TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mjociv Archive

View 0 posts and 201 comments by mjociv on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Really? I could understand this take if all the accusations were coming out in mid-October with all available polling data showing Planter having a slight lead over Collins. He was still mostly unknown a year ago and Mills dropped her primary campaign against him at the end of April. You have to know Collins (being the incumbant of the opposing political party whom he is challanging) is going to try and dig up all the dirt she can. A little over two months after Planter became the Democrat candi…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 02:00 PM
3

that doesn't mean he deserved to be falsely accused of heinous behavior he's not actually guilty of. He totally got a tattoo of a totenkopf on his chest and it was there for over a decade. The totenkoph is a well established symbol used by nazis specifically by members of the SS and concentration camp guards. Regardless of Planter's excuses or apologies he is undeniably "guilty" of getting the symbol tattooed on his body.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 02:39 AM
19

But I can assure you, it is happening at a mass. I believe you mean "en masse"
/r/MensRights10/04/26 05:25 PM
63

Its New Zealand, hope I saved some of you a click.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 12:57 AM
32

NATO is the reason. Are you willing to let an invading nation just take over by accepting whatever their requirements are of you under their subjugation? If no than some form of "conscription" will always be necessary for you to maintain your way of life.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 02:13 PM
28

I think this post doesnt have a clear enough explanation/description to get whatever answer youre looking for.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 09:41 AM
3

If people are working the careers they want and are legitimately excelling in those fields why would anyone care? The majority of issues arise when the exact same actions/behaviors cause the same results but are portrayed as "excellence" when some people do them and "mediocrity" when others do.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 11:59 AM
10

Anyone who has read/watched the news since 2017 has "heard it", any man born after 1985 had "heard it" before then, and any man born after 1985 who went to college had "heard it" a lot before then. TBQH the comment you're responding to and this comment I'm responding to come off very concern troll-ish.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 06:13 PM
1

As an individual user though, I do have much more effective ways to deal with bad faith commenters than I do when fighting against a power-tripping mod Only if there are enough individual users who think/feel the way you do on that subreddit, though. Going back to my hypothetical subreddit for a Christianity podcast: if there are 499 people who disparage and mock Christianity/Christians for every 1 "original" user who actually listens to and wants to discuss the podcast than the original users w…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 04:59 PM
7

This does leave a sub open to "infiltration", unfortunately, but that can be handled with active participation by genuine supporters, and it is less of a threat than extreme elements taking hold I agree with one big caveat: the "genuine supporters" need to be a significant percentage of the active users. Im not an expert in social psychology (or whatever discipline is most related here) so I'm not really sure if that percentage needs to be over 50% or can be as low as 15%-20%. For example: if yo…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 02:23 PM
23

No, as she explained they block her. Blocking prevents a user from continuing to post to a subreddit.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 12:50 PM
7

The question I want to ask these men (or you guys, hopefully you can answer this for them) "These men" are never objectively defined by you. Unless you tell someone they fit your stereotype for "male feminist vibes" they won't know.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 02:34 PM
1

5, 6, 10, and 11 all being on the same list doesn't seem likely. Is this based on an actual situation or a pure hypothetical? TBQH, it comes off like a buzzfeed style listicle with a title like "11 reasons dating a single mom SUCKS, according to MGTOW".
/r/MensRights02/03/25 09:35 AM
6

when wealth is more naturally dispersed - like say, a system were men are paid the value they produce and hard work is properly rewarded, rather than some other - typically man - taking the majority of it. The only way this works is when everyone has the same understanding or definition of "value". The only way everyone will have the same definition of something as subjective as value is with a "centrally planned economy" or a "command economy". These socialist/communist systems always fail, eve…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 10:50 AM
6

The entire debate comes down to when a person becomes a person. The people who "have problems with abortion" believe a new life is created when the egg is inseminated because the end result has a unique DNA profile from the egg and sperm used to created it. It's why this group calls itself "pro-life" and not "anti-abortion". Put another way, how would you feel about someone deciding they're not ready to be a parent and euthenizing a healthy 2-year old child? That's exactly how pro-life people vi…
/r/MensRights22/02/25 11:17 AM
1

Doest tiktok have some partition between the version seen by people in china vs the version seen by people in the west? I thought most of the stuff going viral in the US would appear to people in Sweden but wouldn't appear to people in china.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 07:18 AM
1

I said the objective and verifiable statements I made? This response confuses me. What would you have preferred I said?
/r/MensRights17/01/25 12:13 PM
30

Randall told police that "catch a predator" is big on TikTok, but this incident "got out of hand and went bad," according to the complaint. The 18-year-old also divulged that he and the other five accused students exchanged ideas on how to lure the man to the campus, including what to text him, the document said. Other news outlets reporting on the incident have claimed their motive was to go viral on TikTok. Randall, the student being quoted above, is male as were 3 of the 5 named defendants.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 11:30 PM
38

Assumption University students Kelsy Brainard, 18, Easton Randall, 19, Kevin Carroll, 18, Isabella Trudeau, 18, and Joaquin Smith, 18, appeared in Massachusetts court on Thursday and pleaded not guilty to conspiracy and kidnapping charges. Most of the defendants are men.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 11:24 PM
5

Any place that claims to be Communist, is only in it for the authoritarianism. You don't need the mall bit.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 12:18 PM
0

Well, I don't really think they would do that because for a lot of them she is a "gender traitor." Add to the fact that a lot of them really think that every woman is "progressive" and "pro-choice" Your response is literally two sentances that directly contradict each other. Why wouldn't a female healthcare CEO be considered some form of gender/class traitor and get the same level vitriol? Better question, why respond if you're going to delete your account?
/r/MensRights26/12/24 12:13 PM
1

Not to mention if you criticize or say bad about any person who happens to be a woman, they automatically declare it to be misogyny. The "feminist or women's subreddits" you're referencing were defending Amy Coney Barrett and labeled all criticism of her "misogyny" during her confirmation hearing?
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:24 PM
3

Reddit would have a very similar reaction if the CEO was a woman. The motivations among redditors that make Luigi more popular on reddit than in real life would all still exist. Reddit is not an accurate reflection of real life. Pre-meditated murder is viewed far less favoribly in real life than it is on reddit.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 05:25 PM
1

Because there are only two parties who's candidates ever get above 10% in any given election. So, every vote not for one of those two parties is effectively a "protest vote" and therefore the US is effectively a 2 party system.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:24 PM
7

with this most recent election, Democrats in the higher echelons of the party have had talks of restructuring and rebranding. We see them discussing it on mainstream news everywhere. They're scrambling to find a way to win over more male votes. They did this in the aftermath of the 2016 election and to a slightly lesser extent in the aftermath of the 2022 midterm election. I dont know why anyone thinks they're going to change anything now, it's been all talk before.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 02:11 PM
1

What period are we talking about exactly? "pre suffrage voting standards" weren't exactly uniform. Depending on the state and/or year: male/female landowners could vote or only male landowners or only male tax-payers, also, many states flip-flopped on letting free black men vote. Seems like the kind of thing "well read, intelligent" people would have mentioned.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:14 PM
1

A misdemeanor that might get her up to 2 years 7 total misdemeanors that might get her up to 12 years is what she's actually charged with.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:10 PM
4

Charged with 7 misdemeanor counts for up to 12 years total, everything except the "Causing false alarm..." charge are second degree misdemeanors which carry up to 2 years apiece. Inb4: I get that first time offenders with no prior record never get the maximum sentence.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:08 PM
4

OK, so when that happens call it out. If she wasn't being charged at all you would have a point but she is clearly being charged. Since she has been charged, unless she has the charges dropped you're straight up lying when you say "she’s not facing real Consequences for her action" because she is literally facing the exact consequences anyone would be at this point between arraignment and the beginning of trial, given the crimes being alleged.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 02:07 PM
20

Court records show that Urumova was arraigned Monday on charges for making false reports (two counts), causing false alarm to an agency of public safety, tampering with or fabricating physical evidence, and for "unsworn falsification to authorities" (three counts). Bail was set at $30,000, records also show. She was arraigned under 48 hours ago at time of writing. She is presently facing charges and there is no indication these charges will be dropped. To say "Spoiler : she’s not facing real Con…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 01:47 PM
6

Cam girls are generally considered sex workers. You might have a different personal definition but generally cam girls are considered sex workers, just like the phone sex operators in the decades prior.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:36 PM
16

Yeah, went on the YouTube app just now and I'm not getting any recommendations for "cam whores" but I did get recommended a full documentary from the 70s on life in the Soviet Union. The algorithm knows me so well 🥰
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:43 PM
2

The "reason why legislators have not enforced a draft is because" the US isn't directly involved in the current offensive in the Gaza Strip. What basis is there for a draft in the US when the US isn't fighting? Even if the US were currently fighting shoulder-to-shoulder with the IDF in Gaza there wouldn't be a draft. Hamas is significantly less formidable than Iraq in either of the US-Iraq wars and the US never considered a draft for either of those conflicts.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 06:25 PM
0

This is the real answer. Everyone is either a "civilian" or a "combatant"; children can't be combatants and women weren't for thousands of years of human civilization and still can't be in most non-western countries. It's assumed the non-civilian men dying in a military conflict are the combatants; basically all of the "rules of war" are to differentiate civilians from combatants and to minimize civilian casualties.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 12:17 PM
1

There is a lot of context you're leaving out. Isreal is only one half of the hostage negotiation. Hamas has been releasing a trickle of hostages for weeks now and seem to release hostages that will make Hamas itself look less barbaric in the western press, for example one of the first hostages released was related to a former NBC journalist. Also, given that both sides consider themselves to be at war any able-bodied person would be harder to negotiate the release of, particularly given Isreal's…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 01:21 PM
12

Breakfest is at most 200 calories and lunch is around 100 calories. Even with 800 calories worth of pasta for dinner (not a small portion) she is only maintaining a BMI of 18 if she is like 4 feet tall; her BMI should be much lower if she is really living on like 700 calories a day. Women around five and a half feet tall could easily maintain a BMI of 18 on 1500 calories a day.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 04:10 PM
4

Needing a certain % of your population to be working age at any given time is necessary for literally any economic, governmental, or societal system. Everything collapses if 70% of your population is too old to work. Birthrate decline is just an issue period.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 03:07 PM
4

For men, it has to be earned though, you don’t have the luxury of waiting for it to happen. It goes through taking more responsibility in society, bettering yourself, developing your confidence etc. What objective metrics are there for any of this? I ask because the long list of purely subjective criteria seems like a way to dismiss guys who genuinely have issues attracting women as opposed to legitimate advice. To a 27 year old guy who is 5'3", has a permenantly disfigured face, a high-school e…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 04:38 PM
6

A good personality, being funny or sharing an interest or hobby can certainly make you a lot more attractive. It's the inverse; being attractive makes your personality, jokes, interests, and hobbies more interesting.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:14 PM
8

I think you mean second-class citizens. Although I have gotten enjoyment from reading this as though men deserve their treatment for being so uneducated.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 09:12 AM
1

"Those terms" are exactly how she and her friends talk about this trip when their spouses aren't within earshot.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 07:47 PM
3

That site rates the NY Daily News with its highest level of credibility and the NY Post on par with the article from OP.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 02:18 PM
1

I must have forgotten what a gym rat Warren Buffet was. /s
/r/MensRights29/12/22 01:39 PM
91

Marriage can also benefit your long-term standard of living, albeit to a highly imperfect and uncertain extent, if you’re awarded alimony in divorce. An estimated 41% of all first marriages will end in divorce or separation, according to data from California-based law firm Wilkinson & Finkbeiner. I love calling alimony a "benefit [to] your long-term standard of living" and talking about it in a way that a thoroughly ignorant person would believe both sides of a divorce could have it awarded. So,…
/r/MensRights04/11/22 12:34 PM
3

Latvia is a NATO country and not currently involved in anything large scale enough where being conscripted is "a highly likely death sentence".
/r/MensRights23/09/22 08:32 PM
2

I never said anything about the possibility of replicating the Yale study or regarding bias in hiring more generally. I looked into the link you gave where you claimed "an earlier study found the opposite" and found your linked "study" to be an article on an unreliable website. All I ever did was provide context on the misinformation this 50-day old account was disseminating to the people lurking who might confuse your long-winded ranting with intelligent and worthwhile discussion.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 06:15 PM
2

https://youtu.be/pWdd6_ZxX8c
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:46 PM
3

to the prior point: Of those men who did go to a prestigious university, how many spent that four years jerking off, didn't intern at a reputable company during their time in school, or/and strengthen their so-called soft skills, like learning how to dress, groom, and navigate a job interview? If it turns out that a substantial portion of male graduates are failing to do these very basic things, which has then in turn lead many tech companies being reluctant to give male candidates a hearing, we…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:06 PM
31

Gender Bias: The Résumé Edition By Monica Beyer May 15, 2019 Recruiting Updated: May 16, 2019 The heading on the article you link to. The article is purportedly summarizing a study on bias in hiring. The article concludes with: While many people are taking strides to eliminate race and gender biases, it may be true that some biases are so ingrained that people may not realize they carry these presumptions until they’re highlighted. We wouldn’t have been surprised if these findings were more pola…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 11:36 AM
1

Yeah...a shove in response to being bumped or poked isn't an escalation and you would be within your right to do it. I didn't say to shove them to the ground and kick them till their unconscious. You are confused, otherwise you wouldn't be implying a shove is some huge escalation from having a beer thrown in your face. As far as the law is concerned both of those actions are "simple" assault and battery. "Non-harmful violence" isn't a legal term, on the contrary its a total oxymoron.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 12:58 AM
22

telling him to shut up and calm down is the proper response. When something happens to you that isn't harmful, responding with violence or more aggression isn't the answer. If she pulled a gun on him, a beat down would be in order. But a beer on your face does not give you free range to lay hands. I am not advocating responding in this situation physically but wanted to point out that beer thrown on you, water thrown on you, being bumped without getting knocked back/down, someone poking you whil…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 01:53 PM
5

Marjorie Taylor Greene, the member of the US Congress who infamously blamed Californian wildfires on a Jewish space laser.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 07:23 PM
7

Except the only thing the article says is that the guy asked what she was studying and "became animated" when he learned the topic she was studying. I can say with 100% certainty that in the "reverse" situation where girl asks guy what he's working on and shows enthusiasm there wouldn't be anyone using the term "harassment" to describe the situation. The article, the starbucks batista/representatives, the girl at starbucks, and her mother don't describe the situation as "harassment", why are you…
/r/MensRights22/02/22 12:48 PM
6

Given that you were overvaluing the cars in situation #1 it's plausable they thought you were haggling and that you and your husband were doing a "good cop bad cop" type thing. It wouldn't be the first couple they encountered who did this. Yes, upselling is very common. The salesperson gets a commission based on the price of the vehicle sold. If they could convince your dad to "help" with the down-payment on a more expensive vehicle than the salesperson makes a bigger commission. Also, they get …
/r/MensRights26/01/22 07:51 PM
5

Situation #1 is definitely sexism if you ultimately got what your research said you should have for the used cars. Situation #2 is a salesperson attempting to upsell and would happen regardless of the gender of the 20-someting browsing with their parent.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 07:08 PM
6

Assuming you can just "go independent" and aren't selling MRI machines to hospitals or electricity to municipalities.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:43 PM
9

About the only way his behavior makes sense: they had a huge fight, she insisted of getting a flight/bus home, he last sees her when he drops her off at a bus station, he drives home, gets home and learns she never made it back. I don't fault him for lawyering up. Given the length of time between her disappearance and him turning up in Florida there are a lot of details to misremember and every one of them will be a sign of guilt to the courts.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 06:32 PM
5

Kind of depressing how far I had to scroll to see this. Hoping this comment ages poorly.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 12:42 PM
3

The landlord can't openly discriminate like that, an individual looking for a roommate can. As long as the landlord doesn't discriminate when applications are given to them the tenant can discriminate all they want in whom they would like to live with.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 02:43 PM
17

You're dismissing the issues bottom 50th percentile guys face the same way feminists do. Any male who genuinely believes "creepy" is never subjectively used by women to dismiss unattractive males isn't in the bottom 50th percentile. I've never been accused of harassment in this manner but I've absolutely been led on for half an hour, not because she was into me, but to start drama when her boyfriend got there. When you're so ugly they know they will never date you you're a plaything/pawn. You wi…
/r/MensRights25/04/21 05:04 PM
6

Narcissists care about recieving narcissistic supply and would totally feign an emotional reaction if it results in the attention they crave. I don't want to come off too argumentative here. More a warning to anyone as naive and big-hearted as I was in my 20s.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:11 PM
4

Don’t let anyone tell you you are overreacting about something you care about. I understand the point you're making but a genuine narcissist would abuse the heck out of this mentality.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 09:21 PM
2

It's more of a false flag.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 10:52 PM
1

You're describing a worst case scenario in a he-said she-said type situation, in OP's case the security guard would be the "she-said" side. There is security footage in OP's case that would completely exonerate them.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 03:19 PM
2

We're all connected. The things that affect women also affect men. Those "ya know what I call boys under 6feet? Friends XD" posts affect the women making then as much as the guys being insulted? Being mocked for being born with a preference women dislike affects the women doing the mocking just as much? Also, posts in this style never appear in feminist blogs/social media/forums/etc and are heavily criticized by feminists when they do appear, right? because toxic masculinity isn't primarily a sl…
/r/MensRights14/04/20 05:35 PM
4

A life partner to grow old with would be the ideal. I am with you that happiness should come from within and should absolutely not be dependent on another person. That being said realizing children of my own arent ever a thing that will happen hurts to type. The thing that stings most are posts/comments in places like r/depression where (paraphrased example from a few weeks ago) a woman wrote about being single for years. Crying alone in her bed most nights while cuddling one of her pillows and …
/r/MensRights06/04/20 07:43 PM
12

That study is one of the more depressing things I've read. Given the financial pitfalls of divorce and how easy it is to be deemed unworthy why would any guy get married? I've been doing the diet and exercise thing for a couple months and was starting to see results and feel better about myself. I'm always going to be under six feet and I'm only going to be middle class without a career change. Guess I should just accept dying alone?
/r/MensRights06/04/20 02:34 PM
1

Between smartphones, social media, and OLD she can easily stay in contact with former hookups or find new ones. If you're not in the ~20% of guys who have the vast majority of the casual sex you need to accept that she settled for you and she isn't attracted to you. Any guy in the position of being settled on should absolutely insist on DNA testing before opening themselves up to child support.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 08:07 PM
6

"Proof" is easy enough for the anti-MRM to come by: make dummy account, make blatantly offensive post/comment, screencap it, switch back to primary account, post screencap, profit! Sure someone here will find the comment, look at the post history, and figure out what happened. This takes time, both to research as well as for others to read the conclusion. "A lie goes halfway around the world before the truth gets its pants on" is a phrase I've heard before that fits nicely.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 02:32 PM
5

I wasnt trying to defend the concept just pointing out it's been used for over 50 years.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 06:14 PM
16

AFAIK "unpaid labor" as a concept has been big since 2nd wave feminism, primarily in the context of the family court system. It isn't that stay-at-home wives are freeloaders but rather they provide all of this "unpaid labor". Someone who knows more than me can correct this if I'm wrong: the concept of "unpaid labor" is part of the justification for alimony payments.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:51 PM
5

In states with $10 min wage that's really not unheard of. The entire overnight staff starts at $10.25/hr in the restaurant I work at.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:47 AM
3

Thank you for this. I've only looked into it online as a nobody and came to the "not an actual statistic" conclusion but didn't learn much else. I never realized prison populations aren't considered for some (most?) of these studies. Always nice to see similarities between what I wrote and what you've got in your "Summary" section. Yours be phrased more better tho
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:19 AM
22

"Attempted suicide" isn't a statistic kept by anyone, at best it's survey data mixed with hospital visits for self harm and at worst it's a blind estimate. Death by suicide is an established statistic kept by governments. This entire "yea but women attempt it more" argument is put forth to metaphorically muddy the waters regarding suicide and by making it on behalf of women's groups without knowing what you're really doing, yeah, you're gonna get downvoted.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 04:46 PM
1

This is basically the male version of the hot/crazy scale. Nail on head.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 11:25 PM
1

I've been noticing an increase in trolls for a little over two months now. Hard to be objective about it and I'm sure at least a few well intentioned but argumentative people are falsely identified as a troll. Ghandi onve said: First they ignore you, then the mock you, then they fight you, then you win. Somewhere between mock and fight isn't so bad is it?
/r/MensRights24/04/16 11:15 PM
5

Women are the majority of the victims of this one specific felony is evidence of what exactly? Men are the majority of the victims of every other felony. Men getting nowhere near the attention women get, for that one specific felony they are the primary victims of, would be evidence that men's issues aren't taken as seriously as women's, correct? If one genders issues are more important than the other which gender would be considered "second class" should that term apply? For the record I don't …
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:37 AM
0

You made accusations against a former employer in a blatantly transparent move to create leverage(you had none otherwise) in getting out of a contract you willingly signed? Because that is what Kesha is doing here.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 02:11 AM
0

In summary: Kesha's own lawyers describe her case as "unsubstantiated" but you still think "it doesn't seem likely" that she is lying(no objective reason given), your posts history reads like a writer from feministing.com playing the part of a political moderate, and you claim to not know anything about the Rolling Stone/UVA case despite clearly following and having strong opinions on gender politics. Either you can see why you look like a troll who is false flagging or how dare I accuseexpose y…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:20 AM
3

Kesha's own lawyers describe the sexual assault case Kesha makes as “vague and unsubstantiated, with pivotal details such as dates fudged.” That's why I'm pretty comfortable saying she is lying to get out of a contract she willingly signed. I don't doubt that Dr. Luke is a total asshole. If she can prove he verbally abused her than the eating disorder and rehab are certainly evidence that his words caused real harm. This all happened long after the alleged sexual abuse and there seems to be actu…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 06:59 AM
2

Statistically, it's more likely that it's true than that it's false. Source please? The study on the validity of sexual assault claims used as leverage in getting out of an unrelated legal contract would be a fun read. Even just a paraphrasing of the methodology used would help, I can't think of how to objectively study this.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 03:31 AM
19

A life sentence to an established pop star. When she was an 18 year old nobody the contract was amazing.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 03:14 AM
1

I've heard that these numbers are similar in England and the US, it appears British women do initiate divorce more often than their American counterparts. Still not close to 80% and everything I've found written in the last couple years looking back at the time period your link is from indicate that 72% of women initiated divorce. Worth noting that your data is from the high point ever for divorce in general and also when the highest percentage of people initiating divorce were women. I'm not tr…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:03 AM
1

Source on the 80% statistic? Women definitly file the majority of divorces but the highest numbers I've ever seen are at or just below 60%
/r/MensRights25/01/16 10:18 PM
11

Favorite part: the author says Wikipedia's strength is that it offers objective information then without a hint of irony complains that the people who edited the GamerGate page to have it read like the feminist narrative were punished.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:36 AM
3

It delegitimize the concepts and ideas discussed here by treating #Mensrights the same as #Hitlerwasright or something similar.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 01:32 AM
2

Define how you are using the term troll and explain how this applies to what Milo does. An actual example using one or a seris of his tweets shouldnt be be that hard to produce, if he does this all the time. I'm not on twitter so honestly don't know what he is like there. Does he just mindlessly spam people or does he engage other politically active people in debates?
/r/MensRights15/01/16 01:23 AM
2

Dr. Helen Smith's book Men on Strike is a nice place to start. Less academic than the stuff in the sidebar but a very quick read and makes for a nice introduction to the ideas and concepts discussed here.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 12:12 AM
4

Someone here is shadowbanned.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 01:14 AM
3

Worth noting this is in the weekend journal's "review" section; located in a completely different place from their op-ed section. Considering the topic is gender politics putting this in the section with the book reviews tells me the WSJ doesn't hold the author's opinion in very high regard.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 07:08 AM
18

There are 37 words on that image and 19 of them are the source for the statistic presented through the previous 18 words. The majority of the words on the image are literally the source being asked for. That's why I downvoted at least.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 12:00 AM
5

She pulled a knife on him and threatened him with it. Even if you're going to charge him with simple assault you have to charge her with assault with a deadly weapon and (in America at least) that is a significantly more serious crime. You might make the case for him threatening her right at the beginning of the video but she didn't pull the knife then. Rather she was allowed to walk away and did before she turned back and pulled the knife. I went back and rewatched the part with the seats and i…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 10:31 PM
3

It's all based on the false claim. The exam part was her motive for committing the crime which she is being punished for. The police always try to establish the motive for crimes, it helps paint an accurate picture in their reports.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 01:04 AM
0

How exactly did she ruin the man's life? The article flat out says he was in jail when he allegedly attacked her and that is what made police suspicious of her. The guy was never charged with anything, at least the article never mentions anything.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 01:01 AM
4

I didn't think actual violence was being advocated but rather just an extreme expression of disapproval. So you're being downvoted (by me at least) because your comment is taking what was said out of context. Whether this was intentionally done as a false flag/trolling attempt or not is irrevelant, comments that don't add meaningfully to the discussion get downvoted.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 12:10 AM
1

That part didn't sit well with me either. My brother is a HS senior right now and I haven't heard him, or any of his friends, mention this when talking about college. I told him to think twice about RIT or any school in NY because they have affirmative consent laws and he needed me to explain what I was talking about.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 11:06 PM
-1

Thank you. Was about to respond to clarify that my tone here isn't angry and in my first message I wasn't trying to accuse OP of anything (could have been an overzealous 19yo kid who wants them to hire a "hot chick").
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:03 AM
-8

A pic of the sign from today would be the way to set the record straight here. If the sign didn't look blatantly doctored today, the way it did yesterday, why did you use a pic from yesterday? You posted 6 hrs ago and Toronto is one time zone away from me so the "better" sign was up before you posted.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 01:21 AM
0

The part that says "female $$$" looks like it was written by a different person and applied after the fact. The three $ on the bottom look different from the two near the top. Everything else is spaced evenly except the word female which is fit into the end and touches the "g" in hiring. Why wasn't the word "apply" pushed over to the right more, so female could fit easily? Why did the person making the board change their writing style for just the last line on the chalkboard?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 12:22 AM
1

Some good points raised here unfortunately the end of point 6 was where they lost me. Complaining about Jess Phillips' spelling on her twitter feed while having this sentence in your opening paragraph: For those who dont’ know about this story, Jess Phillips MP laughed at he idea of discussing men’s issues in Parliament and insisted there shoudl be no debates on men’s issues until 50% of women were MPs Is hypocritical. Unless she is infamous for poor spelling (don't follow international politics…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:26 PM
1

Kind of minor but wwlp is 3 time zones away in Chicopee Massachusetts, not even close to an "Arizona news outlet" as the title says.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:35 PM
1

You need at least a bachelor's degree to be a fighter pilot in the US military. I know the Army has some pilot positions that you can do right out of high school but before the Air Force or Navy lets you fly a multi-million dollar jet faster than the speed of sound you need a degree in physics.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 09:20 PM
3

tl;dr: Hey gold-diggers who are in their mid-30s and not particularly successful. Have you considered guys in their 60s? All the disposable income (sometimes more!) than the 40something lawyers you've been throwing yourself at for the last decade+ but still think of and treat you like the whole world did when you were in your early 20s!
/r/MensRights15/08/15 07:39 PM
3

Attempted Suicide isn't an official statistic kept by anyone. Usually this is an estimate based on people admitted to the hospital for self-harm that isn't accidental and augmented by various other factors. So, those statistics you see claiming that women attempt suicide 3-4 times more often than men are as reliable as 1 in 5 women will be raped on a college campus. Looking at the number of completed suicides it's impossible to deny men do it more often. I always saw the "women attempt it more" …
/r/MensRights09/08/15 07:32 PM
3

Judge Moon found that there was sufficient evidence for John to claim that he was discriminated against as a male...He added that John "plausibly established a causal link between his expulsion and gender bias." Moon offered Kozak's claim that "regret equals rape" as an example, since Kozak was clearly biased and was responsible for the investigation that led to John's expulsion. From the second half of the article, apparently the judge mentioned in the title agrees with everything you said.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 06:40 PM
1

The kind of bachelor party where hookers get hired would be the same as the kind of Bachelorette parties where male strippers get hired. The (now former) stripper I'm friends with said she hated private parties, especially with younger guys, because they act like the women in this article. When guys look into hiring strippers a lot of them think like you do here but the reality winds up changing their minds. The same rules apply for a private party as at the club (she might let the groom get cha…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 06:07 PM
0

Ask about her stance on the affirmative consent laws that some US states have passed. Either these laws are really important to protect the 1 in 5 women who are raped or they're unfairly stacked against the accused and make sexual assault the only crime a person is guilty of until they can prove their innocence.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 10:18 PM
2

I'm wondering why you expect to be taken seriously for arguing against a point no one was making. Where in NoDeadPugs' comment is it stated or even implied that women's bodies aren't "analyzed or fantasized over" on the internet?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:22 AM
1

I understand how you feel but this won't happen. Either fight to reduce the age of consent or to get rid of it all together. Even trying to just get the laws as they currently are applied equally would have a better chance of succeeding. Courts nationwide are pretty clear on this, it's up to you to know the person you're sleeping with is legal. It's the reason why it's called statutory rape, no context really matters if an adult engages in sexual activity with a minor it's illigal, period. Put a…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:39 PM
3

It's possible but a lot of things dont make semse if she is just plain old incompetent. By the sounds of it she wasn't going to be reprimanded in anyway besides being sent home that day. If she was unaware that shorts were against company policy why would she quit on the spot? Did she really need or want this job if she quit over something so minor two weeks in? Why did she immediately go on twitter and make it all a matter of het gender? She is certainly aware of and has great admiration for th…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:39 AM
-5

Seems a little paranoid to me. Again, it's just using information anyone could easily obtain by looking at a user's post history. Honestly you might be onto something here. Using a similar robot auto-tag list would make it much more difficult for SRS to troll their way to a screencap that makes this sub look bad.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:11 AM
6

"It's always been an issue, but the Internet is making women feel like they can express their opinion," Stoel said. "We have a huge community of feminists who will share it and give it validation. What we're doing isn't wrong, it's society that is wrong." This part right here was what really got me thinking. Let's take a look at this situation: Based on her statements here and just before them in the article she seems to follow gender politics debates and is very clearly on the feminist/SJW side…
/r/MensRights29/07/15 10:32 PM
29

Your username and comments are already public. People can already link to a comment you've written, quote it, and/or "publicly shame" it or you for writing it. There is nothing stopping someone from going through the comments section of a certain sub and writing the usernames of the people most active in that communtiy. That's all that is happening here except a robot is doing the incredibly tedious part.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 09:18 PM
3

In the three sentences you quoted the first refers to just the prison population, the second refers to a combination of the prison and jail populations, and the third refers to just the prison population. Nowhere can I find if the infographic is referring to just the population in prison or a combination of the population in prison and jail. The second sentence is the only one mentioning the percent of the overall population currently incarcerated and for that they use people in prison and jail …
/r/MensRights26/07/15 08:56 PM
5

The infographic gives the chance someone in these racial/gender groups is "imprisoned" but I'm having a hard time figuring out what exactly their criteria for imprisoned is. Nearly everyone charged with DUI is locked up for that night but they either go to a county jail or just to the local police lockup, not prison. Does this count as being imprisoned or is The Sentencing Project claiming that these are the rates of people who are locked up for at least a full calendar year on felony charge.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 07:36 PM
1

I'm having a hard time finding this "famous" quote, source? I did come across this from Dr. Ruth though.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 06:57 PM
2

Worked fine for me just now.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 06:04 PM
2

I thought the archive link thing was to avoid giving clicks to anti-male people/sites. What has Katherine Timpf done to deserve not getting clicks exactly? and the fact that National Review is hosting the article shows that it's at least neutral here.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:43 PM
1

Secretly recording a coffee date at Starbucks would get you "up shit creek" in a two-party state. If the recording is found to be illigal it won't help the accused at all in a US court. All that would happen us a wiretapping charge would be tacked on with the alleged sexual assult or whatever.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:01 PM
2

In two party consent states a recording can't be done secretly so you were onto it at the end of your comment. For example, the store I'm at right now doesn't have the signs but all of the cameras are on the wall in plain view of everyone. You know they're there and where each of them is facing. If they were behind those glass half dome things then we would need to have something indicating that recording devices are in use. Worth noting I'm absolutely in a a two-party state.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 10:45 PM
0

The quoted link didn't work for me but the lower one of the source did. From the vegress.com link (Minnesota is listed as a one-party state there): Filming individuals in their home is always a more risky venture. In a Minnesota case, a veterinarian making a house call obtained permission to bring a student with him, but failed to inform the homeowners that the student was an employee of a television station. The student surreptitiously videotaped the doctor’s treatment of the family cat in thei…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 10:07 PM
2

I'm not a lawyer but my understanding is that the secret recording would simply not he admissible in court in the US. The case would play out in court as though the recording didn't exist.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 05:35 PM
0

In most states (over 40) all parties being recorded must be aware of the recording. If the recording device isn't in plain view than the party doing the recording must make it aware to anyone being recorded, which is why so many stores have something like "CCTV monitoring in use" stickers on the front door, otherwise the tape of someone shoplifting wouldn't be admissible in court.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 05:21 PM
11

There’s no such thing as a “female gaze” in our society. Women never do the looking, except when we go see “Magic Mike,” browse through the hot guys of Cosmo and giggle over which dude has a nicer ass on the Internet — in other words, except when we objectify you! See how this works? Her entire argument in this piece boils down to "its never true, until it is"
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:41 PM
2

This was Ghandi's saying, right?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 06:01 PM
1

I'm guessing she was never charged because that law only applies to guards and she wasn't a guard?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:49 AM
1

She says she went to another place and got it in her article.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:41 AM
6

The legal definition of assault is all but set in stone. Assault is anything that puts you in fear of physical harm. Battery is the actual physical harm. What you're describing above as "actual assaults" is battery.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 02:04 PM
2

So, no. Nothing intelligent to add just more of the aforementioned temper tantrum.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:08 AM
2

Just sit without moving your knees further apart from the standing position, plenty of people do it all the time (I did just now!). If there is no one standing and the seat next to you is empty go ahead and spread out. That's all anyone is advocating here. Is there a rational coherent argument against this? So far all I'm seeing are empty threats and adult temper tantrums.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:59 AM
2

No man has ever needed to sit that way. I completely agree that it's more comfortable and not a big deal unless the train/bus/etc is more than half full but this argument that it's impossible to sit any other way besides the way pictured is completely absurd.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:28 AM
2

The guys case is against the school for letting her carry the mattress for course credit, legally he never went after her at all. Since she already graduated and this video doesn't appear to be part of her senior thesis this video will have no legal ramifications.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:09 PM
2

This was more impartial than I was expecting from the NYT, given how pro-Sulkowitz (on mobile on break might be spelled wrong) they've been. I didn't realize she was now lying and saying some of the Facebook messages were part of the hearing. That quote about needing proof is perfect, shows how radical this ideology has gone.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:57 PM
10

In the data you're looking for there would be no differentiation between the men who truly wanted nothing to do with their children anymore and the ones who didn't bother fighting the very expensive legal battle for any number of reasons (don't have the money, odds of success being very low, etc.). Some men stop feeling any attachment to a child if they learn the child isn't theirs however on paper they would be cutting contact with "their" child. As for the downvotes, the question you ask is a …
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:38 PM
3

I thought it was in visual arts, hence the senior thesis being a year long performance arts piece.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:17 PM
1

Vietnam ended in 1975, 40 years ago. Your point about "instituting the draft on average about once per generation" is just wrong.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:48 PM
4

Women should be free to express themselves without fear of being ostracized. Given the introductory paragraphs, this sentence (at the end of point #2) is so hypocritical I just stopped reading.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 09:33 PM
5

Both this and the comment I initially responded to make several valid points about why marriage overall is on the decline. This article is written for women currently in a relationship to explain why their boyfriend doesn't seem interested in proposing. Every point made by both you and InBaggingArea don't apply in the context of this article because they would be reasons why she would not date him in the first place.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 10:54 PM
-1

The real reason is hypergamy. This doesn't really work given the title of the article. If it were written to a male audience and had a title like "Why she won't marry you" maybe. The women this article is written for have already found their "higher status" man and are confused as to why he isn't proposing.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 05:03 PM
2

Where are you reading that, she pretty clearly states she gives the majority of the blame to herself with a small minority of it going to the women she hired who were such terrible employees.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 05:25 PM
1

Worse, you let them take the month-long vacation they put in for just prior to telling you this.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 05:14 PM
3

Today feminists control the traffic lights and the road rules, men are only chauffeurs, even when they appear to be in the driver’s seat. I think this is a very good analogy.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:15 PM
1

People who study history are the ones who write and vet what the rest of the world looks up. That whole third paragraph is just nonsense.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 10:32 PM
2

Statistics can be made to say whatever they're needed to; have you never watched a political debate before? Put another way, statistics are used to support the narrative not the other way around.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 10:03 PM
3

The title is misleading, the article is 5 sentences long and seems to suggest it was the "going viral" part that the students got in trouble for. Which is why I asked what in this article suggests she "willingly" let someone upload them. It doesn't mention a punishment for the specific student(s) who uploaded them to twitter/instagram so it looks like no one fessed up to uploading them and the school decided to punish all the guys who had them in their possession. The guy(s) who initially receiv…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:48 PM
-9

What about this article suggests she "willingly" let someone upload the pics to instagram? If she wanted them uploaded to instagram wouldn't she have done it herself?
/r/MensRights26/04/15 11:02 PM
0

I was about to call you out for a repost but this was on /r/facepalm a week and a half ago, not here.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 08:59 PM
0

If your aunt wanted to kick the father out and not let him see his children she could because the kids are hers. If they were married the children belong to both of them and the father has a right to see the kids. If I'm understanding the legal principals here correctly he could take her to court because he has a right to see his children, which the father currently can't do.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:35 AM
1

I thought the only time marriage made sense was if you're planning on having children. The children you father while married are both yours and your wives whereas the children you father with your cohabiting girlfriend are hers. Easier to cut you out of the kids lives or move to a different country or something. Although this may vary by state or not be the way the American law works.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:31 AM
1

I dont think she ever filed a police report. The police investigated the case after the story was published as a result of the public outcry.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 05:46 AM
0

Studies which I'm too lazy to look up conclude that women are significantly more interested in marriage than men. There are a lot of reasons for this but it's generally accepted that the decline in marriage is due to men's choices.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:28 AM
4

I nearly stopped there but kept going until this part: Because despite some men’s claims that sexism is over, it is still socially acceptable to belittle women. ...apparently this guy hasn't seen a sitcom in the last decade. Not only will the male(s) be some dope constantly being saved by his all knowing wife but the majority of commercials play right into the same stereotype. Are people belittling to one another all the time? Sure! Are women disproportionatly belittled? Not by a long shot.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 01:11 AM
3

For the comment I was responding to the most relevant quote would be in the AEI's response to this scandal: [I]t has never been true that we ignore mainstream science; and anyone who reads AEI publications closely can see that we are not "skeptics" about warming. It is possible to accept the general consensus about the existence of global warming while having valid questions about the extent of warming, the consequences of warming, and the appropriate responses.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:11 AM
2

They don't deny climate change, unless disagreeing with the way companies are taxed for emissions counts as denying climate change now.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 02:03 AM
8

You're being downvoted for criticizing her videos for not citing ("cite" is a verb "site" is a noun) sources...but not citing anything that disproves her statements yoruself. She is a very respected academic so if she doesn't cite every stat while making a video for YouTube she will get the benefit of the doubt from most people (myself included) because hearing her rattle off a bibliography would be boring and reduce the number of views the video gets.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:52 AM
1

By using the archive link none of the clicks register at The Guardian. She has a pretty strong following among the 35 and under feminist crowd so she's not going away anytime soon. I'd argue the best way to make her go away is to deconstruct her arguments, which unfortunately requires reading them.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:56 PM
4

The thing that annoyed me about the second quote you have is that there are plenty of examples of women doing more than "hurting feelings." Yet anytime a women cuts off a guys dick after finding out he cheated or pushes him out a 25th floor window to his death when she found out he was leaving her (a case I saw on Locked Up earlier this week) apparently it doesn't count. I still think men are more often physically abusive than women but saying it never happens the other way is dishonest and clea…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:48 PM
0

The 50% stat is skewed by the number of young people who get divorced shortly after marriage and the number of "repeat offenders" out there. My grandmother's sister's (great aunt?) husband wound up divorcing her and then had 5 more failed marriages, I think he and wife #6 are still together. My dad has 3 siblings and 2 cousins so it takes two generations of successful marriages to even things back out.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:25 PM
2

I wish the author would have commented on how exactly being "professional" is completely unique from being "politically correct" because I always saw them as pretty similar and she seems to think acting professional is oppressive. To phrase this a little differently: political correctness has more rules than professionalism does in about every area except dress codes.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:01 AM
4

Ultimate irony being he was doing exactly what this author is claiming would make office environments more welcoming for people, dressing how he would if he weren't at work and "being himself."
/r/MensRights07/03/15 01:56 AM
2

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win" - Gandhi
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:45 AM
1

I'm near the end of Helen Smith's book now and that quote was cherry picked from the chaper on why men aren't as interested in going to college. Homelessness isn't a topic covered there, or anywhere really. She certainly doesn't devote enough space to male homelessness for it to even qualify as an issue she examines.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:13 AM
1

Net tax contributer would either screw a lot of people unintentionally or no one would ever take a government contact/work for the government, awful hard to pay more than you got when all or most of your income is tax dollars. This includes policemen, firemen, EMTs, teachers, some correctional officers, court employees (DA office, judges, etc.), people in the military, you get the idea. Students who take out government backed loans (the vast majority) are all net takers until they're paid off. T…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 01:42 AM
1

I don't remember her saying to wait until marriage, she doesn't really take a moral stand on premarital sex at all. She did mention only having sex with someone's you're in an established relationship with, which is a little different. What I find funny is you and the author seem to agree that adults should make their own choices without college bureaucrats stepping in where real courts should. You feel the need to trash her because you sense her politics are different from yours.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:33 AM
9

I did the same thing and let myself get sucked into 7 ways we alienate Trans people, or something like that. Got to the first one that suggested I stop saying sir or ma'am because no one can be sure what someone's gender is and that it's none of my business anyway. I stopped reading when their suggestion to fix this issue was...to ask what someone's preferred gender pronoun is.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 12:53 AM
1

I think you need to look up the definition of anarchy if you don't understand how I think that applies to what your suggesting regarding obeying the laws of wherever you are.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 02:52 AM
1

Am I talking to a real anarchist or someone pretending to be one?
/r/MensRights01/02/15 02:40 AM
1

An even more dangerous set of morals than "obey the law" is someone who believes laws don't apply when they don't like them. My neighbor has a sweet Porsche, fuck the totalitarian nonsense that says it's his. If I can kick his ass and take it who is the government to say that's not my property, if he wants it he should defend it himself! An extreme example I know but using your logic any law you can justify breaking doesn't apply.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 02:18 AM
1

I agree with a lot of what you're saying here and there are plenty of people who should be set free if pot is legalized. However it's incredibly naive to think that everyone incarcerated for selling weed in a "high crime area" isn't involved in any other illigal activities. If the person also had an illigal handgun on them should they still be let go? I mean the entire reason the cop searched their car and found the gun was because he smelled now legal pot.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 02:13 AM
1

Young people pay more for auto insurance and boys pay more than girls. It goes down quickly if you're accident free. There is plenty of research out there showing younger males to be more aggressive drivers than younger females. I'm not saying there aren't females who drive fast, tailgate, half ass race on back country roads with their friends (ahh, high school memories), etc. but there are significantly more men who engage in this behavior.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 10:37 PM
2

Wouldn't it have been helpful to have an actual MRA make the points on their behalf, or is she just trying to whip up some anti MRA sentiment? /s
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:02 AM
1

Maybe in out of wedlock births or one where the mother doesn't name a father, so you have the DNA of the child? This would just be a needless way to nickel and dime couples, the majority of whom planned on having a baby. Although I'm in the US where any trip to a hospital is really expensive, you might not be.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 12:44 AM
0

The part I'm still having a hard time understanding is, if these statements were made and Dershowitz can easily prove (initially he claimed to have travel itineraris proving he couldn't have been near her on all but one occasion) he couldn't have possibly been near Jane Doe #3 than it's a completely false statement made in a court of law. A statement made by someone who clearly knows it's not true or is so incompetent they shouldn't be allowed to practice law.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:38 AM
2

You didn't explicitly state that you've checked your privilege therefore you're even more misogynistic than you even realize for thinking you're less so. Any attempt to clarify, challange, or question the above statement is a direct assault on womyn and will not be dignified with a response.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:26 AM
6

One thing I'm still confused by, if "Jane Doe #3" made these statements in court and they're verifiablie false isn't that perjury?
/r/MensRights15/01/15 11:38 PM
1

In a lot of corporate environments vacation is mandatory. Anyone who has taken a forensic accounting or auditing class knows mandatory vacation is a great way to uncover fraud.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 02:19 AM
1

As someone who subscribed here recently, the first paragraph is spot on.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 10:18 PM
1

I'm guessing your source for this is the same that said black trans people are 9x more likely to get pulled over as a male.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 08:46 PM
1

Obviously you can. When a car is that close an officer is trying to get the license plate to put in the computer. The CJIS system coming back with a warrant for the person who the car is registered to is how 90% of the arrests come about which is why I completely reject the idea that men are arrested more due to discrimination. If someone was going a little fast, say 37 in a 30, and we ran the plate and the person who the car was registered to has multiple drug offenses in the last 2 years are t…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 01:37 AM
1

If you've got a source on black Transgender people getting pulled over 9x more often as male than female I'll believe you, until then I'm going to call BS. I looked into being a cop for awhile (decided it wasn't for me) and can say from my experience in ride alongs that it's almost impossible to tell the gender or race of the person driving a car more than 100 yards away. The radar cops use has a huge range on it, we knew someone was going 52 in a 35 from over 1/2 a mile away. They were getting …
/r/MensRights28/12/14 12:13 AM
2

Based on what the cops I know have told me guys are more likely to talk their way into a ticket. The instant the lights get flicked on they know if you're getting a ticket or not. If you are...then you are! If you weren't and you tell that pig(1st ammendment pig, you can't stop me from calling you that) to hurry up and give you that ticket because you have places to be, you're getting the ticket you asked for. The arrest/vehicle search stats are misleading for the same reason the 77cent statisti…
/r/MensRights27/12/14 01:52 PM
1

Best line came in the conclusion: Conservatives are capable of ignoring all sorts of real-world evidence in order to stick by their self-serving beliefs For anyone who doesn't know look at her twitter or articles around early December when the Washington Post first started fact checking the Rolling Stone UVA story.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:56 AM
9

If you haven't engaged in sexual intercourse then she doesn't have anything. Besides, the civil small claims court would see right through what she's doing without a police report backing up any of what she said. . As far as I can tell this is a completely irrational fear. You'd be going to a real court not some halfass campus hearing. Courts are expensive to run, take themselves fairly seriously, and hate feeling like their time is being wasted. Why are you only afraid of being accused of rape?…
/r/MensRights25/12/14 12:02 PM
1

If I'm understanding sharia law correctly women are basically property. So when ISIS goes into a rural town all of the women are "claimed" and the men are given the choice to join or die. ISIS isn't killing off the women because to ISIS that would be like tearing apart a perfectly good shirt.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 07:18 PM
1

I thought "manspreading" started in Turkey with something like #closeyourlegs. When I first heard about it I thought Turkish women had a decent case to be made, not so much for women in countries separated from the Middle East by an ocean.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:46 AM
2

This is from an older season of SNL, right?
/r/MensRights19/12/14 03:21 AM
5

I've had a go-to response that echos this sentiment. Progressive friend of mine while having an emotionally charged academic discussion regarding gender relations in western countries: the one-in-five stat is legitimate! I've got studies that prove it but you won't like my sources. Me: Is that because your sources wouldn't have a career if it wasn't true? I have yet to get anything close a real counter argument to this.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 05:01 AM
4

Getting hate mail from outside of your target demographic is a good thing for the guardian, in addition to the clicks they were expecting to get they got several more. The goal of any personality in the entertainment industry is to be equally loved and hated.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 04:52 AM
2

Agreed, this would only really be news if she got off based on this defense. I'm no legal scholar but this seems like a "hail mary" from her lawyer. Knowing the state has a real solid case and hoping to take advantage of a trendy social issue.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 01:48 AM
2

Wouldn't Jackie Coakley have said something by now if she wasn't?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:14 AM
4

I'm skeptical but similar to the way it took less than a week for the inaccuracies in the original RS article to come to light something tells me if this weren't her the friends of hers being interviewed would say something. Or to put it another way, would Jessica Valenti, Amanda Marcotte, and the rest of the leaders for the twitter lynch mob let this lie gain momentum?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:18 AM
0

At least rephrase the Ray Rice part. As it reads now someone not following it would think 2 games is acceptable. The media outcry was more about how damming the evidence was and that there was proof the NFL knew about the video before it was released but looked the other way and believed Rice's story. On a related note, there is absolutely no justification for Rice's actions. That's my other issue with the way this was written. If you're going to include the part about Rice being provoked you ha…
/r/MensRights18/11/14 08:17 PM
1

I'm worried about feeding a troll here but your right about terrorism, really doesn't apply here. Assault with a deadly weapon does. I think you don't understand the legal definition of what a deadly weapon is. It's anything besides your body used to assault someone, a newspaper, wearing shoes while kicking someone, punching someone while wearing a ring, heck even the ground or a wall is considered a deadly weapon if as part of your assault you shoved the person into the wall/ground. Considering…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 11:22 PM
2

In sexual assault and domestic violence cases involving a male and female the police are taught that men are the default aggressor unless strong evidence exists in the contrary. At least in my state and most others. So in your example, the hearing which condenses down to both parties admitting they engaged in intercourse and accusing the other of not consenting the male would be the aggressor.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 06:41 PM
2

I tend to feel this way anytime I read something online and my initial reaction is "they would never say this in person"
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:23 PM
1

Basically redefining what a felony is would be a little more complicated than a simple act of state legislature. All crimes are either felonies or misdemeanors. If their not one their the other so if all nonviolent crimes are no longer considered felonies then they will be considered misdemeanors and the laws governing punishments for misdemeanors would apply.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 10:10 AM
2

No that is not the case. It might help to think of them as county jail and state/federal prison to get an idea for which is which. The types of cases typically in jail would be repeat offense drunk drivers, simple assault and battery(bar fight), or other misdemeanors. There are a lot of crimes where at least the first offense is only 30-60 days of incarceration and this is what a jail is used for. The sentences "cutoff" for jail in my state is 2.5 years or less and some states it's 1 year or les…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 09:57 AM
2

I don't think you quite understand what the difference between a felony and misdemeanor is. I know it varies by state but basically misdemeanors are punishable by fines and/or time in a county jail(typically for a year or less, in my state the longest jail term for a misdemeanor is 2.5 years). A felony is a crime punishable by a term in state or federal prison. Some states have their jails and prisons be the same building just in different parts while others have them separate altogether. So you…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:24 PM
2

I remember when this story got posted when the gov. pardoned him, it's two months in jail to be served on consecutive weekend which seemed really shamful. The reason for this is she is also ordered to pay him some huge amount of money ($90,000 maybe) and the court wanted her to keep her job so she would actually pay him, which is a little less ridiculous.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 06:40 PM
1

Wouldn't he go after her in a civil suit?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:42 PM
2

In addition to the company letterhead issue I have some issues with the letters content. Mrs. Lash would be identified by her full name before being called "Mrs. Lash," the comment would not be given a subjective description like sarcastic, the comment would be quoted not just referred to as a "sarcastic comment," and this would result in some kind of mandatory sexual harassment class or at least a meetring with HR to review the companies sexual harassment policy.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 05:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter