TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mexicaaaan Archive

View 1 post and 115 comments by mexicaaaan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

mexicaaaan/r/seduction16/03/15 04:43 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

pretty much - but being intelligent enough to know your from you're helps too!
/r/seduction24/03/15 06:25 AM
1

You bring up some great points. I was definitely hesitant to become some sort of beta orbiter, of which I know she has a few. It didn't occur to me the extent to which they are not mutually exclusive. i definitely get laid, and from some great pussy lately, but I would be lying if I said I didn't have a crush on this one. Great advice for next time. I think she's definitely a notch above my normal matches, and given the upswing I've had the past years. It's been otherwise uncharted territory for…
/r/seduction16/03/15 10:34 PM
1

You definitely bring up a good point in another possible option. I was hesitant for friendship because I'm not interested in being one of her many orbiters. I definitely agree that if I could do it over again I'd probably try tiur approach.
/r/seduction16/03/15 10:29 PM
2

Hey, thanks the advice. Your whole assessment of the situation seems pretty spot on.
/r/seduction16/03/15 07:36 PM
1

With that in mind do you think I perhaps messed up by so strongly denying her friendship advance? Probably should've just been like "yup" and then continued to play my game the same way? Do you think there is a certain approach, like the late night one you suggest, that will result positively? Like directly talking about hooking up or more general BS? So far everything was the latter as opposed to the former.
/r/seduction16/03/15 05:34 PM
1

Sex does not have to be a romantic interest, Yes, this isn't my first trip around the block. I have a number of 'plates' or what have you. Hence my willingness to easily reject her friendship request - no interest in that whatsoever. However, I'm curious as to what it is that she said that makes you think what you do?
/r/seduction16/03/15 05:02 PM
1

Well, I'm assuming she doesn't want a relationship or anything involving sex given how she responded and expressed her romantic lack of interest. Do you think that's what she meant by being "friends"? I wasn't necessarily vying for a relationship, but just hooking up didn't seem to be working for her, so I did make an attempt at more traditional dating/seduction. Otherwise, what are your suggestions on what I do. Ignore her until she hits me up again (pretty much my plan anyway)?
/r/seduction16/03/15 04:58 PM
1

Can you be a little more clear about what you mean?
/r/seduction16/03/15 04:52 PM
1

Because she figures if she fucks him she'll get even more - which seems like it would make sense because here he is showing up back at the apt even though he left without sex the first time. She knew he was a doctor and she knew has was rich. He could talk like daffy duck and she'd still be giving him those eyes, so it's really outside of anything he is doing. Did she think he was coming back for conversation??
/r/TheRedPill21/07/14 10:38 AM
1

Maybe it's because everyone thought that you would never even be able to accomplish even a basic career. You gotta shoot for the stars, dude. Also - acting like getting in shape and reading a few books means that you deserve something is probably why you aren't having any luck with women. You might want to work on your actual self-esteem as you clearly don't think too highly of yourself (therefore no one else will).
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 04:32 PM
1

I love how you switch between making genuine and disingenuous arguments based upon the convenience of how stupid I pointed out you appear to be. Yeah - it's hard to see through that one. Also - if you don't actually get someone's point that doesn't leave you in a position to argue against it seeing as you yourself have admitted you can't comprehend it. Have you gone to college? What did you study? And if you think cuckold porn is marketed towards dudes that want to fuck other men's women, it's y…
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 04:14 PM
1

Right - but the difference being that the standard model of gravity can get satellites to pluto, and TRP can maybe get some guys laid. I see no reason why there can't be a simplified guide to the principles of human interaction, that comes with the caveat that obviously no simplified guide on the principle of human interaction could ever be truly comprehensive, or literally reflect all the truths about everyone. Yet TRP lacks the caveat. That's my point. In fact - everyone here acts like that ca…
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 12:20 PM
1

Please, dude, don't act like I'm a tumblerina. You can go and read all my posts on reddit. I think you'd find the opposite. Sorry I used a multi-sylabic word, I should've known you wouldn't be able to use basic common sense to put the meaning of the two words together. Also I did explain exactly what I meant by it and why it's detrimental, so for someone that does a great 'point by point' analysis, you sure did skip that sentence! Obviously it's my opinion that this place is a joke. I'm not sure…
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 12:17 PM
1

To answer your questions, I can only assume that it's not a joke. Single motherhood is already sky high and still on the rise. This isn't exactly the sort of logical argument I was looking for in a response (in that it isn't a logical argument), but sure. My point being that this place is a joke and pointing to a general lack of fatherhood could never make this place legitimate. There is no established relationship between the two concepts. It's lack of legitimacy is due to the unequal applicati…
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 12:12 AM
0

I don't think there was a guide and I think part of the point is that there isn't a guide. You can pretend there is a guide and try and let someone explain the entire complexity of human interaction in a simplified fashion - but that'd obviously fall short, so I don't know why you'd think the internet equivalent would be any bit more helpful.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 11:54 PM
1

Whoa this is the most reasonable thing I've ever read in this subreddit.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 11:53 AM
-3

Neither. I find TRP interesting, but more like a coping mechanism for confused men. Many of the things that are talked about here were not things that I thought needed description or explanation before I arrived here. If something was common sense before TRP was ever around, I don't think it means much for TRP. People act like there are really clever insights about women, or society, here. But none of it is new. The only novelty here is the certainty with which the community perceives their enti…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 11:39 AM
-4

TRP doesn't claim to keep women from wanting other men. I know. When did I say it did? I said some people do that and call it TRP but they are foolish.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 03:38 AM
-2

Yes, you can just up and walk out of your marriage... or you can bother to talk to your spouse about it. What a doormat!
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 11:15 PM
2

It's a fantastic movie and arguably one of his best, but keep that in mind. It's fucking dense and it's about a lot of things, not just relationships. Yes, there are elements of it that will reflect TRP, but that's inevitable because it's a movie about society in general, and marriage more specifically. It most definitely isn't a pro-TRP film and at no point is the thrust of the movie about how to deal with your spouse (moreso about yourself). This is a movie from the same guy who made 2001. I'v…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 11:11 PM
-26

No, common sense is common sense. Red pill is a 'distilled' form of common sense with the aided benefit of pissy generalizations about women and what men 'need' to do to attract them. Common sense is common. Red Pill exists only within Red Pill. That is to say AWALT isn't something contained within common sense, yet it exists only within red pill (any other place wouldn't need to come up with an acronym to reflect the word homogenous. But then again, in most places if you called women homogenous…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 11:02 PM
-2

I don't know, I take that as a total tear-down of TRP. Women are looking to fuck, just like men are. It's not about security or dominance or anything. It's about their desires. For women, the greatest sexual thrill is to have the desire of a man. For a man, the sexual thrill is the act of being with the woman. You might try and come up with explanations, and to try and say things like AWALT, but that's the notion she is throwing out. She is saying men can't predict women at all, one way or the o…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 10:15 PM
-21

I'm sorry, but is RP the only thing that recognizes that women have the possibility to be attracted to other men? What if I called it common sense?
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 10:12 PM
4

Yo dude, that chick wanted to fuck Bill because A) she is a prostitute and B) her roommate told her that Bill gave her a bunch of money without even needing to fuck.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 10:11 PM
-9

I think you are really misunderstanding the movie and seem to be projecting a very immature notion of love that somehow excludes the possibility of attraction to a 3rd party. Love doesn't preclude attraction to a 3rd party, which is A) pretty much entirely what the movie is about and B) something that TRP seems to struggle with and comes up with any reason to explain away.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 10:09 PM
0

Honestly dude, consistency of application is not one of the strengths of TRP. I'm fascinated with this place too and I see exactly what you are getting at. Yes, in TRP, there is an absolute lack of consistent application of thought across the gender spectrum. People here are angry at females all the time. It's somehow unfair that women might actually be attracted to other men...but have you met a man that isn't attracted to other women? TRP is more like a guide to the cognitive dissonance necess…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 09:50 PM
1

There are 3 answers to your question. The real-real answer (no, women shouldn't guilty). The TRP 'real' answer is because it's dishonest. But the real TRP answer is that they are all pissed because they aren't that dude even though like everyone here is totally alpha supposedly.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 09:40 PM
0

Sure but how on earth do you think that discounts my point? The fact that some people in group A do some things that everyone in group B does has no bearing on the notion that what you do only attracts group B. I mean, all women go to the bathroom. Heck, all humans go to the bathroom. Where is the end of your argument? Are you saying that the hypergamous nature of women is what attracts them to RP'ers? That's quite the argument if so...
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 09:39 PM
0

Yes, if you pretend that all women only behave exactly a certain way it will make TRP easier to understand, but then you will only ever be able to work things out with the one type of women that works that way.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 02:08 PM
0

No, I'm pretty sure you are wrong. You can’t hit girls over the head with your dominance by bragging about how rich/powerful you are or by acting like an arrogant douchebag. So - you mean you can't be dominant about being dominant? Do you think that would maybe just mean - be confident?
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 02:01 PM
1

You are a fucking idiot. You are blaming it on her while you got fat and lazy and actually recognize it? Fucking delusional
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 11:05 AM
0

Well he gave advice because he wanted to, I don't think anyone thought he had to give the advice. So what's your point? Is this some weaker way you saying shouldn't now that I've argued you into a corner and made it very clear that in fact you don't know what infer means? Please dude - I have better things to do.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 08:08 PM
1

I never said you were the only person I disagreed with here. Well, I'll grant that you clearly don't know the meaning of the word 'every': "I'm glad you know these things, but everyone else clearly thinks of him differently" Its a perfectly relevant point to bring up the fact that a person, who is telling people to just deal with shitty forms of employment, never really had such a job of their own. We both know this, so stop pretending I have vendetta against him because I brought it up. He does…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 08:05 PM
1

I'm sorry, am I suddenly the only person that called you out for having your panties in a bunch over this advice? Oh right - I wasn't! I told you I saw a number of things in your posts, and not one of them made you seem intellectual so there was obviously no reason at all for me to give you the benefit of the doubt over a bunch of things that were perfectly clear. Yes - you clearly don't like the advice nor him. Why? Maybe it's because he is an actor, that's my guess. I don't really know and it …
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 06:03 PM
0

Lol. I don't have to infer that he went to art school and worked at QVC. Do you know what infer means? Those are facts! Dude - can you not read? I never said you inferred that he did those things. I said what you inferred was that those are the reasons why he said what he did. Odd that you keep claiming I'm making strawman attacks when you are either ignorantly doing so because you are a moron, or knowingly doing it, aka being disingenuous. Fucking christ not even bothering with the rest of that…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 05:59 PM
0

No, you literally fucking told me your perspective. I'm not inferring shit. Holy fucking dumbasses you shit head. Mike Rowe never said "Do all this shit because I went to art school and worked at QVC" that's what you are inferring. The big difference is I'm supporting my arguments by citing the things he wrote, and explaining why I think they are ill conceived and why I think he just doesn't understand the subject he is talking about. You aren't producing any content of your own, and you are jus…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 05:33 PM
1

So, you do understand that its an important distinction to make that who he is as a person is not reflected by who he is portrayed as on tv. Yes, I make this distinction though it seems you don't. I don't imagine him as a plumber saying these things. I imagine him just like a person. A person saying something. Unfortunately, you seem to be telling me I "hate him" because I've brought this stuff up... but here you seem to recognize its an important part of the argument. It's not an important part…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 05:32 PM
1

Yes, I can tell the difference between reality and television. However, you seem to not be able to tell the difference from him giving advice as a person and him giving advice as the tv character you are talking about. And then you start going off about how acting isn't a hard job. Ok dude - I get it, you don't like actors! I think this is all crystal clear from what I wrote. I think it's clear that your head is full of crystals, from what you wrote.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 04:57 PM
0

You are arguing like a woman Not in the least bit. I'm not going through someone's history and casting judgements upon him, unlike you. And you aren't angry that he is an actor? Because this sort of shit makes it seem like it bothers you: This guy went into the arts an theatre. He's an actor. He's playing a role.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 04:15 PM
0

I don't make inferences about what you believe, you write what you believe and I respond... I'm well aware I don't have some sort of neural scanning device that lets me know what really goes on inside of anyone's head. No shit sherlock... but if I have someone's documented life history and read/hear the things they right and say, of course I'm going to make judgements about their perspective... its what we all do, every day on reddit. Yes, the difference being most people are aware that their pe…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 04:12 PM
0

If we can agree that the message is "be a good little worker bee", then we should be able to agree that the perspective is out of touch... just not to the same extent as say the Mitt Romney's of the world. It doesn't change the fact that its not from the perspective of your typical wage slave. Well I don't agree that that's what the message is and I also don't have a stick up my ass about mike rowe, I was using your example for convenience. I never said that he had the right perspective either, …
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 03:41 PM
0

You just seem more pissed that he is an actor than anything else, excuse me for finding your ridiculous attitude absurd.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 03:38 PM
1

And a surprisingly strong consensus emerges about what works for guys who report here. That consensus is far more in favor of dominant and aggressive behavior than what one would conclude from reading the article. Are you sure you read the article? The article talks extensively about what you just said. They even made the greater point that people that do what you do engage in a self-fulfilling cycle where you date the kind of women that respond to such tactics (which the article said is true by…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 01:04 PM
0

To repeat, what women say they want is not the same as what they are attracted to. You can repeat that all you want, that doesn't actually make it true. You don't think it's the slightest bit absurd that your response to a scientific study is "no, my anecdotes must be true instead". Like - where is the perspective in your head for you to think that makes sense? But my first sentence is a well known truth that refutes the whole study. Your first sentence is a cop-out you and everyone else on TRP …
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:56 PM
1

No, all of the time. Anytime you use 'Alpha' to describe what is actually an entirely dynamic bundle of complex emotions and actions that can be attributed either way, you ignore the entirety of the nuance.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:53 PM
0

What are you talking about? I did exactly that in the last post. I know you did, that's why I said you were unjustified in doing so. Its extremely common for the wealthy to be out of touch with what the poor have to deal with. There is literally several millennia of history to back that notion up. Pick up a history book and read it. Do you think the people they show on QVC are wealthy? I've seen advice from rich people that's out of touch, and it usually isn't "be a good worker bee", it's more l…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:51 PM
0

Dude - no one said it's a hard job, but you clearly don't know what the fuck an actor is if you think it's their goal to work at QVC, or if that's even an acting job in the first place.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:50 PM
1

Failure to control for wrong answers is flawed science. Well if it was something so obvious and universally true, you'd think it would've been brought up in their peer review process. But you know, only the truest information exists on TRP. No, it's not. The first point is that the method of "science" is flawed. The second point is that conclusions from a false method will produce unreliable results. The first point is that the science is flawed therefore you can't get conclusions from it. If we…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:46 PM
1

"Alpha" and "beta" are useful terms, so long as one understands that they don't stand in for real sets of mutually exclusive behaviors. Right, however, their use in discussion pretty much disregard those non-mutually exclusive behaviors.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 03:12 AM
1

Which is why many here would tell you that those terms are useful simplifications. So because the notion of alpha and beta is nonsense, they are useful simplifications? I just said that they can't serve as useful simplifications, and you just told me that is the very reason why they'd be great as useful simplifications. Do you know how words work? Yes, there are disagreements. But the article is part of the conversation and not, strictly speaking, a "counterpoint." Yes - I'm here conversing, not…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 01:25 AM
-1

First, women can't be trusted to give accurate feedback about what attracts them. This has been well established both by experience and by science. Really? Because you are contesting a scientific study of what women reported as attractive to them. At least they had the decency to provide their information. Second, the basis for this whole article is highly flawed because it's based on the feedback of women, which is observably inaccurate. You can't say "X is most desired by women because they sa…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 01:11 AM
-1

The article tries to add lots of noise without adding actionable advice. Yes, not everything in life is literal advice on how to deal with women i.e. "go up to her and say XYZ". Shocking, I know. It lures young folks right back into the "nice guy" situation. And that is outright dangerous for youthful men. Well the article actually makes the opposite argument. That perceiving male behavior as a sole binary state will lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy of interactions with the exact type of femal…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 11:39 PM
2

His point is about the attitude you have, not that nurture is stronger than nature. Dyslexics that were never told they were dyslexic tend to be highly functioning, whereas children who are diagnosed dyslexic and are told that they will never be able to read tend to struggle to read. This is controlled for with how dyslexic they are. The point being that having a good attitude is important. And while knowing that Mitt Romney got to where he is because of how lucky he is doesn't change the fact t…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:35 PM
0

He simply doesn't have the capability of knowing what life is like from that perspective. I'm not sure where you get the notion that you actually have the perspective to determine what perspectives he does or doesn't have. You are outrageous
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:32 PM
1

The guy used to work at QVC - can you take your insecurities somewhere else?
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:31 PM
0

Look at this guy redefining the concept of economic development in order to support his trite argument that Mike Rowe wants you to be a slave, because Amerikkkaaaaa
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:30 PM
-3

I'm not sure what part of his rules you thought said "be mistreated" but excuse me for pointing out how you argue nonsense just like a woman.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:29 PM
1

Does it bother you because he is probably a liberal or something? I seriously don't get it. The dude is on the discovery channel, and he is an accomplished actor? Like - in what sense? Do you think other actors think he is accomplished? Or that he just has a good gig?
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:27 PM
1

I guess you don't like actors?
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:25 PM
1

Thanks for sharing the article, I found it fairly insightful and a bit of a polemic against some of the notions often shared here. I think some of the people responding to you didn't comprehend the article, given the "but women can't be trusted to give feedback about how they feel".
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:24 PM
-3

Yeah, but the article also brings up great points that are often rejected here. The notion that there are two ways of behaving, alpha or beta, is nonsense. The article suggests that such a mindset is outright dangerous for youthful men and I could not agree more. We often see younger folks posting here that got themselves into a situation they never would have had they not believed that the only way to get chicks was to do XYZ.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:22 PM
8

oooh - a new troll! yay us!
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 09:56 PM
-3

Dread game isn't TRP, it's straight up beta shit that you use to keep a low-value women down. get the fuck out of here with this nonsense
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 09:41 PM
-1

You say you are TRP but yet you are worried that your life will leave you for someone better? Up your damn worth then. Take some responsibility for yourself. Don't be the guy that the girls you want to be with don't want to be with.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 09:39 PM
1

Well for example you keep harping on how there is some significant misunderstanding between you and me as to whether or not all women are hypergamous - fine, you admit they are. It doesn't touch on my point that your experiences deceive you and that claiming them to be the height of proper development is your own narcissism coming through. I'd love for you to tell me how I'm not right about that.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 12:03 AM
2

Choosing to not put myself in your position isn't 'white knighting'
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 03:05 AM
1

Yeah, except it's not a guide on how to control people. It's a guide on how to beat down the self-esteem of abuse victims. That was the book he read. He even basically suggested that the post was in jest.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 01:21 AM
1

What about it did you find interesting?
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 11:58 PM
-1

This post seems very Machiavellian Yeah, right? He only opened with: always eager to add new tools to my arsenal for controlling my wife It sounds like he is with some girl that can't really move up any further, so she is just willing to deal with whatever he does to her. I've been there and it's pretty much beta. Good luck pulling that shit with some chick that has the least bit of self-esteem (hence his need for constant new ways to put his wife's down). Frankly I think whining about why a boo…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 11:23 PM
1

It's you that stinks - look at your posts
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 01:53 PM
1

No, retard. It's you. They don't show hypergamy because they have nowhere else to go. Hypergamy isn't going to get them anything besides a pissed off you. So trying to point to your experiences as how a truly well raised woman behaves is just your own narcissistic delusion. For example: would you actually know a well-behaved woman from shit on your head? Is she well behaved because she was taught better, or because there is nothing else she can earn? Unfortunately, we don't know enough about you…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 10:09 PM
1

Yes and did you fucking read my post? I've got news for you - the women that you are dating that aren't hypergamous, have nowhere else to go. That's not to say that you are an alpha. Just that 3's know what they aren't getting.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 08:49 PM
0

Sure a few people control the vast majority of wealth, but this is no different than it has always been No. It is different from how it has always been. Rarely has it been so concentrated. That's the entire point. No matter what you say, technology helps the average person. No one is talking about technology except for you. Technology isn't equivalent to wealth and it is not true that your wealth would be greater today than 100 years ago or that it'd be easier for you to create wealth than 100 y…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 11:46 AM
3

It may be true that things are less equal than they might have been in the past (a tenuous argument at best), but the average male is still better off now than ever before. It's not a tenuous argument at best. It's entirely substantiated by statistics and current economic data, unlike your assertions. Which are all 'feel good' points. You are referencing no metric for technological access. Yes, this isn't the 1700s - but that's not the argument I'm making. And substituting technology for wealth …
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 02:09 AM
0

I'm not sure how seriously you take 'TRP' but it's clearly a lot more serious than I do.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 12:37 AM
0

I don't think you can tell a white-knight from the stick up your ass
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 12:35 AM
-1

Honestly - go read all my posts and think about having this debate with me before you find yourself in a position you didn't anticipate. Try and think about where I'd agree with you and where I wouldn't.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 07:14 PM
9

Wealth has never been so accessible to so many people. This is demonstrably untrue, wealth has never before been so concentrated and out of reach for 99% of the world in the modern era.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 06:19 PM
1

Work on that reading comprehension
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 06:12 PM
1

that there was such a subreddit
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 06:10 PM
18

if she's into you it's not harassment
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 06:10 PM
0

Because it's not dreadgame, it's lackofgame. It's just 15 years of negligence and bad attitudes.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 05:57 PM
14

No one is talking about her, they are talking about you and what you assume. Yeah man, you gave her vagingles so deep I bet next week she'll be letting you bring your fling home for a threesome.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 05:02 PM
11

ding ding ding spot on. People aren't making moral judgements at the OP. The shit just doesn't make logical sense.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 04:56 PM
-1

It's not even about the security of beta men, what women want is the desire of the opposite gender. As a man who is having an affair that he is entirely unwilling to break off, she will very quickly find out that it will be impossible for her to have his desire in any way she would want it. That will be the end of their marriage. That's when she will cheat, that's when she will file for divorce (blaming OP for cheating on her). Up until he told her that he was cheating, she probably just though …
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 04:55 PM
0

His point is that if you don't want to be married... don't get married. The morality isn't an element of the marriage, but being honest to each other. He could've spared himself 15 years of apparent misery if he was honest with himself, so all your handwaving about morals seems to disregard the actual point.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 04:49 PM
29

You are right dude. This is the 'you are right subreddit' and we are here to remind you about how correct you are, because you just like totally are. There is obviously no way you could be incorrect about what your wife would do (even though you've been unhappily married to her for 15 years). Surely we are foolish for thinking that your wife would do what women do in general, let alone after you admit to cheating on her. It would not at all make sense that your wife would now want to cheat on yo…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 04:18 PM
1

Sounds more like you have a submissive without any self-esteem. Great job?
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 04:05 PM
1

Wow - I had no idea. And I'm 5'7".
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 03:14 PM
51

TRP isn't anti-women, but this subreddit can definitely serve as a collection bucket for men that are fucking ragingly pissed-off about women and that's where I think the perception comes from.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 12:54 PM
0

Apparently you have to be hot to be not be screwed by divorce law. That's a bit of logical nonsense. Ooooh, are we playing "throw out accussations and see which sticks?". I don't see you complaining about the plight of women in India - clearly you're an asshole for complaining about not being able to find a job! (rolls eyes) No, I'm playing "point out how you are full of shit because you are entirely inconsistent in your whining", aka "point out how you behave just like a feminist". I was never …
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 12:41 PM
1

What you are doing is the psychological concept of projecting. You are projecting your anger and preferences onto women. You insist that the women that behave in a way you don't like must be the result of behavior you don't like even though there is no evidence to support your point. Well raised women are absolutely hypergamous. You defy the concept of social evolutionary theory. Women were hypergamous since before it was socially acceptable to be gendered different from your sex, so it'd be imp…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 12:30 PM
0

You have a situation where Group A says terrible things about Group B. If Group A has social influence like feminism does, for Group B to just go about things and ignore Group A is for Group A to gain more and more power over them. Really - what laws are being passed? Where is this huge social movement against men that I have not noticed in a single day of my life in the largest city in this fucking country? Colored men are put in jail for crimes that white men are ignored for - yet I don't see …
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 10:50 PM
1

I read through your entire post, and you ended with this - which is pretty much what I was saying above. TheRedPill is about seeing through the bullshit. You misunderstand me. It's not about seeing through the bullshit. It's about spewing back an equivalent amount of bullshit but from the opposite end of the spectrum. It's a knee-jerk reaction. That's why they re-label basic terms. If every post here said 'stop acting like a bitch, and get some self-respect', people wouldn't even bother coming h…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 07:56 PM
2

She's into me, it's obvious. She says that sex is a big deal for her because she's only had one other SO. She says that she's had only one SO and that she's muslim, but she is also in a SORORITY and does regular social functions with her friends. She doesn't drink alcohol around me, but for all I know she could be getting drunk and getting all sorts of strange while stringing me along into thinking that she isn't. I told her directly that I'm skeptical about her sexual history. Trust and communi…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 05:13 PM
2

We need something on the sidebar about this confirming that women are NOT repeat NOT aware of hypergamy, Alpha Fuck/Beta Bucks or even their dark instincts. They will honestly argue with you that girls don't REALLY go after bad guys...and if they do well we are thinking, rational creatures who can make logical decisions for ourselves. Who are you kidding? If a murderer got on the stand in court and said he never killed anyone, would you believe him? Women are liars, so why do you trust them when…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 05:02 PM
-1

I think this just makes dudes sound angry because the chicks they want to fuck are fucking hotter dudes. Don't turn this place into a pissy-bitchfest. Take it to MGTOW or something.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 04:32 PM
8

Then if she doesn't care and goes anyway and it bothers you, dump her. The only BP thing you are doing is sitting here and wondering whether or not your standards should be met.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 04:17 PM
4

she was totally misgauged as a women I thought was worth my time and possible future with So stop fucking seeing her. What's the confusion?? Though I gotta say, if you go to strip clubs and still do fine in the relationship, I'm not sure why you think she'd have so much trouble. But it sounds like the answer to that question is your first point, which is that you don't think she can handle it. So fucking drop her.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 03:59 PM
1

The red pill doesn't have to be codified for it to exist-certain behaviors are simply preferable for interacting with women and society. Those behaviors have been stripped away over the last ~50 years and have finally been given a name to make people aware to do them. Right. And if you bothered to read what I've said, you'd realize it's entirely debatable that these things have been stripped from life, and that they already had perfectly fine names like "self respect" before TRP came a long. Wit…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 11:34 AM
3

Dude, everyone in the NYPD has to take the same physical test. You ever wondered why there are so many fat male NYPD officers? Because the test is a joke.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 08:34 PM
1

The answer, like in most cases, is more difficult than sitting around pointing fingers and saying "they are worse". Also - if you are going to pretend like this is a feminist world for feminists, then you are falling into the same trap we just agreed exists. In my experiences, some things are great for women, and some things still suck. That doesn't mean that the fact that you and I exist is some form of oppression that some radfems might insist. I don't think it's difficult to use your own head…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 08:09 PM
-7

If men acted like feminists, it would be this subreddit, where people angrily gather about the wrongdoings of the opposite.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 03:56 PM
0

Except in order for them to know the private key, you would have to do something unnecessarily negligent which is why I think my analogy is a better representation. It's not better because you'd have to do something negligent in my scenario as well. I'm just saying it's a bit easier to do it with bitcoin than you are acknowledging. You act like it's somehow impossible to tell where a coin started from and where it ended, except that's the killer feature of bitcoin... the fact that there is a ver…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 08:27 PM
-1

That's a terrible comparison, it'd be more like saying a certain encryption algorithm is useless if someone else knows your private key, which is entirely true. If someone knows your private key, there is no point in using that same encryption scheme to try and hide information from said person, as it won't work. So maybe you should think your arguments through a tiny bit more
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 04:03 PM
1

Can you actually write more than a sentence?
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 11:07 PM
-1

I think we more or less agree. I just think it's total nonsense that the bitcoin economy is in such a place where it's at all practical to launder half a million. The OP is posting like you are going to get that on localbitcoins. Maybe if you stalk it every day for months. I think if you plan ahead, it totally works. But the OP mentioned doing this once assets were declared, which is a very bad idea regardless of btc. Doing this in a divorce is asking for trouble as I'm not sure what kind of law…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 10:46 PM
2

I think you missed my point. In these situations, what anyone is going to be looking for are entry nodes and exit nodes. That is, nodes where the lawyer knows that the cash went into, and then a node where it came out. You have to consider that an end node can be another bank account, where some or all of the money is consolidated. It's a very tangible issue - and unfortunately, if the bitcoins are ever going to be turned back into cash - there will be an exit. Like say you wanted to hide it in …
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 10:17 PM
3

Dude I think you might actually be schizophrenic. You do realize there is a difference between the guy that sets up asset structures prior to divorce, and the guy that proceeds you through the divorce? One is a 'finance specialist', the other is a lawyer. I wouldn't listen to the advice from your specialist on how to proceed through your divorce, that's what your divorce lawyer is for. Yes, if you turn your assets into bitcoin prior to divorce and don't declare them, your spouse won't find out. …
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 09:47 PM
2

What wont happen to me? Losing my assets in a divorce proceeding because I tried to illegally funnel them into bitcoins? Of course that's not going to happen to me, I'm posting here about how dumb of an idea it is. Short of that, I have no idea what point you are trying to make.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 09:37 PM
1

Right, because I'm advocating giving your spouse all your money. No, my point is that if you want to divorce her and not lose all your assets, you shouldn't break the law trying to hide your assets. Because that's exactly what the law is designed to prevent. The guy who wrote the article seems to think bitcoins are magic anonymous things, they aren't. There are ways to get them that aren't as revealing as others, but that's about it. Of course nothing about the bitcoin itself does anything to ch…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 09:26 PM
1

It's all the same model of statistical analysis, all that you are changing with the transaction size is a variable that isn't even necessarily a factor in determining the difficulty of the problem. With a beginning node and an end node(s) it's trivial to determine any transactions that took place in between. The point being, that bitcoin is the least relevant variable in the equation above. What's more important is how you get the bitcoins and how you sell them. Unfortunately, for any significan…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 09:10 PM
-2

You seem to be incredibly confused, because I never said that taking it out all at once was the problem. The problem is that you at one point declared $20k in assets that no longer exist. It doesn't matter how quickly or slowly that happened. They disappeared = you are going to need an even better lawyer. You admit this yourself... that hiding your declared assets is illegal. Using bitcoin doesn't change that. You've offered a few scenarios that would make it possibly harder to discover the mone…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 08:59 PM
3

You seem very knowledgeable about bitcoin. I'm wondering why you think that coin tumblers are effective then. Due to the nature of bitcoin, it's actually pretty much trivial to trace those transactions using programmatic statistical analysis.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 08:22 PM
-2

That's just one jump in the chain. It doesn't make it impossible to establish that financial fraud is being committed. And honestly - do you think that if you are going to take out $20k of declared money and send it to someone, that no one will notice? You are wrong, it sounds like you don't actually understand how bitcoin works. It's not magic, it's just another form of value storage that moderately resembles a currency.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 08:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter