TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

married_woman_plus_k Archive

View 82 posts and 214 comments by married_woman_plus_k on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
153

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights10/04/12 08:14 PM
108

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:10 PM
58

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:51 AM
51

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights22/03/12 10:17 PM
43

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:56 PM
37

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights05/08/12 07:02 PM
36

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:24 AM
35

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights24/07/12 08:04 AM
29

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:42 PM
27

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights28/04/12 06:22 PM
21

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights26/07/12 05:54 AM
21

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:01 PM
19

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:07 PM
18

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:50 PM
18

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights19/08/12 04:49 PM
16

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:07 PM
16

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:44 AM
16

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:51 AM
15

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights26/03/12 10:45 PM
15

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:24 PM
14

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights23/02/12 05:55 AM
14

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights01/08/12 01:12 AM
11

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:10 AM
10

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:59 PM
10

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:28 PM
9

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:21 PM
9

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights29/03/12 11:44 PM
9

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights29/03/12 11:30 PM
8

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:54 AM
8

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:00 AM
6

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights07/09/12 09:43 PM
6

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:43 PM
5

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights07/09/12 09:42 PM
5

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:13 PM
5

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights27/03/12 05:51 AM
4

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:09 PM
4

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights11/01/12 07:23 AM
4

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights09/05/12 10:48 AM
3

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights07/09/12 10:28 PM
3

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights27/03/12 05:51 AM
3

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights20/07/12 03:29 AM
2

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights26/07/12 11:33 AM
2

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights29/02/12 05:34 AM
2

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights29/02/12 05:33 AM
2

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights22/03/12 10:50 PM
2

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:47 PM
2

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:33 PM
1

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights06/04/12 04:59 PM
1

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights29/02/12 05:33 AM
1

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights04/03/12 09:52 PM
1

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights22/03/12 08:01 PM
1

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:47 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights05/01/12 02:13 AM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights28/04/12 07:09 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights28/04/12 07:05 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights28/04/12 06:23 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:22 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:07 AM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights29/02/12 07:01 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:28 AM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights08/01/12 09:48 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights08/01/12 09:29 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights07/09/12 06:06 AM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights23/03/12 05:45 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights27/04/12 12:13 AM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:40 AM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights03/09/12 03:57 AM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:44 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights27/03/12 06:10 AM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights22/03/12 11:00 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights20/07/12 05:38 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights27/03/12 05:52 AM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights22/03/12 10:52 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights22/03/12 09:40 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:35 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:06 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:07 AM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:46 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights07/04/12 05:00 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:25 AM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/MensRights29/03/12 09:51 PM
0

married_woman_plus_k/r/seduction29/02/12 05:36 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

what you babblin bout
/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:20 AM
-1

Ron Paul would have been a serious contender if it weren't for women's vote. And just think if only white landowners could vote. :)
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:08 AM
1

That would be a feminist definition of 'creepy', yes. Much as rape is in the eye of the beholder, which is equally retarded.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 07:53 PM
0

This isn't anything new, it's been going on for ages.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 04:48 AM
-1

I really don't care what you think. You are an immature little pup of no consequence whatsoever, a coward, a nothing.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 03:31 AM
3

It's nice to see the mods have continued the tradition of appointing people who are totally ignorant about men's rights to lord over a sub-reddit supposedly dedicated to men's rights. If you have to ask that question, you're simply not qualified to enforce an "off-topic" rule here.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 03:19 AM
-2

ignatius, if you think anyone actually believes you gave up your moderator position you're dumber than I ever imagined. We all know you possess, at the very least, /u/rMensRights, because you are a power hungry control freak. It wouldn't surprise me if you gave up on active moderation, of course, since you never were an actual activist, just someone who likes to control what material is allowed here.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 03:12 AM
0

Nope.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 03:08 AM
-1

From Wikipedia: Gynocentrism (Greek, gyno-, "woman, female") is the practice, conscious or otherwise, of placing female human beings or the feminine point of view at the center of one's world view. The perceptions, needs, and desires of women have primacy in this system, where the female view is the reference point or lens through which matters are analysed.[1] Ideologically, gynocentrism prioritizes females hierarchically, as the overriding focus, and at the exclusion of all else. Observed in p…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:13 PM
-5

Your gynocentrism, like I said.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:10 PM
-1

It is neither immoral nor "creepy" to take pictures of people in public.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:09 PM
-3

Your gynocentrism is to blame.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:02 PM
0

No, it's a list of egalitarians and feminists. That the list happens to coincide with many users who disagreed with him and are not conservatives is because egalitarians and feminists tend to disagree with outspoken pro-masculine voices. Factory2 and GirlWritesWhat weren't on the list, now were they? I find it to be a highly accurate list.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 08:56 PM
3

Game works. You just wish it didn't. I have no time for bigots.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 08:52 PM
5

Weird how meta threads that the mods agree with get to stay here instead of being forced into the meta sub-reddit that no one reads. While meta threads they don't like are deleted and forced into the meta sub-reddit that no one reads. It's almost as if the meta sub-reddit was created for the purpose of hiding stuff the mods don't like! Imagine that.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 08:50 PM
-7

There's a reason SSJAmes is listed as one of the numerous anti-male egalitarians who frequent the /r/mensrights sub-reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/antiegalitarian/comments/10ygy5/catalogue_of_feminist_and_egalitarian_concern/ He's not an MRA, he's an anti-male feminist.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 05:56 PM
0

Its more about the dogmatism and stupidity that PUA brings with it. If we're worried about dogmatism and stupidity we'd do better to ban egalitarians than PUAs.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 05:51 PM
-1

As you can see, the mods don't care what you or the users who up-voted your comment to the top think. We're a bunch of "whiners".
/r/MensRights20/10/12 05:50 PM
0

I know, how dare we learn from our environment! Remember guys and gals, it's "pseudoscience" when it doesn't support the moronic notion that men and women are exactly the same when it comes to sexual behavior. Women like typhonblue are against this material because they'd rather keep men ignorant of how women behave. No better than a feminist. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 05:49 PM
5

Erasmus demonstrates clearly why these articles are appropriate here. Troll mod, who still runs the head moderator account for this sub-reddit, responds with juvenile troll post.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 05:47 PM
-11

Take it to the meta. That's where important discussions take place.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:22 PM
2

there's a difference between pride and irrational fear/bigotry/intolerance. Most people paint any white male issue as the latter.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:43 PM
1

I'm just alluding to the fact that Obama comes from a background of widespread corruption in Chicago.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:43 PM
2

The law is ridiculous, but there's nothing that can be done about it. Sure there is. Fight against feminism/Leftism which is responsible for these laws.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:42 PM
-13

Odd how black men's rights articles are up-voted while white men's rights articles are down-voted.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:12 AM
0

Everything is part nature and nurture. To think otherwise is absurd.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:06 AM
1

Thanks Obama.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:27 PM
2

Show me the misogyny. Misogyny is hatred of women, dontchaknow. Remember, you said: This is an extensive list of misogynistic, largely fallacious or stereotypical hypothetical questions. See, when you define "misogyny" as any criticism of women whatsoever, you aren't an MRA, you're a feminist.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:23 PM
0

The article also details some specific men's rights issues that white men face.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:37 PM
0

He is by definition a bigot. Bigotry: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:34 PM
2

You cannot be bigoted against ideas That's the definition of bigotry. Bigotry: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself. You are a bigot and so is friestogo.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:34 PM
-1

Anyone who uses the word "misogyny" seriously here should be banned.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:33 PM
2

Domestic violence IS a "gendered" problem, actually. Most DV is initiated by women.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:26 PM
2

Also, you're talking to a socialist here Of course, that's why you're complaining when I correctly diagnose Myers' bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:23 PM
0

Who cares?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:41 AM
0

Bullshit. You intentionally misconstrue the Bible because you are biased against anything and everything traditional. Bitch. You're probably barren.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:53 AM
0

How about liberal. Or emasculated weenie. Or tweebo. I think mangina is a pretty good one though.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:29 AM
2

Bye. Something tells me you're more concerned with my accurate assessment of Seth Myers: a liberal who pushes liberal (including feminist) propaganda through SNL. Yes, it is propaganda. Seth Myers is a smarmy liberal weenie who pushes propaganda through unfunny "comedy".
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:25 AM
-13

They're called liberals.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:09 AM
0

Seth Myers is an emasculated mangina pushing a feminist liberal agenda on viewers. That is why this "joke" was made. Stop trying to excuse it.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:02 AM
1

Yeah, okay.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 11:50 PM
-2

Pretty silly to emulate SRS. This sub-reddit has become a sad joke.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 11:49 PM
-1

No she didn't. Yes, she did. She continued complaining about it long after it was resolved. As we have every right to. It was a rotten thing to do - and a victory for the MRM. It was a rotten thing to do. It was also a pointless distraction. Just like all the bitching about SRS and the recent VA doxxing. Blah, blah, blah. Do some real activism.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:17 AM
0

But GWW continued trying to push an attack even after the situation was resolved, and people continued to complain about it. Nothing every came of all the blustering. I for one am tired of sensationalist crap all the time.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:07 AM
1

This is bass-ackwards tripe. Radical feminism is core feminism which is anti-male, anti-masculinity, anti-tradition.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:05 AM
2

Regarding "the equal education of all girls and women" I've seen lots of other studies saying the same thing: college educated women (especially masters+) end up leaving full-time work when the baby comes. In some fields (MBA is one), it's as high as 75% of the women not working full-time 10-15 years after graduation. The men, of course, end up being much more likely to work full-time. There's several reasons that drive this and I feel that quite a few of them are biologically driven. The issue …
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:09 PM
-6

Perhaps. Personally I think it's largely a non-issue. And it's another case where people get all up in arms and offended, just like they did with the GWW attempt to doxx. But that turned out to be a non-issue too. It's good that we're boycotting links from those shitty websites, but I can't help but feel this whole issue is just another distraction, another example of us reacting to our enemies rather than being proactive about pushing men's rights issues. Thanks for the answer.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:49 PM
-5

That's a pretty silly idea.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:45 PM
1

Sorry but that's simply not true. There is a history of bannings for dissenting opinion. You just don't hear about them.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:45 PM
10

Less needless drama, more men's rights activism. We already have multiple posts about this issue on the front page, and there was no need for another.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:44 PM
-7

Indeed, indeed. These are people who have failed at life and so want to change the system so that their failure isn't actually failure, by tearing down those who are successful. The ideology is Leftism, which is a Robin Hood system of taking from the most successful to give the least successful by whatever measure of success these ideologues choose. This is why Leftists are anti-male, anti-white, anti-religion, anti-heterosexuals, etc. etc.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:33 AM
-10

SRSers adhere to a radical Leftist ideology, much as the /r/mensrights moderators do. These types use harassment and censorship as their primary weapon, refusing to engage in rational discussion.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:30 AM
-7

For the same reason every other Leftist feels the need to fuck with anyone who doesn't agree with them and their twisted evil ideology.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:25 AM
-4

No. It's not about women being happy. It's about women doing whatever they feel like doing at any given moment. Which as we can see, leads to grave unhappiness for women and men alike.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 09:34 PM
-3

That's not conservative ideology, that's liberal ideology. Feminism is and always has been a liberal anti-traditional movement for egalitarianism. Everyone is equal (even when they're not, and women are more equal than others).
/r/MensRights07/10/12 09:32 PM
1

Almost all racially motivated violence is committed by blacks against whites. You don't see the media admitting the fact that blacks commit an extremely disproportionate amount of violence. In fact when blacks attacks whites, the media usually refers to the blacks as "youths" or some other racially neutral term to hide the fact that it's largely black on white crime. But when George Zimmerman, a hispanic Jew, defends himself against a black hooligan, oh boy, it's EVIL WHITE racism against an inn…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 06:23 AM
-1

Part of being a real man is standing up to women. You must be deluded to call men standing up to women's selfishness "gynocentric". In fact, everything you say screams gynocentrism. You are an example of a failed woman who wants the rest of us to change things for you to comfort you. You are no different than a feminist, and the female companion to weak, emasculated males who have failed as men and want the rest of us to change things for them to comfort them.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 03:36 AM
-2

It's a known fact that men granted women power over them and feminism took over society. It's not bullshit at all.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:40 PM
2

Your generalization is false and therefore hateful. My generalization is true and not hateful whatsoever, merely true.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:03 PM
1

There is a case to be made that women tend to vote with their lady parts. :)
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:19 PM
3

Sure it is. Because it's true. Lying about women was what got us into this mess in the first place.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:17 PM
1

And there's nothing wrong with being "sexist", as you define the term, because in fact men and women are different and one CAN make generalizations about them. Calling me a "sexist fuck" for stating the truth shows just how meaningless the term "sexist" has become. As meaningless as the word "misogyny".
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:16 PM
-4

The reason we're in this feminist mess in the first place is men failed to be "real men". Instead they were "pussies" who white knighted for and pedestalized women and supported feminist anti-male practices. Being a real man means standing up against women's bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:15 PM
2

An idiot.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:25 PM
2

In fact it's true that the media and politicians ignore violence against WHITE people committed by blacks. So that would be a more realistic example.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:21 PM
-1

Sexist? STFU.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:39 PM
0

That's not giving up. That's standing your ground to get what you want. The other stuff is just begging, rather than asserting. I can't help but sense you're a stupid person.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:38 PM
-3

It's not men's responsible to grovel at our feet, princess. And making generalizations about women, especially when accurate, is not misogyny. Women like you who constantly bitch about men speaking their minds truthfully are precisely why most women aren't helpful to the MRM. It's nothing but a method of controlling men, what you are doing here. For reference: http://www.angryharry.com/esWomenManipulateMen.htm
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:54 AM
1

His advice is actually better than anything else in the thread. Few women respond well to logic.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:46 AM
1

Someone else linked this. It seems relevant: http://www.antifeministtech.info/2012/08/is-it-possible-to-defend-a-male-space-without-it-being-hostile-to-women/
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:35 AM
1

That's a rather absurd thing to hear coming from you of all people. Grow up kid.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 07:00 PM
7

Feminism is a thoroughly indefensible hate movement.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 09:00 PM
26

It's shameful how these people are so willing to use children to push their agenda which actually ends up harming children.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:58 PM
2

If there are men who like strong and dominant women, they are a small minority. And they're all in /r/OneY lol.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 09:20 PM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/LadyMRAs/comments/wqisi/hunting_for_archetypes_doch_doch_gave_me_an_idea/ http://www.reddit.com/r/LadyMRAs/comments/wzzbv/about_the_mgtow_dustup/ http://www.reddit.com/r/LadyMRAs/comments/x07zd/apology_accepted_now_heres_how_to_reel_this_thing/ The women who run /r/LadyMRAs are raving misandrist feminists pretending to be MRAs. vegibowl, doch_doch, and Alanna. They were feminist concern trolls before they created their own sub-reddit where they can hide from men, and they…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:50 AM
-1

Could it be your blatant misandry here and at /r/LadyMRAs? Yes, yes it could.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:47 PM
-2

I won't support any website run by a feminist shill like yourself, vegibowl. Down-voted.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:40 PM
1

More accurately he's just shut down discussion about these topics and told those who are actually seeking solutions to these problems to go away. Much like what the mods here try to do. All that remains at AVfM now are a bunch of "yes" men. Discussion about solutions doesn't even take place. It's not an activist website, it's just a whine fest.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:37 PM
0

This article seems relevant: http://www.amerika.org/politics/an-offer-you-cant-refuse/
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:35 PM
-1

Personally I think a 20 year old young woman having sex with a 14 year old boy is more questionable than a 20 year old young man having sex with a 14 year old girl, especially when the 20 year old woman isn't even responsible enough to use birth control and the 14 year old boy has no right to paternal surrender. It's actually pretty natural for men to be attracted to younger women and women to be attracted to older, more mature men. But when you have an older woman who preys on young boys who ar…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 02:02 AM
-8

Thank God! I was so worried about what you thought, rilakkuma1. You have a vagina. You used to dislike r/MensRights. Today you changed your mind! Bravo, you pioneer you! What would the movement do without you?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 05:17 AM
3

I never said anything of causes. I said refusal to take a man's name and feminism in women are correlated. If you think a feminist-leaning woman is just as likely as a non-feminist woman to stay married, you must be insane.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:22 PM
0

I am claiming that women who refuse to take a husband's name are more likely to divorce than women who happily take a husband's name. Whether all rates are increasing is not relevant.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:04 PM
-1

I sometimes wish people who haven't thought about an issue whatsoever would just keep quiet. The real destruction of marriage as a lifelong institution did not begin with No-Fault divorce, but rather the cultural shift in attitudes regarding who should receive child custody in the event of divorce. The real changes to our society began with the changing attitudes of the culture towards what the institution means and why it existed in the first place. Marriage used to be the contract in which a m…
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:01 PM
0

I don't really see why that is a bad thing. Um, yeah, okay.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:56 PM
-7

There is a correlation, that does not mean it necessarily applies in every case.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:55 PM
0

Not in my opinion.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:47 PM
4

It's not even relevant. The question to ask is what is the divorce rate for couples in which the wife took the man's name VS couples in which the wife did not take the man's name. I guarantee you'll see a higher divorce rate in the latter, as refusal to take the man's name is correlated with feminist (me me me it's all about me!) types.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:44 PM
-1

I guarantee there is a correlation between refusal to take a husband's name and divorce.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:38 PM
-2

Grapeban is a feminist. Consider that.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:35 PM
-7

I think taking your husband's name is essential. It helps a woman to recognize that this is a serious life change, it's not just a wedding, it's a marriage, a real, serious commitment. A woman who wants to keep her maiden name or hyphenate it is too feminist for any man to trust. She values her own needs over the family's unity. Most established MRAs, for example Dalrock, suggest NEVER marrying a woman who won't take your name. It's a huge red flag indicative of underlying issues.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:33 PM
2

Most people seem rational and understanding, but most are anything but. Keep that in mind. Most people are ignorant bigoted fools. Expect it.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:26 AM
3

Try to always keep your cool. That's the most important thing. When they attack, laugh it off, make your point, and if they continue to act silly, just laugh it off and end the conversation insinuating they clearly don't have the maturity to discuss the issue rationally.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:24 AM
1

Be sure to report them and hope the mods do their job. I did.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:06 AM
1

Today I learned polygamy is anti-woman!
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:05 AM
-2

Her recent reaction was because he was talking quietly in class. Why? Because Miss Wheatley banned his group from their usual spot and allowed the white kids to take it over. One of the white kids was texting him teasing him about it, and he was responding. If Miss Wheatley had not been a cunt and unfairly banned his crew in the first place because she had a vendetta against him, it never would've happened. He did not do anything serious. Miss Wheatley MADE it serious. She reminds me very much o…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:00 AM
0

Welcome to 1984 Thanks liberals!
/r/MensRights10/08/12 03:58 AM
3

Some topics covered: Boys acting out against female-oriented education. Giving boys Ritalin to shut them up. Female, likely feminist teacher who gets very angry when boys act like boys. (Miss Wheatley) Miss Wheatley's abuse of Jonah was making me very angry even though it's just a mockumentary and mostly a comedy show.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:45 AM
-5

The old system of sex roles did not "suck for both men and women". It was actually a good deal for both men and women. Men could have a companion and a family, and so could women.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 09:22 PM
10

Oh yeah, I forgot, "Not All Feminists Are Like That" so we're not allowed to talk about the majority that are like that or the mainstream feminist movement which is like that. Thanks for the clarification!
/r/MensRights05/08/12 07:35 PM
10

Feminists do exactly what he is talking about.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 07:31 PM
3

Men don't exist. Meanwhile, P&G is a proud sponsor of moms.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 07:29 PM
13

TL;DR: N8theGr8 made a straw man argument about what the OP said, gets down-voted for being uninformative and unreasonable.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 07:26 PM
1

Yeah, Donovan is sensible about masculinity. The Way of Men is an excellent book.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 07:04 PM
2

Reported. Will you be banned, or is it acceptable for feminists like yourself to disparage /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 01:52 AM
0

Spot on Mike. You should read Jack Donovan's The Way of Men. It answers the same question in a different form: What is Masculinity? link: http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/2012/03/the-way-of-men-masculinity-explained/
/r/MensRights04/08/12 07:06 PM
1

It's evolutionary, my Dear Watson.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:34 PM
3

Pretty sick, huh?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:34 PM
4

Government should have zero authority to interfere with family. Even CPS is corrupt: http://www.lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w106.html The more we welcome government into our private lives, the more liberty we lose.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:32 PM
1

No problem.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:22 PM
0

What about murdering unborn children?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:20 PM
2

Here you go bud. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/wg5qs/man_loses_all_rights_to_see_his_children/c5d92ac Any sufficiently complex legal system is indistinguishable from corruption. If you have to hire a professional to work the system for you, then it is no different from just paying a bribe. Those may not be the original quotes, but hopefully that helps.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 03:52 AM
2

That's because the US actually is more oppressive than those countries. The US just hides it through the justice injustice system. You can hide a lot of oppression when you convince the population it's "the right thing to do". The Founding Fathers would be disgusted.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 03:44 AM
-1

Anti-Feminist University by Laura Grace Robins: http://fullofgraceseasonedwithsalt.blogspot.com/search/label/AFU%20%28Anti-Feminism%20University%29
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:11 AM
2

Maybe we can put a link to it in the sidebar along with the other organizations.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:37 PM
1

The same thing happens whether it's funded or not. They are giving their donations away to charities that have little to do with men's rights. Better to donate to a men's rights organization in the sidebar.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:35 PM
0

Not sure what your point is. I already stated that if equal opportunity leads to destruction of society, it is immoral. Clearly we are already on that path, clearly when women have "equal opportunity" it results in female supremacy, dysfunction, and eventually destruction from within or without.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:30 PM
3

But I don't think that the recognition and rejection of misandry or male disposability are conservative values, as examples. To some degree they are. Masculine values ARE conservative values. Now a lot of your average social "conservatives" are misandrous, yes. And there are some flaws regarding male disposability in many religions. But generally, society USED to celebrate masculinity. They didn't demonize men en masse. Masculine values were VALUED, CELEBRATED even. And this was good for society…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:29 PM
0

You're making a fool of yourself. Innocence Project was merely the first men's rights-oriented charity that came to mind.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:27 PM
1

So essentially you're saying that the entire video had implicit "sarcasm tags" around it? I got the jokes, but it seemed like their message about negative tropes seemed genuine. Agreed. I see little evidence to the contrary. I suppose the picture of an acne-ridden nerd may have been a joke. And maybe they're trying to make some commentary. But it isn't well done. Seeing as their "comedy" isn't even funny, I don't think I want to see their videos in the first place. And again, donating to them go…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:21 PM
0

Says who? That doesn't seem to be the case at all, and considering their donations don't go to men's rights organizations, instead catering to feminist demands to donate to ovarian cancer research, it seems unlikely. edit: Maybe there are a couple indications it is somewhat of a joke, but it isn't clear. Their "comedy" isn't funny, which does not bode well for their videos.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:21 PM
1

CONFIRMATION BIAS really I don't have more time to waste on you
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:08 PM
0

What is wrong with equal opportunity, troll? That's not how you start a conversation. Try again.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:08 PM
1

This is an article from the same guy who's on trial for having an anti-feminist blog.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:07 PM
3

This is where we're headed in America as long as the PC police get their way.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:04 PM
1

Still not a mens rights blog. It's an anti-feminist blog detailing the history of feminism. It IS part of the manosphere. Yet you want to ignore all the content there because you're anti-religion. You're a hypocrite. End of discussion.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:00 PM
1

I'm the only one TRYING to have a discussion. You aren't. I'd say you're the troll. But to each his own. If you don't want to discuss, you don't have to.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:59 PM
0

http://www.innocenceproject.org/ is completely related to THIS SUB-REDDIT, whereas donating to THE OP'S VIDEO results in 75% of your money NOT going to a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:55 PM
3

Full of Grace, Seasoned with Salt, is dedicated to fighting the sin of feminism. It chronicles one woman's view of the fallen world around her as she continues to shed worldly, often damaging philosophies--namely, feminism. This site is about "renewing of the mind" or "deprogramming from the Matrix", if you will, and as such this blog contains a miscellany of thoughts and topics that stem from the renewing process. I write from a Christian worldview, yet this is not primarily a Christian blog. I…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:54 PM
0

Concession of defeat accepted.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:54 PM
0

Actually, the choices in charities were chosen that way to seem a little more unbiased, As quite a few journalists were attacking it as "sexist" and "hateful" And the result is that only 25% of the money actually goes toward men's issues. That's stupid. And yeah, Chemo is pretty harmful, that's kind of the point of the research, so that alternative safer methods can be discovered, such as cancer-attacking neurotoxins Then why has such research been fruitless, even though there ARE alternatives t…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:52 PM
3

Why? 25% of your money goes to prostate cancer research. The rest goes to ovarian and lung cancer research. Very deceptive. I'd much rather spend such money at the innocence project. Heck, most cancer research appears to be totally useless anyway. We're still doing extremely harmful chemotherapy. At least the innocence project is actually doing something real.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:43 PM
1

Respond to what I said with a counter-argument or don't respond at all. You DID argue for equal opportunity even when that opportunity is harmful. I did NOT mischaracterize what you said. If equal opportunity is harmful to society, should we not discuss it? I think so.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:37 PM
1

The point remains: if you have a problem with a generalization, argue against its accuracy, rather than pretending that the person was making a universal statement.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:36 PM
1

They are claiming that videogames that portray men doing the things men actually like to do are "damaging". It's just silly. It's a feminist kind of thing: "Violence in videogames is bad!" Most men LIKE playing a character that's big and badass. There is nothing wrong with that because that's how men are. This is a video for men who want something to complain about, and there are FAR better ways to spend money on men's rights issues. edit: Okay, so your money actually goes to these places: 25% -…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:35 PM
-3

Oh wow, it's going to be a video series about how it's "sexist" for men to be portrayed as manly men who kick ass. That's anti-men's rights. Yuck. Our society has almost no tolerance for unsanctioned physical violence. Children are expelled from school for fighting, and something as historically common as a weaponless, drunken brawl can land men in court or in jail. As coalitions of females, pandering politicians and fearful men organize to child-proof our world, to ban guns and regulate violent…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:24 PM
6

Logical fallacy. Unlike liberals, I don't discount factual information due to the source. You see, I try to avoid confirmation bias. Looks your way. Go read something, like JD Unwin's Sex and Culture. It's becoming clear why you are so ignorant.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:20 PM
2

No, it's not social conservatism, it's conservatism, which doesn't conflict with men's rights whatsoever, in fact it is the solution to men's rights issues. Sites like amerika.org for example. edit: Sites like http://fullofgraceseasonedwithsalt.blogspot.com/ I wouldn't call social conservative either. That word encompasses too many crazies to be used for rational manosphere bloggers. Here's a quote from her site: Full of Grace, Seasoned with Salt, is dedicated to fighting the sin of feminism. It…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:08 PM
0

That is Jeremiah, ass. edit: And here we go with another campaign to get a conservative banned at /r/mensrights by falsely associated them with someone else. Censor, censor, censor is your cry. You're a real coward. Make an argument like an adult, and stop bad-mouthing me with straw man attacks.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:56 PM
2

The answer you get here is based on the political leanings of those here, not of those in the wider manosphere, which is largely conservative.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:55 PM
5

The MRM is about as radical as it gets. Indeed. And considering the status quo is feminism and liberalism, the MRM is radical precisely because its core ideas are anti-feminist and conservative.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:53 PM
4

Perhaps you should venture into the wider manosphere. It is clearly conservative in nature, as the core ideas of the men's movement are conservative.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:52 PM
-1

You value feelings over results, which is a liberal idea that leads only to societal collapse. Conservatives value results over feelings, which leads to societal stability. You choose death, I choose life.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:48 PM
0

NAWALT my butt.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:46 PM
1

There are stereotypes that come to be through dynamic processes, which are usually accurate. Then there are stereotypes manufactured intentionally to misinform, like those put out by feminists.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:45 PM
1

Yep, most stereotypes are true, except for the ones intentionally manufactured to misinform, generally by feminists and liberals. "Men are misogynists", "Whites are racist", all baloney.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:44 PM
1

And so does reality.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:43 PM
-1

Take your schoolgirl drama elsewhere.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:42 PM
2

Is this guy a coward? Yes. No, he's just smart, to have the composure to do what he did.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:38 PM
0

Evidence comes in many forms. Studies can be falsified and regularly are. Common sense reveals many generalizations that exist because they are true.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 11:35 AM
3

Indeed.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 11:34 AM
-6

Why should women have equal chances when women are so much more likely to squander it, and birth defects vastly increase whilst women are busy being educated and playing at a career before they eventually stop that and become housewives?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 11:32 AM
-9

Um, no. I'm not adding superfluous words. The generalization is implied.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 11:30 AM
3

women should be equal - yes But women are not the same as men, and therefore not equal. If you mean equal rights, then what about equal responsibilities? Feminists only campaign for equal (or better) rights, equal (or better) outcomes, and never equal responsibilities. In other words, feminists campaign for female supremacy.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 05:59 AM
1

I never said the word "all". A generalization is not a universal statement.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 05:51 AM
6

Further proof that no matter how much you give women as a group, they still want more.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 05:49 AM
6

Absolutely nothing, but you can lower your chances by staying away from kids, staying away from women, staying away especially from women who seem vindictive, selfish, strange, etc.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:21 AM
0

Interesting way of putting it. Furthermore, overall, women today are a drain on society. Women consume more than men and men produce more than women. Men pay more taxes and women receive more handouts. Women are, however, superior at incubating babies, but unless these guys saved women who were pregnant with their children, which I'm sure they didn't, then it was very foolish of them to give their lives for these women.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:19 AM
4

Videogames are not to blame, obviously. Men enjoy videogames because violence and danger are fun and exciting. And yes, men do have a biological instinct to protect women, but society exacerbates this greatly, far more than is rational. Men should not sacrifice their lives for women just because they are women, and it's completely irrational to throw your life away for some girl you just happen to be sleeping with at the time. She probably isn't "worth it".
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:16 AM
-13

Yet you would not fling yourself on a grenade for him (please, don't embarrass yourself by claiming that would be your instinct, you'd definitely run away and let him die for you). Proving that women will never give up their privileges, whilst they constantly demand "equal or better" for themselves. Proving that equality can never exist.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:01 AM
6

I'm not saying he should be expected to, but that's the only scenario where it makes any sense whatsoever. But also if you think about it, women have always exchanged sex with men for their protection. A guy who would sacrifice his life for some girl he just happens to be having sex with at the time, who in this world probably won't even be with him much longer, though, is a fool.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:59 AM
-5

Home school, small town. It's really your only option unless you want the educational system and media to raise him and indoctrinate him with ridiculous liberal propaganda.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:54 AM
15

This should be the top story at r/mensrights, fighting against the cultural pressure that says men should give their lives up instantly to protect ANY woman, even women they barely know or who are merely friends or "girlfriends". Why should a man give up his life for anyone but the mother of his children, the woman he will love for the rest of his life?
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:52 PM
5

Is he smoking a cigar in the last one where he's accused of touching her breasts?
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:18 PM
1

I'm sure there are, but you will only attract a certain type of male, and your numbers will be limited. It will be a "men's group" for only a certain type of man, whereas a group where the males can do some sort of activity, like even playing cards, would attract a more diverse crowd.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:14 PM
1

In other words, feminist doesn't want equality.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:06 PM
-1

Textbook concern troll.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:02 PM
-2

Relevant: Nothing Makes a ‘Gina Tingle Like a Killa http://www.avoiceformen.com/women/nothing-makes-a-gina-tingle-like-a-killa/
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:13 PM
1

I sincerely doubt anyone at AVfM has the stomach to act like THAT much of a mangina for THAT long. No, Futrelle is the real deal.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 09:07 PM
4

Some men rise above such stimuli, some find a way to weather it, and others are broken by it. And some men rebel against it. In the modern world, where it certainly appears we are impotent, that nothing we do matters, MRAs rebel in their own way, men like Thomas Ball rebel by burning themselves alive, and rampage shooters rebel by killing a lot of people. I wouldn't necessarily just pass these men off as "broken", they are doing what men have always done: lashing out against what they perceive a…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 08:59 PM
3

Oppression: Prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control. I think that describes the situation for men pretty well. Though I am against resorting to the same type of victimhood ideology as feminism, I can't help but call the world we live in today quite oppressive, especially for men. The US certainly is no longer the land of the free.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 08:55 PM
5

See /r/mensrights I think it's highly likely that he felt oppressed in some way for him to do what he allegedly did. The sharp increase in shooting sprees by males recently indicates that something is coming to a boiling point, and I'm certain that anti-male sentiment is a big part of that, though certainly not the only component. I did not say it justifies what he did. It merely explains it, and points us toward real solutions. How can we stop men from going on shooting rampages? Easy, stop pis…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 08:50 PM
7

It's generally not considered discrimination unless it's against "minorities", women, or homosexuals, as far as the liberal ACLU is concerned.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 07:07 PM
7

More accurately, being an oppressed male results in mass murder as protest.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 06:43 PM
2

Nah they are not just escapes, they are bonding experiences. Once you have those experiences, you know each other better, and THAT is when you sit around the campfire smoking cigars and drinking whiskey and talking about life. To try to set up a men's group that's just about talking won't attract very many men, you need some sort of activity to draw people in. Men aren't women, they don't want to sit around talking to strangers about their feelings in a sterile support group setting.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:25 PM
0

The point is, who cares? Just because she's a woman who did a shorter, less impressive flight than other men, way after they did it, and after tagging along on a similar run with a man who showed her the ropes? We have to celebrate women, always, even when they aren't that special? That's feminism, that's sexism. What's so special about Amelia Earhart that deserves a spot on Google's front page or even in our history books? I don't see it.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:20 PM
2

You need to learn how to read each other and work together as a group. Go to the shooting range. Go hunting. Play paintball. Go to the gym. Take martial arts classes. Join a sports team. Take a workshop. Learn a useful skill. Fix something. Build something. Make something. Get off your asses and do something. Jack Donovan, The Way of Men
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:13 PM
6

Absolutely. Article is shit. Knew it from the moment I read: We teach men that violence is a viable solution to problems. That's the message behind expressions like "let's go outside and settle this like men." Society doesn't TEACH men to be violent. Men react with violence DESPITE society's attempts to manipulate them into being passive little sheep who never stand up for themselves, i.e. slaves. Our society has almost no tolerance for unsanctioned physical violence. Children are expelled from …
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:11 PM
-1

If you guys like this article you should really check out Jack's books: http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/books/
/r/MensRights23/07/12 08:33 PM
-2

Actually not just young men, but men of all ages, and especially white men. Heck, even a few Asians.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 05:43 PM
5

DOGA hates men, what do you expect?
/r/MensRights09/05/12 10:51 AM
3

Use of the word faggot only serves to demean gay men No, the term faggot refers to effeminate males, not gay men, according to the author of the article and the author of the book he's reviewed. Jack Donovan, the author of the book being reviewed, uses the term that way, as do most people. This was discussed quite clearly in the article as well. And Jack is homosexual himself. Faggotry doesn’t refer specifically to homosexuality, though a lot of homos happen to be fags. Faggot, gay, girly-man, f…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:14 AM
-1

Only feminists like you stand up for women even when they behave badly. Some of us aren't herd animals.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:46 PM
0

Yes, the OP is textbook definition of concern troll.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 08:23 PM
2

Textbook definition of concern troll.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:05 PM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disorderly_conduct Disorderly conduct is a criminal charge in most jurisdictions in the United States. Disorderly conduct is typically classified as a violation or misdemeanor. edit: Apparently in NY disorderly conduct is a violation, and a violation is not a crime, so it seems you're fine. http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/bclc/web/NewYork/ny3(b).htm http://www.newyorkcriminallawyer-blog.com/2009/02/new-york-criminal-defense-law.html
/r/MensRights29/03/12 08:15 PM
9

Believe it or not gay guys can call women cunts too.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:15 PM
1

The positive side of all this is, I don't have a criminal record Unless you got the conviction expunged, yes you do.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:14 PM
2

I agree, but Caperslol seems intent on doing it anyway.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:22 AM
3

Why would you even talk to a creature like that?
/r/MensRights27/03/12 09:49 PM
0

I can see that, but being a "nice woman" is often a temporary thing. A man needs experience with women and needs to know how to deal with them; till then he is extremely vulnerable. Game is not perfect in this but it does help get the ideas flowing.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 06:21 AM
2

I agree. But at least men who are dead set to do it can be informed. I tend to agree far more with the Spearhead article than that article, myself.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 06:12 AM
3

Perhaps this article will give you some hope... 50% of marriage end in divorce, but 50% do not. If I was a potter and 50% of the time my pots broke in the kiln I wouldn't quit being a potter but instead I would try to figure out what went right the other 50% of the time. http://equalitythroughtruth.blogspot.com/2011/01/dont-get-married-wuh.html
/r/MensRights27/03/12 05:52 AM
1

It's a worse deal for men than women, which is why it's relevant.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:11 PM
1

Men and women get different things out of marriage. Fidelity in a woman is more important than in a man. If 60% of married women cheat, it's not a very good deal for men.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 06:09 AM
0

I discredit the movement by linking to articles by leaders of the movement? You're juvenile.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 10:01 PM
1

Young man, learn some respect. Chateau Heartiste is a men's rights activist as well a pick-up artist, and his insights are profound. The article is completely appropriate here.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 09:08 PM
2

Relationships are a men's rights issue. Marriage is a men's rights issue. Divorce is a men's rights issue. There is a whole thing called the marriage strike instituted by MRAs because most American women are so spoiled today. Of course it's a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 06:04 PM
2

They are both insults. I admit that. Clearly, I'm not the one with the bias. The point isn't political ideology, it's worldview. I can see both views, you only see your own. Anyway, I have no patience for your juvenile insults, either, young man, so please don't talk to me anymore. You ought to learn how to show respect, or you will receive none.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 05:43 PM
2

By the way, you are demonstrating very clearly why the moderation here can never be fair as long as there are no conservative MRAs as moderators. You see no problem with chavelah attacking Demonspawn with an attack by claiming he has "Victorian social mores" because you have a bias against traditionalism. On the other hand, as soon as Demonspawn uses the word "slut" you see it is an attack because you have a bias in favor of progressivism. Both are attacks, and chavelah attacked first. If progre…
/r/MensRights22/03/12 08:00 PM
0

I am lost at your grade 6 level of insulting those more intelligent than you.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 05:20 AM
-2

Yet the people who pay her are leeching off the taxpayers, and therefore she is leeching off the taxpayers through them instead of getting a real job where people willingly spend their own money for her services. It's really quite simple, so I'm not sure where you got lost. There's a reason women dominate the public sector, funded by taxpayers who are forced to pay for their luxurious and useless positions regardless of whether they are willing or not.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 11:37 PM
19

Home school students do exceptionally well when compared with the nationwide average. In every subject and at every grade level of the ITBS and TAP batteries, home school students scored significantly higher than their public and private school counterparts.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 11:26 PM
0

Oh, please. Sex is binary. Grouping people based on sex is a terrible measurement of their driving risk. Just about anything would be better than assuming every single male has a higher risk of accident than every single female. If they changed this clearly sexist policy and started using factors that actually are indicative of driving risk, insurance rates would go DOWN for responsible men and UP for irresponsible men and women, which is absolutely FINE by me. The reason they get away with this…
/r/MensRights21/03/12 07:15 PM
-16

Why is it women who claim to be "strong and independent" never, ever are? This woman has made her living leeching off the taxpayers' dollars in political campaigns. She isn't strong and independent, she's a parasite. And if she were really "strong and independent", she wouldn't be made up like such a whore; she'd actually have to earn her place then.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 07:04 PM
1

chavelah repeatedly used insults in place of reasonable argument. You are unable to detect it due to your bias. Insult/strawman #1: "Well, as a man who would like to see Victorian social mores make a comeback..." Chavelah implies he is an irrational evil traditionalist with this statement. You do not see it because you are biased. "Slut" is just a less subtle insult, but not more of an insult. I don't need to go on.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 11:24 PM
0

It's not important whether an insult is gendered. chavelah has been insulting him throughout, making the insinuation that anything traditional is evil. Due to your bias, you only see his calling her a slut as an attack, while ignoring her constant attacks against him. This is because you also assume anything traditional is evil, and are completely unwilling or unable to overcome your bias.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:28 PM
-1

You clearly don't understand women. (Most women don't.) Virgin women have a far easier time forming lasting pair bonds, if all other factors are equal.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:20 PM
1

False rape culture is what's really fucked up.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:03 PM
1

Patriarchy, at least in the traditional meaning of the word, isn’t the cause of violence. It is the solution to violence.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 05:51 AM
0

:/
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:06 AM
4

Oh my God, the statement in the OP I used as an example is from one of your moderators, ignatiusloyola. What the hell? You guys have a feminist running this sub-reddit?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:01 PM
1

Isn't it obvious? You make sure to include the fact that affirmative action is also wrong because it harms men. To focus only on "the poor wimminz" ensures that people's views never change and they continue to focus only on women (gynocentrism). It is irresponsible to focus only on women to try to solve men's issues. That's what feminists do, not MRAs. And we've seen thus far that focusing only on women never actually solves any of men's problems, so your idea that affirmative action is going to…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:57 PM
3

It doesn't matter who's saying it, it's not right. People should not be using ploys that rely on and further enable gynocentrism at the expense of men just to win supporters who only care about women and not men. That politically correct stuff is what got us here in the first place and it doesn't help us in the long run because what we really need is supporters who are here for men. The reason discrimination against men is wrong is because it is discrimination against MEN, not because it hurts w…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter