TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mml76gs Archive

View 0 posts and 261 comments by mml76gs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"why do you have to be an asshole" Why do you have to exist? would be the response
/r/TheRedPill01/04/18 02:30 PM
1

So it's about feeling inferior (and then, envying, and then having to sublimate such envy into some "ethical values" and "ideals"). Statistically, this will involve more women who realize they aren't attractive to men, and financially well-off women (given how it's when the stomach isn't empty that the mind feels the need to fabricate problems and see ghosts where none are).
/r/TheRedPill24/03/18 08:01 AM
1

If you want to talk of risk-taking and openness to novelty and enterprise, do it without mentioning marriage, and possibly on a thread where marriage isn't the topic. Or shouldn't you?
/r/TheRedPill20/03/18 04:26 PM
1

You struck some truth for quite a few people it seems. I agree with your point and doubt anyway. The large majority of "father wrongs" are invented — even unconsciously: it's that natural for them — by females who have discarded them (finding a more useful tool or replacing with a less boring equally useful tool).
/r/TheRedPill18/03/18 11:27 PM
1

They self-deceive like crazy. If you began to love her (as she tells you, and herself, is her wish) you'd see her vanish in the blinking of an eye.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/18 10:15 PM
3

Well this post is surely commendable in its intentions and not only content. However, "asking yourself" is something normies won't do. Or they will, but they'll invariably feed their ego (consciousness you call it) the sugar-coated petty and pretty lies it never stops asking to be fed. (The kind of petty and pretty lies which perish at Chateau Heartiste). So, while it is a commendable post, it will hardly help anyone, because psychological progress, and the attributes needed to even kick it off …
/r/TheRedPill27/02/18 05:14 PM
1

Yes. THEN the day must come, you must make it come, you say: now I must stop being angry, and accept irrationality. But taking it easy from step one? Whew.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/18 11:47 AM
1

(Dostoevsky said some men live under an irresistible pull of sufferance — they can't help but walk towards it. Self integration is the way to go only when the panoply of mainstream culture provided, and mental self-deceptive structures people develop as they grow, fail. If no defence mechanism aboout red, and darker still pills, is left available to the person, then it's time to stare into the (inner) abyss — even though it'll look back. You enter your less conscious parts of the mind... they co…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/18 11:46 AM
3

She told me how the cheating really went down, apparently she forgot the excuses she gave me 4 years ago. They forgot after 4 seconds, hours or days, averagely. Go figure 4 years afterwards.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/18 03:49 PM
2

It defines stupidity, alongside hypergamy, I would say.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/18 03:34 PM
1

They ask for advice, and then deny the truth. Usually this happens with the most stark of truths rather than subtle discussion points Well, it's triggered by a drive to avoid what imposes fear (as opposed to the usual ego vanity that makes people behave how you describe them to in every discussion, but I don't think governs many TRP commenters' actions). The bigger the point, the bigger the fear, so, yes, you won't behold spectacles of cowardice in front of fine points usually.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/18 03:33 PM
1

Because you don't have options. If you had a lot of options and were sifting through the trash looking for gold, you'd behave the same. Or you should. Come on, why this one though? Even mean with many many options can act decently — and a fair % try to, unlike women.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/18 03:31 PM
2

I mean... WHY? Why is the least welcome question by nearly all humans — let alone hens. Why ask a why of a hen. There is an alternate route you can take. Exit the game and live with yourself, or keep partaking in the game but see it as a game played in one-vs-all mode, where what they seek is whatever their egos identify as winning, and not you (don't even mention your inner self). Just that. Consider also that your average simpleton (as well as your median female) found their judgments (and how…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/18 03:29 PM
2

This is a comment I subscribe to, less for the fact you seem to believe females (and outer-directed humans generically) respect more who respects them best. No, the only thing they respect is socially-sanctioned worth, power in other words. It's not respect that begets respect. Then, in some other way, it is. The led (who are led because they'd be too afraid of leading themselves) both admire and resent their leaders. So what you say is also true, just half-true. That's why you see mobs, all thr…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/18 02:42 PM
3

Yeah, but their sublime prowess in self-deception (believing they want what they have, and don't want what they don't have), and the unlimited amount of available betas, make their post-wall existence less lone and sour that it should be for the sake of fairness. Sadly.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/18 02:31 PM
1

On the outside, though, women should be held responsible for their actions. They should be shunned, judged, disliked, and punished for being cruel Well, I was assaulted here by someone for a comment on psychological violence, the assault being to the tune of "violence is only physical", lol. As long as the whole of mankind is, and thereby behaves, as mostly-bodies if not only-bodies, and not more as psychic subjects, you can expect all the focus to be on shaming the violence everyone can see, wh…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/18 02:29 PM
1

They are, exactly, biological robots. So it makes sense to be angry at destiny, nature — you choose the name — for making them the way they are (and instilling in our inward a desire to receive non-superficial companionship from them), but not to be angry at the biological robot itself. There's a dramatic gap between the level of self-awareness, or psychological development, of the more evolved men and even the more evolved women. They basically lack any self-consciousness, that is, a mental aut…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/18 02:24 PM
1

Elaborate? What interest can a mother have in manipulating her offspring? Manipulating into what?
/r/TheRedPill24/02/18 02:11 PM
4

As Jung said — at the female's core is an animus, not an anima... And men who are madly in love project their soft core (anima) onto the woman, imagining her core is of the same nature as their own.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/18 02:09 PM
2

8,000 years ago, this was not the case. No one would WANT her after she had 2-3 dongs in her guts, or even one kid. And if she left, he'd beat her to death and the entire villiage would help him. Lol — you seem to exhibit some nostalgia of those times of nobility...
/r/TheRedPill24/02/18 02:06 PM
1

It's not reasonless to be angry over nature. Maybe it is to be angry over any specific's woman, but not about the overall thing.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/18 02:05 PM
14

which is how your average Fakebook/Instalie female conducts her life — by the way. As many split selves as the people they deal with, and constant self-denial. However, I agree that it is pitiable, and, for men, who can avoid it, to be avoided.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/18 01:54 PM
1

(You can think, but do not say ".... because I keep my word and you likely won't") Well, that's the main point... (You think you pine for what you are asking — but you only pine for a demonstration that you have the power to have me consent to your request. Soon as I consent, your lack of real interest on the request's object will show.)
/r/TheRedPill22/02/18 10:48 AM
1

You mean Higher-ups maybe? He's saying what he thinks, and you are verbally abusing him for no apparent reason than 1) Your mood drives you to do it 2) You feel you are allowed to do it 3) Somebody stating things in disagreement with you offends your sense of power Not funny, not sightly, not constructive — and it shouldn't be left here for other people to read. Don't even know how many subreddit (and civility) rules it breaches.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/18 10:39 AM
1

Don't project your malaise onto other people. One could respond to that by "don't project your illusory optimism onto other people." All such injunctions thrown at others out of self-interest, as a reaction because something somebody says went against your personal principle of pleasure aren't specially meaningful — why blame others for doing what yourself do, just in a way that doesn't fit your self interest? Live and let live. Project and let project.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/18 10:34 AM
2

Yes, OP pertains more to the black pill, and white pill, and not so much to the red pill. It's stairs. If you find peace and satisfaction on a step, you keep there. If you still have ghosts spooking you behind your back, you keep trying to climb — for climbing is what it is.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/18 10:32 AM
2

Many things follow this same mechanic — they are pined for only by those who find themselves lacking them. Be it fame, money, physical beauty. If someone has the burden of self-awareness, and some reality-awareness cast upon them, the more they have, the more they'll see it's not what those who don't have it believe it is, that is, a way to happiness.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/18 10:28 AM
2

He means: in the game of push and pull (give signals of interest, but not so much), stay a step behind her. Give your, for example, 3rd sign of interest only once she has given her 3rd or even 4th. Maintain the impression that you are the prize.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/18 10:26 AM
1

Women don't believe a word you say anywa An additional reason for that is: everyone has the mechanism of projection, and women, as averagely less self-aware minds, project even more (far more). Thereupon, they don't believe any of your words because, as you said, a) Your words and thoughts are not what about you drew them to you and also b) they don't believe any of their own words (projecting this feeling onto you)
/r/TheRedPill22/02/18 10:24 AM
13

I think you are talking of impulse/will conflict, rather than exactly cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance regards held convictions and notions, not conflicting drives and desires. That aside, it's an agreeable post, and the closing on psychological inertia is a finely stated point. (Psychological inertia can be seen as the opposite of open-mindedness.)
/r/TheRedPill21/02/18 02:30 PM
89

The last remark is quite subtle. Is there anything females loathe as their real self? Doubtfully. But I "unfollow-through" whenever I want, and the answer to a possible Shit Test Attack is shrugging. So long as you don't care for her more than she does for you, anything will go.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 06:27 PM
13

Maybe one more fact to accept is that "relinquishing frame" is, also, "not your fault," and it is "your biology." So it's biology, on both parts, that drives things onto the decline, and not some "fault." You can choose to pretend more, and get more vajinal rewards, but then again, sometimes your internal clock will reject this and will to go the other way — with the outcomes we know. It's just the jungle, with language and hopes to complicate it. quote She has suddenly brought in feminist views…
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 06:24 PM
1

Well, yeah. Anything, such as for instance envy, that deflates the view of the self is cooped into the unconscious. That's a sure one.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 11:10 AM
1

Self-interest if the first biological, and sociological, motivator. No changing that.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 11:09 AM
4

Where "worth" = "profitable for them on some personal level".
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 11:05 AM
1

That's a never-missing feature of every one of their "memories".
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 11:00 AM
2

are you talking about hearing, palate, eye-sight? If so, I fully agree. It's emotional/nervous sensitivity that I see as only psychological (and I thought that was the topic in question).
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 10:57 AM
2

Each of that is a sensitivity. Palate (taste) is one. Hearing is another. Eye-sight. Then there's what we call "sensitivity" generically, which is, basically, the susceptivity of the nervous system. This one is a psychological trait (unlike eye-sight, hearing, ...). Women cluster in the median third of the Bell Curve. Only men are found at both ends.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 10:45 AM
1

That is off-topic, derailed (meaning my comment gave you emotional suffering and you couldn't manage it. Why so?) and an ad-hominen. Or should I just say: womanly? (You also told us you are a woman in your first comment, which users here are invited not to).
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 10:41 AM
1

Now, all I can wish is that, along with hasting to downvote my reply and telling me a good number of times how confused I am, you'd actually read what I posted. Or become aware of the presence of masks put on egos — which make appearances, and real intentions, different from each other if not opposite to each other. The equivalence is real, and it's in the purpose. The purpose is power. Behind the mask, the dominant and the domineering are the same person. It's differently honed and skilfully cr…
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 10:39 AM
0

This is excellent. When I called manipulation "psychological violence", some far-sighted, enlightened sage on one of these comments sections contended that "there is no psychological violence, violence is only physical," lol. The simple fact is, at the present stage of evolution, a wide majority of humans recoil from physical violence. But violence is still the point (since power is, and organisms with different genes are set to battle versus one another in the theatre of natural selection). So …
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 10:23 AM
1

Even millions of people can be controlled at once, with the right devices. What is power — apart from control, that the controlled will never see as control, or rear against? The point is in having no feelings for the controlled — except maybe hidden contempt. So: you can't control the people you love.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 10:14 AM
0

Will you fell better if you restrain yourself from getting as emotionally involved as you naturally would, and from letting your guard down as you naturally desire to, and they don't go away? Acting against you nature will damage your well-being. Will it more or less than having them turn their back on you and leave? You are to choose between two kinds of pains, not between a wrong and a pristine, joyful roads. See which fits you best, but every lunch has its price.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 10:12 AM
2

How to do that which works? Understand human psychology — and female psychology. Have no emotions tying you with them on a level of any depth.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 10:07 AM
1

The difference between being dominant and domineering is in how astutely you manage the relation (I am not calling it a relationship, but a relation). If you are domineering the right way, you'll be reckoned as well-meaning and dominant. If you are domineering the wrong way, you'll be judged as domineering. (It's like "selfish". Selfishness that doesn't work will be seen as selfishness. That which works, as beneffective behaviour.)
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 10:06 AM
-8

If you don't want to be cheated sexually, have a sexually open relationship (which, by the way, will make her much less prone to experiencing sex on the side).
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 09:57 AM
3

You speak of artless, in-the-open controlling pressures. Greene's books on the laws of power (and seduction: he has 2 books), both much recommended around here, deal with effective control (cunning, indirect, aimed at the controlled's subconscious), the only type that, to a degree, works. And trust me, that one works.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 09:53 AM
3

Like there is an IQ population distribution (represented by a Bell Curve), so there is a Bell Curve for every other trait. You could talk of Honesty Quotient, Pretending Quotient (where women would be one standard deviation over men on average), ... and of course Sensitivity Quotient.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 09:49 AM
1

It can still be "invalid", on a state-by-state basis. You have no idea the winding and deviousness they'll go to still punish you for having married. Just no marriage is the way to go.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/18 05:46 PM
1

It's what I said. Not easy to not feel dejected about it...
/r/TheRedPill19/02/18 04:55 PM
1

Well about men instincts. You know... lack of options, or more bluntly, a life of being turned down, are quite effective at checking such instincts. Men without options don't conduct themselves with more dignity than wall-women in the sexual marketplace. They match each other, and spread tokens of how they love love love each other on their social media. So unfortunately I see no women deserving of a lorn post-wall life lacking a subservient bill-footing Fakebook-pic-smiling "husband".
/r/TheRedPill19/02/18 04:53 PM
2

Very right! However, have you ever been in the shoes of "her strong-willed father"? It's exhausting work — think, to begin with, of the hundreds topics you can't broach with her, because reasonably touching on any would imply telling one of the huge troops of Santa Clauses societal programming (and the reality-avoidance connate to feeble female egos) hate to heart don't exist. You have to hide from her 80%, if not more, of your own emotions and things you know about human nature and society. You…
/r/TheRedPill19/02/18 04:50 PM
3

A woman's nature is to follow his guy. If she feels that he is not stable enough, she has to leave the boat. Otherwise she will drawn with him too. True. But makes me wonder what's their purpose beyond functioning as 2-legged loitering vaginas. The more I observe, the more I wonder.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/18 08:36 PM
26

but also because there was no man in her fucking life who has the balls to tell her that she truly is nothing and can't expect more from the other than she is herself. Lol. If she meets only one such man, she'll easily label him as deranged, and go ahead on her journey of thoughtless vanity. You're underestimating their narcissism and reality-repression talents. They draw their self-opinion from either compensatory fantasy, or herd validation, nothing else to draw on for them.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/18 08:26 PM
2

OP at the end of the day it's just chemicals in your fucking brain, I refuse to take any medication. Isn't "it's chemicals in the brain" a reason to take medications, and get the chemicals a little better? I refused to do it for years; tried of late, and it helps a bit. Medications won't solve existential depression, but they palliate it well.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/18 12:29 PM
2

Yeah, if at the core of my mind is a will to feel powerful and ego-massaged, an inferior female will be the ideal fit. I just don't have that luck.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/18 05:09 AM
13

even saying a word like "valedictorian" in female company may cost you a chance to reproduce. Lol
/r/TheRedPill17/02/18 05:05 AM
2

It's more nuanced. Her (more or less conscious) mind assigns you a score. Some things up your score, others lower it. "Deep conversation" lowers it. If you are at 100, and 70 is the baseline for her to have intercourse with you, then you can afford throwing away some of your score with some depth and meaningful talk. Doesn't mean it's not score-lowering.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/18 05:04 AM
1

She'll BEAR it, wishing it's over soon, if it comes from Chad ;). Just bear it.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/18 05:02 AM
1

Or: never tell people what they can't understand (try to talk them about what they can't understand) if you want them well-disposed toward you. Or: remember that the battleground is her unconscious — where drivers are primal and millennia-evolved. It's even pre-verbal. Words are needed for more civilized, complicated enterprises, and are harmful whenever not needed.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/18 04:58 AM
2

When you free yourself from the chains of feminism, ie believing that women are as capable as men, is that your anger will subside into pity and understanding of the reality as it is. Self-pity too, if you reflect on the impossibility of having a peer as your life mate and don't look for distractions, or missions, actively enough.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/18 04:53 AM
-1

You conflate seduction (of which playful "fighting" and play are part) with innocent, second-thoughts free, child games. They are similar, but diverse.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/18 11:50 AM
3

Girls will flock to whoever gives off the more POWERFUL energy. Not the more positive energy. My cousin bangs girls left and right and his energy is absolute positive. Mine in counter is just powerful energy. I'll laugh a little but most of the time I just don't care and girls seem to notice this. When it reaches the extent as in your case... it's no longer mate-assessment, it is masochism. (Evolutionarily understandable: if your sex has to undergo being ravaged by males for millennia, it's adap…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/18 11:48 AM
1

he confronted her Big mistake. If he's your friend, make sure he understood the lesson, and won't trip again in the future (not in the same way at least).
/r/TheRedPill08/02/18 01:39 PM
4

/u/TheRedPike timeout /u/mml76gs and /u/Lavlamp for 2 weeks. Do you ask that whenever a 31-upvotes comment doesn't get your liking, or what.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/18 01:34 PM
-1

She'll come to you anyway if you show a defiant, don't give a fuck at all personality. You can accommodate, and you can strike, so long as you don't need her more than she does you, she'll come. No obligation to be diplomatic, some of life spice is in not being so. Some fierce dialectic can even arouse her to an acme, also. Anyway, "You are an option". No matter if she backfires, and no matter the downvotes.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/18 01:30 PM
2

They have reptilian communicative inclinations on average. As always, you may want to sieve out the manically serpentine, and only deal the slightly indirect/cunning. (Specially if you want more than casual bonking).
/r/TheRedPill08/02/18 01:26 PM
2

Yes. As additions, we can say that 1) Not so many other really love their sons 2) In the midst of what Rollo Tomassi terms "a surrender of the soul", some very rare ones can give you unconditional, optimal-mother love. But it will be minutes. Maybe a hour. Maybe a few hours scattered over some months' time. And then it will crushing to see it gone to never be reachable again. Better, for the mind's safety and sanity, to never experience that — because the awakening is much too scathing.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/18 01:17 PM
1

He did, and landed in jail and almost got killed. Oh! Care to tell me more (a bit curious I admit)?
/r/TheRedPill08/02/18 01:14 PM
2

I fully admit I am a female validation addict. That's how we cope with the fact we can't get our dreamer-of unicorn, I guess. For me, it is. ** As to the "destructive" outcomes, yes, every addiction generates a sucking spiral within one's mind... trying to suck one into the spiral's eye. Then we try to grab her, and bring her with us into the spiral. Then they leave. Then we are left amidst the mad whirlwind, and abandoned. And it's a very steep way to get outside there, back to peace of mind. M…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/18 01:13 PM
15

I think the guy will understand better the point you make if you add: women are psychological (and not only) parasites. They don't purpose on playing with you as team mates striving for victory. They purpose on standing on the side, watching the game, waiting to know who won it, and then associating themselves with him. They want to do no work. They want to have no responsibility.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 10:42 PM
-13

Simple reply: "You haven't earned being more than an option so far."
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 10:39 PM
3

She'll like you even more after being told that.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 10:36 PM
1

If not N64's, GameCube's. Or Commodore 64. lol
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 10:33 PM
1

Those are swindlers, not real PUAs.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 10:31 PM
1

So he bought into that pua stuff, helped him get druggies, normal women saw him as fake, because thats what he really was. OK, but wasn't it still much better than nothing? It's not about turning average guys into ladykillers, but about finding a way, as an average guy, to: 1) Live some "ladykiller" time of thrills 2) Land, if he so wishes, a decent LTR that game-unaware people on his same level in all other things will probably not land.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 10:30 PM
2

You are right. PUAs are jaded, life-frustrated intellectual guys who try to get some revenge from a sense of emptiness in life that haunts and harms them. Winning women over, and dominating them psychologically, is a meager palliative to what we may call existential depression. I said "they" but I should have said "we" because I am one of them. You are right; it's about the game. It has the same soothing action as, say, one or two glasses of strong wine.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 10:26 PM
1

are you saying DAUGHTERS shit test their fathers? Lol, unbelievable.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 09:49 PM
1

A few of them can have some genuine feelings. Not deep ones, but genuine, to a degree, yes. Usually and mostly, it's mere tool-using.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 09:48 PM
2

As luck has it, I chance on such a comment 2 or 3 days after watching the movie "Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring". That it a very deep and complicated question. When you say peace, it relates to where in the film they say "It's easy to kill others [the hypergamic woman who in the storyline leaves the man] what's not easy is to kill yourself. That "peace" looks like a twin of death — it's the least resort to be hoped for for one's life, and anyone else's (but if it's the only one left,…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 09:44 PM
2

I agree, that's the impression he gives off there. But it's a good thing to be aware of one's own mistakes, and leave them behind.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 09:38 PM
1

(So my comment stands, with "by nature" substituted for "amoral".
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 06:03 PM
1

Lol, would YOU have made that kind of comments when you were her age, in a situation like that? I wouldn't have. And yes, it's about one's nature and not "morals". Those are a cloak, and are learned later on in life.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 06:03 PM
1

Are you considering LTRs or fuck buddies/lays? For 1), I'd screen out anyone who does any silly things on FB (as long as you want something more than a conglomerate of flesh with a vagina) for 2) their social media doesn't matter
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 02:45 PM
1

Women who procreate also see a massive decline in breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and cervical cancer. Are you sure that is not "women who have sex regularly"?
/r/TheRedPill07/02/18 04:11 AM
-2

I'd still say "driven," but you may be right.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 10:47 PM
51

Note: when we were hooking up she smiled and said "guy A is going to be so pissed" She laughs (girls are mostly amoral) That's far beyond "amoral". They are psychologically violent. It's their brand of violence.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 10:09 PM
1

I guess I admire the motivation behind writing what you wrote for publication here, OP. You "commend" both wanting or not wanting to extend one's genetic strand into time, but you are clearly pro-reproduction. I'd say you "respect" the no-reproduction life planning, and commend the other one. (I agree with you, but this is beyond the point.)
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 08:55 PM
-1

even if she denies it) biologically be compelled to have children How did this came into your mind? There's a fair amount of women who do not want progeny.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 08:51 PM
3

That's what BlackDragon calls Alphas 1.0. (The Alpha 2.0 being the completely red-pilled, woman-independent, oneitis-proof, drama-intolerant alpha). Alpha 1.0's can easily be more headstrong, and have more psychic energy (and invest more of it on their woman of choice) — so they may wall-crash into more painful and scar-leaving heart-breaks than Betas.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 08:48 PM
1

Also, their childlike narcissistic mindset (encapsulating their mind into a lose-or-win outlook on any bit of life) will make unable to detach themselves from the relationship provided you make sure it looks to them that it ended (or momentarily went into a halt) because you, not she, resolved it had to. It's like when you play some game with a little baby — if you wanna stop playing without hearing the baby crying, you have to let him/her win the final game. Of course, finding this psychologica…
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 08:45 PM
2

His later Back to Blood is all about hypergamy too. Charlotte Simmons is more literarily refined and deep, Back to Blood is more "paperback". Both are masterpieces and feature as main personage an hypergamic woman who does some good climbing up.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 08:38 PM
1

Exactly what I said. It's part of the normie-hen preening ABC — to word it kindly. They can go no further than hen-see-hen-do, and of course it can't be but silliness. [Made no mistake: serious pics of real travels shared not to strut like peahens are totally legit. But that's not the case of females... "Travel" was in origin a male sort of adventure, and a genuine experience made for the travel itself. Social media & hen-minds have turned it into an item of mode: like clothes and dresses, a new…
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 11:09 AM
11

This post brought to my mind Tom Wolfe's masterpiece, I am Charlotte Simmons. A matchless novel on hypergamy, female no-exception feral (and socio-fake) nature, and the red pill altogether.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 11:05 AM
45

OP, there's a film (a great one) where they say: there'd be no flowers in spring without rain in winter. Why didn’t I discover this shit earlier ? Fuck. So, no. It would be not profitable and preferable to "start learned". Trials and tribulations are a stage of life, an absolutely needed one. TLDR Fixed version: It's good I suffered, it's the right "groundwork" for following learning. Now I wanna learn as much as I can — and never let oneitis erase from my knowledge from my mind.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 11:02 AM
2

I'd wipe her off my mind if I were you. Then, if you wanna enter a seduction game and play a battle of tantalize-and-deny ("seduction"), just know it's never going to end. It's not like you win a few rounds and it ends, with these personalities. It will just never end. They like the battle (and being "overpowered" in the battle), they don't like you beyond your performance as a player. I just come from a like scenario: developed oneitis, paid for it, and am in the way to recovering.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 08:16 PM
8

If its full of travel photos and activities and friends, she has some substance Oh yes. Lotta substance in that.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 02:59 PM
0

In fact the "talk" is instrumental to the fuck/reproduction/having a housekeeper. That was the natural order of things. If you try to make serious talk of the "talk", women will leave / their liking gauge will go a notch down.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 02:58 PM
1

Truth is never a viable truth. Outspoken truth is always the worst path. I don't see the OP taking glee in it. It's simply as it is, you can't change the game.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 07:05 AM
1

It was. See how many missed it (that's when you know sarcasm has hit the spot).
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 06:07 AM
1

No it's the most ironical... / sarcastic
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 06:05 AM
1

The (very hateful) "hate the messenger" thing is needed by their minds. After all, they gonna delegitimize what you told them, and can't do this by analyzing it (they'd notice it's true). So their mind treats itself to this simple trick: "Who said X is evil and wants to hurt me -> I don't need to think X could be true, it was said to hurt me".
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 05:59 AM
3

Women self-lie all the time about what offends them, turns them on in a fuckmate/mate, ... Never take their advice on such issues. They'll tell you everything wrong, though they do it in good faith.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 05:20 AM
8

Even her being offended over "hoe" was a shit test, you missed that part. If only you nexted her at that point, that would probably set things straight. The mix of ignoring you + following you on IG was either another shit test (which you could have passed by mostly ignoring her, at least for a few weeks) or a malicious lure-and-retreat play (typical of women, it gives them a sense of power).
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 05:12 AM
1

Ignore (in all respects) for at least a few months. That's the only way conducive to a possibility her interest in you relives.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 05:06 AM
1

you shouldn't desire them; the two of you wouldn't get along, anyway. They would appear to be the entirely frivolous strain of creaturehood, without any real, substantive quality to their constitution, OP was about bedding them, so your point, valid though it is (and it is absolutely so), doesn't really disprove what he wrote. But you said you "are a woman" — proving at once female lack of inclination to 1) reading rules (subreddit rules, in this case) 2) actually reading what they are going to …
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 04:55 AM
-4

With a difference: there's a certain % of the male camp that breaks this rule. Nobody does on the female camp.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/18 08:43 PM
11

Ask any female a question of any depth and they'll run off, "creeped out". Lolz They can be intelligent, but not intellectual.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/18 08:43 PM
3

Yes, but there is a difference in kind (partial) and degree. "Guys" may get an addiction like the female's to Fakebook/Instalie shallo-validation to having other males who obey him. It will be as addictive as the female's, as unconscious, and rationalized in equally unworthy ways whenever needed. Usually, they'll be at the helm in organizations. They are addicted to giving orders and having them acted on without question by stools. But they are a far lower % of males than the vanity-addicted fem…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/18 05:52 PM
18

Here is the problem with women: they are more emotional than men, we all know that meaning that they feel their emotions more than us and, therefore, have more trouble going against their emotion. Don't be angry, is their nature. They are more emotion-driven, too. To be emotional and to be emotion-driven is not to be conflated. A share of men are less emotional than females. But a % of them are more, and in a deeper way, emotional than females (this is why break-ups and turn-abouts wound a certa…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/18 05:45 PM
5

Half true, half untrue. To see what gains you the "respect of society and your peers as a male" look no further than Greene's The 48 Laws of Power. It's a blend of adeptly dosed alternated and calibrated honesty, integrity, truthfulness, and their opposites. Your points on the womanhood, I agree on every one. Quoting from a blog: Women are not integral or integrated. They are segmented, like an orange. Their ego is one thing among certain peers, and another thing in different circumstances. They…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/18 05:26 PM
2

This posts sounds like: don't be a female. High-value, fundamental advice if you ask me.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/18 05:23 PM
2

There's plenty of stuff on this sub that is horseshit, not even gonna bother arguing about that. Too many people allowed to start threads, just, I guess, to keep the subreddit "alive". This is at loggerheads with the need to have only high-quality, theoretical-level material published. (Hence, the Right Bar.)
/r/TheRedPill04/02/18 01:15 PM
1

It's easy to observe it with time and experience. A read I can suggest is "Rotating Polyandry & its Enforcers" by F. Roger Devlin
/r/TheRedPill04/02/18 12:57 AM
1

Pre marriage contract signing time is the time they give off the most IOIs to the most men, least for the very few cases they are seriously into the soon-to-be "hubbie".
/r/TheRedPill04/02/18 12:32 AM
2

I wonder why. Maybe you are not good at exhibiting a touch of sale-is-assumed cockiness and give them the bits of SIMPLE humour and witticism they want, all while convincing them that it's not your, but rather their chance not to miss. It's way tougher to make their Fuck Yes extend in time than to fire it up at the startm flighty beings that they are.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/18 12:31 AM
2

A little-discussed bit of female courage in such tight spots (when they have cheated male A, who they like more than B, with male B): they'll convince male A that they, really, really, didn't want to do it, and, somehow somehow, all the mischief was made by B, and B is to be held responsible for the screw she had with B. Of course, male A usually likes to believe this true (we all like to believe true what makes us feel better), and then B is in danger, while the scheming, double-faced slut is a…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/18 12:27 AM
1

but if this was always dominant then I'm just being a dick. Ooops. I have to work on this.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 08:14 PM
1

Ooops :) It wasn't about getting a beta hubbie for her, obviously. She wanted to be bonked. But won't let anybody bonk her in body without previous mind-bonking.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 08:11 PM
2

I said it too (As for sex, some very indirect hints, allowing her full plausible deniability, won't harm the date (they probably will boost it!) Don't forget to fine-tune the whole thing to the girl's mental type. Some need far more hypocrisy (they are less mature, in short), some need more boldness. As you said, ALL need some subtle hints.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 08:10 PM
1

They surely understand socially-encouraged culturally-encouraged prostitution less than their married equivalents. So, less smart for sure, when it comes to prostitution smarts at least.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 04:04 PM
1

Nothing that female did had nothing to do with extracting resources.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 04:03 PM
1

Dario Nardi ran experiments where through a modern equivalent of applied electrodes they watched what went on the various parts of the brain while people dated. The forbidden topics to bring up on early dates are: Religion, Politics, Sex, Death (diseases you may have). Remember when people "fall in love" for you, or even give you sex for a night, they do it in return for pleasure you do them. People don't want to have their beliefs scrutinized: they don't want to spend the night with you diving …
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 04:01 PM
7

somebody make the comment above a sticky.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 03:56 PM
2

. Eventually she replied and accused me of having issues. She said I was projecting my problems onto her and it was making her feel awkward. I asked her to explain. She said she did not have time. Accusing you of projecting is an exemplary sample of projection. All human project (anything that makes them feel low-value, ashamed, worthless, at fault, ...). Females are a tall step above males and men in the projection scale. Females of that kind are a tall notch above normal females in the project…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 03:56 PM
2

Very important point. Our existence witnesses an endless string of tough wins achieved by all our forebears. One shouldn't take it easy to be the first loser, and wanton away all their "work".
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 03:51 PM
2

Mocking the hamster (in a playful, not -- god Forbid -- reasoned and philosophical way) vs ignoring the hamster. Both work, but I prefer the first way. It creates more attraction, yet more frustration too. If overdone, she'll start hating you. So, dose both carefully: ignoring, and dismissing with irony.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 03:49 PM
2

No. If what you are promoting here is bare sincerity and bare-mindedness to her, it is a way of conducting oneself that will always, always receive a penalty. We could belabor this point, and detail what penalty retribute what sincerity (by relationship type, woman type, man type, ...), but the underlying principle stays true at any time. The "humble/assertive" pair follows the nearly universal rule as to female liking in reality and in female speech, that is, they are each other's opposites. Fe…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 03:48 PM
5

The main "underlying factor" is: time elapsed + distance. We must not forget that even with no mistakes made, no betatude shown, and so on, the female attraction undergoes a cycle, a cycle whose "running" is (surprisingly) quite unconscious in the female's mind, and whose duration is brief. With distance, the cycle's end is reached far more quickly. The "cycle" follows the blueprint of the evolutionary "be impregnated -> keep him around insofar as he's needed because you haven't recovered from t…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 03:41 PM
3

Getting them to come to you instead of you to them sounds unfeasible to me. You mean getting them to take the first step and break the ice, or getting them to act proactively AFTER you kicked off things and broke the ice? It's different. The second of those two things isn't impossible to achieve — just be aloof, keep a veil of mystery on your figure and behaviour, and be spinning multiple plates. Be too busy to proactively often be the first to contact them / reply their communications quickly, …
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 03:06 AM
19

As of now, I can already sense her attraction dropping to a mere 5/10. Completely different tone, unenthusiastic about my return, and not flirty/sexual as before. OK, but it's because you acted like a man, not like a beta. Not everything that makes her attraction lapse must be a mistake to regret. I think you did it all right (since you say you wanted an LTR with her, and not a fuck-buddy relationship). She was overly confrontational, as if she has a conscious or unconscious eagerness to drive a…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 03:00 AM
29

The worst is when a teacher turns it into an argument and tries to convince the kid that they're actually nice. "I'm not mean! I just read a book to you!" The kid doesn't care and won't be convinced, they're living in the moment. This is a xerox of women psychological make-up. If shit-tested: never complain, never explain. Both things are at best ineffective, at worse counterproductive.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 02:49 AM
1

She either is an unhealthily sexually repressed virgin — or all your worries and suspicions are 99% true. (Even if she were a repressed virgin, she shouldn't be acting this way if she was attracted by Peter as she should.)
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 02:45 AM
12

Loving a girl is an addictive drug and withdrawal is extremely painful. It is a inherent vulnerability. Oneitis is a symptom that you have done something wrong. It actually rewires part of the brain (like heroine). Re-collecting the previous mental state is than a very uphill battle. The effect takes place in men brains, not in women brains (in any event, there's a disproportionate majority of affected men). . Your ex is not a bitch, especially cruel, heartless, or different in any way from ever…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/18 02:36 AM
2

(Just like no woman will tell you "It arouses me to be pulled up and down rudely" but they'll all tell they are looking for a "good, sensitive, hard-working, kind man".) They can't "know" they want anything society doesn't highlight as right to want. (I hate play-acting, so it bothers me, but there's no changing this; many things will always be said counter to how they are.)
/r/TheRedPill02/02/18 04:50 PM
2

There's always the unconscious-conscious opposites game. I mean, the more everybody minds a matter, the more sincerity about it would lead to clashes breaking civil coexistence down, so the more it must be left unsaid. Then, that's not enough any more. Minds feel better (= there is more social peace) if the very opposite of anything known as true deep-down but desired to be forgotten is stated. Usually, stated in an iterative/obsessive way ('coz the unconscious keeps knowing the opposite truth, …
/r/TheRedPill02/02/18 04:48 PM
1

Yes, inasmuch as I remember the posting rules, this is not a valid thread. Nevertheless, I can't help but wish you the best of luck, man. I think post-30 is when you start getting the hang of "what goes on", specially if your life is bumpy enough of a ride (otherwise, blissful ignorance may be your cocoon for life). Read in full the "Theory reading" and "Reference" linked material on this reddit, keep at bay idealistic illusions and oneitis, and, again, good luck. (You may start a blog to reliev…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 11:22 PM
1

I see you have learned to be fearless and suppress the instinct to hesitate. That's half of the pill. As you grow into a red-pill-wise man keep in mind that, basically, bare, forthright spoken truth is never allowed in talking with females you have in your sexual crosshairs. "Is never allowed," isn't right either. I should have said: it never comes without a price. Think of a woman (in a sexual/romantic interaction, where the divide between "sexual" and "romantic" is far thinner than BP teaches …
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 09:34 PM
82

Females don't want to be treated the way they say, but the way they deserve. The female is a paragon of the slave mindset. Treated like a peer (let alone set above you), she will (unconsciously) see the rapport terms as inappropriate and work towards disrupting it — by spurring you to abase her (shit tests) or rejecting/leaving you (or staying with you materially, if other aims make it profitable for her, but not mentally). The ultimate explanation to this is: 1) freedom is responsibility. Wanti…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 05:17 PM
9

You take it from a bit too... rueful a angle, though. (I agree that book is a top-level masterwork.) The point is, I think: life isn't what our will-to-power, desire to feel important, and "absolute", would have life be. This said, it's still a table, with various foods on it — surely, each with a price, none free, and the most appetizing priced higher without exception. As long as you can take some pleasure in eating, it makes sense and it is not "nothing".
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 03:42 PM
4

The next morning I get a text from her, informing me that her ex had sent her a Facebook friend request. (Yeah, right. Big coincidence. Not!) It is an obvious and pathetic lie and shit test, designed to make me jealous. I respond: "Cool. So what's he up to?" No response for the rest of the day, although she did read the text. Well, you got some elementary school grade shit test and power play game from her there. Too easy to not pass. There are far thornier spots they can put you in — especially…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 03:35 PM
12

That "5 hours" touch had me in stitches, frankly.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 01:19 PM
2

Or none that you could see. We owe it to ourselves to keep such a doubt alive, whenever something looks pointless to us. It's a great way to grow. "Is there nothing, or nothing that I see?"
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 11:48 AM
2

That's not alone owing to their wanting to be the one party who's striking a great deal (your value > hers). It's also because they are psychologically groundless, butterfly-like, fearful of anything really anything with the smell of personal agency/responsibility on it. You will notice how there's no way they say "I don't want", it will always be "I can't". And then, depending on how many times you inquire, false, absolutely disjointed explanations and reasons will be given as the backing of th…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 11:47 AM
2

It must have, or have had, some evolutionary purpose to it. Otherwise, why so common and deeply entrenched in the male mind. (Maybe to make the male put some of his efforts in the nurture of the offspring — which, had he no "feelings" for the female, he'd have a certain proneness to even slaying, as observation of primates shows?)
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 11:42 AM
2

You know "Satan" was a metaphor for human nature, I'm sure.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 11:40 AM
3

There is a similar storytelling element central to Mizoguchi's film Ugetsu Monogatari (sourced from a 16th-century Japanese legend, no less). The enchanting female, and the honeymoon days of bliss enjoyed with her turn out to be phantoms (and when he is back to the wife he left, he happily finds her where he'd had left her. But the next morning she isn't there. He goes outdoors, asks people about his wife, and learns it's some time she is dead (so the one he found on returning home was another i…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 11:39 AM
3

I think what he had in mind is: telling the truth to yourself sets you free. Even to that, it would be fair to counter that yes, it does, but only the few people who can bear it, 'cause, as Jung said, no truth is as mind-shaking as that about ourselves. (And that's why self-awareness is unreachable, and avoided like the plague, by females.)
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 10:55 AM
1

Well, in Bell Curve terms, female are a full SD below males in physical strength and, not coincidentally, a full SD above males in deception (and its twin, self-deception). Lies and self-lies were the counter to clouts and blows. Then civilization progressed. For it to progress, two keystones were sexual repression and physical violence repression. Humans were at that point "evolved enough" to live without coupling and brawling like the other animals. They are now not evolved enough to suffer fr…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 10:53 AM
2

Wu just runs a show. When the learner is ready, the teacher shows up. It applies also the other way around, with fools. They always find who fools them.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/18 07:54 PM
1

From time to time they'll need to tell friends or boyfriends "I was once raped". That's how self-deception obtains validation. That they aren't "accusing", I clearly stated. That they are mindless beings who don't tolerate finding themselves in front of a mirror where their identity is there to be seen, I clearly stated as well.
/r/MGTOW31/01/18 07:35 PM
1

Ok, I'll give you 3 links 1) https://therationalmale.com/2015/01/13/acing-the-test/ (more concrete in orientation) 2 and 3) https://illimitablemen.com/2014/12/14/the-shit-test-encyclopedia/ https://illimitablemen.com/tag/shit-tests/ more philosophical/subtle discussion, but invaluable as well. 2) and 3) also touch on shit testing being a male-male (and female-female) practice too. A single male "friend", or a group where you are a newcomer trying to be accepted and become "one of them" will shit…
/r/askTRP31/01/18 03:32 PM
1

Yes it would, but English isn't my primary tongue. And anyway... if you ask for confirmation, you probably are under 30 / never married. These are things that creep into couple life over 30, mostly, and for regularly married people. It's just a subroutine of the main algorithm: extract as many resources as possible from him.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/18 03:27 PM
2

Lol. If you counted in "false rape accusations" all females simply telling themselves (or some friends) "I was raped", that would go close to 50% of sexual encounters. Whenever their societally-programmed anti-slut-shield kicks in, they have to remove their agency from the sexual act they took part in, an no hallucination is beyond their mind's reach. I wasn't myself, I was drunk; and "he raped me" are the more common. However, these are, usually, conscionable people, so they'll keep their neede…
/r/MGTOW31/01/18 03:24 PM
2

what is taught at a Top 5 engineering school. Safe bet: only lies are taught about "#metoo and whatnot"
/r/TheRedPill31/01/18 10:27 AM
4

Welcome to an only-tangentially discussed side of female social behavior (plotting to pull the male away from his personal connections and ties), yet nevertheless a central feature of the female mind. They try to pull away the male from his relations — first and foremost his family relations — to, well, make him orbit about their sphere of relations — first and foremost, her family and parents. This isn't causal, or superficial. It's part of the evolved firmware, and part of the resource-securin…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/18 10:23 AM
2

That's not exhaustive, because she can even act irritated or angry, and it can still be just... an act ( a shit test).
/r/askTRP30/01/18 09:56 PM
4

I particularly agree on the "especially sluts" don't want to appear as such. On the mark.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 09:51 PM
2

On Sunday she flakes but immediately reschedules for Monday night. Capricious power play. If it was I, I'd "flake" on Monday, and tell her to reschedule it for the next Saturday (or another day of her choice). ** The missed lay, explanations: 1) There's a % of times it's gonna go awry, without any specific fault on your part 2) The quick-lay maximisation theory I like more is BlackDragon Blog's. He says to go very lightly about kino escalation. Just touch her a little during the first date. It'l…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 09:50 PM
1

I found the whole scenario amusing. If she hadn't altered her behavior, they'd most definitely still be together right now. Most girls would start cooking him 5-star meals and fucking him like a pornstar, yet she basically did the opposite. I don't understand her thought process, it's like the thought of being rich short-circuited her brain. Yes. She isn't worse than most of the others, she's better than most of the others, in that she didn't manage to be deceptive — which is the regular female'…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 08:11 PM
1

And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise That one line has me puzzled. Does it mean fake humility and don't make people's intrinsic jealousy rear its ugly head? (Fake humility is disjointed from genuine humility. People need fake humility to see you as humble. My comment doesn't mean genuine humbleness is wrong. But when dealing with people, it is off-topic.)
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 10:11 AM
1

Gonna try it — curious to see what'll lead to.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 07:31 AM
1

but leave no ending point to it so that the conversation can continue, wait for further instructions. That's my favourite to do, lol. Although, if this kind of psychological dominance is pursued obsessively (I tend to get addict to leaving the conversation start onus on them 100% of times) it can seriously make a few of them sick and leave (which isn't = "lose interest", though).
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 07:23 AM
1

The real concern is what happens when men stop competing within the provider paradigm? That's not a good thing. Well, frankly, I'd love to see it happen. It would have a heavy moderating effect on female whimsicality, wouldn't it. However, there's no way to deny that True MGTOWs are the exception. In terms of really not caring about women, most of those guys are buffering themselves. is true. Globally, what I think (because I see it) is that more freedom doesn't make people fulfilled, it makes t…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 06:01 PM
1

So then is your view more accurately that men should stay blue pilled? Well, what interests do you have in mind there? Society's (cohesion)? Men's? If all authorities all over the world (more or less!) structured society along lifetime-marriage (usually monogamy: not everywhere though), that means it makes/made for the stablest societies. Now there's more freedom, and that model doesn't hold water any more (it would work only with patriarchy). So women's feral nature is... cropping up (because i…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 05:58 PM
1

And a sure fire way to demonstrate you're in BB camp is say "just me and you." Maybe Blackdragon (Blackdragonblog.com) idea of Alpha 2.0 LTR relationship (sexual freedom and variety for both partners; no marriage contract and financial "enmeshing"; akin to a marriage in every other regard; don't share the same roof if possible) is the best middle way between AF and BB. I have sure witnessed too many times to still delude myself that it's not a rule how women love the game of being upgraded to "y…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 05:53 PM
1

It was an undefined feeling that it didn't flow smoothly and before finishing to read it I found myself in "yes, right, but what's the main point being made?" some 3 times. As if you hadn't digested it and organized it before laying your post out. No disagreement on any of the points (and maybe I was less attentive than usually while reading, also).
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 03:56 PM
7

they weren't going out specifically to get pounded that night. Well, this part can be true in a % of cases. However, they still get horny at some point later. And they also don't want to know it. In a share of cases, they don't want to know it after the fact either. "I was drunk and not myself" (when all alcohol does is bring out the true nature of people). A fraction that comes out in a "I was raped" form, that when you hear it you don't know whether to laugh until your sides hurt or run in con…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 03:45 PM
1

Basically, they can't be taken for anything more than a vagina-equipped toy — and they won't bear it if one does. Great, isn't it.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 03:31 PM
2

Make it as if you slightly look down on her. Warning: don't do this with fundamentally low-self-esteem women, they won't take it as you expect. Or as somebody put it, people who feel little have the greatest pride. Why? Because it helps them not feel little. So some rules of game don't apply with such women. I learned it at my expense.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 03:28 PM
3

Lol. You can pursue your interests without having fun about people's stumblings and pains. Let's just agree to disagree, I wasn't knighting anything, I was only speaking my mind.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 03:23 PM
22

Well, the point is: the less is said, the easier rationalization and whatever shield for her pride or else is for her. Ideally, you don't say "I want sex now" and you don't say "I don't want sex now". They will also do anything they can to say neither. I mean, man, I have been witness to unthinkable pussy-drying (as you call it) just for telling her "you are horny" (which I mistakenly believed was funny). So the best guideline is: don't make her need to say anything on the subject, and say nothi…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 03:20 PM
9

"Theyness", in Heidegger's terms: Everyone keeps his eye on the Other first and next, watching how he will comport himself and what he will say in reply. Being-with-one-another in the “they” is by no means an indifferent side-by-side-ness in which everything has been settled, but rather an intent, ambiguous watching of one another, a secret and reciprocal listening-in. Under the mask of “for-one-another”, an “against-one-another” is in play.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 03:13 PM
1

Hey, I like most of your posts and am having a tour of them actually. This thread just was written quite awkwardly, I agree with jackandjill22
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 03:05 PM
1

Even the trauma will rationalized away through retconning, and whatever it takes. Females don't confront themselves (most men don't, likewise: the difference stands in the "every one of them" vs "most").
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 02:57 PM
1

Yeah. That's the point. To be submissive. (It escapes you that insofar as we are forced to equate "decent" or "fair" or "sensible" to "submissive" we are still talking of feral organisms to be deceived/tamed, and not of reliable, mature people who can be on the same level with a responsible mentally developed man — and that is what OP means to warn us doesn't exist.)
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 02:48 PM
1

It goes beyond that. OP dealt with a substantive difference in consistency, "sight length", stability over time and closeness to the concept of responsibility — which results in heavy sorrow for the most committed and involved of men. That's left out of your concise resume.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 02:45 PM
1

Females are also masochistic, as a handful of Illimitable Men's maxims highlights. They need drama. After all, you too said that here: For men who are abusers they started out that way- in fact, that was probably the initial attraction! So that's it: they become abusers if you lose your ability to abuse them (the way nature gives them the longing to be abused, id est). Since fearfulness is what drives them, they never lose the need to run a mental narrative where they are constantly well-meaning…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 02:41 PM
1

You have a point there. We all transition to a state of consciousness to the next one, instant by instant. But an "identity" or "self" is what stays the same over time. It's information passed from cells that are going to be replaced to those that come next up (like inheritance from a person to their offspring). And women have far less of an identity than men, or at least than a few of more thoughtful rational men. That creates the painful asymmetry for such men when they fall in love. They inve…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 02:36 PM
1

Well, civilization is built upon the repression (largely) and suppression (occasionally) of Y. Male Y even before female Y (it would be physically destructive; female's is psychologically destructive: it destroys valued and other ideals, not bodies. This is way it is still given a pass, and will probably be given one for much time to come). All what ought to be controlled tends to become unconscious, since repression uses less energy than suppression (= better efficiency). If you take away all "…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 02:31 PM
2

Attraction springing from non-rational elements can not be managed and maintained anyway. Idealist fall in love for reasons — thus, if the other person didn't change, they would not fall out of love. Normal people fall in love they-don't-know-why, specially women of course, and they fall out of love just the same. Mostly chemical neural processes shaped by the reproductive cycle over the course of evolution, as one can easily observe. Awareness, assuming it can be achieved by women, would not ch…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 02:22 PM
1

Well, those were trained girls. Just like their descendants are trained (in a way diverse than before). Imagining a now-vanished self-awareness in past generations is a fantasy. Your introspective faculties, and desire for truth are clearly out-of-the-norm. Congrats.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 02:16 PM
1

Condensed version of your good comment: A wise old owl lived in an oak, The more he saw, the less he spoke The less he spoke, the more he heard, Now, wasn't he a wise old bird? ** What's spellbinding is the female ability to maintain full unawareness of her own inner psychological processes.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 02:10 PM
1

I believe women are incapable of understanding their wicked nature until they confront themselves. 3 quotes by C G Jung: 1) The most terrifying thing is to accept oneself completely. 2) No tree, it is said, can grow to heaven unless its roots reach down to hell. 3) There is no coming to consciousness without pain. People will do anything, no matter how absurd, in order to avoid facing their own Soul. One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness consci…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 02:06 PM
1

"This son of a bitch went to her house crying telling her how much she meant to him, that it was a mistake and that he only wanted her. long story short, they got back together. " It worked, most likely, because it was feigned. There's a huge difference between faking pain and repentance, and being grief-swamped for real. It's the latter that will make her leave (and, broadly, any form of truth-saying/sincerity).
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 11:53 AM
1

Rules change, but they don't. Rules are unchanged, just adapted to new ways of domination, and interests at play.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 11:50 AM
3

Men don't go on Facebook and post like in a trance "I am happy I am happy I am happy" (in words, and with selfies all showing the same, robot-made smile) before getting back on their feet, though. And they don't say "I didn't fall" while reddening and starting to cry.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 11:46 AM
3

It works better than otherwise — truth is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 11:41 AM
1

Yes — but they make sure to show him they despise him in the process. That's part of the Beta's punishment. Then of course, on their Fakebook/Instalie/chats with "friends" they "love" the Beta. They "love" the Beta only whenever and however making a show of it boosts their social standing and looks good to other people's eyes.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 11:30 AM
1

That's never an issue. Read or not read, they aren't equipped to comprehend. As for "posts", nearly none posts. Their posts are quite easy to recognize... from utter lack of self-awareness to begin with.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 11:26 AM
1

To men, looks are the hot commodity. Lots of y’all crap on women for looking at money the same way you care about looks, just saying. There are differences you, predictably, glossed over. Men have no qualms telling themselves, and others, they are after physical beauty. Females will go to any length of hypocrisy and self-deception to live as if they "didn't know" what they were doing when it comes to resource acquisition. That's just a subset of their general hypocrisy and basic need for self-de…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 11:21 AM
1

Yes, that's what civilization, and the hypnosis-like socially imparted "morality" are. Training of feral subjects to make them curb their feraility enough that society is tenable, and material advancement not hindered/made impossible. Even private property exists to that end. But you seem to cheer at a possible return to overt, unmitigated ferality. I wonder why.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 11:14 AM
1

You basically tell us it's cool if events prevent her as much as possible from acting her real nature out (or even finding her real nature out). What bliss.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 11:10 AM
1

well pretty hardwired: it's firmware you're talking of. Or maybe hardware.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 11:00 AM
1

Yes... cluster-B disorders, he has one of those, or maybe more than one. These c-B disorders are ubiquitous: anytime any backstabbing, money-stripping and so on needs to be rationalized, they pop up.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 10:51 AM
1

That's an universal rule. (Think of females flaunting how "in love" they are with their post-Wall caught beta they'd have rejected mockingly so late as a few years before.) The more you need to lie to yourself, the more loudly, and iteratively, you have to do it.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 10:28 AM
1

Punctuation is illegal in the third millennium. A sorry state of affairs, but it is as it is... [don't even think of ";"s and ":"s being used. That's too much sophistication to demand].
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 10:26 AM
0

Yes. Nevertheless, while culture is culture, genes are genes, and wide West-East variance persists thereby.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 10:20 AM
1

You completely missed the point. The point is how illogicity-laden the mental male attractiveness map women hold in their nutheads is. And their delusional map is as the other guy here posted. They'll rate as "ugly" and think as "below average" 75-80% men. Ridiculous? Yes. True? Yes.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 10:15 AM
1

That's omega man self-loathing. Give it a quit, for your own sake.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 10:14 AM
2

Well, there's no way our society wouldn't need (and then give itself) the collectivist delusion you are tired of hearing stated over and over everywhere. David Riesman's The Lonely Crowd is a great book, where this collectivist delusion taking centre stage in our culture and society is foreseen.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 10:10 AM
1

Freedom and unchaining from traditionalist societal programming make the true nature (which was always there and is inborn) surface.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 10:08 AM
1

You are wrong on sadism. You should have ladled out like this: physical sadism (males) ↔ psychological sadism (females).
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 10:00 AM
1

It's not the same. In Bell Curve terms, females are 1 standard deviation (a huge gap) above males in all what relates to deception and self-deception. A quick survey of Fakebook or Instalie will be proof to that.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 09:55 AM
0

No, ugly girls receive much more an incentive to learn manipulation, deception and self-deception, by their circumstances in life. Beauties have lower deception skills, not higher.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 09:52 AM
1

Their sole "morality" is socially programmed — that's fictitious, and not impervious at all to rationalization. Social morality is designed so as to provide looholes such that people (and women much more than men) can act on their feral drives, being aided by their own rationalisation and society's pats on their back.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 09:50 AM
1

I won't. That's what this thread is all about. There are men who won't act like males. There are no women who won't act like females.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 09:48 AM
1

No. It's the betas who are so elated with the (self-deceptive) feeling that finally there's one who likes them, to force blindness upon themselves in front of all the red flags. Women are impish. They can never resist letting out some tells that they don't like a man, when this is the case. Betas trick themselves into wilful obliviousness.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 09:45 AM
1

Lol. Another tactic you can use is, respond quickly, but always make her have to text first. That makes them feel inferior enough for them to keep having interest in you too.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 09:36 AM
2

Even that is not needed. No validation at all works better.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 09:35 AM
1

Basically, you win on hard mode if you don't fall in love.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 09:20 AM
4

Inference: thinking of doing anything with them apart from using them for your own ends is a mistaken hope/effort.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 08:53 AM
1

That's what I said. Outer-directed. They lack internal introverted mental tools that produce will and opinion and thought.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 08:51 AM
3

The best read on the subject is Gustav(e) Le Bon's The Psychology of Crowds. For the realistic psychological description laid out by OP doesn't regard females only (although it regards all females). Only exception to your reality-adherent account: when it comes to scheming against other females, acting of social status consolidating/gaining behaviour, exploiting weak-willed option-deprived males, and, in general, plotting. In all of those lines of action, you will see the female brain turn capab…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 08:48 AM
38

You talk as if gulfing down the red pill would open the door to joy for him. The untold truth is: if a man is more sensitive than the unsensitive kind of male females crave, he's gonna stay like that. I mean, yeah, if he reads this Reddit he'll learn the right ways, and next time he'll earn his lay. What do you think this will do to his life, make it "happy"? Lol. Having to pretend you are a careless brute whilst you are not. Oh the happiness it gives you! So I agree all men should take the Red …
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 08:43 AM
236

It's not merely that she "likes you less". It's that you strip her of her primary need (a need far above sex for her), that is: dissimulation. Sex is "implied", and if you make it any more explicit than "implied" you'll take away from her the possibility to lie to herself (and having it "happen" later, of course not because she "wanted it"). This is the main dealbreaker, even more than she really liking you less. Females have hypocrisy and self-deception as their core mental need, and basically,…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 08:39 AM
2

Your allegation of "manshaming" is as fact-detached as the average Twatter "mainsplaning". He shamed nobody, he advocated for some decency.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 08:29 AM
9

Oh well. When they do — as they usually do, coz, you know, they have the need to believe themselves "moral", so their confused-yet-manically-solipstic minds manufacture fake narratives about everything where they shine as moral people — the same but with a few hands of honest-girl rationalized polish applied over truth it's still more distasteful and lowly, not better...
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 08:28 AM
4

I don't like you making a mock of the beta. We should underscore female meanness, without disparaging weak-willed, or whatever else you want to call it, fellow men. (Surely, I know it's those betas who make female behaviour be what it is, so sometimes I'm very hostile to them too. But deriving amusement from their sorrow? No thanks.)
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 08:26 AM
3

You're trying to sell to yourself the narrative that you saw her only has a sexual release object. You know, males self-deceive too (although they have the option to not self-deceive, which females mostly lack). You have feelings of a deeper order for her, that's the point. And see... you can't kill them. You can shut down your instincts, and act pretending like you don't have those feelings. And she'll be more interested in you. But then what? I went through this in these late months. Then your…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 03:29 PM
3

{{There's only so hard you can push someone who doesn't want to change.}} Each person needs a set amount of rue to wake up to what they (for other reasons, and obeying to other drives) don't want to see. For some, that amount is infinite: meaning that they'll choose to not know what (they subconsciously) know, at all costs, even in spite of the self-preservation drive. This is one extreme. The opposite is self-awareness and enlightenment. The latter is not within the female mind reach, evidence …
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 03:14 PM
12

Being in love is an hellish tribulation; has little to do (or not necessarily much to do) with being beta. Some people parallel "oneitis" (= real, addictive, soul-possessing love) to "beta". Has nothing to do. Only thing it has to do: on the surface, you will act like a beta. And since females can only see the surface of things, she'll very likely grade you as beta and lose attraction. For they can't go beyond the surface, and see how the greatest deed of courage for a man is to still be a non-b…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 03:11 PM
0

Well, what about a new type of open mind? Your talk here is all about accepting human nature — and that includes women are titillated by fling temptations (with or without some sentiment attached to it). You talk about women hamstering away their sexual nature, the Anti-Slut Defense, and then what, expect physical faithfulness defying the ages from her? The answer to this is: Alpha 2.0 LTR: open for both, on both sides. Emotional loyalty, and sexual flings in the open (not hidden) for each, when…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 03:01 PM
9

Well, the first seems a little hasty. The second sign will come soon after enough. I'd say: walk away at the second sign.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/18 03:27 PM
2

You can never say or know, because even if they are aware of the truth, they have to feign they aren't.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 09:14 PM
0

Solipsists are the most abstract thinkers of all, and solipsism is the reverse of "herd member". "solipsism" is a widely misused word.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 09:14 PM
6

Their "morality" can be defined as Facebook (or Instagram) morality. A surface. There's no dishonest thing they are above doing — just, they'll make sure it doesn't get shared to their social media contacts, and they'll say "thank you" in closing their (dishonest) speech.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 09:12 PM
1

Well, for that matter, they can't philosophize on anything.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 09:11 PM
1

That's always the main point... to not be responsible.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 09:10 PM
12

Yes, this is why, well particularly women, will become much quicker with their utterances as they lose their reason. It's just a spring mechanism, socially programmed — no rational control over the process (although they will rationalize everything, after it's said/done).
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 02:55 PM
3

You also have to think they are volatile creatures, who will provoke, disrespect, and move from a male to the next even if you make no "mistakes." That's maybe a crimson red pill, but one to swallow too.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 02:46 PM
2

Lol, most times the difference is: degree of self-repression and hypocrisy. Hard to know which and what and who is better and worse, in truth.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 02:44 PM
5

You just choose to self-deceive, and turn a deaf "ear" to your nervous-system-level (or gut-level) alarm.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 02:42 PM
1

"Saw once Tinder is still on her phone, asked about it, she said it’s just for fun, she doesn’t even answer, but swipes (warning). Which was true, still, I told her it’s not okay in a relationship, so she uninstalled." ([b]mistake[/b].) OP, you forgot that (mistake). However, if you have to be jealous the whole time and feign you aren't to not make many (mistakes), maybe doing that is one large, big mistake in itself. I mean, if you feel bad/ill and pretend you don't, you still feel bad/ill. In …
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 02:35 PM
26

Never compliment a woman on her beauty. That's one of the mainstays of any game theory, and absolutely beyond question. So yes, you are right.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 08:40 PM
4

Well, how to put it? I'm partially relieved by seeing your thread's upvote count reads nought. You just teamed up with a ******* ***re and emotionally bullied a good man. Wrong type of alpha, if alpha it be.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 08:39 PM
1

1) They can be alphas due to just their looks, or the other traits that make a male an alpha in the eyes of females (social success, power, arrogance, 1 2 or 3 of the Dark Triad features, ...). Contrary to what most want to believe, looks play a part too. 2) Is she an alpha widow? Depends on her level of primativity. You'll find all needed explanation, on both your question and the word "primativity" in the excellent Treatise of Love: http://www.oocities.org/protopop_1999/treatise.html
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 08:25 PM
2

why don't you go view their FB pages now? It's a good way to check if you've gotten over them.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 08:19 PM
1

Of course the whole thing comes crashing down with the Wall. You mean the time they fall in Facebook-love for that nice-oh-so-nice guy who had been proposing for 3 years, his advances turned down all the time. Time to go to the city hall and sign a marriage contract. Also, time for lots of mechanical, all-the-same smiles in lots of Facebook #happyFamily pictures.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 08:18 PM
1

You clearly cared little about them, lol.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 08:14 PM
1

"She kisses him and wishes him good night. She loves him but the eternal "What If" will haunt her for the rest of her life." She loves him in her Facebook and Instagram status updates, comments, and collage pictures with floating hearts. That's where she "loves" him.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 08:08 PM
1

It's not necessarily always a lie for men, though. Women's is, but men's is.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 05:46 PM
4

Just a variation on the "they can know they want only the opposite of what they want", basically. And, as you say, it's when you start to appeal to beyond-object parts that they feel "under pressure," that you are "demanding," and lose interest. Because being more than a body begins to imply serious responsibility, reflectiveness, ... and a few more things unberable to them (and, in any event, "not funny", lol!)
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 05:42 PM
3

The objectification issue is an issue of projection. I mean: they expect everyone to objectify them all the time because they do it to themselves.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 05:40 PM
2

Lol. Are you aware that 1) She would hardly ask to hang out, had she nowhere in her mind the idea of doing something more with you 2) your lack of interest is likely to arouse her more ?
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 05:36 PM
3

No. This is a place where people are helped. That's the underpinning point of the whole thing.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 05:28 PM
1

What you don't know exactly? Women, more deceptive and dissimulation-oriented as they are, won't express anger or discontentment and will pretend they are liking everything as long as they think you no longer can be any use for them. So, as they say, the poison will be in the tail. You'll see a good "section" of their real deep nature only after they can't use you any way. (And a part of this is: they will childishly scan their own mind for what could hurt you most, and tell you it — sometimes d…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 05:25 PM
2

Lol. You may define "love" however you want, and make any point you want. What's your definition, the essentially-jungle-mating-inspired-but-Instagram-sweet-words-coated socially dominating one? I already gave you my definition [percolates into the core of its being (soul)], and of course it's equal to what you call oneitis and neediness. Try to get someone-something into the centre of your deep mind, and then not "need" it or "depend on it" :). Even researchers say love has the same effect as a…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/18 06:40 PM
6

If you reject their sexual advances while still acting as if you like them, it'll only double their arousal. Another arousal-increasing option is the push-pull game.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/18 06:37 PM
2

It's not just "confidence and outcome independence." It's also lack of sensitivity, and an aggressive personality. It's also, not loving her. The most outcome independent and confident man will lose these traits with a woman, if she percolates into the core of its being (soul). This is why love between a male and a female is something that ends (for her) when it begins (for him). Or we can say: women can love men, only provided men are the type which can't feel love ever / happens to not feel lo…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/18 03:36 PM
3

Or he feigns so for the sake of his reputation (and job). Who knows.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/18 03:32 PM
3

"Creeped" should mean "scared". When you say women are "scared" by a sign of lack of strength, you're telling us they are morally upstanding, noble, creatures woven from innocence and high-mindedness. Right? I mean: if it's a jungle, with just "thank you"'s and Facebook/Instagram likes added, call it for what it is. Then tell the OP that he hasn't grasped the jungle's workings well yet — I agree on that.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/18 03:26 PM
4

Persistence + tactics + deception + charming superficiality. There definitely is a lot more to success than persistence, and persistence itself shall be practiced but under a veil of indifference.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/18 03:22 PM
31

Lol, women handle rejection much worse than men. Since they are vanity-centered and ego-centered, they'll go any length to express interest maintaining plausible deniability. It's needed for their myopical egos to tell themselves "he's crazy, I never wanted him" the moment they get rejected with a tad less hypocrisy than their egos demand. Even at age 40 the average female will lapse into the silliest, most hallucinatory theatrics, in front of a non-hypocritical rejection. Males may get angry, b…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/18 03:20 PM
1

You are just starting to hear your deeper self, as your keenness on environmental noise and lures subsides... Or: you are transitioning from youth to maturity. You'll miss youth, but then, it's not our choice to transition.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/18 01:02 AM
7

That's how ideological buzzwords are crafted. It's by design not by chance. And "who is right" is who gets more followers, retweets, and support from mass-market media — nothing else counts.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/18 12:54 AM
4

Lol, no solidarity and cohesion between men is the precise reason behind what's going on — and you don't mind it, as well as it doesn't involve you and the rest of "alphas"? You counter the Sisterhood with a Brotherhood, and nothing less.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/18 12:49 AM
1

Finally someone states the saddest truth, but the most in need of being stated. Basically, her love "ends" when your love starts. Frustrating dynamic, but also... dynamic that can't be changed.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/18 12:38 AM
1

I second what fetchy said. If you are born more sensitive, prone to attachment, and desirous of, let's call it with its name, mother-degree love, your neural make-up ain't gonna change no matter how many times you hit a great-relationship-turned-sour-then-into-rejection wall. So, it comes down to acting. At this point, you may also choose to not play the game. The only pitiful situation is, I think, playing the game without understanding the rules. But you can't "turn alpha", ever. It's about ac…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/18 11:19 PM
1

So anyone who values loyalty merely for the sake of loyalty is someone who doesn't believe they can readily find a substitute for something they lose. "Loyalty" is the result when you pass up other opportunities because you value your current relationship more than the potential alternative relationship presented to you. You may not believe me or think I have a super-hard time scoring women, but I am loyal, love to be loyal, and finding out the truth about "women's loyalty" has crushed me mental…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/18 11:15 PM
1

To use each other as expediently and conveniently as possible. Sadly.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/18 11:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter