TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mymraccount_ac Archive

View 15 posts and 380 comments by mymraccount_ac on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
155

Progressmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights19/10/17 10:03 AM
57

Discriminationmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:33 PM
33

Social Issuesmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights23/07/17 11:42 AM
32

Social Issuesmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights03/10/17 12:45 PM
26

Social Issuesmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:18 PM
23

Feminismmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:06 AM
14

mymraccount_ac/r/MensRights23/10/17 08:56 AM
13

False Accusationmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:46 AM
10

Marriage/Childrenmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights12/12/17 04:07 PM
8

Marriage/Childrenmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights08/07/17 08:56 PM
6

Social Issuesmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights18/07/17 01:42 PM
6

Social Issuesmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights18/12/17 12:13 PM
5

Generalmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:39 AM
5

Social Issuesmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights09/11/17 05:16 PM
3

Marriage/Childrenmymraccount_ac/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:06 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

I'm sure we'd shove men in there too if there was overcrowding.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:25 PM
40

I understand that dog shelters are not just for protecting dogs -- wild dog packs are a fucking menace to society. Look at Russia. We have men's shelters, we call them prisons.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:14 PM
12

Academia. The US went with a loan system before the UK and EU. As a result they jumped on the 'gender studies' bandwagon early, purely to cash in on students that weren't clevel enough to study real subjects. That junk science started to effect social change.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:09 PM
2

Not sure you've followed your own logic there. Women should not be CEOs? Women should be paid less because they can't work as hard?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:05 PM
7

Same as all the previous studies then.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:03 PM
21

"Will you marry me", "YES!", "Great, now buy me a ring".
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:02 PM
2

Reading between the lines a bit, seems clear the ex did nothing to help him. Bet she thought he was just being manipulative; I've seen that attitude towards unwell men so many times.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 02:30 PM
3

I mean, this seems serious enough to get social services involved. I know if a man proclaimed 'kill all women' and he had a daughter, he'd lose custody.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 11:52 AM
-3

Not a men's rights issue. What rights does this affect?
/r/MensRights30/12/17 11:42 AM
53

It's a great example of concept creep. Just like violence now means anything that causes offense, harassment now means staring or off colour jokes, and assualt means a hand on shoulder or knee.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 11:32 AM
2

Ah see, thought you were trying to say 8% claim is false, my mistake. Yep, the link you posted tries desperately to prove the 2-8% figure, and fails completely on the 2% end. Would like to see the 8% paper.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 08:10 PM
5

So, I've read that, and if you think it proves studies that show 8% wrong, you're way off. Most of the studies it does back are in the 7-9% range. Most of its critism of Kanin are based on mere assumptions about possible police practices. And it doesn't even deal with Jordan (2004) which finds the same results as Kanin. Now let's look at the studies that show 2.5% and 2.1%. With Kelly, Lovett, & Regan, 2005, the author completely dishonestly cherry picks a subset of the false reports to come up …
/r/MensRights23/12/17 07:58 PM
8

If they are so deeply flawed, I'm sure you can cite acedemic sources based on real police case files that demostrate that fact. Love to see them.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 07:23 PM
15

Lucky I can cite sources then, eh.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 07:17 PM
12

I think anything I say or anyone says will only confirm your views. All available evidence points at a variance between 8-40%. It's as simple as that.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 07:16 PM
9

If you don't like Kanin, try Jordan (2004).
/r/MensRights23/12/17 07:07 PM
8

Yep sure: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=mGaOIzxRByoC&pg=PA276&lpg=PA276#v=onepage&q&f=false
/r/MensRights23/12/17 07:03 PM
10

It's from university. Shitty papers get published by gender studies departments and are used to justify shitty policy by biased or uninformed lawyers, judges and politicians.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 05:45 PM
40

It's also completely wrong. The range is 8-40%.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 05:41 PM
0

Holy shit this has nothing to do with men's rights. This is just incel level feminist hating. There are innumerable men out there that are just as bad in their treatment of women, and that isn't a women's rights issue either. Do you people even understand what 'rights' are?
/r/MensRights23/12/17 05:22 PM
1

It's a really interesting history tbh. Women's suffrage was on the table all the way back in 1817: The claim for the women's vote appears to have been first made by Jeremy Bentham in 1817 when he published his Plan of Parliamentary Reform in the form of a Catechism,[17] and was taken up by William Thompson in 1825, when he published, with Anna Wheeler, An Appeal of One Half the Human Race, Women, Against the Pretensions of the Other Half, Men, to Retain Them in Political, and Thence in Civil and…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 12:03 PM
4

How long before we have a situation such as a man getting explicit consent for sex, only for the woman to claim in court she only consented to missionary sex and did not give explicit consent for doggy style?
/r/MensRights22/12/17 11:42 AM
3

In the UK at least, yes. The Liberals in parliament had been arguing since the late ninetenth century that all people over 21 should get the vote. The suffragette movement came much later, at the turn of the 20th century. All they did was set of bombs, attack police and march. The suffragists had more of an effect on parliament, but ultimately all they wanted was what the Liberals had been trying to get since their created. The thing that swung parliament was that the men returning for WWI were …
/r/MensRights22/12/17 10:42 AM
4

I don't even think it's the conviction rate that is the main problem in the US. They hand out such long sentences.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 10:09 AM
1

Paywalled. Can someone post article?
/r/MensRights22/12/17 01:22 AM
6

Four in one week, ffs. How many more innocent men are languishing in prison because of our ideologically corrupted and systemically sexist justice system?
/r/MensRights22/12/17 01:12 AM
27

In the words of the most recently accused: While it is embarrassing and I have suffered and I am never ever, ever going to get my career back, that is not the point,' Mr Armstrong said. 'The point is on this allegation somebody is trying to send me to prison for a very long time for something I didn't do.' It will take this man a long time to get over the damage this hateful woman did. A woman that will simply walk away in private unscathed.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 01:02 AM
6

Most men could not vote either back then. And it was the rise of classical liberalism and its belief that all people should be afforded the same rights that gave them the vote, not the efforts of early gender identarians.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 12:47 AM
1

Well, the case I was refering to started out as: he told an officer she froze after Armstrong started to kiss her. She said she explicitly declined an invitation to go back to Armstrong’s flat, but he undressed her and raped and sexually assaulted her. She said he told her “this is what you want”, which made her feel there was an “inevitability” that they would have sex, despite her not wanting to. But predictably ended up as: Mr Armstrong said that they danced in the office and began kissing, b…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 12:33 AM
2

Yep. We have this narrative forced down our throat in the UK by the national curriculum that the Representation of the People Act 1918 was all about women's suffrage. But the fact was that neither the majority of men nor women could vote before 1918. The Liberals and Labour had been pushing for equal votes for all long before the suffragette movement even started, as it was a core principle of Classical Liberalism. While the suffragette acted like fucking terrorists - attacking police, setting o…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 12:00 AM
6

has been a major factor in victims not coming forward in the past. It's not even true. This has been tracked. Table 9, page 7 shows reasons why women have said they do not report rape. Currently, 'Police would not do anything to help' stands at 13%, not even the largest reason. Compare that with table 11, page 8 which shows the percentage of cases actually acted on by police. Here's the kicker - in the past when action taken was in reality lower, fear that the police would not act was conversely…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 09:13 PM
10

Just two years before, suffragettes in England were comparing veterans to lunitcs and drunks, declaring themselves more deserving of the vote. Most soldiers in WWI would not get the vote themselves until 1918.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 07:17 PM
3

They do this quite often to push a narrative. For instance things iike 'hate crime increases for second year in US', with an article all about Trump, the alt-right, and LBTQ violence. Reality - most of the increase is due to anti-white violence, hate crime is actually at an all time historic low.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 07:07 PM
54

Not so long as Alison Saunders is head of the CPS. As the Director of Public Prosecutions, Saunders has faced criticism and controversy around the handling of trials for rape and sexual assault. The Crown Prosecution Service has been criticised for the case of Eleanor de Freitas, who killed herself after the Crown Prosecution Service decided to take over a private prosecution brought against her by the man she accused of rape. Saunders said that the "evidence in this case was strong and having c…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 03:20 PM
1

Anal is a rather extreme example. There is a case going through the courts in the UK at the moment where the woman claimed she 'froze' when she was kissed, somehow recovered completely to say no to going back to his flat, but then without resisting in any way allowed herself to be undressed and shagged on the desk. I'll remind you that simple assertiveness training of college aged women in the US(?) resulted in a halfing of reported rapes. Simply saying no, ffs. Why should a man's entire life ha…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 03:14 PM
3

A lot of studies are done by survey and have flawed methodology or an agenda. (Women's centers run the survey and are incentivised to find more female victims) For example, phone surveys to women saying "Have you ever had sex while drunk? " and then recording it as a male-female rape. This is so so bad and responsible for so much academic fraud. It ends up all being peer reviewed by professors with exactly the same agenda. One of the recent ones was an australian study that found that 40% of col…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 03:05 PM
2

It is adequately explained by the bell curve of genetically inherited traits. Men express more traits at the further edges of the curve - more men with an IQ of 160 but also more with an IQ of 40. Likewise, more sexually aggressive and yet more lacking in sexual drive completely. Women lie more towards the centre on all these traits. However, if you're looking for a purely environmental cause, try virgin shaming. IF you accept the feminist argument that slut-shaming was the sole driver of women'…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 02:57 PM
1

Is it not true that women are raped by men far more often than they are raped by women? Only when you define rape as penetration by penis, object or body part. When you include forced to penetrate, the numbers are equal.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 02:48 PM
3

Women don't actually attempt suicde more. Thre was a study, and I can't really be bothered to find it atm but I will, that showed that women intentional chose non-fatal sucide methods because their only intent was to get help.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 08:41 PM
1

while the the victim is telling the person no So I don't need to constanly ask.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 08:35 PM
1

Yep, sounds like the male pill all over again - chemical castration and all the mental health issues that go with it.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 08:34 PM
5

It's being caused by the influx of incels. They are not mens rights supporters, just women haters.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:20 AM
40

It's up to the person to withdraw consent by saying no. We are at the stage now where even verbal consent (as in the case of Louis CK) is not enough. We have pure academic fraud from people saying women are unable to say no to sex being used in court.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:04 PM
1

I'm sorry but the officer is clearly at fault. You can claim the whole thing is systemic if you want, but you won't ever change the situation unless individuals are held to account.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:00 PM
31

does initially consent to sexual contact but during the act does not consent too certain action Yeah, fuck everthing about that. Do they expect people to seek verbal consent for every position and act during sex?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:42 PM
1

Homeless vs living on the street. There's a difference.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:10 PM
2

There was guy in the UK that was not found guilty and stil ended up on the register, and had to report any potential sexual encounter to the police.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 06:28 PM
1

The Telegraph ion the UK quite frequently does.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 05:20 PM
3

we actually have a pretty good record when it comes to prosecuting false accusers. The conviction rate for rape has gone way up, but also the conviction rate for contempt of court for false accusers.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:57 AM
2

TRIGGER WARNINGs: video content will result in viewers needing to THINK. Another one involving Haidt here on exactly that subject. Honestly, when and if these values being spread like cancer in iniversities make it into the workforce, there will be have to be push back against it.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:04 PM
-9

It's just the mgtow/incel invasion. There's one in every thread now.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:26 PM
15

They're completely unable to deal with an issue 1-on-1, absolutely everything has to be a public performance. To an extent it has always been that way. As Peterson likes to repeat quite often - when men move beyond civil discourse they fight, when women do the same they try to destroy reputations (generalising obviously). The difference now is that with social media reputation destruction is so much more effective and damaging.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:22 PM
1

Don't like speaking for others really, but girlwriteswhat et al. speak on this specific question here
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:03 PM
2

Really depends on the frequency of false rape accusations and the number currently serving sentences that were simply miscarriages of justice. A second conviction could just mean that the same person lied twice.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 05:23 PM
2

Er, there's obvious bias. In this story, there's no condemnation of her actions, no attempt to hold her to account, and she's painted as the victim of the disorder. She could easily have killed people. In the sexsomnia article, there is never any attempt to show him as the victim, they constantly call it rape even though there was no intent, they constant paint her as the victim and him as the perp. It's subtle, but it's right there.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 04:38 PM
4

I think protection from paternity fraud should come first. Small steps.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 07:39 PM
3

You are saying neither.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 03:26 PM
3

What is sexism and racism, at it's core - generalisation based on gender or colour. That's all you do. It's not a fact that black men are violent, or men are violent.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 03:12 PM
-3

Go back to TRP and the white supremacist uncensorsorednews. The men's rights movement is not a place for racists or sexists like you.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 02:53 PM
8

There's an entire website dedicated to pervy photos of men on the tube, no action taken.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 02:48 PM
-13

Men are known to be more impulsive and violent. That is one of the many reasons why they are over represented in violent crimes
/r/MensRights10/12/17 02:46 PM
-30

Enough with the childish shite.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 01:34 PM
6

Nope. Women will often lie to cover the fact they had sex. Either due to being part of a religious community that thinks extramarital sex is a sin or because they had an affair.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 12:17 PM
1

Feminists forcing women into roles they don't want to do. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6754kjBA8Hg
/r/MensRights08/12/17 05:14 PM
6

Which ones? There are barely any male teachers left.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 05:08 PM
14

Seems like this could very easily backfire on her. The court of appeal has the power to apply an even larger sentence.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 05:05 PM
2

It is obvious from your history. You always speak in generalisations about women, all women. That;s not what this sub is about.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:21 PM
1

No, I'm a pragmatist. You can be for mens rights without hating women. Only 19% of women are feminists, that's a good indication of the number of women that are likely to cause you harm in life. It's really not worth risking a loveless, unfulfilling life for the sake of some fringe nutjobs. And you really can't deny that you are the 'big red' of the mens rights movement. Full of utter shite. It would be a disservice to MRM not to call you on your utter BS just like it is a disservice to feminism…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:06 PM
-2

Let me just add, you are a fucking loser. The men here are fighters, fighting for their rights to a fulfilling, equitable life. You do not stand with us. You hamper us with your self serving pity parade. No-one cares for antisocial people that just want to bail on life without a fight. That's all you are doing.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:41 PM
-4

go sacrifice yourself for a woman or your life is worthless See that's just your interpretation. And it has fuck all place in the men's right movement. Most of us are fighting for our rights to see our kids, for fair divorce settlement, for equal treatment before the law. You are just here to spread hate and division between the sexes. You're the male equivalent of the absolute worst man-hating, pink haired, shit stained feminsist. You're scum. Fuck off. because men are not worth anything at all…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:29 PM
1

Women are three times more likely to make an unsuccessful attempt than a man, yet will attempt suicide two to three times more often. They account for most of that. 3 times more likely and 3 times more often. That one in 33 is usually a man.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:47 PM
2

Read the statistics on suicide. Number one cause - family breakup. Number two - no family. It's a biological clock for men, trust me. The midlife crisis is a very real thing and it kills.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:44 PM
14

I keep seeing people refer to it as a simple filter. It's really not. It's a neural network. They feed a learning algorithm hundreds maybe thousands of faces with and without makeup. It learned the difference such that it can apply an intelligent processing chain to any face to remove make up. It's obviously not perfect, and it seems to favour making the person paler and older, but it's certainly not simple.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 07:58 PM
-9

They have their own sub, take it there.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 07:53 PM
-4

That sorry story ends with suicide when you hit middle age with no family, parents long gone, staring into the abyss of your empty, loveless and meaningless life.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:49 PM
11

Here's the paper if anyone's interested: https://www.webcitation.org/6NwyUOL68. It goes much further than establishing the single source in Against Our Will. Ms. Brownmiller, who is a very meticulous and organized writer, very kindly on my request located and sent me a copy of this xeroxed speech. In relevant part, the judge's speech reads: "In fact, according to the Commander of New York City's Rape Analysis Squad, only about 2 percent of all rape and related sex charges are determined to be fa…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:36 PM
1

That's rage inducing.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 09:25 PM
1

The government have that covered though. Just get pregnant and become a single mother. No need to settle.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 09:01 PM
1

Second one in as many months I believe. Another was a guy self-immolating over a custody battle.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 08:35 PM
2

I believe the 1 in 3 stat included 'being stared at', 'inappropriate jokes', and other such nonsense.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 08:06 PM
1

Still not much good. If they had stuck with: supremists, fascists, transphobics, sexists It'd be fine. You can't call someone that disagrees with feminists a peddler of hate, because feminism extends well beyond gender equity into some broad hate peddling of its own.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 01:46 PM
3

Yep, I think in 6 months or so he'll be able to make a comedy sketch out of the event and it would be nothing. None of what he did was serious at all. I'm expecting other comedians to make light of the situation too. eta: Burr has already started on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUb0tAW4CHc
/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:40 PM
-2

My thoughts exactly. Dating has little to do with men's rights until kids and marriage are involved. I expect more posts like this whinging about how unfair dating is now incels has closed. That sub kept the crazy contained.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:32 PM
1

No, not feminist, just female. However since feminists tend to be supremacists, they believe women's way of dealing is better, and then blame things like anger and violence in men on them not talking about their feelings like women do. Psychology and therapy has been particularly effected by this view. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeidHsRONyg
/r/MensRights14/11/17 10:36 AM
2

Yes, like having an abusive scumbag for a husband. That's a reason to leave, not a reason to cheat.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 02:48 PM
8

Yeah, but it was so unrealistic. People with PTSD don't just snap and go into shock like that. It affects their whole lives and character. And he dealt with it by talking about it, which is not typically how men deal with emotional issues, but the way women do and the way feminists think men should too.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 02:40 PM
2

not enough attention/lonely spends too much time at work doesn't treat me well enough Blah, blah. These are excuses trotted out on a regularly basis for women/wifes cheating, not just in the media but as valid defences in divorce settlements. You may not accept them, but you don't represent all women.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 10:17 AM
1

There seem to be plenty for women.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 09:43 AM
1

Quite often when you hear of a man running out on his kid, it's only because the couple split up and mother does everything possible to ruin his reputation for revenge. Part of that is putting the blame for the break on him, denying him access, and turning kids against their father.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:15 PM
1

This was a great video and all, but it's only concerned with the 'white' aspect of it. Nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 04:14 PM
1

If that happens though, you just know a lot of men will be arrested for harassment for quite naturally staring.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 12:01 PM
3

To a degree, but it's more emotional control imo. Women do not need to learn much control because they have little strength. Every boy needs to learn that if he lets negative emotions get the best of him, he will hurt the people around him.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 11:47 AM
1

That's because single mothers raise weak men. As Peterson often likes to throw out there - weak men are capable of the most evil, because they easily succumb to resentment, bitterness and jealousy. Not of women and minorities like this clown likes to believe, but of other men within their social hierarchy.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 11:39 AM
2

No, the legal and financial issues surrounding marriage is a men's rights issue, but avoiding marriage altogether is a separate choice. People only advocate for more balanced marriage and divorce laws because they are either married or would like to get married one day.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 08:21 AM
4

It's the zeitgeist at the moment - women want protection from everything harmful in society. Ironically that's precisely what they said they didn't need protecting from last century. Real feminists could go toe to toe with any powerful man without the fear of allowing themselves to be coerced or manipulated, and it would be a sign of their strength and independence.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:50 AM
3

I see a lot of bleed over in this sub from MGTOW lately, lot's of comments saying 'never talk to women at work', 'avoid relationships', 'never marry', etc. I wish people would save that for their own sub, because it really has nothing to do with men's rights activism. Equally there is a lot of posting about dating double standards that would fit right in over at incels or TRP, doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:34 AM
1

Careful. Hating men's rights activism isn't the same as hating men, just the same as hating feminism isn't the same as hating women. Goes both ways.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:30 AM
6

Mgtow, incels, alt-right, TRP, the list keeps growing. None are related. Men's rights certainly appeals to men that belongs to those groups, but it has a much, much wider reach.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:28 AM
1

essentially toxic shame No More Mr Nice Guy would be a good start with that.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:19 AM
15

Since when does due process apply to careers? Since when does due process apply to University? Hell, let's just pull all justice out of those annoying courts and do it all without due process. /s Most places companies can be taken to court and sued if they do not follow due process in their dismissal procedure.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:10 AM
12

So did all the people that accused Ghomeshi (eventually). The case was thrown out of court for collusion. It was all BS.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:05 AM
16

Hmm, I think a lot of men are blind to the injustices men face until they go through it themselves. Not going to hold it against him.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:59 PM
1

Take for instance the Libdemstoo website, set up in the wake of accusations against MP in the UK specifically to get people together to find accusations against libdem MPs. It lead to a completely anonymous accusation of rape against an MP that got him suspended. This is the definition of collusion, and any court case that results from it is completely ruined by it. And if you mean proof in this case, read the original article. All 5 women came forward with the information at the same time, the …
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:55 PM
2

If they felt it was wrong they should have said it at the time, like an adult would. And you know the guy thinks everything he does is wrong, Louis would apologise for his own shadow. In fact he had already apologised for this in private to the people concerned. The only reason they went public was not for an apology, but to ruin his reputation.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:32 PM
2

It's a predicament for them Are they children? Do they want to be treated as children? Unable to make adult decisions and unable to consent in certain situations.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:18 PM
1

He was basically just an unnamed writer for Chris Rock at the time, with some local success in the Boston scene.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:13 PM
1

At the time he did this, arguably the world did not work that way. You really have to take stock at how hysterical the west has become about sex lately.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:11 PM
1

over whom he potentially had some influence So some potential influence equates to the inability to give consent? This is straight from the 'women are children and need special protections' school of feminism.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:04 PM
2

Yes, and in the wake of #metoo, a lot of women are doing it.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:00 PM
1

I didn't claim it was not true, only that they did it to do damage. The Times article was certainly structured that way too. Look at the way is leaves out all instances of him asking and getting consent until way down in the article, and leads with significantly worse version of events.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 10:58 PM
3

Asking and getting consent isn't enough. And simply being admired is enough of a power imbalance for it to be wrong now. WTF. I've seen this argued on reddit. Mentors or people you admire. I mean shit, don't women feel a certain admiration for all their lovers? The net is so wide now it covers everyone.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 10:51 PM
1

Yes, not talking to women is being rude and makes it basically impossible to do your job. You would be seen as a 'low key woman hater' without even saying a word.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:33 PM
1

I completely agree. Asking questions directly completely throws people. The insistence on this kind of contractual sex that's required by consent laws is totally unnatural to most people. It turns something that should be instinctual, driven by base desires and guided by body language, into a higher cerebral activity. It just makes things awkward. But what can we do? It's pretty much required by law, but as this case shows not even asking is enough to avoid your reputation being ruined.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:30 PM
9

We are the progressives. Feminism is utterly regressive.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:20 PM
3

Someone tried to argue in the main Louis CK thread yesterday that it was assault because he launched into it without any foreplay. They want sex without foreplay to be illegal, it's really that ludicrous.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:19 PM
1

Beg to differ: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/778pms/trollxchromosomes_celebrate_about_getting_a/
/r/MensRights09/11/17 11:01 PM
26

That was definitely my first thought behind the motives. Louis has been very pro men, anti-feminism lately, going more in the direction of Burr. These people have a personal vendetta. They got together, collaborated on their stories then went to the press. This is libel and I very much hope Louis has the balls to take them all to the cleaners.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 10:56 PM
5

Apparently LOUIS has felt the need to apologize to these women Probably just felt ashamed of his fetish.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 10:52 PM
6

On more than one occasion I've asked once and been instinctively told no, then brought it up 10 minutes later to a resounding yes. It's really not unusual. People can be naturally reserved and it takes a while for an idea to sink in. Especially if you're in a work environment There was only one occasion that happened at work. He asked first, she said yes!
/r/MensRights09/11/17 10:48 PM
8

In fact on one occasion the woman said yes, but decided later that it was wrong and she knew at the time and now regrets it. Even yes means no.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 10:45 PM
3

Well I've been saying for years that men need to step aside and let women run things for a time. Men have been running things since the beginning and look where we are. Yes, look where we are: https://youtu.be/v-hIVnmUdXM?t=3092 Totally naive view. She says that from what Peterson calls a 'protected area', standing on top of layers and layers of infrastructure that men build and maintain.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 10:29 PM
3

I'm not advocating leniency and your example is so absurdly off base in comparison Is it? You would be arguing for the same 'understanding' for a child abuser, potentially a child killer. Arguably far worse a crime than rape. If your mild annoyance over a crying baby is so out of your control, how can you possibly argue that a testosterone fuelled sex drive and biological deviance that leads to rape is any different?
/r/MensRights09/11/17 07:19 PM
2

I'm all for taking such a lenient view, so long as it's applied to men too. Where would you ever see you're not always consciously aware of your actions, you're not always in control of who you are and very rarely does anyone ever recognize the sheer amount of automation that we're all running on. in say a rape case?
/r/MensRights09/11/17 05:27 PM
5

proxy violence That's a big one. Men are more often killed by other men that are 'known to the family'. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/compendium/focusonviolentcrimeandsexualoffences/yearendingmarch2015/chapter2homicide#relationship-between-victim-and-principal-suspect In particular, women were far more likely than men to be killed by partners/ex-partners (44% of female victims compared with 6% of male victims), and men were far more likely than women to be k…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:41 PM
6

I don't believe all are lying, but I think most are doing it for praise. They don't want justice in many cases, and just want to be seen as courageous.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:30 PM
15

There should never be urinals in a gender neutral bathroom. That seems like an open invitation for both invasion of privacy AND incident exposure claims depending on the complainant.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:25 PM
7

Women don't exist just to fuck you over. The only one generalising here is you. The fact is they can and many frequently do.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:21 PM
2

By not talking to female colleagues, you get reported to HR for being creepy and quiet. That was precisely the nature of that trollX post from a while back.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:20 PM
1

I can understand why a lot of men would be being against the issue, because honestly women do totally fuck with the fighting effectiveness of the military and would so even more in a conscripted army.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:05 PM
19

She shook her child after it screamed for hours and hours. Google "shaken baby syndrome". Better people than her are tempted to do the same thing. It is a tragic and sad situation where a teen mother with no coping skills hurt her own child in frustration. Sorry, but the whole issue with SBS when it first surfaced was that many people were sent to prison for it even though the baby hadn't been shaken. It is entirely justified in this case. 'Frustration' would not be an adequate excuse for a fath…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 01:59 PM
1

You just know that comment is going to be taken out of context.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 12:02 PM
21

Could you post the actual article please? Your screenshot cuts off the part where women were the ones that didn't want to do it.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 11:51 AM
3

Women tend to just murder and abuse their children.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 11:41 AM
8

There's a whole wiki page on it. Common knowledge around here to be frank, doesn't need citation. The data comes from the CDC, which shows that when you exclude rape, lesbians have the higher incidence rates of DV than hetero. Bisexual women have the highest incidence rate of all groups even including rape. It's also the study that showed the number of men are made to penetrate is more or less equal to that of women raped over their lifetimes. There was also a recent 'female perpetrators of sexu…
/r/MensRights08/11/17 11:36 AM
15

As Erin Pizzey has always said, DV is the result of growing up in a family in which violence is normalised. You can tell a lot about your other half's potential for violence from their family.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 11:02 AM
0

Yeah, there is actually a series of steps required to make those preschoolers in the first place. Ask your parents about it. It's not a precise art either, and people make mistakes along the way.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 07:47 AM
0

They are still alleged until he is proven guilty by a court of law.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 07:35 AM
31

Household feminists give the more extreme elements of feminism their power though. Here on MR, we tend to downvote misogynists and others that try to hitch a ride on the movement to spread hate. You don't see that too often in feminism.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 07:31 AM
1

Alleged predatory acts*. Honestly some of the stories I've read have been tame. "He invited me to his room after a date, made a move which I rejected. He backed down, I left", and such bollocks.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 05:55 PM
2

It's good that you only said how you would react, but that's not what feminists do. They claim that all women are like that. Generalisation literally as bad as anything TRP would say.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 10:40 AM
24

But there’s a twist to this tale of sexual harassment. Stafford-Clark suffered from pseudobulbar palsy following a stroke and brain injury in 2006. At 76, and using a walking stick and a wheelchair, he also presented signs of ‘occasional disinhibition’. In a statement following the complaint, a spokesperson for Stafford-Clark explained: ‘Occasional loss of the ability to inhibit urges results in him displaying disinhibited and compulsive behaviour and his usual (at times provocative) behaviour b…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 10:35 AM
5

Yep, my thoughts too. Unless they compared the severity of the ailments/injuries, they would not know whether the lower death rate was because of gender or other factors.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 05:58 AM
9

I hate to say this, because personally I've always found it just a bit uncivilised, but there's a reason why some men do it. I've worked with scaffolders, bricklayers, etc., real salt of the earth type knuckle draggers. They try it on with many passer-bys. The only reason they do it is because a significant number of women respond positively to it. Does any reasonable person think that if they got shit for it all day they would keep doing it? They only do it to brighten up their own day, to brea…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 09:22 PM
1

Just like with games eh? Did GamerGate pass you by?
/r/MensRights24/10/17 08:59 PM
21

I'd hazard a guess that even if you did a non-reverse-gender version of this, only half (at best) of the women targeted would be overtly offended. Not all women are straight laced, prudish feminists that hate (or are jealous of) sexual attention.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 02:59 PM
6

I think you totally ignore both the current sociopolitical climate and the history that led to it. You name films and cartoons from 20+ years ago as counterexamples, yet they were made during a time when it was socially acceptable to make light of both male and female perpetrated sexual assault. I struggle to think of any 'coming of age' or 'bros' type comedy that has been made in the last 10 years that make light of male perpetrated sexual violence. The peephole in shower room trope is dead, so…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 02:06 PM
2

No sources for /u/Arby01's claims about statistical issues, but for the 2% claim see here: https://www.webcitation.org/6NwyUOL68 One highly respected legal academic, elected by her peers as president of the prestigious Association of American Law Schools, recently reported that "the overwhelming consensus in ... research relying on government data is that false reports account for only about 2 percent of rape complaints." 9 It is indisputably true that, largely through the efforts of legal domin…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 11:26 AM
24

This is an extremely common tactic in most of feminist media, science and even wiki. When a statistic is deigned to need a citation, it will either be to yet another blog or media post, or to an article that itself uses shaky citations. Often trying to find the original source is like going down a rabbit hole that often leads to some off hand comment made in the 70s without any evidence. Statistics in the media get perpetuated this way, and those articles are then deemed reliable sources for wik…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 10:39 AM
8

Hmm, there's money in what they do, plenty of it. That's part of the problem with modern feminism, you have millions of household feminists that simply believe in equal rights who prop up hate-spewing journalists that spread the worst elements of the ideology. That in turn creates the background through which academia and law is funded to spew out sexist laws and junk science.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 09:25 AM
3

Indeed. I think men should be speaking up and taking action. We need new laws that say, regardless of innocence or guilt of the accused, it must always be illegal to accuse anyone of any crime in the public sphere. Crimes should always and only be reported to the proper authorities and it must be for them alone to decide whether to make the issue public. It serves no purpose other than to punish the accused to publicise the matter extrajudicially, and in fact it will often ruin any potential cou…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 09:15 AM
13

In fact abstinence only and the driving forces behind it may underlie one of the primary reasons women falsely accuse men of rape to such a large degree, which is that they do it to cover up consensual sex they would be punished by their peers and family for.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 09:02 AM
13

Actually much more than that. That is the figure for homelessness, not rough sleepers. Homeless women are by-and-large couch surfers or living in hostels.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 08:56 AM
19

It's a double edged sword though isn't it. How long before some feminist decides he's just acting as male feminist to get his way, a wolf in sheep's clothing, and then starts a #metoo campaign of bullshit against him.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:36 PM
11

It's so laughable how uninformed about feminism she is. Women get custody because feminists got the laws changed, look back 100+ years and men were the default parents. Women get alimony not because muh gender roles, but because 'back in the day' they were often left homeless and feminists lobbied to change most of marital property laws (with such success that men were thrown in jail for their wife's non payment of tax). And what does homeless men have to do with feminism? Well, all of the above…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 08:12 PM
1

Does anyone know a study that bothered to ask what percentage of women are actually offended by cat-calling?
/r/MensRights23/10/17 07:06 PM
7

You could be a bit more subtle than that. Ask if she was scared of all black men because some of them are rapists too. Either way they go it's going to be racist.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 04:12 PM
1

Hmm, how else would you interpret that sentence? The parental psychopathology was maternal warmth and self-regulation. It was indirect because the primary cause was alcoholism and psychopathology was secondary to that. So, there is an association between maternal warmth and self-regulation and teen dating violence. It even states that maternal warmth is a good protective factor against the development of teen dating violence. The link is demonstrated clearly.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 03:44 PM
1

Parental psychopathology in infancy was indirectly associated with teen dating violence in late adolescence via low maternal warmth and self-regulation in early childhood The primary focus of the study was alcoholism, but the main component they found was in the title I used.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:51 AM
1

No haven't found it yet. It's on researchgate so you can request it if you're a student. There is an article about it here, but it has some problems. For one they blame men for the behaviour of the mothers.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 10:23 AM
3

Honestly sounds like a person with emotional or borderline personality disorder. Think I'll pass on having shit thrown at me and being stabbed.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 06:58 AM
1

If you do not understand why men's rights activists are typically anti-feminist, then I'd suggest you have no deep understanding of the issues men face and their history. Why are there very few shelters for abused husbands? Why are sexual assault laws gendered to favour women? Why are divorce settlements so bad for men? Why do women get custody of children so much? The answer to all of them is because feminists lobbied to get changes that favours women and hurt men, and they have been doing it i…
/r/MensRights22/10/17 11:36 PM
2

The reality is that even most women that are simply casual feminists are useful idiots to the radical feminists that wield power in higher education, media and law.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 11:23 PM
0

Cases in point: https://youtu.be/hzIiHYmExiw, https://youtu.be/UtAByXu_U-I
/r/MensRights22/10/17 11:17 PM
9

They have repeatedly now. Mattress girl for instance. The college was sued but they settled out of court.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 11:10 PM
3

But she is allowed to go back to school in future, where she may or may not face disciplinary proceedings. The 'could' from the article is a pretty serious omission though I agree.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 10:36 PM
2

Well, we know from hard data from the CDC that there are an equal number of women that force to penetrate, i.e. rape men. So 6-10% of women. And bearing in mind that the 2002 study claims that up to 90% of what they consider rape just isn't reported, isn't it plausible that these violent sexual encounters may in fact be reciprocal or tolerated in many cases? Also: https://youtu.be/j4NzBytUxEo?t=1608
/r/MensRights22/10/17 09:19 AM
4

Okay, so they are selling out their core principles for that sweet government cash. It seems the government is forcing them to become a gender neutral charity to receive any handouts. My question is, do they apply the same rules to the plethora of feminist charities they fund? If not they can be absolutely demolished by discrimination laws in the UK.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:56 AM
2

Actually yes it was. It specifically used the words 'if there were no consequences for the participants', plural. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291567285_Denying_Rape_but_Endorsing_Forceful_Intercourse_Exploring_Differences_Among_Responders Attraction to sexual aggression. The survey concluded with part of the attraction to sexual aggression scale (Malamuth 1989a,b). This scale measures self-reported likelihood to engage in a variety of sexual behaviors ‘‘if nobody would ever know and…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 09:25 PM
1

Can you link the studies? I'd imagine they are typical, BS gender studies papers with no peer review, repeatable results, nor any citations since. Bonus points if they use the Masculine Norms Index.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 09:15 PM
9

Pretty sure it's in relation to this: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/03/day-woman-strike-aims-raise-awareness-170307173935540.html. An event that happened without anything noticeable going wrong.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 09:12 PM
1

A married 30-year-old female reported that she had been raped in her apartment complex. During the polygraph examination, she admitted that she was a willing partner. She reported that she had been raped because her partner did not stop before ejaculation, as he had agreed, and she was afraid she was pregnant. Her husband is overseas. That would actually be prosecuted as rape now. An unmarried 16-year-old female had sex with her boyfriend and later became concerned that she might be pregnant. Sh…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 09:02 PM
1

So basically it's insurance fraud taken to the criminal courts. Body cameras and mics seem the way to go.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 08:45 PM
1

Not just those topics, other areas of social science are being corrupted by identity politics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drRgyFcGwuc&t=0s
/r/MensRights21/10/17 12:16 PM
1

Stanford prison experiment, every time. Now these libtard fuckwits are in power, they are every bit as hateful as the people they railed against.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:40 PM
32

Does female circumcision reduce this risk? It's totally morally justifiable if so.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:36 PM
7

Obviously
/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:27 PM
11

For now. Stay vigilant.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:24 PM
16

I don't know about this person, as she was no-personed by wikipedia. She went down the memory hole.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 09:28 AM
31

Could you imagine it? A bunch of women in vagina hats trying to stop half the population going about their business.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 09:19 AM
1

Is that a problem? Seems to me a private entity would capitulate to violence and censorship far easier than a public one.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 09:04 AM
4

forcibly kissing someone It needn't even be that. It could simply be attempting to kiss, or attempting to hug, If there is any strength involved, someone would say it was 'forced'.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 08:57 AM
5

There's no mention of rape.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 08:54 AM
11

No, she is a proper feminist, like Erin Pizzey and her ilk. Listen to her views, they are compelling and empowering to women.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 01:44 PM
4

There were a lot of level headed responses to this in the bestof thread.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 10:11 AM
3

Although it seems the biggest mistake they made was attacking TERFs like Greer. We'll see if it holds for the views of centre and right leaning academics, and anti-establishment progressives like MHRAs.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 10:07 AM
1

We have. Take for instance fathers4justice in the UK. Got a huge amount of press coverage, and because of that, a massive amount of demonisation from left wing press.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 08:07 PM
6

900/3=300. I just don't see how it is sustainable for any company that employs a lot of manual labour, as they would usually only require a handful of admin/managerial staff to run. It's fine with financial/commercial services companies, in fact it'd be pretty easy to meet for them. But it would be so uncompetitive in certain sectors that companies that try will lose out to companies that simply pay the penalty taxes.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 07:12 PM
4

Doesn't that mean for a construction company that hires 600 subcontractors that are all men, they need an office filled with 300 women? Meaning there is no room for men in the office jobs.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:57 PM
4

How are construction, mining, fishing and farming companies dealing with the law?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:44 PM
26

Let’s drop the pretense, a lame one at best, that she’s offering advice. If it were advice, who would listen, given the way it’s delivered? Spot on. This article was not aimed at men, but other women. It's propaganda aimed at instilling a hatred of men in those who think they are feminist.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:25 PM
7

If you read the actual judges comments she indicated that she was satisfied from the testimony And the judge based that on nothing but her testimony, ignoring his testimony of the exact opposite. In his defence, Queree claimed that at no time did she tell him not to touch her breasts although he said she did at one stage ask him, in non specific terms, to be more gentle and he complied. This is the very definition of bias in the court system. In a case that is purely he said/she said, the court …
/r/MensRights14/10/17 07:12 AM
8

If you read the article, you'll see that he claims that at no point did she ask him to stop touching her breasts. And that is just as valid as her evidence which was purely anecdotal evidence. There was no evidence of bruising presented in the case. The real reason I suspect, is that he jilted her and broke off the relationship after the sex.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 06:58 AM
7

Couple of things about this. First, I guarantee that men are the biggest purchasers of Tinder+ and Tinder gold, and yet they openly attack their biggest cash cow. It's awful business for them. Second, the way in which it is implemented, with features only available to women, leave them wide open to discrimination laws. Not only are they discriminating against men in general, but they are discriminating against homosexual men that may want to use the same features as women.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 06:42 AM
17

Toxic shame is thought to be the underlying cause of nice guy syndrome. Boys growing up with shame about themselves and their masculinity develop strategies to hide it by trying to act in a way society claims is acceptable - nice, putting others first, etc. It doesn't work because people either think you're a push over or they don't find it attractive, so it creates bitterness at the injustice of it. However guys that are ashamed of themselves just think they are not trying hard enough to be nic…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:48 PM
3

This will continue until girls' hobbies and activities take centre stage at the Scouts, eventually becoming feminised to the point that it is indistinguishable from the Guides.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 10:50 AM
8

p61, t4-5 PERPETRATOR Child Fatalities Reported Relationships Reported Relationships Percent PARENT - - - Father - 170 14.7 Father and Nonparent(s) - 18 1.6 Mother - 309 26.7 Mother and Nonparent(s) - 122 10.5 Mother and Father - 259 22.3 Mother, Father, and Nonparent - 22 1.9 Total Parents - 900 77.7
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:01 AM
2

I seriously hope that means more public funding for vasalgel.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:11 AM
2

He wants to mold the world to be a nurturing cocoon for her. And does he do the same for his son? Feminists would call that benevolent sexism. Laws that benefit women, benefit him. Not when they benefit the mother in a custody battle. By far the biggest subgroup of the men's rights movement are fathers rights groups. This idea that MRA are just uncaring childless manchildren with no understanding of girls and women's issues is just deeply naive and offensive.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:05 AM
14

A rather extreme counterexample: Why should a rape victim be provided an abortion? The child didn't do anything wrong.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:43 PM
6

From an early age, we have an unhealthy ideal of masculinity that we try to live up to. Part of that ideal tells us that Real men do everything on their own. Real men don’t cry. Real men express anger through violence. Although a lot of his points ring true, he misses the ball on the 'men need to talk and share their feelings more'. A lot of men do not. It's not an ideal or gender role that men do not cry, it's biology. Men have lower prolactin levels and so we have less of an urge to cry. Testo…
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:20 PM
3

Saw this the other day. It's really not just SV, in fact I'd say it started in offices and warehouses a long time ago and tech is one of the last sectors to be affected (excluding any sort of manual or dangerous job of course).
/r/MensRights06/10/17 04:27 PM
2

It's very interesting to me that when these individual cases of sexism come up, most reasonable people with call it out and dispute it, yet very few will take stock of all the separate cases and come to the obvious conclusion that we have a general issue with men's rights being trampled on in society. That even includes people being treated like shit by the family courts. They tend to only focus on themselves and not see the bigger picture.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 04:21 PM
1

The danger here is that the next time someone decides to do this, they might think "may as well blackmail them into actual physical rape, because that's what I'd be prosecuted for anyway".
/r/MensRights06/10/17 08:21 AM
3

Comparing to TERFs I expect, and I agree.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:42 PM
3

He said men not in after marriage were more likely to die earlier, experience health problems and get into debt. Fixed that for him.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 08:49 AM
5

final one is supposed to be throwing a drink in someone's face. Endorsing assault, basically.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 11:11 PM
6

Flood it with reports.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 11:09 PM
0

It says abusers are mainly men, not that men are mainly abusers. I'm not sure they would be correct in either case tbh, but there is enough variation in studies of domestic violence that it could be supported by many.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 07:56 PM
5

I guess it's possible he started drinking at 14 and it became a problem after he was raped.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 07:30 PM
3

And the common male shaming comes out too. According to them he's: moaning, blubbing, washing dirty linen, and lacking male hormones. See it's only acceptable for men to show emotion when it's about others, never in self pity or desperation.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 07:27 PM
12

http://blog.gotinder.com/tinder-launches-reactions/ It's basically a way for people to be even fucking lazier in their responses. Also, take a look at some of the things they consider douchebag behaviour: http://blog.gotinder.com/content/images/2017/10/blogPost_02_larger.gif So first one - guy is a douchebag for saying 'hey' in response to 'hey', presumably because he is the one that must make all the effort. Second one, guy admits he doesn't drive - strike 1 because of low status I guess. Third…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 05:21 PM
6

This is a problem more for TERFs and other feminists to deal with. They are the ones that get people fired for claiming men and women are different. Doesn't affect men's rights at all except for edge cases where providing gender neutral facilities typically calls for only men to make the sacrifice. Pretty sure MRAs are not allies of TERFs.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 04:33 PM
18

Reading the comments, they have been getting flak for it for 5+ years now. Notice the complete lack of any primary sources. This is basically fake news.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 04:21 PM
1

Not sure what your point is really, but the only witch hunt is being committed here is against men and masculinity.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 03:56 PM
1

Unfortunately I don't think anything can be done about it in context. By saying that abusers are mainly men, they avoid labelling all men. And since it's a course specific to violence against women, mentioning that gender-based violence is also committed by women is mute. Futurelearn is owned by the Open University if anyone is interested in complaining.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 03:52 PM
2

There's a massive amount of discussion about it in the thread. So fucking true. Toxic ideas of masculinity that our society has promoted for so long is one of the reasons that the one actual unifier between all of the biggest mass shootings is that EVERY .. SINGLE .. ONE .. was male. Dude. Fuck. Yes. This needs to be talked about more. Toxic ideas of masculinity are a fucking thing. It's something a lot of "SJWs" actually try to talk about but then as soon as the words "toxic" and "masculinity" …
/r/MensRights04/10/17 09:29 AM
3

Feminism is truly eating itself. Feminists are turning on male feminists, TERFs turn on feminists, etc.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 06:38 AM
2

The same thing happened with Brock Turner who committed an awful crime, but got off light. Not really. All the charges of rape against him were dropped before trial because they were frivolous. There was no evidence that he even intended to commit rape. The victim was consenting until she lost conscious during the act. The account of the trauma suffered by the victim was entirely centred on the police's post-rape process not the assault itself. All of the 'brook turner is a rapist' stuff on the …
/r/MensRights30/09/17 09:09 PM
1

When would you ever see so much concern for the children of a father being convicted of something similar? Those kids should be in foster care far away from this woman.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 09:03 PM
6

A ridiculous amount of students go for BAs thinking an education means big money. It doesn't. It does when you consider diversity targets. I have a Bsc in computer science, work alongside other guys with Masters and PhDs in the same. However most of the women in our department have completely unrelated qualifications if any at all, and they think having done a 2 day professional cert on Scrum gives them the right to lecture highly qualified engineers on the dos and don'ts of software. The most h…
/r/MensRights30/09/17 04:33 PM
1

Cleared by texts, but are they being used as evidence for contempt, or is she getting away with it?
/r/MensRights30/09/17 06:20 AM
16

This is the same theory that a small minority of sexually aggressive men are more likely to go out of their way to meet a larger number of women, so women get the distorted impression that most men are like that because they encounter them more.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 08:28 PM
9

Even in this case, worse things happen to men. She wasn't the biological, genetic or 'default' mother. He was birthed by another woman, using her eggs not the OP's, and she spent next to no time with the baby. She isn't his mother in any sense. She would have only been his mother on some privileged legal bullshit that needs striking from the statutes. Men lose custody even when they are biological fathers that are stay at home primary carers. On an unrelated note, I absolutely love the fact that…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:01 AM
9

Not just Pearson, but some of the victims of this cunt. Some even did hard time, with no evidence for any of the cases. Don't put so much faith in the police when it comes to this stuff, they proceed with cases that are nothing but thin air. Both police and the judiciary are under intense pressure to secure convictions.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:15 PM
1

Attack the argument not the person. Take a running jump with all this 'racist', 'sexist', 'bigot' mudslinging.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 08:40 AM
9

You could fill entire documentaries about each of the many issues in MR: circumcision - involvement of cosmetic industry, corrupt doctors, the social attitudes on MGM vs FGM, religious aspects, deaths it causes, complications, etc. education - how it has changed to favour girls, attitudes of the glut of feminist teachers towards boy students, university admissions, discrimination, false accusations. employment - the hostile environment created by HR, false accusations, unequal parental leave, et…
/r/MensRights25/09/17 08:37 AM
1

The largest living arrangement group they had data on was single mothers. That is going to skew those total numbers to females. You've got that exactly backwards. It is because single mothers were the biggest perpetrators that the percentage (of total killed) that lived with their mothers was highest. Now if instead you're saying that in the wider population, kids are more likely to be living with their mothers, and hence mothers are more likely to be the perpetrators, then you have a point. But…
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:48 AM
2

Worse still, due to changes going through in the UK atm, if she accuses another man of rape, this court judgement will not be usable as evidence of her history of making false rape claims. It is totally without consequence.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:41 AM
12

Completely the opposite: http://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php 71% of Children Killed by One Parent are Killed by Their Mothers; 60% of Victims are Boys Latest data (p61, t4-5) PERPETRATOR Child Fatalities Reported Relationships Reported Relationships Percent PARENT - - - Father - 170 14.7 Father and Nonparent(s) - 18 1.6 Mother - 309 26.7 Mother and Nonparent(s) - 122 10.5 Mother and Father - 259 22.3 Mother, Father, and Nonparent - 22 1.9 Total Parents - 900 77.7
/r/MensRights22/09/17 10:02 AM
12

You are correct. http://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php 71% of Children Killed by One Parent are Killed by Their Mothers; 60% of Victims are Boys
/r/MensRights21/09/17 09:56 AM
14

No it's true in the west too. Men may be more violent, but that is typically in protection of those they care for. Women are far more violent towards their children. Summary link. Latest data (p61, t4-5). If we lived in some alternate reality where data was analysed impartially by the family courts, men would get default custody most of the time. And fewer kids would be killed as a result.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 09:52 AM
29

I mean, they let Rotherham and similar towns' child sex scandals go on for decades without doing a damn thing about it. They aren't saints.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 09:44 PM
5

Case in point on reddit today: https://np.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/7146xi/exwife_is_suing_me_for_child_support_i_dont_even/ Unfortunately I suspect she'll go after his assets after his death too.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 09:19 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBABgHHZvSM
/r/MensRights17/09/17 04:10 PM
7

There's only one group they should be discriminating against quite frankly, the group that has been causing all the problems at festivals lately - muslim immigrants. But they would rather be actually sexist than risk being accused of racism.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 01:17 PM
9

There shouldn't be, but there is. Feminists want unequal sentencing, unequal custody, unequal laws, even the right to mutilate male children. Until that changes, they are pretty much the enemy of MR.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 08:20 AM
1

On nights out on the town, sure. In my experience, any time a group or men or a group of women get together and get drunk, they are just as bad as one another.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 10:31 AM
1

women can give the child up for adoption which goes to the father usually What planet do you live on? It is extremely difficult for a father to get custody if a mother gives it up for adoption.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 09:59 AM
9

I know the anger and hate towards the real injustices are completely justified, but if he had just take a more level-headed tone in that article, it would have appealed to a much wider audience.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 01:09 PM
1

In fairness, there is a certain subsection of the right wing that would call them feminazis.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:21 PM
1

It's not a question of why there aren't women in positions of power, it's a question of why there are any men crazy enough to do it.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 02:03 PM
2

I'm very worried. She's trying to punish me for breaking up with her. Yes she is, and you can use that against her. Record everything she has done, get a lawyer, use all the frivolous claims against you as evidence to show the police she is being vindictive. Then press harassment charges against her, get a restraining order, etc.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 01:59 PM
2

Men face more injustice in the way they are treated in society now compared to the 50s. Doesn't seem complicated to me. Back then we had the same gender roles to conform to, but masculinity was revered and respected.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 11:50 AM
3

I really am in two minds about this. It's true that a natural part of learning to deal with your emotions in being told not to cry (and by implication, do something about it). But on the flip side of that you have a massive amount of social conditioning that makes boys feel they can't talk about serious problems. And that is what leads to situations like this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/08/school-seconds-scene-truly-wicked-killings-boy-took-shotgun/ The boy pleaded guilty to possess…
/r/MensRights10/09/17 10:47 AM
2

Surprisingly well balanced article. It's good this issue is finally getting mainstream attention. Only 999 other men's issues to go.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 07:58 AM
1

What a pointless bot, reddit already has this feature.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 07:57 AM
3

This is just what gender studies does. They invent a sexist yard stick by which to measure everything and then low and behold, their results confirm their biases. Take a look at the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory for another example.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 07:42 AM
24

This is akin to a woman saying "Am I the only one that likes my labiaplasty". There is a difference between being okay with the result yourself and being okay with forcing it on others against their will. To support infant circumcision is to support the death of 100+ baby boys a year in the US alone and it's support of only women having bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 07:34 AM
3

Neither of which are misogynistic.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 11:49 AM
2

Feminists hate toxic masculinity just as much as /r/mensrights does. Men's rights does not even accept the definition. It is a contrivance made up by sexist people. If we were to start going round saying that there is such a thing as toxic femininity, and that women should not act in certain ways to prevent it, that would rightly be seen as gender role enforcement and sexism. It is no different with toxic masculinity. The people that use the term are man haters.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 10:57 AM
31

Miss Kelly Scrivener, defending, said Lee has already suffered severe consequences from her actions but has turned a corner in her life by accepting she needs help and treatment. She has suffered no consequences for attempted murder. What the fuck is this? Lee lied to medical staff about poisoning the child and accused the boy's natural father of bringing the spiked drinks into hospital. She was suffering from a psychological disorder which made her believe the drugs were helping rather than har…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:46 PM
1

I'm unsure where you get your information that there aren't rape, sexual assault, and other problems in schools everywhere else in the world. When you have studies like this, claiming that 50% of women are sexually harassed in university, and it turns out that 50% consists of: inappropriate staring or leering (14%) sexually suggestive comments or jokes (11%), and intrusive questions about an individual’s private life or physical appearance (9%). It's very difficult to take seriously. Especially …
/r/MensRights08/09/17 10:50 PM
1

But it works pretty fucking well everywhere else in the world. Millennials aren't having problems with sexual relationships, they are having problems with false hysteria created by gender studies pseudoscience. Constantly force fed studies that grossly exaggerate the prevalence of sexual harassment and assault. This isn't some huge problem that needs extra-judicial processes to deal with. That is just a vicious and barbaric witch hunt. It's a small problem that needs standard due process, judici…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 10:26 PM
1

So you don't believe in anonymity for people accused of bullshit in university? You think that either with or without Title IX, men should have their reputations ruined on the whim of a bitter ex, or jealous peer? After reading your linked post, it's clear you are not a supporter of men's rights. You want more power to extra-judicially punish anyone you point a finger at. You want to make it worse for students suffering under the surge of malicious and false accusations.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 10:06 PM
1

These are just men expressing their feelings. And here you are confirming that only 'socially acceptable' feelings are permitted. You'd call a suicidal man bitter, a suicidal teen a neckbeard.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 09:58 PM
10

When I was young and I cried in public, I was laughed at, got hostility from teachers, punished by parents, lost friends and was bullied for it. I was more emotional that most boys my age. That could be for any number of reasons - genetics, too much attention when I cried as a baby (I had colic), maybe not enough socialisation when I was very young (I had a speech delay too). But at some point I think every boy learns that being a fucking crybaby solves nothing. As an adult, it's rare that I eve…
/r/MensRights08/09/17 09:22 PM
1

Civil liability under Title IX? That's the whole problem.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 08:43 PM
1

There should be no should thing as 'student justice'. The US and parts of Canada are really is quite alone in having campus police. Students should be policed by the same people the rest of us are, and tried in the same courts too. It should be none of the university's business until a verdict has been reached. At best they should take steps to keep students under investigation or on bail away from each other, but only if instructed by the authorities.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 08:38 PM
28

Nothing unusual, women are responsible for most child deaths. http://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php
/r/MensRights08/09/17 07:17 AM
18

That is really good news for those in the US. Hope the public consultation works out. Sure will piss off the 'progressive' left to lose the power to ruin young men's lives based on nothing by the whim of another though, and they will fight hard against this.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:01 PM
2

Move to the UK bud. We know how to queue. This shit would not be accepted.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:21 AM
5

Just bog standard male gender role enforcement.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:18 AM
10

Hmm, take a look here: https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/6xc8a5/i_want_to_divorce_my_wealthy_foreign_national_wife/dmfgjwd/?context=3 The mod is just sexist. It's bloody obvious the comment was simply stating the fact that men do not get custody even if they aren't abusive, etc. The mod isn't balanced at all, they just hate men's issues.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 09:59 AM
3

Check out the page on alt-right too, it associates men's rights with nazis.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 09:06 AM
66

A child told investigators he heard Adrian screaming “I’m going to die” through a vent and his stepmother, Heather Jones, telling him to “suck it up.” Just standard "man up" gender role enforcement taken too far. The abuse this kid suffered is a very extreme version of the abuse most boys suffer.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 01:36 PM
5

It's one thing to be supportive of masculinity, but another to start shaming men for not conforming to it. Almost as bad as claiming that masculinity should burn.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:18 PM
13

I thought Movember was prostate month?
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:15 PM
1

Not so sure IQ would be a factor in crime. The levels at which men start to outnumber women is very low, in the 60s. At that level, people are incapable of very much agency and need supervision simply to live. That said, it isn't simply IQ that is affected by the variability of genetic traits. Violence is genetic - there are more men at both the ultra-violent end of the spectrum and the ultra-pacifist end than women. There are many other traits that could lead men to commit more crimes when at t…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:01 PM
3

Feminism treats women like children. Hmm, when it suits them sure. Though, that is reflected in the way MRAs talk about men sometimes. I think it's important to recognise that sometimes both men and women can lack agency, can be weak, can be victims, and require help. Even though for the most part they are strong and responsible. The key difference to me is that women are allowed to be victims at times, whereas men are not.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 09:43 PM
3

Yes, male gender roles are enforced just as much by men as by women. It is exactly the same with feminism; a lot of of misogyny comes from women. It's really not complicated. Sexist ideas tend to be reinforced by society as a whole. The main difference imo, is that male gender roles are still socially acceptable and many are enforced by the law.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 09:16 PM
2

Feminism is gender equality, Hahaha
/r/MensRights01/09/17 04:04 PM
1

How much would that change if men didn't commit crimes due to social pressures in everyday life, ones that women don't face. Poverty, homelessness, violence, etc. There is no safety net for some men, crime is often the only solution that puts food on the table. This is the reasoning that is often applied to higher rates of black crime, btw. Juxtapose that with the lecturer insisting that the only sentencing gap is a black/white one. The same forces are at work for male/female sentencing gaps.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 11:11 AM
1

There's no need for them to directly challenge you. They can simply fail you on your exams and kick you out of the class.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 11:07 AM
4

Any time a woman commits a crime there's always someone ready to legitimise it with pity over their 'troubled past'. Look, there are plenty of people that suffer the same and don't end up killing their children. This shit is why women get off so easily in court.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 09:21 AM
2

Well they bitch about double airfares and lack of health insurance discounts.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 06:02 PM
1

Who's forcing women to spend more money on shampoo? They have more hair... that's it. I've never bought "men's shampoo", and I guarantee specialist men's care products are vastly more expensive than women's. Fucking trivial half-truths and non-issues all of them.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:55 PM
2

Lot's of people there making the mistake of claiming: "a bad thing happened to a some women" => "all men are responsible"
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:43 PM
3

You should read the article then. Estée Lauder’s child-bonding leave is in addition to the paid leave new mothers receive for childbirth recovery.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:29 PM
2

This is a serious problem in all gender studies classes imo. Most tackle the subject of men and masculinity purely from a feminist perspective, and seeks to blame 'toxic' masculinity for all the problems women face. They do nothing to understand men's lives and problems. It's a problem because, despite the fact that the vast majority of papers from these courses' students are never cited again, the constant flow of them defines a strong anti-male narrative in the media, and having those papers o…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 04:59 PM
1

The Y chromosome is "degenerate", which is to say that it has rapidly shrunk in humans I believe you've misunderstood that study. It compares humans to chimpanzees (our 'ancestors'), not past humans.
/r/MGTOW31/08/17 04:48 PM
2

Here: http://health.usnews.com/health-news/articles/2015/06/10/anti-rape-program-halved-number-of-campus-assaults-study
/r/MensRights28/08/17 09:15 PM
53

All of the mods of XY type subs were doxxed and their subs hijacked by SJWs a long long time ago.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 09:06 PM
2

There are frequent posts about gay men's rights and the rights of trans people. Many of the prejudices faced by trans men are the same as those faced by men, which is why there is a loud and growing TERF movement against them.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 09:49 AM
14

Whiny vs real men? Careful, your sexist, gatekeeping stereotypes of men are starting to show.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 09:07 AM
-4

You sound like a concern troll. Go back to spamming in marchagainsttrump and shaming men in niceguys. Doubt you've ever made more than two posts here. There are far right and far left leaning members of this community. But subreddit algebra shows this sub is quite well balanced politically. mensrights + news Similarity Rank Subreddit Name Similarity Score 1 Libertarian 0.733760147359337 2 conspiracy 0.719106986533262 3 politics 0.718131508590866 4 uncensorednews 0.690241800058516 5 Conservative …
/r/MensRights28/08/17 09:03 AM
2

What if you're stumbling drunk yourself? Incapable of making rational decisions? It's just not as morally unambiguous as you claim.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:01 PM
2

you shouldn't be trying to fuck drunk people I'm sorry, but the vast majority of people at some point in their lives will gets drunk with the sole purpose of hooking up. Women go out 'on the pull' for exactly the same reason as men do. In moderation it's a social lubricant and there's nothing immoral in it.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:49 PM
3

What if they don't say no? There was a study on a course that taught college aged women to assertively say no which concluded that simply saying no halved their risk of being raped. Many just passively go along with it. A more apt analogy in this case would be if the girl simply stole without asking or stole something the man had agreed to, but then regretted the next morning.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 12:58 PM
3

Women seem to be doing this at a much greater rate then men at the moment. Any one have any stats?
/r/MensRights25/08/17 07:08 PM
7

‘Things were great at first, but when our daughter was born in 2014, it felt to me like my wife didn’t want me any more. We divorced in 2015. It's so easy, everyone's doing it.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 07:45 PM
1

I suggest we use this against all the misandry on twitter and the media. Next time someone starts complaining about manspreading on the BBC, skip complaining to the BBC and just report it to the police.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:30 AM
1

Not funny at all. But it is the nature of the beast. Use the same tactics.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 05:23 PM
4

Yeah but that's just benevolent sexism, men only do it because they think women are weak. When you think about it, it's quite toxic.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 11:45 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=brocialist&sort=relevance&t=all
/r/MensRights18/08/17 06:10 PM
3

Yep, nothing new in far left circles. First create the idea of the bourgeoisie oppressing the people, then extend it, then extinguish. That's how they get from evil capitalist pigs to humble farmers (Kulaks).
/r/MensRights18/08/17 06:03 PM
4

Brocialist is term used in all the socialist/communist/alt-left subs, used to exclude any men claiming their problems are as bad or worse than that of the oppressed minorities.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 06:00 PM
15

Of course they didn't look at the other side of the spectrum: neckbeard, creep, manchild, manspreader, brocialist, etc.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 05:28 PM
8

I know I sound like a lunatic You do not.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:05 PM
1

I looked in the mirror and saw an utter failure Dude that's depression, don't fall for it. Get, no, demand help from a professional.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:04 PM
1

It's dumb, it's a low effort meme post. Post an article, something with some substance, some statistics at least. This shit just give the movement a bad name. No clickbait titles, advice animals or other low-effort image or text posts. Mods may remove these at their discretion.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:01 PM
-1

No it's not, but a dumb picture of a road sign is hardly the best way to start a discussion of it.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:12 PM
1

Well considering they all went through the same shitty lawyer, all dropped their cases, then started a new case for libel after he called them liars: yeah, duh! It was obvious bullshit and everyone lapped it up.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 04:37 PM
2

I see more of these articles nowadays than ones with men doing the same. I wonder if it's becoming more common?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 04:34 PM
1

I wish we could quit this trivial BS.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 04:27 PM
5

I'm so reliant on google, how do I get rid of it? I use google drive, have a great gmail address, everything I watch is on youtube. I need 30GB for £2 and God tier spam filtering.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:56 PM
2

teachers Minor point, but 'traditionally' teaching was a male dominated profession. It's only relatively recently that its been dominated by women, and typically ones with an agenda.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 07:02 AM
1

Notably none of them really came out and said James was right, they just disagreed with the way it was dealt with.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 05:20 PM
3

do you tell the other women to do theirs as well? or do you let them slack off? That would be considered sexism. Many people accept the fact that men and women are different, but think it's sexist to hold women to the same standards of work because of that.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 02:45 PM
8

Anecdotally, it's happened at every workplace I've ever been in. One place had KPIs that pretty much all of the women failed to meet every so often, no repercussions. It was instant disciplinary procedure for men though. Now I'm not longer working in a physically demanding job but instead in software, none of the women I work with are in any way qualified to do their jobs. Ex-receptionist turned Scrum master after a 2 day professional cert, lecturing CompSci Masters graduates on what skills a pr…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 02:37 PM
1

The divide is not in fact getting bigger. Feminism is increasingly being seen as hysterical and the men's rights movement is growing year on year in response. At this point it's fairly obvious you are just a concern troll.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:00 AM
1

You can be as angry as you want. Quit your gaslighting. But laws HERE would mean it would have to be a private club. But you are wrong. There are many other circumstances even in the US. Private club status is just one of several exceptions available to businesses wanting to bypass discrimination laws.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:07 PM
5

It really would depend. If you were to give a task that measures executive control to both men and women, it could be that they finish at the same time but have different activity levels in the pfc. Men's pfc maybe larger but less active, and women's maybe smaller and more active. There's structure to consider too.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:53 AM
1

First off, this is in Aus not the US. But assuming the laws are the same, your excuse doesn't really cover female-only gym/pool sessions that are both common and can be paid for on the spot. There are also plenty of female only salons, tanning studios, health spas, you fucking name it. The way they get out of discrimination laws is not by claiming they are a private club, but by claiming a 'reasonable' exception to the law based on the sexist lie that 'men are dangerous and make women uncomforta…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:41 AM
1

That link doesn't even split by gender against age. Am I missing something? eta: here are those stats: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_in_the_United_States#Number_of_suicides_by_age_group_and_sex
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:05 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation#/media/File:FGC_Types.svg Type 1 right there. Yes it's a huge chunk, yes it's very noticeable. Holy shit.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 06:34 PM
0

Aesthetically it's very similar - a huge chuck of flesh is removed, exposing sensitive glands.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 06:14 PM
2

Er, how do you figure that? Female circumcision is removal of the clitoral hood, it's almost directly comparable to male circumcision. Comparing labia size is nothing like the same.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:54 PM
1

Is it me or do those bruises look more like suction marks? Typically you get periphery bruising from being hit or crushed - yellow, blue, black, etc. Those are just red.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:25 PM
16

and nothing wrong with women preferring circumcised men You'd have the same attitude to men preferring circumcised women I take it.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:13 PM
38

I get sexist remarks like this thrown at me everyday. "Women are better at multitasking", "typical bloke response", "men don't have good people skills", etc etc.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 09:02 PM
1

Hmm. Being misandrist doesn't mean you identify as a feminist.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 05:10 PM
1

I'm quite well built actually. I don't see how that helps against women either trying to shame me publicly or frivolously accuse me of assault. It's not a solution in general either, men should not be expected to be tough simply to do things they have a right to do.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 01:26 PM
4

Etsy allows you report product for hateful stuff. Do it, en masse.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 04:44 PM
12

Still happens today in the UK. You need to be either married to the mother or be on the birth certificate to prevent the mother giving away your child. That or go to court. No such process is needed to prove you liable for child support of course.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 04:42 PM
5

This is good. I have been confronted violently in the past simply for meeting eyes with a girl in public. I guess they look at me at the same time as I look at them and think I'm staring at them. When I'm walking down the street, sometimes I get a fear of just looking around in case someone takes offence. This on top of the fear that simply brushing shoulders with a girl can lead to frivolous sexual assault charges. There has to be a line drawn with this shit. I should be able to look at whoever…
/r/MensRights01/08/17 03:20 PM
2

Each year in the United States more than 100 newborn baby boys die as a result of circumcision and circumcision complications. Wholly crap, that's news to me. It's horrific.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 10:50 PM
7

59.3 percent decline in the total sperm count That's massive. Other's have suggested alcohol, but that has been fairly universally available for centuries, and alcohol use has been declining for most countries except the US. Other causes could be linked to oestrogen pollution: The pill - it pollutes the water supply with oestrogen. Milk - diary cows are pumped full of oestrogen as a way to increase yields Plastics - they contain Bisphenol-A which mimics oestrogen. All of these have been on the i…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:45 PM
7

The association stems from a single article: https://www.thecut.com/2016/12/mens-rights-activists-are-flocking-to-the-alt-right.html The movement reached its peak around 2014, when it began to receive mainstream-press attention. Its leaders, who were mostly bloggers and YouTubers who’d gained followings on Reddit and in other corners of the so-called manosphere, believe the world has been overrun by feminism and that the only way to fight back is to embrace a super-dominant, traditionally mascul…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:33 PM
5

The rate of increase was slightly higher among older men, at 70% for the 41-60 age group, compared with 67% in the 26-40 category and 63% among 19- to 25 .. Medical leaders and health experts have put the growing numbers down to pressure from popular culture and social media. I'm more inclined to think it's due to reducing dating opportunities and the onset of the midlife crisis. Coincides with highest suicide rates too.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:18 PM
1

The number is about 75% of men that are forced to penetrate are forced by a female perp.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 02:54 PM
17

Asking once is not okay. At the very least it should be on request only and should never be covered by insurance. Preferably it should be illegal, with heavy penalties for any doctor and hospital that does it without medical need.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 02:43 PM
6

What is happening in most cases I suspect, is that they are using excuses like suffering abuse or suffering depression or something, things that simply would not work for men. It'd be hard work to compile the evidence for that.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 06:41 AM
7

I don't care what they intend by it. If a man says something provocative to me, I don't care if he's sizing me up. It's irrelevant. In either case, in the interests of equality, I'll treat them the same: as shitty people trying to get a rise out of me. But you're right that TRP is the place for this, it's completely off topic here.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 12:11 AM
8

It stems from a basically flawed and sexist list of masculine traits devised by a bunch of gender studies students called the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory (CMNI). Here are the traits they picked: winning, emotional control, risk-taking, violence, dominance, playboy, self-reliance, primacy of work, power over women, disdain for homosexuals, physical toughness, and pursuit of status Compare to the one for women: Nice in Relationships, Thinness, Modesty, Domestic, Care for Children, Roma…
/r/MensRights29/07/17 12:01 AM
7

I think TRP over think it far too much. What's wrong with d) the woman said something shitty because they are a shitty person? It's not any sort of a test, it's just who that person is.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:49 PM
6

Source: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/compendium/focusonviolentcrimeandsexualoffences/yearendingmarch2015/chapter2homicide#victims This is on top of the existing sentencing gap which means even those 17% that are convicted get off with a much lighter sentence.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:34 PM
1

Source: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/compendium/focusonviolentcrimeandsexualoffences/yearendingmarch2015/chapter2homicide#victims
/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:31 PM
5

No, they specifically ruled that out in the study.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:19 PM
10

Hmm, under EU law, people have a right to a family life. Many terrorists have used this to avoid being deported.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:15 PM
29

It is spun so that toxic masculinity is the cause. For instance in this case, the guy only killed himself because he lost his masculine 'control' over his family. It sounds absurd, but that is the gist of it: http://www.cbc.ca/life/wellness/toxic-masculinity-may-be-quadrupling-the-suicide-rate-for-canadian-men-1.4158731
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:13 PM
1

If only it were that simple. She'd tell all her friends you were a baby for sulking about a playful joke, and the women are wonderful effect would go into full swing.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:35 AM
1

As of forever you mean. Obama only introduced the law in June 2016 to spite the next congress.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:34 AM
7

In one of the many threads on this yesterday, someone claimed that only the disabled could escape the draft putting transgendered into the disabled group. They conveniently forgot that a privileged 50% of the population were also excluded.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:28 AM
1

My ex worked on a ward for postnatal depressed women. She joked when she told the story of one of her patients hiding her baby in a suitcase and claiming it had been kidnapped. Police were involved, a huge investigation started. Then a full day later the baby was found. The mother kept her kid, most of them do. And many of them have attempted to kill or abandon their babies.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 06:24 PM
0

I'd definitely change my gender to get higher grades, STEM funding at university, employment on easy mode, custody of my children, a shot at an equal divorce settlement, a lower prison sentence, better healthcare access, more social services, access to shelters, avoid conscription, etc etc.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 06:19 PM
1

It's just flat out sexism, and should be called out as such.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:30 PM
2

Just never speak to her again and blank her in public. What, and be accused of 'sulking' like a manchild?
/r/MensRights25/07/17 12:00 PM
2

Where are you based? There is CALM in the UK. Samaritans too.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:17 AM
7

Think he was just opposed to labels in general. Can't say I disagree. They are used very divisively by the left.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 10:55 PM
18

will be the same in 2020, but is not yet Not if WASPI get their way, and they seem to be making headway. They bizarrely claim that pension equality is actually inequality.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 10:37 PM
12

I'll concede that, it's news to me. Honestly all of the media coverage of this was about vaccinating boys simply to protect girls. There was never any mention of the 2% of cancers in men that are caused by HPV (compared to 3% in women). The lopsided reporting and aims of the program seem another case of sexism to me.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 10:07 AM
12

Viable birth control for men is going to change the world, just like the pill did. It's going to be glorious.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 10:15 PM
-23

Just to be clear here, HPV is vaccinated in girls because there's a direct link to cervical cancer. There's no such problems in men and boys, genital warts can be treated without vaccines. The only reason for vaccinating boys is to protect girls from catching it from them. Personally I think this is a win.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 10:09 PM
3

Yes, in my experience the most vocal transphobia comes from women defending their privileged position in society. It's especially prominent in feminism, with its large faction of TERFs.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 06:31 PM
5

they should not be allowed in female spaces. Why are female spaces so sacrosanct? It's an example of privilege, no different from exclusive gentlemen's clubs at the turn of last century. There is no such position on male spaces. For example, many public restrooms are being converted to female + any gender specifically to exclude transwomen from female toilets.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 06:26 PM
1

I've tried anti depressants, they don't work for me. Yes, they made me less depressed or rather, stopped me dwelling on it so much, but they stopped me caring about consequences too. I got lazy and fat, and I'd say and do things very impulsively which lost me friends.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 11:31 AM
14

Ruined it all by apologising. Why are male prisoners being put in front of female parole boards in the first place? It's obvious they will bring their own biases in.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 12:07 PM
3

This is a pretty big internal battle for me whenever I suffer from recurring depression. A large part of depression is there's something wrong in life, but it's hard to decide if it's caused by depression or the cause of it. I'm stuck in two minds, thinking that the way to fix the depression is to deal with it myself by fixing the problems I have, or seek help because it's something out of my control. Seeking help can compound feelings of being a failure for not being able to sort your own shit …
/r/MensRights21/07/17 12:01 PM
10

Next the inevitable sexual harassment case involving a bloke exposing himself to a trans-woman in an all gender restroom. The only reason we are getting this crap btw is because there is a significant group of feminists that are transphobic, and they simply won't tolerate a trans woman in a woman's restroom.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:22 AM
1

The only way to win then is to get a decent PR team together, go on hunger strike, and make sure the public is damn well aware of the injustice.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:44 PM
6

Stages of grief - denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. Whether it's through abuse, rejection, discrimination, whatever - there are a lot of people, men and women, stuck on the anger phase. I don't hold it against people personally, anger is natural. But they need help to move on, a sane voice to reflect on. Maybe that could be you.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:31 PM
1

The UK has a really bad problem with exactly the opposite. Men in commercials are painted as idiots, women as all knowing, intelligent consumers. It is mainly just advertisers playing to women's egos.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:19 PM
6

I'll try not to repeat what other's have already listed: family courts are still biased against men for custody - heavily influenced by parental leave that favours women and usually means they become the primary carer by default. domestic violence against men is not treated equally by the law. There are few shelters for men. Women are rarely prosecuted. prison sentencing and guidelines are heavily biased against men. Women routinely get lighter sentences for the same crime. parental leave still …
/r/MensRights18/07/17 09:13 PM
1

Bit of a win this. Not sure what the state of advertising is in other countries, but in the UK it is rife with sexist depictions of men being useless at trivial tasks. No doubt this advertising is aimed squarely at women, because it both plays to their own sexist views of men and makes them feel superior when buying these shite products.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 01:45 PM
4

Actual marxists scoff at liberals, identity politics and liberal feminism Not the impression you'd get from any of the socialist subs on reddit.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 01:21 PM
3

That looks like an interesting paper, but postmodernism is at a different conceptual level than both neoliberalism and marxism. They are political ideas that have both been influenced by post modern thinking. Specifically he believes the left is full of 'post modernist marxists'. That is, marxists that have dropped that whole proletariat/bourgeois dichotomy in favour of a huge number of victim groups, with the single oppressor tending to be white men. It is post modern because it rejects the gra…
/r/MensRights16/07/17 11:10 AM
3

He believes it is post modernism iirc. https://youtu.be/Cf2nqmQIfxc?t=237
/r/MensRights16/07/17 10:41 AM
3

It was a very subtle way of saying feminism is sexist because it still holds to the stereotype that 'women are wonderful'. Hence feminism needs to be 'expansively interpreted', because it's wrong.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 06:20 AM
1

It#s true that younger male drivers are more accident prone. Yet can you explain how that leads to less accidents per mile later in life? I'd say it's because men learn better how to handle a car by taking risks while learning. Insurance companies don't give a fuck what you look like, your race, your gender, what they care about is the bottom line. Numbers don't lie and they are like that for a reason. The bottom line could have been met simply by increasing the premium for each 1000 miles drive…
/r/MensRights14/07/17 06:15 AM
1

Sure, but not every adult has a job, which they work full time, which they are prepared to commute a good distance for, etc etc. These stats echo the gender wage gap - even when given perfectly equal opportunities, women choose to work less, commute less, and earn less.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:35 PM
7

The claimed reason is that men are at higher risk of an accident. The actual reason is that men drive significantly more than women. When you compare the number of accidents vs number of miles driven, men are actually at slightly less risk of an accident per mile driven.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 10:14 PM
5

What an astonishing indictment on society that single-parent families are now presumed to be the norm Not just that they are the norm, but it's expected that the mother will be the only parent. The father is always the 'deadbeat' dad, no matter the circumstances.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:06 PM
20

Think it's more correct to say women have equal opportunity to drive, but they don't. Men still account for most delivery drivers, truck drivers, taxi drivers, still drive more for work, etc. These are all jobs that women could do, but they don't want to.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:30 AM
1

Okay thanks replies, but let's get a few things straight: men don't have 'bodily autonomy', it's purely a fiction invented to protect abortion rights. We can be sent to die by the government, we can be circumcised without our permission, etc. That said I do believe that women should be able to get an abortion, but I don;t believe the state should pay. The state does not pay for my mistakes, I do. I don't believe women should be able to give children up for adoption without the father's consent, …
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:04 PM
3

Yep, she epitomises the current epidemic of depression in working women. They got sold on a dream of working hard all their lives, just like men. But when they start to approach their 40s they realise that it's all a lie, there's no glory in working hard. I can honestly say, as a 40 year old man still dating, some women are just depressed, baby crazy and dangerous to be around. It's a shame, because I want the same thing still. I've been waiting my whole life to meet the love of my life, to sett…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:31 PM
1

That really is a shocking law and I'm surprised it passed. But then it is a most extreme version of many national laws that derive from many completely one sided UN conventions on women and domestic violence. It shows just how much power feminist lobbying really has, and how scared people are to speak out against it for fear of being branded sexist. Far from the original and noble goal of early feminists and egalitarians that all laws should be non-gendered and apply equally to all, we have many…
/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:01 AM
1

The value of a person is not measured by their reproductive value, and I'm sure feminists would agree.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 08:54 AM
24

And then you spot a man in the corner. He is hunched. He is lined. He is grey. He looks up. His eyes light up. Your heart sinks. If you’re a woman over 40 who has tried internet dating, you have probably been here at least once. The photo is fine. Or at least the photo is OK. He is not George Clooney. But you are not Scarlett Johansson, and you are not 25. Look, he has, or seems to have, his own hair. He has, or seems to have, his own teeth. Pure denigrating objectification. And she wonders why …
/r/MensRights06/07/17 08:39 AM
8

Interesting angle. I think there are other factors though. There is a massive tendency to report rape and sexual assault statistics solely against women without comparing them to male victims of the same. There is also hardly any reporting of how western countries compare to other areas of the world. In the former case, a good example is the "2 women are killed by their partner every day" and related stats, which paints a horrible one sided picture women being sole victims of male perps. But men…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 07:30 PM
4

This seems self evident to me. Of course men are scarred emotionally by a tougher upbringing. All of us, men and women alike, buy into the idea that men are (and need) to be tougher, and so they are treated as such. It is a gender norm. And it's make or break, you either grow into a man that can carry your scars or you become another disposable loser, a manchild that no-one cares about. The pressure is all around us, even on reddit's so called progressive subs. All the terms we see thrown about …
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter