TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mrmrchoice Archive

View 16 posts and 103 comments by mrmrchoice on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
778

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:07 PM
253

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:27 AM
148

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights08/12/13 08:59 PM
67

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights30/07/14 07:23 AM
61

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:12 PM
40

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights04/03/13 03:02 PM
39

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights04/11/12 12:03 AM
29

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:03 PM
26

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights12/08/14 01:34 AM
6

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights04/02/14 10:58 PM
4

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:57 PM
3

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:43 PM
2

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:22 PM
1

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights07/08/14 09:12 AM
0

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights26/02/13 04:19 PM
0

mrmrchoice/r/MensRights07/06/14 10:01 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

When you put it that way it seems reasonable - yes there are elements of masculinity which harm men eg being unable to open up about feelings etc. But the vast majority of the time the phrase 'toxic masculinity' pops up it isn't being used in a sympathetic way, it's being used to criticise men.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 06:24 PM
1

Just curious - what was the process that ended up with you being interviewed multiple times without a lawyer? I can't help but think that if you had a lawyer in those initial voluntary interviews then this may not have even pregressed to your arrest.
/r/PussyPass15/09/19 06:42 PM
6

Haha do you get it it's because someone who puts the seat down on a toilet is a homosexual hahaha good joke haha /s
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/19 02:33 AM
3

Okay but there are 2 bed apartments on rightmove for £1,400 so conceivably you could be paying less than half the rent you are currently - so do you get to complain that your rent is over twice what it could be?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/19 01:19 PM
3

What gold-plated mansion are you living in where your rent is £4000 a month?! Sincere question!
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/19 12:45 PM
6

18 if the accused is in a position of authority
/r/MensRights28/04/18 07:05 PM
1

Kevin Spacey is actually a well respected and long tenured actor with multiple awards. Yes it was definitely wrong, and he should be punished. It's just a shame that his reputation is now ruined and he will most likely only be remembered for this act.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/17 04:52 PM
1

Because you have said that a woman being let off a jail sentence when a man wouldn't have been is a reason to use deadly force when someone burgles your home. Your comment didn't say anything about self defence - it just implied that your position is that the homeowner should have tried to kill the burglar because she didn't ultimately end up going to prison. Which I don't agree with.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 07:17 PM
1

No
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:30 PM
1

I haven't seen those posts but I've seen this one. It doesn't affect you. Chill out.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/17 07:38 AM
1

I work in an office full of women unfortunately, I'm not allowed an opinion. Our heatwave a couple of weeks ago I had to fight to be allowed to wear shorts.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 08:36 AM
1

I tried it at work. The response I got was: "oh no mrmrchoice, you're not one of those meninists that think men's problems are relevant, are you?" I wish I'd had a snappy comeback but I just told her she shouldn't put words in my mouth.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:47 AM
1

Think of it as the difference between a chemical reaction and a physical reaction like we learned at school. Whereas the pill uses hormones to change our body chemistry, causing side effects, Vasalgel coats the sperm ducts and tears sperm apart on a microscopic level as they pass through. That way our ejaculate is just full of dead sperm but otherwise nothing is different.
/r/MGTOW07/02/17 06:55 PM
41

I identify as a Fortune 500 company my pronouns are money/moneys stop triggering me
/r/TheRedPill09/01/16 04:15 PM

*homicide
/r/MensRights28/12/15 10:38 AM
12

Everyone in statutes (offenders and victims) are referred to as 'he' because traditionally that word is used to refer to "a person or animal of unspecified sex" (Oxford dictionary) or "any person". It prevents the ambiguity of 'they' when referring to a singular person and is widely accepted to include both males and females. s(1)(1)(a) of the 2003 Act is not male-specific because it uses the pronoun 'he' but because it requires the use of a penis - something which does not require the offender …
/r/MensRights08/12/15 10:40 PM
1

If you read the article: However, his mother was told her son's details - along with those of the girl involved and another teenager - had been added to a police intelligence database
/r/MensRights03/09/15 08:15 AM

Serious question from a serious contributor here - is it a double standard of ours that we point out that women are biologically weaker than us etc. and that we have biological differences, but now we complain that the males of our species are disposable which is, unarguably, biological?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 09:14 AM

This is mens rights not TRP
/r/MensRights15/06/15 09:35 PM
1

Awkward
/r/MensRights15/06/15 05:19 PM

Sorry I meant to the actual reddit post
/r/MensRights15/06/15 05:13 PM

Could you link me to that post? Call it schadenfreude masochism but I kinda wanna see the reception it got....
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:52 PM
2

Had a friend apply for and get into the audience for Jeremy Kyle. They aren't bribed, and it isn't staged etc
/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:36 AM
11

The irony is, the stereotype goes that no guy can find the clitoris... so maybe we should remove girls' labia? /s
/r/MensRights19/08/14 09:24 AM
4

Ah my deepest apologies, I should have known that two small sentences and a link people are probably too lazy to click should be enough inside a long article, thank you :) Seriously though what you said is fine but it's little more than a footnote, and your footnote there was pretty unnecessary.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:08 PM
8

It's touched on in the supplementary articles I posted, and this wikipedia article adds some colour to the picture: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_child_molesters In essence, it's a small percentage (one figure was 9% only women, 9% women and men) but the figures are likely to be underestimates because of the stigma of reporting abuse by women, and disbelieving attitude taken when someone does report it.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:42 AM

Keir Starmer was a joke as DPP - he went on record saying that false rape accusations didn't exist, quoting the statistic that there were "only 35 prosecutions for false rape accusations in [a 17 month period]". Yes. 35 prosecutions. How many tens, or hundreds, or thousands, were simply dropped by the police when they realised they were false, because if you prosecute them it might discourage real accusations? It's a touchy subject but to say they don't exist is ridiculous. Source
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:04 PM
1

Yeah I agree. I don't know what the law is in that state but it looks as if it differs from this - consensual sex with a minor seems to carry the lesser charge of "unlawful sex" rather than statutory rape
/r/MensRights06/06/14 12:02 PM
11

It's not worded well by the news agency but since always - in the UK the law calls it rape of "B does not consent and A does not reasonably believe B consents" - so if the 'rapist' believes that the 'victim' consented and that belief is reasonable, it isn't rape.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:44 AM

I've been asked how big my dick is more than I've been asked how high my IQ is, is that sexist? I think no one ever asks someone how high their IQ is.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:52 PM
1

Or a good result
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 10:16 AM
23

The phrases "one in the same" and "one and the same" aren't one and the same. Let's tear down the patriarchy with good knowledge of the nuances of the English language,
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 12:31 AM
40

In any social situation, if someone makes the group laugh, and I mean genuinely laugh, look to see who looks at who. Both guys and girls tend to look at the person they fancy because subconsciously they want to make sure that person finds the same things funny as then. No voodoo, no trickery, no pseudo-science. Simple.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 01:37 AM
5

Important to note from the article that the 20 years she was facing was the statutory maximum and in fact federal prosecutors had only asked for three years. So, yes, her sentence was reduced a lot but not by the mind numbing 20 years the somewhat misleading title would suggest
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:37 PM
1

Yeah, just read it through for the first time since writing it and boy am I ashamed. Gonna blame this one on typing quickly on a tablet..
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:29 AM
1

... because she's casually smoking, not intending to murder? But seriously, she didn't mean to or want to kill him, so it isn't attempted murder.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:06 PM
3

She was convicted of wounding without intent, causing greater harm with lower culpability (ie category 2). The sentencing range for that category is 1-3 years with a starting point of 1 year and 6 months. Her sentence was only two months less than the highest sentence. For her to be charged with attempted murder, she must have intended to murder him, which she didn't.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 01:34 PM
4

I'm just going to put this out there: It isn't "only" 2 years and 8 months. That sentence is towards the top of the sentencing range for the offence committed. http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/wounding_or_inflicting_grievous_bodily_harm/
/r/MensRights07/01/14 03:34 AM
2

no anecdotal evidence from both sides - the damage side hasn't provided evidence anecdotal or otherwise. Can confirm that numerous sprayings both planned and unplanned have had zero negative effects on my sight and smell. The most likely scenario for damage would be if the police sprayed CAPTOR2 (which comes out as a concentrated stream rather than a gas) directly into the wide open eyes of a person from within 1m. British police are encouraged to make more use of the spray because it's infinite…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 06:03 PM
36

Secretly enjoy it because patriarchy /s
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:15 AM
2

Also note, when you do it in writing tell your boss you'll email him a copy (or whatever) so they there's an unloseable dated record
/r/MensRights22/12/13 04:29 PM
1

Just a word of advice here - never, ever accept a police caution, certainly without discussing it with the free lawyer you are entitled to. It usually means the police don't have enough evidence to prosecute you successfully, yet you still get a criminal record. What you did was minor, in the name of self defence. Certainly you shouldn't have even gotten a caution.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 01:43 PM
1

I think it's possible to have a smoothly run household without needing to worry about gender norms - I'm a recently graduated student working 7am to 5pm living in a shared house with 3 other students. We cook for ourselves and pay or own rent but the shared kitchen and living room are kept fairly clean and tidy and my kitten is always fed, watered and played with. I think that as long as everything that needs to be done in your house gets done, the bills get paid and the food is bought, cooked a…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 01:38 PM
45

Ouch... fuck, I'm going to go back to r/wtf where things make more sense
/r/MensRights22/12/13 01:30 PM
2

Unfortunately I was on my mobile but thanks I'll search for that!
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:00 PM
1

I've not heard of it being reported. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, but anecdotally I don't think you need to be afraid. She even if it did happen, so what? You politely point out she's your daughter and move on
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:13 AM
2

As a male who pees and poops on a daily basis, I can tell you that here in the UK we don't blink an eye if a dad brings his young daughter into the men's room
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:10 PM
-1

Should have immediately said "I can't tell which is bigger" and grabbed her tits. /s
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:33 PM
1

UK law here: This seems similar to the UK legal principle that you are liable for any harm that comes as a reasonably foreseeable consequence to your actions. In Hayward v DPP a man punched a woman who, as a result, dropped her baby. He was held to have assaulted the baby. The problems with situations like these come from the reasonably foreseeable part - what is foreseeable? In this case, the basis of the charge is that, by acting how he was the man could reasonably expect to be shot at by poli…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:27 AM
1

Regarding provocation only being a defence to murder: the provocation defence was abolished in 2010 and replaced with a "loss of self control" defence. The reason it only applies to murder is because it does not vitiate liability. Manslaughter is a special crime because it has the same act as murder, but without the intention to kill. This is applied because when a person loses all control and a death results, they must show they did not intend to kill. Regarding her initiating the violence: jus…
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:43 PM
4

Just to clarify, the two weeks inside weren't due to any sentence but because he was refused bail for that period of time and so remanded into custody.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:55 PM
1

Unfortunately, if they're married and he's left her in charge of the finances, it's perfectly legal for her to use them as she wants. Now, impersonating him for the mortgage/loans is quite possibly fraud, but might be better served as a civil claim to try and sue the money back from her. The sentencing is probably reasonable. Found guilty of ABH in a domestic violence setting and escaping a custodial sentence leaves him not much to complain about. It's a nice touch that the jury indicated they d…
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:54 PM
11

Neither. I'm submitting an article to a subreddit purely because of its relevance, without any comment at all.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:36 AM
1

We didn't really touch much on this during my degree but I would imagine that judges read a gap between you becoming drunk and you doing whatever you did - as in, I get drunk but I don't punch people. Even if I got spiked I wouldn't punch people. So reversed someone who tends to get violent while drunk will be violent whether they intended to be drunk or no.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:28 PM
1

I think it's reasonable, insofar as if your drink gets spiked then yes okay you're drunk, but you're still responsible for your actions after that same as any drunk person? Or, you've been spiked so you should have sought help or taken more care, perhaps. Yes that's the whole message of the comment
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:47 PM

Edit & Disclaimer: information stated below is simply that - information; a statement of fact. It doesn't necessarily represent my opinions. That being said, it is what I recollect and interpret from a subject studied a while ago and may be wrong. UK law here: It's an interesting quirk really, that comes from a clash of the two following principles: Intoxication can rarely, if ever, count as a defence. Being drunk won't negate your liability for committing a crime (especially "dutch courage" - g…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 08:55 PM
3

Aufwiderhoren (or something)
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:26 AM
1

The main problem with the is that phrases such as "x shouldn't..." "x cannot..." "x need to..." are incredibly inflammatory for any gender or class because they generalise that which shouldn't be generalised and then directly lead to a stereotype! It's the equivalent of a leading question - those phrases have been searched for the sole purpose of finding exactly what the searcher wanted to prove.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 04:47 PM
2

Yeah it's an interesting one - 41 girl places is all their places but 300 boy places, while over 7 times more, isn't all the boot places. There are a lot more boys going to jail but then, in a country where men receive in average 6 times longer sentences than women for equivalent crimes is that really a surprise?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 06:24 PM
1

Further down in the teenage girls one: 300 places for teenage boys will also be axed
/r/MensRights29/09/13 06:12 PM
2

Drove past a pub today offering 25% off your meal if you're a woman on their "woman's night" - that's actually illegal here in the UK
/r/MensRights20/07/13 06:06 PM
1

I've a spare facebook account I can change the gender of but, being from the UK, I can't actually download the app!
/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:49 PM
5

Really? Maybe it's a British thing but here it's used almost exclusively towards guys, not because of a gender assignation bit because it's such a horrible word people don't use it towards women. Again, I can't speak for outside the UK but I promise you here it has absolutely zero gender bias whatsoever
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:50 AM
6

Literally just say no. There is no way anyone can force you to have that surgery, and if there WAS a legal way to force you then you would encounter English-speaking people WAY at the beginning of that road, people you don't know personally and don't need to be ashamed of explaining that circumcision reduces sexual pleasure. Seriously, I was discussing this with my girlfriend last night and there are literally zero benefits to circumcision. Literally zero. The only vaguely viable one is "it's cl…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:40 AM
1

Politely point out to her that if she think it's necessary to make such a message, you will include it in the "birds and the bees" talk when they reach 12 or whatever age you decide to give it. I'm pretty sure boys don't need to be taught not to rape - they don't need to be taught not to murder because serious crimes like that are pretty much highlighted over the course of a lifetime as unacceptable anyway. What you CAN do is teach them, from a mature and male point of view, how to avoid situati…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:36 AM
2

The problem is, there is no simple definition of rape, because: (a) sexual intercouse (b) without V's consent (c) D knows there is no consent Each throw up their own issues - what should be construed as sexual intercourse? English law now includes vaginal, anal and oral - so that men and women are afforded the same protection from men. Then (b) and (c), which are where the real problems lie: (1) What is consent? Must it be voiced or otherwise indicated? (2) If it needn't be indicated, how can D …
/r/MensRights22/04/13 01:15 PM
1

Estimates suggest that aroud 8-10% of all rape complaints are false http://thisisabuse.direct.gov.uk/worried-about-abuse/view/rape-sexual-assult/myths
/r/MensRights22/04/13 01:02 PM
1

Well, yes. That is the case. Rape is when a person penetrates the mouth, anus or vagina of another person with his penis and (a) that person did not consent; and (b) the defendant did not reasonably believe the person consented. Women can be prosecuted for envelopment, but it's called sexual assault by penetration. It has the potential for a similar length sentence. You might be interested in my post here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/19n1xt/male_rape_by_women_does_exist_in_uk_law…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:37 PM
1

It depends how specific you are: I love kids Fine I love 10 year olds Not so much
/r/MensRights12/04/13 11:05 AM
1

On the back of the stop and search tickets we give out in the UK, in the info section for people being searched it says "an officer cannot search you just because you consent" - essentially saying unless they have grounds to, you can't just say "SEARCH ME BLUD COME ON SEARCH ME I AINT GOT NUFFINK BLAD"
/r/MensRights12/04/13 10:59 AM
1

high paying fields, such as IT and engineering, are dominated by men, while women are more likely to hold jobs in low paying fields such as education and nursing. I find it strange that women complain they feel excluded from high paying fields, yet when men try and become primary or kindergarten teachers they find themselves drowning in suspicion, and portrayed as effeminate for being nurses (or 'murses').
/r/MensRights11/04/13 11:10 AM
2

The sign held by the silent, nonlussed looking smiling girl at the back: MRAs think women are animals to be trained Do we? I wasn't aware of this. Thing is, she probably believes that, and every single person who knows no better who sees that sign will believe that.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:12 PM
1

This. It's entirely possible there's some caveat of the law that means that having your daughter exclusively for those two weeks will grant her some extra right
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:20 PM
1

yes, I am, but based on a whole set of factors
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:27 PM
1

It's converse, on my experience - when my mom thought I'd cheated she was angry at me and accusatory and was pressuring me to tell my girlfriend until I corrected her. I know my best friends and family would lose respect for me if I cheated, more so if I didn't admit it. Conversely, when my girlfriend cheated on me, her friends congratulated her for not feeling tied down to a relationship, for living live and #YOYO (you're only young once!). Her mom questioned whether she was happy in the relati…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:30 AM
1

for me it's the way they hate it at first, are screaming etc and at the end look like they enjoyed it. It's like hey, it's okay to rape men because they enjoy sex so that's fine.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:03 PM
1

We are part of the European Union haha! Great Britain = the island including England, Scotland and Wales. UK = Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The UK is a member of the EU.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 01:43 AM
1

UK Edit: or, yes, EU if it got that far
/r/MensRights16/03/13 03:17 PM
1

Give me until July 17th to graduate, then maybe a year to qualify as a Chartered Legal Executive - then I'll be happy to at least give you an objective and balanced opinion
/r/MensRights16/03/13 01:52 PM
0

The figure quoted by the BBC is the same as in the Guardian article - 35 in 17 months. I'd agree with you, though, that it probably only includes the ones that are prosecuted and considering there is a MASSIVE reluctance to prosecute false allegations, I am absolutely shocked that he can honestly believe this.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 12:26 PM
1

Yes, the palaces and homes are part of that. It's difficult. They still "belong" to the monarch in a sense and are inherant with accession to the throne. However, they are managed by an independent body - the Crown Estate Commissioners. I would imagine it operates in a similar fashion to a trust - the CEC are trustees and the monarch the beneficiary, though all the profits go to the Treasury. For interest's sake, the Crown Estate, valued at £7.6 billion, includes: Urban properties worth around £…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:54 AM
2

please post this on r/feminism?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:43 AM
1

self defence would cover this - even if he commits a crime by recording, he's doing it to prevent a crime
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:31 AM
2

The moment she says "let's go ahead and do it" that's pretty much enthusiastic consent. Whether or not she is consenting, he has a reasonably held belief that she does consent. He is not culpable.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:16 AM
5

Actually she owns very little property - the Crown Estate is essentially owned by the government insofar as all income etc (£153m in 2003) goes straight to the government in return for an annual "salary" to run the entire Royal household (about £52m in 2003)
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:33 PM
2

I just read through the article and his parson. Basically, you can apply to the higher courts in Virginia for a writ of actual innocence, but that of course takes time/can't happen over a weekend. The governor granted the pardon essentially letting him out of prison on probation for 30 days. This is plenty of time to have his conviction overturned by the upper courts, in which circumstance all conditions are fully removed.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:13 PM
1

I know what we say in this sub is rape has no bearing on what UK law calls rape. The whole point of this thread is highlighting how what we consider rape is criminalised under UK law, which peeps don't know because s 4 is lesser-known. Give me two or three hours to get home to a computer and I'll respond properly but I'm afraid it'll be little more than repetition because you simply aren't listening to what I saying.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:13 PM
1

I'm not sure if you're purposefully being obtuse here. Male rape by women referring to the act on non-consensual envelopment which the majority of people in this sub consider rape. My definition of rape is any non-consensual sex. What I'm saying in the title is perfectly aimed to get the attention of readers in this sub with our definition of rape, then explain how it is a criminal offence even if the UK statutory definition of rape doesn't include it. I accept everything you're saying, I'm just…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 03:53 PM
1

Yes - as far as I and a lot of people on this sub are concerned, non-consensual envelopment is rape. However, UK law doesn't call it that. The aim of this post was to highlight that, contrary to popular belief, non-consensual envelopment of a man by a woman is a criminal offence, and that it carries the possibility of a severe sentence; albeit not as severe as rape. Ok, now your second paragraph: Firstly, the idea that rape under s 1 of the 2003 Act was made to protect women and not men is absur…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 01:32 PM
2

As someone else already pointed out, it's not chrome specific. As I already replied - yes, I know. I just picked chrome because I know it well.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 04:01 PM
1

I didn't say it was browser specific, I just offered chrome as a browser I'm familiar with.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:45 PM
5

Everyone starts somewhere and you're doing magnificently to be where you are already
/r/MensRights05/03/13 02:13 PM
5

you should try Google Chrome as a browser - you can go from this to this i.e. much bigger textbox. Plus, the hover zoom extension lets you expand images without clicking them on websites like Facebook and Reddit. PS good job with the feminism thing, too!
/r/MensRights05/03/13 01:52 PM
8

shorthand for he/she. You'll find it throughout British statues - he or they. You can tell it's not a gender thing because offence definitions normally start with the words "a person commits an offence if...". I don't know if there are any female-specific offences and, if they are, whether just for that offence it is written as "she". EDIT: I accidentally my spelling
/r/MensRights04/03/13 03:19 PM
16

That hurt to read. Worst bit? Comments disabled.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:16 PM
6

and grammatical quirks
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:12 AM
4

Literally would have no qualms punching her right back in her fucking scabby northern arrogant face. And this coming from a man who has never, ever properly struck anyone
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:10 AM
1

It's more disparaging to nerds than men. If you're on android, get the Fast Dilbert Reader app, scroll back to maybe 2005 and read on from there
/r/MensRights04/11/12 02:33 AM

Sorry they've all been me - I figured I'd keep them going until I stopped receiving a reasonable amount of encouragement.. which would seem to be now
/r/MensRights04/11/12 02:22 AM

my job here is done
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:56 PM
1

My thoughts entirely
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:14 PM

Personally I'll be watching this post for results, and I'd be very grateful if you could keep us updated
/r/MensRights12/09/12 10:14 AM
1

"Equal rights for women - we want the same pay etc etc, but expect you to treat us with preference in other ways" You cannot eat your cake and also have it.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 09:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter