TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

librtee_com Archive

View 26 posts and 570 comments by librtee_com on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3497

Raising Awarenesslibrtee_com/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:32 AM
1029

librtee_com/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:08 PM
646

librtee_com/r/PussyPass14/06/14 09:51 AM
424

librtee_com/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:58 AM
402

librtee_com/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:44 AM
331

librtee_com/r/PussyPass02/05/15 01:50 AM
312

Outragelibrtee_com/r/MensRights06/07/14 09:16 AM
174

librtee_com/r/MensRights20/10/14 08:08 AM
103

Action Op.librtee_com/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:04 AM
50

Action Op.librtee_com/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:00 PM
50

librtee_com/r/MensRights19/12/14 10:45 AM
48

librtee_com/r/MensRights04/07/14 11:21 PM
38

Outragelibrtee_com/r/MensRights01/01/15 05:11 PM
28

Discussionlibrtee_com/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:06 PM
28

Questionlibrtee_com/r/MensRights12/10/14 01:25 AM
27

librtee_com/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:17 AM
24

librtee_com/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:21 AM
8

Outragelibrtee_com/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:46 AM
5

Outragelibrtee_com/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:12 AM
4

Men's Rights Newslibrtee_com/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:38 PM
0

librtee_com/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:27 AM
0

librtee_com/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:15 PM
0

librtee_com/r/seduction19/03/13 08:58 AM
0

librtee_com/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:53 PM
0

librtee_com/r/MensRights20/09/13 07:07 AM
0

librtee_com/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:28 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"Libertarian Feminist" "My goal isn’t a society based on property rights. My goal is human flourishing. I want an ethical, free, and humane planet. A world where humans take care of each other and other living creatures. I want a world of flattened hierarchies, including the non-violent ones. A world with human dignity. That may be a future where property rights – as we think of them today – don’t exist. " -Will Moyer, 'The Limits of Libertarianism' Cathy Reisenwitz's description of this article…
/r/MensRights22/06/15 06:09 PM
8

I once had a roommate who was obsessed with me. She kept hitting on me over and over. I turned her down repeatedly, I was not interested in her in any way. She got more and more insistent, to the point of outright sexual harassment - touching my crotch without my permission, etc. Her sexual violation of me culminated in falsely accusing me of rape. Interesting how that worked out.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:51 AM
10

No, it isn't. It's effective messaging. Feminists fight dirty every day of the week. There is no reason not to reply in turn. The most worthy party is the one that presents the strongest facts, not the one that is most limp-wristed in their communications.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:59 AM
17

What? Why? It's the truth. The more they highlight this, the more they discredit themselves.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:58 AM
1

Ah. The word you (and I) were looking for was 'imply,' not 'insinuate'.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:51 PM
2

And shitty journalism is all it takes to become a "fact" on Wikipedia Not anymore, all the total bullshit been cleaned off :) No more mention of 'men's rights' on his page, as it should be.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:40 AM
2

Yes, millions of women around the world ar owed money right at this very moment - but that's an issue for the world's payroll to handle, OK hill?
/r/MensRights24/04/15 05:50 PM
2

yes. you get the point.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:22 AM
0

As bad as demanding equality in wages for two populations with different work patterns?
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:21 AM
2

Yes, precisely the intended point.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:20 AM
4

Please support this new feminist hashtag campaign, because there should be equality in every area of the society. I wish u could edit titles.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:59 AM
61

Look at that big shit eating grin on his face. That's the face of privilege, ladies and gentlemen. This dudebro clearly hasn't checked his.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 12:05 AM
3

He doesn't 'insinuate' it, he flat out states it. This is why I find the Daily Show to be absolutely despicable operation - by adopting the guise of 'satire' and 'humor,' they have created an actual, real, news reporting show, that has given itself the leeway to play fast and loose with the facts...
/r/MensRights14/04/15 07:25 PM
1

She receives life in prison 'plus a $10 surcharge' ahahahahaha http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/13/us-usa-crime-arias-idUSKBN0N40VI20150413
/r/MensRights14/04/15 07:27 AM
2

I know what you mean. I know someone just like this. A woman...
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:43 AM
1

it's actually roughly half and half, at least here
/r/MensRights23/03/15 09:02 PM
2

There is simply much, much more venom coming from the left today than the right.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 09:00 PM
1

you're in a tiny minority of people. don't be a nimcompoop. if she were moving to another state, even if it were two counties away, it would be unusual english to describe this as 'moving two counties away'
/r/MensRights14/03/15 09:53 AM
1

"Now today she informed me that she is moving two counties over," strange way to refer to moving to another state
/r/MensRights14/03/15 09:15 AM
2

Whenever Feminists encounter a nugget of truth they react like Captain Haddock does when he accidently drinks water.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 08:38 AM
2

Actually, we do know. If she had moved across state lines, that's what he would have written. It's possible this is East Coast, and two counties isn't that far in geographical distances but still prohibitively time consuming to drive through.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 08:29 AM
8

This is who gets to raise my son now, having never had a job or a home since he went to prison at 17 and just got out ... That's the kicker for me. Your son's future is absolutely at risk here. Normally I wouldn't ever advocate such a thing, but you need to figure out a way to get her arrested. If she's in prison / has a felony strike on her record it would give you a reason for a second look. Figure out a way for the cops to want to tear her apartment apart at a time when you're sure she'll hav…
/r/MensRights14/03/15 08:27 AM
5

filed under 'male privilege'
/r/MensRights14/03/15 08:23 AM
1

Yes, but only feminists are subject to rape-by-twitter.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:13 AM
11

In real life, when drink spiking occurs, people freak out when the woman is the victim and remain silent when a man is the victim. If any 'public awareness' needs to be raised, it's for this sort of thing happening against men. But these scumbags are not interested in the protecting the public good, but simply maintaining the victim narrative that keeps their useless degrees economically lucrative. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Qlmzh03oYw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-57-i1S95Kk
/r/MensRights07/03/15 09:23 PM
2

In real life, when drink spiking occurs, people freak out when the woman is the victim and remain silent when a man is the victim. If any 'public awareness' needs to be raised, it's for this sort of thing happening against men. But these scumbags are not interested in the protecting the public good, but simply maintaining the victim narrative. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Qlmzh03oYw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-57-i1S95Kk
/r/MensRights07/03/15 01:54 AM
4

But he wasn't asking for full custody, the dispute was over two weekends a month of visitation.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:18 PM
3

muh gender wage gap
/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:14 PM
1

what do you mean i've heard probably hundreds of feminists complain that it's women who are the ones suffering for lack of birth control options http://www.reddit.com/r/AgainstFeminism/comments/2xp9er/and_because_we_still_cant_get_an_adequate_safe/
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:47 AM
2

'odd' is one way to describe it
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:11 AM
1

in a society that worships anyone who regularly appears on screens as gods, well...around 1800 people give or take :P
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:11 AM
1

I've read it sourced to a book she wrote, 'Don't Pee on My Leg and Tell Me It's Raining'
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:08 AM
4

Some sort of organization that shows a man who's hung himself while his child and ex-partner happily swing away on the other side of the tree... https://www.facebook.com/MaliciousMoms
/r/MensRights04/03/15 09:48 AM
6

She said it right in that image there. What, you don't believe everything you read pasted over an image with quotation marks around it? What's the matter with you?!? On a more serious note, it says here she published those words in a book: http://jcb.cts.com/tf.htm
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:37 AM
3

according to another comment in this thread, she supervised the manhattan family court system for 14 years (though i couldn't verify this) someone else said that she was his family court judge, and was an absolute horrorshow
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:16 AM
7

This same effect is true of a wide array of subjects: in areas where most people don't have much direct knowledge, they will just believe whoever sounds most authoritative and whichever message is repeated most often.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:15 AM
2

In generations past, bitter racial and religious bigotry and hatred was condoned and spread from officialdom and in academics. Now, that has fallen out of favor - but it has been completely replaced by officially promoted ideological bigotry and hatred.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:01 AM
12

wow maybe she had an attack of conscience in her older years
/r/MensRights04/03/15 01:45 AM
119

Well, to be fair, that probably applies to a wide majority of people who consider themselves (or are described by others) as 'MRAs'.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 01:38 AM
9

Google 'Albert James Calabrese mra': A number of hits from the sex offender registry, and..this article, and the GQ one. The GQ one where this pedo was wandering around the MRA conference freaking everyone out, the journalist was told repeatedly that nobody knows the guy and they want nothing to do with him, and yet he is featured in the article as some shining light of the MRM. Way to permanently trash your credibility in just one stroke, James Conrad writing for Latest.com. Forever a two-bit h…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 07:06 PM
5

"Why can't you fight for equality as individuals? Joining a movement will do you no good." Yes, good question. Ponder it. Please note that Feminism is an institutionally powerful movement with tremendous leverage in academia, media, and government. Sites such as /r/mensrights is less an organized movement than a valuable counter-narrative.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 12:41 PM
6

seems pretty obvious 404 didn't actually watch the vid
/r/MensRights22/02/15 11:57 AM
10

feminism != equality for women before you mindlessly copy and paste from a dictionary, please read both definitions at merriam-webster, note the inherent contradiction between them, and then kindly fuck off
/r/MensRights22/02/15 11:57 AM
4

yeah i don't think anyone here is going to waste their time explaining reality to some fool who didn't bother to even watch the 5 minute video and is simply here complaining about the title
/r/MensRights22/02/15 11:49 AM
5

'Feminism is about equality. If you want the sexes to be equal, you're a feminist' /s
/r/MensRights19/02/15 10:56 PM
13

These people are so dumb and ignorant of basic human nature that they don't realize that they are actively marketing the book and promoting sales.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 09:51 AM
0

ok, fair enough.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 02:58 AM
1

mate, you said that a single person - a person with a job title - creates legislation in modern democracies
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:36 PM
2

If a gay person murders the straight person specifically because they are straight? (consider for instance, Zemir Begic)? Yes, that would count as an act of oppression associated with being straight. Seeing how the government in the West does not widely engage in such actions, if you are counting random individual gay-bashing as 'oppression', then this is too.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:09 AM
1

OK, fair enough. I just wonder, why do the screenshot thing instead of just linking the article?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:04 AM
2

So if a black person murders a random white person for explicitly racial reasons, where would that fit into your continuum of oppression?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:03 AM
1

http://www.researchgate.net/publication/256079484_No_evidence_of_racial_discrimination_in_criminal_justice_processing_Results_from_the_National_Longitudinal_Study_of_Adolescent_Health http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_2_criminal_justice_system.html
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:01 AM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parental_testing#France You have to first go through an adversarial (and presumably expensive) court process and have the court demand the test.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:34 AM
1

finally a job title You're not very clear how parliamentary democracies work, are you?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:33 AM
2

Just because you can't half-ass it in your backyard like in 'murica doesn't mean it isn't there. Doing it on the side: if the results show you are the father, you simply quietly bury them, and go on as before. Doing it through an adversarial court process: if the results show you are the father, you have introduced a permanent and painful rift of mistrust and strife into the relationship that will likely have ramifications for years to come.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:31 AM
1

And how much do the lawyers cost for this sort of thing?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:29 AM
2

the French government citing psychologists who state that fatherhood is determined by society, rather than biology. Hey look, find some stupid asshole lapdog academic who says what you want to hear, and you can use it to justify just about any destructive and unjust policy. Where have I seen that before. The maximum penalty for carrying out secret paternity testing is one year in prison and a €15,000 fine.[17] ...
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:28 AM
3

Never use fiction as an example to prove a point.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:26 AM
8

DUDE WHY THE FUCK YOU POST FUCKING SCREENSHOTS OF THE FUCKING WEBSITE? POST THE FUCKING LINK. Christ. Seconded. 1) Don't deny websites that do this journalism the traffic they have earned. 2) Let us read the whole story. /u/cptnpops WTF mate. The link, BTW: http://hamptonroads.com/2015/02/change-fortune-i-wish-i-hadnt-won-lottery
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:22 AM
1

Explain the causal link between legalization of gay marriage in the USA and gay rights in Uganda. I will explain the opposite: More discussion of gay issues on international media creates a backlash, and groups who would simply ignore gays go out and actively victimize them.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 11:43 PM
1

Baseless nonsense
/r/MensRights25/01/15 11:03 AM
1

You mean rights such as a 40% longer prison sentence if you commit a crime? Sure, be my guest.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:41 AM
1

It's not Wikipedia, per we, it's academia and much of the establishment media. Wiki just mirrors this.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:40 AM
2

Be a woman 2. Marry a violent psycho
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:33 AM
21

Please, please don't link to RawStory, or to anything written by Marcotte and her ilk. It financially rewards the company for publishing it, and incentives them to keep her in work. Use Archive.today or similar to create an image of it, and then post that. Downvoted for this reason.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 04:41 AM
2

I'm sorry, I don't like gamerghazi a bit and I'm not condoning their actions...but isn't the headline awfully overblown? He received rude replies to his comments, and people question whether he's really black..and it 'nearly ruined my life?'
/r/MensRights02/01/15 09:02 PM
1

If he just wanted to make a strip about college rape, it would have been quite easy to, at the very least, just edit the text a bit to make it less specific. Nearly a month after the case fell apart, publishing it with the details of 'UVA' and 'frat members' is inexcusable and simply deplorable.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 09:51 AM
3

Such hilariously bad websites really do say something. Their job is to find the best person for the job. But, when tasked with finding the best person to make their website..they failed miserably.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 12:28 AM
1

How is this different from a company called 'WhiteTaxi'?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:39 AM
3

Likely you were banned because they looked at your post history and noticed that you had previously made a post at /r/mensrights. This is not at all uncommon.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 01:59 AM
4

'Innocent until proven guilty' has been effectively buried. It comes after the death of 'paying your debt to society and moving on.'
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:15 AM
0

Both feminism and porn have a similar effect on the respective genders: it tells people 'if you just stay single, pursue your personal interests, and don't accept the responsibility of procreation, just look at all the wonderful things you will have.'
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:54 AM
1

It was a flyer they had down at the Road Transit Authority office (ie, the Australian DMV)
/r/MensRights20/12/14 12:55 AM
1

*thinks, d'oh
/r/MensRights19/12/14 12:36 PM
6

I'd like to point out the sloppy use of 'rights' in this: For instance, if men commit suicide at three times the higher rate than women do, that might be a symptom of rights denied in important areas of men's lives, but it does not itself in any way indicate that his 'rights' have been violated.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 07:48 AM
1

get a more successful personality! But feminism promotes just the opposite...
/r/MensRights07/12/14 01:02 AM
1

Nope, I have been, even though I never so much as touched her.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 01:01 AM
1

True. But, it's not so effective to tell THEM that ;)
/r/MensRights07/12/14 12:57 AM
15

I don't care about Amanda Marcotte. I care a lot about Alternet and Salon that utterly discredit themselves keeping her on staff. I'm going to write a letter demanding her resignation or I will stop visiting their sites. You should do the same.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 05:34 PM
2

As soon as I read she 'crashed through the glass table' and then that detail was immediately forgotten for the next three hours, I assumed the story was complete and utter bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:06 AM
2

It became gigantic when it was featured in a national publication.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:05 AM
1

Wait, what? Why wasn't she charged? It doesn't even say. What is this madness?
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:55 AM
5

Makes sense. From my experience, a very high proportion of 'feminists' are basically alcoholics. Certainly, feminism as a whole is utterly hostile to discussions of reducing the overall rate of alcohol consumption in both men and women as a means of reducing the incidence of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:38 AM
3

Relevant: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2532461/Why-having-women-doctors-hurting-NHS-A-provovcative-powerful-argument-leading-surgeon.html Male doctors tend to sacrifice their quality of life and work-life balance more often for their job; they work crushing 90 hour weeks much more frequently. Female doctors are much more likely to drop out after 5 years and have children, and not enjoy seniority. Also, female doctors are less likely to go into specialities such as anaesthetics that …
/r/MensRights30/11/14 11:58 AM
35

Diamond rings are a massive scam. Diamonds have little inherent value. It's all just from marketing and monopoly supply manipulation. Nobody should buy them, ever. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5kWu1ifBGU
/r/MensRights29/11/14 08:37 PM
6

Props to based grandma there
/r/PussyPass28/11/14 03:04 PM
2

I stopped reading and downvoted at the incorrect capitalization of 'Not'.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:12 AM
2

Divide and conquer. Cause women to blame men in general for the problems in the world, instead of, well, the men actually causing all the problems. Way easier to blame a guy whose face you know for saying something non-PC, than to blame the wall street honcho or MIC executive who you know nothing about.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:10 AM
2

Meanwhile, the gender fatality gap hasn't budged.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 11:43 AM
3

Something profoundly ugly in one of her videos I saw today..in the whole utterly ridiculous video where a game gives her everything she has asked for and she tears it apart on superficial grounds...but there was one thing in particular: When presented with a female character who is strong, heroic, self-determining, a total badas...the only good thing she can come up about her is 'she's a single mother' How fucking twisted is that? Since when is being 'a single mother' a virtue? Becoming a single…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 12:21 PM
2

Shooped, but still funny. http://static.squarespace.com/static/52fa3c5de4b0eea0230c1416/t/5464e1a8e4b05a44e86c6c6b/1415897513620/
/r/MensRights17/11/14 04:35 AM
2

I'll, ah, have to get back to you on that mate. Give me a few years to ponder it, I'm sure I'll come up with something :P
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:07 AM
22

To be fair, male privilege definitely exists. There are certainly benefits to being a man in our society. The thing to emphasize is that female privilege also exists, and is of similar magnitude, although quite different. That being said, equating denial of male privilege with wife beating is twisted...
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:10 PM
1

http://np.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2m3bxh/my_feedback_to_the_oz_abcs_shitty_gg_story_could/
/r/MensRights12/11/14 05:59 PM
7

I can't help but wonder if the fact that Firefox still sucks..is still not very reliable..and still has memory leaks..is connected to the SJ madness that pushed out Eich? People more concerned about 'social justice' bullshit that putting out a competently sound product. Par for the course. Ditto GNOME. RIP. There's a silver lining, it caused me to try i3WM; since the day I installed it two+ years back I have never used anything else. It's so, so good and has no parallel in Windows or OSX. The Li…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 01:34 AM
1

With men getting screwed in 7/10 marriages Don't be unrealistically pessimistic. Men don't get screwed in 100% of divorces. Especially outside the USA with its utterly and outrageously corrupt divorce system. MRAs should be conscientious not to engage in a mirror of feminist fear-mongering of relationships.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 01:11 AM
7

More to the point: You came here because someone told you it was a hotbed of misogyny. Wanting your moral superiority kick of the day, you came here to shame the misoginysts. However, after having spent a few minutes here, you didn't find anything misoginystic. Unfortunately, lacking either the zeal for accuracy that might make you question the source that told you that, or simply the attention span to remember why you came over here in the first place, you decide to shitpost about something els…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 02:18 PM
1

what they got is much better. A deeply flawed, dishonest, and superficial spokesperson. Just what they deserved..
/r/MensRights09/11/14 01:53 PM
11

A reference you're too ignorant to understand? Misogyny!
/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:30 PM
4

It certainly struck me that Adria Richars did more to set back women in tech than any person in decades.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:37 PM
1

Udall relied heavily on the 'GOP war on women' nonsense. Davis ran on her uterus, her fillibustering of a pro-choice bill, and on not being a GOP. The social justice types eat their own: I google 'Wendy Davis', the top text is the headline 'White women didn't just fail Wendy Davis — they failed the rest of Texas, too' - Salon‎
/r/MensRights07/11/14 01:00 AM
1

Yes, I agree, but that's not the only issue that politicians determine.. It's worth pointing out that it's quite hypocritical to stand up and generate political hay by loudly denounce incremental reductions in women's access to parental choice, without saying a word about men's complete lack of any legal parental choice whatsoever.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:52 AM
1

The point is about the waning power of feminism as a political bludgeon, I'm not much a fan of the GOP either. As a couple commenters pointed out, the GOP didn't win the race, the Dems lost it.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:31 AM
7

Also worth noting... http://i.imgur.com/x3bOM1y.jpg
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:58 AM
5

And forever since you've spoken with a feminist who was not a liberal.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:46 AM
11

IMHO if you don't denounce Bush's philosophy and the GOP's massive spending the last few decades, you're a shitty and hypocritical conservative. It's kind of a litmus test.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:45 AM
8

As a guy who has spent significant time living in both Chicago and Sydney, I can attest to this cultural difference.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:43 AM
1

What, you don't have eveleigh lane anymore?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:42 AM
6

Ugh, PLEASE DOWN VOTE THIS IT'S BULLSHIT Look, that's clearly a single occupancy stall. Only the door on the left has locks. There is almost certainly a men's bathroom down the hall. PLEASE UPVOTE FOR VISIBILITY AND DOWNVOTE THE POST FOR THE REPUTATION OF THE SUB.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:46 PM
5

When I was 19, I had a roommate who had a huge crush on me. But, she was morbidly obese and had a terrible personality; I constantly spurned her advances, which became more and more direct, to the point where she was asking if she could just play with my penis for a while. I turned her down again and again. Finally, she accused me of trying to rape her.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:09 AM
1

hey, i'll answer in a bit, gotta walk into town, way too sunny a day :)
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:22 AM
2

How are woman oppressing men? I'm not saying they are. I pretty clearly implied in my last comment that the majority of those doing the oppression in our world are men. What I'm saying is that most of the institutionally oppressed in the West are men. You reply that 'Yes, but the oppressors are men too.' That doesn't, however, in any way invalidate or address my point. You can't group the elite/politically powerful men and the working class/ non-influential men of the world into one social class…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:49 AM
2

How do you get over the fact that 99 % of people with power in this world are men? The 99%, of the 1%. The power structures of the world are particularly interested in keeping men weak and downtrodden, because common men have made up the core of revolutionary and political resistance to power through human history. The powerful men of the world do not feel any sort of gender solidarity.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:26 AM
2

Some men are more violent/agressive. I agree with that, although not with certainty. The rate is probably higher than with women, and men have more capacity to cause physical harm. But that in no way excuses the barbaric conditions of our prisoners that primarily affect men as they are 90%+ of prisoners, prison rape of men being culturally tolerated and openly joked about in mainstream media as a punishment, the massive anti-male sentencing discrimination (it's worse to be a man rather a woman t…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:31 AM
3

Meanwhile, women have..incremental challenges to their right of choice to parenthood post-coitus, a right men have, legally, literally none of at all. (this is the reference 95% of the time feminists use the phrase) Remember that incidence of rape in America has fallen 50% over the last 20 years. Sure sign of a 'war on women.'
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:02 AM
4

No, we've woken up to it. Look at the family court systems. Look at the vets blown to shit and left to rot. Look at the prisons.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:00 AM
15

I'll tell you this: The idea of a 'war on men' in the west is a hundred times more credible and supported by evidence than a 'war on women.'
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:55 PM
2

this 'Gamergate' thing recently showing on television where 99% of airtime is given by the media to hyper-feminists this 'Gamergate' thing recently showing on television where 100% of airtime is given by the media to hyper-feminists
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:40 PM
2

I just wrote this comment reply yesterday. I lay out how Zoe Quinn and her friends have proved with a great degree of certainty that harassment is a vanishingly tiny part of GamerGate. I'm goint to clean it up and submit to KiA later today: http://np.reddit.com/r/GamerGhazi/comments/2khai4/10_reasons_gamergate_has_failed/clncuf4
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:03 PM
3

You have a movement with tens of thousands of participants, with something like ten of those involved in harassment. I don't think the harassment is made up, but I DO think the media narrative that 'gamergate has a serious harassment problem / gamergate is about harassment' is complete and utter bullshit - and repeated in 100+ stories in all the 'credible' journalistic outlets.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:03 PM
9

Actually, GG is a massive issue, one of the top 5 issues of this tumultuous year. When every single journalistic outlet in the entire western world colludes to push a bullshit narrative, with over 100 articles written in every single one of the most 'reputable,' 'neutral' publications never given a peep of a voice to the other side, all based on grossly unfair slander of the gamergate supporters...it's an issue.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:01 PM
5

I just wrote this comment reply yesterday. I lay out how Zoe Quinn and her friends have proved with a great degree of certainty that harassment is a vanishingly tiny part of GamerGate. I'm goint to clean it up and submit to KiA later today: http://np.reddit.com/r/GamerGhazi/comments/2khai4/10_reasons_gamergate_has_failed/clncuf4
/r/MensRights30/10/14 09:54 PM
2

Great reply.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 07:04 AM
1

I think I've just come to realize there's a huge truth gap - that several cultural narratives are badly distorted, and people are not just ignorant but actively misinformed about the truth nature of humanity and society...personally, I think it's a real problem. It's not about morality, it's about honesty.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:17 AM
1

Why should I listen to some dumb kid who is unable to logically support what he says? Repeating 'no' over and over doesn't prove shit, you fucking douchebag.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:49 AM
1

If there is indeed a pattern of bias in whether victims gender is identified or not, yes it does matter, because it paints a false picture of reality.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:34 AM
1

Mate, I would have thought better of you. Your contributions on are really commendable on this subreddit; I'm disappointed you'd make this comment. Your answer here is exactly analogous to feminists pointing to the dictionary definition of feminism, and acting like that proves anything. They might be called the communist party, but they hardly follow communist principles. Look, the Gini coefficient for China is roughly the same as America. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient#mediaviewe…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:31 AM
2

I feel my participation in the MRM is simply to call 'Bullshit!' when feminists spew it. Oh God, you'll love the story from CNN on the front page of MR now. In it, the author blatantly claims the wage gap is actually 66 cents on the dollar. it's linked to a very well produced, nicely designed, very very professional looking report from the World Economic Forum. Try actually digging into it however...and you can't. It's impossibly opaque, very difficult to figure out the methodology. After 1/2 ho…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:22 AM
2

It draws from and contributes to the overarching narrative that men are violent and women are victims. It matters.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:08 AM
1

Either way. As long as its consistent.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:07 AM
2

This guy tears into it better than me: "Source is World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey, 2014. Response to the survey question, “In your country, for similar work, to what extent are wages for women equal to those of men?” (1 = not at all — significantly below those of men; 7 = fully — equal to those of men). The data is converted to a female-over-male ratio." That's LITERALLY ALL this is based on. http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2014/10/28/the-latest-absurd-predictions-about-th…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:39 AM
1

What a fucking opaque report. The number is in table E2. The methodology for E2 is not explained at all. E2 is sourced from: "Wage equality between women and men for similar work (converted to female-over-male ratio) World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey (EOS), 2014" So, CNN are complete assholes linking this report to tell their story. They should be linking to the underlying data that this just copies and pastes from. Ah, and now we see why: the actual data, and the methodology, is.. …
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:31 AM
1

Is that reality because it REALLY IS TRUE? It may well be, I don't deny this. So Feminism cause us to value and protect the common man over women? What? I'm talking about perception here, about a false narrative, a false belief that most people hold. Everyone believes, even assumes without thinking about it, that we value men more highly than women. If we are as a society to protect women more highly, that is not irrational; but let's at least be honest about our social priorities. If you don't …
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:46 PM
3

"Fighting gender roles and patriarchy" 'Gender roles' is the ONLY male issue feminists ever talk about - because it fits into the general feminist worldview. Any mention that men face real, hard-edge, institutional discrimination is not just wrong, but a heresy to them. They are unable to even comprehend the fact; I have never once had a feminist have an earnest, honest discussion with me about this. It starts with denial, then name calling, then when facts are presented simply exiting the conve…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 08:41 AM
7

It's not just her; there are whole generations of women who have never lived life as a man but assume it is vastly easier.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 08:39 AM
3

He's a real class act. http://imgur.com/6lQZ9PE
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:02 AM
2

Our society prioritizes the suffering of women more than the suffering of men; and is completely schizophrenic about this fact. If this doesn't have any effect on you, then you lead a very lucky life.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 03:36 AM
1

Political reasons. They were not killed because of their gender - at least, not that I'm aware of - I just posted this to point out the media double standard.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:52 PM
1

The gender doesn't matter; the subject of the post is this is one more example of the clear and long-standing double standard in the media (I've read posts documenting this extensively) - the gender of the victim is left out if male but always included if female. It comes back to the basic MRA point that humans care about the suffering of women much more highly than the suffering of men. News organizations are profit seeking bodies who we can assume act rationally; thus, we can assume that peopl…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 08:56 AM
2

The attacks made by Boko Haram were motivated my a misogynistic world view. That statement is complete bullshit. There is no factual basis for it. They aren't misogynistic; they are misanthrpopic, they don't like any secular or un-Islamic influences. They have slaughtered many boys and men; these incidents were barely or not at all reported on. This is exactly the point: because the subtly tilted narrative that is presented causes people to infer completely wrong interpretations of reality.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 08:52 AM
8

Well, I'd just like consitency and accuracy. if a group consists only of members of one gender, any description of the group that omits this fact is inadequate. This inconsistency was reflected just in the Boko Haram coverage itself: the kidnapping of the girls drew rivers more printer ink than the group's previous years of mixed gender mayhem.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:46 PM
2

Here's the real problem with #YesAllWomen: It purported to show that all women experience male violence/intimidation in their daily lives, and created a forum for them to express this. However, what we see when we look at the actual tweets is very, very VERY few individual stories, and loads of recitations of feminist talking points. So, the rational thing to conclude from reading it, is that my a large margin most women do not experience male-violence in their personal lives, but rather by prox…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:26 PM
4

In reading all those news stories, the consensus is that they are about as likely to be alive as those Malaysian Airlines passengers. There have been eyewitness accounts of their mass execution.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:19 PM
73

The reporting matters. The double standard matters. If they were 100% female, you can be guaranteed that would be mentioned in every headline, and feature prominently in the stories. If 43 women were killed, they would not be referred to throughout as 'students.'
/r/MensRights25/10/14 04:16 PM
25

Compare this media treatment to the Boko Haram coverage. Even today. https://www.google.com.au/search?q=boko+haram Here's the point: imagine 43 all female students being massacred. Try to imagine the top ten news stories about it not mentioning they were women in any way. It's absolutely impossible. Dying as a female is more important. That's the world we live in. That's reality. Feminism turns the reality of our society - a society that values and protects the common woman better than the commo…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 04:12 PM
33

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=boko+haram Even though they have caused loads of other mayhem since the female kidnapping last year, today the top five headlines for Boko Haram ALL have the words 'women' or 'girls' in them. It's about the double standard.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 04:08 PM
100

At least Vice said that it was an 'all-male' college, by which we could deduce that the victims were all male. They followed the strict code to never refer to male victims, however. WashPo used 'men' twice: 'gunmen', and 'armed men'. WashPo, Al-Jazeera, The Guardian, New Yorker, CS Monitor, The Atlantic, The Nation, Fox News: no reference to gender whatsoever, no way to know that the victims were male. Common Dreams had no mention of gender, but at least they show the faces of all the victims. B…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:19 PM
1

I was talking to my cousin the other day. She graduated with a Sociology degree from one of the most liberal state universities in the country about ten years back. I realized I hadn't ever talked to her about it, and...expecting perhaps a kind of hard conversation, I started going on about what a disaster modern feminism was. I was surprised that after only a couple minutes it was more her ranting about feminism than me :P
/r/MensRights25/10/14 07:40 AM
1

Yes, agreed, my scenario is not very likely.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:46 AM
1

Point out the clear and consistent pattern of provable lies, distortions, and omissions that define the 'feminist' press?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 03:11 AM
1

Except (and I mean this quite seriously)...it could actually be a GamerGater pretending to be a Feminist pretending to be a gamer. Anything's possible. Except for another level of impersonation above that :P
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:29 AM
2

Have you read the excellent Cathy Young articles on GG? http://reason.com/archives/2014/10/12/gamergate-part-i-sex-lies-and-gender-gam http://reason.com/archives/2014/10/22/gamergate-part-2-videogames-meet-feminis From the second one, " In a recent survey of incoming college freshmen, nearly 13 percent of the young men said they had usually spent over 15 hours a week playing video or computer games in their senior year of high school; only two percent of the women did. Other data show more femal…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:27 AM
1

As I understood, the discussion in this thread was more about race. Sorry if I read it wrong.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:24 AM
3

That seems to be a roughly proportionate cross-section of the American male population (w/ some girls of varying races). What eyes are you looking with that you can look at that picture and conclude you are seeing a predominantly white group? Where did you get these eyes, who gave them to you?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:17 AM
1

It's worth questioning yourself, what information do you base that belief on?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:16 AM
9

You're in the middle of an active battle, mortar shells exploding all around, corpses on the ground, the smell of death and sulfur in the air, and you say: "Careful! We should be cautious about shooting our guns at that army over there, for what if they decide to shoot back?"
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:02 AM
5

I've got a problem with dishonesty, character assassination, and demagoguery, even if I support their legal right to do so and appreciate that they were not physically harassing attendees.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 01:30 AM
1

For instance, Joergen Luntzen, 'Gender Researcher', Oslo University Gender Studies Unit: "Breasts, hair, height, a few other things.... but everything outside of that is the same. Feelings? Interests? Yes." http://youtu.be/tiJVJ5QRRUE?t=8m38s "The myth that women are naturally a weaker gender...is a deeply ingrained, socially constructed myth." Anita Sarkeesian https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJeX6F-Q63I&feature=youtu.be&t=15m53s This exchange more or less confirms my arguments that many MRAs kn…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 06:42 PM
1

What an honor! And quite a lot to chew through in this interesting reply. In the past, I've described feminism as 'a movement devoted to the systematic denial of the existence of female privilege, as well as furthering that privilege.' I think I stand by that. But it is so important for everyone to realize your fundamental point here (which I got from your vids I believe) that the real issue is not feminism itself, it is a society that simply values protecting women much higher; feminism simply …
/r/MensRights20/10/14 06:30 PM
1

That's a very weak reply.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 06:25 PM
2

Once again, before communism you had a literal king, and serfs. Well, not technically; serfdom had officially been abolished for 50+ years by the revolution. Not that the situation of the peasants wasn't still dire, and generally unfree. But with the worker's soviets being stripped of effective power by the '30s, how was the situation any better? Well then you're wrong. Oh. http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/why-russians-still-dont-hate-communism-9294 I'll be sure to tell the Chinese. Would …
/r/MensRights20/10/14 05:59 PM
1

There is a great amount of truth to this statement. This is the basis of why it is not just 'radical' feminism that is the problem...
/r/MensRights20/10/14 05:15 PM
1

Yes, right. It was just the last paragraph I wrote in reply to a feminist on MR, and thought it was a statement worth discussion/consideration that would get about five upvotes. It could have certainly been more artfully, or even accurately, worded...stickies never stay up long around here, I think any fair observer (hahahaha fair perspectives on MR what a fantasy) would rightly see that it is a discussion point being promoted by a mod, rather than a concrete position being promoted.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 05:12 PM
1

The Soviet system created a kind of impoverished economic equality, but it did little to help the political inequality. And even with 'economic equality,' the lifestyle of the party leadership in no way resembled the lifestyle of the common people. And it must be said, it achieved this economic equality in part by slaughtering the middle class. The new-capitalist period that provoked such a strong backlash was the Yeltsin period, mainly because he was a drunken buffoon who let mobsters run off w…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 04:48 PM
3

Is it about equality in your opinion?... Or is it about women? Well put.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 04:00 PM
1

OK, done. RES tag changed: menacing anti-feminist / helpful red :D
/r/MensRights20/10/14 03:49 PM
1

Well put.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 02:28 PM
1

After I typed it, I changed it to the 'basic appeal' instead of 'basic idea' - ie, the 'USP', in marketing speak. That video was characteristically excellent, thanks :)
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:48 PM
2

It's very hard to believe any modern feminist about anything whatsoever. If a strongly self-identified modern Feminist tells you the sky is blue, I suggest going outside to check and make sure. That's hyperbole of course, but dear lord to they play fast and loose with statistics, and even simple facts; they have as much credibility as Bernie Madoff. In terms of consistency of thought and belief, it's even worse.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:42 PM
1

Well, most feminists. I'm not saying that that is what it actually produces or works for, of course. Just as communism was a desire for 'social and class equality.' We see that is not what it ever created. But that is still the basic appeal anyhow.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:36 PM
0

Yeah, it was the last sentence I wrote in reply to a feminist here on MR. A desire for 'legal and social gender equality' would be the basic idea of feminism.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:27 PM
2

Yeah. You're absolutely, 100%, sadly correct. Being 'well intentioned' is no excuse for being as naive, unempathetic, and wilfully myopic to true the reality of the world as most modern rank-and-file feminists really seem to be. Something I've felt for awhile..if a young, middle class girl growing up in the west thinks the most pressing issues in the world are those facing young, middle class girls in the west...wow, it really doesn't speak well to her character or human empathy TBH. Even if the…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:07 PM
1

RES tag changed: helpful MRA -> helpful MRA/red menace
/r/MensRights20/10/14 11:23 AM
6

But the problem is that dictionary-definition feminism does not control the official feminist movement. Ohoh, tell that to the dozen plus online feminists who have quoted the dictionary definition to me over the years in article comment sections, lol. Warren Farrell's "The Myth of Male Power" was essentially an extension of early, non-radical Second Wave feminism to men's issues, after all. Interesting, I had never realized that; I haven't read him.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 11:17 AM
1

I don't disagree with you, but again: the average college communist wants to raise the poor or stop war or whatever. The average communist or feminist sees only a small idealized part of the whole of their movement. Marx was clearly in the ranks of the 'cynical leaders.'
/r/MensRights20/10/14 10:39 AM
7

Well, let's say feminism as understood by the majority of naive but probably well meaning casual feminists, as opposed to how it is understood by the minority of deplorable cynics who make up the leadership.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 09:34 AM
1

Yes, but many Feminists believe quite literally that there are no differences whatsoever between the sexes other than gender and facial hair. It's a fairly widespread belief. For instance, Anita Sarkeesian in her first video said that 'the idea that men are physically stronger than women is of course a complete myth.' The first hour of the multi-part 'Brainwashed' documentary from Norway was all about this myth, focusing on a prominent government funded 'gender studies' think tank that champione…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 07:53 AM
1

Great album, top kek. I recommend removing '3 bathroom tips that tell all.' Googling it returns nothing. Notice the authors/categories is blank. I feel this is probably a fake. Additionally, 'No results found for "[email protected]".' I'm calling shenanigans on that one.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 02:57 AM
1

Those three really are the worst of the worst. Forget their political views or ideologies, they are just objectively terrible human beings. I'd rank them Marcotte, Valenti, and Watson in terms of lack of basic compassion for those different from them, consistent dishonesty, and seemingly malicious nature.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:34 AM
14

From the comments on every news article now, it is clear that our positions are gaining the recognition and discussion they so richly deserve. Thank you to everyone who is spreading the word of rationality, justice, and fairness! Keep on, brave soldiers, don't stop now! http://www.civilwar.org/battlefields/sailorscreek/sailors-creek-history-articles/union-cavalry-at-sailors.jpg
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:19 PM
1

Question: do you have any pull with her parents, and do they have any with her?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 02:29 PM
1

You yourself have jumped to the conclusion that his opinion is formed from watching just one or two videos.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 02:17 PM
1

The conversations I read in the internet have changed radically in the last couple years. We are definitely having a noticeable effect, which is why the anti-MRA voice have taken on a particularly desperate and nasty tone in the last six Months. March on proudly, it's becoming impossible for rational, earnest non-ideologues to ignore the validity of MRA positions.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 02:15 PM
1

What an utterly stupid comment. It's similar to defending someone being called a "creator" of a movie for creating the sets.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 12:49 PM
6

"Don't allow"? Please elaborate.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 12:18 PM
9

Please don't link to these dirtbags. Use archive.today or similar please; make a habit of it whenever you link to dirtbags.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 12:17 PM
1

OK, thanks for doing the legwork, great. It seems the CCFW is clearly the largest and primary women's prison in California, and only one that has an isolation unit. Troublemaking women are brought there from all around the state. The number of female inmates in 'Admin Segregation' through 2012-2013 can be read on Page 3 of this PDF. A max of 146. However, the real number to look at is number there at the bottom of page 4, the 'Single Cell Inmates'. We see, with a 2 month anomaly caused by a dist…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 01:37 PM
1

For an hour? For a day? No. For a month? For a year? A decade? It is said it is one of the most profoundly distressing and long term damaging psychological tortures known. Periods of a month or more are linked to a host of psychological traumas, some of which can be permanent. http://www.insidescience.org/content/solitary-confinement-form-torture/1569 https://afsc.org/resource/solitary-confinement-facts http://ccrjustice.org/solitary-factsheet http://www.wired.com/2009/04/solitaryconfinement/
/r/MensRights12/10/14 12:57 PM
4

Don't make friends with stupid people, or people incapable of forming their own opinions about the world. Simple.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 11:12 PM
6

Outrage isn't always warranted. Selective abortion is a real issue in some countries. This produces more women than men in society. This creates a class of men who can never find a partner. This creates problems. It's not exactly misandry at play here.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 04:08 AM
2

I guess there are a few different meanings of 'Western'. When I hear 'Western Powers', I tend to think of EU + US + Can/Aus/NZ
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:34 AM
2

Hugely important and under-reported news story, shit headline. It reveals both the strengths and weaknesses of this media.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:10 AM
3

I don't mean to sound rude, but I suggest spending some time with maps of the world mate. Belgium is as Western as they come. Perhaps you're thinking of Bulgaria?
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:08 AM
1

If Feminists were really interseted in reducing the rape of male-on-female rape and violence in society, probably the best place to start (other than discouraging drinking all around) is to seriously try and diminish the violence and trauma that some young boys experience in development. But that would involve aiding the hated oppressor, so it's off the table and never discussed.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:04 AM
3

The next time someone tells you that MRAs are hateful misogynists, refer them to the comments on this thread.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:30 AM
5

Well, they are both widely perceived as examples of male oppression but in reality are often highly financially beneficial for women, so maybe she has a point.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 06:27 AM
225

Hey, at least it didn't contain a warning to fathers not to rape and kidnap the children. I honestly thought that's what it was gonna be.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 09:51 PM
1

ouch..
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:31 AM
1

d'oh, thanks.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 11:31 PM
2

What edits would you suggest? Other than the, uh, basic factual inaccuracy about it being totally scrubbed...
/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:21 PM
5

I found a blog that had the whole article after posting it...so that part isn't quite true :-/ Here it is tho:
/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:06 AM
23

Drunk Female Guests Are The Gravest Threat To Fraternities I realize this headline is click-bait, but I believe it to be true. Let me explain. I am the president of the alumni house corporation of my MIT fraternity. One of my responsibilities is working with our young brothers to identify and manage risks that could lead to a tragic loss of life, the bankruptcy or loss of our chapter house as a result of a legal judgment, or forced dissolution after serving MIT students for over 125 years. A rec…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:05 AM
4

Women being harassed online? Yep, sounds like relevant Operating System news.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:45 AM
7

I have to disagree - just because this is the tagline of the most heavily promoted global feminist initiative in the world right now, being actively promoted by the UN...if it were a lesser thing, I would agree, but the context matters.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:09 PM
5

Headline is inaccurate. He didn't just 'post under' #NotYourShield, he started it.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:51 AM
11

He said it's some small non-gaming company that 'he expects to fold by christmas anyway.'
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:50 AM
5

Do you know anything about the context of her hitting her lovers? There isn't much detail. Anything you know specifically about it, any basis for crying 'false equivalence,' is 100% constructed in your own head. And you assume that whatever she did must have been so minor as to not even be comparable to what he did. Based on nothing. Well, based on gender assumptions. This is kind of the point of the whole post.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:17 AM
6

It's bullshit. Been widely debunked. There were like 30,000 identical votes cast in a 1 hour period or something. The person who was running the survey publicly stated this and deleted this mass block of identical votes. Feminists, wanting to maintain their narrative over promoting truth, don't care. 100,000 notes... A quick google reveals that Raw Story, The Stranger, and Will Wheaton all ran with this. And none of them retracted it when a few hours later it was revealed to be bunk. What a surv…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 01:36 AM
3

Valenti had an article today saying the same thing. It made me think just one question. Sure, I agree we should all look out for each other. I agree. Who doesn't. But Obama and Valenti both phrase it in a specific way: It is the responsibility of surrounding men to protect a woman who might be raped, but NOT the responsibility of surrounding women. In both narratives that are presented, 100% of the focus is on what men can do to prevent rape. There isn't even a word given to gender neutrality, o…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 07:24 AM
1

WWIII has been on the march for long before GamerGate. SyrianGirl is awesome and has been speaking for a long time.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:20 AM
1

The whole thing is in quotation marks :)
/r/MensRights18/09/14 11:12 PM
2

http://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers/ Hmmmm.....perhaps I should look into it again. I had a staggering realization yesterday. The first time I ever had sex, the day I lost my virginity, 18 years old freshman in college...I walked into a small party, a girl immediately takes an interest in me, from the word 'hello' she starts handing me shot after shot...I remember clearly one of her friends saying 'oh, S, take it easy on the kid, up to your usual tricks again.' and 'have you ever slept with…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:40 AM
-1

I agree with the first three lines she says tho :P
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:09 AM
4

"Feminism is, of course, part of human rights in general - but to choose to use the VAGUE expression human rights is to acknowledge reciprocal and complementary problems of gender. It's a way of acknowledging that historically both men and women who have been oppressed. It's a way of admitting that that repressive gender roles target both men and women. That both men and women face the majority of their problems not due to their gender but simply due to the fact they are HOMO SAPIEN SAPIEN HUMAN…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:04 AM
2

Feminism is a religion, you are only being consistent.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 01:51 AM
2

And you have a situation where in 100 years, if current trends continue, it's entirely possible that completely illiberal unassimilated muslims will have a political majority in Sweden. Yet nobody is allowed to even publicly examine the issue, because 'racism.'
/r/MensRights16/09/14 01:37 AM
0

The study says that 18.3% of women have been raped and 6.2% of men have either been raped or made to penetrate. http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf page 18-19
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:43 AM
1

As MRAs, we have to be vigilant to not make the mistake Feminists do and cherry pick data to suit the case we're trying to make. I don't think I've ever read any estimates that put it that high. I've of course read 6:4, but looking into the numbers I didn't find them completely convincing.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 10:52 AM
1

Well, that too. But let's be honest: rape happens. Rape is primarily, although certainly not exclusively, a man on woman problem. And the men who do rape make up a tiny percentage of men; men who have general criminal tendencies and a disregard for human suffering. ie, sociopaths. It's a valid social goal to reduce the rate of sociopathy. And in my opinion, the best way to do so is to protect the developing psyche of the young.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 10:32 AM
1

Can you imagine the shitstorm if a man wrote this article aimed at women?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:41 AM
2

She makes a couple good points, but knows she can't write a completely sane article or feminists will jump on her. Ironically, arguably the single most important way that society can protect women from male violence is protecting little boys from violence and trauma in their upbringing. But this would involve helping the hated oppressors, so feminists never even consider it.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 05:56 PM
0

I'm going to be perfectly honest. A few days ago I had a female Nigerian-Dutch couchsurfer stay with me, a SAP IT professional. She was quite nice and a great guest, but I was shocked by her lack of any kind of technical knowledge. Whenever I asked her anything IT related, she had no idea what I was talking about. And she wasn't lying when she said she worked in the field.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 05:40 PM
3

Personally, I think the ERA should be a cornerstone demand of the MRA. Simply demanding it highlights how many legal, institutional discriminations there are against men. Feminists would fight a modern, non-Hayden ERA kicking and screaming.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 02:56 AM
5

Relevance to Men's Rights: 1 on a scale of 100. This would be better suited on /r/sjsucks or similar.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 01:16 PM
2

By looking into the source statistics and seeing whether the questions and methodology makes sense.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 02:22 AM
1

Hillary Clinton is a vicious warmonger with a terrible record on the big issues of our day, such as mas surveillance. She is the most ardently pro-war candidate put forth by the Dems in a long time. The only reason liberals support her is because she is a woman. The ONLY reason. Just as, let's be frank, the only reason Obama was seriously considered is because he's black.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 12:50 AM
2

Naw. Thank you for making it. You're a braver man than I, and I admire you for making this video. The vid wasn't bad, and definitely had strong parts, but..for instance, you said that false rape incidents happen 'lots and lots and lots' or something similar. But the only evidence you gave to back up this assertion was a single personal anecdote. I'm not disagreeing, I myself have been falsely accused of rape, it just didn't hold together to my ear. BTW, I asked this once on /r/protectandserve, I…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 10:01 AM
2

I think that asserting that female privilege is very real and arguably outweighs male privilege is a pretty strong argument to make. This video certainly made some very good points, but for the most part was frankly rather rambling and weakly argued.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 09:31 AM
7

Word. I was a lifelong feminist, until I came up against the basic fact that the whole modern feminist movement has a major credibility problem...
/r/MensRights10/09/14 04:37 PM
1

Good find whoever noticed this.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 02:01 AM
1

FWIW, feminists are very welcome on this board. We may disagree with you, we may downvote you, but unless you're an out and out jerk, nobody will wish you to leave.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:12 PM
16

Happened to a good friend's dad. Tenant was months late on rent, he went to evict her, she freaked out and screamed rape and said she wouldn't call the police for $5000. He got out of it somehow, it was 5+ years back I heard the story, don't remember the end.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 10:58 PM
2

His numbers: http://www.redonkulas.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/WTF-WOMAN.xls
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:09 AM
1

No, I agree that this situation is not right; I was only objecting to the usage of 'racist' in the article.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:06 AM
11

Meanwhile in Spain, a similar documentary is making waves. (although it's focused on how easy it is to file false abuse charges) https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GjgBfklmYj8
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:00 AM
2

This article is kind of stupid. Especially the part where a man sees a white man with two young 100% asian ladies, and assumes that he isn't the parents. Oh, you didn't know they were adopted? You racist!
/r/MensRights31/08/14 12:42 AM
2

Yes, this is my point. Feminists have defined the whole issue of 'abortion rights' as being about the sanctity of the woman's body. Ignoring all the other issues, and ignoring the blatant denial of legal equality for men in the matter of choosing to be a parent. They say 'pregnancy is a woman's choice, it's a woman's body' as if pregnancy is an isolated medical condition that resolves after nine months and then everybody goes on their way.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:01 PM
6

Well, if they have any luck with that, let me know. One day, mysteriously, the whole of SRS is shadowbanned :P
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:59 PM
2

I don't know about you, but personally I'm pro-choice.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:46 PM
2

Trace the IP of the poster, Oh, so you're a reddit admin?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:43 PM
2

I agree that's a major issue, but in terms of how it actually affects lives ( at least in peacetime), it doesn't really compare. In a war, that's an entirely different story.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:19 AM
9

This is arguably the single greatest legal inequality between men and women today. It must be a top issue of the MRM.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:22 AM
6

The sordid and tragic tale of the '30 second rapist.' http://australian-news.net/articles/view.php?id=142
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:21 AM
13

42% of women would rape men That's my takeaway from this. This deeply ingrained idea that women have no moral responsibility not to commit crimes against men is sickening, and almost certainly the #1 MRA issue that is not explicitly political.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:31 AM
2

That's a massive, massive crime. Far more destructive and malicious than many felonies. Plus you bring a child into the world who one parent didn't want. The child is more likely to suffer. And you are putting a person under a lifetime of massive financial obligation. In a sense defrauding them out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. If we are to match the harm a crime causes to its punishment, lying about being on birth control should be considered felony fraud, and carry a sentence of 10 to 2…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:29 AM
-1

John Oliver is a partisan hack. You see him going after one person you don't like, so you trust him. That trust isn't deserved.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 01:42 AM
1

You're right, it was kind of a dumb comment.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:49 PM
1

The medical examiner ruled his death a homicide. Athena Skeeter, 40, was arraigned Sunday on charges of manslaughter and endangering the welfare of a child. ???
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:31 AM
4

Don't blame Google. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexism http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/sexism http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sexism
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:28 AM
1

These statements are accurate: 'Zoe Quinn, but her own definition, is a rapist.' 'Zoe Quinn is a disgusting hypocrite.' This statement is not: 'Zoe Quinn is a rapist.' Definitions are important. If you say she is guilty of rape in YOUR eyes, then you are saying that for you, subjectively, you adopt her definition of rape. If you say that, in your eyes, she is a rapist, then you must also hold that every person who cheats in an affair is actually a rapist. Careful what you write. The definition o…
/r/MensRights24/08/14 09:12 AM
2

Well, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303678704576440014119968294 Is a decent overview, and a summary of the Caleb Warner case. I was just reading about another, the case of Mr. Ibbs from Perth, Australia, the '30 second rapist'. Not exactly relevant, it happened in the late '80s, but a famous example down here (and it's fresh in my memory). He was convicted of taking 30 seconds to withdraw after she withdrew consent, and was sentenced to a full 15 years. Not sure where laws …
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:44 PM
2

While I agree, we should be doing everything we can to drag the crime of 'rape' back into the realm of sanity. Having a reasonable definition of rape in broader society is more important than how it applies to Zoe Quinn.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:41 PM
2

In short, scaring people into not drinking is effective. Alcohol is fucking poison, and increases your likelihood of being a victim of all sorts of crime, not just rape..along with the many other problems with alcohol usage. If you could reduce the rate of alcohol consumption, especially the rate of binge drinking, you would have a tangible effect on the rape rate. Telling people that 'rape is not your fault' is guaranteed to do nothing to reduce the incidence of rape, and is unlikely to do much…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:33 PM
2

Yes, I made another comment just above saying exactly that. She did not rape him, although perhaps in a moment of moral clarity she will realize that by her own standards she did.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:04 PM
46

Let's be clear on one thing - she did not rape him. Now, by her own radical definition, she did rape him - and she is a disgusting hypocrite for it. But by the definition the rest of us use, she did not commit rape.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:35 PM
31

She didn't rape him by a sane definition, but she did by her own feminist definition. She had made it clear that she considered it impossible to give consent when you don't know the facts of the relationship. For instance, you are unable to fully consent when your partner is having a secret affair, because you are opening yourself up to risk of STDs that you didn't ever accept. So, she made it very clear that she considered sleeping around and coming back to her to be rape. But then she slept ar…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:34 PM
10

The whole Family Court/Divorce Court system is one of the most blatantly corrupt, greedy, and hugely destructive institutions in our whole society. And that is saying a lot! It looks like a courtroom, but there is no Constitution, no public counsel, and frankly little concern for the welfare of either the parents or the kid. When a family walks into Family Court, every eye lights up with dollar signs. It's a problem that certainly hurts women, but hurts men a lot more frequently, in a case of ar…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 05:39 AM
4

Yes, the father is indeed very lucky to live in America the land of the free, where the government doesn't kill you with bullets (if you're white at least), it kills you over years of misery and smothering your soul.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:34 AM
1

Maybe billing $500 for some ridiculous nonsense 'specialist' appointment in the Family Court system? You don't need shit for qualification to do that. You don't even have to be mentally competent.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:28 AM
34

What the actual fuck happened in that court hearing? It's a confidential secret; the world will never know. That is why this rotten family (destroying) court system has gotten so bad. Nobody knows what the hell they do, confidentiality is presumed. Judges are not hesitant to throw around outrageous gag orders as well. Several fathers are doing hard time in prison in America for running a blog / making facebook comments about their case, and nothing else at all.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:24 AM
2

A huge and crucial documentary for one of the least recognized badly broken institutions in our society.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:44 AM
1

Well, there was more to it than that. http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/20140417-editorial-cortez-unsuited-to-sit-in-judgment-of-others.ece And let's be honest. If you are able to stay in a relationship of longer than 24 hours with a drug addled, psycho floozy like this, it doesn't exactly reflect wonderfully on your character. That wouldn't be enough by itself to tilt my vote, but it would affect it. DSYDIC
/r/MensRights17/08/14 12:43 AM
8

Don't pay any of your old bills. SAVE ANY MONEY YOU CAN! MOVE THE FUCK OUT OF ALASKA!!!! He has a kid :(
/r/MensRights09/08/14 05:20 AM
4

The counterpoint is that it would frighten off real rape victims, and the rapist might just lie about everything and try and turn it around and have the victim locked away. Which is a valid concern. However, when there is positive proof (for instance these tumblr screenshots) that it was false and malicious. Yes, absolutely, it should be a serious felony.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 09:53 PM
1

get some sleep buddy.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 11:52 PM
2

As a woman (sorry for busting in on your sub) Women are 100% welcome here. Even outspoken Feminists are, although they may be downvoted.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:59 PM
2

Being a feminist and being insane are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:57 PM
1

I was once accused of rape by a woman, who was mad at me because I would NOT have sex with her despite her repeated requests. She was my roommate. Technically, she sexually assaulted me more than once. Then she accused me of rape. Oddly, she looked kind of a lot like this creature here.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:56 PM
1

That's an awesome edit, and a good source. Thank you! I'm gonna keep an eye on it and make sure it sticks, because there is no way that should go away. Great work :)
/r/MensRights16/07/14 08:19 PM
1

Leaving her home alone would have been, by all reasonable measures, far, far worse for her social and personal development. America is safer than it has been in 50 years, but we are 100 times more paranoid than we were then. This is why I oppose Feminism: because the narratives, the stories we hold true as a society, really matter. But the Feminist narrative of society is not the only faulty narrative we hold. There are many. The 'kidnapper behind every bush' is another important one. The horrib…
/r/MensRights15/07/14 08:13 PM
1

But, you got kidnapped murdered, and you are now a zombie corpse typing those words. You left you left out that little detail!
/r/MensRights15/07/14 08:10 PM
3

Every situation is different. If it is working for you, if it is making you happy, then that's wonderful. The joy of raising kids is profound. Just that marriage is an inherently gynocentric institution, both legally and in its basic construction.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 11:45 PM
1

They are not feminist men, only 'allies.' In the way that Hungary was an 'ally' of the Soviet Union. Their minds have been invaded and occupied.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:30 PM
1

Wait...if men aren't allowed in in the first place, what's the point of that?
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:29 PM
1

Funny, I've spent a fair deal of time at the largest San Francisco hackerspace (Noisebridge), and it was EXTREMELY friendly to women, there were always quite a few women there doing their thing there, the guys would generally bend over backwards to help them figure out their projects, and I never saw a hint of any sort of uncomfortable, harassing, or unwelcoming energy directed towards them. Quite the opposite.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:28 PM
5

I'm sure I'm going to get downvoted for this, but I really have come to view most men who marry and choose a life of subservience, sacrificing their freedom and self-determination in life, and repressing their sexuality to be, well, losers. Marriages make me cringe. The modern marriage contract is so, so, so negative for men, I honestly don't understand why men still sign up for it. If you want to get married to sacrifice yourself to create the most stable possible foundation for raising a new g…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:35 PM
28

Don't de-condition yourself to not help women in need; condition yourself to also help men in need.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:20 AM
3

I think more accurately, wikipedia has a bias towards the dominant media paradigm. Currently, the media is highly feminist, so Wikipedia reflects this. I had a frustrating experience a few days ago...I found indisputable evidence that a prominent activist had at some point in the past gone by a different name, and had exaggerated her resume on her biography. No matter how I cited it, or what I cited, my revisions kept being rolled back (I could only find these questions being raised in highly pa…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 04:38 AM
1

I saw the edit 'The very fact that women are treated as if they are non-violent victims makes the model clearly faulty and misandric, ignoring real life statistics.', but I would have rejected that edit myself, it makes the case weakly. There has to be a way to make this edit stick, I might take a stab myself.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 03:44 AM
0

The meaning of words is contextual. In this context, the two phrases are similar.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 03:30 AM
2

Important interview. Very good, noble soul.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 01:49 AM
6

This is more /r/TumblrInAction type stuff, but it's still aggressively stupid. Feminism is heavily invested in turning issues that are true to everyone into issues that only affect women.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:38 PM
1

'Assert his privilege', 'Oppress Women', close enough.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:36 PM
3

http://lawschoolissoover.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/do-not-touch1.jpg
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:36 PM
12

Note that any edits will likely be removed if they don't cite a good source...part of the reason I don't do this myself, is I can't find any articles from neutral publications on the topic...
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:02 PM
10

I'm referring to all the great MRA youtubers out there. If you watch PewDiePie, that's your own damn problem!
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:15 PM
4

It's not about hating feminists, it's about pointing out the flawed and incorrect ideologies narratives of feminism, which create real harm in our society through bad policy and destructive social attitudes. Ideas are important. The information we have shape our response to the world. Incorrect ideas create real world problems. In short, the narratives we collectively hold true as a society have a profound aspect on every aspect of society, and Feminism presents a false and deceptive narrative t…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:49 PM
7

Because, I believe that blocking YouTube prevents any video makers from receiving money for your view.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 06:34 PM
19

Perhaps try contacting some local reporter investigate the story? It sounds interesting, but would require some serious time to verify, and without that effort being done to systematically examine and present the issue, it won't be possible to gain any traction with it.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:18 AM
18

Another thing people should do on a personal level: Install AdBlock Plus, systematically whitelist all sites you want to financially support (as well as YouTube in general probably)
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:11 AM
2

Don't say, show. If you say 'you've a well-known ability to prove your point', in a paragraph utterly failing to prove your point, you lose.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 04:25 AM
2

Aye, true, true, but in the long game, as the pieces clear out, the pair of bishops, especially if the opponent only has one, are devastating. Long range surprises are always fun.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 03:56 AM
18

I don't know, I found this to be among the most egregious mistruths anita has made. Focusing mostly on one incredibly stupid statement is powerful in a way. If she has stolen videos, that itself doesn't invalidate the points she makes. This, however, completely obliterates her point.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 12:59 AM
17

pawn = 1 knight =3 bishop = 3 or 2 bishops = 7 (generally) rook = 5 queen = 9 fyi but chess is a horrible violent game of the patriarchy, so the king is all that matters.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 12:55 AM
22

Watching people bash Anita is kind of like the MRA's version of trash reality TV. There really isn't much to be learned from watching it, but it's still entertaining nonetheless.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:02 PM
2

24:00 she had accused a previous boyfriend of rape, mind=blown
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:33 PM
2

Thank you, looking forward to it! If you do, can you please link it in these comments?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:56 PM
1

I know someone who is a lifetime sex offender for being 17 with a 15 yo girlfriend with fundamentalist parents. Totally fucked his life up...
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:53 PM
-2

This horrible story encapsulates so many core points of the MRM, it's so sick.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:52 PM
1

That single fact utterly destroys her case to me.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:38 PM
4

Or injuries consistent with rough consensual sex with the monstrously strong world heavyweight champion.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:38 PM
1

I'm sure a Feminist would see this, and say it's sexist against women because most of the leads in it are male.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:54 AM
1

It's another movie where every lead male character is a vicious misogynistic psycho and the lead woman is a victim who is empowered by killing the men.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:53 AM
1

But you said she doesn't work?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 09:38 PM
1

I think you're being a bit paranoid mate, 'Plans aren’t required to cover: Services related to a man’s reproductive capacity' would in my understanding include lopping a dude's prick off.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:06 AM
3

RES tagged: 'Only has good ideas'
/r/MensRights08/07/14 03:52 AM
7

That's a really good idea, I like that.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 02:21 AM
2

Sorry, I misremembered what she wrote in the article.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 02:11 AM
25

I loved how she went outside and cried after hearing a pretty weak and mild joke. You've got reporters all over the world in combat situations, being shot at, kidnapped, seeing people die, being in mortal danger for practicing journalism. It's a thing. And she goes into shellshock because she heard some stupid joke. Beyond pathetic.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:24 AM
2

Why can't Feminists, or wider society for that matter, ever show the same level of humanity and compassion to men?
/r/MensRights07/07/14 09:54 PM
1

In my opinion, the harm occurred when the money was disbursed. It should not have been. So even if this were still an ongoing piece, even if it were opening night, it would be irrelevant. The point is to prevent funding ideologically/politically partisan art in the future.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 09:49 AM
3

Personally, if a Feminist makes a valid point about the MRM or something I've written, but does it in a rude abrasive manner, I don't mind at all. What really pisses me off, and what it seems the norm is, is to NOT make a valid point in a rude abrasive manner, just fluff name calling and bullshit. It's not the tone of Feminists that pisses me off; it's their intellectual cowardice and refusal to engage with unfamiliar or unpopular ideas. Just IMHO. The fact that I'm a perfectionist who is way to…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:04 AM
3

In any situation, the person who is the sole bastion of honesty is...the person who has the accurate information, and is vocalizing it. It's basically a meritocracy, you know? Anyone can point out anyone's mistakes. If we are sloppy with facts, we hurt the whole movement. Frankly, I feel like dogshit that when you visit /r/mensrights, on the frontpage, there is a very incorrect headline that entirely my fault. I harmed the credibility of the MRM in some tiny but meaningful way through my careles…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:55 AM
1

Andrew Little's response to me: The background to this is that presently one incident in a hundred of sexual violation results in a conviction. Many victims of sexual violation either don't report it or withdraw their complaint very early in the process because of the way issues are dealt with by the court system. This is the public policy issue that needs to be addressed. In a sexual violation case now, the crown has to prove there was sexual contact (and the circumstances of that contact), tha…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 01:47 AM
1

It's not Halloween, so no. I'd certainly never heard about it however, and apparently most MR readers hadn't either. It's not like this is something that happened 30 years ago.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 01:32 AM
2

Word.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 12:43 AM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/29yhpx/toronto_what_your_taxpayer_dollars_pay_for_the/ciq8f97 If I don't give you gold for calling me out on my bullshit, it's just because I'm kind of short on funds right now.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 12:29 AM
3

Please, don't defend me. I posted a bullshit, false title because I misread a news story and didn't do proper research before posting (it was late). Seriously_trolling did me and us a favor pointing this out; if he/she called me an idiot, I deserved it. Except he/she didn't, they just said 'misleading title'. Which it absolutely was. One of our most important claims as MRAs is that Feminists widely misrepresent facts and we have the moral and intellectual high ground in pointing this out. If we …
/r/MensRights07/07/14 12:27 AM
2

You were right to call me out on my false title, in fact I'm grateful for it and feel really very stupid for posting something false, and your tone was fine.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 12:20 AM
1

That's right. In fact, his family should be THANKING her for solving his terrible itch problem. Which, if you read the article, is about what they did. MEGA FACEPALM
/r/PussyPass06/07/14 11:03 PM
1

No, no, no. You don't understand. He had an itch. A mosquito bit him. It was a really bad itch, he had been trying to scratch it, but no luck. She was just trying to use the knife to give him a proper scratch, but then her hand slipped a tiiiiiiny bit, and it plunged directly into his heart. And fuck, all these shitlords don't give her any credit: she did effectively scratch the itch, it doesn't itch any more.
/r/PussyPass06/07/14 10:54 PM
5

Dear lord, THAT'S what he looks like? No wonder he called the sites he created 'ManBoobz' and 'We Hunted the Mammoth.' He sure looks more like the 'stereotypical MRA' than any MRA I've ever met or seen a picture of.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 10:50 PM
2

The Internet, particularly sites like Twitter, tends to encourage petty nastiness, because it's so easy to get a tiny dopamine 'boost' from sending a nasty tweet, and no real downsides to it.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 10:47 PM
1

It really boggles me that in this day and age anybody would ever think that not letting a reporter view an event at all could possibly be a good PR idea.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 09:47 PM
1

You're right. Knowing what I know now, i regret posting this link. I still have problems with it, but it's valid art. The Toronto Sun article I linked elsewhere in this thread said it is taxpayer funded.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:39 PM
4

Wise man here.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:16 PM
2

I was just watching the BBC show 'orphan black' A pretty good show by its own measure, but I couldn't help but notice that there is exactly one white, straight male in it - and he was the big bad guy.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:02 PM
0

That's an interesting observation.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:00 PM
0

You know, I've never been to a slutwalk, so I don't know exactly what they are. If they are just walking around in skimpy clothing, I just won't agree that that is acting like 'animals in heat.' Porn sites, yeah, 'animals in heat' - presenting themselves up for sex, making sexual noises, that's an accurate description. But just walking around in skimpy clothing (if that's all that happens) doesn't reach that level. Is every girl jogging down the street in a skimpy exercise outfit an 'animal in h…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:56 PM
3

Thanks. I'm sorry. It does appear men were allowed to enter. I informed the guy who made the action opp, and I put a bold correction in the comments here.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:51 PM
4

CORRECTION: After looking into it more, it appears that they DO allow men inside. There are still major issues with this, but they are lessened by that fact, and I apologize for the inaccurate headline. http://www.shedoesthecity.com/kill-joys-kastle-a-lesbian-feminist-haunted-house http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7425/10426539024_e8312386cf_b.jpg (from the Bitch magazine article on it)
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:50 PM
9

Hi, after looking into it more, it appears they do NOT discriminate against men. They just barred admission to these specific reporters, the female reporter then got through just because she was unrecognized as such. I apologize for miswriting the title of my submission, and you should change your action opp. However, thanks for putting up the action op, and you definitely go intoa lot of valid detail about why this is problematic. For instance, the 'blue' pic #5 on this page clearly shows a man…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:49 PM
1

It's not the art, 100% of the problem is the taxpayer funding.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:37 PM
1

Yes, frankly, if it was just a specific reporter that does change things. I saw a few photo sets on a few sites, didn't seem to see any guys around. My other gripe was the tacit endorsement of violence against males.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:23 PM
-1

lol, yes, I realized that after typing that comment. Guilty as charged, it was late.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:22 PM
0

How so?
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:19 PM
0

lol, i want to visit just to see if it lives up to the expectations. Shame, I've knows loads of cool people from toronto.. But when I look at my FB, yeah, I realize most of them are diehard SJWs. That last fact is fucking hilarious. Good job girls...
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:19 PM
0

Yeah, for me, there were two primarily problems with this: 1) A taxpayer funded project exluding people based on gender and 2) A taxpayer funded project seemingly advocating violence against males (the depictions of severed penises all over...)
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:18 PM
1

I can't begin to say how absolutely fucked up and despicable I find these kinds of articles. This is what Feminism has become: An orchestrated effort to saturate the minds of young woman in fearfulness and paranoia. I can't imagine much more harmful to the well being of women than material like this, especially its repetition over and over. Some of these are definitely valid, some are insane. But...what is the SOLUTION proposed? What is the positive, empowering message to be found here? But to c…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 10:52 AM
0

http://campaign.labour.org.nz/andrew_little
/r/MensRights06/07/14 09:40 AM
13

More details: http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/30/taxpayers-funding-lesbian-haunted-house-in-toronto
/r/MensRights06/07/14 09:16 AM
0

Someone needs to put together a resource, that consists of descriptions of all these well known feminist statistics, where they come from, and a description of the in depth analysis of them.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:44 AM
0

Well, I've been falsely accused by a girl that I tried to rape her, does that count?
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:42 AM
1

It's really sad when press releases of politicians of national prominence can fall under 'Poe's Law'. http://www.cc.com/video-clips/jwmvxd/chappelle-s-show-love-contract
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:42 AM
13

This is quite literally saying that, uniquely in the crime of rape, the accused is guilty until proven innocent. It is shifting the burden of proof to the accused - as it is in no other crime. And people say Feminism isn't destructive to basic human dignity. Keep it classy, ya fuckin' twits.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:40 AM
1

Huh. intersting points. I'm heading to bed now, but thanks for the thought provoking discussion. And BTW, I really LOVE the idea of making short web bits of men telling their personal stories of violence survival or abuse by the system...I think that's a really powerful idea. Maybe try to raise some energy on that idea with the /r/MR community?
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:36 AM
1

We have to be aware, in the current media environment, everything relies on instant impressions and associations. Anything that can't be expressed in an image or a 5-10 second video clip won't catch on in the minds of the dumbed down public. As I see it, the ERA is like a strategic position, a fort, that our opponents have left unguarded for many years and now we can try to claim it. If we can work through intense repetition to get it stuck into the mind of the populace that MRA = ERA, that woul…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:15 AM
0

You're making me sad dude. Please stop. Your 3rd paragraph was an excellent point. Remember the last time the 'small government' crowd got a guy in on a platform talking a lot about reversing an incredibly stupid federal initiative (reagan, the Dept. of Education initiated only in '78 or something) And look, after eight years, he didn't even manage to reverse that one, obviously horrible program. This whole goddamn ACA mess...I don't even know where to start. Demanding it be repealed because it'…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:05 AM
1

Naw, dude, having a kid is wonderful. It's really so, so much fun. She brings so much joy and happiness to my life. It's true what they say, in so many ways it IS the most deeply fulfilling thing I have ever experienced. And frankly, it forced me to enlarge my self-image, to do something bigger than I had ever conceived of to be able to meet this challenge. And even she was basically an accident..and her mother and I are going through divorce right now...at least I had the common sense to only n…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:55 AM
5

Here's what happened. He walked into the room. However, her massive girth was already filling every single cubic inch of the room. So, unwittingly he walked right into her vagina without consent. So actually, it was rape.
/r/PussyPass06/07/14 05:49 AM
1

The thing is, passing it anytime soon is not really realistic. It's been tried for 100 years. The reason I feel so enthusiastic about it is that it would turn the entire debate on its head. One of the most important objectives of the MRM must be to reclaim the gender narrative from Feminists. They can oppose it for whatever reason they want. As long as we are seen as actively supporting the ERA - even being identified with it - and Feminists are seen as opposing it for whatever reason - it would…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 05:26 AM
1

but should it be left to its own devices, it will just wither and die. There's no difference. The same could be said about 6 month old baby. Hell the same could be said of the average 15 year old these days :P "In the name of" is not "in accordance with the principles of". It's very easy to say you're doing one thing and do another thing. Yes, but how do you tell one from the other? Hitler (sorry for the godwin) had massive support from his population, claimed to be acting in the interests of th…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 04:38 AM
7

I tend not to dismiss links based wholly on the person who posted them. If the chief mod of SRS came over and posted some amazing MRA material, I would happily read it.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 03:57 AM
2

Father here. I would say that the news that I was going to be a father seriously damaged my mental health and cause me MASSIVE anxiety that kind of lasts to the current day. The anxiety and sleeplessness as I wrestled with 'how the fuck am I going to support this kid' caused me to wreck my car a couple months after learning. So, there might be something to this.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 03:52 AM
0

The thing is, (and I'm highly cynical about the legislative process myself), there IS not 'section 25b'. The Amendmant is really, really simple. That's effectively all there is. As it has for most of the last century, it is an active house bill. You can read it right here: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c113:S.J.+Res.+10: What potential for misinterpretation is there?
/r/MensRights06/07/14 03:07 AM
0

bombs awaaaaaaaay!
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:51 AM
70

If this were a university, it would be really fucked up. As its the military, well, I don't know, it's different. Things in University are presented seriously, but I often think of the military as being suffused with black humor...
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:19 AM
0

But if the law is written as simply as this: 'Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.' How could Feminists ever vocally oppose it without revealing their hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:14 AM
0

This whole concept of 'corporate personhood' is very confused. Currently, we hold that when a corporation is chartered, in effect a brand new human being is created. When the people who run the corporation commit a crime, it is that corporate Frankenstein's monster who is to blame. The corporation is a wholly separate person from the people who run it; this legal construction has big, big problems and I feel should be totally reversed, perhaps by constitutional amendment. However, this case is d…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:12 AM
1

No, it's easy to prove a NON-fertilized embryo is not life. If left to it's own devices, if there is no intervention, it will just wither and die. Forget the moment of conception. Let's use the moment of first heartbeat as the measure. You can't compare an acorn to an mammallian embryo/fetus that has a pulse. Utilitarianism demands that everybody chip in for the good of the many. It's worth noting that literally all of the greatest crimes in history have been carried out in the name of the 'good…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:05 AM
0

I gotta disagree here. Animals in heat don't wear clothing. It's possible to wear skimpy clothing with a sexualized aspect to it, hell I love going around nude in public when I can. Rapists aren't motivated by clothing anyway, that's a canard, and yes men should act civilized in society no matter what is going on around them. I think your comment here kind of reinforces their whole point.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:02 AM
0

All civil rights activists face hatred, vitriol and violence from the mainstream at first. Later they are celebrated. I'm going to copy and paste that quote about 1000 times everywhere, I hope you don't mind.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 01:34 AM
0

Huh. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/0603/Political-misquotes-The-10-most-famous-things-never-actually-said/First-they-ignore-you.-Then-they-laugh-at-you.-Then-they-attack-you.-Then-you-win.-Mohandas-Gandhi
/r/MensRights06/07/14 01:33 AM
2

x-post /r/crappymusic :P
/r/MensRights05/07/14 09:39 PM
0

My basic point is that companies don't provide a fair compensation for services because they are forced to by law, but because it's necessary to keep good employees. I don't like 'religious exemptions' either. But at the same time, the Federal rules are irrelevant. Hobby Lobby is paying beyond what they are required to, and offering insurance beyond what they are required (other than the 'abortificants', the HL health care is actually quite generous and goes above and beyond what they are requir…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 11:24 AM
0

So why does the company pay $9hr part time / $14hr full time? Why not just pay minimum wage?
/r/MensRights05/07/14 10:59 AM
0

Health care is part of overall pay; if you 'abuse' it by finding ways to offer shittier coverage, you'll lose employees.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 10:42 AM
1

Don't just write it down. Any sort of negative behavior whatsoever. surreptitiously record.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 09:48 AM
2

http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/lawrence-shannon-the-predatory-female.pdf
/r/MensRights05/07/14 09:48 AM
2

I don't get the Hayden Rider thing. Apparently it was put in place in order to effectively ice the progress of the bill..back in the '50s. It's once again a bill before the house: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c113:S.J.+Res.+10:
/r/MensRights05/07/14 09:45 AM
6

This was the exact language of the 1971 ERA: Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification. I got no problem with that.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 09:31 AM
1

"This" meaning the last 40 years.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 08:45 AM
1

DulcineaIsAWhore He's Ya Homie [+12]
/r/MensRights05/07/14 08:40 AM
1

If you 100% own a small restaurant with a few employees, is that restaurant not inexorably linked to 'you?' Likewise, if a small family owns a chain of art supply stores with many employees, is that chain not inexorably linked to the individuals who make up that family?
/r/MensRights05/07/14 08:30 AM
0

They provide a great level of health care relative to their competitors. But Hobby Lobby the company is not the point of the case, or of my posting; my posting is about the ACA and not directly related to Hobby Lobby at all, and the Hobby Lobby case is not interesting because of how it will affect Hobby Lobby but rather because of its wider implications in the economy.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 08:27 AM
0

A pretty good TL;DR of my rambling response :P
/r/MensRights05/07/14 08:15 AM
0

Fuck, it's like a zen koan. I'm gonna go sit on a cushion for an hour to see the truth of it.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:59 AM
14

Holy Fucking Shit. You want to throw a thought-bomb that will completely melt the brain of every Feminist within a 100 yard radius, present this - agitating for the passage of the ERA exactly as it was worded - as primary goal of the MRM. This is a fucking huge and subversive and brilliant idea. If the MRM were to advocate for the passage of the ERA exactly as written - which we SHOULD because so many of our complaints are of legal and governmental discrimination - it would draw masses of positi…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:45 AM
0

In terms of the abortion debate, I think there is one position that is most honest: Both sides have a valid and defensible position. Lifers believe that a embryo is effectively a human being from a very young age; they have a heartbeat from as soon as three weeks. Based on this belief, abortion is ending a human life and is equivalent to murder. And the thing is, it's very hard to philosophically disprove that position - it's hard to prove that an embryo is NOT in some way a human life. But at t…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:28 AM
0

What? I think you're confused. It wasn't some random website I was linking; that was the official healthcare.gov. Hobby Lobby was choosing to provide vasectomy coverage of their own volition. So it wasn't part of this case at all. If that is a side effect of this case - requiring vasectomy coverage - why hasn't anyone been talking about that? The decision is 95 pages long. Just glancing through and searching for a few key words, I couldn't find anything to support that interpretation. http://www…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 06:34 AM
17

Two points. One, this case was not really about Hobby Lobby. It rather, it is much bigger than that. It was about what federal requirements for all employers are. Second, Hobby Lobby HAS been offering a wide variety of female birth control - including sterilization, the nearest equivalent to vasectomy. Out of 20 possible contraceptive options, they offered all but the 4 they considered abortificants, offering a contraceptive package that serves both men and women very well. Hobby Lobby has been …
/r/MensRights05/07/14 01:18 AM
0

Defense Attorney: "She is a highly intelligent woman." Evidence speaks otherwise...
/r/PussyPass05/07/14 01:03 AM
1

Feminism does not advocate seeing women and men as equals. That is one of the great lies of Feminism
/r/PussyPass05/07/14 12:59 AM
0

'all our balls are like the federal reserve' Is that a typo? I don't understand that first sentence.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 11:42 PM
5

'War on women' my butt.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 11:30 PM
1

I mean, it is good activism, it is good to be in the real world talking with people...but I too wasn't very impressed with the video, and would have taken different approaches in almost every single confrontation.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 11:04 PM
0

According to him, it was 2AM, he was drunk, and 15 minutes prior some guy had randomly tackled him in a bar and his adrenaline was sky high. Just a bit of background. http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2013/02/sam_rosenwinkel_star_of_duluth_muffin_mace_video_speaks_about_his_newfound_celebrity_interview.php
/r/MensRights04/07/14 10:39 PM
0

BTW, this was NOT staged. http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2013/02/sam_rosenwinkel_star_of_duluth_muffin_mace_video_speaks_about_his_newfound_celebrity_interview.php
/r/MensRights04/07/14 10:38 PM
0

Hey BTW, what's up with your website? Is it working properly? http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/ Or, is your site COTWA? Sorry, just curious.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 09:55 PM
0

RES tagged user snockadilez 'fucking idiot'. Why are you a fucking idiot? Because you advocate physical violence as a valid response to boorish behavior. You literally don't think it's a crime. if we are walking on the street and you say 'hey, watch where you're stepping asshole,' you would then be OK with me punching you in the jaw in response. You would find it a 'shame' if I went to jail. Sorry, I edited your tag. '/r/MensRights Troll and/or Complete Fucking Idiot'
/r/MensRights04/07/14 09:46 PM
-1

One of the core non-institutional points MRAs make is that female violence towards men is socially condoned and even encouraged. In the sick permutation of 'feminism' we see in the world today, advocation of violence against men is too often equated with 'self-empowerment.' When you start looking, you see this stuff a LOT. 'He Deserved It' has 87 upvotes...
/r/MensRights04/07/14 09:43 PM
0

OMFG this just makes all those Hobby Lobby outrage twits look even stupider and more badly informed, and that's saying a LOT.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:28 PM
2

Collective guilt is ALWAYS a dangerous notion. We don't know what will happen 10, 20, 50 years in the future, and we should never set a precedent of accepting collective group based on inborn characteristics ever, no matter what.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:57 AM
2

Doing better than me :(
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:20 PM
0

For instance, this attitude here: http://comicshans.tumblr.com/post/90617091253/zathrian-comicshans-zathrian Not giving even a shadow of a thought to what repercussions a false rape accusation might cause a person. Not even considering it, not for a moment. Not proclaiming that false victimization doesn't cause any harm, but rather doing so by ommission, simply refusing to even think about the subject.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 02:55 PM
0

Just as long as you don't wake up one day and say 'shit, i just wasted the last ten years of my life writing comments on the internet'
/r/MensRights03/07/14 02:28 PM
1

It's an issue between the employer and employee. it's stupid for the government to be involved. Relying on our work for health insurance is a stupid way of doing things. 'Insurance' being the provider of a regular, routine, every day thing is stupid. Out of 20 available types of contraceptive, Hobby Lobby has been providing 16. The media coverage is horribly stupid. The whole thing is completely stupid. Stupid, stupid, stupid. That's my thoughts on the matter.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 08:30 AM
1

I have a feeling you didn't read all the way to the end.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:54 AM
6

Please note that the same table says that America is also 74. Please also note that the linked table is not a comparison of 'wages made for similar work', it's more accurately described as an aggregate description of women's participation in the economy, compromised of several statistics of which 'wage comparison' makes up 30% of the weighted total. There is strong reason to believe that America's ratio of same job, same hours worked, woman-to-man wage ratio is much higher, in the neighborhood o…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:44 AM
0

The problem isn't Radical Feminism. The problem isn't most naive self-described Feminists. The problem is the ideology of Feminism itself. The problem is the idea of patriarchy, which implies that all men are responsible for our social problem and all men benefit at the expense of women. The problem is latent encouragement of violence towards men in media as some sort of twisted 'female empowerment'. The problem are mainstream journalists and academics who uncritically report bogus statistics su…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 02:35 AM
2

It is. Just read it for the first time last night. I was actually going to post it around reddit a bit, it is an excellent essay.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 07:35 PM
-1

I'm not offended by it at all, it was late at night and I was wondering if that was why they were so quick to ban him. Except this is /r/feminism, so my theory is probably BS.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 07:34 PM
4

It's really a damn shame. A lot of what the left fights for I support and appreciate. Fighting corporate power, anti-war, pro-civil liberties, etc. As more and more of the Left gets consumed by the SJW cancer, the valid topics they fight for are starved and instead time is spent sitting around on tumblr complaining about TV shows.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 11:23 AM
3

Yep. From about six weeks back, Some profoundly vacuous and brainless, grade A toxic Feminist feel good outrage bullshit. Shutting down a legitimate anarchist anti-police brutality conference because one of the panelists some months before had the temerity to write on his private blog a piece critiquing victim culture. I literally don't think they say a single thing in the entire video that is not 100% bullshit, and their intimidation and lack of self-awareness is reprehensible. The whole, entir…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 11:04 AM
-3

As a side note, are you aware that the number '88' is often associated with neo-nazis?
/r/MensRights02/07/14 10:35 AM
-1

I suppose so. But I've only lived in a few countries.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 10:28 AM
9

Here's the fucking thing: This was written by a rather key figure in the whole Occupy Wall St. thing. It is a bit odd for a MtF transexual to call for female slavery of all men. Just make sure to get the surgery before the matriarchy is imposed and all men are enslaved, right? This is truly a bizarre piece.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 09:58 AM
9

Poe's law invoked. Poe's law invoked. I thought it was serious until the final paragraph. Even after reading it, the sad thing, it still might be.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 08:51 AM
-1

Australians have tremendous potential for being utterly self-righteous pricks. Especially on the topic of pedantically enforcing rules. LPT: If you are very interested in everyone around you assiduously following every single rule in society, you're probably an asshole.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 08:06 AM
1

The thing is, they are absolutely right. Women's prisons are an abomination against human decency, a terrible way to address the problem they purport to solve and SHOULD be closed. But here's the thing: that's all true of men's prisons too, they should also mostly be closed, and just by numbers they are a MUCH bigger problem. The views expressed by this report are true, but at the same time it's insanely discriminatory in its basic approach...
/r/MensRights21/06/14 04:12 PM
3

Too late now...but the answer is probably (depending on state) go back and talk to her again with a recording device running.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:11 AM
20

"Parents of younger children are more comfortable with women as teachers, we think you'd fit best in preschool or school age". Sounds like enough to file a discrimination lawsuit.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 09:32 PM
1

EDIT: Nope, they never published it. So many prominent left/Feminist personalities and well positioned journalists made utter donkey's assholes of themselves by their wilful and blindly ignorant misrepresentation of Rodger's involvement with or even knowledge of the current MRM. The reality is that there is no evidence that Rodger had even passing knowledge of the MRM itself or ANY of its core issues. There IS evidence he was involved in two particular obscure Internet subniches, forums devoted …
/r/MensRights15/06/14 09:39 PM
1

If I were a reviewer on this paper, I never would have recommended accepting it. I'm sure you'll be glad that the esteemed and infallible Centers for Disease Control holds a different opinion, and had no problem running with it. http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/sv-datasheet-a.pdf
/r/MensRights15/06/14 06:58 AM
16

She is probably accepting donations to offest her senseless tragedy.
/r/PussyPass15/06/14 12:22 AM
26

2 years for first degree murder, sounds legit.
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 05:51 PM
11

It's NZ. They are all inveterate white knights. She was just 'smashing the patriarchy' after all. Stabbing the patriarchy. Whatever.
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 05:48 PM
62

Holy shit. I missed that. What a fucking line. His family must have really, really hated him. How could they not have any animosity for the person who brutally murdered their son in cold blood? I'm all for 'turning the other cheek' in most situations, but this is ridiculous.
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 05:47 PM
0

The spending that has exploded under Obama has been non-military spending.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:45 PM
-2

No, no, that's why I took a while to reply, it's a bit confusing. Women women certainly do experience violence at the hands of males. However, to imply that all should be fearful of men is paranoia. On the other hand, basically no Americans at all post 2001 experience violence at the hands of Muslims (in America at least), so it's not a good analogy. Even if it were #YesAllEuropeans it would make more sense, because Europe has a lot more to worry about from Muslims than America does, and Muslims…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:34 AM
75

Yeah, the fact that she had just come back from a night of drinking with her lover is mentioned only in passing in that rather long writeup.
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 11:32 AM
1

lol, yes, good point.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:31 AM
0

Simply that Muslims are much more afraid of Americans than Americans are of Muslims. There aren't all that many Muslims in America, and the last major act of terrorism they committed here was a long, long time ago.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:14 AM
22

From the article: "The only issue for the jury was whether she had any murderous intent when she picked up the large kitchen knife and plunged it into his chest." The jury's answer to that question was 'no'. Legally, the jury decided she did not have 'malicious aforethought.' She meant to plunge the knife into her husband's chest, but she did not have any intention to kill him. This was the jury's decision.
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 11:07 AM
-4

No, my point is that it's not Americans who generally fear Muslims, but rather Muslims who fear Americans.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:51 AM
206

"She admitted stabbing her husband through his heart during the early hours of February 10 last year had fatal consequences but she denied meaning to kill him." Um, OK Maybe she just thought he had an itch. In the inner chambers of his heart. That she was trying to scratch with a big kitchen knife. Sounds legit.
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 09:54 AM
4

Think you need to switch that around: #NotAllAmericans / #YesAllMuslims Nobody could ever suggest that Americans in 2014 are affected in any way by Muslims...the opposite could not be said.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:19 AM
1

I got permabanned from 'RawStory' for saying another user was being 'pedantic.' At least, that was their explanation.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:59 AM
3

I think almost all MRAs are actually egalitarians, we just tend to focus our energy on men's issues because they don't get enough attention in the world today.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:57 AM
2

Historically, the GOP has been worse on deficits than the Democrats. Obama is an anomaly. At least the Democrats are straightforward about their bad economic policies; the GOP are just disgusting hypocrites.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:56 AM
1

5 people haven't fuckin' been paying attention.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:55 AM
1

Over the years, I've tended more from an AnCap to a Geo-Libertarian. I agree with individualist libertarians on just about everything...except the 'homesteading principle,' just strikes me funny. So a Georgist land-rest that is simply equally distributed back to the people as a 'Basic Income' in an otherwise Anarcho-Capitalist society, I often think that this would be a pretty positive system.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:53 AM
1

So you don't support property rights and small business being free from red tape?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:49 AM
2

I've made the point multiple times that by shutting down any discussion of the link between alcohol and rape, the Feminist movement does more than any other organized group to increase the real world prevalence of rape. Thanks for the images. Where did you get them? Those results are very confusing. They seem to imply that twice as many girls were raped in college (3.4%) as had someone touch them in an unwanted way (1.4%). That seems really bizarre... It would also be useful to see the original …
/r/MensRights14/06/14 03:43 AM
2

Just curious. Fuckin' paywalls on academic research. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19433402
/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:28 AM
13

But, but, but, "Feminism cares about men's and boy's issues too." I've heard that 1000 times, so it must be true! Feminism has sometimes benefited men; but only, only, as a byproduct of advocating for a woman's issue. There has never once been an example of the Feminist movement tackling an issue that primarily affects men/boys, and this simple fact utterly destroys the constant refrain that 'the MRA is redundant because Feminism cares about all these issues.'
/r/MensRights13/06/14 10:08 PM
3

Yes, I actually agree with this. One caveat. Men should be spared as well. Prisons are evil and destructive places that NO HUMAN BEING should be subjected to, not just 'no women.' It's a perfect example of the exclusionary human right's advocacy of Feminism. "I support ending human rights abuses, for 50% of the population. The other 50%, well, fuck 'em."
/r/PussyPass13/06/14 07:32 AM
2

Read it again, mate. The phrase 'men and women' occurs exactly one time on the entire page. 'Women and their families' occurs quite often, I suppose, but that's a funny way of wording things. Read the top title. What does it say? When a representative who is elected to serve the interests of all of his/her constituents advocates only for some of them, that's a problem no matter who is excluded.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:15 PM
3

And the fine people of Kentucky have a choice between her...and Mitch McConnel. The wonders of Democracy. PS I agree with all that you wrote, except that she is a 'closet feminist'. She is well out of the closet!
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:23 AM
1

It depends a bit on your personality. If it were me...now..what I would probably do is find out who exactly she talked to, find a time to pull them aside, and clear your name with them. Impress upon them that it's really a serious charge this girl has made, and it's totally untrue. They may not believe you; tell them specific questions they should ask her that are too black and white for her to lie about. Impress on them that our society is based on 'innocent until proven guilty', and that's it'…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:49 AM
3

Check again, they announced the new venue...at a VFW just north of the city.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:30 AM
4

Reading through her position, it is basically 'Republicanism + Feminism' I just noticed that (in this campaign website for senator) she doesn't spend even a single word discussing either foreign policy or the environment. Apparantly she forgot after spending so much time describing how only women are victims of DV, '77 cents on the dollar', how women's health issues are more important, etc. Something makes me think we're going to see a lot of pages that are cookie cutters of the next couple elec…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:17 AM
1

Posted to TheRedPill once. Said a commenter was wrong in blaming Feminism for absolutely EVERYTHING wrong in society, that a more naunced view was needed. My only comment there ever. Perma-ban. Proud to say I am banned from both TRP and a number of Feminist subs.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:33 AM
2

"Uncle Whitey's Roast Rib Shack. $100 seating fee. Free for heterosexual whites." I don't think it would go over well.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:40 AM
11

I watched a youtube from that aristocratic british teenager the other day. She was really upset that all the lies she told in a previous video caused the conversation in that video's comments 'derail' from her intended point to people calling out her lies. My eyes, they gushed.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:39 AM
1

Watch it before you downvote it people. This short doc definitely falls within the broader issue of 'Men's Rights.'
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:54 PM
4

My reply. Let's see if they publish it. Full of hatred and misogyny, after all. Are you demanding their conference is cancelled because they are ‘violent misogynists’, or because you don’t agree with them? After all, there isn’t any suggestion that any hateful or misogynistic content will actually be discussed at the conference. It includes figures such as the founder of the first battered women’s shelter in the UK and the first black female Canadian senator. The entire allegation is that they a…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 10:11 AM
5

I love the fact that she is likely to be able to support herself with this. She has a real talent, and she deserves to be rewarded for expressing it.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 07:38 AM
2

Right, it's possible because blackouts DO happen, but...thanks for the strong reply, wish i had time to respond a bit more.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:46 AM
2

+1
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:07 AM
1

If one is to be effective in the world today, one has to understand the media and public consciousness environment, and how easily manipulated both are. If he is advocating an MRA position, he WILL be presented as an MRA, and some people who don't have a strong opinion of us will associate us with that sort of attitude. This happens regularly in many different political areas.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:31 AM
1

Because we're trying to gain legitimacy. It's not about what Feminists might think, it's what the general public might think. He is advocating an MRA point in the worst possible way. In so doing, he is discrediting any discussion of that point. We can't hope to make any social progress if we remain blissfully ignorant of basic human psychology.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:49 AM
2

Even if it's possible she IS lying - it's also possible she isn't, and concluding with such conviction that she is from a fragment of the story is not right. No person should ever talk to another like that. I know he's a 'shock' personality, but that doesn't really change much.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:33 AM
1

I'm happy about this, of course, but I'm really pissed off that the MRM has to pay a 'free speech tax' in order to hold a conference. This is extortion. Will we have to pay this any time we want to get together in a conference room and discuss men's issues? Does anyone know if the FBI or other competent national authorities has been engaged in finding out who made the threats?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:54 PM
3

One important issue, to me, is the idea of men's disposability, that suffering of men doesn't really matter. Boko Haram murders a couple entire schools full of boys, but nobody notices until they kidnap a school full of girls. Elliot Rodgers shoots 4 guys and 2 girls, and the girls are the focus of media attention. TV show 'Shameless' shows a man being handcuffed to a bed and anally raped with a giant dildo while he screams in protest ('Frank the Plank' episode); it is played off as lighthearted…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:40 AM
9

Why don't they show the other instances of the girl spiking the drink? At first I was quite confused why this had so many downvotes, but now I see why.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:23 PM
3

OK, yes, I see. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/06/eric-holder-fbi-rape_n_1189145.html This is very good and needed, and it is a credit to Feminism. But I should point out one thing: It did not change the criminal definition of rape; it changed only the definition the FBI uses for collecting statistics.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 06:42 AM
3

Can you give the specifics of this? I have read it several times, and have searched for the details, but have never been able to find anything about it. My Google-Fu is weak.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 06:33 AM
3

It really is true that, if there is a 'rape culture' in America, it is generally limited to rape against males.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 06:19 AM
4

I agree with this. Not all men are awesome. Nope, didn't freeze up.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:22 AM
4

#YesAllWomenShouldLiveInAConstantStateOfFearAndIntimidationEvenThoughStatisticsDontSupportThisFeministRapeHysteriaDoesBecauseItBolstersPoliticalPowerOfTheirMovementEvenAsItHurtsActualWomenWithFearPorn
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:39 PM
7

Feminists have a very shaky connection with reality. Point out that many key Feminist issues equally affect men, and are not at all gender specific issues, and it's all 'male tearz' and 'mansplaining.'
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:37 PM
2

Yeah, a lot of Men's Rights issues are actually 'fucked up society and institutions' issues, which just happen to harm men at disproportionately high rate.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:35 PM
1

I've come to realize it's not quite right to point out radical feminists: they were decades ago, were controversial at the time, and make up probably a few % of self-identified Feminists today, not more. No, just looking at modern, mainstream Feminism is enough. I actually use that Hashtag sometimes: All Feminists twist and cherry pick statistics, distort reality, and in working to make all women fearful of men and the outside world, amplify the negative effects of anti-woman violence. #NotAllFe…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:21 PM
1

That story was likely a hoax, but it closely followed the events of a real story 10 years before. http://law.justia.com/cases/california/caapp4th/50/842.html
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:29 PM
1

and also believes in the men's rights movement because that's equality and equality is important Wait, so you're saying that you're a satan worshiping nazi?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:28 AM
3

Doesn't it both people a bit to write flagrantly stupid things attached to their name?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:21 PM
5

Male privilege exists, and female privilege exists. They are both very different things, but both very real. To deny either is stupid.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:29 PM
2

I think it was orginally a DailyKos article.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:22 PM
6

one of them, she frequents this subreddit often Please forgive me if I am a bit suspicious of her claim! I've been following the MRM for about two years. I think there must have been a quantum shift around that time, because all of the rampant misoginy and nastiness that it is infamous for, I just don't see it. Not that it's totally absent, just that it's a small minority and tends to get downvotes to oblivion much more than agreed with. I do think..I have even heard from MRAs...that the interne…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:16 AM
1

Yeah, more recent research has found that single, unwed women and lesbians make slightly more than men all factors being equal. Which indicates that the pay gap (which is more accurately around 5%) is not a misogynistic anti-woman gap, it's a utilitarian anti-pregnancy gap. And one can certainly argue this is still unfair to women, absolutely, but first at least let's start by describing things in the right way.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:37 AM
2

There is a very simple insight into 'positions of power' given in that very FB thread. A Wikipedia editor is a position of power. Minor power, but power accessible to anyone, that affects the knowledgebase of all mankind. They are a gatekeeper for information, for one of the most widely used sources in the world, accessed by hundreds of millions of people. They are the modern equivalent of publishing house editors who hold a great amount of quiet power. This is a position of power that is open t…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:32 AM
2

P.S. OP: You should link this thread on to the end of the Facebook post to give an example of all the 'hatred' and 'misogyny' that is rampant in this community. Because these comments are, from my experience, pretty representative of the tone around this subreddit.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:17 AM
0

Heroic and clear headed defense you put up, OP. Purple wins the award for 'Things that really happened, uhuh' I find particularly puzzling the line that 'Feminists have all of men's issues covered, as well' when it has generally become an accepted viewpoint that men can't be Feminists, we can only be 'allies.' But don't worry, all the female Feminists who hate and revile the MRA and only have 24 hours in their own days can surely be trusted to adequately address all male specific issues in socie…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:14 AM
13

A couple weeks ago, on some random subreddit, we were talking about Men's Rights. A poster made it a point to me to prove how evil the MRM is, and ask 'do you really want to be associated with people like that.' (S)he linked to an old Elam article, gave evidence of doxxing on this sub, etc. The point being made over and over again, 'is this a group you want to be known to be associated with?' With the clear meaning being that I should abandon interest in the 'undesirable' MRA. After contemplatio…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:07 AM
5

Maybe it will, as it will put it in front of the public eye more and give MRAs an excuse to talk about it with friends, as in 'can you believe this bullshit, major media saying that pickup artists are part of the MRM' 'The what?' 'Grab a chair!'
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:02 AM
13

The contrast between the worst of the RadFems and the worst of the MRAs really is staggering. The most strident MRA/MTGOWs want to live their lives with a minimum of female contact and not become entangled with women; the most strident RadFems want the complete extermination of all males from the planet. RadFems can accurately be described as 'FemiNazis.' Their vision for a harmonious world through gender purity echoes Nazi beliefs in harmony through racial purity; their demonization of men for …
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:01 AM
1

34 straight up haters :P
/r/MensRights26/05/14 02:59 AM
1

Your whole story was such a nightmare. I wish you and your kids the best. Stick in there, you're not alone. I wish I knew anything really helpful to say. Your only mistake throughout was ever having any faith in this broken, corrupt system in the first place :( Think outside the box. Maybe get her framed for a serious crime or something. This whole story went completely ridiculous about 2/3 of the way through.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:14 PM
5

Are we sure that he actually even made this diagram? Where did he post it? https://www.google.com.au/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisl0djmgJF8UnptVcQ7k0Ygp3w1ZlQr3XVNZBOX2QLgJm1eynrDnm1CctCCRVriCRC-X6EEpWcsTUkcegFsLnjtIdstrisc5uHjSftyziFH9GShgoyE6q7DwA8lJvXdmUI3nzBJh2nWag-TIUSNvL5CZBSy8iasPvhNxPrMME26n_1kAJtzJoAx_1MraGOddycPgy_1zB1lyf7W3h3p_1erAmO8xNnAQfgYkSiMoFKA-3DFj79cKexJOrM_1fKUO0SNbaqaBBspaPo5X3YoDmJq1kFCWBHuj3hynfeccIbrstSrqKLcLd6xgnWPs1dSpXV8SMBA1rWXKf1KzOHgi_1dMVXua8juEi4ZouczJjgqRmQK6y9LreDEmSy4…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:42 PM
1

Yeah, it's kind of the exact opposite of what I know of TRP.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:39 PM
1

MRAs believe men are entitled to basic human rights, not to women.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:34 PM
0

tumblrinaction selection bias.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:31 PM
3

How do you figure?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:59 PM
0

STOPTHEWARONWOMEN (to quote the Daily Kos' label of the incident)
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:57 PM
1

$4,500 for an evaluation. The whole thing is a racket. It's not for the good of the child. How could it be more blatant? My father worked as a prosecutor for 30+ years, and now does professional license review board stuff. He brings a huge depth of knowledge, connections, professionalism, experience to these review hearings. He charges $50/hr+travel. So a regular 3 hours session, 1 hour away, with this JD/MBA with 30 years relevant high level professional experience costs the state $250. Assumin…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:49 PM
9

I was being sarcastic. The pictures I have seen of the victims were only women. Many, many people believe he killed 6 women.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:01 AM
4

Thanks for taking time to document just how poorly understood/blatantly slandered the MRM is in the mainstream and left leaning media.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:40 AM
11

4 men, actually 2 women. STOPTHEWARONWOMEN
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:39 AM
10

It's not useless or misleading. Out of 91K /r/mensrights subscribers, 200 are also subscribers of TheRedPill. Quite to the contrary of being 'useless', this quite thoroughly puts any talk that they are one and the same to rest.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:36 AM
15

4 of the deceased are male. Whaaaa? Then how come the only victims I saw pictures of were women?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:33 AM
1

I believe that 'Patriarchy' exists, it is just wholly inaccurate to use it to describe modern western society.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:13 AM
2

I came here to say literally almost the exact same thing, also intending to use the phrase 'apples and oranges.'
/r/MensRights18/05/14 06:08 AM
3

Judge Pirro has a few good bits. If you're in the mood for more 'Men's Justice Porn', here's another great one for you. The guy is kind of a douche as well, but Pirro goes on a great rant about casually tossing around false rape charges. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cmvs4U6POR4
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:51 AM
1

Yeah, it was a great vid, very useful.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:41 AM
3

This is the original idea behind 'professional escorts' - a man would hire a woman who as not just a good lay but was well presented and classy enough to take out beforehand. This is just swapping the genders. I see no problem with this.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:25 AM
-1

LOL, feminists have been trained to believe that rape is the only evil in the world, so if you put a debate in that very simple language they understand, you completely short circuit their mental processes.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:07 AM
0

As I understand, there arguably IS what could be called a 'rape culture' in India. Rape victims really do have it quite bad, and it has been in the news a lot. Maybe their views are extreme, but I feel the mood in India is quite fed up with the high rape incidence lately. Which is just the perfect opportunity to pass a rushed, poorly thought out law!
/r/MensRights10/05/14 06:48 PM
1

1:40 or so
/r/MensRights10/05/14 06:46 PM
2

This isn't a Mens Rights issue. He got up and further escalated the situation. Maybe it's a crappy law, but if they were both guys, it would have been the same result. I know down here in Australia, if someone punches you on the street, your only legal recourse is basically to run away. It sucks..but it's not a MR issue.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 06:14 PM
2

10000 notes. tumblr, wtf. Anyone who seeks to demonize an outside group, no matter which one, should always be met with the utmost of suspicion.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:41 PM
1

Kind of a weak video. Quite a few of these felt like padding. Come on, start with a bang, not 'you can get into clubs for free.'
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:11 PM
4

Well, apparently the FBI is on the case. Otherwise..what do you do in cases like this? Call the police department? Probably the most important thing is to get media attention, which this already has. http://kxan.com/2014/02/20/feds-step-in-after-student-was-tased-at-bastrop-school/ Jesus, medical bills of 1.5M, I wonder who will pay for them?!?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:10 PM
4

Certainly not going to argue that with you for a minute, mate. Especially in America. As an American whose lived in a few countries, it's shocking the difference in the attitudes of police here vs. there...
/r/MensRights07/05/14 01:44 PM
6

EDIT: Apparently, the fight was between two BOYS. Apologize for the mistake. In light of that, this isn't really in the right sub.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:03 PM
8

Find me an instance of them tasering a 10 year old, cute as pie blonde girl, then we'll talk. I'm sure they're capable of it. Violent police do victimize women and girls. But they assault men and boys at a much higher rate.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:01 PM
1

Oh. Thanks for the correction. If that's the case, this is in the wrong sub.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 11:59 AM
1

This is literally the Feminists position: If a woman should sneak into the Institute for Criminally Insane Sex Offenders, strip naked, and lie spread eagle in the middle of the floor, and is then raped...that is 0% her fault, to criticize her for her choices is 'rape apology' and 'victim blaming,' it's outrageous and offensive to suggest she made a bad choice, the only correct response in that case is to criticize the Criminally Insane Sex Offenders for raping her. Honestly..if a man got drunk a…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 11:58 AM
1

Don't be a fucking idiot. Objecting to the specific exclusion of white people from the council is not 'racism.' Sure, I agree that young male minorities have it harder than young white minorities. There isn't much question. But that doesn't mean that all young male whites have it super easy. Create a council to study the challenges of young black and hispanic boys, sure. But then, also make another one that studies all boys. As it stands there are these presidential council set up to study the c…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 11:33 AM
3

In a sane world? No. By the Feminist definition? Absolutely.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:45 AM
1

Notice I didn't use the term 'Feminist' to describe her at all, but an advocate of 'Woman's Liberation'. I consider them to be very different things. Feminism, the advocacy of women's interests, in many cases clashes with male interests. Woman's Liberation, as I see it (as a libertarian), goes hand in hand with Men's Liberation.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:48 PM
3

Great reply. I realize that 'Individualist Feminist' is a fair term to call myself: Hey, I have a daughter, I want her to be strong, self empowered, and go through life confidently and with many choices. But this entire modern Feminist movement fucking stinks, and it must be pointed out time and time again that it disempowers women, robs them of agency, and seeks to create a generation of perpetual victims.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:06 PM
3

But of course - women have no agency, so if she typed stupid and hurtful things on a website, it wasn't her, it was merely her victimization by the patriarchy and an aggressive man that subconsciously influenced her to type these things.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:49 PM
11

Here's the thing about false accusation rates: They are inherently unknowable. If a man is falsely accused and convicted, by all measurable statistics, he goes in the 'real rapist' column. If a man rapes a woman and successful claims its a false charge, he goes in the 'falsely accused' column. (ignore the gender assumption, just speaking hypothetically) There is no way to ever cut this Gordian knot. It will never be possible to say with any certainty what the false accusation rate is. Never. It'…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:42 PM
1

Simple enough: Vote with your wallet... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5kWu1ifBGU
/r/MensRights01/05/14 10:02 AM
2

regardless of gender Oops, yeah, I meant to mention that in the title. That was my first thought watching it - 'oh no, you got harassed by a bum...it must be so hard to be a lady (man)!'
/r/MensRights30/04/14 06:28 PM
2

Rape- That is one I haven't seen. Notice, though, they didn't show a mugging or murder. That's the male version. And the 'female version' shown here is completely unrealistic. The vast majority of rapes are by acquaintances. This video seems to assume that public gang rape in broad daylight is some sort of common thing. Maybe in Liberia or wherever...
/r/MensRights30/04/14 06:26 PM
3

My only experience teaching was in Korea. I consider myself so lucky. It was a public school, but it was so incredibly laid back. Spend the entire lunch break in the tumbling room, sparring with half the boys in horseplay that always involved a lot of sore limbs? Looks like fun! Teaching the smaller classes on a single couch with all the kids crowded around me? Sure, no problem. Taking the kids on my motorcycle speeding through the countryside? Light, laughing reprimand. It was really refreshing…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:28 PM
5

He makes a few good points however. Her show SHOULD be pulled off the air for this.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:43 PM
1

I couldn't avoid that takeaway. In Feminist land, raping someone is 1000 times worse than murdering them. What would have been the reaction if Jaime had stuck his sword in her gut, instead of his prick?
/r/MensRights26/04/14 08:26 AM
3

She speaks so fast that it's a bit hard to call each bullshit item she spouts. '1/4 girls are sexually assaulted' Um, yeah, bullshit. I tracked down that statistic once, it includes 'pestering for a kiss' and other relatively petty behaviours into the 'sexual assault' category.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:56 PM
1

How about physically preventing people who want to hear you from entering the lecture hall, as happened at the UofT Farrel lecture?
/r/MensRights21/04/14 09:05 AM
-2

So if I DDOSed his server so that nobody could visit it, then hacked the files and deleted everything, that might be criminal, but that wouldn't be a violation of his free speech. Rather it would be a sign that the people reading his cartoons think he's an asshole. OK...
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:05 AM
1

The 'it's one of the two major DE's' was true a few years ago...before Gnome totally jumped the shark.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:01 AM
1

I once spent some time digging into the original source material for the "1 in 5 women will be raped number". It turns out, this includes a wide variety of activities, including 'pestering for a kiss.' The number who experienced actual sexual assault was something less than 10%, still too high of course, but quite a bit different from the mid 20s%.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 11:44 AM
-2

Is this true? It says you can buy the game here: http://www.truthandtrolls.com/#!play/c1acn If it's just a case of final deliverability, cut her some slack, it's hard to finish games on deadline, for anybody. Particularly if it's your first project. Duke Nukem comes to mind.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 09:07 PM
1

This video was awful. Some stupid trivial political bullshit completely divergent from any relevant issues to anybody. She sounds like a usual politician asshole, the interviewer is an obnoxious badger. Nothing is gained in the interview, nothing is learned. Nobody is 'destroyed' except the time spent watching it. Downvote, downvote, downvote.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 02:12 PM
5

Safe assumption. She looks like an expert at the "negative 100% return" investment method...
/r/MensRights22/11/13 11:04 PM
4

Look at this lady! She's a smart professional, an expert! She's finally found a skilled well paying career! at using legal maneuvers to take as much money from her husband as possible... http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/11/10/article-2496333-195080F100000578-288_306x725.jpg
/r/MensRights22/11/13 03:52 PM
21

She shames women everywhere. $20M is a fortune ten times over for any sane person in the world. She didn't help him create the fortune, just perhaps maintain it (and spend it). By her words, her lack of gratitude to life her, she deserves nothing. Not a pence. She should be forced to get a job washing dishes to afford a share flat.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 03:26 PM
2

Damn. Did anything, at all, happen to her?
/r/MensRights17/11/13 05:39 PM
1

MGTOW Interesting, never heard that term before.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 05:43 PM
3

It's a big world. Wife beating has and continued to be pervasive in many societies. I would absolutely argue that a patriarchy exists in, say, most of the Middle East, or India to a lesser extent. That is, the average man in for instance Pakistani society is involved in oppressing the average woman. Wife beating was common practice in Korea and almost expected until only one generation ago.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 05:41 PM
5

I think this sub is composed largely of people who are genuinely egalitarian in their desires. It's a fundamentally different thing from TheRedPill, which is much more focused on restoring traditional gender roles.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 05:35 PM
2

The inflection point seemed to have been around 9/11 or so. If the terrists blew up the towers, next they're going to kidnap all the kids. It matches a creeping criminalization of everything. Things that were once considered innocent and banal are now severely punished. It's simply madness. It applies to so many issues. To me, it touches on the men's rights issue, because I see the abusive and discriminatory 'justice' system (and related 'zero tolerance' policies) as being one of the most import…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 03:24 PM
4

It's a different world. There is a new fucked up story every day. An eight year old was threatened with expulsion this week for drawing a ninja with a sword, last months Child Protective Services took some kids away because they were playing in the front yard, while mom was watching through the kitchen window. Youth is being outlawed, as is basic innocent human nature. And, of course, the children are the real victims here - because if you raise a generation only on the 'safe' activity on sittin…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 08:56 AM
6

Without answering your question directly, that is (or has been) the legal situation in a number of ass backward states. http://uspolitics.about.com/b/2007/10/28/georgia-supreme-court-releases-wilson.htm
/r/MensRights03/11/13 08:41 AM
1

http://scherle.com/psychoexgirlfriend/voicemails.html Just listened to a few of these the other day. It was like deja vu. I had an ex who sounded EXACTLY like them, even used most of the same ploys and emotional swings..at one point even trying to frame me for drug possession while we were in india. Red flags, pay attention to them.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 04:50 AM
3

really sorry you're going through this. honestly, he may well have his life utterly destroyed by a malicious criminal, and if you aren't lucky there may be little you or he can do to prevent this. That is why MRAs consider the false rape issue to be very serious, and feel that malicious false rape accusations beyond a reasonable doubt should be treated the same as rape itself. In some ways, being falsely accused of rape can be more damaging to one's overall life trajectory than rape itself - bot…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 04:47 AM
4

It's to protect the victim, you see.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 04:22 AM
11

Two men I have known, both forced into fugitive status. One, a divorced father with minimal vistiation who had proof and several witnesses to attest that the mother was a drug addict and was spending his child support on hard drugs she was using around the children while neglecting the children. Nobody in the family court system would even consider his evidence or his demands for custody. The judge looked him in the eye at one point, and told him flat out 'Inside these walls, you have no rights.…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 04:07 AM
0

They need a new mascot for it: http://cdn0.dailydot.com/cache/6f/8d/6f8d38c48652603a776e7b1e26edf613.jpg
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:54 AM
2

No, he's saying that media tends to glorify violence and criminality and denigrate the law abiding average Joe. As the case may be, most actors portraying glamorous criminals are black, and most actors portraying wage labor middle class losers are white. In truth, both blacks and whites are harmed by this typecasting. If this op comment is your "strong" evidence that /r/mensrights is white supremacist, imo, that is itself evidence it is not.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:53 PM
1

Yeah, fucking /r/avengers, fuck those guys! In short, yes, yes it is.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:18 PM
0

Well, I can't find that link..so apparently it was deleted, too.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:08 PM
0

Well, to be fair, I made a single comment on /r/TheRedPill basically saying that blaming every ill in western civilization on Feminism was hyperbolic and counter-productive, and I was perma-banned from there as well... The sword cuts two ways, friends. edit: OK, OK, sorry - for some reason I thought the two were closely aligned.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:02 PM
-18

This is stupid. Every issue on here is one that feminism doesn't say anything about, except for porn, which I doubt has really done you so much good. Thus post makes me think of something on r/politics where they complain about "those libertarians trying to shove their bibles down my throat. All you demonstrated is you don't understand feminism and are happy to project your own ideas about a type of person you don't like, and labeling that "feminism" fail.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/13 02:53 AM
1

tl; dr
/r/seduction11/07/13 02:57 PM
5

Nah, she's British. But several of my friends who lived over there are now married to Korean girls. I think a certain segment of Korean girls still do look forward to marrying a western man, because the default lifestyle for Korean women can really suck. I had a friend who, although she worked more hours than her husband, was also expected to clean every fucking thing for her husband AND in-laws and prepare all sorts of elaborate banquets. WTF. It was driving her nuts. I think there is so much e…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 04:28 PM
3

Yah, I'm sure you're right, but it was in Korea so pretty cheap.don't remember how much.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 09:50 PM
3

Lol my wedding cost like $3...that was for the train fare.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 09:46 PM
-2

Two wrongs don't make a right. Don't stoop to their level.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 11:36 AM
1

Which sucks.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 11:33 AM
5

Oh dear. And when this woman gets turned down for job after job, I'm sure she's going to blame it wholly on 'cis-gender discrimination.' This was really a particularly ugly display. These foolish women here are their own worst oppressors.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 11:04 AM
1

You're just thinking about this now?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 07:28 AM
1

That's fine. I don't believe in monogamy. I think it is unnatural. I think people should have affairs. But for fucks sakes, be honest about it. There is no shame in being highly skilled at being a lying weasel.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:48 AM
2

That's really good to hear. Now, if the system was anything other than insane, that law would retroactively pardon past 'romeo and juliet' cases.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 12:50 PM
1

An edit to that: We must recognize the awesome and terrifying power of the state. The state has the power to extinguish the lives of any of its citizens just like swatting a fly. If the state can shrug and radically disrupt the lives of thousands. The state can kill, put people in dark cages for years, destroy businesses and impoverish families, etc. It has all these powers at ready use. So, in order for this terrible power to exist, there must be many, many checks against it. However, what you …
/r/MensRights21/04/13 12:48 PM
0

The problem is, while waiting for the epically slow process of changing obviously unjust laws, to defend those who enforce and prosecute them. Putting 'law' above basic human rights and morality. Saying that the only way to change the enforcement of unjust laws is through the legislative process, that the police, courts, prosecutors should have no humanity at all, no judgement, no intelligence, but just by the book destroy life after life, is a recipe for disaster. Drug laws are also inherently …
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:58 PM
2

This is the logic of all abusive governments everywhere. 'We're going to continue to destroy your life, but maybe you can work to change than. In 20 years, we might stop shitting down your throat. Maybe. In the meantime, hey, just doing our job. Sorry about all the futures destroyed, but not really. It's your own fault, should have voted for somebody else, even though the system is rigged by the 2 parties.' You know as well as I that the average person has absolutely no way to change laws in Ame…
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:33 PM
33

Living off the radar, running from the authorities who wanted to send him back to prison for his 'sex offender violation' (not reporting where he was living while homeless).
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:56 PM
4

If a law is unjust, abusive, and trashes basic human rights, the problem is with the law, not the so-called 'offender.'
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:45 PM
8

Man, I'm sorry, but fuck you. Rape implies 'not consent.' If you are saying a 15 year old can't consent to sex, you are saying she can't consent to anything - forced medication, being forced to move against her will, forced association, etc. You are denying her humanity and basic human rights.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:29 PM
169

I once met someone this happened to. Same ages, 18 15. Her parents were ultra religious. He got gang raped many times in prison. After getting out, he was a lifetime registered sex offender. After getting out, he ended up homeless for awhile. He didn't update his location because he didn't know what to say, he was living in his car. He ended up with a warrant out for him for violating the sex offender statue. He didn't want to go back to prison, because he didn't want to get raped again. When I …
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:18 PM
5

I noticed you didn't say a single word in here about the personal dynamics between you and the girl. She checks all the boxes, but do you two GET ALONG??
/r/TheRedPill17/04/13 05:01 AM
2

Well to be fair...ah..she was already pregnant when we married. And we didn't really have a choice because of immigration reasons (she's british, im US, we were in Korea). Say what you will, but raising a child has absolutely been the most amazing joyful experience of my life. Nothing's ever perfect, but it's sure as hell been worth it so far...
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 05:11 PM
4

I had an old family friend I went to elementary school with, never really friends with her. She was engaged, and just about to start her residency as an MD. I heard from my mom that she was FURIOUS with her parents, to the extent of having a phone tantrum, that the parents were ONLY pitching in 50k to the wedding. SMH. To be fair, her parents are pretty loaded..but shit, my folks do OK too, and I am grateful if they send me $100. LOL, my wedding was in the seoul municipal office, and costs basic…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/13 10:31 PM
-21

Oh come on. This is as stupid as the feminists, pretending there is no difference between men and women. Consider this following example: How do you think the average adult man would feel about having 20 beautiful women waving their tits in his face? How do you think the average adult women would feel about having 20 handsome dudes waving their dicks in her face? I think it's safe to say that 90% of men would love the situation while a minority of women would. I'm not say this video isn't messed…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 03:49 PM
6

too intellectual
/r/seduction15/02/13 08:17 AM
2

http://miraclefrooties.com.au/images/High%20Five.jpg
/r/seduction12/08/12 08:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter