TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mwarg Archive

View 4 posts and 120 comments by mwarg on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don't follow you. Can you explain
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 03:58 PM
6

No regrets. It doesn't work with everyone. Some individuals respond better to traits and behaviors closer to androgyny than hyper masculinity or hyper femininity. Each person has their own history and preferences. However I do believe most women prefer masculine men and most men prefer feminine women, so knowing that much is a great place to start.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 02:47 AM
3

It's important to take care in how we use technologies. My first thought, naturally, is "I would love to turn my sex drive on and off at will" and "virtual reality? Yeah I'll try it." But there will be unexpected consequences. We don't often think about just how addicting VR will be for so many people. Addiction is terrible. And what happens when you lose the natural ability to become aroused or do your work without a drug? For some individuals these technologies will be nothing short of miracul…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 02:36 AM
1

Because that's their preference. There will always be some people who will believe whatever they want. What seems pointless to you doesn't seem pointless to them. There's seven billion people on this world and some are going to be different.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 03:49 AM
1

Good luck with discarding the preferences of most men. It's really not about access to economic resources because fathers provide a lot more love to the development of children than that. Your system would divide children into classes of alphas and bastards.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 06:11 PM
1

It's a result of monogamy. This is why conservatives go on about family values. No family values, no monogamy, no father figures. Economics is related but men (collectively) have always been producers (of commodities) more than women. The driver of change is actually technology like access to birth control. Now you could use paternity tests in the utopia you envision but how much time is a man going to have to raise your child when he's got 40 others.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 05:54 PM
1

Accept what you want. Would you rather most children have a father figure in their life?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 05:34 PM
1

Political power: no (doesn't matter, there's a plutocracy anyway) Economic power: no (the market works better than sex-based policies) Relationship power: yes because monogamy Monogamy is a patriarchal social behavior that permits most men to become fathers. Without monogamy there are few fathers. In a monogamous society women's relationship power is limited by the pool of available men, e.g. upstanding men saying "No."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 05:27 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 07:22 PM
1

A burden that people work hard to achieve? I think not. It's a privilege you take for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 12:35 PM
1

Yes, that's a fun way to think about it. The ability to thrive is important. We want success for ourselves and our families.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 02:10 AM
1

I care about overall health. Physical, mental, social. In my mind that includes pretty much everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 01:53 AM
3

Never forget the booty
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 01:45 AM
1

It's just a strategy. Nothing evil or complicated about it. Part of making as many babies as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 01:43 AM
1

It means you won't find something beautiful unless you anticipate on some level it will make you happier, or more generally, associate it with things that make you happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 01:31 AM
2

I think you know why. It certainly seems straightforward. These are biological drives we have. They go much deeper than your consciousness, into your subconsciousness. It's so profound because it's the reason we're all here today: procreation. You can become better at it if you want to but you will then sacrifice the opportunities and benefits that come with surrounding yourself with what you find beautiful. And I'll leave you with a fun quote. "Beauty is the promise of happiness."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 12:52 AM
2

Most people in general are more selfish than altruistic. They will care about their friends and family but won't care much about strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 12:42 AM
1

the easiest way to understand and examine this is to flip the thinking around and ask yourself: would you want to be around someone that thinks like you? This is a nice way of thinking. We should be happy, positive, and supportive people no matter the conclusions we come to. Life is short and we're all in this together.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 08:06 PM
1

I don't understand your question. Everything is not amoral and sexual strategy is not immune to moral judgment. The subreddit doesn't want to bother wasting space with that discussion because it doesn't interest the redditors there and they consider virtue signalling on this topic as unhelpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 07:35 PM
1

amoral: unconcerned with the rightness or wrongness of something Seems that's what I just explained
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 05:34 AM
1

No, this has nothing to do with government welfare. Monogamy has existed for thousands of years. And resourcefulness is certainly some component of fitness from a natural selection view because it takes resources to raise offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 04:40 PM
1

Monogamy decreases genetic fitness in the population because the studs are only breeding monogamously. Most women must then settle for average men. It's not about strength vs resourcefulness, because if strength doesn't indicate best fitness then the women who chose those inferior genes would ultimately lose the natural selection game to the women who did choose the actual best fitness.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 04:07 PM
1

What's moral? What's right? I have my own answers to those questions but no one cares and that's the point: to put it aside because any discussion that devolves to that level is not useful or interesting and this isn't the place for it. Instead we can talk about actual reasons, experiences, expectations, and consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 03:26 AM
2

Physical attractiveness stereotype and Halo effect biases, just for starters
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 02:23 AM
1

Monogamy is an adaptation humans have practiced for thousands of years. It's related to mate-guarding and reduces female sexual selection (reducing overall genetic fitness in the population) in exchange for most men gaining the opportunity to become fathers. Mothers also gain the benefit of a father to help provide and raise her children.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 11:03 PM
2

Oh I see what you're saying now. Yeah it could be an indictment of either capitalism or male sexuality. There is a natural element of exchange involved and then there's also the economic system exaggerating this effect as if to suggest exchange is everything. (You can't actually get sex by buying their brand.)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 09:31 PM
2

Can you explain what capitalism has to do with this? Women and men have been exchanging favors long long before capitalism...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 08:53 PM
1

That's one extreme. There's definitely some room for cooperation between "I have all the power" and "You have all the power."
/r/RedPillWomen16/05/17 02:55 PM
2

Not bad at all. Who wouldn't want someone to take care of them? And you're not alone about your job. Most jobs suck big time -- that's just the economic system we have and it's not changing anytime soon. The majority of people, men and women, would rather be doing something else, typically spending more time with their loved ones.
/r/RedPillWomen16/05/17 01:12 PM
2

Monogamy Be monogamous Don't fuck around In all seriousness monogamy is the compromise and it's the system we had before recent technological advances (access to birth control, paternity tests, safe abortions, legal protections, pornography, dating apps) made it easier for women to have many partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 01:00 PM
2

They are aware and they advocate it. If enough women didn't like it then it wouldn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 12:52 PM
2

I'm not sure anyone here actually gets the difference: the defining feature of that market is monogamy. Anyone who wants monogamy will be better off there because that's the norm. The women are not sexually repressed, they are monogamous. To maintain their value they must reject chads who only want to smash and dash and would make them a single mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 09:52 PM
1

Non-monogamous women and chads. The defining feature of that marketplace is monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 09:44 PM
1

Ignore the politics. It's a clusterfuck in America now and only getting worse. The 99.99% of Americans have absolutely zero understanding of socialism, anarchy, and capitalism too. It happens that more leftists identify with feminism and more of trp is opposed to feminism. That's pretty much it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 02:27 AM
1

It's about information propagation. Genes are information that determine behavior so yes you want good genes. But sexual selection is more than that. You want a good culture fit. You want someone who shares your ideas and lifestyle. You want a personality that works with yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 01:58 AM
1

Sure. Technological progress is outpacing evolution. So rather than our culture adapting slowly in response to generational changes, it's adapting fast in response to huge technological change like the internet. And like birth control. Birth control is great, it gives women choice, but it also makes women more likely to sleep with men they don't see themselves with long term. Whether you see this as good or bad depends on your own view on these things, but it's not exactly good for a culture of …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 08:23 PM
1

Would be interesting to discuss how access to birth control and safe abortions has already affected gender dynamics. I believe this is the foundation for the modern wave of female sexual liberation, promiscuity (having many partners), delayed marriage, and a decrease in family values and overall relationship satisfaction. Not that I'd recommend decreasing access to these technologies, but they do have effects on social behavior and expectations. There is a larger point to be made here and this e…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 07:25 PM
3

I wouldn't say that. Monogamy is a valid compromise between men's​ and women's​ sexual strategies. You just need to actually be monogamous and that means end the relationship if it's not. And I don't think it's recommended on trp.
/r/RedPillWomen14/05/17 06:43 PM
1

This sub is focused on how women can attract a better partner and have better romantic relationships. If you want a focus on sex specifically there's r/sex or for a family or friendly focus try r/relationships or r/casualconversation. There is an American bias here because this is Reddit and most users are American. Of course dating will have huge cultural differences so it's possible much of the info you find won't be relevant to your particular situation. However I'm sure the people here would…
/r/RedPillWomen14/05/17 05:00 PM
2

Be grateful to me because I do a job that's not totally unnecessary?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 12:47 PM
32

Looking at it another way, if she didn't behave in this manner, that would actually imply something was wrong with her from a psychological perspective by going against her core drives. Whoa now let's separate behavior from impulses. While it's good strategy to assume everyone is capable of cheating, this is a strategy. Cheating is not a behavioral inevitably.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 06:57 PM
1

First I've seen this. I'm all for pen and paper journaling but this system does feel complicated. I'll have to watch a couple more videos to see where all the pieces fit together.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/17 10:09 PM
1

Isn't liberal feminism OK with gender roles as long as women choose them voluntarily? I assume you want to get rid of the gender system so that more women are treated equally in the areas they don't like like prison sentencing and garbage collection and the draft?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/17 12:25 PM
1

Damn I didn't realize this was happening! Definitely some bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/17 01:55 AM
1

I'd be curious what types of comments get the ban hammer or removed in those subs. I know anything that's too negative and direct especially if it's off topic might as well go but if someone's just expressing a harmless opinion it should be fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 10:13 PM
2

Same that's what I do as well: consider everything issue by issue and try to avoid the labels unless they've been defined for the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 10:07 PM
2

I think we have an economic hierarchy. Extreme wealth inequality isn't good for society. But I'm not convinced of a powerful patriarchy that's hurting society or viewing women as less. Many of the laws hurt men and benefit women. And many conservative women voters are fighting hard to make abortion less accessible for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 10:02 PM
1

Wow I really hadn't thought of it quite like that before. I know we work twice as hard now, collectively, for the same pay, but hadn't thought about collective wage suppression due to submissiveness in the workplace. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 09:52 PM
2

Thanks for sharing. I've had similar experiences with feeling at times like feminist goals included "otherizing" a group or diminishing the importance of men's issues and race issues. I remember talking to a couple bright friends who didn't think men had any social problems and reading to them a list of men's issues; every one was just dismissed as making something from nothing and told it's nothing​ compared to women's issues and that it's ultimately men's fault because the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 09:44 PM
1

Thanks for sharing that post was really helpful. It's also interesting to me how biology influences relationships and behaviors of men and women. Like the sexual strategy of AF/BB and the strategy of monogamy and the possible long-term social effects of technology like contraception and porn. I believe the feminist response is to increase freedom of choice and opportunity for women regardless of any externalities.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 09:23 PM
1

Thanks for sharing. I've seen many of these as well and wondered the same thing. There's gonna be a minority within any community that's batshit including rp and bp. So I've gotten into the habit of ignoring the insanity (everyone should be against that) and trying to find the reasonable perspectives.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 08:51 PM
2

Well it clearly means different things to different people and many people have strong feelings on it. Personally I find this makes it really hard to express any support or opposition except when it comes to very specific issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 07:43 PM
1

Gonna need examples here
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 06:58 PM
2

I'm gonna need examples
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 06:58 PM
2

This seems reasonable to me. What do you think of the argument that advocacy for women doesn't hurt men? These feminists would say why not be a feminist or at least supportive.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 06:56 PM
0

I'm surprised anyone thinks they are. We all have cognitive/cultural biases prizing girly innocence and motherly love and feminine submissiveness which makes it easier for women to escape responsibility for their actions. But this says little about their morality or selfishness compared to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 06:21 PM
1

For me the "how the sausage is made" reference means nobody cares about the work you put in. They care about the result. If the work or ingredients are gross (awkward, unhealthy men failing at everything) they especially don't want to see it. It means TRP is an ugly process with methods that aren't super wholesome but in the end (so they claim) it works and spits out something many women enjoy. How these men looked before only matters to the extent that it might impact their future behavior but …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 06:06 PM
1

Yes. If you didn't want to work then you need marriage/alimony for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 09:10 PM
1

Sure. Forcing a shitty relationship just for the kids is way overrated. And child support comes regardless. No one wants the monogamous relationship to end but once it's over the best move is moving forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 06:40 PM
1

I believe the real middle ground is monogamy​ without marriage and that's what I aim for myself as well. Find a partner who will love and care for your children (if you want them) and will challenge you to be the best version of yourself and provide a stable healthy environment. Of course it's kinda difficult so meanwhile just be safe while you're dating around. Don't waste time and energy on short term encounters.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 03:23 PM
1

It's better for the world when you donate to charity. So please donate to charity. But try not to donate because it benefits you. That's kinda shitty and suggests you'd stop when it no longer benefits you. Instead do it altruistically.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 02:37 PM
1

It's a good deal for the women who deeply enjoy it. The larger point that it's not ideal for (the majority) women seeking monogamy is pretty obvious IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 02:18 PM
3

The answer is "no I would not be OK with that. And yes I would pursue this type of relationship for myself."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 02:04 PM
1

Interesting that nobody in this thread seems​ to agree what the word means. Yet it's... the first and most important thing with trp? Here I am thinking it's literally a conversation technique that says, whatever I was doing or thinking about 2 min ago, yup I'm still thinking about that thing. Call me stable, stubborn, predictable, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 01:56 PM
1

This post really got me thinking about monogamy as a compromise in sexual strategy. Thanks for sharing. I would commit before sex but only with a partner who is dedicated to monogamous dating rather than the hypergamous promiscuity which dominates our dating culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 06:11 PM
6

Quality post thanks for linking it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 04:46 PM
1

Oh wow. It's so dumb for a public figure to admit anything to do with trp. Like one of the rules for EVERYONE is you don't talk about trp IRL. It's never gonna go well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 04:27 PM
1

Tall, strong jaw, broad shoulders, thick daddy forearms perfect for lifting infants. Powerful defined muscles, an emotionally stable personality, a pile of money that needs spending, a steady career and lifelong passion. Respected by other men and women, a leadership position within the community. Fertile.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 04:11 PM
2

Where does he confirm anything? I must have missed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 04:06 PM
2

All of the above. Women like it, it's a lost cause, and it keeps betas busy. You got it. Feminism also involves sexual liberation and economic emancipation so there were mixed messages to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 03:52 PM
1

Hyper-masculinity. When they say alpha they mean hyper-masculine. Now you can see why it needs to be taught.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 03:47 PM
3

Are you aware that condoms fail despite best intentions for them not to?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 04:37 AM
1

Yes and no. I spend a lot more time with my partner than a friend so it's more important they don't annoy me. However it's less important they're a good friend because I'm not sure great partners make great friends. Relationships thrive on a push and pull dynamic and have a sense of impermanence which is not conducive to a longterm friendship. And becoming too dependent on your partner for all your needs can impact the relationship and how your partner views you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 04:35 AM
2

she's not in control of her birth control failing. But men are always in control of their birth control failing? What.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 03:44 AM
2

But if the other gender doesn't abandon their own sexual strategy, then, per the cardinal rule, the only way for you to succeed is... compromise?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 08:47 PM
2

Yeah that's what it seems like. I'm really interested in sustainable compromises though. My guess is that's monogamy? Cooperation is nice even if it's not optimal strategy. I hadn't realized redpill neglects the masculine desire to be a father for a good family. That is a good point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 08:44 PM
3

Sounds good. So you're still an advocate for marriage for both sexes I see. Seems that's rare around these subs. Personally the possibility of everything changing in the relationship as a result may be too much for me, but I'm not close to 35 yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 08:38 PM
2

It is interesting how at odds the advice is here: women on the defensive, don't get exploited and build attachment, and men on the offensive, better to exploit and don't get too attached. Do you believe there's a sustainable compromise?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 08:34 PM
2

Sounds good. Marriage free?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 08:28 PM
1

Interesting. I like how different the advice is for sons/daughters, recommending no kids and then kids. Looks like you've put a lot of thought into this. Recently I did think about the effects abortion/contraception has had on sexual strategy (and came to similar conclusions) but I'm definitely unsure of the ethics involved in removing them from society.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 08:27 PM
2

Good perspective. I think a lot of us are becoming less social through our reliance on technology, texting, internet, dating apps, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 08:17 PM
2

Lol. Not sure if serious but I like your approach
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 08:13 PM
1

Ha maybe it was just late
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 08:06 PM
7

That wasn't at all obvious. And it's already the shitty state of affairs for a good chunk of attractive men on Tinder. Of course the majority don't get any attention at all. Dating apps are difficult for almost everyone. They're just not great; more for collecting profits than securing good sustainably healthy relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 05:49 AM
1

Or friends... I'm trying to get a response here that's not just "do wat you want" because wtf does this sub even exist if nobody has any good ideas on what should be done. And it's not trolling. Hierarchical and non-hierarchical relationships are both quite common and interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 04:20 AM
2

OK. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 04:05 AM
2

OK. Sounds more like a rejection of redpill culture. Do you recommend pursuit of casual sex, short-term dating, long-term dating, marriage, hypergamy, monogamy, polyamory, abstinence, hierarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 04:00 AM
2

No. It's advice. Should I go for the donut or the salad? If you know what you're talking about, there is a correct answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 03:33 AM
2

Well, is it better to just get your dick wet? What about women?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 03:23 AM
4

4/10 it's advice
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 03:17 AM
3

1/10 advice. Can't do
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 03:16 AM
3

lol. Men don't see Emma Watson as average. Like 2 guys in this thread do. She's a fucking model and actress. The average woman is 39, fat, and shit-tier personality. Absolutely ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 03:10 AM
3

share none of the wealth they've accumulated together I'm OK with sharing. Not OK with throwing money away.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 02:43 AM
1

Struggling in life vs not struggling in life? How is this a choice. B.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 10:25 PM
1

Right. I almost feel like the blatant controversy is there for a reason. Like someone's making money off the attention. All of this info could easily be presented in a healthier way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 09:47 PM
1

You have a link? What attraction models did they have
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 09:37 PM
1

Interesting way to put it. I'm not sure it's necessarily a bad thing though -- many of the activities that make you a more attractive partner also make you healthier and happier in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 09:30 PM
1

Right, I implied that this is a spectrum in saying "more masculine." And implied we're working with correlations by using "tend to."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 09:26 PM
1

TRP is also about how horrible feminism is and why it brings the downfall of society. I still don't know what anyone is talking about here. Women in politics? Access to birth control? Heads of household? Media portrayal of men or women? Who wants what and who doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 09:17 PM
1

degrees to which certain behavior(s) exist among each gender Hard to argue this since it's all anecdotal and good advice for one person will be bad advice for a different person. varying applications of TRP's strategy and whether it works Same here: I don't think any of this is particularly scientific. So you're just going to get accounts of "worked for me!" and such. moral arguments for or against certain TRP advice Well this is always swampy territory but generally the goal should be happier, …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 09:05 PM
2

Seems most the disagreements boil down to "I don't like how you said that." It's diction. If you misuse the word rape then you fucked up. If you blame someone too much (overestimating their agency) then you fucked up. If your language is too harsh it's typically not a good idea. If you say "all women" you're actually kinda stupid. And so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 08:36 PM
2

So what are the major disagreements? I'm not too familiar with bluepill theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 06:34 PM
3

Yeah this is all about trends and patterns of behavior. I do hate the phrases AWALT and such because it's just logically stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 06:27 PM
2

I've got love for tom boys too but I've noticed (do a google search or recall any movies/media representations) typically the women able to pull this off best are attractive women with such feminine features that her femininity can be understated with great success.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 06:24 PM
2

Ha. Personally I have to consider all the factors that make for attraction. These are both social, well-liked, reasonably intelligent, and wealthy as all fuck, so they're each a solid 10/10. Now for sake of argument let's say they're working your average job, no fame, nothing special. She's still going to be a 10. I don't know how you're getting around that unless you want to use a log-scale. He's more like an 8, needs to lose some fat but he's tall, funny, attractive, and he's got some charm.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 06:09 PM
4

I believe their issue is keeping the men they really want. But plenty of women would like to attract better men as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 05:50 PM
1

Thanks. The corollary here is there's gotta be a sub dedicated to increasing femininity for women. (Advice for women who want better relationships.) Is this what r/redpillwomen is about?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 05:42 PM
4

Thanks. Been lurking TRP for a week and first post in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 05:40 PM
1

Thanks. What's your personal criteria for care/don't care? Appears inconsistent at first glance.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/17 02:59 AM
1

Am I correct in understanding this post is supportive of polyamory/open relationships/swinging/exhibitionism? As long as everyone is disease free and not getting pregnant, why care?
/r/TheRedPill21/04/17 02:27 PM
1

There's a lot of talk about how women's value comes only from their pussy. Of course this can't be literally true -- do you want any woman that's got a pussy? No. You value her health, fitness, a personality, some self control, maybe a passion for something. Question: so are you limiting yourself here? Do you only care about sex? Or do you acknowledge hardworking women are more valuable just like hardworking men, and likewise pursue partners who clearly put some effort into their lives?
/r/TheRedPill20/04/17 01:04 PM
1

You have to read what I said: We all share a society with a common culture and market forces and we're all human and susceptible. Yet our personalities and personal histories and how we're conditioned to respond to our environments and our actual biologies and lifestyles can be quite different.
/r/MGTOW07/04/17 08:54 PM
2

That's only up to a certain age right? I've seen a relationship value over time chart somewhere. And only on average; some men will have no problems here.
/r/MGTOW07/04/17 08:39 PM
1

First rule of the internet. Why do you believe polyamory benefits women more? Especially if women are hypergamous. Maybe I'm missing the economics of the situation so please lay it out for me. I do know for many couples it just makes sense to opt for activities that bring mutual satisfaction, and for some it's impractical to expect all their relationship needs be satisfied by one person.
/r/MGTOW07/04/17 08:29 PM
3

Title of the post is "Discovered this sub yesterday and wanted to pose some discussion to the guys here." Apologies if you expected something different. I see you didn't answer any of the questions but thanks for setting those out for other readers.
/r/MGTOW07/04/17 06:46 PM
3

She's a person like any other person... Just really depends. Maybe she's a doctor, trainer, masseuse, cook, educator, or just a hardworking and generous individual like yourself willing to pick up the slack when you're tired and she's not. Anyone can be a neighbor or friend.
/r/MGTOW07/04/17 06:38 PM
1

I'm not talking about marriage here, but the actual relationship and lifestyle. Many people don't get married. It seems more men of this sub have decided "it's not worth it" in any case including dating.
/r/MGTOW07/04/17 06:25 PM
3

Romantic companionship, sex, there's a lot of feel-good hormones you get from intimacy and contact, a partner you feel comfortable with and enjoy spending time with, someone who helps you achieve your goals. I mean if it's not worth it for you personally I totally understand but there are benefits and men who enjoy them.
/r/MGTOW07/04/17 06:00 PM
2

The mate guarding instinct is natural too. When you're breeding with the best available mate, this practice secures best available genes in your future offspring. But not everyone wants to breed. And there's social status associated as well, but not everyone gives a fuck how society might perceive them. Why do you believe this occurs at the expense of all men involved?
/r/MGTOW07/04/17 04:58 PM
4

Worth the $5 just to not have your device bombarded with vibrating ads hijacking your browser and screens requiring you to make an account.
/r/MGTOW06/04/17 03:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter