TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

moonlandings Archive

View 2 posts and 172 comments by moonlandings on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Where hes from is less important than where the divorce proceedings take place. And france will probably also take a dim view of this kind of asset hiding, should they happen there
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/23 02:43 AM
69

Not really. Also he still has income. That 1 million a month is gonna be considered when calculating spousal support. Where it goes once he gets it isn't really the courts concern.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/23 05:20 PM
4

No. “She’s a lioness, what does that make you” is putting yourself in the women’s frame.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/22 03:14 AM
1

Asking this question implies starting from the female frame.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/22 11:35 PM
47

This is not the stage of “hard times.” Let’s be clear, on a global and historical scale our society is very much still in the good times. We are on the decline of the good times, but if you think these times in our culture are the hard times you’re in for a terrible shock when you actually see the rest of the world.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/20 04:03 PM
2

Probably because you’re a weakling who needs to get his shit together and your own mother recognizes those girls can and should be doing better than you. Also, consider why Lion mothers kick their sons out of the pride once they’ve reached maturity. It’s time for them to grow up and become the alpha of their own pride. The lioness’ loyalty is to the pride, they are social creatures as are human females. None of this is complicated if you actually think about it.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/19 01:47 AM
1

First of all, you’re lying to yourself that Ross is an experiment. Second, she is using you for comfort AT BEST right now. This chick already has you in her grasps and you’re too naive to see it. Cut and run young blood, cut and run.
/r/askTRP23/10/19 04:37 AM
9

Bruh, what the fuck kind of cuckold fetish shit did I just read? Your bitch ain’t your bitch anymore. Mentally, if not physically, (HAHAHAHAH) she has moved on. What the fuck are you even asking anymore?
/r/askTRP23/10/19 04:22 AM
14

The thing is, women see movies like Good will Hunting and think to themselves "oh that poor tortured Matt Damon. I could totally love him if he opened up to me about being abused as a child." And they probably could simply because being abused as a child physically isn't nearly as emasculating as rape. But that allows them to perform some mental gymnastics and convince themselves that they are an exception to the rule. So they will feel personally attacked when you say "men shouldn't open up to …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/02/19 10:36 PM
1

the M in AMALT is males. Doesn't matter if they are men, by any definition or not. Saying AMALT only applies to a subset of males but AWALT applies to all females is intellectually dishonest.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 06:03 PM
2

Honestly, this is the wisdom of the ages that mothers and grandmothers used to pass on to their young daughters. "it doesn't matter that he doesn't have a 6 pack and ride a motorcycle, he will be a good husband and father. He will provide for you. Those are the things that matter." Young women don't hear those kinds of things now and don't realize them themselves until they're 40 something looking for a sperm donor to go with their IVF treatment. It's sad.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/01/19 01:05 AM
36

This has to be satire. I can't believe anyone would say this with a straight face
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/12/18 07:40 PM
10

Bruh. I knew a chick with THREE baby daddies who started dating a chump and legit told him she was a "born again virgin" and didn't want to fuck him until marriage WHILE she was fucking with at least one of the baby daddies still. Dumb fuck still wifed her up. Never underestimate the thirst of some chumps
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/12/18 11:45 PM
2

He's got a whole lecture series about the bible where he intellectually explores adherence to religion. Maybe you should know what you're talking about before talking.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/18 10:44 AM
28

They're talking about STEM. more or less right/wrong questions. There's no feedback other than whether you were right or wrong.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/18 09:34 PM
14

You should seek counseling.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 05:52 AM
14

I disagree. Men are built for conquering challenges. We aren't built to have everything we need. That's why so many men die shortly after retirement, our purpose in life is what drives us and keeps us alive, when it's accomplished we find new purpose. Having everything we want means having no purpose.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/18 09:49 PM
6

With nothing left to strive for? I really don't think we would be happy at all.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/18 08:31 PM
0

Still a piece of shit move and a good way to get men to not want to associate with you.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/18 12:37 AM
13

Don't do that. But definitely fuck the dog shit out of her once their relationship ends.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/18 12:06 AM
52

It's not. On my deployment in Afghanistan we just fucking hated the women attached to us and mostly ignored them unless they were in the way
/r/TheRedPill27/03/18 04:23 PM
8

Because you're acting like one.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/18 07:37 PM
16

or like you think the way to respond to legitimate criticism is with sarcasm. Seems to be the way of a child, not a man.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/18 07:32 PM
9

Honestly half the problem with this sub is that people who truly internalize the philosophy rarely stuck around here. Generally they're too busy off living their life to put much thought into writing for a bunch of new guys. There are obvious notable exceptions, guys who feel it is their mission to stick around and mentor new guys. Thank goodness for them. Because otherwise this place would be totally intolerable.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/18 06:09 PM
8

Maybe. But if they got pussy the other reasons would seem way less significant.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/18 10:27 PM
11

I've been enjoying the mods shutting stupid shit down lately. I'm all for it continuing
/r/TheRedPill14/02/18 11:13 PM
20

The other option is take control of your life, develop a spine and live unapologetically for yourself. Become fucking Machiavelli if that's what it takes to come out on top because you bet your sweet ass she is doing exactly that.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/18 01:23 AM
2

Perhaps I am misunderstanding. I took it to mean he suggests men put other men ahead of women. My contention was that men who have fought to the top of a dominance hierarchy to get high value women will value those women, the result of their hard work, no matter how temporary, over some dudes they don't know.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/18 06:55 PM
1

Modern society arose because of the competition between men, not in spite of it. I didn't say men can't follow laws or social norms. What I said is that men are programmed to prioritize their advancement up the social hierarchy over that of other men.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/18 06:17 PM
2

There will never not be competition among males. Just as women are programmed to seek men higher on the male dominance hierarchy, we are programmed to attempt to filter ourselves to the top of the hierarchy. This requires us to compete among ourselves, frequently in front of women. We compete for resources, attention and pussy. And ultimately a man will value what is his, including the pussy he currently has, over what is not, including men outside his immediate family or social structure.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/18 03:56 PM
2

I for one am enjoying the totalitarian lockdown. Long past due.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/18 11:20 PM
13

Because civil and criminal cases are entirely different. There are regularly civil suits to go along with criminal. That's what got OJ in trouble. He beat criminal charges and got hammered with a 7 figure order from the civil court.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/17 01:48 PM
3

This community prides itself on rational analysis. Nothing about the comment he made was a rational analysis.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/17 01:19 AM
27

Because it's not a sufficient answer to the question he was attempting to answer and the nazi imagery comment is straight nonsense. Fascism is alive for the same reason Marxism is. Ideologies don't die easy and fascism and socialism both are appealing on their surface without much analysis.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 02:10 PM
1

I despise get because she frequently makes bad arguments
/r/TheRedPill11/12/17 03:13 PM
5

My argument is that the issue is ideologues. Only ideologues are so dogmatic and emotional in their attacks. It's not evident to me that there is a clear distinction in the rhetorical patterns of male and female ideologues. Similarly, I have not seen enough of a difference between male and female non-ideologues to attribute the difference to gender.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/17 11:02 PM
16

This is not a case of "male vs female" debate tactics. This is a common example of "ideologue vs non-ideologue." It is a grave mistake to attribute the tendency to want to shut down debate by means of emotional or popular arguments to women only. Women are capable (occasionally) of having reasoned arguments (IE, Karen Straugh, Ann Coulter, though I despise her personally) just as there are men, like the greasy little shit in Berkeley, who are incapable of making more reasoned or nuanced an argum…
/r/TheRedPill10/12/17 10:05 PM
3

Dude, the squat, deadlift and bench bar is uniformly calculated at 45. Meaning your squat is 225, deadlift is 315, and bench is 155. Also, for OHP, try doing seated dumbbell presses and seated military press. It helps take the back out of it. For gaining muscle, how much you're eating very much matters. If you're eating right at your BMR you are not going to put on muscle no matter how much you lift. Additionally, you wont gain strength. If you're as small as you make out then don't be afraid to…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/17 11:39 PM
2

Threatening to "expose censorship" and throwing a tantrum when we collectively tell you to get fucked is not "on point." It's childish and pathetic and you are getting the scorn and mockery you rightfully deserve.
/r/AlreadyRed09/11/17 06:13 PM
3

Is this Alex Jones alt account or something? You sound straight up unhinged.
/r/AlreadyRed09/11/17 03:14 PM
1

I think part of it is that people read the rules of Pook and don't understand that becoming the prize takes work, time and effort. Is hard to internalize the attitude and not come off like you're spouting useless platitudes.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/17 01:56 AM
2

Worth noting. She's also lying about not meeting him until you were gone. Just cut this chick out of your life as fast as possible and if you ever run into her just act like nothing about this situation bothers you. You're done and on to greener pastures now.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/17 04:26 PM
6

Less is more with what you write. I've had the most success with "Here for a good time, not a long time" and/or "The only thing more boring than your politics is your dog." The second one is more attuned to the D.C. area I live in though.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/17 09:27 PM
1

But.... She's getting exactly that. Not working with other women and being treated like an equal. Of course, try to point that out to her and there's no way that sinks in.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 04:19 PM
4

Even then it's usually the boom after that makes one jumpy.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 04:17 PM
20

At least the comments there are telling him he's an idiot. Granted, not for the right reason, but they're telling him not to be ok with it.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/16 08:04 PM
1

I was responding to the guy who said college campuses trivialize sexual assault on campus. I agree with your basic points.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 05:02 PM
3

That narrative really doesn't hold water with the slew of title IX regulations in place. Quite frankly the pendulum has swung the other way and if anything campuses over react to claims of sexual assault.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/16 09:39 PM
2

I mean.... There's gradients to everything. Can I hold her purse while she puts on her jacket as we're walking down the road? Sure. Am I gonna hand that shit right back as soon as the jacket is on? Absolutely. Am I gonna hold her shit while she does some meaningless bullshit and just wants free hands? Fuck nah.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/16 03:59 PM
5

I realize this is nit picking, but it drives me nuts when media constantly switches between calling him a soldier and a marine.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/16 08:52 PM
5

Dude, nothing in what he wrote can be construed as blaming men. He said women are beautiful when they accept their role as women.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 08:26 PM
21

Only really works for military though.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 07:10 PM
17

Not really. He gave her classic advice that is actually good if she is to secure the affections of a strong, confident man. None of us would have any interest in those " friends" of hers beyond making them our fuck toy; but if she is genuinely the kind of person the dude describes then she'll end up happier than most women these days. That said, she obviously was not in a social setting where that advice served her well short term. Long term though she's better for it.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 09:45 PM
6

Implying they hadn't pushed for legal reform to make marriage entirely beneficial to only them? Because in that case, maybe. Under the existing legal code and precedent structure? No way in hell.
/r/askTRP13/01/16 02:34 AM
1

I find it fascinating you keep writing these long winded diatribes of nonsense and have yet to respond to u/always-be-closing and his scientific evidence of your bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 03:04 PM
2

Another weekly PSA to not be that guy in those threads. Do not talk about TRP on other subreddits. Most especially dont go running your mouth about how alpha and dominant you are. Everyone is going to perceive you as a pathetic, sad little keyboard warrior and they'd be right. Looking in particular at u/wont_tell_i_refuse in that thread.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/15 02:16 PM
3

There is such a thing as self control. I was merely opining that I wished I didn't have to control myself.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/15 09:07 PM
6

You are 100 correct. This is definitely the way to deal with the situation and something I've learned while bouncing as well. My issue is I love fighting. Even if I get my ass kicked it's still fun for me. Hard to turn down an opportunity to scrap.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/15 05:16 PM
3

I didn't say he was getting pigeon holed as BB. Just that he's got a bunch of one-itis going on. It drips through in how he's talking about her. Plus, this girl isn't dumb, she's known this dude for years and she's post wall herself, probably recognizes he wants a low n-count and a particular kind of girl. She's already got him meeting parents and talking about romantic weekends away. The real lesson here is no one is immune from one-itis, it happens to the best of us.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 03:57 PM
5

Sounds like AF from the second story has himself a case of oneitis. I wonder what freaky shit "Layla" is hiding from him now.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 12:10 PM
1

Polygamy with multiple chicks is just as negative for children as polygamy with multiple dicks. If you want to have children you may have to simply bit the bullet and get married and deal with monogamy. If you take kids out of the picture, then by all means, go for it with multiple chicks. Here's the thing, and Stefan outlined this repeatedly in that video, humans do not bond tightly to non genetically related children. It's just a fact of our evolutionary biology. As a consequence bringing non …
/r/askTRP26/09/15 06:42 AM
8

You're still stuck with a scarcity mentality man. Your thought process is something like "if i drop 2 I'll be stuck with just this one other girl" while it should be "if i drop number 2 I'll be stuck with just 3.49999999 billion girls"
/r/askTRP31/08/15 10:04 PM
2

My counterpoint to this argument is Vitor Belfort. Dude absolutely wrecked Wanderlei Silva in seconds with pure boxing strikes. The guy has been at the top of the MMA game for years, so obviously he has developed multiple dimensions to his game, but back in the day he was just a pro boxer who made the transition. He isn't even in Floyds class of boxing and still put down one of the best MEN to ever fight in that arena. Mayweather against Rousey is a joke. No chance she has the ability to take hi…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 11:19 PM
3

Being in a high SMV job certainly helps. I'm a bouncer and I fuck 2-3 new girls every weekend. Bartender is another good one. Realistically once you have the right mindset you find yourself getting into social situation, meeting chicks and maybe not fucking them, but figuring out what works and doesn't and eventually hit a point where the returns become exponential, to where you literally have to stop taking girls numbers because you don't have time to fuck them for like 3 weeks and you'll have …
/r/askTRP22/07/15 03:16 AM
3

Alpha widowing isn't a goal unto itself per se. Being the best man you can be is. If that happens to be the best man she ever encounters then so be it, but your goal should be to always strive to be better so the man that she perceived as the best she ever had doesn't even stack up to who you are a month or a year from now. As far as what you appear to be actually asking, having absolute control in a relationship is by definition impossible, there is always an element of chance that could factor…
/r/askTRP16/06/15 03:21 AM
8

You seem to have missed the whole point of "you are the prize." In any particular situation a single female may be the one deciding if there's sex going on, but it is ALWAYS the man deciding if there wi be commitment. Sex is cheap and easy to come by, so the man is being selective. Plus the aloof mindset is what a woman is biologically inclined to be attracted to. Go read and lurk more.
/r/askTRP01/06/15 08:19 PM
1

This man has answered every question and objection any rational person could reasonably conceive. But you're not gonna listen, are you OP? No, you're gonna be a little faggot who is absolutely convinced that you have a unicorn you will ignore all wisdom and advice to the contrary. So just go the fuck away and leave this sub to people who actually will listen to the answers to their questions.
/r/askTRP11/05/15 09:44 PM
1

You're being trickle truthed hard and your oneitis is blinding you to reality. This chick is not special, she's not the unicorn you're seeking, you are lying to yourself to convince yourself that she is. Take a serious step back, really consider what it is she adds to your life and whether that can be found elsewhere or not. Then consider whether you're willing to get suckered into being this girls chump because of those qualities. Long distance is always a problem, she is compounding the issue …
/r/askTRP07/03/15 05:30 PM
11

Don't listen to this guy. I'm a former marine, complying with instructions quickly and quietly is gonna make you look like a bitch. Just be a man and present yourself professionally, ie dress decent, shave, and be on time. A good handshake, good morning/afternoon sir and you're golden. It's really not hard, just don't be a simpering, pathetic lap dog like u/5850s is suggesting.
/r/askTRP06/03/15 04:12 PM
7

Best guess is you were plan B and her main option didn't work out. Which is not to say she was banging that guy, but that she was sounding out his intentions/desires, she realized he isn't interested so now it's your turn.
/r/askTRP25/02/15 05:08 PM
2

You. I mean, it applies to both of you, but clearly I replied to you.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 06:34 PM
11

Dude. What the fuck is wrong with you? You have massively failed to set the parameters of your relationship. You need to scrap this one on principle and not fuck up so hard in the future.
/r/askTRP20/02/15 03:21 PM
1

Actually Pope Francis said something about this fairly recently. The short version is the Catholic church's official stance is that God did indeed create the world but there is no conflict of faith in that he did so through influencing natural processes and the 6 days in Genesis are in no way literal.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 03:51 PM
-19

For real though, this bitch made asshole got slapped around by a bitch half his size (and he's already small.) The dude has long since lost anything approximating testicular fortitude. That's the real tragedy here.
/r/PussyPass29/01/15 03:16 AM
1

I read that whole article before I looked at the title or name of the author. I legitimately think "Alex" is just the androgynous pen name of some pissed off bull dyke. I refuse to believe anyone with actual testosterone can write this level of sniveling bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 10:38 PM
4

I think you need to reconsider your decision to upgrade this woman. Look, men enjoy sex, that's not really disputed. But women are MADE for sex. If she's turning you down you just Ain't dat nigga. It could be she's comfortable in her new position and confident you won't drop her ass, in which case it means you need to instill dread. Or it could be that she just isn't getting the tingles from you now because you are "with" her. Either way, you fucked up somewhere in this process if the chick you …
/r/askTRP22/01/15 07:55 PM
1

Jesus Christ. Do people even read the sidebar anymore? Even without TRP principles who the fuck just leaves their own bed like a little pouty child? God damn, why would this chick respect you or fear losing you?
/r/askTRP16/11/14 11:20 PM
4

I'm pretty much the same. Lack of sleep makes me exponentially less likely to put up with bullshit
/r/askTRP16/09/14 08:03 PM
1

Fascinating read. Any chance you have the link to the original Korean article? I'm trying to brush up.
/r/AlreadyRed16/09/14 01:51 PM
1

Hence why I said I want to say it's a step in the right direction. At least this woman acknowledges all men do for women before becoming completely utilitarian. But yeah, still Machiavellian in nature.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 03:54 PM
1

I wanna say this is a step in the right direction. But damn, this whole article leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 03:05 PM
4

In the LTR I just ended I turned her down for sex a total of 3 times. She flipped her shit. Part of why I ended it.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 05:40 PM
6

Some of hers looked pretty damn good actually.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 03:26 PM
2

Honestly, a lot of people are saying its a shit test for attention. I think it sounds more like she was putting up LMR and you failed to pass it and she was genuinely confused about what to do. As for the text in the morning thing, that probably is a shit test. 2 ways to handle it, ignore until she texts again about something completely separate OR A&A. I personally would go with the latter.
/r/askTRP01/09/14 03:17 PM
2

Damn. I liked this guy. Too bad he had to wander into an area of economics he has no business talking about.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 01:06 PM
1

The fuck did I just read?
/r/askTRP18/08/14 06:23 PM
1

"Cause these hoes ain't loyal" works with surprising regularity for me.
/r/askTRP17/08/14 01:43 PM
1

I use either "tinder told me to ask you to have my babies. Seems weird but I'm rolling with it" or "I wanna bury my dick so deep in your ass whoever pulls me out of you will be the next king of England." Both have pretty high success rates for getting responses. Positive or negative responses don't matter, just get them talking to begin the push/pull dance that ends with your babies on her face.
/r/askTRP16/08/14 07:35 PM
2

Neither do I. But like I said, it's the only thing approaching a viable answer i've gotten from the women to whom I have posed the question.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:32 PM
1

Fair enough. Never bothered to do the research myself. I personally don't care to live into my 90's anyway.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:31 PM
6

Something about quality of life vs quantity of life comes to mind. God knows i'd rather die at 70 than live to 90 with a nagging shrew as a housemate.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:30 PM
4

The only thing approaching a viable response to that question that I've ever gotten is that, statistically, married men live longer. I've never been able to actually get someone to cite the proof of that for me, but that's the response I get.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 03:26 PM
10

Pretty sure they're speaking chinese. I would bet this is in China. I was struck by how many people are just sitting there watching this girl get her ass kicked and only jumped in to do anything once dude was pummeling the shit out of one girl from the mount. Dude had no idea what he was doing, but damn was that entertaining to watch.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/14 04:31 PM
1

Damn. I totally didn't. I just read that how it was supposed to sound.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:54 AM
2

Honestly that's just me being pedantic. Good write up.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:12 AM
2

No. You spelled it "Kemosobe" and I spelled it "Kemosabe." Third syllable is "sa" not "so"
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:06 AM
2

The only way I can think you're wrong is how you spelled Kemosabe.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:18 PM
6

Because you're making a flawed analogy. You have a right to bodily integrity. You have no right to a relationship or anyone else's time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 05:58 PM
1

Well I answer that way because feelings aren't the point, but efficacy. It's no fantasy world i live in. Married men are fully cognizant of the fact that their wives could leave at any time. I've had numerous women be not so subtle about telling me about all their ale friends or coworkers or even exes. This isn't something women need to tell each other, it's just something they intrinsically understand. Men need to be told what to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 05:35 PM
2

Men constantly are. It's implicit, but it's there. I've been on the receiving end before and whether or not it feels good; it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 05:21 PM
4

Then so is much of what women do in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 05:20 PM
7

Not every male is naturally desired by women. In fact 80% aren't. So dread game is implicit for your boyfriend. You KNOW he has options. Most men are not so lucky, hence TRP exists to give strategies to those men for maximizing their chances of success.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 05:19 PM
2

I see the metaphor. But insisting my worldview is rationalizing bad behavior without explaining why my behavior or worldview is negative is just weak. It's also tautological. "It's bad because I say it's bad" is essentially what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 04:45 PM
1

Call it whatever you want. Doesn't change the fundamental idea behind it. Calling it dread game doesn't mean literally instilling dread anymore than "spinning plates" means literally spinning multiple plates at a time. Interesting how you single out 2 explanatory sentences out of context and ignore the actual substance of what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 04:31 PM
6

It seems you've constructed quite an interesting straw man there. I don't know why you don't seem to understand that TRP doesn't view "dread game" as abusive. If anything people have been conflating the NAME with the actual ACTION. Dread game essentially means letting your SO know (subtly or otherwise) that you have other options and won't tolerate disrespect. I fail to see what's wrong with it. It's NOT manipulative. It is the antithesis of manipulation. It is making the terms of a relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 04:15 PM
1

Ok. But I have to think you are the exception to the rule. 99 times out of 100 an open relationship benefits only the female. Especially one that began monogamous and then "opened" later on.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 07:14 PM
8

No. I would not be ok with this. And I believe most TRPers wouldn't be either. Quite simply opening a relationship never goes in the mans favor unless he is already steadily turning women away.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 06:45 PM
0

Casual sex is most likely not offered to those women because men surmise they aren't the type to be interested in it. However, if they OFFERED casual sex, odds are good they would be taken up on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 06:15 PM
2

You know, I don't agree with you and in all likelihood we wouldn't get along in person. But that shit was funny. So for right now I like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/14 01:12 AM
3

Dude I have a steady girlfriend of several years and we have consistent sex. I still masturbate. Sometimes it's just preferable. Like sex is a full home cooked meal and jerking off is throwing a hot pocket in the microwave.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 09:43 PM
2

Ok, thank you for the actual study. I had no idea what to make of just a table of numbers.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 10:18 PM
2

My point is men have a HIGHER correlation. So men are more hateful than women? Is that what this is saying?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:36 PM
5

Am I reading this wrong or does that same study suggest a negative .94 correlation between males attractiveness and hostility toward women. So basically ugly people are ugly all the way through.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:26 PM
1

Define "harassed"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 05:19 AM
-1

So if we're forced to subsidize it then we're entitled to a part of it, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 07:28 PM
5

That's ok. The fetus wasn't going to be walking anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 07:13 PM
2

If you gotta pay for it you're doing it wrong. But in principle of quid pro quo I can get behind this policy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 06:49 PM
1

What I'm saying is "not all women can afford birth control" does not mean it's ok to take from the rest of us to pay for it. Frankly if they can't afford safe sex then something is seriously wrong considering how incredibly cheap and safe birth control is in the modern world
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 04:55 PM
3

You do realize prescriptions are given out like candy, right? Even urgent care clinics can hand them out. Birth control is not that expensive. The argument as to women's financial situation determining whether or not they take precautions against pregnancy is ludicrous. Men do need birth control. At WORST it's a secondary protection against pregnancy and at best it would be a protection against devious women. I am not saying the responsibility of their actions is what bonds men to pregnancy but …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 04:33 PM
3

In the first world it is true. Prescriptions are handed out like candy and Walmart stocks birth control for a few dollars a month. What "society" benefits from is irrelevant. The fact is a group of people are demanding that the government rob the rest of us to subsidize their choices. Your argument about men's control of their reproduction is false. Men can control the us of condoms, but women can and have been known to "sperm jack" from condoms or lie about her own birth control. I realize you'…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 04:27 PM
5

Women HAVE consistent access to birth control. What they don't have, and have no right to, is taxpayer funded birth control. And let's be honest, women have far more control of their sexuality than do men. There exists no birth control pill for men, no abortion equivalent men can exercise to escape responsibility for their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 02:18 PM
2

I disagree with the principle that women are unequal to men in the first world. The suffragettes and early feminists had (semi) legitimate complaints and worked to correct what they perceived as social injustices. Modern feminism is a dying beast gasping for air and clinging to the thinnest straws of "patriarchy" to remain relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 02:14 PM
1

At my niece/goddaughters christening. Frankly only went because my brother asked. Saw this gorgeous girl I was dead convinced I was going to bang that weekend. Got to talking and turns out she's about as redpill woman as a western woman comes. Been with her 2 years now. Neither of us are inclined towards marriage, so it's working out well.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/14 04:51 PM
19

I'm looking forward to the update where she comes crawling back to this poor sap because the new guy dropped her like a bad habit.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 11:09 PM
3

Because it would be nice to be able to rest on our laurels and relax. But if we know we'll be replaced by a better prospect we can't do that. But strictly speaking we don't blame women for that. Again, it's just how it is. Men are there to push the limits and explore new frontiers. That's what being the disposable sex is all about.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 06:17 PM
3

Hypergamy isn't bad. It's just how things are. That's why we say the red pill is bitter. Because it sucks to know that if you don't push yourself constantly to be the best man you can be and maintain your frame and leadership role; she'll leave you for a man who does.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 01:14 PM
1

I respect that and all. But this guy/gal is obviously trolling and has violated at least a few of the sidebar rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 03:15 PM
0

Because he feels like it. End of story.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 06:48 AM
2

In all seriousness; do you know what the word "misandry" means or do you just throw it around trying to sound intelligent?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 06:47 AM
6

Mods: you seriously aren't going to delete something as obviously trolling as this?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 06:39 AM
0

Well, you're oversimplifying my response, but sure, whatever you want to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 01:05 PM
0

That's all well and good. I was simply explaining why we think how we do. The beauty of a belief system is that I can believe what I believe and form my actions based on that and you don't have to think I'm right. In fact, I don't even have to care what other people think.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 12:55 PM
1

I'm more than happy to explore my beliefs. It's just that how males in general act under similar circumstances is not a part of my beliefs. Maybe RPW would be more able to answer you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 05:25 AM
0

I think it will again boil down to collective anecdotal arguments. We see men react differently to the same situations than women and can draw conclusions from that. Ultimately it just doesn't matter to that many of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 05:16 AM
1

Yes, but the point is as a redpiller we shouldn't do that. Of COURSE men will rationalize her behaviors. We just laugh and continue to bang their girlfriends. And of COURSE most men don't know or accept these things, frankly, we don't care. More men knowing these things is just competition for us. I never said it was an innate part of sexual strategy, I said it was a TRP part of sexual strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 05:10 AM
1

Then you're essentially saying it's a meaningless debate. The original conclusion has nothing to do with men. Redpillers don't care if a male is prone to rationalization. We would probably seek to eliminate such behaviors in ourselves, but still, in general male rationalizations for behavior has little to no effect on us. So why would we care if men hamster?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 04:59 AM
0

Ah, I didn't write that clearly. Let me rephrase. Her Hamstering is not a part of her sexual strategy, but KNOWING she is inclined to such rationalizations would be a part of ours. For example, I meet a chick, she tells me she has a boyfriend. Based off the Hamstering principle I know I can probably still get sex out of her and she'll rationalize it later to him. Similarly, if I'm ever met with a situation where a woman is telling me something that doesn't quite add up or I feel she's rationaliz…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 04:54 AM
2

I think at this point you're asking for an impossible burden of proof and you know it. These observations are not based on clinical studies, peer reviewed and sanctioned by whatever academic institution does such things. We speak from experience and observation. A better question might be do YOU have any evidence that men rationalize as much or more?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 04:48 AM
1

Dismissing feminists is an entirely different subject, worthy of it's own thread honestly. There are myriad reasons we dismiss feminists claims. The distinction I believe you are getting at (correct me if I'm wrong) is when a woman says something like "well, I have a friend who doesn't do that, so your generalization is invalid." We would dismiss that out of hand because in our mind that is anecdotal evidence being extrapolated to attempt to dismiss an observed phenomenon. So I believe therein l…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 04:38 AM
6

Yes, it absolutely is. Her wanting to fuck other dudes is inherently indicative of her loss of interest in you. Similarly, a dude wanting to fuck other chicks, especially in front of her, signifies he has little to no feelings whatsoever left for her
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 04:28 AM
1

Redpillers have consistently said our philosophy is based on observation and experience. I'm saying the same thing in different words. I agree a single case of anecdotal evidence could be dismissed as a bitter male, but when a significant section of the male population starts to hold the same beliefs based on that same personal anecdotal evidence.... You start to have a much more convincing argument Now, do I have any academic studies to prove my point? No, of course not. If anyone had bothered …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 04:19 AM
1

Justify which belief? That men rationalize less? Well, we're mostly male and our interactions with females have taught us that they will explain away bad behavior at the drop of a hat. I've had numerous personal experiences with such activity, so that's where my personal belief stems from, I imagine much of TRP is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 04:08 AM
-2

Hamstering is a term used to describe the uniquely female instances of such rationalization. I've never seen a redpiller deny men rationalizing also. At most we would say men rationalize less
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 04:01 AM
3

That is not true. Most military guys are friends with people in their own unit and therefore all deploy together, so there would likely be no such friend back home. All that aside that shit is retarded. Most military guys send their wives back to their hometown in the hopes that mommy and daddy can keep her from embracing her inner whore for 6-12 months of deployment.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 06:36 PM
11

Absolutely not. I'm all for the AVAILABILITY of any kind of contraceptive the market deems profitable and effective. But why the hell should we all have to pay for the indiscretions of a generation of females; the vast majority of whom we cant stand to actually talk to unless we're banging them? There is no "inevitable rise in single mothers." What there is is a failing of personal responsibility for an entire generation and a massive expansion of a welfare state where people can make all the st…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/14 09:42 PM
3

Women's studies is a given. Anyway, being a STEM major as well as a social science major (EE and ECON) I do recognize what you're saying about limited applicability of the social science majors. HOWEVER, that doesn't change the fact that by and large they are fluff. More importantly the (relative) ease of attaining these degrees waters down the signaling power of a bachelors degree and simultaneously downgrades educational standards across the board. But that's a more in depth argument about eco…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/14 01:33 AM
2

Sociology, psychology, English, history, communications, business admin. There's quite a few others, and some of these certainly have a purpose, but by and large on most universities these are mostly fluff majors and, at least on my university, dominated by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/14 09:40 PM
1

That one example is exactly that. An example. Women receiving 60% lighter sentences for the same crime is another. The divorce courts in this country are currently constructed as to offer no real disincentive to women toward divorce. The fact of the matter is there is really no cost to a woman if she wants a divorce and that's not true for men. Alimony is a symptom of the disease. A woman can behave badly, ignore her commitments, and tear a father from his children with no real repercussion more…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/14 12:52 PM
-1

I didn't say women have no responsibilities. I said they and society seek to absolve them of responsibilities. On divorce, I don't believe for a split second that men cheat more than women. Perhaps men are caught more, but I don't believe they actually do it more. You claim spousal support "should" only occur under specific circumstances, but one glance at family law courts will tell you that's not even close to how things actually go. There are a number of cases where men are ordered to pay mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 04:26 PM
1

A dictionary definition that has it's genesis in feminist thought is not a valid argument to me. My contention is that the loud minority does not receive the scorn and denouncement it richly deserves, particularly from other feminists. My views on feminism aside, my argument that women seeking consistently to absolve themselves of responsibility puts them tantamount to a child. Feminists are the loudest and most successful group of women in that regard but it's a consistent, daily activity for m…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 04:11 PM
1

Divorce and spousal support is an example, not the only one of courts being skewed towards women. Society as a whole coddles women and absolves them of most responsibility of their actions. Hence, they are at best complicit in being children. And some feminists may be extremists, but they are by far the most vocal and successful group. Their views are in fact the ones gaining the most traction in legislation and courts. Hence, they are de facto "all feminists" because I don't hear a clamor from …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 03:43 PM
-1

My personal take on the matter is pretty straightforward. Yes, women are large children. The reasoning why is more nuanced Consider this: all persons have rights and responsibilities. A person with no rights but all responsibilities is a slave. A person with no responsibilities but retaining rights is a child. Women in western society, particularly feminists, consistently seek to absolve themselves of any consequences for their actions, therefore they are children. How do they seek to do this? I…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 02:53 PM
1

That was a bitch move. It's one thing if he swung back immediately. But this asshole sucker punched her when she had turned away. No matter who you're fighting, that's a bitch move in my book.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 01:59 AM
8

Agreed. But women having the notion that I'm scared of anything they bring is laughable. It's not healthy for them to think we're afraid of them. Not my problem though, I suppose.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 07:45 PM
8

I like a lot of this. The only thing I take exception to is "men are terrified of feminine anger." I'm not the slightest bit terrified of feminine anger, it doesn't scare me in the slightest. I AM however sick to death of it and just fed up with dealing with angry bitches.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 07:32 PM
9

You mess with the bull, you get the horns. Plain and simple. You wanna talk shit like you can whip any group of guys and then offer to follow through; it's gonna end badly. You talk shit to any group of servicemen and offer to follow through; you get KTFO. Sad thing is I can hear her hamster spinning from here. I doubt anything will change in her mindset from this. What we really need as a society is about a decade worth of moratorium on the whole "men don't hit women" thing. After that, guarant…
/r/TheRedPill04/11/13 02:17 AM
2

Practicing catholics in general. I went to a catholic school and my family was "small" at 7 kids. Biggest family was 16, but 10 was about average.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/13 11:35 PM
-17

Soooooooo. That sucks for him and all. Too bad he couldn't get an extremely lucrative job after being in prison for several years. But what exactly does this have to do with Mens rights? Other than him being falsely accused and an example of what can happen to a man in those circumstances.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 06:34 AM
11

That is incorrect. Any walmart will carry birth control for like 8 bucks a month. Some forms require doctor prescription, not all.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 02:25 AM
1

I really hope it's true. It occurs to me that for millennia men have waged wars for women. Wont be a long fight when we wage war AGAINST women. Let's hope the majority of women pull their heads together and shut down hateful feminists before it comes to that.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:42 AM
4

Well that's because the wage gap is a myth, but this is an actual increase in the cost of hiring women. That's where the logic differs.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:24 PM
4

Ah, I see where your logic went. Ok, well, I have to say I disagree simply because in the long run this company still needs to make profits. If they somehow have such a monopoly on their customer base as to be beyond the reach of market controls then yes, I agree with your assessment. In the more realistic scenario where they still need to make money either they forgo the model they have just adopted or the entire industry adopts it. Either way, to me, in the long run, the result is the same. At…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:42 AM
9

I don't follow the logic of how she ends up edging men out. If she is comparably more expensive than men of the same skills, experience and qualifications then economic logic dictates that she be the one edged out. Could you explain what you mean a bit more? I'm curious how you reach your conclusion.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:04 AM
27

True. It's only one business, but its a precedent. And more often than not the precedent is followed and perhaps even eventually codified into law. That was my point.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:29 AM
172

I love when people ignore basic economics. This seems to me to ultimately lead to one conclusion: women are now more expensive to employ, hence there will be relatively fewer women employed in the future than there are now. I can't help but chuckle when radfems shoot themselves in the foot. In a few years they'll be crying for mandatory minimum employment rates akin to affirmative action.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 10:57 PM
1

I'm still confused on the particulars of this case. How is it exactly that a general has the authority to overturn the verdict of a courts martial? And why is it a problem to strip them of that authority? I mean, it's still up to the commanding officers discretion whether a courts martial is even convened in the first place. Had this guy Herrera's CO done his/her job in the first place then a trial would never have been convened. Again, I'm confused how exactly it was appropriate for a General t…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:14 PM
1

I'm interested in her lady flower...
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:34 PM
1

I appreciate the feedback. I was thinking much the same things. Though I don't have any sources on hand for debunking them. I'm trying to find hard facts and studies, but not having much luck so far
/r/MensRights21/03/13 08:18 PM
1

Couple questions on this one.... 1) When did this sub become another hack political platform for barely tangentially related issues. 2) Why the fuck is this ignorant drivel even still here?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:10 AM
122

Maybe I'm missing something. But that article seems to be satirical in general and more genuinely laudatory towards males than anything. Maybe i'm just reading it in the tone I'd like to hear though. I find it hard to believe anyone would be so overtly disparaging of stay at home dads.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:41 PM
0

Thanks for the info. I wasn't debating the stupidity of the belief for the record. I was merely clarifying what seems to be the air travel industries beliefs on the matter. I had several friends who were ground crew tell me the same thing. I eventually just stopped arguing with them.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 07:08 PM
0

Pretty sure the theory is the high levels of concentrated RF and electromagnetic radiation from the communication and radar equipment cause sterility. Though more often than not any reproductive effects would be felt more by the ground crew than anything.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter