TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

morebeansplease Archive

View 3 posts and 271 comments by morebeansplease on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
52

Good example of cops enforcing feminism. They're definetly part of the problem.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 06:14 PM
0

It's exactly what was just described in my initial response....
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/23 04:00 PM
1

Have you thought out the logical conclusion of what you're discussing?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/23 04:07 AM
9

This all brings up a really good and scary point. Your experience proves it's just a power grab. What if the biological differences you're talking about are directly linked to the survival of humanity? We could actually be discussing the decline and even downfall of human life. Should this corrupted and power hungry feminist agenda be allowed to make decisions in that example situation?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/23 05:37 PM
-4

I don't see a reference for a single one of those comments. I mean, isn't it bad faith to judge without hearing the other side of the story?
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:11 PM
1

Oh, so when you say her narrative it means you don't trust her story. I see what you're saying now. Like, I'm not really following this whole thing. Definitely not enough to go find some links. It just wasn't clear to me what you were getting at. Thanks for the explanation.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 11:09 PM
-3

I mean, she had a bruise on her face. Even had to testify that it was him. I'm not an expert here. Is that what you mean by narrative?
/r/MensRights24/05/22 09:09 PM
-2

Wait, I thought the domestic violence against her was proved when she got that restraining order a few years. This new thing is about libel for an interview... I thought.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 06:59 PM
1

I guess I'm confused. Was Heard the victim of a crime?
/r/MensRights24/05/22 05:45 PM
2

I mean, how many Christians follow the bible though? It seems to be more of a pick and choose which parts you like effort. Matthew 19:24 I'll say it again-it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of A needle than for a rich person to enter the Kingdom of God! 1 Timothy 2:12 I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent. Matt 5:38 to 48 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:38 PM
1

Not Christianity, as they abolished the practice of circumcision years ago. Abolished? Like, they made laws preventing it? As in the abolishment of slavery... Can you explain this. I'm not sure I understand what you're saying.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:31 PM
4

Or, we're different people with different perspectives. I mean, not everyone thinks the same... right? In good faith I'm asking you to explain yourself. No tricks.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 07:49 PM
7

Ease up. I'm a different person, with different life experiences and different thoughts. What you're suggesting is not something I've heard before. I'm happy to learn though. Why do you believe Christians are against circumcision?
/r/MensRights09/05/22 07:37 PM
5

That's what your words mean. Maybe instead of telling me what I meant. It would be more helpful to expand on your thoughts a bit.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 07:32 PM
6

No, I don't believe that 86% of Alabama is Jewish. Why do you believe that?
/r/MensRights09/05/22 07:27 PM
0

Doesn't excuse the blanket statement or blame game. We can't pursue change for the betterment if we're stuck pointing fingers. Do better. We can't identify where the issue is coming from without pointing fingers. In fact, how can you claim to be solving the problem if you don't talk about what's causing it. Help me out here. How is what you're saying making sense?
/r/MensRights09/05/22 07:25 PM
-5

There's a lot of interesting history on this topic. Let's have some fun learning about it. I'm going to spam a few different articles here to give you a good view of the landscape. The first one is about Christianity and masturbation across the world. Christian denominations have different views on masturbation. Today, Roman Catholic (including Eastern Catholic), Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox and some Protestant Christians consider masturbation to be a sin. Here is how circumcision and mas…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 07:16 PM
-4

I mean, we're talking about Alabama... right? Do you really not know which religion is pushing this on Alabama?
/r/MensRights09/05/22 06:45 PM
-14

These Christians just don't care about human rights.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 06:29 PM
-10

Even if the woman was the headline actress for the film? I mean, I can't prove either way. The take on this one feels like a reach. But that's just my take.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 10:57 PM
11

"The world is different than it was when I was a little kid," Murray said. "What I always thought was funny as a little kid isn't necessarily the same as what's funny now. Things change and the times change so it's important for me to figure it out."
/r/MensRights01/05/22 10:27 PM
-4

It kinda seems like you're deciding what's okay for women to do. I'm not an expert here. But shouldn't each person get to decide what's best for them?
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:27 PM
-6

This hierarchy that's oppressing you sounds terrible. But instead of just giving up. Have you thought about fighting for equality?
/r/MensRights25/03/22 04:34 AM
1

We already discussed the importance of reading comprehension, bro. Don't you remember reading that?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 04:00 PM
1

Why do you talk to other people if hearing what they have to say counts as "wasting your time"?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 02:23 PM
1

/yawn
/r/MensRights14/03/22 07:03 PM
1

It's cool. I'm okay with being patient. I have kids. Go ahead, try again.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 09:38 PM
1

Swing and a miss.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 05:33 AM
1

You've been clear about what you don't understand. I've been clear about why you need to understand it. Let's see how long it takes for you to realize what needs to happen next.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 04:31 PM
1

Bruh, reading comprehension is critical to success here.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:44 AM
1

That's not what courage looks like. I know, I've seen courage before.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:28 AM
1

Answered, I thought we were going to have a conversation. Or a... what's the word, ah, discussion. Let me know when you find the courage to participate.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 08:41 PM
1

Wait, are you ready to discuss the responsibility men have? I'm happy to discuss the responsibility women have after that.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 04:38 PM
1

You're just not making any sense. What is stopping you from discussing the responsibility that men have in this situation?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 10:59 PM
-2

Yeah sure.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 10:58 PM
0

This prevents you from being honest?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:27 PM
-1

Are you acknowledging that men are enforcing it on men?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:24 PM
0

Why are you so scared of discussing the responsibility men have?
/r/MensRights07/03/22 04:48 PM
-1

I'm trying to discuss how men are doing and we, as men, aren't stepping up to that. Is it okay if we discuss that?
/r/MensRights07/03/22 04:47 PM
1

Locker Room Talk Any manner of conversation that polite society dictates be held privately - with small groups of like-minded, similarly gendered peers - due to its sexually charged language, situations or innuendos.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 05:35 PM
1

Ah, so you do think men should be held accountable.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 05:05 AM
-2

I think men are enforcing it on other men.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:55 PM
0

Why do men enforce this on other men?
/r/MensRights03/03/22 04:09 AM
0

Voting for president is not absent of coercion. Corrupt systems present unfair options. Please justify your "all things being equal" voted for president comment.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:56 AM
-1

I see. Because you're question "correlates" it's not worth answering mine.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 04:27 PM
0

Oh, was my question not worth answering?
/r/MensRights02/03/22 12:02 AM
-3

Wow, okay, let's just assume that's accurate. As is, men are responsible for enforcing that other men die. But if men embraced equality, then it would be also women that are responsible for men dying. Or, even if women take control, then it's 100% their responsibility. But with men in charge, they're responsible for this action... yes?
/r/MensRights01/03/22 04:24 PM
-13

I bet that if the men had done more to support feminism it would be a discussion of equality instead of patriarchal responsibilities. Kinda screwed themselves over on that one didn't they.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 02:45 AM
2

rape culture noun A society or environment whose prevailing social attitudes have the effect of normalizing or trivializing sexual assault and abuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/21 06:06 PM
1

ROFL
/r/MensRights06/05/21 06:09 AM
1

I remember because I asked you for a reference and you never gave one... Just like right now. Are you allergic to references or something?
/r/MensRights05/05/21 05:51 PM
1

We dont oppose any 'gender-equality movement' because none exists... Then why not create one that focuses on bringing men up to equal?
/r/MensRights05/05/21 03:02 PM
1

Back. Where did we leave off?
/r/MensRights04/05/21 11:20 PM
1

I'm out.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 03:00 AM
1

and there's the duck. You tried to dismiss my argument based on a technicality you invented. Remember the whole imaginary requirement of "global gender equality organizations".... After i spent all that time informing you about the world you still won't look up a definition. Now you're resorting to insults.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 02:52 AM
1

You didn't look it up, did you.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 02:25 AM
1

There's the dip. You know I told you that you would do this. Go look up the definition of politician. Seriously, right now. Before you do anything else. Open Google and look it up.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 02:19 AM
1

There's the dodge. So what's the definition of politician?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 02:10 AM
1

Just like your first post me asking for definitions will destroy almost every single claim you've made. So let's go through the 5 D's of dodgeball one more time. Hey show me the definitions of those words you're using.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 01:56 AM
1

Inform me, what is the difference between politician and leader? Black males only got the right to vote in the 60's. They're still being oppressed today. You're still playing sharpshooter. There are many men's rights groups. Some work with Feminists. This one you support doesn't even have the goal of equality in its agenda. You're still running away from the big picture.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 01:31 AM
1

How else can you organize without leadership? Are you a communist. Advocating for strong and self reliant communities?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 01:15 AM
1

You're still sharpshooting the bottom to dismiss the top. Every single large effort has failures and incompetence. The larger the effort the larger the failures. I'm busy showing you the framework is there. The goal is there. Pretending it's not misses the reality of the situation. We can't just fix things overnight. We're 8n the transition to value human rights right now.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 01:03 AM
1

You really missed the guts of that last response.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:55 AM
1

We need to understand the agenda's and restrictions before focusing on practice. Otherwise you're just setting up yourself to be a victim of process. As we already showed, the Left hasn't been running the US for the last 3 decades. If anything, the capitalists have. Your arguments betray a lack of big picture. We have clear evidence of multi-national, of global organizations working towards equality. So why isn't it successful? But we can't answer that until we map out the processes. Cherry pick…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:42 AM
1

"in principle"
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:32 AM
1

Yo, I've got a thing. Won't be around for... maybe 6 days. If you got questions ask now. Otherwise holding pattern.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:26 AM
1

My claim is about gender equality. I am demonstrating there are larger groups than what you call "feminism" that concern themselves with gender equality. One could say they are common across the globe. In fact, none of your movements fight for gender equality. They claim to fight for 'equality', which itself is loosely defined. This is false. Equality includes gender equality by definition. What's your go to here? You're going to try and find real world examples as a gotcha moment. Well, I would…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:19 AM
1

The 'Texas sharpshooter fallacy' (or: 'clustering illusion') refers to a man with a gun but no shooting skills who fires a number of bullets into the wall of a barn, paints a bull's-eye around a fortuitous cluster of bullet holes, and declares himself a sharpshooter
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:00 AM
1

Where did you get the word "dismissed' from... You've done that thing where you dont understand the discussion. So you just make up answers from what you know. It's okay to look stuff up... right? 1 We Are All Born Free & Equal. We are all born free. We all have our own thoughts and ideas. We should all be treated in the same way. Why don't we start with the kids version.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 11:49 PM
1

Slow your roll. We're not in the clear yet. We've just muddied the waters. We know that if you ever point at a Neo-Liberal and expect them to choose equality over making money there is question in what they will choose. Keep in mind, they have to keep up appearances. So you may see verbal support but then lack action to push it through. I know your keen about that one. As history has shown. It will be framed in "incremental change" and "we need to move slow". I have tons of examples if you want.…
/r/MensRights22/04/21 10:45 PM
1

I already mentioned why. The Neo-Liberals, in accepting capitalism, no longer hold equality as a core value. So everything is based on incremental change. Remember when Joe "status quo" Biden told his billionaire friends that he would bring things back to normal... But Neo-libs don't define the party anymore. They're losing control. The last 3 decades of US leadership has been anything but Leftist. How many times have they raised the min wage? How many times have they socialized healthcare? How …
/r/MensRights22/04/21 10:27 PM
1

Which Liberals? Not all Liberals are the same. Which time period? Each moment in history has a different set of moral values. Which region? Each region has their own set of traditions and situations. That's what I'm trying to get across. Only an idiot would say every conservative is the same... yes? Well it's similar for Liberals. Keep in mind I think Liberals suck.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 10:16 PM
1

I'm only asking about the principles of Liberalism. After we have agreeance I will break it down and show how application gets screwy.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 10:11 PM
1

Let's make a division. Instead of looking at the people and thier actions. First lets look at definitions of words and ideas. The goal here is to understand the philosophies and concepts. Then see how people are applying them. I will make sure to use the phrase "in principle" to show that we're just talking about the ideas. Thank you for the patience I know this has been dragging out a bit. Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed and equality befo…
/r/MensRights22/04/21 10:00 PM
1

Do you agree that the Left has a core value of equality?
/r/MensRights22/04/21 07:22 PM
0

I'm gonna be offline for a few hours but here's good faith references to show I'm not making this up. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left%E2%80%93right_political_spectrum The topic of free speech is one of the most contentious issues in liberal societies. Because conservatives choose hierarchy over equality and therefore don't believe in free speech. Hold off on applying specific individual laws. We're still reviewing what it mean when we say ideology of the Left. Or philosphy of Liberalism. On…
/r/MensRights22/04/21 03:01 PM
0

The definition will still be true regardless of the actions of the person. Instead of looking at the definition as the problem qualify the actions as inconsistent. But we still need the word to describe the thing. The ideology of the Left has equality as a core value. Each philosophy will have a different path to achieve it. So.. all of them. Just with difference care and feeding. Example the Left brings us freedom of speech. Every person has an equal voice. As long as your telling the truth, ev…
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:57 AM
0

You're creating a false equivalent. We don't need a global gender equality movement for a gender a gender equality movement to exist. It's an unreasonable action to exclude dictionary definitions. Sure, you could ask for more info. But to refuse accepting them damages your credibility. They're universally accepted as value add. So to be clear I'm not accepting your explanation. I just feel like you're not seeing the whole picture. You forgot about Leftist philosophies. They all support equality,…
/r/MensRights22/04/21 12:48 AM
1

Thank you for that robust response. I appreciate the effort you put into it. Cheers, have an upvote. But I fear there has been a misunderstanding. You appear to be responding to the topic you made up instead of my post. Look, here is my post. Mensrights doesn't fight for equality. In fact it has no goal of working towards equality. Since it stands in the way of groups that do fight for equality mensrights is effectively perpetuating oppression. What in your reply responds to what I wrote? Think …
/r/MensRights21/04/21 11:38 PM
1

Okay, you win.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 08:11 PM
0

Wow, you're not even trying anymore. I have some dignity left. I have friends I can talk to. So, very exciting you're willing to just make up random shit to be the last one talking. You're going to win that one every day of the week. I'm not emotionally attached here. You've just gone mask off.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 07:39 PM
0

Are we already back to you insulting me again. That was a short trip back to the topic.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 06:29 PM
0

LMAO called it.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 04:40 PM
0

/yawn Shouldn't we be getting back to your point?
/r/MensRights21/04/21 04:27 PM
0

Which side do you believe it took?
/r/MensRights21/04/21 04:20 PM
1

Thank you for sharing the idea's in your head. I was looking for references though. Ya'know things other than your opinion or personal experience. You understand that... right?
/r/MensRights21/04/21 04:18 PM
1

Ah, you weren't really discussing. Just more distracting. That's on me. I shouldn't have taken you serious.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 04:17 PM
0

I'm patiently waiting for you to re-enter the conversation in good faith. Anything less than that would seem to be an insufficient action. Libs aren't just "on the Left" by the way. Example, are you a pro capitalism lib? Then you're on the Right. Pres Biden is auth/right. So was Pres Obama before him. I recommend saying Equality is a Leftist term. It's a much more accurate usage.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 04:10 PM
0

lol, your bluff got called. Is this that thing I keep reading about. How people "own the libs". Gotta admit I'm a bit disappointed.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 03:47 PM
0

Are you going to provide supporting evidence? Or have we confirmed the pattern of baseless claims...
/r/MensRights21/04/21 03:43 PM
0

I'm not here pushing a side. Just here for the facts. Notice how I'm not peppering you with insults. instead patiently asking you to show good faith to finish the conversation. Notice how you describe the situation as good vs evil. Not saying I'm perfect though.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 02:36 PM
0

Go ahead remind me. Let's go back to that spot.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 02:31 PM
0

Isn't that a repeat? Uh oh. Somebody is running out of distractions. Smart try adding the dodge comment. But you already know my reply... oh, so you're ready for an honest conversation now. Why don't we pick up where you stopped participating and started just saying whatever you wanted. Ready?
/r/MensRights21/04/21 04:44 AM
1

Why would you re-write your insult and pretend like it didn't happen? Then go on to make more? You realize I'm waiting for you to establish good faith right? Every time you change the subject and ignore cleaning up the mess you're just digs the hole deeper. There's no reason to keep going if you won't take responsibility for your words.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 03:54 AM
1

I didn't call anybody any names. I told you to look the mirror yourself... How can you say this and retain self-respect? Which basically means the society is bigoted and doesn't care about its boys and men.... And you wont need a dictionary to verify this statement. Just go and look into the mirror. Who does that.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 12:59 AM
0

You'll just talk about anything but the topic won't you.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 12:57 AM
0

You knew you had the week hand. So switched to always attack. But now you can't stop. Because when you do I just point back to the point you're running away from. There is no reason for me to respond. Because regardless right/wrong you won't defend it and will introduce a new topic. But you need to bait me into responding so that you can change the subject. You're just distracting from the point you can't respond to. Try harder. Better yet, pretend to revert back, then play stupid like you can't…
/r/MensRights20/04/21 11:13 PM
1

Which facts exactly? Don't you mean which emotions. Calling people names instead of using your adult words is the problem. You are here to be fair and respectful... right?
/r/MensRights20/04/21 11:11 PM
1

So there's no one answer yet you're here making definitive claims. How does that work? ...and it looks like you got triggered. Here come the insults. If you can't separate the facts from your emotions we don't need to keep talking.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 10:39 PM
0

Come on, is that the best you can make up? Try harder.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 10:37 PM
0

I wasn't asking.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 09:12 PM
0

This whole winning by looking like your winning is getting old. Can't you see it's not working? You're just here all by yourself downvoting me. Leaving a breadcrumb trail for others to follow. But nobody is here. It's just you putting on the show all by yourself. We both know you're preserving your ego by avoiding the difficult conversation. Look at how you're operating as if deathly afraid of self-awareness. Also by operating on stereotypes it allows you to dismiss everything I say without evid…
/r/MensRights20/04/21 04:35 PM
0

Right now, in this conversation?
/r/MensRights20/04/21 03:40 PM
0

So no possible chance there is something for you to learn here.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 03:29 PM
0

What about that other part. The one where your words triggered you. What are your thoughts on that?
/r/MensRights20/04/21 03:16 PM
1

Wait, now you're triggered and feeling attacked... When I use your words against you. It triggers you and makes you feel attacked. I wonder if there is something we can learn from this?
/r/MensRights20/04/21 02:56 PM
0

cool story
/r/MensRights20/04/21 02:32 PM
1

Would you mind referencing that definition.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 05:47 AM
0

nah
/r/MensRights20/04/21 05:46 AM
0

Ah, this is one of those "things" the dictionaries and universities lie about. But you're here to set me straight. With your version of science and your facts. Can I quote you on this. Or will you lie and claim its not what you said later?
/r/MensRights20/04/21 02:35 AM
0

Your ability to recognize "reality" is really setting the tone here.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 02:00 AM
0

Some of those quotes aren't from me. Wait, what... really? Why would you lie about something that is like preserved so everyone can see? What is happening. You can go back right now and see that you said these things... right? Everyone for as long as the internet is alive. Can go back and see what you wrote. We can all see that you're lying. I took a screen shot. Here, take your own advice. I'll suggest a starting point: read more carefully.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 11:20 PM
0

So far you've told me The dictionary lied. Observe the actions of the movement to find the truth, don't build your beliefs on fallacious claims. (Stanford lied) So I asked where to get information from. I mean the world is too big to personally know everyone. History is too long so most of the people who have been alive during the existence of feminism are dead. Hook me up. Where can I go to find the truth? Then you told me this. I get my facts from observations of the actions of feminists. Now …
/r/MensRights19/04/21 11:03 PM
0

I'm literally just asking you were to get facts from. Not sure why you're willfully confusing faith in religion with trust in academics. But it really is starting to look like you're stalling for time. Are you going to try and turn me on to self-help books...?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 10:34 PM
1

Nice move, turning the attacker into the victim. Thanks for trying to control your emotions and work through the facts. It's about practice. Not about getting it right every time. Have a blessed day.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:52 PM
1

Well you look calmer... But we still haven't sorted out the issue with the definition. Are you okay to discuss that without erupting into name calling?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:31 PM
1

You're still triggered. Take a moment to compose yourself. It's clear you feel like you're being attacked. But it's just a discussion on facts. Calm down.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:19 PM
1

Interesting course change. Instead of taking responsibility. You've decided flip the table and call me names. Don't be triggered. This is a safe space. Remember facts over feelings. Are you able to calm down and talk through this. Or should we break it off and go our own ways?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:07 PM
-1

Hmm... okay, so that's lies too. So I shouldn't be trusting any dictionary definitions or anything coming from universities. Well where do you go for your facts. I mean the world is too big to personally know everyone. History is too long so most of the people who have been alive during the existence of feminism are dead. Hook me up. Where can I go to find the truth?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:56 PM
-1

What about the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Will you accept that? Or is it also lies? In the mid-1800s the term “feminism” was used to refer to “the qualities of females”, and it was not until after the First International Women’s Conference in Paris in 1892 that the term, following the French term féministe, was used regularly in English for a belief in and advocacy of equal rights for women based on the idea of the equality of the sexes.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:46 PM
0

Except that it's different. Ya'know, the idea's it presents are different than the definition you agreed to. Again, there is no sense in continuing if you're not going to take responsibility for what you say. Will you take responsibility?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:28 PM
0

So you're admitting the definition you gave is made up? I mean there's no sense in continuing forward if you're not responsible for what you say... right?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:20 PM
-1

The men's rights movement (MRM)[1] is a branch of the men's movement. The MRM in particular consists of a variety of groups and individuals who focus on general social issues and specific government services which adversely impact, or in some cases structurally discriminate against, men and boys. Now share yours.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:12 PM
-1

What do you think to goal of MRA is? Because those words you wrote right there are not in the definition. That's literally just some shit you made up.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:40 PM
-1

You can argue feminists are corrupt. But pretending like dictionary definitions don't exist seems kinda... ridiculous. fem·i·nism - the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 03:22 PM
-1

Mensrights doesn't fight for equality. In fact it has no goal of working towards equality. Since it stands in the way of groups that do fight for equality mensrights is effectively perpetuating oppression.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 03:16 PM
27

If only we had some effort out there to ensure genders were treated equally.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 09:32 PM
2

Wait... who "wants" to get married?
/r/MensRights30/12/20 03:50 PM
2

Just everywhere I go men are shamed. Faggot, virgin, loser, coomer, beta, simp, cuck, small dick, gay, etc. With the exception of loser all of those terms are hateful. That is, language designed to dehumanize and justify disrespecting people. The people who talk that way should be models of how not to act. Positive masculinity is a thing to be proud about. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. You, as a human, should be exercising these traits. Every healthy community depends on these traits. Eng…
/r/MensRights29/12/20 10:39 PM
-1

Yes, you've shared your opinion already. Thank you.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 01:28 AM
-3

Okay, so it's your personal experience and not an academic source. What did you think of my... more academic looking source. Do you find that to be acceptable?
/r/MensRights15/12/20 12:49 AM
-4

Dude, did you just make up that list to try and win an argument... weak. There's too many to post but how about a taste. Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished. The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s), and its members (e.g., the leader is considered the Messiah, a special being, an avatar—or the group and/or the leader is on a special mission to save humanity). The group has a polarized, us-versus-them mentality, which may caus…
/r/MensRights14/12/20 11:42 PM
-1

You've left out Men's Liberation. The men's movement that feminist's support and do agree with. Any legitimate study of mens' rights must include this group. Was this glaring neglect done on accident or on purpose? To me, I see the real discussion here as the difference between MRA and MensLib... I would argue that men's rights are not dependent on women or Feminist's. Every time a discussion is started that way it's not a true discussion of men's rights. Instead it a discussion on the interacti…
/r/MensRights14/12/20 11:34 PM
1

Anglosphere captures the US for its cultural similarities without its governmental entanglements. This is the reason we decided to use it, as with all language, we gave it distinct meaning and it is convenient. Okay, so you're using it for something out of context. Looking at the rant OP posted I don't think you're assessment is accurate. But, in the interests of learning, sure, I'll bite. What are you using it for, what purpose does it serve, what thing is happening when you create this group?
/r/TheRedPill08/01/20 12:42 AM
0

Curious claim. Even more curious is it's lack of references. You clearly read the conversation about finding the back story on things. Ran over here like a little puppy dog. Then felt it necessary to vomit out a response limited to only your personal opinion. Geee... thanks for taking the time... I can't wait to hear what you say next.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/20 12:28 AM
0

Are we playing a game of imagination here. Again, any fool that can use google can literally just find out the back story. Yet you're not living that version of reality. I wonder, what version are you living.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/20 12:10 AM
-1

Instead of playing fuck fuck games call it what it is the White Commonwealth. You realize people can just look these things up... yes?
/r/TheRedPill07/01/20 11:56 PM
0

What definition of legitimate are you using?
/r/TheRedPill07/01/20 04:39 PM
-1

Anglosphere... This sounds more like a racist rant than meaningful advice. I'm gonna pass on this one. But thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/20 09:09 PM
0

If trp is political what ideologies does it use? It seems left is out, so looking at the right we see; heirarchy, nationalism, sense of duty. Holding onto traditional sex roles seems to be conservative, okay. But that also means. being all christian, so fuck you. What other options are there?
/r/TheRedPill04/12/19 04:41 AM
7

Technically the male g-spot is in your ass... maybe they're all missing out.
/r/askTRP06/11/19 08:03 PM
1

Who is dumb enough to learn about facts from the news...?
/r/MensRights06/09/19 07:33 PM
-1

Men are still taught from a young age that we're responsible for providing for everyone in our lives. You're literally describing toxic masculinity. This should not be taught or embraced. Who holds this as a standard?
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:15 PM
0

Ain't mine. Just found this one funny.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 03:15 PM
-16

FTFY This is how MRAs sound when they argue that ALL feminists do something edit1 -8 already, dont hate facts, dont hate the messenger, this statement doesnt survive the swap test.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 03:11 PM
-1

Virginity doesn't work like that, go watch some Adam ruins everything.
/r/askTRP07/06/19 07:11 PM
1

ah yes, THE LAST STRAW of 2014!
/r/MensRights06/06/19 05:20 PM
-12

This subreddit used to be kinda cool. Now its full of people pretending to be outraged at pictures of headline articles. Why so emo?
/r/MensRights30/05/19 06:08 PM
0

Is this subreddit just a place to repost the_donald memes now?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 11:47 PM
5

Practice staring down your cat.
/r/askTRP30/04/19 04:10 AM
1

You keep implying there's some logic yet refuse to explain it. I know a liar when I see one.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:11 PM
1

I'm still stuck at your question doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:42 AM
1

Your question doesn't make sense, so I asked a clarify question. I'm still stuck at your question doesn't make sense. You not adequately grasping the conversation does not equal me dodging. If you're not willing or not able to explain yourself that's okay just quit wasting my time.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:17 AM
1

Hey pal you didn't answer my question.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 03:56 AM
1

Movements are judged by the words and actions of their leaders. I have never heard of this idea where did you learn about it from?
/r/MensRights08/03/19 03:47 AM
-1

Why does your understanding of feminism start and end with people. It's an idea, a philosophical perspective. Shouldn't we be checking the definition of feminism to see if it supports idea that men can be raped. Could you imagine describing Christianity through Trumps actions. It would be the dumbest explanation ever. He doesn't seem to reflect a single characteristic of a Christian. Instead you should look to the bible to describe a Chrisitan.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 03:06 AM
0

You're splitting hairs between "fake feminists" and "real feminists." Maybe that's a hair that should be split.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:57 AM
-2

Oh, so not actual feminism. Instead it's a remark on pop culture or stereotypes of feminism. ty
/r/MensRights08/03/19 01:15 AM
1

Shoot first, ask questions later.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 10:11 PM
-1

Why does the title call her a feminist?
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:06 PM
2

It seems for many women if they do not get their way they make a false sex allegation knowing a man is not protected by the law. This statement is stupid. Not only does it lack any credible measurements but it propagates stereotypes. How many women.. .001%, .01%, .1%, 1%, 10%? Its a fear mongering statement teaching people to be scared. What is the actual chance of being in a situation like this, I dont know but let's all be scared. Women are just as shitty as men. We dont want men to be stereot…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:19 PM
1

OP where did you find this trash?
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:21 AM
5

Maybe we just need to put some hard work into it.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 12:18 AM
44

We all know how to fix this problem. Regulating working hours, resolving poverty, closing for profit prisons, ending the war on drugs, ending the male only draft would let the Men go home and be a Dad. So how do we get people on board with this?
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:03 PM
0

I'm unfamiliar with the position you're taking. Maybe you could give me an example and explain yourself.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 10:08 PM
0

You have made an easy error, are you perhaps new at this whole evidence based conclusions thing? Here is exactly, word for word, what Jonathan said “Of course [Kavanaugh] was different then; he was a third of the age he is now. And teens do stupid, dangerous and destructive things.” This is colloquially labeled as "boys will be boys" which makes it easier to communicate the idea. Which is an efficient and common way to communicate big thoughts. Surely you have heard that there was "a statment fr…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 09:08 PM
0

Oh wow, such an easy answer will convince you. Okay, here is the first response from Google from the very legit source of PBS... Jonathan Zimmerman.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 08:33 PM
-1

Wasn't this the comment used to justify sexual assault. What does that have to do with Marines?
/r/MensRights16/01/19 05:45 AM
1

Looking at the responses in this thread which conclusions, relevent to our topic, have you drawn?
/r/MensRights07/12/18 12:19 AM
1

Yes to what? Yes propaganda doesn't actually work or yes most adults are not reasonable?
/r/MensRights07/12/18 12:03 AM
0

I think any reasonable adult knows that extreme views or statements like "all feminists" is absurd. If any reasonable adult knows then how could propaganda possibly work? Or are you suggesting most adults are not reasonable?
/r/MensRights06/12/18 11:33 PM
0

I wasn't seeing any posts that admitted its not addressing all feminsits, how are you able to make that claim?
/r/MensRights06/12/18 11:22 PM
-3

Since when does one opinion piece qualify to represent the views of all feminists? This article is propaganda and hate fuel. The formation of a men's identity group is not to attack things we hate. It's about protecting things we love.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:57 PM
1

He found the courage to face his bully.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/18 07:40 PM
-1

As retarded as your mom?
/r/MensRights30/09/18 07:12 PM
-2

What you'er seeing is sensationalized drama over what should be a regular slow and boring situation. Kavanaugh's accusers should get their day in court and he should not be nominated until cleared, done. But thats the smoke, here is is the fire.. This is all for rich people to avoid criminal charges. Kavanaugh is a shitty enough person that he will break any law to support the good'ol boys club. Which protects Justice Kennedy's kid and the Trump empire. Of course the big goal is for the FBI to l…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:29 PM
2

You're arguing from the perspective of the human condition. Feminism is an academic idea. Arguing about emotional satisfaction to academics is like trying to prove religion is real because people have faith. Good luck with that.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/18 05:49 PM
2

This seems so easy. If we just recognize positive feminism its okay to rail on toxic feminism all day long. Lets avoid meeting the definition of hate group... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_group Remind me again, why am I not supposed to acknowlege positive feminism?
/r/TheRedPill28/09/18 04:47 PM
1

We are definetly not meet our expected sensationalism quota for the day.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:58 PM
6

Masculinity is half the race. It's integrity. It's honor. It's sacrifice. It's strength and stoicism. It's providing and defending. Protecting friends and loved ones from the consequences of their own mistakes (when possible). I'm finding your points very difficult to follow. Its as if they don't match up to any academic source. Would you mind referencing where you learned these definitions and concepts from. Masculinity is half the race. Especially this part. Effiminate men are real people. Som…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:48 PM
4

Thats why news articles labeled opinion and editorial are such poison. Always take the time to look up the words you don't know, research the topics that don't make sense to you. Only a sheep accepts knowledge without error checking it.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:59 PM
9

Not OP, but yes. Both positve and toxic feminism exist in the world.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:46 PM
3

The person who wrote this meme doesn't understand that positive masculinity exists.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:45 PM
8

Ouch, you just called out OP.
/r/askTRP08/08/18 12:23 AM
1

I'm sorry. Your response is a bit out of context. Would you mind taking a moment to explain yourself.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 12:08 AM
1

I have to ask, why did you quote this if it didn't relate to your comment? It is related, the rest was audio.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:37 PM
2

Thats the summary ...did you listen to the podcast?
/r/MensRights07/08/18 09:22 PM
4

Now you're just not making any sense. We are discussing a scientific conclusion that is different from the laws of a country. The science says that people are biologically hardwired to feel like a woman or a man. Not because they have a penis or vagina, but because they have wiring in the brain which makes them feel that way. But you brought in SJW which implies a discussion about laws in a country treating people unfairly, or as your pejoritive definition goes wanting something extra. Why did y…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 08:04 PM
1

You got me, I care about being accurate. What I'm trying to figure out though is how Social Justice fits into the equation. Why did you bring that up. Have I demanded that people be treated fairly?
/r/MensRights07/08/18 04:24 PM
3

“It’s not to say that there isn’t variation within men and women, or that some women are not more like men and some men are not more like women, but again this is biologically based and it has a lot to do with hormonal exposure,” Soh said. “I don’t think we have to deny the science in order to promote equality between the sexes.” So this proves that just having a penis does not mean you feel like a man or even want to be a man, or vice versa. I thought this was all settled, who doesn't get it ye…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 03:57 PM
164

If only we knew which guy that was.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/18 05:57 PM
1

That website is textbook propaganda. Your references are just cherry picked opinion pieces from major news sources. Are you able to tell the differnece between an opinion piece and news? Remember news is just supposed to tell you the facts and not convince you. Opinion pieces are there to convince you. You're being programmed to only see things one way. The world simply does not have one interpretation. I would love to continue using the original definition of a liberal... The bubble you're in i…
/r/MensRights26/07/18 03:04 PM
1

You don't get to just redefine words any which way. I am not redefining words, they are already redefined, at least on a social level. I don't like it, but if majority of people perceive feminists as "toxic feminists", then the redefinition is understandable. You acknowledge redefining words, my question stands. I did no such thing. When majority of feminists are toxic (as you quite well put it), then the "toxic feminism" is the current feminism and ordinary people and media are using this (thei…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 07:05 PM
0

Now you've gone from ignoring my question to calling me names. How exciting, whats next.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 04:13 PM
0

No to what, you have no authority or yes you do have authority?
/r/MensRights24/07/18 03:03 PM
1

I am not redefining words, they are already redefined, at least on a social level. I don't like it, but if majority of people perceive feminists as "toxic feminists", then the redefinition is understandable. Only in your social group. You acknowledge redefining words, my question stands. Why is it acceptable for you/your social group to create new definitions for things? Only "inequality issues" I saw were... Its really strange how you get to decide when people have enough rights. Are you a judg…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 02:34 PM
0

Why do you get to re-define words? Have you been granted some authority. Or are you just here to confuse people and stir the pot?
/r/MensRights24/07/18 02:07 PM
1

Your narrative only works if the Dems were in position to "call" the bluff at the house level. Oh you were serious about not understanding how feminism was involved. peace.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 12:48 AM
0

This is partisan and heated enough Thats cool of you to keep your partisan and emotion out. I'm just here on a mission to sort out the facts. It doesn't matter which sides argument they disrupt. I just think you were making an argument essentially dismissing "slippery slopism" based on other emotional arguments, and I don't think that's relevant to our discussion. It was based on your positions. You reeled in in. We're good. What importance I assign Gender Roles and "Traditional Gender Roles" is…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 11:37 PM
1

It was a called bluff (at least in the seante), you don't know your poker terminology. The Senate passed it 32 to 30.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 11:17 PM
1

I took the time to read through that link. The pool of responders was pretty small. There was certainly some horrible responses. The one about hating men is not equal to hating women was the best. But you really just can't walk around saying that is a reflection of reality. Thats the discussion we're having. But I counter-argue that the bad ones MASSIVELY outweigh these so-called "good feminists". Which is a fine idea, but its just not an evidence based conclusion. No one is asking the illogical…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 11:15 PM
0

You seem to agree your examples and over-generalizations cannot be assembled into a temperature guage. Lets keep paying attention. But also avoid over-reacting.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 10:48 PM
0

Ignoring your idiotic rhetoric about the Second Amendment, and religion. I didn't invent it, just using it as examples cause its true. I can provide links if you're not clear on the factual parts. It's an invented way to live BASED on the biological and anthropological differences between the genders. And yes, thanks to the freedoms that science and political advancement have offered us, we're not as inclined as a people to require the extremes of that invention. We seem to agree but I can't fig…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 10:21 PM
0

Tell me again how this was a move attributed to Feminism? Because he dared them to vote in support of equality thinking they would be bluffing. It was not a bluff. I still don't see where this was an issue raised, promoted, and lobbied, and celebrated by Feminists. You're moving the goal post. Duncan Hunter dared them to uphold their feminist beliefs and they did. He explicitely said as much; ...he was trying to make the point that while such a change might sound like a progressive push for gend…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 08:50 PM
0

That's egalitarianism, not feminism. In western world women have long time equal rights, but men have much less choice, more severe punishments and laws favouring them. Feminism is now about deepening women superiority, not about trying to make laws and justice more fair for men (so they would be on-par with women). You don't get to just redefine words any which way. Feminism is about equality. You keep taking one off examples and using them to redefine feminism. Does one bad male set the exampl…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 08:22 PM
0

Yes, I keep throwing around the definition of feminism which explicitely states the goal is about equality. Then I went on to describe two different types of feminists. Those who stick to the ideal and are called "positive feminists" and those who are corrupted and called "toxic feminists". Those are the claims I'm making. I'm asking you for examples. This is a step back from asking me to defend current feminism and calling it a lie. But assuming you agree to the boundaries I laid out we are mov…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 08:12 PM
1

and you saw me whining and comoplaining about male privilege... I'm very certain you have never seen me do that.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 07:08 PM
-1

Which is really strange, why you would ask me to defend feminism. I certainly support the idea of feminism. I believe women and men should have an equal seat at the table. But I haven't made any claims to the level of corruption for current feminism. I don't even know where to begin measuring that one. You seem to have the info on that. Please show me, how far has current feminism strayed from its ideals.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 07:01 PM
1

I'm not following, why have you labeled me as a 3rd waver. What does that mean to you? That may be the first time I have been accused of fighting for rights I already have. What sort of stereotype have you assigned me?
/r/MensRights23/07/18 06:58 PM
1

Agreed. But you have to admit its scary to have people in positions of power treat you poorly based on your sex and/or skin color. Its as if they're invisible and have no voice. Can you blame their fear?
/r/MensRights23/07/18 06:56 PM
-1

*Edit: Downvote brigading doesn't answer my challenge, nor make my observation less relevant. It gives me a chuckle going from (+8) to (+2) in mere seconds with no reply. I don't know about the down votes but I had a busy weekend. Back to business. What are the issues at the forefront of current Feminism? Why do you keep doing that thing. I keep talking about how feminism has good and bad sides. You keep responding with these narratives and stereotypes of current feminism. Lets cut to the chase,…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 06:54 PM
1

I'm sorry, I just don't see things that way. I see feminism as having some relevant points. You're right it has toxic points as well though.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 06:38 PM
-3

Thats such a blanket and over-generalized statement. Its nonsense. Surely you don't believe everything about this current wave is anti-equality (what are we at wave 3?). Surely you don't believe every feminist is on board with that. Lets remember they're our allies. Some are power hungry just like some men are power hungry. Its important we take the time to separate the positive ones from the toxic ones.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 10:17 PM
4

I do believe in equal responsibility, thats positive feminism. Toxic feminism seeks the power without the responsibility.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 08:30 PM
-4

I can't agree with this one. There is positive feminism and there is toxic feminism. Women are people and deserve equal representation and equal rights.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:25 PM
49

This isn't a politics sub-reddit and you clearly don't know your politics. How about we stick to the business at hand. ne·o-lib·er·al·ism - a modified form of liberalism tending to favor free-market capitalism.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/18 06:54 PM
1

This post is logical.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 05:05 PM
2

I don't think the best answer is to end feminism. I see the best answer is to provide equal respect to women's lib and men's lib. It's clear that people are wired to easily overlook the rights of an out group. The goal would be then to support groups which seek to give a voice to those. Ultimately ensuring that as we move forward all sides gets a fair chance to be heard and not overlooked.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 04:50 PM
15

Lets see if it passes the substitution test... "One day a week the shop serves only white people in an effort to make the bike community more inclusive." There is a lot of hate coming from that bike shop.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 08:47 PM
1

I may be a 20 year old virgin but I have enough common sense... Thats not logic, its just your animal instinct sense of justice. You gotta crank the volume down on that abit before it leads you astray.
/r/askTRP09/05/18 02:22 PM
2

You are 100% right about 50% of the situation. Yes, people, especially ones who identify as masculine will use banter to establish their superiority. But these animals can and will resort to violence if banter has a critical failure. What I mean by that is that banter exists at the social construct layer. It requires concious thoughts to create and maintain. If anxiety, drugs, insufficient sleep reduce conciousness sufficiently the person lapses into a primal state. Then violence becomes the too…
/r/askTRP08/05/18 02:42 PM
5

Its seems a bit insane to be that scared of half the population. What sort of bubble do these people live in?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:03 PM
5

Reverse intersectionality.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:18 PM
5

That would be cool. In my country we don't even have an evidence based pollution policy.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:46 PM
2

Feminists must fight for men. Not in the name of equality, but instead to control them!
/r/MensRights19/02/18 09:24 PM
1

Sounds like it's time to take ownership of your actions. Just a normal part of growing up, scary at first but gets easier. Parents rarely kill their adult children, relax.
/r/askTRP19/02/18 08:54 PM
-6

Remember when Kevin Spacey was accused of sexually assaulting a minor, then he responded by talking about how he was gay. This is a lot like that.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:33 PM
2

Many times racist people get stuck in the information bubble they were raised in. Bring up her statements and see if she listens and changes. If she doesn't you can bet it won't go away any time soon.
/r/askTRP30/01/18 03:19 PM
3

A turn of events. You managed to respond to my comment without insulting me. Can I take that as engagement or are you going to regress?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 06:38 PM
3

There you go again. Why is it so important for you to be hurting me with your words? Is that how you feel better about yourself?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 06:25 PM
-2

Is that the situation. You're being a friendly asshole and I'm too sensitive. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 06:18 PM
-13

Ooh an internet bully, how scary.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 05:58 PM
-24

Doesn't this post feel like Republican hate propaganda. Edit, OPs pic not the above post, I no speak well.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:33 PM
2

Grouping people by race does more harm than good and produces no significant scientific results. We should choose to stop.
/r/askTRP21/01/18 05:33 AM
527

The idea that society only oppresses women is laughable. FTFY
/r/MensRights21/01/18 05:17 AM
67

A reality television programme kicked off a debate... You can make this shit up. You can make it up, blow it out of proportion and then profit selling it on day-time TV. This is nothing more than hate fuel. There are so many more important things to spend our time on.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/18 10:32 PM
-1

That article is hate fuel. Anyone who starts describing reality and uses the term SJW is really just vomiting Alt-right propaganda at people.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 11:08 PM
1

Male gender roles set the standard that men respond with violence. That violence requirement is state enforced at 18 through draft cards. Every man (and woman for that manner) is programed that violence is the ultimate answer and that to be a man means they're the ones being violent. So, yeah, no shit men are acting like the people society pressures them to be.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 05:28 PM
1

Male privelege.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 12:24 AM
2

It's funnier if you switch women with white people and men with black people. Not haha funny...
/r/MensRights21/05/17 03:43 AM
2

What I'd like to ask is what now? Now its just time to do the work. Get ready for the motivational quote. “Watch your thoughts, they become words; watch your words, they become actions; watch your actions, they become habits; watch your habits, they become character; watch your character, for it becomes your destiny.” You sir have figured out the thoughts in your head are inaccurate. How do you get accurate thoughts, by exploring and testing of course. Its time to read, practice and test. Is the…
/r/askTRP19/04/17 11:29 PM
-1

It should be Dem but their current trends seem to be about pushing males down to get women exposure instead of genuine equality. Which does have the side effect of giving incompetent and insecure women good jobs which can be lucrative. The Reps are all about their silly Christian storybooks where the man in sky counts how many times you masturbate and holds sex hostage until after marriage. That oppression and BS has no place here. The libertarians want deregulation which destabilizes society. T…
/r/askTRP19/04/17 11:20 PM
1

Because precise words communicate the ideas clearly. These concepts are both complex and critical. We should be working hard to get it right.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 03:11 AM
1

Its about who has the power and who is being oppressed by the power. Who has the power in your country?
/r/MensRights13/04/17 04:46 PM
-1

No and it's a bit Reductio ad absurdum. To clarify the status quo of the man is to be the provider which is largely quantified by the money he brings in. That's why men take the shitty jobs that get them overly stressed, maimed or even killed, so they can be good providers. Critically, I don't think men are kept as expendable money providers by the women, my position is that the system is owned by the corporations who strive to keep the whole population in debt slavery. The concept of the rights…
/r/MensRights12/04/17 08:55 PM
1

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/race "a group of persons related by common descent or heredity." There are borders in Asia that people do not cross. We do not live in a global world as some of you seem to think. There is no Asian version of the EU. I can see where your going but don't think its the whole picture. As /u/revconhar pointed out Japan is a country, a nation. Therefore Japanese people are an ethnic group. While it may be a * more isolated* nation, Japanese is not a racial category. e…
/r/MensRights12/04/17 06:21 PM
33

The situation is for his own good, men are only worth the money they provide the family. This action of forcing him to pay will give him more value, more satisfaction with life, more purpose. He is the real winner here. /s
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:37 PM
1

Japanese is a race. Jsut like how the danes and celts are different races. Its not just skin color and eye shapes that defIne races. Could you provide a reference, where did you learn this from?
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:33 PM
1

You're on target, I'm not sure why the sheeple are so keen on downvoting. It would be nice if more of them explained their position.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:31 PM
25

Its very clear that nobody here actually looked up the definition of race.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 02:53 PM
1

Your initial comment was one sentence long and made a statement about all women. I know, I wrote it. Then you went off about racism and some other nonsense. I'm only here at this point to defend my initial comment on your comment so I guess this conversation is done now. Again, then you should leave because I am here to explore the comment I provided. Good bye.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 10:50 PM
1

My comment didn't say anything about equality. But my topic is about equality. So your not really responding to me at all. Instead your criticizing my generalization on a topic that is notoriously short on specifics. How can we go forward? I can almost guarantee you that the notion that women need access to a class that men cannot have access to had nothing to do with the formation of this class. Good for you, but thats not my topic and irrelevant, a wonderful straw man. The concern is that nobo…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 09:25 PM
1

Whoah dude hold on. Generalizing about all women helps nothing at all. Well then give me the specifics so I don't have to generalize, at this point I'm not convinced equality is even being worked on equally. But I'm open to learning something new. Show me some studies on how men get oppressed or on how much power they actually have. Show me what you're seeing so I don't have to generalize and can be specific about this oppression. Or better yet, show me that this isn't even oppression, or that t…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:30 PM
1

It seems women are more focused on being the next oppressor than gender equality.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 05:19 PM
5

But men are a minority, wtf is this about?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:05 AM
2

Its hard not to treat this as remedial discrimination. Why was the term two years chosen and not say a required rate of change at maybe 2% per year, dragging it out over 10+ years? It would seem like just putting people out of a job to give unqualified people jobs was a knee jerk reaction. Why not give both sides the best chance as adapting to the transition? Also, I wonder how the 50% rule will be managed, if a man left a spot must it be filled by another man no matter his qualifications? Is th…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 09:31 PM
3

Women just had a villian in the last presidential election, maybe we should focus on good ones for awhile.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 11:57 PM
1

Why do people keep jumping in line to be the next oppressor? Shouldn't we all be moving to the equality line... together?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 06:27 PM
2

Why do the crazy people always need to make things their idea, what sort of cult behavior is this? Seriously, how many 10's of millions of men are against the new administration? Well fuck those guys, we're going to do a women's march, better yet, a day without women! Look how awesome we are ladies! Have fun feeling strong and secure in your womens group while not really getting shit done.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:50 PM
1

Its a parody account, they are supposed to have exceptions when posting material. I will take your point into consideration and back off until I get a better answer but there is still plenty of room for this to be censorship.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 09:57 PM
1

If Twitter deems it necessary to start deleting disruptive parody accounts they sure have started in a strange spot. Why not start censoring somewhere practical, like with that one guy who is pretending to act like a president?
/r/MensRights08/02/17 09:51 PM
1

I am a college who supports cultural progressivism and I have noticed some trivial example of what could in some small sense be unintentional representation of man being the dominant participant in a particular job. Option 1; whine like a toddler and make a public scene. Use this righteous indignation to force trivial forward progress on a now very annoyed group of people. Option 2; buy new signs and politely ask that they be used because I am a fucking adult treating other people like fucking a…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 05:28 PM
35

This isn't the controversy that you think it is. Your statement is that this happened so long ago (8 years) that is not a controversy... Wouldn't it be more accurate to say we have walked this path, lets not over react, but yes its an authentic example.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 05:02 PM
3

I would really feel better about calling this harassment if they would post her responding with no, stop, and I don't feel the same so please stop. But none of that showed up in the article...
/r/TheRedPill09/01/17 08:56 PM
1

Wait, so this asshole gets on TV and calls most Mexicans rapists (some are good) and thats a bad thing, we all agree that was wrong. But now MTV has taken it upon themselves to inform the white man that "some can do a little better, some are doing a great job, some of you don't"... and thats supposedly to be a positive non-hateful message. Can somebody explain this?
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 05:49 PM
1

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say equal rights for all?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 05:46 PM
1

Nah thats bullshit, the desire to be dominant or submissive is about how your brain is wired. You need to get out and have more sex... with other people.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/16 10:33 PM
3

How the fuck can a minor sign their rights away?
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:38 PM
1

Yeah but we can't prove intent. Its only possible to prove the intent of a white male everyone else is immeasurable.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 08:43 PM
4

That was not a news article, that was ignorant hate speech. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2043345/The-California-boy-11-undergoing-hormone-blocking-treatment.html edit1 i cant spell.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 09:14 PM
7

Remedial discrimination, that will fix all our problems.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter