TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ladyskins Archive

View 3 posts and 134 comments by ladyskins on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

ladyskins/r/MensRights23/08/09 03:56 PM
7

ladyskins/r/MensRights14/08/09 08:00 PM
2

ladyskins/r/MensRights30/06/09 03:42 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I agree with you, I think. I was just pointing out a very black-and-white issue- physical versus verbal. I'm thinking of the more modern definition of groping, to fondle someone for sexual pleasure, not to blindly search with the hands. If by "groping," you mean touching, I don't totally disagree. There is a major difference between commenting on one's physique and grabbing at absolutely any part of another person's body.
/r/MensRights27/06/10 06:38 AM
2

If it's not awkward for her to grope me, it shouldn't be awkward for me to comment on her body. It's equality. Nope, that's not even equality. Equality would be commenting for commenting and groping for groping, not one action being admissible for one group and a lesser being admissible for the other. (I do agree with your other points.)
/r/MensRights27/06/10 04:48 AM
3

Are you referring to women in general or these specific facebook users?
/r/MensRights08/01/10 07:47 PM
5

If your wife uses sex to control, shame or hurt you physically or mentally abuses you or steals from you, maybe you should re-evaluate your relationship status.
/r/MensRights06/01/10 04:16 PM
7

Crazy Bitch Syndrome
/r/MensRights06/01/10 03:33 AM
8

Wow. When I first started reading your comment, I checked to make sure I hadn't written it myself while sleepwalking. My cousin- also my good friend- went through the situation you described. I soon realized I was wrong- that bitch purposefully got pregnant (then married) for his death benefits. I could elaborate much more on your second paragraph- that parasite wouldn't even pull her weight as a wife, mother, or member of fucking humanity- but it's not relevant. Yes, there are women around mili…
/r/MensRights06/01/10 03:27 AM
2

You sound like a fantastic parent.
/r/MensRights30/12/09 02:36 PM
2

I absolutely agree with you. I also wholeheartedly agree with outsider and rmbarnes above. I was only trying to make a (bad) joke about how this story is a joke. I don't see anything wrong with catering to a certain demographic in business or allowing voluntary single-sex trips or organizations, so long as it's not infringing on the other sex's rights. I just don't believe that this specific case is in any way infringing on the rights of men. I also don't think that male-only masonic lodges are …
/r/MensRights19/11/09 02:03 PM
-2

Q-tip?
/r/MensRights18/11/09 07:53 PM
1

Now judges need to work on those pesky women-only restrooms. Wait...
/r/MensRights18/11/09 07:25 PM
2

I'd love to argue that with you, but... fuck. I'm already breaking it.
/r/MensRights18/11/09 07:00 PM
8

After some drunken Halloween fun, I was driven home in an abandoned shopping cart (a chariot of sorts.) I now have a huge bruise on the back of my knee from said ride. I should either sue the city for uneven sidewalks or press charges against my (male) friends for not making sure the shopping cart was padded first. I haven't yet decided. After all, I was drunk; therefore, I couldn't consent. Hey! I know what you're thinking, but I'm the victim here. Their bruises and lack of sobriety don't count…
/r/MensRights03/11/09 06:15 PM
9

With language like that, he's bound to start raping young girls anytime. Especially when he turns 18.
/r/MensRights03/11/09 05:54 PM
2

How did any of these motherfuckers think that they were protecting the public by arresting this kid? Possible justifications from the lofty heights of cops and judges: spreading of the disease of terrible spelling, grammar and punctuation; declining the occurance of teen angst; helping parents save money on text charges. Perfectly valid legal stances. Edit: my own fucking punctuation.
/r/MensRights03/11/09 05:52 PM
10

Of course! Don't you see the direct connection between teen text messages and school shootings? Those young men need to be pre-emptively punished for what they may possibly do! kill half the school ill load everyone with bullets and then shoot myself in the head right in front of u just to show u how much u pushed me.” Ahh, there it is. A very scary, troubled teen who can only be dealt with by writing an essay. Considering his (below) excellent grasp of spelling and grammar, this should be a sna…
/r/MensRights03/11/09 05:48 PM
1

The marked-down portion is from a comment made on the article itself, not by me. I agree with some of the commenter's points; being dishonest, placing one's own needs above those of everyone else and being in a relationship for the sake of money are all absolutely terrible characteristics of anyone, male or female. I was commenting on that comment and I totally agree with yours. I love my pussy, but it should only be on a raised platform during gyno exams and some interesting positions for oral …
/r/MensRights15/10/09 03:22 PM
1

Says the person who comments 19 days later.
/r/MensRights02/10/09 07:12 PM
1

I'm sorry to let you down, but I wouldn't recommend it to a strong woman, comfortable with the label "feminist". I mean, the women call themselves "stupid women", the men get to do all the hard labor and the female protagonist doesn't make the first move! Oh, and she can be a bad driver. It's made a bit better by the fact that there are no women in the war. I wouldn't want a woman to back me up on the battlefield; they're better suited to be nurses' aides. And I think she shaves. Fuck that.
/r/MensRights16/09/09 03:50 PM
1

Just in case you're wondering why this comment is in the negatives, it's probably because you accidentally posted it twice. The other one is +9 right now, while this is at -3.
/r/MensRights16/09/09 05:27 AM
1

I'm not refuting your entire comment, just a couple of statements: Man, you're being a dick. Many people in r/feminisms and some in r/women and some more in r/equality would- or should, after some previous comments about dissing people based on their genitals- would disagree with your wording. I, myself, am not disagreeing with you. I really believe that the only way that stereotypes and "bad" words can be neutralized by using them in a funny- not mean- way. I call my gay friends fags and my les…
/r/MensRights15/09/09 04:07 AM
2

Oh, wow. You're pretty ballsy (ovary-sy? overeasy? hmm...)
/r/MensRights13/09/09 12:41 AM
2

I think you've pointed out one of the main reasons I love this subreddit. The WBB posts are so-so for me, since I realize that both women and men act like shitfaces most of the time and one more doing it isn't going to teach me a lot. However, the greatest thing (for me) here is that rational discussion, well-thought out posts and knowledge always are upmodded far above any pun threads or "LOL!!1!) or "fuck women, their a bunch a bitches." Thanks for contributing and another upmod for you.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 12:17 AM
2

It's awesome to have "new" on your RSS feed. It really does help to reduce spam (in other subreddits) and increase viewings of good posts. I hope I can have that kind of tenacity sometime. I can only do it so long before getting so sick of spam and turning it off.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 12:03 AM
3

Thank you for reminding people of this. I don't usually find others' editing to be an issue, especially if done quickly, but badly-reasoned or badly-worded posts or comments don't have the weight and impact than those that are well-thought out. I should take this advice, myself.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 12:01 AM
3

I'm also glad you did. I'm glad I did, too. Take me as proof that the majority here aren't (usually) in their own He-Man Woman Hater's Club. I am a woman (and point that out quite a bit, when emphasizing a point about not all women being castrating, money-grubbing whores.) I've rarely been downvoted below the default "hide" position and have received a ton of great, well-thought out responses. Yes, some of the users here are bitter or very biased, but not most. I don't blame them so much, withou…
/r/MensRights12/09/09 11:59 PM
2

I actually agree with most of your points. For me, your earlier comment seemed like a general, absolute statement. Since it wasn't, I'll respond to this comment. The odd part of your explanation is that I totally agree with almost all of your statements. Women, in general, are very different and most should admit that many women are slutty or gold-digging. You're also correct that a ton of men are uncaring, general assholes as well. No matter what gender you're talking about, there's a huge majo…
/r/MensRights12/09/09 03:06 AM
5

Absolutely, all women are whores in college, fucked only douchebags, and once they get ugly (after about age 25, I'm guessing), they try to find a "nice" husband. Overgeneralizations about a whole group of people doesn't help any equalizing movement, especially when some of the members of the other group are here to learn and help. Comments like yours alienate those who could be seeing this as their first /MR thread. Do you want to make possible new believers run away by painting all women as bi…
/r/MensRights10/09/09 07:26 PM
0

I'm not sure about that. Anytime I think something should be posted in more than one subreddit, I go through the process twice, selecting one subreddit at a time. Answers from a more-seasoned cross-poster are welcome. Edit: it really doesn't take long to do it two times.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 06:50 PM
0

Cross-posting is simply submitting the same article or self-post to different subreddits.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 02:12 PM
3

Some of them can even be found here.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 02:10 PM
2

Oh, you karma-whore. Wait, you said this before I commented in this thread. More than one upvote for you, then.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 01:15 PM
-1

Did you mean to link to visarga's comment?
/r/MensRights10/09/09 12:47 PM
1

Oh, please don't ban us all... Some women are here to learn. I've learned a huge amount by reading this subreddit, even though I already agreed with a lot of its tenets before I learned of it. It's hard to really understand what a different group is going through. There's an r/circlejerk already. That's one thing I love about reddit- there are specific subreddits devoted to certain topics or actions. Turning every subreddit into a big circlejerk defeats the purpose. Excessive downmodding, which …
/r/MensRights10/09/09 12:43 PM
0

I don't know; it seems like "I have a friend who is an MRA; what are some good tactics to shut him up?" would be more honest, if that's really what the poster meant. They are too easily swayed by strangers on the internet if their opinion would change because of biased users' comments. It'd be a bullshit, purposefully-uninformed request, but it would be more truthful. If the OP wanted to know about the main tenets of MRA, why wouldn't they have posted here? It's obviously more dedicated and (usu…
/r/MensRights10/09/09 12:28 PM
2

Psychology Today talks about it in an article called "Crying Over Spilled Semen- Why women who don't use condoms feel happier." The finding that women who do not use condoms during sex are less depressed and less likely to attempt suicide than are women who have sex with condoms and women who are not sexually active, leads one researcher to conclude that semen contains powerful—and potentially addictive—mood-altering chemicals. Semen contains hormones including testosterone, estrogen, prolactin,…
/r/MensRights10/09/09 12:20 PM
3

Well, I did say that I'm glad you aren't my kid. So, yes, I'm happy.
/r/MensRights27/08/09 09:36 PM
2

I will now think of you as a one-armed man with 34 shots and awesome knowledge of films. If you ever dare to break into my house, you'll encounter "Monster-In-Law" and "The Marine." Just so you know. I even have a backup television, made to broadcast "The Notebook" just for you.
/r/MensRights27/08/09 03:57 AM
1

I think you're funny for a couple of reasons: You didn't really respond to my comment. I made a funny about the relationship between cavemen and us, including conversation. Maybe I should have added cats; I don't know. It still has nothing to do with nuclear war. Nuclear war- If we truly had a major nuclear war and "trashed the planet", as you say, do you really think you'll be around to find out? When/If it comes to that point, I'm guessing you won't be too incredibly worried about saying "Lol"…
/r/MensRights27/08/09 03:19 AM
1

Please, for the sake of humanity at large, do not say "Lol"- please, please don't. When a much more advanced society searches our big rock flying around the sun, they will see how absolutely imbecile humans were by saying "Lol" instead of actually voicing an opinion. That will be a sad, sad day. Maybe cavemen yelled at each other about the drawings made on cave walls- "Dude- that looks ridiculous! What, do you think that future generations want to see your paint-by-numbers picture of a goat? No!…
/r/MensRights27/08/09 02:48 AM
8

I'm not sure about some of those people- I don't pay that much attention to usernames unless I've friended them or spoken to them a bit, but DOGA is pretty hilarious. A gay Japanese ex-porn star with a Yakuza member for a roommate? Plus, a 10-inch cock? That's pretty fucking interesting.
/r/MensRights27/08/09 02:26 AM
5

I'm so glad you aren't my kid.
/r/MensRights27/08/09 12:47 AM
3

You still, after consulting with our lost and found section, have lost your colon. That can be a serious problem. You should look into it.
/r/MensRights27/08/09 12:27 AM
4

I may have a woman's name on it but the first thing I thought was it was penned by a man or just a woman who is completely out of touch. Why? Also, check in with our grammar and spelling police. They will help you out with your missing commas and apostrophes. You're making all women sound like unintelligible assholes. We can act like women and still be smart, too, you know? There's no way to tell whether an article is written by a man or woman unless it is stated as such. You get in touch.
/r/MensRights27/08/09 12:18 AM
3

I've never taken the phrase "sorry, lady" to mean so much. Thanks!
/r/MensRights27/08/09 12:13 AM
2

That's actually a good idea in many circumstances. Downmods be damned; guns are great deterrents. We have a little window sticker on our front door- at some point, it was made to say "This house is protected by...." with something (presumably intelligent) added to the list. We added midgets and our specific guns. Also, there is no use for an unloaded gun, unless you are planning on smacking someone with it. Nobody at all should own or operate a gun without really, really knowing how to use it. E…
/r/MensRights26/08/09 11:59 PM
5

"YES!" to which part?
/r/MensRights26/08/09 08:54 PM
12

My favorite comment, from Michael (sorry, I can't link to it directly): The author must be one of those ultra feminist types. It sounds like she is targeting Stay at home mothers, or women who actually wish to be with their boyfriend/husband. I think a better list would be 1) She drinks a lot of alcohol 2) She is dishonest 3) Cares more about her own career than anything else 4) Places her own needs above everyeone and everything else, while complaining how her meets are never met 5) Would rathe…
/r/MensRights26/08/09 05:04 PM
1

Wow, you just replied to me three times with varying messages. Are you sure this is the one you want to keep? Care if I respond to any of your deleted content? Hello? Are you okay with me mentioning your deleted content or not?
/r/MensRights24/08/09 03:16 PM
2

As strongly as I believe that legal procedures must be changed in the cases of unproven rape- mostly because of the large amount of false rape charges, but also for fairness in the law- I do have practical issues with some of the blog's (Pierce Harlan's) points. Sometimes they are forced to reveal a consensual relationship as a necessary part of their defense. [The accused] is often presented with a terrible choice that is really no choice at all. As part of his defense, he must reveal that the …
/r/MensRights24/08/09 02:28 PM
1

It seems that the college closed for the 2008-09 school year because of a dispute with an independent group of financial donors. This article makes a lot of good points about Antioch's program and the Gettysburg College Sexual Misconduct Policy, which is also a very interesting case of requiring verbal consent. It's summed up by this: By the way, the Antioch policy also says that The SOPP is violated whenever there is an incident of non-consensual sexual conduct on the Antioch College campus, du…
/r/MensRights24/08/09 12:51 PM
5

Yeah, that's where I first saw it. I thought that the subject itself was far more relevant to this subreddit than a page of IAmA comments. It will be interesting to hear your opinions on that program.
/r/MensRights23/08/09 10:11 PM
2

I kind of agree with his "clincher". I see what he was going for about the disparity between female rights and female responsibility. I'm not sure how well he expressed it but I THINK I see where he was going. Damn. That spelling error bothers me, but I'll leave it so you don't sound retarded by putting it in quotes. More seriously, I can kind of understand his thought process, but it doesn't add up logically or practically. It starts with the assumption that women are children, which directly l…
/r/MensRights19/08/09 04:21 PM
3

Women are frigid bitches. and The founding fathers were libertarians, I bet they would know how to fix Niggeria. Edit: The clencher. All sex is apparently rape because women are children.
/r/MensRights19/08/09 03:42 PM
7

Before I get into all the uncertainties and debatables, I would like to say that I agree with you completely with your statements about the growing political correctness of sexuality. It seems only logical that in progressing (?) times, we are growing ever more prude in our jesting when it comes to the witty and understanding sort of way. An example being: I have a lot of homosexual friends. I call them fags and carpetmunchers (to those who do) with no ill will. I make jokes about every single g…
/r/MensRights18/08/09 12:30 AM
5

I was making a wider point with that statement; I mean it seriously in some ways, but also as a joke about the things women do that seem so confusing to men. (The statement itself was a bit of a joke, in that it could be taken a lot of ways, as are our actions when behind closed doors.) It was meant in a few different ways. I probably meant it in most of the ways most would see it, but not all. As for your example: It is nice to have someone hold your bag (of whatever kind), but that has nothing…
/r/MensRights18/08/09 12:02 AM
15

Absolutely. I'm well aware of the hypocrisy, however- I don't catch near the amount of shit men do when saying it. I've never once been accused of objectifying such a holy, pure piece of human flesh. I have pissed other women off with it, but calling their tits pretty bags of flesh there to make up for brains would do the same. Just to add another female tidbit- we objectify men just as much. When we go to the restroom together, what do you think we talk about? Woman's Day magazine?
/r/MensRights17/08/09 02:16 PM
10

Cunt!
/r/MensRights17/08/09 02:05 PM
2

I guess I just don't understand why you would automatically think that someone was "hit and run trolling" when submitting a comment that is relevant to /MR. That makes no sense. My title is not unclear. There is a popular subreddit named "WorstOf" and my assumption (and I could be wrong) is that most people around here understand what I mean. Even without the subreddit, that still makes sense. Again, what would you or anyone else that disagrees with either the submission or the title believe tha…
/r/MensRights14/08/09 09:28 PM
1

No worries. Regarding the post, I was pointing out both misogyny and misandry in a single comment. Neither prejudice is confined to either males or females; they can be perpetrated by anyone. I am a woman, but I don't feel that has any weight in this. Do you? My username is based on my own actual name. I won't apologize for your assumptions. Edit: Why would you assume it's male misogyny? Women are prone to acting (or believing) that way that just as much. Yes, the comment assumes that women are …
/r/MensRights14/08/09 09:15 PM
2

I think it shows how some people think men should be held to a higher standard than women in an equal, practical situation. Isn't that much of the basis of the subreddit? Of course, a lot of it is about laws, but shouldn't we also be concerned about societal norms? Changing viewpoints changes beliefs. Laws don't usually change without that. Educating people, debating with them, showing them the real world helps to change perceptions, which helps everyone (provided the idea is true.) So what's th…
/r/MensRights14/08/09 08:54 PM
3

How would you propose I say it? It's a terrible comment (a WorstOf) relating to the Men's Rights subreddit (/MR). Also, why would it matter if that person is a mod for /MR? Edit: changed "when it comes to" to "relating to". It makes sense and doesn't sound as though it was posted to /MR, as it may have been taken otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/08/09 08:43 PM
3

One wife will do that.
/r/MensRights29/07/09 07:51 PM
0

Don't give up hope- I was a "feminist" in college. All of us that labelled ourselves that way thought that hard-core feminist writers were just batshit insane or trying to prove their points by going to the furthest degree. I've since tried using "equalist," although egalitarian would also be workable. Edit: spelling
/r/MensRights07/07/09 01:40 PM
3

I know you think I'm stalking you in this subreddit, but thinking that I'd go back through your comment history on the off chance that you'd talked about your favorite movies is ridiculous. I asked because you talked about it in this thread and it was hilarious. I did, however, just go back to see how far it really was. Five pages. What is the probability of that, versus me seeing your comment in this thread and replying to it? The word of a stranger counts for absolutely nothing on the slightly…
/r/MensRights06/07/09 01:27 PM
1

As much as we disagree on so many things, your reactions to women's favorite movies makes me laugh so very much. So, what would you propose to do if she said: One Flew over the Cookoo's Nest, Brick, The Notebook or Fight Club? (Not trying to argue here; just curious.)
/r/MensRights06/07/09 03:35 AM
3

Thank you. Watch out for the downmods from most of these guys and their dummy accounts, though- they can be ruthless if you don't think that all women are, in essence, prostitutes selling vagina for material goods or all legal offenders planning on reporting rape on any man forced into having sex with her. Tread lightly. Most of these members are rational; some are utterly ridiculous. Thanks for the laugh, though!
/r/MensRights06/07/09 12:48 AM
3

You're right. It's just hard to draw the line as to when proactive reaction is needed.
/r/MensRights05/07/09 11:38 PM
2

You are correct; I hadn't taken into account the aspect of government funding, as I should have. I just thought it would be interesting to research some of the shelters for male victims of domestic violence, which is what you had wondered about, so that's what I posted. If I can find more information soon, I will post it as a reply or edit this comment. I wouldn't advise you to hold your breath, as you know.
/r/MensRights05/07/09 11:00 PM
3

I agree with you in most of your intentions, but not as much in your statements. I applaud you in your thought process, though. Here are the things I'm in (usually slight) disagreement with: there may come the day when this isn't true and we are under the threat of invasion That is totally true. I'm sure there will come that day, at some point if not in the near future, that a country/group may try to or in fact follow through with an invasion to one of our countries. However, I disagree on the …
/r/MensRights05/07/09 10:55 PM
2

Questions? Yes, actually. You say that all women are prostitutes, selling the use of their vaginas for material goods. If I'm wrong on that, correct me, please. Based on that, how do you feel about these situations? A two-worker household in which the woman makes more money than he does A family in which the father stays at home with the child(ren) while the mother works Casual sexual partners/fuckbuddies/whatever you'd like to call them Asexual couples Men with "sugar mamas" Surrogate mothers A…
/r/MensRights05/07/09 06:33 PM
2

In many situations- mostly those in which people wouldn't think of hoppping on a computer, filling out a detailed form about how many fingers will be allowed to penetrate whatever hole- that would be a good idea. But I checked out one of their forms. In the fine print: I acknowledge that this contract is for informational purposes only and may not be enforceable How it that any more helpful than a consent note written on a cocktail napkin?
/r/MensRights05/07/09 05:45 PM
3

Maybe might be an understatement.
/r/MensRights05/07/09 05:32 PM
2

If you want to take the word "prostitute" so incredibly loosely, aren't all adults "prostitutes"? Anyone who works is selling themselves for a set price. Any stay-at-home parent is trading services for rewards. Why just women? It seems by your definition, men are total whores, too.
/r/MensRights05/07/09 04:07 PM
3

I didn't downvote you. Actually, I was going to thank you for the explanation, but I didn't want to have the wrath of some of the meaner members of /r/mensrights raining down on me for not adding to the conversation. Obviously, I got downvoted, too, for simply asking a non-loaded question.
/r/MensRights05/07/09 03:01 PM
3

True or not, the usual response comes in the form "we are against the drafting of both men and women and therefore most definitely support equality." Although that response is sidestepping the hypothetical debate over who should be drafted, many people of all sorts of gender beliefs think that eliminating conscription altogether is a larger political issue, as it would be a general equalizer for the sexes, at least legally. Since legal inequalities are a large part of the backbone of the men's r…
/r/MensRights05/07/09 02:10 PM
3

No, it seems to be about gender discrimination and the beliefs and terminology that go along with it.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 05:55 PM
6

There are not even close to being enough, especially for strictly male victims, but here's a list of some resources available for battered men.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 05:04 PM
3

I'd hoped this was a response from BestServedCold, as he is much more legible than you seem to be. The sentiments expressed, though, don't seem too different.
/r/MensRights01/07/09 04:15 PM
6

Totally agree. Both men and women play integral roles in society as a whole, no matter the culture. Obviously, we're different in many ways and various religions/societies/cultures define them much differently, but no society could exist without men. It has very little to do with jobs, as many think, but much to do with the varying strengths and weaknesses of the genders. Just because we're different doesn't mean that one gender should be treated badly for simply being born with certain genitali…
/r/MensRights01/07/09 01:05 PM
5

I'm sure MrForeskin would be able to answer this better than I, but it says on Wikipedia that at the age of 6 months, after concern was raised about how both twins (David and Brian) urinated, both boys were diagnosed with phimosis (NSFW). Doctors performed the circumcision using an unconventional method in which the skin would be burned. The procedure did not go as doctors had planned, and David Reimer's penis was burned beyond surgical repair. He had sexual reassignment surgery, while his twin …
/r/MensRights01/07/09 11:14 AM
4

And which public restroom facilities should Pop use?
/r/MensRights01/07/09 10:59 AM
3

Yes, I did. One was serious, one sarcastic, and one just a bit flippant. You are right, though, I did. Stalker, however? Not so sure about that one. I don't know how one could stalk another on the internet, but whatever. I'm glad to have flattered you, as if you're so important that someone wants to stalk you. Maybe it just has something to do with you having many controversial remarks in the same thread? Oh, no, that must be wrong. I must be stalking you! How does Ladder Theory not apply to BOT…
/r/MensRights01/07/09 02:56 AM
2

You're totally correct. When a certain group of people (disenfranchised, used, whatever) fight against the very same system that has done that to them, they gain very little leverage by fighting alone. Much like the whites you mentioned, women have nothing to gain (and much to lose, in the cases of many self-centered bitches), but also much to gain because their men are happier and more equal. There should be no argument, other than from the standpoint of self-promotion. Thank you for applauding…
/r/MensRights01/07/09 02:45 AM
2

BestServedCold: can you not even formulate a response to my comment? To again drop to your level, grow some fucking balls, man up, and argue for what you believe. Fucking pussy. You're proving the feminist argument that men are stupid, which is the exact thing we are trying to combat. Here you go, as suggested by my husband/significant other/partner/whatever you'd like to hear: go wash your vagina, change your tampon, take your Midol and calm the fuck down. Then answer me.
/r/MensRights01/07/09 02:35 AM
0

Just in case I understand it incorrectly, what exactly is your definition of "womyn"?
/r/MensRights01/07/09 02:30 AM
2

As for your statements about the stages of feminism, I totally agree. I have nothing more to add to that, so thank you. I do think that some good things have come from the later waves (the men's rights movement, obviously, is more appreciated because of the later women's rights movements, no matter what bitter men on here say. Precedent in a similar matter does help.) Yes, I do think that women fighting for your rights does make your/our position more believable/viable. I don't think it's sad, t…
/r/MensRights01/07/09 02:28 AM
2

I couldn't agree with you more. Obviously, skinjeans (who has been a user for all of 54 minutes at this point) is major troll. You're also totally correct in that there are good and bad apples in any and every group and that gender has nothing to do with it. r/mensrights seems to have a different view sometimes, but that's because the whole subreddit is designed to point out the injustices imposed upon men. Of course it'll be skewed and I find nothing wrong with that, other than the blatant woma…
/r/MensRights30/06/09 11:40 PM
3

Wow, a user for less than half an hour, and already an asshole.
/r/MensRights30/06/09 10:28 PM
1

Wow, one man died. That must be a huge dent in the men's rights movement. Are you also going to submit articles about the other incalculable men who die every day, or do celebrities just count more?
/r/MensRights30/06/09 10:07 PM
6

Most feminists now give those of the past a horrible, nasty name. A lot of the original feminists had some good ideas and were well-intentioned in fighting for true equality. Many feminists nowadays are just assholes, fighting for superior rights for women instead of equal rights/opportunities for everyone. As I've said before, I did consider myself a feminist in college, because it seemed as though the term referred to equality for everyone (we even had men's rights literature in gender studies…
/r/MensRights30/06/09 09:27 PM
2

I agree with you in a lot of ways. I could definitely be wrong, but I think it has to do a lot with the differences in brain chemistry and the basic ways that men and women communicate. Men are usually much more straightforward about their intents and wants, whereas women depend a lot more on subtlety. I think that women have become so used to using slight hints and inferred meanings when it comes to communicating that we display those subconscious sexual signals without meaning to. Of course, m…
/r/MensRights30/06/09 09:19 PM
6

That's just adorable. A (married) woman who's read Ladder Theory and thinks she understands it. Oh, that's so sweet. Adorable? How kind. Get off your high horse already. You're acting like one of the catty, vindictive bitches you despise. And how does me being married affect this conversation at all? I said "sans husband" because the situation would be totally different if he were around. Would it matter to you if I'd said "significant other" or nothing at all? As for Ladder Theory, it does appl…
/r/MensRights30/06/09 07:51 PM
4

Why not?
/r/MensRights30/06/09 06:57 PM
0

I just thought that it was a good conversation starter. This issue has been discussed a lot as of late; since it's a different point of view I thought it could be good for debate. I realize that the article contradicts itself, which makes it interesting for this subreddit, by dissecting the relevant points of view. I'm no feminist, more equalist. So sorry for the "propaganda", though, if I've offended you.
/r/MensRights30/06/09 05:57 PM
1

Just because the ladder theory is relatively true in many ways, doesn't mean that the sexes can't be friends. I have a ton of guy friends. I realize they'd probably want to fuck me if I walked out of their bathroom naked (sans husband, obviously) asking them to. We still have a good time and good relationships.
/r/MensRights30/06/09 05:53 PM
3

It seems as though you are smart enough to avoid those bitches so often discussed in this subreddit, then. Kudos to you and your friends.
/r/MensRights30/06/09 05:51 PM
6

No, that isn't a reflection on me, I've never said or done anything that would give her a reason to say that... and I find that my friend said is echoed by about 90% of the females I meet on the east coast. Actually, I do think that it is a bit of a reflection on the OP. You know the whole saying about who you choose to associate with reflects upon yourself and all. If he's choosing to be friends with women who automatically assume something so ridiculous, he should at the very least think about…
/r/MensRights30/06/09 05:49 PM
2

First off, thank you for the flattering remarks. I do try to relay my thoughts in a succinct and intelligent manner, but that's not always the case. (Obviously, I rant a lot. Sorry for that.) I accept that; it happens to everyone. I do, however, appreciate you taking the time to say it. As for PierceHarlan, I'm not sure what to think. I respect his opinions, obviously, and agree with much of what he has to say. Yet, I see some logical flaws when it comes to real-life reasoning. I haven't had the…
/r/MensRights26/06/09 05:03 PM
6

At the end of the day if women are included in the decision making process of a Mens Rights Organization, they will undermine it. I disagree. Every successful rights movement in recent history has been backed by some members of the other group. A huge amount of whites were for the abolition of slavery and later for the end of segregation. A lot of men were behind the feminist movement when it was just beginning. Maybe a few joined in to undermine the causes, but the majority were sincere. Why do…
/r/MensRights25/06/09 02:21 PM
3

I don't know how widespread this is in many universities, but I got to take an entire course on the roles of men in various influential films. One of the most memorable and discussed books we read (in a gender studies course) was Manliness by Harvey C. Mansfield. My university was definitely not a notably progressive one. Feminist writings do outnumber those arguing for men's rights, but that's mostly because there are more of them in "modern" literature. The men's rights movement is moving forw…
/r/MensRights25/06/09 02:11 PM
7

How can women not be directly involved in a movement they agree with? Obviously not all women either agree with or understand the men's rights movement, because they aren't in the position of men. We haven't walked in your shoes; we can't fully understand, but that doesn't mean that those of us who do care shouldn't be factored in as a positive force on your side. When it comes to organization and achieving goals, the more people involved and informed, the better.
/r/MensRights25/06/09 01:51 PM
5

That seems like a very good response. With much of the court system going so bonkers, it's a great way to approach the subject, provided that she's also up-to-date on politics and disagrees with recent decisions. He could also tailor it in an even more emotional (albeit cheesy) way, like "Honey, our love is so special and important to me that I don't want to mar it by bringing the government into our relationship." They could still have a ceremony, religious or not, with family and friends, if t…
/r/MensRights25/06/09 01:40 PM
3

I am not a troll, and the ad hominem attack is unnecessary. Am I purposefully antagonizing other people, insulting or hurting them? Does it seem as though my intent is malicious in any way? I'm not commenting to harass or inflame anyone.
/r/MensRights25/06/09 01:17 PM
5

I agree with you completely, when you talk about the economy affecting both men and women, regardless of who's working. However, how are the "vultures" feeding of men specifically? Ooh, one article. That means nothing. Two or three articles mean nothing in the scheme of things; men's rights articles should focus on the injustices shown only to men. The economy, as you admit, doesn't care about gender. Men do not bear the brunt of it- the men who work in production bear it; the women who work in …
/r/MensRights23/06/09 11:13 PM
0

Well, then, I have downvoted you because your comment adds nothing at all to the conversation. If you disagree, tell us all why. If you don't feel like making an argument, just downvote and move on. It's just that easy. Just because a few reports have shown one thing doesn't mean it's true across the board. Throughout the last few decades, reports have "proven" one thing and then "proven" the exact opposite. If you need an example, think of the perception of eggs on a person's health. It's chang…
/r/MensRights23/06/09 10:31 PM
0

From what I've experienced, women have been losing as many jobs as men, relatively speaking (as in, women working and men working, not factoring in pay.) Jobs are being cut across the board. A few years ago, factory jobs started leaving, then some more training-needed jobs, then service-industry jobs. Women usually fall into the latter categories, but that doesn't mean that a certain group should be classified as the one being fucked right now. Single-worker families are fucked, whether the brea…
/r/MensRights23/06/09 07:18 PM
3

To be a total bitch and overgeneralize, the woman who would perceive a harmless encounter as harassment, regardless of its circumstances, is bonkers and is probably not one a man who understands his rights would want to be with. That seems like a good reason to be honest up front, if only to weed out the rotten apples, or whatever the saying is. Edit: pluralization
/r/MensRights20/06/09 05:18 AM
2

I'll try to respond to your comment in the order in which you wrote it, but the ideas intermingle. I haven't tried to comment with anything that adds nothing to the conversation, but I understand that in any discussion, that will happen. I was adding another point of view and I may not have added enough elaboration to be clear. I'll try to rectify that now. I'm trying to learn about a position I've never been in; I'll be wrong a lot. I'm trying to understand. Upthread, potroast made the highest …
/r/MensRights20/06/09 05:02 AM
1

I wish I could respond better to your comment, because it seems well thought-out and interesting. I have no idea how to, though, because aren't all adjectives and adverbs mostly subjective? Yes, their definitions do rely heavily on societal expectations and norms, but how else can I describe actions? I'm not perceiving things to be black and white at all; I just find that most of the actions on the safer side of gray won't hurt.
/r/MensRights20/06/09 04:12 AM
3

Sorry if you mind that I'm copy-and-pasting, but I want to say the same thing to you as I did to A_for_Anonymous: Thank you. The main reason I subscribed to this subreddit is to better understand the problems that I don't face. It's hard to really get it when you yourself don't go through life dealing with it. I'm trying to see it as best I can. My opinions may be unwelcome in many ways, especially because I'm an outsider in most ways, but I'm making an effort.
/r/MensRights20/06/09 03:54 AM
4

Thank you. The main reason I subscribed to this subreddit is to better understand the problems that I don't face. It's hard to really get it when you yourself don't go through life dealing with it. I'm trying to see it as best I can. My opinions may be unwelcome in many ways, especially because I'm an outsider in most ways, but I'm making an effort.
/r/MensRights20/06/09 03:52 AM
2

Believe it or not, we also like to masturbate. It's great fun! Really, though- having another participant is much more fun; there are a lot more options for increasing the fun-making. Deciding to never again approach a woman takes away most of that fun. Poor guy.
/r/MensRights20/06/09 03:46 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights20/06/09 03:42 AM
1

Not everything on television is true (e.g., Fox News.)
/r/MensRights20/06/09 03:42 AM
1

I'm not positing a position in this argument, but why do you have to call someone a troll simply because they have a different opinion than you, which you yourself admit is subjective? Sorry, moving on with my life now.
/r/MensRights20/06/09 03:39 AM
1

Thank you for giving another example of a girl that isn't a horrible, money-grubbing bitch that a lot of the guys posting think we are. Of course, some women are. Some men are, too, but less, usually. I work just as hard as my husband and would like just as much respect, although some stereotypes afford me less. That sounds as if I'm discounting men's rights issues, which is totally wrong. I want to work for both sexes to be considered equal, whether it's about work, sex, divorce or otherwise. L…
/r/MensRights19/06/09 07:21 PM
3

I'm also tired of the media portraying every single racial group or class or gender of people as stupid, 2nd class, inferior and substandard. It doesn't just happen to men. I'm doing my best to learn all the discrimination that men deal with- I am a woman reading the mensrights subreddit, obviously. I'm trying to understand the far side of the gender spectrum. I'm trying to understand, because inequality is inequality, no matter which form in which it shows itself. I'm tired of the MSM portrayin…
/r/MensRights19/06/09 06:38 PM
2

If you approached me and said, "Hi, in the interests of complete up-front disclosure, I'd like to have sex with you tonight", I would probably feel flattered, laugh, then tell you I'm married, but thank you. When I was single, I would have probably said close to the same thing (minus the married part, obviously), but would have probably tried to engage you in some kind of conversation to see if you were the kind of guy I'd want to sleep with. It's a great pick-up line to women who aren't into so…
/r/MensRights19/06/09 05:41 PM
1

I totally agree with your comment. I used the words "deferential" and "bland" to reference the previous comment. Not everyone who considers themselves a feminist (me, when I was in college and wore rosy glasses) believe that men should be "bland, deferential and accomodating". Your approach sounds wonderful, at least to me, although I realize I don't represent all women. As for it not being rocket science, I also agree. However, a lot of people in this thread are debating various approaches and …
/r/MensRights19/06/09 05:21 PM
2

Wow, dude, that's deep. You should write a book.
/r/MensRights19/06/09 05:12 PM
5

I agree. Men should be mad; they're getting the short end of the stick in most cases. I'm just wondering why my point of view (which is different, but not necessarily against theirs) was being downmodded. I had been so proud of r/mensrights, and I had seen other opinions taken seriously and argued against. I'm also mad about the way men have been treated as of late- and I'm a married woman, which would put me, for many people, in the opposite position. No one is treated equally, and that pisses …
/r/MensRights17/06/09 09:10 PM
1

It's sexual harassment to do what? Tastefully approach her? That's beyond stupid.
/r/MensRights17/06/09 08:55 PM
7

Yes, you said that before. I guess I should have been more clear- which part is overused/overplayed? There isn't a clear adjective or adverb. Here, I'll give you some choices- harassing, persistent, annoying, sexual, intellectual, stimulating, attractive... I have no idea what you're objecting against. Try again. Make a decent argument, rather than some one-word comment, and I- or someone else- will be able to respond. At this point, your one-word comments add nothing to the conversation and giv…
/r/MensRights17/06/09 07:55 PM
3

I have no idea what you mean. Could you elaborate? Edit: Why does a simple question, with no undertones whatsoever, deserve downvotes?
/r/MensRights17/06/09 07:45 PM
-2

I have no idea why you're being downvoted. As a woman (who hasn't always been married), there is no reason to not approach her with a tasteful (which can be a sexy, but not crude) line or conversation starter, just to see if she's interested. The ladder theory is pretty true. Raping will land you in jail; approaching may land you a date. Go for it!
/r/MensRights17/06/09 07:43 PM
6

Then I'm disappointed for both of us. I've read a lot of this subreddit and have been very proud of it- most movements are more prone to ad hominem attacks and pun threads- this one has been more rational and discussion-oriented. I haven't downvoted you, because I like hearing different sides of conversations, whether I agree or not. That's the point of a discussion. I know I'm not right all the time; I'm probably not right most of the time. I just don't think that downvoting is the best way to …
/r/MensRights17/06/09 06:29 PM
0

And world peace? I was talking about both. I agree that there is enough food to feed everyone in the world and then some. But world peace? Yes, the majority of the world's population (as far as I know and I could be wrong) would prefer world peace over conflicts in all the myriad forms. Do you really think that either are possible, in our or our children's lifetimes?
/r/MensRights17/06/09 06:12 PM
8

Okay, I have to ask you guys- why the downmods to all my comments? It's ridiculous. If I'm spamming or adding absolutely nothing to the conversation, downmod me to hell and back. I was trying to offer another point of view to the conversation, which is the whole point of reddit. If you want a big circle-jerk, go for it. I thought the point was to have good discussions without ad hominem attacks and nastiness. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like the men's rights movement is getting into th…
/r/MensRights17/06/09 06:05 PM
3

Well, women aren't dogs. They shouldn't be hit. Neither should men. This woman was way out of bounds by physically hurting him, of course. She should be dealt with exactly as a man would be, had he hit his significant other or anyone else. However, scaring someone by hitting them is ridiculous. What if she wanted to train him like a dog (as you are suggesting), and hit him to scare him into better action? Wouldn't that piss you off? By your statement: ... Some dogs need to be hit with a newspape…
/r/MensRights17/06/09 05:56 PM
1

World peace and food for everyone is unrealistic, absolutely. My point is that small changes help, and in huge ways for those that don't conform to the "norm". When it comes to the way one guy reading this acts toward women, it's very realistic. I'm no relationship guru by any means, but perceptions by individuals can be altered pretty quickly, even if widespread changes take much longer. It doesn't have to continue to be 'played' like this for men (and women, obviously, but the topic is men's a…
/r/MensRights17/06/09 04:45 PM
1

Admiring is awesome. Harassing, not so much. Persistence will get you somewhere, but not annoyance. Also, women are sexual creatures, too. There's no reason to act asexual with us. Intellectual conversations can be stimulating and attractive, but being sexy is usually welcome. Edit: repeated word
/r/MensRights17/06/09 04:37 PM
13

In college, I considered myself a feminist, mostly because all the literature we read that promoted gender equality was considered "feminist". (By the way, there were many discussions and a few articles devoted to the inequalities for men, which was also considered feminist. Who knew?) Since then, I've tried to find a better description, but it's difficult. Maybe "equalist"? More to the point, in my experience, it's better for both sexes to be more upfront and honest about their wants and intent…
/r/MensRights17/06/09 04:35 PM
1

Yeah, just like how potheads must be more dangerous, because they make up so much of the 'criminal' population in the US,too. I don't understand how so many people, no matter their gender, think that only fighting one side of a problem is somehow fighting for equality. There are unnatural and immoral issues for every gender.
/r/MensRights16/06/09 01:43 PM
13

That is absolutely ridiculous. Why are there different standards for men and women (of the same age, for the same crime?) Usually, we have different amounts of strength than the other sex, but that has nothing to do with crimes committed. We should have the same penalties, no matter what. What is the point of emphasizing equal rights if the punishments aren't equal? Is there a specific crime for which men are sentenced more harshly than women? Maybe I haven't read enough about Russian sentencing…
/r/MensRights15/06/09 09:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter