TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

laggerzback Archive

View 2 posts and 85 comments by laggerzback on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Conversationlaggerzback/r/seduction22/09/20 04:14 PM
1

Removed: Unhelpful Body Textlaggerzback/r/seduction13/02/21 10:20 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

No I didn’t ignore what you said. Its the truth. If all you’re looking for is sex without a commitment, you’re not going to have a meaningful relationship. In fact, lets say you actually did find someone who only just wanted sex from you. Thats it you only hit them up because you’re horny or whatever, that kind of relationship doesn’t last long for a few reasons: one because one of the two starts to develop feelings for one another (because sex is in fact an intimate act and not just getting you…
/r/seduction28/04/21 12:13 PM
1

Sometimes. Other times they actually do value you but don’t have a sexual or romantic attraction to you. They probably like doing things with you like going to places to hang out, play Smash Bros, etc. They still want you around because you have shared interests and stuff and you two click and all. I used to think what you’re thinking too, but I’ve honestly learned that it really depends on your chemistry with people. Discerning who you want to keep in your circle depends on how your platonic re…
/r/seduction28/04/21 11:51 AM
-1

I mean if all you’re looking for is sex then the only person making a fake-ass friendship is you. The only reason why opposite sex relationships don’t work is that most guys are only looking for sex.
/r/seduction28/04/21 11:20 AM
-4

I mean if that is your ulterior motive to just be with someone because you only want sex with them, then of course that kind of relationship will falter. Its the reason why the OP said she tried to actually make that kind of commitment to someone she really could only see as a friend and the relationship turned more sour than if she turned her ex down initially. You should look at that thread because understanding both perspectives helps in the end. And no, a friendship isn’t some sort of commit…
/r/seduction28/04/21 11:16 AM
4

That is how you miss out on some good relationships that are platonic. But yeah be honest about your intentions from the start. If you’re hitting things off, its ok to tell the person you’re with that you like them, find them attractive, or interested. Ask their number or whatever. Worst thing is they say “no” and you move on. No need to be upset. Shit happens
/r/seduction27/04/21 02:31 AM
1

This is very important here Charisma is a key factor. Sell your good side. Many people think its a confidence thing but you don’t just magically gain confidence.
/r/seduction27/04/21 02:17 AM
33

I think this is something a lot of people on here fail to realize in this subreddit. And it stems from this culture of “Women are from Venus, Men are from Mars” where people put women in boxes. Treating people like human beings and being overall charming helps draw people to you.
/r/seduction21/04/21 04:25 PM
1

As someone who’s been in one? Theres not that much of a difference at its core. The overall difference honestly has to do with how we make things convoluted based on people’s sex. The whole “man’s world” or “woman’s world” thing that can be pretty restrictive. While its true you can relate more with a member of the same sex, there’s still boundaries that get in the way and its still just as hard to get into a relationship too. Ive had lesbian friends tell me that even they have a hard time picki…
/r/seduction15/04/21 04:20 AM
1

Well one, no. Not really. People like to act like seduction is this complex notion thats exclusive to men. The whole “men are from mars, women e from Venus” thing and while its true that both sexes have different mentalities based on social situations, once you observe stuff like same-sex relationships (which I’ve been in,) you start to realize there’s not much of a difference. Yes, confidence plays a key, and that is achieved through building self-esteem, which is easier said than done. Sinceri…
/r/seduction14/04/21 12:47 PM
1

See, thats the thing, you don’t know about a person. One, you don’t know if the woman is straight either unless they tell you. You’re only making assumptions about people you don’t know. And even if they don’t, thats not a necessary criteria on how to get with someone in all honesty. People can share preferences and you can narrow down demographics based on those qualities alone.
/r/seduction14/04/21 12:34 AM
1

Oh i had something to say. Just mocking you
/r/seduction13/04/21 10:37 PM
1

Lets be real though, neither does it work with men either. I’ve had my share of bad advice from men about how to approach women or treat them. If you want to talk about coaches, leave that to professional counselors with Masters or Ph.Ds in Psychology or Sociology. Theres actual social skills coaches that can teach meaningful advice about building your charisma.
/r/seduction13/04/21 09:47 PM
1

Because its reddit? I can reply but you could block me. I dont really care lol
/r/seduction13/04/21 09:35 PM
1

Could be laughing at you, not triggered. :/
/r/seduction13/04/21 06:40 PM
1

Am i though? All the relationships I’ve been in were meaningful.
/r/seduction13/04/21 03:21 PM
1

Thats just being shallow. “Oh why cant women like old ugly/fat me!” “Oh, this bitch is a 2. Too fat/ugly” Yeah if you’re the type of person who is that shallow, not bothering to understand a person and only see them for their body, then good luck getting a relationship. That goes for anyone.
/r/seduction13/04/21 03:20 PM
1

For a guy with that username complaining about women, i doubt it.
/r/seduction13/04/21 03:18 PM
0

“You don’t listen to women, you observe them” Yeah thats called stalking. Maybe you should learn to listen to them and talk to them because if you’re around them long enough, they tell you things about themselves and if you keep attention to that, and respond accordingly, they find that very attractive. Means you’re taking time to actually pay attention to them, which goes a long way in a relationship.
/r/seduction13/04/21 03:17 PM
0

Inexperienced? Ive had about 6 relationships in my life, 5 girlfriends, one boyfriend, and they were meaningful when they lasted. Thats the problem with men. They want to only listen to men about what women want when theres literally women telling them. Nice guys aren’t being instinctively rejected. Women have had to deal with “nice guys” who turned out to be toxic. And there’s always an ulterior motive with them. Again, i tell men “stop trying to be a nice guy and be a good man” because nice gu…
/r/seduction13/04/21 02:52 PM
1

And i can tell you thats not how that happens. Some of those people used alcohol, got those chicks piss drunk, or high, and fucked them while incapacitated and then these dudes wonder why they got kicked out of college for rape. Confidence isn’t relegated to assholes. Its about building self-esteem which is hard if you have low self esteem. You can be confident and a good person and if straight women had the choice between the two, they’d rather have the confident good man who treats them right …
/r/seduction13/04/21 02:23 PM
1

And how would you know that? You talk with women on the regular?
/r/seduction13/04/21 02:07 PM
1

Your point is “unattractive men are qlmt always invisible to women” and youre making assumptions that women are shallow. What about unattractive women? Either way, i know thats wrong because there are a lot of qualities about yourself that can attract people despite your looks. Even Notorious B.I.G was a fat ugly bastard and he had folks attracted to him even before he was famous.
/r/seduction13/04/21 01:59 PM
0

Idk what you mean, coz I’ve understood what she meant. Being bold of course means flirtatious. And like she said, its a hit or miss because it depends on the environment and how your relationship with a person is. And by that, i mean if you know that person is open to that. It also depends on your charisma too.
/r/seduction13/04/21 01:52 PM
-1

Who said they were friends? Could be in a poly relationship...
/r/seduction13/04/21 01:44 PM
1

Thats a bad example tbh. You’re comparing professional fighting to relationships and thats a really bad analogy. I can guarantee you if you were in a conference of 100 straight women telling you what they like, you could use some of those preferences to suit your personality and find someone. Sometimes it helps to understand both sides.
/r/seduction13/04/21 01:43 PM
1

That has more to do with how men act towards women. The only reason why they live different lives is because they deal with different things. Women tend to be more in danger so they have to protect themselves. That disaster could be avoided with a phone call and communication is a good quality to have in a relationship. Theres differences of course, but learning each other is a key on how you make things work.
/r/seduction13/04/21 01:39 PM
5

Yeah thats not how that works. Being aloof means that you’re nonchalant. Yes you take whatever opportunity to strike up a conversation with her to understand who she is all while showing her the best qualities of yourself. If she likes you, cool! Being able to present yourself as easygoing allows people to let their hair down. When they feel comfortable with you, then you can approach them, ask them to hang out, whatever. Just don’t let the horny speak for you unless you’re in that part of the r…
/r/seduction13/04/21 01:36 PM
1

Heres why i hate that analogy. Other than that women aren’t fish and can communicate (and likely that if fish could talk, they wouldn’t want you to eat them anyway.) But let’s play the Devil’s Advocate here. Fishermen know how to catch fish because they study them. They have to learn what fish like, dislike, behave. And you also have to know what type of fish you’re trying to catch. You can’t rely on human advice to get you through and you don’t always have the same equipment either. So you work…
/r/seduction13/04/21 01:31 PM
1

Trust me, that doesn’t work. Theres a lotta rich men who are either too socially awkward or they’re creeps. Plus, women prefer to be more independent and have their own money rather than rely on men to be their sugar daddy. Sure there may be some women who do want a sugar daddy, but that kind of relationship can be draining. What i can say is that women prefer guys who are doing something for themselves. So trying to work on your career or skillset, or going to school, means you’re doing things …
/r/seduction13/04/21 01:19 PM
1

You wanna know why? Its confidence. You can totally win people over with your best qualities. If you’re a big bear type, theres folks that like that and being the cuddliest bear or protective bear helps. Dating and job searches are kinda similar. Know what you’re selling and be the best version of yourself.
/r/seduction13/04/21 01:14 PM
1

Your point was made clear and you’re not the only person who said this. Problem is that you’re An r/niceguys here and the one thing you can learn is that you have to work on your self esteem and confidence. Also, as someone who has been in 6 relationships so far, the docile approach does work but be sure to be receptive to those who do like you too. In truth, knowing when to apply both situations also works, coz you might be able to find mutual partners who are also looking for a good time, and …
/r/seduction13/04/21 01:10 PM
6

I’mma be real with you. This sounds like trust issues here. Like textbook definition. You wanna know how to fix that? Find people who share the same interests. If you’re looking for a booty call buddy, you get what you get.
/r/seduction26/03/21 08:36 AM
1

The issue is thinking that all women want the same thing. And its not true.
/r/seduction21/03/21 03:11 AM
1

So, this is another question: Do you take antidepressants? Or do you have a history of high blood pressure? Believe it or not, when taking antidepressants, some cause you to have changes in your sex drive. Even then, that sounds like your girl really likes you and its still good that u two still enjoy being intimate with each other even if you cant have sex. Definitely don’t let that get you down because its still a big win if you get that person who loves you for you.
/r/seduction14/03/21 02:00 AM
2

The only reason why wealth has provided “safety” is die to the fact that you had years where women were restricted to specific roles. When you start dating businesswomen or wen who work good paying jobs, you start to see that thought process is different. They prefer character over status because people can be wealthy and be terrible people. Not needing to depend on men and being able to work by the sweat of your own brow makes you really think differently on who you want to date.
/r/seduction14/03/21 01:11 AM
1

Its all a marketing strategy. People end up buying into the lie.
/r/seduction14/03/21 01:07 AM
4

Thats basically the myth. The reason why men fall into the trap thinking that money provides security is based on the idea that women at one point were to depend on men to provide for them in exchange for marriage. Women have struggled for years to have the opportunity to be self sufficient and the more that window of opportunity widens and they make more, the less they feel they need to rely on men’s ability to provide. In turn, theres more gravitation towards quality of character which relatio…
/r/seduction14/03/21 01:03 AM
1

How is that implying I’m attacking the OP?
/r/seduction13/03/21 06:24 PM
1

I mean i wasn’t talking exactly about the OP in that context.
/r/seduction13/03/21 05:15 PM
2

A good idea is to just sell your best qualities of yourself, and improve the qualities that you’re not good at. Be the best version of yourself. Most things you think that women are mostly attracted to can’t be changed. But it doesn’t mean you don’t have a shot. Just find people who share similar interests and work from there.
/r/seduction13/03/21 12:05 PM
3

“You can learn concepts through generalizations” If you’re trying to bump your head, you can learn a lot. But you can learn a lot more about people looking past a person’s demographic with much less lumps on your head. You may not have said that every woman does this/that, but what you’re saying is that its safe to imply that women gravitate towards X kind of man. And my rebuttal is that it doesn’t matter. People have preferences all the time, but will ignore them if they really like you (unless…
/r/seduction13/03/21 12:08 AM
2

It sounds weird until you actually run into those kinds of people. Then you’re more grossed out that those kinds of people exist.
/r/seduction12/03/21 11:37 PM
6

No you can talk about people and not generalize them. People tend to think the “where have all the real men gone” type of women and the women who want to be independent of men are the same women. They’re not. Some women like being submissive and like the whole power play thing. Some aren’t. But to lump them together as it’s some sort of uniformed disposition is a gross generalization and you’re going to find yourself really struggling in the dating scene. Why? Because the generalizations don’t s…
/r/seduction12/03/21 11:31 PM
3

Yeah, i said it. Some of these guys i hear that think relationships are all about asserting power or superiority like to infantilize women a lot. And its honestly disturbing.
/r/seduction12/03/21 11:19 PM
-2

I believe I meant what I said. Theres nothing healthy about generalizations because all you’re doing is stereotyping people before you get to know them. And by doing so, you make rash decisions based on what you think they are. In the case of this statement, this isn’t the appropriate subject matter to make this type of rebuttal. But of course, i know you’re trying to make your comment sound nuanced here but it really isn’t. Also, this isn’t the appropriate subject matter to make that kind of st…
/r/seduction12/03/21 09:27 PM
-2

Just because things are “common” doesn’t mean it’s “right” And no, its not normal nor good to generalize people. Thats called “prejudice” especially when you consider you’re talking about a demographic that makes up about half of the world’s population. Moreover, what are your sources on that statement? That majority of women need someone thats “superior” to them?
/r/seduction12/03/21 08:35 PM
11

I honestly don’t agree with this at all. 1) You’re making assumptions that all women are the same. Some women are conservative and its usually them that complain about “where have all the real men gone” and they are the ones who perpetuate this whole toxic masculinity thing. Call it a preference or whatever, but it mostly stems from the idea that independence is a bad thing for women. They perpetuate this idea about men being only good for the value and merit they bring to the table and this tox…
/r/seduction12/03/21 06:13 PM
10

That is a big misconception that you have to be “manly” or “womanly” and be dominant. You gotta be yourself, but not only yourself, but be the best version of yourself. Yes, you cant chase women around coz even if you are well kept, you’re going to creep people out in general. Women prefer people who value them as people and not something to chase over.
/r/seduction12/03/21 05:54 PM
2

I cant agre that its ingrained. The part of Egalitarian feminism is to eliminate gender based roles and obligations. not to force people into some gender free this or that. The while point is that people have the freedom to do and choose what they want without social stigmas as well as support the rights of people who cant choose how their bodies are wired. By that i mean the trans and gender non confirming people. For women’s rights, if you are the type of woman to want to be submissive or a ho…
/r/seduction12/03/21 05:49 PM
1

I mean even the one who studied wolf hierarchies found the study to be debunked. Wolves have a family system and its usually the parents running things
/r/seduction27/02/21 08:39 PM
3

Nah, a PUA’s goal is to score. It never depended on outcome independence, only if you could charm people (as many as you can) and not exactly building a relationship or connection. There are better confidence boosting coaches out there that can help you with interpersonal skills.
/r/seduction26/02/21 01:27 PM
2

The issue people tend to have with the idea of befriending women is the myth that you cant ever be in a platonic relationship with them the way guys do. Obviously, you don’t want to be clingy to anyone, as that would turn anyone away. But being able to confide with a person is a good thing, and the relationship should be at a level where you two can talk about anything and you have the energy for one another. Do i believe gender matters? No. Not really. What i do believe though is that having pe…
/r/seduction20/02/21 04:10 AM
35

Well, you’re forgetting one or two things here: One, the woman you’re interested in could be better off financially than you at a point where she wouldn’t need to depend on you to make the money. That type of woman looks more for character than ability. Two plays more on character as well. You could be that guy making ends meet, but if she sees you’re working hard and trying to keep your business together, more than likely she would be attracted to you, especially if you have a good talk and pro…
/r/seduction14/02/21 11:07 PM
2

My advice is, just sell your best features. Treat the women you like like you would with anyone else, but with the hopes of talk into her again. Be laid back. Make it easy for them to talk to you.
/r/seduction11/02/21 04:32 AM
2

Yeah I don’t agree with what the OP is saying here. First of all, the Machiavellian/Chauvinism thing isn’t normal. And it’s still a pretty bitter outlook on the whole nice guy/asshole dichotomy here. Here’s the real truth. Neither Nice Guy or Asshole get meaningful relationships and showing your ass doesn’t always work, especially if you aren’t good in the looks department. So I’ll point out what I’ve learned about nice guys problems, assholes problems, what I do agree with the OP on (but would …
/r/seduction11/02/21 04:29 AM
1

And I’m telling you that’s not how that works. Even the woman who spoke about her experience said that it was something she found out along the way through her relationship. Causation is not correlation. Just because they are assholes does not make women driven to them. Ted Bundy and Charles Manson were able to draw so many women because they got into their heads. When you have someone mentally manipulated, you can make them do anything. Even people like Jim Jones was able to sexually seduce his…
/r/seduction08/02/21 05:03 AM
1

She also explained in a latter comment why that happened, that she felt initially safe, because he helped her with prior stalkers and thirsty men after her. but she started experiencing the abuse. Why do you keep insisting that women just flock to abusive people? Only time and experience and given prior knowledge can help you avoid those kinds of people and once you know those red flags, you make your decision.
/r/seduction08/02/21 04:53 AM
2

Even if you’re doing well as so you say, a lot of people who come to this thread may not be and I’ll gladly speak my mind on that subject.
/r/seduction08/02/21 04:15 AM
0

Just a word of advice: don’t refer women as “females” You will get laughed at.
/r/seduction08/02/21 03:59 AM
1

You felt safe but at the same time the abuse builds up. When you’re young, you don’t catch those red flags but after time, being burned by folks, you know the types of people to avoid.
/r/seduction08/02/21 03:53 AM
2

I’ve had to deal in ministry with abuse victims. Some of those points are definitely factors in why abused women stay with their abusers outside of Stockholm syndrome, but there’s the general fear of being killed if they say “no” too.
/r/seduction08/02/21 03:49 AM
1

Last I checked, no woman wanted to get laid with the BTK killer. Ted Bundy and Charles Manson were exceptions and again, you can’t talk about agency when you have mastermind manipulators. Don’t make that mistake to assume being an abusive asshole gets you the girls. In fact, people like that tend to get their Harvey Weinstein moment. There’s a famous “tough love” post that’s kinda not something I would say all of, but a dad told his son after he complained about being a nice guy and getting all …
/r/seduction08/02/21 03:46 AM
3

There’s people who have mental issues who don’t prey on the naive or children. And when you really look at it, the same behavior these guys do on young women are the same behaviors done on children and teen minors by pedophiles. These people are monsters, and it doesn’t mean that girls don’t like good guys. Here’s the problem with nice guys: they feign kindness and expect rewards for it. They’re often raised to believe every good deed is guaranteed a reward but life doesn’t work like that. You h…
/r/seduction08/02/21 01:11 AM
7

Relationships should always be about mutual simping
/r/seduction08/02/21 12:56 AM
2

But that’s because these kinds of men are predators. They take advantage of the inexperienced and that’s how this happens.
/r/seduction08/02/21 12:37 AM
5

That isn’t something of her own fault though. Someone in their 20’s could be easily manipulated by someone in their 30’s. Those kinds of people know what they’re doing and know who to prey on. So they “get laid” because they know who to target.
/r/seduction08/02/21 12:36 AM
4

That’s honestly something not a 20-something year old’s fault though. Most cases, people like that are ten, maybe 20 years older and their experience makes it easier to prey on younger girls. Some actually will go as far as grooming minors or even prepubescent children because they take power over naivety. This isn’t a favorable trait and the original message does hold true.
/r/seduction08/02/21 12:34 AM
1

Only simp when you’re married.
/r/seduction08/02/21 12:27 AM
1

I mean, if sex is all you want, hire a prostitute or something. But if you do want a meaningful relationship, definitely put the effort to make yourself committed to that person. Get to know them personality-wise, and not carnally. You might just find someone who likes sex just like you do. And there’s nothing wrong with being attracted to trans people. Just stop calling them slurs like “trnns” and “ldyb*ys”
/r/seduction29/01/21 06:17 AM
1

I wouldn’t say 80/20. You have to find out what you can work with and be confident about it. I knew a guy that basically made girls melt like butter simply using his voice. And he was pretty average looking. Looks can help, but ultimately it’s what you can sell and how charismatic you are
/r/seduction28/01/21 04:10 PM
1

The way I see it, even if you were a maestro at flirtation and getting someone really attracted to you, if that was a one time visit, you wouldn’t be able to see them again regardless. Realistically, you’re more better off befriending them and offering some opportunity to hang out than getting someone to have the hots for you on the spot and getting their digits. Not to mention the general preference of the targeted person either. If they obviously don’t want to engage in conversation, it wouldn…
/r/seduction23/01/21 05:03 PM
1

The issue is approach of course. The safest way you can engage with someone you like is to befriend them. Getting to know them more helps you build a relationship with them, albeit platonic, it’s the first step. And at the time you think is right, ask them out. Tell them how much you like them and just bear through it if she says no, coz that’s all they will have to say. You don’t have to wait for the person to ask you out, just be the best version of yourself and take the step. One more note, n…
/r/seduction21/01/21 05:19 PM
1

Funny.
/r/seduction23/08/20 05:26 AM
1

Normal weight is subjective depending on a few factors. There’s no such thing as a normal height though. But that’s irrelevant to my point. Societal norms are subjective. What is okay and isn’t ok is based on public opinion.
/r/seduction22/08/20 07:58 PM
1

Not the case. BDSM is a mutual relationship. There are a lot of kinky things going on, but having been both a dom and sub, they feel in control because it’s the subs that have the say as they’re being acted on. You can’t go into BDSM thinking you can take the dom role just to get off. You have to respect boundaries and communicate what is and isn’t ok beforehand and respect safe-words.
/r/seduction22/08/20 05:28 AM
3

Sex toys definitely aren’t the problem. And you can use them during sexual activity. Plus, they’ve found that it actually helps with performance, especially with men using penetrable sex toys like masturbator sleeves/Onaholes. Things that can be used with partners too and helps spice things up in the bedroom.
/r/seduction22/08/20 05:22 AM
1

There’s a half/half ration of men and women watching porn. But yeah like it was touched on earlier, you can ban porn all you like, and people will still have certain interest in kinks and fantasies. Freud even hinted on this about psycho-sexuality where a person has different preferences. Porn just made kinks easily accessible, but you have other kinds of erotica as well. People blame porn for a lot of things but really it’s negligent parenting and almost lax ISPs.
/r/seduction22/08/20 05:20 AM
2

Normal is overrated because it’s subjective.
/r/seduction21/08/20 03:10 PM
1

If you’re into anime, I’d definitely look for people who share the same interests. It’s one thing finding a hot guy but not sharing the same passion makes things a whole lot more boring.
/r/seduction21/08/20 03:09 PM
-1

I personally can’t agree with that. The purpose of objectification is to reduce people to certain roles or purposes. It’s why I can’t say I personally agree with the idea of a consenting partner wanting to be used in a certain way as the same thing as an abusive person telling some one all they’re good for is lying on their back, making meals, or bringing home the bacon.
/r/seduction20/08/20 12:47 AM
3

Ok, I see where you are coming from, but there’s a more simplified term for this, and that’s “consent.” The “objectification” you’re mentioning in BDSM different from the objectification that feminism speaks against. The latter is a combination of conscious and subconscious thoughts and actions that reduce people to sub-human purposes, essentially abusive behavior.
/r/seduction19/08/20 08:08 PM
16

The BDSM community isn’t that. There’s kinks that would normally not be accepted, but it’s two mutual partnerships consensually acting out on fantasies that are harmless. People think doms are the ones running things but it’s actually the subs. Because they’re the ones being acted on, they have a lot of say on what the dom does to them and that’s the mutual respect that goes on in BDSM. If you think you can just go in and be dominant and get your rocks off, you won’t be welcome. It takes a speci…
/r/seduction19/08/20 06:53 PM
1

That’s a great start! As for flirting, I wouldn’t be too worried about that as not everyone is good at that and not everyone likes to be flirted on. But befriending someone is a good start. Befriend friends she knows too and get to know her from them as well as her when you hang out with them more.
/r/seduction17/08/20 02:44 PM
2

Those words reinforce toxic masculinity. You don’t want to be a “pussy” and therefore you take extra measures to aggressively approach women, making them feel uncomfortable instead of taking your time, acquainting yourself and getting to know the person you’re interested in. Then you lose out on an opportunity on a relationship because you were too aggressive. More cases than one, you don’t need to give looks, or gestures. Being calm and casual tends to get the job done.
/r/seduction17/08/20 08:00 AM
2

How about we stop throwing around “being a pussy?” Though? Yeah some people are really afraid of rejection and that lies in low self esteem with some trauma. It happens and the best thing to do is to help them gain more self esteem and heal from any past trauma.
/r/seduction14/08/20 11:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter