TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mongooseondaloose Archive

View 2 posts and 19 comments by mongooseondaloose on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
25

relevant comic It's also absurd how the original article is framed: "Paternity Tests Rob Women of Their Hold Over Men". Because any structure that actually encourages parity between the sexes must be in reality anti-women /s.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 07:05 PM
2

I'd just like to say I had a male babysitter growing up, and Bruce was one of the best things that happened to me as a kid. I certainly thought he was more fun to hang out with than any of my female babysitters, and I was much more at ease coming to Bruce with problems I had, or questions about boys or girls. It was especially great having a positive male role model around since my dad wasn't at home way too much (an MD on call relatively often). I remember thinking, wishing that I could be some…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:31 PM
1

I assumed that (+) feminine referred to females who exhibit the often-touted always-positive traits of womanhood: nurturing, caring, gentle, kind, loving, soft. However, I figured that (-) femininity was referring to males who exhibit similar female traits, which are supposedly negative for some reason (perhaps the need for male disposability?).
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:42 AM
2

Saving this for Father's Day (June 16).
/r/MensRights26/03/13 10:05 PM
9

This is awesome to see. Hopefully people will take the responses seriously, namely the ones concerning female-on-male domestic abuse and rape. There are some partial untruths circulating the thread (such as the "rarity" of female-on-male rape<sup>1</sup> ), but it is definitely good to see positive talk about men on the larger reddit community. 1 [source] pp18-19, tables 2.1 and 2.2
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:41 PM
1

Can I get a link to the article that this is referencing? I really am out of touch, it seems.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:16 AM
0

The issue I see in this is perspective. Any fair and ethical method of administering justice should take the perspectives of both parties into account. I don't think it is rational to assume that he sees his actions as "groping"- I would presume, given the circumstances, that he views his actions as playful, flirty, and perhaps kino (a technique involving escalating physical contact to indicate romantic interest). Essentially, if she were not to indicate to him in any way that she did not enjoy …
/r/MensRights21/02/13 02:06 AM
2

Never did i state that it is unreasonable for a guy to ask before initiating physical contact. I believe that the burden of responsibility is shared by the recipient if it is occurring regularly and is unwanted, though nothing is said about it (as we can certainly assume from the original post text). Personally, whenever I have received unwanted physical contact, I let the person know that I do not like it and would rather they stop. Something along the lines of "hey, stop that" or "quit it" usu…
/r/MensRights20/02/13 07:07 PM
33

It's instances like these where the true mentality of approaching sexual harassment possibilities is shown as "guilty until proven innocent" and "shoot first, ask questions later". A reasonable consensus is that unwanted groping and kissing is something that needs to be addressed, though how the respondents are implying that an adequate punishment for inappropriate touching is academic ruin via university expulsion entirely puzzles me. It's unclear (though a possibility) that this girl has even …
/r/MensRights20/02/13 05:19 PM
3

I know it's unrelated to the argument, but I can't stand when people end e-mails/ text correspondence with that "buh-bye!" bullshit. So fucking conceited.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 11:12 PM
19

We call that a Freudian slip of the penis. edit: tongue
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:31 AM
1

It's like a backwards question mark. On phone right now.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:52 AM
–

I firmly believe that an overwhelming majority of academic feminists would agree with you in principle. However, it has been consistently and overwhelming demonstrated that some disproportionately vocal minority "fringe" within the movement is pulling feminism in a new direction- a direction involving male shaming, unfair legislation, outright denial of mens rights issues, and villainizing mens rights advocates as members of a "hate group". Though this might catch some flack, I think it is compr…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:54 PM
9

Holy fuck those commercials are gold.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:55 AM
21

However, patriarchy hurts men too – something that does not erase the damage it does to women, but underlines how important it is to reject bankrupt binaries when they are damaging. The U.S. Military Registration Acknowledgement Selective Service card in my wallet agrees, but wonders how gender binaries cause more harm to well-being than potential mandatory military enrollment.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:58 PM
–

Do women still do this? Two feminists found the answer is yes. Nearly 40 percent of college women acknowledged they had said "no" to sex even "when they meant yes." Could I get a source on this?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:53 PM
2

Really respected how you responded to criticism respectfully and thoroughly.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:47 PM
–

This is true. It also brings up a very interesting question as to how we value life. Is this really less of an issue because it claims less time than other diseases? If that is so, a purely numerical comparison of Potential Years of Life Lost (PYLL) between diseases would be warranted. Here's a handy list from the National Cancer Institute which outlines and quantifies national data on deaths and PYLL. I won't say that PYLL is a perfect metric to use when comparing diseases' "relevance" or "dese…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:34 PM
–

I completely agree. An important note, though: these are the age-adjusted mortality rates. Age adjusted mortality can be distinguished from crude mortality, which only measures death proportions in a population. To reduce confounding due to age-related death risks across populations, age adjustment takes statistical measures to standardize morbidity/mortality across diseases that affect different age groups differently. If this isn't clear (I'm going off a class I took a year ago) here's a secti…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter