TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

meshosh Archive

View 9 posts and 84 comments by meshosh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
694

You definitely did something wrong. You came back and put yourself in that situation. Should have just left and moved on with life.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 09:38 PM
1

Oh, and 20 partners at mid-30s is a bad sign. That means she had more than one partner per year on average, which means that A: she was very promiscuous at some point in her life, or B: she could not stay in a relationship for too long. Both are red flags if you are a guy looking for a long term relationship. So, if this woman is competing against a 25 year old who had 3-5 partners, she is just out of luck. You see, 20 partners in 10-15 years might not seem that much, really. She might have just…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 01:44 AM
1

You're right. Starting early, a woman can get a pretty high number of partners at 20. However, she WILL have a hard time getting (successfully) married at that age. Hell, having this many partners, she will most likely not even want to. I mean, why would she?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 01:13 AM
2

Yes, people (women) get off to those books. They are not best sellers for their literary value, and everyone who bought them knows that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:45 PM
1

In that case, their partner count will be smaller, which is precisely my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:40 PM
2

Up until they are well into their 30s and watching their dating pool shrink by the day. Then it's suddenly not.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 02:54 PM
11

Well, porn is made for men, not women. Porn for women would be 50 shades and stuff like that. In which women do actually fuck college degrees, job titles, status, money, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 06:53 PM
1

The ones who die don't stick around much. But men do get beat up and hurt by women. It's no exception. Men stay on abusive relationships for the same reasons as women.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 08:13 PM
1

If you two were fighting empty handed, sure, you would most likely subdue her. Now, give her a knife, gun, or any weapon and lets see if it is still that easy.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 01:02 AM
2

It's the fascination with the 6-6-6, as I've come to call it. A guy is not acceptable if he doesn't make six-figures, doesn't have a six-pack, and is not at least 6-foot tall. And the worst part, that these women absolutely can't fathom, is that a guy like that can get ANY and ALL women he wants. These guys will not settle for unattractive, overweight, bitchy women over forty. But women these days are so delusional that they they can't understand that.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 06:15 PM
1

Because you are basically arguing the exact opposite of what I am. No, I am not, Because these two behaviors are not mutually exclusive. Males can have children with lots of women, and pair bond with just one of them. Most of the other children will survive anyway. Another way this can happen (we don't see this in humans anymore, but it happened A LOT, and still happens with lots of mammals) is one male having a harem. This way he can have sex with multiple women, and care for all of them, and t…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 01:03 PM
6

Well, at least here you can say that without being banned. You could also tell OP why he's wrong instead of just bashing everyone.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 03:24 AM
1

And why can't both be true?
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:29 PM
1

I like being in a relationship too. I wouldn't go as far to say I crave a relationship, though. Sex, on the other hand... If men actually wanted relationships so bad, prostitutes would be out of business and every porn would end with them getting married (like romantic comedies usually do). I'm not at all suggesting men don't like intimacy or long term relationships. What I'm saying is just that sex is the 'primary' reason why men do most of what they do.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 07:48 PM
1

Men don't just crave sex. I'd argue most men want a relationship in which they can have a lot of sex rather than choose to have sex with many women and stay single. And you would be wrong. Back when our minds were shaped the way they are now, there were no marriage, commitment, etc. The men who, for whatever reason, did have a lot of sex with a lot of different women had more children than those who had a lot of sex with few women. We descend from those guys. Our culture, however, developed to c…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 07:07 PM
1

I've never thought about it that way, but I think you make a solid point there.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:01 PM
3

That's actually a very good question. Most people hate MRA now because of feminism, however, some people are starting to see that these guys do have a point. I don't think it's possible to change women's overall behavior, but it might be possible to change some laws and aspects of our culture.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 05:48 PM
1

Hey, I'm not even disagreeing with you. All I was saying is that men and women are portrayed they way they are for different reasons. I don't even think it's a bad thing. I'm loving dragon's crown. The fact that it is overly sexual actually makes me like it even more.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:16 PM
-5

men are objectified just as much as the women I used to agree with that, but I don't think it's true. Sure, every male character is tall, muscular, etc. But they are not designed that way to appeal to women at all. They are mostly male power fantasies, not female sexual fantasies.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:00 PM
1

So... In the end everybody wins, right?
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 01:11 PM
1

But that's because you are an asshole! Just kidding. I know this happens and I'm always aware of this possibility. However, this way I can still watch her behavior around other guys, and as long as it's friendly and respectful, I'm good. And if anything changes, I'll know right away.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 01:09 PM
2

You are not wrong, and I think he would also agree with you on that. However, the point is that just because he was comparing two types of rape, it doesn't mean he endorses any of them. Even if his logic is wrong.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 08:43 PM
3

The original question was 'Mulheres que usam roupas que mostram o corpo merecem ser atacadas'. It translates roughly to 'Women who wear clothes that show their body deserve to be attacked'. Now, 'attacked' is not the same as 'rape'. We do have a word for rape (estupro). And while attack could mean rape depending of the context, it can also mean a lot of things. Actually, by itself the word attack doesn't mean anything specific at all. It could be interpreted as a anything from a criticism, insul…
/r/MensRights05/04/14 02:19 PM
1

That's not what they said. The word 'rape' wasn't anywhere in this question.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 01:53 PM
2

I said Breaking because this news just came out. And this is very relevant to a discussion that is still happening on a lot of other subreddits. And you are just plain wrong when you say spousal beatings is accepted in Brazil. I am Brazilian and I've lived here all my life. This is simply not true. I don't know where you got this 30% figure, but I wouldn't trust it either. Don't get me wrong, there is plenty of abuse going on here, it's just not accepted though. This is important news because it…
/r/MensRights05/04/14 02:38 AM
18

Agreed. However, the entire survey was biased and the questions were somewhat ambiguous. So the results cant be trusted anyway.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 12:31 AM
5

I also read the survey right after I've seen it on the news. Before these protests started. I was shocked. Really shocked. This thing was so obviously skewed and manipulated. One thing that caught my attention is how they put one or two pages of text before every graph, basically telling you how you should interpret the 'data' they would present. I mean, not only did they made this survey to justify their point of view, but they also presented it that way. They also pointed out multiple times in…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 06:30 PM
25

It also looks unfinished. There are A LOT of default elements left that just don't mach this design.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 08:32 PM
1

Translated article I read the original research too, and it feels like they made the whole thing with the sole purpose of getting that answer.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 08:53 PM
1

Good idea!
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 04:15 PM
1

Don't they always?
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 02:41 PM
3

You're right, but to answer your question. Attitude and behavior can and do stand alone. But not for long. I have a friend in his 40's who is very charismatic, popular and confident. He consistently hooks up with LOTS of gorgeous women, both younger and older. However, he is also poor, lazy and still lives with his mother. Every woman picks up on that very quickly and they leave him. He just can't hold on to any woman, no matter how much he tries to.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 01:08 PM
4

3 years. why?
/r/TheRedPill13/03/14 02:39 PM
1

You just described all religious people. Using religion to justify wrong actions is just what they do.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 02:50 PM
0

You are so right. Too bad most people can't see that. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:38 PM
3

No, there is not.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:32 PM
3

It really depends on how much you make.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:19 PM
4

Exactly!
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:30 PM
1

Right. I know those are not really the same thing, but that's when I thought about that.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:29 PM
16

Bingo
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:27 PM
5

So you'll never go into a higher tax bracket and pay more? Sure, but if your income changes and you make less than before, you pay less again. And It's called INCOME tax, so it makes sense that it's tied somehow to the income.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 04:10 PM
4

Income tax kinda makes sense though. I mean, at least it's consistent through your entire life. It's not like you have to pay more just because you changed your marital status.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 03:54 PM
1

You are reading that all wrong. Mothers may be responsible for transferring sexist attitudes to their children, but that's only because they were raised to be sexists as well. The problem is NOT the amount of time these children spent with their mothers, its their mothers mindset. And, by the way, most fathers wont even realize their wives are being sexists because they were also been raised as sexists. The solution is not to restrict time spent with mothers, but to change the sexist mindset on …
/r/MensRights30/03/12 12:32 PM
2

So, what ARE you saying? That no mother should be allowed to be with her children if the father can't be around as well?
/r/MensRights29/03/12 08:56 PM
2

I don't get it. Are you actually saying both parents should necessarily spend always an equal amount of time with their children? How is that going to work when at least one of them have to be away from home for most of the day? Should women be required to stay away from their children while their husband is at work? Just so they don't ever brake that balance?
/r/MensRights29/03/12 08:54 PM
0

OMG! you are so, so wrong. This is not father-absence at all. It's just an arrangement where the parents have clear roles on different aspects of life, thats all. You are making the same argument used by feminists who claim that stay-at-home moms are prisoners of their evil and controlling husbands. I was raised like that and my father was never absent. Sure, he wasn't at home all day, but I loved when he came back and we could watch tv together and talk after dinner, not once I thought about hi…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 08:34 PM
3

'under-father'?? What the hell!? The man is working and trying to be part of their children's lives as much as possible. What is wrong with that?? Any half decent woman will make sure the children understand it, and they will love their father even though he can't be around all the time. That's not a problem at all. Of course you might say that he might be disadvantaged at a family court, but that's an entirely different issue that has more to do with law and education than with having a mother …
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:54 PM
1

No one is calling men unemotional, because that is not the true in any shape or form. Men, however, are LESS emotional than women. Of course men get depressed after a break up. But women are much more likely to get depressed watching Extreme Makeover than men. That's the whole point of the article. As for the creativity, in this context, it is not meant that actually painting a kitchen is supposed to be creative. It is actually having the desire to change the color to that particular shade of sa…
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:52 PM
2

There are lots of studies showing just that. Men and women do think different, there is no doubt about it. And sometimes these differences trigger conflicting behaviors between partners, thats all. Just because something is a stereotype, it doesn't necessarily mean it's false. Some behaviors become stereotypes for a reason, and deny their existence is the best way to avoid figuring out their causes and (if necessary) their solution.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:47 PM
1

Sure, women have testosterone. But way, way less than men. Just take a look at any female bodybuilder and you can see why it's a big deal. And if testosterone does inhibit empathy, that would make complete sense to different behaviors between men and women..
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:19 PM
2

Not at all. Men ARE (on average) less empathetic than women. What the article says is that women should accept that instead of trying to change their partners. Being less empathetic is not an insult, nor it should be. The word 'creative' however, is in my opinion misused there. It does not mean that have less creativity, but that men don't usually care about the same aesthetics as women, witch is also true. This becomes clear in the context. You could, however write an article about how men are …
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:12 PM
10

Come on, guys! What's wrong with you?? This is a good article. Acknowledging differences between men and women is not reinforcing stereotypes. What are they supposed to say? That men and women have absolutely no difference whatsoever? Pretend that those differences don't have a negative impact on relationships?
/r/MensRights28/03/12 02:16 PM
2

I feel pretty much the same. Sometimes I want to forward to some friends info about men's rights, both from here and from other sites as well. But even though I know the facts are usually solid and raise valid issues, there is this 'vibe' that just don't seem trustworthy. From an outsider perspective we DO look like a bunch of crazy angry men. Sure, once you get past from that you get used to it, and can even see the same attitude from feminists, but at fist sight, we look like the bad guys.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:06 PM
1

And now they do. Unless you are a man, that is.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:12 AM
1

Sure. It's always nice to protect the poor little women from the evil men.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 11:11 AM
2

They should not. And that's the problem.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:49 AM
1

Yet there is this need to reinforce the idea that men are violent pigs and that women need full time protection from them.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:32 AM
2

You may need proof to arrest someone. However, just the accusation may be enough to destroy the men's life, even if he turned up innocent in the end.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:22 AM
5

Women can make a false accusation and never have to deal with it again. This can be dangerous. And I think it's terrible that they are making women-only laws and demonizing men.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:07 AM
1

The funny thing it that her "boyfriend" was not even the father. Some other poor dude was.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 12:04 AM
3

That seems correct. My wife is an architect and she works with about 10 other people, last year she found out that one of her colleagues (also female) had a better salary, working in the same position as my wife. It turns out she negotiated her salary, while my wife just took what the company first offered.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 07:03 PM
3

That's right, but criminals can be men or women, and should both be treated as such.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 01:33 PM
8

Pretty much. Their version it that she was not in the robbery, but was picked up later. I know it's likely she will get a light sentence, but that is a whole other issue.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 03:42 AM
0

I think you are right. We need to focus on Gender Equality, not Men's Rights. However, feminists have already 'hijacked' that term long ago. Try talking about gender equality with other people and you will notice that most will bring up feminist issues (like the 'pay gap', rape, etc). It's not very common for most people to think that gender equality goes both ways. And that's were men's rights comes in, to bring awareness that equality is not only about taking care of women, but men too. Once t…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:44 PM
2

Please change that background color.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 02:50 PM
2

Because if she and her husband can provide for him, it means her kid is growing up on nice home, with people who love and support him. This is the most important thing a kid can ask for, IMO. It would also mean that going after the father's money (who is clearly not interested in his own child), is motivated more by a sense of revenge than actual need. Maybe if the father wasn't so wealthy, she wouldn't even be so upset about the whole thing. I don't sympathize with the father at all, I think he…
/r/MensRights09/11/10 08:28 PM
3

Ok, I can totally get your point. But let me just ask you this: Can just you and you husband support your son? Without any help whatsoever from your ex? I'm not asking if it's fair, just if it's feasible.
/r/MensRights09/11/10 01:01 PM
2

I know! You are 100% right about that, genetics plays a role too. But as I said on my first answer, when the same genetics makes things tougher for women (breast cancer, childbirth), people don't just accept it as nature, but do everything they can to stop this. But when we talk about men, the general feeling is that it's just bad luck, nature just wants men dead. This is not a problem worth of any concern. That's what drives me crazy.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 01:53 AM
3

I'm not trying to be rude or anything, but do you really think this difference in life expectancy happens just because of genetic reasons? According to wikipedia, Mozambique has a life expectancy of about 42.1 years, while the US has 78.2. Is it logical to think that people from mozambique die almost twice as quickly just because of their DNA? These people die younger for a number of reasons (disease, war, lack of proper sanitation, etc). And it shows up on the statiscs like that. It's not like …
/r/MensRights16/10/10 01:36 AM
2

You have no idea how statiscs work, do you?
/r/MensRights16/10/10 12:57 AM
6

Just like breast cancer. Which because of that nobody gives a shit, right?
/r/MensRights15/10/10 04:05 PM
3

And then he bought a whole bunch of 3rd world children so satisfy another talentless ass.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 02:14 PM
4

Of course I´m not comparing apples to apples. The only thing these two jobs have in common is the fact that both are supposed to be dominated by one gender. And of course being a nanny is not nearly as desirable as being a CFO. But that does not, however, mean that women should get monopoly somewhere just because there are other jobs that men can apply to. This is just just not right. There are escorts who make as much money as a CFOs. Would it be right then, to argue that since women can earn t…
/r/MensRights02/02/10 11:44 AM
3

And yet if they don´t get that nanny job early on, they might never get the qualifications needed to dream about being a CFO.
/r/MensRights02/02/10 11:09 AM
2

It really depends on what part of life you are in. When you´re in college and need money, being a nanny becomes very desirable.
/r/MensRights02/02/10 10:47 AM
2

Sure it would. But it´s not every time that they get such undeniable evidence. Specially on rape cases.
/r/MensRights13/01/10 02:53 PM
4

Well, credibility plays a large role on any trial. If I told everyone I wanted to kill my wife and bury her in the bushes behind the house. And then a couple weeks later the exact same thing happens, no one would be surprised if my previous statements were used in the trial.
/r/MensRights13/01/10 01:43 PM
1

So true. However, equality was already hijacked by feminists long ago.
/r/MensRights24/11/09 05:14 PM
1

I´ve never said there is NO pressure towards women, the only thing I´m arguing here is that men are not the only ones to blame. Women are as guilty (if not more) as men for creating these standards.
/r/MensRights19/08/09 06:37 PM
1

I´ve never argued that there are stereotypes on the traditional roles of men or women. Of course there are. It would be stupid and naive to think otherwise. The only problem I have with feminists is when they try to blame only men for every single problem on our society, including the ones coming from places where women rule (like fashion, which I used as an example). If you are not this kind of feminist, good for you, really. However, I don´t think there can ever be absolutely free choice, unat…
/r/MensRights19/08/09 05:18 PM
1

You know whats funny? Trying to find a man on any of those lists: 1, 2. Which is precisely my point. Just because men do pay for women to look better, they do not dictate how women should look. Those standards are made up entirely by other women, and sometimes they even contradict what men actually prefer. But as I said before, this can also be twisted to look like it´s men´s fault. Feminists must think that men should just protect women from getting hurt when they don´t live up to the standards…
/r/MensRights19/08/09 02:33 AM
2

And yet, this ideal is ONLY enforced by other women. Ask any man if they think women really need to spend hours getting their hair done, of if they need that boobjob, or a liposuction. Men don´t care that much about looks, only women do. But according to feminism that is somehow men´s fault as well.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 04:05 PM
1

You pretty much summed up my life story. I was shocked when I learned about the obscure tactics employed by feminists in order to convince (quite successfully) the entire world that men are the cause of all evil. I´ve even felt guilty about being a man when growing up mostly because I was raised believing that feminists were the good guys.. or girls.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:54 PM
2

I´m married and I live in Brazil. Laws are quite different here, but there is still the same pattern going on. When divorced, women can get a lot of money from their ex husband. It´s not as easy or profitable as in the US, but mostly because the court system is not as effective. However, what I find most disturbing here is that you DO NOT need to get married to be screwed by your ex if she wants to. You don´t even have to live together! All she needs to do is prove that you were on a stable rela…
/r/MensRights12/08/09 01:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter