "women marry up." Most men don't, they marry down because of women's hypergamy. Both sexes are attempting to optimize their mate selection, but one does so above their own standing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 12:32 PM
1

If you're asking how to get one particular girl, you're entirely missing the fucking point of the red pill.
/r/askTRP01/08/17 03:10 AM
1

It's a combination. For one, when you ask a woman what she "likes" she's going to rattle off a checklist off the top of her HEAD that amounts to a socially-approved list of things that would make for cute BF/GF Facebook photos. But on the other hand, when they're out in the club in a place where they no longer need to choose based on that approved list and/or what will look good on FB and instead choose based on what their PUSSY wants in the moment...They select something else entirely. "It's ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 07:24 PM
2

You continue ghosting. You don't owe her an explanation, and she certainly wouldn't give you a real one were the tables turned.
/r/askTRP26/07/17 07:55 PM
2

We as a society have decided that the correct way of doing things is the female way. This starts in childhood when female teachers can't understand why the boys can't sit still in class like the girls do (and they themselves did). Vis a vis, boys are defective girls. Nevermind that becoming a dictator is actually difficult, wanting to rule is male and therefore a defective goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 07:35 PM
1

You have a habit of willfully redefining things in the most hyperbolic manner around here. So I'm not sure it would be clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 06:00 PM
2

The same thing everyone means when they use that terminology about gadgets, species, or fads.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 01:12 PM
1

Implying women are going to be wiped out, and wanting to kill all women aren't even in the same Zip code.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 03:58 AM
2

I've heard people advocate sex bots, but killing all women? That sounds more like a page out of the feminist playbook...although their goal is 10% male population.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 12:47 AM
1

Settling down isn't getting married. You put your bullshit on that, and then keep trying to pin it on me with snark. I'm 0% embarrassed. But your public display of continually trying to cram words in my mouth has got to be awkward.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 01:58 PM
1

I'm paying for them either way. But that's not the laughable part, the laughable part is where you start with a reasonable argument claiming statistics, and then take a swerving left to shitsville and start talking about "beneficial for society." Something so fucking subjective we could spend the rest of forever debating what is actually beneficial. Was your statistics talk just a smoke show to lend weight to your main argument that was complete bullshit? Seems that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 01:55 PM
1

In fairness. Right. Because he was trying to be fair and not unthinking, need-an-insult-so-racist-will-do, leftist.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 01:50 PM
1

LOL. Now you want to throw in what's "beneficial to society?" That's rich...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 07:15 PM
1

They statistically have higher infertility rates, miscarriages, and birth defects too. You want to play with those dice?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 07:12 PM
2

You're hilarious. How many more posts before you call me literally Hitler?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 04:27 PM
1

Are you hard of reading? Nowhere in that quote do I advocate marriage. And in fact, I only even mention it in the negative as a response Seriously, who thinks that reimagining something totally visible to everyone makes them look good or smart? ffs I see blues do this all the time; stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 03:44 PM
2

What you don't need is several 65" TVs, an AMG Mercedes, a new iphone every year, and all the other trappings of modern society we've come to expect. Those are the types of trivialities one might have to forgo to have kids on $45k a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 03:30 PM
1

I haven't seen that trend. I've seen a delay in marriage age as the narrative has ramped up in frequency and amplitude, but women eventually want a husbsnd and babies. What I have seen is that they've pushed this want so far out in their life, that they're then unable to realize them for various reasons. End then you get the sour grapes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 03:14 PM
–

Diversity isn't a strength. Diversity isn't ethnic restaurants. Conservative areas aren't synonymous with religious ones. You want a religious area. Or at least a Western European Christian one. Sure, the people are more judgemental and exclusive, but the crime is much lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 03:05 PM
2

"cheaper areas" I live in the suburbs of a major city in Texas. What you pay for an apartment the size of my closet is what I pay for a house with a 7000 sq ft yard. Obviously everyone "desires" more income, but if you live away from one of the liberal meccas of degeneracy (NYC, LA, Chicago), you can raise a family on $45k a year. Just without the trappings of hyper-consumerism you feel are required for a fulfilling life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 02:46 PM
1

Several. It was a bunch of drunk people doing naughty things below the foam line. Alcoholism and promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 02:42 PM
1

Lol. Yea. None of your thoughts or your location surprises me. Good luck with your sex and the city life plan.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 02:32 PM
1

The college experience is alcoholism and promiscuity as you so eloquently summarized as "greek life and foam parties." And while you may have gotten a useful education, the majority of degrees profered aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 02:27 PM
1

Care to quote the part that says marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 02:25 PM
2

Lol. No. There is no voice saying "$45k a year is fine to raise a family on at 25." Not. One.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 02:24 PM
1

I was arguing about biology. I shouldn't need to be more clear that marriage isn't biological.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 02:23 PM
2

You still think a household income in the top 5% is required. Think about that for a minute.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 02:21 PM
1

Waiting til you're 30 to consider reproduction and then being 35 when you attempt it is in fact at odds with biology. I'm still not sure why you, and everyone else, is attempting to pin marriage to that. Wait, scratch that. You're hoping to get a TRPer to say that men should get married young. Sorry, not going to happen. Marriage in its current legal context is still a shit bet for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 02:13 PM
3

That's what you think because that's what you've been told. You've also been told you need a 6 figure salary and a mcmansion in order to raiae a family. Funny how our parents didn't...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 02:01 PM
1

You're trying to tie marriage into this, and I'm not going to bite because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 02:00 PM
1

Are you replying to the right person?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 01:59 PM
2

You know exactly what is dangerously at odds with biology. What isn't biology is marriage. Or "the college experience" or "finding yourself" or any of the other reasons we use to justify delaying reproduction until the womb is on its deathbed.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 01:47 PM
0

This is why feelz should not be the operative reason for...Well anything at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 01:45 PM
2

What does marriage gave to do with sperm quality?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 01:34 PM
1

You're absolutely right. You're encouraged to waste your prime reproductive years being a career and consumer whore for the benefit of the elite, and then with those last few eggs...have yourself a downsy little kid. Wonderful plan. We should totally listen to that encouragement.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 12:55 PM
8

Its a time when people are dating but not really settling down (getting married). Just because that's what they ARE doing doesn't mean that is what they SHOULD BE doing. Current social norms are dangerously at odds with biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 12:52 PM
3

It's only fallacious in a context were there is empirical data to refute it. There's not, and there never will be because the forces that control the narrative will never fund the research.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 10:11 PM
5

The number of times you used the word affection belies your attempt to pretend this was just sex. You wanted the relationship as bad as she did, but instead you tried some really incongruous "no I'm an alpha loner who can't be tied down" act, and pushed her into a Hail Mary in the hopes you'd drop it. Maybe next time try being real?
/r/askTRP29/06/17 01:42 PM
1

No, I understood fully: you're just dropping "traditional masculinity" in place of "real men."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/17 10:57 PM
2

So now you're going to take your shot with a "real men don't complain about women?" Come on...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/17 11:02 AM
3

An almost clever trap of the "real men do/don't X." Funny thing: we're fucking tired of the rest of the world dictating what "real" masculinity is in a way which selfishly benefits them, and never us. So the answer to your question is: we don't care what you think a real man is
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/17 01:38 AM
1

You're paying $100k for that opener. Seems kinda pricey.
/r/askTRP27/06/17 09:37 PM
1

If you had the ability to steal women, why would you help the person you're stealing from? Why would you go our of your way to do a solid for someone who looks at your ability to steal said woman as a "gimmick?" You should do things for people that hate you out of the goodness of your heart? Ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/17 08:47 PM
3

Only real gamer girl I knew (WoW) cheated on her fiance with a guild member.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 11:30 PM
1

Save up 6 months worth of rent first. There's nothing alpha about being broke.
/r/askTRP08/06/17 01:13 AM
1

In the aforementioned skill at manipulation
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 08:21 PM
1

Lawyers of both sexes have a vocabulary and formal education for the type of personal and social manipulation that women develop innately. Do I find them different from other women? Only in magnitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 06:18 PM
1

No, and here's why: Calling something "too judgemental" isn't an honest criticism of anything. It's both inspecific, leaving whomever uttered it the final authority on the upper limits of acceptable judgment, while simultaneously providing no metrics by which to determine if anything has breeched it. This means the aforementioned authority can move the goalposts at will with no accountability as to having done so. What calling anything "too judgemental" really amounts to is a disqualification ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 06:11 PM
1

This question is unanswerable as "screwed over" could mean anything from simply ending a relationship she didn't want to end to maxing out her credit cards."Ask a more defined question.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 04:18 PM
3

People don't like change. If they're real friends they will eventually adjust. You can't set the timetable for that to happen nor can you expect it will actually happen. You just gotta do you, and let them do them.
/r/askTRP07/06/17 04:03 PM
2

Women do hate each other but they will defend "team woman" in a way men won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 12:00 AM
2

I disagree, it's the same group taking out both sides of their mouth. Porn is empowering for women to produce and get paid for, but patriarchal and sexist for men to consume.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 03:33 PM
0

He might want a serious relationship, but girl obviously doesn't think she's in one. Based on the info given, I struggle to call this chick his GF. In conclusion, she isn't cheating because she's single.
/r/askTRP06/06/17 12:57 AM
2

The stats say that once you go minority, you're a single mom. Will mudsharking increase? Probably. Will RELATIONSHIPS increase...nope.
/r/askTRP02/06/17 09:13 PM
10

A&A "Whoa, of course not. You need to take me out on at LEAST 3 dates so I trust you."
/r/askTRP02/06/17 09:11 PM
1

Ah yes
/r/askTRP02/06/17 12:26 AM
1

Da fuq does "off and on TRP" mean?
/r/askTRP31/05/17 04:52 PM
4

I don't even understand what you think you're proving by this statement. That there exists racist people? Cuz I never refuted that. In fact, it wasn't even part of the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 06:23 PM
6

You have never "just made a thread to ask a general question" around here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 01:52 PM
3

Obviously not since you want to use them all interchangeably
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 01:50 PM
3

Ok, fine. You apparently are more interested in being misinformed, and using "white nationalist" as a definitionless insult. So I'll just sit back, and point and laugh while you make yourself look stupid instead of attempt to educate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 01:49 PM
6

Nazism isn't nationalism, and the fact that you don't know the difference...Or even care what either means...Is a sad commentary on the soundbite-liberalism so prevelant in today's politics of stupidity. To my knowledge GLO isn't a white nationalist, he's a nationalist. He's all for every color, creed, and ancestry being able to have their own nation INCLUDING Australians. Which apparently your "white is racist" brand of globalism won't allow.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 01:45 PM
2

Do we have a choice? No organization in the world would fund research to either prove or disprove TRP so we have to read in between the lines when the keepers of the narrative slip.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 01:42 PM
12

Rape or no rape, she left her friends to follow a dude to a club and a house party. She was shopping for some dick before this possible rape even occured. That alone is wrong.
/r/askTRP28/05/17 02:48 PM
1

And science don't mean shit when the same entities attempting to control the narrative also control what constitutes science. So...yea. that's why RP is a an ongoing praxeology
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 08:15 PM
2

They're not supported DIRECTLY by science because they can't be. Who would write a grant to study the unpleasant aspects of the female psyche? The are inderictly supported by science, and even a casual perusal of chateau heartiste would confirm this. But yes, where there's no indirect science, we have to rely on accumulated anecdotes. It does not mean we're wrong, it means science as a profession has been converged.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 07:56 PM
1

That word "still" doesn't mean what you think it means when considering the totality of human evolution and evo-psych. "Society" itself is a pretty modern concept in that scope.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 05:40 PM
2

Is that even how it worked? I think a case could be made that we squat to shit for most of human history (instead of the more modern sit-to-shit) and therefore there was nothing to wipe. so your example, by virtue of its lack of historical backing kinds proves my point: we slowly evolved a working framework a long time ago...No matter how are """higher""" selves have decided to deviate from it in recent history.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 04:33 PM
3

So crazy that it has worked that way for THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of human history. There's a reason we still jokingly refer to it as "living in sin."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 03:02 PM
2

How you act around the boys, and how you act with the opposite sex aren't the same thing. Your example doesn't prove your point: some of the best college and pro athletes I know (decidedly more college I'll admit) are bitchmade pushovers around their girlfriends and wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 08:46 PM
1

Nobody said you were the only one, I just said you were abnormal, but you won't even admit that to yourself, apparently. And if we can't even come to terms on what constitutes an exception vs the rule...Well none of the rest of it matters. But I get that you'd want to feel like I'm the exception that being raped into fetishizing violent sex is just oh-so common if only people where as brave as you are to talk about it. I get that this line of thinking helps with the pain. It just doesn't make fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 07:22 PM
1

I stand corrected. You're thoroughly damaged goods, and your opinion in these matters isn't void because of zero experience, it's void because of your stated abnormality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 06:49 PM
1

The fact that you don't care what a woman's BODY looks like, and only it's temperature, both confirms that you've never had sex with anyone possessing an attractive one while also explaining why you have to go to such ridiculous lengths to enjoy sex. Having sex with genuinely attractive women isn't something that most men get to do...and especially not with much frequency, but don't get all sour grapes over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 04:07 PM
2

That is what I'm saying, but "a pretty face and a warm body" is what YOU said. Not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 03:55 PM
3

I'm not assuming that at all, but I understand that you're well practiced beating that strawman. So don't mind me, continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 02:37 PM
4

That's a lie you tell yourself to excuse your lack of interest in the person you're having sex with. The encounter HAS to be skilled...because the individual is meh. Like I said, if you're genuinely attracted to the person and not their lack of gag reflex, you'll have good sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 02:10 PM
3

Well that explains why she's been so relaxed lately...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 12:20 PM
3

Most men are beta. Theyve been conditioned their whole life to want relationships. Nothing in this survey surprises me. Few women who hook up are going to admit to it, all their hookups either "just happened" and don't count or they "really really liked the guy" which means it was a budding relationship that failed to launch and ALSO doesn't count.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 12:19 PM
4

You've never had sex with a genuinely attractive person.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 12:16 PM
1

Tinder isn't reality, tinder is marketing. Too many girls on there SAY they aren't looking for hookups, so men have to feed into the fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 12:15 PM
4

The concept for men is just that you're not getting laid. You could smash 10 girls tonight, and then if had a 6 month dry spell...The stigma is just as bad as if you had never had sex at all.
/r/askTRP28/04/17 08:31 PM
19

You're a guy. You don't have a virginity.
/r/askTRP28/04/17 03:00 AM
2

"just roommates" don't eat dinner together
/r/askTRP22/04/17 12:33 PM
4

She doesn't intend to fuck you. That's all the intent you need to consider.
/r/askTRP22/04/17 12:31 PM
1

Their subjective interpretation of their own personal experience has more value than any facts or, as is normally the case with regards to this particular topic, a mountainous collection of corroborating anecdotes. And as a personal sidebar, it always irrates me when a BPer asks for the studies that back up what a TRPer says because They know that science is political and therefore you can't actually study these things Even if/when the science DOES exist, they still trust their personal experien…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 06:55 PM
1

I don't paint anything with my experience, and that's the key difference. BPers not only want their experience valued and validated, they want to believe that it has more gravity in an argument than anything else. It doesn't. Reality is reality no matter how you've been lucky/unlucky enough to interact with it. Let me give you a tangible example: we can imagine that many democrats would have said "my experience is that NOBODY would EVER vote for Trump." But there he is...All presisent and shit. …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 06:33 PM
1

No. Reality matters, not any persons biased interpretation of it. And all statements about "my reality" are bullshit white-washing of the prevailing statistics when they disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 02:58 PM
1

Risk vs reward. Properly vet whomever you're letting impregnate you, and the risk is low compared to the reward. Virtually nothing in this world is risk free, and it's a travesty to suggest that you're either not going to do a single thing on this earth because there's risk or that society needs to change to remove the risk for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 02:09 PM
3

Except that statistics show that women initiate 70% of divorces. Odds are better you'll decide "you don't need no man to be a heroic single mom," and kick HIM out.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 12:56 PM
1

Nobody guaranteed you that sex would be without risk. You have the option of not having it if the 1% chance of pregnancy is too much for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 12:55 PM
1

Sometimes, single moms happen (widows, etc), HOWEVER....it's not good for the fucking kids, and we should never...ever...celebrate it. Do I hate single moms? No, I hate the culture that thinks they're fucking heros for abusing their children by depriving them of a 2 parent household.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 12:53 PM
7

You're right and you're really fucking wrong all at the same time. Am I partying and getting "mad pussy, yo"? No. I'm also not putting that much effort into it anymore. Am I not having fun? Nothing could be further from the truth. I play in a shit little band, I enjoy working out, I'm starting to get more into 3gun shooting, I've got a racecar (and until a few months ago two race bikes). I think the "fucked up fantasy" to use your words is that partying and fucking are the only two things worth …
/r/askTRP09/04/17 03:57 AM
1

Hypergamy in a vacuum isn't bad. Hypergamy in a society of no fault divorce + cash&prizes, and uberbeta daddy government is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 11:53 PM
2

Well this is certainly a novel restating of "TRP isn't new, it's just common sense, therefore you don't need TRP."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 11:10 AM
2

Women don't want to hear how you learned the rules, they just want to play the game BPers Eich anyone doing things they don't like.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 06:25 PM
1

That hasn't been my experience. They'll tell anyone that'll listen that it was "just sex" but their behavior belies the pain.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 07:49 PM
1

I rarely here the laments of men like that. They seem pretty happy. The women on the other hand... Well, let's just say: if the women are the ones using the men, why are they so distraught?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 07:31 PM
1

effectively human dildos used by women for their pleasure and instant gratification. You're flipping the gender script here. That's not how it works at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 07:18 PM
0

Rape culture happens when any given group of people feels sexually entitled to the bodies of any other given group of people. It happens when egos are more important than human rights. So rape culture isn't when there's a culture of rape, it's when people have, like, thoughts and shit. Fascinating branding, there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 07:10 PM
1

Rape Culture: the belief that all men are rapists everywhere and are complicit in hiding and excusing all the hella-rape that's happening everywhere all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 07:09 PM
1

Yet it's still sound advice to be more like Bill Gates.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 07:04 PM
3

Why are you so hung up on this "hours a day" thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 07:02 PM
5

Somehow I think you've confused "role" with "full time job." My house doesn't clean itself, my meals doesn't cook themselves, my clothes don't wash themsleves, the puppy doesn't potty train itself, and the lawn doesn't mow itself. Sure, these things might not add up to a straight-40 workweek as we know it in corporozombie terms, but it IS still a role.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 06:58 PM
3

and you never will with bullshit like you posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 06:54 PM
2

Even if it did, nothing would happen. Part of their protest is to not BUY anytyhing today too. You know what happens? They just buy it tomorrow. They sure showed men! The same bullshit happened when they tried "a day without buying gasoline"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 09:25 PM
0

And now medical schools and dental schools are majority women. They are useless too. Women throw a hissy fit to institute affirmative action to make sure there's as men seats at the table for them as men Fast forward a generation snark about how they're equal participants. Uh....no.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 09:24 PM
0

Yea, not really. Every time a day without anything goes on, nothing happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 09:21 PM
2

Discounting advice because it comes from someone who you think "has it easy" is just a buffer against trying and failing. However that does depend on the advice. If anyon e ever says "I just <insert something really simple>" you have to take that with a grain of salt.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 04:23 PM
1

Aahhh, you're just here to troll. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 11:46 PM
1

It's an opinion. Of one anonymous person on the internet. I'm pretty sure the only thing further from a fact is a confirmed lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 08:00 PM
2

You do realize finishing an OP with the word "fact" doesn't actually make it so...right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 06:44 PM
1

Does seeing hotties on the internet count as "exposure?"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 11:13 PM
1

The TRP sub states, pretty explicitly, that it is only concerned with sexual strategy. There's more to the red pill than that sub, though. So to answer your question: it depends on what you mean by TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:36 PM
2

Already at 23/24 (my age) I see women starting their careers and having no time or energy for nightclubs anymore, and the last thing they seek is a high-maintenance childboy Are you an investment banker or something? Because all the straight-40 "career" women I know were clubbing WELL into their early career days, and had stereotypical bad-boy """boyfriends.""" It wasn't until all the booze started to taint their looks did they suddenly """discover""" that they actually wanted to be treated nice…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 06:38 PM
1

I keep hearing this Red Pill nonsense regarding women and 'bad boys' and how using 'dread game' and making her think you will drop her immediately and rush to another woman if she misbehaves will make her love you and do anything to please you. It's pure garbage, I have never seen it happen in real life. Oh really? What I see in real life is women complaining all the time about how men are 'jerks' and being totally unafraid of dumping said jerks, divorcing them, and calling them out for said beh…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 06:35 PM
12

BiggerDthanYou definition of misogny: anything that doesn't increase the height of women's pedestals. Look, both sexes have intrinsically negative traits. When a woman says "all guys want is sex" nobody makes a post saying "don't you realize this is misandry", no, they just tacitly agree. In fact, most people are SO COMFORTABLE shitting on men at every turn, they've never even heard the word misandry. But to really answer your question: we've been called so many "ists" that we don't really care …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:27 PM
5

why would they fight for equality for men if they hated men? But they don't do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 06:25 PM
1

Honestly, I think your future is far too incomplete a picture to really have an kind of meaningful discussion. I also think some of the facts you're rolling in are inaccurate. The world doesn't have a low birth rate, we just have a larger proportion of births occuring at a below-avreage intelligence point (translation: third worlders are fucking like mad). It does make sense that a socialist-like, technologically advanced, pro-globalization future will be more feminist-like. But that future does…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 06:15 PM
1

I'ts pretty obvious you're trying to say this is an analog for men offering sex to women. It's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 06:08 PM
6

Sure, that's what they talk about. But actions speak louder than words. Who are they dating? Who are they marrying? Most men that are marriage minded and of sufficient attractiveness to accomplish that goal do not end up marrying the hottest girl they've ever dated. They end up marrying the hottest they can do that ISN'T a PITA. The type of girl that dips below your magic 34% floor. And the better thing still is that, assuming she doesn't blow up into a ham-planet, they don't torpedo the relatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 06:07 PM
3

You're not over her. Why are you concerned your friends are going to know the truth? Stop lying to them and yourself.
/r/askTRP17/02/17 04:00 AM
1

If I keep saying no, are you going to keep trying to rephrase the question until you get the answer you think I'm supposed to be giving?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 12:24 PM
1

Nope. Where I work is a fairly pure STEM meritocracy. Funny thing about merit: it's hard to earn it with inferior ass-in-seat time. Guess which group uses more sick days, takes more vacation days, and works less OT?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 03:21 AM
2

Lot of Christians on the right. This is pretty easy to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 10:25 PM
1

Because we don't focus on the exceptions. You said it yourself: generalizations are generally true. Why would we waste effort on the handful of times they're not?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 06:41 PM
2

Back in the days of the patriarchy, men had an advantage over women, and could treat them very badly. They could beat their wife without going to jail, they could have a mistress without the woman being able to divorce and keep the children. No one seeing the current culture changes was of a dating/marrying age during these supposed "good old days of patriarchy." We didn't have those "privileges" to begin with so we can't possibly lament them being taken away. What we're being subjected to is an…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 06:37 PM
2

hypergamy is more than just "women marry up." It is a gnawing uncertainty that the man they've consolidated on is the best they could get. This is the source of all shit tests in a relationship. In those terms, men don't really have an equivalent.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 09:16 PM
1

Women never want a provider... a woman would never enter into a sexless marriage for a "provider" husband. That makes 0 sense. They don't enter into a sexless marriage, they're using sex as a carrot to get providership. So its a weapon only to be weilded by the wife when she wants a baby or something material. When he wants it...boom, headaches and bloating. 40% of women make more than their husbands. Why would they want to waste their money trapping themselves in a sexless marriage? If 40% of w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 09:11 PM
2

Being a provider doesn't make you sexually attractive to women! Being hot does! No shit, genius But there comes a time in every woman's life where the providership becomes useful to them. This, not coincidentally, occurs with the wall. Would you rather marry a model with no education or an ugly women who easily makes 6 figures? The model right? You can make your own money and fuck the model. Why do you think women are any different? We also pick our mates on their attractiveness. men and women a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 08:47 PM
1

You can't make a guy anything at all. So if she won't fuck him, how the hell will he convince a stranger to? You keep asking this question, and I keep not answering it because it shows a complete lack of understanding of the dichotomy I'm proposing. So I guess I'm going to have to try........again..........to fucking explain this to you. Early in life a man has a choice: "do the right thing" spend 8 years getting a masters in STEM, get the right job, get the right large house..........and then s…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 08:17 PM
3

Women do want to fuck B. They also want to label him a douchebag so that a certain subset of guys choose path A for when they're done being pumped and dumped by all the hot """douchebags.""" If she married the guy, she is at least somewhat sexually attracted to him. Nothing at all gaurantees that. She may just be financially attracted to him. Money doesn't part the puss for long.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 08:06 PM
3

I'm talking about two different life paths here. A. be the provider society expects you to be B. be the """douchebag""" No guy is going to choose A if they knew women actually wanted to fuck B.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 07:45 PM
2

I was thinking it was funny how they hamster someone being a celebrity as "knowing" them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 06:40 PM
6

And you are sure you aren't just selecting for those women? Positive. I don't really "select for" women in that way anymore; I'm too old and busy to do the bar cold approach thing. Most of the women I make my acquaintance with at this point are girls that have retired their slut-status, and are playing lovingwife. They invariably have that story, though... Unless it's a band member or DJ, but in this case they knew him """knew him""" Still counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 04:27 PM
4

you know that's how it works...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 03:59 PM
11

I'd say 90% of the women I know have at least 1 fucked-a-guy-in-a-public/unclean-place-shortly-after-meeting-them story. So, technically, not every woman, and certainly not every guy they were with, but at least one..and given the option, every guy would choose to be him instead of the 4-$100-dates-for-a-handsky guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 03:41 PM
14

isn't Beta Bux just a shaming term used to put down a guy who wants a family and is providing for his wife. Some alphas want families too. The difference is whether or not she actually wants to fuck him. Lots of women probably legitimately love their husbands who could be described as Beta. And lots of those same women say exactly that "I really love my husband" and then immediately follow it up with "but I'm not sexually attracted to him." And yes...that sucks. No guy would rather work 90 hour …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 03:38 PM
9

The sex details sound like a guy fantasizing about what it would be like to have a big dick.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 04:32 PM
2

You said you had to have a Phd to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 11:32 PM
1

To date, no federal government. But California is getting close at the state level, and several state universities have rules that effectively do.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 11:31 PM
1

The only time I care about her earning potential is if we're discussing having kids and she has such an amazingly low paying job that it's a net negative for her to continue to do it whilst putting our children in day care. And yea...I know people who do that for their wives so they can play "strong independent woman." Not happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 10:51 PM
2

So the only way to really know this stuff is to double-down on degrees with no future of employability?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 10:47 PM
3

It is fine for women to act like that (they don't, asking them to is called victim blaming) it is not fine for a government based on "innocent until proven guilty" to legislate like that. The latter is what the saying is encouraging.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 10:43 PM
1

Projection. Nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/17 12:48 AM
1

With the removal of forcible, it opens up a whole host of possibilities for women to back-rationalize sex they regretted as rape. Ergo "well, he didn't force me, no, but he called me a cab and sent me home afterwards instead of cuddling.....so I was 'raped'"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/17 11:47 PM
1

exactly, your CMV is a complete fucking sham.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/17 11:43 PM
1

I rather like being paid equally for doing the exact same job as my male counterparts You are but that doesn’t mean I want to wear the pants in the family or be the sole breadwinner for my SAHD husband. And that's the problem. You want the high paying jobs that men used to use to support their SAHW....................and then you still want to look further up the corporate ladder for a husband. Except for now there's, like, 10 dudes up there and 100 corporate-hustling women all fighting for them…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/17 11:39 PM
3

This isn't a CMV, this is a passive-aggressive shot at the SMV of TRP men disguised as a CMV. Come on, now...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/17 11:34 PM
1

You don't have anything better to do with your life?
/r/askTRP02/02/17 02:54 AM
1

First, fuck her on her period. Second...is it ever bad when a chick doesn't want to wait to see you!?
/r/askTRP02/02/17 12:12 AM
0

I have a bad habit of wanting to break bitches that resist. That's kind of a personality flaw you should investigate.
/r/askTRP01/02/17 10:30 PM
1

Depends on what you mean by "greatest" The "lonely old man" stigma is certainly the greater of the two as far as tools for manipulation is concerned.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 09:27 PM
2

I hear a lot of men in my office complain about their wives, but I think a lot of their complaints stem from the fact that they have little to nothing in common with their wives. I hear a lot of guys complain about their girlfriends because their girlfriends have no interests to speak of, and follow them around to literally everything they do. I think common interests, like everything else, lies on a bell curve: none is bad, some is good, lots is bad (again).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 09:25 PM
0

Normal as compared to what? All the other kids in your upper middle class neighborhood?
/r/TheRedPill26/01/17 03:16 PM
3

How often does that attitude get your jaw unhinged?
/r/TheRedPill26/01/17 03:14 PM
-2

At 18 I was covering my own rent, paying for my own groceries, and paying for college. You're pampered.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/17 01:20 PM
2

Meaning I thought a lot harder than just accepting a movement's stated goals and instead considered their actions. Case in point: a bunch of starbucks-toting, white, fat, women marched for what they called "equality," and against a president who had somehow taken that from him in merely 48 hours of holding the office despite the fact that his executive orders had more to do with the EPA, Immigration, and trade up until that point. The fact that they were all well dressed, overfed, with $5 coffee…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:53 AM
1

No. But if you're a dude, your "own goals" involve being more fuckable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:50 AM
3

You're seriously going to trot out that hunk of shit right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 10:20 PM
4

Uhm... women pay taxes too They sure do, honey! And they get all of that back......and some of his. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2375926 And a blog with commentary on the subject http://judgybitch.com/2016/08/16/reblog-research-find-that-as-a-group-only-men-pay-tax/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 10:13 PM
1

These "men" are relaying a combination of their porn viewing habits and/or imitating other RP personalities that claim to have been wildly successful with women. They act on their own sexual predilections or assumptions with casual sex partners, particularly first timers. Young women are not known for asserting their sexual preferences, and given the context of the current sexual climate, might play along even if they are not enjoying themselves. They may do these because they want to appear mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 10:05 PM
3

Maybe some men just think equality makes sense. I don't care what website you quote that says different, feminism.............especially the type typified by the recent march...... has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with equality. So if a man is about equality, he would avoid the movement entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 10:01 PM
1

"oh look how feminist I am. I even don't notice races". Wait, women is now a race?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 09:54 PM
1

Typical crazy response from you. Most TRP guys are BP guys who couldn't use BP ways to get laid and then decided to try TRP ways. So unless there's thousands of "in the closet" TRPers that are somehow a distinct group from BPers.................every dude is doing whatever it is they're doing in order to get laid. Whether that's black knighting, white knighting or anything in between. With varying degrees of sucess, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 09:53 PM
1

are you serious? Yes I'm serious. The sexual market is the one market to rule them all. It may not be a an A-to-B kind of deal, but men do things to get laid, and that's the end of the story.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 09:50 PM
3

No, I'm pretty sure my wallet is still dinged for taxes, which statistics show amounts to a transfer of funds to women, despite my status as a single man. But Alimony and alimony-disguised-as-child-support too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 09:44 PM
3

Pretty sure the court says exactly that. Or if not a gun, at least a set of handcuffs and a jail cell.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 09:18 PM
1

that isn't as relevant anymore today because women now have the option to enter well-paying jobs and provide for themselves - and many do! Statistics on which sex consumes the most government funding says otherwise. Women are still looking for a provider................it's just that now daddy-government is the ultimate provider as he can pick the pocket of every dude instead of the woman having to choose just one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 09:17 PM
1

I don't spend hours reading all of this theory because it just hasn't been necessary. Translation: I just cherry picked the part that proved my point, and now I'm going to pretend like I'm above actually doing the research. qualify to me. Yea dude...you have less trouble with women than someone who needs TRP because you have some natural alpha tendencies. People are learning the things you do by default. Your experience is quite outside the norm. But that's what happen when you take your persona…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 03:22 PM
4

Am I reading this right? You want us to change your view that you have your own view? I just...I don't even know how that would work.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 03:17 PM
1

then stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 10:03 PM
–

I've never actually heard the complaints myself. It's all indirect. Can you read? The interwebs is littered with op eds of this nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 10:02 PM
1

The reason for that is that TRPers tend to be generally of middle class or even working class (mostly around middle class though), whilst BPers tend to be around UMC or even in some cases of UC. This causes the disagreements that occur. It also doesn't help that a lot of TRPers are foreign either (think indians, Chinese or the other chinese) and are accustomed to a different SMP where their ability to provide is far more important to the women there than other things What? I've never heard anyon…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 07:39 PM
2

Your'e conflating two very different things: guys who are interested in mothers for their children and chads. You're absolutely right, chad doesn't care, cuz he's going to throw her back after a few fucks anyway. A dude wanting to be a Patriarch on the other hand isn't. So unless you're saying that any man who wants to raise children in the environment most conducive to their success as adults (a two parent household) is weak, you're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/17 10:29 PM
2

One partner does not good oral skills make, homie. And it takes lots of partners before you're trying anal and letting yourself get tied up.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 09:56 PM
2

have an updoot for using the term feefees
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 01:36 AM
2

What do you consider a high N-count and what is your reasoning? greater than 3 lifetime partners What actions add another number to N-count? Penetration of an orifice. No "freebies" because "it was just oral" What specifically happens to a woman every time she has a different sexual partner? Sex is a bonding experience, especially for women. There's a rush of hormones that occurs with sex and even moreso with orgasm that causes tghis. When you continue to create and break that bond over and over…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 01:34 AM
2

The only times I've ever heard "respect women" was about respecting women's bodies It's not, just treat our bodies like they belong to us Because it's not just about that. It's about giving women, by default, the same type of respect you'd give a high value man who earned it. It's not a simple "do not sexually assault," it's a "default to pedestalization" and yea...men should take offense to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 01:27 AM
2

Example 1: "Women divorce or deadbedroom their husbands because they were never really attracted to him to begin with." Notice the assumption that the woman's attraction is constant over time. I've never heard it stated that way. Normally it's stated that she slowly lost attraction for him as he doubled-down on betatude. So, her attraction IS constant...he's just slowly become less attractive. Example 2: "Women fuck hot, sexy men in their youth, then settle for a boring beta." Notice that again,…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 03:30 PM
1

I did that
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 11:20 PM
1

A high pre-marital notch count increases the chances a woman will get divorced, far more than it increases the chances a man will.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 07:13 PM
1

Actually this "entire thread" has been about fucking alpha and marrying beta. It was your tangent that proposed this magical age, and then used what "lots" of people are doing to defend it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 06:34 PM
2

Errrmmm...buddy, when the stats are split by the sexes, a funny thing happens... http://www.ncfr.com/pdf/press_releases/PRESS%20RELEAS2.pdf The partner count is far more deleterious for women than for man. But...you know...good job trying to bury sexual dimorphism.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 06:30 PM
1

LOL "If you cannot see that I've redefined words to satisfy my need to be right, then my head is going back into the sand." Good luck with the rest of your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 06:24 PM
1

Actually, that puts her just barely starting a relationship (that could have easily ended in a few months (or one night) like the last 12 she had) as she passed from her early 20s to mid 20s. There's a reason we don't simply bifurcate that decade, and that's because someone at 20 is a VASTLY less mature person, on the average, than someone at 24.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 06:17 PM
1

Why would I have ready a conversation you were having with someone else, and then adopted your non-standard definitions therein?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 05:54 PM
1

Jeez calm down dude. I wasn't hinging my whole argument in that one point. Anyway, thanks for the stat. It still doesn't disprove my overall point, You failed to have an overall point because you used the word "lots." hich is that most women get together with their future spouse by age 25. If the average relationship lasts 3.6 years before marriage, and the average woman gets married at 27 (which means a significant number are getting married even younger than that), then most are pairing off in…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 05:47 PM
1

lots of couples cohabitate for 3, 4, 5 years before tying the knot. "Lots" is one of those words that's totally useless. "Lots" of people are gay. "Lots" of people are pedophiles. "Lots" of women let their dogs penetrate them. Are you going to hang your hat on what "lots" of people do..................or are you going to start looking at the proportion of the whole? Cuz guess what? The average length of the entire relationship prior to engagement (of which living together is only a fraction) is …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 05:06 PM
1

Newsflash: ejecting a father from the home because the wife is bored "affects [sic] the children negatively," but you don't seem to think there's anything wrong with it because she's just trying to be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 05:00 PM
3

There's nothing wrong with it under marriage 1.0. Under the current marriage 3.0 regime where boredom gets you cash&prizes in divorce you're literally stealing a man's ability to be happy in order to provide for a woman's happiness. There's something VERY wrong with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 04:59 PM
1

You can certainly grow more dimorphic muscles which will make your body create additional testosterone which will create more dimorphic facial features...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/16 09:08 PM
1

Both depending on the constitution of the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/16 09:05 PM
3

There's 5 stages of grief. You're basically asking if you can grieve without grieving.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 02:25 AM
4

Chad is definitely real. He was in my fraternity: he got top grades at a very prestigious STEM school, he literally modeled (still does a bit I'm told), and daddy owned a construction company so he was loaded to boot. His life was easy street...and the confidence that gave him rounded out the full Chad stereotype. He dated LITERALLY the most attractive girl on campus. Ended up marrying a model.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 02:04 AM
1

I'd buy that these were distinct entities with distinct beliefs if...and only if it...was distinct groups of people in each. It's not. It's a constantly moving target with the same folks (and whomever they can scrape up from the younger generation) moving on from one goal to the next.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 01:10 AM
0

No, the philosophy, means and ends are the same. The only thing different is the degree of subjugation and/or elimination that is sufficient.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/16 11:36 PM
-1

I understand plenty about history, and I understand the tensions only exist when they're not screaming at men. For the most part, they're all on the same team. So I find trying to split these hairs maliciously misleading.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/16 10:55 PM
-1

You're playing the cup game. It's clever, but ultimate disingenuous. You couch your game in terms of "making sure everyone is on the same page," but what you're really doing is making sure that whatever anyone is attacking is on some other page that's outside the bounds of discussion. Ergo: "that thing you're mad about isn't us it's <insert some other group that seems plausible in the moment>"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/16 10:44 PM
0

wap out my 'radical feminism is not "extreme" liberal feminism, they are distinct philosophies' comment now and again when it's relevant though to make sure that everyone is on the same page. So you wap out your "feminism is on two different pages" comment to make sure everyone is on the same page? Seems legit...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/16 10:28 PM
1

K
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/16 06:27 PM
1

Men aren't more violent. The specific type of violence men engage in is just more phyiscally destructive, and we as a society, have couched violence in only those terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/16 03:00 PM
1

Same thing applies to books. Women will read books written by guys and gals, but guys won't. So guys get published because they make more money for the publisher. Check your stats homie. Guys simply don't read anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/16 02:59 PM
0

The publishing industry is OVERWHELMINGLY female. At this point, readers are OVERWHELMINGLY female. If women face any kind of discrimination, it sure as shit isn't sexism... Maybe they, on the whole, write shitty books?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/16 02:58 PM
7

You're pretending like we owe you absolutely everything you ask for, in a zero sum game, and then call us horrible names when we disagree. And then to make matters worse: you try to convince us that our existence is both toxic and unnecessary, and that losing at this zero sum game is therefore in our best interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 08:21 PM
1

My point is that you can't judge whether she deserves her dream guy or not based on what you see outside if you don't know every detail of her personal life. first of all: you're wrong. Secondly: Why would you choose this thread to make that point? Thirdly: You suck at making points if that's what you were trying to say. Next time just say that intead of all the whack shit you actually typed. I dislike Trump, I think he's a jerk in public and I would like to say he doesn't deserve Melania but I …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 08:18 PM
1

The epiphany phase generally occurs when Chad finally has more interest in younger, hotter options. If you're a guy waiting for a woman to hit her epiphany phase to be interested in you, you're getting the sexually hollowed-out, less (and losing more) attractive version of that woman. She spent, maybe, a decade getting spit roasted by super sexy dudes. Doesn't matter if she can't hold their attention anymore, she still has those memories. It's going to be hard for her to settle for Mr. Epiphany …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 05:27 PM
3

It happens to all of them eventually. Rollo calls it the "epiphany phase," BUT it normally doesn't occur until she's lost enough value that Chad has moved on to younger, hotter pastures.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 11:56 AM
1

Seriously? I try to give a simplistic example and you're going to pick it apart? Come on, man, this is absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/16 03:12 AM
2

She probably does, but she hasn't realized this. Hence the not changing her standards to match her reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/16 03:10 AM
2

I've seen it on PPD where guys say "women as a whole should stop having such high standards", or they try to shame individual women for having personal preferences. They absolutely should, if the goals they've stated are their actually goals. I.E. Fat girl that can't cook, clean, and generally has a bad attitude: Why can't I have a boyfriend, he just needs to be rich, 6', and have 6 pack abs. A boyfriend is all I want. uhhhh.....yea...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/16 11:00 PM
3

Because apparently, despite the fact that we RPers consistently point out that the SMP both is unfair and will always be unfair, BPers still want to talk about things in terms of equality and fairness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/16 10:57 PM
3

It doesn't even matter if she hit you. It doesnt matter if she's a cheater. It doesn't matter if she's abusive. Just fucking leave, she's your girlfriend...not your wife. You don't owe her shit.
/r/askTRP11/12/16 02:01 PM
5

You're thinking about "high standards" in an absolute sense, and not a relative sense. While all women do, in fact, want the top 20% of men (absolute high standards), there's a large swath of women who realize that they can't have those men. HOWEVER, even the group of women who sprinkle a small amount of rationality on their dating thought process still drastically overrate their value(relative standards), because the things they think men should value...they don't. Blue Pill men have the same f…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 07:19 PM
2

I realize all these things, but I also realize this threat of jail only applies to men. I realize that 95% of the time, alimony and child support get paid by men. There's very little incentive for a woman to fix her marriage. You have: single mom herohood alimony child support no oversight on the above Divorce is a win-win-win for women. Hell, there's active campaigns to shame men into marrying single moms to remove the dating stigma too! And they just have to get bored or be unhappy to make it …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 10:11 PM
2

Judges and prosecutors aren't really interested in jailing poor, unemployed men who are scraping to make ends meet. No, but they're obviously interested in creating poor, unemployed men by putting people in jail who miss their payments. There's also the issue of implied income which fucks over divorced fathers in many industries. I just had to take a 50% paycut to keep a job as I work in the oil industry (well, I went from investment banking back to industry), and that's a pretty good deal. If m…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 10:02 PM
1

There is ZERO oversight as to where that money goes (other than the government taking their cut). There is absolutely no way to prove that the money is ever spent on the child. We're just supposed to take it on faith that the same women who fucked over the child by detonating his family is going to do the right thing with the funds she's given to raise him? That's why I said alimony disguised as child support. Look, there's probably some equity in shitty parenting between the sexes. But there's …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 09:51 PM
1

my own experience, do not paint the picture of the average divorce being the poor, middle class man being crushed financially under the bootheel of a woman who now lives in the lap of luxury for years on end while he can barely afford his studio, roach-infested apartment. Well, no, because she only gets a PORTION of his stuff. So she lives in the lower middle class, but well maintained, house they both shared, and he lives in a shitty apartment. Helped my dad move into his...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 09:29 PM
1

Can't you see that it's your kids you are supporting? The state, by and large, has decided that when this issue is contested...............they're her kids. And as far as support goes: I've dated single moms. I've seen what they spend the child support checks on. It's dubious that you could say that even 50% of then funds actually support the child. Unless you think that mommy driving a nice infiniti vs a nissan is somehow appropriate support for a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 09:07 PM
1

Oh so now we shouldn't be choosing men on the basis of sexual attraction? TRP needs to get it straight because apparently women who choose men for BB reasons are evil but those who choose men who give them tingles are also LTR'ing wrong. Jesus, what is it that men actually want? A woman who is primarily sexually attracted to him or not? TRP is devoted to sexual strategy. Not relationship or marriage. So you don't want equality you want men to have the power. I want the breadwinner to have the po…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 09:05 PM
1

Do you honestly think women are mostly will-nilly divorcing their husbands? Enough, yes. you're telling women that they better make sure they prioritize a career because if they could be de facto forced to be stuck in a shitty marriage if they do not. Or you're telling them to, you know, put some effort into choosing a husband for the right reasons instead of letting their vagina make their long-term commitments for them. Let me get this straight. You think current marriage laws give women too m…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 08:22 PM
2

After significant coercion.
/r/askTRP05/12/16 07:52 PM
1

This isn't what divorce statutes are premised on. You're absolutely right. Divorce statutes are premised on giving the wife a threatpoint to heel a husband. Which is shit unto itself in the modern era, but understandable in the time in which things changed. However, what statutes are premised on, and the unintended uses are different things entirely. And under what you're proposing, it incentivizes people to stay together in shitty, unhappy marriages. It incentivizes people to fix their unhappy …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 07:50 PM
1

No I want to bifurcate divorce: No fault? Fine...you just don't get shit. Being "unhappy" doesn't entitle you to anything. Fault? Ok, you can have all the trappings This disincentives women to detonate their nuclear families on a lark. Which is what is truly in the child's best interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 07:27 PM
1

I think child support shouldn't be calculated in a no fault divorce. "I'm just not happy" is not sufficient justification to shred a family, and stick someone with a bill for it. The claim is that "supporting the kid with the same amount of money that would have been spent" is in the best interst of the child. No, having a two parent household is in the best interest of the child, BUT.............the state doesn't get a cut of a marriage, they get a cut of child support. So many perverse incenti…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 04:14 PM
1

Alimony is bullshit? An (in)equitable division of marital assets is bullshit? Alimony disguised as child support is bullshit? Wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 03:28 PM
3

I think that's a rationalization. He speaks in the plurality which makes me believe several sluts that """"chose him""" have moved on. Which shits all over his rationalization. He's not "Mr. Favorite" he's "Mr. Flavor of the month."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 03:42 PM
2

If any of the things you mentioned happen, a woman walks away with cash&prizes. The law assures you there's zero risk. Why go your own way NOW when you can do that at any time in the future with payments!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 04:20 AM
1

You should refrain from doing those kinds of favors for people that will NEVER repay them. When she said no the first time you should have just walked away.
/r/askTRP04/12/16 03:10 AM
1

Sure. And you heard "fo shizzle" a lot not just in hip-hop spaces too, didn't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 02:22 AM
3

Translation: what TRP needs is feminine oversight to make sure whatever TRP teaches is in women's best interest instead of men's. Yea bud, we've heard it all before...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 06:21 PM
1

Obviously there's different prospectives. Otherwise this thread wouldn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 05:04 PM
1

No more or less reliable than any other. The only think we can say reliably is that someone, in every thread, will ask for numbers they know don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 04:41 PM
1

So what was the point of posting that it was something you had read?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 04:40 PM
1

No, it's just the assholes way of saying "just because you read it, doesn't make it true."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 04:27 PM
1

You know they don't exist because women lie in self-report studies of this nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 04:27 PM
2

I disagree. I think you'll find that most women have had sex with at least one stranger. It was probably a really fucking awesome stranger. Which is my point: Its not that girls have a default "I need to get to know you" program. It's that they have a "you're not sufficiently awesome for me to give it up yet" program.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 03:53 PM
1

I read somewhere that you should shove ginger up your butt to make your farts smell good.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 03:48 PM
2

Most people don't have a preference for one night stands. However, most people have met AT LEAST one person that was so awesome they didn't need to "get to know them." So what does that tell us? It tells they don't actually need to "get to know them" if the person is sufficiently awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 03:42 PM
1

Because it's possessive and stalkerish? I get this "I'm going to bake a hair pie so there's always a part of me inside you" vibe. You don't have an actual best friend? Seriously? You've alienated EVERYONE from your social sphere and asked your wife to fill ALL of those roles? And you're proud enough of it that you'll tell people? It's fucking weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 03:37 PM
1

Friends first exists just because many people need some time before they can consider someone as an sexual partner. The number of people who have had at least a single ONS puts the lie to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 03:09 PM
1

No, and I get creeped out any time someone says "my wife is my best friend."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 03:09 PM
1

Not according to the group that created the term "toxic masculinity," no.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 03:07 PM
3

TRP is honesty and frankness about the dark/edgy side of flirting. Your view on this topic doesn't need changing, your unwarranted negative connotations of what TRP is are what need changing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/16 11:34 PM
2

Toxic masculinity: any attributes of classical masculinity that is to the benefit of men and/or at the expense of women. Non-toxic masculinity: any attributes of classical masculinity that is to the benefit of women and/or at the expense of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/16 11:27 PM
7

I'm sure there's a small subset of guys who are insecure enough about their intelligence to be intimidated by degrees, but as a dude with just a bachelor's that has dated girls with masters, PhDs, and even a doctor-doctor...I don't get it. First education and intelligence AREN'T the same thing, and why would a guy be intimidated by something that provides him no value in a relationship context?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 12:00 AM
1

Most criminal reports, PERIOD, don't make national news. That is, unless it's a white cop shooting a black suspect, or a white middle class rapist. Then you get a full write-up in Rolling Stone........with no criminal charges.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 02:51 PM
1

So you're going to tell me that hiding the name of the accuser, and putting the name of the accused on blast is not actual law, and is a conspiracy by every mainstream media outlet to destroy due process? Ok, I'm game.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 02:51 AM
2

Not my country, but I can tell you that all of the European Union nations, especially Germany, that have allowed the barbarian hordes inside the gate have had DRASTICALLY increased criminality and sexual assaults. They've lost control of entire neighborhoods. Parcel services won't deliver there, but they're keeping quiet about all of it so that no one forms a negative (but very realistic) opinion about the quality of the people they've just flooded their country with.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 02:46 AM
1

Really? So that's why they allow rape accusers to remain anonymous? Please...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 02:43 AM
1

You don't act incredulous when the alleged victim is a robbery or home invasion victim, you should apply the exact same lack of bias to alleged rape victims when conducting a police investigation. It's not about abolishing the fundamental criminal standard for conviction. You also don't say "Job Bob Smith is the one who robbed me....SHUN THE CRIMINAL...shun" There is an element of anonymity provided other types of accused that is NOT provided to rape suspects. Once again: names are named, and th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 02:06 AM
2

yea...it is http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=55280
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/16 02:03 AM
6

Red pillers have to be because NO ONE ELSE WILL. It'd not innocent until proven guilty, its guilt and ostracism from a mere accusation if you're a man. Were it not for red pillers, things like #believeallwomen, which is literally the opposite of due process, would be acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 09:56 PM
4

Because white men are bad, and therefore it's ok to make false accusations against them. Whereas refugees are good, so if you're going to make an accusation, you can pretty much bet it'll be true. The number of victims in Europe who didnt come forward because they didn't want to make a statement that could paint refugees negatively is proof of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 09:52 PM
2

But that's not the normal range for his age. That's the normal range for adult men. Including the aforementioned, atrophied, 70 year olds. Hence, the problem with relying on the bullshit that constitutes an "expert medical opinion." Or actually, the idiocy of the uninformed public who thinks that a GP is somehow an expert in all things medicine.
/r/askTRP26/11/16 09:19 PM
-2

Your post is why you don't always listen to a doctor. A 20 year old should not be on the absolute low end of a "range" that includes 70+ her old men.
/r/askTRP26/11/16 08:43 PM
2

Right. And America is nowhere near a race war. And Trump is nowhere near electable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 05:51 PM
1

You're either the creepiest troll I've seen around here in a while, or you're bat shit insane.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/16 03:26 PM
5

Snarky comment about melodrama Melodrama 10/10 post. Will read again.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 03:22 PM
4

Nope. Like I said: look at the japanese herbivores.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 03:22 PM
9

Why? You're basically telling men that the driving force behind civilization itself is bad. Do you want to go back to wiping your ass with leaves, and have no protection from...anything? Cuz that's what you're asking. Look to Japan's herbivores for what happens when men "stop being concerned if what you are doing is going to get your dick wet." Because you know what happens? Nothing. Nothing at all happens. Nothing is invented, nothing is built, nothing is repaired.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 03:46 AM
1

So, really, you're not interested in punishment. You just want them to die.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/16 01:15 AM
22

BPD don't process guilt like you'd expect them to. Your punishment wouldn't work.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/16 02:34 PM
2

If she's in Rship-mode you might not be able to plate her. Beat to tell her where you're at, and she might decide that's fine. Or she might not, but you should be outcome+independent.
/r/askTRP24/11/16 11:05 PM
2

If she's someone you want to fuck, it's guaranteed someone else is going to try to fuck her too. Get used to it.
/r/askTRP18/11/16 11:49 PM
2

Translation: Why isn't alpha what I'm already doing? I think I'm alpha, I don't want to change to become alpha, so I'm going to dangle a challenge out there so the betas latch on, and make me feel alpha.
/r/askTRP16/11/16 04:29 PM
1

Part of your life stress is a burden of performance for women. You're escaping that burden. So it's more like "phew, I don't have to be any certain way in here. It's an expectation free zone."
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 11:41 AM
3

Digital hijab. Nice. Except, no. We're ALL hiding. You can play hours and hours with no mic not revealing your sex either way, male or female. It's a truly equal space, because nobody knows if you're a man or a woman, they assume you're a man and treat you like one until you decide to name your character roxygirl_pink.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 11:38 AM
6

using it as escapism Yea, FROM WOMEN. Why wouldn't they be mad when you show up there too? The funny thing is: in the world of computer games, there's no sex. So if people know you're a woman, it's because you've gone out of your way to un-anonymouse your sex. And yea, fuck you for doing that. Why? Because literally the ONLY reason to do so is because you want special treatment for having a vagina. The same special treatment you're afforded in the real world (and claim doesn't exist).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 04:32 AM
3

the fat middle aged dad is confident, loud, good family provider, stable career, etc. Kevin James is potrayed as arrogant, loud, poor family provider, and with a shit career. What show did you watch!?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 11:57 PM
1

No confusion at all. "A gaggle" is a far smaller number than the 59 MILLION people that voted for Trump.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:53 PM
1

You might have a point. They probably think they're above reproach.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/16 03:35 PM
1

You made a statement about high level politicians, explicitly. I proved that your statement was stupid. What TRPers don't like is when we talk about women and they say "but men too!" That's two totally different groups. We're talking about the exact same group: high level politicanss. This is, what, the 4th stupid post of yours I've replied to this morning? Keep trying. Eventually something will make sense...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 03:30 PM
1

This is exactly what happens when anyone is elected president. Were you fucking born yesterday? The number of soundbites of black people claiming Obama was gonna pay their mortgages after he got elected was tantamount. It's literally the same fucking thing you're claiming is an embarrassment. Oh that's right, it's only an embarrassment when it's "those guys" not "us guys" doing it. The lack of self-awareness you're demonstrating is impressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 03:28 PM
2

Far more blacks ACTUALLY VOTED when it was Obama.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/16 12:51 AM
1

That's part of why a Trump win was so unexpected. People acted like Clinton supporters...until the voting booth.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/16 12:30 AM
1

Clinton is a lesbean. Weird to be against your own rights.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/16 12:05 AM
2

Because it's not their #1 issue. Those aren't issues. Those are magic words that erase people from existence. Once a liberal labels you any of those things you're supposed to be poofgone. It didn't work on teflon-Don. So they're not saying "how is it he got elected despite me calling him *ist?" It's "I called him *ist...how did he not vanish into thin air!?"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 11:17 PM
1

He was a real estate maven before reality TV even existed. And Mrs. Clinton was a first lady who bullied her husbands sexual assault victims into not coming forward. Who has the problems now?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 11:13 PM
1

generally, people expect more from high-level politicians than construction workers Did you read some of the things Hillary said in her emails? No of course you didn't because the media buried it. Trust me...nobody expected more from her than a construction worker...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 11:09 PM
2

despite their glee over the results, i don't believe that he's actually going to do all the great things for his voters that they believe he will. No president in the history of ever has. Mrs. Clinton would not have been an exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 11:06 PM
1

The primary issues in this election were immigration and war with Russia. Any PPD-worthy discussion was a MINOR influence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 11:05 PM
2

Because he's an <insert your favorite>ist! There's a liberal, amygdala-salving process that basically un-persons anyone they can label as an *ist. That way, they don't have to deal with the existence of someone who disagrees with them. So it's not so much that you're a garbage human being, it's that you're not a human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 03:36 PM
3

When she has her hair straightened, and she's wearing a dress, I'd hit it. If I didn't know that she's the spawn of soulless, truly evil, powerbrokers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 07:47 PM
3

Pretty!=super hottie You shit on your own argument by not even sticking to it for the duration of two whole paragraphs.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 04:48 PM
2

Bruce Willis as /u/TW_CountryMusic suggests. Also, Jason Statham. And Vin Diesel.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 09:03 PM
1

The Wall is about losing sexual market value, not specifically about physical attractiveness. It just so happens that women's sexual market value is more heavily influenced by their phyiscal attractiveness than men. What you've created is a false equivalence. It's the same one that has been created 42000 different ways in this sub, and shit on equally as many. Did you think you had some original take on this?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 09:01 PM
1

I didn't claim anything like that at all. Stop trying to put words in my mouth. Especially ones as ridiculous as those.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 02:37 AM
3

Differing views are welcome. Coerced agreement which is what separates someone from having a viewpoint and bring g an SJW, isn't.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/16 10:58 PM
1

Cool story, keyboard commando. Have you tired reality yet? The resolution is better than 4k.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/16 05:20 PM
1

I said being loved how a mother loves was the ideal. I'm not sure how that warranted a dissertation on motherhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/16 02:06 PM
1

I only tangentially mentioned motherhood. I don't know how you'd call that romanticising.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/16 06:33 AM
1

wut?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 02:04 PM
1

This is a very feminine way of looking at things. "Omg, TRP tactics are a hail Mary for the sexless...that means there's RISK! Never ever risk anything. Safety and security are too important to ever take a risk!" Yea, guess what? The guys that swing for the fence and connect are the ones women find sexiest: the college dropouts that became billionaires, the broke musicians that became rockstars, the Olympic athletes from humble beginnings. Nobody ravishes Mr. 5-year-plan-middle-manager. There's …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 10:47 PM
1

If TRP is weird because jargon, then every single sub, every hobby, every activity, and every profession is weird because jargon. And if everything is weird....nothing is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 10:24 PM
1

Your definition of both alpha and chad are both absurd, and highly limiting. In fact, so limiting that I doubt a single real human that has ever lived manages to meet either. Please get off your computer, and go meet real humans. Yo're doing yourself a grave disservice by silo'ing yourself on the internet away from reality.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/16 03:10 PM
0

You responded to me, not OP. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 06:40 PM
2

This is not changing the subject, it's putting it in perspective. A woman might also say she wants to be loved unconditionally and wants a man to give her everything she wants even if she grows fat and ugly, but that is not reasonable. No, it's changing the subject. I'm shining a flashlight over into the dark left corner, and here you come all "but the right corner over there is dark too!" It's not perspective, it's derailment. Intentional derailment to prevent an honest discourse on a particula…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 03:48 PM
1

Disagree. The ideal is to get chad's child AND commitment, but as Chad won't commit, she settles for someone else's providership.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/16 03:26 PM
7

We're not talking about how men love, we're talking about how men want to be loved. Stop changing the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 02:57 PM
7

Men's ideal love is a mother's love: unconditional, and with no regards to "what you've done for me lately." Obviously, any other woman will have conditions, and those conditions must be met repeatedly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 02:05 PM
1

Uh... I am pointing out that most people have flaws. That wasn't what you were pointing out.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 07:09 PM
1

Yes, that was my first reaction to reading your post too. Then, when I tossed out the chafe, what was left was this: its generally true, there are exceptions. But even rich and famous people could for instance have mental illness, drug addiction, sex addiction. AKA NAPALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 05:41 PM
1

so, in other words: NAPALT (not all people are like that). Gee, that sounds exactly like some shit we talk about all the time here.......
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 01:44 PM
1

You've been playing it for several days now, bro.
/r/askTRP31/10/16 01:43 PM
3

No. This is a clever restating of the universe being inheritly fair, and its false. Sure, thinking the rich, attractive guy "must" be a piece of shit, because fairness, might make you feel better, but there's no cosmic balance requiring it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/16 08:45 PM
1

You're not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?
/r/askTRP30/10/16 01:42 PM
2

I have a far higher value so she treats me like a king, does whatever I tell her to do, and is loyal (as far as I can tell). So you'd rather be in a relationship with a bitch that doesn't know this so in addition to doing your research you're also having to deal with a near-constant barrage of shit tests? Fun fact: most men with options don't end up in a relationship with the hottest girl they've ever fucked. Why? Because one not quite as hot that knows her place is way less work.
/r/askTRP27/10/16 03:14 PM
20

"she's a great friend, the sex is fine." Sounds better than half the marriages I know. What exactly do you think is out there that's better?
/r/askTRP27/10/16 01:48 AM
1

A crossing of rights and biological imperatives doesn't make a whole lot of sense. I have the biological imperative to kill everyone and take their belongings, but I don't have the right.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 01:42 AM
1

Trash talk: "you suck" Bitch ass shit: "I heard other people whispering bad things about you." Guess which you've advocated?
/r/askTRP26/10/16 09:44 PM
1

Doubling down on the bitch ass behavior, I see. So red pill, much alpha.
/r/askTRP25/10/16 08:26 PM
1

Under no circumstances am I going to put myself into bitch headspace. Have some standards.
/r/askTRP25/10/16 06:30 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 10:12 AM
1

Sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive. 1 man can impregnate an entire tribe of women, so increasing their scarcity will do EXACTLY ZERO to increase their value in evolutionary terms. Man's value to women comes in the shit we can do with our different brains and musculature than women. And guess what? Despite the truly batshit insane feminist contention that 10% male population would be a utopia...it'd be one devoid of electricity and flushing toilets as it requires far more than 10% of the populati…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 10:38 PM
1

Well, I guess be suspicous of me, I don't have fantasies about taking pussy, my fantasies are about women begging me to take it. In conclusion: I don't think your line of thinking necssarily follows. Men may have a natural inclination to be physically violent, but that's so we can climb to the top of the hierarchy of men, and have all the pussy that's available, not so we have to fight literally every one and everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 10:35 PM
1

Does it really matter? One of the most irritating shitlib responses to any discussion that isn't going their way. Other versions are "why do you care?" and "how does this effect you?" As if I'm prohibited from caring or changing a social dynamic. Which is hilarious because the same white shitlibs are so heabily involved in a black lives matter moevemtn that breaks their "does it effect you? trope. Rant over. Moving on. She's not asking too much...........so long as she's willing to deal with the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 10:31 PM
1

i think pretty much everyone appreciates being admired by others, even if it's not a deep, essential need. Agreed, but you're not entitled to it. Admiration isn't a participation award, you have to do something/be someting admirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 10:12 PM
1

Homeboy got hundreds of obese, older women to exercise. Good on him.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 10:11 PM
1

So your solution to someone being a whiny bitch, is to do some bitch shit yourself? No.
/r/askTRP24/10/16 07:44 PM
1

not playing the "what's your threshold" game either. Because in the end, no matter what number I pick, your response will be the same: some variation of "not all women are like that." No thanks, Jeff.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/16 01:17 PM
1

only a sith deals in absolutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/16 03:07 AM
3

How about "don't be so litigious, american girls?" The risk isn't worth the reward because American women aren't necessarily good at sex either.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 11:01 PM
8

Because mattress girl and UVA never made it to mainstream news? Bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 10:59 PM
11

Guys are bad because what you're calling "dominant and sexy" tonight could become "violent sexual assault" tomorrow morning, and we'd rather not take that chance. Fast forward a decade and a few girlfriends who don't even know that they might like that so have never asked, and it's no longer something you even think about.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 08:24 PM
1

No. Porn and video games was the effect, not the cause. There's plenty of men who play EXACTLY by the rules of "then." And women no longer respect them. When they realize this, they play video games and masturbate.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 02:10 AM
0

The answer is: for the same reason that "the view" and "the talk" do the reverse. The difference is: men don't really watch talk shows, and even if we did...no major network would air such a thing. Because misogyny is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 07:41 PM
1

Resources is not an exogenous factor to your SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 11:12 PM
21

lower quality guys are much better off in relationships. A relationship means you will have much more frequent sex and it also means you can be with someone of your SMV or a point higher. I was with you until this. No fucking way are you getting a relationship with a girl that's a point higher. Girls don't do anything down.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/16 02:50 AM
1

Yes. It's not going to be common, of course, because there just aren't that many single men at 40 let alone ones with think they have a chance with a girl that age, but I've seen it from both sides of the fence: girls I knew in college dating older men, and now, at 34 guys I know a few years older than me dating younger women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/16 10:03 PM
1

Is it just that I am more confident, or do you think women can sense it somehow. Sex is validating. Consequentially, you're more confident and women can sense that because you carry yourself differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/16 07:18 PM
1

Believing that men and women are different is aaawwwffullll redpill. Maybe it's time to update that flair.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/16 10:21 AM
4

Yes, it's better than nothing. Not much, but the validation that you're at least fuckable by someone is more than a significant portion of men get.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 09:52 PM
1

How does one of these "undeveloped minds" you claim young girls have simultaneously create so much drama for you?
/r/TheRedPill26/09/16 07:32 PM
1

I wonder what percentage of responds admitted to having a dead bedroom. /r/deadbedroom has enough traffic to make me concerned. I'll gladly take 25% less sex to avoid no sex ever
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 10:12 PM
3

So let me get this straight: The evidence that the provided evidence doesn't count is that "you'd say" people who created it are unattractive? Do you finally understand why I shit all over the people who ask for proof here as a first response to confronting a statement they don't like?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/16 03:41 PM
2

orbiters are orbiters and cucks are cucks. If they were the same, we would use the same term.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 01:43 AM
1

There's a big difference in "unflattering" and horribly cut. There's been girls that I've rolled the dice on because their clothes were so poorly tailored I couldn't actually tell if they were fat or not. Won a few, lost a few on that gamble. Same goes for me: I'm not some single digit body fat adonis. If I wear poorly tailored clothes I look like a fucking landwhale...to myself. I can't imagine what a fat piece of shit I look like to others. Shit that actually fits on the other hand...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 09:41 PM
18

i try not to be friends cuz she has a bf and im not tryna get cucked. That's not how that works. That's not how any of this works.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/16 07:52 PM
1

At least he had the balls to tell the whole country to fuck off instead of just lining up for more abuse.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/16 01:32 PM
1

Hyperbole doesn't prove shit, and in fact...it can't even be called an example. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 02:53 PM
1

more confirmation you haven't read there. Please stop lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/16 07:51 PM
1

Then how did you miss the concept of IoIs entirely?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/16 07:51 PM
1

How did you jump straight from buying a drink to getting her drunk?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/16 12:19 AM
2

You, and the person below you have stereotypes of TRP that prove, hilariously, that you've never read there. Hell, the number of times the phrase "IoIs" has been panned here should tell you that - yea - we teach that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/16 12:16 AM
1

I can't imagine the raisins he had to begin with if pulling some bitch-shit like waiting for her to go out of town would cause 5x swelling.
/r/askTRP09/09/16 10:53 PM
2

TRP is trying to ameliorate the problem, but nooooo....you keep telling men it's badfeelz, and to stay away.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 09:43 PM
2

If you're a man and can't tell when a woman has no interest in you, then you have a lot to learn. but...but...but... it's "common sense" and "everyone knows that" so "TRP is pointless," right?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 06:55 PM
1

Aboslutely. The whole thing is "some of you believe AWALT, do you really believe AWALT? What about the women that aren't like that?" And yet here you are...trying to tell me it's about something else...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 01:15 PM
1

There is a lot of non-verbal subtext in the way girls communicate. It's not so much "intuition" as it is being more attuned to these queues than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 12:05 PM
3

That's exactly what it's about. He even uses AWALT in the first fucking paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 04:55 PM
4

This entire thread is the 420000 rehash of AWALT. If I have nothing substantial to offer, I'm nestled right in with this post thematically.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 04:43 PM
4

"some" take dicks in the ass and still call themselves straight. "some" cover themselves in flour, and run around the street naked shouting "I am the walrus." What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 02:52 PM
2

Do you think he was being polite? Yes Would he have done the same, acted the same, if I were a guy? He wouldn't have asked permission to take it back if you were a a guy Or was I cashing in my pussy pass? Well, you didn't cash it in as it's still valid, but you definetly swiped it Is using the pussy pass a bad thing for women to do? Should I have not asked to use it? Would you, as a man talking to another man, not ask to use the soldering iron? Am I, as a woman, at some kind of disadvantage in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 02:50 PM
4

Are you...are you serious with this? I know you've been around long enough to know that AWALT is a heuristic. What is this garbage?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 02:44 PM
1

If they were actually common sense, TRP wouldn't need to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 08:44 PM
2

The problem then arises when Red Pill also gets extremely offended whenever women begin to assert anything about being suspicious of men as potential rapists. No, the problem arises in that feminism goes the next step and just assumes all men are actual, confirmed, rapists, and that any women - by virtue of being a woman and because all men are rapists - must be believed without due process when she says she's been raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 08:38 PM
2

no
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 09:05 PM
1

I'm halfway to leftoid buzzword bingo just by reading your post title. Can anyone tell me if I'll win if I read the whole post?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 08:25 PM
2

What TRPers can't grasp is why you took so many words to write such an unoriginal idea such as this...and then thought it was good enough content to be a new thread in PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 08:24 PM
3

Why focus on physically?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 03:25 PM
4

So women only want to have sex when they want to have sex. So original. Much research.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 03:11 PM
1

little late to this party?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/16 11:20 AM
0

Do you even internet? A single subreddit on a site devoted to nothing in particular is nothing like an entire forum devoted just to one vehicle that is further subdivided into subsections about specific aspects of that vehicle.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 03:55 PM
0

How much more angry does that sentence sound than "use of profanity is a bad rubric"? Profanity is unquestionably correlated with anger. Think of the times you've heard people shouting at each other; profanity is usually involved. Think of all the times people use profanity when they're not angry............as in the sentence you quoted. Usage of profanity doesn't guarantee anger. What forums are you seeing this behavior in? On /r/toyota, for example, the current top post is a bunch of pictures …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/16 10:45 AM
2

Use of profanity is a shitty rubric. Ever been to a forum for a particular brand of car? You'd think literally every vehicle on the planet is a piece of shit if you had. Why? Because people generally only post when there's a problem. So yea, the posts are always going to skew towards anger because people only post when they're angry. It says nothing about the population. Conclusion: your methodology is terrible, and results inconclusive
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/16 05:55 PM
1

Yes: positive masculinity
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/16 09:13 PM
1

What women really want is a man with self respect who is also nice to them and respects their opinions. Oh, so you do want them to go red pill. Weird, cuz you just said you didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/16 09:13 PM
1

So if you state a general trend, and I state my special snowflake experience, my experience outweighs your trend for me at least. Nobody cares about you or your experience, though. This is a global forum, and a global discussion so it only makes sense to talk in generalities that apply globally. It'd be like me saying "none of my friends are voting for Hillary" in a discussion about who is going to be the next American president. I live in Texas...yea, it's a red state, but I'd have to be fuckin…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/16 07:37 PM
1

I stand by exactly what I wrote, I'm not backpedaling here. That would be a childish move, adults think before they type or speak. You stand by the fact that you know a ton of women? Really? You know 2000 women, and intimate details of the level of their sex drive? Bullshit You're the one trying to spin this. Instead of just giving your opinion, you have decided to attack my opinion. I gave my opinion. My opinion is that you're full of shit. You don't, in fact, know a ton of women...and even if …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 07:09 PM
1

I have an issue with your "I know tons of women" load of garbage. Stop trying to spin this. You've pathetically tried to pin this on how much sex I'm getting twice. How stunted is your amygdala that you'll literally lash out at someone about their sex life in order to avoid admitting you made a minor mistake? You know it was a stupid comment, but you're not good enough at adulting to just say "you know what? My bad, personal anecdotes are kind of silly and I trumped mine up to boot."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 07:01 PM
1

So let me get this right: you make a stupid statement, and instead of owning up to it like an adult..........you're going to try to make this about me? Sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 06:57 PM
2

Does he have an ailibi for the date in question? he is claiming that she's going to go to the police and claim that he raped her after they broke up Do you have proof of this claim?
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 06:55 PM
1

I don't think there's any ongoing research into people using personal anecdotes with hyperbolic terms like "ton" to try to make their bullshit have more weight, but I'll certainly look into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 06:52 PM
1

Did you just....yea, you did. You just contradicted yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 06:31 PM
1

ISIS seems to be having a strong run at the moment, and they're staunchly patriarchal. So...maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:53 PM
1

There are approximately 3.5 billion women on this planet. Let's say that 1.75 billion are of a sexually active age. If we take you at your literal word (which is probably a gross exaggeration) You know 2000 women. You know .0000001% of the demographic. In other words, your "ton" means jack shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:51 PM
2

There's plenty of laws on the books already that protect people from being forced into sex they don't want. What's wrong with all those? The incidence of rape in this country is so infinitesimal and decreasing, so they seem to be working... Any additional laws must, therefore, have a different objective.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:47 PM
3

An alpha is a man that other men want to be, and women want to be with. You can break that down 42 different ways, but that's the rollup.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:44 PM
0

This is true. However if you're not stimulating her other important parts, an orgasm is likely elusive. Not bragging here, but I've literally had a woman come the instant I touched her vagina because she was so worked up, mentally, prior. Very few "other important parts" were being stimulated. A practiced alpha would know this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:43 PM
2

Odds are they're better simply by virtue of additional practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:40 PM
1

For starters, it's conditional.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 11:08 AM
1

Yes. For a definition of love that looks nothing like rom-com love.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 12:46 AM
1

Don't know, don't care in this context. I haven't studied men like I do women because I don't want to fuck men. Nor does the vast majority of TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 09:53 PM
1

I see charisma as more of a natural talent that can potentially be improved upon, like athleticism. Athleticism can be learned too. This is what I am saying. Stop being pedantic. If that's what you're saying, then why not actually say it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 05:56 PM
1

Terps mildly resent being male No, zero TRPers would choose to be female. Terps resent male gender role expectations No, we embrace male gender role expectations in a world where women embrace female gender role expectations. But we don't live in that world, so fuck that. Hardcore Terps tend to eschew women and "go their own way" No. That's an entirely separate group. Likewise I predict Terps will deny the same things, retorting that men are superior so why would they resent being male? But when…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 05:25 PM
1

What would that reason be? So you could keep dancing around the subject? Charisma can be learned. And once learned it can be executed. And STEM people have documented proof that they're capable of learning. They also have "6 figure salaries" that are proof they can execute. Conclusion: STEM people can become "alpha pussy slayers." Is it easy? No. Are most going to succeed? No. But it is possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 05:18 PM
1

So having an undergrad degree does not mean that you can "learn" to be successful with women. There is no correlation there. Wait, is it learning or executing? You're bouncing all over the place to keep from admitting you were wrong, and I can't keep up.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 04:04 PM
1

Learning an executing are two different things. You can learn a lot about how to lift, but until you put in the work you still have a shitty physique. You can learn about how to approach women, but until you actually become interesting and attractive you are going to continue to suck with women. ok. So? Your statement was it seems to me that Red Pill is performing heroic leaps of confirmation bias to make it seem as tho the IT guy could become an alpha warlord pussy slayer. Why are you now split…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 04:01 PM
1

1) RP talks so much about the "STEM job with the 6-figure income" when fantasizing out loud that it has become cliche. IT is typically what they are referring to. TIL: Science Technology Engineering and Math...............means IT. Who knew!? 2) Those IT guys then come to RP because they still can't get laid, even tho they now have good jobs. They want to become popular and get laid. Get it? Yes, and you're saying they aren't capable of learning. Despite having documentated proof of being capabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 03:45 PM
1

make it seem as tho the IT guy could become an alpha warlord pussy slayer. become become Interesting choice of wording. Two thing are apparent from your post: you think IT and programming types typify STEM...they don't You think guys that have bachelors degrees, masters degrees, and professional certs proving that they're capable of learning, then magically become incapable of learning anything else and becoming anything else. It doesn't even pass the smell test.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 02:10 PM
1

WTF is moral agency?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 11:48 AM
2

Guys in chick flicks aren't alphas. They appear as alphas that can be tamed by the specific feminine wiles of the protagonist. They're greater betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 11:35 AM
1

I can conclude only two possible options from this. They're either not doing what you contest they are doing...or they're terrible at it. Either way, my point holds.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 07:33 PM
1

And I disagree with that real peer review doesn't exist anymore. I work with expert witnesses and I know they go through multiple drafts in order to get published in a reputable journal. I won't deny the rubber stamping exists though. They go through multiple drafts of the paper. Not the science...the paper.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 04:50 PM
1

I think you're misunderstanding what I'm saying. I'm not even talking about bias. I'm talking about what we call "peer reviewed" not actually being reviewed. The stuff is just rubber-stamped and published. So pointing out that one study is """peer reviewed""" and one isn't, in the current climate, has no meaning. Neither study was actually reviewed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 03:56 PM
1

Fair, but in the interum, we need to stop saying "well, it's good data because it's peer reviewed."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 03:35 PM
3

uh huh.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 02:26 PM
1

Sure, it's considered higher quality, but the latest reports say that it's scandalously unreviewed, and riding on the fact that it's considered higher quality...without actually being higher quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 02:26 PM
1

Peer reviewed has been proven to be shit quality. Mostly because it more or less isn't actually reviewed anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 01:35 AM
4

It's only worth more when you disagree with the opinion, but think the data agrees with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 01:32 AM
1

What the fuck? Jilted exs are the ones that keep calling. Telling someone you don't want to talk to that you don't want to talk to them isn't an emotional outburst, it's factual.
/r/askTRP22/08/16 01:22 AM
3

I think "mating is black magic, and nobody has cast it's spell on me" is a buffer for people. Telling them "no, this is something you can learn" highlights two things they don't know it already now that it's knowable, it's something they have to actually learn, and they don't want to do that
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 11:22 PM
1

Pretty sure they didn't allow cameras because there were a lot of...very undressed...folk in that club.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/16 12:37 PM
2

I personally wonder if some of the landwhales I've seen have ever been laid, but they're still not shut-ins to the level that men can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/16 10:01 PM
2

who needs pinkies and little toes anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/16 10:00 PM
1

I've seen it. Said man may have been on meth, not real sure. It was a quasi-underground shithole of a dubstep club.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/16 09:51 PM
3

No, you can be walking around in a club with your shirt off with a 6 pack, and still be creepy if you carry yourself creepily. Now generally speaking aesthetic guys have self confidence, but that's not always the case. If you mope around or are skittish, you can still be considered creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/16 08:32 PM
1

If you see a dude you want to hit on you, and you notice he's looking at you, peel yourself off from your group of 42 girlfriends so the approach is less daunting. Want to take it up a notch? Find a reason to be in his general vicinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/16 01:54 PM
3

Kim K is fucking fat Victoria Beckham is gross for the exact opposite reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 06:15 PM
1

Kim Kardashian
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 06:13 PM
3

I heard in the US you guys have a standard of giving a wrongfull accuser a sentence that is equal to the max sentence the wrongfully accused was facing. Nope. We don't punish the wrongfully accused at all because it "might keep the actually raped from coming forward."
/r/TheRedPill16/08/16 02:47 PM
0

So because some is good, more is always better? Next time you're thirsty, drink two gallons of water.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/16 05:37 PM
1

Feminist contradiction: women are the same as men except for sex organs, but we only know about men's physiology. Someone link the Jackie Chan mind blown meme please.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/16 12:12 PM
1

Aesthetics, wealth, status, power. The 4 axises of male attraction. You said yourself: they have a million subscribers. That, sir, is status. EDIT: They're pretty much all nerds. Normal, ordinary guys with normal social skills that make many laugh. So which is it? Are they normal ordinary guys, or obese nerds? Cuz guess what: nerds aren't normal and ordinary. Nor are obese people.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 10:37 PM
1

Nobody cares what you like You don't know what I like. I didn't even provide that info because...nobody cares what I like either Just because you like them doesn't mean they exist Just because they exist doesn't mean you actually get to meet them Just because you meet them doesn't mean they want to talk to you So basically, your entire post is a fucking fabrication where you turn what you wish would happen into what """actually happens,""" complete with a red pill strawmen based on...well nothin…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 09:30 PM
10

Feminists: Express your feelings! Men: we feel that you're shit Feminists: OMG, suck it up and deal with it you whiner.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/16 12:17 PM
1

That seems a bit harsh. Not harsh, just garbage dating """advice""" I've heard thousands of times from people with the best of intentions...and zero useful info. It's a cliche at this point. Even moreso because I DON'T hang out in bars. What're you trying to talk about? Things the average person knows about? I mean, probably not. Normal people want to talk about the state of Kim K's ass, and whatever shit is going on on the bachelor. So maybe it is my fault because "normal" is fucking retarded? …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 09:42 PM
1

Because I only spend time in bars, and I just need to get out into all these other places (that you won't bother to name) to meet the ones that aren't like that. Is that about the summary of the bullshit you were going to try to pass off on me?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 08:26 PM
1

How would you fake like you have a girlfriend?
/r/askTRP12/08/16 02:46 PM
1

I don't know what's worse: facebook memes...or a rehash of their facebook drama. I don't care who's fucking whomelse's boyfriend. Unless that boyfriend is me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 02:01 PM
2

Can confirm: most women have subzero conversational skills. And by conversation, I mean a two-way interaction, not regurgitating a stream of mindless shit from the social media feeds.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 01:35 PM
2

Yes. And we're also breeding a generation of women who have very little interest in being pursued.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 01:33 PM
0

Terrible, but still better than being with a bum ass wife. And it's not like she gets to leave with half your skills. You can go earn more money.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/16 11:14 AM
6

Dread works in marriage, it just has to be real. You can't fake like you have the balls to leave.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/16 02:16 AM
1

Dread game is a poor strategy for LTR, you will eventually feel like a passive agressive child if you keep on doing it. Abundance mentality is something that should be done for YOURSELF. If you expect a girl to see how much you live in abundance and crawl back to you, you will end up frustrated. Dread game fully works in a LTR. if it's dread game, and not the game of dread. Which is kinda what you're hinting at: if it's a bullshit tactic you're implying to keep her in line, eventually she'll see…
/r/TheRedPill11/08/16 09:29 PM
2

If she did a lot of anal, I doubt Chad had a BBC.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/16 09:26 PM
1

Trumpettes are cucks serving Putin's geopolitical goals and they don't even know it. If by "Putin's geopolitcal goals" you mean his nationalistic ones, then I kind of agree. Putin wants to make Russia an insular superpower, and Trump wants to do the same with America.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 09:22 PM
1

Been hearing that at every step of this election. He might not win, but I put zero stock in the repeated failings of people telling the world what Trump "can't do."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 09:19 PM
16

Moral of the story: you can never relax. And if you see your woman getting fat...it's because she's relaxed, and that's not good. You never want a woman so comfortable in a relationship that she thinks she can get fat, and you'll stay around like a chump.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/16 09:09 PM
1

But that's not what TRP says. TRP says chad fucks a lot. Chad is the guy your girlfriend is fucking on the side. Chad is the guy she takes home the first night she meets him. TRP doesn't say "chad is aesthetic, and that's the only thing he has going for him." That's coming from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 06:13 PM
1

I don't tell you the opposite, I tell you the same thing. It's your personal pre-conceived notion that "alpha Chad #1" is a dumb, broke, powerless, guy with a model's body that's the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 05:53 PM
1

There you go, trying to carve off portions of attractiveness again...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 03:01 PM
1

Fine, this is why we were talking in circles then. This is why I kept emphasizing "objective physical attractiveness," because when you said "attractive" that's the definition I was using. Not this ambiguous definition you apparently are using. It's not an ambiguous definition, I've specifically stated it's a combination of aesthetics, status, wealth, and power. You're the one that saw those 4 things and tossed 3 of them out to focus on the one particular one Trump is lacking. You decided to use…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 08:49 PM
1

We're not going around in circles, you're just tossing distinct principals into a pot, and picking out your favorite pieces to call soup. TRP would say that women who sleep with a man she isn't physically attracted to but has money are doing so because he's BB material. You're confusing sleep with and get into a relationship with. Women will get involved in a relationship with a guy they're not attracted to because he's a provider (either financially or emotionally) she may or may not have sex w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 08:07 PM
1

Is that a thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 07:18 PM
1

Yes. physically attractive. TRP maintains that a man's attractiveness isn't based entirely on his aesthetics, but also on his wealth, status, and power.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 07:17 PM
1

Uh...yea. Spin it. I'm copying almost verbatim from Rollo. But sure...it's spin.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 05:46 PM
1

SMV doesn't work square across male to female, but it's safe to say he's less attractive than the guy getting sex easily with average or above average women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 05:40 PM
1

BB is a term to describe the providership modality of women's bimodal mating strategy. AF - the highest quality sperm she can get, and BB - the highest quality parenting/providership she can get. The ideal man would be both, but so few man can possibly accomplish this. They are the apex of the sexual market. Therefore, most women are forced to satisfy the different modes with different men. If Ivanka is Donald's daughter then he's probably not a BB, but actually fulfilling both roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 05:29 PM
1

I don't think there's a better objective measure of a man's SMV than the woman he's actually had sex with. Actions speak louder than words. Otherwise, I'd still be a confused beta believing all the women who told me they'd "totally fuck me if they were single" all while no one was fucking me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 05:27 PM
1

BB is generally used in contrast and conjunction with AF. Is Trump paying for the raising of Melania's bastard child, and I'm unaware of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 05:16 PM
1

Strange. Cuz the proximity of your question about "real love" to a question about whether or not Melania married for money would suggest otherwise...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 05:15 PM
1

Being rich and being BB aren't the same thing. Which, actually, I said in that argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 05:06 PM
1

Yup. I did. The quality of women that he has fucked (read: all his ex wifes) proves that he's attractive...even if he isn't aesthetic. Why? Because a man's attractiveness is more than just his aesthetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 05:06 PM
2

The only thing attractive about him is his bank balance. So he's attractive, then. Which is the same discussion that /u/TW_CountryMusic alludes to having had: you're doing that nogoodverybad thing called objectifying if you're seperating Trump from his money.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 05:04 PM
1

Did Melania marry Donald for his money? That and his status, yes. Is there real love there? I'm guessing you're attempting to define "real love" in some way that excludes the aforementioned? Why? What is real love? Why must it exclude this?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 05:02 PM
1

The fact that you can't recognize the difference between a dude messaging chicks "out of his league" and girls actually fucking only high value men is astounding.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/16 08:21 PM
1

If I "got you" to stop sounding like a 12 year old girl from the valley, it was worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/16 08:18 PM
4

I just want to say, what a worthless piece of shit. What a nauseatingly pathetic excuse for a human being. Cowardly, selfish, egotistical and desperate for control over his wife no matter how "OI" he claims to be. I know right? How dare he put himself first! Doesn't he know his wife is a woman, and by virtue of her existence, flawless and worthy of subjugating himself? Ugh! What a cunt. All of his efforts should exist to accomplish one goal: to make his wife feel secure in the marriage. Because …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/16 08:15 PM
1

My statements stands. And you don't have to call me god, kick works.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/16 08:11 PM
1

You are trying to be a special snowflake. You're just doing so in the exact same way every other girl tries to be a special snowflake, which means you're confirming the heuristic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/16 10:48 AM
1

of course not /s The only evidence that represents real life is that which confirms your bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 07:27 PM
1

As has been said at least 1000 other times on here, AWALT isn't a literal, it's a heuristic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 07:26 PM
1

The okcupid study would suggest otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 06:18 PM
2

No. Men are not women. Sex is easy to acquire for women, and difficult to acquire for men. Therefore Isn't being able to get laid with young people far more important? I think it is. Only holds for the one sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 06:17 PM
1

I'm wondering, when you say all women, do you really mean ALL women? Read it again. quoted it this time. My original comment still stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 06:16 PM
1

if you love someone don't you stick with them through everything? TIL: women think love is a free pass to be as much of a piece of shit as they can stand, and have someone just quietly suffer their transgressions. "But love conquers all" Well, love ovbiously didn't conquer your pussy's need to wander, so I guess it doesn't.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/16 03:47 PM
1

But isn't there a discrepancy between the modern industrial way of life and those instincts? No, there's just a certain group of people who ignorantly think we've reached a post human society. They say things like you don't obtain food by hunting anyways, you just go to the store and buy it. Even a short, fat and ugly person can go to the store to buy food just as well. Without realizing the amount of actual labor that goes into growing those crops and/or tending those animals, havesting/slaught…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 03:14 PM
1

You took an opinion I might have actually had an interest in having a discussion on. One where you could have possibly had me agree with you.............and then tried to stuff a bunch of shit like "pansexual" and "LGBT" into it, and now I have zero interest in the discussion. This is the flipside of the "we don't like TRP because of the tone" coin: people don't like to have to have some nature of SJW special interest glommed onto their conversations either.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 03:11 PM
1

If you were to tell me something that all women have in common, I could probably go on about how I differ. https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/70631002.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 02:20 PM
1

As has been said at least 1000 other times on here, AWALT isn't a literal, it's a heuristic. I'd advise doing a little reading around the sub first before you post what you think is a novel thread, but is actually a verbatim rehashing of something that's been beat to death, revived, beat to death again, injected with the T virus til it became a zombie, and then beat again.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 02:16 PM
1

Narcissists, generally, recognize their own kind and avoid each other. So suggesting that narcissists (covert or otherwise) turn to TRP to learn to protect themselves from other narcissists doesn't make sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 12:15 PM
1

Being a provider and being wealthy aren't the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 12:35 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 10:23 PM
1

I do know better. I know that just having a separate heuristic for men and women violates their egalitarianism enough to constitute hate speech. Don't you know what we're all the same?* *except our plumbing and where women are better
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 08:45 PM
2

You define hate speech as hateful speech. They have a much more narrow definition which includes any speech that might be considered non-egalitarian. If everybody isn't exactly the same......you must hate them for noticing differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 08:02 PM
1

That was never your point. Your point was that aesthetics was the only factor in attraction, and because Trump isn't aesthetic, he isn't attractive, and women are only sleeping with him for exogenous factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 06:13 PM
1

Isn't that what you've been doing all along? Splitting Trump's aesthetics from his money?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 06:00 PM
1

Channing Tatum is. Magic Mike isn't. You're, again, trying to seperate all aspects of attraction from aesthetics, and then hone in on aesthetics like it's a smoking gun. Nobody masturbates to Channing Tatum in 21 Jump Street, so it's obvsiouly not just Channing Tatum.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 05:44 PM
1

So your answer to the question "How do you know that women aren't masturbating to Trump" is "women aren't masturbating to real men at all?"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 05:35 PM
17

Yes. What TRP means by women's brains stop developing at 18 Is more of a lack of societal pressure to be any better. Women can still choose to be better, it's just that much harder because nobody expects any better from them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 10:57 AM
1

No So then it's not about sincerity at all. Sincerity is a very attractive quality to a woman But you just said... Sure but it's never the same, it's always contrived. Because people can tell the difference? Because every woman do to their undefinable womanness is innately a perfect judge of these things?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 10:54 AM
1

Well that's a change of tune. First it was "they only want him for his money" now it's "he doesn't meet the fantasy ideal." You've lost. Move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 10:49 AM
1

and yet they're different enough that we call the humans, apes, gorillas, and chimpanzees...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 10:48 AM
2

and it happens to perfectly dissect the dating world into TRP->Damaged/BP->undamaged, huh? Like I said, far to convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 11:38 PM
4

So if I'm a fat piece of shit, and I communicate my sincerity of wanting to bang a hot chick, she's going to fuck me for my sincerity? That's your play? Women want to bang attractive guys because they perceive them as attractive. Sincerity has little to do with it. There's a massive amount of advice out there (outside of TRP even) about how to deceive women into believing you possess those qualities whether you do or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 11:37 PM
1

I'm sorry, but I find your conclusion far..........FAR to convenient to possibly be true, and I'm certainly not going to take your word that it's "really really important" waste an hour making sure
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 11:33 PM
3

I'm sorry, but <link to RSD> + "yeah no" snark doesn't qualify as a point. Especially not one about attachment style. So no...I'm not missing anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 11:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter