TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lodro Archive

View 0 posts and 402 comments by lodro on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Haha. There is no substantive difference between our points of view except that you're stuck on what I choose to call each thing.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/17 02:32 AM
1

9778139
/r/askTRP20/01/17 01:44 AM
–

That's a fair point; in my mind that kind of crying isn't crying. There are tears but it really isn't the same.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/17 01:43 AM
1

2577456
/r/askTRP19/01/17 05:19 PM
1

42482671
/r/askTRP19/01/17 05:00 PM
1

8368
/r/askTRP19/01/17 04:42 PM
2

701
/r/askTRP19/01/17 04:42 PM
1

064448
/r/askTRP19/01/17 04:37 PM
1

54142818
/r/askTRP19/01/17 04:30 PM
1

805687
/r/askTRP19/01/17 04:26 PM
–

McGregor, like all self-made men was extremely lucky, and his success is extremely rare. There are millions of men out there who worked just as hard and achieved far, far less, none of whom you will ever hear of.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/17 04:00 PM
–

Grown men crying are a terrible sight.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/17 03:43 PM
–

I find it funny that your comment is about twice as long as the OP, which might be summed up as "you guys are talking too much and trying too hard".
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 11:14 PM
–

I really don't believe you're being realistic about this. It's reasonably likely this will end your relationship. You're putting the pants on her here; it's unlikely to work.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 10:59 PM
–

No, fuck off with that. Terms like "soft next" and "dread game" are useful because they have specific meanings. One of the greatest differences between intelligent people and everybody else is that intelligent people maintain and use concepts with high specificity. If you want to be a dumbass, you have plenty of other people to keep company with. This shouldn't be the place for it.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 10:55 PM
–

In my view you're setting yourself up for a huge disappointment by trying to open the relationship this way. She'll never feel ok about it and you're rubbing her face in it by making it explicit.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 04:05 PM
–

I agree; it's tempting to want to think you can do this and have everybody just be polite and understanding about it like nice modern "it's CURRENTYEAR" people, but it doesn't ever seem to work. If you want to bang on the side in a committed relationship that started out monogamous, you have to be Machiavellian about it.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 03:45 PM
–

No, you can't. Dread game is something quite different; you can't soft next because she lives in your fucking house. There is no question about whether you'll come back, and you're very obviously going out of your way to make some kind of impression.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 06:58 AM
–

FEELS BEFORE REALS TRP populated by sissies confirmed
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 02:23 AM
–

No, you can't. The soft next does not apply to women you live with.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 02:20 AM
–

That isn't really how it works. The difference between pseudo-science and science is a difference in underlying logic, in the reasons given to believe something. It is rare for the logic of pseudo-science to produce actionable, worthwhile hypotheses that could be put to the test using scientific thinking and methods; because of this, pseudo-scientific claims rarely progress to become scientific facts (as they are almost always either false or unfalsifiable).
/r/TheRedPill14/01/17 11:49 PM
–

Sadly, this sub and the TRP community as a whole are mostly made up of men in the anger phase or not even RP.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/17 11:44 PM
–

Missed point see other reply for detail; you're imagining an absurd situation which I would never propose
/r/TheRedPill12/01/17 08:57 PM
–

It's just another self defense scam. There are only ~four legitimate martial arts that are widely taught in the US today: BJJ, kickboxing (Muay Thai or western), wrestling, and boxing. What makes these arts legitimate is that they are all active, competitive sports and most gyms teach them within a culture of active, realistic sparring against resisting opponents. And importantly, each sport has a ruleset that allows for a reasonably realistic simulation of actual combat. It's possible to find l…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/17 07:15 AM
–

If you're moving in on some dude's woman then u deserve what happens to u. That's bullshit. She isn't his; it was his turn. If he wants to pick a fight over his turn being over, he can get stomped.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/17 07:07 AM
–

I don't count reddit as social media. It is social media, though. Look at your description of how you use it; it's not much different from a Facebook news feed.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/17 07:48 PM
–

Think what you like; idgaf.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 04:50 AM
–

You missed my point completely. I'm guessing you aren't into sports.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 04:28 AM
–

That may be, but isn't necessarily the case. This example is ambiguous because we don't know, but have good reason to suspect that the 2nd place finisher wasn't a natural female either. Cycling is far and away the number one PED sport and those two finished far ahead of the rest.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 02:17 AM
–

She beat one rider by 1 second, and everybody else by 22 minutes or more. 22 minutes is a huge lead.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/17 11:05 PM
–

Should probably delete and spell degeneration correctly. Great post though man, I'm glad you've made it. It's one part of the huge influx of guys the sub has had over the years.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/17 10:51 PM
–

Ottermode Has to be one of the dumbest terms that's come up in the last few years.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 11:32 PM
–

post wall 7.5-8. definitely bangable Dude, what are you talking about?
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 11:06 PM
–

That isn't the case. You're too committed to winning ego points to have a constructive dialogue.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 10:50 PM
–

Yeah...that really wasn't the point of this post man. You should read the whole thing.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 08:16 PM
–

I believe those two statements are not mutually exclusive.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 09:48 AM
–

Those are the only two options you can imagine? Damn..
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 12:49 AM
–

Nobody knows if they bang or not. OP didn't get any answer because he blew himself out by being an autist.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 11:52 PM
–

No. If OP had any sense he wouldn't have said that in front of his friend's girl - it accomplishes nothing.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 11:49 PM
–

Make Him Comfortable Have him lean back in a comfortable chair or suggest he lie down in the bedroom. Have a cool or warm drink ready for him. Arrange his pillow and offer to take off his shoes. Speak in a low, soft, soothing and pleasant voice. Allow him to relax - unwind. About as close as you can get to saying "suck his dick" in that era
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 09:37 PM
–

Sort of. You really don't want to fake more than you have to - it should be a crutch that you use when necessary. For example: You're going to a party to get laid where there will be a lot of young women you don't know. You know you're going to feel very nervous when you go up to talk to them at first. You should hide that nervousness at first with the aim of relaxing and letting go. If you spent the whole night feeling nervous but suppressing it that wouldn't be very helpful - your goal has to …
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 09:20 PM
–

It depends on what you do, what result you get. If you make a habit of faking emotions and so on then you'll end up with a bunch of habits of faking emotions and so on. That's what a lot of guys here seem to be doing, though I don't believe most of them realize that. You need to keep your critical thinking skills engaged with a subject like this. Don't accept something as truth until you've seen it with your own eyes and examined it thoroughly. The idea of "alpha" and "beta" males itself is both…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 05:35 AM
–

I think OP's message would be better revised and improved on.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 03:38 AM
–

Well...there's something to this, but I have to seriously question your priorities here: The key is to pretend. Just try it, and see the results. Talk positively about everything, every fucking thing, even if it makes you cry from inside. Mother died? Feel any emotion you want to feel but show to others that you are thankful, she must be in suffering and death have freed her of it. Hamster to the next level. Show others that you can't think negative.(Death of mother is just to illustrate an exam…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/17 10:51 PM
1

Most or all of the anarchist subreddits, like most anarchist groups in the US, are overrun with and ironically overseen by pink hair fat lesbian transwoman libtards.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 11:42 PM
2

No need to be a Butthurt Beverly about it OP.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 11:35 PM
2

I gave you a thoughtful, intelligent, reasonably charitable reply; you gave back a rude, low-effort one that entirely missed every point I made above. No amount of Testosterone would turn a 5'2" subhuman mouthbreather with frail bones into a 6'5" robust Chad. And yet a frail, mouthbreathing 14 year old could easily grow into a strong, reasonably good looking nose-breathing man if he chooses to lift, eat, and stand up straight with his mouth closed. You clearly both over and under estimate the in…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 08:35 PM
1

A good face is mostly genetic and prenatal. You're mistaken. You can tell somebody doesn't know what they're talking about when they call any complex human trait "genetic". Genes do not effect development - nor anything else - directly. They only have any effect via the proteins they encode for, which signal the cells they're in to make other molecules or take various actions. What genes are you talking about? By what mechanism do they function? How does that mechanism interact with a person's e…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 07:46 PM
1

For sure man. I guess you're also genetically fat-chinned then. Rare combination.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 06:31 PM
1

Well...that is an rare state if it's true. I have a lot of experience training with people around the 8-15% bf range and equivalent in women, and in my experience very few men store noticeable fat anywhere except the stubborn spots (abs/lowback/butt) once they reach about 10%. No neck fat, no chest fat. If you used to be fat it's probably skin and empty tissue (which only cosmetic surgery or a long ass time would reduce).
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 06:10 PM
1

Ah yeah, I mix up the fiber types all the time. You got it though, just have to swap them for my post to make sense; the point is that hypertrophy from test definitely targets more than protein deposition and is relevant to muscular endurance (including slow twitch).
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 09:43 AM
1

The recovery you can make as an adult is limited and research is lacking. I'd watch one or more of Dr. Mike Mew's talks if you want to know more about it, he gives a good and fair overview despite his obvious interest in having interventions work.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 09:00 AM
1

It definitely builds the jaw muscles, but if done during growing years it also powerfully influences the development of the face. This is probably why so many modern people have ugly ass chinless faces and require orthodontics to keep their teeth straight; people don't use their jaws much growing up. Interestingly: fiber intake has a fairly strong influence on blood cholesterol levels, which you mentioned above (more fiber = lower cholesterol).
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 07:29 AM
1

For sure man, I get that. It's just the domain hosting that article; nothing in the article is about paleo really. It's just a quick fluff piece to familiarize a person with the issue at a casual level (the level most people look for). I have yet to read or meet anybody that was into paleo who could advocate for it convincingly; I think they have one good idea (that a modern diet is pretty shit, and doesn't match our evolutionary heritage) but basically nothing else. Their diet doesn't actually …
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 07:19 AM
1

I offered it as an easy summary of the basic ideas that surround this topic, not as a source supporting a claim. If you read the article, you'd know that the author himself basically presents it as an inconclusive overview. Your low effort comment only serves to discourage participation, apparently in a vain attempt to earn ego points by putting down someone else's contribution. It's pointless.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 06:52 AM
1

There was actually a study using photos of men with feminine versus masculine features. The masculine featured man (features typically caused by higher testosterone levels) got the most votes for a one night stand (read: sexual attraction). Right: one of those photo game studies. There are two problems with this as it relates to the OP and my reply above: First, they're rating photos. It's relevant to your response rate on Tinder, but does it generalize to real life? Nobody knows. Second, facial…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 11:28 PM
1

Well, the idea that testosterone only induces type I fiber growth is not true. One of the primary effects of supraphysiological testosterone use (i.e. STEROIDSSS) is actually enhanced glycogen production in muscle and enhanced insulin sensitivity; in short, muscles fill up with extra fuel and water. This greatly enhances performance, and can allow a person to train very heavily. It also reverses entirely when testosterone levels return to normal, but could lead to a lasting edge if the user took…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 11:17 PM
1

It's true. I see it as an expression of excessive magical thinking in society at large, and not all that particular to the manosphere. Though I could be wrong in that. I'm glad OP made his post though, this is a great topic for discussion and he made some fair points.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 11:12 PM
6

don't forget the dick gains gotta jab that too
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 08:37 PM
1

To be fair, gaining strength in the upper back does seem to improve posture. Perhaps it's because the activities you have to do to gain that strength stretch the muscles on the front of your body, or perhaps there's an increase in Type I muscle's health or mass that comes with it. A lot of the size increase seen with training isn't fiber at all, but is water, fuel (glycogen), mitochondria (energy production), and other metabolic factors. Perhaps that helps. I wouldn't be surprised if that claim …
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 08:33 PM
11

You missed the point. A man in his early 20's with T levels of a 60 year old is hypogonadal. He'll feel like shit, have womanly fat deposits, poor libido, etc. He should get tested and address the problem. The rest of us who have normal range testosterone and live a healthy lifestyle do not need to think about it. Eat good food, get good rest, exercise, fuck women, control stress, and avoid endocrine disruptors - yes, those are all good ideas. Having done that, you do not need to sit around thin…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 08:28 PM
2

Here is an easy to read summary of ideas surrounding this intended for a lay audience. Here is an experimental study in mice; despite obvious limitations in applicability, their jaws do have a very similar structure and function to ours. Studies like this establish that mammalian jaw development is function dependent (makes sense given that all other parts of the musculoskeletal system are). Here is a fairly long lecture by an orthodontist from the UK who appears to have made this topic his life…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 08:24 PM
2

Exercise and a good diet do the same thing :/ There's minimal fat left in the facial area of healthy males once they hit about 12%-15% body fat.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 07:36 PM
1

It certainly isn't all genetics, but it's also true that you can't make large changes after you're done growing. While growing, facial form is dramatically influenced by posture and diet.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 07:36 PM
2

Lift, sit up straight, and eat reasonably hard foods. It will have a larger effect and be better for you. If in your early 20s after you're done growing you still want to take steroids, look into it then at the earliest. It's usually a bad move unless you're a professional athlete (in which case it's usually mandatory).
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 07:34 PM
13

Excuse me? Why make this into a childish confrontation? You were wrong about several things you posted, and I corrected you. If you disagree about the facts, discuss the facts. It's clear from my post above that I'm a reasonably intelligent person and not a moron. It's clear from your post that you're a reasonably intelligent person and not a moron (else I would not bother replying). Why pretend otherwise? You want to win some imagined argument? It isn't remotely convincing. Soft tissue moves to…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 07:24 PM
5

Yeah, there is. That is why I said: this post is absolutely packed with scientifically inaccurate yet emotionally satisfying silliness. It's true. The post is full of demonstrably false claims.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 07:20 PM
114

Nothing against you - this is a great subject and I'm glad you've posted on it. That said: this post is absolutely packed with scientifically inaccurate yet emotionally satisfying silliness. Pseudoscience is a major threat to the TRP community, right up there with the threat of excessive faggot influx (too many newcomers to sustain). It's insidious - pseudoscience is better than actual scientific knowledge in every way except accuracy, and so is hard to keep out of your head and community. It's …
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 06:48 PM
51

No, first comes arguing on the internet, then comes arguing on the internet, and that culminates in arguing on the internet.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 11:20 PM
1

That makes sense rationally, but again, easier said than done with some things. Which always comes up when this is discussed.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 11:08 PM
1

Well, I disagree. If you're skinny, you should lift. And you should cultivate the feeling that you're good enough as you are and don't need a certain physique to be worthwhile to women. Either one alone is suboptimal; you want both. If you're short, you can't get taller. But you can wear boots, you can keep a slightly taller hairstyle, etc. You should probably do whatever you can (within reason) to enhance your height, because it matters. And you should cultivate the feeling that you're good eno…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 09:45 PM
3

Feels good to see the constructive attitude people have here, in contrast.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 09:43 PM
1

Had to search that one (QTIP: "Quit taking it personally"). Yeah, that's fair. Though easier said than done with something like height; I imagine that would hit pretty hard.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 09:42 PM
1

I have to replies to that: First, no. The passage you're thinking of reads: Disdain Things you cannot have: Ignoring them is the best Revenge By acknowledging a petty problem you give it existence and credibility. The more attention you pay an enemy, the stronger you make him; and a small mistake is often made worse and more visible when you try to fix it. It is sometimes best to leave things alone. If there is something you want but cannot have, show contempt for it. The less interest you revea…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 09:51 AM
1

That really isn't my point. My point is that pretending you don't want things you can't have as a reaction to finding out you can't have them is a way to cultivate weakness and doesn't serve you.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 09:30 AM
12

If she rejects you based on your height, she has her own issues to deal with and you don't want her anyway Don't cultivate sour grapes thinking; you're just lying to yourself, which creates weakness. This isn't exclusively a short guy thing either. It doesn't benefit any man to think this way (she rejected me for X, therefore she has negative quality Y so I'm not missing out), but many of us are tempted to at times. This is a pretty good post, but you have two types of content mixed together in …
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 07:19 AM
5

Somehow they always seem like a dick move. Glad to see this one appreciated; it's only a correction, nothing to prove by it.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 09:06 PM
20

Me and my friends use it constantly My friends and I use it constantly. You can check sentences like this by seeing if the sentence works if it's just one person in the list: Me use it constantly I use it constantly "I" is required here because it is the subject. "Me" is an object and can't perform actions. Things are done to me; I do things.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 08:17 AM
4

Yeah no shit, because it's a self-selected group with a strong bias for cuck
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 08:09 AM
10

get off reddit and talk to grilll
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 06:12 AM
5

I would have never thought that (atleast for ME), these feminazi women are some of the most responsive to red pill game. It's insane. And the more I've been messing around, literally, these are some of the easiest chicks ever to game. lot of them aren't bad looking either. Could be a combination of the utter scarcity of non-faggot men in their social circles and their "sex-positive" philosophy. I've also found that super liberal / feminist women (on the opposite coast) are often incredibly easy.…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/16 10:09 PM
8

That's cool man. But have you considered lately how awesome it is to be single? Forget pussy! I have all the time in the world to do what I want to do as a man: post on internet forums and collect model trains. TRP FOR LIFE BITCHES
/r/TheRedPill26/12/16 07:51 AM
1

To be fair most people are idiots.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/16 07:48 AM
6

Yeah, that kind of thing is extremely transparent. It's obvious that you're doing something to try to make it on your terms, which communicates that you're upset about it and feel the need to make it look like it's on your terms. It's a sign of weakness and immaturity. Much better to actually be comfortable with yourself and just let it go. Other than that point I think OP has the right idea.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/16 07:43 AM
1

Yeah. Old habits die hard. Sounds like a great experience to have, though. She really did you a favor by being straight about it (and you did yourself a favor by getting confirmation from her and not just fading away, even though it hurts). You can think this one over when you need emotional leverage to make a better choice next time. If she's genuine about wanting to be some kind of friend (they usually aren't but you can be the judge) you could even take her up on it. Female friends can be ext…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/16 07:02 PM
1

Yes you have you florid talkin homosexual
/r/TheRedPill19/12/16 07:57 AM
1

well that went way over your head
/r/TheRedPill19/12/16 07:28 AM
-1

I have a social brain and can understand more from human speech than the literal meaning of words. You probably do too. I doubt that you would actually approach a situation like this the way you claim.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/16 06:08 AM
1

Pretty clear from context it wasn't a credible threat. Autism ftw
/r/TheRedPill19/12/16 06:05 AM
24

I disagree about involving the police etc, I think that would be a terrible move. Great way to ruin everybody's night, look petty, and be (rightly) ostracized.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 09:59 PM
15

That isn't what happened and isn't relevant. Nobody was a champ.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 09:56 PM
160

No; he fucked up by apologizing when he did nothing wrong. He let some guy walk up and punch him out of nowhere when he was doing nothing wrong, and let a whole room of people end up on that guy's side.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 06:39 PM
1

Guys vary a lot in their hormonal status; refractory period, time to orgasm, etc are regulated by prolactin and estrogens and so on. This is why prolactin lowering drugs basically remove the refractory period. It isn't just a youth thing.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/16 07:11 PM
4

I've tried to make myself last longer with distraction techniques But to be frank, this kinda hampers sex for me... Yeah, fuck that. She'd probably rather have you enjoy yourself and not last as long. If she's really into you she probably cares more about your enjoyment than anything in that moment. You could do what I do: hold back nothing, but be ready to fuck 2-3 times in rapid succession. Not everybody can do this without drugs, but you might surprise yourself if you try to make it work for …
/r/TheRedPill16/12/16 07:03 PM
1

That's a pretty crap source.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/16 03:05 AM
0

Didn't need to be so harsh about it, sounds like. You don't want to express that you're put out or whatever, or say things she'll take that way. In the long run you want to work yourself out so that you aren't put out by things women do because women will always do things like this etc. That said unless you want a relationship where you say 6 and she says "I'll be there at 7" and you just accommodate it like a bitch, you obviously had to say no. But I think it's better to do it in a way that lea…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/16 02:58 AM
1

Your experience doesn't really matter on this point. AWALT is already established in its meaning and it isn't quite what you're saying. Your experience is great but don't use it to fuzzy up the definitions of basic technical terms.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/16 02:52 AM
2

Spoken like a dude who has banged 2-3 women who were all roughly as hot as one another. AWALT != all women are exactly the same. Categorical differences in response between different tiers of attractiveness are a well established finding.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/16 02:51 AM
0

Hey guys I've been doing Starting Strength for about 4 weeks and I'm here to tell you how to lift and get bitches RP truth 4 lyfe wut
/r/TheRedPill14/12/16 05:09 PM
8

At some point in the next month you will be a bum in Austin, jerking off to the memory of porn in a public toilet. And for the rest of your life, you'll have to live with the knowledge that that was the deciding moment when you became a man. Or a beta fag, I guess, if you fail.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/16 05:04 PM
1

Find people who have great critical thinking skills and find ways to talk with them about complicated problems, ideally by working together or by studying a difficult discipline under them. People generally learn skills best by applying them under the guidance of somebody who has already mastered that skill.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/16 11:01 AM
1

Good luck dude. Can't relate to improv or salsa, but will attest to the benefits of improving your physique. It's easy to overemphasize but there are certain thresholds that once crossed, yield clear social benefits. Going from chubby to fit (which happens around that 15% mark) is definitely one of them.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/16 01:37 AM
2

Yeah, that must be what OP was getting at.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/16 07:31 AM
1

Can be a good exercise at times, but holy shit it is a weird thing to do in a lot of places. And a huge sink of attention that could be spent on something more productive.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/16 07:20 AM
1

Verify fucking everything you learn on the internet by testing it in the real world. Even if the person writing it had the right idea - which they often don't - our first interpretations of new ideas are often quite poor, especially with abstract or subtle ideas about complicated systems and their behavior. Test it in real life. Try to disprove it. If you can't, it may be true. I can't think of a better way to fuck up a teenage boy than to give him a few bad experiences with women and then set h…
/r/TheRedPill12/12/16 07:17 AM
3

Opposite for me: back on the Tinder train fuck pointless girls.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/16 07:14 AM
0

Another thing that hit me hard was that somehow every commenter is somehow ok with her feeling like that, focusing on the biological differences between men and women on fat loss, but not a single damn soul told her directly about all the wrong things in that way of thinking. To be fair, though: testosterone is a hell of a drug. It fucking works; men gain muscle and lose fat much faster and easier than do women. I'd have a bit of venting to do myself if I were in that position.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/16 07:11 AM
8

Usually goes something like "you did x z y and that was bad and it hurt me bla bla cry cry" and she's just annoyed that 6 weeks later you're still talking to her. Haha.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/16 06:57 PM
3

If a girl knows that you are spoiling her reputation, she is likely to get super vindictive. She may spread all sorts of lies against you, she will play the victim, invent stories against you. And importantly: she will almost always win this game.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/16 04:08 PM
6

It works fantastically with 2 year relationships - it just happens to end them.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/16 04:07 PM
21

It really depends on the situation and how it's done. I think the sub is anti-revenge in part because a lot of guys have experience of how not to do revenge and little context for well executed, appropriate revenge (which is rare).
/r/TheRedPill10/12/16 03:59 PM
149

Oh my god; who gives a fuck man.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/16 07:47 AM
1

Not a great example for OP but who cares.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/16 07:47 AM
3

Yeah. It was a mistake to come out and see her, driven by the mistake of getting attached to her. Lesson learned. That said stay cool and make the best of it. You don't need to stay angry, and it won't help to say anything to her out of anger. I probably wouldn't try to escalate anything tonight unless she starts it. Better to go out and meet somebody else, tonight or tomorrow, or just go out for the fun of it. With her or not. Hell, you could cool off awhile, say "actually friends is cool", and…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 04:06 AM
3

Trolling is all well and good, but red pill already has way too much exposure (hence the need for the OP; the community is heavily diluted with faggotry).
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 04:39 AM
1

I suppose that's one way, if you really have to be hit over the head with it to notice. Haha.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/16 08:00 AM
6

You're 5'10". You aren't short and have no idea what being a short man is like. This is a short guy meme poorly stated as a "shorter than me" meme.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/16 07:44 AM
1

We disagree and there isn't really anything else to say about it. A lot of what you said is true (e.g. strength is a masculine trait and is desirable) but also compatible with my position.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/16 11:59 PM
2

Ah yeah. TRT is very easy to do and very safe. You still have to keep estrogen balancing / blocking drugs on hand but the dose required (if any) is very low.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/16 10:44 PM
1

This is all false. You can't just fake it all from day one, but you also do not need any particular physical traits to be "alpha". They help, but aren't at all necessary. The main way they help is by helping you convince yourself that you're good enough to act like a man.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/16 10:31 PM
6

The most common steroid people use is just testosterone in an excessively high dose. Testosterone boosters do not actually exist, it is all bullshit to separate retards from money. Reddit has a decent steroids sub or two where you can answer those questions for yourself, and a TRT sub that's sort of ok. In short: high testosterone is pretty easy to manage but also easy to fuck up. The kind of guys that are attracted to it and risk tolerant enough to do it are, as a group, not the brightest or mo…
/r/TheRedPill06/12/16 10:26 PM
1

I don't follow. Where's the rule 0 in the OP? How is any of this applicable to the goal of TRP? What do you mean?
/r/TheRedPill04/12/16 11:08 PM
1

Come on man, don't backpedal now. It isn't a bad article; it's a good example of a basic online dating concept that everybody here should know well (i.e. the filter, and how much you can get away with when you have high population density). It was also unintentionally hilarious. No shame in that
/r/TheRedPill04/12/16 10:53 PM
1

TRP is cheat codes for life. Not in this context, no. You're mixing up metaphors. I believe OP's meaning there is to condemn the magic pill seeking behavior that so many people have been infected with. "Ohhh if only I obtained THING, then I would be happy". Not gonna happen! And it certainly isn't TRP.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/16 09:40 AM
2

In my view the post isn't garbage; there's garbage in it, but also some useful insight, at the very least as a seed for discussion. It's interesting to consider the parallels between rape and cuckoldry, as well as important differences (e.g. acute trauma vs. longterm investment). But we should not have any particular interest in expressing this to women or convincing anybody of this point of view. You can't find any lasting happiness by making yourself dependent on the views of other people, esp…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/16 09:35 AM
1

Yeah. This is the classic online dating hard filter strategy. It works if you have enough people to drive through it. You can use it for other outcomes as well, even to match only virgin uptight Christian prudes saving themselves for Jesus. Don't try it in a small town.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/16 09:29 AM
28

Imagine this scenario: I drag you across the bed by your hair, which is now full of Cheetoh crumbs, and slap you senseless before taking a few minutes to catch my breath, which heaves passionately over your sweet sweet bosoms m'lady Then I nut prematurely do you want some tendies also? Imma go to the kitchen I think mom made some earlier
/r/TheRedPill04/12/16 09:27 AM
2

Great post, thanks for sharing. TRP can lack empathy at times but it's absolutely central to man healing to be able to experience empathy for yourself and other people. We tend to associate empathy with femininity - to some extent rightly so - but there is absolutely a role for it in a masculine world. Have to take care of yourself.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 03:03 AM
2

TRT can be a true game changer - not to mention an incredible learning experience - for guys who are actually hypogonadal.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 03:00 AM
1

rekkt
/r/MensRights29/11/16 01:10 PM
0

6402866
/r/MensRights29/11/16 12:20 PM
13

0264
/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:40 AM
1

naw fuck that let's be dickless
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:47 AM
5

9963
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:46 AM
0

153
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:46 AM
5

That is fucking gold. Gotta be the oldest video of Ross Jeffries I've ever seen; dude is hilarious and even more so alongside that poor, poor MRA fellow and Sir Nutless Faggot on the right.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/16 08:58 AM
2

It is interesting but also very misleading. SMV only exists as a perception in somebody's view. You don't have it somewhere, tucked away and just waiting to be drawn out and wielded. It's an idea we use to talk about how attractive somebody is to another person. Imo the image of a blade that you can sharpen is an attractive but misleading fantasy. Yeah, you can mature and grow and advance your career and do various things that will tend to make you more attractive to women you meet in the future…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/16 08:42 AM
10

Today you fucked up by having any emotional investment in that scene at all. Who gives a fuck about this? I sure don't. Finish your degree and gtfo. Not one of those people is worth anybody's time, and you should be focused on what's ahead for you and your own personal growth.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/16 08:33 AM
18

Yeah holy shit. OP, none of this fucking matters in the least - get your degree and get the fuck out of there. Don't engage any of those people unless it's necessary to move forward toward the degree. You do not need to spend your time thinking about this and posting on the internet about it etc. Forget those people and get your life started up.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/16 08:31 AM
8

Things I've notice after working out (lifting+hard sport) for 2 years consistently I look like a beast I feel like a beast I am a beast Most other things about my life have not been dramatically changed Yes, there's a big personal growth aspect to hard athletic training (physique stuff and basic 5x5 meh; most of it is pretty fucking easy tbh but if it's the hardest thing you've done it'll mature you ofc). Yes, being man-shaped gets you a foot in the door with women relative to being faggot-shape…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/16 08:23 AM
1

We'll see. Imo TRP has been due for a purge and change in direction for several months.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/16 08:07 AM
8

I concur. We must stay strong and purge hard. This is a man-space; reforming half-men are welcome only if they're here to grow.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/16 12:42 AM
6

I agree - women in a TRP forum wouldn't be much of an issue if that forum were not largely populated by weak men in a bad place trying desperately to get their head on straight. Nothing against those men, btw. But a mixed sex community doesn't serve them. They require a male space to heal and grow. Having women in here would be like a women's rape survivor group inviting a bunch of sexually aggressive men to join. Wouldn't make any sense.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/16 12:40 AM
0

14095221
/r/MensRights04/10/16 03:01 PM
2

See my other reply about affirmative consent in California. California has a law that mentions affirmative consent and makes some funding dependent upon its inclusion in some public university conduct policies - that is quite different from making it a standard for criminal offenses (which would obviously be unconstitutional and has never been done). But just for fun, here is the law that defines rape in the State of California. Note that there is no mention of affirmative consent, nor anything …
/r/MensRights04/10/16 02:53 PM
1

There's no need to be childish. That remains true in the form I stated it. California has some law that requires its public universities to have conduct policies with some kind of wacky neonazi consent standard built in, but the state does not have any crimes which use such standards. That distinction must be recognized in any meaningful discussion of affirmative consent in law, and one which is almost always ignored here. You can't be arrested or convicted of any crime or punished by the govern…
/r/MensRights04/10/16 02:47 PM
0

76923
/r/MensRights04/10/16 04:37 AM
2

Ok. That's quite different from the statement you made earlier (am I doing this right?).
/r/MensRights03/10/16 11:03 PM
2

It isn't all of it because probation isn't the only thing that judges make decisions about in criminal cases.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 11:02 PM
7

As it would be to anybody that didn't have a handy reference to all those laws. Take it as shorthand for "a bunch of existing rape and rape-related offenses". This is the new law citing other laws that define what rape is, what sexual assault is, etc. So with context, the law is basically saying: (a) Notwithstanding any other law, probation shall not be granted to, nor shall the execution or imposition of sentence be suspended for, a person who is convicted of violating paragraph (2), (3), (4), …
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:02 PM
1

For sure man, cheers
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:00 PM
5

I suppose that's somewhat true and problematic, but I don't believe it's all that relevant to this thread.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 06:59 PM
0

412229
/r/MensRights03/10/16 06:59 PM
5

Oh, good catch. Probation, not parole. That said I don't see how the hyperbole after that correction follows; so far as I can tell it removes one very specific form of judicial discretion, not all of it.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 06:57 PM
3

7370074
/r/MensRights03/10/16 03:50 PM
4

6500
/r/MensRights03/10/16 03:41 PM
2

4082230
/r/MensRights03/10/16 02:54 PM
18

This law is pretty short and sweet, and is a good opportunity for someone with a poor understanding of legal language to learn by reading it closely a couple times. It doesn't define any new crimes - rape, etc, are referenced from other laws and the requirements for each remain the same as before. It just creates some cases where probation might have been available before, but isn't now. It wouldn't effect anything except whether a person receives probation. The people saying this changes consen…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 02:00 PM
24

No, it doesn't. Read the law - it'll take about 30 seconds as it's quite short and simple. It doesn't give any definitions - it only references existing law for them. The summary from the law itself: Existing law prohibits a court from granting probation or suspending the execution or imposition of a sentence if a person is convicted of violating specified provisions of law, including rape by force, pandering, aggravated sexual assault of a child, and others. This bill would prohibit a court fro…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:50 PM
-25

3330402
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:49 PM
49

Probably just an old clause that hasn't been used recently enough to get thrown out.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:17 PM
136

This would be outrageous if it were true. But this law (full text, quite short) does not change anything about the actual rape offense in California law - which is quite reasonable and has absolutely no "affirmative consent" anywhere in it. This new law disallows parole for those convicted under existing law whose victim was "either unconscious or incapable of giving consent due to intoxication". Men face many serious issues in modern society - there's more than enough for us to get up in arms a…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:15 PM
4

Why should I have to lower MY standards when I'm a such a BAD ASS BITCH? To be fair though, I have been with and known older women (past early thirties, into early forties) who were totally cool and very feminine. They exist, and they are more mature than 20-somethings generally. Can make for great relationships, sexual or not. Still comes with the mustache.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/16 10:44 AM
6

"It’s this logic that has most of my 30-something guy friends dating girls fresh out of college. " Yeah, must be the logic. See - men just don't get it. They don't understand. Why are men so dumb? Hips, tits, kindness, innocence, girlishness, youth, and a lack of mustachio - these things are obviously, rationally inferior to the power of a career driven woman who knows what she wants and won't take no for an answer because she's 38 and racked with testosterone. Wait...
/r/TheRedPill27/09/16 10:42 AM
3

40761516
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/16 06:20 AM
1

There's no perfect option in any real world human decision. In some situations it's better to just be straightforward.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/16 02:27 PM
3

Yeah that isn't true. Plenty of alpha guys are also career driven guys. Trying to show off your career to her screams provider. Having a good career doesn't scream anything in particular except that you could provide if you wanted.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/16 11:01 AM
2

You can also show that by replying casually and briefly and then moving along. Making a big joke implies that you have something to hide, which can hurt you if your career is important to her (as it often is) and she has no other way of assessing your $ value.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/16 10:59 AM
2

When you actually have a cool job and make a good living, it can be just as well to casually reply with what you do and move along. There is nothing wrong with telling a woman what you do for a living (the only problem is if you do it to gain approval). Though I prefer to make it a joke because I find the standard getting to know you conversation boring.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/16 10:58 AM
2

"What is this, some kind of job interview?" Followed by either a mock impression of a nervous young man in his first job interview (for [Her Name] Corporation) or a description of some absurd fictitious career. I've found plenty of girls, especially younger ones, just ask what I do for work out of reflex. They don't know what to say, and that's a normal thing to ask when meeting somebody new, so they ask. But it doesn't have any real intention behind it and they're usually relieved when I take t…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/16 10:54 AM
1

I mean that you both like it and can feature yourself doing it. Don't get hung up on this. Find something that's good enough and go do it 100,000 times.
/r/seduction29/08/16 02:35 PM
1

I'd just check out the free youtube material of reputable teachers (e.g. the older RSD guys) until you find one you click with. Whatever teacher you use should offer a method that seems reasonably appropriate to the social setting you're in and should emphasize doing approaches over thinking about shit and reading.
/r/seduction29/08/16 10:00 AM
3

When you notice it, it is conscious for a moment and you can decide to think about something else. Otherwise you're pretty much at the mercy of your mental and emotional habits. Probably a big part of why personalities change so slowly. That said, if you consistently choose a new way of doing something, it will eventually become your unconscious habit. So while in the moment you're largely a slave to your past, you should expect change if you do the work.
/r/seduction29/08/16 09:18 AM
1

Find a method that makes sense to you and fits your situation, and stick to it. It takes time to learn. Don't jump around from this to that - pick one method, from one teacher/school, and apply it until you get results. Living in Berkeley, you should hit the night life - you live in a huge metropolitan area (SF) and have access to a huge number of women. It is much, much easier than daygame as it is expected and you can run a huge volume and not care about making mistakes (unlike at your univers…
/r/seduction29/08/16 08:11 AM
1

agreed
/r/seduction29/08/16 08:09 AM
1

The next morning, same as post-sex contact. "Hey that was fun we should do it again ;)" You don't want her to feel like a slut; that's more important in this case than trying to look super cool. You're not going to fool anybody. Just send a quick text to show you're a decent guy; it doesn't come off as needy at all.
/r/seduction29/08/16 08:07 AM
2

Yes, you need to find a source of women your age. That will be necessary for the next few years, as women are not interested in boys. (One caveat: you should feel free to practice on them and withhold your age, just don't escalate beyond flirtation) Once you find that, get the fuck off the internet (no offense) and just talk to them. Try whatever you feel like trying. Do whatever you want. You will learn faster by doing the normal, natural, growing up stuff that every normal kid ever did than yo…
/r/seduction29/08/16 08:04 AM
2

I'd advise against this.
/r/seduction29/08/16 08:00 AM
1

It's pretty easy: you just mix in touchy feely getting emotionally attached to her honest kind of stuff. In pickup language: act more like a chode. Don't overdo it, and be genuine. If you think she's awesome, tell her that some time (and include why). Maybe take her for a date that's more stereotypically romantic. I'd avoid getting too heavy or making some big grandiose statement of intent, though. You want her to continue thinking of you as a player, but as "her player". She wants to feel like …
/r/seduction29/08/16 07:56 AM
1

Have an excuse to go your place that doesn't sound like you're just asking her to come over and bang. Can be the disingenuous practical errand: "hey my place is on the way (to wherever you're going), lets go up real quick and I'll [change my clothes / grab my wallet / turn off my AC/heater]" Wherever you're going could be something you made up that's in the direction of your place, or it could be real. Or a slightly more genuine invitation: "hey my place is 5 minutes from here, I really want to …
/r/seduction29/08/16 07:47 AM
2

Coffee dates: you show up before her and order your own drink. The only normal thing for her to do when she arrives is to buy her own drink. Gold-diggers may balk at this, which is a good filter so you can ditch them. Public places with people around are better for online dating. Women are physically vulnerable and usually don't want to be alone with you until you've built trust in person. Pick places in areas you know well, with scenic walks nearby you can transition to after a drink. Ideally w…
/r/seduction29/08/16 07:40 AM
1

Best is to separate her from the group to be with you one on one, ideally before the friends leave Second best is to prevent the group leaving or go with them, depending on what's most fun for everyone Worst is to exchange contact information Keep in mind that she may well have had no interest in you at that point anyway (her response to your awkward handhold and refusal to dance suggest that). Women's stated reasons for doing things are often lies, especially when they're trying to evade strang…
/r/seduction29/08/16 07:31 AM
7

Yes, shame on you OP. /s Usually it's better to minimize these fantasies - which is all you're experiencing - as if you run with them, you start to turn into a walking, talking, menstruating vagina. That sounds a bit cold, but it really isn't. It just isn't your role as the man to go diving into some fantasy and going head over heels for a woman. You can be more stable than that and give her room to play.
/r/seduction29/08/16 07:28 AM
2

You just have to get used to it by repetition. To you, right now, spending time with a beautiful woman alone is some rare high-stakes event that you don't want to fuck up. So of course you'll be nervous and fuck it up. If your goal is not to fuck up this date, that's a problem. If your goal is to get better with women, it isn't. That's a more adaptive goal because you're screwed in the short term. Make your goal long-term improvement. Eventually you'll be used to spending time with beautiful wom…
/r/seduction29/08/16 07:25 AM
1

A big part of being good with eye contact is not breaking it out of fear. Try practicing this with somebody you trust or, if you don't have anybody who'll do that with you, youtube videos where the subject often looks into the camera.
/r/seduction29/08/16 07:22 AM
-2

Donald Trump is a piece of shit but this post seems reasonable enough to me.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 06:53 AM
1

Yea dude bro legacy TRP TRP
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 01:15 PM
1

Haha. Donald Trump's influence in his own wealth has been net negative. He'd have far more money if he'd simply invested his inherited fortune in low-risk boring index fund instead of investing it in his own poor business decisions. Funny that TRP is so infested in with guys who want nothing more than to suck on Donald Trump's nuts.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/16 04:04 PM
1

I got six downvotes on TRP today. Didn't even have to inherit them from my Dad.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/16 03:07 PM
-5

Ehh fuck that guy, who cares.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/16 12:52 PM
4

That's a fair argument. Not sure I agree, but I appreciate your point of view.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/16 02:19 AM
0

578
/r/PussyPassDenied17/08/16 05:48 AM
1

440556
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/16 04:20 AM
206

Woman attacks a man, he defends himself, he spends 8 months in jail and she gets free publicity. This doesn't belong in this sub at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/16 03:43 PM
2

What TRP men need is to have quarterly regional meet-ups. Day one is a wrestling tournament to decide who will be the king of that region. On day two, everybody has a hefty dose of MDMA and they all take turns venting and crying about all their shitty experiences with women and/or being 5'6".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 10:30 AM
5

... Skinny guys have the absolute easiest scenario for building a nice physique: just start lifting and eating. Bulk until you're a little fat, then cut a little. You'll look 10x better in just one bulk/cut cycle, could be done with it in 6 months as you never have to cut much at all. Contrast that with a fat guy who can't bulk properly until he's got a year+ of dieting behind him. Ugh.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/16 01:00 AM
-7

mrw
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 02:06 PM
-28

I disagree - this isn't red pill. This should be removed as off-topic to help curb the gradual shift toward bullshit self-help that plagues the sub.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 01:59 PM
-2

Kind of hard to visualize a woman slapping somebody so hard they hit the ground.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/16 05:55 AM
1

Yeah. Nothing wrong with it, just doesn't necessarily get a reply. It's important not to get too worked up (nor to overthink things) when following up with numbers as the success rate is low and getting emotionally involved doesn't improve your odds.
/r/seduction03/08/16 12:16 AM
1

You didn't say anything about how long it's been that she hasn't replied, so depending on that the answer may be to wait. That said it sounds like the text you sent didn't really ask for or need a reply so I wouldn't be surprised if it didn't get one. One point of view that's quite popular is that text has only one purpose: to get the woman on the phone or in your physical presence. That doesn't mean you go straight into date logistics with every text, but if you have any strategic thought in mi…
/r/seduction02/08/16 11:21 PM
1

I didn't mean to suggest that "most" women see things that way. It's certainly a vocal minority, but they are the ones calling the shots. I see. It does seem that such people call the shots in some cases, but I don't believe that it's widespread nor inevitable in any particular case. In many situations, especially those where decisions are made locally by relatively small numbers of people, it's relatively easy to influence who gets to call the shots.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:29 AM
2

I don't dispute the particular example, but I disagree that most women see things that way (it's a vocal minority) and don't share your pessimism for the strategy. It's worth noting that Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts are entirely separate organizations; there is no reason whatsoever to expect that the policies of one would mirror the other. Boy Scouts of America accepts only males.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:15 AM
1

About 6000 of them are attempts to explain why in truth, women are just as strong as men.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 03:24 AM
1

If only those poor women could throw off the shackles of patriarchy that prevent them from using their full strength.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 03:23 AM
1

Gotta maintain that mancave vibe
/r/MensRights02/08/16 03:19 AM
1

Testosterone replacement therapy is available in most developed countries, though it can be a hassle to obtain and tends to be fairly expensive. I don't think this is relevant to the sub tbh. A discussion of the subject would be, but a how-to isn't.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 03:17 AM
7

Good for him and his future babies, but it doesn't help any sons that woman bears with some other guy.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 03:11 AM
2

Agreed. I imagine most men on here consider the right to hold male-only spaces as one of the more important ones to defend at this moment in history; in my view we would do well to champion womens' spaces as a strategic means for recovering our lost male spaces.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 03:08 AM
1

That kind of approach, you'd be dumping every woman you met before you had a chance to put your dick in her.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/16 02:18 AM
0

You're missing the point. This post isn't about how it'd be super red pill if we were all professional fighters.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/16 02:17 AM
1

You missed the point. I did not say the network was currently vulnerable to direct attack; I don't believe it is.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/16 08:49 PM
11

Bitcoin is extremely vulnerable as well - the network is not as robust as enthusiasts like to claim. The development team is small and development is highly politicized (not to mention vulnerable to attack by the same forces that could print the value out of dollars). Blockchains aren't going anywhere, but there is no particular reason to expect that Bitcoin in particular will survive and grow in value over the next few decades. It's just as likely to fail and be replaced with a better implement…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/16 02:34 PM
14

Come on man post your dick or gtfo
/r/TheRedPill01/07/16 08:52 AM
3

Prohormones are a waste of time in almost all cases. If you want to use drugs to enhance your gains, use steroids and be realistic about the risks and challenges associated with them. Everything else is either the 2-3% boost in the gym shit (e.g. creatine) or very expensive unicorn tears.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/16 08:50 AM
2

Huh. If you were right, I wonder how this study (one of many follow-up studies to the first linked above) could have happened... Testosterone-induced increase in muscle size in healthy young men is associated with muscle fiber hypertrophy. The science is against you. A good bit of gains are intramuscular water retention, but the idea that all or most gains but those valiantly earned through excellent training evaporate after PCT is incompatible with the scientific literature on the topic (not to…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/16 07:30 PM
13

Missing the point. If 9/10 males can't lift 100lbs overhead (unlikely), an even greater proportion of females cannot. Whatever proportion of males is able to train and build that capacity, a much smaller proportion of females will be able.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/16 12:59 AM
2

Could be man, it's just how it struck me.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/16 07:23 PM
17

Most men break eye contact with me quickly. Women have started apologizing for being in my way even slightly. Like walking through the same door. Sometimes just being in my presence. It's an interesting feeling. Being powerful. Something I never even considered before. Now with the true alpha male something different happens. Eye contact with them pierces through me. I break as quickly as the lesser males break eye contact with me. Within about a second or two I can tell if someone is truly powe…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/16 10:22 AM
1

Great article, thanks.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/16 09:03 PM
1

See [META] tag. It's a great opinion piece and extremely relevant to the sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/16 09:03 PM
1

I was talking about my habit of wearing shorts and sandals, and distaste for boots and dress shoes.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/16 08:49 PM
1

It's tangentially relevant to the sub, but the advice is not redpill - it is conventional fashion advice, totally compatible with a bluepill view of male-female interaction.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/16 08:17 AM
1

/cringe Yeah whatever, things don't always come across in text. You know what I mean. It feels good to be able to move athletically if I want to. The advice isn't bad advice except that it isn't redpill - it's misplaced here. It isn't redpill, it's just fashion advice.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/16 07:15 AM
-2

Personally, these fashion posts strike me as insidiously blue-pill. What kind of guy decides what to wear on the basis of an internet post telling him that if he wears x and y, and never wears p and q, he'll get pussy? That's right - a guy who doesn't think he's good enough, and is trying to fit in. I wear the clothes that look and feel good to me, and it's worked out quite well. I do follow certain guidelines: if every woman I know thinks I look awful, I'll probably make a change. I wear clothe…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/16 04:55 AM
2

Shorts are a nice touch also if you have massive ripped calves like you all probably should by now.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/16 04:43 AM
2

No - it definitely has an effect. First impressions, etc. Not the end of the world but it does rule out some women in some situations no matter how great your frame is. TRP does not make a man into a sex machine that makes every woman tingle at first glance.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/16 09:40 PM
2

I have to say, I don't believe your results shift has much of anything to do with your hair except to the extent it has boosted your confidence. Women have only reacted to me more positively as my head became progressively balder over the years. I don't believe it has any significant effect except on very young women (21 and under) and women for whom it is a turn-on. But I am jacked and style it appropriately (i.e. very short hair). Skinny-fat and balding is not a good look. Also, blocking DHT f…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/16 10:52 AM
8

It can certainly effect your results with those younger women who are turned off or weirded out by older men, as they associate baldness with being older. But it also effects your results with younger women who are turned on by older men, for the same reason. Imo it's a plus to be at least somewhat bald if you are older (30's+) as you won't waste as much time with girls that are gonna be weird about the age difference anyway, and you get to game in easy mode on the girls who want daddy.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/16 10:48 AM
4

Yes! Deadlift is the number one posture exercise imo. Strengthens everything involved in standing up straight and you can't do it well without addressing all the little kinks and inflexibilities that come up as you train it. Face pulls are a great assistance to really pull back the rounded shoulders and caved thoracic spine.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 09:30 PM
1

Haha. Yeah, the physique is quite attainable for any guy that has a pair. It's true, though, that they are all (or almost all) on testosterone at a minimum - many fighters have spoken about it, and it makes so much sense it'd be a big surprise if anybody wasn't on. It gives a massive advantage in making weight without losing strength or conditioning, and supposedly a pretty big advantage in striking power and weathering damage as well. Some of the heavyweight guys in right now probably couldn't …
/r/TheRedPill16/05/16 09:16 PM
1

No; in my view, the infographic's representation of male deaths in the workplace is not a falsehood. It's an accurate representation of the fact that far more men die at work than do women, with some attempt to show why (because of the work men choose to do). The equivalent for the wage gap would be to show the percent of women and men in high and low earning fields (or hours worked over a career on average) alongside differences in lifetime earnings or some equivalent measure of pay. It paralle…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:48 AM
2

'Relative length of sentence - 100 v 163'. 163 what? Relative means no units - the numbers represent a relationship. Think of a fraction where both numbers have the same units - the units cancel out and are meaningless. Probably why one is fixed to 100, to make the comparison easy. Probably more effective to tie it to 1, but maybe OP thought the decimal would confuse people. So? That's choice you idiot, nobody's forcing you into that. Kind of like that wage gap, eh?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:07 PM
-1

I'm saying you don't have any good basis to make that claim from.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/16 10:17 PM
3

Doesn't matter, it's a robust finding across several well designed trials. For example: The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. Free full text even, read it. They had a bunch of young guys either do nothing, run a cycle of 500mg test enan a week and NOT train, train, or run the cycle and train. Cycle + training wins, but cycle + nothing comes in second. It's been replicated at least a half-dozen times. I would never do a cycle without lift…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/16 10:14 PM
1

Genetics is real, and it's a bitch. Look up a thing called myostatin, which is the prime factor in deciding muscularity among mammals. Haha. Shots of testosterone in the butt are real and they're what built most of that physique.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/16 11:44 AM
5

He's right about the juice working whether you train or not. Though it works better if you train.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/16 11:42 AM
1

2 weeks is nothing; you need at least a month or two. There are dozens of clinical trials where young men take a low-moderate dose of testosterone for several weeks and make impressive gains. Your barracks 2 weeks of whatever doesn't contradict that.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/16 11:42 AM
3

Either way, it's not hgh, if you aren't lifting heavy, often, and well, than a stack won't help you. That isn't true. You can gain more by taking a low-moderate dose of testosterone and not training than you can by training without testosterone. Read the whole thing, or just skip to the table summarizing the clinical trials the article is based on. You can gain even more with both, but it's a lie that the drugs only enhance training effects.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/16 11:38 AM
2

Guys, young men here please listen. You are never ever going to be big unless you take steroids. Be thin, be fit. That is enough. And it is healthy. You're overstating it severely. Any reasonably healthy young guy over 5'7 can get a physique like an MMA fighter up to welterweight (taller guys up to middleweight) by lifting and eating right for a couple years. Just talking appearance, not conditioning etc. Or he can get it in 8 months with a hefty dose of testosterone. If you want to get big and …
/r/TheRedPill12/05/16 11:14 AM
-1

Pretty shit claim to make if you lifted before you did the martial arts as you don't know how the two interacted. In my experience both have been indispensable.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/16 03:40 AM
3

Believe it or not, it's at the end. Woman on the stretcher gets up and charges the police, gets slammed.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/16 03:35 AM
5

7591
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/16 02:21 AM
-6

Go fuck yourself? If all you have to add to discussion is to call people fags you may as well not post. He rants on about how he is a bastion of strength and masculinity Quote it. I don't see that anywhere above.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 07:37 PM
2

I strongly prefer pulling out to condoms. There are so many methods of birth control that nobody should use withdrawal or condoms as their primary method. All methods other than vasectomy, pulling out, and condoms place control in the woman's hands. Have you read any of the other discussion here?
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 07:36 PM
5

It works roughly as well as condoms if you do it perfectly every time (4% failure rate after a year vs 2%). They're both pretty shit methods compared to hormonal birth control if it's actually taken correctly. Best non-condom method for an LTR: an IUD. Near zero failure rate and you can feel the strings attached to it when you go deep.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 07:18 PM
-2

... A person's internet reputation is a very poor way to gauge the validity of their arguments.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/16 07:10 PM
1

Pretty sure they use a machine that resembles a female rabbit well enough that the male rabbits fuck it voluntarily on the regular.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 09:58 PM
0

Great excerpt - what's the book like? Why do you recommend it? edit: and who is the author? There are multiple books with the same title..
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 10:24 AM
0

Read the post before commenting.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 10:23 AM
1

I agree that OP's story is implausible. But the first guy's firing is plausible if his vulgar, angry speech was well outside the norm for the company. That said, it doesn't make any sense that the company would get rid of 3 more productive employees without addressing the obvious root cause of conflict in the group (tumblrina). The implied explanation - that the company is afraid to get rid of her because of discrimination etc - makes no sense when one of the people fired is a black man.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/16 10:18 AM
2

Stunning and Brave!
/r/seduction03/03/16 06:36 AM
6

If you don't want lifts, at least wear boots that add an inch, and use all the little visual things that make a guy look slightly (!) taller. Haircut, clothing style, muscle mass, posture, beard, etc. Then lie and say you're 5'9" or 5'10".
/r/TheRedPill03/03/16 04:21 AM
3

That's silly. There's no opportunity cost here unless you attempt to impregnate a woman every time you bust a nut..
/r/TheRedPill31/01/16 03:11 AM
3

What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 04:23 PM
3

You're not describing an RP guy; you're describing a guy who just discovered the RP sub after a series of painful rejections, and is now confused as fuck and trying to be RP. Yeah, not much in it for women to be with that guy right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 08:20 AM
1

More like 50,000 to 100,000. Anatomically modern humans in relatively modern language-based agrarian societies emerged a very, very long time ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 02:23 AM
3

Sounds like a straw-man argument. Who thinks being arrogant is a way to appear attractive? I sure don't. But I disagree with your OP... Feigning in general is problematic, as people are quite good at detecting it. But feigning disinterest can increase attraction in women if done appropriately and correctly. You can fake some of these behaviors if you have to. RP is more about acquiring traits (e.g. confidence, masculine physique, abundance mentality) that are attractive than it is about tricking…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 08:58 PM
8

Yup. Almost everything about human beings is outdated, yet somehow it's still here...it's almost as if we don't have direct, rational control over our biologically driven desires and perceptions! :O
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 08:55 PM
9

Your way of looking at it is oversimplified in the other direction, though. If you study mammalian evolution and human evolutionary psychology, you'll find far more nuance than you see discussed on Reddit. But the truth is that plasticity is extremely limited relative to genetically driven development, even in humans (whose fitness is largely derived from an uncommonly strong adaptability). just because we have a pretty similar brain with pretty similar hormones to our relatives 5,000 years ago …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 08:37 PM
2

The idea is there, but the scale is off by a couple orders of magnitude...natural selection is far slower than that, and we were out of our element 5,000 years ago, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 08:29 PM
-2

9141
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 09:57 AM
10

But if you have great options, doesn't it make sense that eventually you will choose one? I don't see why a man would. Men like sexual variety and tend to crave it after the initial falling in love intoxication wears off.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 09:56 AM
-4

Who cares? Obviously folks on this sub, myself included, disagree with the policies of liberal universities about sexual assault bla bla bla.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/15 06:10 AM
4

Not really. In court, he would never have been convicted - wouldn't even have gone to trial. By law, he was raped if anything. US law is actually fairly reasonable about rape, although the process may not always be. In my state, you can't be convicted of rape if you had a reasonable expectation of consent, for example (it doesn't have to be verbal, and it doesn't matter if she withdraws it unless she communicates that withdrawal). This article is about a campus disciplinary action, not a court. …
/r/TheRedPill19/12/15 11:49 PM
13

It's a fairly important detail that this was a campus disciplinary action, not a US court of law. This guy could not have been convicted of rape by law.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/15 11:47 PM
3

How do you know? Have some personal experience with this situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 08:33 PM
2

Pedophilia isn't relevant to red pill, which has nothing to say about it. When redpill addresses youth and attraction, it's talking about sexually mature youth - rarely present before ~16 (the age of consent in most of the western world). Pedophilia is defined as attraction to sexually immature children.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 08:27 PM
3

The declining quality isn't just age - it's also monotony. Men crave sexual variety in a way women do not. For most men, aging wouldn't even play a major role until she was in her mid-thirties.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 08:23 PM
1

Good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/15 11:03 PM
1

It's a long story... Unfortunately, probably not one I can effectively tell you in this comment thread. It's not trivial to go from "this is the penis I've always known, it works great, I love it" to an honest understanding of what's missing. It's an uphill battle, and I have no emotional capital or established authority that I could use to take you from your current point of view (likely that your dick is no worse off for having had its moving parts removed) to the truth (that you're missing an…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/15 02:11 AM
1

Go talk to someone else. You don't get it. I don't dispute anything you've said about suicide rates etc, I just think you're being an insensitive self-important meanie-pooh and should show yourself out.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 01:29 AM
1

I'm not arguing with you - I'm saying you're being rude and insensitive, replying in this way. You're still being rude and insensitive. What you're saying isn't relevant. Imagine if you told somebody that you were deeply troubled by the many female friends you have struggling with depression, and the lack of recognition and support available in society for them - and I replied by spouting off research statistics about how the suicide rate is actually higher in men. I wouldn't be wrong, and you'd…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 08:31 PM
10

Male genital mutilation x1000 Shouldn't be a male specific issue at all; everybody, male/female/intersex, should be protected from forced genital cutting. But in the United States, at least, it remains a mens' issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 08:49 AM
6

This isn't relevant; it's quite rude and insensitive of you reply this way. /u/cats_or_get_out is correct that the suicide rate is highest in the US among middle aged men. (Here is some data with pretty graphs) You framed your reply as though it contradicts this, but it doesn't. Suicide attempts are not suicides, and usually aren't as traumatic as actual suicides - especially the nonviolent attempts most commonly made by women (a failed violent suicide can be horrific; a failed sedative-based su…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 08:47 AM
1

Haha. I have no idea why he chose 5 smooth stones, nor whether the odds favored Goliath. I know that a single punch to the back of the head from an untrained average size male can end your life, and can happen easily in a fit of anger. People who have direct experience of violence generally respect it, and rarely posture about their lack of fear from violent people. You come across as an inexperienced guy with a lot to prove here. p.s. fuck your frame. :D
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 09:28 PM
4

Yah he might like to do that. Makes things even more fun. Words of a guy who's never seen combat - probably never even taken an unexpected punch. Violence happens easily, suddenly, and ruins bodies more quickly than violence-naive people think. A healthy fear of others' anger is natural and good, and neither alpha nor beta.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 08:50 AM
1

Zero. It doesn't take a degree to learn how to speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 11:58 PM
1

Calling it a faux pas was another error in word choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 07:55 PM
1

That's not a grammatical error, but one of word choice. Also see: The OP describes a different situation, where every sexual advance is successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 05:01 PM
1

Pretty much exactly? Haha. Have to pick one; it's either exact or it isn't. The OP describes a different situation, where every sexual advance is successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 04:48 PM
1

That all sounds nice, but what about your concrete results with women? Are you getting laid? Are you getting relationships? With what kind of women and how much? I don't mean to be crass, but this forum is about sexual strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 08:27 PM
0

No, he isn't. An average woman can get most guys to fuck her a few times, and can get average to moderately above average guys to stay in a relationship with her indefinitely. But she can't get really attractive men to stick around after the first few lays, nor to invest emotionally. The guys she really wants are hard to keep around.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 05:44 PM
1

How long have you been living this way, and how are the results?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 05:25 PM
6

Gross. If you have to fuck your plates so hard they're sore for days to keep them from fucking other guys, you're doing it wrong buddy. I doubt it would even work. If a woman wants a man, she'll have him even if it hurts. If you want a woman to be faithful to you, she must see you as the best man available. In this culture there is no other way.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/15 10:15 AM
1

Yeah, there's truth to this. A guy's appearance isn't worth much on its own.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/15 06:41 AM
3

Very rarely if ever do you see a girl commenting on how cute a guy is on the internet, nor do you hear it often in person. Hell, most of the girls I dated didn't even mention my appearance. Not sure if they even found me attractive, maybe just witty and confident. Not my experience at all. Every woman I've been with for more than a week or two has offered genuine complements about my body. I'm not particularly good looking, either, and have been out of shape most of my adult life. It seems to me…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/15 06:39 AM
0

:/ No. Your post implies that the trend exists across women as a category; it doesn't. It exists across some categories of women, and not others. You claim that women are getting bigger, but they're not: black and hispanic women are getting bigger. The rest are staying the same size, according to your source.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/15 08:53 PM
15

According to the link, the increased incidence of obesity in women is entirely due to an increase in obesity among black and hispanic women. The widening gap between women and men could be attributed to the obesity rates in black and Hispanic women. The authors of the report found that while the obesity rates remained pretty much the same for white women and men, the rate for black women skyrocketed to 57 percent while the rate for black men was at 38 percent. For Hispanics, the rates were 46 pe…
/r/TheRedPill13/11/15 08:05 AM
3

Oh sure, I probably agree so long as those standards restrict authority and empower individuals. But I'm only describing the current legal situation as I understand it. I don't intend any value judgement.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/15 03:38 AM
3

The rights you have in court don't leave the courtroom. You have the right to due process in court - you don't have that right in disagreement with your roommate. Your roommate can decide that you're an asshole without hearing you out, and they haven't violated your rights. A university has more responsibility than that, obviously, but not the same responsibility as a court of law (as they don't decide whether you've committed a crime). Whether (and how) they have to respect your right to due pr…
/r/TheRedPill10/11/15 02:35 AM
1

That doesn't establish what the majority of attraction is based on - it only establishes that the first impression is based on appearances. That much is obvious, but how much weight the first impression carries is not. Interestingly, I disagree that the appearance-based first impression is all that physically bound either. It seems to me that it's largely based on social status and personality cues, such as how well dressed a person is, how they carry themselves, their sense of aesthetics throug…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:29 AM
6

Thats law in California now, google yes means yes False. The law requires California universities to use affirmative consent to adjudicate campus disciplinary actions related to sexual assault. It has no relevance to criminal or civil cases of sexual assault, rape, etc. California's laws on those crimes have not changed recently and are fairly reasonable (e.g. it isn't rape if the aggressor had a reasonable expectation of consent, even if the other person didn't want the sex). It wouldn't be pos…
/r/TheRedPill10/11/15 01:22 AM
1

Uh...what? How do you know? Why do you believe this? Why couldn't it be the opposite way?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 10:12 PM
3

What makes you so sure that the initial impression based on appearance accounts for 90%, and the rest is only 10? Why not 80/20, or 30/70?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 10:59 AM
1

But you are making claims. Your claim is that they like older men? No. You said: The only real thing older men have on dudes her own age is "money and resources." And I offered several reasons why that doesn't seem to be true. You don't seem interested in addressing any of them. It's easy to dismiss obviously flawed claims like "young women love older men." Perhaps that's why you'd prefer to talk about those things instead of what I've actually said? :P ... I haven't stated this before, but my c…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:39 PM
1

Sure. But there's an important difference: I'm not making sweeping claims about how most women view any particular thing. I don't think you should either, if all you've got to back it up is one woman's experience and a sense of how 21 year old women view older men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 06:38 PM
2

And for most women at 21 his "wealth of knowledge and experience" isn't as impressive to her as "resources he's amassed." How do you know? That's a fairly bold claim. (Though interestingly, it isn't particularly relevant to my post. What about all the other relevant differences besides knowledge and experience?) How can this explain men in their early thirties who sleep with women in their early twenties but have few material resources?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 06:34 AM
3

You don't seem to be making an honest effort to consider this topic. Why are you posting at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 03:37 AM
2

The only real thing older men have on dudes her own age is "money and resources." How do you figure? Comparing two guys who are similar in all respects except their birth year, I'd expect the one who's ten years older to have several advantages over the younger: He'll have ten years more experience dating and sleeping with women He'll have ten years more life experience He'll have ten years further advancement in his career He'll have ten years of fitness training (if these guys lift) He'll have…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 12:22 AM
1

Rough choice. Being male is obviously preferable in this society - if you know what you're doing, you can easily dominate and have a fantastic life. But being a male baby in the USA is a gamble because you might lose your dick-skin. :-/ Can I be Canadian?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 10:56 PM
1

i suppose it reminds them that they won't be young and hot forever, and soon they will be treated more like an average man. Haha. To be fair though, women can be genuinely intrigued by honest descriptions of male experience. Not most women I've met, and not in most situations. But in the context of strong sexual relationships I've connected with a few girlfriends in this exact way and had very interesting, satisfying, mutually eye-opening conversations.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 01:01 AM
1

I'm not sure if we'll be together forever or just a short time thing but I'd rather see what plays out. This sounds like a perspective she's likely to appreciate, assuming it's heartfelt. If she's just a fuckbuddy then so be it, clearly it's not going to be the end of the world for me. This is the kind of thing you should not say, but just feel it and let it come through in subcommunication. Obviously nobody can tell you what this woman is experiencing. But what you've described sounds a lot lik…
/r/seduction29/09/15 08:48 PM
0

Apparently /r/seduction agrees. Yay opinion based downvotes!
/r/seduction28/09/15 10:24 PM
3

If you want to get good at something fast, doing it every day is the best approach. You have more unstructured time on your hands while in college than you likely ever will in your non-retired life. If this is what you want, you can have it. There's no shame in making this your focus for a few weeks or months - women are a huge part of a man's life, and the reward is well with the effort.
/r/seduction28/09/15 06:20 PM
10

You're right that these hobbies won't get you anywhere with women. But it doesn't matter. It's good that you have hobbies you enjoy, and women will either appreciate these things about you or they won't really care either way. Hobbies don't do much to determine attraction in most cases, and when they do, it's usually fairly random; you're about as likely to meet a woman who gets wet for nerdy guys as you are to meet one who gets wet for electronic music production. It'll happen if you meet a lot…
/r/seduction28/09/15 06:13 PM
-10

35888
/r/seduction28/09/15 05:56 PM
2

Learn pickup and incorporate it into whatever lifestyle you like. The lifestyle choices really don't matter very much outside of extreme cases (e.g. homeless, rock star, working too much to make time).
/r/seduction28/09/15 07:29 AM
1

Talk to her. If you haven't read the sidebar newbie posts, do that first perhaps. You get better at things by doing them repeatedly and learning from your successes and mistakes alike. If you want to get good at turning one night stands into relationships, you'll probably have to have a decent number of one night stands first. This one might work out, and it might not. You'll be better off if you get comfortable with that fact before moving forward. Regarding interest: it's common to send a warm…
/r/seduction28/09/15 12:23 AM
1

Yeah, you fucked up the text. Maybe it made sense to text her self-deprecating humor, but it probably didn't get you any points. If you wanted to acknowledge your drunkenness (maybe a good idea, maybe not), it would have been better to do it in a way that doesn't communicate self-consciousness. More importantly though, you asked her when you're going to see her again. Don't ever ask a woman when you're going to see her or what you're going to do, especially in text. You can ask her when she's fr…
/r/seduction27/09/15 08:19 PM
30

What I imagined reading this
/r/seduction27/09/15 08:06 PM
3

Give it a few days, then text if she hasn't to arrange a meeting. Easy.
/r/seduction27/09/15 07:59 PM
1

All of my long-term relationships as an adult began with sex on the first date or before. I don't believe that I'm particularly special in that regard - men in general seem very open to relationships beginning with sex. Whatever is going to happen with this guy will only happen if you go see him again. If he's worth your time (i.e. looking for something similar and a good guy), you'll be able to make it happen by just being real with him about your feelings etc. If he's not, you'll find out pret…
/r/seduction27/09/15 06:48 PM
2

You can still transmit HPV and herpes if your scrote is exposed.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 12:46 AM
5

Naw...most vulva are within the range of sexy for most men, so it doesn't really matter. Like I said, I've only seen a few that I didn't like. They seem to be rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 07:51 PM
4

Hell no! I'd encourage her to meet a man who likes her chunky vulva.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 07:07 PM
3

Haha - what a world that would be. I guess that is the direction we're heading, though. I'm not saying I have or would back out of sex if her vulva wasn't pretty enough for me, just to be clear. But having hit it, and knowing my options, I can imagine big vulva being the deciding factor between calling it a one-night-stand or pursuing her further. All else equal, I'd rather spend my time with a woman whose lady-bits I find deliciously sensual. It's better that way for everyone involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 05:21 PM
2

Guys: have you ever really encountered a vagina that you didn't like? Absolutely; I've encountered a few. I enjoyed fucking them, but I didn't enjoy it aesthetically. There's wide variation in women's genitalia - at least as much as in men's, and arguably much more if you exclude body modification. Like every man I've had the occasion to know this about, I have a definite preference for certain styles of vulva. And to be honest, it is a factor when I consider who I'd like to spend my time with. …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 05:13 PM
1

I stand corrected (and disappointed).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 05:07 PM
1

Weird...it seems I was mistaken. Maybe it's also a thing for Asian men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 11:32 PM
1

Are you in America? I don't think this is a big thing anywhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 09:31 PM
1

You did what I said - you overlooked the fact that the averages must be the same on the whole. That isn't the same as claiming it is impossible for them to be the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 09:14 PM
1

Those are only examples; my point is exactly the same if you swap the numbers. My point is that you've overlooked a very simple mathematical fact: the average number of sexual partners must be the same between men and women as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 06:24 PM
1

Why is that an impossible scenario? If two men fuck the same 100 women, they both have partner counts of 100, whereas the women have partner counts of 2. It's impossible when the number of men and women counted is equal. Very basic statistics; each new partnering adds one partner to a man and one to a woman, so the averages must end up equal. The distributions may be quite different, of course; there may be a subset of men who've had hundreds of partners, but no women with more than a few dozen.…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 06:19 PM
4

4354
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 06:04 PM
4

So I've noticed black and other men consciously avoid me. Are you in decent shape? Men will rarely approach overweight women. If you are, then it's likely that all you need is to make yourself look more approachable (e.g. by smiling, wearing an outfit you feel sexy in, making friendly eye contact).
/r/seduction21/09/15 11:07 AM
5

(In other words: agree & amplify, because this is a shit test)
/r/seduction21/09/15 11:01 AM
25

I'm afraid to touch girls, can someone help me. Try using this as your opener. :P
/r/seduction21/09/15 11:00 AM
6

Are these just nice ways of avoiding meeting? Sounds like it. I'd go ahead and make a date to see what happens, but I wouldn't count on anything. Meet more women.
/r/seduction21/09/15 10:58 AM
1

TL;DR: I don't know whether my first time should be meaningless, meaningful, or whether I should wait until I'm married IMO the idea that losing your virginity needs to be made extra special and meaningful is garbage. It's not that big a deal. Similarly: if you fall in love, the sex will be meaningful as fuck; you don't need anything to make it extra special, and the sex you had before won't taint it in any way. If anything, sex in love is better for the sex out of love you've had before, for pu…
/r/seduction21/09/15 10:55 AM
2

Great article; thanks. Quite refreshing and genuine inner game approach.
/r/seduction21/09/15 10:51 AM
-1

Get off the internet and talk to people. You don't need instructions - just go try it.
/r/seduction20/09/15 11:45 PM
6

If you're really into him, you could invite yourself over to his place for a massage. Take off your clothes upon arrival. If he can't play the man role at that point, you'll probably have lost interest anyway. :P
/r/seduction20/09/15 11:09 PM
6

This assumes that this woman is attracted to you and reasonably comfortable with you (safe bet if she's flirting with you in bed). Get up out of the bed Extend your arms towards her, offering your hands She'll take your hands, and you pick her up out of the bed. Hold eye contact and a smirk throughout Promptly throw her onto the bed back-first and jump on top of her If you don't know what comes next, Reddit cannot help you.
/r/seduction19/09/15 10:49 PM
2

It does, and does so independent of my pedantry.
/r/seduction18/09/15 08:35 PM
3

3657688
/r/seduction18/09/15 07:18 PM
2

Why? Can you link to some examples?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 06:31 PM
1

/s
/r/seduction18/09/15 01:17 AM
2

That's a lot of long, rambling lecture to sit through; I gave it ten minutes but he barely covered anything. Does he ever give a decent synopsis of his approach? Do you have any other, more concise videos that would give us an idea of what he teaches in a timely way?
/r/seduction17/09/15 07:03 AM
8

You should read some before starting a topic; most of the material here is explicitly about seducing complete strangers. From the perspective of the seduction community the answer is an emphatic no.
/r/seduction17/09/15 06:08 AM
0

I see, yeah. This is about how I see the idea of the neg. Cocky and funny isn't negging, because it isn't about putting anybody down or making them feel inferior. It's about having fun and setting a sexual, man-woman frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 05:28 AM
1

It's unclear what you mean by negging, and what you mean by cocky and funny. It seems fairly plain to me that cocky/funny isn't negging. What in particular are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 05:04 AM
6

bite the bullet and cut it off, if that's your desire whoah I have no objection to the literal meaning of this sentence, but someone about this drew my scrotum in tighter than I'm comfortable with.
/r/seduction14/09/15 05:06 PM
6

Great example. All kinds of quite primitive animals depend completely on social learning to acquire the skills they use to serve their most basic drives. Small mammals teach their young all kinds of things, and animals often learn from their peers as well. /u/Fuschia19: Every animal behavior - human or otherwise - comes about through a complex interaction of many factors, which will always include both genetically driven development and the organism's environment. Nothing is "biological" in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 05:56 AM
1

That's true, but that doesn't mean he won't get cockblocked by his roommates. They may do it without even meaning to if OP is much less attractive (not visually - the whole vibe) than they are. It's hard to turn this stuff off after awhile (or if you're a natural).
/r/seduction14/09/15 05:48 AM
1

How do you know? I'm only trying to relate my experience, offered anonymously on the internet, for what it's worth. I've met tons of people interested in meditation, and the ones who've been able to learn the technique well and practice it regularly - which is the only way to enjoy strong benefits - are those who had human teachers they met with in person regularly for some period of their lives. But since you've offered a claim that seems plainly false to me, I will say: when you think about it…
/r/seduction14/09/15 05:38 AM
2

It depends on the context. If she's attracted to you and the conversation is already framed as a man-woman conversation, you can just drop it any way you like that isn't apologetic or hesitant. If you need something to get started, you can try taking things she says that aren't sexual but could possibly be construed as sexual, and interpreting them as sexual. Ideally, you interpret them as come-ons and accuse her of trying to pick you up. This works well if you're shy about it and need baby step…
/r/seduction14/09/15 01:30 AM
2

There's probably a better way. OP would be wasting his time if he went through all that, agreed to just be friends, and then tried to fool around again. She's not probably not down; he'd be better off meeting a new woman on the street. I agree that he should essentially blow off what she's said and give it another go if she drops the matter, though; in that case, she's probably down but just needs to not feel like a slut.
/r/seduction13/09/15 11:56 PM
3

Does anyone have a large amount of experience in meditation? Yes; several years of daily practice, mostly of mindfulness. I'm interested in it and the benefits associated with it, but how do you get to the truth of meditation without wading through the bullshit? It can take some doing, but in any reasonably populated Western city you can find good, in-person, free instruction in mindfulness-based techniques (e.g. following your breath). This is the kind of technique that is most applicable to se…
/r/seduction13/09/15 11:41 PM
1

Congrats.
/r/seduction13/09/15 11:31 PM
4

Bad idea. Purple Pill Debate isn't an average of those two subs; it's quite different from each of them in format and culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 07:56 PM
1

They do (to each other), and it's not assuming too much. If you make friends with people and meet several women through them, you're in college, and you aren't freakishly disfigured, at least a couple of those women will be attracted to you. I know you don't believe me. But you won't know whether I'm right unless you try it. The worst that can happen is that you meet a bunch of people and women, but don't get any pussy. Even that gets you closer to your goal. edit: regarding girls being horny an…
/r/seduction12/09/15 07:39 PM
0

In that case, you should agree with me that this fellow would be well served by assuming attraction... That said, I do disagree with you view. When you assume attraction, it shows that you expect that she's attracted to you. That doesn't say anything about whether or why you think you can get with her at all - it just communicates that in your world, women like her tend to be into you, and you're comfortable with that. It's the same thing I do when I feel naturally confident. It isn't a big deal…
/r/seduction12/09/15 07:18 AM
1

0541688
/r/seduction12/09/15 07:05 AM
2

Getting an attractive girlfriend is very, very easy if you're an average guy with his life together. And when you're 17, the standard for being an average guy with his life together is low as fuck; you basically just need to be doing some cool things with your life, feeling comfortable-ish with people, and standing up straight and you're good. So most people just try stuff that seems intuitive, they've heard from friends, or read some place / seen in a movie. And it works, generally, because wom…
/r/seduction12/09/15 07:01 AM
2

:/ I disagree - and I doubt you'll find any substantive agreement elsewhere in the sub. If you believe that, please explain your reasoning. As I see it, if this guy just assumed attraction and proceeded accordingly, he would: Relax Stop wasting his time worrying about things he can't do anything about or know Make a decent pass at the girl next time he sees her And that would lead to the best possible outcome - he'll easily and quickly discover whether she's into him. If she is, he'll have moved…
/r/seduction12/09/15 06:51 AM
2

Probably ought to read the stickied thread on always assuming attraction if you're having questions like this.
/r/seduction12/09/15 05:54 AM
5

I came hoping for an article about the importance of making sure she climaxes first.
/r/seduction11/09/15 10:52 PM
12

You're in the wrong subreddit. Go get some help with your social anxiety. Once that's covered, you can learn seduction techniques if you still need or want that. There's definitely some material here for dealing with normal anxiety that arises when you do intimidating things (e.g approach anxiety when introducing yourself to total strangers for the purpose of fucking them). But it's not intended - nor is it likely to help - folks who are very anxious in normal social situations. So in my view, y…
/r/seduction11/09/15 09:49 AM
2

Ah - I see what you mean. In my experience, assuming attraction doesn't have to be the sort of assumption you're talking about to work. I assume it, and I act on that assumption - but I'm not an ass about it, and I'm not upset if it turns out that I'm wrong. There's no problem with me being wrong, because although I've assumed attraction, I'm not dependent on it. I don't need it to be true at all; I'm really just using the assumption to induce a state (sexual confidence) and the behaviors that c…
/r/seduction11/09/15 07:10 AM
1

Right. So the time when you'd tell her you think she's cute and you'd like to hang out more in your dorm room or hers or whatever, is when you've already hung out in a group and become slightly familiar. She will have formed an attraction to you naturally by then if she's going to. If she's attracted to you, she'll probably be glad you said this and agree (or else she'll say no, but will try to make it happen some other way). If she's not, she'll decline. No big deal. In the context, it isn't ev…
/r/seduction11/09/15 07:02 AM
1

Just follow the bullet points. I'm telling you, it's easy. If there's any specific point you don't get, ask.
/r/seduction11/09/15 06:55 AM
1

cool story bro
/r/seduction11/09/15 06:50 AM
1

You should hook up with someone you can actually get an audience with. The only ways to do that with these girls are to stalk them, wait to run into them some other time by chance, or do what you've suggested. This sub isn't really about learning how to seduce a particular woman, but learning general methods that you can use to seduce women in general. If you're really set on these two girls, your best bet is to do exactly what you've said, and grab one of these girls in the hallway and chat her…
/r/seduction11/09/15 06:46 AM
2

That's all great, but this post is about assuming attraction. Either person you described should assume attraction if he wants the best results attracting women.
/r/seduction11/09/15 06:39 AM
2

You find out real quick and move on with your life. If you don't assume attraction, you waste your time trying to find out or having friendly asexual interactions. If you assume attraction, then you act on that assumption by flirtation and physical escalation (touching etc). She'll let you know instantly if she's not feeling it, and then you can move on to another woman. No problem at all.
/r/seduction11/09/15 06:37 AM
7

I saw this, and cringed thinking it'd be about consent. :O Too much time hanging out with college women.
/r/seduction11/09/15 06:32 AM
1

Hmm. Try this method: Meet people in your dorm and classes by introducing yourself, being friendly, and doing fun things together (thereby meeting their friends, too). When you meet someone who is a women you'd like to have sex with, tell her you think she's cute/pretty/hot/sexy (pick one) and that you'd like to hang out one on one. If she says yes, have her meet you at a specific place and time (could be right then and there in your / her dorm room) Fuck her. You'll have to fill in the specific…
/r/seduction11/09/15 06:27 AM
5

You should read a few pages of material from the sidebar, think about it, and come back. You're asking for an explanation of very basic fundamentals that you can easily educate yourself about by reading and thinking. edit: because you're 18 and in college, you can probably accomplish what you're looking for without knowing much at all if you're reasonably comfortable with people. Just make friends with the folks in your dorm and in your classes, and do things with them for fun. Some of them will…
/r/seduction11/09/15 06:19 AM
0

TRP isn't really interested in anything like that. They aim for the general information. Hmm...I don't believe that's true at all. TRP is full of attempted theoretical explanations of women's feelings and behavior. Most of TRP is about very specific, factual claims. When thinking about it, the only people that come here are those who were screwed over. So of course it will appear that everything is true. Others that argue against it just throw out insults and don't even consider TRP's perspectiv…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 09:15 PM
1

I appreciate your reply. The only difference in this topic between you and me is that you cherish feelings over rationality and I cherish rationality over feelings, but I'm sure you're often a rational person and I can assure you I have a lot of feelings. I don't see any conflict between the two; to me, having seen the value of various irrational things (e.g. love, art, food, sex; most things we enjoy), it is rational for me to seek them out. That seems fairly plain and uncontroversial, and I as…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 09:01 PM
0

Maybe this is true for the type of women you aim for. Most of the people here believe that "most" women do not like this. They claim that they do and may even believe it. But in reality, it allows them power in relationship. Nothing "wrong" with that. But its not the preferred situation to be in. I get that. But for TRP to approach truth, it needs to be able to adapt its theoretical explanations to evidence; otherwise it's just another story that people can believe if they find it satisfying, bu…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 08:31 PM
0

Believe what you like; I understand perfectly well. Stoicism is bullshit; you don't have to sacrifice your own emotionality in order to control relationships. Doing that is a sign of weakness itself. I don't hesitate to do anything in a relationship; I'm not afraid of it ending, of her getting upset, etc. But I'm also warm and open in most situations. It seems that you can't see beyond your own frame, in which strong emotions attached to a woman are a weakness, and stoicism is strength. True lov…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 08:18 PM
0

Which you prefer is up to you, but I'm inclined to believe that one of your motivations is that you do it for your lovers; not yourself. Of course - it's real love. I care about the women I sleep with. Life is much, much better that way if you're comfortable with your own emotions. If you can't handle being hurt when someone you enjoy fucking won't fuck you anymore, then I guess stoicism feels better than love. But it's a distant second to actual confidence paired with genuine affection.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 07:28 AM
1

I disagree only in that I believe there are very useful parallels to draw between human behaviors and closely related primate behaviors. There is a sense in which you do need to be strong to do well with attractive women. You don't have to have physical strength, and you don't have to be a baddass. But you often do have to endure great emotional turmoil and come out the other side with your frame intact, for example. Humans are more sophisticated than other primates, but we have a lot in common.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 05:15 AM
4

I can't wait til we redefine terms. The study that showed that wolves are alpha and beta has been soundly refuted...by the original author. The alpha beta language has morphed into something quite foreign to its roots in the scientific study of animal behavior. But to be this framework as it exists in science has not been abandoned; it simply doesn't describe canine behavior very well. It's still quite good for many primate species, arguably including human beings. Because in popular discourse i…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 05:11 AM
1

Not really, no. Women can be individuals and still have traits in common. For example, almost all women have breasts that are a least a handful in size. Almost no men have these. This is the result of hormone-driven developmental processes. Guess what? Yeah, there are traits in the central nervous system that are also shared in common across almost all members of each sex, which are the result of hormone-driven developmental processes as well. Think about men and tits. How many heterosexual men …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 05:05 AM
1

Yeah, cmon. It's 36ish when the shit hits the fan for a typical woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 04:54 AM
1

would anyone like to live in a different reality where men and women have the very same sex drive both quantitatively and qualitatively? Fuck no! In that world, it would be impossible for me to keep multiple girlfriends satisfied and faithful at the same time. I only have so much jizz to offer; three or four women each twice a week is the limit. Any less and they'd start to wander; any more and I wouldn't be able to form coherent sentences.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 04:53 AM
0

I'm being a bit cheekie, but I'm quite serious about the truth of what I've said. Red Pill doesn't like it, but their sisters and girlfriends do. :trollface: In all seriousness - pushing away strong feelings and emotional bonding is not alpha, and is not attractive to most women. Being comfortable with whatever feelings come is usually very attractive. The women I form relationships know that I love them, and that if we parted ways, I would be sad. They also know that I love some other women in …
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 04:34 AM
1

Women do use game in this sense. It's just that women's game is predictably very different from men's. Women wear makeup. Women wear bras that push their tits up into nice cleavage. Women try to appear innocent and to downplay the extent of their sexual experience. Etc. You can't game men with personality and social value stuff, because men aren't wired that way. They're wired to seek young, sexually mature, women with feminine personality traits (traits that all women seem familiar with, honest…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 03:48 AM
-15

This is something that CANNOT HAPPEN TO YOU. Women want to destroy your manhood to the point that you cannot go on without them. Once that happens, they will leave your ass sitting in the shit box that you created for yourself. All the while, they are off having wine with their girlfriends laughing about the fact that they heard for so and so that their ex boyfriend hasn't gotten out of bed for days and has been asking about her. Huh. Do not do this shit. You have to be the man that doesn't give…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 03:28 AM
1

I'd just say that our perceptions of attraction are highly context dependent. My apparent SMV is quite low when I'm talking openly with a friend about my insecurities and all the things in my life I don't like and want to change first thing in the morning after a night of heavy drinking. After a run and a shower, flirting with the cute college girl behind the counter as I buy groceries later that day, I might appear pretty damn attractive. Speaking professionally with my female coworkers (and ag…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 03:07 AM
1

Hmmmm so I have a question then. Anytime someone is rating someone else in TRP, they're referring to SMV as a whole, not just appearance? I haven't read TRP very much, but my impression is that numbers get thrown out like candy with little clarification of intent offered. Much of this is just appearance rating, which is ubiquitous in male culture outside TRP; other times, SMV is what's intended, but what's intended by SMV may be unclear. It seems to me that it is usually intended as an assessmen…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 12:49 AM
3

That's a good example, yeah. When you have options, and you're honest with yourself and her about how you feel, the frame communicates itself - and there's plenty of room to be a normal, caring human being, too. "Oh, you want to be my friend? Well, I wanted to be your lover so I'm not really interested." ... "Hey come over and fuck me?" You know you're onto something when she bootie calls you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 12:26 AM
2

If you're a man, it certainly could. If you're a woman, no. Maybe 7.5? The job gets you exactly nothing. SMV is a way of roughly quantifying your appeal to the opposite sex, and is necessarily determined by different things for people of different sexes. Men's attraction to women is definitely influenced by personality, and heavily so at the extremes. But a woman can't make up for a lack of beauty with anything; men can, because looks just don't matter as much to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 12:09 AM
1

You're placing way too much emphasis on looks in determining a man's SMV. The mere fact that he regularly sleeps with hot women weighs much more heavily than his appearance, so long as he is not disfigured. An ugly women is a low SMV woman. An ugly man who regularly attracts 7's and 8's is at least a moderately high SMV man. If he were still ugly but not attracting beautiful women, he would probably have low SMV. If she were just as ugly as ever but regularly sleeping with high SMV men, her SMV …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 12:04 AM
1

It really depends on the relationship; explicitly non-monogamous long term relationships are great, and this point of view you've espoused is definitely relevant to them. It takes some subtlety and nuance to avoid having these go down in flames of resentment and jealousy, but it's well worth the effort imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 11:44 PM
5

How is that relevant? Men and women are attracted to very different qualities in the opposite sex. I can read /u/Hackey23 's post in a fairly harsh light, and think "Gosh, this guy thinks men should act like women are an interchangeable, disposable commodity, and make it known to women that he sees them this way. That'd feel pretty bad to be on the receiving end of." But I don't believe that is the intent (if it is, he's gone too far). Being a dick works with a certain set of women, but almost b…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 08:54 PM
2

Whatever dude! I'm just describing my experience. In my life, looks have not seemed all that important to women. Women say they appreciate things I do, feel, and say; they don't talk much about my appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 08:10 PM
3

I meet women in person. I've never had height come up - I just don't approach women as tall as I am sexually. I'm not into tall women, and women aren't into short men - but it's all relative. I've never had a woman reject me for my height, which is decidedly average. Come to think of it, though, the question is irrelevant. Even if women commonly rejected me for my average height, my experience would still contradict your claim as I would still have had plenty of casual sex opportunities as a non…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 11:57 PM
1

It seems to me that a lot of casual sex for women isn't really about relationships - thinking about it in terms of relationships may not be the best approach. What if they're just driven to be impregnated by the studliest guy around when they're ovulating? That might explain the behavior better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 11:54 PM
4

Women, however, are EXTREMELY picky, as Tinder studies have shown. If you're not 6 feet, charismatic, and ripped, the odds are you will NEVER have sex without commitment in your life. That's ridiculous, as I'm sure many will point out in this thread. In my experience, height is only a deal-breaker for women if you're not a bit taller than they are (and there is no difference in this regard between casual and non-casual sex). Looks in general don't seem to matter much, actually. Casual sex opport…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 11:50 PM
1

Interesting... I haven't been with anybody who doesn't like to be touched by guys she's attracted to - perhaps because I get physical almost immediately with new women, without regard to whether I want to be lovers or friends. So some of my go-to activities are things like impromptu partner yoga, play-fighting, wrestling, massages, mock palm-reading, and so on. I do this stuff shortly after meeting, in our first interactions, and come back to it often in relationships. But there are many other w…
/r/seduction23/08/15 07:26 PM
1

Are you sleeping with this woman? If so, you can get a lot of mileage out of being great in bed (which is fairly easy to accomplish). If not, you should probably move on; this woman is your friend. Of the things you mentioned, jealousy and intense shared experience are the closest to good ideas. You don't want her to think you're mentioning other women to make her jealous, but if she gets the impression that other women are into you that will almost always increase her attraction. This can be as…
/r/seduction23/08/15 06:24 AM
3

Probably ought to read a few sidebar posts. Short answer: it doesn't matter.
/r/seduction23/08/15 05:48 AM
1

Why work so hard to prevent silence? There are times when you're picking up a woman when it's good to be able to steer the conversation to avoid some awkwardness. But you don't need to constantly talk to do that. There are also times when you should lay back and leave a big awkward space or a poignant silence. Being comfortable with silence yourself is very, very important.
/r/seduction15/08/15 07:06 PM
1

You should read up on how to make conversation with women, as it sounds like you're making typical man conversation with them (i.e. discussing objective facts that could be true or false). Women usually do not enjoy doing this with guys they'd like to get to know sexually.
/r/seduction15/08/15 06:53 PM
2

Well said, /u/eatshitfaggotbitch! /s
/r/seduction15/08/15 06:50 PM
2

but to advise against communication about sex in general? This isn't what I meant, though. I'm advising against proposing escalation verbally, and advising that you just do it, gradually, and see what response you get. Because it's gradual, and you get clear behavioral consent or disapproval each time, there isn't any problem. You might do one thing she doesn't want, and then withdraw (e.g. OP might be fingering her and then put her hand on his balls and she withdraws the hand and says "no"). Bu…
/r/seduction15/08/15 06:44 PM
1

You got some decent advice above, including: Next time you are lying in her bed, escalating to fingering her, eat her pussy, and when she is warmed up and doesn´t already begs you to fuck her, just fuck her. Be dominant, show her that you are a a man. A man that knows what he wants, and takes it whenver he wants it. That might be too forceful, too aggressive for your situation. But the idea - escalate physically toward what you want, starting with what you know you can do and slowly building fro…
/r/seduction14/08/15 08:25 AM
2

It does sound a bit rapey, but I think in truth, it wouldn't be. Why? Because this is how sex actually happens, all the time. One or both people escalate physically until they either have sex, or somebody backs off / stops expressing enjoyment. There is essentially no chance of OP convincing this woman to fuck him with words, and there is also no chance that OP is going to put his dick in this woman if she doesn't want that (because she will obviously make it known, and OP has clearly demonstrat…
/r/seduction14/08/15 08:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter