TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kkjdroid Archive

View 0 posts and 466 comments by kkjdroid on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

They're referencing the story of the rapist Brock Allen Turner.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 03:03 AM
2

So you agree with the comment you just called stupid?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 09:06 PM
2

You can be attracted to someone without being in love with them, no one is disputing that. Can you, however, be in love with someone without ever having been attracted to them? Many people can't imagine themselves doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 09:00 PM
12

You can't accidentally lie. That's called being incorrect. Lying is deliberate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 01:26 AM
14

If the men you're attracted to do X, why are you wishing that they did? I don't wish that the earth were round, because it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 01:24 AM
6

And the vast majority of "gender-related medical interventions" on children are not surgical, whereas circumcisions are surgical by definition. Surgery on intersex infants is an exception, but that should end too, because it also isn't consented to. Surgery should only be performed with consent unless it's life-saving or damn close.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 02:01 AM
1

Attraction doesn't mean you're necessarily open to a relationship, but it doesn't seem offensively wrong.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 02:21 AM
–

DEI is empty corporate virtue signaling. It doesn't solve problems, it just masks them. What we actually need is school and prison reform (remove school vouchers, pool property taxes for schools instead of localizing them, actually try to rehabilitate people, reduce penalties for crimes of desperation, and massively increase oversight for police departments).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 11:31 AM
14

Mike Rowe has also never actually held a blue-collar job. He uses it as an aesthetic, but he's a rich actor.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 12:53 AM
4

Dipshit neo-Nazi incels aren't representative of the population at large. If your post boils down to "Nick Fuentes fans are stupid," then it's true, but not exactly interesting. You might as well make a post pointing out that things fall if you drop them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 12:01 PM
1

nobody who participates in hookup culture ever complains about it Anyone who's participating in hookup culture is doing so on purpose. If they don't like it, why would they do it? That doesn't necessarily mean that they couldn't be successful if they wanted to, just that they don't want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 11:58 AM
2

I'm really surprised this was considered Nobel worthy work, since this has been conventional wisdom for a very long time. Conventional wisdom is often both difficult and useful to properly test.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:12 PM
15

If someone is as bi as possible (i.e. Kinsey 4), you'd expect them to mostly have hetero relationships, simply due to the number of potential partners being massively higher. About 80% of people are straight, and the majority of the 20% of people who are LGBT+ are still attracted to the opposite sex, so a bi person is eligible to date upwards of 90% of opposite-sex people compared to under 20% (assuming they aren't looking for an ace person, which most people aren't) of the same sex. And that's …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 05:32 PM
5

Don't digress into rape subject, rape is illegal But still doesn't always prevent child support.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 03:21 PM
2

Is it really possible to go to 24 weeks pregnancy without knowing you're pregnant? In some very rare cases, it is. I've heard of pregnant people who were so obese that they didn't notice the weight gain and already had so many health issues that they didn't notice things like morning sickness. Ordinarily, though, the only risk of not noticing is in places with heartbeat bills and similar, which set the limits far too early.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 03:19 PM
1

They're saying that you should be nice regardless, rather than pretending to be nice just to get something.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 02:02 PM
-7

It kind of is a joke, though. She isn't expecting to find that you're a serial killer, that's exaggeration. She's trying to find out if you're trying to cheat on someone with her, or if there are any other red flags (e.g. if you've been harassing people in the comments, have photos with an SS uniform on, that sort of thing).
/r/MensRights11/09/23 01:39 PM
0

Especially with sex crimes, since those are incredibly hard to prove and very harshly punished. Even if you can show in a court of law that the two of you had sex and you didn't want it, you may not be able to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. The fact that the difference between a felony and a lawful action is a thought and perhaps a word, in private, means that even really heinous cases are hard to tell from someone regretting it later.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 10:37 PM
1

If they're using salaried workers, the effective hourly rate would be higher for someone with the same salary and fewer hours worked, but the hourly rate in the OP is lower, so I don't think that's happening, or at least not enough to swing the overall numbers.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 05:40 PM
-2

You're adjusting for hours worked twice. Women work 33.2/39.5=0.84 as many hours and are paid 0.87x as much per hour, so their total paychecks are 0.84*0.87=0.73x as much.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 04:19 PM
1

The previous of the two legal barriers, which is 13 for a minor to another minor, was raised to 16. The law now reads both minors need to be 16 for consent to available on both sides, but in the case of a 13-year-old, no more than a 5 year gap upwards is tolerated, in order to prevent prosecuting 13-, 14-, 15-year-olds unfairly from doing sexual acts with each other. So the law is still 13 for other minors, since a 5-year upward gap from a 13-year-old includes literally every minor? The way you …
/r/MensRights13/04/23 11:24 PM
1

In practice, regional ordinances banning “lewd” acts with minors are sometimes seen as effectively raising the age of consent to 18 in many parts of Japan. But they come with significantly lighter penalties than rape charges and deem sex with children merely “unethical” conduct, “completely discounting its forced nature,” said Kazuna Kanajiri, an activist fighting pornography and sexual exploitation. Many doesn't mean all, and it was a pretty minor crime until literally this year. https://www.ja…
/r/MensRights13/04/23 09:19 PM
1

Actually, they changed it. This year. Before that, it was federally legal,but some prefectures made it a minor crime. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2023/02/17/national/crime-legal/justice-ministry-panel-age-of-consent/
/r/MensRights13/04/23 09:16 PM
1

That's as of just this February, before which the age of full consent was 13. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2023/02/17/national/crime-legal/justice-ministry-panel-age-of-consent/
/r/MensRights13/04/23 09:15 PM
2

It did until this February. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2023/02/17/national/crime-legal/justice-ministry-panel-age-of-consent/
/r/MensRights13/04/23 09:15 PM
13

Japan is currently trying to raise its age of consent from 13 to 16. The relationship depicted is was actually legal right now until this February. Super predatory, but there are obviously a fair number of Japanese people who disagree with me, otherwise they would have raised the age of consent a long time ago. Edit: tons of people mentioning the age gap exception without realizing it was made this February, before which the age of consent was actually 13 federally, with some prefectures having …
/r/MensRights13/04/23 04:47 PM
1

It might be more accurate to say that it claims to be about helping cis women, since that does seem to be (nearly) universally true.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 06:37 PM
1

Of course, the general medical consensus has been that SRS is only for adults and intersex infants basically since the practice started, so the bill is pure virtue signalling.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 02:28 PM
-2

Given the number of cis women who have been shamed (or worse) for going into bathrooms with short hair or broad shoulders, I wouldn't call bathroom bullshit pro-cis-woman.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 02:20 PM
2

It's probably to virtue signal to reactionaries who think that people are giving sex reassignment surgery to toddlers.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 02:19 PM
5

For romantic/sexual partners in general, obviously. People going about their daily lives generally don't want to be hit on at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 01:32 PM
9

People are probably just assuming you aren't interested in person. On a dating app, you're obviously looking to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 11:27 AM
-2

In general, body shaming is bad, but I'm OK with it in this specific case just because it made Tate so butthurt he doxxed himself.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:34 PM
0

Not when people are canceling their suscriptions and boicoting your products. If you'd get more boycotts by not doing it, or if more people are signing up than are cancelling, yes, that's what happens. And the point isn't whether they're correct, it's whether they think that. Sears thought that Amazon was a fad and stuck with in-store purchases in order to make more money. They were wrong, and they lost out on a couple trillion dollars, but they still made the decision because they believed it w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 09:15 AM
3

But a few decades later we have high taxation I don't know who "we" is, but here in the United States the top marginal tax rate has dropped from 81% or 88% (depending on when in 1942 the book was published) to just 37% today. welfare state That was already in process with FDR's New Deal, and it's been in the process of being dismantled since the 1980s. woke leftist agendas promoted by big corporations Corporations are responding to market forces: they believe that they'll sell more products if t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 05:36 AM
3

Communism is not the opposite of capitalism, but actually a form of STATE capitalism. There are certainly countries that have called themselves communist and then engaged in state capitalism, but communism itself is defined as a stateless, classless, moneyless society. State capitalism requires literally all three of those things, so it meets zero of the three criteria (I guess you could call "society" a criterion and give it 1/4 if you were feeling generous).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 04:07 AM
16

Neither would a leftist woman. Tankies aren't leftists, they're reactionaries with a coat of red paint.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 04:04 AM
2

You can stop the pill without their consent, obviously. You can't have sex with them afterward, though, that's rape by deception.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 05:29 PM
-21

Male is not a gender. Male is a sex. Man is a gender.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 05:27 PM
1

Capability for reproduction is at best tangentially related to sexuality, which has to do with attraction. Infertile people still have sexualities. In fact, many people report experiencing attraction well before puberty. And vanishingly few people are trying to prevent puberty altogether. The overwhelming majority of puberty blocker use is to let people whose natural puberty might be harmful (plenty of whom are not in fact suspected to be trans) put it off until a more appropriate time, when the…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 07:03 PM
2

Puberty blockers (and indeed HRT and SRS) have nothing to do with sexuality. As for the couple in the OP, it's both kinda weird (31/2+7=22.5>21) and none of my business (21>=18).
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:08 PM
2

Yeah, that's not hormone therapy or surgery. It's puberty blockers. Completely different (and completely reversible) treatment.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:30 PM
–

and then as a by product you also get the father or mother diagnosis. Yeah, it sucks when maternity is in question.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 02:57 AM
2

Lame dudes love to do this. Ben Shapiro who's never seen his (doctor) wife wet, they guy who has never met a woman who enjoys sex...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 08:31 PM
3

Part of that is technically correct: she's a child molester, but not necessarily a pedophile. Child molesters aren't necessarily attracted to kids and pedophiles don't necessarily act on their urges.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 01:21 PM
1

The jobs that look are probably jobs that care, but you're right that the vast majority of jobs won't look.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 07:34 PM
16

You can skip the "what are considered," they straight up donated to an organization that did conversion therapy.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 06:03 PM
3

Yeah, and the calculator considers it delusional to want a man who isn't married.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 03:06 AM
1

Wetness is the state of being covered or saturated by a liquid. Oxford, Cambridge, and Merriam-Webster do not state a requirement that the wet substance must not be a liquid. Water, as long as you have more than a few molecules of it, is covered by other water. Thus, water is wet. If you're going to be pedantic, at least be correct.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 05:01 AM
1

I just called you out for trying to say narratives are A-okay. With the slight problem that I never said that. Should I call you out for saying that kicking puppies is A-OK? It should not be a difficult thing for you to say the ends do not ever justify the means should they be unethical, but that isn't even a thought that occurs to you. You're right, it never occurs to me to say things that are tautological. That's because there's no point in saying them. Obviously, if a thing is unethical, it i…
/r/MensRights14/11/21 04:58 AM
1

There isn't a place in America where Biden can go that Trump can't attract a much larger crowd at. Nearly everyone I know voted for Biden. Not one of them went to a single rally. Trump's fans are far more energized, but Biden's voters (not all of them even necessarily supporters) are more numerous. Trump's approval ratings aren't evidence that he was a bad president, it's evidence that media is criminally manipulative and folks like yourself are happy to carry that poisoned water for them. I cou…
/r/MensRights14/11/21 01:39 AM
2

That's literally what I was saying. A household can be fatherless, but have two mothers, and such a household has very similar outcomes to a household with a father and a mother.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 01:16 AM
2

Narratives aren't necessarily true, but they aren't necessarily false either. Biden's approval rating for has consistently been better than Trump's at the same point in their respective terms, so clearly not "everybody" is sick of it, and it isn't like Biden has been a stellar President.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 12:02 AM
0

You're right, the last administration proved that a modern conservative both cannot and does not wish to help the average person.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 07:12 PM
0

It's plenty high enough. There are 30+ million gay people in the US. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6309949/
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:23 PM
3

"Conservatives" are consistently horrible to poor people, even more so than liberals (the quotes are because Americans use the term incorrectly; liberals are conservative, and American "conservatives" are reactionary). The American welfare system is a huge problem, but welfare systems themselves aren't; means testing creates the "welfare cliff," where increasing your wages can disqualify you from social programs, thus decreasing your overall income. This actively disincentivizes poor people from…
/r/MensRights13/11/21 05:30 PM
-4

Correction: single-parent household. Most of those are single mothers, but single fathers yield similar results, and having two mothers or two fathers both produce similar results to one of each.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 05:22 PM
4

Yeah, as far as I'm aware the worst things for a child's mental health are abuse, parents who should be divorced but aren't, and parents who are divorced, in that order.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 10:35 AM
1

And porn companies often don't pay attention to things like high rates of anal prolapse on their actors. Same deal.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 02:30 AM
3

Working in retail or foodservice is technically voluntary (if you don't consider the threat of starving to death in the streets to be coercion), but it's incredibly degrading. Porn can also be a shitty job where you get abused, and such positions are very common. There are also people who think that all porn is by definition degrading, but they generally have complexes about sex in general and shouldn't be listened to.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 02:26 AM
1

The timing would sure look suspicious, though.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 05:53 PM
3

Yeah, there are very few reasons you can't fire someone, but reporting a crime sure is one of them.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 09:22 AM
5

I have literally never heard anyone except dipshit online right-wingers use any of those words.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/21 06:55 AM
3

Literally just requiring not married is 43.7%. Calling that delusional in any way is itself delusional. If you don't have any requirements, you get "Delusion score: 0/5; are you sure you're a woman?" I think this site is just terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/21 01:39 PM
23

Just one more reason for the government to assist in suppressing wages and increasing working hours. If everyone is exhausted and poor, they don't have the time or energy to hold anyone (be it police, politicians, or companies) accountable for their misdeeds.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 09:22 PM
0

but most men are just swiping right on every woman and don’t even message every single one Meanwhile, most women literally never message first, so that's hardly a useful point.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 03:22 AM
9

Yeah, the issue is pretty much all money. A handful of terminally online people think like OP, but there are tons of happy, fertile, straight, cis couples using birth control because they can't afford kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 04:45 PM
4

60k is above the mean household income in the US. Your post would make more sense if you'd said 30k.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/21 12:36 PM
6

It sounds like a textbook case. Maybe the lawyer just wasn't very good. OP should look for a second opinion.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 06:01 AM
3

Illegal injustice is still injustice.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 11:56 PM
1

There are cases of people being rejected by prostitutes, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 09:31 PM
-1

All of the tut-tutting and open letters in the world won't bring back Tamir Rice or Heather Heyer. At some point, violence can only be answered with violence.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 07:05 AM
-1

Nothing shuts down speech quite like homicide.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:21 AM
1

Antifa haven't killed anyone. Literally no one. Right-wing terrorists kill people all the time.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:57 AM
0

He's either a Nazi or RPing as one, and I don't particularly care which. His posts are full of racism, nationalism, and misogyny.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:40 AM
1

I disagree with lots of people who aren't Nazis, but that guy isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:23 AM
0

It isn't, and even if it were, I was talking with a Nazi, so intelligent discourse was never an option.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:07 AM
0

"Risible" is not a word that people use in normal conversation, especially people stupid enough to be racist.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 11:24 PM
-6

Ooh, breaking out the thesaurus. I'm honored to have prompted this change from your usual vocabulary of slurs and stupid questions.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 10:25 PM
-5

My age is irrelevant, but I am indeed anti-fascism, like any reasonable person.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 10:10 PM
-7

He donated $1.25 million to Dorito Mussolini. Non-shitheads don't do that.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 09:24 PM
0

They weren't complaining that the funding was external, they were complaining about the fact that it was Thiel. If it had been from GoFundMe, they likely would only have complained that it was hurting Gawker.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 09:20 PM
31

And complaining that it was funded by notorious shithead Peter Thiel. Just because there's a bad person who hates you doesn't mean that you're in the right.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 12:15 PM
3

Clearly, the solution is to create a page for every possible race/gender combination.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 05:07 PM
1

Marxism (A) is all about that first difference, and doesn't deal with the others and (B) doesn't have a monopoly on separating people into groups and deciding which is better lmao what the fuck?
/r/MensRights26/11/19 03:47 PM
8

It's a synonym for condescending most of the time (albeit a shitty, sexist one), but obviously not to busybodies like in the OP.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 03:22 PM
1

Swastika face tattoo.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 04:07 AM
2

The narrative of some SJW trans-rights activists is that since FtM are now treated socially as men, they receive instant male privilege. I don't think that many trans activists would claim that. TERFs would, but no one likes TERFs anyway.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 08:00 AM
2

I spent it all on LEGO.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 10:05 PM
10

Well, there seems to be a consensus among women that they shouldn't sleep with me, so I'm not sure it does.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 05:54 PM
23

I'm 24 and I have a closet and two sets of shelves full of LEGO.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 01:21 PM
4

There's always the remote chance that someone actually is that insane.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 01:34 PM
6

An extra huge victory considering that he didn't go into it sane.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 03:45 PM
3

That is clearly a woman with primarily European ancestry and a heavy, probably fake, tan. Also, you're pretty evidently a racist, which is interesting for someone who spends half of his time posting thirsty shit on /r/MassiveCock.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 04:10 AM
5

Yeah, how dare we try not to render the planet uninhabitable by 2050.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 05:22 PM
6

far right or just fucking stupid That's pretty redundant.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 07:17 AM
-3

Holocaust denial and racism aren't right. Edit: Imagine downvoting someone for saying that Holocaust denial and racism are wrong.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 09:41 AM
-7

He's wrong more often than not, but he still makes some good points in between the racism and Holocaust denial. That feels weird to say, granted.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 04:30 AM
2

I'd put fault on both the government and the troops for Iraq, but still mostly on the government. There was an insane amount of propaganda in 2003; it was possible to find out how stupid the war was, but only if you specifically looked into it.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 12:49 AM
5

Those last two wars were fought for no good reason, so the deaths they caused actually were useless.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 04:40 PM
3

Yet someone with a 115-130IQ (clustered around 130) will get absolutely demolished by someone with a 145-160IQ. If you've ever tried to do anything extremely complex and interacted with someone "at that level" it'd become apparent quickly. These are people that solve serious problems in humanity, and they are in your "genius" category. This is utter nonsense. The only context in which it makes any sense is if the distinction is expertise in a certain subject rather than IQ. These are people that…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 07:15 PM
15

Eh, dignity is personal. You obviously shouldn't enter a long-term relationship with someone who doesn't respect you, but hookups don't require you to have a good rapport.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/18 08:39 AM
10

It's the National Review. It's like The Onion (though it claims not to be), but with a strong right-wing political agenda.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 04:50 PM
2

From what I've heard, this is a gendered thing. Men are apparently much more likely to separate physical attractiveness from personality traits, while women will actually find people they like more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 03:53 AM
1

If someone is saying that false accusations are literally impossible, then sure, it's a valid way to prove them wrong. If they're saying that they're rare, though, then you're just saying "Well I just made them less rare, so there!" which doesn't prove anything.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 02:03 AM
3

making a false accusation to prove that false accusations exist
/r/MensRights26/10/18 10:21 PM
2

how can you just gloss over that? that's huge. 95% of the population that is above 130 IQ is men. Even if that's true (I can't be bothered to verify), that's still only 2.25% of the population. Sure, that explains the proportion of male CEOs, but it doesn't justify discriminating in favor of the vast majority of men who are roughly average.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 02:35 PM
14

Men are not more intelligent than women on average, we're more variable. Most people with very high IQs are men, but so are most people with very low IQs.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 01:17 PM
13

Murder is a social construct. It's specifically illegal homicide. Rape would be a better example. Humans are basically the only animal that gives a damn whether the other party wants to have sex.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 10:46 AM
5

If the accused is found innocent, the accuser would have a hard time staying out of jail. If they're only found not guilty, that's a different matter.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/18 12:16 AM
7

Police should be the first ones to call for body cams, if they're doing their jobs correctly. If you're in the right, you want everyone to know it.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/18 10:49 PM
12

Some people seem to think that prosecuting false accusations means that if you can't prove it, you get locked up. This is completely false. If you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accusation is true, the accused is locked up. If you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accusation is knowingly false, the accuser gets locked up. Otherwise, no one is punished.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/18 10:47 PM
-1

$137m/30 ~= $4.5m, more than enough to throw in an index fund and retire.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/18 05:36 AM
-2

It costs as much to kill one criminal as it would to give ~30 people enough money to live comfortably off the interest forever. Welcome to America.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/18 07:52 PM
1

Man, and I'd do it as long as they weren't an asshole the first time. I'd also date a formerly fat woman who'd asked me out and then lost weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/18 01:26 AM
2

She's 135lb, and I'm pretty sure that it'd be well publicized if she went around beating up children.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 06:19 AM
1

This page goes into a lot of detail about how gay parents are just as good as straight ones. I don't think you'll have trouble finding a study about the drawbacks of single-parent households, but let me know if you do and I'll dig one up.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 02:05 AM
-1

This is a misleading statistic, because it focuses only on single mothers. Children raised by two parents tend to turn out better than those raised by one, but lesbian couples do just fine.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 07:58 PM
2

They cut him off. It isn't hard to not follow someone for a mile after they cut you off.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/18 04:03 PM
8

Barbeau then followed Stackhouse for more than a mile, eventually exiting his car and punching Stackhouse's rear window, shattering it Yeah, he isn't exactly blameless here. Shitty people all around.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/18 03:35 PM
1

Vanilla ice cream a la mode.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:18 AM
4

Interesting fact: the sadness of that story is inversely proportional to your distance from the WTC on 2001-09-11.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 09:51 PM
14

How much of that was culture shock, though? I agree that men have it worse by and large in Western Europe and the US, but I bet that the same thing would happen with a man passing as a woman, at least to some degree.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:20 PM
-5

Oh, right, they're actually anti-racists waving Nazi flags and yelling 1488.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:03 PM
4

Couldn't safely drive in the rain.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:59 AM
-8

If you had any doubt that rape is more about power than about sexuality, look no farther.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/18 10:13 PM
29

That's a good way to get called a rape apologist.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/17 07:05 PM
21

OP is responding really well to the feedback in the thread. Credit where credit is due.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/11/17 06:12 AM
2

They have their methodology posted, and it's a lot better than "I watch TV sometimes," so yeah, it's more likely to be right than you.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:03 PM
1

So your anecdotal evidence invalidates their study? Come off it.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 06:04 AM
1

We can hardly help it if a few idiots can make you feel unwelcome while everyone else is telling you that you're fine.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 06:01 AM
6

For all you know, the father of her children is married to someone else, abusive, gay, or dead. Your advice isn't just rude and unsolicited, it's terrible.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/10/17 01:26 PM
5

just don't deliberately pick fights and bring it here That's literally everything that OP posts.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/10/17 08:48 AM
8

Jesus, dude, now you're shaming people for not being able to have kids? Is being a dick to random strangers your fetish or something?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/10/17 08:43 AM
1

Yeah, how dare she try to meet men without some random keyboard warrior filling her inbox with impotent rage? The nerve! Seriously, her profile is completely positive, no "men are pigs" or anything of that nature. You're just being rude.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/10/17 01:23 PM
5

Seeking someone out to insult them is never polite, even if you so generously refrain from swearing in the process.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/10/17 02:19 AM
7

Why would you bother seeking these people out to be an asshole to them?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/10/17 01:33 AM
1

It isn't cheating if you have permission.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 11:58 AM
2

/r/ihavesex
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 04:32 AM
25

21, single, and pregnant, don't forget those.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/17 01:57 AM
3

Civ VI is surprisingly small, but it would still take twelve CDs to hold it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/17 01:57 AM
3

Not sure that's fair, how about one trial coed tourney?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 09:37 PM
3

Same female tennis player.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 04:16 PM
9

That doesn't make it more prestigious. Having eaten a lightbulb is something that only a few people can honestly claim, but it isn't prestigious in the slightest.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 12:36 PM
2

Seat and lid down.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/17 11:41 AM
6

Not for the same amount of the same work, but men are paid more overall.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 04:46 PM
2

My ADHD caused me to withdraw and as a result didn't get diagnosed until I was 17. There was a lot of "kkjdroid is smart, and if he'd just try he'd do really well" before that.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 04:45 PM
1

Trump is filthy rich on his daddy's money.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/17 04:08 AM
1

Reddit's search is horrible. OP may very well have used it.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:15 AM
0

Most don't, that's why I mentioned the assumption that they follow a similar ratio.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 04:30 PM
1

I'm not sure what you're even trying to say there.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:27 PM
-6

Convictions are very rarely overturned. Plea deals never go to trial.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 02:29 PM
-7

I don't think that it's unfair to say that unreported rapes are more common than false reports. It looks like about 80% of rape cases that go to trial result in a conviction, so if we assume that serious reports (the ones that would go on a college summary) follow a similar ratio, you wouldn't need very many unreported rapes to end up with more rapes than you have reports. Remember, nonconsensual sex is still rape even if the victim doesn't know it happened, is afraid of the perpetrator, forgive…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 01:15 PM
2

That seems a bit silly. Wanting multiple things doesn't generally prevent people from being happy about getting one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 10:49 PM
1

You'd rather have more chances to get out of poverty than simply not be impoverished in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 06:56 PM
1

A poor woman may be worse off than a poor man, but a rich woman is far better off than a poor man.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 06:55 PM
1

Cargo shorts and t-shirt for me. I've never really cared about style.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 03:04 PM
31

The more important distinction is that between pedo/hebe/ephephile and child molester. Just being attracted to children isn't illegal. Choosing to rape them is very illegal.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/17 12:40 PM
2

Probably having a horrible childhood that led to her becoming a rapist.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/17 12:37 PM
3

Life support systems are paid for. Zygotes don't pay medical bills.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/17 02:54 AM
1

The problem with the OKCupid study is that it was done on OKCupid. Probably 80% of my OKCupid matches are women of below-average attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 03:08 AM
1

Well, it was a lot less rude before it was on social media. There's a big difference between disclosing your partner list and shaming everyone in it.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 12:35 AM
2

Mine depends very much on the other person enjoying herself. I guess that could technically include some rape (i.e. meaningful consent was not obtained but would have been freely given), but for me the woman enjoying herself is very important.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 02:39 PM
1

I believe that the unhappiness that gays feel is internal. They don't accept themselves before anyone else does. How much of that is due to external homophobia, though? I'd wager that most if not all is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 03:48 PM
1

People are going to do any number of things. That doesn't make it right to advocate them.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 03:35 PM
1

That doesn't make them right, though. The system is far from perfect, but individual victims deciding whom to kill is a very bad idea.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:04 PM
-2

Yeah, how about not condoning murder?
/r/MensRights12/10/16 03:25 AM
8

And it was incredibly stupid then, too.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:11 PM
15

But very little agency, which was what ended up being more important.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 03:21 AM
1

Sounds like he's saying that single parents should try to find good role models for their kids, but that they have to put the kids first, so many people will be unwilling to date single parents. I don't think that that depends on gender at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 10:40 AM
2

I seriously doubt that Muslims commit 95% of the terrorist attacks in the US. For example, Wikipedia's list of the highest-profile attacks has three attacks that were likely Jihadist, one that was motivated by wingnut Christianity, and one that was white-on-black racism. 60% Muslim is a lot, but 95 is a massive exaggeration.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 07:44 AM
2

It isn't wrong to cuckold your partner if they like that sort of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 12:32 AM
4

Yeah, he's essentially suing her for his gifts to her.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 04:02 AM
3

Oh. Yeah, that's pretty bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 11:38 PM
3

OP even said that the woman shouldn't be doxxed for her blog.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 10:50 PM
7

Could you point me to the "gross and cruel" content? The blog is somewhat crass, but he makes a point of saying that he's happy for the women who found other men and seem happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 10:48 PM
22

Holy shit, the lack of self-awareness in that post. Men are privileged because they want sex, until women want sex, at which point men are privileged because they don't want sex as often.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 10:41 PM
1

You don't go into a courtroom sure that either the plaintiff or the defendant is going to jail. You have to actually try the accuser in a court and prove that it was knowingly false.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:34 AM
2

If you frame someone for murder, you go to prison. If you frame someone for fraud, you go to prison. Why should rape be different?
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:33 AM
3

You're going to get much more reliable results if you post a full-body picture. Black out your face if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 08:47 PM
1

The reaction of most straight men is going to be to ignore the clothes. Those women are very attractive and their strange attire wouldn't deter many men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 08:46 PM
1

I mean, if you're going to get arrested either way, maybe you want to deserve it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 01:14 PM
1

I would not favor surrender, but I would advocate making abortion legal again and then making surrender legal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 05:02 PM
2

Democrats don't support worker ownership over the means of production. #1 is literally the definition of socialism.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 02:29 PM
9

They assume it because they have persecution complexes. Have you ever heard a remotely sane person unironically say "mansplain?" Didn't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 02:21 AM
4

I would put the deadline for paternal surrender well before the deadline for. a safe, legal abortion, if the father is informed in a timely manner. Otherwise, I see no problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 09:29 PM
2

Remember, though, that this isn't just any woman. It's a crying woman who says that she was the victim of a horrible crime. And they already have means and opportunity, because OP's friend did have sex with her. It really is he-said-she-said for the rest.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 05:33 PM
2

They did have sex, so that may not have been hard to prove. The rest of it is consent, which is his word against hers, and we all know whom a courtroom will believe.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 05:06 PM
7

It isn't theft, the property of a minor legally belongs to his or her parents. This phone was apparently bought with the mother's money, though, so he stole it from another adult.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 03:04 PM
7

If she's under 18, he actually does have the right to take it away if she bought it. If her mom did, then only the mom can take it.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:58 PM
1

And some of the greatest paragons as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 04:11 AM
3

He's clearly not describing 'rape' so much as just being persistent and confident. He is literally having sex with someone who is telling him not to. That is the textbook definition of rape.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:06 AM
1

/r/whiteknighting
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:00 AM
1

Cruz and Rubio. Huckabee, too, but he won't win.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 02:16 PM
6

He's running in a primary against a sleazeball and a guy polling at 1%, and the other side is currently deciding whether they want to nominate a bible-thumper, a racist, or someone who thinks that the pyramids were grain stores. You don't have to like Sanders very much to realize that he's the best choice.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 03:29 AM
1

They're so far left that they aren't liberal. There are right-wing liberals too (i.e. support small government, few laws, little to no social safety net, but still value free speech).
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/16 02:06 AM
5

That's the National Review's MO. Take a perfectly good story and write a three page article that's mostly whining about the left, the Democrats, President Obama, etc..
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/16 02:03 AM
3

I usually agree with John Oliver on things, but this is ridiculous. As long as people are making money, any two groups are going to have a gap. 4% is pretty negligible.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:40 AM
1

Could be the 25th and 75th percentiles.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:37 AM
4

Rich white women have it easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 10:00 AM
4

Manic depression is an archaic term for bipolar disorder. Depression is a different disorder entirely. Also, both have genetic bases, though they can be caused by other factors as well.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 04:22 AM
1

I dunno, I hate Dolores Umbridge
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:34 AM
1

The statement is true, but it's pretty rude toward men. That isn't surprising, seeing as it's from a feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:29 AM
1

Way to shift goal posts, I never said a single thing about the definition of personhood or murder, we are talking specifically about sanctioned killing of human lives. Firstly, it's a bit of a unique case because it isn't specifically the killing that's the goal, it's the removal of support. The zygote then dies because it can't survive without the host. In no other case are you expected to provide care for another organism unless you deliberately took on that obligation. Secondly, the sanctione…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 03:39 AM
1

Don't be supercilious when you have no idea what you're talking about. Science doesn't define personhood, much less murder. In fact, I don't believe that a zygote can be considered an organism by the strictest definition, because it cannot reproduce. And of course all of this ignores that most of the time, when a sperm and an egg meet to form a zygote, it dies anyway. The mother never even knows, because it just looks like menstruation. By your measure, that would be somewhere between accidental…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 03:06 AM
1

In your unpopular and rather ill-supported worldview, sure.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:28 AM
1

Sperm has the potential to be a human, given extensive care, just like a zygote. I probably used genocide a bit more loosely than I should have, but mass murder should make the question more valid.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 12:50 AM
1

So masturbation is genocide mass murder, right?
/r/MensRights26/12/15 11:54 PM
14

In an industrialized country, it has no upsides, is done without consent, and is permanent.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 10:38 PM
3

So could men, if they lowered their standards enough. Most men just prefer being alone to dating a 400lb narcissist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 08:59 PM
1

The very first message was "On a scale of 1-10, what's your favorite position?" The valid answers to that are numbers. It's a joke. And yet the joker is posted for shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 07:12 PM
3

Smaller percentage, though. The 80/20 rule is pretty accurate here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 07:00 PM
1

Unless the woman isn't attractive or is completely batshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 06:57 PM
12

People are far more congratulatory toward those who are seen as experts through work and not natural talent. The shaming part doesn't have the same parallel, though, to my knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 06:56 PM
2

Also, one hopes that people would get better over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 01:06 PM
2

Well, certainly if she'd been in the women's Olympics. They couldn't deal with the T levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 01:05 PM
16

And in the scenario you mentioned, he's absolutely on the hook.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/15 05:38 PM
1

Because some women are actually enemies to men.They're just overgeneralizing, which is a very human, if a very inaccurate, thing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 06:39 PM
4

He loves his kid.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 05:29 PM
1

You do realize that the world is ~47% straight women and ~3% gay men, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 06:10 AM
1

Wu Xifei and Catherine the Great come to mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 06:06 AM
10

You can report things anonymously.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:57 AM
1

Single restrooms in general, I mean. Instead of having a third type of restroom for < 1% of the population, having a restroom that's "anyone but men," etc..
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:56 AM
6

Well, it's a good solution to family restrooms and trans issues.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 09:21 PM
1

That's an oxymoron. Murder is defined by legality, not morality.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:56 PM
2

Yes, SRS, please get reddit to fold. Then, we can all move to Voat, where the admins don't even like you.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/15 01:29 AM
1

If you identify as a Men’s Rights Advocate, don’t play Magic. If you harass feminists over their ideologies, don’t play Magic.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:20 PM
1

GF against that guy? Better change your tag to #BurgersAndFries.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:20 PM
5

Bullying in school generally has a physical component. Sticks and stones and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 03:40 PM
9

Really now? So why do most governments have laws concerning anti-harassment and online bullying? Because there are idiots who expect the government to coddle them to the point where it's illegal to hurt their feelings, and those idiots vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 02:58 AM
1

I'm not on there even though I frequently post here and in the TiA network of subs. Triggered.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:54 AM
1

That's a good point. Maybe go with the old "If you have nothing nice to say, say nothing." If you want to sleep with them, say so, otherwise talk about something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 08:10 PM
1

That's so far outside of social norms that it would weird most people the fuck out, but if you find a single guy and you want to sleep with him, saying so will probably get you what you want (so long as you're in the top 2/3 or so for attractiveness). Edit: Straight men can't do this. I envy gay men for this reason. I have no idea about gay women. I was originally talking about straight women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 08:07 PM
1

Thanks, bot! The mouseover doesn't seem to be working quite as it should, though--the same text is shown in gray without mousing over.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 06:43 AM
1

5'-5'4", slim, brilliant, quiet, straightforward and literal. Hair color doesn't matter. Absurdly wealthy family is always a plus. Oh, and she has to like me. That's pretty important. And as long as we're on the subject of pipe dreams, bi, poly, and interested in FFM threesomes. For something a bit more attainable, likes to dress down. Some of the most attractive scenes I've come across have involved a woman in sweats.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 05:53 AM
2

In love and she's experienced? Sounds like a good deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 05:01 AM
2

Because it contains almost no socialists, just fascists pretending to be socialists. They're anti-authoritarian until people they like are the authorities, and then suddenly they want the government to have unlimited power and tons of control over everyone's personal life.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 02:17 PM
3

Well, /r/military isn't necessarily representative of the military. /r/socialism has a lot of fascists. Go figure.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:10 AM
10

/r/humblebrag
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 04:47 PM
9

She's Chinese-American. Affirmative action is against her. Nepotism, on the other hand...
/r/MensRights05/07/15 07:11 AM
1

Cleopatra got as many (sex) slaves as she wanted, so that's a pretty bold comment. More than any class, sure, but lots of individual people had it better.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:16 PM
2

They're comparing men who are 1-8 on a ten-point scale with women who are 5-10. Sure, the 1-4 women aren't getting attention, but they're maybe 25% of women. The 9-10 men are getting attention, but they're getting almost all of it from the 5-10 women, leaving the other 80-90% of men to try for whatever they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 07:57 PM
2

Most of these stereotypes are rooted in pre-agrarian tribalism. When mortality is so high, you need to make as many children as possible. The most efficient way to do this is for all viable females to mate with a few of the most viable males while all other males go do dangerous things, because humans are mammals and that's how our reproduction works. The males who are mating naturally have higher status than the males who aren't. If a female is a virgin, she can conceive a child with very clear…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 07:50 PM
2

And honestly aren't really the bad guys in Star Wars Legends canon. Before the Disney wipe, Palpatine seized power from a corrupt and bloated Republic to repel the Yuuzhan Vong.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 07:43 PM
1

I wasn't taking a stance on it either way, I was just pointing out that your logic was circular.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:01 PM
6

I mean, they did try to outlaw manspreading.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 12:05 PM
2

I'm pretty sure it already is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:56 AM
1

It's only an illegal manner if you outlaw it, which OP seems to think shouldn't be done.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:55 AM
5

Yeah, there's a big difference between "Look at this toddler, isn't she hot?" and "Look at this girl, isn't she hot? Ha ha, she's 17!"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:50 AM
0

A few problems. The categories all overlap. 16-65 is disingenuous--it's listing possibly undesirable traits common in people 40+ for the only group that includes the early 20s, when people are generally most attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 11:46 AM
1

Well, I guess it's a good thing they weren't being compared on success or reputation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/15 04:39 PM
2

You can compare things without equating them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/15 06:22 AM
2

Well, that's just bonus free asshole detection.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 11:29 PM
1

Straight, would prefer to be bi. I know more single gay guys I'd date if I found them attractive than single straight women. Still in college, nothing in high school. n/a Deliberately inflict/receive pain, use degrading language. Those would completely kill the mood for me. A threesome, like any straight guy. Probably overrated, but my dick doesn't believe me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 11:07 PM
2

You aren't going to find a lot of subjective scholarly stuff. That said, if your mother doesn't think that raw data from a couple of .gov sites are reliable, she's just ignoring facts.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 04:51 PM
1

Pre-selection basically doesn't work at all for men. If a man with stellar genes sleeps with 100 women, that makes up to 100 babies with his good genes. If a woman sleeps with 100 men, that makes up to 1 baby with very questionable genes. Women lose little by all getting pregnant by the same man, because maternity is never in question, so pre-selection allows them to distribute the work over a group. Men don't have that luxury.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 03:16 PM
2

You're defining emotional maturity in a pretty arbitrary way, though. Both groups are following their instincts--men to have sex with lots of women and women to have a stable mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 03:12 PM
9

All you have to do is call the police and say you don't feel safe and you'll generally get a ride home. You don't have to report a crime, just say that you're afraid of one. The fact that she went that far instead of just thinking like a logical, empathetic human being is absurd.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:51 PM
1

Yep. Hopefully, we can elect Bernie Sanders and he can get through to the knuckle-draggers in Congress.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:49 PM
1

I would much rather have insurance be expanded to be all of your medical needs for one price, more like the Nordic model. It streamlines things and makes them more predictable for both sides.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:47 PM
8

Women have an in-group bias, and men have a group bias in favor of women. It's just good political sense.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:46 PM
1

That said, I'm glad that anyone is getting more mandatory coverage. Sets a precedent, at the very least.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:45 PM
1

You're already looking at the bottom half if not worse. Attractive women rarely need to use dating websites, because they can easily get dates in person.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/15 02:10 AM
2

Nowhere near that, at least in my age range. Once you get into the 40s and 50s, maybe, but most casual sex is going to be in the 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 03:20 AM
3

I wouldn't say that top 10% is a reasonable standard of quality. Maybe top 80%. I find about 80% of women my age attractive, so I wouldn't hesitate to exclude the bottom 20% in saying that women have an advantage in getting sex, but ignoring almost everyone is pretty odd.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 02:52 AM
2

Oh, well then, good luck to you. It's sort of disingenuous to say that men won, though, because 90% of men actually lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 02:44 AM
1

"Well, then, you're in luck!" I have a very beta personality, so I'm naturally all of those things. Plus, it sounds like it could be a joke, so she doesn't feel pressured.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 02:38 AM
3

As big a fan as I am of yoga pants, women aren't competing for our attention, they're competing for the attention of the top 10% or so of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 02:26 AM
3

Nope, I'm all of those. I'm just not attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 01:08 AM
4

The donation explicitly says no child support, whereas a blowjob is implicit.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:04 PM
2

RPers have what I view as an unhealthy view of relationships--they see them as competitions rather than cooperatives in far too many cases. I understand where the cynicism comes from, but they take it well beyond where it should go. BPers are still in the 1950s with their feminism, so they're fighting an imaginary enemy. Women are paid the same for the same work, and it's illegal for that not to be the case. Society does not support rape. The only rape culture is in prisons. Women are treated be…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 12:22 AM
1

In that first link, he's referring to "rape fantasies." Having sex with someone who has not consented is technically rape, but these fantasies are about someone having sex with someone who has not consented, but would if asked. That's a fairly important distinction. They aren't talking about a mugger in a dark alley or roofies, they're talking about two people who want to have sex with each other having sex with each other without going through the usual steps to make sure no one gets hurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 04:51 AM
2

No, the patriarchy intimidates women into not suing for obvious flouting of laws. Or somesuch nonsense.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:27 AM
9

Bruce Jenner is not a "real woman" because... he is not "paid less than a man" So Oprah is a man. Got it.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:22 AM
2

Think about it this way: if the 77% gap were true, then for every employer who paid women as much as men there would be one that paid women 55% as much or less. Or just 23 employers paying them 76%.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:21 AM
1

I haven't hooked up with anyone to date, but I would date a black woman if she fulfilled the same criteria that I apply to anyone else I'd date.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 10:53 PM
3

I remember that this picture posted above was from a study where people were simply asked to rate each scenario from 1-5. Most people assumed that it was your average strongly disagree, disagree, neither agree nor disagree, agree, strongly disagree scale, but then they went ahead and marked everything 2 and up (so, including disagreement) as agreement.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 04:08 AM
0

Men have natural urges to have sex. Our animalistic subconscious minds really don't think past that. Sex = possible procreation = good. Consciously, though, we can and do distinguish. The vast majority of men are turned off by violent rape. It's important to make that distinction--society has determined that sex where one person is in power is rape, as is sex where one participant is 17, etc.. Having one participant who is trying to get away resonates much more with the part of your brain that c…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 04:04 AM
5

Can't we just agree that they're both shit?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/15 12:48 AM
1

No, but if a woman did so, she had no source of income. She could be abused or starve to death in the streets, a bit like minimum wage workers today.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 09:09 PM
1

Indentured servitude IS a form of slavery or bondage. I know we popularly think of "slavery" in terms of African chattel slavery That's true, but if you're speaking in English it's rather important to make sure that people know you aren't talking about race-based chattel slavery.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 05:12 PM
2

I think it was actually a lot higher. Remember, spousal rape was legal at that point. The problem isn't the confiscation, it's the criteria for deeming it necessary, which are way off.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:57 PM
1

It is it's own, one-of-a-kind, form of bondage (as in slavery). It's more like indefinite indentured servitude. Remember, in chattel slavery, you have basically no rights ever. If they want to rape you, they can, legally. If they want to kill you, they can. If they want to beat you, they can. Our police force may be deplorably inconsistent about female-on-male sexual and domestic violence, but it doesn't just acknowledge and allow them.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:49 PM
1

http://psychcentral.com/lib/the-myth-of-the-high-rate-of-divorce/00011473 It's more like 30% if neither of you has been married before. People who have been divorced are far more likely to do it again than people who haven't.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:46 PM
1

Well, everyone thinks that they've found a woman who's truly a good person who loves them and will be with them forever. And in about 70% of first marriages, that's more or less true and they don't get divorced. The remaining 30% have some people who weren't very committed in the first place, some who were committed but changed, etc..
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:45 PM
1

Well, if I make $100k and marry someone who makes $0, in the US we could file as a couple making $100k, which is at a lower tax bracket than a single person making the same. You can't do that without getting married, to my knowledge.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:40 PM
3

The original idea was that women (who at the time generally didn't have jobs) could get away from abusive husbands without promptly becoming homeless. Of course, women are now the primary breadwinners in like 40% of heterosexual marriages and often have enough income to support themselves even if they aren't primary.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:38 PM
1

Insults aside, they want more women because more women means more people.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 12:26 AM
1

No, you're missing my point. The grandmaster who gets no prize won't quit chess. The tournament organizers don't care that he's more skilled, they care about getting the less-skilled women to more events so that they can have more people.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 10:56 PM
1

They're not worried about fairness overall, just within each tournament, and their goal is to expand the number of people playing chess. Sure, the guy who got 5th place in the regular tournament might be a bit miffed that a worse player got 1st and a prize in the women's tournament, but he isn't going to quit chess because of it, and if 50 women had fun in the women's tournament then they have more people than they did before.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 10:14 PM
1

Well, I can't think of a time when they'd need to. In most sports, women's professional teams are behind boys' high school teams, and the vast majority of games are likewise dominated by men. Making a men's-only prize pool wouldn't change much at all, because almost everyone would be able to compete for it.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 06:12 PM
1

I can't actually think of a lot of competitions where men don't already win most of the time, so it seems rather unnecessary. Remember, this isn't about sexism, it's about untapped markets. The group being pulled in could be anyone, it just so happens that women are ~51% of the population and have a fair amount of in-group cohesion, so they're an obvious target.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 06:08 PM
1

I still don't see any point. People who organize chess tournaments wanted more women, so they tried to get more women.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:25 PM
4

No, you could do the same thing for men in areas where they didn't participate if you wanted.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:51 PM
3

Basically, women don't play chess, so they make prizes that only women can win so that any given woman has a rather high chance of winning them (because there are few competitors). This is supposed to get more women into chess.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:31 PM
3

It isn't body shaming, it's sexual preference. The FA movement isn't fighting to not be shamed, it's fighting to have sexual opportunities afforded only to those who work to be attractive (among other things like the privilege to pay for one plane seat and get two).
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:02 PM
1

Oh, OK.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:27 PM
1

That's definitely a reasonable stance to hold. I would hope that a trial with no evidence would lead to the same result, though, which is no conviction.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:15 PM
1

If you can't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt either way, as in this case, you don't send anyone to jail. However, trying them would be fair, there's just no reason to expect a conviction.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:31 PM
2

I'd estimate 99/1, but it's still the sort of thing you should be careful with.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:29 PM
2

You're more average than lucky. It isn't like a majority of people who have drunk sex end up accused of rape, it's just a very concerning phenomenon happening to a small minority.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:28 PM
6

Hope for the best, prepare for the worst.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:26 PM
2

It's actually completely different bullshit, but black men have to deal with this problem as well, on top of their average 20% longer sentences. It's a real shitshow, but hopefully we can push back a bit and have a society that's actually equal, instead of going from inequality in one direction to inequality in the other.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:25 PM
2

more specifically not proven TRUE in court A reasonable system would require you to prove them false to prosecute. If you prove them true, the accused is punished. If you prove them false, the accuser is. If you don't prove them either way (with rape, probably most cases), no one goes to jail.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:19 PM
2

Well, 50 minimum, but very unattractive people don't get that sort of attention most of the time.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:56 PM
2

So what if he's being disruptive? He gets kicked out of class. That's how disruptiveness works.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:52 PM
19

If we give women the same, perhaps overly-harsh sentences we give men, at least it's equitable. And who knows, maybe female prisoners will garner sympathy that male prisoners can't and get sentences lowered for everyone.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/15 04:05 AM
8

http://b1969d.medialib.glogster.com/media/36cb9daabc4f9660164fd16b472eb7ef8537ddc9f96e189d76d47028666f9a25/anorexia-nervosa-1.jpg
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:45 PM
36

Or ridiculously skinny. Attractive face preferable.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:21 PM
2

I doubt that this sub is 90% conservative.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 04:55 PM
3

Women ask for advice when they want it. So why would you try to give advice when what they are asking for is commiseration? To most men, "x is wrong" means "please help me solve x." We don't, by default, see it as a request for commiseration.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/15 05:53 PM
1

This was one of the RP truths I don't think RP gets to lay claim to that. I've heard it from many people who were very much not RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/15 05:51 PM
4

RP aren't very empathetic toward men either. You aren't going to get then for hypocrisy here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 10:53 AM
-1

It's funny that both feminists and misogynists use that. Feminists say that 5% of rape accusations leading to jail time means that 95% of rapists get away with it, while misogynists say that 95% of accusations are false.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 10:37 AM
1

The statistic only takes into account people who do work. The number of unemployed (voluntary or otherwise) people does not affect it. The actual reason has more to do with career path, overtime, and salary negotiations.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 10:34 AM
2

OK, I agree with you in that case. It just sounded like you were saying that consent was permanent, which would give /r/againstmensrights more ammo (they'll totally link it anyway, but any sane passersby will hopefully realize that it isn't true).
/r/MensRights13/12/14 04:26 AM
2

Sex isn't a contract, though. You can withdraw consent at any time for all future acts so long as you communicate it.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:55 AM
2

Yeah, that's a good idea. I'll probably do that as well. In the meantime, I have Saints Row IV, which would cause even more butthurt if it were prominent enough for nongamers to notice.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 03:35 AM
2

It's different here in the States, so that explains the confusion. We just have racks of games with disks behind glass doors with alarms everywhere.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 01:56 AM
4

You never know, it could have been a white knight who did it. White knights may be pussies, but they don't have the pass.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 01:55 AM
0

Yeah, I'm very torn between "the game looks mediocre and fuck Rockstar for taking forever to even announce a PC version" and "this will cause major SJW butthurt."
/r/MensRights11/12/14 01:54 AM
3

It was a joke. You obviously can't spend your pay on alcohol if you're paid in sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 08:04 PM
1

Uh, it doesn't stay in the gene pool...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/14 12:23 AM
1

Watch AMR claim that this individual represents the MRM.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:30 AM
3

Well, yeah, but I wasn't seriously advocating that.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 03:20 PM
5

Only 10% of rape accusations go to court? That means that fewer than 10% of rapists go to jail. Which means that they're probably innocent, let them all go.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 01:04 PM
1

I'm not active there at all, but I've posted a couple of times and they made me an approved submitter upon becoming private.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:22 PM
2

Moderator of /r/feministfrequency and /r/misnadry Yeah, I totally want you moderating a men's issues sub.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 02:00 AM
1

In fact, if you can get someone to make the value judgment that equality is good, then they've just agreed that genociding the entire male population of Sweden would be good.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:20 AM
1

Fan-fucking-tastic. Never mind that both men and women in Syria die earlier than their counterparts in the US, it's OK because women are living much longer than men!
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:18 AM
3

We'd be required to start each meeting with terrible jokes.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:05 AM
5

Abnormality is stigmatized, though. It doesn't make any sense, but it happens. Our society has a weird relationship with conformity.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 10:17 PM
3

Well, most people get on a carousel and pick a single seat, then stay there for the rest of the ride.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/14 10:57 PM
2

And regardless of your stance on abortion, an already-birthed infant is a human being and does have rights.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 02:29 PM
3

Doxxing = privilege + sharing personal information!
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:20 AM
2

Well, duh. So should financial abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 05:54 AM
1

I bet a lot of other women would abort or put the child up for adoption.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 05:47 AM
1

Is RP pro-life? I haven't heard them advocating it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 05:45 AM
0

For the first one, that's an excellent point. For the second, that's a good idea, but it seems awfully difficult to implement.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 05:44 AM
-2

So you're pro-life, then?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 05:42 AM
-2

Don't want kids? Don't have sex. So you're pro-life, then.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/14 05:42 AM
11

According to sane people, no, it is not.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:45 AM
1

Well, yeah. Any partner can revoke consent for any future act at any time. The problem is revoking consent for past acts.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:23 PM
23

Well, yeah. Any partner can revoke consent for any future act at any time. The problem is revoking consent for past acts.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:23 PM
3

Well, there's a difference between circumstantial evidence (which can absolutely apply, for example two people leaving a bar with one being very drunk and the other not being very drunk) and no evidence whatsoever. Rape can actually occur with no evidence whatsoever, which is pretty rare in other crimes, and it's essentially impossible to prosecute in that case because all you have are two contradicting testimonies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/14 02:31 AM
4

Firstly, would you suggest wantonly prosecuting possibly innocent people for rape based on literally no evidence? You'd essentially just flip a coin for any random person off the street. Tails, you're a sex offender. Secondly, I'm not TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/14 05:55 PM
2

Well, you could have witnesses of two people leaving the room with one extremely drunk and the other not extremely drunk, or you could have evidence of a struggle, but barring those two you have a situation that's essentially indistinguishable from consensual sex where one partner is lying, so you really can't prosecute it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/14 04:32 PM
3

It applies to lots of other crimes too. It's freaking insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/14 03:23 AM
6

in other words, why are you not equally afraid of being falsely accused of murder? You need a lot of evidence for a murder conviction. You're supposed to need a lot of evidence for a rape conviction, but there are exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/14 03:21 AM
6

Think of it this way: your parents made the choice you would have had you been asked (or at least one you don't mind). Many people don't have that good fortune.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:42 PM
0

This isn't SRS, it isn't here to just agree with you no matter what.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:45 PM
1

All of your five are perfectly reasonable. Six is the one douchebag I mentioned. You posted before OP mentioned the PMs and before the example was posted, so it doesn't help you either.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:48 PM
0

And by "most" you mean "one idiot who commented twice."
/r/MensRights11/08/14 01:08 PM
0

That's one anecdote from one church that's trying to head off accusations. I was asking for data.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 12:52 AM
2

Granted, but aren't women shamed even for repeated casual encounters or serial monogamy? I conceded this in my first comment. I'm not sure why you're still pushing it. Normal male desire is not dangerous Well, at least we can agree on something. what is often built upon it is: pornography, prostitution, catcalling, etcetera. Porn isn't dangerous. Prostitution often is, but if it's regulated like porn it may be possible to make that safe too. Catcalling is not dangerous, though it is annoying; ho…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:00 PM
2

OP is conflating MRAs with terpers, because that always works on /r/MR.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 08:18 PM
2

The moment someone proposes outlawing the sex trade for all the valid reasons there are to do so, people jump head over heels to portray it as an industry of free choice when this is hardly the case. The arguments I usually see are that legal prostitution may decrease the prevalence of STDs, rape, and crime. Why is the sex trade popular, then? Because johns want sex and are willing to provide money in exchange for it. Business transactions do not constitute thinking that everything of the same s…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 08:15 PM
1

Another wonderful topic where a guy comes to us expecting that we'll sympathize with him, and most of you tell him he's in the wrong. Well done. You can sympathize with someone and still let them know that they're probably overreacting. Though to be fair, OP, I do think you should talk to your fiance about this. If she reacted as negatively as you thought she was going to? She shouldn't be your fiance to begin with. I would hope that if I told something like this, and my worries, to someone I wa…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:39 PM
1

Do you have an actual number for "frequently"? OP may very well have been able to accept and perform that job without incident. It's a pity that he's been scared off.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:36 PM
8

A common complaint among MRAs is that "women/feminists like exerting control over men through sexuality". It's much more common among terpers. But this is because (as much as men scream that we are not sex-crazed pigs) men don't control their sexuality. That's a lie. Men think they have the right to shout sexual slurs ("it's just a compliment") at any woman they fancy. A small minority of men do. The vast majority of men do not. They shout "BUT MUH FREEDOM!" the moment someone suggests they don'…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:33 PM
-1

<sup>[1]</sup>
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:55 PM
2

What? Oh, I'm an idiot, replied to the wrong comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/14 06:39 PM
2

edit: oops, wrong comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/14 06:03 PM
-5

Men outnumber women in 2014 Earth.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:41 PM
3

You can't just censor any ideology you don't like. Reddit isn't yours to censor. /r/niggers was banned for brigading, not for being dickheads.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/14 09:34 PM
11

There's a difference between censoring your own community and trying to have another community completely removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/14 09:31 PM
1

Well, that's why you decide whether to extrapolate. You certainly shouldn't assume that the 90% are homogenously whatever fits your agenda, like certain people.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:31 AM
1

No verdict reached, not prosecuted, or the defendant was found not guilty but either no charges were filed against the accuser or the accuser was also found not guilty.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 10:31 PM
1

$78k/year at their daily rate if you work five days/week. Sounds like an excellent job for people whose self esteem isn't diminished by such activities.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 08:52 PM
2

A fair estimate looks like 2% false, 8% true, which would mean that one in five (or more, it's fucking hard to convict someone for a false report) rape reports are false.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 08:37 PM
-6

I wonder if this has anything to do with India's massive rape problem.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 08:36 PM
3

+ and no charges are brought against the accuser for false accusations.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 08:58 PM
6

It's an intentionally obtuse rewording of the only way that "teach men not to rape" could possibly have any merit.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:55 AM
1

Let's add that defragging an SSD doesn't break it or anything, it just slightly shortens the lifespan without doing anything useful.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 02:33 AM
1

Over the years, I’ve noticed that this dream is not important to American men. Most guys are content to get the most bang for their buck, whether that means living in an apartment complex, renting a room from a friend, or buying a cheap piece of land in the country. In over forty years, I never met a man that actually dreamed of owning a home in the suburbs. The plural of "anecdote" is not "data," and the singular certainly isn't. This desire—to own a suburban home—is a female one. In short, it’…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 02:23 AM
1

"He was a little shit, your honor."
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:49 AM
9

No, you see, men can stop themselves from raping, they just have no idea what rape is or that it's bad. All you have to do is say "raper no raping!" and they'll be all like "oh, whoops!" and stop.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:48 AM
1

Holy shit, that self-awareness from a movement that says that women who don't choose to join their movement are brainwashed and that a woman who's had one beer can't consent to have sex. And that's just the everyday, mainstream feminists, so you can't NAFALT that.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:46 AM
3

That has got to be the easiest malpractice suit ever. They cut off a very important organ but didn't impair his ability to testify or anything, and he never consented to any of it. I bet the lawyers are willing to pay him so long as they get a cut of the settlement.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:44 AM
2

Absolutely not, but that doesn't mean that we should begrudge her kids the help.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:38 AM
6

He got a blowjob! Can't a womyn go for a walk in a public area without being forced into performing oral sex on a man?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 12:12 AM
6

Sexual and gender-based.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:01 AM
2

Happy and fulfilled people have better things to do than argue on the internet. Arguing on the Internet makes me happy. Checkmate.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/14 02:01 AM
7

Looks like Cambridge is about 50.7% male, just about equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 04:38 PM
5

Could you thoroughly explain and cite that? It's interesting, but I'm not sure exactly what you mean.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 01:17 AM
1

Well, they still have to sort of play nice around egalitarians who think that "feminist" describes their views.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 04:32 PM
5

Paul Elam is an idiot, but you have to remember that he has no political power whatsoever, unlike many feminist wackos.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:22 AM
12

It seems like a larger moderate feminist (i.e. egalitarian) base just makes the influential ones more batshit insane.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:16 PM
12

The average feminist and the average influential feminist are insanely far apart.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:10 PM
2

Well, unless the FA movement is completely different from Health At Every Size (and I don't think it is), then they are saying that being fat is not inferior in any way to not being fat, which is simply untrue. Obesity is unhealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/14 05:29 AM
2

But that doesn't put them in the top 0.1%.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/14 11:14 PM
1

Reddit has more than 7 million people...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/14 10:55 PM
7

Well, if you can link it to 4chan you can be pretty sure it's a hoax.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:12 PM
1

I'm moderately surprised that the account looks more or less legit. /pol/'s #YesAllWomen effort included one Mr. Herschel Shekelstein.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:10 PM
1

Absolutely not. They're completely arbitrary in today's society because their original purposes are no longer relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/14 04:13 PM
0

It isn't a minority in SRSS. I have several comments below -30 for saying that transwomen are women.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:56 AM
2

Arguing for Men's Rights in the Feminist subreddit. I thought feminism was for equality. It's Wednesday, isn't it? You were trying to argue Feminism is a sexist movement, "because focusing on female issues isn't egalitarian." Doesn't #1 prove that? You were fighting a victimyest-victim-arms-race between male issues VS. female issues. Oh, yeah, because feminism never fucking does that.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:51 AM
5

I've taken to responding by calling ridiculous (either fabricated or not sexist) instances of misogyny "soggy-knee." I'm not sure if it's working, but it makes me feel better.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:46 AM
0

Warning, they hate the fuck out of trans people, unlike the related /r/TumblrInAction.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:44 AM
1

But the majority of that barely matters. It's a plutocracy that happens to discriminate against atheists (occasionally, you can't run for office in many states), gay people (sometimes) and trans people (pretty often). By and large, though, unless you fit into the ~5% who can't marry or can't switch apparent sexes, it's all about money.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:43 AM
1

"Wait, omfg, are you a girl or a 12 year old kid!?" Either way you answer, there's a large chance to be picked on. I've often responded that I'm a girl, but that doesn't matter and to just play the game. They'd then go on tyraids about making me suck their cock, or how "LOLZ THERES NO WOMENS ON THE INTERNET" or... the list could go on. Here's the response that the rest of us use when we're verbally abused over chat: tell them to fuck off. If they open their mouths again, mute and optionally vote…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:38 AM
2

Affirmative action is the wrong way to go about it. It's replacing discrimination with discrimination in the opposite direction and expecting to not overshoot or otherwise screw up. A better solution is to remove discrimination and watch the problem fix itself.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:34 AM
-1

Now, to be fair gay marriage is still illegal in many states. Gay people are actually objectively and measurably getting the short end of the stick by law. That isn't true of race or gender issues.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:32 AM
1

I haven't done any research on that You made that clear in your last comment but coerced into sex doesn't seem like it would be as traumatic What the actual fuck. I was coerced into doing things when I was younger. Still not traumatized I was forced into things when I was younger, but they weren't sex. It's a different animal. Forced to penetrate is counted As sexual assault, same as having your ass grabbed. It's forced sex, so it's rape. Also, the major issue isn't just the actual rape, it's th…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:42 AM
1

I can't even get one SO, no idea how I'd maintain multiple relationships. I won't begrudge it to the people who can, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/14 01:10 AM
1

If you include coerced into sex and forced to penetrate, you get very different numbers. The current definition essentially requires the perpetrator to be a man.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:44 AM
1

Women are around 40% of rapists and are more than half of abusive romantic partners. Nice try.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 01:49 PM
1

It's to discourage trolls and spammers by making it harder for them to know if their posts are being seen.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 11:22 AM
1

The "not all black people steal" one used in the OP is an easy example.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:42 PM
9

Try replacing men with other oppressive groups and suddenly the analogy works again. THAT'S BECAUSE YOU'RE ONLY OK WITH SAYING MEAN THINGS ABOUT GROUPS YOU DISLIKE YOU HYPOCRITICAL FUCK Sorry about that, had to get it out.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:08 PM
1

Lost terpers.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:02 PM
36

Frankly, I think that we'd all be better off if feminism and the MRM could just agree to mutually disappear and merge into egalitarian movements focusing on all inequalities regardless of whom they benefit. Of course, that's a pipe dream.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:27 PM
2

That's just intersex people. It has nothing to do with the special snowflake crap in the parent comment.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 01:50 PM
12

Because being a homemaker doesn't give you job experience that will help you support yourself. You need a buffer to make up for lost time. You obviously don't need $50k/year for life, but there should be something.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:59 PM
1

Great idea, horrible execution.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:57 PM
2

Well, if we can get women added to it we get the feminists on the side of abolishing it :)
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:57 PM
2

I say keep it, but make it temporary (a couple years at the absolute most) and limit it to a certain percentage of income or a living wage, whichever is lower (so that venture capitalists don't have to pay their exes hundreds of thousands of dollars per year because that's ridiculous).
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:56 PM
8

It was originally meant so that a partner who was tough to employ (no job experience, for example) wouldn't stay in a bad/abusive relationship because leaving meant starving. For some reason, though, there doesn't seem to be an upper limit--I saw something on the news about the ex of a football player wanting her alimony raised from $23,000 to $93,000 a month. She's already getting 6 times the median household income, and she wants to quadruple it. And that isn't thrown out of court immediately.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:54 PM
3

No, it's a Tumblr joke.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 03:54 PM
0

Or, more concisely, "I hate radfems".
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:33 PM
13

I'll put $50 on no hard time for the cop. He's a cop. Paid leave at worst.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:11 PM
4

And even if they were, hating everyone who happens to share the same sex organs is ludicrous.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 03:33 PM
1

But if you say that women won't get into STEM because they see it as being for nerdy losers, suddenly you're Hitler.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 08:54 PM
-1

Do I even need to? It's a freaking male separatist movement.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 11:52 AM
-2

No, really don't. Creepy RedPill-esque cults aren't sane choices.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:57 PM
11

Doesn't mean we have to stoop to their level.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:54 PM
2

Bingo. The downvoted commenter was lamenting the change.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:19 AM
2

Well, some people have free time and choose to use it in that manner. Who are you to judge?
/r/MensRights19/04/14 04:00 PM
12

Prevent me from fighting any day.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:59 PM
3

Well, it isn't legal to hit your husband, it just isn't generally prosecuted.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:58 PM
10

Women had a hard time in 1913 with legal spousal abuse True, has fortunately been resolved since limited privileges True, has fortunately been resolved since shitty childbirth death rates While unfortunate, this wasn't discrimination. Doctors were doing their best, their best has just gotten better. There hasn't been a draft since Vietnam and most likely won't be another one But there might be, and men have to sign up for it just in case, and that has not been resolved yet.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:57 PM
14

Well, it does exist, but it's well under 10%, not the 25% that certain people would have you believe. Most of that is explained by women working fewer hours, working lower-paying jobs, and not negotiating raises and promotions as frequently or as well.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:53 PM
1

A higher percentage of Republicans in Congress supported the civil rights act than Democrats That was the beginning of the end, though. Prior to that, most civil rights stuff was Republicans; afterwards, it's been mostly Democrats. Heck, look at the geographical support bases: Democrats were mostly from the South in Lincoln's time, and now it's mostly Republicans down there. Roe v Wade was a court case, and dealt with when can a mother kill her child, not civil rights It isn't a child, it's a zy…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:37 PM
1

LOL. The Civil Rights Act of 1963 was LBJ. Roe v. Wade was supported by Democrats. Gay rights has been 100% Democrats. The names have switched.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:28 PM
1

Remember, it was conservative Republicans who fought long and hard against the Democrats to win legal equality for women and minorities in America Yeah, the liberal Republicans of bygone years, from back when the Democrats were the conservatives.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 10:45 PM
1

Well, one side wants to prioritize women and the other side wants to prioritize screwing them over. Why can't we just be fair?
/r/MensRights17/04/14 10:44 PM
2

Well, most of the voting base, maybe. The people in power are willing to pander to people who want very special treatment for women, so special that they can't get abortions or even sometimes birth control.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 10:43 PM
1

Political allies, not military ones.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:07 PM
1

Feminism seems to have more subsects than Christianity these days. Yup. If you don't need to believe in the patriarchy to be a feminist, then what distinguishes them from egalitarians? Well, when the movement was formed, the path to gender equality was unequivocally through helping women. Women were legally property, couldn't vote, etc.. The name is a relic of that, a fact that radfems have exploited to no end.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:07 PM
1

You keep saying that, but I'm referring to the practices of the guy who invented the term, Benito Mussolini, and to some extent his political allies and successors.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 11:07 AM
1

Isn't that what I've been saying this whole time? That radfems are essentially fascists? The Italian fascist party, the Nazi party, and radfems are all pretty hardline right-wingers, even if they don't all agree about which groups are inferior.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 11:01 AM
1

The National Socialist German Worker's Party had a ton of ideology in common with the National Fascist Party.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 10:41 AM
0

The fundamental tenet of feminism is the idea of lizard people This only applies to radical feminism (which is literally defined as that subset of feminism with focuses on the patriarchy). Most feminists don't subscribe to that, but unfortunately the ones who do seem to be the most vocal and the most powerful (ironically, because their ideology states that only men can have power).
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:47 AM
-4

Nazism is a right-wing ideology. It's a German brand of fascism. Its ties to socialism begin and end with the name; Hitler had the socialists locked up.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:44 AM
7

Literally any comparison to Nazis on the Internet fulfills Godwin's Law. Godwin's Law just states that any Internet debate will involve some sort of comparison to the Nazis. It doesn't say that that's a bad thing.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:42 AM
2

The really strange part of that is that if the guy just got stabbed, people would have more sympathy for him. You don't laugh at a stabbing.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:54 PM
2

Typically, Wheaton says something innocuous, gets bitched at by SJWs, and folds immediately and posts a long apology.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:53 PM
0

Ron Paul is insane. I'd rather see Al Franken in charge.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:52 PM
14

And therefore a hypocrite, I guess. /u/wil, look at the Google Docs link from row ~450 on and tell me that those are unique, real people.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:45 PM
1

Female privilege is not actually being attacked or raped on the street. "Having to worry" is bullshit when those you're saying don't "have to worry" are much more likely to actually have something happen.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:49 AM
1

Because that's how women's swimsuits work, and because indoor basketball doesn't use a beach environment and therefore does not require swimsuits.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 07:34 AM
1

There's usually a better option than beating someone up, and the "anything else" means negative things if you leave it in context.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 10:30 PM
1

You may want to bring up how absolutely useless the term "rape" is rendered by that distinction; it essentially means "sexual assault where a woman is the victim". It's still written into the law, but you might spark a good class discussion.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 01:30 PM
15

That's very illegal and very unethical.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 01:27 PM
5

Or how about everyone tells everyone that no one deserves to be raped, beaten, killed, or anything else? That seems like the best idea to me.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 01:07 PM
2

Probably not, because long pants would inhibit their ability to play the game effectively. You do realize that the men wear Speedos for a reason other than making Patriarchy-smiting softcore porn, right?
/r/MensRights02/04/14 02:37 AM
18

Jezebel: "Waaaah, patriarchy!" RoK, TRP: "Fuck yeah, patriarchy!" MRM: "What patriarchy?"
/r/MensRights02/04/14 02:16 AM
4

Eve assuming that everything has to be perfectly equal 100% of the time, why the fuck would you destroy the nicer ones rather than replacing the inferior bleachers on the other field with a new set?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 03:40 AM
1

...upon proof that the injuries on which the action is based... I don't think it is.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 12:43 PM
6

Is that legally ingrained or is it just a societal bias? Rape is too often legally defined as penetrating someone against their will, but I don't really see how custody could be legally set in that manner.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:11 PM
1

Well, an easy reply to that would be that it's a counterbalance to feminism, which focuses on women's rights.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:31 AM
5

I thought I recognized that name. Really, someone hit on you and then left when you declined, and that's bad?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:22 AM
4

Hey, maybe parents are 100% rational consumers and always pick the lower-priced services.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:21 AM
1

You realize that you could close the suicide gap by having fewer men commit suicide, right?
/r/MensRights03/02/14 05:56 AM
3

She also bought Diablo 3.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 09:16 AM
7

Grisly.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 09:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter